WEBVTT - S4: EP 4 — Shock to the Conscience

0:00:00.560 --> 0:00:03.680
<v Speaker 1>Hey guys. Before we get into the episode, a quick note.

0:00:03.760 --> 0:00:06.360
<v Speaker 1>We're looking for news stories of betrayal for our weekly

0:00:06.400 --> 0:00:10.840
<v Speaker 1>Betrayal series, which returns in August. If you've experienced betrayal

0:00:10.880 --> 0:00:13.680
<v Speaker 1>and feel ready to share your story, now is a

0:00:13.680 --> 0:00:16.959
<v Speaker 1>great time to reach out. Email us at Betrayal Pod

0:00:17.040 --> 0:00:24.680
<v Speaker 1>at gmail dot com. That's Betrayal Pod at gmail dot com.

0:00:24.880 --> 0:00:27.960
<v Speaker 2>She starts screaming and yelling at us, and we just

0:00:28.000 --> 0:00:30.840
<v Speaker 2>got up and started to walk away, and then as

0:00:30.840 --> 0:00:33.559
<v Speaker 2>we were walking out of their house, she's fallen behind us,

0:00:33.600 --> 0:00:36.720
<v Speaker 2>and then she says, I'm going to ruin.

0:00:36.640 --> 0:00:37.519
<v Speaker 3>Your fucking lives.

0:00:53.880 --> 0:00:57.560
<v Speaker 1>I'm Andrea Gunning and this is Betrayal, Season four, Episode four,

0:00:58.360 --> 0:01:07.480
<v Speaker 1>Shock to the Conscience. In our last episode, we saw

0:01:07.560 --> 0:01:11.399
<v Speaker 1>Joel Kern's double life, a side by side comparison of

0:01:11.480 --> 0:01:15.720
<v Speaker 1>two different realities, but those two realities were on a

0:01:15.760 --> 0:01:20.240
<v Speaker 1>collision course because Joel's reckoning day at the Colorado Springs

0:01:20.240 --> 0:01:25.839
<v Speaker 1>Police Department was rapidly approaching. This was the day he'd

0:01:25.840 --> 0:01:28.959
<v Speaker 1>be forced to answer for his lies, and this time

0:01:29.040 --> 0:01:32.520
<v Speaker 1>it wouldn't be Caroline who was left in disbelief. It

0:01:32.520 --> 0:01:37.000
<v Speaker 1>would be Joel's coworkers, officers he'd worked closely with for

0:01:37.120 --> 0:01:41.920
<v Speaker 1>over two decades men. He graduated from the police academy

0:01:41.959 --> 0:01:48.000
<v Speaker 1>with men who'd been close friends and mentors. In March

0:01:48.080 --> 0:01:51.680
<v Speaker 1>twenty twenty two, Joel was under investigation at the CSPD

0:01:52.280 --> 0:01:55.280
<v Speaker 1>because a couple came in to file a complaint against him.

0:01:55.880 --> 0:01:58.360
<v Speaker 1>The wife confessed to having sex with Joel in his

0:01:58.400 --> 0:02:02.360
<v Speaker 1>police car. He was making amends for her actions, and

0:02:02.400 --> 0:02:04.920
<v Speaker 1>part of that was alerting the department that one of

0:02:04.960 --> 0:02:09.200
<v Speaker 1>their officers was up to no good. So the department

0:02:09.280 --> 0:02:13.799
<v Speaker 1>launched an internal investigation and dug into the claims. Then

0:02:13.840 --> 0:02:17.799
<v Speaker 1>they called Joel in for his official interview with internal Affairs.

0:02:18.320 --> 0:02:21.880
<v Speaker 1>He was even able to bring an attorney. His future

0:02:22.000 --> 0:02:26.040
<v Speaker 1>hinged on what happened in this meeting. We've got it

0:02:26.080 --> 0:02:30.480
<v Speaker 1>all on tape and we want you to hear it.

0:02:30.639 --> 0:02:34.280
<v Speaker 4>Good to see you again. It's been a while, okay, Joe,

0:02:35.680 --> 0:02:37.760
<v Speaker 4>being in the form you've been up be here, so

0:02:37.760 --> 0:02:38.720
<v Speaker 4>I'll let you read that.

0:02:40.120 --> 0:02:43.440
<v Speaker 1>They start the interview by having Joel sign a garrity advisement.

0:02:44.400 --> 0:02:48.959
<v Speaker 1>It's an acknowledgment that he's under investigation, it explains the process,

0:02:49.320 --> 0:02:54.200
<v Speaker 1>and most importantly, it requires him to answer truthfully. After

0:02:54.240 --> 0:02:58.200
<v Speaker 1>he signs this document. A lie could mean termination.

0:02:58.160 --> 0:03:02.639
<v Speaker 4>Sir, Okay, we'll get started. It's Lieutenan ron Field Chancellor

0:03:02.639 --> 0:03:06.160
<v Speaker 4>with the Coloria Springs Police Department Internal Affairs Section. Today's Monday,

0:03:06.160 --> 0:03:09.000
<v Speaker 4>March twenty first, twenty twenty two. I'm an interviewing on

0:03:09.040 --> 0:03:12.040
<v Speaker 4>Lieutenant Joel Kern in regards to Internal Affairs case twenty two.

0:03:12.040 --> 0:03:16.560
<v Speaker 4>That's zero two three. Also present are Lieutenant James Sokolick

0:03:16.800 --> 0:03:21.400
<v Speaker 4>and Lieutenant Kern's attorney, Joan John Newson. Joel, I know

0:03:21.440 --> 0:03:23.680
<v Speaker 4>you were a peer, so before going on the record

0:03:24.160 --> 0:03:27.600
<v Speaker 4>where you provided a tight garrity advicetment, I was did

0:03:27.639 --> 0:03:28.799
<v Speaker 4>you signed up voluntarily?

0:03:29.000 --> 0:03:29.320
<v Speaker 3>Yes?

0:03:29.520 --> 0:03:31.680
<v Speaker 4>Do you have any questions regarding the garrity advicement?

0:03:31.880 --> 0:03:32.760
<v Speaker 3>No? Okay.

0:03:33.480 --> 0:03:35.760
<v Speaker 4>Will you be answering all of our questions concerning this

0:03:35.840 --> 0:03:37.600
<v Speaker 4>matter truthfully today?

0:03:37.680 --> 0:03:38.000
<v Speaker 3>Yes?

0:03:39.400 --> 0:03:42.880
<v Speaker 1>You may remember in episode two, Joel's boss, Commander Strawsner,

0:03:43.040 --> 0:03:47.000
<v Speaker 1>reported a conversation he had with Joel where Joel denied

0:03:47.040 --> 0:03:50.200
<v Speaker 1>knowing the couple and was worried that someone was impersonating

0:03:50.240 --> 0:03:56.480
<v Speaker 1>him or filing a false complaint. Strawsner believed him.

0:03:56.720 --> 0:03:59.400
<v Speaker 4>This is now under garrity. This is your opportunity to

0:04:00.120 --> 0:04:02.160
<v Speaker 4>just let us know what happened. I don't want you

0:04:02.200 --> 0:04:04.760
<v Speaker 4>to feel tied to whatever you said to Strustner. Anything

0:04:04.800 --> 0:04:09.080
<v Speaker 4>that was said there is that good? Is that? Bear?

0:04:10.680 --> 0:04:12.080
<v Speaker 3>I'll tell you exactly what I told you.

0:04:12.920 --> 0:04:17.640
<v Speaker 4>Okay, tell us why do you think those allegations against

0:04:17.640 --> 0:04:18.920
<v Speaker 4>you were brought forward?

0:04:20.400 --> 0:04:25.080
<v Speaker 2>I don't know why specifically these allegations were made, but

0:04:26.520 --> 0:04:33.279
<v Speaker 2>I have some ideas. I think maybe the the persons

0:04:33.320 --> 0:04:36.919
<v Speaker 2>making allegations got in over their head or something, and

0:04:37.080 --> 0:04:42.480
<v Speaker 2>I suspect that they're catfished me in whatever communication they

0:04:42.480 --> 0:04:42.919
<v Speaker 2>were having.

0:04:44.600 --> 0:04:48.039
<v Speaker 1>But before they got into that, Chancel wanted to focus

0:04:48.120 --> 0:04:53.080
<v Speaker 1>on the incident at Joel's house the day a stranger

0:04:53.080 --> 0:04:56.000
<v Speaker 1>showed up accusing Joel of having sex with his wife

0:04:56.040 --> 0:04:57.800
<v Speaker 1>and his police cruisers.

0:04:57.839 --> 0:04:59.359
<v Speaker 4>My wife out there, the one that you thought in

0:04:59.400 --> 0:05:01.880
<v Speaker 4>your cruiser? What are you talking about that?

0:05:02.120 --> 0:05:04.920
<v Speaker 1>Joel wasn't aware that the man had secretly recorded the

0:05:05.080 --> 0:05:09.320
<v Speaker 1>entire encounter, and Joel didn't know that the man gave

0:05:09.360 --> 0:05:13.960
<v Speaker 1>the recording to the CSPD. Chanza gave Joel an opportunity

0:05:14.040 --> 0:05:17.479
<v Speaker 1>to recount what happened from his point of view, I

0:05:17.520 --> 0:05:17.800
<v Speaker 1>was just.

0:05:17.760 --> 0:05:20.560
<v Speaker 2>In shocked that someone was standing there saying this to me.

0:05:21.960 --> 0:05:25.000
<v Speaker 2>So I said, I don't know who you are, but

0:05:25.080 --> 0:05:27.760
<v Speaker 2>I'm not fucking your wife or anybody else's wife.

0:05:28.560 --> 0:05:31.440
<v Speaker 3>And he.

0:05:32.880 --> 0:05:36.279
<v Speaker 2>Looked at me again and then he said, well, I

0:05:36.320 --> 0:05:39.000
<v Speaker 2>don't even really know if it's you, and if it's

0:05:39.000 --> 0:05:43.320
<v Speaker 2>not you, I'm really sorry. And I took pause for

0:05:43.360 --> 0:05:47.400
<v Speaker 2>a second because I'm like, you're coming to my house

0:05:48.200 --> 0:05:50.880
<v Speaker 2>banging on my front door, and then you dropped this

0:05:51.040 --> 0:05:54.479
<v Speaker 2>bomb on my household, and then you're going to say

0:05:54.480 --> 0:05:58.039
<v Speaker 2>that you don't even know if it's me. So I said,

0:05:58.320 --> 0:06:02.080
<v Speaker 2>you need to get the fuck off my property. I

0:06:02.120 --> 0:06:04.039
<v Speaker 2>walked onto the sidewalks so I could look in the

0:06:04.080 --> 0:06:07.120
<v Speaker 2>car just to see who this is. And when I

0:06:07.160 --> 0:06:10.479
<v Speaker 2>saw the person, I didn't recognize them at all. And

0:06:10.520 --> 0:06:15.560
<v Speaker 2>then she gets out of the car and then like

0:06:15.640 --> 0:06:18.080
<v Speaker 2>she's staring at me, and then she has these huge,

0:06:19.160 --> 0:06:22.360
<v Speaker 2>huge sunglasses on, like so huge I couldn't even see

0:06:22.360 --> 0:06:25.600
<v Speaker 2>her face really, but they weren't like total blackout, and

0:06:25.640 --> 0:06:28.400
<v Speaker 2>I could see through the sunglasses that looked like she

0:06:28.440 --> 0:06:31.520
<v Speaker 2>had like two black eyes, and she's crying.

0:06:32.520 --> 0:06:35.240
<v Speaker 1>It seemed like Joel, in an effort to deflect the

0:06:35.320 --> 0:06:39.600
<v Speaker 1>attention off of his own actions, was slightly suggesting this

0:06:39.680 --> 0:06:40.960
<v Speaker 1>man was beating his wife.

0:06:42.480 --> 0:06:47.440
<v Speaker 2>And then this guy slams the back of their car

0:06:48.080 --> 0:06:51.920
<v Speaker 2>and says, is that him like screaming at her? And

0:06:52.000 --> 0:06:57.479
<v Speaker 2>she startles and she starts to cry even more, and

0:06:57.520 --> 0:07:00.280
<v Speaker 2>then she shakes her head yes, and then gets right

0:07:00.320 --> 0:07:05.240
<v Speaker 2>back into the car. And then he said, well, the

0:07:05.320 --> 0:07:10.280
<v Speaker 2>least that you can do is apologize for ruining my family.

0:07:11.480 --> 0:07:13.960
<v Speaker 2>And then so I started walking away and I said,

0:07:14.040 --> 0:07:16.680
<v Speaker 2>I have nothing to apologize for because I don't know you,

0:07:16.800 --> 0:07:19.000
<v Speaker 2>I don't know your wife. I'm not fucking your wife.

0:07:19.600 --> 0:07:22.200
<v Speaker 2>I'm not fucking anybody else. And then I just started

0:07:22.200 --> 0:07:25.760
<v Speaker 2>to walk back in my house and then they drove

0:07:25.800 --> 0:07:26.560
<v Speaker 2>away eventually.

0:07:28.600 --> 0:07:31.360
<v Speaker 4>Okay, so you have never seen either one of them.

0:07:31.640 --> 0:07:39.320
<v Speaker 4>No going back to catfishing. You made a comment about

0:07:39.320 --> 0:07:42.640
<v Speaker 4>that at the beginning when we opened up. What does

0:07:42.640 --> 0:07:46.040
<v Speaker 4>that have to do with them coming to your front door?

0:07:50.120 --> 0:07:54.480
<v Speaker 2>And like two years ago there was a essentially like

0:07:54.520 --> 0:07:59.920
<v Speaker 2>a breakup of friendships with like four different couples.

0:08:00.640 --> 0:08:03.560
<v Speaker 1>It seemed like Joel had come prepared with a backstory.

0:08:04.200 --> 0:08:06.520
<v Speaker 1>He says it all started at a dinner party that

0:08:06.600 --> 0:08:09.520
<v Speaker 1>he and Caroline attended. It was with a group of

0:08:09.560 --> 0:08:13.640
<v Speaker 1>couples an argument broke out. The couple hosting got into

0:08:13.680 --> 0:08:18.160
<v Speaker 1>it with Caroline and Joel. The wife in particular was enraged,

0:08:18.520 --> 0:08:18.880
<v Speaker 1>so she.

0:08:18.880 --> 0:08:21.960
<v Speaker 2>Starts screaming and yelling at us, and we just got

0:08:22.040 --> 0:08:24.800
<v Speaker 2>up and started to walk away, and then as we

0:08:24.800 --> 0:08:27.400
<v Speaker 2>were walking out of their house, she's fallen behind us,

0:08:27.440 --> 0:08:30.840
<v Speaker 2>and then she says, I'm going to ruin your fucking lives.

0:08:31.600 --> 0:08:35.760
<v Speaker 1>The story was over the top ridiculous. Even then it

0:08:35.800 --> 0:08:39.480
<v Speaker 1>got even stranger, Joel said. Another woman got pulled into

0:08:39.520 --> 0:08:42.720
<v Speaker 1>the conflict, and the two women teamed up to take

0:08:42.760 --> 0:08:43.760
<v Speaker 1>down the Kerns.

0:08:44.200 --> 0:08:46.920
<v Speaker 2>There was another couple who was friends with this lady

0:08:46.920 --> 0:08:49.400
<v Speaker 2>that said that she's gonna fucking.

0:08:49.160 --> 0:08:51.040
<v Speaker 3>Ruin my life or ruin our lives.

0:08:52.000 --> 0:08:54.360
<v Speaker 2>And she, when we were all friends, used to brag

0:08:54.400 --> 0:09:00.079
<v Speaker 2>about how she would make fake social media accounts and

0:09:00.080 --> 0:09:04.839
<v Speaker 2>then converse with people using the fake account. Her idea

0:09:04.840 --> 0:09:08.520
<v Speaker 2>of fun was to impersonate a friend of a person

0:09:08.520 --> 0:09:12.160
<v Speaker 2>that they already have on Facebook, and then she would

0:09:12.200 --> 0:09:15.040
<v Speaker 2>start conversing with him on the instant messaging.

0:09:15.679 --> 0:09:19.240
<v Speaker 1>Chanza asked more questions about the women Joel believed targeted

0:09:19.280 --> 0:09:22.400
<v Speaker 1>his family, but eventually they got to the heart of

0:09:22.440 --> 0:09:22.839
<v Speaker 1>the matter.

0:09:24.080 --> 0:09:26.480
<v Speaker 4>Have you ever had any kind of sexual contact insite

0:09:26.480 --> 0:09:28.040
<v Speaker 4>your city, a scign take on vehicle?

0:09:28.240 --> 0:09:28.320
<v Speaker 3>No?

0:09:29.200 --> 0:09:31.960
<v Speaker 4>Have you ever had any sexual contact with anyone while

0:09:31.960 --> 0:09:37.760
<v Speaker 4>on duty? No? Okay, so the allegations that are being

0:09:37.840 --> 0:09:40.640
<v Speaker 4>brought against you are absolutely not true.

0:09:40.840 --> 0:09:40.880
<v Speaker 5>No.

0:09:42.480 --> 0:09:46.160
<v Speaker 1>Chanza then showed Joel a photograph of a woman. It

0:09:46.240 --> 0:09:49.360
<v Speaker 1>was not the woman who filed the complaint, it was

0:09:49.400 --> 0:09:50.000
<v Speaker 1>someone else.

0:09:50.720 --> 0:09:51.880
<v Speaker 4>Have you ever met this lady?

0:09:52.400 --> 0:09:53.360
<v Speaker 3>No?

0:09:53.360 --> 0:09:58.120
<v Speaker 4>No. Have you ever uploaded WhatsApp on your work cell

0:09:58.120 --> 0:09:58.679
<v Speaker 4>phone number?

0:09:58.800 --> 0:09:58.839
<v Speaker 5>No?

0:10:01.120 --> 0:10:04.400
<v Speaker 4>Obviously you're aware we took your phone, and, as you

0:10:04.440 --> 0:10:09.920
<v Speaker 4>may imagine, we dumped your laptop. What if I were

0:10:09.960 --> 0:10:12.959
<v Speaker 4>to tell you that you did communicate with someone directing

0:10:13.000 --> 0:10:13.880
<v Speaker 4>them to go to WhatsApp?

0:10:15.720 --> 0:10:27.079
<v Speaker 6>With that, refresher memory?

0:10:37.720 --> 0:10:41.960
<v Speaker 1>Lieutenant Chanza began to lay out the evidence they collected. Immediately,

0:10:42.200 --> 0:10:47.439
<v Speaker 1>Joel's tone shifted, so did his story. These guys worked

0:10:47.440 --> 0:10:50.679
<v Speaker 1>with Joel for years. This was the last situation they

0:10:50.720 --> 0:10:51.560
<v Speaker 1>wanted to be in.

0:10:52.040 --> 0:10:55.320
<v Speaker 4>Obviously, you're aware we took your phone, and, as you

0:10:55.400 --> 0:11:00.839
<v Speaker 4>may imagine, we dumped your flaptop. What if I were

0:11:00.880 --> 0:11:03.920
<v Speaker 4>to tell you that you did communicate with someone directing

0:11:03.920 --> 0:11:04.840
<v Speaker 4>them to go to WhatsApp?

0:11:05.520 --> 0:11:07.720
<v Speaker 6>With that, refresh your memory?

0:11:08.400 --> 0:11:08.480
<v Speaker 7>Now?

0:11:08.520 --> 0:11:13.120
<v Speaker 3>I don't remember in what context you said that her names?

0:11:13.160 --> 0:11:18.800
<v Speaker 4>What would to help you if batold you she has

0:11:18.960 --> 0:11:20.880
<v Speaker 4>a Denver number?

0:11:23.120 --> 0:11:31.440
<v Speaker 2>Yeah? I met her at a brew function. I'm sorry

0:11:31.600 --> 0:11:34.280
<v Speaker 2>to what a brewery function like a beer function?

0:11:35.000 --> 0:11:35.880
<v Speaker 4>Can you describe that?

0:11:35.920 --> 0:11:39.800
<v Speaker 3>FORCE just met her.

0:11:39.640 --> 0:11:44.640
<v Speaker 2>Through there and then we started talking and then share

0:11:44.720 --> 0:11:48.200
<v Speaker 2>common interests and became friends. But I just know her

0:11:48.200 --> 0:11:50.880
<v Speaker 2>as her first name. I don't know her last name

0:11:50.960 --> 0:11:52.120
<v Speaker 2>or anything like that.

0:11:52.880 --> 0:11:58.120
<v Speaker 3>Well, you recognize the pictures, right, Yeah? Now I do? Yep, Julie.

0:11:58.120 --> 0:11:58.920
<v Speaker 4>You know how that's looking?

0:11:59.040 --> 0:12:05.960
<v Speaker 3>Right? Is this the person making allegations? We'll get to.

0:12:05.880 --> 0:12:10.480
<v Speaker 4>That, But I mean, if we're trying to establish credibility veracity,

0:12:11.040 --> 0:12:12.840
<v Speaker 4>I'm showing you a picture, I'm giving you a chance

0:12:12.880 --> 0:12:15.520
<v Speaker 4>to take a look at it, and you're telling me

0:12:15.559 --> 0:12:17.640
<v Speaker 4>to my face that you don't recognize them.

0:12:18.040 --> 0:12:22.480
<v Speaker 3>Well, I was mistaken. I apologize for that.

0:12:24.520 --> 0:12:27.000
<v Speaker 2>I recognized her because I just met her at the

0:12:27.320 --> 0:12:28.559
<v Speaker 2>prow functions.

0:12:29.160 --> 0:12:30.880
<v Speaker 3>But that's it.

0:12:31.760 --> 0:12:33.920
<v Speaker 1>The woman in the photo was the same woman we

0:12:34.000 --> 0:12:37.360
<v Speaker 1>heard from in an earlier episode. We're not using her

0:12:37.440 --> 0:12:40.200
<v Speaker 1>name here. She was the one Joel had sex with

0:12:40.280 --> 0:12:43.280
<v Speaker 1>in the parking lot of a sporting good store. The

0:12:43.320 --> 0:12:46.120
<v Speaker 1>one Joel was texting when he said, there's been some

0:12:46.240 --> 0:12:50.400
<v Speaker 1>drama and I deleted everything. The CSPD had copies of

0:12:50.440 --> 0:12:51.080
<v Speaker 1>their messages.

0:12:52.400 --> 0:12:55.920
<v Speaker 4>You don't have any kind of leather relationship with her? No.

0:12:56.480 --> 0:12:58.360
<v Speaker 4>Have you communicated with her through WhatsApp?

0:12:59.000 --> 0:13:04.079
<v Speaker 2>Yes, just as friends talking through that about different things,

0:13:04.080 --> 0:13:05.400
<v Speaker 2>but that's it.

0:13:06.440 --> 0:13:08.560
<v Speaker 8>Do you have a romantic relationship with her, Joel.

0:13:08.400 --> 0:13:15.920
<v Speaker 3>I do not. Would she say differently, I don't know.

0:13:17.520 --> 0:13:19.440
<v Speaker 3>I don't have a romantic relationship with her.

0:13:19.520 --> 0:13:20.600
<v Speaker 8>You've been intimate with her?

0:13:21.320 --> 0:13:21.360
<v Speaker 4>No?

0:13:22.080 --> 0:13:24.280
<v Speaker 9>When I say intimate, I'll be very brontu belueal. So

0:13:24.320 --> 0:13:25.960
<v Speaker 9>we don't have any to have you even the physically

0:13:25.960 --> 0:13:27.800
<v Speaker 9>intimate or had sex with her.

0:13:28.600 --> 0:13:31.960
<v Speaker 1>Before Joel could say anything, so Glik decided to lay

0:13:31.960 --> 0:13:35.480
<v Speaker 1>it all out there. He was done with Joel's denial.

0:13:36.400 --> 0:13:38.680
<v Speaker 9>Before you answer that could of pausing I want to say,

0:13:38.720 --> 0:13:40.720
<v Speaker 9>is I want to make sure it's very clear that

0:13:40.760 --> 0:13:42.720
<v Speaker 9>the internal affairs detectives are in Denver right now to

0:13:42.760 --> 0:13:43.960
<v Speaker 9>contact or during this meeting.

0:13:45.040 --> 0:13:46.840
<v Speaker 8>So this should be a really easy question, Joel.

0:13:46.760 --> 0:13:48.760
<v Speaker 4>We're another hear to tricky Joe. This is whe're trying

0:13:48.800 --> 0:13:50.640
<v Speaker 4>to get to the bottom of this. I mean, do

0:13:50.640 --> 0:13:51.520
<v Speaker 4>you know both of us.

0:13:51.679 --> 0:13:55.040
<v Speaker 9>So I think let me stop things for a second here. Okay,

0:13:56.360 --> 0:13:57.760
<v Speaker 9>I really want to clear I know you're talking about

0:13:57.800 --> 0:14:00.840
<v Speaker 9>catfish all this. That is not the allegation. The allegation,

0:14:00.920 --> 0:14:03.200
<v Speaker 9>you very clear is you had sex with this person,

0:14:03.520 --> 0:14:05.040
<v Speaker 9>not that she talked to you about having sex. That

0:14:05.080 --> 0:14:07.760
<v Speaker 9>you have had sex with this person in your department vehicle.

0:14:08.800 --> 0:14:11.640
<v Speaker 9>That's not a catfishing situation. It's a very serious allegation.

0:14:12.920 --> 0:14:14.839
<v Speaker 9>And it's not like a misunderstanding. I'm talking to the

0:14:14.880 --> 0:14:17.839
<v Speaker 9>wrong person online. This person's identifying that they had sex

0:14:17.880 --> 0:14:21.760
<v Speaker 9>with you, Joel Kern in your department car, and I'll

0:14:21.800 --> 0:14:22.960
<v Speaker 9>be honest that it doesn't sound as you being a

0:14:23.000 --> 0:14:26.080
<v Speaker 9>one hundred percent honest to your Joel. So we're asking

0:14:26.120 --> 0:14:28.200
<v Speaker 9>again real quick understanding. The detectors are out there to

0:14:28.200 --> 0:14:31.200
<v Speaker 9>talking to her right now. Have you in physically intimate

0:14:31.320 --> 0:14:32.200
<v Speaker 9>with this individual?

0:14:32.600 --> 0:14:32.920
<v Speaker 3>Yes?

0:14:34.600 --> 0:14:36.080
<v Speaker 8>Did you have sex with them?

0:14:36.400 --> 0:14:36.760
<v Speaker 3>Yes?

0:14:37.240 --> 0:14:39.000
<v Speaker 8>Did that occur inside the department vehicle?

0:14:39.720 --> 0:14:39.760
<v Speaker 4>No?

0:14:40.200 --> 0:14:41.240
<v Speaker 8>Did it occur on duty?

0:14:43.280 --> 0:14:46.640
<v Speaker 3>No? I mean I guess it could have.

0:14:47.280 --> 0:14:48.520
<v Speaker 8>Are you familiar with fat Life.

0:14:49.640 --> 0:14:52.200
<v Speaker 1>I've heard of it, but yeah, bet life is a

0:14:52.280 --> 0:14:54.680
<v Speaker 1>cank and fetish social networking website.

0:14:54.960 --> 0:14:56.200
<v Speaker 8>Did you meet her through fat Life.

0:14:57.760 --> 0:14:59.200
<v Speaker 3>I can't remember if I did or not.

0:14:59.440 --> 0:15:01.840
<v Speaker 8>You have a fat life account? Did you have a

0:15:01.840 --> 0:15:02.680
<v Speaker 8>fat Life account?

0:15:02.760 --> 0:15:02.960
<v Speaker 3>No?

0:15:03.640 --> 0:15:05.720
<v Speaker 9>Okay, So in order to go through fat Life, you

0:15:05.720 --> 0:15:07.800
<v Speaker 9>have to have an account in order to have those

0:15:07.800 --> 0:15:09.760
<v Speaker 9>conversations back and forth or do dms of that kind

0:15:09.760 --> 0:15:11.880
<v Speaker 9>of stuff. So how would you have met her potentially

0:15:11.920 --> 0:15:13.560
<v Speaker 9>there if you do have an account of that life.

0:15:15.760 --> 0:15:19.360
<v Speaker 2>I don't remember how I met her exactly. It's been

0:15:19.360 --> 0:15:20.760
<v Speaker 2>a few years.

0:15:21.160 --> 0:15:22.920
<v Speaker 4>So we're not gonna let's just give them this one.

0:15:26.040 --> 0:15:28.720
<v Speaker 4>You just said I might have. So clearly you have

0:15:28.840 --> 0:15:31.400
<v Speaker 4>been on fed life. Can we establish that.

0:15:32.760 --> 0:15:33.520
<v Speaker 3>I looked at it.

0:15:34.240 --> 0:15:37.840
<v Speaker 4>Yes, But and what Jimmy just said is that you

0:15:37.920 --> 0:15:42.440
<v Speaker 4>cannot get on there without having an account. We've tested

0:15:42.480 --> 0:15:43.000
<v Speaker 4>all this out.

0:15:43.880 --> 0:15:48.160
<v Speaker 2>Hm, I deleted I had an account, and then I

0:15:48.240 --> 0:15:52.560
<v Speaker 2>deleted it when I was trying to get my life

0:15:52.600 --> 0:15:53.200
<v Speaker 2>back on track.

0:15:54.960 --> 0:15:58.160
<v Speaker 4>Okay, that's a step in our direction. So you had

0:15:58.160 --> 0:16:00.280
<v Speaker 4>an account, but you don't know if you've met her

0:16:00.640 --> 0:16:01.480
<v Speaker 4>through that life.

0:16:03.640 --> 0:16:08.240
<v Speaker 3>I think I think I did. Yeah, but it wasn't.

0:16:09.440 --> 0:16:10.520
<v Speaker 3>You're painting it out to be.

0:16:12.000 --> 0:16:15.200
<v Speaker 4>Passing judgment, Joe. I'll stop you there. We're not. We're

0:16:15.240 --> 0:16:17.000
<v Speaker 4>giving you an opportunity.

0:16:16.520 --> 0:16:18.120
<v Speaker 6>To talk to us.

0:16:18.880 --> 0:16:21.520
<v Speaker 4>All we're trying to establish is that you violate policy,

0:16:21.600 --> 0:16:24.040
<v Speaker 4>and if you did, obviously we have to be held accountable.

0:16:24.080 --> 0:16:26.600
<v Speaker 4>Period I mean, that's it. We're not here to pass judgment.

0:16:29.760 --> 0:16:39.080
<v Speaker 2>So there's periods in my marriage and home life that

0:16:39.800 --> 0:16:44.200
<v Speaker 2>were bad and then you know, I met her and

0:16:44.240 --> 0:16:46.640
<v Speaker 2>talked to her and then we just became fast friends.

0:16:48.120 --> 0:16:50.160
<v Speaker 2>But to the question of violating policy and.

0:16:50.080 --> 0:16:57.240
<v Speaker 4>All that, okay, but you said that possibly you met

0:16:57.240 --> 0:16:59.760
<v Speaker 4>her while you were on duty. You were coming back

0:16:59.800 --> 0:17:04.160
<v Speaker 4>from Denver when you went to this trip that you're

0:17:04.160 --> 0:17:06.680
<v Speaker 4>thinking about where you're driving your take home vehicle.

0:17:07.000 --> 0:17:11.119
<v Speaker 6>Yes, okay, So how does that happen?

0:17:11.440 --> 0:17:12.320
<v Speaker 4>How do you meet her?

0:17:13.280 --> 0:17:15.560
<v Speaker 6>You said you went to a brewery.

0:17:17.200 --> 0:17:21.560
<v Speaker 2>It was coming back from a training and then she

0:17:21.720 --> 0:17:26.840
<v Speaker 2>suggested that we meet, and then so we met on

0:17:26.880 --> 0:17:29.920
<v Speaker 2>the way back, and then coming back, we just.

0:17:29.920 --> 0:17:33.359
<v Speaker 3>Met at the I forget the name of the store.

0:17:33.480 --> 0:17:36.679
<v Speaker 2>Is an outdoor store like around Lincoln and by twenty

0:17:36.720 --> 0:17:38.120
<v Speaker 2>five okay.

0:17:39.560 --> 0:17:45.560
<v Speaker 4>And then where do you guys go and have intimate relationships.

0:17:49.800 --> 0:17:54.119
<v Speaker 2>Well, she came over into my car and then we

0:17:54.200 --> 0:17:58.240
<v Speaker 2>just talked and everything, and then kissed.

0:18:00.480 --> 0:18:04.280
<v Speaker 3>A part of the car front passenger.

0:18:03.880 --> 0:18:08.360
<v Speaker 4>Seat, any other area of the car she might have been.

0:18:11.000 --> 0:18:13.920
<v Speaker 4>And I'm sure you can probably guess where we're going

0:18:13.960 --> 0:18:17.119
<v Speaker 4>with this. We obviously took the car, we had the

0:18:17.560 --> 0:18:22.959
<v Speaker 4>lab search it and do what they do. Would there

0:18:23.080 --> 0:18:25.520
<v Speaker 4>be any chance for her DNA to be in the

0:18:25.560 --> 0:18:26.359
<v Speaker 4>back of that car?

0:18:27.600 --> 0:18:29.000
<v Speaker 3>Oh, sure, she's in the car.

0:18:29.119 --> 0:18:31.959
<v Speaker 4>Or so, Joel, is your name besides kiss?

0:18:36.240 --> 0:18:43.600
<v Speaker 2>Well, this is all very embarrassing and humiliating, but yeah,

0:18:43.680 --> 0:18:44.639
<v Speaker 2>we had sex.

0:18:46.960 --> 0:18:52.160
<v Speaker 3>Whereabouts in the car, in the in the back only

0:18:52.200 --> 0:18:52.720
<v Speaker 3>the one time.

0:18:54.359 --> 0:18:59.800
<v Speaker 1>Okay, Joel admitted to certain details, but when and only

0:19:00.040 --> 0:19:02.480
<v Speaker 1>then he realized they already knew it.

0:19:03.760 --> 0:19:07.360
<v Speaker 4>So the picture that we're getting, Joel, is that there

0:19:07.480 --> 0:19:11.440
<v Speaker 4>might be more than one person, And so we want

0:19:11.480 --> 0:19:13.600
<v Speaker 4>you to think about it. Pause, if you need to

0:19:13.600 --> 0:19:15.800
<v Speaker 4>take a break, if you need to use the restroom,

0:19:15.920 --> 0:19:18.920
<v Speaker 4>get some water, and then we can talk about that

0:19:19.880 --> 0:19:20.680
<v Speaker 4>when we get back.

0:19:21.720 --> 0:19:24.919
<v Speaker 1>They took a break, and when they returned, Chanza and

0:19:24.960 --> 0:19:29.640
<v Speaker 1>so Click continued their questioning, did.

0:19:29.480 --> 0:19:32.840
<v Speaker 3>You have conversations during that light I don't know her name.

0:19:34.160 --> 0:19:37.560
<v Speaker 2>Or who she is or anything like that, but yeah,

0:19:37.600 --> 0:19:39.919
<v Speaker 2>I think you had conversations or I did have conversations

0:19:39.920 --> 0:19:42.200
<v Speaker 2>with her flight did.

0:19:42.040 --> 0:19:44.000
<v Speaker 8>You arrange per the download to what's appen so you

0:19:44.000 --> 0:19:46.040
<v Speaker 8>guys can have conversations privately on your phone.

0:19:48.440 --> 0:19:48.800
<v Speaker 3>Yes.

0:19:49.080 --> 0:19:52.000
<v Speaker 9>Did you arrange to meet her at a oil park? Yes,

0:19:52.480 --> 0:19:54.600
<v Speaker 9>then basically you had sex with her at a oil park.

0:19:55.320 --> 0:19:57.879
<v Speaker 3>Didn't have sex, there's no penetration.

0:19:58.119 --> 0:19:59.679
<v Speaker 8>So that was oral sexallently.

0:20:00.119 --> 0:20:00.399
<v Speaker 3>Yes.

0:20:01.320 --> 0:20:05.000
<v Speaker 1>Juel is treading carefully here, because admitting to having sex

0:20:05.080 --> 0:20:08.159
<v Speaker 1>in public is not only admitting to a violation of

0:20:08.200 --> 0:20:10.640
<v Speaker 1>his duty, but a violation of the law.

0:20:10.800 --> 0:20:13.439
<v Speaker 9>During this conversation, said when you arranged that, basically she

0:20:13.520 --> 0:20:17.440
<v Speaker 9>is submissive and you were dominant. She says you struck

0:20:17.440 --> 0:20:21.119
<v Speaker 9>her several times, leading bruises. I will say before in

0:20:21.200 --> 0:20:23.760
<v Speaker 9>front of our two. She says this was a consensual accounter.

0:20:25.160 --> 0:20:27.160
<v Speaker 9>She is not alleging a sexual assault.

0:20:27.200 --> 0:20:29.840
<v Speaker 4>And remember you're within the confines of garrety.

0:20:31.080 --> 0:20:34.000
<v Speaker 1>Remember the garrity advisement is a warning given to police

0:20:34.000 --> 0:20:39.200
<v Speaker 1>officers during an internal investigation. The individual signing this advisement

0:20:39.600 --> 0:20:41.919
<v Speaker 1>is declaring that they will tell the truth.

0:20:42.760 --> 0:20:44.359
<v Speaker 9>This is not having to do anything to do with

0:20:44.359 --> 0:20:47.160
<v Speaker 9>a criminal investigation. I'm just trying to lock in her statement.

0:20:47.440 --> 0:20:50.680
<v Speaker 9>She said you left bruses, physically struck her, pull her hair,

0:20:50.920 --> 0:20:55.080
<v Speaker 9>that type of thing. No, okay, So obviously at some

0:20:55.080 --> 0:20:57.680
<v Speaker 9>point in time after this takes place, you break.

0:20:57.480 --> 0:21:02.920
<v Speaker 8>Contact with her. Yes, yes, you have any further contact

0:21:02.960 --> 0:21:03.399
<v Speaker 8>with her.

0:21:05.440 --> 0:21:09.719
<v Speaker 2>Just here there afterwards, but nothing what is here and there?

0:21:09.760 --> 0:21:15.600
<v Speaker 2>Mean just texting a little bit on the app, but

0:21:15.880 --> 0:21:18.240
<v Speaker 2>no physical meetings at westoever.

0:21:19.800 --> 0:21:21.280
<v Speaker 8>So when her husband showed up, you know what he

0:21:21.320 --> 0:21:21.960
<v Speaker 8>was talking about?

0:21:24.200 --> 0:21:24.840
<v Speaker 3>You know who I am?

0:21:25.040 --> 0:21:27.880
<v Speaker 4>No, guess my wife felt there when that you're talking

0:21:27.960 --> 0:21:31.680
<v Speaker 4>your cruiser. What are you talking about?

0:21:33.600 --> 0:21:40.440
<v Speaker 2>Well, yeah, but again I didn't have sex with her,

0:21:41.600 --> 0:21:47.400
<v Speaker 2>as in you know, sexual intercourse or anything like that.

0:21:47.560 --> 0:21:51.040
<v Speaker 2>So but yeah, I had an idea.

0:21:51.560 --> 0:21:53.520
<v Speaker 8>Did you recognize her that day?

0:21:54.640 --> 0:21:55.080
<v Speaker 3>Vaguely?

0:21:55.280 --> 0:22:00.640
<v Speaker 4>Yes, So just to clarify the make sure that I'm

0:22:00.640 --> 0:22:03.160
<v Speaker 4>showing you here, Joe ass the lady that was there

0:22:03.240 --> 0:22:05.639
<v Speaker 4>that day in front of your house.

0:22:05.800 --> 0:22:06.080
<v Speaker 3>Yes.

0:22:06.920 --> 0:22:11.200
<v Speaker 1>Then the investigators turned to an important element in this case.

0:22:11.840 --> 0:22:14.200
<v Speaker 1>They have a selfie. Joel sent to this woman, a

0:22:14.200 --> 0:22:17.880
<v Speaker 1>photo where he's wearing his police uniform. You can clearly

0:22:17.920 --> 0:22:22.119
<v Speaker 1>see his badge on his chest, and the investigators needed

0:22:22.160 --> 0:22:24.800
<v Speaker 1>to know why. What was Joel's intention?

0:22:26.200 --> 0:22:32.439
<v Speaker 4>You sent a picture of yourself to the complainant in

0:22:32.480 --> 0:22:38.040
<v Speaker 4>this case, the person that you met at Memorial Park. Yes, okay,

0:22:38.320 --> 0:22:44.320
<v Speaker 4>four you in uniform, can't remember? Did you identify yourself

0:22:44.359 --> 0:22:45.840
<v Speaker 4>as a police officer to this person?

0:22:46.760 --> 0:22:48.760
<v Speaker 3>And after some time after we were talking to me, is.

0:22:49.080 --> 0:22:49.960
<v Speaker 4>Why did you do that?

0:22:51.160 --> 0:22:54.440
<v Speaker 3>Because she said that she works in law.

0:22:55.960 --> 0:23:01.159
<v Speaker 2>And the intent was a developing friendships and all that

0:23:01.200 --> 0:23:02.879
<v Speaker 2>and having friendships. So it's just more of like a

0:23:02.960 --> 0:23:03.480
<v Speaker 2>getting to know.

0:23:04.200 --> 0:23:07.720
<v Speaker 4>The information we received is that she was nervous. Is

0:23:07.760 --> 0:23:10.040
<v Speaker 4>that why you sent a picture of yourself or is

0:23:10.080 --> 0:23:12.480
<v Speaker 4>that why you identified yourself as a police officer to

0:23:13.240 --> 0:23:16.080
<v Speaker 4>now make her feel more comfortable?

0:23:16.640 --> 0:23:19.560
<v Speaker 3>No, absolutely not, But you.

0:23:19.520 --> 0:23:21.440
<v Speaker 4>Did identify yourself as a police officer.

0:23:21.880 --> 0:23:24.320
<v Speaker 3>Yes, So so we start our list.

0:23:25.160 --> 0:23:26.600
<v Speaker 8>Why didn't you see what happened?

0:23:31.320 --> 0:23:39.960
<v Speaker 2>Because it's humiliating, it's embarrassing, it's traumatic, and you know,

0:23:40.040 --> 0:23:44.880
<v Speaker 2>all the demons from my past come to rise. And

0:23:46.080 --> 0:23:50.920
<v Speaker 2>I was at a low point definitely in my marriage

0:23:50.960 --> 0:23:53.200
<v Speaker 2>and in my life and.

0:23:55.200 --> 0:24:01.399
<v Speaker 3>Trying to save face, trying to not get fired.

0:24:03.400 --> 0:24:09.000
<v Speaker 2>And I think maybe I priy for help.

0:24:14.240 --> 0:24:16.320
<v Speaker 9>There's anything you want to make sure that the person

0:24:16.359 --> 0:24:18.600
<v Speaker 9>who means this gets here directly from you?

0:24:21.200 --> 0:24:32.000
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I think I think I'm salvageable I acknowledge that

0:24:32.000 --> 0:24:36.679
<v Speaker 2>that I needed help for a long time, and I

0:24:36.800 --> 0:24:40.320
<v Speaker 2>just throw myself at the mercy of the people reading

0:24:40.359 --> 0:24:46.040
<v Speaker 2>this and promise that you know, I want to do better,

0:24:46.240 --> 0:24:48.760
<v Speaker 2>and I think I need help, and I think it

0:24:48.800 --> 0:24:51.840
<v Speaker 2>would be nice for the department to help me get there.

0:24:55.000 --> 0:24:58.240
<v Speaker 2>We pay a lot of lip service about our employees

0:24:58.280 --> 0:25:01.720
<v Speaker 2>as our family and all that, but I like to

0:25:01.800 --> 0:25:06.080
<v Speaker 2>maybe somehow believe in that and recognize that I've had issues,

0:25:06.119 --> 0:25:11.120
<v Speaker 2>and I've had issues for a long long time, and

0:25:12.200 --> 0:25:14.760
<v Speaker 2>every day is a struggle, and I want help.

0:25:17.480 --> 0:25:20.480
<v Speaker 4>And closing this investigation is ongoing. In order to maintain

0:25:20.520 --> 0:25:22.720
<v Speaker 4>the confidentiality of this case, I'm giving you a direct

0:25:22.800 --> 0:25:24.879
<v Speaker 4>order not to discuss this case or this interview with

0:25:24.920 --> 0:25:27.320
<v Speaker 4>anyone other than Internal Affairs or anyone from whom the

0:25:27.359 --> 0:25:31.560
<v Speaker 4>discussion would be legally protected and confidential under Colorado's statute.

0:25:31.840 --> 0:25:32.960
<v Speaker 4>Do you understand this order?

0:25:33.560 --> 0:25:35.080
<v Speaker 3>I do, okay.

0:25:35.160 --> 0:25:39.160
<v Speaker 4>This will conclude the interview. The time now is thirteen

0:25:39.280 --> 0:25:40.920
<v Speaker 4>forty four hours.

0:25:45.960 --> 0:25:48.840
<v Speaker 1>Caroline and I listened to the Internal Affairs interview together.

0:25:49.680 --> 0:25:52.199
<v Speaker 1>I wanted to know what she thought of Joel's performance.

0:25:53.320 --> 0:25:55.800
<v Speaker 1>Finally she could hear what was really going on with

0:25:55.880 --> 0:26:04.680
<v Speaker 1>Joel while she was still in the dark. Caroline remembers

0:26:04.760 --> 0:26:07.080
<v Speaker 1>exactly what she was doing the week of Joel's interview

0:26:07.520 --> 0:26:10.760
<v Speaker 1>because she was on vacation with her daughter. They decided

0:26:10.760 --> 0:26:13.040
<v Speaker 1>to take a trip to Vegas together and soak up

0:26:13.040 --> 0:26:16.600
<v Speaker 1>the desert sun. Joel hung back, saying he was busy

0:26:16.680 --> 0:26:20.480
<v Speaker 1>with work all the while he knew he'd been caught.

0:26:21.640 --> 0:26:24.159
<v Speaker 1>He was just waiting to find out how bad the

0:26:24.240 --> 0:26:25.320
<v Speaker 1>consequences would be.

0:26:26.080 --> 0:26:28.000
<v Speaker 7>And he picked us up at the airport with our

0:26:28.080 --> 0:26:32.119
<v Speaker 7>dogs in the card, gets out of the car, kisses me,

0:26:32.280 --> 0:26:32.920
<v Speaker 7>hugs her.

0:26:33.320 --> 0:26:34.760
<v Speaker 10>Missed you, guys, Oh, we missed you.

0:26:35.119 --> 0:26:38.040
<v Speaker 7>We're catching up. We're talking about the food, we ate

0:26:38.160 --> 0:26:39.080
<v Speaker 7>and we're filling him in.

0:26:39.160 --> 0:26:39.760
<v Speaker 10>How was work?

0:26:39.760 --> 0:26:43.359
<v Speaker 7>Oh, my gosh, so busy this week. I have replayed

0:26:43.400 --> 0:26:48.760
<v Speaker 7>that over and over and over and over again to Caroline.

0:26:49.119 --> 0:26:50.879
<v Speaker 1>Her husband seemed completely normal.

0:26:52.160 --> 0:26:56.960
<v Speaker 7>Meanwhile, he has just revealed what is going to be

0:26:57.040 --> 0:26:58.760
<v Speaker 7>the detriment to our family.

0:27:00.280 --> 0:27:00.639
<v Speaker 10>Wow.

0:27:01.760 --> 0:27:05.480
<v Speaker 1>I mean he signs the garrity, which is basically saying

0:27:05.520 --> 0:27:09.600
<v Speaker 1>that he's promising to tell the truth, and from the

0:27:09.760 --> 0:27:15.320
<v Speaker 1>very beginning from question one, he is lying. Do you

0:27:15.359 --> 0:27:17.120
<v Speaker 1>feel like he thought that he could talk his way

0:27:17.160 --> 0:27:17.640
<v Speaker 1>out of it.

0:27:18.280 --> 0:27:20.320
<v Speaker 7>I don't think he just thought he could talk his

0:27:20.400 --> 0:27:23.600
<v Speaker 7>way out of it. I think that he truly and

0:27:23.760 --> 0:27:26.800
<v Speaker 7>his gut believed he would get away with it. He

0:27:26.880 --> 0:27:29.360
<v Speaker 7>not only thought that he could have his attorney believe him,

0:27:29.560 --> 0:27:32.159
<v Speaker 7>but Joel believed that he would be able to have

0:27:32.520 --> 0:27:34.960
<v Speaker 7>Raphael and Jimmy believe him as well.

0:27:35.320 --> 0:27:38.240
<v Speaker 1>And those are the two internal affairs investigators we heard

0:27:38.359 --> 0:27:42.000
<v Speaker 1>questioning him, Raphael Chans and Jimmy Soklick. These are two

0:27:42.040 --> 0:27:44.480
<v Speaker 1>people who both knew you guys personally.

0:27:45.240 --> 0:27:48.480
<v Speaker 7>Yes. The part that disturbs me so much on this

0:27:48.640 --> 0:27:51.520
<v Speaker 7>is not just that he lied, but the level of

0:27:52.240 --> 0:27:56.760
<v Speaker 7>personal connection and whom he lied to. They were promoted

0:27:56.840 --> 0:28:00.920
<v Speaker 7>on the same day together as lieutenants. We were at

0:28:00.960 --> 0:28:04.840
<v Speaker 7>Jimmy Sokolick's wedding. Wow, these were people who had been

0:28:05.240 --> 0:28:09.280
<v Speaker 7>at personal events and our lives. He's lying to them,

0:28:09.680 --> 0:28:12.880
<v Speaker 7>and not only just lying to them as professionals, colleagues

0:28:12.880 --> 0:28:16.320
<v Speaker 7>and friends, but he is lying about the dynamic of

0:28:16.480 --> 0:28:22.080
<v Speaker 7>our home. There was not this unhealthy, horrible life at home.

0:28:22.680 --> 0:28:25.800
<v Speaker 7>And yet this is what he reverts back to time

0:28:25.960 --> 0:28:28.600
<v Speaker 7>and time and time again on the times where he

0:28:28.640 --> 0:28:29.640
<v Speaker 7>has gotten caught.

0:28:30.359 --> 0:28:33.280
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I was going to say, he refers to your

0:28:33.320 --> 0:28:36.280
<v Speaker 1>marriage being in a bad place. And this isn't the

0:28:36.280 --> 0:28:42.640
<v Speaker 1>first IA investigation where he cites this experience. You don't

0:28:42.640 --> 0:28:44.960
<v Speaker 1>look back at that time feeling like your marriage was

0:28:45.000 --> 0:28:48.520
<v Speaker 1>in a bad place. I do not do you even

0:28:48.600 --> 0:28:52.920
<v Speaker 1>recognize the person on that tape.

0:28:53.200 --> 0:28:58.320
<v Speaker 7>So when I hear the investigation, I see the stranger

0:28:58.360 --> 0:29:01.320
<v Speaker 7>who I lived with. I do not know that man.

0:29:02.280 --> 0:29:05.400
<v Speaker 7>That man who is on that tape is evil. I

0:29:05.440 --> 0:29:09.440
<v Speaker 7>don't know anything about him. He just didn't think he

0:29:09.440 --> 0:29:12.040
<v Speaker 7>would get to that point. That's why he started with

0:29:12.600 --> 0:29:17.080
<v Speaker 7>the line denying, deflecting, and shifting any of the responsibility.

0:29:17.640 --> 0:29:19.760
<v Speaker 7>And then when he had to fall on his sword,

0:29:20.520 --> 0:29:23.920
<v Speaker 7>magically it became all this was going sideways at home.

0:29:24.600 --> 0:29:29.360
<v Speaker 7>I have demons, I need help. Yeah, it turned into

0:29:29.440 --> 0:29:30.440
<v Speaker 7>a different deflection.

0:29:31.120 --> 0:29:32.239
<v Speaker 5>Yeah.

0:29:32.320 --> 0:29:36.160
<v Speaker 7>He would make comments about quote slaying his demons, and

0:29:36.200 --> 0:29:37.920
<v Speaker 7>then he would talk about I just need to get

0:29:37.960 --> 0:29:38.920
<v Speaker 7>back to the man I was.

0:29:39.040 --> 0:29:40.800
<v Speaker 10>I could be the husband I was, I could be

0:29:40.840 --> 0:29:43.960
<v Speaker 10>the dad I was. But the fact of the matter is.

0:29:45.640 --> 0:29:47.720
<v Speaker 1>What were you? Yah? Who were you ever?

0:29:48.240 --> 0:29:50.320
<v Speaker 7>That's a question that the kids and I have grappled with.

0:29:51.360 --> 0:29:55.160
<v Speaker 7>Those are the moments where I question things but I

0:29:55.240 --> 0:29:58.440
<v Speaker 7>have to remind myself the kids and I were living

0:29:58.480 --> 0:30:00.920
<v Speaker 7>the truth. He loving the lie.

0:30:02.200 --> 0:30:06.320
<v Speaker 1>Yeah yeah, How long is it taking you to get

0:30:06.320 --> 0:30:10.440
<v Speaker 1>to that place to be able to say that I.

0:30:10.440 --> 0:30:13.480
<v Speaker 10>Do it daily? I still have to do it daily,

0:30:32.800 --> 0:30:33.120
<v Speaker 10>all right.

0:30:34.840 --> 0:30:37.360
<v Speaker 5>So just to go on the record, today's ago.

0:30:37.440 --> 0:30:41.000
<v Speaker 1>About a month after Joel's Internal Affairs interview judgment day

0:30:41.040 --> 0:30:45.080
<v Speaker 1>finally came, Joel had to face his boss, Commander Strassner,

0:30:45.560 --> 0:30:49.000
<v Speaker 1>who had believed in him, thought the best of him.

0:30:49.640 --> 0:30:54.040
<v Speaker 1>You've heard the date several times now, April eleventh, twenty two,

0:30:54.760 --> 0:30:57.200
<v Speaker 1>and Strawsner got right to it.

0:30:57.880 --> 0:31:01.720
<v Speaker 3>I want believer the point here this is not.

0:31:03.400 --> 0:31:05.880
<v Speaker 5>Did not expect to have to do this with you, Joey,

0:31:06.000 --> 0:31:09.080
<v Speaker 5>Really you never expected this would have to be the case.

0:31:11.000 --> 0:31:13.200
<v Speaker 5>Did you get the agenda for the meeting?

0:31:13.480 --> 0:31:15.240
<v Speaker 3>Yes, sir, yes, sir. Okay.

0:31:17.280 --> 0:31:19.960
<v Speaker 1>Strassner began by laying up the facts of the case.

0:31:20.640 --> 0:31:24.400
<v Speaker 5>About four thirty to five pm, you informed me that

0:31:24.440 --> 0:31:27.840
<v Speaker 5>you knew you were under investigation. When I asked how

0:31:27.880 --> 0:31:30.400
<v Speaker 5>you knew that, you proceeded doing tell me about the

0:31:30.440 --> 0:31:34.440
<v Speaker 5>confrontation that occurred on February fifth, professing your innocence and

0:31:34.480 --> 0:31:40.200
<v Speaker 5>adamantly denying any involvement in the situation. I had no

0:31:40.360 --> 0:31:44.040
<v Speaker 5>reason not to believe your innocence in this case, which

0:31:44.080 --> 0:31:47.040
<v Speaker 5>meant that either the couple was lying and needed to

0:31:47.040 --> 0:31:50.760
<v Speaker 5>be criminally charged, or that another cop was impersonating you

0:31:50.800 --> 0:31:53.719
<v Speaker 5>and needed to be fired, and that we would make

0:31:53.760 --> 0:31:58.400
<v Speaker 5>sure the case was thoroughly investigated. After being advised and

0:31:58.480 --> 0:32:01.280
<v Speaker 5>signing the garrity warning, which included in order to answer

0:32:01.440 --> 0:32:05.960
<v Speaker 5>questions truthfully, you knowingly lied, providing false information to the

0:32:06.000 --> 0:32:09.880
<v Speaker 5>investigators from nearly forty to forty five minutes. You initially

0:32:09.880 --> 0:32:13.320
<v Speaker 5>attempted to blame someone you know as for causing you

0:32:13.360 --> 0:32:16.320
<v Speaker 5>and your wife's problems and somehow causing this complaint by

0:32:16.360 --> 0:32:20.520
<v Speaker 5>catfishing you online. You initially denied ever having an account

0:32:20.560 --> 0:32:25.400
<v Speaker 5>on fet life and denied knowing either. Only after being

0:32:25.440 --> 0:32:28.720
<v Speaker 5>confronted with specific facts did you begin to admit to

0:32:28.760 --> 0:32:32.840
<v Speaker 5>having sex with While admitting to having sex with her,

0:32:33.160 --> 0:32:35.920
<v Speaker 5>you initially denied the encounter occurred in your police car.

0:32:36.760 --> 0:32:39.960
<v Speaker 5>You later confessed you might have met her on fet life,

0:32:40.240 --> 0:32:43.160
<v Speaker 5>and then did admit the sexual encounter did occur in

0:32:43.200 --> 0:32:47.160
<v Speaker 5>your police vehicle. After taking a break in the interview,

0:32:47.360 --> 0:32:51.760
<v Speaker 5>you returned finally you admit that you arranged a meeting

0:32:51.840 --> 0:32:55.640
<v Speaker 5>and memorial park with you stated you did not have

0:32:55.720 --> 0:32:59.120
<v Speaker 5>sex with her because there was no penetration, and quite frankly,

0:32:59.160 --> 0:33:01.480
<v Speaker 5>I think this is QUI over the details. Because she

0:33:01.560 --> 0:33:03.520
<v Speaker 5>did perform oral sex on you in the back of

0:33:03.520 --> 0:33:07.320
<v Speaker 5>the suv. There are discrepancies in the rest of the

0:33:07.360 --> 0:33:10.920
<v Speaker 5>interview between what can you describe as having occurred in

0:33:10.960 --> 0:33:14.440
<v Speaker 5>the back of the suv. Quite frankly, those details are

0:33:14.480 --> 0:33:18.440
<v Speaker 5>irrelevant to proving the overall case. However, given the false

0:33:18.440 --> 0:33:21.240
<v Speaker 5>statements you've provided to Internal Affairs, I have no reason

0:33:21.280 --> 0:33:25.840
<v Speaker 5>to discount any of her recollection of these events. That's

0:33:25.880 --> 0:33:28.520
<v Speaker 5>my overall case summary.

0:33:29.520 --> 0:33:30.000
<v Speaker 3>Lieutenant.

0:33:30.000 --> 0:33:31.640
<v Speaker 5>Do you have any comments that you want to make.

0:33:33.320 --> 0:33:42.280
<v Speaker 2>I'm extremely remorseful, I'm extremely ashamed, humiliated, embarrassed, upset. I'm

0:33:42.320 --> 0:33:47.840
<v Speaker 2>begging for mercy. I literally was not in my right mind,

0:33:48.960 --> 0:33:52.760
<v Speaker 2>and I've been going through a hard time for several

0:33:52.840 --> 0:33:56.440
<v Speaker 2>years and I can promise you that.

0:33:56.520 --> 0:33:58.920
<v Speaker 3>Nothing like that, whatever ever, happen again.

0:34:00.560 --> 0:34:11.120
<v Speaker 2>I initially light in the eye interview because I was humiliated, embarrassed, scared.

0:34:12.400 --> 0:34:13.200
<v Speaker 3>Didn't I want to.

0:34:18.520 --> 0:34:21.760
<v Speaker 2>How this come to fruition and lose everything.

0:34:21.920 --> 0:34:22.600
<v Speaker 8>That I have.

0:34:25.200 --> 0:34:31.880
<v Speaker 2>I am on bended knee asking for forgiveness. I promise

0:34:31.960 --> 0:34:35.200
<v Speaker 2>you that none of this will ever happen again. I

0:34:35.280 --> 0:34:39.160
<v Speaker 2>understand that I've shattered your trust and it's something that

0:34:39.200 --> 0:34:43.520
<v Speaker 2>I want to work hard to get back. I apologize

0:34:43.560 --> 0:34:49.560
<v Speaker 2>for any of this happening. The last three months have

0:34:49.600 --> 0:34:57.520
<v Speaker 2>been hell, and I just am begging for your mercy.

0:34:58.719 --> 0:35:02.040
<v Speaker 5>I'm gonna move to the next section here and just

0:35:02.080 --> 0:35:08.480
<v Speaker 5>talking about my comments and insight regarding this case. This

0:35:08.560 --> 0:35:12.120
<v Speaker 5>case is not about the sex or how you meant

0:35:12.120 --> 0:35:16.000
<v Speaker 5>these women. Honestly, I don't really care what your preferences

0:35:16.040 --> 0:35:18.759
<v Speaker 5>are unless the PD is somehow brought into this situation.

0:35:19.719 --> 0:35:23.520
<v Speaker 5>Has occurred in this case when you sent essentially these

0:35:23.560 --> 0:35:27.560
<v Speaker 5>strangers a photograph of yourself in police uniform and used

0:35:27.560 --> 0:35:30.040
<v Speaker 5>your work vehicle for your activities. That's what made this

0:35:30.200 --> 0:35:34.880
<v Speaker 5>police issue. The week the allegation was filed, you didn't

0:35:35.000 --> 0:35:37.360
<v Speaker 5>need to say anything to me about the case, and

0:35:37.719 --> 0:35:39.480
<v Speaker 5>quite honestly, I wish you'd not said.

0:35:39.320 --> 0:35:42.080
<v Speaker 3>Anything to me at all. You literally lied.

0:35:41.920 --> 0:35:44.800
<v Speaker 5>To my face on that Wednesday afternoon proclaiming your innocence,

0:35:44.840 --> 0:35:48.440
<v Speaker 5>and unless than twenty minutes later was texting with to

0:35:48.480 --> 0:35:50.840
<v Speaker 5>tell her there was drama, and that you deleted everything.

0:35:52.400 --> 0:35:54.719
<v Speaker 5>Even on Friday, when I tried to reassure you that

0:35:54.800 --> 0:35:58.560
<v Speaker 5>I had no reason not to believe you and would

0:35:58.600 --> 0:36:02.920
<v Speaker 5>make sure that this case was the investigated, you didn't

0:36:02.960 --> 0:36:07.800
<v Speaker 5>flinch even when I threatened to criminally charge this couple

0:36:08.080 --> 0:36:11.400
<v Speaker 5>or maybe fire another employee, and you later thanked me

0:36:11.480 --> 0:36:14.839
<v Speaker 5>for believing in you. To me, this is the most

0:36:14.840 --> 0:36:19.000
<v Speaker 5>disturbing piece of the entire case. Even in your interview

0:36:19.040 --> 0:36:24.239
<v Speaker 5>with IA, as a former investigator yourself, you lied to

0:36:24.320 --> 0:36:26.440
<v Speaker 5>Jimmy and rolf A, all trying to pin this on

0:36:26.480 --> 0:36:29.839
<v Speaker 5>a third person named You had five and a half

0:36:29.880 --> 0:36:32.680
<v Speaker 5>weeks to think about your interview and decided to stick

0:36:32.760 --> 0:36:35.880
<v Speaker 5>with your story and deny that any of this occurred.

0:36:37.200 --> 0:36:38.960
<v Speaker 5>The fact that you lied, the fact that you were

0:36:39.000 --> 0:36:41.320
<v Speaker 5>willing to put this on a third person or possibly

0:36:41.320 --> 0:36:44.800
<v Speaker 5>even have charges filed against the complainant, is absolutely horrific

0:36:45.520 --> 0:36:50.359
<v Speaker 5>and constitutes a violation of your oath in office. I

0:36:50.400 --> 0:36:53.640
<v Speaker 5>also cannot ignore the previous history from the twenty nineteen case.

0:36:54.280 --> 0:36:57.680
<v Speaker 1>Strawsner is referring to the case when a reporter contacted

0:36:57.680 --> 0:37:02.319
<v Speaker 1>the CSPD because Joel was for the public information officer job.

0:37:02.960 --> 0:37:06.920
<v Speaker 1>The reporter alleged that Joel had sexually harassed her and

0:37:07.000 --> 0:37:07.960
<v Speaker 1>other reporters.

0:37:08.360 --> 0:37:12.440
<v Speaker 5>Twenty nineteen, Commander Mandel wrote, in regard to that incident,

0:37:13.040 --> 0:37:15.840
<v Speaker 5>Lieutenant Kern is a valuable member of the departments, committed

0:37:15.840 --> 0:37:18.120
<v Speaker 5>to putting this behind him and being a better person

0:37:18.160 --> 0:37:21.200
<v Speaker 5>and leader for the organization. I have full confidence that

0:37:21.280 --> 0:37:23.560
<v Speaker 5>Lieutenant Kern has learned from his mistakes and he will

0:37:23.600 --> 0:37:26.800
<v Speaker 5>not place himself or the department in this position again.

0:37:28.160 --> 0:37:30.359
<v Speaker 5>I'm hearing some of the same things that were said

0:37:30.440 --> 0:37:30.959
<v Speaker 5>last time.

0:37:30.960 --> 0:37:35.520
<v Speaker 1>In that case, Strassner is right back in twenty nineteen,

0:37:35.760 --> 0:37:39.800
<v Speaker 1>Joel had used some of the exact same language. Here's

0:37:39.880 --> 0:37:41.080
<v Speaker 1>Joel in twenty nineteen.

0:37:41.400 --> 0:37:50.320
<v Speaker 11>I'm mis shaped, and I'm embarrassed, and I'm hamiliated, and

0:37:50.360 --> 0:37:53.480
<v Speaker 11>again I take four responsibility for my actions and yes,

0:37:53.520 --> 0:37:54.120
<v Speaker 11>for mercy.

0:37:56.400 --> 0:37:59.640
<v Speaker 5>Not only did you put yourself in that same position,

0:38:00.080 --> 0:38:04.440
<v Speaker 5>you made it worse. Someone might make that argument that

0:38:04.520 --> 0:38:07.440
<v Speaker 5>you were initially evasive in the ie interview, but that

0:38:07.560 --> 0:38:10.960
<v Speaker 5>you rectified it later by telling the truth. I want

0:38:10.960 --> 0:38:12.840
<v Speaker 5>to be clear that I do not believe you fully

0:38:12.960 --> 0:38:17.719
<v Speaker 5>redeemed your credibility or you were completely transparent even near

0:38:17.760 --> 0:38:20.120
<v Speaker 5>the end of your interview. You were specifically asked by

0:38:20.120 --> 0:38:23.440
<v Speaker 5>Lieutenant Socolick whether you deleted the WhatsApp, to which you

0:38:23.520 --> 0:38:27.239
<v Speaker 5>told them yes. Later, Lieutenant Chansa asked you do you

0:38:27.320 --> 0:38:30.799
<v Speaker 5>still use WhatsApp currently, and you replied, just to talk

0:38:30.840 --> 0:38:34.319
<v Speaker 5>to I believe the slip up proves you're still not

0:38:34.360 --> 0:38:37.480
<v Speaker 5>being completely honest with investigators, that you're unable to keep

0:38:37.520 --> 0:38:40.480
<v Speaker 5>track of all your lives, and quite frankly, I question

0:38:40.560 --> 0:38:42.279
<v Speaker 5>how many other women are out there that may bring

0:38:42.360 --> 0:38:48.600
<v Speaker 5>forward allegations in the future. Now, before I present my findings,

0:38:49.160 --> 0:38:51.600
<v Speaker 5>I want to address something you stated during your interview

0:38:51.640 --> 0:38:57.239
<v Speaker 5>with Lieutenant chans And Sokolick said that you believe you

0:38:57.280 --> 0:38:59.120
<v Speaker 5>need help and it would be nice for the department

0:38:59.160 --> 0:39:01.000
<v Speaker 5>to help you get there, And you said, quote, we

0:39:01.080 --> 0:39:03.720
<v Speaker 5>pay a lot of lip service about our employees as family,

0:39:04.200 --> 0:39:06.319
<v Speaker 5>and I'd like to maybe somehow believe in that and

0:39:06.360 --> 0:39:09.200
<v Speaker 5>recognize I've had issues. I want to point out a

0:39:09.200 --> 0:39:12.600
<v Speaker 5>couple of things. In twenty nineteen, you receive nothing more

0:39:12.640 --> 0:39:15.480
<v Speaker 5>than a written reprimand at a time when you might

0:39:15.480 --> 0:39:18.080
<v Speaker 5>have been able to get more, and you said you

0:39:18.120 --> 0:39:21.839
<v Speaker 5>were already seeking the help. I believe this department has

0:39:21.920 --> 0:39:26.480
<v Speaker 5>treated you more than fair regarding these previous indiscretions.

0:39:25.800 --> 0:39:27.040
<v Speaker 3>I'm not saying that they weren't.

0:39:29.080 --> 0:39:31.680
<v Speaker 5>I'm about to go into the findings of the policies.

0:39:31.680 --> 0:39:33.239
<v Speaker 5>Did you have anything you wanted to add?

0:39:35.440 --> 0:39:38.480
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, that I know that the department has been good

0:39:38.480 --> 0:39:46.480
<v Speaker 2>to me. I am sorry that I that this kind

0:39:46.520 --> 0:39:49.480
<v Speaker 2>of stuff happened a second time, but I swear that

0:39:49.560 --> 0:39:52.799
<v Speaker 2>there is nobody else. I'm willing to do whatever it

0:39:52.840 --> 0:40:00.440
<v Speaker 2>takes to hold on to my employment, and two to

0:40:00.520 --> 0:40:04.319
<v Speaker 2>show that I can do better. And I apologize from

0:40:04.360 --> 0:40:09.040
<v Speaker 2>the bottom of my heart. I understand that it looks

0:40:09.040 --> 0:40:15.680
<v Speaker 2>bad the way everything's been discussed here, and again, I'm

0:40:15.719 --> 0:40:16.840
<v Speaker 2>begging for your mercy.

0:40:18.120 --> 0:40:20.000
<v Speaker 1>Strassner was unmoved.

0:40:20.760 --> 0:40:26.520
<v Speaker 5>Okay, let's go through each of the policies. So as

0:40:26.520 --> 0:40:29.239
<v Speaker 5>I go through these, remember the standard as a preponderance

0:40:29.280 --> 0:40:33.440
<v Speaker 5>of the evidence. First one is nine oh six point

0:40:33.480 --> 0:40:38.000
<v Speaker 5>three zero. It's the take home Vehicles policy. By a

0:40:38.000 --> 0:40:41.520
<v Speaker 5>preponderance of the evidence, your take home vehicle was inappropriately used.

0:40:42.200 --> 0:40:48.160
<v Speaker 5>This allegation is sustained four hundred point three zero.

0:40:48.320 --> 0:40:52.400
<v Speaker 1>Another big one, conduct unbecoming of a police officer.

0:40:53.080 --> 0:40:56.520
<v Speaker 5>What's reasonable believe that using photographs of yourself an official

0:40:56.560 --> 0:40:59.400
<v Speaker 5>police uniform to gain the trust of women you have

0:40:59.440 --> 0:41:01.560
<v Speaker 5>met on fees life and then having sex with them

0:41:01.560 --> 0:41:04.520
<v Speaker 5>in an official police vehicle has brought disrepute to the

0:41:04.520 --> 0:41:07.759
<v Speaker 5>police department. Further, your false statements to me at the

0:41:07.800 --> 0:41:10.759
<v Speaker 5>onset were unsolicited and used to paint yourself in the

0:41:10.760 --> 0:41:15.719
<v Speaker 5>most favorable light regarding this investigation. This allegation is sustained.

0:41:17.239 --> 0:41:21.680
<v Speaker 1>Then Strawsner reached the most egregious of Joel's violations, and

0:41:21.719 --> 0:41:22.480
<v Speaker 1>the final.

0:41:22.200 --> 0:41:25.800
<v Speaker 5>Allegation is four hundred point one to three employee conduct

0:41:25.840 --> 0:41:29.520
<v Speaker 5>departing from the truth. Employees will not willfully or knowingly

0:41:29.560 --> 0:41:32.360
<v Speaker 5>depart from the truth and giving testimony or in connection

0:41:32.480 --> 0:41:35.680
<v Speaker 5>with official duties. You were given a garrity advisement and

0:41:35.800 --> 0:41:38.359
<v Speaker 5>sign that invisement, knowing you were being ordered to tell

0:41:38.360 --> 0:41:41.279
<v Speaker 5>the truth by a preponderance of the evidence, you gave

0:41:41.320 --> 0:41:44.200
<v Speaker 5>a false statement for the first approximate forty minutes of

0:41:44.239 --> 0:41:47.560
<v Speaker 5>the interview. Only when confronted with evidence did you finally

0:41:47.640 --> 0:41:50.879
<v Speaker 5>begin to confess some of your role in this case. Yet,

0:41:50.920 --> 0:41:52.600
<v Speaker 5>as I said, I still am not sure that you've

0:41:52.640 --> 0:42:05.360
<v Speaker 5>told the whole truth. This is sustained as well. This

0:42:05.440 --> 0:42:07.960
<v Speaker 5>whole thing has just been like a shock to my conscience.

0:42:08.000 --> 0:42:13.240
<v Speaker 5>It really has, and honestly, I think we've been painted

0:42:13.400 --> 0:42:16.080
<v Speaker 5>into a corner where there's really only one outcome. In

0:42:16.120 --> 0:42:20.440
<v Speaker 5>this case, I can recommend. I have no option but

0:42:20.600 --> 0:42:22.080
<v Speaker 5>to recommend your termination.

0:42:30.480 --> 0:42:34.640
<v Speaker 1>Caroline. It feels like, maybe for the first time, someone

0:42:34.680 --> 0:42:39.120
<v Speaker 1>with authority sees through Joel's facade. What went through your

0:42:39.160 --> 0:42:41.400
<v Speaker 1>mind when you heard Joel's boss in front him.

0:42:42.400 --> 0:42:46.160
<v Speaker 7>I think it's fascinating to listen to when Strasner says,

0:42:46.160 --> 0:42:48.640
<v Speaker 7>and I believe there's more, there's more women. I question

0:42:48.719 --> 0:42:51.440
<v Speaker 7>how many other women will come forward? And then hearing

0:42:51.520 --> 0:42:55.040
<v Speaker 7>Joel say I swear these were the only two. I

0:42:55.239 --> 0:42:58.839
<v Speaker 7>swear these were the only two. And next thing you know,

0:42:58.920 --> 0:43:01.880
<v Speaker 7>it's all kinds of different names are being revealed, and

0:43:02.280 --> 0:43:06.040
<v Speaker 7>all of these sexual encounters and sexually illicit behavior while

0:43:06.040 --> 0:43:07.800
<v Speaker 7>he's under the guise of a police officer.

0:43:08.280 --> 0:43:09.800
<v Speaker 1>Did you ever talk to Strawsner?

0:43:10.680 --> 0:43:11.040
<v Speaker 5>I did.

0:43:12.719 --> 0:43:13.840
<v Speaker 1>What can you tell me about that?

0:43:14.719 --> 0:43:16.520
<v Speaker 10>There's two people who.

0:43:17.920 --> 0:43:20.240
<v Speaker 7>A lot of people will be shocked that I'm grateful

0:43:20.280 --> 0:43:22.600
<v Speaker 7>for the first one is the male who came to

0:43:22.640 --> 0:43:25.399
<v Speaker 7>my front door, the husband of the wife who Joel

0:43:25.440 --> 0:43:28.680
<v Speaker 7>had an affair with. And the second one is Jeff Strassner.

0:43:29.560 --> 0:43:34.320
<v Speaker 7>I'm extremely grateful for Jeff Strawssner. I was at a

0:43:34.360 --> 0:43:38.080
<v Speaker 7>community event and he was there, and as we walked

0:43:38.080 --> 0:43:40.359
<v Speaker 7>out together, I said, hey, Jeff, and I could tell

0:43:40.440 --> 0:43:42.440
<v Speaker 7>he was nervous to see me, and he was like, oh,

0:43:42.600 --> 0:43:46.400
<v Speaker 7>you know, hey, Caroline, and I said I'd like to

0:43:46.440 --> 0:43:52.800
<v Speaker 7>thank you, and he looks shocked, and I said, thank

0:43:52.840 --> 0:43:55.239
<v Speaker 7>you for not believing him.

0:43:57.960 --> 0:43:59.319
<v Speaker 10>Thank you for.

0:44:00.800 --> 0:44:04.399
<v Speaker 7>The due diligence of hearing this one out and not

0:44:04.440 --> 0:44:07.480
<v Speaker 7>giving him the benefit of the doubt. You may have

0:44:07.560 --> 0:44:09.800
<v Speaker 7>saved mine in my kids' lives.

0:44:10.239 --> 0:44:10.640
<v Speaker 10>Thank you.

0:44:12.480 --> 0:44:16.200
<v Speaker 7>And Jeff's always been a very friendly and a little

0:44:16.200 --> 0:44:18.840
<v Speaker 7>bit stoic of a man. But his voice started a

0:44:18.840 --> 0:44:22.239
<v Speaker 7>crack and you could see the emotion on him, and

0:44:22.360 --> 0:44:26.400
<v Speaker 7>he said, oh my gosh, thank you for saying that.

0:44:27.200 --> 0:44:29.680
<v Speaker 7>I appreciate you saying that. I have thought about you

0:44:29.719 --> 0:44:34.920
<v Speaker 7>and the kids so much. So when I hear Jeff

0:44:34.920 --> 0:44:42.160
<v Speaker 7>Strassner's commentary in this interview, I'm extremely grateful for him.

0:44:43.120 --> 0:44:47.680
<v Speaker 7>I know that just hours later is when Joel's going

0:44:47.760 --> 0:44:53.040
<v Speaker 7>to do his reveal to me and the kids. So

0:44:53.440 --> 0:44:57.759
<v Speaker 7>it's an interesting thing to reflect back on it and think, yeah,

0:44:57.800 --> 0:44:59.960
<v Speaker 7>what that day must have been like in his world.

0:45:01.040 --> 0:45:06.319
<v Speaker 1>So we know that Strassner recommended Joel for termination, but

0:45:06.400 --> 0:45:07.600
<v Speaker 1>he wasn't fired, was he.

0:45:10.360 --> 0:45:10.520
<v Speaker 4>No?

0:45:14.440 --> 0:45:19.280
<v Speaker 1>Joel wasn't fired, and this case only gets more interesting.

0:45:20.160 --> 0:45:24.279
<v Speaker 1>We'll explore how he was able to avoid termination on

0:45:24.360 --> 0:45:32.239
<v Speaker 1>the next episode of Betrayal. Thank you for listening to

0:45:32.280 --> 0:45:34.719
<v Speaker 1>Betrayal season four. If you would like to reach out

0:45:34.760 --> 0:45:37.840
<v Speaker 1>to the Betrayal team, email us at Betrayalpod at gmail

0:45:37.840 --> 0:45:43.360
<v Speaker 1>dot com. That's Betrayal Pod at gmail dot com. Also,

0:45:43.440 --> 0:45:46.120
<v Speaker 1>please be sure to follow us on Instagram at Betrayal

0:45:46.200 --> 0:45:49.840
<v Speaker 1>Pod and me Andrea H. Gunning for all Betrayal content,

0:45:49.920 --> 0:45:52.680
<v Speaker 1>news and updates. One way to support the series is

0:45:52.719 --> 0:45:56.200
<v Speaker 1>by subscribing to our show on Apple Podcasts. Please rate

0:45:56.280 --> 0:45:59.880
<v Speaker 1>and review Betrayal five star reviews help us know you

0:46:00.080 --> 0:46:04.319
<v Speaker 1>appreciate what we do. Betrayal is a production of Glass Podcasts,

0:46:04.600 --> 0:46:08.560
<v Speaker 1>a division of Glass Entertainment Group, in partnership with iHeart Podcasts.

0:46:09.160 --> 0:46:12.280
<v Speaker 1>The show is executive produced by Nancy Glass and Jennifer Fason.

0:46:13.080 --> 0:46:16.600
<v Speaker 1>Betrayal is hosted and produced by me Andrea Gunning, written

0:46:16.600 --> 0:46:20.120
<v Speaker 1>and produced by Carrie Hartman, also produced by Ben Fetterman,

0:46:20.840 --> 0:46:24.960
<v Speaker 1>our associate producers are Caitlin Golden and Kristin Melcury. Our

0:46:25.040 --> 0:46:29.200
<v Speaker 1>iHeart team is Ali Perry and Jessica Crincheck. Story editing

0:46:29.200 --> 0:46:32.920
<v Speaker 1>by Monique Leboard, audio editing and mixing by Matt Delvecchio,

0:46:33.600 --> 0:46:37.480
<v Speaker 1>editing by Tanner Robbins, and special thanks to Caroline and

0:46:37.520 --> 0:46:41.680
<v Speaker 1>her family. Betrayal's theme is composed by Oliver Baines. Music

0:46:41.760 --> 0:46:45.800
<v Speaker 1>library provided by my Music and For more podcasts from iHeart,

0:46:45.880 --> 0:46:49.359
<v Speaker 1>visit the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get

0:46:49.360 --> 0:46:50.120
<v Speaker 1>your podcasts