WEBVTT - COP29 talks are at an impasse. Brazil is already looking to COP30 

0:00:00.440 --> 0:00:01.240
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to Zero.

0:00:01.480 --> 0:00:05.120
<v Speaker 2>I am akshatrati this week good Cop, bad Cop.

0:00:05.519 --> 0:00:06.600
<v Speaker 3>I had to use it sometimes.

0:00:20.160 --> 0:00:22.120
<v Speaker 2>I'm in Baku, Yes, still in Baku.

0:00:22.200 --> 0:00:23.120
<v Speaker 3>For COP twenty nine.

0:00:23.440 --> 0:00:26.480
<v Speaker 2>It's week two, which means the biggest heads of state

0:00:26.560 --> 0:00:30.640
<v Speaker 2>have gone home, as have many climate celebrities like al

0:00:30.720 --> 0:00:34.960
<v Speaker 2>Gore and Theresa May. Now negotiators are getting down to business.

0:00:36.159 --> 0:00:39.200
<v Speaker 2>We are still days away from knowing what agreement, if any,

0:00:39.280 --> 0:00:42.400
<v Speaker 2>might be reached, and Zero will come to you with

0:00:42.560 --> 0:00:46.159
<v Speaker 2>how it all went down next week. In the meantime,

0:00:46.360 --> 0:00:49.479
<v Speaker 2>there are already questions about what the next COP might

0:00:49.520 --> 0:00:52.839
<v Speaker 2>look like, and for good reasons. As we explode in

0:00:52.880 --> 0:00:56.720
<v Speaker 2>a previous episode, the small state of Azerbaijan has had

0:00:56.880 --> 0:01:01.240
<v Speaker 2>its hands full in hosting fifty thousand delegates and advocates

0:01:01.360 --> 0:01:04.960
<v Speaker 2>who arrived in Baku from around the world. Next year,

0:01:05.440 --> 0:01:10.200
<v Speaker 2>Brazil will play host, but not in Rio or Sa Paolo. Instead,

0:01:10.840 --> 0:01:13.280
<v Speaker 2>the conference is said to be in the city of Belem,

0:01:13.560 --> 0:01:18.080
<v Speaker 2>the gateway to the Amazon, a beautiful coastal city that

0:01:18.440 --> 0:01:22.240
<v Speaker 2>might not have the infrastructure to host fifty thousand people.

0:01:22.920 --> 0:01:25.600
<v Speaker 2>But Brazil has been trying to position itself as a

0:01:25.680 --> 0:01:28.640
<v Speaker 2>leader on climate, and it warns people who come to

0:01:28.680 --> 0:01:33.720
<v Speaker 2>COP thirty to realize what's on the line. But Brazil

0:01:33.840 --> 0:01:37.000
<v Speaker 2>is also growing. It's all in gas production and quickly

0:01:37.400 --> 0:01:41.720
<v Speaker 2>reaching levels that match the United Arab Emirates. So I

0:01:41.800 --> 0:01:44.240
<v Speaker 2>was eager to catch up with Andre Corea the Lago,

0:01:44.680 --> 0:01:48.720
<v Speaker 2>Brazil's Secretary for Climate, Energy and the Environment. He's rumored

0:01:48.760 --> 0:01:52.200
<v Speaker 2>to be the next COP president, something he wouldn't confirm

0:01:52.240 --> 0:01:55.320
<v Speaker 2>on the record, but he wasn't shy in answering just

0:01:55.480 --> 0:01:58.200
<v Speaker 2>how much Brazil has to do to make COP thirty

0:01:58.200 --> 0:02:02.400
<v Speaker 2>a success, from challenging the sticks to fracture in geopolitics

0:02:02.880 --> 0:02:05.560
<v Speaker 2>and what COP twenty nine must get right to give

0:02:05.600 --> 0:02:25.280
<v Speaker 2>Brazil a better footing. Andre, welcome to the show.

0:02:25.760 --> 0:02:27.600
<v Speaker 1>Hello, it's lovely to be here.

0:02:27.960 --> 0:02:31.160
<v Speaker 2>Now tell us what Brazil is hoping to get out

0:02:31.200 --> 0:02:33.320
<v Speaker 2>of COP twenty nine specifically.

0:02:33.720 --> 0:02:37.400
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, Look, you know that one of the basic principles

0:02:37.440 --> 0:02:42.959
<v Speaker 4>of brazil foreign policy is to strengthen multilateralism. So we want,

0:02:43.280 --> 0:02:45.160
<v Speaker 4>obviously COP twenty nine.

0:02:45.000 --> 0:02:46.440
<v Speaker 1>To be very successful.

0:02:46.480 --> 0:02:50.000
<v Speaker 4>We believe in UNFCCC, we believe in the Paris Accord,

0:02:50.639 --> 0:02:53.480
<v Speaker 4>and we have to show the world that this is

0:02:53.520 --> 0:02:56.120
<v Speaker 4>the right way of doing things.

0:02:56.800 --> 0:02:58.560
<v Speaker 2>And at coptery nine there are going to be two

0:02:58.639 --> 0:03:01.320
<v Speaker 2>things that need to be worked on. One it seems

0:03:01.360 --> 0:03:03.600
<v Speaker 2>has already been worked on, which is Article six. Are

0:03:03.680 --> 0:03:05.440
<v Speaker 2>you happy with the Article six outcome?

0:03:05.720 --> 0:03:08.360
<v Speaker 4>I think that to have an outcome is already a

0:03:08.480 --> 0:03:12.959
<v Speaker 4>very good news. I like quite a lot the solution,

0:03:13.560 --> 0:03:17.000
<v Speaker 4>but now we have to transform it into something practical

0:03:17.000 --> 0:03:20.440
<v Speaker 4>because the problem is that we've been thinking about that

0:03:20.680 --> 0:03:26.240
<v Speaker 4>for nine years and we saw that in general, carbon

0:03:26.320 --> 0:03:29.760
<v Speaker 4>markets and everything else have been very complicated in recent years,

0:03:29.840 --> 0:03:33.600
<v Speaker 4>and I think that this decision will be extremely important

0:03:33.639 --> 0:03:36.400
<v Speaker 4>to put some order into that. We think that this

0:03:36.560 --> 0:03:38.120
<v Speaker 4>is a very important step.

0:03:38.240 --> 0:03:40.840
<v Speaker 2>So you know that among the things that we approved

0:03:40.960 --> 0:03:46.680
<v Speaker 2>our possibility of old credits being grandfathered into the Article

0:03:46.760 --> 0:03:51.200
<v Speaker 2>six program, and they could be on sale as soon

0:03:51.240 --> 0:03:55.040
<v Speaker 2>as January one, twenty twenty five. And many of those

0:03:55.600 --> 0:03:59.800
<v Speaker 2>old credits, vast majority of them are renewable energy credits,

0:04:00.080 --> 0:04:03.320
<v Speaker 2>which many experts have said are junk and really should

0:04:03.360 --> 0:04:07.720
<v Speaker 2>not have been allowed to grandfather into a new market

0:04:07.760 --> 0:04:10.360
<v Speaker 2>that is hoping to be quite credible so that it

0:04:10.360 --> 0:04:13.000
<v Speaker 2>can sustain and it can grow. Are you not worried

0:04:13.000 --> 0:04:15.320
<v Speaker 2>about the credibility of the old offsets?

0:04:15.560 --> 0:04:21.320
<v Speaker 4>Look, we need to have environmental integrity in that operation,

0:04:22.040 --> 0:04:26.520
<v Speaker 4>or we're going to destroy the already battered carbon market.

0:04:27.080 --> 0:04:32.440
<v Speaker 4>Carbon markets I think can be amazing, but it's true

0:04:32.480 --> 0:04:35.599
<v Speaker 4>that these years have been very confusing, so we have

0:04:35.720 --> 0:04:40.000
<v Speaker 4>to analyze that and somehow. You know, in a negotiation,

0:04:40.279 --> 0:04:44.480
<v Speaker 4>for good things to pass, sometimes you need other things

0:04:44.560 --> 0:04:45.560
<v Speaker 4>also to pass.

0:04:45.600 --> 0:04:47.080
<v Speaker 1>So let's see.

0:04:46.920 --> 0:04:50.800
<v Speaker 4>How we can manage that. We are very concerned with

0:04:51.600 --> 0:04:55.440
<v Speaker 4>forestry credits because we believe that they are the most

0:04:55.440 --> 0:05:00.120
<v Speaker 4>important credits possible, because as we know, restoration of for

0:05:00.279 --> 0:05:06.440
<v Speaker 4>us are probably today the most science supported form of

0:05:06.560 --> 0:05:11.039
<v Speaker 4>sink that you can create, and these credits, for instance,

0:05:11.080 --> 0:05:15.680
<v Speaker 4>have been very much discredited. I'm sorry for using the

0:05:15.720 --> 0:05:20.000
<v Speaker 4>word and this is absurd because if you believe in

0:05:20.320 --> 0:05:25.560
<v Speaker 4>urgency to fight climate change, you need to do the

0:05:25.600 --> 0:05:29.800
<v Speaker 4>best possible things as soon as possible. It's useless also

0:05:29.880 --> 0:05:32.960
<v Speaker 4>to try to do the perfect system if we know

0:05:33.160 --> 0:05:35.480
<v Speaker 4>that we have very few years ahead of us. So

0:05:35.600 --> 0:05:38.880
<v Speaker 4>let's try to be ambitious and at the same time

0:05:38.920 --> 0:05:42.880
<v Speaker 4>to be practical and not to be unhappy in three

0:05:42.960 --> 0:05:46.000
<v Speaker 4>years when we discovered that we could have done many things.

0:05:46.320 --> 0:05:48.440
<v Speaker 4>Some of them may fail, some of them may not

0:05:48.560 --> 0:05:53.680
<v Speaker 4>have environmental integrity. But let's concentrate on the majority. They

0:05:53.880 --> 0:05:56.520
<v Speaker 4>try to have the overwhelming majority of what do we

0:05:56.640 --> 0:05:58.720
<v Speaker 4>do with environmental integrity.

0:05:59.200 --> 0:06:01.839
<v Speaker 2>The second thing on the agenda is the new Quantified

0:06:02.080 --> 0:06:07.719
<v Speaker 2>Goal on Climate finance, and that is crucial for developing

0:06:07.760 --> 0:06:11.480
<v Speaker 2>countries like Brazil, like India, but so many other developing

0:06:11.480 --> 0:06:17.760
<v Speaker 2>countries to step up their climate actions. And without a

0:06:17.800 --> 0:06:22.960
<v Speaker 2>good outcome on a larger amount of money supporting the

0:06:23.000 --> 0:06:27.719
<v Speaker 2>action of developing countries, you're not likely to get very

0:06:27.920 --> 0:06:33.040
<v Speaker 2>ambitious targets set under the nationally determined contributions, and that

0:06:33.120 --> 0:06:36.279
<v Speaker 2>will have so many downstream impacts. It will affect COP thirty,

0:06:36.320 --> 0:06:39.520
<v Speaker 2>which is going to come to Brazil. So on NCQG,

0:06:40.720 --> 0:06:43.400
<v Speaker 2>where do you think things stand right now and how

0:06:45.080 --> 0:06:47.400
<v Speaker 2>much of an ambitious deal could we get?

0:06:48.360 --> 0:06:50.040
<v Speaker 1>We're not in the right direction.

0:06:50.400 --> 0:06:53.720
<v Speaker 4>That I think is quite clear, and I think that

0:06:54.279 --> 0:06:59.640
<v Speaker 4>we have to understand the Convention. Although we are all

0:06:59.720 --> 0:07:04.120
<v Speaker 4>de developing countries under a certain category in the Convention,

0:07:04.240 --> 0:07:08.560
<v Speaker 4>but the truth is that you have some very low

0:07:08.640 --> 0:07:13.000
<v Speaker 4>income countries that really need full support. That it's even

0:07:13.040 --> 0:07:16.600
<v Speaker 4>absurd to think that they have to mitigate when they

0:07:16.640 --> 0:07:20.560
<v Speaker 4>are absolutely not responsible for emissions and they have to

0:07:20.640 --> 0:07:22.840
<v Speaker 4>take care of schools, they have to take care of

0:07:23.280 --> 0:07:27.000
<v Speaker 4>health and other things, and their action is not going

0:07:27.040 --> 0:07:30.840
<v Speaker 4>to have such a big impact because they emit very little.

0:07:30.880 --> 0:07:34.120
<v Speaker 4>It's very unfair somehow. And then you have the middle

0:07:34.160 --> 0:07:39.040
<v Speaker 4>income developing countries like Brazil, like Indonesia, like India, and

0:07:39.200 --> 0:07:42.840
<v Speaker 4>we can do a lot to mitigate climate change, and

0:07:42.920 --> 0:07:46.360
<v Speaker 4>we are doing a lot to mitigate climate change, and

0:07:46.560 --> 0:07:50.680
<v Speaker 4>the sums that we're talking about under the NCQG is

0:07:50.840 --> 0:07:54.440
<v Speaker 4>very far from what we know is reality. Most of

0:07:54.480 --> 0:07:56.800
<v Speaker 4>the studies have been showing that we're going to need

0:07:56.880 --> 0:08:01.600
<v Speaker 4>trillians and we're talking about some one hundred billions that

0:08:01.720 --> 0:08:04.160
<v Speaker 4>are very necessary. I'm not going to say they are

0:08:04.200 --> 0:08:09.440
<v Speaker 4>not necessary, but they are not the full solution. And

0:08:09.480 --> 0:08:14.360
<v Speaker 4>then you have to organize the finance in a way

0:08:14.520 --> 0:08:18.480
<v Speaker 4>that it can fulfill the needs of the lower income countries,

0:08:18.520 --> 0:08:22.160
<v Speaker 4>which I think the NCQG can deal with that. But

0:08:22.320 --> 0:08:25.600
<v Speaker 4>we need much more money for these middle income countries

0:08:25.920 --> 0:08:29.040
<v Speaker 4>to do what they need to do, and this is

0:08:29.080 --> 0:08:31.480
<v Speaker 4>not going to come in the NCQG. I don't see

0:08:31.520 --> 0:08:36.080
<v Speaker 4>the developed countries having the same sense of urgency that

0:08:36.160 --> 0:08:41.640
<v Speaker 4>they proclaim as climate change. Oh, the PROCLAIMATY is very

0:08:41.640 --> 0:08:44.880
<v Speaker 4>close it's very close, but the this urgency is not

0:08:45.320 --> 0:08:49.200
<v Speaker 4>in the finances. You don't see the same sense of urgency.

0:08:49.440 --> 0:08:53.079
<v Speaker 4>So what do countries like in the Indonesia and Brazil,

0:08:53.160 --> 0:08:57.360
<v Speaker 4>for instance, do Brazil worked on that very hard on

0:08:57.400 --> 0:08:59.800
<v Speaker 4>the G twenty in our presidency of the G twenty,

0:09:00.679 --> 0:09:06.559
<v Speaker 4>and how much we have to mainstream climates into investments

0:09:06.559 --> 0:09:12.679
<v Speaker 4>in general and not in specific funds. We are huge economies,

0:09:13.360 --> 0:09:16.000
<v Speaker 4>the developing countries that are in the G twenty, and

0:09:16.160 --> 0:09:19.240
<v Speaker 4>we perfectly understand that it's not going to be grants.

0:09:19.280 --> 0:09:21.040
<v Speaker 1>It's not going to be that that is going to

0:09:21.040 --> 0:09:22.080
<v Speaker 1>solve our issue.

0:09:22.200 --> 0:09:26.240
<v Speaker 4>The problem is that we pay too much for foreign capital.

0:09:27.040 --> 0:09:30.520
<v Speaker 4>We cannot afford to pay. It's completely absurd that we

0:09:30.640 --> 0:09:33.319
<v Speaker 4>have to pay such a high price to have this capital.

0:09:33.440 --> 0:09:36.599
<v Speaker 4>So we have to work on many fields. So the

0:09:36.720 --> 0:09:40.120
<v Speaker 4>NCQG is one of them. Is extremely important, but we

0:09:40.240 --> 0:09:43.920
<v Speaker 4>also have to be practical and think that we have

0:09:44.120 --> 0:09:45.319
<v Speaker 4>very few years ahead of it.

0:09:45.480 --> 0:09:49.120
<v Speaker 2>Yes, So if I am hearing you right, you're saying NCQG,

0:09:49.320 --> 0:09:52.240
<v Speaker 2>the needs are clearly in the trillions, but there is

0:09:53.280 --> 0:09:58.280
<v Speaker 2>very little possibility or political feasibility of the trillions being approved.

0:09:58.840 --> 0:10:01.640
<v Speaker 2>But the hundreds of billions may get approved, and that

0:10:01.720 --> 0:10:03.959
<v Speaker 2>means the gap has to be filled in other ways,

0:10:04.400 --> 0:10:06.520
<v Speaker 2>and those other ways are what.

0:10:07.400 --> 0:10:11.480
<v Speaker 4>The other ways are the mainstream of the economy. Countries

0:10:11.559 --> 0:10:15.080
<v Speaker 4>like Brazil, Indonesia or India, we are very investible countries.

0:10:15.160 --> 0:10:17.120
<v Speaker 4>I mean, there are many things to be done in

0:10:17.160 --> 0:10:20.520
<v Speaker 4>our countries, and our economies are huge and our population

0:10:20.679 --> 0:10:25.280
<v Speaker 4>is huge, and so we have to lower the cost

0:10:25.320 --> 0:10:29.839
<v Speaker 4>of capital I think will have an amazing impact. Then

0:10:30.120 --> 0:10:35.320
<v Speaker 4>you have also to recognize that countries like ours, including China,

0:10:35.440 --> 0:10:39.280
<v Speaker 4>we've been doing so many things inside our country without

0:10:39.720 --> 0:10:45.160
<v Speaker 4>foreign support, and this is never taken into consideration. For instance,

0:10:45.240 --> 0:10:49.920
<v Speaker 4>fighting deforestation in Brazil, ninety percent of what we spend

0:10:50.160 --> 0:10:54.000
<v Speaker 4>is from our budget, is not international support. So this

0:10:54.200 --> 0:10:58.120
<v Speaker 4>recognition of what we're doing and the importance that we

0:10:58.240 --> 0:11:02.000
<v Speaker 4>invest in our own effort to combat climate change is

0:11:02.040 --> 0:11:05.679
<v Speaker 4>not taken into consideration. So there is this very strange

0:11:05.720 --> 0:11:10.560
<v Speaker 4>idea of increasing the donor base, which is completely getting

0:11:10.600 --> 0:11:13.160
<v Speaker 4>out of the main subject. The main subject is what

0:11:14.120 --> 0:11:17.600
<v Speaker 4>are the developed countries going to provide for the developing

0:11:17.640 --> 0:11:19.920
<v Speaker 4>countries under the rules of the Paris Accord.

0:11:21.240 --> 0:11:24.280
<v Speaker 2>But are there steps that can be taken or are

0:11:24.360 --> 0:11:27.520
<v Speaker 2>being taken to lower the cost of capital coming into Brazil,

0:11:27.640 --> 0:11:28.800
<v Speaker 2>India and Indonesia.

0:11:28.840 --> 0:11:31.200
<v Speaker 4>We are trying in the G twenty. I think that

0:11:31.240 --> 0:11:35.360
<v Speaker 4>there was quite a good progress because we put together

0:11:35.559 --> 0:11:38.120
<v Speaker 4>for the first time in the G twenty the ministers

0:11:38.160 --> 0:11:42.640
<v Speaker 4>of finance and the central bankers talking together with their

0:11:42.920 --> 0:11:46.560
<v Speaker 4>ministers of foreign affairs and ministers of climate. And it

0:11:46.679 --> 0:11:49.839
<v Speaker 4>was quite surprising because even in the developed countries they

0:11:50.200 --> 0:11:53.920
<v Speaker 4>hardly knew each other. So I think this is a progress.

0:11:54.160 --> 0:11:58.640
<v Speaker 4>But what really drives us is the sense of urgency,

0:11:58.640 --> 0:12:02.760
<v Speaker 4>and the sense of urgency cannot only be in ambition. Yeah,

0:12:02.960 --> 0:12:05.360
<v Speaker 4>it has to be finance, it has to be action.

0:12:05.640 --> 0:12:07.640
<v Speaker 2>Where is the next G twenty happening.

0:12:07.920 --> 0:12:09.000
<v Speaker 1>In South Africa?

0:12:09.120 --> 0:12:12.880
<v Speaker 2>So that's great, But I hear that the South African

0:12:13.320 --> 0:12:16.560
<v Speaker 2>economy ministry and the finance ministry do not get on

0:12:16.640 --> 0:12:18.760
<v Speaker 2>with each other, so they might not do what you

0:12:18.960 --> 0:12:22.560
<v Speaker 2>did so successfully under the Brazil G twenty. Is that right?

0:12:23.120 --> 0:12:24.840
<v Speaker 1>I think that.

0:12:26.679 --> 0:12:30.600
<v Speaker 4>I have to tell you that the biggest differences between

0:12:30.840 --> 0:12:34.480
<v Speaker 4>finance ministries and climate ministries that I saw in the

0:12:34.559 --> 0:12:36.960
<v Speaker 4>G twenty was in some European countries.

0:12:39.520 --> 0:12:43.880
<v Speaker 2>So do you think given the tense negotiations which is

0:12:43.920 --> 0:12:47.080
<v Speaker 2>the case every comp but especially when it comes to money,

0:12:47.120 --> 0:12:49.079
<v Speaker 2>and there's sorts of money. We are talking at COP

0:12:49.160 --> 0:12:51.320
<v Speaker 2>twenty nine. Do you think there will be a deal

0:12:51.360 --> 0:12:51.880
<v Speaker 2>at the end?

0:12:53.080 --> 0:12:57.000
<v Speaker 4>I do hope that because I hope that for two reasons,

0:12:57.040 --> 0:13:01.200
<v Speaker 4>First as a citizen of the planet and second because

0:13:01.200 --> 0:13:04.360
<v Speaker 4>Brazil is going to preside the next COP, so we

0:13:04.400 --> 0:13:06.480
<v Speaker 4>need a successful COP twenty nine.

0:13:06.720 --> 0:13:11.439
<v Speaker 2>So between now and the next COP, Donald Trump is

0:13:11.480 --> 0:13:14.520
<v Speaker 2>going to come to power, and he has said that

0:13:14.600 --> 0:13:16.520
<v Speaker 2>he will pull the US out of the Paris Agreement,

0:13:16.600 --> 0:13:19.240
<v Speaker 2>which is something he did in his first term in

0:13:19.280 --> 0:13:23.679
<v Speaker 2>twenty seventeen. Last time around, the impact wasn't very much

0:13:23.800 --> 0:13:26.920
<v Speaker 2>because of rules. He only left in November twenty twenty

0:13:26.960 --> 0:13:30.240
<v Speaker 2>and jan twenty twenty one, Joe Biden joined the US

0:13:30.400 --> 0:13:33.600
<v Speaker 2>into the Paris Agreement again. This time he can have

0:13:34.120 --> 0:13:36.560
<v Speaker 2>much greater impact because he will leave within a year,

0:13:36.880 --> 0:13:38.920
<v Speaker 2>and he could pull the US out of the UN

0:13:38.960 --> 0:13:43.280
<v Speaker 2>Climate Treaty altogether. So when you meet your US counterparts

0:13:43.320 --> 0:13:46.200
<v Speaker 2>right now who are from the Biden administration, do you

0:13:46.240 --> 0:13:47.160
<v Speaker 2>take them seriously?

0:13:48.320 --> 0:13:54.000
<v Speaker 4>I take them very seriously because they are really serious negotiators.

0:13:54.320 --> 0:13:59.040
<v Speaker 4>But we have to try to find a new way

0:13:59.040 --> 0:14:02.480
<v Speaker 4>of dealing with the US. But we cannot think that

0:14:02.559 --> 0:14:05.640
<v Speaker 4>the US is just the government of the US. The

0:14:05.760 --> 0:14:11.480
<v Speaker 4>US is universities, scientists, states, cities, and many of them,

0:14:11.640 --> 0:14:15.040
<v Speaker 4>most of them believe in climate change and believe that

0:14:15.080 --> 0:14:18.200
<v Speaker 4>things have to be done. So if you just take California,

0:14:18.280 --> 0:14:20.720
<v Speaker 4>it's one of the biggest economies in the world. So

0:14:21.040 --> 0:14:25.240
<v Speaker 4>if you concentrate your efforts on the sectors of the

0:14:25.400 --> 0:14:29.120
<v Speaker 4>US that can contribute to this debate, it's already a lot.

0:14:29.360 --> 0:14:31.680
<v Speaker 4>It's obvious that it would be much better to have

0:14:32.080 --> 0:14:36.320
<v Speaker 4>the whole government together. Now, what I also believe is

0:14:36.360 --> 0:14:42.400
<v Speaker 4>that even the most anti climate personality in America or

0:14:42.400 --> 0:14:47.960
<v Speaker 4>whatever will rethink about it if he sees that he

0:14:48.040 --> 0:14:53.840
<v Speaker 4>can have profits working with climate change. So see for instance, Texas.

0:14:53.920 --> 0:14:57.880
<v Speaker 4>Texas has become one of the states of the United

0:14:57.920 --> 0:15:01.760
<v Speaker 4>States that uses most renewables, with the wind energy, with

0:15:01.920 --> 0:15:06.120
<v Speaker 4>solar energy. Why it's not an ideological decision like people

0:15:06.200 --> 0:15:10.840
<v Speaker 4>say that California is. This was exclusively because of the cost,

0:15:11.040 --> 0:15:14.760
<v Speaker 4>because it was a good business. So for those who

0:15:14.800 --> 0:15:19.640
<v Speaker 4>don't believe in those discussions, let's talk with the language

0:15:19.760 --> 0:15:25.120
<v Speaker 4>of business with others. Let's talk with the appropriate language of.

0:15:25.200 --> 0:15:28.240
<v Speaker 2>Chun see there is a deal a chapter twenty nine

0:15:28.280 --> 0:15:30.520
<v Speaker 2>on the NCQG, and then the US pulls out of

0:15:30.520 --> 0:15:33.800
<v Speaker 2>the Paris Agreement. The US is the world's largest economy,

0:15:34.160 --> 0:15:37.800
<v Speaker 2>it would, I believe, have to promise the largest sum

0:15:37.840 --> 0:15:41.040
<v Speaker 2>to be given under the NCQG. If the US gets out,

0:15:41.160 --> 0:15:42.640
<v Speaker 2>what happens to the NCQG.

0:15:43.320 --> 0:15:48.240
<v Speaker 4>I think that it would be quite logical not to

0:15:48.440 --> 0:15:51.600
<v Speaker 4>expect the US to be one of the main funders

0:15:51.600 --> 0:15:52.840
<v Speaker 4>of the NCQG.

0:15:52.640 --> 0:15:55.160
<v Speaker 2>Even now, So going into the deal, you don't think that'll.

0:15:54.960 --> 0:15:59.520
<v Speaker 4>Happen, because even if you're negotiating with the bide and administration,

0:15:59.680 --> 0:16:03.480
<v Speaker 4>the truth is that the signs that President Trump has

0:16:03.520 --> 0:16:06.440
<v Speaker 4>already shown are very clear.

0:16:07.560 --> 0:16:11.280
<v Speaker 2>And so if what happens at the NSQG and the

0:16:11.440 --> 0:16:17.960
<v Speaker 2>US is backtracking from its commitments shows up at COP thirty,

0:16:18.480 --> 0:16:20.760
<v Speaker 2>how are you going to make sure COP thirty is

0:16:20.760 --> 0:16:24.080
<v Speaker 2>a success. Because the NCQG will be a challenge. Not

0:16:24.240 --> 0:16:28.480
<v Speaker 2>enough countries will have submitted ambitious NDCs. They will look

0:16:28.520 --> 0:16:32.120
<v Speaker 2>at the US, the world's largest historical emitter, and say

0:16:33.240 --> 0:16:36.280
<v Speaker 2>they're out, why should we contribute? And you get into

0:16:36.320 --> 0:16:39.000
<v Speaker 2>a new, bigger fight when you come to COP thirty.

0:16:39.040 --> 0:16:40.800
<v Speaker 2>So what are you doing now to avoid that.

0:16:41.920 --> 0:16:44.520
<v Speaker 4>Well, I think we cannot avoid that. We have to

0:16:44.600 --> 0:16:47.720
<v Speaker 4>deal with that, and so we'll have to find some

0:16:48.480 --> 0:16:54.760
<v Speaker 4>intelligence answers to those intelligent questions. But that is reality.

0:16:54.960 --> 0:16:57.880
<v Speaker 4>We have to face reality, like climate change if you

0:16:57.960 --> 0:17:00.880
<v Speaker 4>believe in it. So it's a big challenge, there is

0:17:00.920 --> 0:17:01.760
<v Speaker 4>no doubt about it.

0:17:07.359 --> 0:17:10.680
<v Speaker 2>After the break, more from my conversation with Brazilian Secretary

0:17:10.680 --> 0:17:13.679
<v Speaker 2>for Climate, Energy and the Environment Andre Corea the logo.

0:17:14.760 --> 0:17:15.640
<v Speaker 3>By the way, if you've.

0:17:15.560 --> 0:17:17.840
<v Speaker 2>Been enjoying this episode, please take a moment to rate

0:17:17.880 --> 0:17:20.679
<v Speaker 2>and review the show on Apple Podcasts and Spotify. It

0:17:20.760 --> 0:17:22.320
<v Speaker 2>helps other listeners find the show.

0:17:29.840 --> 0:17:30.040
<v Speaker 3>Now.

0:17:30.080 --> 0:17:35.320
<v Speaker 2>Cop thirty is currently scheduled to happen in Bellm. We

0:17:35.520 --> 0:17:39.880
<v Speaker 2>just got attendance figures today and there are expecting fifty

0:17:40.040 --> 0:17:42.760
<v Speaker 2>two thousand people coming to this cup. Now, this is

0:17:42.760 --> 0:17:45.520
<v Speaker 2>the capital of a country. It's a small country, but

0:17:45.560 --> 0:17:47.400
<v Speaker 2>it's the capital of a country, and you are able

0:17:47.440 --> 0:17:50.760
<v Speaker 2>to manage that crowd. My understanding is Bellm is a

0:17:50.840 --> 0:17:53.760
<v Speaker 2>really good place to go to just understand what the

0:17:53.800 --> 0:17:58.240
<v Speaker 2>amazon is, but it's not got the capacity to host

0:17:58.400 --> 0:18:02.640
<v Speaker 2>fifty thousand people, let alone eighty thousand people which showed

0:18:02.720 --> 0:18:05.879
<v Speaker 2>up in Dubai. So what is the plan currently for

0:18:06.119 --> 0:18:07.960
<v Speaker 2>COP thirty in Brazil?

0:18:08.160 --> 0:18:13.159
<v Speaker 4>In Belem, the plan is to have a COP that

0:18:13.920 --> 0:18:19.639
<v Speaker 4>is proportional to what the city can offer, but also

0:18:19.800 --> 0:18:23.359
<v Speaker 4>a COP that will leave a very positive legacy to

0:18:23.440 --> 0:18:28.960
<v Speaker 4>the city. So we cannot build pharonic things just for

0:18:29.040 --> 0:18:31.919
<v Speaker 4>a COP. If we are going to improve the city

0:18:31.960 --> 0:18:35.200
<v Speaker 4>for the COP, it's to improve the city itself and

0:18:35.560 --> 0:18:38.720
<v Speaker 4>there will be a legacy for the population. Now, we're

0:18:38.760 --> 0:18:41.760
<v Speaker 4>going to have to do it differently, obviously very differently

0:18:42.200 --> 0:18:47.119
<v Speaker 4>than Dubai was or what Baku is operating, but you

0:18:47.200 --> 0:18:51.399
<v Speaker 4>can be sure that we will be very transparent about

0:18:51.440 --> 0:18:52.960
<v Speaker 4>what is possible.

0:18:52.760 --> 0:18:54.679
<v Speaker 1>To have in Berlin.

0:18:55.440 --> 0:18:58.880
<v Speaker 4>We have a full team of the people that are

0:18:58.960 --> 0:19:03.399
<v Speaker 4>organizing the billain here seeing all the challenges that we

0:19:03.480 --> 0:19:08.320
<v Speaker 4>will have to face. But the symbolism of having it

0:19:08.400 --> 0:19:13.000
<v Speaker 4>in the Amazon, and the fact that Brazil is developing

0:19:13.040 --> 0:19:18.800
<v Speaker 4>countries with many success stories but also with huge challenges,

0:19:18.840 --> 0:19:22.119
<v Speaker 4>and the fact that Brazil assumes to do it in

0:19:22.200 --> 0:19:27.719
<v Speaker 4>a complex place, I think it has a fantastic political power.

0:19:28.280 --> 0:19:30.960
<v Speaker 4>We are not trying to hide the problems we have

0:19:31.119 --> 0:19:35.600
<v Speaker 4>and as you know, deforestation is our main source of emissions.

0:19:35.600 --> 0:19:39.320
<v Speaker 4>We have a very strange profile of emissions. So we

0:19:39.359 --> 0:19:42.360
<v Speaker 4>are taking the world to the place where we have

0:19:42.560 --> 0:19:46.080
<v Speaker 4>our biggest source of emission, and we're going to show

0:19:46.119 --> 0:19:49.560
<v Speaker 4>to the world how complex the Amazon region is. With

0:19:50.000 --> 0:19:53.080
<v Speaker 4>the best food in Brazil on one side, the most

0:19:53.200 --> 0:19:57.679
<v Speaker 4>beautiful natural place you can imagine, but a city that

0:19:57.760 --> 0:20:01.720
<v Speaker 4>still has lots of very strong social challenges. So I

0:20:01.760 --> 0:20:05.720
<v Speaker 4>think that it is quite refreshing to have a country.

0:20:05.760 --> 0:20:08.960
<v Speaker 4>Obviously I'm suspicious because I'm Brazilian, but I'm quite proud

0:20:09.040 --> 0:20:12.320
<v Speaker 4>of being a country that doesn't hide its problem. It's

0:20:12.359 --> 0:20:15.159
<v Speaker 4>a country that is showing the world it's problems and

0:20:15.280 --> 0:20:18.440
<v Speaker 4>let's try to work on that. Everybody has its problem

0:20:18.680 --> 0:20:22.679
<v Speaker 4>and we are showing ours very clearly to everybody.

0:20:22.680 --> 0:20:24.720
<v Speaker 2>So how many people do you think, well them will

0:20:24.760 --> 0:20:25.920
<v Speaker 2>be able to fit.

0:20:27.080 --> 0:20:31.320
<v Speaker 4>I think that the organizers are working on fifty thousand people.

0:20:31.520 --> 0:20:35.600
<v Speaker 4>They are working on fifty thousands, but President Lula wants

0:20:36.240 --> 0:20:42.239
<v Speaker 4>very strong participation of civil society, so we'll have to

0:20:42.359 --> 0:20:46.160
<v Speaker 4>measure how many people. I mean, because the negotiators, as

0:20:46.160 --> 0:20:48.760
<v Speaker 4>you know, is something that doesn't move very much, is

0:20:48.800 --> 0:20:52.760
<v Speaker 4>around twenty thousand people. Then you have the UNFCCC staff

0:20:52.840 --> 0:20:55.919
<v Speaker 4>is one hundred, there's like eight hundred two thousand people,

0:20:56.720 --> 0:21:01.080
<v Speaker 4>So we're dealing with the realistic numbers. But President Lula

0:21:01.119 --> 0:21:04.359
<v Speaker 4>doesn't want, you know, to let's have less people from

0:21:04.440 --> 0:21:08.480
<v Speaker 4>civil society. No, we need lots of presence and citizens.

0:21:08.920 --> 0:21:09.200
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

0:21:09.280 --> 0:21:14.439
<v Speaker 2>Now Brazil produces more oil than the UAE does, and

0:21:14.520 --> 0:21:19.399
<v Speaker 2>President Lula has asked Petro Brass to produce even more oil.

0:21:19.960 --> 0:21:21.760
<v Speaker 2>How is that going to play in your NBC?

0:21:22.560 --> 0:21:28.240
<v Speaker 4>We have to deal with this very, very challenging reality

0:21:28.480 --> 0:21:33.359
<v Speaker 4>is that last year Brazil's main expert was oil. So

0:21:33.960 --> 0:21:37.680
<v Speaker 4>from an economic point of view, this is obviously interpreted

0:21:37.800 --> 0:21:42.680
<v Speaker 4>by most of the Brazilians as something that we didn't expect.

0:21:43.080 --> 0:21:48.320
<v Speaker 4>And this only happened because of the incredible technological progress

0:21:48.440 --> 0:21:52.399
<v Speaker 4>of Petro Brass that is looking for oil in places

0:21:52.720 --> 0:21:59.840
<v Speaker 4>that are extremely complex and technologically difficult places to exploit oil.

0:22:00.119 --> 0:22:03.280
<v Speaker 4>So there is a part of Brazil that is extremely

0:22:03.400 --> 0:22:07.800
<v Speaker 4>proud of Petrobrias to have found oil in such deep areas.

0:22:08.000 --> 0:22:11.400
<v Speaker 4>And then on the other side, we all are conscious

0:22:11.440 --> 0:22:14.240
<v Speaker 4>that we have to transition away from fossil fuels. So

0:22:14.760 --> 0:22:16.919
<v Speaker 4>this is the big debate we're going to have in

0:22:16.960 --> 0:22:20.280
<v Speaker 4>Brazil next year because we have to arrive at COP

0:22:20.359 --> 0:22:25.160
<v Speaker 4>thirty lead by example as our Minister of the environment,

0:22:25.200 --> 0:22:27.720
<v Speaker 4>but in a silver always says so.

0:22:28.000 --> 0:22:32.320
<v Speaker 2>Over here, you're hoping there will be a big financing

0:22:32.400 --> 0:22:36.280
<v Speaker 2>push that will hopefully make it possible for countries to

0:22:36.320 --> 0:22:42.320
<v Speaker 2>come with new ambitions in bellum at COP thirty. What

0:22:42.440 --> 0:22:45.760
<v Speaker 2>other metrics are you setting for success? First is that

0:22:45.800 --> 0:22:49.240
<v Speaker 2>countries need to come up with new ambition with goals

0:22:49.320 --> 0:22:51.959
<v Speaker 2>set out to twenty thirty five and ideally start to

0:22:52.359 --> 0:22:54.679
<v Speaker 2>finally reduce emissions that paces needed.

0:22:55.240 --> 0:22:56.600
<v Speaker 3>What are the other priorities?

0:22:57.240 --> 0:22:59.920
<v Speaker 4>I think that to try to make it as simple

0:23:00.080 --> 0:23:05.840
<v Speaker 4>as possible, we feel that urgency has to be everywhere

0:23:06.000 --> 0:23:09.840
<v Speaker 4>when we talk about climate change. So this is a

0:23:10.000 --> 0:23:14.200
<v Speaker 4>progress in these debates that will make a huge difference.

0:23:14.200 --> 0:23:16.720
<v Speaker 4>So it's not only the an f c C. It's

0:23:16.760 --> 0:23:21.400
<v Speaker 4>not only the Paris Accord. It's the economy in general.

0:23:21.520 --> 0:23:24.080
<v Speaker 4>It's the behavior of people that have to take into

0:23:24.240 --> 0:23:31.040
<v Speaker 4>consideration the urgency, economic theory, ministries of finance, ministries of transportation.

0:23:31.119 --> 0:23:34.040
<v Speaker 4>I mean it's not that's the sense of the n

0:23:34.119 --> 0:23:37.960
<v Speaker 4>dissies is that the ndsies create a number that is

0:23:38.000 --> 0:23:40.680
<v Speaker 4>an objective, and each country is going to find its

0:23:40.800 --> 0:23:44.320
<v Speaker 4>way to reach it, and we have to do it

0:23:44.400 --> 0:23:47.639
<v Speaker 4>together because, as you are saying, if the richest country

0:23:47.680 --> 0:23:51.240
<v Speaker 4>in the world is going to backtrack maybe on some

0:23:51.320 --> 0:23:54.800
<v Speaker 4>of its commitments, why the others are going to follow.

0:23:54.840 --> 0:23:58.120
<v Speaker 4>So we have to build something really strong in which

0:23:58.200 --> 0:24:02.399
<v Speaker 4>the world is con vinced of the urgency. How are

0:24:02.440 --> 0:24:05.760
<v Speaker 4>we going to do that this? I cannot give you

0:24:05.800 --> 0:24:06.800
<v Speaker 4>the answer now.

0:24:07.200 --> 0:24:11.359
<v Speaker 2>So in a way, now COP thirty becomes how to

0:24:11.440 --> 0:24:15.960
<v Speaker 2>defend the climate consensus even as the US leaves the

0:24:16.000 --> 0:24:16.720
<v Speaker 2>paras of card.

0:24:16.960 --> 0:24:19.720
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, but remember that when we say the US is

0:24:19.840 --> 0:24:23.160
<v Speaker 4>leaving US, scientists are not living US.

0:24:23.320 --> 0:24:24.639
<v Speaker 1>Business is not living.

0:24:24.920 --> 0:24:29.720
<v Speaker 4>And we have to think that the symbolic billionaire that

0:24:29.960 --> 0:24:33.960
<v Speaker 4>supports President Trump is eln Musk. Elon Musk is the

0:24:34.040 --> 0:24:37.600
<v Speaker 4>guy that made America fall in love with electric cars.

0:24:37.840 --> 0:24:43.400
<v Speaker 4>So there are many dimensions in America. We cannot oversimplify

0:24:43.480 --> 0:24:47.080
<v Speaker 4>what it is. And I mean, if the oil companies

0:24:47.720 --> 0:24:53.120
<v Speaker 4>find a way of contributing to the transition away from

0:24:53.240 --> 0:24:57.400
<v Speaker 4>fossil fuels, that would be super welcome. I mean everybody

0:24:57.480 --> 0:25:01.879
<v Speaker 4>has to come with solution in their own way, in

0:25:02.000 --> 0:25:07.199
<v Speaker 4>a reasonable with reasonable costs, and with reasonable social costs.

0:25:07.200 --> 0:25:09.480
<v Speaker 4>Because we have seen in some countries that the fight

0:25:09.520 --> 0:25:12.800
<v Speaker 4>against climate change has made some of the basic services

0:25:12.840 --> 0:25:15.679
<v Speaker 4>more expensive. This is not the solution. You lose the

0:25:15.760 --> 0:25:18.080
<v Speaker 4>support of the population for this fight.

0:25:18.359 --> 0:25:20.880
<v Speaker 2>So I'm looking forward to the new Brazil climate plan.

0:25:21.640 --> 0:25:27.159
<v Speaker 2>But given Petrobrass's state backed are we also going to

0:25:27.200 --> 0:25:30.920
<v Speaker 2>see a new climate plan from your state backed oil company.

0:25:31.760 --> 0:25:35.760
<v Speaker 1>Ah, that's a good question. Let's talk to Peter Brass together.

0:25:36.840 --> 0:25:38.040
<v Speaker 2>Thank you for coming on the show.

0:25:38.320 --> 0:25:48.760
<v Speaker 3>Thank you very much, thank you for listening to zero.

0:25:49.160 --> 0:25:59.800
<v Speaker 2>And now for the sound of the week. This is

0:25:59.800 --> 0:26:04.959
<v Speaker 2>this sound of cop. Every year, almost always, there is

0:26:05.560 --> 0:26:11.160
<v Speaker 2>wooden flooring newly put to turn something into a cop

0:26:11.400 --> 0:26:15.879
<v Speaker 2>venue and have thousands and thousands of people walk across it,

0:26:16.280 --> 0:26:27.040
<v Speaker 2>making this drumbeat of a noise that's the sound of

0:26:27.040 --> 0:26:31.760
<v Speaker 2>the footsteps inside the Bako Olympic Stadium, the drumbeat.

0:26:31.440 --> 0:26:33.600
<v Speaker 3>That dictates the pace of negotiations.

0:26:35.800 --> 0:26:37.760
<v Speaker 2>If you liked this episode, please take a moment to

0:26:37.840 --> 0:26:40.480
<v Speaker 2>rate or review the show on Apple Podcasts and Spotify.

0:26:40.920 --> 0:26:43.800
<v Speaker 2>Also check out Bloombergreens coverage of COP twenty nine. It's

0:26:43.880 --> 0:26:47.080
<v Speaker 2>free to read, share this episode with a friend or

0:26:47.119 --> 0:26:49.360
<v Speaker 2>with someone who is ready to plan a trip to.

0:26:49.320 --> 0:26:50.720
<v Speaker 3>Brazil in twenty twenty five.

0:26:51.440 --> 0:26:53.600
<v Speaker 2>You can get in touch at zero Pod at bloomberg

0:26:53.640 --> 0:26:57.000
<v Speaker 2>dot net. Zero's producer is might Lee Row. Bloomberg's head

0:26:57.000 --> 0:26:59.520
<v Speaker 2>a podcast is Sage Bowman and head of Talk is

0:26:59.520 --> 0:27:03.040
<v Speaker 2>Brendan You Know Ar. Theme music is composed by wonder Lee.

0:27:03.760 --> 0:27:08.760
<v Speaker 2>Special thanks to Simone Iglesias, Chowan Wagner, Ethan Steinberg, Blake

0:27:08.840 --> 0:27:13.080
<v Speaker 2>Maples and Jessica benk I am Akshatrati Back soon