1 00:00:00,440 --> 00:00:01,240 Speaker 1: Welcome to Zero. 2 00:00:01,480 --> 00:00:05,120 Speaker 2: I am akshatrati this week good Cop, bad Cop. 3 00:00:05,519 --> 00:00:06,600 Speaker 3: I had to use it sometimes. 4 00:00:20,160 --> 00:00:22,120 Speaker 2: I'm in Baku, Yes, still in Baku. 5 00:00:22,200 --> 00:00:23,120 Speaker 3: For COP twenty nine. 6 00:00:23,440 --> 00:00:26,480 Speaker 2: It's week two, which means the biggest heads of state 7 00:00:26,560 --> 00:00:30,640 Speaker 2: have gone home, as have many climate celebrities like al 8 00:00:30,720 --> 00:00:34,960 Speaker 2: Gore and Theresa May. Now negotiators are getting down to business. 9 00:00:36,159 --> 00:00:39,200 Speaker 2: We are still days away from knowing what agreement, if any, 10 00:00:39,280 --> 00:00:42,400 Speaker 2: might be reached, and Zero will come to you with 11 00:00:42,560 --> 00:00:46,159 Speaker 2: how it all went down next week. In the meantime, 12 00:00:46,360 --> 00:00:49,479 Speaker 2: there are already questions about what the next COP might 13 00:00:49,520 --> 00:00:52,839 Speaker 2: look like, and for good reasons. As we explode in 14 00:00:52,880 --> 00:00:56,720 Speaker 2: a previous episode, the small state of Azerbaijan has had 15 00:00:56,880 --> 00:01:01,240 Speaker 2: its hands full in hosting fifty thousand delegates and advocates 16 00:01:01,360 --> 00:01:04,960 Speaker 2: who arrived in Baku from around the world. Next year, 17 00:01:05,440 --> 00:01:10,200 Speaker 2: Brazil will play host, but not in Rio or Sa Paolo. Instead, 18 00:01:10,840 --> 00:01:13,280 Speaker 2: the conference is said to be in the city of Belem, 19 00:01:13,560 --> 00:01:18,080 Speaker 2: the gateway to the Amazon, a beautiful coastal city that 20 00:01:18,440 --> 00:01:22,240 Speaker 2: might not have the infrastructure to host fifty thousand people. 21 00:01:22,920 --> 00:01:25,600 Speaker 2: But Brazil has been trying to position itself as a 22 00:01:25,680 --> 00:01:28,640 Speaker 2: leader on climate, and it warns people who come to 23 00:01:28,680 --> 00:01:33,720 Speaker 2: COP thirty to realize what's on the line. But Brazil 24 00:01:33,840 --> 00:01:37,000 Speaker 2: is also growing. It's all in gas production and quickly 25 00:01:37,400 --> 00:01:41,720 Speaker 2: reaching levels that match the United Arab Emirates. So I 26 00:01:41,800 --> 00:01:44,240 Speaker 2: was eager to catch up with Andre Corea the Lago, 27 00:01:44,680 --> 00:01:48,720 Speaker 2: Brazil's Secretary for Climate, Energy and the Environment. He's rumored 28 00:01:48,760 --> 00:01:52,200 Speaker 2: to be the next COP president, something he wouldn't confirm 29 00:01:52,240 --> 00:01:55,320 Speaker 2: on the record, but he wasn't shy in answering just 30 00:01:55,480 --> 00:01:58,200 Speaker 2: how much Brazil has to do to make COP thirty 31 00:01:58,200 --> 00:02:02,400 Speaker 2: a success, from challenging the sticks to fracture in geopolitics 32 00:02:02,880 --> 00:02:05,560 Speaker 2: and what COP twenty nine must get right to give 33 00:02:05,600 --> 00:02:25,280 Speaker 2: Brazil a better footing. Andre, welcome to the show. 34 00:02:25,760 --> 00:02:27,600 Speaker 1: Hello, it's lovely to be here. 35 00:02:27,960 --> 00:02:31,160 Speaker 2: Now tell us what Brazil is hoping to get out 36 00:02:31,200 --> 00:02:33,320 Speaker 2: of COP twenty nine specifically. 37 00:02:33,720 --> 00:02:37,400 Speaker 4: Yeah, Look, you know that one of the basic principles 38 00:02:37,440 --> 00:02:42,959 Speaker 4: of brazil foreign policy is to strengthen multilateralism. So we want, 39 00:02:43,280 --> 00:02:45,160 Speaker 4: obviously COP twenty nine. 40 00:02:45,000 --> 00:02:46,440 Speaker 1: To be very successful. 41 00:02:46,480 --> 00:02:50,000 Speaker 4: We believe in UNFCCC, we believe in the Paris Accord, 42 00:02:50,639 --> 00:02:53,480 Speaker 4: and we have to show the world that this is 43 00:02:53,520 --> 00:02:56,120 Speaker 4: the right way of doing things. 44 00:02:56,800 --> 00:02:58,560 Speaker 2: And at coptery nine there are going to be two 45 00:02:58,639 --> 00:03:01,320 Speaker 2: things that need to be worked on. One it seems 46 00:03:01,360 --> 00:03:03,600 Speaker 2: has already been worked on, which is Article six. Are 47 00:03:03,680 --> 00:03:05,440 Speaker 2: you happy with the Article six outcome? 48 00:03:05,720 --> 00:03:08,360 Speaker 4: I think that to have an outcome is already a 49 00:03:08,480 --> 00:03:12,959 Speaker 4: very good news. I like quite a lot the solution, 50 00:03:13,560 --> 00:03:17,000 Speaker 4: but now we have to transform it into something practical 51 00:03:17,000 --> 00:03:20,440 Speaker 4: because the problem is that we've been thinking about that 52 00:03:20,680 --> 00:03:26,240 Speaker 4: for nine years and we saw that in general, carbon 53 00:03:26,320 --> 00:03:29,760 Speaker 4: markets and everything else have been very complicated in recent years, 54 00:03:29,840 --> 00:03:33,600 Speaker 4: and I think that this decision will be extremely important 55 00:03:33,639 --> 00:03:36,400 Speaker 4: to put some order into that. We think that this 56 00:03:36,560 --> 00:03:38,120 Speaker 4: is a very important step. 57 00:03:38,240 --> 00:03:40,840 Speaker 2: So you know that among the things that we approved 58 00:03:40,960 --> 00:03:46,680 Speaker 2: our possibility of old credits being grandfathered into the Article 59 00:03:46,760 --> 00:03:51,200 Speaker 2: six program, and they could be on sale as soon 60 00:03:51,240 --> 00:03:55,040 Speaker 2: as January one, twenty twenty five. And many of those 61 00:03:55,600 --> 00:03:59,800 Speaker 2: old credits, vast majority of them are renewable energy credits, 62 00:04:00,080 --> 00:04:03,320 Speaker 2: which many experts have said are junk and really should 63 00:04:03,360 --> 00:04:07,720 Speaker 2: not have been allowed to grandfather into a new market 64 00:04:07,760 --> 00:04:10,360 Speaker 2: that is hoping to be quite credible so that it 65 00:04:10,360 --> 00:04:13,000 Speaker 2: can sustain and it can grow. Are you not worried 66 00:04:13,000 --> 00:04:15,320 Speaker 2: about the credibility of the old offsets? 67 00:04:15,560 --> 00:04:21,320 Speaker 4: Look, we need to have environmental integrity in that operation, 68 00:04:22,040 --> 00:04:26,520 Speaker 4: or we're going to destroy the already battered carbon market. 69 00:04:27,080 --> 00:04:32,440 Speaker 4: Carbon markets I think can be amazing, but it's true 70 00:04:32,480 --> 00:04:35,599 Speaker 4: that these years have been very confusing, so we have 71 00:04:35,720 --> 00:04:40,000 Speaker 4: to analyze that and somehow. You know, in a negotiation, 72 00:04:40,279 --> 00:04:44,480 Speaker 4: for good things to pass, sometimes you need other things 73 00:04:44,560 --> 00:04:45,560 Speaker 4: also to pass. 74 00:04:45,600 --> 00:04:47,080 Speaker 1: So let's see. 75 00:04:46,920 --> 00:04:50,800 Speaker 4: How we can manage that. We are very concerned with 76 00:04:51,600 --> 00:04:55,440 Speaker 4: forestry credits because we believe that they are the most 77 00:04:55,440 --> 00:05:00,120 Speaker 4: important credits possible, because as we know, restoration of for 78 00:05:00,279 --> 00:05:06,440 Speaker 4: us are probably today the most science supported form of 79 00:05:06,560 --> 00:05:11,039 Speaker 4: sink that you can create, and these credits, for instance, 80 00:05:11,080 --> 00:05:15,680 Speaker 4: have been very much discredited. I'm sorry for using the 81 00:05:15,720 --> 00:05:20,000 Speaker 4: word and this is absurd because if you believe in 82 00:05:20,320 --> 00:05:25,560 Speaker 4: urgency to fight climate change, you need to do the 83 00:05:25,600 --> 00:05:29,800 Speaker 4: best possible things as soon as possible. It's useless also 84 00:05:29,880 --> 00:05:32,960 Speaker 4: to try to do the perfect system if we know 85 00:05:33,160 --> 00:05:35,480 Speaker 4: that we have very few years ahead of us. So 86 00:05:35,600 --> 00:05:38,880 Speaker 4: let's try to be ambitious and at the same time 87 00:05:38,920 --> 00:05:42,880 Speaker 4: to be practical and not to be unhappy in three 88 00:05:42,960 --> 00:05:46,000 Speaker 4: years when we discovered that we could have done many things. 89 00:05:46,320 --> 00:05:48,440 Speaker 4: Some of them may fail, some of them may not 90 00:05:48,560 --> 00:05:53,680 Speaker 4: have environmental integrity. But let's concentrate on the majority. They 91 00:05:53,880 --> 00:05:56,520 Speaker 4: try to have the overwhelming majority of what do we 92 00:05:56,640 --> 00:05:58,720 Speaker 4: do with environmental integrity. 93 00:05:59,200 --> 00:06:01,839 Speaker 2: The second thing on the agenda is the new Quantified 94 00:06:02,080 --> 00:06:07,719 Speaker 2: Goal on Climate finance, and that is crucial for developing 95 00:06:07,760 --> 00:06:11,480 Speaker 2: countries like Brazil, like India, but so many other developing 96 00:06:11,480 --> 00:06:17,760 Speaker 2: countries to step up their climate actions. And without a 97 00:06:17,800 --> 00:06:22,960 Speaker 2: good outcome on a larger amount of money supporting the 98 00:06:23,000 --> 00:06:27,719 Speaker 2: action of developing countries, you're not likely to get very 99 00:06:27,920 --> 00:06:33,040 Speaker 2: ambitious targets set under the nationally determined contributions, and that 100 00:06:33,120 --> 00:06:36,279 Speaker 2: will have so many downstream impacts. It will affect COP thirty, 101 00:06:36,320 --> 00:06:39,520 Speaker 2: which is going to come to Brazil. So on NCQG, 102 00:06:40,720 --> 00:06:43,400 Speaker 2: where do you think things stand right now and how 103 00:06:45,080 --> 00:06:47,400 Speaker 2: much of an ambitious deal could we get? 104 00:06:48,360 --> 00:06:50,040 Speaker 1: We're not in the right direction. 105 00:06:50,400 --> 00:06:53,720 Speaker 4: That I think is quite clear, and I think that 106 00:06:54,279 --> 00:06:59,640 Speaker 4: we have to understand the Convention. Although we are all 107 00:06:59,720 --> 00:07:04,120 Speaker 4: de developing countries under a certain category in the Convention, 108 00:07:04,240 --> 00:07:08,560 Speaker 4: but the truth is that you have some very low 109 00:07:08,640 --> 00:07:13,000 Speaker 4: income countries that really need full support. That it's even 110 00:07:13,040 --> 00:07:16,600 Speaker 4: absurd to think that they have to mitigate when they 111 00:07:16,640 --> 00:07:20,560 Speaker 4: are absolutely not responsible for emissions and they have to 112 00:07:20,640 --> 00:07:22,840 Speaker 4: take care of schools, they have to take care of 113 00:07:23,280 --> 00:07:27,000 Speaker 4: health and other things, and their action is not going 114 00:07:27,040 --> 00:07:30,840 Speaker 4: to have such a big impact because they emit very little. 115 00:07:30,880 --> 00:07:34,120 Speaker 4: It's very unfair somehow. And then you have the middle 116 00:07:34,160 --> 00:07:39,040 Speaker 4: income developing countries like Brazil, like Indonesia, like India, and 117 00:07:39,200 --> 00:07:42,840 Speaker 4: we can do a lot to mitigate climate change, and 118 00:07:42,920 --> 00:07:46,360 Speaker 4: we are doing a lot to mitigate climate change, and 119 00:07:46,560 --> 00:07:50,680 Speaker 4: the sums that we're talking about under the NCQG is 120 00:07:50,840 --> 00:07:54,440 Speaker 4: very far from what we know is reality. Most of 121 00:07:54,480 --> 00:07:56,800 Speaker 4: the studies have been showing that we're going to need 122 00:07:56,880 --> 00:08:01,600 Speaker 4: trillians and we're talking about some one hundred billions that 123 00:08:01,720 --> 00:08:04,160 Speaker 4: are very necessary. I'm not going to say they are 124 00:08:04,200 --> 00:08:09,440 Speaker 4: not necessary, but they are not the full solution. And 125 00:08:09,480 --> 00:08:14,360 Speaker 4: then you have to organize the finance in a way 126 00:08:14,520 --> 00:08:18,480 Speaker 4: that it can fulfill the needs of the lower income countries, 127 00:08:18,520 --> 00:08:22,160 Speaker 4: which I think the NCQG can deal with that. But 128 00:08:22,320 --> 00:08:25,600 Speaker 4: we need much more money for these middle income countries 129 00:08:25,920 --> 00:08:29,040 Speaker 4: to do what they need to do, and this is 130 00:08:29,080 --> 00:08:31,480 Speaker 4: not going to come in the NCQG. I don't see 131 00:08:31,520 --> 00:08:36,080 Speaker 4: the developed countries having the same sense of urgency that 132 00:08:36,160 --> 00:08:41,640 Speaker 4: they proclaim as climate change. Oh, the PROCLAIMATY is very 133 00:08:41,640 --> 00:08:44,880 Speaker 4: close it's very close, but the this urgency is not 134 00:08:45,320 --> 00:08:49,200 Speaker 4: in the finances. You don't see the same sense of urgency. 135 00:08:49,440 --> 00:08:53,079 Speaker 4: So what do countries like in the Indonesia and Brazil, 136 00:08:53,160 --> 00:08:57,360 Speaker 4: for instance, do Brazil worked on that very hard on 137 00:08:57,400 --> 00:08:59,800 Speaker 4: the G twenty in our presidency of the G twenty, 138 00:09:00,679 --> 00:09:06,559 Speaker 4: and how much we have to mainstream climates into investments 139 00:09:06,559 --> 00:09:12,679 Speaker 4: in general and not in specific funds. We are huge economies, 140 00:09:13,360 --> 00:09:16,000 Speaker 4: the developing countries that are in the G twenty, and 141 00:09:16,160 --> 00:09:19,240 Speaker 4: we perfectly understand that it's not going to be grants. 142 00:09:19,280 --> 00:09:21,040 Speaker 1: It's not going to be that that is going to 143 00:09:21,040 --> 00:09:22,080 Speaker 1: solve our issue. 144 00:09:22,200 --> 00:09:26,240 Speaker 4: The problem is that we pay too much for foreign capital. 145 00:09:27,040 --> 00:09:30,520 Speaker 4: We cannot afford to pay. It's completely absurd that we 146 00:09:30,640 --> 00:09:33,319 Speaker 4: have to pay such a high price to have this capital. 147 00:09:33,440 --> 00:09:36,599 Speaker 4: So we have to work on many fields. So the 148 00:09:36,720 --> 00:09:40,120 Speaker 4: NCQG is one of them. Is extremely important, but we 149 00:09:40,240 --> 00:09:43,920 Speaker 4: also have to be practical and think that we have 150 00:09:44,120 --> 00:09:45,319 Speaker 4: very few years ahead of it. 151 00:09:45,480 --> 00:09:49,120 Speaker 2: Yes, So if I am hearing you right, you're saying NCQG, 152 00:09:49,320 --> 00:09:52,240 Speaker 2: the needs are clearly in the trillions, but there is 153 00:09:53,280 --> 00:09:58,280 Speaker 2: very little possibility or political feasibility of the trillions being approved. 154 00:09:58,840 --> 00:10:01,640 Speaker 2: But the hundreds of billions may get approved, and that 155 00:10:01,720 --> 00:10:03,959 Speaker 2: means the gap has to be filled in other ways, 156 00:10:04,400 --> 00:10:06,520 Speaker 2: and those other ways are what. 157 00:10:07,400 --> 00:10:11,480 Speaker 4: The other ways are the mainstream of the economy. Countries 158 00:10:11,559 --> 00:10:15,080 Speaker 4: like Brazil, Indonesia or India, we are very investible countries. 159 00:10:15,160 --> 00:10:17,120 Speaker 4: I mean, there are many things to be done in 160 00:10:17,160 --> 00:10:20,520 Speaker 4: our countries, and our economies are huge and our population 161 00:10:20,679 --> 00:10:25,280 Speaker 4: is huge, and so we have to lower the cost 162 00:10:25,320 --> 00:10:29,839 Speaker 4: of capital I think will have an amazing impact. Then 163 00:10:30,120 --> 00:10:35,320 Speaker 4: you have also to recognize that countries like ours, including China, 164 00:10:35,440 --> 00:10:39,280 Speaker 4: we've been doing so many things inside our country without 165 00:10:39,720 --> 00:10:45,160 Speaker 4: foreign support, and this is never taken into consideration. For instance, 166 00:10:45,240 --> 00:10:49,920 Speaker 4: fighting deforestation in Brazil, ninety percent of what we spend 167 00:10:50,160 --> 00:10:54,000 Speaker 4: is from our budget, is not international support. So this 168 00:10:54,200 --> 00:10:58,120 Speaker 4: recognition of what we're doing and the importance that we 169 00:10:58,240 --> 00:11:02,000 Speaker 4: invest in our own effort to combat climate change is 170 00:11:02,040 --> 00:11:05,679 Speaker 4: not taken into consideration. So there is this very strange 171 00:11:05,720 --> 00:11:10,560 Speaker 4: idea of increasing the donor base, which is completely getting 172 00:11:10,600 --> 00:11:13,160 Speaker 4: out of the main subject. The main subject is what 173 00:11:14,120 --> 00:11:17,600 Speaker 4: are the developed countries going to provide for the developing 174 00:11:17,640 --> 00:11:19,920 Speaker 4: countries under the rules of the Paris Accord. 175 00:11:21,240 --> 00:11:24,280 Speaker 2: But are there steps that can be taken or are 176 00:11:24,360 --> 00:11:27,520 Speaker 2: being taken to lower the cost of capital coming into Brazil, 177 00:11:27,640 --> 00:11:28,800 Speaker 2: India and Indonesia. 178 00:11:28,840 --> 00:11:31,200 Speaker 4: We are trying in the G twenty. I think that 179 00:11:31,240 --> 00:11:35,360 Speaker 4: there was quite a good progress because we put together 180 00:11:35,559 --> 00:11:38,120 Speaker 4: for the first time in the G twenty the ministers 181 00:11:38,160 --> 00:11:42,640 Speaker 4: of finance and the central bankers talking together with their 182 00:11:42,920 --> 00:11:46,560 Speaker 4: ministers of foreign affairs and ministers of climate. And it 183 00:11:46,679 --> 00:11:49,839 Speaker 4: was quite surprising because even in the developed countries they 184 00:11:50,200 --> 00:11:53,920 Speaker 4: hardly knew each other. So I think this is a progress. 185 00:11:54,160 --> 00:11:58,640 Speaker 4: But what really drives us is the sense of urgency, 186 00:11:58,640 --> 00:12:02,760 Speaker 4: and the sense of urgency cannot only be in ambition. Yeah, 187 00:12:02,960 --> 00:12:05,360 Speaker 4: it has to be finance, it has to be action. 188 00:12:05,640 --> 00:12:07,640 Speaker 2: Where is the next G twenty happening. 189 00:12:07,920 --> 00:12:09,000 Speaker 1: In South Africa? 190 00:12:09,120 --> 00:12:12,880 Speaker 2: So that's great, But I hear that the South African 191 00:12:13,320 --> 00:12:16,560 Speaker 2: economy ministry and the finance ministry do not get on 192 00:12:16,640 --> 00:12:18,760 Speaker 2: with each other, so they might not do what you 193 00:12:18,960 --> 00:12:22,560 Speaker 2: did so successfully under the Brazil G twenty. Is that right? 194 00:12:23,120 --> 00:12:24,840 Speaker 1: I think that. 195 00:12:26,679 --> 00:12:30,600 Speaker 4: I have to tell you that the biggest differences between 196 00:12:30,840 --> 00:12:34,480 Speaker 4: finance ministries and climate ministries that I saw in the 197 00:12:34,559 --> 00:12:36,960 Speaker 4: G twenty was in some European countries. 198 00:12:39,520 --> 00:12:43,880 Speaker 2: So do you think given the tense negotiations which is 199 00:12:43,920 --> 00:12:47,080 Speaker 2: the case every comp but especially when it comes to money, 200 00:12:47,120 --> 00:12:49,079 Speaker 2: and there's sorts of money. We are talking at COP 201 00:12:49,160 --> 00:12:51,320 Speaker 2: twenty nine. Do you think there will be a deal 202 00:12:51,360 --> 00:12:51,880 Speaker 2: at the end? 203 00:12:53,080 --> 00:12:57,000 Speaker 4: I do hope that because I hope that for two reasons, 204 00:12:57,040 --> 00:13:01,200 Speaker 4: First as a citizen of the planet and second because 205 00:13:01,200 --> 00:13:04,360 Speaker 4: Brazil is going to preside the next COP, so we 206 00:13:04,400 --> 00:13:06,480 Speaker 4: need a successful COP twenty nine. 207 00:13:06,720 --> 00:13:11,439 Speaker 2: So between now and the next COP, Donald Trump is 208 00:13:11,480 --> 00:13:14,520 Speaker 2: going to come to power, and he has said that 209 00:13:14,600 --> 00:13:16,520 Speaker 2: he will pull the US out of the Paris Agreement, 210 00:13:16,600 --> 00:13:19,240 Speaker 2: which is something he did in his first term in 211 00:13:19,280 --> 00:13:23,679 Speaker 2: twenty seventeen. Last time around, the impact wasn't very much 212 00:13:23,800 --> 00:13:26,920 Speaker 2: because of rules. He only left in November twenty twenty 213 00:13:26,960 --> 00:13:30,240 Speaker 2: and jan twenty twenty one, Joe Biden joined the US 214 00:13:30,400 --> 00:13:33,600 Speaker 2: into the Paris Agreement again. This time he can have 215 00:13:34,120 --> 00:13:36,560 Speaker 2: much greater impact because he will leave within a year, 216 00:13:36,880 --> 00:13:38,920 Speaker 2: and he could pull the US out of the UN 217 00:13:38,960 --> 00:13:43,280 Speaker 2: Climate Treaty altogether. So when you meet your US counterparts 218 00:13:43,320 --> 00:13:46,200 Speaker 2: right now who are from the Biden administration, do you 219 00:13:46,240 --> 00:13:47,160 Speaker 2: take them seriously? 220 00:13:48,320 --> 00:13:54,000 Speaker 4: I take them very seriously because they are really serious negotiators. 221 00:13:54,320 --> 00:13:59,040 Speaker 4: But we have to try to find a new way 222 00:13:59,040 --> 00:14:02,480 Speaker 4: of dealing with the US. But we cannot think that 223 00:14:02,559 --> 00:14:05,640 Speaker 4: the US is just the government of the US. The 224 00:14:05,760 --> 00:14:11,480 Speaker 4: US is universities, scientists, states, cities, and many of them, 225 00:14:11,640 --> 00:14:15,040 Speaker 4: most of them believe in climate change and believe that 226 00:14:15,080 --> 00:14:18,200 Speaker 4: things have to be done. So if you just take California, 227 00:14:18,280 --> 00:14:20,720 Speaker 4: it's one of the biggest economies in the world. So 228 00:14:21,040 --> 00:14:25,240 Speaker 4: if you concentrate your efforts on the sectors of the 229 00:14:25,400 --> 00:14:29,120 Speaker 4: US that can contribute to this debate, it's already a lot. 230 00:14:29,360 --> 00:14:31,680 Speaker 4: It's obvious that it would be much better to have 231 00:14:32,080 --> 00:14:36,320 Speaker 4: the whole government together. Now, what I also believe is 232 00:14:36,360 --> 00:14:42,400 Speaker 4: that even the most anti climate personality in America or 233 00:14:42,400 --> 00:14:47,960 Speaker 4: whatever will rethink about it if he sees that he 234 00:14:48,040 --> 00:14:53,840 Speaker 4: can have profits working with climate change. So see for instance, Texas. 235 00:14:53,920 --> 00:14:57,880 Speaker 4: Texas has become one of the states of the United 236 00:14:57,920 --> 00:15:01,760 Speaker 4: States that uses most renewables, with the wind energy, with 237 00:15:01,920 --> 00:15:06,120 Speaker 4: solar energy. Why it's not an ideological decision like people 238 00:15:06,200 --> 00:15:10,840 Speaker 4: say that California is. This was exclusively because of the cost, 239 00:15:11,040 --> 00:15:14,760 Speaker 4: because it was a good business. So for those who 240 00:15:14,800 --> 00:15:19,640 Speaker 4: don't believe in those discussions, let's talk with the language 241 00:15:19,760 --> 00:15:25,120 Speaker 4: of business with others. Let's talk with the appropriate language of. 242 00:15:25,200 --> 00:15:28,240 Speaker 2: Chun see there is a deal a chapter twenty nine 243 00:15:28,280 --> 00:15:30,520 Speaker 2: on the NCQG, and then the US pulls out of 244 00:15:30,520 --> 00:15:33,800 Speaker 2: the Paris Agreement. The US is the world's largest economy, 245 00:15:34,160 --> 00:15:37,800 Speaker 2: it would, I believe, have to promise the largest sum 246 00:15:37,840 --> 00:15:41,040 Speaker 2: to be given under the NCQG. If the US gets out, 247 00:15:41,160 --> 00:15:42,640 Speaker 2: what happens to the NCQG. 248 00:15:43,320 --> 00:15:48,240 Speaker 4: I think that it would be quite logical not to 249 00:15:48,440 --> 00:15:51,600 Speaker 4: expect the US to be one of the main funders 250 00:15:51,600 --> 00:15:52,840 Speaker 4: of the NCQG. 251 00:15:52,640 --> 00:15:55,160 Speaker 2: Even now, So going into the deal, you don't think that'll. 252 00:15:54,960 --> 00:15:59,520 Speaker 4: Happen, because even if you're negotiating with the bide and administration, 253 00:15:59,680 --> 00:16:03,480 Speaker 4: the truth is that the signs that President Trump has 254 00:16:03,520 --> 00:16:06,440 Speaker 4: already shown are very clear. 255 00:16:07,560 --> 00:16:11,280 Speaker 2: And so if what happens at the NSQG and the 256 00:16:11,440 --> 00:16:17,960 Speaker 2: US is backtracking from its commitments shows up at COP thirty, 257 00:16:18,480 --> 00:16:20,760 Speaker 2: how are you going to make sure COP thirty is 258 00:16:20,760 --> 00:16:24,080 Speaker 2: a success. Because the NCQG will be a challenge. Not 259 00:16:24,240 --> 00:16:28,480 Speaker 2: enough countries will have submitted ambitious NDCs. They will look 260 00:16:28,520 --> 00:16:32,120 Speaker 2: at the US, the world's largest historical emitter, and say 261 00:16:33,240 --> 00:16:36,280 Speaker 2: they're out, why should we contribute? And you get into 262 00:16:36,320 --> 00:16:39,000 Speaker 2: a new, bigger fight when you come to COP thirty. 263 00:16:39,040 --> 00:16:40,800 Speaker 2: So what are you doing now to avoid that. 264 00:16:41,920 --> 00:16:44,520 Speaker 4: Well, I think we cannot avoid that. We have to 265 00:16:44,600 --> 00:16:47,720 Speaker 4: deal with that, and so we'll have to find some 266 00:16:48,480 --> 00:16:54,760 Speaker 4: intelligence answers to those intelligent questions. But that is reality. 267 00:16:54,960 --> 00:16:57,880 Speaker 4: We have to face reality, like climate change if you 268 00:16:57,960 --> 00:17:00,880 Speaker 4: believe in it. So it's a big challenge, there is 269 00:17:00,920 --> 00:17:01,760 Speaker 4: no doubt about it. 270 00:17:07,359 --> 00:17:10,680 Speaker 2: After the break, more from my conversation with Brazilian Secretary 271 00:17:10,680 --> 00:17:13,679 Speaker 2: for Climate, Energy and the Environment Andre Corea the logo. 272 00:17:14,760 --> 00:17:15,640 Speaker 3: By the way, if you've. 273 00:17:15,560 --> 00:17:17,840 Speaker 2: Been enjoying this episode, please take a moment to rate 274 00:17:17,880 --> 00:17:20,679 Speaker 2: and review the show on Apple Podcasts and Spotify. It 275 00:17:20,760 --> 00:17:22,320 Speaker 2: helps other listeners find the show. 276 00:17:29,840 --> 00:17:30,040 Speaker 3: Now. 277 00:17:30,080 --> 00:17:35,320 Speaker 2: Cop thirty is currently scheduled to happen in Bellm. We 278 00:17:35,520 --> 00:17:39,880 Speaker 2: just got attendance figures today and there are expecting fifty 279 00:17:40,040 --> 00:17:42,760 Speaker 2: two thousand people coming to this cup. Now, this is 280 00:17:42,760 --> 00:17:45,520 Speaker 2: the capital of a country. It's a small country, but 281 00:17:45,560 --> 00:17:47,400 Speaker 2: it's the capital of a country, and you are able 282 00:17:47,440 --> 00:17:50,760 Speaker 2: to manage that crowd. My understanding is Bellm is a 283 00:17:50,840 --> 00:17:53,760 Speaker 2: really good place to go to just understand what the 284 00:17:53,800 --> 00:17:58,240 Speaker 2: amazon is, but it's not got the capacity to host 285 00:17:58,400 --> 00:18:02,640 Speaker 2: fifty thousand people, let alone eighty thousand people which showed 286 00:18:02,720 --> 00:18:05,879 Speaker 2: up in Dubai. So what is the plan currently for 287 00:18:06,119 --> 00:18:07,960 Speaker 2: COP thirty in Brazil? 288 00:18:08,160 --> 00:18:13,159 Speaker 4: In Belem, the plan is to have a COP that 289 00:18:13,920 --> 00:18:19,639 Speaker 4: is proportional to what the city can offer, but also 290 00:18:19,800 --> 00:18:23,359 Speaker 4: a COP that will leave a very positive legacy to 291 00:18:23,440 --> 00:18:28,960 Speaker 4: the city. So we cannot build pharonic things just for 292 00:18:29,040 --> 00:18:31,919 Speaker 4: a COP. If we are going to improve the city 293 00:18:31,960 --> 00:18:35,200 Speaker 4: for the COP, it's to improve the city itself and 294 00:18:35,560 --> 00:18:38,720 Speaker 4: there will be a legacy for the population. Now, we're 295 00:18:38,760 --> 00:18:41,760 Speaker 4: going to have to do it differently, obviously very differently 296 00:18:42,200 --> 00:18:47,119 Speaker 4: than Dubai was or what Baku is operating, but you 297 00:18:47,200 --> 00:18:51,399 Speaker 4: can be sure that we will be very transparent about 298 00:18:51,440 --> 00:18:52,960 Speaker 4: what is possible. 299 00:18:52,760 --> 00:18:54,679 Speaker 1: To have in Berlin. 300 00:18:55,440 --> 00:18:58,880 Speaker 4: We have a full team of the people that are 301 00:18:58,960 --> 00:19:03,399 Speaker 4: organizing the billain here seeing all the challenges that we 302 00:19:03,480 --> 00:19:08,320 Speaker 4: will have to face. But the symbolism of having it 303 00:19:08,400 --> 00:19:13,000 Speaker 4: in the Amazon, and the fact that Brazil is developing 304 00:19:13,040 --> 00:19:18,800 Speaker 4: countries with many success stories but also with huge challenges, 305 00:19:18,840 --> 00:19:22,119 Speaker 4: and the fact that Brazil assumes to do it in 306 00:19:22,200 --> 00:19:27,719 Speaker 4: a complex place, I think it has a fantastic political power. 307 00:19:28,280 --> 00:19:30,960 Speaker 4: We are not trying to hide the problems we have 308 00:19:31,119 --> 00:19:35,600 Speaker 4: and as you know, deforestation is our main source of emissions. 309 00:19:35,600 --> 00:19:39,320 Speaker 4: We have a very strange profile of emissions. So we 310 00:19:39,359 --> 00:19:42,360 Speaker 4: are taking the world to the place where we have 311 00:19:42,560 --> 00:19:46,080 Speaker 4: our biggest source of emission, and we're going to show 312 00:19:46,119 --> 00:19:49,560 Speaker 4: to the world how complex the Amazon region is. With 313 00:19:50,000 --> 00:19:53,080 Speaker 4: the best food in Brazil on one side, the most 314 00:19:53,200 --> 00:19:57,679 Speaker 4: beautiful natural place you can imagine, but a city that 315 00:19:57,760 --> 00:20:01,720 Speaker 4: still has lots of very strong social challenges. So I 316 00:20:01,760 --> 00:20:05,720 Speaker 4: think that it is quite refreshing to have a country. 317 00:20:05,760 --> 00:20:08,960 Speaker 4: Obviously I'm suspicious because I'm Brazilian, but I'm quite proud 318 00:20:09,040 --> 00:20:12,320 Speaker 4: of being a country that doesn't hide its problem. It's 319 00:20:12,359 --> 00:20:15,159 Speaker 4: a country that is showing the world it's problems and 320 00:20:15,280 --> 00:20:18,440 Speaker 4: let's try to work on that. Everybody has its problem 321 00:20:18,680 --> 00:20:22,679 Speaker 4: and we are showing ours very clearly to everybody. 322 00:20:22,680 --> 00:20:24,720 Speaker 2: So how many people do you think, well them will 323 00:20:24,760 --> 00:20:25,920 Speaker 2: be able to fit. 324 00:20:27,080 --> 00:20:31,320 Speaker 4: I think that the organizers are working on fifty thousand people. 325 00:20:31,520 --> 00:20:35,600 Speaker 4: They are working on fifty thousands, but President Lula wants 326 00:20:36,240 --> 00:20:42,239 Speaker 4: very strong participation of civil society, so we'll have to 327 00:20:42,359 --> 00:20:46,160 Speaker 4: measure how many people. I mean, because the negotiators, as 328 00:20:46,160 --> 00:20:48,760 Speaker 4: you know, is something that doesn't move very much, is 329 00:20:48,800 --> 00:20:52,760 Speaker 4: around twenty thousand people. Then you have the UNFCCC staff 330 00:20:52,840 --> 00:20:55,919 Speaker 4: is one hundred, there's like eight hundred two thousand people, 331 00:20:56,720 --> 00:21:01,080 Speaker 4: So we're dealing with the realistic numbers. But President Lula 332 00:21:01,119 --> 00:21:04,359 Speaker 4: doesn't want, you know, to let's have less people from 333 00:21:04,440 --> 00:21:08,480 Speaker 4: civil society. No, we need lots of presence and citizens. 334 00:21:08,920 --> 00:21:09,200 Speaker 1: Yeah. 335 00:21:09,280 --> 00:21:14,439 Speaker 2: Now Brazil produces more oil than the UAE does, and 336 00:21:14,520 --> 00:21:19,399 Speaker 2: President Lula has asked Petro Brass to produce even more oil. 337 00:21:19,960 --> 00:21:21,760 Speaker 2: How is that going to play in your NBC? 338 00:21:22,560 --> 00:21:28,240 Speaker 4: We have to deal with this very, very challenging reality 339 00:21:28,480 --> 00:21:33,359 Speaker 4: is that last year Brazil's main expert was oil. So 340 00:21:33,960 --> 00:21:37,680 Speaker 4: from an economic point of view, this is obviously interpreted 341 00:21:37,800 --> 00:21:42,680 Speaker 4: by most of the Brazilians as something that we didn't expect. 342 00:21:43,080 --> 00:21:48,320 Speaker 4: And this only happened because of the incredible technological progress 343 00:21:48,440 --> 00:21:52,399 Speaker 4: of Petro Brass that is looking for oil in places 344 00:21:52,720 --> 00:21:59,840 Speaker 4: that are extremely complex and technologically difficult places to exploit oil. 345 00:22:00,119 --> 00:22:03,280 Speaker 4: So there is a part of Brazil that is extremely 346 00:22:03,400 --> 00:22:07,800 Speaker 4: proud of Petrobrias to have found oil in such deep areas. 347 00:22:08,000 --> 00:22:11,400 Speaker 4: And then on the other side, we all are conscious 348 00:22:11,440 --> 00:22:14,240 Speaker 4: that we have to transition away from fossil fuels. So 349 00:22:14,760 --> 00:22:16,919 Speaker 4: this is the big debate we're going to have in 350 00:22:16,960 --> 00:22:20,280 Speaker 4: Brazil next year because we have to arrive at COP 351 00:22:20,359 --> 00:22:25,160 Speaker 4: thirty lead by example as our Minister of the environment, 352 00:22:25,200 --> 00:22:27,720 Speaker 4: but in a silver always says so. 353 00:22:28,000 --> 00:22:32,320 Speaker 2: Over here, you're hoping there will be a big financing 354 00:22:32,400 --> 00:22:36,280 Speaker 2: push that will hopefully make it possible for countries to 355 00:22:36,320 --> 00:22:42,320 Speaker 2: come with new ambitions in bellum at COP thirty. What 356 00:22:42,440 --> 00:22:45,760 Speaker 2: other metrics are you setting for success? First is that 357 00:22:45,800 --> 00:22:49,240 Speaker 2: countries need to come up with new ambition with goals 358 00:22:49,320 --> 00:22:51,959 Speaker 2: set out to twenty thirty five and ideally start to 359 00:22:52,359 --> 00:22:54,679 Speaker 2: finally reduce emissions that paces needed. 360 00:22:55,240 --> 00:22:56,600 Speaker 3: What are the other priorities? 361 00:22:57,240 --> 00:22:59,920 Speaker 4: I think that to try to make it as simple 362 00:23:00,080 --> 00:23:05,840 Speaker 4: as possible, we feel that urgency has to be everywhere 363 00:23:06,000 --> 00:23:09,840 Speaker 4: when we talk about climate change. So this is a 364 00:23:10,000 --> 00:23:14,200 Speaker 4: progress in these debates that will make a huge difference. 365 00:23:14,200 --> 00:23:16,720 Speaker 4: So it's not only the an f c C. It's 366 00:23:16,760 --> 00:23:21,400 Speaker 4: not only the Paris Accord. It's the economy in general. 367 00:23:21,520 --> 00:23:24,080 Speaker 4: It's the behavior of people that have to take into 368 00:23:24,240 --> 00:23:31,040 Speaker 4: consideration the urgency, economic theory, ministries of finance, ministries of transportation. 369 00:23:31,119 --> 00:23:34,040 Speaker 4: I mean it's not that's the sense of the n 370 00:23:34,119 --> 00:23:37,960 Speaker 4: dissies is that the ndsies create a number that is 371 00:23:38,000 --> 00:23:40,680 Speaker 4: an objective, and each country is going to find its 372 00:23:40,800 --> 00:23:44,320 Speaker 4: way to reach it, and we have to do it 373 00:23:44,400 --> 00:23:47,639 Speaker 4: together because, as you are saying, if the richest country 374 00:23:47,680 --> 00:23:51,240 Speaker 4: in the world is going to backtrack maybe on some 375 00:23:51,320 --> 00:23:54,800 Speaker 4: of its commitments, why the others are going to follow. 376 00:23:54,840 --> 00:23:58,120 Speaker 4: So we have to build something really strong in which 377 00:23:58,200 --> 00:24:02,399 Speaker 4: the world is con vinced of the urgency. How are 378 00:24:02,440 --> 00:24:05,760 Speaker 4: we going to do that this? I cannot give you 379 00:24:05,800 --> 00:24:06,800 Speaker 4: the answer now. 380 00:24:07,200 --> 00:24:11,359 Speaker 2: So in a way, now COP thirty becomes how to 381 00:24:11,440 --> 00:24:15,960 Speaker 2: defend the climate consensus even as the US leaves the 382 00:24:16,000 --> 00:24:16,720 Speaker 2: paras of card. 383 00:24:16,960 --> 00:24:19,720 Speaker 4: Yeah, but remember that when we say the US is 384 00:24:19,840 --> 00:24:23,160 Speaker 4: leaving US, scientists are not living US. 385 00:24:23,320 --> 00:24:24,639 Speaker 1: Business is not living. 386 00:24:24,920 --> 00:24:29,720 Speaker 4: And we have to think that the symbolic billionaire that 387 00:24:29,960 --> 00:24:33,960 Speaker 4: supports President Trump is eln Musk. Elon Musk is the 388 00:24:34,040 --> 00:24:37,600 Speaker 4: guy that made America fall in love with electric cars. 389 00:24:37,840 --> 00:24:43,400 Speaker 4: So there are many dimensions in America. We cannot oversimplify 390 00:24:43,480 --> 00:24:47,080 Speaker 4: what it is. And I mean, if the oil companies 391 00:24:47,720 --> 00:24:53,120 Speaker 4: find a way of contributing to the transition away from 392 00:24:53,240 --> 00:24:57,400 Speaker 4: fossil fuels, that would be super welcome. I mean everybody 393 00:24:57,480 --> 00:25:01,879 Speaker 4: has to come with solution in their own way, in 394 00:25:02,000 --> 00:25:07,199 Speaker 4: a reasonable with reasonable costs, and with reasonable social costs. 395 00:25:07,200 --> 00:25:09,480 Speaker 4: Because we have seen in some countries that the fight 396 00:25:09,520 --> 00:25:12,800 Speaker 4: against climate change has made some of the basic services 397 00:25:12,840 --> 00:25:15,679 Speaker 4: more expensive. This is not the solution. You lose the 398 00:25:15,760 --> 00:25:18,080 Speaker 4: support of the population for this fight. 399 00:25:18,359 --> 00:25:20,880 Speaker 2: So I'm looking forward to the new Brazil climate plan. 400 00:25:21,640 --> 00:25:27,159 Speaker 2: But given Petrobrass's state backed are we also going to 401 00:25:27,200 --> 00:25:30,920 Speaker 2: see a new climate plan from your state backed oil company. 402 00:25:31,760 --> 00:25:35,760 Speaker 1: Ah, that's a good question. Let's talk to Peter Brass together. 403 00:25:36,840 --> 00:25:38,040 Speaker 2: Thank you for coming on the show. 404 00:25:38,320 --> 00:25:48,760 Speaker 3: Thank you very much, thank you for listening to zero. 405 00:25:49,160 --> 00:25:59,800 Speaker 2: And now for the sound of the week. This is 406 00:25:59,800 --> 00:26:04,959 Speaker 2: this sound of cop. Every year, almost always, there is 407 00:26:05,560 --> 00:26:11,160 Speaker 2: wooden flooring newly put to turn something into a cop 408 00:26:11,400 --> 00:26:15,879 Speaker 2: venue and have thousands and thousands of people walk across it, 409 00:26:16,280 --> 00:26:27,040 Speaker 2: making this drumbeat of a noise that's the sound of 410 00:26:27,040 --> 00:26:31,760 Speaker 2: the footsteps inside the Bako Olympic Stadium, the drumbeat. 411 00:26:31,440 --> 00:26:33,600 Speaker 3: That dictates the pace of negotiations. 412 00:26:35,800 --> 00:26:37,760 Speaker 2: If you liked this episode, please take a moment to 413 00:26:37,840 --> 00:26:40,480 Speaker 2: rate or review the show on Apple Podcasts and Spotify. 414 00:26:40,920 --> 00:26:43,800 Speaker 2: Also check out Bloombergreens coverage of COP twenty nine. It's 415 00:26:43,880 --> 00:26:47,080 Speaker 2: free to read, share this episode with a friend or 416 00:26:47,119 --> 00:26:49,360 Speaker 2: with someone who is ready to plan a trip to. 417 00:26:49,320 --> 00:26:50,720 Speaker 3: Brazil in twenty twenty five. 418 00:26:51,440 --> 00:26:53,600 Speaker 2: You can get in touch at zero Pod at bloomberg 419 00:26:53,640 --> 00:26:57,000 Speaker 2: dot net. Zero's producer is might Lee Row. Bloomberg's head 420 00:26:57,000 --> 00:26:59,520 Speaker 2: a podcast is Sage Bowman and head of Talk is 421 00:26:59,520 --> 00:27:03,040 Speaker 2: Brendan You Know Ar. Theme music is composed by wonder Lee. 422 00:27:03,760 --> 00:27:08,760 Speaker 2: Special thanks to Simone Iglesias, Chowan Wagner, Ethan Steinberg, Blake 423 00:27:08,840 --> 00:27:13,080 Speaker 2: Maples and Jessica benk I am Akshatrati Back soon