WEBVTT - Listener Mail: A Whistle of Worth

0:00:02.960 --> 0:00:05.360
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to Stuff to Blow Your Mind, production of My

0:00:05.480 --> 0:00:11.000
<v Speaker 1>Heart Radio. Hey, welcome to Stuff to Blow your Mind

0:00:11.240 --> 0:00:14.840
<v Speaker 1>listener mail. My name is Robert Lamb and I'm Joe McCormick,

0:00:14.840 --> 0:00:16.960
<v Speaker 1>and it's Monday, the day of the week that we

0:00:16.960 --> 0:00:19.840
<v Speaker 1>read back some messages you've sent into the show account,

0:00:20.360 --> 0:00:23.400
<v Speaker 1>which is, by the way, contact at stuff to Blow

0:00:23.440 --> 0:00:25.239
<v Speaker 1>your Mind dot com. If you ever want to get

0:00:25.280 --> 0:00:28.360
<v Speaker 1>in touch to share something interesting, if you have feedback

0:00:28.400 --> 0:00:30.560
<v Speaker 1>on a recent episode, or if you just want to

0:00:30.560 --> 0:00:33.080
<v Speaker 1>say hi, tell us your thoughts about the show or

0:00:33.120 --> 0:00:36.520
<v Speaker 1>anything else, get in touch contact at stuff to Blow

0:00:36.560 --> 0:00:40.320
<v Speaker 1>your Mind dot com. We have a bunch of messages

0:00:40.360 --> 0:00:43.279
<v Speaker 1>in response to our series about whistling, and I think

0:00:43.320 --> 0:00:46.320
<v Speaker 1>we should kick right off with this message from Joe.

0:00:46.560 --> 0:00:48.720
<v Speaker 1>Rob Do you mind if I read this one? Go

0:00:48.880 --> 0:00:56.920
<v Speaker 1>for it? Okay, this is Joe, just Jo, not like me.

0:00:57.000 --> 0:01:00.560
<v Speaker 1>I've got any on there. So Joe says hello and

0:01:00.640 --> 0:01:04.559
<v Speaker 1>good day. I was whistling while listening to Whistling Part

0:01:04.640 --> 0:01:07.280
<v Speaker 1>one until you mentioned that you'd cover some of the

0:01:07.360 --> 0:01:11.160
<v Speaker 1>superstitions about whistling. It just so happens that a lot

0:01:11.200 --> 0:01:15.600
<v Speaker 1>of Southeast Asians believe that whistling attracts unwanted attention from

0:01:15.640 --> 0:01:20.520
<v Speaker 1>supernatural beings, especially since it's currently the seventh Lunar Month

0:01:20.680 --> 0:01:25.200
<v Speaker 1>a k a. Ghost Month. Although you've done many spooky episodes,

0:01:25.240 --> 0:01:27.959
<v Speaker 1>I don't think I've ever heard the Hungry Ghost month

0:01:28.040 --> 0:01:31.039
<v Speaker 1>mentioned on the podcast. In case you haven't heard about it,

0:01:31.160 --> 0:01:34.279
<v Speaker 1>let me give you a short introduction. The seventh Lunar

0:01:34.319 --> 0:01:37.120
<v Speaker 1>month is when the gates of hell are opened and

0:01:37.160 --> 0:01:40.360
<v Speaker 1>ghosts are allowed to roam the earth for thirty days.

0:01:40.440 --> 0:01:44.440
<v Speaker 1>Spirits wander the mortal realm in search of entertainment and sustenance.

0:01:44.880 --> 0:01:47.960
<v Speaker 1>This month is considered pretty inauspicious, and people in places

0:01:48.000 --> 0:01:52.120
<v Speaker 1>like Malaysia, Singapore, and Taiwan will often avoid being outside

0:01:52.160 --> 0:01:55.680
<v Speaker 1>at night for fear of running a foul of mischievous spirits.

0:01:55.680 --> 0:01:58.480
<v Speaker 1>Throughout the month, it's not uncommon to see offerings of

0:01:58.520 --> 0:02:01.040
<v Speaker 1>food placed by the side of the road for hungry

0:02:01.080 --> 0:02:04.920
<v Speaker 1>ghost ease. It's only polite that pedestrians avoid stepping over

0:02:05.000 --> 0:02:07.520
<v Speaker 1>these offerings or getting too close to them, as this

0:02:07.640 --> 0:02:11.840
<v Speaker 1>might disrupt any feasting spirits. Malaysia and Singapore also have

0:02:11.919 --> 0:02:15.400
<v Speaker 1>a tradition of setting up stages where performers are hired

0:02:15.440 --> 0:02:19.400
<v Speaker 1>to sing and act for their invisible floaties. For this reason,

0:02:19.440 --> 0:02:21.680
<v Speaker 1>the first few rows of chairs in the audience of

0:02:21.680 --> 0:02:24.200
<v Speaker 1>any such stage are to be left empty in case

0:02:24.280 --> 0:02:27.320
<v Speaker 1>these supernatural friend does want to take a seat and

0:02:27.440 --> 0:02:31.079
<v Speaker 1>enjoy their foray back into the mortal world. Some places

0:02:31.160 --> 0:02:34.480
<v Speaker 1>only celebrate the Hungry Ghost Festival, which is the fifteen

0:02:34.800 --> 0:02:39.519
<v Speaker 1>of the seventh month. It's the twelfth of August. It's

0:02:39.520 --> 0:02:43.480
<v Speaker 1>a day when food, jawsticks, paper money, prayers, and rituals

0:02:43.480 --> 0:02:46.959
<v Speaker 1>are offered up to appease the restless roaming spirits. It's

0:02:46.960 --> 0:02:49.720
<v Speaker 1>also common to see lights and candles placed on the

0:02:49.760 --> 0:02:51.959
<v Speaker 1>side of the roads, as it is believed to help

0:02:52.000 --> 0:02:55.880
<v Speaker 1>guide the spirits back into Hell. There are a slew

0:02:55.919 --> 0:02:59.960
<v Speaker 1>of superstitions related to Ghost Month. Loud sounds like whistle

0:03:00.120 --> 0:03:03.560
<v Speaker 1>ling are believed to attract spirits. It has always been

0:03:03.560 --> 0:03:06.720
<v Speaker 1>discouraged in Southeast Asia, but even more so during this

0:03:06.760 --> 0:03:11.000
<v Speaker 1>spooky month. Other superstitions include not looking back over your

0:03:11.040 --> 0:03:14.040
<v Speaker 1>shoulder to see if someone is yelling your name. This

0:03:14.120 --> 0:03:17.200
<v Speaker 1>is because daois slash Buddhists believe that there's a tiny

0:03:17.240 --> 0:03:21.000
<v Speaker 1>invisible flame on each shoulder and on your head, creating

0:03:21.040 --> 0:03:25.120
<v Speaker 1>a triangle of fire. This protects you from spooky encounters.

0:03:25.160 --> 0:03:27.239
<v Speaker 1>But if you turn your head and look back over

0:03:27.280 --> 0:03:30.360
<v Speaker 1>your shoulder, you will extinguish one of the flames and

0:03:30.360 --> 0:03:34.079
<v Speaker 1>this will open you up to hauntings slash ghostly things.

0:03:34.720 --> 0:03:38.480
<v Speaker 1>Despite the spookiness of the whole month, Valentine's Day is

0:03:38.520 --> 0:03:41.880
<v Speaker 1>celebrated on the seventh day of the seventh month. This day,

0:03:41.960 --> 0:03:44.520
<v Speaker 1>known as cheese c, is about the tail of the

0:03:44.600 --> 0:03:47.960
<v Speaker 1>cow herd and the weaver girl. They had a forbidden

0:03:48.080 --> 0:03:51.160
<v Speaker 1>romance and were cast opposite sides of the Heavenly River.

0:03:51.680 --> 0:03:55.680
<v Speaker 1>But every year on Cheese c a bridge of magpies

0:03:55.880 --> 0:03:59.160
<v Speaker 1>forms over the river and allows the lovers to reunite

0:03:59.240 --> 0:04:02.520
<v Speaker 1>for a brief moment. Mont Anyway, Ghost Month in two

0:04:02.640 --> 0:04:07.400
<v Speaker 1>lasts until August. Until then, whistling, especially at night, is

0:04:07.440 --> 0:04:10.960
<v Speaker 1>not encouraged. Less to lost ghost follow you home and

0:04:11.000 --> 0:04:14.680
<v Speaker 1>take up residence in your abode. Stay spooky and stay safe,

0:04:14.800 --> 0:04:19.400
<v Speaker 1>live along and prosper. Joe. Uh wow, what a wonderful email.

0:04:19.440 --> 0:04:22.599
<v Speaker 1>Thank you so much, Joe, that that was fantastic. Yeah,

0:04:22.600 --> 0:04:26.200
<v Speaker 1>those are some close encounters of the spooky kind for sure. Yeah,

0:04:26.240 --> 0:04:28.760
<v Speaker 1>we've I guess we we've spoken a little bit about

0:04:29.480 --> 0:04:31.840
<v Speaker 1>hungry ghosts in the past, but yeah, we've never talking

0:04:32.120 --> 0:04:35.080
<v Speaker 1>We've never spoken about about this month. So yeah, this

0:04:35.120 --> 0:04:37.360
<v Speaker 1>is a wonderful email. This is exactly the kind of

0:04:38.160 --> 0:04:40.360
<v Speaker 1>of stuff I love to hear from the listeners. Now,

0:04:40.360 --> 0:04:42.440
<v Speaker 1>I guess this episode won't come out until after the

0:04:42.520 --> 0:04:44.680
<v Speaker 1>Hungry Ghost Festival, which Joe says is going to be

0:04:44.680 --> 0:04:47.279
<v Speaker 1>on the twelfth of August, But you still got the

0:04:47.279 --> 0:04:49.440
<v Speaker 1>rest of the month to to to play around on

0:04:49.440 --> 0:04:52.440
<v Speaker 1>the spooky side. True, and hey, on August twelve, the

0:04:52.480 --> 0:04:55.280
<v Speaker 1>Weird House Cinema is just, by happenstance, going to be

0:04:55.320 --> 0:05:06.360
<v Speaker 1>a really cool Taiwanese magical fantasy adventure film. Yeah, all right,

0:05:06.440 --> 0:05:08.680
<v Speaker 1>here's another one. This one comes to us from Phil

0:05:09.160 --> 0:05:11.760
<v Speaker 1>Phil right soon and says Hi, Robert and Joe. From

0:05:11.760 --> 0:05:14.080
<v Speaker 1>the moment I saw the topic of this week's episodes,

0:05:14.120 --> 0:05:16.320
<v Speaker 1>I knew that I would want to write in. Whistling

0:05:16.400 --> 0:05:18.240
<v Speaker 1>is something that has been very near and dear to

0:05:18.279 --> 0:05:20.920
<v Speaker 1>me for a long time. I first learned to make

0:05:20.960 --> 0:05:23.279
<v Speaker 1>a single monotone sound when I was seven. I thought

0:05:23.320 --> 0:05:25.520
<v Speaker 1>I was doing it wrong for a little while, and

0:05:25.560 --> 0:05:29.160
<v Speaker 1>that's why I was monotone because my grandfather always used

0:05:29.160 --> 0:05:32.360
<v Speaker 1>to whistle by pulling his lower jaw in and rounding

0:05:32.400 --> 0:05:35.039
<v Speaker 1>his lips almost like he was about to play a flute.

0:05:35.279 --> 0:05:37.680
<v Speaker 1>I believe he would also suck air in to make

0:05:37.800 --> 0:05:40.359
<v Speaker 1>in the noise rather than expel it, but don't quote

0:05:40.400 --> 0:05:43.839
<v Speaker 1>me on that. I was always fascinated by this method

0:05:43.880 --> 0:05:46.880
<v Speaker 1>and never managed to replicate it myself. Apart from wishing

0:05:46.920 --> 0:05:50.520
<v Speaker 1>to chime in with this bit about my grandfather's irregular technique,

0:05:50.720 --> 0:05:53.359
<v Speaker 1>I also wanted to bring up something with regards to

0:05:53.440 --> 0:05:56.400
<v Speaker 1>my own whistling. I am physically tongue tied. I have

0:05:56.520 --> 0:05:59.160
<v Speaker 1>encountered one other person in my life that is tongue tied,

0:05:59.160 --> 0:06:01.559
<v Speaker 1>and they claimed to not be able to whistle because

0:06:01.600 --> 0:06:03.359
<v Speaker 1>of it. I, on the other hand, love to whistle.

0:06:03.560 --> 0:06:06.680
<v Speaker 1>I do it constantly and can even employ a bit

0:06:07.040 --> 0:06:10.919
<v Speaker 1>of vibrato and possibly something that resembles double tonguing for

0:06:11.000 --> 0:06:13.880
<v Speaker 1>really fast sections. It is a great way for me

0:06:13.920 --> 0:06:17.000
<v Speaker 1>to quote unquote sing songs with female vocals or no

0:06:17.160 --> 0:06:20.240
<v Speaker 1>vocals at all. Whistling is something I think I am

0:06:20.320 --> 0:06:23.159
<v Speaker 1>quite good at. However, based on this one other person,

0:06:23.240 --> 0:06:25.480
<v Speaker 1>I am curious why I can whistle with my tongue

0:06:25.480 --> 0:06:27.880
<v Speaker 1>tied down to the bottom of my mouth but she couldn't.

0:06:28.160 --> 0:06:31.159
<v Speaker 1>I'm also afraid that should I ever get my tongue

0:06:31.160 --> 0:06:34.320
<v Speaker 1>tie cut so that I can actually do things normal

0:06:34.360 --> 0:06:37.120
<v Speaker 1>people can the like lick an ice cream cone or

0:06:37.120 --> 0:06:40.080
<v Speaker 1>blow bubbles with bubble gum, it will have an adverse

0:06:40.240 --> 0:06:43.440
<v Speaker 1>effect on this thing that I love. However, maybe it won't.

0:06:43.839 --> 0:06:46.719
<v Speaker 1>Don't know and too afraid to try. Thank you for

0:06:46.800 --> 0:06:49.200
<v Speaker 1>all of the episodes. You guys were the first podcast

0:06:49.279 --> 0:06:52.040
<v Speaker 1>show that I ever listened to. I obviously haven't stopped

0:06:52.279 --> 0:06:55.360
<v Speaker 1>and have no intention to do so anytime soon. All

0:06:55.400 --> 0:06:59.320
<v Speaker 1>the best, phil ps. Some of my favorite songs to

0:06:59.360 --> 0:07:02.640
<v Speaker 1>whistle Think of Me from Phantom of the Opera sung

0:07:02.680 --> 0:07:06.599
<v Speaker 1>by Sarah Brightman, Ship to Wreck by Florence and the Machine.

0:07:06.960 --> 0:07:08.880
<v Speaker 1>I love that song. That's that goes on a lot

0:07:08.880 --> 0:07:10.720
<v Speaker 1>on my playlists. Oh, I don't know that one, and

0:07:10.800 --> 0:07:13.920
<v Speaker 1>I know think of Me. I know Phantom Breathe by

0:07:14.040 --> 0:07:18.560
<v Speaker 1>Michelle Branch and Been Not Break by Vitamin String Quartet,

0:07:19.040 --> 0:07:24.320
<v Speaker 1>a string quartet cover of a dashboard confessional song. I

0:07:24.360 --> 0:07:27.920
<v Speaker 1>am also trying to teach myself the Whistling Caruso by

0:07:27.960 --> 0:07:31.560
<v Speaker 1>Andrew Bird from the end of the movie The Muppets.

0:07:32.240 --> 0:07:35.560
<v Speaker 1>This is proving to be challenging. Andrew Bird is a

0:07:35.800 --> 0:07:39.200
<v Speaker 1>is a mighty whistling musician. Some another listener got in

0:07:39.240 --> 0:07:41.960
<v Speaker 1>touch about Andrew Bird songs that have whistling, A number

0:07:41.960 --> 0:07:44.880
<v Speaker 1>of them, a lot of them do oh yeah. By

0:07:44.960 --> 0:07:47.520
<v Speaker 1>the way, I just in case anybody out there was

0:07:47.560 --> 0:07:49.960
<v Speaker 1>as confused as me at first, I I was not

0:07:50.120 --> 0:07:53.480
<v Speaker 1>familiar with the idea of uh with the idea of

0:07:53.640 --> 0:07:57.640
<v Speaker 1>tongue tie as an actual physical condition in the mouth.

0:07:57.760 --> 0:08:01.440
<v Speaker 1>It's I'd always heard tongue tied as like a metaphorical expression,

0:08:01.480 --> 0:08:04.480
<v Speaker 1>meaning like not knowing what to say. But tongue tie

0:08:04.520 --> 0:08:07.880
<v Speaker 1>is a real physical condition, also known as ankleo glossia

0:08:07.880 --> 0:08:11.440
<v Speaker 1>and it. According to the Mayo Clinics page on it,

0:08:11.440 --> 0:08:14.720
<v Speaker 1>it's basically a condition that restricts the tongue's range of motion.

0:08:15.200 --> 0:08:18.840
<v Speaker 1>Quote with tongue tie and unusually short, thick, or tight

0:08:18.920 --> 0:08:22.600
<v Speaker 1>band of tissue, the lingual frenulum tethers the bottom of

0:08:22.600 --> 0:08:24.960
<v Speaker 1>the tongue's tip to the floor of the mouth, so

0:08:25.000 --> 0:08:28.080
<v Speaker 1>it may interfere with breastfeeding. Someone who has tongue tie

0:08:28.200 --> 0:08:31.239
<v Speaker 1>might have difficulty sticking out his or her tongue. Tongue

0:08:31.240 --> 0:08:33.920
<v Speaker 1>tie can also affect the way a child eats, speaks,

0:08:34.000 --> 0:08:38.120
<v Speaker 1>or swallows and it also says that sometimes this condition

0:08:38.200 --> 0:08:41.560
<v Speaker 1>might require surgical procedures for correction, but other times it

0:08:41.640 --> 0:08:44.760
<v Speaker 1>doesn't cause enough problems, so it's just left how it is.

0:08:45.120 --> 0:08:52.520
<v Speaker 1>All right, Well, thanks for writing in Phil. Okay, here's

0:08:52.559 --> 0:08:57.320
<v Speaker 1>a message from Randy reporting from Mexico saying that that

0:08:57.400 --> 0:09:01.120
<v Speaker 1>they just finished our part three of our whistling series

0:09:01.440 --> 0:09:04.200
<v Speaker 1>and says, quote, you were mentioning the idea of whistling

0:09:04.280 --> 0:09:06.680
<v Speaker 1>is a form of contempt and that it might have

0:09:06.720 --> 0:09:09.040
<v Speaker 1>been a practice in olden days. I think we were

0:09:09.040 --> 0:09:12.120
<v Speaker 1>talking about those papers saying that like in the English theater,

0:09:12.320 --> 0:09:15.680
<v Speaker 1>for example, you would whistle to show like I don't

0:09:15.720 --> 0:09:18.160
<v Speaker 1>like what is being said. Oh. In fact, that also

0:09:18.200 --> 0:09:20.560
<v Speaker 1>goes back to Roman times, the idea that there would

0:09:20.600 --> 0:09:22.760
<v Speaker 1>be shepherd whistles in the audience if they didn't like

0:09:22.760 --> 0:09:25.240
<v Speaker 1>what a speaker was saying. And I guess we were

0:09:25.280 --> 0:09:28.400
<v Speaker 1>saying that it didn't We hadn't encountered that in American culture.

0:09:28.960 --> 0:09:31.040
<v Speaker 1>You know, if an audience whistles, that usually seems to

0:09:31.080 --> 0:09:33.800
<v Speaker 1>be a sign of approval rather than disapproval. It's like, yeah,

0:09:33.960 --> 0:09:39.160
<v Speaker 1>keep going, but a very thunderous supplies exactly. But Randy says, well,

0:09:39.240 --> 0:09:42.120
<v Speaker 1>let me take you once again to Mexico, where you

0:09:42.160 --> 0:09:46.880
<v Speaker 1>can still hear disapproving whistles among crowds alongside booing. It

0:09:47.040 --> 0:09:50.160
<v Speaker 1>usually mimics the way you would cuss at someone. Picture

0:09:50.240 --> 0:09:53.840
<v Speaker 1>the equivalent of an fu in Spanish, and then that

0:09:54.000 --> 0:09:58.160
<v Speaker 1>is transposed to whistling. And then Randy shares video of

0:09:58.200 --> 0:10:02.040
<v Speaker 1>a cockatoo demon straighting what this sounds like? So it

0:10:02.320 --> 0:10:05.400
<v Speaker 1>is the yeah, So it is the straight up Spanish

0:10:05.400 --> 0:10:08.680
<v Speaker 1>phrase that is the equivalent of the English FU. But

0:10:08.840 --> 0:10:12.079
<v Speaker 1>it's like whistled in the same way that I demonstrated

0:10:12.120 --> 0:10:14.280
<v Speaker 1>in one of our whistling episodes that I could sort

0:10:14.320 --> 0:10:17.839
<v Speaker 1>of whistle the phrase, um, hello, nice to meet you,

0:10:17.920 --> 0:10:20.160
<v Speaker 1>and people would basically be able to know what I

0:10:20.240 --> 0:10:21.680
<v Speaker 1>was saying, or at least a lot of a lot

0:10:21.720 --> 0:10:23.800
<v Speaker 1>of people might be able to figure it out just

0:10:23.840 --> 0:10:27.040
<v Speaker 1>by the intonation of the whistling Uh. You can do

0:10:27.080 --> 0:10:29.960
<v Speaker 1>the same thing with vulgar phrases. So, according to Randy,

0:10:30.040 --> 0:10:39.960
<v Speaker 1>this happens in in unhappy Mexican audiences. Alright, This next

0:10:39.960 --> 0:10:42.880
<v Speaker 1>one comes to us from Jamie Oh an important bit

0:10:42.920 --> 0:10:45.360
<v Speaker 1>of context. The subject line of this one is the

0:10:45.440 --> 0:10:50.559
<v Speaker 1>strange death of whistling Scotland all right, well, Jamie writes,

0:10:50.920 --> 0:10:52.880
<v Speaker 1>Dear Robert and Joe, thank you as always for the

0:10:52.880 --> 0:10:55.920
<v Speaker 1>stimulating podcast. I've been greatly enjoying your series on whistling,

0:10:56.280 --> 0:10:58.960
<v Speaker 1>and while hearing about the decline of whistled languages around

0:10:58.960 --> 0:11:00.760
<v Speaker 1>the world, I thought, when was the last time I

0:11:00.840 --> 0:11:03.840
<v Speaker 1>heard someone whistle a jaunty tune? When I was young,

0:11:03.880 --> 0:11:06.640
<v Speaker 1>whistling was, if not ubiquitous, at least common enough to

0:11:06.679 --> 0:11:10.679
<v Speaker 1>hear on a daily basis, especially amongst jobs whose practitioners

0:11:11.160 --> 0:11:13.720
<v Speaker 1>move around a lot during the day, with periods of

0:11:13.760 --> 0:11:18.240
<v Speaker 1>intermittent in forced slackness. Builders, plasterers, joiners, that kind of thing.

0:11:19.120 --> 0:11:21.480
<v Speaker 1>Maybe that time is now occupied by playing with one's

0:11:21.480 --> 0:11:24.839
<v Speaker 1>phone and whistling is yet another casualty of the smartphone revolution.

0:11:25.320 --> 0:11:27.000
<v Speaker 1>Or I may be wrong and there is a whole

0:11:27.080 --> 0:11:32.079
<v Speaker 1>genre of whistling TikTok in an aside by this episode,

0:11:32.080 --> 0:11:34.400
<v Speaker 1>have you ever thought of doing an episode on the

0:11:34.440 --> 0:11:37.959
<v Speaker 1>world's most difficult language? Of course, language difficulty is a

0:11:38.000 --> 0:11:41.560
<v Speaker 1>subjective concept and depends upon the native language of the learner.

0:11:41.960 --> 0:11:45.040
<v Speaker 1>That said, is someone who has learned French, Japanese and

0:11:45.120 --> 0:11:48.240
<v Speaker 1>Arabic and had to go at Russian and Scottish Gaelic.

0:11:48.760 --> 0:11:51.360
<v Speaker 1>I would say that the latter was actually the hardest.

0:11:51.720 --> 0:11:55.280
<v Speaker 1>I wonder what would be the optimum combination of difficult

0:11:55.280 --> 0:11:59.360
<v Speaker 1>features from various languages. The system of tents in aspects

0:11:59.360 --> 0:12:03.920
<v Speaker 1>of English, the Hansi ideograms of Chinese, the extensive tones

0:12:03.960 --> 0:12:08.320
<v Speaker 1>of Vietnamese, the challenging voiced glottal stop of Arabic or Hebrew,

0:12:08.440 --> 0:12:11.560
<v Speaker 1>or the clicks of various Southern African languages might be

0:12:11.679 --> 0:12:15.440
<v Speaker 1>fun to play around. Keep up the good work, Jamie, Yeah,

0:12:15.480 --> 0:12:17.680
<v Speaker 1>that's a really interesting idea. I mean, I know different

0:12:17.760 --> 0:12:22.199
<v Speaker 1>languages have different things that present problems that I don't

0:12:22.280 --> 0:12:23.960
<v Speaker 1>know if this is true, but I mean I've heard

0:12:24.000 --> 0:12:26.480
<v Speaker 1>it characterized that one of the most difficult things about

0:12:26.559 --> 0:12:31.560
<v Speaker 1>learning English, uh is the lack of regularity in in

0:12:31.600 --> 0:12:35.520
<v Speaker 1>the way like uh, grammar and word forms, work and stuff.

0:12:35.559 --> 0:12:39.960
<v Speaker 1>English is sort of a highly chaotic and irregular language,

0:12:40.200 --> 0:12:42.040
<v Speaker 1>whereas I think with other things it would be Yeah,

0:12:42.040 --> 0:12:45.160
<v Speaker 1>you'd have to learn, like if you're not already familiar

0:12:45.200 --> 0:12:48.720
<v Speaker 1>with tonal languages. I'm sure learning a tonal language from

0:12:48.720 --> 0:12:51.679
<v Speaker 1>only a non tonal background has got to be incredibly hard.

0:12:52.720 --> 0:12:54.800
<v Speaker 1>But yeah, this is a great idea. Certainly we'd love

0:12:54.840 --> 0:12:56.800
<v Speaker 1>to We're all would love to come back and do

0:12:56.960 --> 0:13:00.440
<v Speaker 1>a linguistic episodes, so it might be an area to

0:13:00.480 --> 0:13:08.400
<v Speaker 1>consider for the future. Okay, we got one message that

0:13:08.520 --> 0:13:12.040
<v Speaker 1>was about story machines from Trey and this one, this

0:13:12.080 --> 0:13:16.319
<v Speaker 1>one legitimately made me laugh out loud. So remember how

0:13:16.360 --> 0:13:19.160
<v Speaker 1>in the previous that we were talking about when you

0:13:19.200 --> 0:13:21.400
<v Speaker 1>feed stuff into the story machine that makes it put

0:13:21.400 --> 0:13:24.560
<v Speaker 1>out not really something that's not really a story, like

0:13:24.840 --> 0:13:28.720
<v Speaker 1>the ones that instead turned into ads for books or something,

0:13:29.160 --> 0:13:32.679
<v Speaker 1>And this was one of those. So Trey says, Hi, Rob, Seth,

0:13:32.720 --> 0:13:35.360
<v Speaker 1>and Joe I work at a staffing company and I'm

0:13:35.400 --> 0:13:37.200
<v Speaker 1>also a big fan of stuff to blow your mind.

0:13:37.559 --> 0:13:40.120
<v Speaker 1>I used the story machine dot net generator to make

0:13:40.120 --> 0:13:43.560
<v Speaker 1>a mock ad. The title was part time Jobs, eight

0:13:43.559 --> 0:13:46.880
<v Speaker 1>hour shifts. The prompt was we have good paying part

0:13:46.920 --> 0:13:50.240
<v Speaker 1>time jobs. Below is what the robot wrote, we have

0:13:50.360 --> 0:13:53.280
<v Speaker 1>good paying part time jobs. I get paid thirteen dollars

0:13:53.320 --> 0:13:55.760
<v Speaker 1>an hour. My husband gets paid twelve dollars an hour,

0:13:56.120 --> 0:13:58.600
<v Speaker 1>but our hours are cut back to eight hours a day.

0:13:58.840 --> 0:14:01.400
<v Speaker 1>We are only paid for eight hours. We are only

0:14:01.480 --> 0:14:04.120
<v Speaker 1>paid for the hours we work. We are not paid

0:14:04.160 --> 0:14:06.600
<v Speaker 1>for the hours we are off. We are only paid

0:14:06.600 --> 0:14:09.000
<v Speaker 1>for the hours we are working. We are only paid

0:14:09.040 --> 0:14:11.400
<v Speaker 1>for the hours we are at our job. We're only

0:14:11.440 --> 0:14:14.079
<v Speaker 1>paid for the hours we are working. We're only paid

0:14:14.120 --> 0:14:16.199
<v Speaker 1>for the hours we were at our job. We are

0:14:16.200 --> 0:14:18.240
<v Speaker 1>only paid for the hours we were at our job.

0:14:18.520 --> 0:14:20.920
<v Speaker 1>We're only paid for the hours we are at our job.

0:14:21.200 --> 0:14:23.120
<v Speaker 1>We are only paid for the hours we were at

0:14:23.120 --> 0:14:25.560
<v Speaker 1>our job. We are only paid for the hours we

0:14:25.560 --> 0:14:27.840
<v Speaker 1>are at our job. We are only paid for the

0:14:27.880 --> 0:14:31.000
<v Speaker 1>hours we are at our job. Wow, it kind of

0:14:31.480 --> 0:14:36.000
<v Speaker 1>got stuck there, didn't got broken yet you destroyed its mind,

0:14:36.760 --> 0:14:38.960
<v Speaker 1>Trey says, I think you could read the last half

0:14:39.000 --> 0:14:42.560
<v Speaker 1>where it begins repeating six times the same sentence six

0:14:42.600 --> 0:14:45.640
<v Speaker 1>times as a droning chant. This sounds like a creepy

0:14:45.680 --> 0:14:48.520
<v Speaker 1>short story about part time workers who hate their jobs

0:14:48.720 --> 0:14:54.480
<v Speaker 1>or our zombies. Thanks Trey, that was pretty great. Um. Yeah,

0:14:54.520 --> 0:14:56.360
<v Speaker 1>there's so many there's so many fun things to do

0:14:56.480 --> 0:15:00.200
<v Speaker 1>with this um, with this interface. Um, and I not

0:15:00.240 --> 0:15:04.560
<v Speaker 1>thought about a mock at but that's that's brilliant. Oh.

0:15:04.760 --> 0:15:06.840
<v Speaker 1>This may also have been springboarding off the one in

0:15:06.920 --> 0:15:09.560
<v Speaker 1>the previous listener mail that was a story about the

0:15:09.600 --> 0:15:22.040
<v Speaker 1>bank that sends its customers to hell. All right, we

0:15:22.120 --> 0:15:25.520
<v Speaker 1>have a little bit of weird house cinema mail here

0:15:25.600 --> 0:15:28.080
<v Speaker 1>to to look at this first first one here It

0:15:28.120 --> 0:15:32.040
<v Speaker 1>comes to us from Dan the subject Plan nine, weird House.

0:15:33.080 --> 0:15:36.520
<v Speaker 1>Dear Robin, Joe. I love this episode. Plan nine from

0:15:36.520 --> 0:15:39.200
<v Speaker 1>Outer Space, along with Halloween three Season of The Witch

0:15:39.240 --> 0:15:41.680
<v Speaker 1>are two movies that I think we're custom made for

0:15:41.720 --> 0:15:44.800
<v Speaker 1>weird house cinema. I loved hearing Joe's personal story about

0:15:44.840 --> 0:15:47.320
<v Speaker 1>he and his wife fell in love after watching Plan

0:15:47.480 --> 0:15:50.320
<v Speaker 1>nine on a bootleg VHS tape in high school. I

0:15:50.360 --> 0:15:52.760
<v Speaker 1>first saw Plan nine from Outer Space in college on

0:15:52.840 --> 0:15:55.960
<v Speaker 1>Turner Classic Movies late at night. This was after I

0:15:56.000 --> 0:15:58.640
<v Speaker 1>had seen Tim Burton's ed Wood, which is one of

0:15:58.640 --> 0:16:01.520
<v Speaker 1>my favorite movies, and I, of course had heard about

0:16:01.560 --> 0:16:05.280
<v Speaker 1>how it was consistently ranked as the worst movie ever made,

0:16:05.280 --> 0:16:07.120
<v Speaker 1>so I was curious to see what it was like.

0:16:07.440 --> 0:16:10.440
<v Speaker 1>Is it really that bad? I remember thinking that while yes,

0:16:10.520 --> 0:16:12.960
<v Speaker 1>the acting is terrible, the dialogue doesn't make any sense,

0:16:12.960 --> 0:16:15.960
<v Speaker 1>and it's and is overwritten and clumsy. Something over there,

0:16:16.120 --> 0:16:19.040
<v Speaker 1>but I'll be over here. Nothing matches. The effects and

0:16:19.080 --> 0:16:22.800
<v Speaker 1>set design are so cheap, the airplane cockpit, but I

0:16:22.880 --> 0:16:25.880
<v Speaker 1>was still charmed and somewhat entertained by it certainly not

0:16:25.960 --> 0:16:28.440
<v Speaker 1>the worst movie I had ever seen, which begs the

0:16:28.520 --> 0:16:31.840
<v Speaker 1>question something I thought you might go into a more discussion.

0:16:32.560 --> 0:16:34.680
<v Speaker 1>If Plan nine from Outer Space is really the worst

0:16:34.680 --> 0:16:36.960
<v Speaker 1>movie ever made? Why do so many people still find

0:16:37.040 --> 0:16:41.320
<v Speaker 1>it fascinating, entertaining, fun to talk about, and his referenced

0:16:41.320 --> 0:16:43.720
<v Speaker 1>in other forms of media. Shouldn't the worst movie ever?

0:16:43.760 --> 0:16:47.720
<v Speaker 1>Maybe something no one ever remembers is boring, is grossly

0:16:48.160 --> 0:16:52.360
<v Speaker 1>cynical and a commercial sense fun fact, Plan nine has

0:16:52.560 --> 0:16:56.840
<v Speaker 1>never been on IMDBs bottom one d. I also wondered

0:16:56.840 --> 0:17:00.120
<v Speaker 1>if maybe the Criswell predicts scene at the beginning and

0:17:00.280 --> 0:17:03.360
<v Speaker 1>whenever he went on the Tonight Show was what Conan

0:17:03.400 --> 0:17:07.199
<v Speaker 1>O'Brien was parading on his original late night show with

0:17:07.280 --> 0:17:10.000
<v Speaker 1>the recurring segment in the year two thousand where he

0:17:10.080 --> 0:17:13.760
<v Speaker 1>and a guest made ridiculous predictions about the future. Finally,

0:17:13.960 --> 0:17:16.800
<v Speaker 1>are you familiar with the song Plan nine Channel seven

0:17:16.840 --> 0:17:20.280
<v Speaker 1>by the British punk proto goth band The Damned, which,

0:17:20.280 --> 0:17:24.679
<v Speaker 1>according to lead singer Dave Vanian, was was written about

0:17:24.880 --> 0:17:29.679
<v Speaker 1>Vampira link here and they include the link and then

0:17:29.760 --> 0:17:32.119
<v Speaker 1>Dan finishes everything up by saying thank you for the

0:17:32.119 --> 0:17:35.719
<v Speaker 1>countless hours of podcasting about the strange and the unusual. Future.

0:17:35.800 --> 0:17:38.200
<v Speaker 1>Podcasts such as these will affect you in the future,

0:17:38.320 --> 0:17:40.840
<v Speaker 1>my friends, because that is where we will be spending

0:17:41.119 --> 0:17:45.760
<v Speaker 1>the rest of our lives. Uh. That song by the

0:17:45.800 --> 0:17:48.840
<v Speaker 1>Damned is great Channel nine with shades of Grade too

0:17:48.840 --> 0:17:52.040
<v Speaker 1>Close but two worlds Away, Plan nine her Domain, too

0:17:52.080 --> 0:17:54.560
<v Speaker 1>close but two worlds away. Yeah. I don't think I

0:17:54.600 --> 0:17:56.600
<v Speaker 1>was familiar with this track, but I just I just

0:17:56.640 --> 0:17:59.639
<v Speaker 1>gave it a quick listen, and uh, yeah, like the

0:17:59.760 --> 0:18:03.480
<v Speaker 1>vibe here. But regarding the whole like worst movie ever made? Thing,

0:18:03.560 --> 0:18:06.920
<v Speaker 1>I have heard people say that about Plan nine. I

0:18:06.920 --> 0:18:09.400
<v Speaker 1>I don't know. Well, I hesitate to say this because

0:18:09.600 --> 0:18:11.920
<v Speaker 1>it is a podcast and somebody might surface a clip

0:18:11.920 --> 0:18:13.760
<v Speaker 1>of me saying the opposite. But I think I think

0:18:13.840 --> 0:18:17.240
<v Speaker 1>I usually shy away from things like the worst movie

0:18:17.280 --> 0:18:20.040
<v Speaker 1>ever made, unless I'm just trying to be funny, because

0:18:20.080 --> 0:18:23.560
<v Speaker 1>I mean, obviously, not only are things like that subjective,

0:18:23.600 --> 0:18:25.760
<v Speaker 1>I mean, of course, but that seems like a weird

0:18:25.760 --> 0:18:28.400
<v Speaker 1>thing to even try to say from your own personal

0:18:28.480 --> 0:18:32.000
<v Speaker 1>point of view, because, uh, the badness of a movie

0:18:32.160 --> 0:18:36.840
<v Speaker 1>encompasses so many different ways of thinking about a movie. Yeah, so, like,

0:18:37.200 --> 0:18:39.200
<v Speaker 1>what would you really be looking for? Does it mean

0:18:39.240 --> 0:18:43.000
<v Speaker 1>like the movie that made you the most unhappy by watching,

0:18:43.119 --> 0:18:45.560
<v Speaker 1>or you know, it's it's hard to figure out what

0:18:45.600 --> 0:18:49.679
<v Speaker 1>that even really means. Yeah, the worst can cover a

0:18:49.720 --> 0:18:52.920
<v Speaker 1>lot of ground. And I can think of various examples

0:18:52.920 --> 0:18:55.560
<v Speaker 1>of films that I'm I might think of as the

0:18:55.600 --> 0:18:58.399
<v Speaker 1>worst in the sense that I do not like them. Yeah,

0:18:59.040 --> 0:19:01.240
<v Speaker 1>and and then they're ms that I can't even tell

0:19:01.280 --> 0:19:03.600
<v Speaker 1>you that I don't like them because I don't remember them.

0:19:03.760 --> 0:19:06.399
<v Speaker 1>And perhaps those are the worst because yeah, as as

0:19:06.480 --> 0:19:10.000
<v Speaker 1>Dan alluded to, like the unmemorable films, films they don't

0:19:10.040 --> 0:19:13.080
<v Speaker 1>move you one way or another, like, those are probably

0:19:13.119 --> 0:19:16.000
<v Speaker 1>the worst. Those are ones where you just have lost

0:19:16.119 --> 0:19:19.040
<v Speaker 1>hours of time in your life that you'll never get back,

0:19:19.400 --> 0:19:22.400
<v Speaker 1>whereas something like Plan nine from Outer Space. I mean,

0:19:22.480 --> 0:19:25.240
<v Speaker 1>it's it's it's a riot, it's it's fun to watch.

0:19:25.320 --> 0:19:28.119
<v Speaker 1>It's I find movies like this thought provoking in ways

0:19:28.200 --> 0:19:33.120
<v Speaker 1>that that that quote unquote intelligent films sometimes are not.

0:19:33.600 --> 0:19:36.600
<v Speaker 1>You know, uh, there's uh. That's one of the things

0:19:36.600 --> 0:19:40.000
<v Speaker 1>that keeps coming, it keeps pulling me back to them,

0:19:40.080 --> 0:19:43.879
<v Speaker 1>is that almost it's almost like the gaps, the flaws

0:19:43.880 --> 0:19:47.760
<v Speaker 1>and these pictures, they they give you room to to

0:19:47.760 --> 0:19:50.919
<v Speaker 1>to think creatively about them, to try and stitch together

0:19:51.040 --> 0:19:54.080
<v Speaker 1>that which is not well connected and so forth. Yeah,

0:19:54.160 --> 0:19:57.560
<v Speaker 1>totally agree with all of that. I would say that

0:19:57.920 --> 0:20:00.320
<v Speaker 1>I think Plan not people might be tempted to say

0:20:00.480 --> 0:20:03.560
<v Speaker 1>Plan nine is the worst movie ever made in a

0:20:03.600 --> 0:20:05.520
<v Speaker 1>way that I think what they mean is like it's

0:20:05.640 --> 0:20:10.919
<v Speaker 1>the worst, It's like the most remarkably interestingly bad movie

0:20:10.960 --> 0:20:14.440
<v Speaker 1>ever made. They're saying it's like notable for its badness

0:20:14.440 --> 0:20:18.080
<v Speaker 1>in the sense, not like execrable because of its badness. Yeah,

0:20:18.119 --> 0:20:20.880
<v Speaker 1>I mean, ultimately it's it's lovingly bad, like you can

0:20:20.920 --> 0:20:24.800
<v Speaker 1>embrace the quote unquote badness of Plan nine from outer space.

0:20:25.520 --> 0:20:28.560
<v Speaker 1>Uh it's uh yeah, there are there are plenty of

0:20:28.600 --> 0:20:30.159
<v Speaker 1>films that if you actually had to come up with

0:20:30.200 --> 0:20:32.040
<v Speaker 1>a list of like what are the worst? Like what

0:20:32.080 --> 0:20:34.920
<v Speaker 1>are I mean? That would just be an unpleasant experience

0:20:34.960 --> 0:20:37.520
<v Speaker 1>to even try and put together that list of films,

0:20:38.080 --> 0:20:41.600
<v Speaker 1>because there's some real dogs out there. Yeah, I do remember.

0:20:41.840 --> 0:20:44.199
<v Speaker 1>So I have long been a person who, you know,

0:20:44.320 --> 0:20:46.720
<v Speaker 1>my friends knew I loved bad movies, and they would

0:20:46.720 --> 0:20:49.720
<v Speaker 1>sometimes ask me like, well, what's the worst worst, not

0:20:49.800 --> 0:20:52.480
<v Speaker 1>the best, worst, but worst worst you've ever seen? I

0:20:52.520 --> 0:20:54.560
<v Speaker 1>probably wouldn't still stick by this, but for a long

0:20:54.640 --> 0:20:58.720
<v Speaker 1>time I said my answer was a movie called Beaks,

0:20:59.040 --> 0:21:04.000
<v Speaker 1>which is a Spanish horror movie by Renee Cardona Jr.

0:21:04.080 --> 0:21:07.639
<v Speaker 1>That's a rip off of Hitchcock's The Birds, but I

0:21:07.680 --> 0:21:11.440
<v Speaker 1>remember that in a really like unique and profound way

0:21:11.560 --> 0:21:17.119
<v Speaker 1>causing intense physical and psychic pain. Uh. I think because

0:21:17.160 --> 0:21:20.400
<v Speaker 1>of a soundtrack issues like the I record It's been

0:21:20.600 --> 0:21:23.280
<v Speaker 1>forever since I've seen it, but the remember the soundtrack

0:21:23.359 --> 0:21:29.240
<v Speaker 1>was like one excruciating, droning high synthesizer note held down

0:21:29.480 --> 0:21:35.080
<v Speaker 1>for for minutes at a time. Yeah. Yeah, I haven't

0:21:35.080 --> 0:21:38.920
<v Speaker 1>seen the film in question, but I can imagine where

0:21:38.760 --> 0:21:42.320
<v Speaker 1>there's a negative sonic experience that tied up with it

0:21:42.880 --> 0:21:45.600
<v Speaker 1>that you could certainly a case could be made. I

0:21:45.680 --> 0:21:48.119
<v Speaker 1>was watching it with some friends and I remember at

0:21:48.160 --> 0:21:52.320
<v Speaker 1>one point I was like, in such misery I literally

0:21:52.400 --> 0:21:55.639
<v Speaker 1>like rolled out of my chair onto the floor. But

0:21:57.000 --> 0:22:01.480
<v Speaker 1>to consider the IMDb bottom one ranking, like, if you

0:22:01.520 --> 0:22:04.240
<v Speaker 1>go to that page and I'm looking at it right now,

0:22:04.440 --> 0:22:07.840
<v Speaker 1>there's some tremendously fun stuff on here. There's there's stuff

0:22:07.880 --> 0:22:11.760
<v Speaker 1>like Santa Claus versus the Martians. Uh oh what else

0:22:11.800 --> 0:22:15.720
<v Speaker 1>we have? Troll too is on here, hob Goblins, um,

0:22:16.040 --> 0:22:20.160
<v Speaker 1>lots of stuff. A battle Battlefield Earth Is is pretty

0:22:20.240 --> 0:22:22.960
<v Speaker 1>high or low ranking on the list. Yeah, the movies

0:22:23.000 --> 0:22:26.680
<v Speaker 1>that get featured on these things. Again, there there's obviously

0:22:26.720 --> 0:22:30.640
<v Speaker 1>no like unified objective criteria on which to judge these things.

0:22:30.640 --> 0:22:33.720
<v Speaker 1>But the movies that get identified as the worst of

0:22:33.760 --> 0:22:36.960
<v Speaker 1>all time tend to be maybe not because they're actually

0:22:37.000 --> 0:22:39.520
<v Speaker 1>the worst, but because they're the worst in the most

0:22:39.600 --> 0:22:46.200
<v Speaker 1>notable ways, meaning they're especially entertainingly bad, or they were like, uh,

0:22:46.359 --> 0:22:50.239
<v Speaker 1>notorious in some way like very high profile, uh like

0:22:50.480 --> 0:22:54.000
<v Speaker 1>big budget flops or something. Yeah, yeah, I mean, and

0:22:54.040 --> 0:22:56.040
<v Speaker 1>to be clear, there are definitely some films on here

0:22:56.080 --> 0:23:00.360
<v Speaker 1>that I absolutely will not say and you're not having nuts.

0:23:00.480 --> 0:23:02.679
<v Speaker 1>You're not gonna get me to sit down for super

0:23:02.720 --> 0:23:07.040
<v Speaker 1>Babies baby Geniuses too. Yeah, but you know, there's there's

0:23:07.040 --> 0:23:08.880
<v Speaker 1>plenty of There's there's some other stuff I on here.

0:23:08.880 --> 0:23:11.080
<v Speaker 1>I could be talked into, Like, you know, I don't

0:23:11.119 --> 0:23:16.480
<v Speaker 1>know that I necessarily need to see in the name

0:23:16.520 --> 0:23:25.040
<v Speaker 1>of the King of Dungeon Siege Tail Theater. Goodness, it's

0:23:25.040 --> 0:23:28.080
<v Speaker 1>got Burt Reynolds in it. Oh, that's right. It had

0:23:28.080 --> 0:23:31.840
<v Speaker 1>an impressive castor But anyway, yes. To come back to

0:23:31.880 --> 0:23:34.320
<v Speaker 1>Plan nine, I would say Plan nine from Outer Space

0:23:34.359 --> 0:23:38.280
<v Speaker 1>definitely not the worst movie ever made. Uh and and

0:23:38.280 --> 0:23:41.439
<v Speaker 1>and really ultimately a very fun film and not a

0:23:41.440 --> 0:23:43.399
<v Speaker 1>boring film at all, and not a dull moment in

0:23:43.440 --> 0:23:51.320
<v Speaker 1>that film. Okay, one last message from Lawrence. This one

0:23:51.359 --> 0:23:53.800
<v Speaker 1>also has to do with Plan nine from Outer Space.

0:23:54.080 --> 0:23:57.520
<v Speaker 1>I asked people with the experience in the film industry.

0:23:57.320 --> 0:24:00.480
<v Speaker 1>I had this this idea that it seems like even

0:24:00.640 --> 0:24:04.719
<v Speaker 1>bad movies these days generally don't have the level of

0:24:04.840 --> 0:24:07.880
<v Speaker 1>technical incompetence that you see in a lot of bad

0:24:07.920 --> 0:24:11.080
<v Speaker 1>movies of you know, the fifties or sixties. Uh, the

0:24:11.119 --> 0:24:13.880
<v Speaker 1>way that, for example, in in Plan nine from Matter Space,

0:24:13.880 --> 0:24:17.560
<v Speaker 1>they're just like mismatched day night shots. It cuts randomly

0:24:17.600 --> 0:24:20.040
<v Speaker 1>back and forth between them, or that uh you know

0:24:20.119 --> 0:24:22.800
<v Speaker 1>bell Bella Legos, he walks out of frame and then

0:24:22.800 --> 0:24:25.000
<v Speaker 1>he supposedly gets hit by a car, but he's just

0:24:25.080 --> 0:24:27.720
<v Speaker 1>standing there and you see his shadow falling into frame,

0:24:27.800 --> 0:24:32.240
<v Speaker 1>not moving. So my idea was, like, movie, there's still

0:24:32.320 --> 0:24:34.520
<v Speaker 1>tons of bad movies these days, but there's like a

0:24:34.560 --> 0:24:38.919
<v Speaker 1>baseline level of professionalism in the film industry that usually

0:24:38.960 --> 0:24:41.919
<v Speaker 1>seems to prevent stuff like that. From happening anymore, and

0:24:41.960 --> 0:24:45.040
<v Speaker 1>that bad movies these days tend to be more failures

0:24:45.040 --> 0:24:49.000
<v Speaker 1>of creative imagination. Um, but I was wondering. Okay, people

0:24:49.040 --> 0:24:52.040
<v Speaker 1>with experience, what do you think about this? Lawrence says,

0:24:52.080 --> 0:24:54.679
<v Speaker 1>your recent episode on Plan nine from Outer Space was

0:24:54.680 --> 0:24:57.600
<v Speaker 1>a treat on the topic of modern bad movies not

0:24:57.680 --> 0:25:00.720
<v Speaker 1>having technical mistakes. I will chime in with and agree

0:25:00.720 --> 0:25:04.600
<v Speaker 1>and disagree. I don't know how mainstream Plan nine would

0:25:04.600 --> 0:25:06.639
<v Speaker 1>have been at the time, but I can think of

0:25:06.720 --> 0:25:10.760
<v Speaker 1>some recent micro budget direct to streaming movies available alongside

0:25:10.800 --> 0:25:16.399
<v Speaker 1>actual studio fare, which contained glaring technical problems. It feels rarer, though,

0:25:16.640 --> 0:25:20.160
<v Speaker 1>and with anyone able to create basic effects from their computer,

0:25:20.600 --> 0:25:25.359
<v Speaker 1>the line between poorly executed and error seems blurry. Case

0:25:25.440 --> 0:25:29.240
<v Speaker 1>in point, any Neil Breen movie, that's that's a great example, Rob.

0:25:29.280 --> 0:25:30.840
<v Speaker 1>I don't know if you're familiar with Neil, but I

0:25:30.880 --> 0:25:33.520
<v Speaker 1>was not familiar with him until looking at this email.

0:25:33.560 --> 0:25:37.200
<v Speaker 1>I pulled up his IMDb page, and that's a that's

0:25:37.200 --> 0:25:40.119
<v Speaker 1>a rabbit hole. Maybe for us one day, maybe not

0:25:40.200 --> 0:25:44.560
<v Speaker 1>for the show. They're they're they're sort of recent, but yeah,

0:25:44.680 --> 0:25:49.440
<v Speaker 1>he has a movie called I Am Here Now, in

0:25:49.520 --> 0:25:53.600
<v Speaker 1>which Neil Breen is sort of a an all around filmmaker,

0:25:53.680 --> 0:25:56.120
<v Speaker 1>kind of an ed Edward D. Wood Jr. Sort of guy,

0:25:56.200 --> 0:26:00.280
<v Speaker 1>and that he writes, directs and produces his own stuff. Uh,

0:26:00.320 --> 0:26:04.000
<v Speaker 1>and it's for example, he really likes, I think, to

0:26:04.080 --> 0:26:07.119
<v Speaker 1>make movies where he plays like a hacker, you know.

0:26:07.240 --> 0:26:10.719
<v Speaker 1>So he does a movie called Double Down where he's like,

0:26:10.840 --> 0:26:14.160
<v Speaker 1>I can hack into any computer in the world anytime

0:26:14.280 --> 0:26:18.160
<v Speaker 1>with only a cell phone. But he just like sits

0:26:18.160 --> 0:26:22.200
<v Speaker 1>around in the desert eating tunic cans mostly, and it's

0:26:22.680 --> 0:26:28.560
<v Speaker 1>they're they're very bad. Yeah, the modern bad filmmaker is

0:26:28.920 --> 0:26:31.639
<v Speaker 1>is kind of hard to define. I mean, you have

0:26:31.720 --> 0:26:35.080
<v Speaker 1>you have some some standouts. You have stuff like like

0:26:35.119 --> 0:26:38.560
<v Speaker 1>Bird Dimic, you have The Room. Those are great examples

0:26:38.600 --> 0:26:41.640
<v Speaker 1>of more recent bad films. But yeah, the times it's

0:26:41.640 --> 0:26:45.159
<v Speaker 1>a lot more difficult. Like, um, I saw the first

0:26:45.359 --> 0:26:50.320
<v Speaker 1>film that Glenn Danzig directed, Veratica, came out in twenty nineteen,

0:26:50.480 --> 0:26:54.239
<v Speaker 1>and I wanted it to be worse than it was

0:26:54.520 --> 0:26:57.720
<v Speaker 1>in a way that was entertaining, and um it was.

0:26:58.000 --> 0:27:00.520
<v Speaker 1>It was just very lukewarm for me, Like it wasn't

0:27:01.320 --> 0:27:05.560
<v Speaker 1>what wasn't enough in in any direction. So I don't know,

0:27:05.640 --> 0:27:11.000
<v Speaker 1>maybe he will get better or worse because you are

0:27:11.040 --> 0:27:13.439
<v Speaker 1>neither hot nor cold, I will spew you out of

0:27:13.480 --> 0:27:15.840
<v Speaker 1>my mouth. Yeah, Like I've got to end up having

0:27:15.880 --> 0:27:21.800
<v Speaker 1>some sort of reaction other than boredom with these things. Uh. Yeah,

0:27:22.000 --> 0:27:24.400
<v Speaker 1>it comes comes back to something we often talk about, like, well,

0:27:24.400 --> 0:27:26.399
<v Speaker 1>like why why do we select the films we select

0:27:26.400 --> 0:27:30.960
<v Speaker 1>for weird al cinema? There's they very greatly in in

0:27:31.280 --> 0:27:35.200
<v Speaker 1>genre and scope and budget and time period. But there's

0:27:35.240 --> 0:27:38.000
<v Speaker 1>there's something there's at least that one thing about the

0:27:38.040 --> 0:27:40.399
<v Speaker 1>film that's interesting. So you've got to have like that

0:27:40.480 --> 0:27:43.720
<v Speaker 1>one performance or that one plot element, right, There's got

0:27:43.720 --> 0:27:47.200
<v Speaker 1>to be something there that is that is sparking curiosity

0:27:47.320 --> 0:27:50.760
<v Speaker 1>and desire. But anyway, Lawrence, I do agree with you that, Yeah,

0:27:50.840 --> 0:27:53.040
<v Speaker 1>it becomes more difficult to sort out this thing I

0:27:53.119 --> 0:27:55.760
<v Speaker 1>was talking about when you take into account just truly

0:27:55.840 --> 0:27:58.680
<v Speaker 1>amateur movies like Neil Breen movies you know that are

0:27:58.920 --> 0:28:02.640
<v Speaker 1>not really being made by professionals. Oh and then finally,

0:28:02.840 --> 0:28:06.080
<v Speaker 1>Lawrence says. Lawrence says he was doing some he was

0:28:06.119 --> 0:28:10.000
<v Speaker 1>messing around some with the story machines thing, and he

0:28:10.040 --> 0:28:12.639
<v Speaker 1>wanted to share a couple one This one I thought

0:28:12.720 --> 0:28:16.560
<v Speaker 1>was actually extremely haunting. So the title he gave it

0:28:16.600 --> 0:28:19.199
<v Speaker 1>here is flat Land, which is also the name of

0:28:19.200 --> 0:28:22.359
<v Speaker 1>a novel. Did you ever read flat Land? Rob? Oh?

0:28:22.480 --> 0:28:24.240
<v Speaker 1>You know, I don't think I ever did. I'm familiar

0:28:24.240 --> 0:28:26.720
<v Speaker 1>with it by reputation, but that's about it. It's a

0:28:26.920 --> 0:28:31.000
<v Speaker 1>It's a geometrical satirical novel that was by a guy

0:28:31.040 --> 0:28:34.080
<v Speaker 1>named Edwin Abbott that I read when I was in

0:28:34.160 --> 0:28:37.360
<v Speaker 1>high school and I thought it was very interesting. Uh

0:28:37.400 --> 0:28:41.040
<v Speaker 1>So I haven't revisited it since then, but high school

0:28:41.040 --> 0:28:45.000
<v Speaker 1>me was impressed. So this story goes title flat Land.

0:28:45.480 --> 0:28:48.840
<v Speaker 1>A door is graffitied on a wall. It's just a drawing,

0:28:49.440 --> 0:28:52.400
<v Speaker 1>but when you press on the drawing, it opens. The

0:28:52.480 --> 0:28:54.920
<v Speaker 1>door is a jar and you can see the inside.

0:28:55.640 --> 0:28:58.600
<v Speaker 1>It's a dark and dusty room. There's a single bed

0:28:58.640 --> 0:29:01.840
<v Speaker 1>in the corner. There's a chair and a desk. There's

0:29:01.880 --> 0:29:04.680
<v Speaker 1>a broken window, and there's a man in the bed.

0:29:05.360 --> 0:29:08.640
<v Speaker 1>He's sick, he's dying. The man in the bed A

0:29:08.680 --> 0:29:15.640
<v Speaker 1>is you bum bum bom? Yeah, we're straight up two

0:29:15.680 --> 0:29:18.840
<v Speaker 1>thousand and one. I love it. Oh, I thought you

0:29:20.960 --> 0:29:22.840
<v Speaker 1>no offense. I thought for a second you were doing

0:29:22.880 --> 0:29:27.480
<v Speaker 1>the theme from Independence Day. How does that relate? I

0:29:27.560 --> 0:29:30.360
<v Speaker 1>don't know, but it's good. I should have gone bum

0:29:30.400 --> 0:29:37.960
<v Speaker 1>bum bum bom. Oh dude, Well that's a pretty good one, Lawrence.

0:29:38.120 --> 0:29:42.720
<v Speaker 1>That's pretty good. Yes, all right, Well, I think we're

0:29:42.760 --> 0:29:44.680
<v Speaker 1>going to close up the mail bag for today. But

0:29:45.040 --> 0:29:46.920
<v Speaker 1>this has been fun and we'll be back next week

0:29:47.080 --> 0:29:49.760
<v Speaker 1>to discuss some more listener mails, so keep it coming. Well,

0:29:49.880 --> 0:29:52.840
<v Speaker 1>we'll continue to have some stuff coming about whistling. Uh

0:29:52.840 --> 0:29:56.480
<v Speaker 1>we're not cinema episodes, some upcoming episodes of note uh

0:29:56.560 --> 0:29:59.680
<v Speaker 1>so yeah, right in, right in about old episodes anything,

0:29:59.720 --> 0:30:03.360
<v Speaker 1>it's Eric game. In the meantime, Yes, Listener mail publishes

0:30:03.400 --> 0:30:06.080
<v Speaker 1>on Mondays, Tuesdays, and Thursdays. We have our core episodes

0:30:06.120 --> 0:30:07.800
<v Speaker 1>of Stuff to Blow Your Mind. On Wednesdays we do

0:30:07.880 --> 0:30:10.680
<v Speaker 1>Artifact or Monster Factor. On Friday. Well, that's when we

0:30:10.680 --> 0:30:13.080
<v Speaker 1>set aside most serious concerns and just talk about a

0:30:13.080 --> 0:30:16.440
<v Speaker 1>weird film. Huge thanks as always to our excellent audio

0:30:16.520 --> 0:30:19.600
<v Speaker 1>producer Seth Nicholas Johnson. If you would like to get

0:30:19.640 --> 0:30:22.120
<v Speaker 1>in touch with us with feedback on this episode or

0:30:22.120 --> 0:30:24.760
<v Speaker 1>any other, to suggest topic for the future, or just

0:30:24.880 --> 0:30:28.040
<v Speaker 1>to say hello, you can email us at contact at

0:30:28.080 --> 0:30:38.160
<v Speaker 1>stuff to Blow your Mind dot com. Stuff to Blow

0:30:38.200 --> 0:30:40.520
<v Speaker 1>Your Mind is a production of i heart Radio. For

0:30:40.600 --> 0:30:42.800
<v Speaker 1>more podcasts for my heart Radio, visit the i heart

0:30:42.880 --> 0:30:45.600
<v Speaker 1>Radio app, Apple podcasts, or wherever you listen to your

0:30:45.600 --> 0:30:46.320
<v Speaker 1>favorite shows.