WEBVTT - Selects: How Forgiveness Works

0:00:00.720 --> 0:00:03.160
<v Speaker 1>Hey, everybody, it's me Josh, and I thought for my

0:00:03.320 --> 0:00:06.080
<v Speaker 1>picks this year, I would kick off twenty twenty six

0:00:06.160 --> 0:00:10.400
<v Speaker 1>with a very sweet, moving, and also eye opening episode

0:00:10.640 --> 0:00:13.520
<v Speaker 1>on forgiveness. It turns out all of us have the

0:00:13.560 --> 0:00:17.200
<v Speaker 1>capacity to forgive, but that's not always the best course

0:00:17.239 --> 0:00:21.360
<v Speaker 1>of action for any given circumstance. This episode also has

0:00:21.400 --> 0:00:24.560
<v Speaker 1>a lot of really great stories of amazing acts of

0:00:24.600 --> 0:00:28.880
<v Speaker 1>forgiveness by people who forgave others against all odds. It's

0:00:28.920 --> 0:00:31.080
<v Speaker 1>a good episode and I hope you enjoy it, and

0:00:31.120 --> 0:00:33.440
<v Speaker 1>I hope your year is going wonderfully so far.

0:00:37.000 --> 0:00:44.760
<v Speaker 2>Welcome to Stuff You Should Know, a production of iHeartRadio.

0:00:46.680 --> 0:00:49.280
<v Speaker 1>Hey, you, welcome to the podcast. I'm Josh, and there's

0:00:49.400 --> 0:00:51.800
<v Speaker 1>Chuck and Jerry's here too, and this is stuff you

0:00:51.880 --> 0:00:57.800
<v Speaker 1>should know. Some philosophical waxing is going to happen in

0:00:57.800 --> 0:01:02.160
<v Speaker 1>this one. I think it's inevitable. Pull Chuck, that's right,

0:01:02.240 --> 0:01:05.920
<v Speaker 1>and Don Henley songs Oh yeah, that's a good one too,

0:01:06.520 --> 0:01:10.280
<v Speaker 1>Heart of the Matter. Mm hmm. You like it sure,

0:01:10.400 --> 0:01:13.600
<v Speaker 1>all right? That part where he's like, I'm learning to

0:01:14.000 --> 0:01:20.080
<v Speaker 1>live with that, dude. No, it stirs my soul every time. Forgiveness. Yeah,

0:01:20.120 --> 0:01:22.080
<v Speaker 1>you'd have to be dead inside to not be stirred

0:01:22.080 --> 0:01:25.800
<v Speaker 1>by that part. I agree, it's good, good song, but

0:01:25.880 --> 0:01:28.360
<v Speaker 1>he really kind of nails it in that because he's

0:01:28.400 --> 0:01:32.399
<v Speaker 1>talking about forgiveness and the heart of the matter. Sure,

0:01:34.600 --> 0:01:38.280
<v Speaker 1>and he's he wants forgiveness, he needs forgiveness, even if

0:01:38.319 --> 0:01:39.960
<v Speaker 1>like it's the end of the relationship.

0:01:40.080 --> 0:01:41.800
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, even if she doesn't love him anymore.

0:01:42.160 --> 0:01:46.440
<v Speaker 1>Sure. So, on the one hand, that is a certain

0:01:46.560 --> 0:01:50.320
<v Speaker 1>kind of forgiveness that an individual or person can that's

0:01:50.360 --> 0:01:53.800
<v Speaker 1>a path someone can set down. But there's been a

0:01:53.800 --> 0:01:58.400
<v Speaker 1>lot of research starting starting in the very beginning stages

0:01:58.480 --> 0:02:01.200
<v Speaker 1>at the middle of the twentieth but really picking up

0:02:01.240 --> 0:02:06.160
<v Speaker 1>in the nineties, research into forgiveness, like legitimate scientific research,

0:02:06.200 --> 0:02:08.560
<v Speaker 1>and it's a multidisciplinary thing because there's a lot of

0:02:08.560 --> 0:02:14.960
<v Speaker 1>different fields disciplines, sure, that have said, hey, this actually,

0:02:15.120 --> 0:02:17.920
<v Speaker 1>this is something we can study and measure and produce

0:02:18.160 --> 0:02:22.760
<v Speaker 1>articles and work on. And they have, They've produced some

0:02:22.800 --> 0:02:25.600
<v Speaker 1>really good, legitimate work. But what most of them have

0:02:25.639 --> 0:02:29.880
<v Speaker 1>been focused on is not the Don Henley position of

0:02:30.000 --> 0:02:33.600
<v Speaker 1>somebody who needs to be redeemed, who needs redemption to

0:02:33.639 --> 0:02:36.840
<v Speaker 1>feel better, who needs forgiveness, yeah, but rather the person

0:02:36.960 --> 0:02:40.880
<v Speaker 1>doing the forgiving the person who has originally transgressed against,

0:02:41.080 --> 0:02:44.239
<v Speaker 1>not the offender, but the offendee. That's where most of

0:02:44.280 --> 0:02:48.000
<v Speaker 1>the research has been done on forgiveness. Right.

0:02:48.680 --> 0:02:51.840
<v Speaker 2>Don Henley is a rock star, so he's writing a

0:02:51.880 --> 0:02:55.680
<v Speaker 2>song about wanting to be forgiven for a foursome he

0:02:55.720 --> 0:03:01.560
<v Speaker 2>had in Saint Paul backstage. Sure, even if you don't

0:03:01.600 --> 0:03:02.960
<v Speaker 2>love me anymore, can you forgive me that?

0:03:03.200 --> 0:03:10.560
<v Speaker 1>You know? Can you blame a guy? Is what he's saying. So, yeah,

0:03:10.600 --> 0:03:12.560
<v Speaker 1>I think that's probably exactly what that song is about.

0:03:12.560 --> 0:03:16.399
<v Speaker 1>Now that you mentioned that's the subtext. So I think

0:03:16.400 --> 0:03:20.680
<v Speaker 1>we should start by pointing out something about forgiveness. Is

0:03:20.720 --> 0:03:24.640
<v Speaker 1>that a lot of people there's a lot of stories

0:03:24.680 --> 0:03:29.000
<v Speaker 1>about people not forgiving. We call it revenge, and people

0:03:29.080 --> 0:03:33.359
<v Speaker 1>love revenge, you know, Like think about the revenge movie

0:03:33.440 --> 0:03:37.040
<v Speaker 1>genre and how many entries there are pretty great? Like

0:03:37.320 --> 0:03:40.640
<v Speaker 1>have you ever seen I Saw the Devil? Yeah? Have

0:03:40.720 --> 0:03:45.280
<v Speaker 1>you ever seen Old Boy? Yeah? Have you ever seen

0:03:45.960 --> 0:03:51.800
<v Speaker 1>Death Becomes Her? Yeah? Have you ever seen She Devil? Nope?

0:03:52.680 --> 0:03:56.160
<v Speaker 1>Oh you haven't. With Roseanne Barr and Ed Bigley and

0:03:56.560 --> 0:04:01.880
<v Speaker 1>Mary Movie, yes, all of them great revenge movies. Can

0:04:01.920 --> 0:04:04.000
<v Speaker 1>I shout out one of my favorites? Yeah, please do.

0:04:04.320 --> 0:04:07.800
<v Speaker 2>Like legitimately, it's kind of a smaller indie movie called

0:04:07.800 --> 0:04:08.440
<v Speaker 2>Blue Ruin.

0:04:09.200 --> 0:04:10.520
<v Speaker 1>Oh yeah, I saw that one.

0:04:10.520 --> 0:04:12.960
<v Speaker 2>Great great revenge movie. If you're into revenge movies and

0:04:13.000 --> 0:04:15.680
<v Speaker 2>I am, I enjoy it. There's a cap arsis involved

0:04:15.960 --> 0:04:18.760
<v Speaker 2>because I'm a big forgiver, So I think I like

0:04:18.839 --> 0:04:21.279
<v Speaker 2>seeing movies where revenge happens.

0:04:21.720 --> 0:04:24.320
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and we'll talk a lot about, you know, revenge,

0:04:24.400 --> 0:04:28.040
<v Speaker 1>because they're virtually two sides of the same coin, and

0:04:28.160 --> 0:04:31.520
<v Speaker 1>they really interact in some surprising ways that are sensible

0:04:31.560 --> 0:04:33.159
<v Speaker 1>when you see it laid out, but you might not

0:04:33.240 --> 0:04:36.919
<v Speaker 1>necessarily be walking around thinking about. But on the other side,

0:04:37.120 --> 0:04:41.000
<v Speaker 1>if you look up movies about forgiveness, almost all of

0:04:41.040 --> 0:04:45.080
<v Speaker 1>them were produced by a megachurch somewhere in the South.

0:04:46.520 --> 0:04:51.120
<v Speaker 1>Or you've got Magnolia and then the Fisher King are

0:04:51.200 --> 0:04:55.120
<v Speaker 1>like the two like legitimate contenders for movies about forgiveness.

0:04:55.839 --> 0:04:59.440
<v Speaker 2>Well, I don't know, because I think there's a fine

0:04:59.440 --> 0:05:02.920
<v Speaker 2>line sometimes between redemption stories and forgiveness stories.

0:05:03.200 --> 0:05:04.719
<v Speaker 1>Okay, they can kind of go hand in hand. There

0:05:04.720 --> 0:05:10.080
<v Speaker 1>are plenty of redemption stories. Okay, like what what redemption stories? Yeah,

0:05:10.160 --> 0:05:12.000
<v Speaker 1>let's hear it. Oh, I mean.

0:05:13.520 --> 0:05:17.880
<v Speaker 2>Hoosiers one of the great sports redemption movies.

0:05:19.000 --> 0:05:23.000
<v Speaker 1>Okay, I think that's a pretty loose definition of redemption.

0:05:23.240 --> 0:05:28.000
<v Speaker 2>Now, former alcoholic coach who who was not working because

0:05:28.040 --> 0:05:31.200
<v Speaker 2>of some bad deeds gets redeemed by looking a team

0:05:31.200 --> 0:05:35.120
<v Speaker 2>to a championship. Dennis Hopper gets redeemed as the alcoholic father.

0:05:36.160 --> 0:05:40.400
<v Speaker 1>Wait a minute, was was Gene Hackman on the road

0:05:40.400 --> 0:05:43.040
<v Speaker 1>to redemption? I thought he came in and basically got

0:05:43.720 --> 0:05:47.920
<v Speaker 1>Dennis Hopper redeemed a double redemption. He was getting redeemed

0:05:47.920 --> 0:05:50.640
<v Speaker 1>as well. All right, Okay, okay, okay, So plenty.

0:05:50.400 --> 0:05:52.359
<v Speaker 2>Of redemption stories, and I think there's a lot of

0:05:52.360 --> 0:05:56.760
<v Speaker 2>movies that wrestle with the idea of forgiveness and really weighty,

0:05:57.279 --> 0:06:02.480
<v Speaker 2>heavy ways, like these true stories that you hear about

0:06:02.560 --> 0:06:06.240
<v Speaker 2>these awful things that happen, whether a family member is

0:06:06.760 --> 0:06:10.680
<v Speaker 2>accidentally killed by someone or murdered by someone, like, there's

0:06:10.720 --> 0:06:12.120
<v Speaker 2>a lot of that stuff in movies.

0:06:12.880 --> 0:06:15.799
<v Speaker 1>Okay. So my thesis is this, and this is strictly

0:06:15.880 --> 0:06:19.159
<v Speaker 1>me editorializing here, I think there's some validity to it,

0:06:19.200 --> 0:06:22.280
<v Speaker 1>and that is that the reason why it's much easier

0:06:22.320 --> 0:06:26.280
<v Speaker 1>to name revenge movies is because revenge appeals to our

0:06:26.360 --> 0:06:31.719
<v Speaker 1>baser instincts. It makes sense, it's universally understood. And like

0:06:31.760 --> 0:06:34.480
<v Speaker 1>you said, you even consider yourself a big time forgiver,

0:06:35.000 --> 0:06:37.880
<v Speaker 1>and yet you enjoy revenge movies. It's cathartic for you.

0:06:37.920 --> 0:06:40.560
<v Speaker 1>There's something to be delivered by a revenge movie. Yep,

0:06:40.839 --> 0:06:45.839
<v Speaker 1>a movie about forgiveness, it's just more complicated, it's harder.

0:06:45.960 --> 0:06:52.880
<v Speaker 1>We're not as good and we're not as automatically adept

0:06:53.279 --> 0:06:56.840
<v Speaker 1>at forgiveness as we may be with revenge. That's why

0:06:56.880 --> 0:07:00.680
<v Speaker 1>I think there's fewer forgiveness movies. But that's not to

0:07:00.680 --> 0:07:02.400
<v Speaker 1>say that we're not moved by it, because I think

0:07:02.440 --> 0:07:07.080
<v Speaker 1>if you hear whenever you hear real life stories of forgiveness,

0:07:07.839 --> 0:07:10.320
<v Speaker 1>they just bowl you over. Oh yeah, even when you

0:07:10.360 --> 0:07:13.200
<v Speaker 1>step back and think about like what the person's actually doing,

0:07:13.320 --> 0:07:17.080
<v Speaker 1>you're like, yes, legitimately, anybody could do what they just did.

0:07:17.720 --> 0:07:23.320
<v Speaker 1>It's it's akin to hearing somebody's solo climbing Mount Everest

0:07:23.360 --> 0:07:26.360
<v Speaker 1>or something like that. It's it makes the news literally

0:07:26.800 --> 0:07:31.000
<v Speaker 1>when somebody forgives in like a really deep way that

0:07:31.120 --> 0:07:32.480
<v Speaker 1>the average person might.

0:07:32.320 --> 0:07:35.920
<v Speaker 2>Not, yeah, like a big time transgression. A lot of

0:07:35.920 --> 0:07:39.360
<v Speaker 2>times you'll hear of a courtroom scene where someone has

0:07:39.520 --> 0:07:43.440
<v Speaker 2>forgiven the person who like murdered their relative or loved

0:07:43.440 --> 0:07:46.800
<v Speaker 2>one or something, and that man, that stuff is powerful.

0:07:46.880 --> 0:07:50.360
<v Speaker 2>You're right every time you see these stories. You dug

0:07:50.440 --> 0:07:56.520
<v Speaker 2>up this one story from Berkeley the Greater Good magazine

0:07:57.440 --> 0:08:00.640
<v Speaker 2>Science Based Insights for a Meaningful Life out of UC

0:08:00.800 --> 0:08:06.960
<v Speaker 2>Berkeley of this woman who was a nurse's aide who

0:08:07.280 --> 0:08:09.480
<v Speaker 2>hit a guy. She had been drinking hit a guy

0:08:09.520 --> 0:08:13.480
<v Speaker 2>in her car. He went through the windshield and was

0:08:13.560 --> 0:08:17.040
<v Speaker 2>stuck there, and she was so impaired she didn't realize

0:08:17.040 --> 0:08:21.560
<v Speaker 2>it for a while. Eventually realized that got out of

0:08:21.600 --> 0:08:24.320
<v Speaker 2>the car, could not get the guy out, who was

0:08:24.360 --> 0:08:28.480
<v Speaker 2>still alive, mind you, and so drove home and parked

0:08:28.480 --> 0:08:30.720
<v Speaker 2>her car in the garage to let this guy slowly

0:08:30.800 --> 0:08:33.600
<v Speaker 2>die yeah, in her garage.

0:08:33.320 --> 0:08:35.400
<v Speaker 1>Over the course of a couple of days, and like

0:08:35.840 --> 0:08:37.960
<v Speaker 1>she sobered up, would go out and chuck on him

0:08:38.000 --> 0:08:39.880
<v Speaker 1>once in a while, but refused to call for help

0:08:39.920 --> 0:08:42.800
<v Speaker 1>because she was too concerned about getting in trouble, so

0:08:42.880 --> 0:08:45.959
<v Speaker 1>instead she let him die, had a couple friends come

0:08:46.040 --> 0:08:49.000
<v Speaker 1>help her hide the body, move the body, and then

0:08:49.160 --> 0:08:52.520
<v Speaker 1>actually got found out later on because four months later

0:08:52.559 --> 0:08:54.960
<v Speaker 1>she was at a party and she joked about it

0:08:55.000 --> 0:08:57.480
<v Speaker 1>to an acquaintance who went and told the cops, and

0:08:57.840 --> 0:09:01.000
<v Speaker 1>this woman ended up getting fifty years in pre that's

0:09:01.040 --> 0:09:03.800
<v Speaker 1>a horrible story, Like that's one of the worst things

0:09:03.840 --> 0:09:06.240
<v Speaker 1>that a human being could possibly do. There were so

0:09:06.400 --> 0:09:09.440
<v Speaker 1>many opportunities for this woman to save this man's life.

0:09:09.559 --> 0:09:12.880
<v Speaker 1>And by the way, everyone involved in that court case

0:09:12.880 --> 0:09:16.240
<v Speaker 1>who had a medical degree said that had she called

0:09:16.280 --> 0:09:19.440
<v Speaker 1>the cops, the fire department taken the guy to the hospital,

0:09:19.679 --> 0:09:23.760
<v Speaker 1>he almost certainly would have survived those injuries. But given

0:09:23.840 --> 0:09:26.480
<v Speaker 1>that she didn't for days get him medical aid, he

0:09:26.520 --> 0:09:29.200
<v Speaker 1>finally did succumb to them, but he probably would have survived,

0:09:29.200 --> 0:09:31.920
<v Speaker 1>almost certainly would have survived. Like what she did was

0:09:32.200 --> 0:09:35.439
<v Speaker 1>about as horrific as what a person could do and

0:09:35.600 --> 0:09:39.559
<v Speaker 1>just so irresponsible with human life. And she rightfully got

0:09:39.600 --> 0:09:44.480
<v Speaker 1>a fifty year prison sentence for that crime. And yet

0:09:44.520 --> 0:09:48.480
<v Speaker 1>despite how horrific that was, what made news just as

0:09:48.559 --> 0:09:51.600
<v Speaker 1>much as that is that a short time later that

0:09:51.720 --> 0:09:55.760
<v Speaker 1>man's son, the man who was hit and killed publicly

0:09:55.880 --> 0:09:58.720
<v Speaker 1>forgave that woman for killing his father.

0:09:59.440 --> 0:10:05.079
<v Speaker 2>Yes, at the sentencing said quote, there's no winners in

0:10:05.120 --> 0:10:08.080
<v Speaker 2>a case like this. Just as we all lost Greg,

0:10:08.880 --> 0:10:11.559
<v Speaker 2>you all will be losing your daughter to her family.

0:10:12.000 --> 0:10:15.439
<v Speaker 2>I still want to extend my forgiveness to Chante Mallard

0:10:15.720 --> 0:10:17.559
<v Speaker 2>was her name, and let her know that the Mallard

0:10:17.559 --> 0:10:20.319
<v Speaker 2>family is in my prayers. And this is the kind

0:10:20.360 --> 0:10:22.400
<v Speaker 2>of stuff, like you said, that makes the news where

0:10:22.800 --> 0:10:27.160
<v Speaker 2>I think it hits everybody because it makes everybody stop

0:10:27.200 --> 0:10:28.520
<v Speaker 2>for a second and.

0:10:28.400 --> 0:10:31.520
<v Speaker 1>Say, could I do that? Yes?

0:10:31.640 --> 0:10:36.000
<v Speaker 2>Could I reach that point of forgiveness? And that's a

0:10:36.040 --> 0:10:42.080
<v Speaker 2>big weighty question because there's all kinds of forgiveness. There's

0:10:42.559 --> 0:10:46.840
<v Speaker 2>a couple partners together who get in a fight and

0:10:46.920 --> 0:10:49.240
<v Speaker 2>someone says they're sorry for doing a certain thing, and

0:10:49.280 --> 0:10:53.959
<v Speaker 2>they're forgiven or not. There are situations at work where

0:10:54.000 --> 0:10:56.920
<v Speaker 2>people are forgiven. There are friends who maybe betray you

0:10:57.679 --> 0:11:03.520
<v Speaker 2>by like cheating on on somebody with someone. I had

0:11:03.520 --> 0:11:06.360
<v Speaker 2>a situation like that where I had a former friend

0:11:07.040 --> 0:11:10.839
<v Speaker 2>I felt like cheated with my barely ex girlfriend and

0:11:11.000 --> 0:11:13.400
<v Speaker 2>I spent quite a few years being upset about that

0:11:14.160 --> 0:11:17.800
<v Speaker 2>and then forgave him. And it's a powerful thing. So

0:11:17.840 --> 0:11:20.880
<v Speaker 2>there's like levels. But when you get to this kind

0:11:20.920 --> 0:11:24.600
<v Speaker 2>of thing where someone caused the death of a loved

0:11:24.600 --> 0:11:27.000
<v Speaker 2>one and then even laughed about it, like to be

0:11:27.040 --> 0:11:30.199
<v Speaker 2>able to forgive like that is just that's next level.

0:11:30.960 --> 0:11:33.160
<v Speaker 1>It is. It is so much so, Chuck, that a

0:11:33.320 --> 0:11:37.000
<v Speaker 1>group of convicted murderers who were serving sentences in prison

0:11:37.280 --> 0:11:39.679
<v Speaker 1>heard about this, and I guess got in touch with

0:11:39.679 --> 0:11:44.679
<v Speaker 1>one another and raised funds and got a ten thousand

0:11:44.679 --> 0:11:50.920
<v Speaker 1>dollars scholarship together, Wow, for Brandon Biggs to go to college.

0:11:51.080 --> 0:11:53.839
<v Speaker 1>The convicted murderer sent the kid to college because this

0:11:54.679 --> 0:11:58.520
<v Speaker 1>very generous act of public forgiveness of his own father's murderer.

0:11:59.800 --> 0:12:02.280
<v Speaker 1>So yeah, it is. It's an astounding thing. And yet

0:12:02.800 --> 0:12:07.040
<v Speaker 1>everything that like the research that really, like I said,

0:12:07.120 --> 0:12:10.880
<v Speaker 1>started to take off in earnest in the nineties has

0:12:10.920 --> 0:12:15.160
<v Speaker 1>shown us is that we're all perfectly capable of doing that.

0:12:15.200 --> 0:12:17.760
<v Speaker 1>The answer is, yes, yes, you can do that, You

0:12:17.840 --> 0:12:21.240
<v Speaker 1>totally could do that, but that we don't necessarily fully

0:12:21.320 --> 0:12:25.840
<v Speaker 1>understand how to. And yet there's a lot of evidence

0:12:25.880 --> 0:12:30.280
<v Speaker 1>also that it's evolutionarily wired into us to do that. Yeah.

0:12:30.280 --> 0:12:33.240
<v Speaker 2>And you know, we'll get into religiosity of it a

0:12:33.240 --> 0:12:37.160
<v Speaker 2>bit more in detail later, but all religions talk a

0:12:37.160 --> 0:12:40.920
<v Speaker 2>lot about forgiveness. There's you know, a pretty famous story

0:12:40.920 --> 0:12:44.280
<v Speaker 2>in the Bible where Peter said to Jesus, lord how

0:12:44.280 --> 0:12:46.680
<v Speaker 2>many times shall I forgive my brother or sister who

0:12:46.720 --> 0:12:47.800
<v Speaker 2>sends against me up.

0:12:47.720 --> 0:12:48.600
<v Speaker 1>To seven times?

0:12:49.120 --> 0:12:52.240
<v Speaker 2>And Jesus said, I tell you not seven times, but

0:12:52.400 --> 0:12:55.559
<v Speaker 2>seventy times seven. And Peter said so four hundred and

0:12:55.640 --> 0:13:01.040
<v Speaker 2>ninety times, and Jesus said, oh, Peter, are always so literal. Yeah,

0:13:01.040 --> 0:13:02.960
<v Speaker 2>that one's pretty good. But you know, you can read Hindu,

0:13:03.520 --> 0:13:06.360
<v Speaker 2>you can read the Buddhists talk about it. Like everyone,

0:13:07.080 --> 0:13:11.320
<v Speaker 2>every religion talks about. Forgiveness is kind of a maybe

0:13:11.360 --> 0:13:15.880
<v Speaker 2>a cornerstone of the religion in some cases, so.

0:13:15.880 --> 0:13:19.800
<v Speaker 1>Much so that when science started looking into forgiveness and

0:13:20.640 --> 0:13:25.560
<v Speaker 1>just trying to figure it out, generally people is just

0:13:25.640 --> 0:13:29.760
<v Speaker 1>presumed forgiveness was under the realm and the domain of religion.

0:13:29.880 --> 0:13:32.720
<v Speaker 1>That's where that's where you went for answers about forgiveness.

0:13:32.760 --> 0:13:36.920
<v Speaker 1>And science said, oh, we we can top that. Well,

0:13:37.120 --> 0:13:39.760
<v Speaker 1>surely we can beat that four hundred and ninety number.

0:13:39.800 --> 0:13:41.840
<v Speaker 1>And that's what they've said about doing Yeah.

0:13:41.640 --> 0:13:46.000
<v Speaker 2>I mean, Jesus forgave his crucifiers. It's like one of

0:13:46.000 --> 0:13:48.320
<v Speaker 2>the few things Jesus said on the cross. According to

0:13:48.320 --> 0:13:52.360
<v Speaker 2>the Bible, they know not what they do, like forgive

0:13:52.360 --> 0:13:53.520
<v Speaker 2>them for they know not what they do.

0:13:54.040 --> 0:13:58.200
<v Speaker 1>Right. And like you said, it's not just Christianity. Although

0:13:58.280 --> 0:14:03.319
<v Speaker 1>Christianity gets all the all the accolades for forgiveness, Jainism

0:14:03.400 --> 0:14:05.760
<v Speaker 1>is a big one. There's a there's a kind of

0:14:05.800 --> 0:14:08.840
<v Speaker 1>a mantra from Jainism that says, I grant forgiveness to

0:14:08.920 --> 0:14:12.319
<v Speaker 1>all living beings. They all living beings, grant me forgiveness.

0:14:12.640 --> 0:14:15.840
<v Speaker 1>My friendship is with all living beings. My enmity is

0:14:15.920 --> 0:14:20.360
<v Speaker 1>totally non existent. And that's I mean, when you look

0:14:20.360 --> 0:14:24.920
<v Speaker 1>at that, especially if you're not a Janist, you're you're like, wow,

0:14:24.920 --> 0:14:27.960
<v Speaker 1>how would you ever? How would you ever reach that level?

0:14:27.960 --> 0:14:29.840
<v Speaker 1>And I think the point is it's like you never

0:14:29.880 --> 0:14:31.960
<v Speaker 1>reach that level. It's an ideal, a goal that you

0:14:32.080 --> 0:14:34.880
<v Speaker 1>try to achieve, probably on a daily basis if you're

0:14:34.920 --> 0:14:38.680
<v Speaker 1>a Janis, but it's certainly over a lifetime, you know. Yeah.

0:14:38.760 --> 0:14:41.320
<v Speaker 2>And I'd like to read this again, not to pile

0:14:41.400 --> 0:14:43.880
<v Speaker 2>on the religious stuff, but the Hindu one really spoke

0:14:43.920 --> 0:14:44.120
<v Speaker 2>to me.

0:14:44.960 --> 0:14:45.080
<v Speaker 1>Uh.

0:14:46.200 --> 0:14:47.960
<v Speaker 2>This one part in the middle says what can a

0:14:47.960 --> 0:14:51.400
<v Speaker 2>wicked person do? And to him or into one who

0:14:51.520 --> 0:14:54.840
<v Speaker 2>carries the saber of forgiveness in his hand? And that

0:14:54.880 --> 0:14:58.360
<v Speaker 2>one really speaks to me in that it's the it's

0:14:58.400 --> 0:15:02.800
<v Speaker 2>a powerful tool to forgive, and it's for you as

0:15:02.840 --> 0:15:05.680
<v Speaker 2>the forgiver. I think a lot of times people think

0:15:05.720 --> 0:15:08.440
<v Speaker 2>it can clear the conscious of someone who's done something wrong.

0:15:08.480 --> 0:15:11.800
<v Speaker 2>I guess that certainly happens, But to me, it's really

0:15:11.840 --> 0:15:16.400
<v Speaker 2>about it's a powerful weapon you have to regain your

0:15:16.440 --> 0:15:18.400
<v Speaker 2>own strength as a human.

0:15:19.160 --> 0:15:22.480
<v Speaker 1>Yes, that seems to be the bulk of what psychology

0:15:22.560 --> 0:15:25.640
<v Speaker 1>is coming up with as far as studying forgiveness goes

0:15:25.720 --> 0:15:29.720
<v Speaker 1>that it's really the person who is who has been wronged.

0:15:30.560 --> 0:15:35.000
<v Speaker 1>That's what forgiveness is more about. That's the psychological aspect

0:15:35.040 --> 0:15:39.240
<v Speaker 1>of it. Like we said, it's a multidisciplinary investigation, and

0:15:39.280 --> 0:15:42.640
<v Speaker 1>so you've got evolutionary biologists who like, that's really great psychology,

0:15:42.680 --> 0:15:45.200
<v Speaker 1>but we found a different reason for forgiveness and it

0:15:45.200 --> 0:15:50.280
<v Speaker 1>doesn't quite fit that mold. And then like the medical

0:15:50.320 --> 0:15:53.880
<v Speaker 1>field says, no, it's even better than that. You can

0:15:53.920 --> 0:15:58.720
<v Speaker 1>actually like improve your health by genuinely forgiving somebody. So

0:15:58.760 --> 0:16:01.080
<v Speaker 1>there's all these different inputs that are coming together to

0:16:01.120 --> 0:16:05.960
<v Speaker 1>create this really like complex, contextualized picture of what forgiveness

0:16:06.000 --> 0:16:07.760
<v Speaker 1>is and what it does for us and why we

0:16:08.320 --> 0:16:11.200
<v Speaker 1>have it. That's right. I think it's a great setup.

0:16:12.000 --> 0:16:14.120
<v Speaker 2>I agree, you want to take a break, I might

0:16:14.200 --> 0:16:16.200
<v Speaker 2>just not come back and feel so good about that.

0:16:17.120 --> 0:16:20.320
<v Speaker 1>No, we have to finish. We got to complete, all right.

0:16:20.320 --> 0:16:22.440
<v Speaker 2>We'll be back in a minute to talk about what

0:16:22.480 --> 0:16:24.200
<v Speaker 2>I think is probably the most interesting part of this

0:16:24.280 --> 0:16:25.880
<v Speaker 2>is the evolutionary aspect.

0:16:25.960 --> 0:16:26.520
<v Speaker 1>Right after this.

0:16:38.520 --> 0:16:44.120
<v Speaker 3>Learn and stuff with Joshua job stuff you shine up.

0:16:58.360 --> 0:17:03.600
<v Speaker 1>So this was this, this is the correct forgiveness? Was

0:17:03.640 --> 0:17:04.680
<v Speaker 1>the Dave Ruse joint.

0:17:04.840 --> 0:17:07.720
<v Speaker 2>Oh okay, I thought this was Livia. So yeah, thanks

0:17:07.720 --> 0:17:09.199
<v Speaker 2>to Dave for this. He did a great job with

0:17:09.240 --> 0:17:13.359
<v Speaker 2>this research. But the evolutionary aspect of forgiveness is super

0:17:13.359 --> 0:17:15.960
<v Speaker 2>interesting to me because I think that a lot of

0:17:15.960 --> 0:17:20.440
<v Speaker 2>people assume that it's what Dave calls a higher virtue,

0:17:20.600 --> 0:17:24.280
<v Speaker 2>like you know is took took in the gang. We're

0:17:24.400 --> 0:17:29.199
<v Speaker 2>so base as you know, kind of primitive thinkers, is

0:17:29.240 --> 0:17:32.159
<v Speaker 2>that they didn't have the capacity forgive. They would they

0:17:32.160 --> 0:17:34.679
<v Speaker 2>would smite somebody if if someone punched, took took in

0:17:34.680 --> 0:17:38.520
<v Speaker 2>the face, took, took punch back, or someone attacked took took, took,

0:17:38.560 --> 0:17:42.520
<v Speaker 2>took attack back, maybe even harder. And there is quite

0:17:42.520 --> 0:17:46.280
<v Speaker 2>a bit of evidence that they're not mutually exclusive and

0:17:46.480 --> 0:17:50.280
<v Speaker 2>that that fighting back and forgiving both have a big

0:17:50.359 --> 0:17:52.320
<v Speaker 2>evolutionary advantage.

0:17:52.440 --> 0:17:56.240
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, So the big evolutionary advantage of revenge is if

0:17:56.280 --> 0:17:59.800
<v Speaker 1>you live in a social group and somebody takes advantage

0:17:59.800 --> 0:18:01.879
<v Speaker 1>of you, or they hit you, or they steal your

0:18:01.920 --> 0:18:05.120
<v Speaker 1>food or whatever, if you don't do something to right

0:18:05.200 --> 0:18:08.200
<v Speaker 1>that wrong, you're broadcasting to the rest of the group

0:18:08.280 --> 0:18:12.360
<v Speaker 1>that you are open for exploitation. And that's not good

0:18:12.400 --> 0:18:15.000
<v Speaker 1>for you. It's also not good for the chances that

0:18:15.040 --> 0:18:18.600
<v Speaker 1>you're going to pass along your genes, and so under

0:18:18.640 --> 0:18:21.959
<v Speaker 1>the auspices of natural selection, it makes sense for you

0:18:22.000 --> 0:18:24.280
<v Speaker 1>to hit that person that steals your food or who

0:18:24.400 --> 0:18:28.320
<v Speaker 1>hits you, And that's revenge, and revenge forms that function

0:18:28.400 --> 0:18:30.760
<v Speaker 1>in a social group. It says to everybody. It signals

0:18:30.760 --> 0:18:33.159
<v Speaker 1>to the rest of the group you are not to

0:18:33.160 --> 0:18:35.239
<v Speaker 1>be messed with. This guy tried it, and look what

0:18:35.320 --> 0:18:38.640
<v Speaker 1>happened to him. Nobody else should try that. Go pick

0:18:38.640 --> 0:18:41.359
<v Speaker 1>on somebody else. And there's actually been studies that have

0:18:41.359 --> 0:18:45.520
<v Speaker 1>showed that not just among apes and primates, but among

0:18:45.960 --> 0:18:50.639
<v Speaker 1>human cultures, revenge is found pretty much universally. And I

0:18:50.680 --> 0:18:53.800
<v Speaker 1>saw a study Chuck that said that the mere presence

0:18:53.840 --> 0:18:57.080
<v Speaker 1>of a person a third party who's witnessing an argument

0:18:57.480 --> 0:18:59.840
<v Speaker 1>increases the chances that the argument is going to come

0:19:00.160 --> 0:19:03.879
<v Speaker 1>to blows because you're signaling to the rest of the

0:19:03.920 --> 0:19:06.560
<v Speaker 1>group and in this case, just that third person you

0:19:06.600 --> 0:19:09.200
<v Speaker 1>are not to be messed with. That That's the purpose

0:19:09.240 --> 0:19:11.960
<v Speaker 1>of revenge is to broadcast that signal.

0:19:12.960 --> 0:19:15.760
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I mean, I would say that any kind of dumb,

0:19:16.680 --> 0:19:19.840
<v Speaker 2>drunk bar fight, half of it is the fact that

0:19:19.880 --> 0:19:22.720
<v Speaker 2>someone didn't want to back down in front of other people.

0:19:23.320 --> 0:19:26.400
<v Speaker 1>Sure, you know more than have totally.

0:19:26.119 --> 0:19:28.639
<v Speaker 2>And that if those two guys were just in an

0:19:28.720 --> 0:19:30.840
<v Speaker 2>alley somewhere, they may just hug it out.

0:19:31.560 --> 0:19:34.840
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, probably not, but you never know. It's possible, or

0:19:34.880 --> 0:19:37.080
<v Speaker 1>they might talk it out at least.

0:19:37.240 --> 0:19:40.879
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, or disagree that it's domb and leave. Yes, but

0:19:40.960 --> 0:19:44.199
<v Speaker 2>you talked about studies in the animal world. There's a

0:19:44.200 --> 0:19:50.399
<v Speaker 2>primatologist name Franz Deval who looked at wild chimps recorded

0:19:51.160 --> 0:19:55.200
<v Speaker 2>three hundred and fifty encounters aggressive encounters between these gymps

0:19:55.400 --> 0:19:58.879
<v Speaker 2>and then what happened afterward, And in fifty one percent

0:19:58.880 --> 0:20:02.960
<v Speaker 2>of these encounters, the chimps would literally kind of kiss

0:20:02.960 --> 0:20:06.239
<v Speaker 2>and make up and touch each other and embrace each

0:20:06.280 --> 0:20:08.840
<v Speaker 2>other after a fight. We've seen the same thing in

0:20:08.920 --> 0:20:13.960
<v Speaker 2>bonabos and great apes. There's sheep, there's dolphins, there's goats.

0:20:14.359 --> 0:20:18.879
<v Speaker 2>Even hyenas have shown traits of forgiveness. So it's not ubiquitous,

0:20:18.920 --> 0:20:21.959
<v Speaker 2>but it is all over the animal kingdom. Animals fighting

0:20:22.000 --> 0:20:23.719
<v Speaker 2>and then animals making up with one another.

0:20:24.520 --> 0:20:27.320
<v Speaker 1>Right, So, I mean, the revenge one's pretty easy to understand,

0:20:27.359 --> 0:20:29.399
<v Speaker 1>but then you're like, okay, well, why would there be

0:20:29.440 --> 0:20:32.159
<v Speaker 1>the making up part? But that also ties into the

0:20:32.160 --> 0:20:36.440
<v Speaker 1>fact that these same animals are also living in social

0:20:36.600 --> 0:20:39.879
<v Speaker 1>tight knit social groups, and so you have a limited

0:20:39.920 --> 0:20:42.680
<v Speaker 1>amount of people that you can possibly have a dispute

0:20:42.760 --> 0:20:46.199
<v Speaker 1>or a feud with, and if you're not working together

0:20:46.320 --> 0:20:52.280
<v Speaker 1>cooperatively in that sense, also your chances of survival are decreased.

0:20:52.760 --> 0:20:58.120
<v Speaker 1>So what makes sense is what's called the valuable relationship hypothesis,

0:20:58.160 --> 0:21:01.960
<v Speaker 1>which says, if somebody hits you, you should hit them back,

0:21:02.560 --> 0:21:04.520
<v Speaker 1>but then after that you should make up with them.

0:21:04.520 --> 0:21:06.640
<v Speaker 1>So you're sending that signal you're not to be messed with.

0:21:06.840 --> 0:21:10.399
<v Speaker 1>But then you're repairing that relationship, that valuable relationship that

0:21:10.720 --> 0:21:14.840
<v Speaker 1>you depend on to help your survival in the social group.

0:21:16.240 --> 0:21:18.640
<v Speaker 1>You're repairing it, and then you guys can move forward.

0:21:18.720 --> 0:21:24.840
<v Speaker 1>And that that is how revenge and forgiveness are basically

0:21:24.880 --> 0:21:26.760
<v Speaker 1>two sides of the same coin, or at least work

0:21:26.800 --> 0:21:31.400
<v Speaker 1>in conjunction with one another to keep the group functioning

0:21:31.480 --> 0:21:32.920
<v Speaker 1>at its best right.

0:21:33.600 --> 0:21:36.760
<v Speaker 2>And that kind of dovetails with a second part of

0:21:36.760 --> 0:21:40.720
<v Speaker 2>that thing, which is called negative reciprocity, which is if

0:21:41.200 --> 0:21:47.359
<v Speaker 2>someone hits Tiktook and Tiktook goes c razy and just

0:21:47.440 --> 0:21:50.119
<v Speaker 2>starts wailing on the other person who just slapped him

0:21:50.119 --> 0:21:53.240
<v Speaker 2>in the face. Yeah, that's not good either, because everyone's

0:21:53.280 --> 0:21:57.320
<v Speaker 2>going to go, whoa Tiktook. I'm not sure I trust

0:21:57.359 --> 0:22:00.840
<v Speaker 2>him now. He's definitely burned that bridge for between him

0:22:00.880 --> 0:22:04.080
<v Speaker 2>and the other guy. And none of this is very good.

0:22:04.200 --> 0:22:08.120
<v Speaker 2>So what they found is negative reciprocity. If you if

0:22:08.119 --> 0:22:12.040
<v Speaker 2>someone smites you, you smite them back the same amount

0:22:12.480 --> 0:22:15.159
<v Speaker 2>and then forgive them. Like if someone takes off their

0:22:15.240 --> 0:22:19.800
<v Speaker 2>glove and slaps you across the face, you don't kick

0:22:19.800 --> 0:22:22.240
<v Speaker 2>them between the legs and then wail on their face.

0:22:22.640 --> 0:22:24.960
<v Speaker 2>You slap them back with your glove, and then you

0:22:25.000 --> 0:22:28.199
<v Speaker 2>talk about forgiving one another. And everyone sees that you

0:22:28.240 --> 0:22:31.479
<v Speaker 2>can work with people, You can you can stand your ground,

0:22:31.800 --> 0:22:34.160
<v Speaker 2>but you can also forgive and work with people, which

0:22:34.200 --> 0:22:36.560
<v Speaker 2>means you're valuable to the group and you're valuable to

0:22:36.560 --> 0:22:37.080
<v Speaker 2>have around.

0:22:37.760 --> 0:22:39.760
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and so kind of tie it into what you

0:22:39.800 --> 0:22:43.159
<v Speaker 1>were saying earlier about you know how, there's this idea

0:22:43.240 --> 0:22:46.960
<v Speaker 1>that you know, revenge is a base instinct and forgiveness

0:22:47.080 --> 0:22:49.760
<v Speaker 1>is a higher instinct, rather than realizing that they're both

0:22:50.000 --> 0:22:55.200
<v Speaker 1>pretty basic instincts for among the animal kingdom. Is there's

0:22:55.200 --> 0:23:00.359
<v Speaker 1>this idea that in human society, we have created like

0:23:00.400 --> 0:23:05.480
<v Speaker 1>these social institutions in these contexts so that the individual

0:23:05.600 --> 0:23:09.560
<v Speaker 1>doesn't have to carry out revenge and then forgiveness, that

0:23:09.600 --> 0:23:12.760
<v Speaker 1>they can just focus on forgiveness as long as those

0:23:12.800 --> 0:23:15.680
<v Speaker 1>social institutions are doing what they're supposed to do, as

0:23:15.760 --> 0:23:19.040
<v Speaker 1>long as there is like a pursuit of justice, and

0:23:19.080 --> 0:23:22.160
<v Speaker 1>you can rely on the idea that the person who

0:23:22.359 --> 0:23:24.879
<v Speaker 1>transgressed against you by killing your father is going to

0:23:24.880 --> 0:23:27.720
<v Speaker 1>be caught and punished and sentenced to jail. You don't

0:23:27.760 --> 0:23:31.040
<v Speaker 1>have to worry about revenge. It's being conducted for you,

0:23:31.240 --> 0:23:34.520
<v Speaker 1>and then you, the individual in this well functioning society,

0:23:34.720 --> 0:23:37.080
<v Speaker 1>can just focus on whether you want to forgive or not,

0:23:37.320 --> 0:23:40.200
<v Speaker 1>and that that's that kind of higher and lower echelon.

0:23:40.640 --> 0:23:44.800
<v Speaker 1>Because in the opposite situation where there isn't like a

0:23:44.840 --> 0:23:47.200
<v Speaker 1>good sense of justice, where it does seem like if

0:23:47.240 --> 0:23:49.480
<v Speaker 1>you want justice you have to go seek it out yourself,

0:23:49.680 --> 0:23:53.560
<v Speaker 1>revenge is going to be much more exercised, much more

0:23:53.600 --> 0:23:56.040
<v Speaker 1>frequently than forgiveness.

0:23:55.440 --> 0:23:59.000
<v Speaker 2>Will Yeah, which says a lot about the United States

0:23:59.119 --> 0:24:02.359
<v Speaker 2>these days, you know. Yeah, I mean, I'm not trying

0:24:02.359 --> 0:24:04.000
<v Speaker 2>to be cynical even, I mean, that's just sort of

0:24:04.760 --> 0:24:06.280
<v Speaker 2>what we see around us. I think a lot of

0:24:06.280 --> 0:24:09.240
<v Speaker 2>people feel like the sense of justice in this country

0:24:09.280 --> 0:24:12.720
<v Speaker 2>is pretty skewed, and that's why you might see the

0:24:13.600 --> 0:24:18.880
<v Speaker 2>increases in things like vigilanteism or revenge. And I don't

0:24:18.880 --> 0:24:20.600
<v Speaker 2>know what societies you look to to do a study

0:24:20.640 --> 0:24:22.679
<v Speaker 2>like that. I'm kind of curious on the ones that

0:24:22.720 --> 0:24:25.919
<v Speaker 2>are very well policed and the justice is sort of

0:24:25.960 --> 0:24:30.280
<v Speaker 2>fair and equal. But I think that's one of the

0:24:30.320 --> 0:24:34.640
<v Speaker 2>problems in the in the States these days, for sure. Yeah,

0:24:34.800 --> 0:24:36.560
<v Speaker 2>without getting two far down that rabbit.

0:24:36.320 --> 0:24:39.080
<v Speaker 1>Hole, but also even you know, it's it's kind of

0:24:39.080 --> 0:24:41.680
<v Speaker 1>eye opening to me because I've never really thought about

0:24:41.680 --> 0:24:45.960
<v Speaker 1>the courts and the justice system is set up to

0:24:46.119 --> 0:24:49.800
<v Speaker 1>help individuals move along. Yeah, it should do. You just

0:24:49.840 --> 0:24:52.520
<v Speaker 1>think of it as punishment. It's a system for punishment,

0:24:52.600 --> 0:24:58.600
<v Speaker 1>not for redemption necessarily, but it's also to help the victims.

0:24:59.040 --> 0:25:00.600
<v Speaker 1>I just never saw it that before.

0:25:01.320 --> 0:25:03.760
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it's interesting when you talk about that guy in court,

0:25:03.800 --> 0:25:06.000
<v Speaker 2>and a lot of times you'll hear the courtroom forgiveness.

0:25:07.600 --> 0:25:10.359
<v Speaker 2>Sometimes you'll also hear the opposite, and you hear the

0:25:10.400 --> 0:25:13.040
<v Speaker 2>courtroom like, I will never forgive you for what you

0:25:13.080 --> 0:25:16.639
<v Speaker 2>did to me, And I think not always, but it

0:25:16.640 --> 0:25:20.000
<v Speaker 2>seems to be a lot of time tied to whether

0:25:20.080 --> 0:25:25.920
<v Speaker 2>the transgressor has really acknowledged what they've done and sought

0:25:25.960 --> 0:25:29.160
<v Speaker 2>forgiveness and said that's the worst thing I've ever done

0:25:29.160 --> 0:25:31.120
<v Speaker 2>in my life, and I don't think you should ever

0:25:31.160 --> 0:25:34.119
<v Speaker 2>forgive me. Like it's an interesting sort of dance that

0:25:34.200 --> 0:25:36.800
<v Speaker 2>happens there because it's not a one to one thing.

0:25:36.840 --> 0:25:39.640
<v Speaker 2>It's not like every time a bad criminal that does

0:25:39.680 --> 0:25:42.119
<v Speaker 2>something really asks for forgiveness and says it was a

0:25:42.200 --> 0:25:45.320
<v Speaker 2>terrible thing, the other person forgives. So sometimes the person

0:25:45.760 --> 0:25:48.479
<v Speaker 2>could laugh it off like this lady did and not

0:25:48.520 --> 0:25:51.159
<v Speaker 2>ask for forgiveness. Any other person could forgive, which I

0:25:51.200 --> 0:25:54.440
<v Speaker 2>think goes back to the notion that forgiveness comes from

0:25:54.560 --> 0:25:55.600
<v Speaker 2>the forgiver.

0:25:55.960 --> 0:26:00.479
<v Speaker 1>Right, that it's really about the person who's been wrong too.

0:26:00.560 --> 0:26:02.920
<v Speaker 1>It's about and so yeah, now we've reached the kind

0:26:02.920 --> 0:26:07.159
<v Speaker 1>of psychologies domain over the concept of forgiveness, which is

0:26:07.760 --> 0:26:10.840
<v Speaker 1>that it's about you, the individual who suffered a wrong,

0:26:12.640 --> 0:26:16.119
<v Speaker 1>releasing the pain and the anger and the resentment and

0:26:16.160 --> 0:26:19.440
<v Speaker 1>all the negative feelings that you're experiencing so that you

0:26:19.480 --> 0:26:22.600
<v Speaker 1>can feel better. And that it doesn't matter whether the

0:26:22.680 --> 0:26:25.639
<v Speaker 1>other person is asking for forgiveness, and that it doesn't

0:26:25.640 --> 0:26:29.119
<v Speaker 1>even matter if the other person deserves forgiveness or not.

0:26:29.760 --> 0:26:34.840
<v Speaker 1>That genuine forgiveness psychologically speaking, according to some psychologists, will

0:26:34.880 --> 0:26:40.080
<v Speaker 1>hear that some disagree, but that genuine, true forgiveness is unconditional,

0:26:40.320 --> 0:26:43.560
<v Speaker 1>that you forgive the person whether they deserve it or not.

0:26:44.359 --> 0:26:46.399
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, And this is to where the language to me

0:26:46.640 --> 0:26:50.840
<v Speaker 2>is a little I could see people debating this because

0:26:51.520 --> 0:26:54.440
<v Speaker 2>it is forgiveness in a way, but to me, it's

0:26:54.520 --> 0:26:57.280
<v Speaker 2>almost more of just a letting go. Yeah, I agree

0:26:57.280 --> 0:27:02.040
<v Speaker 2>with you, of an anger, it's not. It's so tricky

0:27:02.080 --> 0:27:05.520
<v Speaker 2>with the definition because when you think of forgiveness, you

0:27:05.520 --> 0:27:09.280
<v Speaker 2>think I'm saying and it's really not what it is.

0:27:09.359 --> 0:27:12.639
<v Speaker 2>What you're not saying is it's okay what you did. Okay,

0:27:12.640 --> 0:27:14.239
<v Speaker 2>so yes, you know what I mean. That's not what

0:27:14.440 --> 0:27:16.919
<v Speaker 2>That's not a key component of forgiveness.

0:27:17.200 --> 0:27:20.040
<v Speaker 1>No, No, it's not. You're that's and that's a very

0:27:20.080 --> 0:27:23.360
<v Speaker 1>confusing thing for a lot of people too. Is that

0:27:23.720 --> 0:27:26.520
<v Speaker 1>the idea that if you forgive somebody, you're you're you're

0:27:26.560 --> 0:27:29.200
<v Speaker 1>condoning their behavior. You're saying it's okay what they do.

0:27:29.840 --> 0:27:34.680
<v Speaker 1>That's not the point of forgiveness. From from what psychologists

0:27:34.800 --> 0:27:37.879
<v Speaker 1>who research this are coming up with. They're saying, No,

0:27:38.040 --> 0:27:40.359
<v Speaker 1>what you're doing when you forgive somebody is to say,

0:27:40.440 --> 0:27:43.760
<v Speaker 1>I know what you did, you wronged me, and I

0:27:43.800 --> 0:27:47.040
<v Speaker 1>can live with that. It doesn't make it any better. Yeah,

0:27:47.160 --> 0:27:49.919
<v Speaker 1>it doesn't make it any better. It doesn't excuse what

0:27:49.960 --> 0:27:53.240
<v Speaker 1>you did, right, and it does it certainly doesn't excuse

0:27:53.400 --> 0:27:58.280
<v Speaker 1>future repeated instances of what you just did. But it's saying, like,

0:27:58.359 --> 0:28:01.360
<v Speaker 1>I'm willing to let go of the I have associated

0:28:01.400 --> 0:28:04.679
<v Speaker 1>with this act you did against me, that you this wrong,

0:28:05.359 --> 0:28:08.160
<v Speaker 1>and I'm going to move forward with my life, and

0:28:08.640 --> 0:28:11.000
<v Speaker 1>in doing that, I'm willing to let you move forward

0:28:11.080 --> 0:28:12.119
<v Speaker 1>as well. Well.

0:28:12.280 --> 0:28:15.320
<v Speaker 2>Or I think sometimes in a case like this, that

0:28:15.400 --> 0:28:20.280
<v Speaker 2>kind of forgiveness can make the transgressor suffer worse sometimes yeah,

0:28:20.480 --> 0:28:24.240
<v Speaker 2>just a guilt, Yeah, and they want to be admonished

0:28:24.320 --> 0:28:27.919
<v Speaker 2>and hated as part of a punishment. But you know,

0:28:28.880 --> 0:28:32.200
<v Speaker 2>ts you know, because again, forgiveness is not for you,

0:28:32.680 --> 0:28:34.879
<v Speaker 2>it's for the person. Dave even makes a great point

0:28:35.440 --> 0:28:40.640
<v Speaker 2>the person being forgiven is secondary or even unnecessary to

0:28:40.680 --> 0:28:43.520
<v Speaker 2>the process, and that's sort of the key. You don't

0:28:43.560 --> 0:28:48.240
<v Speaker 2>even have to tell that person necessarily. We'll get to

0:28:48.320 --> 0:28:50.600
<v Speaker 2>later some kind of like how to forgive. Some people

0:28:50.640 --> 0:28:54.959
<v Speaker 2>say that you should tell someone out loud, like literally

0:28:55.000 --> 0:28:57.360
<v Speaker 2>tell someone, But you don't necessarily have to tell that

0:28:57.400 --> 0:29:00.600
<v Speaker 2>person if it's a situation like this, or even if

0:29:00.600 --> 0:29:03.440
<v Speaker 2>it's like a close personal friend like I think usually

0:29:03.440 --> 0:29:05.440
<v Speaker 2>you do when it's someone you know, because that's a

0:29:05.440 --> 0:29:08.000
<v Speaker 2>part of communicating with one another in a healthy way.

0:29:08.040 --> 0:29:11.080
<v Speaker 2>But if it's the person who who killed your family,

0:29:12.120 --> 0:29:14.240
<v Speaker 2>you don't have to tell them to forgive them, and

0:29:14.360 --> 0:29:15.680
<v Speaker 2>you can still forgive them.

0:29:16.120 --> 0:29:21.360
<v Speaker 1>Yes, So some psychologists define forgiveness, like a full forgiveness

0:29:21.680 --> 0:29:26.160
<v Speaker 1>as including you actually seeking out contact with that person, right,

0:29:26.600 --> 0:29:28.960
<v Speaker 1>and that if you forgive them but don't tell them,

0:29:29.120 --> 0:29:31.600
<v Speaker 1>or you still avoid them afterward, where it's like, hey,

0:29:31.640 --> 0:29:33.280
<v Speaker 1>I forgive you, but good luck with the rest of

0:29:33.320 --> 0:29:35.960
<v Speaker 1>your life. You're not in my life anymore. That to

0:29:36.520 --> 0:29:41.640
<v Speaker 1>some psychologists, not all. Some psychologists say that's not genuine forgiveness.

0:29:41.680 --> 0:29:44.040
<v Speaker 1>That's akin to what you were saying, which is letting

0:29:44.040 --> 0:29:47.320
<v Speaker 1>go of anger and moving on, but not really actually forgiving.

0:29:47.480 --> 0:29:50.560
<v Speaker 1>I still say it's forgiving. I'm not one of the psychologists, sure,

0:29:50.720 --> 0:29:53.600
<v Speaker 1>and it's very much debated, for sure. But then that

0:29:53.680 --> 0:29:57.920
<v Speaker 1>also leads to another point too, that if you forgive somebody,

0:29:57.920 --> 0:30:02.000
<v Speaker 1>it doesn't necessarily mean you forget, and that's not part

0:30:02.040 --> 0:30:05.400
<v Speaker 1>and parcel to it. Forgiving doesn't mean forgetting. You can forget.

0:30:06.880 --> 0:30:08.960
<v Speaker 1>I'm actually really good at that kind of thing, where

0:30:09.320 --> 0:30:13.479
<v Speaker 1>like I forgive because it just unless it was a

0:30:13.520 --> 0:30:16.760
<v Speaker 1>really huge wrong, it just kind of phased from my

0:30:16.800 --> 0:30:21.000
<v Speaker 1>memory fairly easily, and I don't dwell on it, so

0:30:22.000 --> 0:30:24.480
<v Speaker 1>it can it can go hand in hand. But if

0:30:24.480 --> 0:30:27.560
<v Speaker 1>you've been deeply wrong by somebody where you're actually going

0:30:27.600 --> 0:30:30.280
<v Speaker 1>through the process of forgiving, which we'll talk about, and

0:30:30.360 --> 0:30:33.880
<v Speaker 1>it is a it's a deliberate step that you're taking

0:30:34.000 --> 0:30:37.520
<v Speaker 1>toward finding peace with yourself and your life again, then

0:30:38.400 --> 0:30:40.640
<v Speaker 1>you know very well, what that wrong was, and you're

0:30:40.640 --> 0:30:43.680
<v Speaker 1>not going to forget it, but eventually the aim is

0:30:43.760 --> 0:30:47.160
<v Speaker 1>that you will have divorced the emotional attachment from that

0:30:47.280 --> 0:30:50.520
<v Speaker 1>memory of that wrong to where it becomes akin to

0:30:50.640 --> 0:30:53.480
<v Speaker 1>like a movie you saw once or a trip you

0:30:53.520 --> 0:30:56.080
<v Speaker 1>took once, Like it's not it's just a thing that

0:30:56.120 --> 0:30:59.200
<v Speaker 1>happened in your life, rather than this, this this crisis

0:30:59.240 --> 0:31:03.280
<v Speaker 1>that is sucking up your attention and emotions.

0:31:03.640 --> 0:31:08.440
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I really like this definition from Fred Luskin, who

0:31:08.520 --> 0:31:12.920
<v Speaker 2>is a psychologist and forgiveness expert for what It's worth,

0:31:13.680 --> 0:31:19.360
<v Speaker 2>director of the Stanford University Forgiveness Projects. And Fred's definition

0:31:19.520 --> 0:31:22.760
<v Speaker 2>is to forgive is to give up all hope for

0:31:22.800 --> 0:31:26.760
<v Speaker 2>a better past, And that really lays it out there

0:31:27.040 --> 0:31:31.120
<v Speaker 2>in this in a very practical sense, that what has

0:31:31.120 --> 0:31:34.400
<v Speaker 2>happened has happened. You may not be there yet in

0:31:34.440 --> 0:31:39.080
<v Speaker 2>your journey to forgiveness or the letting go, but you

0:31:39.160 --> 0:31:42.200
<v Speaker 2>cannot change what happened, no matter how angry you are,

0:31:42.320 --> 0:31:44.440
<v Speaker 2>or how much you want someone to pay for it

0:31:44.560 --> 0:31:47.480
<v Speaker 2>or suffer, or how much revenge you want. So there

0:31:47.600 --> 0:31:51.720
<v Speaker 2>is no better past that's impossible. So giving up hope

0:31:51.760 --> 0:31:53.760
<v Speaker 2>for a better pass, it's sort of a blaque definition,

0:31:53.840 --> 0:31:56.960
<v Speaker 2>but one that I think is pretty instructive.

0:31:57.760 --> 0:32:01.280
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, but it's also a realistic definition too if you

0:32:01.280 --> 0:32:03.239
<v Speaker 1>think about it. Because you can't change the past one

0:32:03.240 --> 0:32:06.760
<v Speaker 1>way or another. You can only alter how you let

0:32:06.800 --> 0:32:10.120
<v Speaker 1>the past continue to affect you or not. And the

0:32:10.160 --> 0:32:12.200
<v Speaker 1>other thing I really want to say here right now,

0:32:12.200 --> 0:32:15.840
<v Speaker 1>because it can be confusing for me too when I

0:32:15.880 --> 0:32:18.880
<v Speaker 1>think about forgiveness and anger and stuff like that, is like,

0:32:19.360 --> 0:32:23.080
<v Speaker 1>this is not No one is talking about a something

0:32:23.160 --> 0:32:27.560
<v Speaker 1>like throwing a switch or like, rather than feeling anger,

0:32:27.760 --> 0:32:31.360
<v Speaker 1>you feel forgiveness. That's actually counterproductive, as we'll see. Like

0:32:31.440 --> 0:32:35.000
<v Speaker 1>you like, you can't replace anger with forgiveness. Forgiveness is

0:32:35.080 --> 0:32:38.360
<v Speaker 1>meant to come after anger because you use anger or

0:32:38.640 --> 0:32:41.560
<v Speaker 1>hurt or resentment or whatever your version of that is

0:32:42.600 --> 0:32:46.760
<v Speaker 1>to to to protect and guard your own boundaries. So

0:32:46.960 --> 0:32:49.560
<v Speaker 1>it's unnatural for you to not have some sort of

0:32:50.120 --> 0:32:57.280
<v Speaker 1>negative emotion or negative response to being wronged. But you

0:32:57.280 --> 0:32:59.280
<v Speaker 1>don't want to replace that or try to replace it

0:32:59.280 --> 0:33:03.640
<v Speaker 1>with forgiveness because you may accidentally trip up the process

0:33:03.680 --> 0:33:07.000
<v Speaker 1>and you're not really legitimately feeling forgiveness. You're basically just

0:33:07.040 --> 0:33:08.560
<v Speaker 1>setting yourself up to be wronged again.

0:33:09.640 --> 0:33:13.880
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, my deal personally is Emily always talks about what

0:33:13.920 --> 0:33:18.800
<v Speaker 2>a forgiving person I am because I really crave.

0:33:20.000 --> 0:33:20.640
<v Speaker 1>To forgive.

0:33:22.000 --> 0:33:23.880
<v Speaker 2>I don't know, I was about to say crave forgiveness.

0:33:24.080 --> 0:33:27.440
<v Speaker 2>I crave forgiving. I guess it sounds funny, but I

0:33:27.560 --> 0:33:31.760
<v Speaker 2>just all I need is for someone to say they're

0:33:31.800 --> 0:33:35.880
<v Speaker 2>sorry for something, and then it's done. Nine times out

0:33:35.880 --> 0:33:39.640
<v Speaker 2>of ten, that's done for me. And as far as forgetting, like,

0:33:39.760 --> 0:33:41.840
<v Speaker 2>I'm a pretty good forgetter too. I don't know about

0:33:42.360 --> 0:33:46.200
<v Speaker 2>like literally forgetting something, but I definitely look back on

0:33:46.480 --> 0:33:49.640
<v Speaker 2>a lot of relationships, especially with like ex girlfriends that

0:33:49.680 --> 0:33:53.280
<v Speaker 2>were terrible, and go, oh that was so bad in there.

0:33:53.320 --> 0:33:54.360
<v Speaker 1>In that relationship, we.

0:33:54.360 --> 0:33:57.400
<v Speaker 2>Were pretty good, right, Sure, No, we weren't pretty good

0:33:57.400 --> 0:34:00.440
<v Speaker 2>at all. Right, I just have rose colored glasses. And

0:34:01.800 --> 0:34:05.720
<v Speaker 2>I think you and I are both like as podcasting

0:34:05.720 --> 0:34:08.560
<v Speaker 2>partners and family and team good about when we have

0:34:08.680 --> 0:34:11.439
<v Speaker 2>little dust ups for giving one another. If the other

0:34:11.480 --> 0:34:13.520
<v Speaker 2>person likes says they're sorry, like you and I both

0:34:13.520 --> 0:34:16.359
<v Speaker 2>get over that stuf pretty quickly. Yeah, which is yeah,

0:34:17.719 --> 0:34:20.800
<v Speaker 2>it's very key though, you know, like, oh, yeah, you can't.

0:34:21.200 --> 0:34:23.239
<v Speaker 2>Forgiveness is like from the heart if you really if

0:34:23.280 --> 0:34:25.440
<v Speaker 2>you're hanging on to something, then you're not done with

0:34:25.480 --> 0:34:26.239
<v Speaker 2>it yet.

0:34:26.960 --> 0:34:29.960
<v Speaker 1>No, but so and that is so important, Chuck. That's

0:34:30.000 --> 0:34:33.719
<v Speaker 1>important for the individual to remember that if you if

0:34:33.760 --> 0:34:37.319
<v Speaker 1>you are unable to forgive, that means that you're you're

0:34:37.360 --> 0:34:40.520
<v Speaker 1>still hanging on to it. That doesn't mean you'll never forgive,

0:34:40.680 --> 0:34:42.359
<v Speaker 1>And that also doesn't mean you have to hurry up

0:34:42.360 --> 0:34:44.719
<v Speaker 1>and forgive. It means you're still in the process and

0:34:44.760 --> 0:34:47.600
<v Speaker 1>that's reaching the point where you can forgive. It's a

0:34:47.640 --> 0:34:50.560
<v Speaker 1>deliberate choice. From everything I've seen in the research, you

0:34:50.560 --> 0:34:53.439
<v Speaker 1>are making a deliberate choice to forgive somebody. But it's

0:34:53.480 --> 0:34:55.719
<v Speaker 1>not throwing a switch. It's part of a process. And

0:34:55.840 --> 0:34:58.720
<v Speaker 1>during that process, while you're on the road to forgiving

0:34:58.719 --> 0:35:01.000
<v Speaker 1>the person, you're still going to be kind of angry

0:35:01.000 --> 0:35:02.799
<v Speaker 1>at them. Maybe not the whole time, but every once

0:35:02.800 --> 0:35:05.320
<v Speaker 1>in a while it might hit you before you've fully

0:35:05.360 --> 0:35:07.160
<v Speaker 1>forgiven them, and then you're going to be mad about

0:35:07.160 --> 0:35:10.080
<v Speaker 1>it all over again. That's okay, that's normal, that's natural.

0:35:10.280 --> 0:35:12.960
<v Speaker 1>You can't really rush it. You can, but it's going

0:35:13.000 --> 0:35:14.960
<v Speaker 1>to be detrimental. What you want to do is just

0:35:15.040 --> 0:35:16.920
<v Speaker 1>kind of let it play out and have faith that

0:35:17.239 --> 0:35:20.200
<v Speaker 1>if you're on the path of forgiveness, you'll ultimately will

0:35:20.239 --> 0:35:21.960
<v Speaker 1>forgive the person and things will be good again.

0:35:22.440 --> 0:35:26.279
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and depending on your life and your childhood, like

0:35:26.960 --> 0:35:29.600
<v Speaker 2>you probably have an inclination or an instinct to forgive

0:35:29.640 --> 0:35:31.880
<v Speaker 2>or not based on what you saw, what was modeled.

0:35:32.600 --> 0:35:35.840
<v Speaker 2>There's both nature and nurture involved. But I think people

0:35:36.440 --> 0:35:40.759
<v Speaker 2>generally have an instinct of revenge or forgiveness, and to

0:35:40.880 --> 0:35:43.640
<v Speaker 2>do one of the other that is against that instinct

0:35:43.680 --> 0:35:47.120
<v Speaker 2>requires great effort, especially in the case of forgiveness, because

0:35:47.320 --> 0:35:49.239
<v Speaker 2>you may not be inclined to be a forgiver at all.

0:35:49.320 --> 0:35:52.160
<v Speaker 2>That doesn't mean something's wrong with you. That just means

0:35:52.239 --> 0:35:55.200
<v Speaker 2>that's probably what you saw growing up, or maybe something

0:35:55.239 --> 0:35:57.239
<v Speaker 2>happened to you when you were young that makes it

0:35:57.239 --> 0:36:00.600
<v Speaker 2>harder for you. But it's still possible to get there.

0:36:00.640 --> 0:36:01.520
<v Speaker 2>It just might be tougher.

0:36:02.160 --> 0:36:04.440
<v Speaker 1>Well, what's neat is another thing that the feel of

0:36:04.440 --> 0:36:07.160
<v Speaker 1>psychology is telling us about forgiveness is that it can

0:36:07.200 --> 0:36:09.520
<v Speaker 1>be taught. You can learn to forgive. Even if you

0:36:09.520 --> 0:36:15.040
<v Speaker 1>were raised in an unforgiving environment where you never learned

0:36:15.040 --> 0:36:17.440
<v Speaker 1>how to do that, you can learn how to do it.

0:36:18.200 --> 0:36:21.360
<v Speaker 1>And I say we kind of jump to those to

0:36:21.600 --> 0:36:25.799
<v Speaker 1>how to forgive before we go into physical health because

0:36:25.800 --> 0:36:27.920
<v Speaker 1>I feel like we're kind of there right now. Yeah, well,

0:36:27.960 --> 0:36:28.760
<v Speaker 1>let's take a break.

0:36:29.160 --> 0:36:32.160
<v Speaker 2>Okay, let's take our final break, and we'll talk about

0:36:32.160 --> 0:36:33.719
<v Speaker 2>that when we get back, as well as this one

0:36:34.200 --> 0:36:36.239
<v Speaker 2>sort of interesting study i'd like to hit real quick too.

0:36:36.719 --> 0:36:53.560
<v Speaker 3>Okay, learn and start with Joshua job stuff.

0:36:53.600 --> 0:37:09.200
<v Speaker 1>You shine up, all right.

0:37:09.280 --> 0:37:13.279
<v Speaker 2>So there's this study that Dave dug up that I

0:37:13.280 --> 0:37:14.120
<v Speaker 2>thought was interesting.

0:37:14.239 --> 0:37:19.359
<v Speaker 1>I think it's flawed. But Inreme Social psychology, they took

0:37:19.400 --> 0:37:21.760
<v Speaker 1>forty six people. They divided them into two groups.

0:37:21.880 --> 0:37:26.600
<v Speaker 2>One wrote about a time when they had something some

0:37:26.640 --> 0:37:29.439
<v Speaker 2>wrong committed against them, but they forgave. The other wrote

0:37:29.440 --> 0:37:32.040
<v Speaker 2>about a time when they had something wrong committed against them,

0:37:32.080 --> 0:37:34.680
<v Speaker 2>but they did not forgive. And then they told those

0:37:34.680 --> 0:37:36.880
<v Speaker 2>people to stand at the bottom of a hill to

0:37:37.000 --> 0:37:41.040
<v Speaker 2>estimate how steep it was, and also, in a separate

0:37:41.080 --> 0:37:42.840
<v Speaker 2>part of the study, to jump as high as they could.

0:37:43.480 --> 0:37:47.600
<v Speaker 2>The unforgiving group guessed that the incline was five degrees

0:37:47.640 --> 0:37:52.160
<v Speaker 2>steeper on average than the forgiving, and the forgivers jumped

0:37:52.480 --> 0:37:57.399
<v Speaker 2>seven centimeters higher. So the takeaway here is is you

0:37:57.520 --> 0:38:02.160
<v Speaker 2>literally it's more difficult for you. You see the world

0:38:02.320 --> 0:38:05.799
<v Speaker 2>as being more difficult and steeper, and you can't jump

0:38:05.800 --> 0:38:08.480
<v Speaker 2>as high and you can't accomplish as much if you're

0:38:08.480 --> 0:38:12.160
<v Speaker 2>holding on to that all kinds of red flags study,

0:38:12.400 --> 0:38:15.480
<v Speaker 2>especially when it comes to the jumping part. Yeah, but

0:38:16.080 --> 0:38:18.840
<v Speaker 2>I thought it was interesting the guessing the incline of

0:38:18.840 --> 0:38:19.200
<v Speaker 2>the hill.

0:38:19.239 --> 0:38:21.640
<v Speaker 1>There may be something to that. Well, yeah, and I

0:38:21.680 --> 0:38:24.400
<v Speaker 1>mean it is backed up, Chuck, by the physical the

0:38:24.400 --> 0:38:31.160
<v Speaker 1>physiological studies of how stress and anger affect you and

0:38:31.160 --> 0:38:34.600
<v Speaker 1>how releasing those can actually help you. There's a lot

0:38:34.640 --> 0:38:37.760
<v Speaker 1>of research that shows that you can suffer from chronic

0:38:37.840 --> 0:38:40.799
<v Speaker 1>stress when you're angry all the time, and that that's

0:38:40.880 --> 0:38:44.719
<v Speaker 1>tied to everything from high blood pressure to diabetes to

0:38:45.400 --> 0:38:50.360
<v Speaker 1>poor cardiovascular outcomes. Just a whole host of chronic conditions

0:38:50.400 --> 0:38:53.200
<v Speaker 1>can be traced back to chronic stress, and chronic stress

0:38:53.200 --> 0:38:56.600
<v Speaker 1>can be traced back to chronic anger. And what they're

0:38:56.680 --> 0:39:01.400
<v Speaker 1>discovering is that forgiveness can actually undo that can actually

0:39:01.440 --> 0:39:07.160
<v Speaker 1>reverse that. There was a study that rated people based

0:39:07.239 --> 0:39:10.560
<v Speaker 1>on the life stresses they'd had, and they apparently recruited

0:39:10.960 --> 0:39:13.680
<v Speaker 1>participants for the study who'd been through a lot of

0:39:13.680 --> 0:39:16.920
<v Speaker 1>stress so much so that they were basically always chronically

0:39:16.960 --> 0:39:20.120
<v Speaker 1>stressed because they have had so many terrible events in

0:39:20.160 --> 0:39:25.239
<v Speaker 1>their life, and there was one group that actually did

0:39:25.280 --> 0:39:28.800
<v Speaker 1>not have poor health compared to the rest of the group.

0:39:29.280 --> 0:39:31.200
<v Speaker 1>And they found that when they gave them a test

0:39:31.280 --> 0:39:35.640
<v Speaker 1>of forgiveness of how forgiving they were generally, they found

0:39:35.680 --> 0:39:39.880
<v Speaker 1>that this subset was actually overall a very forgiving group

0:39:40.200 --> 0:39:44.120
<v Speaker 1>and that that somehow was battling back the chronic stress

0:39:44.200 --> 0:39:47.120
<v Speaker 1>or the effects of chronic stress on their health in life.

0:39:47.320 --> 0:39:49.960
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I mean, I think that makes complete sense. If

0:39:50.000 --> 0:39:54.480
<v Speaker 2>you were someone who really has a problem with forgiving

0:39:54.640 --> 0:39:59.360
<v Speaker 2>and just holds on to these deep, deep resentments against people,

0:40:00.080 --> 0:40:03.400
<v Speaker 2>usually against people very close to you in your family,

0:40:03.560 --> 0:40:08.400
<v Speaker 2>even that just that can't be good for you physically.

0:40:09.239 --> 0:40:11.640
<v Speaker 2>I've seen it happen. I don't want to get too personal,

0:40:11.680 --> 0:40:14.480
<v Speaker 2>but there are people in my family who haven't spoken

0:40:15.239 --> 0:40:20.279
<v Speaker 2>for twenty plus years over dumb stuff that it's like,

0:40:20.960 --> 0:40:26.600
<v Speaker 2>you see that kind of like stubbornness coupled with resentment,

0:40:26.719 --> 0:40:29.919
<v Speaker 2>and it's just, man, that is just no way to live. Yeah,

0:40:30.120 --> 0:40:30.799
<v Speaker 2>no way to live.

0:40:31.440 --> 0:40:35.759
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. So there was another one that another study that

0:40:36.160 --> 0:40:40.000
<v Speaker 1>Dave turned up that shows that even like in a

0:40:40.120 --> 0:40:45.240
<v Speaker 1>very short term, thinking about holding a grudge can actually

0:40:45.640 --> 0:40:50.759
<v Speaker 1>affect you physiologically by activating your sympathetic nervous system, as

0:40:50.800 --> 0:40:55.239
<v Speaker 1>Dave put to the battle or skidaddle impulse. And they

0:40:55.280 --> 0:40:58.520
<v Speaker 1>found that this these they cut these two groups into

0:40:59.560 --> 0:41:02.400
<v Speaker 1>or they cut the participants into two groups. All of

0:41:02.440 --> 0:41:04.600
<v Speaker 1>the people had to think about some time when they

0:41:04.640 --> 0:41:07.280
<v Speaker 1>were deeply wronged in the past, and then one group

0:41:07.400 --> 0:41:09.880
<v Speaker 1>was taken through an exercise where they learned to forgive

0:41:09.920 --> 0:41:13.440
<v Speaker 1>the person. The other group, this is so mean, was

0:41:13.600 --> 0:41:16.799
<v Speaker 1>encouraged to hold a grudge. They were basically taught, they

0:41:16.840 --> 0:41:18.840
<v Speaker 1>went through an exercise to hold a grudge and be

0:41:19.000 --> 0:41:23.120
<v Speaker 1>angry and resentment was resentful about that. And they found

0:41:23.120 --> 0:41:25.320
<v Speaker 1>that the people who were taught to hold the grudge

0:41:25.640 --> 0:41:29.520
<v Speaker 1>had elevated skin conductance, which meant their nervous system was aroused,

0:41:29.920 --> 0:41:33.880
<v Speaker 1>higher arterial blood pressure, not good. They also had muscle

0:41:33.920 --> 0:41:36.040
<v Speaker 1>tension in the brow area you know when your brows

0:41:36.160 --> 0:41:39.280
<v Speaker 1>furrowed when you're stressed out or madge, and that they

0:41:39.840 --> 0:41:42.600
<v Speaker 1>the symptoms. Even after they went through an exercise to

0:41:42.640 --> 0:41:46.560
<v Speaker 1>basically de escalate everything, the symptoms persisted. And this was

0:41:46.719 --> 0:41:49.680
<v Speaker 1>just an exercise where you were just thinking about being

0:41:49.760 --> 0:41:53.120
<v Speaker 1>wronged and then holding a grudge about it. Just like

0:41:53.320 --> 0:41:55.360
<v Speaker 1>probably this was like an hour out of their lives

0:41:55.800 --> 0:41:59.399
<v Speaker 1>and that was the effects. That was the findings of that.

0:42:00.000 --> 0:42:05.520
<v Speaker 1>It's pretty clear that yes, anger can affect you physically,

0:42:06.280 --> 0:42:09.040
<v Speaker 1>and what they haven't we don't have the reams of

0:42:09.120 --> 0:42:11.480
<v Speaker 1>data that we have supporting it like we do that

0:42:11.560 --> 0:42:15.960
<v Speaker 1>anger hurts you physically, But there seems to be the

0:42:16.040 --> 0:42:19.880
<v Speaker 1>opposite of that holds true, which is releasing that anger,

0:42:20.040 --> 0:42:23.120
<v Speaker 1>which is forgiveness in whatever form it takes, can actually

0:42:23.160 --> 0:42:25.200
<v Speaker 1>improve your health as well.

0:42:25.280 --> 0:42:28.240
<v Speaker 2>Right earlier in the episode, we were talking about religion.

0:42:28.320 --> 0:42:32.040
<v Speaker 2>All religions talk extensively about forgiveness and when they do

0:42:32.120 --> 0:42:37.440
<v Speaker 2>studies these days, usually like questionnaires and stuff. Depending on

0:42:37.480 --> 0:42:40.359
<v Speaker 2>the studies you look at, you would think religiosity does

0:42:40.440 --> 0:42:46.840
<v Speaker 2>play a role in that people who describe themselves as religious,

0:42:46.880 --> 0:42:49.520
<v Speaker 2>supposedly in some studies are two and a half times

0:42:49.560 --> 0:42:53.040
<v Speaker 2>more likely to say that others should be forgiven unconditionally.

0:42:53.560 --> 0:42:55.880
<v Speaker 2>But I know you found some studies that found that

0:42:56.880 --> 0:42:59.719
<v Speaker 2>religiosity does not play as big a role as a

0:42:59.719 --> 0:43:04.760
<v Speaker 2>lot of people think it does, and that sometimes religious

0:43:04.760 --> 0:43:07.520
<v Speaker 2>people may be more inclined to say that they are

0:43:07.560 --> 0:43:11.680
<v Speaker 2>forgiving when they aren't because it's the right thing to do.

0:43:12.320 --> 0:43:15.680
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, the study found that when when you ask basically,

0:43:15.719 --> 0:43:19.160
<v Speaker 1>when you survey them, people who are religious tend to

0:43:19.880 --> 0:43:22.480
<v Speaker 1>come off as more forgiving. They self report is forgiving,

0:43:22.840 --> 0:43:26.520
<v Speaker 1>but then if you ask them other certain questions, I

0:43:26.560 --> 0:43:30.040
<v Speaker 1>guess the in real world situations, they're no more forgiving

0:43:30.080 --> 0:43:33.279
<v Speaker 1>than other people. But so that would be an interpretation

0:43:33.400 --> 0:43:36.239
<v Speaker 1>that they think they're more forgiving or tell people they're

0:43:36.239 --> 0:43:40.040
<v Speaker 1>more forgiving than they actually are. But there was another

0:43:40.080 --> 0:43:41.560
<v Speaker 1>way to look at it too, and they went back

0:43:41.800 --> 0:43:45.279
<v Speaker 1>and followed up on that study and they found that

0:43:45.400 --> 0:43:49.919
<v Speaker 1>over a longer term, people who are religious actually do

0:43:50.080 --> 0:43:53.320
<v Speaker 1>tend to be more forgiving in their lives. It wasn't

0:43:53.680 --> 0:43:55.680
<v Speaker 1>like the most set in stone study, but I found

0:43:55.719 --> 0:43:58.719
<v Speaker 1>it interesting that they were. They had it harder. The

0:43:58.920 --> 0:44:04.080
<v Speaker 1>religious people in this study had more difficulty in relating

0:44:04.239 --> 0:44:07.759
<v Speaker 1>grudges that they're carrying around compared to the control group

0:44:07.800 --> 0:44:12.960
<v Speaker 1>of people who weren't religious. Yeah, makes sense. Sure there

0:44:13.040 --> 0:44:15.680
<v Speaker 1>was some redemption there. Yeah.

0:44:15.719 --> 0:44:18.640
<v Speaker 2>As far as how to forgive, like we said, hopefully

0:44:18.719 --> 0:44:20.840
<v Speaker 2>we've gotten it through that is something you can learn.

0:44:21.280 --> 0:44:24.719
<v Speaker 2>If you are not an inherent forgiver, you can learn

0:44:24.760 --> 0:44:31.880
<v Speaker 2>how to through practice. There's a psychologist named Worthington, Everett Worthington,

0:44:32.120 --> 0:44:36.440
<v Speaker 2>Edward Everett, Everett Worthington, there should be a third after that,

0:44:36.520 --> 0:44:37.120
<v Speaker 2>if he asked, I.

0:44:37.040 --> 0:44:38.120
<v Speaker 1>Mean, totally should be.

0:44:39.239 --> 0:44:43.279
<v Speaker 2>And Worthington has developed a reach model which we'll go through.

0:44:43.320 --> 0:44:46.239
<v Speaker 2>It's an acronym.

0:44:46.360 --> 0:44:46.880
<v Speaker 1>Of course.

0:44:47.400 --> 0:44:51.400
<v Speaker 2>Recall is the first step, and that's to really recall

0:44:51.600 --> 0:44:54.759
<v Speaker 2>the event in detail, but in the sort of an

0:44:54.840 --> 0:44:57.840
<v Speaker 2>objective way, and not necessarily something that was done to you,

0:44:57.920 --> 0:45:00.479
<v Speaker 2>but just to look at the detail of it, try

0:45:00.520 --> 0:45:03.920
<v Speaker 2>not to judge yourself or the other person, just simply

0:45:04.280 --> 0:45:05.560
<v Speaker 2>bring that back to your mind.

0:45:06.040 --> 0:45:07.680
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, And the point of that is to feel the

0:45:07.719 --> 0:45:10.320
<v Speaker 1>feelings like we have. We humans have such a tendency

0:45:10.320 --> 0:45:12.960
<v Speaker 1>to try to get away from negative feelings and run

0:45:13.120 --> 0:45:18.040
<v Speaker 1>toward positive feelings. And I think Worthington's position is that

0:45:18.080 --> 0:45:20.799
<v Speaker 1>we have to feel whatever feelings are associated with it,

0:45:20.840 --> 0:45:23.279
<v Speaker 1>and that's a huge part of it. That's we have

0:45:23.320 --> 0:45:25.640
<v Speaker 1>to go through that experience. It's part of the recall.

0:45:26.200 --> 0:45:29.359
<v Speaker 2>Right to the E stands for empathy. This is one

0:45:29.400 --> 0:45:33.200
<v Speaker 2>that is I don't know about controversial, but it's not

0:45:33.280 --> 0:45:35.920
<v Speaker 2>everyone agrees at all on whether or not you need

0:45:35.960 --> 0:45:40.520
<v Speaker 2>to actually have empathy to forgive. But empathy can certainly

0:45:40.560 --> 0:45:45.920
<v Speaker 2>help you forgive. If someone has broken into your home

0:45:46.080 --> 0:45:49.399
<v Speaker 2>and stolen from you, it might help to forgive them.

0:45:49.440 --> 0:45:52.400
<v Speaker 2>To empathize and think about where they may be in

0:45:52.440 --> 0:45:54.480
<v Speaker 2>their life to feel like they needed to do something

0:45:54.520 --> 0:45:56.520
<v Speaker 2>like that is one example.

0:45:57.080 --> 0:46:00.399
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, And he points out also like you're not using

0:46:00.480 --> 0:46:03.799
<v Speaker 1>their behavior right, you're just thinking about them beyond just

0:46:03.880 --> 0:46:06.799
<v Speaker 1>a villain or criminal or a person who wronged you,

0:46:06.920 --> 0:46:09.920
<v Speaker 1>for sure. And actually we should say Everett Worthington had

0:46:09.960 --> 0:46:12.040
<v Speaker 1>to put his money where his mouth was because his

0:46:12.160 --> 0:46:15.520
<v Speaker 1>mother was actually murdered by a burglar. Yeah, I think

0:46:15.560 --> 0:46:18.720
<v Speaker 1>back in nineteen ninety seven, yep. And he put himself

0:46:18.760 --> 0:46:22.560
<v Speaker 1>through this the Reach method, and he said he came

0:46:22.600 --> 0:46:24.600
<v Speaker 1>out on the other side better off than he had been.

0:46:24.840 --> 0:46:28.239
<v Speaker 2>And I think he was already doing this right. That

0:46:28.239 --> 0:46:29.600
<v Speaker 2>didn't inspire his career, did it?

0:46:30.040 --> 0:46:32.920
<v Speaker 1>No? No, I think he was already doing it. Coincidentally, Wow,

0:46:33.239 --> 0:46:37.200
<v Speaker 1>the ironies. So the A stands for altruistic gift. And

0:46:37.239 --> 0:46:40.480
<v Speaker 1>the point of this is that you realize that you

0:46:40.520 --> 0:46:47.279
<v Speaker 1>were actually giving a gift by forgiving somebody, even I

0:46:47.280 --> 0:46:49.239
<v Speaker 1>guess if you don't tell them, even if you don't

0:46:49.280 --> 0:46:51.960
<v Speaker 1>necessarily empathize with them. But the way you do this,

0:46:52.120 --> 0:46:56.560
<v Speaker 1>the way you recognize that your forgiveness is an altruistic gift,

0:46:56.880 --> 0:46:59.000
<v Speaker 1>is to think about times where you've wronged somebody and

0:46:59.040 --> 0:47:03.520
<v Speaker 1>that they've been forgiven or forgiving, and even if you

0:47:03.560 --> 0:47:06.840
<v Speaker 1>didn't necessarily deserve it, and what a gift that that was,

0:47:06.880 --> 0:47:09.279
<v Speaker 1>you're kind of bringing it to mind, which I think

0:47:09.360 --> 0:47:12.759
<v Speaker 1>is really suspiciously kind of tied in with empathizing.

0:47:12.800 --> 0:47:15.080
<v Speaker 2>If you ask me, yeah, I mean he was trying

0:47:15.080 --> 0:47:18.840
<v Speaker 2>to make the word reach sure, commit to. This is

0:47:18.840 --> 0:47:21.920
<v Speaker 2>what I mentioned earlier about telling someone else that necessarily

0:47:21.920 --> 0:47:24.239
<v Speaker 2>have to be the person you're forgiving, although that could

0:47:24.280 --> 0:47:27.400
<v Speaker 2>help if you want to go that route, but telling

0:47:27.440 --> 0:47:31.000
<v Speaker 2>someone else, at least in Worthington's mind, makes it, gives

0:47:31.040 --> 0:47:34.400
<v Speaker 2>it a degree of permanence. Man it basically makes it

0:47:34.440 --> 0:47:39.320
<v Speaker 2>part of your story, like you're changing the story essentially exactly.

0:47:39.640 --> 0:47:42.520
<v Speaker 1>And then hold, and this is very important too that

0:47:42.760 --> 0:47:46.200
<v Speaker 1>we said earlier you can forgive and it doesn't necessarily

0:47:46.239 --> 0:47:49.480
<v Speaker 1>mean you're going to forget. So when you do remember

0:47:49.520 --> 0:47:51.520
<v Speaker 1>that kind of thing, you're still going through the process

0:47:51.560 --> 0:47:53.839
<v Speaker 1>and you're still angered by it. You're still hurt by it,

0:47:54.080 --> 0:47:56.000
<v Speaker 1>but you're on the path of forgiveness. You have to

0:47:56.080 --> 0:47:59.799
<v Speaker 1>hold on to the idea that you're working on for

0:48:00.040 --> 0:48:02.759
<v Speaker 1>giving them. That is not an instantaneous thing, So you

0:48:02.800 --> 0:48:05.120
<v Speaker 1>have to hold the fact that you're forgiving them even

0:48:05.160 --> 0:48:07.520
<v Speaker 1>in the face of, you know, being triggered by or

0:48:07.560 --> 0:48:10.200
<v Speaker 1>flooded by this again when you think about the memory

0:48:10.239 --> 0:48:10.480
<v Speaker 1>of it.

0:48:11.320 --> 0:48:14.720
<v Speaker 2>Right, Luskin has a nine step process, which we weren't

0:48:15.160 --> 0:48:16.960
<v Speaker 2>We're not going to really get into, but step eight

0:48:17.040 --> 0:48:20.400
<v Speaker 2>is interesting. Just like rim says, living well is the

0:48:20.400 --> 0:48:23.160
<v Speaker 2>best revenge is the sort of the nuts and bolts

0:48:23.160 --> 0:48:26.680
<v Speaker 2>of number eight, and there's something to be said for that,

0:48:26.800 --> 0:48:29.640
<v Speaker 2>but I think it also makes it much harder to

0:48:29.680 --> 0:48:32.880
<v Speaker 2>forgive and move on if you're not able to live well.

0:48:32.960 --> 0:48:35.200
<v Speaker 2>And that doesn't mean you know, money and riches and

0:48:35.239 --> 0:48:38.920
<v Speaker 2>stuff like that, right, that means just living a full life.

0:48:38.960 --> 0:48:41.160
<v Speaker 2>But if you were not able to forgive and get

0:48:41.160 --> 0:48:43.360
<v Speaker 2>past that, I mean, there are plenty of movies of

0:48:43.400 --> 0:48:46.480
<v Speaker 2>people that have been have some awful thing from their

0:48:46.520 --> 0:48:49.319
<v Speaker 2>past that they're just wallowing in all these years later,

0:48:49.400 --> 0:48:51.360
<v Speaker 2>and that's the central plot of the film.

0:48:51.400 --> 0:48:58.239
<v Speaker 1>You know, she devil Hoosiers, that's right, but that's I mean,

0:48:58.280 --> 0:49:01.600
<v Speaker 1>that's the that's the point of forgiveness is too, is

0:49:01.640 --> 0:49:05.919
<v Speaker 1>to free yourself, to find peace within yourself. And yes,

0:49:05.960 --> 0:49:08.360
<v Speaker 1>it's great for the person who wronged you if you

0:49:09.000 --> 0:49:11.879
<v Speaker 1>overtly forgive them and let them know, but you don't

0:49:11.920 --> 0:49:14.800
<v Speaker 1>have to. And then also, Chuck, there's a whole school

0:49:14.880 --> 0:49:18.440
<v Speaker 1>thought in psychology that says, not only do you not

0:49:18.600 --> 0:49:21.440
<v Speaker 1>have to tell the person that you're forgiving them, you

0:49:21.480 --> 0:49:25.000
<v Speaker 1>don't have to forgive them right at all, and that

0:49:25.080 --> 0:49:29.560
<v Speaker 1>there's this this whole almost kind of not culty but

0:49:30.200 --> 0:49:34.400
<v Speaker 1>really kind of dogmatic idea that if you don't follow

0:49:34.480 --> 0:49:38.080
<v Speaker 1>these steps and you don't like, genuinely fully forgive somebody,

0:49:38.360 --> 0:49:41.000
<v Speaker 1>you really haven't worked out of the process. There's something

0:49:41.040 --> 0:49:44.160
<v Speaker 1>wrong with you. Maybe you're an unforgiving person and that

0:49:44.239 --> 0:49:48.680
<v Speaker 1>makes you tacky. That's what psychologists call it. And there's

0:49:48.719 --> 0:49:51.000
<v Speaker 1>a whole group of psychologists say no, no, no, there's

0:49:51.200 --> 0:49:53.839
<v Speaker 1>there's way more to this process than just you know,

0:49:54.120 --> 0:49:57.799
<v Speaker 1>nine steps or the reach method like there, there's it's

0:49:57.960 --> 0:50:01.560
<v Speaker 1>more nuanced than that, and that you can be a

0:50:01.840 --> 0:50:06.200
<v Speaker 1>fully functioning, emotionally developed person who says, you know what,

0:50:06.440 --> 0:50:09.360
<v Speaker 1>I don't forgive you, I may never forgive you. But

0:50:09.440 --> 0:50:12.279
<v Speaker 1>I'm still going on with my life, right, And if

0:50:12.320 --> 0:50:15.800
<v Speaker 1>the point of forgiveness is to achieve peace in yourself,

0:50:16.000 --> 0:50:19.000
<v Speaker 1>If you can achieve peace in yourself and you do

0:50:19.120 --> 0:50:22.360
<v Speaker 1>it without forgiving somebody because you don't want to forgive

0:50:22.360 --> 0:50:24.839
<v Speaker 1>them or you don't feel like you should forgive them,

0:50:25.120 --> 0:50:28.680
<v Speaker 1>then that's okay too. As long as you're getting inner peace,

0:50:28.760 --> 0:50:29.440
<v Speaker 1>that's the point.

0:50:29.960 --> 0:50:32.200
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, And there is a school of thoughts saying that

0:50:33.000 --> 0:50:37.280
<v Speaker 2>in cases where like it's a harm has been committed

0:50:37.320 --> 0:50:41.000
<v Speaker 2>to you that could happen again, you may be more

0:50:41.160 --> 0:50:44.480
<v Speaker 2>likely to have that harm committed to you again if

0:50:44.520 --> 0:50:47.880
<v Speaker 2>you do forgive too much. Yeah, there is research about

0:50:48.320 --> 0:50:51.359
<v Speaker 2>spousal abuse that when you are too or when you're

0:50:51.400 --> 0:50:54.799
<v Speaker 2>quick to forgive the abuser, then you are victimized more

0:50:54.840 --> 0:50:59.160
<v Speaker 2>regularly than spouse's who aren't as forgiving, And that's based

0:50:59.200 --> 0:51:02.719
<v Speaker 2>on operant learning. Basically, you're less likely to engage in

0:51:02.719 --> 0:51:06.480
<v Speaker 2>a behavior that has a negative consequence. So they've done

0:51:06.520 --> 0:51:11.640
<v Speaker 2>plenty of research on that, and a lot of psychologists say, like, yeah,

0:51:11.719 --> 0:51:14.839
<v Speaker 2>forgiveness is great, but while you shouldn't be bitter, there

0:51:14.840 --> 0:51:16.560
<v Speaker 2>are a lot of times when you should not forgive

0:51:16.560 --> 0:51:19.080
<v Speaker 2>somebody and that's okay, Yeah.

0:51:18.880 --> 0:51:22.600
<v Speaker 1>There's a whole There's an article from nineteen ninety nine

0:51:22.800 --> 0:51:26.319
<v Speaker 1>on Psychology Today called Must We Forgive? And it is

0:51:26.440 --> 0:51:30.600
<v Speaker 1>really interesting. It's fascinating that this psychologist writes about probably

0:51:30.800 --> 0:51:33.400
<v Speaker 1>half a dozen or more people and they're different individual

0:51:33.440 --> 0:51:37.480
<v Speaker 1>circumstances and the reasons they chose not to forgive, and

0:51:38.000 --> 0:51:41.480
<v Speaker 1>she kind of pigeonholes them into like three general categories,

0:51:41.520 --> 0:51:45.200
<v Speaker 1>but because psychologists love doing that. But it's a really

0:51:45.239 --> 0:51:48.360
<v Speaker 1>compelling article and it's definitely worth reading, and it provides

0:51:48.400 --> 0:51:51.120
<v Speaker 1>this kind of alternative idea that like, no, there's definitely

0:51:51.160 --> 0:51:54.920
<v Speaker 1>situations where some people don't deserve your forgiveness. One of

0:51:54.920 --> 0:51:58.920
<v Speaker 1>the chief among them is if you say, like a

0:51:58.960 --> 0:52:02.080
<v Speaker 1>sibling or a family member of some sort you have

0:52:02.200 --> 0:52:05.200
<v Speaker 1>a like some sort of falling out with or they've

0:52:05.239 --> 0:52:08.160
<v Speaker 1>wronged you, and you choose not to forgive them. You

0:52:08.239 --> 0:52:11.080
<v Speaker 1>might feel tremendous pressure from the rest of your family

0:52:11.280 --> 0:52:13.680
<v Speaker 1>to just go ahead and forgive them. That's a terrible

0:52:13.719 --> 0:52:16.040
<v Speaker 1>reason to forgive somebody. And if you do forgive them

0:52:16.160 --> 0:52:19.799
<v Speaker 1>under those circumstances, or say because your religion decrees it,

0:52:20.920 --> 0:52:24.160
<v Speaker 1>you're like, that's not full forgiveness, and it may actually

0:52:24.239 --> 0:52:29.279
<v Speaker 1>harm you because you may suffer from a distorted self

0:52:29.320 --> 0:52:33.719
<v Speaker 1>image or lowered self respect because you basically went back

0:52:33.719 --> 0:52:36.240
<v Speaker 1>to this person who not only wronged you in the past,

0:52:36.480 --> 0:52:39.000
<v Speaker 1>is unrepentant about it, but it's just going to continue

0:52:39.040 --> 0:52:42.799
<v Speaker 1>the behavior again in the future. So there's definitely instances

0:52:42.840 --> 0:52:47.160
<v Speaker 1>that where you probably shouldn't forgive, But that doesn't mean

0:52:47.160 --> 0:52:50.279
<v Speaker 1>that you should be stuck in resentment and anger and

0:52:50.360 --> 0:52:53.200
<v Speaker 1>letting that person have power over your life. You might

0:52:53.280 --> 0:52:56.479
<v Speaker 1>just need to move on without them and without forgiving them,

0:52:56.680 --> 0:52:58.680
<v Speaker 1>and you can make that work as well.

0:52:59.120 --> 0:53:01.960
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I mean, there was one terrible story that you

0:53:02.000 --> 0:53:04.759
<v Speaker 2>said about the woman who as a child had this

0:53:04.920 --> 0:53:08.040
<v Speaker 2>terribly bullying and abusive older brother.

0:53:08.920 --> 0:53:09.880
<v Speaker 1>And we won't even.

0:53:09.760 --> 0:53:12.040
<v Speaker 2>Talk about the awful things this guy did, but the

0:53:12.120 --> 0:53:15.880
<v Speaker 2>parents were really always pushing like, oh, he just doesn't

0:53:16.160 --> 0:53:17.600
<v Speaker 2>he doesn't know how to say he loves you, he

0:53:17.600 --> 0:53:19.000
<v Speaker 2>doesn't know how to talk to you, so he does

0:53:19.040 --> 0:53:21.120
<v Speaker 2>these things and you really need to forgive him. And

0:53:21.680 --> 0:53:25.400
<v Speaker 2>that's just that's bonkers. You know, that is a situation

0:53:25.480 --> 0:53:28.040
<v Speaker 2>where you were doing such great harm as a parent

0:53:28.520 --> 0:53:32.680
<v Speaker 2>to teach your daughter to accept this kind of behavior.

0:53:33.400 --> 0:53:35.239
<v Speaker 2>And not only accept it but forgive it. It's like

0:53:35.440 --> 0:53:39.120
<v Speaker 2>just setting her up for unless she really therapies through

0:53:39.160 --> 0:53:42.160
<v Speaker 2>that stuff later in life of just a series of

0:53:42.280 --> 0:53:47.719
<v Speaker 2>terrible relationships. So exactly, yes, yes he can't. Forgiveness isn't

0:53:47.760 --> 0:53:52.759
<v Speaker 2>always the thing. I have a friend who had a

0:53:54.040 --> 0:53:56.600
<v Speaker 2>terrible thing happened to him when he was younger, and

0:53:57.120 --> 0:53:59.000
<v Speaker 2>we talked a lot about this, and he has forgiven

0:53:59.040 --> 0:54:03.000
<v Speaker 2>that person in his heart and I was like, well,

0:54:03.040 --> 0:54:05.759
<v Speaker 2>I haven't, and it's like I'm still angry about it.

0:54:06.120 --> 0:54:10.480
<v Speaker 2>And he was like thanks, Like that helps, Like I'm

0:54:10.600 --> 0:54:13.440
<v Speaker 2>angry and have not forgiven on his behalf. And I

0:54:13.480 --> 0:54:15.040
<v Speaker 2>thought he was going to say like, no, man, you

0:54:15.080 --> 0:54:16.799
<v Speaker 2>need to do the same, and he was like brother,

0:54:17.040 --> 0:54:20.279
<v Speaker 2>he was like thank you man, Yeah, I appreciate that.

0:54:21.080 --> 0:54:23.960
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. And I think that's another thing worth pointing out too,

0:54:24.000 --> 0:54:27.320
<v Speaker 1>is we have this concept of people who forgive others

0:54:27.360 --> 0:54:31.560
<v Speaker 1>being saintly. Yeah, And it's not necessarily that kind of

0:54:31.560 --> 0:54:33.760
<v Speaker 1>a thing. It's not necessarily that kind of a process.

0:54:34.120 --> 0:54:37.560
<v Speaker 1>Sometimes it is just straight up self preservation. Like you are,

0:54:37.880 --> 0:54:40.640
<v Speaker 1>that's the way that you're going to get to a

0:54:40.719 --> 0:54:42.760
<v Speaker 1>point where you can feel peace again in your life

0:54:42.760 --> 0:54:44.759
<v Speaker 1>and That doesn't mean you're a saint, or you're even

0:54:44.760 --> 0:54:47.560
<v Speaker 1>feeling saintly or you're conducting yourself in a saintly manner,

0:54:47.719 --> 0:54:49.960
<v Speaker 1>And that doesn't matter as long as you're feeling inner

0:54:50.000 --> 0:54:52.440
<v Speaker 1>peace in your life is no longer turmoil and this

0:54:52.520 --> 0:54:55.160
<v Speaker 1>person who wronged you doesn't have power over you any longer.

0:54:55.360 --> 0:54:56.879
<v Speaker 1>That's the point of forgiveness.

0:54:57.040 --> 0:54:59.200
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, And that was totally the deal in his case,

0:54:59.239 --> 0:55:02.600
<v Speaker 2>is that was his only way forward to healing himself.

0:55:03.360 --> 0:55:06.040
<v Speaker 2>But since this wasn't something that happened to me, I

0:55:06.160 --> 0:55:10.120
<v Speaker 2>was able to not forgive and remain upset about it,

0:55:10.160 --> 0:55:12.319
<v Speaker 2>and he was okay with that.

0:55:12.880 --> 0:55:15.160
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, And still to this day, you won't buy that

0:55:15.200 --> 0:55:20.600
<v Speaker 1>guy of beers Man. So there's one other thing that

0:55:20.719 --> 0:55:23.000
<v Speaker 1>has started to kind of come out of the shadows

0:55:23.040 --> 0:55:25.600
<v Speaker 1>that's just getting picked up by psychology as far as

0:55:25.600 --> 0:55:28.480
<v Speaker 1>forgiveness goes in it's self forgiveness, And we don't really

0:55:28.520 --> 0:55:30.239
<v Speaker 1>have room to talk about that here, but it's worth

0:55:30.239 --> 0:55:33.719
<v Speaker 1>exploring sometime maybe in short stuff. Yeah, that's a big deal.

0:55:34.440 --> 0:55:36.920
<v Speaker 2>Just a lot of times when I'm beating up on myself,

0:55:36.960 --> 0:55:39.320
<v Speaker 2>Emily says, you need to be nicer to my friend.

0:55:40.040 --> 0:55:42.200
<v Speaker 1>Oh, I know, you've told that before. I was just

0:55:42.200 --> 0:55:44.520
<v Speaker 1>in one of the sweetest things I've ever heard. What

0:55:44.600 --> 0:55:48.520
<v Speaker 1>a kind thing to say. It works. You know who

0:55:48.680 --> 0:55:54.359
<v Speaker 1>needs to hear that? Don Henley, You got anything else

0:55:54.400 --> 0:55:57.239
<v Speaker 1>on forgiveness? Yeah, nothing else. This is a good way

0:55:57.239 --> 0:56:00.279
<v Speaker 1>to eat philosophical discussion. I like these, agreed. Thanks a

0:56:00.320 --> 0:56:02.560
<v Speaker 1>lot to Dave Bruce for helping us out with this one.

0:56:03.120 --> 0:56:06.880
<v Speaker 1>And if you want to know more about forgiveness, you

0:56:06.920 --> 0:56:09.600
<v Speaker 1>should seriously go out and do some reading, especially if

0:56:09.680 --> 0:56:12.520
<v Speaker 1>you have something to forgive. It's not something you necessarily

0:56:12.760 --> 0:56:16.799
<v Speaker 1>can understand just instinctively. It helps to see what the

0:56:16.840 --> 0:56:19.960
<v Speaker 1>experts say. So maybe go explore that and free yourself.

0:56:20.440 --> 0:56:22.520
<v Speaker 1>Since I said free yourself, that of course means it's

0:56:22.520 --> 0:56:23.439
<v Speaker 1>time for listener maw.

0:56:25.960 --> 0:56:28.040
<v Speaker 2>I'm gonna call this dental art. Hey, guys, been a

0:56:28.040 --> 0:56:32.120
<v Speaker 2>listener for a while. I've nearly finished with the sandwiching method.

0:56:32.600 --> 0:56:36.480
<v Speaker 2>Before I knew it was even cool, we were talking

0:56:36.480 --> 0:56:38.439
<v Speaker 2>a few shows. You were talking a few shows back

0:56:38.480 --> 0:56:42.480
<v Speaker 2>before the holidays about putting a kidney stone and Chuck's

0:56:42.800 --> 0:56:46.160
<v Speaker 2>replacement tooth. This would be unusual, but people actually get

0:56:46.200 --> 0:56:49.040
<v Speaker 2>custom in lays and artwork made for their crowns inlayser

0:56:49.160 --> 0:56:52.120
<v Speaker 2>generally gold or gymstone with a custom artwork, and it's

0:56:52.160 --> 0:56:54.920
<v Speaker 2>referred to as a tooth tattoo, which is hand painted

0:56:54.960 --> 0:56:57.400
<v Speaker 2>onto the crown before it gets a final clot of glaze.

0:56:58.120 --> 0:57:00.720
<v Speaker 2>The most common request here in the Chicago Land area

0:57:01.040 --> 0:57:02.320
<v Speaker 2>are sports logos.

0:57:02.800 --> 0:57:05.400
<v Speaker 1>Oh no, like a little Chicago Cubs logo.

0:57:05.560 --> 0:57:09.640
<v Speaker 2>Too, But I've seen names, company logos, even a tiny

0:57:09.719 --> 0:57:12.799
<v Speaker 2>version of Starry Night on a tooth. While a lot

0:57:12.840 --> 0:57:15.960
<v Speaker 2>of modern crown in Bridge manufacturing has gone digital, highly

0:57:16.040 --> 0:57:19.600
<v Speaker 2>leveraging cam, A, CAD and three D printing for most restorations,

0:57:19.960 --> 0:57:23.640
<v Speaker 2>tooth tattoos are unique manifestation of the relatively unknown artistry

0:57:23.640 --> 0:57:25.360
<v Speaker 2>of a subset of dental technicians.

0:57:25.680 --> 0:57:26.160
<v Speaker 1>Wow.

0:57:26.400 --> 0:57:28.320
<v Speaker 2>While I recognize the dentistry as a whole as widely

0:57:28.360 --> 0:57:31.000
<v Speaker 2>disliked and a pain to endure, I appreciate you guys

0:57:31.040 --> 0:57:36.240
<v Speaker 2>probably unknowingly helped to destigmatize restorative dental work by openly

0:57:36.280 --> 0:57:39.160
<v Speaker 2>talking about your dealings with it. Toothware and decay is

0:57:39.200 --> 0:57:42.280
<v Speaker 2>part of the human condition. No need for shame. After all,

0:57:42.360 --> 0:57:45.760
<v Speaker 2>we will keep me and my CADRA employed and happily

0:57:45.760 --> 0:57:48.880
<v Speaker 2>listening to stuff you should know. Many regards that is

0:57:48.880 --> 0:57:52.960
<v Speaker 2>from Eric Crowley or Crowley probably Crowley.

0:57:53.280 --> 0:57:56.760
<v Speaker 1>I'm going with Crowley in park Ridge, Illinois. Very nice.

0:57:56.760 --> 0:57:59.520
<v Speaker 1>Thanks a lot, Eric, that's awesome. Can you imagine seeing

0:57:59.600 --> 0:58:02.400
<v Speaker 1>Starry Night on a tooth? I gotta look that up. Wonderful.

0:58:02.440 --> 0:58:05.560
<v Speaker 1>I'd have this scream that's a good one, and then

0:58:05.600 --> 0:58:08.640
<v Speaker 1>you could scream whenever you reveal it too. Yeah, just

0:58:08.640 --> 0:58:12.000
<v Speaker 1>freak people out. And speaking of sports teams, Chuck, I

0:58:12.000 --> 0:58:14.840
<v Speaker 1>feel like we should congratulate our Georgia Bulldogs for winning

0:58:14.880 --> 0:58:16.280
<v Speaker 1>the national championship.

0:58:16.720 --> 0:58:20.360
<v Speaker 2>Yes, never thought I would see the day. What a great,

0:58:20.480 --> 0:58:26.480
<v Speaker 2>great game, Just unbelievable feeling. Two championships in three months

0:58:26.520 --> 0:58:28.880
<v Speaker 2>for this long suffering Atlanta slash Georgia van.

0:58:29.200 --> 0:58:30.280
<v Speaker 1>I know, it's amazing.

0:58:30.880 --> 0:58:32.920
<v Speaker 2>I don't even know how to reconcile these feelings that

0:58:32.960 --> 0:58:33.920
<v Speaker 2>I'm having lately.

0:58:34.280 --> 0:58:37.200
<v Speaker 1>And they'll be robbed from you next year. Don't worry.

0:58:37.240 --> 0:58:39.400
<v Speaker 1>I'll show her back to normal. But that is pretty

0:58:39.440 --> 0:58:41.960
<v Speaker 1>great to go out on a highlight. Probably that was great.

0:58:42.000 --> 0:58:45.080
<v Speaker 1>Go dogs, Go dogs, indeed. And if you want to

0:58:45.080 --> 0:58:47.880
<v Speaker 1>get in touch with Chuck and I and Jerry or

0:58:47.920 --> 0:58:51.320
<v Speaker 1>Frank the Chair or Harry dogg even we can probably

0:58:51.320 --> 0:58:54.520
<v Speaker 1>pass along emails you send. You can wrap your emails up,

0:58:54.560 --> 0:58:56.200
<v Speaker 1>spank them on the bottom, and send them off to

0:58:56.320 --> 0:59:02.640
<v Speaker 1>stuff podcast at iHeartRadio dot com. Stuff you Should Know

0:59:02.720 --> 0:59:06.280
<v Speaker 1>is a production of iHeartRadio. For more podcasts myheart Radio,

0:59:06.480 --> 0:59:09.920
<v Speaker 1>visit the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you listen

0:59:09.960 --> 0:59:10.960
<v Speaker 1>to your favorite shows.