WEBVTT - The Cycle: Rounding The Bases (Ep. 1022)

0:00:05.160 --> 0:00:08.280
<v Speaker 1>Hello, everybody, Welcome into the Cycle. I am Ryan Warmley,

0:00:08.320 --> 0:00:11.400
<v Speaker 1>joined as always by Mike Mayor. We are talking all

0:00:11.400 --> 0:00:14.560
<v Speaker 1>things fantasy baseball. This is part one of three parts

0:00:14.560 --> 0:00:16.960
<v Speaker 1>of the cycle, as we give to you every single week.

0:00:17.000 --> 0:00:20.520
<v Speaker 1>We are rounding the basis with some trending topics, some

0:00:20.600 --> 0:00:23.599
<v Speaker 1>news updates, some bigger picture stuff. This is kind of

0:00:23.600 --> 0:00:26.720
<v Speaker 1>the catch all part of the show where we talk

0:00:26.760 --> 0:00:29.120
<v Speaker 1>about really whatever it is that comes to mind for us.

0:00:29.120 --> 0:00:30.319
<v Speaker 1>How are you doing here today, Mayor?

0:00:30.960 --> 0:00:32.680
<v Speaker 2>I'm doing good. I'm really excited to get into this

0:00:32.720 --> 0:00:35.400
<v Speaker 2>first segment to see if you're actually gonna drink alcohol

0:00:35.520 --> 0:00:36.080
<v Speaker 2>on camera.

0:00:37.520 --> 0:00:41.040
<v Speaker 1>Yes. Our first topic here is Brandon Hyde was fired

0:00:41.120 --> 0:00:44.239
<v Speaker 1>a few days ago, and Worm does a tequila shot. Now.

0:00:44.320 --> 0:00:47.280
<v Speaker 1>I promised to our audience that I would do with

0:00:47.320 --> 0:00:50.600
<v Speaker 1>tequila shot on the show if Brandon Hyde was fired.

0:00:51.080 --> 0:00:54.200
<v Speaker 1>It is ten am my time, Mayor here in Denver

0:00:54.280 --> 0:00:56.840
<v Speaker 1>as of when we're recording this today, and I am

0:00:56.880 --> 0:00:58.520
<v Speaker 1>still going to live up to it. So I have

0:00:58.640 --> 0:01:02.320
<v Speaker 1>brought a little espolonneo and how do you pronounce it?

0:01:03.000 --> 0:01:06.759
<v Speaker 1>Repisodo tequila here. I'm also rocking an Oriol shirt today

0:01:06.840 --> 0:01:08.640
<v Speaker 1>kind of in celebration. Is a Funne One. It's like

0:01:08.680 --> 0:01:11.840
<v Speaker 1>the Beatles, but it's like it's you know, Crossing Abbey Road,

0:01:11.840 --> 0:01:14.080
<v Speaker 1>but it's four Oiols players. If anybody's watching YouTube, it's

0:01:14.080 --> 0:01:15.880
<v Speaker 1>great shirt. They get compliments on it all the time.

0:01:16.640 --> 0:01:21.160
<v Speaker 1>And I brought the bottle. I think it's it's Cal,

0:01:21.800 --> 0:01:24.440
<v Speaker 1>it's Frank Robinson, It's it's not in this order, but

0:01:24.480 --> 0:01:27.440
<v Speaker 1>it's Cal, Frank Robinson, Jim Palmer, and Brooks Robinson.

0:01:27.520 --> 0:01:29.520
<v Speaker 2>Okay, so it's like famous.

0:01:29.520 --> 0:01:33.680
<v Speaker 1>It's not like zach efln correct, It's it's like all time.

0:01:34.120 --> 0:01:37.160
<v Speaker 1>It's probably the four best Orioles ever. I mean when

0:01:37.160 --> 0:01:38.919
<v Speaker 1>you when you think about the oils, like the numbers

0:01:38.920 --> 0:01:41.080
<v Speaker 1>that are retired to Candy Yards, it's like these guys

0:01:41.080 --> 0:01:43.639
<v Speaker 1>and Earl Weaver, who's obviously a manager, not a player.

0:01:43.680 --> 0:01:46.760
<v Speaker 1>So it's like pretty much the four the four Goats.

0:01:46.800 --> 0:01:47.840
<v Speaker 1>I mean you could, I guess you could make an

0:01:47.880 --> 0:01:51.120
<v Speaker 1>argument for like Eddie Murray in there and some other players,

0:01:51.120 --> 0:01:52.680
<v Speaker 1>but yeah, I mean's that's pretty much what it is.

0:01:52.680 --> 0:01:54.560
<v Speaker 1>But yeah, I brought the bottle so people would not

0:01:54.640 --> 0:01:58.600
<v Speaker 1>accuse me of like just pouring something that wasn't tequila earlier.

0:01:58.800 --> 0:02:01.880
<v Speaker 1>This is literally tequila and I'm pouring it on camera.

0:02:02.240 --> 0:02:04.120
<v Speaker 2>I mean, that could be apple juice in a tequila

0:02:04.160 --> 0:02:05.040
<v Speaker 2>boba for all we know.

0:02:05.120 --> 0:02:07.840
<v Speaker 1>It is it is not, And I'm hoping I'm not

0:02:07.880 --> 0:02:10.280
<v Speaker 1>gonna get in trouble for this because I did message you.

0:02:10.280 --> 0:02:12.160
<v Speaker 1>I was like, I'm allowed to do this on air, right,

0:02:12.280 --> 0:02:14.000
<v Speaker 1>and you said I don't see why not?

0:02:14.240 --> 0:02:17.720
<v Speaker 2>So that and we asked no one else for for permission.

0:02:18.320 --> 0:02:22.480
<v Speaker 1>Zero follow up. So uh, cheers to a new era

0:02:22.600 --> 0:02:23.400
<v Speaker 1>for the Orioles.

0:02:23.840 --> 0:02:24.760
<v Speaker 2>Cheers to you.

0:02:26.760 --> 0:02:28.000
<v Speaker 1>All right, gonna be a great show.

0:02:28.680 --> 0:02:31.800
<v Speaker 2>I would I would have done one too, But somehow

0:02:31.840 --> 0:02:33.920
<v Speaker 2>I feel like showing up to daycare to pick up

0:02:33.919 --> 0:02:36.359
<v Speaker 2>your kids with tequila on your breath is probably frowned upon.

0:02:38.120 --> 0:02:40.639
<v Speaker 1>Uh well, I want everybody to notice too that, like

0:02:40.880 --> 0:02:42.840
<v Speaker 1>you know, I'm this is a real tequila shot. There

0:02:42.880 --> 0:02:45.919
<v Speaker 1>was no line, there was no you know, chaser here,

0:02:46.120 --> 0:02:48.720
<v Speaker 1>just straight tequila. That's all you need when you're doing

0:02:48.720 --> 0:02:51.400
<v Speaker 1>is shop. That's my stance on and do. I always

0:02:51.400 --> 0:02:54.200
<v Speaker 1>say if I'm a if I'm drinking, if I'm sipping,

0:02:54.240 --> 0:02:56.240
<v Speaker 1>it's gonna be like scotch or some kind of whiskey.

0:02:56.360 --> 0:02:58.560
<v Speaker 1>If I'm mixing, it's gonna be wrong. If I'm shooting,

0:02:58.600 --> 0:03:01.200
<v Speaker 1>it's gonna be tequila. That's that's definitely they go too.

0:03:01.240 --> 0:03:03.320
<v Speaker 1>That went down really well. Actually, that's pretty I actually

0:03:03.320 --> 0:03:05.799
<v Speaker 1>did tequila that, Teddy. More often you don't have to

0:03:05.840 --> 0:03:06.240
<v Speaker 1>go back.

0:03:06.160 --> 0:03:07.799
<v Speaker 2>And do like a slow mo of you taking in

0:03:07.800 --> 0:03:10.160
<v Speaker 2>and see like what your your facial reaction.

0:03:09.960 --> 0:03:13.760
<v Speaker 1>Was, see the reaction. Yeah, Well, anyways, I Brandon Hyde

0:03:13.880 --> 0:03:15.320
<v Speaker 1>is fired, right, this is this is kind of why

0:03:15.320 --> 0:03:16.960
<v Speaker 1>we're celebrating. I want to be really clear before we

0:03:17.000 --> 0:03:20.480
<v Speaker 1>dive into this that fundamentally I don't really love like

0:03:20.720 --> 0:03:22.880
<v Speaker 1>dancing on the grave of somebody who's lost their job

0:03:23.040 --> 0:03:25.760
<v Speaker 1>like that's I recognize that there is a negative side

0:03:25.800 --> 0:03:28.720
<v Speaker 1>to somebody getting fired, and we are having fun with it,

0:03:28.800 --> 0:03:31.079
<v Speaker 1>but I, you know, I recognize that like a man

0:03:31.120 --> 0:03:34.120
<v Speaker 1>lost his job, and I feel for that. Having said that,

0:03:34.160 --> 0:03:36.600
<v Speaker 1>Brandon Hyde has more money than everybody in my family

0:03:36.600 --> 0:03:39.200
<v Speaker 1>combined will make in our entire lifetimes, he will be fine.

0:03:40.040 --> 0:03:42.600
<v Speaker 1>And the other thing with kind of celebrating and or

0:03:42.600 --> 0:03:45.480
<v Speaker 1>at the very least being enthusiastic about moving on is

0:03:46.360 --> 0:03:48.480
<v Speaker 1>it's not like he was given like short shrift here.

0:03:48.560 --> 0:03:52.680
<v Speaker 1>He was given seven seasons as the Orioles manager. I

0:03:52.720 --> 0:03:54.920
<v Speaker 1>know half of that time, he was dealing with the

0:03:54.960 --> 0:03:56.640
<v Speaker 1>rebuild and was just kind of the guy having to

0:03:56.640 --> 0:03:58.840
<v Speaker 1>wear those losses. I have a lot of respect for

0:03:58.880 --> 0:04:01.600
<v Speaker 1>Brandon Hyde. I thought he was a very, very good

0:04:01.640 --> 0:04:05.040
<v Speaker 1>manager for the rebuild. He was a good dude. I

0:04:05.160 --> 0:04:07.920
<v Speaker 1>met him in person when I was back East covering

0:04:07.960 --> 0:04:13.520
<v Speaker 1>the team, nice guy like. I have nothing bad to

0:04:13.520 --> 0:04:15.960
<v Speaker 1>say about Brandon Hyde, except for once his team became

0:04:16.000 --> 0:04:18.719
<v Speaker 1>a contender, he was just in over his head. I

0:04:18.720 --> 0:04:20.720
<v Speaker 1>thought it was very clear when they got swept by

0:04:20.720 --> 0:04:23.000
<v Speaker 1>the Rangers in the playoffs in twenty twenty three, I

0:04:23.000 --> 0:04:24.440
<v Speaker 1>got very I thought it was very clear when he

0:04:24.480 --> 0:04:27.440
<v Speaker 1>got swept by the Royals last year. Every time there

0:04:27.520 --> 0:04:32.480
<v Speaker 1>was a serious, big, major series or game, I felt

0:04:32.480 --> 0:04:34.360
<v Speaker 1>like he was getting out managed. I had a ton

0:04:34.400 --> 0:04:36.160
<v Speaker 1>of problems, as I mentioned on this show, a lot

0:04:36.240 --> 0:04:40.720
<v Speaker 1>with lineup decisions and sitting guys like Jackson Holiday and

0:04:40.880 --> 0:04:44.159
<v Speaker 1>really not letting any young players get into a rhythm.

0:04:44.839 --> 0:04:48.480
<v Speaker 1>Bullpen decisions I thought were crazy. A lot of the time.

0:04:48.760 --> 0:04:50.840
<v Speaker 1>I just thought he was in over his head as

0:04:50.880 --> 0:04:52.719
<v Speaker 1>the manager of a contending team, but as the manager

0:04:52.760 --> 0:04:54.280
<v Speaker 1>of a rebuilding team, he was a lot of fun.

0:04:54.680 --> 0:04:57.239
<v Speaker 1>I wish him definitely the best of luck moving forward.

0:04:57.240 --> 0:04:59.600
<v Speaker 1>No ill will and even though we're having fun here.

0:04:59.600 --> 0:05:02.039
<v Speaker 1>Like I said, I I do recognize and have empathy

0:05:02.120 --> 0:05:03.680
<v Speaker 1>for the fact that he lost his job, But I

0:05:03.680 --> 0:05:05.120
<v Speaker 1>do think this is a good step for the Orioles.

0:05:05.320 --> 0:05:06.800
<v Speaker 1>The biggest problem is that it took as long as

0:05:06.800 --> 0:05:08.600
<v Speaker 1>it did, Like it shouldn't have. We shouldn't have taken

0:05:08.680 --> 0:05:11.680
<v Speaker 1>until now to replace him. And I'm really curious where

0:05:11.680 --> 0:05:12.279
<v Speaker 1>they go from here.

0:05:12.320 --> 0:05:13.760
<v Speaker 2>Well, I think they had to give him some leeway.

0:05:13.760 --> 0:05:15.320
<v Speaker 2>They were like, look, you would take your lumps for

0:05:15.320 --> 0:05:16.919
<v Speaker 2>a few years, Let's give you a long leash on

0:05:16.920 --> 0:05:18.120
<v Speaker 2>the back end of this to see if you can

0:05:18.160 --> 0:05:21.479
<v Speaker 2>turn this around. I think his biggest mistake was allowing

0:05:21.520 --> 0:05:23.400
<v Speaker 2>them to build the Great Wall of Baltimore out in

0:05:23.480 --> 0:05:26.080
<v Speaker 2>left field instead of chaining himself to the fence and

0:05:26.120 --> 0:05:28.560
<v Speaker 2>forcing them not to move that wall back. Because that

0:05:28.720 --> 0:05:30.000
<v Speaker 2>ruined Ryan Mountcastle.

0:05:30.600 --> 0:05:32.360
<v Speaker 1>I was gonna say, you only feel that way because

0:05:32.360 --> 0:05:33.720
<v Speaker 1>you love Ryan Mountcastle.

0:05:35.480 --> 0:05:37.000
<v Speaker 2>I mean there were some other people didn't do any

0:05:37.000 --> 0:05:39.039
<v Speaker 2>favors either. I don't think Austin Hayes appreciated it for

0:05:39.080 --> 0:05:40.160
<v Speaker 2>his career development either.

0:05:40.760 --> 0:05:44.560
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and I recognize too that this year's team is

0:05:45.200 --> 0:05:48.039
<v Speaker 1>not solely Hide's fault. There have been some injuries, and

0:05:48.800 --> 0:05:51.720
<v Speaker 1>very importantly, there has been a real lack of pitching

0:05:51.800 --> 0:05:54.760
<v Speaker 1>availability because Michael Ayas did not do a good enough

0:05:54.839 --> 0:05:56.680
<v Speaker 1>job building the team of the offseason, and also the

0:05:56.720 --> 0:05:59.200
<v Speaker 1>lineup isn't good enough. They lost Anthony Santander, who had

0:05:59.680 --> 0:06:02.760
<v Speaker 1>mid already's homers last year, and they replaced him with

0:06:02.960 --> 0:06:06.360
<v Speaker 1>Tyler O'Neil, who hasn't been good since opening day, you know,

0:06:06.440 --> 0:06:09.080
<v Speaker 1>adlely taking a step back. It seems like there's some

0:06:09.120 --> 0:06:11.039
<v Speaker 1>bad luck in there. But it's now been a year

0:06:11.040 --> 0:06:13.600
<v Speaker 1>of this. Gunner has not been his usual stuff. I

0:06:13.600 --> 0:06:15.159
<v Speaker 1>think he was rushed back from the injury that he

0:06:15.160 --> 0:06:17.560
<v Speaker 1>had in spring training. But we're now into late May,

0:06:17.800 --> 0:06:20.000
<v Speaker 1>like you know, those excuses start to run a little

0:06:20.000 --> 0:06:21.719
<v Speaker 1>thin at a certain point. It seems like it's just

0:06:22.120 --> 0:06:23.839
<v Speaker 1>kind of a down start to the year for him.

0:06:24.120 --> 0:06:27.039
<v Speaker 1>Mullins started off hot and then got cold. You know,

0:06:27.080 --> 0:06:30.520
<v Speaker 1>Westburg's been hurt, Cowser has been hurt. But this lineup

0:06:30.520 --> 0:06:32.279
<v Speaker 1>wasn't good enough going into the year, I don't think.

0:06:32.640 --> 0:06:35.640
<v Speaker 1>And the rotation was not even the top twenty rotation

0:06:35.720 --> 0:06:37.920
<v Speaker 1>in baseball coming into the season, and that was before

0:06:37.960 --> 0:06:40.960
<v Speaker 1>Eflyn got hurt and before, like you know, knowing that

0:06:41.000 --> 0:06:43.320
<v Speaker 1>Grayson Roaldriguez has had a lot of injury problems like this,

0:06:43.560 --> 0:06:45.520
<v Speaker 1>it just simply was not good enough that they lost

0:06:45.520 --> 0:06:48.520
<v Speaker 1>Corbyn Burns did not replace him, They lost Santainder replaced

0:06:48.560 --> 0:06:51.520
<v Speaker 1>him with Tyler O'Neill, And I recognize that, so I

0:06:51.520 --> 0:06:54.240
<v Speaker 1>don't want to hold those issues against Tide. There were

0:06:54.279 --> 0:06:56.440
<v Speaker 1>other reasons that I felt like Hyde should have should

0:06:56.480 --> 0:06:58.800
<v Speaker 1>have been let go, But this was not a good

0:06:58.880 --> 0:07:00.600
<v Speaker 1>job in the off season by Michael either.

0:07:00.839 --> 0:07:02.919
<v Speaker 2>No, and that's with getting the best case scenarios so

0:07:03.000 --> 0:07:07.000
<v Speaker 2>far with Tony Yuki Sigano. Like you, this is the

0:07:07.080 --> 0:07:08.840
<v Speaker 2>highest range of outcome for him too, So if you

0:07:08.880 --> 0:07:11.000
<v Speaker 2>weren't getting that, it would be even worse. Do you

0:07:11.040 --> 0:07:16.600
<v Speaker 2>think from a fantasy perspective, are there any major changes here?

0:07:16.640 --> 0:07:19.520
<v Speaker 2>Do you think we're going to see like a Kobe

0:07:19.520 --> 0:07:21.120
<v Speaker 2>Mayo come up and get a long run here or

0:07:21.160 --> 0:07:22.680
<v Speaker 2>do you think it's still going to be status quo

0:07:22.800 --> 0:07:23.280
<v Speaker 2>for the words.

0:07:24.120 --> 0:07:26.600
<v Speaker 1>The thing that's hard to answer about that is one

0:07:26.680 --> 0:07:28.720
<v Speaker 1>of the litany of issues that I have with Brandon

0:07:28.840 --> 0:07:32.720
<v Speaker 1>Hyde is I felt like he was far too deferential

0:07:32.760 --> 0:07:37.480
<v Speaker 1>to Elias and it's hard to know how many of

0:07:37.520 --> 0:07:41.360
<v Speaker 1>the lineup decisions we're coming from Hyde versus Elias and

0:07:41.400 --> 0:07:44.040
<v Speaker 1>Sigma Dell saying like, Hey, our computer says X, Y

0:07:44.080 --> 0:07:47.640
<v Speaker 1>and Z, So start these guys here and play them there.

0:07:47.880 --> 0:07:52.760
<v Speaker 1>And Tony Manzilino is as an interim guy who's has

0:07:52.800 --> 0:07:55.520
<v Speaker 1>it's basically admitted publicly that he's kind of run around

0:07:55.520 --> 0:07:57.560
<v Speaker 1>like a chicken with his head cut off and is

0:07:57.640 --> 0:07:58.320
<v Speaker 1>just like trying to.

0:08:00.040 --> 0:08:00.160
<v Speaker 2>Think.

0:08:00.320 --> 0:08:01.880
<v Speaker 1>I mean, he hasn't said that phrase, but it's been

0:08:01.960 --> 0:08:04.000
<v Speaker 1>kind of implied. I think he said he didn't sleep

0:08:04.080 --> 0:08:06.800
<v Speaker 1>until like the third night after this promotion. And you

0:08:06.800 --> 0:08:09.400
<v Speaker 1>know they the Orioles didn't get the new manager bump.

0:08:09.480 --> 0:08:12.440
<v Speaker 1>They lost like four in a row after after the firing.

0:08:13.320 --> 0:08:15.840
<v Speaker 2>What is that the dead cat bounce? Is that what

0:08:15.840 --> 0:08:16.280
<v Speaker 2>that's called?

0:08:16.360 --> 0:08:19.040
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, but like the dead cat stay dead in this case,

0:08:20.240 --> 0:08:22.840
<v Speaker 1>he has made it clear that he is here for

0:08:22.920 --> 0:08:26.880
<v Speaker 1>the players, like he is not really concerned with anything else,

0:08:26.960 --> 0:08:30.680
<v Speaker 1>is his his own coaching record, whatever. He is there like,

0:08:31.200 --> 0:08:33.480
<v Speaker 1>you know, these players have been through a lot, and

0:08:33.559 --> 0:08:35.120
<v Speaker 1>let's try and get this on track for them and

0:08:35.120 --> 0:08:38.160
<v Speaker 1>put them in the best possible chance to succeed. Jackson

0:08:38.200 --> 0:08:40.240
<v Speaker 1>Holliday has been batting lead off a lot since he's

0:08:40.280 --> 0:08:42.360
<v Speaker 1>taken over. You know I did that some, but you know,

0:08:42.480 --> 0:08:44.240
<v Speaker 1>I hope to see that continue throughout the rest of

0:08:44.280 --> 0:08:47.920
<v Speaker 1>the year. And what I really hope, if you want

0:08:47.960 --> 0:08:50.760
<v Speaker 1>to say, like and you Bordomine, have to write off

0:08:50.760 --> 0:08:52.600
<v Speaker 1>the season, like for the playoffs at this point, they

0:08:52.640 --> 0:08:55.240
<v Speaker 1>are just so far the whole day of digging them

0:08:55.360 --> 0:08:58.080
<v Speaker 1>they've dug for themselves is just too too deep. I

0:08:58.120 --> 0:09:01.480
<v Speaker 1>think that you should be thinking about twenty twenty six

0:09:01.520 --> 0:09:03.640
<v Speaker 1>and you should be saying, I want to get Hessen,

0:09:03.720 --> 0:09:05.920
<v Speaker 1>Kirstad and Kobe Mayo and if he gets called up,

0:09:05.960 --> 0:09:08.960
<v Speaker 1>Samuel Bissio every at bat possible, and I don't care

0:09:08.960 --> 0:09:10.800
<v Speaker 1>if it's against a lefty orl righty. I don't know

0:09:10.840 --> 0:09:12.960
<v Speaker 1>if Elias is gonna approach it that way. I mean,

0:09:13.160 --> 0:09:15.000
<v Speaker 1>another thing that really bothered me with Hyde was the

0:09:16.160 --> 0:09:21.920
<v Speaker 1>just being so so driven by righty versus lefty, even

0:09:21.960 --> 0:09:25.960
<v Speaker 1>ignoring when guys had reverse splits. And I want to

0:09:25.960 --> 0:09:29.080
<v Speaker 1>see Holiday develop against left handed pitching. I want to

0:09:29.080 --> 0:09:32.120
<v Speaker 1>see Kirstad do the same thing. I want to see

0:09:32.240 --> 0:09:35.120
<v Speaker 1>Mayo if he gets called up again, just play every

0:09:35.160 --> 0:09:37.960
<v Speaker 1>day and getting two We've seen it so often that

0:09:38.000 --> 0:09:41.000
<v Speaker 1>these really strong prospects come up and don't hit the

0:09:41.000 --> 0:09:44.560
<v Speaker 1>ground running. And it's happened across baseball, but it happens

0:09:44.600 --> 0:09:46.880
<v Speaker 1>most consistently in Baltimore. And I think a large part

0:09:46.880 --> 0:09:49.880
<v Speaker 1>of that is because these guys don't get consistent at bats.

0:09:50.000 --> 0:09:53.800
<v Speaker 1>The only two players that I can remember right from

0:09:53.840 --> 0:09:55.880
<v Speaker 1>the get go, as soon as they're called up they're

0:09:55.920 --> 0:09:59.719
<v Speaker 1>playing every day are Adley and Gunner, and even they

0:09:59.800 --> 0:10:02.319
<v Speaker 1>to a while to adjust. But everybody else has been

0:10:02.400 --> 0:10:05.679
<v Speaker 1>this like, we're gonna wait for the right matchups and oh,

0:10:05.720 --> 0:10:07.880
<v Speaker 1>you had two hits today, we're gonna sit you tomorrow

0:10:08.200 --> 0:10:09.800
<v Speaker 1>just because you're facing a left tea and said, well, no,

0:10:09.880 --> 0:10:11.760
<v Speaker 1>let's get the let's get the momentum going right. I'm

0:10:11.760 --> 0:10:14.440
<v Speaker 1>locked in. It's a it's a rhythm sport. I just

0:10:15.040 --> 0:10:17.720
<v Speaker 1>that was really frustrating. So I hope Tony Mansalino says, like, listen,

0:10:17.760 --> 0:10:20.280
<v Speaker 1>we're just gonna play the young guys and get them

0:10:20.280 --> 0:10:21.840
<v Speaker 1>at beats. And by the way, this team is talented

0:10:21.920 --> 0:10:23.720
<v Speaker 1>enough that they could go on a run. I don't

0:10:23.720 --> 0:10:25.280
<v Speaker 1>think it's a run to the playoffs, but they could

0:10:25.320 --> 0:10:28.280
<v Speaker 1>go on a run just with guys getting hot, and

0:10:28.320 --> 0:10:30.560
<v Speaker 1>if you ad they had a three run homer yesterday,

0:10:30.600 --> 0:10:33.280
<v Speaker 1>and if Gunner looks like his MVP candidate itself like

0:10:33.280 --> 0:10:36.000
<v Speaker 1>you did a year ago. So the fantasy implications is

0:10:36.000 --> 0:10:38.720
<v Speaker 1>a long winded way of answering that is, I hope

0:10:39.040 --> 0:10:41.840
<v Speaker 1>they just let the players play, and it's not like

0:10:41.880 --> 0:10:43.640
<v Speaker 1>the whole coaching staff has turned over. I have a

0:10:43.679 --> 0:10:46.839
<v Speaker 1>lot of problems with like their approach in the batter's box,

0:10:46.880 --> 0:10:48.839
<v Speaker 1>and I think that does need work, But that's something

0:10:48.840 --> 0:10:51.360
<v Speaker 1>that you revamp with a whole new staff. It's not

0:10:51.400 --> 0:10:53.679
<v Speaker 1>gonna be the change in manager is gonna change all that.

0:10:54.160 --> 0:10:55.839
<v Speaker 1>What you can hope for is that guy start playing

0:10:55.840 --> 0:10:57.839
<v Speaker 1>hard again. I though I was really telling that in

0:10:57.920 --> 0:11:01.280
<v Speaker 1>yesterday's game, their first win with Manson was one of

0:11:01.320 --> 0:11:04.920
<v Speaker 1>their classic like comeback late, winning extra innings, like the

0:11:05.000 --> 0:11:07.280
<v Speaker 1>kind of wins that they were doing all the time

0:11:07.320 --> 0:11:09.880
<v Speaker 1>in twenty twenty three. So if they just start playing

0:11:09.920 --> 0:11:14.240
<v Speaker 1>with a little more heart, excuse me, and giving guys

0:11:14.280 --> 0:11:16.200
<v Speaker 1>every day a chance to get into a rhythm, I

0:11:16.240 --> 0:11:18.120
<v Speaker 1>do think this can benefit fantasy managers.

0:11:18.440 --> 0:11:20.480
<v Speaker 2>I think the other thing that could potentially benefit fantasy

0:11:20.520 --> 0:11:23.160
<v Speaker 2>managers is and it's kind of hard to project this,

0:11:23.320 --> 0:11:25.960
<v Speaker 2>and I'm not saying you can really buy low now,

0:11:26.000 --> 0:11:28.880
<v Speaker 2>but it seems like the season is not going anywhere

0:11:28.880 --> 0:11:31.880
<v Speaker 2>for the Orioles, which means what you're talking about, playing

0:11:31.920 --> 0:11:35.319
<v Speaker 2>the young guys every day is either likely or more

0:11:35.400 --> 0:11:37.200
<v Speaker 2>likely to happen in the second half of the season.

0:11:37.679 --> 0:11:39.760
<v Speaker 2>And so if you can kind of like heading into

0:11:39.760 --> 0:11:43.400
<v Speaker 2>the All Star break, make stash of Kobe Mayo, you know,

0:11:43.840 --> 0:11:47.840
<v Speaker 2>get Kerestad, you know, on the cheap. I do think

0:11:47.880 --> 0:11:50.160
<v Speaker 2>those kind of players could play every day in the

0:11:50.160 --> 0:11:51.760
<v Speaker 2>second half of the season when there isn't a whole

0:11:51.800 --> 0:11:54.559
<v Speaker 2>lot to play for other than player development.

0:11:56.600 --> 0:11:59.680
<v Speaker 1>We are now giving away a Jose Ramirez signed Guardians

0:11:59.720 --> 0:12:02.319
<v Speaker 1>jersey the courtesy of our friends at Pristine Auction dot com,

0:12:02.360 --> 0:12:03.880
<v Speaker 1>and all you have to do to enter is to

0:12:03.960 --> 0:12:06.880
<v Speaker 1>subscribe to the Fantasy Pros MLB YouTube channel right now,

0:12:06.960 --> 0:12:09.280
<v Speaker 1>drop a comment below on any video, and that is it.

0:12:09.600 --> 0:12:12.000
<v Speaker 1>We will be announcing one lucky winner right here on

0:12:12.040 --> 0:12:14.319
<v Speaker 1>the channel, so make sure to turn on those notifications

0:12:14.640 --> 0:12:16.240
<v Speaker 1>so you can know when new videos are up and

0:12:16.280 --> 0:12:20.280
<v Speaker 1>to claim your prize. That's long enough on the Orioles,

0:12:20.280 --> 0:12:21.800
<v Speaker 1>Thank you for letting me get that off my chest.

0:12:21.880 --> 0:12:24.600
<v Speaker 1>Mayor and for celebrating to the degree I wanted to

0:12:24.640 --> 0:12:26.120
<v Speaker 1>and for doing it tequila shop.

0:12:25.920 --> 0:12:28.480
<v Speaker 2>And so everyone helped fast forwarded. Now we're heading on

0:12:28.480 --> 0:12:29.240
<v Speaker 2>to second base.

0:12:29.600 --> 0:12:32.720
<v Speaker 1>Because they were Yeah, that's too much Orioles. Stop for

0:12:32.720 --> 0:12:35.480
<v Speaker 1>one episode. All right, let's go to our second topic here.

0:12:36.360 --> 0:12:39.319
<v Speaker 1>This is more, you know, along the lines of close

0:12:39.400 --> 0:12:41.280
<v Speaker 1>to you, near and dear to your heart. The tush

0:12:41.360 --> 0:12:45.680
<v Speaker 1>push survives in the NFL. So we can take maybe

0:12:45.679 --> 0:12:47.440
<v Speaker 1>thirty seconds on that of the I'm sure we've already

0:12:47.440 --> 0:12:49.880
<v Speaker 1>turned off enough of our audience talking too much Orioles,

0:12:50.679 --> 0:12:52.679
<v Speaker 1>but I wanted to kind of spin this into our show.

0:12:52.679 --> 0:12:56.800
<v Speaker 1>What baseball rules would you like to see successfully get banned?

0:12:56.840 --> 0:13:00.199
<v Speaker 1>I will just quickly say, Mayor, and I know you're

0:13:00.200 --> 0:13:02.200
<v Speaker 1>an Eagles fan, so you might hate me for saying this.

0:13:02.480 --> 0:13:05.120
<v Speaker 1>That's actually should have been banned. Now, the reasons for

0:13:05.160 --> 0:13:07.640
<v Speaker 1>it being banned had nothing to do with a lot

0:13:07.640 --> 0:13:10.920
<v Speaker 1>of the talking points from like the Packers or NFL media.

0:13:11.120 --> 0:13:12.960
<v Speaker 1>It is not a safety concern. It is not a

0:13:12.960 --> 0:13:16.440
<v Speaker 1>pace of play concern. It is not because one team

0:13:16.480 --> 0:13:19.800
<v Speaker 1>has perfected it. In fact, most teams are really really

0:13:19.800 --> 0:13:22.200
<v Speaker 1>effective at it. The Eagles just do it way more

0:13:22.200 --> 0:13:24.200
<v Speaker 1>often than everybody else that the Eagles are the best

0:13:24.200 --> 0:13:26.640
<v Speaker 1>at it, but like other teams can be, like the

0:13:26.720 --> 0:13:28.640
<v Speaker 1>Ravens run their own version of it with Mark Andrews,

0:13:28.720 --> 0:13:32.280
<v Speaker 1>Like this is not an Eagles problem. I just don't

0:13:32.320 --> 0:13:35.000
<v Speaker 1>think you should have any plays in football that are

0:13:35.040 --> 0:13:38.840
<v Speaker 1>designed to be one guy gets pushed from behind by

0:13:39.000 --> 0:13:41.640
<v Speaker 1>his teammates or pulled. You know, if it were the

0:13:41.800 --> 0:13:44.679
<v Speaker 1>kind of going the way forward, progress exists to not

0:13:44.760 --> 0:13:46.880
<v Speaker 1>allow that for the defense to push you back. I

0:13:46.880 --> 0:13:48.880
<v Speaker 1>don't see why we allow it for the offense to

0:13:48.880 --> 0:13:51.960
<v Speaker 1>push you forward. It feels unfair to me if it

0:13:52.000 --> 0:13:53.920
<v Speaker 1>happens kind of in a fluke scrum. Like I'm not

0:13:53.960 --> 0:13:56.360
<v Speaker 1>saying you can never push anybody, although I wouldn't be

0:13:56.360 --> 0:13:57.880
<v Speaker 1>opposed to that as a rule, like that's what it

0:13:57.960 --> 0:14:00.320
<v Speaker 1>used to be prior to two thousand and five. But

0:14:00.520 --> 0:14:02.559
<v Speaker 1>I don't like designing plays where the whole point of

0:14:02.600 --> 0:14:04.280
<v Speaker 1>the play is like a guy gets pushed from behind.

0:14:04.600 --> 0:14:07.160
<v Speaker 1>Just let them do sneak, you know, QB sneaks. Jalen

0:14:07.240 --> 0:14:08.840
<v Speaker 1>Hurts will still be the best in football at it.

0:14:08.880 --> 0:14:11.480
<v Speaker 1>So I wanted a band, but not having anything to

0:14:11.480 --> 0:14:13.000
<v Speaker 1>do with the Eagles or safety or any of these

0:14:13.000 --> 0:14:14.760
<v Speaker 1>other talking points, just kind of a general approach to

0:14:14.800 --> 0:14:15.120
<v Speaker 1>the role.

0:14:15.400 --> 0:14:16.840
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, that was the That was the whole reason, and

0:14:16.920 --> 0:14:18.760
<v Speaker 2>I think that's why it failed too, that they like

0:14:18.920 --> 0:14:22.080
<v Speaker 2>it was this sham attempt to like call it for

0:14:22.160 --> 0:14:24.560
<v Speaker 2>like player safety and for like pace of play, which

0:14:24.600 --> 0:14:26.080
<v Speaker 2>the only the only time I ever sold down a

0:14:26.080 --> 0:14:28.040
<v Speaker 2>game was when the commanders jumped off side seven times

0:14:28.040 --> 0:14:31.640
<v Speaker 2>in a row. But yeah, I know I didn't feel

0:14:31.680 --> 0:14:33.400
<v Speaker 2>that strongly about it. Obviously as an Eagles fan, I

0:14:33.440 --> 0:14:35.520
<v Speaker 2>was very happy to see the result. And social media

0:14:35.560 --> 0:14:37.840
<v Speaker 2>has been amazing the last one of four hours, especially

0:14:37.840 --> 0:14:41.200
<v Speaker 2>the actual Eagles account just like trolling everyone involved in

0:14:41.240 --> 0:14:44.800
<v Speaker 2>this was it was amazing. But I do agree in

0:14:44.840 --> 0:14:47.320
<v Speaker 2>a lot of senses it could be banned. I do

0:14:47.480 --> 0:14:49.160
<v Speaker 2>agree with the kind of still that was like a

0:14:49.160 --> 0:14:52.840
<v Speaker 2>sham attempt, but kind of expanding it more than just

0:14:52.880 --> 0:14:55.000
<v Speaker 2>the toush push into like you can't because I think

0:14:55.000 --> 0:14:56.600
<v Speaker 2>one of the more dangerous things is when like an

0:14:56.640 --> 0:15:00.200
<v Speaker 2>offensive lineman comes running from five yards away and whow,

0:15:00.200 --> 0:15:01.800
<v Speaker 2>I was into a pile to push everyone forward too,

0:15:01.920 --> 0:15:03.920
<v Speaker 2>like that is a dangerous play and it's also kind

0:15:03.920 --> 0:15:06.480
<v Speaker 2>of a not fair one. So I think, like, like

0:15:06.520 --> 0:15:09.680
<v Speaker 2>you said that kind of stuff could be banned out

0:15:09.720 --> 0:15:11.320
<v Speaker 2>of the game too, and I think it. I think

0:15:11.320 --> 0:15:12.680
<v Speaker 2>it will next year. I think we're just going to

0:15:12.760 --> 0:15:14.280
<v Speaker 2>get one more year of the Brotherly chev.

0:15:15.880 --> 0:15:17.920
<v Speaker 1>I hope it is, but again not for any kind

0:15:17.960 --> 0:15:21.040
<v Speaker 1>of Eagles reason or anything like that. What baseball rules though,

0:15:21.440 --> 0:15:23.760
<v Speaker 1>would you like to see? Band We did kind of

0:15:23.800 --> 0:15:25.280
<v Speaker 1>an episode where we do have a little deeper on

0:15:25.280 --> 0:15:26.520
<v Speaker 1>this last year, but we have a lot of new

0:15:26.640 --> 0:15:29.680
<v Speaker 1>viewers this year. We're our YouTube now, the podcast has grown,

0:15:29.680 --> 0:15:31.800
<v Speaker 1>which were really grateful for, so for kind of some

0:15:31.880 --> 0:15:33.800
<v Speaker 1>of our new listeners. And this is more of just

0:15:33.840 --> 0:15:36.360
<v Speaker 1>a quick kind of reminder because these are similar rules

0:15:36.360 --> 0:15:38.680
<v Speaker 1>that I picked last year and I put two down.

0:15:39.480 --> 0:15:43.040
<v Speaker 1>One is the DH rule, and I said this last year,

0:15:43.080 --> 0:15:44.600
<v Speaker 1>this is my favorite rule change that I would like

0:15:44.640 --> 0:15:47.640
<v Speaker 1>to see. I don't want dhs, but I also don't

0:15:47.640 --> 0:15:50.160
<v Speaker 1>want pictures to hit. I want just eight batters to

0:15:50.160 --> 0:15:51.640
<v Speaker 1>bat in a lineup. And I know there's a lot

0:15:51.640 --> 0:15:54.840
<v Speaker 1>of symmetry with nine in nine innings, and I get it,

0:15:55.160 --> 0:15:57.880
<v Speaker 1>but I don't see why we just designate one player

0:15:57.920 --> 0:16:00.720
<v Speaker 1>to do only half the game. And I know, like

0:16:00.760 --> 0:16:02.840
<v Speaker 1>the Players Association will never let this happen, but like

0:16:03.200 --> 0:16:05.560
<v Speaker 1>I think it should just be the eight players other

0:16:05.600 --> 0:16:09.040
<v Speaker 1>than pitcher do both. And this would get the best

0:16:09.040 --> 0:16:11.240
<v Speaker 1>players more at bats in a season because those guys

0:16:11.320 --> 0:16:14.040
<v Speaker 1>hitting early there would be one few or batter before

0:16:14.040 --> 0:16:16.000
<v Speaker 1>they get up again. I think it would help with

0:16:16.040 --> 0:16:19.640
<v Speaker 1>some of the pitchers are too good problem in baseball too,

0:16:19.760 --> 0:16:22.600
<v Speaker 1>because you're getting through the lineup more quickly, and therefore

0:16:22.640 --> 0:16:26.960
<v Speaker 1>maybe pitchers, you know, are forced to If starters are

0:16:26.960 --> 0:16:29.000
<v Speaker 1>forced to not go as deep when they're not pitching

0:16:29.040 --> 0:16:30.760
<v Speaker 1>well because they're getting through the you know, the face

0:16:30.800 --> 0:16:34.280
<v Speaker 1>and the best hitters more often, then the relievers are

0:16:34.280 --> 0:16:35.880
<v Speaker 1>forced to cover more outs and then you don't get

0:16:35.880 --> 0:16:37.440
<v Speaker 1>this guy coming in who can just throw one hundred

0:16:37.440 --> 0:16:39.400
<v Speaker 1>and three because he's only facing one batter. Like I

0:16:39.400 --> 0:16:41.400
<v Speaker 1>think it helps in a lot of ways, but at

0:16:41.440 --> 0:16:43.160
<v Speaker 1>the end of the day, like I do, think it

0:16:43.200 --> 0:16:47.160
<v Speaker 1>increases offense and it makes every player kind of unequal footing,

0:16:47.520 --> 0:16:49.320
<v Speaker 1>and so I would really like to see the DH

0:16:49.400 --> 0:16:52.320
<v Speaker 1>rule removed, but without bringing back pitchers hitting. What do

0:16:52.360 --> 0:16:53.160
<v Speaker 1>you think about that one?

0:16:53.360 --> 0:16:55.440
<v Speaker 2>I don't hate it, I do even though I grew

0:16:55.520 --> 0:16:57.280
<v Speaker 2>up as an American League fan, I do kind of

0:16:57.320 --> 0:17:02.120
<v Speaker 2>miss the strategy of having to hit and you know

0:17:02.160 --> 0:17:04.199
<v Speaker 2>the late inning, like do I leave my starter in

0:17:04.280 --> 0:17:06.800
<v Speaker 2>who's really good, or like sacrifice him because I need,

0:17:06.960 --> 0:17:09.200
<v Speaker 2>you know, a pinch hitter. It also makes your bench

0:17:09.240 --> 0:17:11.639
<v Speaker 2>more valuable. We just got to the point where pitchers

0:17:11.680 --> 0:17:15.280
<v Speaker 2>were so bad at hitting that it just became like

0:17:15.920 --> 0:17:17.880
<v Speaker 2>a mockery of the game. It was. It was so

0:17:17.920 --> 0:17:20.600
<v Speaker 2>bad that they had to get rid of it. But

0:17:20.640 --> 0:17:22.960
<v Speaker 2>I also don't hate the idea of just getting rid

0:17:23.000 --> 0:17:25.639
<v Speaker 2>of the DH even though one of the greatest players

0:17:25.640 --> 0:17:27.440
<v Speaker 2>in Red Sox's history was DH only, but he could

0:17:27.440 --> 0:17:31.480
<v Speaker 2>play first base. David Ortiz, Yeah, I don't hate the

0:17:31.520 --> 0:17:35.280
<v Speaker 2>idea overall. I hadn't considered the getting through the lineup

0:17:35.320 --> 0:17:37.760
<v Speaker 2>quicker aspect of it, because that would make things more interesting,

0:17:37.800 --> 0:17:41.080
<v Speaker 2>Like having to face Aaron Judge, whatever percent it is,

0:17:42.240 --> 0:17:45.080
<v Speaker 2>ten percent more times a season is interesting.

0:17:46.280 --> 0:17:49.119
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, And like you know, even just from like the

0:17:49.160 --> 0:17:51.960
<v Speaker 1>excitement of the early parts of the game, like Gunnar Henderson,

0:17:52.000 --> 0:17:54.359
<v Speaker 1>if he's your leadoff hitter, I want to guarantee that

0:17:54.359 --> 0:17:56.800
<v Speaker 1>he's batting twice in the first three innings. That happens

0:17:56.840 --> 0:17:59.359
<v Speaker 1>in the scenario, and your first three hitters are you know,

0:17:59.359 --> 0:18:01.120
<v Speaker 1>are more. If you just get a couple guys on base,

0:18:01.760 --> 0:18:03.520
<v Speaker 1>you're not waiting till any four for that second. I

0:18:03.520 --> 0:18:05.560
<v Speaker 1>it's ending three now, and I just think over time

0:18:05.880 --> 0:18:07.520
<v Speaker 1>it's gonna add up to kind of more fun and

0:18:07.560 --> 0:18:09.000
<v Speaker 1>more at bats for the players. We love. The other

0:18:09.080 --> 0:18:10.560
<v Speaker 1>rule that I want to throw out, and I've said

0:18:10.600 --> 0:18:12.920
<v Speaker 1>this one before too, I would change the pitcher wins

0:18:13.000 --> 0:18:14.720
<v Speaker 1>rule so this isn't an on field one, which is

0:18:14.800 --> 0:18:16.960
<v Speaker 1>kind of why I made it second. But like, I

0:18:17.000 --> 0:18:19.639
<v Speaker 1>think the official scorekeeper of a game should have the

0:18:19.720 --> 0:18:22.760
<v Speaker 1>leeway to decide which pitcher gets to win, or to

0:18:22.800 --> 0:18:24.960
<v Speaker 1>decide that none of them should get the win. I

0:18:24.960 --> 0:18:27.000
<v Speaker 1>don't think we need to be behold into this rule

0:18:27.040 --> 0:18:29.320
<v Speaker 1>of like whoever happened to be on the mound when

0:18:29.320 --> 0:18:31.560
<v Speaker 1>your team took the lead is the one who gets

0:18:31.600 --> 0:18:34.640
<v Speaker 1>to win? Like I think it just happened with Yamamoto,

0:18:35.119 --> 0:18:39.200
<v Speaker 1>like two days ago, he went seven shutout innings, just

0:18:39.320 --> 0:18:42.600
<v Speaker 1>awesome start, but then his bullpen blew the lead in

0:18:42.640 --> 0:18:45.359
<v Speaker 1>the ninth and they won it in the tenth, So

0:18:45.880 --> 0:18:49.040
<v Speaker 1>he went seven shutout innings, the Dodgers won the game

0:18:49.119 --> 0:18:51.800
<v Speaker 1>and was the tenth of the eleventh inning. But he

0:18:51.840 --> 0:18:53.840
<v Speaker 1>doesn't get the win. It was a bullpen guy who

0:18:53.920 --> 0:18:55.840
<v Speaker 1>got two outs in the game instead gets to win.

0:18:56.040 --> 0:18:59.560
<v Speaker 1>That's ridiculous to me. I think we allow the official

0:18:59.560 --> 0:19:03.240
<v Speaker 1>scorekeeper were to determine what is a hit versus an error,

0:19:03.280 --> 0:19:05.479
<v Speaker 1>Like why can't we trust these people to say, like

0:19:06.119 --> 0:19:09.280
<v Speaker 1>very obviously Yamamoto should have gotten the win in that game.

0:19:09.680 --> 0:19:12.800
<v Speaker 1>It happens all the time. I think we should, uh,

0:19:13.080 --> 0:19:15.480
<v Speaker 1>we should have that leeway to decide who gets to

0:19:15.480 --> 0:19:15.880
<v Speaker 1>win there.

0:19:16.200 --> 0:19:18.640
<v Speaker 2>I'd love to see the stats if we went back

0:19:18.680 --> 0:19:21.679
<v Speaker 2>in history and like saw who ended up with the

0:19:21.680 --> 0:19:25.320
<v Speaker 2>most wins overall. We wouldn't have to go back that

0:19:25.320 --> 0:19:28.520
<v Speaker 2>that far because way back when they didn't even use bullpens.

0:19:28.520 --> 0:19:29.679
<v Speaker 2>It was just like you went out and this is

0:19:29.720 --> 0:19:31.600
<v Speaker 2>your start, and you just pitched to your armfro off

0:19:31.600 --> 0:19:34.480
<v Speaker 2>and you either got the winner you didn't. That's why

0:19:34.520 --> 0:19:36.879
<v Speaker 2>stay Young has the most wins and most losses in

0:19:36.920 --> 0:19:40.520
<v Speaker 2>baseball history. But it would be interesting to kind of

0:19:40.520 --> 0:19:42.080
<v Speaker 2>go back and see, you know, if we if we

0:19:42.119 --> 0:19:45.680
<v Speaker 2>rewrote the rule, like you know, maybe like this pitchure

0:19:45.760 --> 0:19:47.960
<v Speaker 2>ends up with like eighty more wins than he previously

0:19:48.000 --> 0:19:49.399
<v Speaker 2>had in the record books.

0:19:49.240 --> 0:19:51.320
<v Speaker 1>It's it's the same thing with losses too, though, Like

0:19:51.359 --> 0:19:55.560
<v Speaker 1>if Paul Skiens gives up one run in six and

0:19:55.640 --> 0:20:00.359
<v Speaker 1>two thirds and the Pirates don't score any but then

0:20:00.760 --> 0:20:04.119
<v Speaker 1>you know, after he leaves the game, the next reliever

0:20:04.280 --> 0:20:07.080
<v Speaker 1>gives up five runs and the Pirates score four, and

0:20:07.359 --> 0:20:09.320
<v Speaker 1>all of a sudden it's a six to four loss.

0:20:09.400 --> 0:20:12.600
<v Speaker 1>But Schemes will give up one run in seven innings, like,

0:20:12.960 --> 0:20:14.560
<v Speaker 1>I don't think he should bet the loss in that scenario.

0:20:14.600 --> 0:20:16.280
<v Speaker 1>So it goes both ways for me, but kind of

0:20:16.280 --> 0:20:21.240
<v Speaker 1>assigning wins and losses and I think too nine times

0:20:21.240 --> 0:20:24.520
<v Speaker 1>out of ten, ninety nine times out of one hundred.

0:20:24.600 --> 0:20:28.280
<v Speaker 1>Maybe you're not gonna there's not gonna be a controversy, right,

0:20:28.320 --> 0:20:31.000
<v Speaker 1>There's not gonna be like, oh wow, the scorekeeper gave

0:20:31.040 --> 0:20:32.880
<v Speaker 1>that guy the decision in this GUF.

0:20:33.160 --> 0:20:35.560
<v Speaker 2>I was gonna say, who's pretty obvious? Who makes the

0:20:35.600 --> 0:20:38.800
<v Speaker 2>final call? Because we can't let the hometown scorekeepers. It's

0:20:38.840 --> 0:20:40.560
<v Speaker 2>bad enough we let them do like hits and errors,

0:20:40.560 --> 0:20:42.880
<v Speaker 2>which are sometimes ridiculous, but we can't have them picking

0:20:42.920 --> 0:20:43.680
<v Speaker 2>wins and losses.

0:20:44.480 --> 0:20:46.399
<v Speaker 1>I would be fine with having them picking wins and losses,

0:20:46.400 --> 0:20:48.600
<v Speaker 1>because they give you obvious more often than not. I

0:20:48.640 --> 0:20:51.480
<v Speaker 1>get your point about the hometown bias and stuff. Maybe

0:20:51.480 --> 0:20:53.879
<v Speaker 1>there's like a you know, kind of a representative of

0:20:53.960 --> 0:20:57.800
<v Speaker 1>Major League Baseball that can oversee it. Again, most of

0:20:57.840 --> 0:21:00.280
<v Speaker 1>the time, it's not it's gonna be very clear year,

0:21:01.480 --> 0:21:05.320
<v Speaker 1>I think. But for those situations where the rule really

0:21:05.320 --> 0:21:08.080
<v Speaker 1>fails our pitchers, I would like to see it changed.

0:21:09.160 --> 0:21:11.119
<v Speaker 1>All right, who what are their rules you want to

0:21:11.119 --> 0:21:11.600
<v Speaker 1>see changed?

0:21:12.040 --> 0:21:14.040
<v Speaker 2>So I threw a few out there because I don't

0:21:14.040 --> 0:21:15.360
<v Speaker 2>think we have to spend too much time on them.

0:21:15.359 --> 0:21:16.639
<v Speaker 2>And a couple of them, or at least one of

0:21:16.840 --> 0:21:20.080
<v Speaker 2>my band I banned. I mentioned last year I wrote

0:21:20.119 --> 0:21:22.280
<v Speaker 2>ban the Shift ban. I hate that we banned the shift.

0:21:22.320 --> 0:21:23.960
<v Speaker 2>I want to bring the shift back. I think you

0:21:23.960 --> 0:21:25.399
<v Speaker 2>should line up wherever you want. If you want to

0:21:25.440 --> 0:21:27.040
<v Speaker 2>put eight guys in right field, I think you should

0:21:27.040 --> 0:21:31.119
<v Speaker 2>be able to. I do agree that baseball got a

0:21:31.119 --> 0:21:33.760
<v Speaker 2>little ridiculous with the you know, second basement like in

0:21:33.800 --> 0:21:36.600
<v Speaker 2>the extra right fielder, but that was more because hitters

0:21:36.600 --> 0:21:38.800
<v Speaker 2>didn't adjust. They were just like the Joey Gallo approach,

0:21:38.880 --> 0:21:40.240
<v Speaker 2>like I'm just going to try it at home run

0:21:40.280 --> 0:21:42.880
<v Speaker 2>anyway and hit into the shift every time, whereas if

0:21:42.880 --> 0:21:45.199
<v Speaker 2>they just went the other way, they'd be a three

0:21:45.280 --> 0:21:47.840
<v Speaker 2>hundred hitter or you know, they'd have to adjust the shift,

0:21:47.880 --> 0:21:50.240
<v Speaker 2>but I just always thought the shift was fun. It

0:21:50.280 --> 0:21:53.639
<v Speaker 2>resulted in like some wacky double plays and guys getting

0:21:53.640 --> 0:21:55.800
<v Speaker 2>thrown out at first basement right field. I enjoyed the

0:21:55.800 --> 0:21:57.359
<v Speaker 2>shift and think you should be able to do whatever

0:21:57.359 --> 0:21:58.879
<v Speaker 2>you want, just kind of like what you can do

0:21:59.440 --> 0:22:01.040
<v Speaker 2>on defense for the most part in football.

0:22:03.040 --> 0:22:05.679
<v Speaker 1>I don't want to go too long on this, but

0:22:05.760 --> 0:22:07.159
<v Speaker 1>I actually really disagree on this.

0:22:07.359 --> 0:22:07.960
<v Speaker 2>I I.

0:22:09.520 --> 0:22:14.760
<v Speaker 1>Can't stand watching like the cleanest line drive single that

0:22:15.000 --> 0:22:18.399
<v Speaker 1>has been a clean line drive single for one hundred

0:22:18.480 --> 0:22:21.960
<v Speaker 1>years of baseball and it gets caught, and that that's

0:22:22.040 --> 0:22:25.439
<v Speaker 1>not just like when you were seeing that kind of

0:22:25.440 --> 0:22:28.000
<v Speaker 1>full Ted Williams shift with three players to the side

0:22:28.000 --> 0:22:30.160
<v Speaker 1>of a bag, but up the middle. I can't tell

0:22:30.160 --> 0:22:32.720
<v Speaker 1>you how frustrating it is to see a player rip

0:22:32.760 --> 0:22:36.160
<v Speaker 1>a line drive over the pitcher's head. It is literally

0:22:36.200 --> 0:22:37.760
<v Speaker 1>a perfect piece of hitting when I was.

0:22:37.720 --> 0:22:40.080
<v Speaker 2>In a happen though even with the current role, that

0:22:40.160 --> 0:22:40.800
<v Speaker 2>still happens.

0:22:41.200 --> 0:22:44.200
<v Speaker 1>I know, and it's frustrating. I don't like that either.

0:22:44.560 --> 0:22:47.359
<v Speaker 1>I just hate what should be that there's a very

0:22:47.400 --> 0:22:50.480
<v Speaker 1>obvious straight for a clean single and it's just an

0:22:50.520 --> 0:22:52.800
<v Speaker 1>easy out. I really don't like that. And I said

0:22:52.840 --> 0:22:55.480
<v Speaker 1>from the beginning with the shift that I was comfortable with,

0:22:57.200 --> 0:22:58.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, fielders being wherever they want it to be

0:22:59.320 --> 0:23:01.960
<v Speaker 1>as long as there were two infielders on either side

0:23:01.960 --> 0:23:04.919
<v Speaker 1>of second house. That's just all I'm asking is that

0:23:04.960 --> 0:23:07.240
<v Speaker 1>we don't have three on one side, and beyond that,

0:23:07.280 --> 0:23:09.520
<v Speaker 1>you can do whatever you want. I'm not saying they

0:23:09.520 --> 0:23:11.840
<v Speaker 1>should change it from that, but I am getting more

0:23:11.880 --> 0:23:13.840
<v Speaker 1>and more frustrated with You're like you said, it's still

0:23:13.840 --> 0:23:16.000
<v Speaker 1>happening when it goes up the middle now and guys

0:23:16.040 --> 0:23:18.600
<v Speaker 1>are just standing right there. I don't think it really

0:23:18.640 --> 0:23:20.879
<v Speaker 1>works to put like a zone that you're not allowed

0:23:20.880 --> 0:23:24.280
<v Speaker 1>to start in up there. But I get frustrated and

0:23:24.280 --> 0:23:26.240
<v Speaker 1>it feels like it's not baseball. I'm like again, like

0:23:26.680 --> 0:23:29.679
<v Speaker 1>you use the other thing too, mayor is it is

0:23:29.760 --> 0:23:33.000
<v Speaker 1>so hard to hit now with the velocity you face

0:23:33.080 --> 0:23:35.399
<v Speaker 1>on every pitch, with the movement that these pictures are

0:23:35.400 --> 0:23:38.679
<v Speaker 1>capable of doing. Pictures are so good that I really

0:23:38.720 --> 0:23:43.320
<v Speaker 1>push back against the argument of hitters didn't adjust properly.

0:23:43.760 --> 0:23:47.480
<v Speaker 1>It's hard enough to hit against modern pitching. To then

0:23:47.600 --> 0:23:50.280
<v Speaker 1>also say like, by the way, this like you know,

0:23:50.440 --> 0:23:53.120
<v Speaker 1>clean single that you hit that has been a clean

0:23:53.160 --> 0:23:56.600
<v Speaker 1>single forever is now also an out. Like that's just

0:23:56.720 --> 0:24:00.000
<v Speaker 1>so frustrating, and I get why batters are then just

0:24:00.000 --> 0:24:02.080
<v Speaker 1>say listen, I'm just swinging for the fences or taking

0:24:02.080 --> 0:24:05.879
<v Speaker 1>the strikeout. When that keeps happening, I just think pictures

0:24:05.880 --> 0:24:10.000
<v Speaker 1>are too good and it doesn't feel like baseball to me.

0:24:10.760 --> 0:24:12.840
<v Speaker 2>I'm fine with that. I know I'm in the minority there.

0:24:12.880 --> 0:24:14.800
<v Speaker 2>You want you only to hit my next three rapid

0:24:14.800 --> 0:24:18.199
<v Speaker 2>fires so we don't go too long. Okay, So the

0:24:18.240 --> 0:24:20.160
<v Speaker 2>other one I wrote is banned the check swing nonsense,

0:24:20.160 --> 0:24:21.879
<v Speaker 2>and I have a very simple take on this. I

0:24:22.400 --> 0:24:25.240
<v Speaker 2>think the check swing is one of the most subjective

0:24:25.280 --> 0:24:27.800
<v Speaker 2>things in sports. And like you said, if we're if

0:24:27.800 --> 0:24:29.359
<v Speaker 2>we're letting people pick wins and losses, you have like

0:24:29.359 --> 0:24:31.800
<v Speaker 2>a ninety nine percent accuracy. I think we're around fifty

0:24:31.800 --> 0:24:34.280
<v Speaker 2>to sixty percent accuracy and check swings because no one

0:24:34.320 --> 0:24:37.160
<v Speaker 2>knows what the actual rule is. It's absurd and they're

0:24:37.200 --> 0:24:39.080
<v Speaker 2>just like you point down to first base. I have

0:24:39.119 --> 0:24:40.600
<v Speaker 2>no idea what that. I'm just going to say because

0:24:40.680 --> 0:24:42.800
<v Speaker 2>they're just making it up. And so I think we

0:24:42.840 --> 0:24:44.800
<v Speaker 2>need to figure out what an actual check swing is

0:24:44.880 --> 0:24:47.040
<v Speaker 2>define it and then do away with whatever we're doing

0:24:47.119 --> 0:24:48.879
<v Speaker 2>right now because it's not working. And I feel like

0:24:48.920 --> 0:24:51.600
<v Speaker 2>I'm the only one who gets annoyed by that. I

0:24:51.640 --> 0:24:53.600
<v Speaker 2>also want to ban umpire immunity. I hate that these

0:24:53.600 --> 0:24:56.479
<v Speaker 2>atrocious umpires can just work in baseball forever and like

0:24:56.600 --> 0:25:00.840
<v Speaker 2>not get fined, not get punished, not get suspended. There

0:25:00.840 --> 0:25:02.520
<v Speaker 2>was an umpire in the Red Sox game the other day.

0:25:02.720 --> 0:25:05.760
<v Speaker 2>He there was a player I don't know if he

0:25:05.760 --> 0:25:07.480
<v Speaker 2>saw the Walker Buehler play, but he threw a picture

0:25:07.560 --> 0:25:09.960
<v Speaker 2>ye right down the middle, and the catcher jumped up

0:25:09.960 --> 0:25:13.040
<v Speaker 2>to throw out a runner who was stealing second. The

0:25:13.119 --> 0:25:15.280
<v Speaker 2>ump missed the call because the catcher stood up to

0:25:15.600 --> 0:25:17.080
<v Speaker 2>throw out the runner. But this picture was right down

0:25:17.119 --> 0:25:19.199
<v Speaker 2>the middle. And then Buehler said, like, that was right

0:25:19.240 --> 0:25:21.439
<v Speaker 2>down the middle. And then the umpire like came out

0:25:21.520 --> 0:25:24.600
<v Speaker 2>and confronted Walker Bueller, and Walker Bueller like walked to him,

0:25:24.800 --> 0:25:26.440
<v Speaker 2>and then he threw Bueller out of the game for

0:25:26.480 --> 0:25:27.680
<v Speaker 2>coming off the mound. But it was like, you went

0:25:27.720 --> 0:25:30.600
<v Speaker 2>after the pitcher first, and so I hate that aspect

0:25:30.640 --> 0:25:32.879
<v Speaker 2>that umpire's going to do whatever they want. And then

0:25:32.920 --> 0:25:34.639
<v Speaker 2>the last one I wrote is band Yankee Stadium, and

0:25:34.680 --> 0:25:36.360
<v Speaker 2>I don't I wrote that as a joke. I don't

0:25:36.359 --> 0:25:39.199
<v Speaker 2>really mean band Yankee Stadium. But one thing I love

0:25:39.240 --> 0:25:42.600
<v Speaker 2>about baseball is how every ballpark is unique and has

0:25:42.600 --> 0:25:46.119
<v Speaker 2>all these fun dimensions. I think rightfield Yankee Stadium is

0:25:47.320 --> 0:25:49.879
<v Speaker 2>just a joke, and I know that the pushback for me,

0:25:49.880 --> 0:25:52.160
<v Speaker 2>as Red Sox fan, is a Fenway Park is crazy.

0:25:52.880 --> 0:25:55.040
<v Speaker 2>My comeback to that is always that they just built

0:25:55.040 --> 0:25:57.159
<v Speaker 2>Fenway Park out of necessity because of the space they had.

0:25:57.200 --> 0:25:58.760
<v Speaker 2>That's why they built the wall. They just had no

0:25:58.800 --> 0:26:01.720
<v Speaker 2>more room. Nankee Stadium brand new, and they rebuilt the

0:26:01.760 --> 0:26:03.840
<v Speaker 2>same thing again as a joke. So I do think

0:26:03.840 --> 0:26:06.600
<v Speaker 2>there should be like some minimums and maximums for these fences,

0:26:06.640 --> 0:26:09.720
<v Speaker 2>and within those you know, dimensions, you can do whatever

0:26:09.760 --> 0:26:11.280
<v Speaker 2>you want. But like the fact that you can hit

0:26:11.320 --> 0:26:12.719
<v Speaker 2>a foul pop up to right field in the Yek

0:26:12.760 --> 0:26:14.879
<v Speaker 2>Stadium and get forty home runs is absurd to me.

0:26:16.520 --> 0:26:18.920
<v Speaker 1>I want to quickly respond to these the check swing.

0:26:19.240 --> 0:26:22.199
<v Speaker 1>I think that you should be able to check your

0:26:22.240 --> 0:26:24.440
<v Speaker 1>swing even if your back goes past the front of

0:26:24.480 --> 0:26:26.439
<v Speaker 1>the plate. Like I think we should just say, like

0:26:26.480 --> 0:26:29.159
<v Speaker 1>that's it's not a full swing unless it's a full swing. Like,

0:26:29.240 --> 0:26:31.919
<v Speaker 1>I think the line of this is too far for

0:26:31.920 --> 0:26:33.640
<v Speaker 1>a check sing should be a few inches in front

0:26:33.640 --> 0:26:36.080
<v Speaker 1>of the plate. I think a lot of people might

0:26:36.080 --> 0:26:37.879
<v Speaker 1>disagree with that, but I, like, I just don't. I

0:26:37.880 --> 0:26:40.359
<v Speaker 1>don't think like that extra two inches like constitutes a

0:26:40.400 --> 0:26:41.880
<v Speaker 1>full swing, Like it just needs to be.

0:26:42.600 --> 0:26:44.879
<v Speaker 2>That's what I want, Like whatever it is, make it

0:26:44.880 --> 0:26:47.600
<v Speaker 2>like like what you said would be more obvious than like, oh,

0:26:47.720 --> 0:26:50.240
<v Speaker 2>I think he went strike, Like at least what you're saying,

0:26:50.280 --> 0:26:51.640
<v Speaker 2>like it would be clear you went too far.

0:26:52.359 --> 0:26:55.600
<v Speaker 1>And then the umpire immunity stuff like yes, half the times,

0:26:55.600 --> 0:26:57.480
<v Speaker 1>the problem with the umpires is that they go after

0:26:57.520 --> 0:26:59.959
<v Speaker 1>the players, and the players get in trouble free retaliating.

0:27:00.080 --> 0:27:02.320
<v Speaker 1>I saw somebody say during the Walker Bueller stuff, I said,

0:27:03.000 --> 0:27:05.560
<v Speaker 1>I thought it was a great point on Twitter. If

0:27:05.680 --> 0:27:08.080
<v Speaker 1>if a player gets ejected for arguing a call, not

0:27:08.119 --> 0:27:11.960
<v Speaker 1>for like being disrespectful or whatever arguing the call then and

0:27:12.000 --> 0:27:13.879
<v Speaker 1>the end they get ejected, then there should be an

0:27:13.880 --> 0:27:16.840
<v Speaker 1>immediate review of the call and if the player was right,

0:27:16.960 --> 0:27:19.600
<v Speaker 1>they are not ejected, like and the umpire I don't know,

0:27:19.680 --> 0:27:20.640
<v Speaker 1>has to pay a fine or something.

0:27:21.000 --> 0:27:23.280
<v Speaker 2>I thought that is that the umpire gets ejected.

0:27:23.560 --> 0:27:25.040
<v Speaker 1>But well, I was going to say that, but then

0:27:25.119 --> 0:27:27.240
<v Speaker 1>I don't think that's actually should be the case, because

0:27:27.240 --> 0:27:29.159
<v Speaker 1>you can't have like a bunch of umpires like at

0:27:29.200 --> 0:27:30.320
<v Speaker 1>the ready to come in or.

0:27:30.320 --> 0:27:32.480
<v Speaker 2>Whatever but play a man down but figure it out.

0:27:32.920 --> 0:27:35.760
<v Speaker 1>Yeah yeah, but yeah, these are good ones. All right,

0:27:35.840 --> 0:27:37.960
<v Speaker 1>let's go through our news and notes. We're running a

0:27:37.960 --> 0:27:39.720
<v Speaker 1>little long here, so we'll go really quickly on these.

0:27:41.560 --> 0:27:43.119
<v Speaker 1>You had, you had the first few of these, so

0:27:43.119 --> 0:27:43.639
<v Speaker 1>go ahead through that.

0:27:43.840 --> 0:27:46.200
<v Speaker 2>So I have Spencer Strider returns and it wasn't great,

0:27:46.800 --> 0:27:48.600
<v Speaker 2>So that there was newsworthy in a good way that

0:27:48.640 --> 0:27:51.080
<v Speaker 2>he's back on the mound, but it didn't didn't look great.

0:27:51.200 --> 0:27:54.800
<v Speaker 2>His velocity was down. I've seen some people making a

0:27:54.880 --> 0:27:57.200
<v Speaker 2>much bigger deal about the velocity, Like he's still touched

0:27:57.240 --> 0:27:59.360
<v Speaker 2>ninety seven a couple of times. So I still think

0:27:59.359 --> 0:28:02.639
<v Speaker 2>this is just him working back, and you know, like

0:28:02.680 --> 0:28:04.359
<v Speaker 2>even if he's around like ninety five ninety six, I

0:28:04.400 --> 0:28:07.239
<v Speaker 2>think he'll be fine. But it was concerning that, you know,

0:28:08.520 --> 0:28:10.640
<v Speaker 2>he came back and it didn't look great. And then

0:28:10.880 --> 0:28:14.159
<v Speaker 2>a good Ronald mccuna development is that it sounds like

0:28:14.160 --> 0:28:16.199
<v Speaker 2>he could be back as early as this weekend. I

0:28:16.200 --> 0:28:18.399
<v Speaker 2>know we've been talking recently recently on the show that

0:28:18.440 --> 0:28:21.280
<v Speaker 2>I was a little frustrated that he hadn't really started

0:28:21.440 --> 0:28:24.399
<v Speaker 2>a rehab assignment, you know, by mid May, and I

0:28:24.440 --> 0:28:26.280
<v Speaker 2>was like, you know, he hasn't had a spring training.

0:28:26.400 --> 0:28:28.240
<v Speaker 2>Who knows how long this rehabit signment's going to be.

0:28:28.280 --> 0:28:30.320
<v Speaker 2>But it sounds like then he started the rehab assignment,

0:28:30.359 --> 0:28:32.879
<v Speaker 2>he was already playing full games, playing the outfield. And

0:28:32.920 --> 0:28:34.880
<v Speaker 2>it sounds like, according to some of the reports I read,

0:28:35.280 --> 0:28:36.920
<v Speaker 2>that he was already kind of doing his own mini

0:28:36.920 --> 0:28:39.480
<v Speaker 2>spring training, like you know, playing like sim games and

0:28:39.480 --> 0:28:41.720
<v Speaker 2>playing the field and so like, it wasn't like he

0:28:41.800 --> 0:28:43.920
<v Speaker 2>was going out to these this rehab assignment cold. He

0:28:43.960 --> 0:28:46.280
<v Speaker 2>had already really been kind of playing in games. And

0:28:46.320 --> 0:28:48.080
<v Speaker 2>so he's a lot closer to returning than we thought.

0:28:48.160 --> 0:28:49.560
<v Speaker 2>So it sounds like he could be back a SORTI

0:28:49.680 --> 0:28:51.080
<v Speaker 2>this weekend. By the time you're listening to.

0:28:51.040 --> 0:28:56.120
<v Speaker 1>This, George Kirby is returning. I believe he's pitching today

0:28:56.520 --> 0:28:58.960
<v Speaker 1>the day we're recording this. He's gonna be pitching every

0:28:59.000 --> 0:29:02.680
<v Speaker 1>six days for now. It sounds like before the others,

0:29:02.720 --> 0:29:03.960
<v Speaker 1>I think he's kind of the biggest name that I

0:29:03.960 --> 0:29:05.400
<v Speaker 1>did when I at least ask a follow up on

0:29:06.000 --> 0:29:07.600
<v Speaker 1>where are you ranking Kirby rest of the season now

0:29:07.600 --> 0:29:08.200
<v Speaker 1>that he's back.

0:29:08.520 --> 0:29:11.000
<v Speaker 2>That's a good question because my starting pitching rankings have

0:29:11.120 --> 0:29:13.160
<v Speaker 2>been all over the place recently. I've been moving people

0:29:13.240 --> 0:29:16.520
<v Speaker 2>up and down, and there's like bigger names I've been

0:29:16.520 --> 0:29:17.920
<v Speaker 2>holding on to and just kind of like, I guess

0:29:17.920 --> 0:29:19.960
<v Speaker 2>I kind of have to drop this guy. I haven't

0:29:20.000 --> 0:29:21.600
<v Speaker 2>moved him yet because I kind of had him buried

0:29:21.600 --> 0:29:24.280
<v Speaker 2>because we didn't know where he was gonna gonna be.

0:29:25.200 --> 0:29:27.800
<v Speaker 2>I have him in like the mid thirties right now,

0:29:29.080 --> 0:29:31.480
<v Speaker 2>but I don't know how far I'm going to move

0:29:31.520 --> 0:29:33.040
<v Speaker 2>him up. Like there was a bunch of pictures above

0:29:33.080 --> 0:29:39.040
<v Speaker 2>him that I'm completely fine moving him above Gosman, Snell, Aaronola.

0:29:39.200 --> 0:29:41.880
<v Speaker 2>I can move him above Aaronola, Clay Holmes, Bryce Miller

0:29:41.880 --> 0:29:46.560
<v Speaker 2>for sure. I feel like I'll like high twenties probably

0:29:47.120 --> 0:29:49.360
<v Speaker 2>to start and to see how you look.

0:29:49.920 --> 0:29:51.720
<v Speaker 1>I think that the only pitching every six days is

0:29:51.760 --> 0:29:54.880
<v Speaker 1>a little you know, not frustrating, I get it, but

0:29:54.960 --> 0:29:56.760
<v Speaker 1>like you know, makes it a little harder for fantasy managers.

0:29:56.800 --> 0:30:00.560
<v Speaker 1>We'll see along that last Robert Hassel the third is

0:30:00.600 --> 0:30:02.160
<v Speaker 1>making his debut, or he might have already done it

0:30:02.200 --> 0:30:05.280
<v Speaker 1>actually till and Cruz goes to the IL, so he

0:30:05.320 --> 0:30:07.000
<v Speaker 1>gets caught up from the Nationals. Another one of these,

0:30:07.200 --> 0:30:10.120
<v Speaker 1>you know, high pedigree prospects, so we'll see how he does.

0:30:10.120 --> 0:30:12.280
<v Speaker 1>Somebody to keep an eye on. Jared Jones officially gets

0:30:12.320 --> 0:30:14.840
<v Speaker 1>elbow surgery out ten to twelve months. We kind of

0:30:14.840 --> 0:30:18.240
<v Speaker 1>anticipated that coming, but you know, this is obviously Donnington

0:30:18.360 --> 0:30:21.440
<v Speaker 1>now impacts twenty twenty six as well. And then the

0:30:21.520 --> 0:30:22.800
<v Speaker 1>last thing that I do want to get your follow

0:30:22.880 --> 0:30:24.760
<v Speaker 1>up on is we kind of have some new statcast

0:30:24.880 --> 0:30:27.640
<v Speaker 1>metrics with this, like a swing, you know, bat tracking stuff.

0:30:28.240 --> 0:30:29.640
<v Speaker 1>Do you have any thoughts on that, any kind of

0:30:29.720 --> 0:30:32.080
<v Speaker 1>fantasy relevance to these metrics for you or.

0:30:32.520 --> 0:30:35.120
<v Speaker 2>I do and I don't. We talked about it briefly

0:30:35.160 --> 0:30:36.960
<v Speaker 2>the other day when it was kind of first announced.

0:30:37.000 --> 0:30:42.360
<v Speaker 2>I love the the access to all this information. I

0:30:42.400 --> 0:30:45.760
<v Speaker 2>saw something on Twitter this morning with a really cool

0:30:46.480 --> 0:30:48.840
<v Speaker 2>write up about like Corbyn Carroll and how we fixed

0:30:48.880 --> 0:30:50.560
<v Speaker 2>his swing and how it was too flat. Like that

0:30:50.560 --> 0:30:52.800
<v Speaker 2>stuff's all really cool because you can kind of see

0:30:52.800 --> 0:30:56.120
<v Speaker 2>what went wrong. And not only hear Corbyn Carroll talk

0:30:56.160 --> 0:30:59.040
<v Speaker 2>about the fix, but then I actually see in the

0:30:59.760 --> 0:31:03.680
<v Speaker 2>act data the fixed happening in real time. I do

0:31:03.720 --> 0:31:06.920
<v Speaker 2>think we're getting like so much information now that it's

0:31:06.920 --> 0:31:09.040
<v Speaker 2>almost like overload, and I think we're gonna overanalyze some

0:31:09.080 --> 0:31:11.680
<v Speaker 2>of these players, and we already see like some players

0:31:11.680 --> 0:31:14.280
<v Speaker 2>who just kind of like consistently outperform their metrics. I

0:31:14.320 --> 0:31:17.240
<v Speaker 2>do think it's gonna be really valuable for like something

0:31:17.240 --> 0:31:19.480
<v Speaker 2>like that, like is this player slumping, Like what is

0:31:19.560 --> 0:31:22.200
<v Speaker 2>drastically different? Like is he hot? What is drastically different

0:31:22.280 --> 0:31:24.520
<v Speaker 2>versus in the off season. I think we're gonna go

0:31:24.880 --> 0:31:28.000
<v Speaker 2>like head over heels into all this stuff and project

0:31:28.080 --> 0:31:32.640
<v Speaker 2>sleepers and busts based on, you know, overvaluing some of

0:31:32.640 --> 0:31:34.840
<v Speaker 2>this stuff. So I think it's really cool. The more

0:31:35.000 --> 0:31:37.200
<v Speaker 2>data the better. It is a little overwhelming that there

0:31:37.280 --> 0:31:40.360
<v Speaker 2>might be like too much to evaluate now, so I

0:31:40.400 --> 0:31:41.520
<v Speaker 2>have like mixed feelings about it.

0:31:42.800 --> 0:31:45.720
<v Speaker 1>Let's shove into our last segment here, grade the Trade.

0:31:47.240 --> 0:31:49.280
<v Speaker 1>We throughout some real trades that have happened in some

0:31:49.280 --> 0:31:51.640
<v Speaker 1>of the leagues that you and I play in, and

0:31:52.480 --> 0:31:55.480
<v Speaker 1>are going to kind of discuss what we think of them.

0:31:55.560 --> 0:31:57.920
<v Speaker 1>Like I said, these are actual trades that have happened

0:31:58.720 --> 0:32:00.320
<v Speaker 1>in our leagues. Some of the ones that I put

0:32:00.360 --> 0:32:03.240
<v Speaker 1>in here are like a couple of weeks old. I

0:32:03.240 --> 0:32:05.040
<v Speaker 1>wanted to throw out it's not like these are all

0:32:05.080 --> 0:32:07.320
<v Speaker 1>in the last week or anything, but these are just

0:32:07.400 --> 0:32:09.000
<v Speaker 1>kind of any of the trades that have happened this year.

0:32:09.040 --> 0:32:10.600
<v Speaker 1>So I just wanted to kind of give that context.

0:32:11.080 --> 0:32:13.880
<v Speaker 1>I also have a trade from a listener who has

0:32:13.960 --> 0:32:17.760
<v Speaker 1>DMed me a bunch, Andrew, who's a great supporter of

0:32:17.800 --> 0:32:21.640
<v Speaker 1>the show, and he actually just this morning messaged me

0:32:21.640 --> 0:32:23.760
<v Speaker 1>a trade that he did, and so I figured I

0:32:23.800 --> 0:32:25.520
<v Speaker 1>would include that one as well. But some of the

0:32:25.560 --> 0:32:28.479
<v Speaker 1>trades from the leagues that we're in, Reese Olsen traded

0:32:28.520 --> 0:32:30.720
<v Speaker 1>for Devin Williams. What would you grade this one?

0:32:31.640 --> 0:32:33.280
<v Speaker 2>So I wanted to ask how he wanted to grade this.

0:32:33.480 --> 0:32:36.120
<v Speaker 2>I was thinking more of grading it on the scale

0:32:36.200 --> 0:32:39.280
<v Speaker 2>of you know those like surveys where it's like neutral, agree,

0:32:39.320 --> 0:32:43.120
<v Speaker 2>strongly agree, strongly disagree. I was gonna, I feel like

0:32:43.480 --> 0:32:47.120
<v Speaker 2>on this one, I agree with the Devin Williams side.

0:32:47.200 --> 0:32:49.640
<v Speaker 2>I'm like agree close to strongly geer with the Devin

0:32:49.640 --> 0:32:53.280
<v Speaker 2>Williams side, just because I think it's your your banking.

0:32:53.520 --> 0:32:55.720
<v Speaker 1>Do you think he gets back to the closer role, That's.

0:32:55.680 --> 0:32:57.360
<v Speaker 2>That's what you're banking on. But I also think if

0:32:57.520 --> 0:32:59.640
<v Speaker 2>if the price to find out is Reese Olsen, like no,

0:32:59.760 --> 0:33:00.760
<v Speaker 2>no problem.

0:33:01.560 --> 0:33:04.640
<v Speaker 1>I actually almost put him Devin Williams as my cell

0:33:04.800 --> 0:33:07.800
<v Speaker 1>high in our part two of this week's show. I

0:33:07.920 --> 0:33:10.600
<v Speaker 1>ended up changing that, but I considered Williams because he's

0:33:10.600 --> 0:33:13.120
<v Speaker 1>pitched really well lately. But it doesn't seem like they're

0:33:13.640 --> 0:33:15.920
<v Speaker 1>that inclined to put him back into the closer role.

0:33:16.000 --> 0:33:17.520
<v Speaker 1>And there's only so much value you can give you

0:33:17.600 --> 0:33:19.960
<v Speaker 1>if he's not getting you saves, and plus who knows

0:33:19.960 --> 0:33:21.440
<v Speaker 1>that this is just maybe a hot streak like or

0:33:21.440 --> 0:33:25.320
<v Speaker 1>if he's actually turned the corner. But I agree with

0:33:25.320 --> 0:33:28.800
<v Speaker 1>you ultimately that Olsen is a fair you know, I'm

0:33:28.800 --> 0:33:31.680
<v Speaker 1>willing to spend him to maybe take the chance on

0:33:31.720 --> 0:33:33.800
<v Speaker 1>getting an elite closer if it works out that way.

0:33:35.560 --> 0:33:37.480
<v Speaker 1>So I would agree with you on that one. Royce

0:33:37.560 --> 0:33:40.000
<v Speaker 1>Lewis traded for Francisco Alvarez, and I wanted to point

0:33:40.000 --> 0:33:41.479
<v Speaker 1>out this is a two catcher league.

0:33:42.960 --> 0:33:45.440
<v Speaker 2>This was an interesting one. Obviously, two catcher league is

0:33:45.480 --> 0:33:48.280
<v Speaker 2>important to one cutcher league. To no brainer Royce Lewis,

0:33:48.840 --> 0:33:51.080
<v Speaker 2>I am lower than contensus on both of these players,

0:33:51.840 --> 0:33:54.440
<v Speaker 2>but the Royce Lewis one is most mostly injury related.

0:33:54.640 --> 0:33:56.560
<v Speaker 2>He just can't stay healthy. But when he is on

0:33:56.600 --> 0:34:01.520
<v Speaker 2>the field, he looks really, really good. So I think

0:34:01.520 --> 0:34:05.280
<v Speaker 2>the upside is more on the Royce Lewis side. Even

0:34:05.320 --> 0:34:07.800
<v Speaker 2>though it's the two catcher league. I have my doubts

0:34:07.800 --> 0:34:12.719
<v Speaker 2>about Francisco Alvarez and his profile, so I lean royce

0:34:12.800 --> 0:34:16.120
<v Speaker 2>Lewis especially. Obviously two catcher leagues and catchers is gonna

0:34:16.120 --> 0:34:17.799
<v Speaker 2>be very shallow. But like the fact that you can

0:34:17.840 --> 0:34:21.200
<v Speaker 2>get a living, breathing third basement in Royce Lewis in

0:34:21.239 --> 0:34:23.160
<v Speaker 2>twenty twenty five, I think it's worth it. So why

0:34:23.480 --> 0:34:26.560
<v Speaker 2>I would put agree with the royce Lewis side.

0:34:27.520 --> 0:34:29.160
<v Speaker 1>I would agree with you on that one as well.

0:34:29.600 --> 0:34:31.239
<v Speaker 1>This was a really fun one. This one is from

0:34:31.320 --> 0:34:33.799
<v Speaker 1>late April, so it's not it's you know, a little

0:34:33.840 --> 0:34:36.720
<v Speaker 1>over three weeks old. But because of the names included

0:34:36.760 --> 0:34:39.040
<v Speaker 1>I wanted to included. And again two catcher league, it's

0:34:39.040 --> 0:34:42.239
<v Speaker 1>the same league. Pete crow Armstrong for cal Raley, what

0:34:42.280 --> 0:34:43.400
<v Speaker 1>do you think about that one?

0:34:43.680 --> 0:34:46.640
<v Speaker 2>That's a really fascinating one. Cal Raley.

0:34:46.680 --> 0:34:50.120
<v Speaker 1>Obviously that one got some some veto votes in our league.

0:34:50.160 --> 0:34:53.120
<v Speaker 1>We have a veto rule in that league, and it passed,

0:34:53.120 --> 0:34:55.840
<v Speaker 1>but it got some some pushback from some folks.

0:34:56.200 --> 0:34:58.879
<v Speaker 2>So I'm guessing because it's a couple of weeks old,

0:34:59.320 --> 0:35:02.920
<v Speaker 2>they didn't leave in the Peaker Armstrong side, and they thought, yes, okay,

0:35:04.360 --> 0:35:07.080
<v Speaker 2>I mean you're wrong. Now, I know.

0:35:07.040 --> 0:35:08.840
<v Speaker 1>It's I was gonna say, it looks it looks like

0:35:08.880 --> 0:35:10.520
<v Speaker 1>almost a Vito in the other way. I mean, I

0:35:10.520 --> 0:35:12.520
<v Speaker 1>think ultimately, given that it's a two catcher league, it

0:35:12.600 --> 0:35:15.799
<v Speaker 1>probably is fair. I think it's a fair I would

0:35:15.840 --> 0:35:17.719
<v Speaker 1>call this very fair now. But in a moment, a

0:35:17.719 --> 0:35:19.600
<v Speaker 1>lot of people were like, why would you give up

0:35:19.640 --> 0:35:21.440
<v Speaker 1>cal Raley for peek Crow Armstrong.

0:35:21.800 --> 0:35:23.799
<v Speaker 2>Now, I was just sorry. I didn't mean to rep

0:35:23.800 --> 0:35:27.200
<v Speaker 2>to you. I was just looking at for some for

0:35:28.160 --> 0:35:30.440
<v Speaker 2>prepping for other parts of the show. I was actually

0:35:30.520 --> 0:35:34.080
<v Speaker 2>looking at our Fantasy pros VBR of like stats for

0:35:34.120 --> 0:35:37.600
<v Speaker 2>the year peak Armstrong is third. He's the third most

0:35:37.680 --> 0:35:42.600
<v Speaker 2>valuable fantasy player right now through May twenty second, and yeah,

0:35:42.640 --> 0:35:44.880
<v Speaker 2>like I have him as a cell high. I have

0:35:45.040 --> 0:35:46.520
<v Speaker 2>had him as a cell high. I still think he

0:35:46.560 --> 0:35:49.200
<v Speaker 2>probably is, but it's also kind of hard to argue

0:35:49.200 --> 0:35:50.960
<v Speaker 2>with the counting stats right now with twelve our months

0:35:50.960 --> 0:35:51.960
<v Speaker 2>and fourteen still vases.

0:35:52.200 --> 0:35:55.640
<v Speaker 1>Probably the most fun story in baseball earlier part of

0:35:55.680 --> 0:35:58.280
<v Speaker 1>the season. Am I forgetting somebody? I think his emergence

0:35:58.280 --> 0:35:59.920
<v Speaker 1>has been kind of the most fun thing to track.

0:36:00.680 --> 0:36:02.880
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I would say so, I've already seen other I

0:36:02.880 --> 0:36:05.600
<v Speaker 2>think I forget who was one of the baseball analysts

0:36:07.160 --> 0:36:09.080
<v Speaker 2>the other day said he might be already one of

0:36:09.120 --> 0:36:11.800
<v Speaker 2>the best position players in baseball, or you know, I

0:36:11.840 --> 0:36:12.879
<v Speaker 2>don't know if he was kind ofab well.

0:36:12.880 --> 0:36:14.959
<v Speaker 1>He definitely has been this season. I mean, who knows

0:36:14.960 --> 0:36:17.800
<v Speaker 1>about if it will last, and it comes down of it,

0:36:17.920 --> 0:36:20.399
<v Speaker 1>but if you're just looking at what's happened in twenty

0:36:20.440 --> 0:36:25.800
<v Speaker 1>twenty five, he's unquestionably Yeah, when you consider the defense

0:36:25.800 --> 0:36:27.760
<v Speaker 1>as well. And the last one from one of my leagues,

0:36:27.840 --> 0:36:30.719
<v Speaker 1>Ryan Helsley, traded for Kittel Marte. This is a trade

0:36:30.760 --> 0:36:34.439
<v Speaker 1>that got accepted but then vetoed in the league, and

0:36:34.800 --> 0:36:39.080
<v Speaker 1>there are some keeper elements. Both guys are pretty good values.

0:36:39.320 --> 0:36:42.560
<v Speaker 1>None of them is like an insane elite keeper value.

0:36:42.600 --> 0:36:45.920
<v Speaker 1>But they're both good values keepers like relative to where

0:36:45.960 --> 0:36:48.480
<v Speaker 1>they are. But Ryan Helsley and the guy has no

0:36:48.840 --> 0:36:51.680
<v Speaker 1>the guy who was trading away kittel Marte had zero closers.

0:36:53.320 --> 0:36:56.399
<v Speaker 1>Helsey for Kittel Marte. It did give Vito so right.

0:36:56.320 --> 0:36:59.280
<v Speaker 2>At the mat, I would say strongly disagree with vetoing

0:36:59.480 --> 0:37:02.480
<v Speaker 2>something that like unless it's like really really absurd, I'm

0:37:02.520 --> 0:37:06.920
<v Speaker 2>pretty anti Veta veto. So like, if two adult competent

0:37:06.960 --> 0:37:08.920
<v Speaker 2>managers want to make a trade, like let him as

0:37:08.960 --> 0:37:10.520
<v Speaker 2>long as it's not like something that's really going to

0:37:10.600 --> 0:37:14.080
<v Speaker 2>upend the league and piss people off. But I feel

0:37:14.080 --> 0:37:16.319
<v Speaker 2>like this is fair enough that I don't see why

0:37:16.320 --> 0:37:17.560
<v Speaker 2>it would need to be vetoed.

0:37:18.760 --> 0:37:21.640
<v Speaker 1>So so one thing I will say, the guy who

0:37:21.680 --> 0:37:24.800
<v Speaker 1>was trying to trade away Marte, I don't and I

0:37:24.840 --> 0:37:27.439
<v Speaker 1>don't think he listens to the show. I don't think

0:37:27.440 --> 0:37:30.799
<v Speaker 1>he is a competent manager. It's his first year and

0:37:30.920 --> 0:37:34.040
<v Speaker 1>it's it's kind of a long running league. But some

0:37:34.160 --> 0:37:36.160
<v Speaker 1>of the people in the fringe end are just kind

0:37:36.160 --> 0:37:38.400
<v Speaker 1>of random people that have been picked up, like you know,

0:37:38.520 --> 0:37:41.600
<v Speaker 1>random users on CBS, like, hey, we're looking for a

0:37:41.640 --> 0:37:43.920
<v Speaker 1>person to just fill the last spot in this league.

0:37:44.440 --> 0:37:49.880
<v Speaker 1>And like his draft this season was jaw droppingly bad,

0:37:51.239 --> 0:37:53.400
<v Speaker 1>like like to the point where it's confusing, Like it

0:37:53.760 --> 0:37:56.480
<v Speaker 1>did he make a mistake like almost with every pick?

0:37:58.040 --> 0:38:02.839
<v Speaker 1>So I do like you say it as long as

0:38:02.840 --> 0:38:05.000
<v Speaker 1>he's two adult competent, Like I don't know that he

0:38:05.040 --> 0:38:07.560
<v Speaker 1>is a competent manager for whatever that that matters.

0:38:07.680 --> 0:38:09.680
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I mean you would have to agree with the

0:38:09.760 --> 0:38:12.440
<v Speaker 2>Catel Marte side of it just because of the upside there.

0:38:12.440 --> 0:38:15.560
<v Speaker 2>I mean, like I am not the biggest believer in

0:38:15.600 --> 0:38:17.800
<v Speaker 2>his in his profile, but also like the guy batted

0:38:17.880 --> 0:38:19.680
<v Speaker 2>like two ninety something with thirty five from he.

0:38:19.840 --> 0:38:22.319
<v Speaker 1>Was like the consensus two b one coming into the

0:38:22.360 --> 0:38:27.000
<v Speaker 1>season for like a good not elite closer. So yeah,

0:38:27.120 --> 0:38:31.520
<v Speaker 1>I understand the side of you know, obviously strongly preferring Marte,

0:38:31.520 --> 0:38:33.360
<v Speaker 1>and then I'll read the one from Andrew our listener,

0:38:33.360 --> 0:38:34.880
<v Speaker 1>and then we'll get into the ones from your leagues.

0:38:36.160 --> 0:38:41.480
<v Speaker 1>So he was expecting to get Jesus Lozardo for Luis Robert,

0:38:41.560 --> 0:38:45.240
<v Speaker 1>so in anticipation of that, he traded Clay Holmes for Rooker,

0:38:45.280 --> 0:38:47.560
<v Speaker 1>trying to get an outfielder back, figuring he was kind

0:38:47.560 --> 0:38:50.440
<v Speaker 1>of upgrading a picture from Holmes to Lozardo, so he

0:38:50.520 --> 0:38:54.359
<v Speaker 1>traded Holmes for Rooker. Then the guy backed out on

0:38:54.400 --> 0:38:57.320
<v Speaker 1>the Robert for Lozardo deal, so he felt like, Okay,

0:38:57.360 --> 0:39:00.440
<v Speaker 1>well now I need to get a picture because I

0:39:00.480 --> 0:39:05.000
<v Speaker 1>just traded away Holmes, so he traded away He also

0:39:05.080 --> 0:39:08.799
<v Speaker 1>he picked up Nick Kurtz on Waivers this morning because

0:39:08.840 --> 0:39:11.240
<v Speaker 1>he had had him and then dropped him out of frustration.

0:39:11.320 --> 0:39:13.279
<v Speaker 1>Then he had this three home runs to two nights,

0:39:13.280 --> 0:39:16.640
<v Speaker 1>so he picked him back up this morning. And so

0:39:16.760 --> 0:39:20.000
<v Speaker 1>but I know he was messaging me last night and

0:39:20.040 --> 0:39:21.520
<v Speaker 1>he was like, I had to take one for the

0:39:21.880 --> 0:39:24.640
<v Speaker 1>community with his bad luck to get him to get

0:39:24.719 --> 0:39:30.000
<v Speaker 1>Kurtz going. So then he traded away Jacob Wilson for Sandy.

0:39:30.360 --> 0:39:33.080
<v Speaker 1>So ultimately I know that was a lot of names.

0:39:33.160 --> 0:39:35.279
<v Speaker 1>Ultimately what ended up happening. He thought he had some

0:39:35.320 --> 0:39:37.719
<v Speaker 1>other stuff happening, It didn't happen. Ultimately we ended up

0:39:37.719 --> 0:39:41.680
<v Speaker 1>doing was trading away Jacob Wilson and Clay Holmes. And

0:39:41.680 --> 0:39:43.239
<v Speaker 1>this is over the course of two different deals, but

0:39:43.280 --> 0:39:46.680
<v Speaker 1>trading away Wilson and Holmes and getting Brent Rooker and

0:39:46.719 --> 0:39:49.640
<v Speaker 1>Sandy al Kintar. So what do you think about that one?

0:39:50.960 --> 0:39:52.360
<v Speaker 2>I think the first thing you need to do is

0:39:52.400 --> 0:39:56.080
<v Speaker 2>not make contingent trades without them both sides locked in.

0:39:56.160 --> 0:39:58.440
<v Speaker 2>You need to have both sides agreed and then like

0:39:58.960 --> 0:40:01.640
<v Speaker 2>hit Sam and on both of them at the same time,

0:40:01.719 --> 0:40:05.600
<v Speaker 2>like because like What happens is you agree to one

0:40:05.760 --> 0:40:07.239
<v Speaker 2>and then the other person's like, well, I don't I

0:40:07.239 --> 0:40:08.600
<v Speaker 2>feel like if that player went for that, I can

0:40:08.640 --> 0:40:10.120
<v Speaker 2>probably get more from my player, and then they back

0:40:10.120 --> 0:40:11.200
<v Speaker 2>out of your deal, so you need to do them

0:40:11.239 --> 0:40:12.280
<v Speaker 2>both simultaneously.

0:40:13.160 --> 0:40:15.719
<v Speaker 1>What I would say in his defense, though, is I

0:40:15.719 --> 0:40:19.720
<v Speaker 1>don't think you needed to get the Lozardo deal done

0:40:20.440 --> 0:40:22.560
<v Speaker 1>for Holmes for Rooker to be a good move, Like

0:40:22.600 --> 0:40:24.840
<v Speaker 1>I like that move just in a vacuum.

0:40:25.080 --> 0:40:27.080
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, yeah, as long as it doesn't like upend your

0:40:27.160 --> 0:40:31.319
<v Speaker 2>roster bounce. What was the I'm sorry, what was the

0:40:31.320 --> 0:40:33.680
<v Speaker 2>actual trade again? When the dust.

0:40:33.520 --> 0:40:38.759
<v Speaker 1>Settled, Clay Holmes for Rooker, okay, and Jacob Wilson for

0:40:38.880 --> 0:40:40.040
<v Speaker 1>Sandy al Contra.

0:40:41.160 --> 0:40:44.319
<v Speaker 2>I feel like, with how good Jacob Wilson, I mean

0:40:44.440 --> 0:40:47.200
<v Speaker 2>like I am buying well on Sandy, so I get it.

0:40:47.280 --> 0:40:49.080
<v Speaker 2>I feel like Jacob Wilson has been so good that

0:40:49.120 --> 0:40:50.360
<v Speaker 2>you're kind of overpaying for Sandy.

0:40:50.360 --> 0:40:52.560
<v Speaker 1>He also picked up kurtz off Waivers, and he said

0:40:52.600 --> 0:40:54.800
<v Speaker 1>he had four a's now because he traded for Rooker,

0:40:55.160 --> 0:40:57.160
<v Speaker 1>so he was like kind of willing to get rid

0:40:57.200 --> 0:40:57.799
<v Speaker 1>of one of them.

0:40:58.080 --> 0:41:01.880
<v Speaker 2>That's fair, Wilson, I mean, that's there I think ultimately

0:41:01.920 --> 0:41:03.680
<v Speaker 2>those are all fine deals. I think you overpaid for

0:41:03.680 --> 0:41:07.080
<v Speaker 2>Sandy a little bit based on where we are, but but.

0:41:07.040 --> 0:41:08.640
<v Speaker 1>I also you got a value on Rooker. I really

0:41:08.640 --> 0:41:09.600
<v Speaker 1>like buying low on Rooker.

0:41:10.120 --> 0:41:13.600
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, especially in that ballpark. Is you know, assuming he

0:41:13.640 --> 0:41:14.879
<v Speaker 2>gets better, which I think you will.

0:41:15.920 --> 0:41:17.440
<v Speaker 1>All right, give me your two trades, then we'll get

0:41:17.440 --> 0:41:17.680
<v Speaker 1>out of.

0:41:17.640 --> 0:41:20.879
<v Speaker 2>Here, all right. I think I think I actually made

0:41:20.880 --> 0:41:23.000
<v Speaker 2>both these trades. I'm in the really fun league. It's

0:41:23.000 --> 0:41:25.439
<v Speaker 2>my first year in this league, and I've never seen

0:41:25.440 --> 0:41:27.640
<v Speaker 2>a league trade like this before. It's a big money league.

0:41:27.640 --> 0:41:27.840
<v Speaker 1>It was.

0:41:27.840 --> 0:41:29.839
<v Speaker 2>It was a high pay in most of the I'm

0:41:29.880 --> 0:41:31.799
<v Speaker 2>on in it by myself, which I hopefully I won't

0:41:31.840 --> 0:41:33.960
<v Speaker 2>be in next year. A lot of it's so expensive

0:41:33.960 --> 0:41:37.439
<v Speaker 2>that a lot of people actually share teams. But there

0:41:37.440 --> 0:41:39.200
<v Speaker 2>are just trades every day. I get like four or

0:41:39.200 --> 0:41:41.399
<v Speaker 2>five offers a day in this league, and so it's

0:41:41.480 --> 0:41:44.000
<v Speaker 2>kind of wild. You know, it's another league that Dan

0:41:44.040 --> 0:41:46.000
<v Speaker 2>Harris is in. Until we're texting about it all the time,

0:41:46.680 --> 0:41:48.480
<v Speaker 2>and a lot of a lot of times we're getting

0:41:48.480 --> 0:41:50.480
<v Speaker 2>offers from the same managers. So it's kind of fun

0:41:50.520 --> 0:41:51.920
<v Speaker 2>to like see him kind of like dance around the

0:41:51.960 --> 0:41:54.920
<v Speaker 2>league and get all these offers. But it is very

0:41:54.920 --> 0:41:57.600
<v Speaker 2>interesting to see all the trades going down. So this

0:41:57.640 --> 0:41:59.319
<v Speaker 2>one is, you know, kind of in the lower end,

0:41:59.360 --> 0:42:01.359
<v Speaker 2>but as Brandon would druft for Xavier Edwards. So it's

0:42:01.440 --> 0:42:04.319
<v Speaker 2>kind of a by low on Exavier Edwards. But then

0:42:04.360 --> 0:42:07.000
<v Speaker 2>also I'm the one who traded away Brandon Woodruff. I'd

0:42:07.080 --> 0:42:10.160
<v Speaker 2>been stashing him. I have not loved what I've seen

0:42:10.600 --> 0:42:13.440
<v Speaker 2>in you know, the lower velocity in the rehab assignment.

0:42:13.560 --> 0:42:15.280
<v Speaker 2>He was someone that I was kind of like stashing,

0:42:15.640 --> 0:42:18.960
<v Speaker 2>hoping I can get some you know, mid May juice

0:42:19.000 --> 0:42:21.319
<v Speaker 2>out of him, and I could use a little bit

0:42:21.360 --> 0:42:25.319
<v Speaker 2>of speed. And I also have I also made to trade,

0:42:25.360 --> 0:42:27.920
<v Speaker 2>so I have some extra pitching. And so I forget

0:42:27.960 --> 0:42:32.400
<v Speaker 2>who he This manager initially asked for a ranger Suarez

0:42:32.480 --> 0:42:34.520
<v Speaker 2>and I countered with Brandon Woodruff and he said throwing

0:42:34.560 --> 0:42:35.920
<v Speaker 2>ten dollars in fab and it's a deal, and I

0:42:35.960 --> 0:42:39.440
<v Speaker 2>said done. So I sent Brandon Woodruff for Xavier Edwards.

0:42:39.440 --> 0:42:40.160
<v Speaker 2>What do you think about that?

0:42:42.080 --> 0:42:47.200
<v Speaker 1>I think I would prefer Woodruff, but I think it's

0:42:47.320 --> 0:42:51.520
<v Speaker 1>close to neutral, Like it's not like on that scale

0:42:51.520 --> 0:42:54.120
<v Speaker 1>you said, It's not like a strongly agree or strongly disagree.

0:42:54.360 --> 0:42:56.759
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, And for like roster context, it was kind of

0:42:56.800 --> 0:42:59.680
<v Speaker 2>like Edwards is going to be like my last utility

0:42:59.719 --> 0:43:02.120
<v Speaker 2>or mid in fielder, like maybe not even start some weeks.

0:43:02.360 --> 0:43:04.080
<v Speaker 2>And Woodrod was kind of kind of be like an

0:43:04.080 --> 0:43:05.759
<v Speaker 2>extra arm. I was either gonna have to drop him

0:43:05.800 --> 0:43:08.359
<v Speaker 2>or someone else. Anyway, when he comes back, I think

0:43:08.400 --> 0:43:13.480
<v Speaker 2>that helps. Yeah, And then the last one is I

0:43:13.560 --> 0:43:15.640
<v Speaker 2>kind of wanted some more pitching volume and wasn't loving

0:43:15.680 --> 0:43:20.000
<v Speaker 2>like what I'd been streaming, and this manager put out feelers.

0:43:20.200 --> 0:43:22.560
<v Speaker 2>He just posted on the lead board. Look, he was like,

0:43:22.600 --> 0:43:25.719
<v Speaker 2>I'm looking for and you know I always talk on

0:43:25.760 --> 0:43:28.040
<v Speaker 2>the show about trading like hitters for pictures. I see

0:43:28.040 --> 0:43:29.520
<v Speaker 2>a lot of examples of like, you know, trading this

0:43:29.560 --> 0:43:31.120
<v Speaker 2>picture for this picture, and I'm like, why are you

0:43:31.200 --> 0:43:33.480
<v Speaker 2>trading pictures for pictures? You should always be the other way.

0:43:33.840 --> 0:43:36.440
<v Speaker 2>But this manager posted, I'm looking to you know, I

0:43:36.440 --> 0:43:39.279
<v Speaker 2>have extra pitching. I'm looking to flip two pictures for

0:43:39.440 --> 0:43:42.920
<v Speaker 2>potential upgrade. And so I sent him a couple offers.

0:43:42.920 --> 0:43:45.880
<v Speaker 2>One of them was Luis Castillo for Dustin May and

0:43:45.920 --> 0:43:50.440
<v Speaker 2>Sandy al Contra, which I have come concerns about Luis Castillo,

0:43:50.440 --> 0:43:52.040
<v Speaker 2>and so it was in my mind I was kind

0:43:52.040 --> 0:43:55.440
<v Speaker 2>of selling high on him for two when I think

0:43:55.440 --> 0:43:57.680
<v Speaker 2>are kind of bilows because I think, I don't know

0:43:57.680 --> 0:43:58.920
<v Speaker 2>if this is going to happen, but I think there's

0:43:58.960 --> 0:44:03.719
<v Speaker 2>a world where both Estamate and Saniel Contra are have

0:44:03.800 --> 0:44:06.000
<v Speaker 2>better numbers than Luis Castillo by the end of the season.

0:44:06.800 --> 0:44:08.600
<v Speaker 2>Maybe not, but I think there's a world where it happens.

0:44:08.600 --> 0:44:10.080
<v Speaker 2>But getting both of them for just him I was

0:44:10.080 --> 0:44:11.959
<v Speaker 2>happy to do. But what do you think about that one?

0:44:13.080 --> 0:44:16.080
<v Speaker 1>I wouldn't say I strongly agree or disagree. I would

0:44:16.120 --> 0:44:20.920
<v Speaker 1>say a regular agree on the may Al Contra side.

0:44:22.080 --> 0:44:24.880
<v Speaker 2>So I like the move. Yeah, and it's it's possible

0:44:24.880 --> 0:44:26.480
<v Speaker 2>it blows up on me too, But I think there's

0:44:26.480 --> 0:44:28.799
<v Speaker 2>also a possibility that Luis Castillo blows up soon.

0:44:29.320 --> 0:44:31.960
<v Speaker 1>Well, And I like that you're getting two bylows, right,

0:44:32.000 --> 0:44:35.279
<v Speaker 1>it's not just one, and so you're you're kind of

0:44:35.280 --> 0:44:37.440
<v Speaker 1>doubling your chances of if one of them hits that

0:44:37.520 --> 0:44:40.000
<v Speaker 1>it looks fair. And if both of them hit then

0:44:40.000 --> 0:44:43.719
<v Speaker 1>it's a great deal. So and and I like the

0:44:43.760 --> 0:44:46.600
<v Speaker 1>case for both of them as bilow's and I like

0:44:46.680 --> 0:44:49.640
<v Speaker 1>the case for Castillo as a sell So I'm on board.

0:44:49.640 --> 0:44:52.160
<v Speaker 1>With that, we'll wrap up this segment of the cycle

0:44:52.640 --> 0:44:54.720
<v Speaker 1>on that one went a little bit longer for everybody.

0:44:54.760 --> 0:44:59.200
<v Speaker 1>Hopefully they enjoyed, uh, you know everything, the long Orioles

0:44:59.200 --> 0:45:02.200
<v Speaker 1>conversation and the football conversation and all this stuff that

0:45:02.239 --> 0:45:05.120
<v Speaker 1>our audience usually hates. Sofday, we're okay with today. And

0:45:05.160 --> 0:45:07.719
<v Speaker 1>the tequila. Oh, they love the tequila. We know that.

0:45:08.840 --> 0:45:11.000
<v Speaker 1>If there's any rules that you with the audience thinks

0:45:11.000 --> 0:45:13.120
<v Speaker 1>should be changed in baseball, please drop those in the comments.

0:45:13.200 --> 0:45:15.120
<v Speaker 1>Let us know what other rules you would like to

0:45:15.160 --> 0:45:18.120
<v Speaker 1>see band or added, or does any other kind of

0:45:18.120 --> 0:45:21.439
<v Speaker 1>fun rules changes you want to see with baseball. Also,

0:45:21.440 --> 0:45:24.879
<v Speaker 1>feel free to drop any trades you comments, and Mayor

0:45:24.920 --> 0:45:27.160
<v Speaker 1>will hop into comments and give his thoughts on those.

0:45:27.400 --> 0:45:30.719
<v Speaker 1>I'll volunteer him as tribute for that. For Mayor, I'm

0:45:30.800 --> 0:45:32.600
<v Speaker 1>Ryan Wrman. Thanks for tuning in. Be sure to check

0:45:32.600 --> 0:45:34.640
<v Speaker 1>out part two of the cycle coming later this weekend.

0:45:35.000 --> 0:45:38.239
<v Speaker 1>Thanks for listening to the Fantasy Pros Fantasy Baseball podcast.

0:45:38.480 --> 0:45:40.840
<v Speaker 1>If you love the show, the best freeway to support

0:45:40.920 --> 0:45:43.840
<v Speaker 1>us is by leaving a positive review on Apple Podcasts

0:45:43.920 --> 0:45:47.600
<v Speaker 1>or Spotify, Follow us on x, Instagram, and TikTok at

0:45:47.600 --> 0:45:50.560
<v Speaker 1>Fantasy Pros and subscribe to our YouTube channel at YouTube

0:45:50.560 --> 0:45:52.760
<v Speaker 1>dot com Slash Fantasy Pros MLB