1 00:00:05,800 --> 00:00:08,720 Speaker 1: Welcome to the Bloomberg p m L Podcast. I'm pim Fox. 2 00:00:08,760 --> 00:00:11,440 Speaker 1: Along with my co host Lisa A. Brahmowitz. Each day 3 00:00:11,480 --> 00:00:15,000 Speaker 1: we bring you the most important, noteworthy, and useful interviews 4 00:00:15,040 --> 00:00:17,520 Speaker 1: for you and your money, whether you're at the grocery 5 00:00:17,560 --> 00:00:20,560 Speaker 1: store or the trading floor. Find the Bloomberg p m 6 00:00:20,680 --> 00:00:32,400 Speaker 1: L Podcast on Apple Podcasts, SoundCloud, and Bloomberg dot Com. 7 00:00:32,479 --> 00:00:35,919 Speaker 1: Joining us now, Dr Ward McCarthy, chief economist for Jefferies, 8 00:00:35,920 --> 00:00:39,640 Speaker 1: and Matt Bosler, Bloomberg Fed reporter. Dr McCarthy want to 9 00:00:39,680 --> 00:00:43,720 Speaker 1: start with you, So, how does j Powell deal with 10 00:00:43,760 --> 00:00:47,360 Speaker 1: this job's report? Well, he has to be delighted with this. 11 00:00:47,840 --> 00:00:51,360 Speaker 1: The FED has a dual mandate UM, one of which 12 00:00:51,479 --> 00:00:55,080 Speaker 1: is maximum employment, the other which is stable inflation near 13 00:00:55,120 --> 00:00:58,920 Speaker 1: two percent. And it's quite clear that FED keeps hitting 14 00:00:58,920 --> 00:01:02,080 Speaker 1: home runs. This fire is the employment numbers of concern 15 00:01:02,200 --> 00:01:05,680 Speaker 1: because the labor market went out of eighteen like a lion, 16 00:01:06,720 --> 00:01:08,560 Speaker 1: and I think that he will be happy to point 17 00:01:08,600 --> 00:01:10,839 Speaker 1: that out. He'll be happy to point to the fact 18 00:01:10,880 --> 00:01:14,640 Speaker 1: that wage growth continues to gradually accelerate and so he 19 00:01:14,680 --> 00:01:18,720 Speaker 1: can declare victory on that front. Matt Bosler, we are 20 00:01:18,760 --> 00:01:24,119 Speaker 1: awaiting comments from a variety of Federal Reserve experts. One 21 00:01:24,160 --> 00:01:26,640 Speaker 1: of them, of course, the current federals are Chairman Jerome Pale, 22 00:01:27,080 --> 00:01:30,640 Speaker 1: also his immediate predecessors, the Janet Yelling and Ben Bernanke. 23 00:01:30,800 --> 00:01:35,080 Speaker 1: There scheduled to speak today at the Atlanta Fed's American 24 00:01:35,200 --> 00:01:39,440 Speaker 1: Economic Association's annual meeting. Do you expect them to reference 25 00:01:39,480 --> 00:01:42,560 Speaker 1: today's jobs report? Well, I can't wait to see what 26 00:01:42,600 --> 00:01:45,040 Speaker 1: he says, because, like we've been talking about, this is 27 00:01:45,080 --> 00:01:48,320 Speaker 1: an amazing jobs report. It pushes the Fed in the 28 00:01:48,360 --> 00:01:51,160 Speaker 1: direction of what they've been doing for the last several years, 29 00:01:51,160 --> 00:01:54,160 Speaker 1: which is tightening in response to a strong labor market 30 00:01:54,280 --> 00:01:58,000 Speaker 1: that should eventually generate inflationary pressure. This is what their 31 00:01:58,040 --> 00:02:00,280 Speaker 1: models are telling them to do. Yet at the same time, 32 00:02:00,320 --> 00:02:03,040 Speaker 1: obviously they have this huge problem in financial markets that 33 00:02:03,080 --> 00:02:06,120 Speaker 1: they also have to address. And so which message do 34 00:02:06,200 --> 00:02:08,320 Speaker 1: we hear? How does he balance those two things? Well, 35 00:02:08,320 --> 00:02:10,639 Speaker 1: and I actually want to push back Dr Ward of 36 00:02:10,720 --> 00:02:13,079 Speaker 1: what Dr Ward McCarthy on what you just said, which 37 00:02:13,120 --> 00:02:16,080 Speaker 1: is that he's got to be thrilled about this job's report. 38 00:02:16,240 --> 00:02:18,720 Speaker 1: Doesn't this make his job a whole lot more difficult 39 00:02:18,720 --> 00:02:22,120 Speaker 1: because if he continues raising interest rates right now, the 40 00:02:22,160 --> 00:02:25,560 Speaker 1: market is implying that longer term growth will slow down 41 00:02:25,760 --> 00:02:29,800 Speaker 1: as a result. Well, I think that right now the 42 00:02:29,840 --> 00:02:32,520 Speaker 1: more important of the dual mandate objectives is going to 43 00:02:32,560 --> 00:02:36,960 Speaker 1: be inflation, because that's headed below target, and as a consequence, 44 00:02:37,000 --> 00:02:39,480 Speaker 1: I think that there's going to be a reprieve of 45 00:02:39,600 --> 00:02:45,120 Speaker 1: several months before the Fed resumes hiking rates. So um, 46 00:02:45,960 --> 00:02:47,920 Speaker 1: I do not think this post is a problem for 47 00:02:47,919 --> 00:02:50,880 Speaker 1: the Fed. The Fed is very happy to have the 48 00:02:50,880 --> 00:02:54,640 Speaker 1: economy continued to grow, and especially I think they're probably 49 00:02:54,680 --> 00:02:58,280 Speaker 1: happy to see the labor force starting to uh increase 50 00:02:58,320 --> 00:03:01,639 Speaker 1: again as well. But I don't do not think this 51 00:03:01,720 --> 00:03:05,000 Speaker 1: increases pressure on the Fed to raise rates anytime soon, 52 00:03:05,440 --> 00:03:07,760 Speaker 1: for the simple reason that inflation is headed in the 53 00:03:07,800 --> 00:03:10,640 Speaker 1: opposite direction of what they wanted to and it will 54 00:03:10,639 --> 00:03:13,320 Speaker 1: continue to be weak so long as the trade war 55 00:03:14,080 --> 00:03:17,480 Speaker 1: continues to suppress commodity prices. So square with me. The 56 00:03:17,520 --> 00:03:21,079 Speaker 1: idea that we have Dr McCarthy a really strong economy 57 00:03:21,320 --> 00:03:26,080 Speaker 1: that cannot handle an additional twenty five basis point rate hike, Well, 58 00:03:26,160 --> 00:03:29,080 Speaker 1: I think the economy can handle another twenty five basis 59 00:03:29,080 --> 00:03:32,120 Speaker 1: point rate high. In fact, I think the account economy 60 00:03:32,360 --> 00:03:35,600 Speaker 1: can handle a number of more rate hikes. But again, 61 00:03:35,720 --> 00:03:38,600 Speaker 1: the Fed has a dual mandate. Um, that is what 62 00:03:38,880 --> 00:03:43,120 Speaker 1: drives their policy decisions. Uh, they're hitting on all cylinders 63 00:03:43,120 --> 00:03:46,720 Speaker 1: on the labor side, but they're starting to fall behind 64 00:03:46,880 --> 00:03:50,760 Speaker 1: as far as the inflation side is concerned. So given 65 00:03:50,880 --> 00:03:54,240 Speaker 1: that their their decisions on policy and based on both 66 00:03:54,280 --> 00:03:57,760 Speaker 1: inflation in the labor markets, I think we can expect 67 00:03:57,800 --> 00:04:00,760 Speaker 1: that they will pause here for a period of time. Matt, 68 00:04:01,080 --> 00:04:05,360 Speaker 1: A lot has changed since December the nineteen, hasn't it explained? Well, 69 00:04:05,400 --> 00:04:08,040 Speaker 1: certainly in financial markets, you know, we've seen a lot 70 00:04:08,120 --> 00:04:12,160 Speaker 1: of changes, and so, Um, this is really comes back 71 00:04:12,200 --> 00:04:14,960 Speaker 1: to this interesting question of what is j. Powell going 72 00:04:15,000 --> 00:04:17,720 Speaker 1: to say, Because if it's the case that they do 73 00:04:17,839 --> 00:04:22,200 Speaker 1: see inflation slowing materially, as Dr McCarthy points out, at 74 00:04:22,200 --> 00:04:25,960 Speaker 1: a time when they still have very strong labor market data, 75 00:04:26,040 --> 00:04:28,240 Speaker 1: they're going to need to start to communicate a more 76 00:04:28,320 --> 00:04:32,080 Speaker 1: fundamental shift in their strategy in the approach that they've 77 00:04:32,120 --> 00:04:34,799 Speaker 1: been taking over the last several years. Because to date, 78 00:04:35,200 --> 00:04:38,159 Speaker 1: what this type of labor market data has meant has 79 00:04:38,160 --> 00:04:40,799 Speaker 1: meant higher interest rates, and so if that is starting 80 00:04:40,839 --> 00:04:45,000 Speaker 1: to change now, Um, it's almost like the markets have 81 00:04:45,080 --> 00:04:48,400 Speaker 1: sort of forced the Fed's hand, uh in terms of 82 00:04:48,480 --> 00:04:50,719 Speaker 1: you know, the strategy that they're pursuing, and so that 83 00:04:50,760 --> 00:04:53,440 Speaker 1: would be, you know, a huge development. So I know 84 00:04:53,480 --> 00:04:55,280 Speaker 1: we have to let you run. Matt Bosler. I know 85 00:04:55,360 --> 00:04:57,560 Speaker 1: you've got a lot going on today, Matt Bosler of 86 00:04:57,680 --> 00:05:02,000 Speaker 1: Bloomberg News. Dr Lord McCarthy, you're staying with us. Dr McCarthy. 87 00:05:02,080 --> 00:05:04,240 Speaker 1: I do want to get your view on the balance 88 00:05:04,240 --> 00:05:07,239 Speaker 1: sheet because on one hand, uh, perhaps the FED can 89 00:05:07,279 --> 00:05:10,040 Speaker 1: afford to raise interest rates by another quarter of a 90 00:05:10,040 --> 00:05:12,960 Speaker 1: percentage point, but what about the balance sheet rolloff? Couldn't 91 00:05:12,960 --> 00:05:15,159 Speaker 1: afford to allow it to be on autopilot two and 92 00:05:15,160 --> 00:05:18,200 Speaker 1: a half trillion from four trillion where it is today. Well, 93 00:05:18,640 --> 00:05:22,200 Speaker 1: the point is, we don't know what they what the 94 00:05:22,240 --> 00:05:24,960 Speaker 1: final objective is as far as what the FED thinks 95 00:05:25,360 --> 00:05:28,920 Speaker 1: the normalized size of the balance sheet should be. So 96 00:05:28,920 --> 00:05:32,479 Speaker 1: so far it is on automatic pilot. Uh. In the 97 00:05:32,520 --> 00:05:36,040 Speaker 1: balance sheet is unscheduled to shrink by somewhere between five 98 00:05:36,120 --> 00:05:39,440 Speaker 1: hundred and fifty billion and six hundred billion over the 99 00:05:39,480 --> 00:05:43,480 Speaker 1: course of What we do not know is when they 100 00:05:43,560 --> 00:05:48,359 Speaker 1: intend to stop. And I think that the normalized size 101 00:05:48,360 --> 00:05:50,839 Speaker 1: of the balance sheet is going to become one of 102 00:05:50,839 --> 00:05:55,960 Speaker 1: the more important policy issues and topics as this year unfold. 103 00:05:56,440 --> 00:05:58,839 Speaker 1: And there's also not just the size issue. There's a 104 00:05:58,920 --> 00:06:02,880 Speaker 1: compositional is you prior to the crisis, the Fed owned 105 00:06:02,960 --> 00:06:07,040 Speaker 1: only treasuries, and even with the rollops that are rundaway, 106 00:06:07,760 --> 00:06:10,360 Speaker 1: should they continue for another couple of years, you still 107 00:06:10,400 --> 00:06:15,359 Speaker 1: would have a trillion or so mortgages on the balance sheet. Um. So, 108 00:06:15,640 --> 00:06:18,039 Speaker 1: I think at some point as well, they're going to 109 00:06:18,120 --> 00:06:20,560 Speaker 1: have to discuss how to get the mortgages off the 110 00:06:20,600 --> 00:06:23,760 Speaker 1: balance sheet. Uh. And I think eventually what they'll do 111 00:06:23,920 --> 00:06:26,480 Speaker 1: is start, once they get the size that they want, 112 00:06:27,040 --> 00:06:30,039 Speaker 1: they will start ruling some of the mortgage proceeds into 113 00:06:30,040 --> 00:06:32,760 Speaker 1: bills so that they can also get bills back on 114 00:06:33,279 --> 00:06:36,279 Speaker 1: the balance sheet as well, because currently they have none, 115 00:06:36,680 --> 00:06:40,280 Speaker 1: and prior to the crisis, about of the balance sheet 116 00:06:40,320 --> 00:06:44,200 Speaker 1: was treasury bills. Lord McCarthy, there are four new voting 117 00:06:44,240 --> 00:06:46,320 Speaker 1: members on the f O m C. You've got James 118 00:06:46,400 --> 00:06:49,440 Speaker 1: Bullard and St. Louis Ester George from Kansas City, Charles 119 00:06:49,480 --> 00:06:53,480 Speaker 1: Evans Chicago, and Eric Rosingrin Boston. You believe that they 120 00:06:53,520 --> 00:06:58,600 Speaker 1: are going to vote for a pause and interest rate increases, well, 121 00:06:59,080 --> 00:07:01,960 Speaker 1: they take it meet to meeting, So They're not going 122 00:07:02,000 --> 00:07:05,279 Speaker 1: to at anyone meeting say oh, we're not going to 123 00:07:05,400 --> 00:07:08,080 Speaker 1: raise rates for the next three or four meetings. But 124 00:07:08,160 --> 00:07:10,200 Speaker 1: what they will be doing, and they've told us that 125 00:07:10,320 --> 00:07:14,640 Speaker 1: going to do, is to become increasingly data dependent. As 126 00:07:14,760 --> 00:07:18,520 Speaker 1: the Fed funds rate, it works further into their estimate 127 00:07:18,560 --> 00:07:22,760 Speaker 1: of neutrality UH. And the inflation numbers at least over 128 00:07:22,800 --> 00:07:24,720 Speaker 1: the next two to three months are going to be 129 00:07:24,920 --> 00:07:29,560 Speaker 1: substantially weaker UH than we've seen for most of eighteen 130 00:07:30,000 --> 00:07:32,800 Speaker 1: and substantially weaker than I think they're going to want 131 00:07:32,840 --> 00:07:35,400 Speaker 1: to see. So it was a consequence. I think they 132 00:07:35,440 --> 00:07:39,480 Speaker 1: will simply defer from their next rate hikes so long 133 00:07:39,560 --> 00:07:44,000 Speaker 1: as inflation remains weak, which I expected to um, so 134 00:07:44,040 --> 00:07:47,760 Speaker 1: long as the trade war continues. Dr Warden McCarthy, thank 135 00:07:47,800 --> 00:07:50,320 Speaker 1: you so much for taking the time today. We really 136 00:07:50,320 --> 00:07:55,080 Speaker 1: appreciate your insights. Dr Warden McCarthy, chief economist for Jefferies 137 00:07:55,160 --> 00:07:57,640 Speaker 1: talking about both the jobs number that we got earlier 138 00:07:57,680 --> 00:08:14,920 Speaker 1: as well as what the Fed will do with them. 139 00:08:15,200 --> 00:08:18,080 Speaker 1: Let's get the opinion of Jason Shanko, president of Prestige 140 00:08:18,120 --> 00:08:21,760 Speaker 1: Economics and chairman of the Futurist Institute, also a Bloomberg 141 00:08:21,760 --> 00:08:25,680 Speaker 1: opinion columnist joining us now, Jason, what was your big 142 00:08:25,680 --> 00:08:30,600 Speaker 1: takeaway from from this panel? Well, you know, I was 143 00:08:31,640 --> 00:08:34,720 Speaker 1: this couldn't come at a better time, really because dove Fest, 144 00:08:36,040 --> 00:08:38,680 Speaker 1: which is what this should be called. Uh, you know, 145 00:08:38,760 --> 00:08:41,920 Speaker 1: I think is you know, well needed at a time 146 00:08:41,920 --> 00:08:44,200 Speaker 1: where there's a lot of risk and uncertainty and concern 147 00:08:44,280 --> 00:08:47,320 Speaker 1: about the fact that the FED is tightening raids and 148 00:08:47,400 --> 00:08:51,760 Speaker 1: still has these only three week old, relatively hawkers set 149 00:08:51,760 --> 00:08:54,280 Speaker 1: a forecast for what they're gonna do at a time 150 00:08:54,320 --> 00:08:59,400 Speaker 1: that financial markets have been very, very concerned about, you know, 151 00:08:59,440 --> 00:09:01,880 Speaker 1: what's going going to happen next, and I think that 152 00:09:02,240 --> 00:09:04,800 Speaker 1: as we look there is still a concern there are 153 00:09:04,920 --> 00:09:07,560 Speaker 1: risks for the year, for the year ahead, and I 154 00:09:07,600 --> 00:09:09,520 Speaker 1: think there was you know, Paul had mentioned that it 155 00:09:09,559 --> 00:09:12,240 Speaker 1: is just going to be like you know, I think 156 00:09:12,240 --> 00:09:15,640 Speaker 1: there are risks that we see contractions in business investment 157 00:09:15,760 --> 00:09:19,520 Speaker 1: this year, but it's the consumer that's going to be strong, 158 00:09:19,600 --> 00:09:22,920 Speaker 1: that's gonna be really critical. Yelling pointed out, that's two 159 00:09:22,960 --> 00:09:26,319 Speaker 1: thirds plus of the economy, and after today's jobs number, 160 00:09:26,400 --> 00:09:28,560 Speaker 1: you know, you have to be optimistic that we're going 161 00:09:28,600 --> 00:09:31,000 Speaker 1: to get some growth this year, even if it's slower 162 00:09:31,120 --> 00:09:34,520 Speaker 1: than last year because the consumer, the john market is 163 00:09:34,559 --> 00:09:39,680 Speaker 1: in a really good place, Jason Shanka. While the excuse me, 164 00:09:39,679 --> 00:09:42,679 Speaker 1: while the panel was going on the dollar weakening against 165 00:09:42,800 --> 00:09:46,360 Speaker 1: all major currencies against the euro one fourteen and the 166 00:09:46,400 --> 00:09:51,440 Speaker 1: pound sterling twenty at the Japanese end level one and 167 00:09:51,520 --> 00:09:56,360 Speaker 1: Canadian dollar really moving higher against the US dollar one 168 00:09:56,640 --> 00:10:00,280 Speaker 1: thirty four, do you believe that the comments about the 169 00:10:00,600 --> 00:10:04,480 Speaker 1: balance sheet will have lasting effects on the movement of 170 00:10:04,480 --> 00:10:08,199 Speaker 1: the US dollar. Yeah. So I think there's two things here. 171 00:10:08,200 --> 00:10:11,880 Speaker 1: I think one is our opinion has been that the 172 00:10:11,920 --> 00:10:16,880 Speaker 1: Feds overly hawkish. Last year October expected four rate heights 173 00:10:18,600 --> 00:10:21,640 Speaker 1: and we didn't see any foreen at that time. Even 174 00:10:21,679 --> 00:10:24,920 Speaker 1: now we see one at most in Q one, if any, 175 00:10:25,000 --> 00:10:28,320 Speaker 1: because it's actually likely to be a base effect pushing 176 00:10:28,320 --> 00:10:30,880 Speaker 1: inflation lower in the year head. So even if wage 177 00:10:30,880 --> 00:10:34,720 Speaker 1: inflation means relatively strong, we think that lower oil prices 178 00:10:34,840 --> 00:10:38,199 Speaker 1: year on ear could dampen some of the inflationary pressures 179 00:10:38,280 --> 00:10:41,640 Speaker 1: and reduce the need for the FED to raise rates anyway, 180 00:10:41,720 --> 00:10:45,520 Speaker 1: and that's before any of the market risks became priced in. 181 00:10:46,000 --> 00:10:49,920 Speaker 1: Is everything on the table. Everything's always on the table, 182 00:10:50,040 --> 00:10:53,520 Speaker 1: so that that isn't necessarily a new thing. But on 183 00:10:53,559 --> 00:10:56,320 Speaker 1: a day where the wage inflation was at three point 184 00:10:56,360 --> 00:11:00,000 Speaker 1: two percent, accelerated from last month, the highest since April 185 00:11:00,080 --> 00:11:03,280 Speaker 1: two thousand nine, you've got a lot of wave inflation. 186 00:11:03,280 --> 00:11:05,160 Speaker 1: That's a bit of a concern. You couldn't have a 187 00:11:05,200 --> 00:11:07,920 Speaker 1: better day for um, you know, for folks who are 188 00:11:07,920 --> 00:11:10,000 Speaker 1: bearished the dollar, for folks who are worried about the 189 00:11:10,000 --> 00:11:13,319 Speaker 1: economy than they have. The FED chairman in the past 190 00:11:13,320 --> 00:11:17,680 Speaker 1: two chairs talking about, you know, potentially not being all 191 00:11:17,720 --> 00:11:20,960 Speaker 1: that hawk is and talking about a pretty outlook. Well, 192 00:11:21,000 --> 00:11:23,800 Speaker 1: you know, Jason. One one big question of the day, 193 00:11:23,840 --> 00:11:26,480 Speaker 1: in my opinion, and one that's going to be gnawing 194 00:11:26,559 --> 00:11:29,640 Speaker 1: at a lot of market participants going forward, is why 195 00:11:29,840 --> 00:11:32,920 Speaker 1: is it that this economy is so strong and people 196 00:11:32,920 --> 00:11:35,360 Speaker 1: are saying that the US can continue going it alone 197 00:11:35,400 --> 00:11:37,840 Speaker 1: even as the rest of the world slows. Why is 198 00:11:37,880 --> 00:11:42,679 Speaker 1: it that market participants react so strongly at the suggestion 199 00:11:42,760 --> 00:11:45,440 Speaker 1: of a tightening FED. If the U S economy was 200 00:11:45,520 --> 00:11:48,560 Speaker 1: this strong, shouldn't it be able to withstand of a 201 00:11:48,600 --> 00:11:53,160 Speaker 1: sort of normalization of FED policy? Well and it should 202 00:11:53,360 --> 00:11:56,760 Speaker 1: right in theory. But the question is, you know that 203 00:11:56,880 --> 00:11:59,520 Speaker 1: there are there are real issues here that you see 204 00:11:59,559 --> 00:12:04,199 Speaker 1: interest rates going up, housing slows, auto slow, business investment slows, 205 00:12:04,280 --> 00:12:07,560 Speaker 1: equipment is going to slow. Those kinds of things slowing 206 00:12:08,000 --> 00:12:12,600 Speaker 1: will will drastically reduce the growth PACEE. But you look, 207 00:12:12,640 --> 00:12:14,720 Speaker 1: even if you look at the FED FED Zone forecast, 208 00:12:14,760 --> 00:12:17,480 Speaker 1: they see the unemployment rate going up from here, and 209 00:12:17,520 --> 00:12:19,840 Speaker 1: the only way it goes up is if growth slows. 210 00:12:19,880 --> 00:12:23,120 Speaker 1: And you know, I mean, I think this is part 211 00:12:23,160 --> 00:12:26,160 Speaker 1: of the cycle as it is. Should it be able 212 00:12:26,200 --> 00:12:29,160 Speaker 1: to handle more maybe, but right now they don't know. 213 00:12:29,240 --> 00:12:32,400 Speaker 1: You know, this is always sort of an experiment in 214 00:12:32,520 --> 00:12:34,679 Speaker 1: situ where we don't really know what's going to happen, 215 00:12:34,679 --> 00:12:38,160 Speaker 1: and they're kind of testing things along the way. Jason 216 00:12:38,360 --> 00:12:41,959 Speaker 1: Shanka Ben Bernanke, former Chair of the Federal Reserves, said 217 00:12:42,400 --> 00:12:47,000 Speaker 1: that long term low interest rates low long term interest 218 00:12:47,080 --> 00:12:50,839 Speaker 1: rates around the world since the financial crisis have made 219 00:12:50,880 --> 00:12:55,360 Speaker 1: the job of central banking more difficult. Can you comment 220 00:12:55,440 --> 00:12:58,520 Speaker 1: on that, Yeah, I mean there's a couple of things 221 00:12:58,600 --> 00:13:01,120 Speaker 1: around this, right. I mean, look, there were folks who 222 00:13:01,120 --> 00:13:03,560 Speaker 1: have made managing director at some of the world's biggest 223 00:13:03,600 --> 00:13:06,120 Speaker 1: investment banks who had at the time where they made 224 00:13:06,120 --> 00:13:08,679 Speaker 1: empty had never seen a FED rate hike, had never 225 00:13:08,720 --> 00:13:11,640 Speaker 1: seen interest rates above zero. So what happens is and 226 00:13:11,640 --> 00:13:14,559 Speaker 1: this times into your first point about, you know, mixing 227 00:13:14,880 --> 00:13:20,120 Speaker 1: financial market understanding with macroeconomic theory. What happens if you 228 00:13:20,160 --> 00:13:22,839 Speaker 1: have practitioners who have never seen a recession, You've never 229 00:13:22,880 --> 00:13:25,719 Speaker 1: seen a downturn, We've never seen interest rate hikes. It 230 00:13:25,760 --> 00:13:31,920 Speaker 1: increases uncertainty because decision makers in funds and incorporations are 231 00:13:32,520 --> 00:13:34,920 Speaker 1: really going to be looking at their their first chance 232 00:13:35,000 --> 00:13:38,640 Speaker 1: of these things. That introduces uncertainty and risk in terms 233 00:13:38,640 --> 00:13:43,240 Speaker 1: of actual corporate actions, capital allocations, and and other dynamics 234 00:13:43,280 --> 00:13:46,520 Speaker 1: within financial markets. In the autonomy right now, I just 235 00:13:46,520 --> 00:13:48,079 Speaker 1: want to bring you up to speed because we are 236 00:13:48,120 --> 00:13:51,480 Speaker 1: seeing a very big rally in US equity markets and 237 00:13:51,559 --> 00:13:54,679 Speaker 1: Nasdaq is up three point seven percent. Ten year treasury 238 00:13:54,720 --> 00:13:57,680 Speaker 1: yields are experiencing their biggest sell off by at least 239 00:13:57,720 --> 00:14:01,200 Speaker 1: one measure in at least a year. Uh So, Jason, 240 00:14:01,280 --> 00:14:04,560 Speaker 1: I'm just wondering going forward here, what do we need 241 00:14:04,640 --> 00:14:07,880 Speaker 1: to see to sustain this rally and risk assets and 242 00:14:07,960 --> 00:14:10,720 Speaker 1: sort of the uh the pain that we're seeing in 243 00:14:10,960 --> 00:14:15,040 Speaker 1: the safe bond. Well, I think the most important thing 244 00:14:15,360 --> 00:14:18,240 Speaker 1: from a technical standpoint in the equity markets for the 245 00:14:18,320 --> 00:14:21,000 Speaker 1: last five years has been the day moving average were 246 00:14:21,040 --> 00:14:23,320 Speaker 1: well below that on the NASDAC in the DAO. If 247 00:14:23,320 --> 00:14:25,360 Speaker 1: we were to go back above that, I think there'd 248 00:14:25,360 --> 00:14:27,440 Speaker 1: be you know, a lot more room above. But right 249 00:14:27,440 --> 00:14:30,520 Speaker 1: now we're still in a in a zone that's reflecting 250 00:14:30,520 --> 00:14:33,040 Speaker 1: a lot of pressure, uncertainty, and risk. I think as 251 00:14:33,080 --> 00:14:35,360 Speaker 1: we look forward at the data, housing data is going 252 00:14:35,440 --> 00:14:38,040 Speaker 1: to be important, Auto data is going to be important, uh, 253 00:14:38,040 --> 00:14:40,360 Speaker 1: and business investment, We're going to watch that line item 254 00:14:40,360 --> 00:14:41,960 Speaker 1: in the next couple of g d P reports. I 255 00:14:41,960 --> 00:14:44,960 Speaker 1: think that's gonna be really really important because there's a 256 00:14:45,000 --> 00:14:47,920 Speaker 1: lot of risk there. As you see higher interest rates, 257 00:14:47,960 --> 00:14:49,600 Speaker 1: I think companies might have pulled forward a lot of 258 00:14:49,640 --> 00:14:54,320 Speaker 1: their purposes in the presents some downside risk to those sectors. 259 00:14:54,640 --> 00:14:59,280 Speaker 1: In Ben bernanke Is said that expansions don't die of 260 00:14:59,400 --> 00:15:05,360 Speaker 1: old age, that they get murdered. Do you agree, Well, 261 00:15:06,000 --> 00:15:08,840 Speaker 1: you know, I think it it might be more that 262 00:15:08,960 --> 00:15:12,800 Speaker 1: they die unexpectedly, right and and and bernanke hit and 263 00:15:12,920 --> 00:15:16,920 Speaker 1: probably think it had referenced sort of what the expectations were, uh, 264 00:15:16,960 --> 00:15:20,080 Speaker 1: you know, before the financial crisis, and you know, here 265 00:15:20,080 --> 00:15:24,000 Speaker 1: we are, you know, ten years plus later. I think 266 00:15:24,040 --> 00:15:26,840 Speaker 1: that it comes as a surprise too many When the 267 00:15:26,920 --> 00:15:29,480 Speaker 1: things go bad, they tend to go bad a lot 268 00:15:29,520 --> 00:15:32,960 Speaker 1: more quickly than people anticipate, and so it doesn't die 269 00:15:32,960 --> 00:15:35,600 Speaker 1: of old age. It sort of ends swiftly once the 270 00:15:35,640 --> 00:15:38,640 Speaker 1: smart money knows that the party's over. Thanks very much 271 00:15:38,640 --> 00:15:41,600 Speaker 1: for being with us. Jason Schenker is the president of 272 00:15:41,680 --> 00:15:44,800 Speaker 1: Prestige Economics. He is also the chairman of the Futurist 273 00:15:44,880 --> 00:15:49,520 Speaker 1: Institute and a Bloomberg Opinion contributor based in Austin, Texas, 274 00:15:49,600 --> 00:15:52,760 Speaker 1: and you can follow Jason and his work on Twitter 275 00:15:52,880 --> 00:16:14,280 Speaker 1: at Prestige ECN. It is the four day of the 276 00:16:14,400 --> 00:16:18,560 Speaker 1: partial government shutdown in the United States. Today there is 277 00:16:18,600 --> 00:16:21,600 Speaker 1: going to be a meeting of Democrats and Republicans, including 278 00:16:21,640 --> 00:16:24,600 Speaker 1: President Trump, to tried to breach the impass and get 279 00:16:24,640 --> 00:16:28,400 Speaker 1: government open again. Here to tell us about how realistic 280 00:16:28,480 --> 00:16:32,000 Speaker 1: this is is Marty Shanker, chief content officer for Bloomberg News, 281 00:16:32,080 --> 00:16:34,880 Speaker 1: joining us here in our Bloomberg Interactive Broker Studios. So, Marty, 282 00:16:35,000 --> 00:16:36,440 Speaker 1: how hopeful are you that we're going to get a 283 00:16:36,440 --> 00:16:40,560 Speaker 1: resolution today? Well? Hopeful we are not going to get 284 00:16:40,600 --> 00:16:44,760 Speaker 1: a resolution today. And I just you know, as a journalist, 285 00:16:44,800 --> 00:16:47,000 Speaker 1: this is a great story moving forward. But as for 286 00:16:47,080 --> 00:16:50,600 Speaker 1: the people affected. It's not pleasant at all, But I 287 00:16:50,920 --> 00:16:53,080 Speaker 1: do not think there's any chance of this getting settled. 288 00:16:53,560 --> 00:16:56,520 Speaker 1: Why is this a great story as a journalist considering 289 00:16:56,640 --> 00:16:58,720 Speaker 1: all of the other sort of back and forth in 290 00:16:58,800 --> 00:17:01,160 Speaker 1: gridlock that's sort of has gone on over the number 291 00:17:01,200 --> 00:17:03,080 Speaker 1: of years in the past. Well, we had this little 292 00:17:03,120 --> 00:17:06,280 Speaker 1: thing called the mid term elections, and leading up to that, uh, 293 00:17:07,080 --> 00:17:12,879 Speaker 1: was a fascinating story. And this essentially extends that narrative 294 00:17:13,080 --> 00:17:15,960 Speaker 1: past the mid terms themselves, because this is the first 295 00:17:16,600 --> 00:17:20,480 Speaker 1: time Donald Trump is having to confront a Democratic controlled 296 00:17:21,359 --> 00:17:24,959 Speaker 1: House of Representatives under the leadership of Nancy Pelosi, and 297 00:17:25,040 --> 00:17:28,640 Speaker 1: I think it is going to color how that relationship 298 00:17:28,680 --> 00:17:33,080 Speaker 1: moves on for the rest of Donald Trump's term. Another 299 00:17:33,160 --> 00:17:37,360 Speaker 1: thing that might color the relationship is that while federal workers, 300 00:17:37,400 --> 00:17:40,359 Speaker 1: at least those that have not been deemed essential, those 301 00:17:40,359 --> 00:17:44,760 Speaker 1: federal workers are not being paid and will not be paid. Yes, 302 00:17:45,240 --> 00:17:52,359 Speaker 1: cabinet secretaries, deputy secretaries, and top administrators, even Vice President 303 00:17:52,520 --> 00:17:57,400 Speaker 1: Mike Pence, they might get an annual increase of ten 304 00:17:57,600 --> 00:18:02,560 Speaker 1: thousand dollars a year. That's not gonna look so great 305 00:18:02,600 --> 00:18:06,200 Speaker 1: because this has to do with the caps on spending 306 00:18:07,000 --> 00:18:13,119 Speaker 1: for federal workers. Without the legislation going into effect, those 307 00:18:13,160 --> 00:18:20,960 Speaker 1: caps are removed and these pay increases will go forward, right. Uh. Look, Uh, 308 00:18:21,080 --> 00:18:25,119 Speaker 1: the optics of the shutdown are not great. Uh and 309 00:18:25,119 --> 00:18:28,639 Speaker 1: and I really do think they're not great for the 310 00:18:28,680 --> 00:18:32,000 Speaker 1: Democrats as well as the Republicans. Um. You know, once 311 00:18:32,040 --> 00:18:34,600 Speaker 1: you get outside of the news centers on the coasts 312 00:18:34,960 --> 00:18:37,920 Speaker 1: in the middle of America, this just reinforces the whole 313 00:18:37,960 --> 00:18:41,639 Speaker 1: idea that governments don't the government doesn't work for them, 314 00:18:41,720 --> 00:18:45,280 Speaker 1: and it is only part of uh, you know, uh, 315 00:18:45,640 --> 00:18:51,399 Speaker 1: the state of affairs where everything is politics and nothing 316 00:18:51,480 --> 00:18:55,600 Speaker 1: is about creating solutions. So I don't think it's great 317 00:18:55,640 --> 00:18:58,760 Speaker 1: for either side. I do think it's true that the 318 00:18:59,280 --> 00:19:02,280 Speaker 1: that president and Trump and the GOP will get the 319 00:19:02,320 --> 00:19:06,360 Speaker 1: majority of the blame. But you know, so what I mean, 320 00:19:06,440 --> 00:19:09,160 Speaker 1: for eight hundred thousand people who are not getting paid, 321 00:19:09,400 --> 00:19:11,760 Speaker 1: it doesn't matter who's to blame. I can't make car payments, 322 00:19:11,800 --> 00:19:14,480 Speaker 1: they can't make mortgage. But it goes beyond just those people, 323 00:19:14,520 --> 00:19:18,800 Speaker 1: because yesterday Kevin Hassett, the chief economic advisor to President Trump, 324 00:19:18,840 --> 00:19:21,720 Speaker 1: said at the White House. He told reporters uh that 325 00:19:22,000 --> 00:19:25,760 Speaker 1: the ongoing partial government shutdown would cut economic output in 326 00:19:25,760 --> 00:19:29,640 Speaker 1: the nation by about zero point one percent every two weeks. 327 00:19:29,680 --> 00:19:31,760 Speaker 1: After a while, this is gonna have a real drag, right, 328 00:19:32,000 --> 00:19:35,240 Speaker 1: that is correct. Uh. And there are all these ancillary 329 00:19:35,320 --> 00:19:41,040 Speaker 1: businesses that rely on these people who are not spending 330 00:19:41,080 --> 00:19:44,560 Speaker 1: money that they don't have. There's contracts that are not 331 00:19:44,640 --> 00:19:50,040 Speaker 1: going to be executed, and frankly, uncertainty breeds uh in 332 00:19:50,160 --> 00:19:53,720 Speaker 1: decision and companies are going to have second thoughts about 333 00:19:54,480 --> 00:19:58,359 Speaker 1: doing anything while this shutdown extends longer and longer, so 334 00:19:58,440 --> 00:20:01,359 Speaker 1: it could have an even more dramatic impact the longer 335 00:20:01,400 --> 00:20:05,159 Speaker 1: it goes. And you know, looking at this job number, 336 00:20:06,200 --> 00:20:09,680 Speaker 1: that's not going to continue if we have an economic slowdown. 337 00:20:10,800 --> 00:20:15,120 Speaker 1: The other unintended effect is you have closures of many 338 00:20:15,160 --> 00:20:21,439 Speaker 1: federal facilities, for example, the park system, many places not 339 00:20:21,520 --> 00:20:25,440 Speaker 1: being cleaned up, not being taken care of. It also 340 00:20:25,440 --> 00:20:28,199 Speaker 1: affects the small and mid sized businesses that count on 341 00:20:28,440 --> 00:20:32,440 Speaker 1: people making visits to those locations in order to survive. 342 00:20:32,680 --> 00:20:36,959 Speaker 1: That's right. And there are other things about uh, you know, 343 00:20:37,040 --> 00:20:43,479 Speaker 1: how companies get visas process, passports issued. Um. There are 344 00:20:43,480 --> 00:20:47,000 Speaker 1: all kinds of ways in which this slow down will 345 00:20:47,480 --> 00:20:51,399 Speaker 1: little by little have an impact on people's lives. The 346 00:20:51,960 --> 00:20:54,440 Speaker 1: I guess the silver lining to that is is those 347 00:20:54,480 --> 00:20:58,760 Speaker 1: things trickled down to Main Street, there is more political 348 00:20:58,800 --> 00:21:02,359 Speaker 1: pressure on getting solved. But right now this has become 349 00:21:02,600 --> 00:21:06,760 Speaker 1: a Nancy Pelosi versus Donald Trump issue, and neither side 350 00:21:07,000 --> 00:21:08,719 Speaker 1: is going to give in. Well, I want to talk 351 00:21:08,760 --> 00:21:12,320 Speaker 1: about exactly that before the effects trickled down. Let's talk 352 00:21:12,359 --> 00:21:15,280 Speaker 1: about who has the leverage here, the balance of leverage 353 00:21:15,400 --> 00:21:19,479 Speaker 1: as these two go into the negotiating room. Who has 354 00:21:19,520 --> 00:21:21,440 Speaker 1: a better position right now? Well, I don't think there's 355 00:21:21,440 --> 00:21:26,240 Speaker 1: any question that the leverage sides with Nancy Pelosi and 356 00:21:26,240 --> 00:21:30,359 Speaker 1: the Democrats. They have passed two separate bills that would 357 00:21:30,560 --> 00:21:35,520 Speaker 1: reopen the government. Uh, that would fund homeland security without 358 00:21:35,520 --> 00:21:39,919 Speaker 1: a wall, uh for a month while they negotiated on 359 00:21:39,960 --> 00:21:43,040 Speaker 1: that issue, but it would essentially reopen the government. So 360 00:21:43,480 --> 00:21:48,040 Speaker 1: it's you know, it's this rather fascinating point where uh, 361 00:21:48,119 --> 00:21:51,560 Speaker 1: Mitch McConnell has basically seated the Senate to the president. 362 00:21:51,640 --> 00:21:54,040 Speaker 1: He's not going to put it to a vote unless 363 00:21:54,080 --> 00:21:59,280 Speaker 1: the President is going to sign what what the Senate passes. So, um, 364 00:21:59,320 --> 00:22:02,399 Speaker 1: it is definitely the Democrats who have the advantage here. 365 00:22:02,520 --> 00:22:04,240 Speaker 1: Can I ask you a question, how popular is the 366 00:22:04,280 --> 00:22:10,560 Speaker 1: wall among Americans? The latest polling shows that most majority 367 00:22:11,200 --> 00:22:14,680 Speaker 1: a majority of Americans don't support the wall, and they 368 00:22:14,720 --> 00:22:20,520 Speaker 1: certainly don't support a shutdown on that issue. Um, but 369 00:22:20,720 --> 00:22:24,119 Speaker 1: I think it's really gotten beyond whether they support a 370 00:22:24,160 --> 00:22:28,640 Speaker 1: wall or not. It's a question of trust, and the 371 00:22:28,640 --> 00:22:32,479 Speaker 1: Democrats have basically said that they don't trust Donald Trump 372 00:22:33,280 --> 00:22:38,080 Speaker 1: to execute any kind of border security based on a 373 00:22:38,160 --> 00:22:43,200 Speaker 1: campaign promise rather than what experts in his own administrations 374 00:22:43,240 --> 00:22:47,600 Speaker 1: say is an effective border security plan. Well, I guess 375 00:22:47,600 --> 00:22:49,720 Speaker 1: this is just going to continue until we see some 376 00:22:49,800 --> 00:22:53,679 Speaker 1: men we actually Monday, Well, we hope. So. Yeah, I 377 00:22:53,720 --> 00:22:58,440 Speaker 1: think the president is shutdown, not US shutdown. We're we're 378 00:22:58,520 --> 00:23:01,120 Speaker 1: not shutting down. Just that's the point that this has 379 00:23:01,160 --> 00:23:03,720 Speaker 1: become a slanging match, hasn't it. It's it's it's kind 380 00:23:03,720 --> 00:23:07,120 Speaker 1: of taken on a personal tone, right with Chuck Schumer, 381 00:23:07,280 --> 00:23:10,600 Speaker 1: Senator from New York, minority leader in the Senate, saying 382 00:23:10,600 --> 00:23:14,720 Speaker 1: that President Trump is a terrible negotiator. Yeah, I mean, 383 00:23:14,800 --> 00:23:22,160 Speaker 1: I don't think anybody is being particularly um shy about 384 00:23:22,200 --> 00:23:26,160 Speaker 1: taking advantage of personal attacks in the age of Donald Trump. 385 00:23:26,200 --> 00:23:29,879 Speaker 1: Although Nancy Pelosi has made it clear she wants people 386 00:23:29,960 --> 00:23:33,160 Speaker 1: they disagree with they want to be civil with them. 387 00:23:33,320 --> 00:23:37,600 Speaker 1: We'll see whether that continues as this slowdown shutdown continues. 388 00:23:37,880 --> 00:23:41,360 Speaker 1: Thanks very much as always, Marty Shanker, Chief content Officer 389 00:23:41,640 --> 00:23:56,959 Speaker 1: for Bloomberg. Our focus on municipals is brought to you 390 00:23:57,000 --> 00:24:01,960 Speaker 1: by Build America Mutual BAM Star Bonds finance projects that 391 00:24:02,040 --> 00:24:05,359 Speaker 1: protect and restore the environment with more renewable energy and 392 00:24:05,400 --> 00:24:11,480 Speaker 1: efficient transportation and buildings. Visit build America dot com, slash 393 00:24:11,680 --> 00:24:17,000 Speaker 1: Green Star, BAM, Building America. Time to bring in Joe Maisak, 394 00:24:17,160 --> 00:24:20,000 Speaker 1: editor for the Bloomberg Brief for municipal markets. He joins 395 00:24:20,080 --> 00:24:23,800 Speaker 1: us here in the Bloomberg Interactor Broker Studios. Joe Maisak, 396 00:24:23,920 --> 00:24:27,320 Speaker 1: Let's begin with a look at where investors are putting 397 00:24:27,520 --> 00:24:31,639 Speaker 1: their money. They are pouring money into municipal bond exchange 398 00:24:31,720 --> 00:24:41,520 Speaker 1: traded funds. What has changed, Well, Exchange traded funds are easier, 399 00:24:42,040 --> 00:24:47,240 Speaker 1: a little more transparent, less in fees than mutual funds. 400 00:24:47,440 --> 00:24:53,240 Speaker 1: And there are relatively recent entry into the municipal market. 401 00:24:53,760 --> 00:24:57,600 Speaker 1: And it turns out, and this was a kind of 402 00:24:57,640 --> 00:25:01,320 Speaker 1: a funny thing. Alan Shankele of Jannie Montgomery brought this 403 00:25:01,440 --> 00:25:03,640 Speaker 1: up the other day and he said, take a look. 404 00:25:03,720 --> 00:25:07,040 Speaker 1: I know, we just started getting inflows back in the 405 00:25:07,160 --> 00:25:11,280 Speaker 1: mutual funds. But over the last several weeks we've got 406 00:25:11,280 --> 00:25:14,160 Speaker 1: more than six hundred million dollars have been flowing into 407 00:25:14,520 --> 00:25:17,439 Speaker 1: munique exchange traded funds well. But is this just an 408 00:25:17,440 --> 00:25:19,919 Speaker 1: issue of transferring out of mutual funds into e t 409 00:25:20,080 --> 00:25:21,840 Speaker 1: F s or is this a sort of vote of 410 00:25:21,880 --> 00:25:26,120 Speaker 1: confidence on this particular market by retail investors. I think 411 00:25:26,160 --> 00:25:28,600 Speaker 1: it's the latter. Ear Lisa a very good point there. 412 00:25:28,800 --> 00:25:31,240 Speaker 1: It's not because you don't see, you know, a one 413 00:25:31,280 --> 00:25:34,440 Speaker 1: to one. It's not just transferring out. It's hey, let's 414 00:25:34,480 --> 00:25:37,159 Speaker 1: look at this new product. And I think the E 415 00:25:37,320 --> 00:25:40,000 Speaker 1: t F families are getting a little bit more uh 416 00:25:41,560 --> 00:25:44,399 Speaker 1: savvy about how they pitch, and you know, it's one 417 00:25:44,400 --> 00:25:47,400 Speaker 1: of those things a product like this takes some time 418 00:25:47,440 --> 00:25:50,040 Speaker 1: to get going, especially because you have mutual funds and 419 00:25:50,119 --> 00:25:53,840 Speaker 1: people's habits are so entrenched. So I'm wondering why why now? 420 00:25:53,880 --> 00:25:55,560 Speaker 1: I mean, is it just basically the bid for bonds 421 00:25:55,560 --> 00:25:58,639 Speaker 1: that we've seen generally until today, uh permeate throughout the 422 00:25:58,680 --> 00:26:01,159 Speaker 1: markets that's driven this, or is it some hope for 423 00:26:01,200 --> 00:26:05,320 Speaker 1: an infrastructure spending plan Because Nancy Pelosi, who is sworn 424 00:26:05,359 --> 00:26:08,719 Speaker 1: in as the Speaker of the House yesterday indicated that 425 00:26:08,760 --> 00:26:12,680 Speaker 1: they were going to move for above bipartisan infrastructure bill, 426 00:26:12,680 --> 00:26:17,280 Speaker 1: which could potentially help. Well, Uh, there's that, but I 427 00:26:18,160 --> 00:26:21,800 Speaker 1: I really think it's more of the haven investment. You know, 428 00:26:21,840 --> 00:26:24,639 Speaker 1: the stock market got so beat up over the last 429 00:26:24,840 --> 00:26:28,679 Speaker 1: but the last quarter. Uh that you know, people have 430 00:26:28,920 --> 00:26:33,359 Speaker 1: been looking at municipal bonds, municipal ETFs, mutual funds and 431 00:26:33,400 --> 00:26:36,399 Speaker 1: you know, maybe mutual funds it's not as sexy as 432 00:26:36,440 --> 00:26:38,800 Speaker 1: it was. Hey, the CTF thing, let's let's give this 433 00:26:38,840 --> 00:26:42,880 Speaker 1: a whirl, and it's muties, which are renowned as your 434 00:26:42,920 --> 00:26:45,600 Speaker 1: safe investment. Well, and just looking at the yields that 435 00:26:45,640 --> 00:26:50,600 Speaker 1: are available on some specific states California two point three, 436 00:26:51,440 --> 00:26:55,560 Speaker 1: New York two point one six percent, Illinois. While that's 437 00:26:55,600 --> 00:26:59,040 Speaker 1: a separate case, but we've seen those yields move lower. 438 00:26:59,800 --> 00:27:05,480 Speaker 1: Oh man. Uh the you know, you would you have 439 00:27:05,560 --> 00:27:08,640 Speaker 1: the January effect taking place, you know, coming up here. 440 00:27:08,920 --> 00:27:12,960 Speaker 1: But yeah, we've again it's because of you know, bond 441 00:27:13,040 --> 00:27:17,159 Speaker 1: market safe haven. Muni's safe haven and the yields have 442 00:27:17,200 --> 00:27:20,120 Speaker 1: been going down. Plus the last two weeks, the calendar 443 00:27:20,800 --> 00:27:24,480 Speaker 1: in municiples has been dead nothing there. Uh, next week 444 00:27:24,520 --> 00:27:27,160 Speaker 1: we have the first deals being priced in the new year. 445 00:27:27,760 --> 00:27:31,440 Speaker 1: Pretty good week too. I think it's about eight billion dollars. Alright, 446 00:27:31,480 --> 00:27:33,280 Speaker 1: so let's talk about yield. Let's talk about where you 447 00:27:33,320 --> 00:27:35,760 Speaker 1: can get it. You were a column looking at yields 448 00:27:35,760 --> 00:27:38,560 Speaker 1: that can be found in smaller liberal arts colleges. Will 449 00:27:38,600 --> 00:27:43,679 Speaker 1: took you there. Oh, you know. I I at the 450 00:27:43,840 --> 00:27:46,840 Speaker 1: end of the year, I was looking at the calendar 451 00:27:46,880 --> 00:27:50,280 Speaker 1: and I said, Okay, what haven't I written about most recently? 452 00:27:50,720 --> 00:27:53,680 Speaker 1: And I saw there was an issue for Randolph College 453 00:27:53,960 --> 00:27:56,240 Speaker 1: and I've never heard of that, and there was an 454 00:27:56,320 --> 00:27:58,639 Speaker 1: issue for Hampton Sydney College, and there was also a 455 00:27:58,640 --> 00:28:01,080 Speaker 1: big issue for Tufts. And as we talked about in 456 00:28:01,080 --> 00:28:06,520 Speaker 1: the last conversation of last year, Georgetown is selling taxable 457 00:28:06,520 --> 00:28:09,560 Speaker 1: bonds to a century BOMs. So I said, gee, you know, 458 00:28:09,640 --> 00:28:12,919 Speaker 1: let me take a look at those, uh colleges. And 459 00:28:13,160 --> 00:28:15,560 Speaker 1: you know, the more you you look into these official 460 00:28:15,640 --> 00:28:20,720 Speaker 1: statements and it just describes a completely different world for you. 461 00:28:21,320 --> 00:28:23,640 Speaker 1: And it just got so interesting that I finally did 462 00:28:23,640 --> 00:28:27,960 Speaker 1: a column just focused on Randolph and Hampton Sydney, which 463 00:28:28,000 --> 00:28:30,520 Speaker 1: you're both in Virginia, and you know, you talk about 464 00:28:30,600 --> 00:28:35,280 Speaker 1: yield on some of those maturities. You're picking up more. 465 00:28:35,359 --> 00:28:38,760 Speaker 1: You're getting more than four percent, which has pin pointed 466 00:28:38,760 --> 00:28:40,959 Speaker 1: out before. What are we seeing now in the market 467 00:28:40,960 --> 00:28:47,479 Speaker 1: point to ten years, we're seeing the two So you know, 468 00:28:47,480 --> 00:28:49,600 Speaker 1: this is a nice pick up. But now these are 469 00:28:49,840 --> 00:28:53,800 Speaker 1: risks though, tell us about the risks. Look, these these 470 00:28:53,800 --> 00:28:56,320 Speaker 1: are lower rated. One is rater today. I think one 471 00:28:56,360 --> 00:28:59,959 Speaker 1: is right triple B plus. Uh. Very small, you're tell 472 00:29:00,000 --> 00:29:04,920 Speaker 1: talking about, uh, you know, a total total enrollment of 473 00:29:05,240 --> 00:29:08,400 Speaker 1: you know, six hundred to a thousand. Uh, so they're 474 00:29:08,480 --> 00:29:13,640 Speaker 1: they're much smaller. And you know, schools have been under 475 00:29:13,680 --> 00:29:18,520 Speaker 1: pressure the last several years as and I remember looking 476 00:29:18,600 --> 00:29:22,080 Speaker 1: at in the Randolph College issue, it had this thing 477 00:29:22,120 --> 00:29:26,960 Speaker 1: called tuition reset where the uh, the school has been 478 00:29:26,960 --> 00:29:30,640 Speaker 1: asked by the board to take a look at rolling 479 00:29:30,680 --> 00:29:33,680 Speaker 1: back tuition, which you know, if you're a parent, you 480 00:29:33,720 --> 00:29:35,880 Speaker 1: know it grows three, four or five percent a year. 481 00:29:36,440 --> 00:29:39,920 Speaker 1: And uh, that was the first time I saw, wow, 482 00:29:40,080 --> 00:29:44,520 Speaker 1: tuition reset. Randolph is also selling its selling its horses, 483 00:29:44,880 --> 00:29:48,720 Speaker 1: closing down it's equestrian program, a lot of interesting things, 484 00:29:48,720 --> 00:29:51,480 Speaker 1: you know, fascinating, but but you know, at the same time, 485 00:29:52,200 --> 00:29:56,959 Speaker 1: these smaller schools, they have very devoted alumni and they 486 00:29:56,960 --> 00:29:59,560 Speaker 1: have endownmonds. Joe Sac, thank you so much for being 487 00:29:59,560 --> 00:30:01,200 Speaker 1: with us. Joe my Sac is the editor of the 488 00:30:01,200 --> 00:30:04,040 Speaker 1: Bloomberg Brief, focused on the Missal Boom market for us 489 00:30:04,200 --> 00:30:10,040 Speaker 1: here at Bloomberg. Thanks for listening to the Bloomberg P 490 00:30:10,160 --> 00:30:13,120 Speaker 1: and L podcast. You can subscribe and listen to interviews 491 00:30:13,160 --> 00:30:17,200 Speaker 1: at Apple Podcasts, SoundCloud, or whatever podcast platform you prefer. 492 00:30:17,600 --> 00:30:21,200 Speaker 1: I'm pim Fox. I'm on Twitter at pim Fox. I'm 493 00:30:21,200 --> 00:30:24,520 Speaker 1: on Twitter at Lisa Abramo wits one. Before the podcast, 494 00:30:24,560 --> 00:30:27,160 Speaker 1: you can always catch us worldwide on Bloomberg Radio