WEBVTT - Hey, Facebook: What’s that smell?, Part 2

0:00:00.240 --> 0:00:04.240
<v Speaker 1>I started Facebook, I run it, and I'm responsible for

0:00:04.280 --> 0:00:08.680
<v Speaker 1>what happens here. Whistle blower Francis Halgan insisting Congress must

0:00:08.760 --> 0:00:11.960
<v Speaker 1>act against a company she says is misleading the public

0:00:12.200 --> 0:00:17.600
<v Speaker 1>promoting hateful and harmful content. She laid ultimate responsibility on

0:00:17.640 --> 0:00:23.440
<v Speaker 1>Facebook founder and CEO Marcus Zuckerberg. Since we wrapped our

0:00:23.480 --> 0:00:27.760
<v Speaker 1>first episode on Facebook, it's been revealed that hell bent

0:00:27.880 --> 0:00:32.239
<v Speaker 1>on growth, Facebook leadership actually knew of the harm that

0:00:32.280 --> 0:00:36.559
<v Speaker 1>they were causing users and they didn't care. So in

0:00:36.600 --> 0:00:40.400
<v Speaker 1>this episode, we continue our exploration of events and learn

0:00:40.479 --> 0:00:44.680
<v Speaker 1>how this information affects Facebook's b S score. And if

0:00:44.680 --> 0:00:47.560
<v Speaker 1>you haven't listened to part one, it's in your feed now.

0:00:47.920 --> 0:00:59.120
<v Speaker 1>We'll be right here when you come back. Welcome to

0:00:59.280 --> 0:01:03.920
<v Speaker 1>Calling bull Shit, the podcast about purpose washing, the gap

0:01:04.000 --> 0:01:07.160
<v Speaker 1>between what companies say they stand for and what they

0:01:07.200 --> 0:01:10.200
<v Speaker 1>actually do and what they would need to change to

0:01:10.280 --> 0:01:14.320
<v Speaker 1>practice what they preach. I'm your host, time Ontogue, and

0:01:14.600 --> 0:01:17.720
<v Speaker 1>I've spent over a decade helping companies define what they

0:01:17.760 --> 0:01:21.160
<v Speaker 1>stand for, their purpose and then help them to use

0:01:21.240 --> 0:01:26.039
<v Speaker 1>that purpose to drive transformation throughout their business. Unfortunately, at

0:01:26.080 --> 0:01:28.959
<v Speaker 1>a lot of organizations today, they're still a pretty wide

0:01:29.080 --> 0:01:33.440
<v Speaker 1>gap between word. Indeed, that gap has a name. We

0:01:33.600 --> 0:01:38.960
<v Speaker 1>call it bullshit. But, and this is important, we believe

0:01:39.000 --> 0:01:42.000
<v Speaker 1>that bullshit is a treatable disease. So when the BS

0:01:42.040 --> 0:01:45.080
<v Speaker 1>detector lights up, we're going to explore things that a

0:01:45.120 --> 0:01:57.440
<v Speaker 1>company should do to fix it. Facebook says its mission

0:01:57.480 --> 0:01:59.840
<v Speaker 1>is to give people the power to build community and

0:02:00.000 --> 0:02:04.040
<v Speaker 1>bring the world closer together, and we've called bullshit on that.

0:02:04.480 --> 0:02:08.079
<v Speaker 1>In fact, in our previous Facebook episode, we gave them

0:02:08.120 --> 0:02:12.680
<v Speaker 1>a sky HIGHBS score of seventy two. But some pretty

0:02:12.720 --> 0:02:16.480
<v Speaker 1>important news has dropped since that episode wrapped, So let's

0:02:16.480 --> 0:02:21.160
<v Speaker 1>do a quick catch up. Since we left off, there's

0:02:21.200 --> 0:02:26.560
<v Speaker 1>been both good news and some seriously bad news from Facebook. First,

0:02:27.080 --> 0:02:32.400
<v Speaker 1>former Facebook data scientist Sophie Young came forward. Sophie says

0:02:32.440 --> 0:02:36.160
<v Speaker 1>that while working there, she noticed political parties across twenty

0:02:36.200 --> 0:02:40.400
<v Speaker 1>five countries had been manipulating Facebook to mislaid and in

0:02:40.480 --> 0:02:45.800
<v Speaker 1>some cases harass it's our in citizens in fairness. Facebook

0:02:45.840 --> 0:02:48.800
<v Speaker 1>then took a step in the right direction by creating

0:02:48.840 --> 0:02:53.320
<v Speaker 1>an independent advisory board, similar to what Cameron Ashgar, founder

0:02:53.360 --> 0:02:57.280
<v Speaker 1>of Cross Media, suggested in our first Facebook episode. When

0:02:57.320 --> 0:03:00.280
<v Speaker 1>I heard of its formation, I thought this might actually

0:03:00.320 --> 0:03:04.960
<v Speaker 1>be a turning point, but then the hammer fell. This

0:03:05.240 --> 0:03:09.200
<v Speaker 1>is the Facebook Files, a series from the Journal. We're

0:03:09.240 --> 0:03:15.520
<v Speaker 1>looking deep inside Facebook through its own internal documents. Francis Hogan,

0:03:16.000 --> 0:03:20.200
<v Speaker 1>a product manager in Facebook's civic Integrity unit, left the

0:03:20.200 --> 0:03:24.640
<v Speaker 1>company in May, taking internal documents with her. She delivered

0:03:24.639 --> 0:03:27.960
<v Speaker 1>those documents to the Wall Street Journal and law enforcement,

0:03:28.160 --> 0:03:32.760
<v Speaker 1>giving us an unprecedented look inside Facebook. The thing I

0:03:32.800 --> 0:03:35.640
<v Speaker 1>saw Facebook over and over again was there were conflicts

0:03:35.640 --> 0:03:39.840
<v Speaker 1>of interest between what was good for the public and

0:03:39.880 --> 0:03:42.760
<v Speaker 1>what was good for Facebook, and Facebook over and over

0:03:42.800 --> 0:03:45.480
<v Speaker 1>again chose to optimize for its own interests, like making

0:03:45.520 --> 0:03:48.960
<v Speaker 1>more money. In October, how Can testified to Congress that

0:03:49.040 --> 0:03:53.160
<v Speaker 1>Facebook had extensive research on all of the problems and

0:03:53.320 --> 0:03:58.040
<v Speaker 1>negative effects of their platforms, from misinformation on Facebook to

0:03:58.160 --> 0:04:02.840
<v Speaker 1>toxic Instagram content target young female users. Not only did

0:04:02.920 --> 0:04:07.440
<v Speaker 1>they know, they chose to do nothing about it. The

0:04:07.480 --> 0:04:10.960
<v Speaker 1>only way we can move forward and heal Facebook as

0:04:11.000 --> 0:04:13.760
<v Speaker 1>we first left him in the truth. Either way we'll

0:04:13.800 --> 0:04:16.760
<v Speaker 1>have reconciliation and we can move forward is by first

0:04:16.760 --> 0:04:20.200
<v Speaker 1>being honest and declaring world bankruptcy. And the way Mark

0:04:20.279 --> 0:04:23.400
<v Speaker 1>Zuckerberg chose to move forward in the midst of their

0:04:23.480 --> 0:04:27.279
<v Speaker 1>very public trial for moral bankruptcy was to change the

0:04:27.320 --> 0:04:30.919
<v Speaker 1>company's name to reflect who we are and what we

0:04:31.000 --> 0:04:35.240
<v Speaker 1>hope to build. I am proud to announce that's starting today.

0:04:35.240 --> 0:04:41.279
<v Speaker 1>Our company is now meta. It was a head scratcher.

0:04:42.080 --> 0:04:44.640
<v Speaker 1>It's a move right out of the big tobacco playbook.

0:04:44.800 --> 0:04:48.279
<v Speaker 1>Remember when Philip Morris became Altria, and even if it

0:04:48.360 --> 0:04:52.120
<v Speaker 1>was genuine, it was pretty much guaranteed to raise suspicion

0:04:52.160 --> 0:04:58.359
<v Speaker 1>about the company, not lower it. Zuckerberg isn't going anywhere,

0:04:58.640 --> 0:05:01.120
<v Speaker 1>and he surrounded himsel off with a tight group of

0:05:01.120 --> 0:05:04.279
<v Speaker 1>people at the top who literally don't care about harming

0:05:04.279 --> 0:05:07.760
<v Speaker 1>the welfare of users, which is why we're seeing Facebook

0:05:07.800 --> 0:05:11.760
<v Speaker 1>employees like Jong and Howgan go public, joining former co

0:05:11.880 --> 0:05:15.599
<v Speaker 1>founder Chris Hughes, former investor Roger McNamee, and others in

0:05:15.760 --> 0:05:19.760
<v Speaker 1>calling for Congress to step in. But as we've seen lately,

0:05:20.080 --> 0:05:22.600
<v Speaker 1>Congress finds it hard to agree on some pretty basic

0:05:22.720 --> 0:05:26.679
<v Speaker 1>stuff like that an attack on our capitol is bad

0:05:26.800 --> 0:05:30.960
<v Speaker 1>and that voting is good, for instance. So I'm not

0:05:31.040 --> 0:05:35.960
<v Speaker 1>holding my breath. So here's the question, what the funk

0:05:36.040 --> 0:05:45.839
<v Speaker 1>do we do to try to get to the bottom

0:05:45.880 --> 0:05:48.080
<v Speaker 1>of this. I reached out to an expert who has

0:05:48.120 --> 0:05:52.279
<v Speaker 1>some unusual and I think sorely needed attributes. He's a

0:05:52.279 --> 0:05:56.360
<v Speaker 1>trained software engineer with a decidedly humanist point of view.

0:05:58.720 --> 0:06:02.320
<v Speaker 1>My guest today is the first century renaissance man, Ramash

0:06:02.520 --> 0:06:06.600
<v Speaker 1>Screeny Vazon, a Silicon Valley native U c L, A professor,

0:06:06.760 --> 0:06:12.839
<v Speaker 1>AI engineer, anthropologist, and author of several books, including Beyond

0:06:12.960 --> 0:06:16.720
<v Speaker 1>the Valley, How innovators around the World are overcoming inequality

0:06:16.800 --> 0:06:21.360
<v Speaker 1>and creating the technologies of tomorrow, and whose Global Village

0:06:21.560 --> 0:06:27.080
<v Speaker 1>rethinking how technology shapes our world. First, I want to

0:06:27.120 --> 0:06:30.719
<v Speaker 1>thank you for being here, Remage, and welcome to calling bullshit.

0:06:31.279 --> 0:06:34.080
<v Speaker 1>Thank you for having me Tie. I'm really excited to

0:06:34.080 --> 0:06:37.320
<v Speaker 1>be part of this. So before we get into the

0:06:37.360 --> 0:06:39.599
<v Speaker 1>topic of the day, which is Facebook, I'd love for

0:06:39.680 --> 0:06:43.080
<v Speaker 1>you to just introduce yourself. So I'm a very strange

0:06:43.120 --> 0:06:46.400
<v Speaker 1>cat in the sense that I'm a mix of a humanist,

0:06:46.800 --> 0:06:50.480
<v Speaker 1>a social scientists. Right. I'm I'm pretty trained in like anthropology,

0:06:50.520 --> 0:06:54.359
<v Speaker 1>cultural studies, all these issues as well as engineering, and

0:06:54.400 --> 0:06:57.440
<v Speaker 1>I think we need all three of these spheres to

0:06:57.520 --> 0:07:00.120
<v Speaker 1>be in conversation with one another to get us out

0:07:00.120 --> 0:07:03.520
<v Speaker 1>of the mess, uh the many messes we find ourselves

0:07:03.560 --> 0:07:06.320
<v Speaker 1>in right now. My work is really rooted in the

0:07:06.440 --> 0:07:10.320
<v Speaker 1>larger question of how we humanize technology, how do we

0:07:10.560 --> 0:07:15.640
<v Speaker 1>transform technology so it serves the best purposes of humanism.

0:07:15.680 --> 0:07:18.400
<v Speaker 1>And so when I mean humanism, I mean that idea

0:07:18.440 --> 0:07:20.960
<v Speaker 1>that we all feel and sometimes we forget that we're

0:07:20.960 --> 0:07:23.840
<v Speaker 1>all in it together. You know that your well being

0:07:23.960 --> 0:07:26.480
<v Speaker 1>might be connected to my own. So that's sort of

0:07:26.560 --> 0:07:31.720
<v Speaker 1>respect of people's and their lives across our planet, particularly

0:07:32.160 --> 0:07:35.680
<v Speaker 1>in the continents of Asia, Africa, South America and so on.

0:07:36.360 --> 0:07:39.360
<v Speaker 1>You know, these people represent together the vast majority of

0:07:39.360 --> 0:07:44.360
<v Speaker 1>technology users, yet they're conspicuously absent really from almost anything

0:07:44.680 --> 0:07:49.400
<v Speaker 1>involving major decisions around big technology platforms. So this kind

0:07:49.400 --> 0:07:53.240
<v Speaker 1>of idea of dignity and respect for all people's that

0:07:53.280 --> 0:07:56.200
<v Speaker 1>has such promise in relation to the Internet, My work

0:07:56.280 --> 0:07:58.280
<v Speaker 1>is really trying to drive us back to where that

0:07:58.440 --> 0:08:02.080
<v Speaker 1>as our north star. Yeah, and I saw that you

0:08:02.400 --> 0:08:05.960
<v Speaker 1>somewhere that you described it as your work is the

0:08:06.000 --> 0:08:11.360
<v Speaker 1>intersection of technology, innovation, politics, business and society. What was

0:08:11.400 --> 0:08:14.320
<v Speaker 1>it that drew you to that topic? I mean, so,

0:08:14.520 --> 0:08:19.240
<v Speaker 1>I am a late nineties Stanford graduate in engineering. I

0:08:19.360 --> 0:08:22.640
<v Speaker 1>worked for two years right after my undergrad in Amsterdam

0:08:22.760 --> 0:08:27.080
<v Speaker 1>in the Netherlands, developing kind of machine learning technologies, and

0:08:27.120 --> 0:08:30.240
<v Speaker 1>all the while, both in my classes as an undergraduate,

0:08:30.360 --> 0:08:33.360
<v Speaker 1>in my own personal life because of you know, my

0:08:33.400 --> 0:08:36.280
<v Speaker 1>family being from India and are my family traveling to

0:08:36.360 --> 0:08:39.280
<v Speaker 1>different parts of the world, but just sort of also

0:08:39.360 --> 0:08:42.839
<v Speaker 1>just generally in my own life, I saw an incredible

0:08:43.000 --> 0:08:48.000
<v Speaker 1>disconnect between the priorities, the lives, the values, the belief

0:08:48.080 --> 0:08:52.520
<v Speaker 1>systems of people around our beautiful planet and where we

0:08:52.559 --> 0:08:55.600
<v Speaker 1>were driving technology. And even in my context as an

0:08:55.640 --> 0:08:58.920
<v Speaker 1>AI developer, and you know, the late nineties, with the

0:08:58.960 --> 0:09:02.320
<v Speaker 1>realities that I was witnessing and and the insights that

0:09:02.360 --> 0:09:04.920
<v Speaker 1>came from other fields in many other parts of the world.

0:09:05.080 --> 0:09:08.840
<v Speaker 1>So you can't really understand technology and what it means

0:09:09.200 --> 0:09:12.640
<v Speaker 1>without really thinking about things that are not about technology,

0:09:12.720 --> 0:09:14.960
<v Speaker 1>if you know what I mean. But you know, all

0:09:14.960 --> 0:09:17.480
<v Speaker 1>the while, what we tend to do as we elevate,

0:09:17.760 --> 0:09:21.360
<v Speaker 1>if not fetishized technology, and that becomes the object of

0:09:21.400 --> 0:09:24.560
<v Speaker 1>our gaze and our attention, rather than what it actually

0:09:24.640 --> 0:09:28.880
<v Speaker 1>means for our people, for our planet, for diverse cultures,

0:09:28.960 --> 0:09:33.080
<v Speaker 1>for democracy, for economic justice, for racial justice, all these

0:09:33.120 --> 0:09:37.520
<v Speaker 1>issues those are not questions fundamentally about technology. And I

0:09:37.520 --> 0:09:40.160
<v Speaker 1>think I've always been sort of a humanist at heart,

0:09:40.240 --> 0:09:45.240
<v Speaker 1>someone who cares about these values more than anything. Yeah, well,

0:09:45.320 --> 0:09:48.760
<v Speaker 1>we need more people like you with that incredibly diverse background, right,

0:09:48.840 --> 0:09:51.760
<v Speaker 1>It's very rare, it seems to me, is particularly in

0:09:51.800 --> 0:09:54.679
<v Speaker 1>the Valley. That's true. Yeah, and I'm in the Silicon

0:09:54.760 --> 0:09:57.320
<v Speaker 1>Valley right now. I'm from Silicon Valley. I went to

0:09:57.360 --> 0:10:00.040
<v Speaker 1>the same high school as Steve jobs stand for a

0:10:00.200 --> 0:10:02.920
<v Speaker 1>late nineties, So this world is very close to my

0:10:02.960 --> 0:10:06.920
<v Speaker 1>own personal world. Yet I've also seen how incredibly opaque

0:10:06.920 --> 0:10:10.360
<v Speaker 1>and limited and actually nearest sighted this world is. It's

0:10:10.440 --> 0:10:13.760
<v Speaker 1>very disconnected. That's why I called my last book Beyond

0:10:13.920 --> 0:10:17.640
<v Speaker 1>the Valley, both in a literal and metaphorical sense. Yeah.

0:10:17.679 --> 0:10:20.600
<v Speaker 1>So let's pivot to Facebook, and this is our second

0:10:20.640 --> 0:10:24.079
<v Speaker 1>episode on Facebook. In the first one, the inciting incident

0:10:24.120 --> 0:10:25.920
<v Speaker 1>really was the Capital, right, and we talked a lot

0:10:25.960 --> 0:10:29.520
<v Speaker 1>about that in Facebook's role in it. The big change

0:10:29.600 --> 0:10:33.160
<v Speaker 1>since we wrapped episode one is that we've learned via

0:10:33.240 --> 0:10:39.000
<v Speaker 1>whistleblower Francis Hogan, that Facebook knows right, Facebook knows that

0:10:39.080 --> 0:10:42.000
<v Speaker 1>they are endangering mental health and in some cases physical

0:10:42.040 --> 0:10:45.640
<v Speaker 1>well being, and they choose to ignore it. And so

0:10:45.720 --> 0:10:50.120
<v Speaker 1>for us at calling BS, that really raises the stakes,

0:10:50.240 --> 0:10:53.320
<v Speaker 1>and so first I just love to hear you know,

0:10:53.400 --> 0:10:55.880
<v Speaker 1>kind of what you think about all of that. I mean,

0:10:56.160 --> 0:10:59.400
<v Speaker 1>what Francis Haagan sort of leaked out that she was

0:10:59.480 --> 0:11:02.800
<v Speaker 1>privy to as as a whistleblower was what a number

0:11:02.840 --> 0:11:06.079
<v Speaker 1>of scholars, not just me, but like, you know, dozens

0:11:06.120 --> 0:11:09.560
<v Speaker 1>of us and journalists by the way we're pointing out,

0:11:09.640 --> 0:11:11.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, we all saw these things, but we saw

0:11:12.000 --> 0:11:14.840
<v Speaker 1>the effects in various parts of the world. We saw

0:11:14.840 --> 0:11:17.560
<v Speaker 1>the effects with January six. We saw the effects with

0:11:17.600 --> 0:11:21.240
<v Speaker 1>the incredible divisiveness associated with Brexit and the and the

0:11:21.280 --> 0:11:25.360
<v Speaker 1>Trump election. So we saw, wait a second, what's going

0:11:25.400 --> 0:11:29.280
<v Speaker 1>on here? These algorithms are manipulating us psychometrically to be

0:11:29.360 --> 0:11:32.319
<v Speaker 1>more divided than ever. So we were seeing this. It

0:11:32.400 --> 0:11:37.880
<v Speaker 1>was extremely helpful for our cause as scholars to get

0:11:37.960 --> 0:11:42.000
<v Speaker 1>that corroboration from internal studies that Facebook was doing, showing

0:11:42.000 --> 0:11:45.120
<v Speaker 1>that Instagram, for example, and any of us who've used

0:11:45.200 --> 0:11:48.560
<v Speaker 1>Instagram can see this, and you can imagine being a

0:11:48.640 --> 0:11:52.000
<v Speaker 1>younger person in their early twenties or teens, just how

0:11:52.000 --> 0:11:54.440
<v Speaker 1>it's correlated with the feeling that I'm never good enough.

0:11:54.920 --> 0:11:57.160
<v Speaker 1>You know, I'm never good enough, I'm never beautiful enough.

0:11:57.200 --> 0:12:00.320
<v Speaker 1>I'm never hot enough, I'm never smart enough, skinny enough,

0:12:00.440 --> 0:12:04.400
<v Speaker 1>because so much of Instagram is artificially filtered, right So,

0:12:04.400 --> 0:12:08.199
<v Speaker 1>so basically these revelations were extremely important because they showed

0:12:08.600 --> 0:12:11.320
<v Speaker 1>how what Facebook is attempting to do, which other big

0:12:11.360 --> 0:12:14.200
<v Speaker 1>tech companies are also trying to do in their own realms,

0:12:14.720 --> 0:12:19.040
<v Speaker 1>is basically dominate our lives in relation to all things

0:12:19.040 --> 0:12:22.360
<v Speaker 1>socially oriented. Right. They want to basically be the place

0:12:22.760 --> 0:12:27.280
<v Speaker 1>we go to to communicate with no and socialize with

0:12:27.360 --> 0:12:30.319
<v Speaker 1>one another. But in the process, what's occurring is not

0:12:30.679 --> 0:12:33.440
<v Speaker 1>tie you and I talking with one another. It's some

0:12:33.559 --> 0:12:36.960
<v Speaker 1>weird stuff that's going on in the middle that's manipulating

0:12:37.000 --> 0:12:38.680
<v Speaker 1>what you see and when you see it, and what

0:12:38.800 --> 0:12:40.840
<v Speaker 1>I see and when I see it. And there's this

0:12:41.000 --> 0:12:44.520
<v Speaker 1>massive acquisition of data that is being used to target

0:12:44.600 --> 0:12:49.240
<v Speaker 1>us as psycho graphic subjects, not demographic, but psychographic. What

0:12:49.320 --> 0:12:52.800
<v Speaker 1>will drive you crazy, what will get you aroused, what

0:12:52.920 --> 0:12:56.480
<v Speaker 1>will get you to be more extroverted? As I was

0:12:56.520 --> 0:12:59.920
<v Speaker 1>preparing for this, I ran across a quote by Sean Parker,

0:13:00.080 --> 0:13:04.160
<v Speaker 1>Facebook's first president, in Axios, and in this interview, he

0:13:04.200 --> 0:13:08.720
<v Speaker 1>said that Facebook and Instagram constantly ask themselves one question

0:13:09.120 --> 0:13:11.520
<v Speaker 1>how do we consume as much of the user's time

0:13:11.559 --> 0:13:14.080
<v Speaker 1>and attention as possible? And then he went on to

0:13:14.120 --> 0:13:19.800
<v Speaker 1>say we were exploiting a vulnerability in human psychology. The investors, creators,

0:13:19.920 --> 0:13:24.679
<v Speaker 1>Mark Zuckerberg, Kevin's Systrom, all of these people understood it consciously,

0:13:25.240 --> 0:13:27.680
<v Speaker 1>and we did it anyway. And I guess my question

0:13:27.720 --> 0:13:32.040
<v Speaker 1>is how why is this even legal? Like it's odd

0:13:32.080 --> 0:13:34.839
<v Speaker 1>to me that we allow this to go on? Well,

0:13:34.880 --> 0:13:38.280
<v Speaker 1>partly because we're only wrapping our heads around what's going

0:13:38.320 --> 0:13:41.840
<v Speaker 1>on recently, and our lawmakers are even more slowly wrapping

0:13:41.840 --> 0:13:44.480
<v Speaker 1>their heads around what is happening here. I mean, I'm

0:13:44.480 --> 0:13:46.480
<v Speaker 1>trying to work with as many of them as I can.

0:13:47.000 --> 0:13:49.959
<v Speaker 1>One piece of good news is that lawmakers across the

0:13:50.000 --> 0:13:54.080
<v Speaker 1>political spectrum for various reasons. The thing is that what

0:13:54.320 --> 0:13:57.520
<v Speaker 1>is occurring here is, you know, leveraging the kind of

0:13:57.559 --> 0:14:01.640
<v Speaker 1>principles of free speech. And I'm all for free speech.

0:14:02.200 --> 0:14:05.439
<v Speaker 1>These technology companies have actually they used that as their

0:14:05.480 --> 0:14:08.240
<v Speaker 1>sort of crutch and then they do whatever they want

0:14:08.280 --> 0:14:11.000
<v Speaker 1>with us. I don't mind that the Internet supports the

0:14:11.040 --> 0:14:14.360
<v Speaker 1>capacity for all types of speech, but what I do

0:14:14.520 --> 0:14:18.480
<v Speaker 1>mind deeply is that the most heinous forms of speech

0:14:18.679 --> 0:14:21.200
<v Speaker 1>are what are being most prioritized. So you know, Tye,

0:14:21.280 --> 0:14:23.520
<v Speaker 1>it's one thing for me to say, Tie, you know,

0:14:23.600 --> 0:14:26.560
<v Speaker 1>you should be able to speak how you wish, and

0:14:26.600 --> 0:14:29.240
<v Speaker 1>you should be able to read what you want. It's

0:14:29.240 --> 0:14:31.240
<v Speaker 1>another thing to say that, Tie, I'm just going to

0:14:31.400 --> 0:14:36.120
<v Speaker 1>keep feeding you insane, crazy and at times conspiratorial and

0:14:36.240 --> 0:14:39.680
<v Speaker 1>outrageous content. So you so you go crazy with a

0:14:39.720 --> 0:14:42.440
<v Speaker 1>dopamine firing in your head, and it's like staring at

0:14:42.440 --> 0:14:45.560
<v Speaker 1>a burning car the entire time. It's so Actually, these

0:14:45.560 --> 0:14:48.680
<v Speaker 1>companies are not prioritizing actual free speech in the sense

0:14:48.760 --> 0:14:51.360
<v Speaker 1>that all forms of speech are, you know, maybe even

0:14:51.400 --> 0:14:55.920
<v Speaker 1>equally accessible. But no, I'm sorry, I'm I'm interrupting. Here

0:14:55.920 --> 0:14:58.040
<v Speaker 1>you go, I'm excited now. Just the last thing I

0:14:58.040 --> 0:15:02.800
<v Speaker 1>would say is in democratic societies, there's always been voices

0:15:02.880 --> 0:15:06.920
<v Speaker 1>that are a little extreme on various margins those that's

0:15:07.000 --> 0:15:10.960
<v Speaker 1>part of democracy. Here, what's happening is, you know, we're

0:15:11.000 --> 0:15:14.240
<v Speaker 1>all being presented with completely different worlds in front of

0:15:14.240 --> 0:15:16.800
<v Speaker 1>our fingertips, and we're all glued to our phones and

0:15:16.840 --> 0:15:19.120
<v Speaker 1>on these apps and on these websites all the time,

0:15:19.320 --> 0:15:23.080
<v Speaker 1>so our entire experience is completely different. Tights, say, you

0:15:23.120 --> 0:15:26.680
<v Speaker 1>and I were like the same demographically, the same, politically,

0:15:26.880 --> 0:15:29.160
<v Speaker 1>the same in terms of economic class. We could be

0:15:29.200 --> 0:15:33.800
<v Speaker 1>presented with completely different dissenting worlds on these platforms, right,

0:15:33.840 --> 0:15:38.240
<v Speaker 1>We live in completely different reality bubbles on the platform. Yeah. Well,

0:15:38.280 --> 0:15:41.600
<v Speaker 1>and that's the thing. They claim that they shouldn't be

0:15:41.720 --> 0:15:46.520
<v Speaker 1>responsible because they exercise no editorial control on the platform.

0:15:46.640 --> 0:15:51.080
<v Speaker 1>They are not a media platform. But the algorithms exercise

0:15:51.240 --> 0:15:54.960
<v Speaker 1>editorial control. That's the point. It's just not it's non human.

0:15:55.280 --> 0:15:58.640
<v Speaker 1>But that shouldn't absolve them. They created the algorithms. That's

0:15:58.680 --> 0:16:01.520
<v Speaker 1>the point. Opt In is a default on every level,

0:16:01.720 --> 0:16:03.920
<v Speaker 1>and it's not just opt in. You know, people like

0:16:04.080 --> 0:16:06.640
<v Speaker 1>Edward Snowden have made the point that even if our

0:16:06.680 --> 0:16:10.080
<v Speaker 1>phones were on airplane mode, we're being recorded all the time.

0:16:10.280 --> 0:16:12.760
<v Speaker 1>Say I'm hanging out with Utah, but I left my

0:16:12.800 --> 0:16:15.640
<v Speaker 1>phone at home. Data about me is still being gathered

0:16:15.680 --> 0:16:18.440
<v Speaker 1>through your phone, through your device, which is creepy because

0:16:18.480 --> 0:16:22.760
<v Speaker 1>you can stitch together data points triangulate. Yeah. Okay, so

0:16:22.960 --> 0:16:25.280
<v Speaker 1>let me shift gears for a sec here and just

0:16:25.400 --> 0:16:28.680
<v Speaker 1>get into another aspect of this. My sense, given that

0:16:28.880 --> 0:16:32.400
<v Speaker 1>Facebook scale, that we're all affected by Facebook in some

0:16:32.480 --> 0:16:35.320
<v Speaker 1>way today. But I'm wondering what you would stay to

0:16:35.520 --> 0:16:38.360
<v Speaker 1>somebody who says, well, if you don't like what they do,

0:16:38.680 --> 0:16:42.720
<v Speaker 1>just delete the platform, don't use the product. Easy, Easier

0:16:42.760 --> 0:16:44.680
<v Speaker 1>said than done. If you're in a country in the

0:16:44.720 --> 0:16:47.640
<v Speaker 1>world where Facebook is the media network, they say, we don't.

0:16:47.640 --> 0:16:49.560
<v Speaker 1>We are not a media network. They're the biggest media

0:16:49.640 --> 0:16:53.040
<v Speaker 1>network in the history of the world period period, you know.

0:16:53.080 --> 0:16:55.960
<v Speaker 1>I mean they're only vuying with like a YouTube, which

0:16:56.000 --> 0:16:58.520
<v Speaker 1>is of course part of Google, right. I mean, if

0:16:58.520 --> 0:17:01.400
<v Speaker 1>you want to look at Instagram, Facebook, I mean the

0:17:01.400 --> 0:17:03.840
<v Speaker 1>technologies and WhatsApp. If you look at the union of

0:17:03.880 --> 0:17:06.479
<v Speaker 1>those three groups, we're talking about three point five billion

0:17:06.520 --> 0:17:09.439
<v Speaker 1>people out of eight billion or so people in the world.

0:17:09.960 --> 0:17:14.080
<v Speaker 1>That's that they're all media platforms, and they are together,

0:17:14.119 --> 0:17:16.320
<v Speaker 1>if you put it all together, the biggest media network

0:17:16.560 --> 0:17:19.320
<v Speaker 1>in the history of the world. So it's like saying

0:17:19.359 --> 0:17:22.520
<v Speaker 1>to someone like, oh, well, too bad, you can just

0:17:22.600 --> 0:17:25.560
<v Speaker 1>choose to get off of our platform and use something else.

0:17:25.800 --> 0:17:30.080
<v Speaker 1>It's just not It's really unrealistic on so many levels, right,

0:17:30.119 --> 0:17:33.560
<v Speaker 1>I mean, because of what we call network effects. I'm

0:17:33.640 --> 0:17:36.600
<v Speaker 1>on Facebook, not because I care about Facebook. I'm on

0:17:36.600 --> 0:17:39.520
<v Speaker 1>Facebook to connect with my relatives in India, with people

0:17:39.560 --> 0:17:42.240
<v Speaker 1>I worked with in South America. That's why I'm there.

0:17:42.320 --> 0:17:46.200
<v Speaker 1>So it's like too late. They are essentially a utility,

0:17:46.240 --> 0:17:49.560
<v Speaker 1>if not something approaching a monopoly. So they are the

0:17:49.760 --> 0:17:53.760
<v Speaker 1>de facto place for socializing. And I don't mean Facebook

0:17:53.840 --> 0:17:57.359
<v Speaker 1>the technology. I mean Facebook the company which owns again

0:17:57.359 --> 0:18:00.720
<v Speaker 1>Oculus right, which is their gateway to meta by the way,

0:18:01.040 --> 0:18:05.560
<v Speaker 1>um Instagram, what'sapp in Facebook? Ye? And in terms of

0:18:05.760 --> 0:18:09.280
<v Speaker 1>Facebook's attitude about all this, I read another thing that

0:18:09.359 --> 0:18:13.720
<v Speaker 1>I found sort of outrageous. This long time Facebook executive

0:18:13.720 --> 0:18:18.040
<v Speaker 1>and now new Chief Technology officer ct O Andrew Bosworth

0:18:18.160 --> 0:18:20.760
<v Speaker 1>came right out and said that he blames users for

0:18:20.840 --> 0:18:24.360
<v Speaker 1>the choices that they make on the platform. He said

0:18:24.359 --> 0:18:27.600
<v Speaker 1>a bunch of that's insane. Yeah, he said a bunch

0:18:27.600 --> 0:18:30.840
<v Speaker 1>of crazy things. He said, rather than social media people

0:18:30.920 --> 0:18:35.080
<v Speaker 1>are to blame for the proliferation of misinformation online, He

0:18:35.200 --> 0:18:37.640
<v Speaker 1>said the owners should be on the individual and any

0:18:37.760 --> 0:18:42.800
<v Speaker 1>meaningful democracy. He called Facebook a fundamentally democratic technology, despite

0:18:42.800 --> 0:18:46.040
<v Speaker 1>the recent revelation that the platform allowed high profile users

0:18:46.080 --> 0:18:50.760
<v Speaker 1>to break its policies. Asked whether vaccine hesitancy would be

0:18:50.800 --> 0:18:53.280
<v Speaker 1>the same with or without social media, he said that

0:18:53.320 --> 0:18:57.000
<v Speaker 1>individuals choose what sources to trust. That's their choice. They're

0:18:57.040 --> 0:18:59.359
<v Speaker 1>allowed to do that. If you have an issue with

0:18:59.400 --> 0:19:02.439
<v Speaker 1>those people, you don't have an issue with Facebook. You

0:19:02.480 --> 0:19:07.440
<v Speaker 1>can't put that on me. I just that attitude seems

0:19:07.760 --> 0:19:10.639
<v Speaker 1>I don't know, anti human in a way like it

0:19:10.840 --> 0:19:15.199
<v Speaker 1>just seems wrong. It's uninformed also right, in addition to

0:19:15.240 --> 0:19:18.920
<v Speaker 1>being just being untrue, it's uninformed. And sometimes these are

0:19:18.960 --> 0:19:22.200
<v Speaker 1>these are perspectives you hear from people like who are

0:19:22.240 --> 0:19:26.840
<v Speaker 1>just so ensnared within the kind of tech bubble they

0:19:26.880 --> 0:19:29.359
<v Speaker 1>somehow think that what they're creating is an open portal

0:19:29.440 --> 0:19:32.320
<v Speaker 1>to the world. How is that possible? If what I

0:19:32.359 --> 0:19:36.879
<v Speaker 1>see on Facebook is determined computationally and algorithmically by Facebook,

0:19:37.440 --> 0:19:40.040
<v Speaker 1>can they tell me how I can experience my Facebook

0:19:40.080 --> 0:19:42.240
<v Speaker 1>feed in a in a way that is more open

0:19:42.440 --> 0:19:45.080
<v Speaker 1>or is more self directed by my own choices, my

0:19:45.119 --> 0:19:49.719
<v Speaker 1>own values. Of course not. Yes, indeed, so just spending

0:19:49.720 --> 0:19:52.879
<v Speaker 1>another minute outside the US. As you pointed out, the

0:19:52.920 --> 0:19:56.760
<v Speaker 1>vast majority of users are outside the US, and one

0:19:56.800 --> 0:19:59.520
<v Speaker 1>aspect is that the US is where most of their

0:19:59.600 --> 0:20:03.000
<v Speaker 1>modern ration happens. In other words, they pay much more

0:20:03.040 --> 0:20:07.119
<v Speaker 1>attention to the US platform than they do outside the US,

0:20:07.200 --> 0:20:10.720
<v Speaker 1>which means that most of their users are looking at

0:20:11.440 --> 0:20:15.560
<v Speaker 1>a completely unmoderated platform in terms of hateful content, and

0:20:15.600 --> 0:20:17.520
<v Speaker 1>so I just wondered if you could talk about the

0:20:17.560 --> 0:20:20.720
<v Speaker 1>impact in places like the global South, India for example,

0:20:20.760 --> 0:20:24.359
<v Speaker 1>and you know what the effects are on democracy worldwide? Yeah,

0:20:24.400 --> 0:20:27.159
<v Speaker 1>I mean Facebook. You know, the company understands that the

0:20:27.200 --> 0:20:29.600
<v Speaker 1>most you know, kind of crop that they're going to

0:20:29.680 --> 0:20:32.840
<v Speaker 1>get or will have to kind of deal with is

0:20:33.000 --> 0:20:36.639
<v Speaker 1>in the US, right, So in other countries, you know,

0:20:36.840 --> 0:20:39.680
<v Speaker 1>this approach to where just getting people content that rolls

0:20:39.720 --> 0:20:42.160
<v Speaker 1>them up, that outreaches them, that drives them a little

0:20:42.160 --> 0:20:45.560
<v Speaker 1>crazy is the norm. Right. So we've seen how that

0:20:45.640 --> 0:20:49.760
<v Speaker 1>manifests in genocides in myyan Mar with the Rohinga community.

0:20:49.960 --> 0:20:52.520
<v Speaker 1>We've seen how it's actually manifested in the more recent

0:20:52.800 --> 0:20:56.920
<v Speaker 1>attack on Burmese people by the state government. We're seeing

0:20:56.920 --> 0:21:01.120
<v Speaker 1>it right now in the Two Grayan region of Ethiopia.

0:21:01.440 --> 0:21:04.040
<v Speaker 1>We've seen this in Sri Lanka. We've seen it right

0:21:04.080 --> 0:21:06.520
<v Speaker 1>here at home in January six. We see it all

0:21:06.560 --> 0:21:09.840
<v Speaker 1>around the world. And we can also see how despots

0:21:09.880 --> 0:21:14.160
<v Speaker 1>and authoritarians, people like Rodrico de Terite in the Philippines,

0:21:14.760 --> 0:21:19.080
<v Speaker 1>Jayur Bolsonaro in Brazil have been able to use social

0:21:19.119 --> 0:21:23.560
<v Speaker 1>media to divide and conquer to polarized people. And our

0:21:23.640 --> 0:21:28.159
<v Speaker 1>former president was a master at being a central node

0:21:28.480 --> 0:21:32.320
<v Speaker 1>of digital activity on many different platforms. He put out

0:21:32.400 --> 0:21:36.760
<v Speaker 1>content messaging that worked perfectly well for these dystopic forms

0:21:36.760 --> 0:21:41.680
<v Speaker 1>of virality and visibility that I'm speaking about. Ramatous take

0:21:41.760 --> 0:21:46.520
<v Speaker 1>on Mark zuckerberg obstacles to regulation and Facebook's revised BS

0:21:46.600 --> 0:22:07.359
<v Speaker 1>score right after this, back with Roma Srinivasan, author of

0:22:07.440 --> 0:22:10.720
<v Speaker 1>Beyond the Valley, how innovators around the world are overcoming

0:22:10.720 --> 0:22:19.760
<v Speaker 1>inequality and creating the technologies of tomorrow. So just different topics,

0:22:19.800 --> 0:22:23.240
<v Speaker 1>but but relevant, I think is and and some of

0:22:23.280 --> 0:22:26.560
<v Speaker 1>our listeners may not understand this. I didn't for a

0:22:26.640 --> 0:22:29.840
<v Speaker 1>long time that Mark Zuckerberg is an unusual CEO and

0:22:29.880 --> 0:22:34.440
<v Speaker 1>that he holds absolute power at Facebook because he owns

0:22:34.480 --> 0:22:38.639
<v Speaker 1>the majority of the voting shares and so unlike most

0:22:38.880 --> 0:22:42.680
<v Speaker 1>normal companies, he doesn't report to the board as most

0:22:42.680 --> 0:22:47.800
<v Speaker 1>CEOs do, so the board doesn't decide Mark does on everything.

0:22:48.000 --> 0:22:52.800
<v Speaker 1>And so when you look at his actions personally, well,

0:22:53.080 --> 0:22:56.080
<v Speaker 1>I guess professionally, they're hard to peel apart, Like, what

0:22:56.160 --> 0:22:59.320
<v Speaker 1>do you think it tells us about his goals for

0:22:59.359 --> 0:23:02.280
<v Speaker 1>the future. So the way Zuckerberg is able to get

0:23:02.320 --> 0:23:05.000
<v Speaker 1>away with this is through what's called dual class share

0:23:05.000 --> 0:23:09.600
<v Speaker 1>of structures. That basically means that Zuckerberg actually owns, you know,

0:23:09.680 --> 0:23:13.399
<v Speaker 1>a different class, a different what's called class of equity.

0:23:13.440 --> 0:23:16.720
<v Speaker 1>This is an equity that can't be overcome by other

0:23:16.800 --> 0:23:20.480
<v Speaker 1>people on the board's decisions. Facebook basically has a strategy

0:23:20.560 --> 0:23:23.320
<v Speaker 1>from this example to other ones, including their you know,

0:23:23.359 --> 0:23:29.080
<v Speaker 1>so called independent you know, advisory board. They basically say like, hey,

0:23:29.119 --> 0:23:32.639
<v Speaker 1>we're down with regulation, We're down with your opinions, your voices.

0:23:32.680 --> 0:23:34.359
<v Speaker 1>But at the end of the day, these are just

0:23:34.440 --> 0:23:38.159
<v Speaker 1>little advisory groups or the board that actually doesn't have

0:23:38.200 --> 0:23:41.240
<v Speaker 1>any power. You know, why would the board actually even

0:23:41.320 --> 0:23:44.120
<v Speaker 1>care to change the status quo unless they have more

0:23:44.200 --> 0:23:47.959
<v Speaker 1>humanist or humanitarian sensibilities given that they're making more money

0:23:48.160 --> 0:23:51.679
<v Speaker 1>than ever. So what you actually see is again abate

0:23:51.760 --> 0:23:54.480
<v Speaker 1>and switch. They say they're innovative, but actually they're really

0:23:54.520 --> 0:23:57.360
<v Speaker 1>anti innovation in the sense that they're not resourceful at all.

0:23:57.640 --> 0:24:00.880
<v Speaker 1>They say they're you know, supporting democracy. Really what they're

0:24:00.920 --> 0:24:04.760
<v Speaker 1>doing is figuring out a masterful model of a triumph

0:24:05.200 --> 0:24:09.160
<v Speaker 1>of a kind of oligarchic capitalism over democracy. So this

0:24:09.240 --> 0:24:11.560
<v Speaker 1>is kind of like when we talk about the governance

0:24:12.040 --> 0:24:15.480
<v Speaker 1>of these technology companies, you know, you can't expect them

0:24:15.680 --> 0:24:18.440
<v Speaker 1>to do any sort of self regulation at all, because

0:24:18.480 --> 0:24:21.560
<v Speaker 1>it's it's actually just you know, like little fake sort

0:24:21.600 --> 0:24:24.800
<v Speaker 1>of agreements to the public like hey, okay, next time

0:24:24.840 --> 0:24:28.280
<v Speaker 1>we'll have better AI. Okay, next time we're you know,

0:24:28.320 --> 0:24:31.080
<v Speaker 1>we're part of this consortium with the a c l U.

0:24:31.560 --> 0:24:34.399
<v Speaker 1>None of those things ultimately change the decisions that are

0:24:34.440 --> 0:24:39.280
<v Speaker 1>made on a business or technological level by the company itself. Right, Yeah,

0:24:39.359 --> 0:24:42.720
<v Speaker 1>I think that you don't agree with this, but but

0:24:42.800 --> 0:24:45.480
<v Speaker 1>obviously you'll correct me. So let me take a run

0:24:45.520 --> 0:24:48.200
<v Speaker 1>at this. Mark has absolute power, and he doesn't seem

0:24:48.240 --> 0:24:51.000
<v Speaker 1>to care whether Facebook is good for people or good

0:24:51.040 --> 0:24:53.560
<v Speaker 1>for the world at all. In fact, we know that

0:24:53.600 --> 0:24:57.040
<v Speaker 1>he is now knowingly pursuing revenue growth at the expense

0:24:57.119 --> 0:25:01.000
<v Speaker 1>of people's mental health, young people, childre don. In some cases,

0:25:01.440 --> 0:25:05.840
<v Speaker 1>he knowingly lies in public occasionally to Congress about his

0:25:05.920 --> 0:25:09.680
<v Speaker 1>intentions to change. And so I look at that behavior

0:25:09.880 --> 0:25:13.719
<v Speaker 1>and it begs the question is Mark a sociopath? Like

0:25:13.880 --> 0:25:17.080
<v Speaker 1>does he have some kind of clinical condition? Yeah? I

0:25:17.080 --> 0:25:18.840
<v Speaker 1>mean you were right to say that. My I would

0:25:18.880 --> 0:25:21.840
<v Speaker 1>answer no to that. Yeah, I heard that you disagreed

0:25:21.840 --> 0:25:24.560
<v Speaker 1>with this, and I just I just wanted to hear

0:25:24.600 --> 0:25:29.320
<v Speaker 1>you talk more about why I think the system is sociopathic, right,

0:25:29.560 --> 0:25:33.600
<v Speaker 1>I think the system is just deeply inhumane. Actually, And

0:25:33.800 --> 0:25:37.040
<v Speaker 1>as far as Mark Zuckerbrook's concerned himself, I've actually met

0:25:37.119 --> 0:25:39.520
<v Speaker 1>him a little over a decade ago. I mean, I

0:25:39.520 --> 0:25:42.679
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't call him shiny happy people, but you know, I

0:25:42.680 --> 0:25:45.320
<v Speaker 1>I thought he was just kind of in that way

0:25:45.320 --> 0:25:47.119
<v Speaker 1>that a lot of engineers can be. I mean, this

0:25:47.160 --> 0:25:50.240
<v Speaker 1>is a long time ago, just kind of just sort

0:25:50.240 --> 0:25:53.639
<v Speaker 1>of wants data and evidence and analysis, and it is

0:25:53.680 --> 0:25:56.680
<v Speaker 1>sort of like, you know, interested in the growth of

0:25:56.760 --> 0:25:59.280
<v Speaker 1>his platform. Right. So it's so it's sort of like

0:26:00.200 --> 0:26:04.000
<v Speaker 1>we have created such a system where growth, no matter

0:26:04.080 --> 0:26:07.000
<v Speaker 1>what is what is valued. And you know, some of

0:26:07.040 --> 0:26:10.320
<v Speaker 1>these people are so kind of just almost you know,

0:26:10.400 --> 0:26:13.199
<v Speaker 1>this is a very humane guess that they're just so

0:26:13.280 --> 0:26:18.080
<v Speaker 1>overwhelmed with not just them growing the platform, but all

0:26:18.119 --> 0:26:22.080
<v Speaker 1>the like hysteria and criticism at all. It just feels

0:26:22.080 --> 0:26:24.320
<v Speaker 1>like they're they're not They're not the people we should

0:26:24.359 --> 0:26:27.080
<v Speaker 1>rely on to do much of anything. They have to

0:26:27.160 --> 0:26:31.160
<v Speaker 1>be forced to be accountable to a public that they monetize.

0:26:31.240 --> 0:26:33.920
<v Speaker 1>And also remember all of these companies live on in

0:26:34.040 --> 0:26:36.960
<v Speaker 1>Internet that was paid for you know, I know it

0:26:37.000 --> 0:26:39.560
<v Speaker 1>was a long time ago in nineteen sixty nine by

0:26:39.760 --> 0:26:44.280
<v Speaker 1>US taxpayers. They're exploiting the public on on multiple levels,

0:26:44.320 --> 0:26:47.479
<v Speaker 1>both in terms of investments that they've monetized for their

0:26:47.480 --> 0:26:50.919
<v Speaker 1>own private benefit, just like you know, Visor, which seems

0:26:50.920 --> 0:26:54.080
<v Speaker 1>to be like the state corporation right now, and and

0:26:54.080 --> 0:26:57.359
<v Speaker 1>and Maderna. I'm all for vaccination, but but I don't

0:26:57.400 --> 0:26:59.320
<v Speaker 1>like this. I don't like that we are having a

0:26:59.320 --> 0:27:04.440
<v Speaker 1>privatized aation of public life on every single level. Right, Yeah,

0:27:04.480 --> 0:27:08.880
<v Speaker 1>I agree that the system is sociopathic. I guess given

0:27:08.920 --> 0:27:12.399
<v Speaker 1>the amount of power and wealth that he has accumulated,

0:27:13.080 --> 0:27:16.440
<v Speaker 1>how do we begin to think about protecting ourselves from

0:27:16.560 --> 0:27:20.800
<v Speaker 1>Mark and other people like him. It's time for actual

0:27:20.920 --> 0:27:24.000
<v Speaker 1>decision making power to rest in the hands of third

0:27:24.040 --> 0:27:27.800
<v Speaker 1>parties that represent people, and there needs to be more

0:27:27.840 --> 0:27:33.200
<v Speaker 1>of a relationship between private technology companies that have created

0:27:33.240 --> 0:27:37.480
<v Speaker 1>certain types of spaces and technologies that they should certainly

0:27:37.600 --> 0:27:41.120
<v Speaker 1>benefit from on an economic level and the rest of us.

0:27:41.160 --> 0:27:44.800
<v Speaker 1>You know, And you can't expect this to occur within

0:27:45.760 --> 0:27:49.479
<v Speaker 1>the bubble of a tech company within the bubble of

0:27:49.560 --> 0:27:55.920
<v Speaker 1>this sort of hyper growth oriented, just valuation oriented, toxic

0:27:56.000 --> 0:27:58.840
<v Speaker 1>business model. So you know, I think I think we're

0:27:58.880 --> 0:28:01.720
<v Speaker 1>just going to have to try our best. I mean,

0:28:01.800 --> 0:28:05.040
<v Speaker 1>I tend to be someone who really deeply admires uh

0:28:05.240 --> 0:28:08.760
<v Speaker 1>Cornell West. Actually he's like my hero. He just calls

0:28:08.800 --> 0:28:11.680
<v Speaker 1>everyone my brother. So let's let's try to say, hey, Mark,

0:28:11.720 --> 0:28:14.399
<v Speaker 1>you're my brother. But you know, we're gonna call We're

0:28:14.440 --> 0:28:16.960
<v Speaker 1>gonna call stuff out, We're gonna keep it real, and

0:28:17.040 --> 0:28:20.800
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna have to ensure that you that this kind

0:28:20.840 --> 0:28:24.399
<v Speaker 1>of you know, egregious offense I think upon people around

0:28:24.440 --> 0:28:27.439
<v Speaker 1>the world, especially the people who are most vulnerable, working

0:28:27.440 --> 0:28:31.400
<v Speaker 1>class people. So one of the other levers that I've

0:28:31.440 --> 0:28:34.280
<v Speaker 1>been thinking about, just as I've been circling this problem

0:28:34.320 --> 0:28:36.119
<v Speaker 1>and trying to figure out how do we how do

0:28:36.119 --> 0:28:38.120
<v Speaker 1>we begin to get out of this One of the

0:28:38.160 --> 0:28:41.320
<v Speaker 1>other lovers is the employees. I mean, Francis Hogan is

0:28:41.400 --> 0:28:43.840
<v Speaker 1>one of a handful of employees which now include also

0:28:43.880 --> 0:28:47.200
<v Speaker 1>a co founder, Chris Hughes, who have spoken out, which

0:28:47.280 --> 0:28:51.520
<v Speaker 1>is incredibly courageous, particularly for her. I assume that Facebook,

0:28:51.640 --> 0:28:55.040
<v Speaker 1>like most companies, is full of good people. How do

0:28:55.120 --> 0:28:59.880
<v Speaker 1>we encourage more of them to either you know, whistleblow

0:29:00.120 --> 0:29:02.920
<v Speaker 1>if they can, or just vote with their feet and

0:29:02.960 --> 0:29:05.760
<v Speaker 1>go do something else. I think that some of the

0:29:05.800 --> 0:29:10.280
<v Speaker 1>greatest activism in terms of actually raising our awareness as

0:29:10.320 --> 0:29:14.800
<v Speaker 1>a public around these issues are from employees within these companies.

0:29:14.960 --> 0:29:17.840
<v Speaker 1>So I have so much appreciation for people who work

0:29:17.840 --> 0:29:20.080
<v Speaker 1>in these companies. You know, a lot of engineers are

0:29:20.160 --> 0:29:22.640
<v Speaker 1>very good people, where they just aren't just like I

0:29:22.680 --> 0:29:25.640
<v Speaker 1>wasn't necessarily trained in all these other issues, but that

0:29:25.680 --> 0:29:29.160
<v Speaker 1>may not necessarily be their job. The problem is someone

0:29:29.600 --> 0:29:34.400
<v Speaker 1>needs to have that awareness, that kind of more holistic, interdisciplinary,

0:29:34.720 --> 0:29:38.280
<v Speaker 1>you know, humanist kind of sensibility, and they need to

0:29:38.320 --> 0:29:42.080
<v Speaker 1>have you know, FIAT decision making power. And you know,

0:29:42.280 --> 0:29:45.320
<v Speaker 1>it's that that's the issue here. But I think when

0:29:45.360 --> 0:29:47.720
<v Speaker 1>I look towards the future, believe it or not, I

0:29:47.800 --> 0:29:50.280
<v Speaker 1>have a lot of I don't know if it's optimism

0:29:50.320 --> 0:29:53.680
<v Speaker 1>as much as determination that we can move things on

0:29:53.720 --> 0:29:56.360
<v Speaker 1>a much better direction, in a much more human direction.

0:29:56.920 --> 0:29:59.240
<v Speaker 1>I wanted to spend a little bit more time talking

0:29:59.240 --> 0:30:02.040
<v Speaker 1>about regulation sation. One of the things that you've said

0:30:02.080 --> 0:30:05.000
<v Speaker 1>is that we need legislation that to quote you, set

0:30:05.080 --> 0:30:08.200
<v Speaker 1>the right balance between free speech and algorithms that make

0:30:08.200 --> 0:30:13.520
<v Speaker 1>hate speech and blatantly false information from unreputable sources go viral,

0:30:13.720 --> 0:30:17.040
<v Speaker 1>And obviously I totally agree with that. What do you

0:30:17.080 --> 0:30:22.080
<v Speaker 1>see as the major challenges to regulation? What? What a

0:30:22.120 --> 0:30:25.280
<v Speaker 1>great question, you know. I think in this particular case,

0:30:25.560 --> 0:30:28.640
<v Speaker 1>in a sort of strange way, I do have a

0:30:28.680 --> 0:30:32.800
<v Speaker 1>lot of hope because progressives, people in the center, and

0:30:32.960 --> 0:30:37.880
<v Speaker 1>Republicans kind of all are pretty miffed by the status

0:30:37.920 --> 0:30:41.000
<v Speaker 1>quo when it comes to where big tech companies are

0:30:41.280 --> 0:30:44.360
<v Speaker 1>a lot of Republicans like to claim that the tech

0:30:44.400 --> 0:30:48.800
<v Speaker 1>companies are biased against conservatives and conservative interests and that

0:30:48.880 --> 0:30:51.680
<v Speaker 1>they actually don't support free speech. A lot of people

0:30:51.760 --> 0:30:54.320
<v Speaker 1>on the more progressive side of the of the political

0:30:54.400 --> 0:30:58.920
<v Speaker 1>spectrum are pretty outspoken about how sort of these oligopolic

0:30:59.040 --> 0:31:03.280
<v Speaker 1>tendencies have not kind of monopolistic tendencies can hijack an

0:31:03.320 --> 0:31:07.520
<v Speaker 1>economy and hijack equality. So you know, whether it's equality

0:31:07.640 --> 0:31:10.040
<v Speaker 1>or whether it's like you guys are biased against us

0:31:10.160 --> 0:31:13.560
<v Speaker 1>kind of thing, everyone's got a problem. So I think

0:31:13.560 --> 0:31:15.680
<v Speaker 1>that there are certain things we can do, and I've

0:31:15.720 --> 0:31:17.880
<v Speaker 1>been calling for what I call a digital Bill of Rights.

0:31:18.200 --> 0:31:21.360
<v Speaker 1>Senator Cloba Charge just introduced a Privacy Bill. It has

0:31:21.400 --> 0:31:23.240
<v Speaker 1>some aspects of what I've been calling for, which I

0:31:23.240 --> 0:31:26.080
<v Speaker 1>would think I think is more progressive, you know, representative

0:31:26.120 --> 0:31:29.440
<v Speaker 1>real Kanda and who I think is really intelligent um

0:31:29.480 --> 0:31:31.880
<v Speaker 1>and or really brilliant on these issues, just released a

0:31:31.920 --> 0:31:35.000
<v Speaker 1>book on these issues. Has been an interesting figure in

0:31:35.080 --> 0:31:37.920
<v Speaker 1>these discussions. Here's a fertile ground for us to do

0:31:38.000 --> 0:31:41.720
<v Speaker 1>something about the status quo. M that's good news. So

0:31:42.400 --> 0:31:44.440
<v Speaker 1>another thing I wanted to talk about is just the

0:31:44.480 --> 0:31:47.800
<v Speaker 1>frame of reference I guess that we bring to regulation

0:31:48.000 --> 0:31:52.000
<v Speaker 1>because for some reason, when we view tech companies, it's

0:31:52.080 --> 0:31:54.600
<v Speaker 1>viewed as a big deal to regulate them. But we

0:31:55.440 --> 0:31:59.040
<v Speaker 1>regulate for the common good all the time. Certain drugs

0:31:59.040 --> 0:32:02.760
<v Speaker 1>are illegal, or their age limits to things like drinking

0:32:02.880 --> 0:32:06.040
<v Speaker 1>or driving a car, flying an airplane. Why do you

0:32:06.080 --> 0:32:10.160
<v Speaker 1>think we don't automatically view Facebook or other big technology

0:32:10.200 --> 0:32:13.800
<v Speaker 1>companies through that same lens. I think it's because a

0:32:13.840 --> 0:32:16.160
<v Speaker 1>couple of things. I mean, first of all, it seems

0:32:16.200 --> 0:32:20.280
<v Speaker 1>different than a car. We use the car in very specific,

0:32:20.800 --> 0:32:24.640
<v Speaker 1>defined kinds of actions and activities, and so in those

0:32:24.680 --> 0:32:27.200
<v Speaker 1>activities were like, yeah, there should be seatbelts in the

0:32:27.280 --> 0:32:30.760
<v Speaker 1>in the car, right, But our digital lives are our

0:32:30.800 --> 0:32:35.080
<v Speaker 1>lives increasing for better or worse. It's sort of saying like,

0:32:35.200 --> 0:32:38.440
<v Speaker 1>our lives should be regulated, and I don't think people

0:32:38.560 --> 0:32:41.120
<v Speaker 1>have an easy time wrapping their head around that. That's

0:32:41.120 --> 0:32:44.760
<v Speaker 1>why we need actual regulators. And remember regulation is not

0:32:44.840 --> 0:32:49.120
<v Speaker 1>the enemy of business. Regulation actually allows businesses to maintain

0:32:49.520 --> 0:32:52.400
<v Speaker 1>their competitive edge. If you look at, for example, the

0:32:52.480 --> 0:32:55.800
<v Speaker 1>last time a major company was broken up in the

0:32:55.880 --> 0:32:58.320
<v Speaker 1>United States, that was a T and T. Last time

0:32:58.320 --> 0:33:00.000
<v Speaker 1>I checked, a T and T is doing pretty well

0:33:00.120 --> 0:33:03.960
<v Speaker 1>right now, right, So it forced the company to actually compete.

0:33:04.320 --> 0:33:07.520
<v Speaker 1>And that is what regulation, at least in that particular case,

0:33:07.560 --> 0:33:11.080
<v Speaker 1>antitrust action is about. In a way, it's about asking

0:33:11.080 --> 0:33:15.360
<v Speaker 1>the company to maintain integrity and actually innovative innovation in

0:33:15.400 --> 0:33:18.120
<v Speaker 1>this case isn't just creating a new iPhone that's going

0:33:18.160 --> 0:33:19.840
<v Speaker 1>to die in three years so we all have to

0:33:19.840 --> 0:33:22.400
<v Speaker 1>buy another one. So I want to spend the last

0:33:22.440 --> 0:33:24.560
<v Speaker 1>few minutes that we have trying to light a few

0:33:24.600 --> 0:33:29.520
<v Speaker 1>candles here, because obviously this is a tough problem, and

0:33:29.800 --> 0:33:34.360
<v Speaker 1>we really believe in the power of action to create change,

0:33:34.400 --> 0:33:37.320
<v Speaker 1>both inside companies and outside them. In the book, you

0:33:37.360 --> 0:33:41.080
<v Speaker 1>talk about a future where technology becomes stakeholder centered instead

0:33:41.120 --> 0:33:44.920
<v Speaker 1>of shareholder centered to get there, though you point out

0:33:45.000 --> 0:33:50.280
<v Speaker 1>that people should have a hand in designing their own technology,

0:33:50.440 --> 0:33:53.440
<v Speaker 1>how do we get there from here? It's such a

0:33:53.440 --> 0:33:56.200
<v Speaker 1>good question. So I think what we can do is

0:33:56.280 --> 0:34:00.360
<v Speaker 1>actually I think not like we we like we started

0:34:00.360 --> 0:34:03.320
<v Speaker 1>with our conversation tie and not sort of have this

0:34:03.400 --> 0:34:07.520
<v Speaker 1>be about technology, but about what kind of world we

0:34:07.600 --> 0:34:11.600
<v Speaker 1>wish to live in. And I think that that question

0:34:12.120 --> 0:34:14.600
<v Speaker 1>is the most important question that should drive all our

0:34:14.640 --> 0:34:20.000
<v Speaker 1>discussions about many things, not only technology or Facebook. So

0:34:20.040 --> 0:34:22.279
<v Speaker 1>when I think about that world, it would be a

0:34:22.320 --> 0:34:25.440
<v Speaker 1>world where there is dignity and respect for all people's

0:34:25.520 --> 0:34:28.719
<v Speaker 1>right It would be where our individual rights would be

0:34:28.800 --> 0:34:32.239
<v Speaker 1>respects as sovereign human beings. You know, we wouldn't be

0:34:32.880 --> 0:34:38.560
<v Speaker 1>sources of manipulation and engines that fuel our depression and

0:34:38.600 --> 0:34:42.399
<v Speaker 1>anxiety and trauma and divisiveness. So I think that's one

0:34:42.480 --> 0:34:45.400
<v Speaker 1>second is when we talk about stakeholders, we need to

0:34:45.480 --> 0:34:49.480
<v Speaker 1>understand what are the populations within the country, around the

0:34:49.520 --> 0:34:54.040
<v Speaker 1>world that are affected by decisions made about a large

0:34:54.040 --> 0:34:58.160
<v Speaker 1>scale technology platform or platforms that are owned by Facebook

0:34:58.239 --> 0:35:01.160
<v Speaker 1>right in that three point five or so billion users.

0:35:01.920 --> 0:35:05.239
<v Speaker 1>So in that case, we have a huge opportunity to

0:35:05.280 --> 0:35:08.600
<v Speaker 1>resolve some of the problems with the digital economy. Instead

0:35:08.600 --> 0:35:15.040
<v Speaker 1>of hiring a few exploited, traumatized content moderators in in

0:35:15.040 --> 0:35:18.800
<v Speaker 1>in the Philippines, what if Facebook partnered with independent journalists

0:35:18.840 --> 0:35:22.080
<v Speaker 1>in every single country where it operated, so that those

0:35:22.160 --> 0:35:27.320
<v Speaker 1>journalists could actually have power over mediating, you know, auditing, tweaking,

0:35:27.719 --> 0:35:31.120
<v Speaker 1>working with Facebook technologies so that they could reach people

0:35:31.160 --> 0:35:33.319
<v Speaker 1>in those countries in ways that are more fair I

0:35:33.320 --> 0:35:36.120
<v Speaker 1>mean by part is it hearing. So that's a huge idea, right,

0:35:36.280 --> 0:35:38.879
<v Speaker 1>this could be a huge way in which Facebook, which

0:35:38.960 --> 0:35:42.640
<v Speaker 1>is a trillion plus dollar valuated company. Right, we haven't

0:35:42.640 --> 0:35:45.640
<v Speaker 1>even talked about meta. Next time, I guess, I guess

0:35:45.719 --> 0:35:48.879
<v Speaker 1>next time, I'll be back. So when we say stakeholders,

0:35:48.880 --> 0:35:51.480
<v Speaker 1>we need to think about those. We have to identify

0:35:51.800 --> 0:35:55.799
<v Speaker 1>groups of populations. We have to identify the groups whose

0:35:55.880 --> 0:35:59.200
<v Speaker 1>voices should be empowered. That can be done with this

0:35:59.320 --> 0:36:02.640
<v Speaker 1>great advice is a reboard in relation to Facebook, and

0:36:02.680 --> 0:36:05.120
<v Speaker 1>then real steps need to be taken to arm those

0:36:05.160 --> 0:36:08.320
<v Speaker 1>different groups with greater power. That means that we moved

0:36:08.400 --> 0:36:13.880
<v Speaker 1>from disorientation to real collaboration. That's what I'm proposing. And

0:36:13.920 --> 0:36:16.359
<v Speaker 1>in the meantime, in our schools and our universities. We

0:36:16.400 --> 0:36:19.279
<v Speaker 1>need our STEM curriculate to not just be stem, but

0:36:19.360 --> 0:36:22.600
<v Speaker 1>to also be steam, including the arts and the humanities.

0:36:22.800 --> 0:36:24.880
<v Speaker 1>I think more than ever, people need to really study

0:36:24.920 --> 0:36:27.880
<v Speaker 1>the humanities and the social sciences so they can understand

0:36:28.120 --> 0:36:31.080
<v Speaker 1>the question what kind of human being do I want

0:36:31.120 --> 0:36:33.279
<v Speaker 1>to be? What kind of world do I want to

0:36:33.320 --> 0:36:35.719
<v Speaker 1>live in? Those are not questions, quite honestly, that are

0:36:35.800 --> 0:36:40.000
<v Speaker 1>usually asked in engineering classes. Yep, No, that's such a

0:36:40.040 --> 0:36:45.440
<v Speaker 1>great point. Okay, roomation. Last question on this show. We

0:36:45.560 --> 0:36:49.680
<v Speaker 1>have something called the BS scale, So it goes from

0:36:49.800 --> 0:36:54.080
<v Speaker 1>zero to one hundred, zero being the best zero BS

0:36:54.600 --> 0:37:00.359
<v Speaker 1>and being the worst BS. So Facebook says that their

0:37:00.360 --> 0:37:03.640
<v Speaker 1>purpose is to empower all of us to build community

0:37:03.920 --> 0:37:06.919
<v Speaker 1>and bring the world closer together. Where do we think

0:37:07.040 --> 0:37:11.080
<v Speaker 1>Facebook falls on that scale in terms of actually living

0:37:11.120 --> 0:37:16.319
<v Speaker 1>that purpose? Right now? I'll give them an a D

0:37:16.520 --> 0:37:18.960
<v Speaker 1>and be nice that way, because I do have hope,

0:37:19.120 --> 0:37:22.080
<v Speaker 1>because there are good people who work at Facebook. You

0:37:22.120 --> 0:37:26.080
<v Speaker 1>know them, I know them. I am willing to always

0:37:26.239 --> 0:37:29.240
<v Speaker 1>sort of hope for and and not in this moment

0:37:29.239 --> 0:37:32.279
<v Speaker 1>where people are so quickly calling one another out. I

0:37:32.360 --> 0:37:35.200
<v Speaker 1>try to follow a practice of compassion. I think that

0:37:35.239 --> 0:37:38.799
<v Speaker 1>there's a huge opportunity here where it could be at

0:37:38.840 --> 0:37:43.000
<v Speaker 1>an inflection point for real transformative change that is great

0:37:43.040 --> 0:37:46.520
<v Speaker 1>for businesses but great for everyone else to write. And

0:37:46.640 --> 0:37:48.759
<v Speaker 1>that is what I want us to get to. And

0:37:48.800 --> 0:37:51.719
<v Speaker 1>I'm I'm determined. That's that's why I'm here with you.

0:37:51.960 --> 0:37:54.759
<v Speaker 1>I'm determined to do everything I can to take us

0:37:54.760 --> 0:37:57.480
<v Speaker 1>there because I'm a veteran of this world. We can

0:37:57.520 --> 0:38:00.200
<v Speaker 1>do a lot about this. We can do a lot

0:38:00.000 --> 0:38:02.960
<v Speaker 1>about this, but we need to start with real dialogue

0:38:03.160 --> 0:38:06.879
<v Speaker 1>and giving up some power and trusting one another, real collaboration.

0:38:07.200 --> 0:38:09.600
<v Speaker 1>I love that vision. Based on that, what's the one

0:38:09.600 --> 0:38:13.120
<v Speaker 1>thing that you would tell Mark to do two to

0:38:13.200 --> 0:38:16.640
<v Speaker 1>actually enact that, which would of course lower that score.

0:38:17.280 --> 0:38:21.680
<v Speaker 1>Sit down with the right kinds of scholars and journalists.

0:38:21.760 --> 0:38:26.120
<v Speaker 1>Let's all get together. Let's agree to some real actions

0:38:26.600 --> 0:38:30.239
<v Speaker 1>that you can take based on what our conversation are.

0:38:30.320 --> 0:38:33.319
<v Speaker 1>Agree and actually enact those actions. And here's another thing.

0:38:33.480 --> 0:38:36.360
<v Speaker 1>Let's do some A B testing. If you are to

0:38:36.600 --> 0:38:39.720
<v Speaker 1>implement some of these changes, Let's see how much that actually,

0:38:39.760 --> 0:38:42.520
<v Speaker 1>if at all, detracts from your you know what they

0:38:42.560 --> 0:38:45.759
<v Speaker 1>call engagement, so you know, attention is their currency. As

0:38:45.800 --> 0:38:48.719
<v Speaker 1>you alluded to earlier, so like, is that really the case?

0:38:48.800 --> 0:38:52.200
<v Speaker 1>You know, if I were exposed to interesting content that's

0:38:52.200 --> 0:38:56.279
<v Speaker 1>not just crazy trauma hype machine content, and it was

0:38:56.360 --> 0:38:59.280
<v Speaker 1>just sort of like maybe interesting in other ways. Uh,

0:38:59.400 --> 0:39:01.879
<v Speaker 1>I don't because human beings we only like to look

0:39:01.920 --> 0:39:04.680
<v Speaker 1>at burning cars. I really don't. I think human beings

0:39:04.680 --> 0:39:06.879
<v Speaker 1>are more complex than that, and I think human beings

0:39:06.960 --> 0:39:10.600
<v Speaker 1>are also activated by things that activate their interests and

0:39:10.680 --> 0:39:16.359
<v Speaker 1>expand their imagination. And call me a hopeful optimist about humanity,

0:39:16.400 --> 0:39:18.640
<v Speaker 1>but you know what, we gotta fight for what we

0:39:18.719 --> 0:39:22.920
<v Speaker 1>mean by humanity here moving forward. That's right, Dent. It

0:39:23.000 --> 0:39:25.000
<v Speaker 1>just reminds me of one of the ideas that someone

0:39:25.040 --> 0:39:27.560
<v Speaker 1>put forward in the first episode was instead of a

0:39:27.600 --> 0:39:31.600
<v Speaker 1>like button, let's try different kinds of buttons like maybe

0:39:31.920 --> 0:39:36.800
<v Speaker 1>made me think button right. Things that encourage you to

0:39:37.680 --> 0:39:40.319
<v Speaker 1>think critically about what it is that you're looking at.

0:39:40.360 --> 0:39:44.440
<v Speaker 1>Things that encourage you to engage in healthier behaviors and

0:39:44.640 --> 0:39:50.080
<v Speaker 1>with healthier content. This was so great. I so appreciate

0:39:50.160 --> 0:39:53.759
<v Speaker 1>your being here with us today and thank you. Oh

0:39:53.840 --> 0:39:56.879
<v Speaker 1>it's my pleasure. This was a great conversation, and thank

0:39:56.920 --> 0:40:05.040
<v Speaker 1>you for having this podcast. I had no idea when

0:40:05.040 --> 0:40:07.440
<v Speaker 1>I started looking at Facebook that they would turn out

0:40:07.440 --> 0:40:10.840
<v Speaker 1>to be such a complicated story, or that their score

0:40:11.040 --> 0:40:14.319
<v Speaker 1>would be so high. But the b S score just

0:40:14.360 --> 0:40:17.200
<v Speaker 1>goes way up when you know about the BS and

0:40:17.280 --> 0:40:19.920
<v Speaker 1>decide to look the other way, and it goes up

0:40:19.960 --> 0:40:22.919
<v Speaker 1>even further if you decide to try to hide it

0:40:23.480 --> 0:40:26.000
<v Speaker 1>to me. The tragedy here is that Facebook has so

0:40:26.200 --> 0:40:29.920
<v Speaker 1>much potential to do good, the ability to support and

0:40:30.000 --> 0:40:33.719
<v Speaker 1>promote great causes at scale, a way to share important

0:40:33.719 --> 0:40:39.160
<v Speaker 1>information about a pandemic, for instance, at scale connectivity in

0:40:39.320 --> 0:40:42.440
<v Speaker 1>all parts of the world. That's what I want from

0:40:42.520 --> 0:40:46.200
<v Speaker 1>my social media. The really big line is that they

0:40:46.239 --> 0:40:50.560
<v Speaker 1>have to pursue this antiquated and dying form of capitalism

0:40:50.600 --> 0:40:56.640
<v Speaker 1>that puts short term profitability over humanity. I am convinced

0:40:56.800 --> 0:40:59.879
<v Speaker 1>that it's ultimately bad for business, and that the mark

0:41:00.120 --> 0:41:04.200
<v Speaker 1>will prove this out over the long term. So I'm

0:41:04.239 --> 0:41:08.880
<v Speaker 1>going to raise Facebook's BS score. Remember the scale is

0:41:08.920 --> 0:41:13.400
<v Speaker 1>from zero to one, zero being the best zero BS,

0:41:13.440 --> 0:41:18.200
<v Speaker 1>a hundred being the worst total BS. In episode one,

0:41:18.239 --> 0:41:21.600
<v Speaker 1>we gave them a seventy two. We're raising it twenty

0:41:21.640 --> 0:41:26.959
<v Speaker 1>points to two. Some might say even that is too low,

0:41:27.560 --> 0:41:30.360
<v Speaker 1>but we're going to spare them those eight points because,

0:41:30.800 --> 0:41:33.799
<v Speaker 1>like Cromace, I believe the company has a bunch of

0:41:33.840 --> 0:41:37.239
<v Speaker 1>good people working inside to try to change it, so

0:41:37.320 --> 0:41:41.000
<v Speaker 1>there's always hope. And if you're running a purpose led

0:41:41.040 --> 0:41:44.080
<v Speaker 1>business or thinking of beginning the journey of transformation to

0:41:44.120 --> 0:41:47.080
<v Speaker 1>become one, here are three things you should take away

0:41:47.120 --> 0:41:51.480
<v Speaker 1>from today's episode. Today, I'm going to switch it up

0:41:51.520 --> 0:41:54.759
<v Speaker 1>and do these in the form of predictions. One, with

0:41:54.840 --> 0:41:57.719
<v Speaker 1>a b S score of ninety two, I predict that

0:41:57.760 --> 0:42:01.520
<v Speaker 1>Facebook is going to lose the war for talent. Young

0:42:01.520 --> 0:42:04.400
<v Speaker 1>people today want to work in organizations that align with

0:42:04.440 --> 0:42:07.680
<v Speaker 1>their values. The very best people won't be interested in

0:42:07.760 --> 0:42:13.000
<v Speaker 1>joining Facebook, and those already there will leave. If you're

0:42:13.080 --> 0:42:16.560
<v Speaker 1>running a purpose led business, keeping your BS score as

0:42:16.680 --> 0:42:21.640
<v Speaker 1>low as you can is a competitive advantage too. Being

0:42:21.680 --> 0:42:27.120
<v Speaker 1>an ultra high BS company attracts regulators. I predict that

0:42:27.160 --> 0:42:30.560
<v Speaker 1>at the very least, the days of Facebook's anti competitive

0:42:30.600 --> 0:42:36.160
<v Speaker 1>behavior of just acquiring or copying competitors is over. If

0:42:36.200 --> 0:42:38.600
<v Speaker 1>you're lucky enough to be running a purpose led business

0:42:38.600 --> 0:42:43.359
<v Speaker 1>that gets big, a low BS score keeps congress away.

0:42:43.480 --> 0:42:49.280
<v Speaker 1>And three, being an ultra high BS company destroys shareholder value.

0:42:50.160 --> 0:42:53.120
<v Speaker 1>I predict that Facebook investors who in the short term

0:42:53.160 --> 0:42:57.000
<v Speaker 1>have benefited from all this bad behavior will start to suffer.

0:42:57.480 --> 0:43:00.080
<v Speaker 1>There is a massive shift taking place in capital is

0:43:00.160 --> 0:43:04.040
<v Speaker 1>um right now. We're seeing the largest intergenerational transfer of

0:43:04.040 --> 0:43:07.560
<v Speaker 1>wealth in history, as boomers age out and transfer their

0:43:07.600 --> 0:43:11.440
<v Speaker 1>money to the next generations. Those generations want to invest

0:43:11.520 --> 0:43:15.160
<v Speaker 1>that money in ways that align with their values. So

0:43:15.239 --> 0:43:18.919
<v Speaker 1>if you're starting or leading a purpose led business, low

0:43:19.040 --> 0:43:22.879
<v Speaker 1>bs will improve your ability to access capital to grow

0:43:22.960 --> 0:43:28.080
<v Speaker 1>that business privately or in the public markets. Usually at

0:43:28.120 --> 0:43:30.400
<v Speaker 1>this point in the show, I would extend an invitation

0:43:30.440 --> 0:43:32.759
<v Speaker 1>to Mark Zuckerberg if he ever wants to join us

0:43:32.800 --> 0:43:36.279
<v Speaker 1>to chat. That door will always be open, Mark, But

0:43:36.400 --> 0:43:40.360
<v Speaker 1>I'd also like to extend an invitation to Facebook employees

0:43:40.680 --> 0:43:43.759
<v Speaker 1>who continue to fight the good fight. If any of

0:43:43.800 --> 0:43:46.560
<v Speaker 1>you ever want to come on our show, you have

0:43:46.640 --> 0:43:55.560
<v Speaker 1>an open invitation. Thanks to our guest today, Ramas Srinivasa.

0:43:56.080 --> 0:43:59.040
<v Speaker 1>You can find out more about him on our website

0:43:59.400 --> 0:44:03.799
<v Speaker 1>Calling Ship podcast dot com. If you have ideas for

0:44:03.880 --> 0:44:07.680
<v Speaker 1>companies or organizations we should consider for future episodes, you

0:44:07.719 --> 0:44:10.760
<v Speaker 1>can submit them on the site too, And I highly

0:44:10.840 --> 0:44:16.200
<v Speaker 1>recommend you check out Romation's book Beyond the Valley. Subscribe

0:44:16.280 --> 0:44:19.160
<v Speaker 1>to the Calling Bullshit podcast on the I Heart Radio app,

0:44:19.400 --> 0:44:24.280
<v Speaker 1>Apple Podcasts or wherever you get your podcasts, and thanks

0:44:24.280 --> 0:44:28.759
<v Speaker 1>to our production team Hannah Beal, Jess Fenton, Amanda Ginsburgh,

0:44:29.160 --> 0:44:34.719
<v Speaker 1>Andy Kim, D s Moss, Mikaela Reid, Basil Soaper and

0:44:34.880 --> 0:44:39.320
<v Speaker 1>me John Zulu. Calling Bullshit was created by co Collective

0:44:39.719 --> 0:44:43.840
<v Speaker 1>and is hosted by me Time Montague. Thanks for listening,

0:44:50.280 --> 0:44:50.400
<v Speaker 1>Ye