WEBVTT - How Do Psychedelics Work?

0:00:15.356 --> 0:00:24.036
<v Speaker 1>Pushkin. Let's talk about psychedelics. It's been a few years

0:00:24.116 --> 0:00:27.076
<v Speaker 1>since the FDA approved the use of ketamine to treat

0:00:27.116 --> 0:00:31.516
<v Speaker 1>depression in certain patients. Later this year, the FDA may

0:00:31.596 --> 0:00:35.236
<v Speaker 1>also approve the use of MDMA in combination with therapy

0:00:35.716 --> 0:00:40.996
<v Speaker 1>to treat PTSD post traumatic stress disorder, and researchers around

0:00:41.036 --> 0:00:45.996
<v Speaker 1>the world are studying other powerful psychedelics like psilocybin, ibogaine,

0:00:46.156 --> 0:00:49.596
<v Speaker 1>and LSD. It's been clear for a long time that

0:00:49.636 --> 0:00:53.356
<v Speaker 1>these are very powerful drugs, and it's becoming clear that

0:00:53.396 --> 0:00:57.916
<v Speaker 1>these drugs may be particularly helpful in certain contexts. But

0:00:58.356 --> 0:01:02.236
<v Speaker 1>still less clear is a very big, very important question,

0:01:03.236 --> 0:01:13.116
<v Speaker 1>how exactly do psychedelics work. I'm Jacob Goldstein and this

0:01:13.196 --> 0:01:15.276
<v Speaker 1>is What's Your Problem, the show where I talk to

0:01:15.316 --> 0:01:19.116
<v Speaker 1>people who are trying to make technological progress. My guest

0:01:19.156 --> 0:01:22.716
<v Speaker 1>today is goul Dolan. She's a professor of psychology and

0:01:22.836 --> 0:01:27.196
<v Speaker 1>neuroscience at the University of California at Berkeley. Goule's problem

0:01:27.516 --> 0:01:30.476
<v Speaker 1>is summed up in a phrase from a paper that

0:01:30.556 --> 0:01:34.196
<v Speaker 1>she co authored last year in the journal Nature. She's

0:01:34.236 --> 0:01:39.876
<v Speaker 1>trying to identify quote, a common neurobiological mechanism that can

0:01:39.916 --> 0:01:44.956
<v Speaker 1>account for the shared therapeutic effects of psychedelics. In other words,

0:01:45.276 --> 0:01:48.076
<v Speaker 1>why do all these very different drugs seem to have

0:01:48.156 --> 0:01:52.276
<v Speaker 1>similar powerful effects on the brain. Goole has a theory

0:01:52.316 --> 0:01:55.276
<v Speaker 1>about this, about why all these different drugs seem to

0:01:55.276 --> 0:01:59.236
<v Speaker 1>have similar effects, and if she's right, it could mean

0:01:59.396 --> 0:02:02.756
<v Speaker 1>that psychedelics used in the right context, may be useful

0:02:02.916 --> 0:02:07.356
<v Speaker 1>beyond mental illness. Goul thinks, among other things, psychedelics may

0:02:07.396 --> 0:02:11.596
<v Speaker 1>be able to help patients recod from strokes. We started

0:02:11.596 --> 0:02:14.556
<v Speaker 1>the conversation talking about the origin of Ghul's quest to

0:02:14.676 --> 0:02:16.556
<v Speaker 1>understand how psychedelics work.

0:02:19.156 --> 0:02:22.316
<v Speaker 2>About ten years ago when I started my lab, you know,

0:02:22.396 --> 0:02:25.596
<v Speaker 2>there were starting to be some hints that psychedelics were

0:02:25.596 --> 0:02:28.916
<v Speaker 2>having these remarkable effects in you know, all kinds of

0:02:28.956 --> 0:02:32.036
<v Speaker 2>diseases that didn't seem terribly connected to each other, right,

0:02:32.116 --> 0:02:36.916
<v Speaker 2>so addiction and depression and PTSD, and you know, the

0:02:36.956 --> 0:02:39.876
<v Speaker 2>people who study those diseases each have their way of

0:02:39.916 --> 0:02:43.756
<v Speaker 2>studying them and modeling them in animals, and they're they're

0:02:43.796 --> 0:02:47.036
<v Speaker 2>siloed into different spaces. And yet we were starting to

0:02:47.116 --> 0:02:51.476
<v Speaker 2>hear hints that, you know, it didn't matter which psychedelic

0:02:51.556 --> 0:02:55.076
<v Speaker 2>they were kind of interchangeably showing some promise in all

0:02:55.116 --> 0:02:58.836
<v Speaker 2>of these different areas that seem unconnected to each other.

0:02:58.916 --> 0:03:01.996
<v Speaker 2>I mean not just in terms of what behavioral essays

0:03:01.996 --> 0:03:04.236
<v Speaker 2>we use, but even sort of what brain regions might

0:03:04.236 --> 0:03:07.956
<v Speaker 2>be important. Right, Like, the depression people were focused on

0:03:07.996 --> 0:03:10.156
<v Speaker 2>the hippi campus and the frontal cortex.

0:03:10.276 --> 0:03:11.836
<v Speaker 3>The PTSD people.

0:03:11.676 --> 0:03:15.956
<v Speaker 2>Were focused on the amygdala, the you know, the addiction

0:03:15.996 --> 0:03:18.236
<v Speaker 2>people were focused on the nucleus, thecumbents, and they were

0:03:18.236 --> 0:03:20.516
<v Speaker 2>just sort of all over the place, and yet there

0:03:20.516 --> 0:03:24.956
<v Speaker 2>seemed to be this overlap. But when we then discovered

0:03:25.036 --> 0:03:27.196
<v Speaker 2>that all of the psychedelics seemed to be doing the

0:03:27.316 --> 0:03:31.076
<v Speaker 2>same thing, it sort of began to settle in that

0:03:31.676 --> 0:03:35.276
<v Speaker 2>this explanation that we came up with could account for

0:03:35.836 --> 0:03:38.436
<v Speaker 2>why all of these diseases that look so different from

0:03:38.436 --> 0:03:43.436
<v Speaker 2>each other could be responding to psychedelics in a therapeutic way.

0:03:43.996 --> 0:03:48.596
<v Speaker 1>So should we start the explanation with talking about critical periods?

0:03:48.676 --> 0:03:50.876
<v Speaker 1>Is that a reasonable place to start. Let's start with

0:03:50.876 --> 0:03:52.396
<v Speaker 1>critical periods. What's the critical period?

0:03:52.956 --> 0:03:53.156
<v Speaker 3>Right?

0:03:53.196 --> 0:03:56.796
<v Speaker 2>So, critical periods are something that you know, neuroscientists have

0:03:56.996 --> 0:03:59.716
<v Speaker 2>known about for almost one hundred years. They were first

0:03:59.756 --> 0:04:03.916
<v Speaker 2>described in nineteen thirty five by Conrad Lorenz, who was

0:04:03.996 --> 0:04:09.916
<v Speaker 2>describing and imprinting behavior in baby geese, So basically, forty

0:04:09.916 --> 0:04:12.636
<v Speaker 2>eight hours after they hatch from their eggs, they will

0:04:12.996 --> 0:04:17.116
<v Speaker 2>imprint onto anything that is moving around in their immediate environment.

0:04:17.236 --> 0:04:20.076
<v Speaker 2>So typically this would be their mother, but you know,

0:04:20.076 --> 0:04:22.356
<v Speaker 2>if there's a crazy scientist around, it might be to

0:04:22.436 --> 0:04:23.436
<v Speaker 2>the crazy scientist.

0:04:23.596 --> 0:04:27.036
<v Speaker 1>And there are photos of the baby geese following him

0:04:27.036 --> 0:04:29.836
<v Speaker 1>around right in fact, as if he were a mamma goose.

0:04:29.916 --> 0:04:31.396
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, exactly.

0:04:31.476 --> 0:04:34.156
<v Speaker 2>And so but that window of time where they're so

0:04:34.356 --> 0:04:37.636
<v Speaker 2>sensitive to their environment and they form these lasting attachments

0:04:38.036 --> 0:04:41.036
<v Speaker 2>only lasts about forty eight hours, and then afterwards they don't.

0:04:41.236 --> 0:04:43.356
<v Speaker 2>They're not sensitive to their environment in the same way.

0:04:43.556 --> 0:04:45.676
<v Speaker 2>They're not learning from their environment in the same way.

0:04:45.716 --> 0:04:48.836
<v Speaker 2>And that window of time Conrad Lorenz called it the

0:04:48.836 --> 0:04:53.716
<v Speaker 2>critical period. And since that time we've discovered literally dozens

0:04:53.756 --> 0:04:56.836
<v Speaker 2>of other critical periods. So there are critical periods for

0:04:56.956 --> 0:05:01.596
<v Speaker 2>rewiring the visual system, critical periods for touch, critical periods

0:05:01.636 --> 0:05:05.596
<v Speaker 2>for movement, critical periods for language. Language is probably the

0:05:05.596 --> 0:05:07.996
<v Speaker 2>one that most people are familiar with. If they try

0:05:08.036 --> 0:05:11.356
<v Speaker 2>to learn enough their language when they were older, it's

0:05:11.436 --> 0:05:13.916
<v Speaker 2>much harder and you always have an accent compared to

0:05:13.956 --> 0:05:17.796
<v Speaker 2>the language you learn as a child, and so neuroscientists

0:05:17.836 --> 0:05:20.756
<v Speaker 2>have known about these critical periods for a long time,

0:05:21.436 --> 0:05:25.396
<v Speaker 2>and we've had this idea that maybe the reason that

0:05:25.476 --> 0:05:29.516
<v Speaker 2>we're so bad at curing diseases of the brain, neuropsychiatric

0:05:29.556 --> 0:05:33.436
<v Speaker 2>illnesses and neurological diseases, is because by the time we

0:05:33.516 --> 0:05:38.516
<v Speaker 2>get around to correcting whatever is the underlying problem, the

0:05:38.636 --> 0:05:40.316
<v Speaker 2>relevant critical period.

0:05:39.996 --> 0:05:40.996
<v Speaker 3>Has already closed.

0:05:41.436 --> 0:05:44.396
<v Speaker 2>And so the classic example of this is if you

0:05:44.516 --> 0:05:47.796
<v Speaker 2>are born with bilateral cataracts in your eyes and you

0:05:47.876 --> 0:05:50.596
<v Speaker 2>don't have them removed by the time you're aged five

0:05:50.716 --> 0:05:53.916
<v Speaker 2>or so, then you will be blind forever because even

0:05:53.996 --> 0:05:57.196
<v Speaker 2>if you remove the cataracts, wants the ability of the

0:05:57.316 --> 0:06:01.116
<v Speaker 2>visual part of the brain to adapt to the corrected

0:06:01.236 --> 0:06:04.756
<v Speaker 2>visual environment. Once the critical period has closed, it can't

0:06:04.796 --> 0:06:07.996
<v Speaker 2>adapt again, and so even though the impediment is removed,

0:06:08.476 --> 0:06:11.276
<v Speaker 2>the brain can respond to it, and so you're blind forever.

0:06:12.596 --> 0:06:15.916
<v Speaker 2>And so we have been looking, probably for the last

0:06:15.916 --> 0:06:19.716
<v Speaker 2>one hundred years or so for ways to reopen critical periods,

0:06:19.716 --> 0:06:22.756
<v Speaker 2>with the idea that if we could reopen them, we

0:06:22.836 --> 0:06:27.036
<v Speaker 2>could potentially cure or do a better job of correcting

0:06:27.036 --> 0:06:29.036
<v Speaker 2>some of these impairments later in life.

0:06:29.556 --> 0:06:32.916
<v Speaker 1>So in this Nature paper, that you published last year.

0:06:33.396 --> 0:06:38.436
<v Speaker 1>You write, it's tempting to speculate that the altered state

0:06:38.716 --> 0:06:43.796
<v Speaker 1>of consciousness shared by all psychedelics reflects the subjective experience

0:06:43.956 --> 0:06:47.476
<v Speaker 1>of reopening critical periods. Let me say, first of all,

0:06:47.516 --> 0:06:50.156
<v Speaker 1>I like, it's tempting to speculate. It's like, you're not

0:06:50.236 --> 0:06:51.156
<v Speaker 1>even speculating.

0:06:51.196 --> 0:06:54.436
<v Speaker 5>It's more speculative than speculating, right, Like, we're not going

0:06:54.516 --> 0:06:58.596
<v Speaker 5>to speculate, but we're tempted to speculate. So and I

0:06:58.636 --> 0:07:01.236
<v Speaker 5>appreciate that, right, Like, this is clearly speculative, it's based

0:07:01.276 --> 0:07:04.316
<v Speaker 5>on research and mice. But why are you tempted to

0:07:04.356 --> 0:07:09.116
<v Speaker 5>speculate that psychedelics may reopen critical periods in the brain?

0:07:09.996 --> 0:07:10.196
<v Speaker 3>Right?

0:07:10.516 --> 0:07:14.996
<v Speaker 2>So, the reason that we're tempted to speculate this is because,

0:07:16.196 --> 0:07:19.356
<v Speaker 2>you know, one of the other things that brings together

0:07:19.396 --> 0:07:23.236
<v Speaker 2>psychedelics as a group of drugs is that they all

0:07:23.276 --> 0:07:26.556
<v Speaker 2>induced this altered state of consciousness. So we discovered a

0:07:26.556 --> 0:07:30.756
<v Speaker 2>critical period in twenty nineteen for Social rewards learning. It

0:07:30.796 --> 0:07:33.596
<v Speaker 2>was a brand new critical period. Although you know, there

0:07:33.676 --> 0:07:37.556
<v Speaker 2>was a lot of literature from human studies suggesting that

0:07:37.596 --> 0:07:40.876
<v Speaker 2>such a critical period should exist, but it just took

0:07:40.996 --> 0:07:43.156
<v Speaker 2>doing it. In nine hundred mice to be able to

0:07:43.156 --> 0:07:46.396
<v Speaker 2>formally demonstrate it. So we did that. We showed that

0:07:46.436 --> 0:07:49.956
<v Speaker 2>there's this social critical period, and originally we showed that

0:07:50.156 --> 0:07:53.196
<v Speaker 2>MDMA was able to reopen this critical period. And we

0:07:53.276 --> 0:07:58.716
<v Speaker 2>thought because MDMA is characterized by having this pro social

0:07:58.836 --> 0:08:02.396
<v Speaker 2>property that makes it different from the other psychedelics in that,

0:08:02.796 --> 0:08:06.156
<v Speaker 2>you know, it's altered state of consciousness, plus you know,

0:08:06.236 --> 0:08:09.956
<v Speaker 2>cuddle puddles and empathy, right, and so we thought it's

0:08:09.996 --> 0:08:13.516
<v Speaker 2>because of that pro social property of MDMA that it's

0:08:13.556 --> 0:08:17.156
<v Speaker 2>able to open this social critical period. But then when

0:08:17.156 --> 0:08:21.556
<v Speaker 2>we figured out that well LSD and I began and KETYMI,

0:08:21.676 --> 0:08:24.996
<v Speaker 2>none of which are like particularly pro social, nobody's you know,

0:08:25.076 --> 0:08:27.876
<v Speaker 2>doing a thirty person cuddle puddle on I begin right,

0:08:28.716 --> 0:08:31.316
<v Speaker 2>even though they don't have this pro social property, they

0:08:31.316 --> 0:08:33.116
<v Speaker 2>are all also able.

0:08:32.836 --> 0:08:34.676
<v Speaker 3>To open this critical period.

0:08:34.716 --> 0:08:38.116
<v Speaker 2>And so that was our first hint that maybe the

0:08:38.756 --> 0:08:45.516
<v Speaker 2>common property is between psychedelics that accounts for this altered

0:08:45.556 --> 0:08:48.716
<v Speaker 2>state of consciousness that they all induce is the common

0:08:48.756 --> 0:08:51.996
<v Speaker 2>property of inducing critical period reopening.

0:08:52.316 --> 0:08:56.036
<v Speaker 1>And so specifically, can you just talk a little bit

0:08:56.036 --> 0:08:59.596
<v Speaker 1>more about the specific critical period in mice that you're

0:08:59.636 --> 0:09:01.556
<v Speaker 1>looking at here, right?

0:09:01.596 --> 0:09:05.916
<v Speaker 2>So, we're measuring something called social condition place preference, which

0:09:05.956 --> 0:09:09.956
<v Speaker 2>is just an assay to measure the ability of the

0:09:10.036 --> 0:09:13.956
<v Speaker 2>mice to learn from their social environments. And so that

0:09:14.276 --> 0:09:18.036
<v Speaker 2>ability changes over time, and as they get older, they

0:09:18.036 --> 0:09:21.956
<v Speaker 2>stop learning from their social environment. And so this developmental

0:09:22.036 --> 0:09:25.276
<v Speaker 2>change relates to why we think teenagers are so much

0:09:25.316 --> 0:09:28.596
<v Speaker 2>more susceptible to peer pressure than adults. We think it

0:09:28.636 --> 0:09:32.196
<v Speaker 2>relates to why you're so much more sensitive to learning

0:09:32.316 --> 0:09:35.596
<v Speaker 2>the rules of your culture when you're young, so you know,

0:09:35.716 --> 0:09:36.956
<v Speaker 2>you learn what's polite.

0:09:37.396 --> 0:09:40.156
<v Speaker 1>So it's basically the idea is that there's a critical

0:09:40.316 --> 0:09:44.236
<v Speaker 1>there is some set of critical periods for learning social

0:09:44.516 --> 0:09:50.476
<v Speaker 1>behavior from language to norms, and that that those clothes

0:09:50.676 --> 0:09:53.516
<v Speaker 1>over the course of childhood and adolescents.

0:09:53.796 --> 0:09:54.596
<v Speaker 3>That's right, that's right.

0:09:55.516 --> 0:10:00.196
<v Speaker 2>And we think that that critical period, like other critical

0:10:00.236 --> 0:10:04.236
<v Speaker 2>periods like language, you know, is curtailed as you get

0:10:04.276 --> 0:10:10.636
<v Speaker 2>older because basically it's sort of expensive energe to always

0:10:10.676 --> 0:10:13.316
<v Speaker 2>be having to learn from your social environment.

0:10:13.476 --> 0:10:14.436
<v Speaker 3>You know, I like to.

0:10:15.876 --> 0:10:18.716
<v Speaker 2>Think back on my teenage years and you know, mostly

0:10:18.716 --> 0:10:21.716
<v Speaker 2>I'm relieved that they're over, because you know, it was

0:10:21.996 --> 0:10:26.836
<v Speaker 2>time consuming and energetically exhausting to you know, have to

0:10:26.876 --> 0:10:29.636
<v Speaker 2>care about the exact right shade of acid washed genes

0:10:29.676 --> 0:10:30.796
<v Speaker 2>that the cool kids are wearing.

0:10:30.876 --> 0:10:33.956
<v Speaker 1>Right, and now you wear whatever acid wash genes you want, right,

0:10:34.076 --> 0:10:34.596
<v Speaker 1>that's right.

0:10:34.716 --> 0:10:37.396
<v Speaker 4>I wear mom jeans that are acid washed.

0:10:39.636 --> 0:10:43.556
<v Speaker 1>And so then you find that when you give psychedelics

0:10:43.596 --> 0:10:46.996
<v Speaker 1>to an old mouse, they're able to the.

0:10:47.036 --> 0:10:51.076
<v Speaker 2>Learning that they were doing in juvenile in their juvenile

0:10:51.116 --> 0:10:54.676
<v Speaker 2>period return, so they're able to learn again like a juvenile.

0:10:55.396 --> 0:10:59.036
<v Speaker 1>Have you tested this theory on other critical periods in

0:10:59.116 --> 0:11:01.116
<v Speaker 1>mice or on other animals?

0:11:01.596 --> 0:11:05.316
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, So basically, as soon as we got this this result,

0:11:05.516 --> 0:11:07.956
<v Speaker 2>I reached out to every single person that I know

0:11:08.156 --> 0:11:10.236
<v Speaker 2>who works on critics periods, and I was like, do

0:11:10.236 --> 0:11:13.436
<v Speaker 2>you have a critical period that you want to try

0:11:13.436 --> 0:11:16.396
<v Speaker 2>and reopen? Because I think we might have accidentally stumbled

0:11:16.396 --> 0:11:20.076
<v Speaker 2>on the master key for unlocking critical periods, and so

0:11:20.196 --> 0:11:23.836
<v Speaker 2>we're working on it. We definitely have some collaborations going.

0:11:24.476 --> 0:11:27.476
<v Speaker 2>But in the meantime between sort of when we first

0:11:27.556 --> 0:11:30.876
<v Speaker 2>have this twenty nineteen paper and then this summer, there

0:11:30.916 --> 0:11:35.916
<v Speaker 2>have been some hints that other critical periods are being

0:11:35.956 --> 0:11:40.756
<v Speaker 2>reopened by say ketamine. There are two papers showing that ketamine,

0:11:40.796 --> 0:11:43.196
<v Speaker 2>if given back to back to back to back can

0:11:43.236 --> 0:11:47.156
<v Speaker 2>reopen the critical period for ocular dominance plasticity, which is

0:11:47.196 --> 0:11:51.076
<v Speaker 2>this visual critical period that we've learned so much about

0:11:51.076 --> 0:11:54.796
<v Speaker 2>the mechanisms about. So that's a first hint, and we

0:11:54.836 --> 0:11:59.156
<v Speaker 2>are working feverishly to see if we can reopen other

0:11:59.236 --> 0:12:02.996
<v Speaker 2>critical periods like motor learning for stroke. We're doing that

0:12:03.036 --> 0:12:06.436
<v Speaker 2>in both mice and in humans. We're working on some

0:12:06.556 --> 0:12:09.836
<v Speaker 2>language critical periods in collaboration with some of the labs.

0:12:09.956 --> 0:12:13.636
<v Speaker 2>So you know, the jury is still out, but there's

0:12:13.676 --> 0:12:15.956
<v Speaker 2>some other reasons to make us think that we're on

0:12:16.036 --> 0:12:19.436
<v Speaker 2>the right track with this idea about the master key.

0:12:20.036 --> 0:12:23.396
<v Speaker 1>When you say master key in this context, in this context,

0:12:23.396 --> 0:12:24.316
<v Speaker 1>exactly what do you mean?

0:12:25.316 --> 0:12:28.036
<v Speaker 2>So I guess what I mean is is that when

0:12:28.076 --> 0:12:30.796
<v Speaker 2>I was a graduate student, we were a little bit

0:12:30.796 --> 0:12:34.356
<v Speaker 2>in a debate with another lab that was proposing that

0:12:34.396 --> 0:12:38.596
<v Speaker 2>there would be some drug or manipulation that you could

0:12:38.596 --> 0:12:43.356
<v Speaker 2>do that could reopen all critical periods, and that you

0:12:43.436 --> 0:12:47.916
<v Speaker 2>could just give that drug and it would it would

0:12:48.516 --> 0:12:50.916
<v Speaker 2>it would be the master key, right and for unlocking

0:12:50.956 --> 0:12:53.796
<v Speaker 2>all of these critical periods. And at the time, I

0:12:53.876 --> 0:12:58.516
<v Speaker 2>remember being really skeptical of that idea, and I thought, well,

0:12:58.556 --> 0:13:01.636
<v Speaker 2>anything that can do that to the brain is either

0:13:01.756 --> 0:13:07.516
<v Speaker 2>going to induce amnesia, cause seizure, or disrupt the structural

0:13:07.996 --> 0:13:11.196
<v Speaker 2>integrity of the brain. And I thought that because of

0:13:11.236 --> 0:13:14.556
<v Speaker 2>what we knew about, you know, basically the mechanisms that

0:13:14.676 --> 0:13:19.356
<v Speaker 2>constrain critical periods to these windows of time, like like.

0:13:19.276 --> 0:13:22.036
<v Speaker 1>You couldn't work without breaking the brain. The only way

0:13:22.116 --> 0:13:24.756
<v Speaker 1>to reopen the critical period is the master key is

0:13:24.796 --> 0:13:27.676
<v Speaker 1>like a sledgehammer that's just gonna totally break everything. So

0:13:27.756 --> 0:13:28.716
<v Speaker 1>why even bother.

0:13:29.196 --> 0:13:31.396
<v Speaker 2>Right, And I you know, I called it the Melti

0:13:31.436 --> 0:13:34.316
<v Speaker 2>brain problem, right, And so then when we when we

0:13:34.396 --> 0:13:39.676
<v Speaker 2>started getting these results for the psychedelics, I was, I

0:13:39.716 --> 0:13:42.436
<v Speaker 2>started thinking, well, how come we're not running into the

0:13:42.436 --> 0:13:46.276
<v Speaker 2>Melty brain problem? And I think, and this is at

0:13:46.276 --> 0:13:50.716
<v Speaker 2>this point still speculative, and we're we're actively pursuing this

0:13:50.836 --> 0:13:53.556
<v Speaker 2>line of research. So I don't want to overstate the case.

0:13:53.876 --> 0:13:56.876
<v Speaker 2>But my hunch is that the way that we are

0:13:56.916 --> 0:14:01.476
<v Speaker 2>able to circumvent, or the way that psychedelics specifically are circumventing,

0:14:01.916 --> 0:14:06.756
<v Speaker 2>the Melty brain problem is that they are context specific.

0:14:07.236 --> 0:14:12.636
<v Speaker 2>So it's not that psychdelics are causing reopening of all

0:14:12.676 --> 0:14:16.676
<v Speaker 2>critical periods everywhere in the brain all at the same time.

0:14:17.076 --> 0:14:21.556
<v Speaker 2>It seems to be that they are not you know,

0:14:21.636 --> 0:14:26.276
<v Speaker 2>destroying or melting the brain, because they're only making available

0:14:26.476 --> 0:14:34.436
<v Speaker 2>for modification the subset of synapses, circuits, memories, and grams

0:14:34.596 --> 0:14:38.316
<v Speaker 2>that are have been recently activated, and that is why

0:14:38.636 --> 0:14:41.436
<v Speaker 2>they have this constraint of being context dependent.

0:14:42.316 --> 0:14:45.476
<v Speaker 1>So this is this is why your thesis is they

0:14:45.556 --> 0:14:51.076
<v Speaker 1>will psychedels will be helpful when paired with interventions like therapy,

0:14:51.516 --> 0:14:53.316
<v Speaker 1>but not by themselves.

0:14:53.756 --> 0:14:54.756
<v Speaker 4>Well, this is.

0:14:56.436 --> 0:15:00.596
<v Speaker 2>This is the explanation we have for why the psychedelics

0:15:00.596 --> 0:15:06.236
<v Speaker 2>aren't breaking the the brain rather than I mean, basically,

0:15:06.276 --> 0:15:11.276
<v Speaker 2>the clinical data is driving this idea that in fact

0:15:11.396 --> 0:15:13.076
<v Speaker 2>the context matters, right.

0:15:12.996 --> 0:15:15.996
<v Speaker 1>But it's a potential mechanistic explanation for that.

0:15:15.996 --> 0:15:19.076
<v Speaker 2>Clinical well that feature, that's right, it's a mechanistic explanation

0:15:19.116 --> 0:15:22.276
<v Speaker 2>for a clinical description, which you know, I don't think

0:15:22.436 --> 0:15:24.716
<v Speaker 2>is going to be the case for every single application

0:15:24.796 --> 0:15:27.676
<v Speaker 2>that psychedelics might be used for. So, for example, I

0:15:27.716 --> 0:15:32.796
<v Speaker 2>think the critical period idea nicely explains why MDMA assisted

0:15:32.836 --> 0:15:37.596
<v Speaker 2>psychotherapy works. If we're able to demonstrate that we can

0:15:37.716 --> 0:15:44.916
<v Speaker 2>correct motor impairments following stroke with psychedelics paired with physical therapy,

0:15:44.956 --> 0:15:47.036
<v Speaker 2>then that'll be a nice other explanation.

0:15:47.676 --> 0:15:50.796
<v Speaker 1>That's a huge idea. You've just dropped in the middle

0:15:50.836 --> 0:15:52.236
<v Speaker 1>of a list, by the.

0:15:52.196 --> 0:15:55.996
<v Speaker 2>Way, right, So, by the way, that's also quite quite speculative.

0:16:00.756 --> 0:16:04.316
<v Speaker 1>After the break, how gool plans to test this hypothesis

0:16:04.716 --> 0:16:19.436
<v Speaker 1>that psychedelics may help patients recovering from strokes. Let's just

0:16:19.556 --> 0:16:22.556
<v Speaker 1>talk about how we get from this sort of you know,

0:16:23.596 --> 0:16:28.716
<v Speaker 1>seems like psychedelics reopen one critical period in mice to like,

0:16:29.836 --> 0:16:31.796
<v Speaker 1>can this idea be helpful in humans?

0:16:31.916 --> 0:16:32.076
<v Speaker 4>Right?

0:16:33.836 --> 0:16:36.756
<v Speaker 1>You must know the aphorism mice lie and primates exaggerate.

0:16:36.836 --> 0:16:38.196
<v Speaker 1>I was thinking of that one.

0:16:39.716 --> 0:16:42.116
<v Speaker 2>I mean, I think that a little bit of why

0:16:42.156 --> 0:16:46.436
<v Speaker 2>it's so hard to translate this stuff from mouse studies

0:16:46.436 --> 0:16:50.356
<v Speaker 2>to human studies so far is that mostly what they've

0:16:50.356 --> 0:16:54.636
<v Speaker 2>been used for is non psychiatric disease, and so it's

0:16:54.716 --> 0:17:00.636
<v Speaker 2>really sort of impossible to measure or to recapitulate all

0:17:00.636 --> 0:17:03.476
<v Speaker 2>of the features of a psychiatric disease.

0:17:03.116 --> 0:17:05.036
<v Speaker 3>In a mouse. Right, Like if.

0:17:04.956 --> 0:17:08.956
<v Speaker 2>PTSD is mostly in humans and females is caused by

0:17:09.396 --> 0:17:12.396
<v Speaker 2>you can't really model rape in a mouse, right, And

0:17:12.436 --> 0:17:15.676
<v Speaker 2>so there are all these other features of the illness

0:17:15.836 --> 0:17:18.956
<v Speaker 2>that you know, you can try and approximate by fear learning,

0:17:18.996 --> 0:17:21.956
<v Speaker 2>but you're not really going to capture the salient elements.

0:17:22.196 --> 0:17:26.036
<v Speaker 2>And so this is kind of why I think an

0:17:26.036 --> 0:17:29.796
<v Speaker 2>important test case of this idea of the master key

0:17:30.356 --> 0:17:34.756
<v Speaker 2>is to switch away from neuropsychiatric disease and move into

0:17:34.836 --> 0:17:40.276
<v Speaker 2>neurological disease, because then you know, we can explicitly test

0:17:40.356 --> 0:17:43.716
<v Speaker 2>this learning model. Right if we switch to a neurological

0:17:43.756 --> 0:17:47.876
<v Speaker 2>disease like stroke, and we're able to show that if

0:17:47.916 --> 0:17:51.156
<v Speaker 2>we give psychedelics and pair it with physical therapy, we

0:17:51.196 --> 0:17:55.756
<v Speaker 2>are able to restore motor learning. But if we give

0:17:55.756 --> 0:17:59.196
<v Speaker 2>psychedelics and then just send them on home without any

0:17:59.196 --> 0:18:02.356
<v Speaker 2>additional physical therapy, then nothing really is going to happen.

0:18:02.876 --> 0:18:05.276
<v Speaker 2>That I think would be an explicit test of this

0:18:05.436 --> 0:18:09.596
<v Speaker 2>idea that what the mechanism at work here is about

0:18:09.676 --> 0:18:12.796
<v Speaker 2>learning and memory rather than a magic bill that corrects

0:18:12.796 --> 0:18:14.636
<v Speaker 2>an underlying biochemical imbalance.

0:18:15.236 --> 0:18:17.356
<v Speaker 1>Well, yes, I mean that's the side of it, addressing

0:18:17.676 --> 0:18:21.716
<v Speaker 1>this debate that you're involved in, but also going on

0:18:21.796 --> 0:18:23.876
<v Speaker 1>there presumably if you're able to do this test in

0:18:23.916 --> 0:18:29.276
<v Speaker 1>stroke patients, is if psychedelics plus physical therapy after a

0:18:29.316 --> 0:18:33.836
<v Speaker 1>stroke leads to better recovery than physical therapy alone. That's great.

0:18:33.916 --> 0:18:35.796
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I don't even care about the mechanism at

0:18:35.836 --> 0:18:38.316
<v Speaker 1>that point, right, Like, is somebody going to do a

0:18:38.356 --> 0:18:42.156
<v Speaker 1>phase one safety trial soon? Like is somebody going to

0:18:42.156 --> 0:18:43.836
<v Speaker 1>give stroke patients psychedelics?

0:18:44.516 --> 0:18:45.796
<v Speaker 4>We are, we are working on it.

0:18:46.116 --> 0:18:48.196
<v Speaker 2>Right after this call, I have a meeting to try

0:18:48.236 --> 0:18:52.076
<v Speaker 2>and secure funding to make that happen. So we are

0:18:52.076 --> 0:18:54.316
<v Speaker 2>on it, and we are actually doing it in parallel

0:18:54.396 --> 0:18:58.116
<v Speaker 2>with mouth studies for mechanism. And you know, I understand

0:18:58.196 --> 0:19:01.036
<v Speaker 2>why people are so much more jazzed about you know

0:19:01.116 --> 0:19:04.876
<v Speaker 2>the clinical outcomes and you know the real world impacts

0:19:04.876 --> 0:19:07.796
<v Speaker 2>of these things. But I have to say, I think

0:19:08.276 --> 0:19:12.236
<v Speaker 2>mechanism should not be underestimated as an important way of

0:19:12.356 --> 0:19:14.876
<v Speaker 2>understanding this, because we never would have even come up

0:19:14.916 --> 0:19:18.436
<v Speaker 2>with this idea of thinking about stroke if we hadn't

0:19:18.476 --> 0:19:21.716
<v Speaker 2>thought of the mechanism. Right, So, if we the mechanism

0:19:21.996 --> 0:19:26.276
<v Speaker 2>is what is leading us to speculate, if this mechanism

0:19:26.396 --> 0:19:30.076
<v Speaker 2>is true, then these other diseases should respond in this

0:19:30.276 --> 0:19:31.236
<v Speaker 2>predictable way.

0:19:31.636 --> 0:19:33.796
<v Speaker 1>There was a better way I could have framed that,

0:19:34.756 --> 0:19:37.636
<v Speaker 1>And I apologize. I mean, what I really mean is, yes,

0:19:37.716 --> 0:19:40.796
<v Speaker 1>it's it's useful and big to learn the mechanism. But

0:19:40.996 --> 0:19:44.916
<v Speaker 1>like helping stroke patients get better is also a huge deal.

0:19:45.196 --> 0:19:48.356
<v Speaker 1>Would perhaps be diplomatic way to say that.

0:19:48.716 --> 0:19:51.676
<v Speaker 2>I mean, I don't mind the undiplomatic way, because that's

0:19:51.796 --> 0:19:53.556
<v Speaker 2>I've been dealing with this right from the beginning.

0:19:53.636 --> 0:19:53.796
<v Speaker 4>Right.

0:19:53.836 --> 0:19:57.116
<v Speaker 2>So, the first time I presented this critical period idea

0:19:57.156 --> 0:19:59.716
<v Speaker 2>at a meeting, it was in Portugal, and you know,

0:19:59.756 --> 0:20:03.196
<v Speaker 2>the room was full of people who were already doing

0:20:03.756 --> 0:20:08.876
<v Speaker 2>clinical trials for psilocybin for depression and MDMA for PTSD,

0:20:09.156 --> 0:20:11.836
<v Speaker 2>and they were already very much invested in the idea

0:20:11.916 --> 0:20:14.596
<v Speaker 2>that it was going to work based on some underground

0:20:14.676 --> 0:20:18.876
<v Speaker 2>therapists results and anecdotal reports, some of their you know,

0:20:19.516 --> 0:20:22.596
<v Speaker 2>pilot studies, and they were like, why do we need mechanism?

0:20:22.636 --> 0:20:23.156
<v Speaker 4>Who cares?

0:20:23.236 --> 0:20:25.916
<v Speaker 2>We know it's going to work, and going backwards to

0:20:26.036 --> 0:20:27.396
<v Speaker 2>look in mice seems silly.

0:20:27.476 --> 0:20:29.116
<v Speaker 4>We know it's going to work. It's just the way

0:20:29.196 --> 0:20:29.556
<v Speaker 4>to die.

0:20:30.036 --> 0:20:32.956
<v Speaker 2>And I said at that time it was like, mechanism matters,

0:20:33.036 --> 0:20:35.276
<v Speaker 2>and there are going to be a million different ways

0:20:35.276 --> 0:20:38.716
<v Speaker 2>that we might fail if we don't understand exactly how

0:20:38.756 --> 0:20:42.396
<v Speaker 2>these drugs are working. And basically that prediction ended up

0:20:42.436 --> 0:20:45.196
<v Speaker 2>being true because the two people who were represented in

0:20:45.276 --> 0:20:48.796
<v Speaker 2>that room were on the one side, the people arguing for,

0:20:49.196 --> 0:20:52.636
<v Speaker 2>you know, let's just use psilocybin like a next generation SSRI,

0:20:53.196 --> 0:20:55.836
<v Speaker 2>and their trial failed. And then the other half of

0:20:55.876 --> 0:20:57.876
<v Speaker 2>the room where people who were saying, no, we need

0:20:57.916 --> 0:21:01.636
<v Speaker 2>to pair it with psychotherapy, and their trial was successful.

0:21:01.676 --> 0:21:05.396
<v Speaker 2>And our mechanism, we think explains the difference between them.

0:21:06.396 --> 0:21:09.596
<v Speaker 1>Is there an animal model you can use is to

0:21:09.756 --> 0:21:16.356
<v Speaker 1>test your hypothesis that in stroke patients psychedelics plus physical

0:21:16.356 --> 0:21:19.356
<v Speaker 1>therapy would work better than physical therapy alone.

0:21:20.116 --> 0:21:22.556
<v Speaker 2>Yes, So basically, one of the people I reached out

0:21:22.596 --> 0:21:25.636
<v Speaker 2>to when you know, we first got this critical period

0:21:25.756 --> 0:21:30.236
<v Speaker 2>result for all of the psychedelics. We're two neurologists at

0:21:30.316 --> 0:21:34.236
<v Speaker 2>John Hopkins, so Steve Zeiler and John Krackauer, and Steve

0:21:34.276 --> 0:21:39.076
<v Speaker 2>Zyler especially had been working on developing a mouse model

0:21:39.236 --> 0:21:43.596
<v Speaker 2>of stroke. And what he has shown is that just

0:21:43.716 --> 0:21:46.676
<v Speaker 2>like in human patients with stroke, right after the stroke,

0:21:47.156 --> 0:21:50.716
<v Speaker 2>there is a critical period that gets reopened and some

0:21:50.836 --> 0:21:55.036
<v Speaker 2>amount of physical therapy is able to restore function, but

0:21:55.196 --> 0:21:58.516
<v Speaker 2>that that is time limited. So in my you know,

0:21:58.716 --> 0:22:01.676
<v Speaker 2>within seven days after the stroke, they're no longer able

0:22:01.716 --> 0:22:04.436
<v Speaker 2>to learn. In humans that's a little bit longer. So

0:22:04.996 --> 0:22:07.276
<v Speaker 2>you know, in humans. After your stroke, you're able to

0:22:07.436 --> 0:22:10.796
<v Speaker 2>benefit from therap physical therapy for about two months. At

0:22:10.836 --> 0:22:14.836
<v Speaker 2>about three months it goes away, and that window of time,

0:22:15.396 --> 0:22:18.276
<v Speaker 2>you know, it's closure. And people have thought about, well,

0:22:18.436 --> 0:22:20.596
<v Speaker 2>you know, nobody has dreamed big that we might be

0:22:20.596 --> 0:22:23.436
<v Speaker 2>able to reopen it. But people have tried to do

0:22:23.556 --> 0:22:26.836
<v Speaker 2>other manipulations that might keep it open longer, you know,

0:22:26.916 --> 0:22:30.716
<v Speaker 2>by enriching the environment, by you know, giving them SSRIs,

0:22:30.956 --> 0:22:32.276
<v Speaker 2>and none of those things have worked.

0:22:32.796 --> 0:22:36.436
<v Speaker 1>It's the injury of the stroke itself is inducing the

0:22:36.476 --> 0:22:39.636
<v Speaker 1>brain to reopen the critical period that has been closed

0:22:39.636 --> 0:22:43.676
<v Speaker 1>since childhood, and that allows people to whatever, try and

0:22:43.716 --> 0:22:46.836
<v Speaker 1>relearn language, try and relearn motor skills whatever they have

0:22:46.996 --> 0:22:50.156
<v Speaker 1>lost in the stroke. Obviously not always successfully.

0:22:50.076 --> 0:22:50.556
<v Speaker 3>That's right.

0:22:50.596 --> 0:22:54.916
<v Speaker 2>And basically until this this psychedelic idea came around, the

0:22:54.956 --> 0:22:58.276
<v Speaker 2>most effective way to reopen the critical period for motor

0:22:58.356 --> 0:23:01.796
<v Speaker 2>learning after stroke was to give another stroke, which is

0:23:01.836 --> 0:23:05.556
<v Speaker 2>not you know, very therapeutically viable, right Like, nobody wants

0:23:05.596 --> 0:23:09.956
<v Speaker 2>to hear their stroke with another stroke. So this idea

0:23:10.196 --> 0:23:14.196
<v Speaker 2>is testable and we are in parallel testing it in

0:23:14.276 --> 0:23:17.436
<v Speaker 2>collaboration with the Xylor lab. This is not a social

0:23:17.476 --> 0:23:20.516
<v Speaker 2>critical period this is a motor critical period. So let's

0:23:20.556 --> 0:23:24.116
<v Speaker 2>test the idea that in this context what matters is

0:23:24.236 --> 0:23:27.516
<v Speaker 2>the motor learning or the practicing a motor task, not

0:23:27.716 --> 0:23:30.996
<v Speaker 2>the social And so we're testing that and combining with

0:23:31.036 --> 0:23:34.796
<v Speaker 2>different psychedelics, but we're comparing all of those different conditions

0:23:34.836 --> 0:23:37.756
<v Speaker 2>to test this idea in mice, and then in parallel,

0:23:37.756 --> 0:23:40.196
<v Speaker 2>we will do the study to look at you know,

0:23:40.316 --> 0:23:42.276
<v Speaker 2>trying to reopen in humans.

0:23:43.156 --> 0:23:45.796
<v Speaker 1>And so the mouse study is underway now, and you're

0:23:45.796 --> 0:23:48.636
<v Speaker 1>trying to get funding for the human study, that's right.

0:23:49.716 --> 0:23:51.556
<v Speaker 1>And then once you have the money, then you go

0:23:51.676 --> 0:23:54.236
<v Speaker 1>to the institutional review board and say can we do this?

0:23:55.356 --> 0:23:58.636
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, you know, everything's queued up and wow, you know,

0:23:58.716 --> 0:24:01.156
<v Speaker 2>everything is basically ready to go.

0:24:01.276 --> 0:24:02.276
<v Speaker 4>We just need the money.

0:24:03.316 --> 0:24:08.076
<v Speaker 1>So non trivial, but it's a lot probably surmountable.

0:24:08.236 --> 0:24:10.596
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, yeah, I mean it's a lot of money.

0:24:10.596 --> 0:24:13.156
<v Speaker 2>We're asking for a million dollars to run, you know,

0:24:13.236 --> 0:24:16.316
<v Speaker 2>a safety trial and about twenty people. And then if

0:24:16.356 --> 0:24:18.996
<v Speaker 2>that phase one trial goes well. The way the trial

0:24:19.076 --> 0:24:22.436
<v Speaker 2>is designed is that it will allow us to collect

0:24:22.476 --> 0:24:25.396
<v Speaker 2>just a little bit of in addition to how well

0:24:25.476 --> 0:24:28.316
<v Speaker 2>this patient population, right, because these are older people who

0:24:28.356 --> 0:24:32.116
<v Speaker 2>have other medical issues, so we just want to be

0:24:32.276 --> 0:24:34.836
<v Speaker 2>double sure that you know, these drugs are safe in

0:24:34.876 --> 0:24:38.196
<v Speaker 2>this population. But the way we've designed the trial is

0:24:38.196 --> 0:24:41.396
<v Speaker 2>it'll give us some hints about efficacy, so we'll test,

0:24:41.636 --> 0:24:43.476
<v Speaker 2>you know, a little bit of you know, their ability

0:24:43.476 --> 0:24:46.276
<v Speaker 2>to recover motor function. And the most important thing about

0:24:46.276 --> 0:24:48.516
<v Speaker 2>the human trial and the way that I the reason

0:24:48.556 --> 0:24:51.556
<v Speaker 2>that I paired up with Steve and John is because

0:24:51.636 --> 0:24:56.796
<v Speaker 2>they have actually developed a sort of gamified virtual reality

0:24:56.836 --> 0:25:01.356
<v Speaker 2>context for delivering this physical therapy. It's a virtual reality

0:25:01.676 --> 0:25:05.836
<v Speaker 2>kind of room, and the cameras track the person's body

0:25:05.836 --> 0:25:08.956
<v Speaker 2>position in space, and as they move their arm around,

0:25:09.436 --> 0:25:12.276
<v Speaker 2>a dolphin on a screen moves around, and it's sort

0:25:12.276 --> 0:25:15.636
<v Speaker 2>of a fun way to get people to practice moving.

0:25:16.036 --> 0:25:19.076
<v Speaker 2>But it's also a little bit more play like, which

0:25:19.116 --> 0:25:23.476
<v Speaker 2>is more the way that we learn during our childhood.

0:25:23.796 --> 0:25:26.236
<v Speaker 2>So there's this shift in the way we learn between

0:25:26.316 --> 0:25:31.956
<v Speaker 2>childhood and adulthood from exploratory learning to sort of goal

0:25:32.076 --> 0:25:36.676
<v Speaker 2>directed exploitatory learning, and so we want to kind of

0:25:36.716 --> 0:25:39.236
<v Speaker 2>mimic that as much as possible, to make it fun

0:25:39.716 --> 0:25:42.196
<v Speaker 2>and to make it not be goal directed.

0:25:42.356 --> 0:25:48.116
<v Speaker 1>They're already doing that sort of psychedelic adjacent sounding thing

0:25:48.596 --> 0:25:51.436
<v Speaker 1>where your arm is a dolphin and you're playing. They're

0:25:51.436 --> 0:25:53.836
<v Speaker 1>doing that without psychedelics, and you're like, let's definitely add

0:25:53.836 --> 0:25:55.636
<v Speaker 1>some psychedelics to that. I mean, is that not to

0:25:55.636 --> 0:25:59.196
<v Speaker 1>be glib about it, but they're already doing that without psychedelics.

0:25:58.756 --> 0:25:59.156
<v Speaker 4>That's right.

0:25:59.196 --> 0:26:04.516
<v Speaker 2>So they have developed that whole paradigm to test the

0:26:04.596 --> 0:26:09.796
<v Speaker 2>efficacy of that sort of gamified environment compare to standard

0:26:09.796 --> 0:26:13.236
<v Speaker 2>of care, because standard of care is really mostly just

0:26:14.316 --> 0:26:18.836
<v Speaker 2>teaching patients how to say the other hand, to zip

0:26:18.876 --> 0:26:22.196
<v Speaker 2>their zipper and brush their hand. It's really compensatory, not

0:26:22.796 --> 0:26:27.076
<v Speaker 2>trying to bring back the lost motor function. And so

0:26:27.196 --> 0:26:30.796
<v Speaker 2>they've done head to head studies of the virtual reality

0:26:31.236 --> 0:26:36.316
<v Speaker 2>game version versus standard of care during that open state,

0:26:36.356 --> 0:26:38.676
<v Speaker 2>of the normal open state of the critical beers, so

0:26:38.756 --> 0:26:43.756
<v Speaker 2>right after the stroke. They've shown that there's better outcomes

0:26:43.796 --> 0:26:47.756
<v Speaker 2>if they use this gamified version. And so now we're saying, okay,

0:26:47.876 --> 0:26:51.636
<v Speaker 2>let's take all those people who didn't get the optimal

0:26:51.716 --> 0:26:54.396
<v Speaker 2>therapy right after their stroke, people who had a stroke

0:26:54.436 --> 0:26:56.796
<v Speaker 2>a year ago, and go back and see if we

0:26:56.836 --> 0:27:00.476
<v Speaker 2>can reopen this critical period and then give them what

0:27:00.516 --> 0:27:03.236
<v Speaker 2>we think is the better therapy in terms of this

0:27:03.316 --> 0:27:04.556
<v Speaker 2>virtual reality.

0:27:08.196 --> 0:27:21.116
<v Speaker 1>We'll be back in a minute with the lightning round. Okay,

0:27:21.276 --> 0:27:22.636
<v Speaker 1>let's finish with the lightning round.

0:27:24.316 --> 0:27:24.676
<v Speaker 4>Okay.

0:27:25.716 --> 0:27:28.756
<v Speaker 1>What's your biggest professional disagreement with your mother.

0:27:30.876 --> 0:27:33.276
<v Speaker 4>Whether psychedelics can cure allergies?

0:27:34.836 --> 0:27:35.156
<v Speaker 1>Go on.

0:27:35.916 --> 0:27:41.356
<v Speaker 2>Okay, Well, so my mother is an allergy and immunologist clinician.

0:27:41.796 --> 0:27:45.276
<v Speaker 2>She's retired now, but you know, I've told her this

0:27:45.396 --> 0:27:49.796
<v Speaker 2>crazy idea that we had about psychedelics and she was like, no,

0:27:49.996 --> 0:27:52.236
<v Speaker 2>that's not how it works. And the idea is based

0:27:52.236 --> 0:27:54.356
<v Speaker 2>on the fact that, you know, there's some evidence to

0:27:54.396 --> 0:27:58.196
<v Speaker 2>support the notion that allergy happens because you know, the

0:27:58.236 --> 0:28:01.036
<v Speaker 2>immune system, the part of the immune system that's normally

0:28:01.116 --> 0:28:07.156
<v Speaker 2>supposed to fight off parasitic infections, is being underutilized by

0:28:07.196 --> 0:28:11.076
<v Speaker 2>our modern diets, which are put more parasite free than

0:28:11.196 --> 0:28:16.036
<v Speaker 2>our evolutionary history, and so it's sort of left jobless

0:28:16.076 --> 0:28:19.956
<v Speaker 2>and it's looking for a job. And my idea is that, well,

0:28:19.956 --> 0:28:22.636
<v Speaker 2>maybe the brain is assigning the job and saying that

0:28:22.756 --> 0:28:24.916
<v Speaker 2>dog barked at you, that's scary, that's the threat to

0:28:25.076 --> 0:28:29.116
<v Speaker 2>go after that immune system, and that if that's a

0:28:29.236 --> 0:28:33.636
<v Speaker 2>learned association that the brain decided that it could unlearn

0:28:33.636 --> 0:28:33.996
<v Speaker 2>it too.

0:28:34.116 --> 0:28:35.556
<v Speaker 3>By reopening this critical period.

0:28:35.676 --> 0:28:36.996
<v Speaker 4>It's totally speculative.

0:28:36.996 --> 0:28:39.556
<v Speaker 2>I have to say, like, I don't believe it enough

0:28:39.596 --> 0:28:42.836
<v Speaker 2>where I'm like out, you know, doing psychedelics and snuggling

0:28:42.916 --> 0:28:43.636
<v Speaker 2>up to a horse.

0:28:43.676 --> 0:28:46.356
<v Speaker 4>I would love to cure my horse allergies. But I don't.

0:28:46.516 --> 0:28:48.396
<v Speaker 4>I don't believe it enough to go for it.

0:28:48.436 --> 0:28:51.316
<v Speaker 3>I think it's a testable hypothesis that we should study.

0:28:51.436 --> 0:28:53.596
<v Speaker 1>And your and your mom believes it even less than

0:28:53.596 --> 0:28:53.836
<v Speaker 1>you do.

0:28:54.436 --> 0:28:54.876
<v Speaker 4>That's right.

0:28:55.676 --> 0:29:01.396
<v Speaker 1>Yes, what's your favorite portrayal of a psychedelics of a

0:29:01.436 --> 0:29:04.196
<v Speaker 1>psychedelic experience in you know, in whatever, in a book,

0:29:04.236 --> 0:29:05.276
<v Speaker 1>in a movie, in music.

0:29:07.876 --> 0:29:11.956
<v Speaker 2>I really still have a soft spot in my heart

0:29:12.036 --> 0:29:15.916
<v Speaker 2>for the Huxley description of him staring at a chair,

0:29:16.436 --> 0:29:19.516
<v Speaker 2>because you know, as a scientist, I have to say

0:29:19.876 --> 0:29:23.036
<v Speaker 2>that one really resonates. Like I'm not a religious person,

0:29:23.516 --> 0:29:26.796
<v Speaker 2>mystical experiences, that stuff doesn't really resonate with me. But

0:29:27.396 --> 0:29:31.276
<v Speaker 2>he's staring at a chair and sort of being mesmerized

0:29:31.316 --> 0:29:35.836
<v Speaker 2>by the you know, asymptotic distribution of chair molecules the

0:29:35.876 --> 0:29:38.676
<v Speaker 2>further away you get from the chair, and then the

0:29:38.756 --> 0:29:41.436
<v Speaker 2>Huxley molecules the further and then you know, the two

0:29:41.476 --> 0:29:43.476
<v Speaker 2>of them sitting on each other and suddenly they're inert

0:29:44.156 --> 0:29:47.036
<v Speaker 2>they're intermixed, and Huxley is the chair.

0:29:47.076 --> 0:29:49.396
<v Speaker 4>I mean that that resonates.

0:29:48.876 --> 0:29:52.676
<v Speaker 1>But have you ever taken psychedelics for work?

0:29:54.116 --> 0:29:54.756
<v Speaker 4>I don't know.

0:29:55.756 --> 0:29:58.836
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I don't really want to talk about that or

0:29:58.876 --> 0:30:00.116
<v Speaker 2>answer that question.

0:30:00.316 --> 0:30:04.236
<v Speaker 1>Mine totally reasonable. Do you have any advice for people

0:30:04.276 --> 0:30:06.756
<v Speaker 1>who are considering taking psychedelics recreationally.

0:30:08.436 --> 0:30:10.756
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it would say that, you know, these are powerful

0:30:10.796 --> 0:30:15.476
<v Speaker 2>medicines and that we should honor and respect their power,

0:30:15.716 --> 0:30:18.676
<v Speaker 2>and that they're doing something. If we're right, they're doing

0:30:18.716 --> 0:30:23.436
<v Speaker 2>something very big to the brain, and that this transformation

0:30:24.316 --> 0:30:27.196
<v Speaker 2>should not be taken lightly. And you know, I would

0:30:27.236 --> 0:30:31.436
<v Speaker 2>also emphasize that our studies suggest that once you reopen

0:30:31.476 --> 0:30:36.676
<v Speaker 2>these critical periods, especially with psilocybin, MDMA and LSD, they

0:30:36.716 --> 0:30:40.356
<v Speaker 2>stay open for several weeks after the acute effects of

0:30:40.396 --> 0:30:43.556
<v Speaker 2>the drug wear off, and so you're gonna be in

0:30:43.676 --> 0:30:47.676
<v Speaker 2>a in a sort of vulnerable state that's reminiscent of childhood.

0:30:48.156 --> 0:30:51.596
<v Speaker 2>And I would say be very very cautious about who

0:30:51.676 --> 0:30:55.716
<v Speaker 2>you expose yourself to during that period. You know, if

0:30:55.716 --> 0:30:59.156
<v Speaker 2>you're in a traumatic relationship, it's probably a good idea

0:30:59.196 --> 0:31:01.916
<v Speaker 2>to stay away from your traumatizer for a couple of

0:31:01.956 --> 0:31:05.436
<v Speaker 2>weeks after you've taken the drug, you know. I think

0:31:05.476 --> 0:31:08.756
<v Speaker 2>that we can learn a lot from the history of

0:31:08.796 --> 0:31:09.716
<v Speaker 2>these drugs.

0:31:10.196 --> 0:31:10.476
<v Speaker 3>You know.

0:31:10.876 --> 0:31:14.436
<v Speaker 2>Charles Manson is a good example of somebody who gave

0:31:14.476 --> 0:31:18.876
<v Speaker 2>psychedelics to people and then used it to, you know,

0:31:18.916 --> 0:31:21.876
<v Speaker 2>when they were in this vulnerable state, which presumably lasted

0:31:21.916 --> 0:31:25.276
<v Speaker 2>for a long time, to indoctrinate them into his way

0:31:25.316 --> 0:31:28.396
<v Speaker 2>of thinking, and turned a bunch of hippies into killers

0:31:28.396 --> 0:31:31.796
<v Speaker 2>who were going to, you know, induce helter skelter to

0:31:31.836 --> 0:31:36.076
<v Speaker 2>save the world. This is the sort of awesome power

0:31:36.116 --> 0:31:39.036
<v Speaker 2>of these drugs that we need to be very mindful

0:31:39.076 --> 0:31:42.476
<v Speaker 2>of and not treat them like little toys.

0:31:43.636 --> 0:31:45.916
<v Speaker 1>Anything else, anything else we should talk about. I know

0:31:45.916 --> 0:31:47.156
<v Speaker 1>you've got to go. I don't want to keep you,

0:31:47.156 --> 0:31:48.756
<v Speaker 1>but if there's anything else you want to say.

0:31:49.196 --> 0:31:53.116
<v Speaker 2>Please, I think we covered a lot, super fun. Thank

0:31:53.156 --> 0:31:56.956
<v Speaker 2>you so much, any.

0:31:56.276 --> 0:32:03.236
<v Speaker 4>Thanks one million dollars.

0:32:06.516 --> 0:32:09.996
<v Speaker 1>Gool Dolan is a professor of psychology and science at

0:32:10.076 --> 0:32:14.596
<v Speaker 1>UC Berkeley. Today's show was produced by Gabriel Hunter Cheng.

0:32:14.916 --> 0:32:18.276
<v Speaker 1>It was edited by Lyddy Jean Kott and engineered by

0:32:18.316 --> 0:32:21.876
<v Speaker 1>Sarah Bruguier. You can email us at problem at Pushkin

0:32:21.996 --> 0:32:25.156
<v Speaker 1>dot Fm. I'm Jacob Goldstein and we'll be back next

0:32:25.196 --> 0:32:37.396
<v Speaker 1>week with another episode of What's Your Problem.