Speaker 1: Something happened Tuesday night in Wisconsin that conservatives should pay
Speaker 1: very close attention to because after months of headlines talking
Speaker 1: about the Democratic Socialists of America and the fact that
Speaker 1: they're marching through the Democratic Party, the socialist's favorite just
Speaker 1: got stopped in one of the most important swing states
Speaker 1: in America. Now, that could be good news, but it
Speaker 1: also could tell you about how close they've gotten, which
Speaker 1: could be a big warning sign as well. The Democratic
Speaker 1: Socialists Hong lost the Democratic primary for the governor to
Speaker 1: the Milwaukee County executive David Crowley, and this was not
Speaker 1: the outcome many people expected. Hong had been widely viewed
Speaker 1: as the front runner, and Crowley's victory is being described
Speaker 1: as nothing but an upset. Axios report that Crowley won
Speaker 1: by only around three thousand votes after internal polling had
Speaker 1: reportedly shown him trailing Hong by nearly twenty points. The
Speaker 1: other question is the posters get it so wrong?
Speaker 2: Now?
Speaker 1: The socialist candidate looked like she was cruising towards a
Speaker 1: major victory. She had the energy, she had the activists,
Speaker 1: she had the momentum coming from the Democratic Party's increasingly
Speaker 1: powerful progressive wing. In fact, the polls showing that she
Speaker 1: was up by twenty Maybe the reason why she actually
Speaker 1: lost because many people that were going to vote for
Speaker 1: her thought they didn't need to show up on election
Speaker 1: day because it was already a foregone conclusion that she
Speaker 1: was going to win. And then Wisconsin Democrats slammed on
Speaker 1: the brakes is another way you could interpret this story. Now,
Speaker 1: this matters because Wisconsin isn't some deep blue congressional district
Speaker 1: in New York City. It's literally Wisconsin. It's one of
Speaker 1: the ultimate American battleground states. Now, Donald Trump won Wisconsin
Speaker 1: in twenty sixteen, Joe Biden won it in twenty twenty,
Speaker 1: and then it switched back to Trump again in twenty
Speaker 1: twenty four. And now Republicans have nominated Congressman Tom Tiffany,
Speaker 1: who is endorsed by President Trump, to run against Crowley
Speaker 1: in November. So why should conservatives find hope in what
Speaker 1: just happened? Well, in a basic level, because the socialist
Speaker 1: movement is discovering that winning an activist driven Democratic primary
Speaker 1: in a deep blue district is very different from convincing
Speaker 1: an entire battleground state to embrace your radical, extreme ideology.
Speaker 2: That's one way again to look at it.
Speaker 1: The other is this, and it's more pessimistic, but it
Speaker 1: may also be very true.
Speaker 2: The real reason why Hong lost.
Speaker 1: Is because the polls showed that there was no way
Speaker 1: she was really going to lose. If you're up twenty
Speaker 1: points in a primary, many of your supporters are much
Speaker 1: less likely to show up on election day to vote
Speaker 1: for you. So this could be great news. It also
Speaker 1: could be terrible news. Now, Hong wasn't hiding, by the
Speaker 1: way what she represented. She was identifying openly as a
Speaker 1: Democratic socialist. She had joined the Wisconsin Assembly Socialist Caucus
Speaker 1: and had previously received the endorsement of the Madison Chapter
Speaker 1: of the Democratic Socialists of America. Now Democratic voters they
Speaker 1: had to decide who they wanted to representing their party statewide.
Speaker 1: Enough of them concluded, at least an election day that
Speaker 1: going further left was a risk they weren't willing to take,
Speaker 1: meaning they would lose the state to the conservative or
Speaker 1: the Republican candidate. Or it could be what I said
Speaker 1: a moment ago. Maybe they all just assumed she was
Speaker 1: going to win by so much that so many people
Speaker 1: in the state that are Democrats stayed home and said,
Speaker 1: I'm not going to waste my time. That very well
Speaker 1: could be why she lost this race. Now I don't
Speaker 1: say that to be a Debbie Downer. I say it
Speaker 1: because my job is to tell you what I think
Speaker 1: actually happened, and I think that's probably what happened this case.
Speaker 1: The headlines and the media had already anointed Hong and
Speaker 1: said that Hong was going to win. And when you
Speaker 1: say that, it is the kiss of death in politics.
Speaker 1: If anything, you want people to be inspired to go
Speaker 1: vote for you, if they support you, you don't want
Speaker 1: them to feel like they're wasting their time and it's
Speaker 1: a foregone conclusion that you are the winner. There's many
Speaker 1: that believe that this is exactly why Hillary Clinton lost
Speaker 1: to Donald Trump in twenty sixteen, because the media had
Speaker 1: already said she was breaking the glass ceiling. The media
Speaker 1: and the polls already said she was going to win
Speaker 1: by a large margin. It was a massive upset and
Speaker 1: election night that I celebrated when Donald Trump won, but
Speaker 1: it was a cautionary tale. At the same time, there
Speaker 1: was quite a few Democrats and some swing states that
Speaker 1: stayed home that did not go vote for Hillary Clinton.
Speaker 1: And we may be witnessing exactly that right now. Now,
Speaker 1: the biggest takeaway is this was the Democratic Party crushing
Speaker 1: the Socialists on Tuesday night in Wisconsin. No is the
Speaker 1: Democratic Socialists Marxist communist.
Speaker 2: Movement so live and well.
Speaker 1: Yes, is this a small victory for conservatives and for sanity, absolutely,
Speaker 1: But is this a trend that could be saying we're
Speaker 1: maybe coming back to sanity.
Speaker 2: I do not believe that's what this is.
Speaker 1: I believe what we witnessed was an over confident Marxist
Speaker 1: Communist socialist voter who believed that they were going to
Speaker 1: run away with an election night in a primary against
Speaker 1: a Democrat they thought was going to lose. Now, Republicans
Speaker 1: have to also be careful because these people are going
Speaker 1: to be way more inspired to show up on election day,
Speaker 1: which is exactly what my concern is nationwide on midterm
Speaker 1: election night, these types of losses can turn into bigger
Speaker 1: victories because now there's a rallying cry for the socialists
Speaker 1: in America to show up on election day, and we
Speaker 1: as concerned privatives need to make sure we don't take
Speaker 1: election day for granted.
Speaker 2: Either.
Speaker 1: We need to make sure we show up and vote,
Speaker 1: otherwise the story could change in just a few months
Speaker 1: to say that Republicans got blown out on election night
Speaker 1: because they were overconfident.
Speaker 2: So let's start with the Save Act.
Speaker 1: You know, where you have to show an ID to
Speaker 1: actually vote in an election in this country, a federal election.
Speaker 1: It's a pretty obvious idea that makes a lot of sense.
Speaker 1: Why is it that Congress is still refusing to act. Well,
Speaker 1: there are many that are actually trying to undermine the
Speaker 1: Save Act, hoping that the majority of Americans will disappear
Speaker 1: from supporting it so then they don't actually have to do.
Speaker 2: Anything with it.
Speaker 1: We've got new pulling that up that has just come out,
Speaker 1: and here is what the American people are saying. And
Speaker 1: I'll get ready because I promise you Washington's still going
Speaker 1: to try to not listen to you yet again, a
Speaker 1: majority of American voters can continue to support the Save Act.
Speaker 1: It's a simple bill requiring proof of US citizenship to
Speaker 1: register to vote in federal elections.
Speaker 2: That's what it does.
Speaker 1: That's it, and that's why so many Americans still support it.
Speaker 1: Now after months of those on the left trying to
Speaker 1: destroy the Save Act, tear it down, say it's racist
Speaker 1: or bigoted, or it's trying to suppress minority voters, however
Speaker 1: they want to describe it.
Speaker 2: Guess what. The American people still are not falling for it.
Speaker 1: According to a new raths Musen survey, sixty two percent
Speaker 1: of likely voters support the SAVE Act, including forty six
Speaker 1: percent who strongly support it, while thirty three percent oppose
Speaker 1: the bill and twenty two percent strongly oppose. Rasmusen says
Speaker 1: support levels have changed little since May, meaning that the
Speaker 1: attacks in May, June, July, yeah, and now we're in August,
Speaker 1: they are not landing that punch with voters.
Speaker 2: Where can people believe that you should be a US
Speaker 2: is and to vote and.
Speaker 1: You should have to prove that you are a United
Speaker 1: States citizen to register to vote? And nothing that they've
Speaker 1: done so far has been able to turn the tide.
Speaker 2: Now.
Speaker 1: The bill, also known as the Safeguard American Voter Eligibility Act,
Speaker 1: has already passed the House, but is not advanced in
Speaker 1: the Senate. Even with the Republicans in charge. Support split
Speaker 1: sharply by the way along party lines. The pulling down
Speaker 1: as shows eighty four percent of Republicans back this bill,
Speaker 1: forty five percent of Democrats. And here's the most interesting
Speaker 1: almost sixty percent of independent voters say you should not
Speaker 1: be able to register to vote in a US election
Speaker 1: without showing proof of citizenship. Yeah, that's a big, big number. Now,
Speaker 1: support also varies by pass vote. Eighty eight percent of
Speaker 1: those who voted for Donald Trump in twenty twenty four,
Speaker 1: for example, back to say that. No surprise there. Fifty
Speaker 1: three percent of Kamala Harris voters opposed it. Again, no
Speaker 1: surprise there. But the poll reveals a high level of
Speaker 1: agreement on citizenship requirements for voting. And that's the part
Speaker 1: that Washington should listen to the most. Eighty two percent
Speaker 1: of voters said only US citizens should be allowed to
Speaker 1: vote in US elections.
Speaker 2: I'll say that again.
Speaker 1: Eighty two percent of voters say only United States citizens
Speaker 1: should be allowed to vote in our US elections. Now,
Speaker 1: including majorities across every party and racial group surveyed as well.
Speaker 1: I'll give you these numbers. Eighty nine percent of Republicans,
Speaker 1: seventy seven percent of Democrats, seventy nine percent of independence,
Speaker 1: eighty seven percent of white voters, sixty seven percent of
Speaker 1: black voters, seventy four percent of Hispanic voters, and seventy
Speaker 1: five percent of other minority voters. Now, what is the
Speaker 1: big takeaway there? Well, the race.
Speaker 2: Bating is not working among minorities.
Speaker 1: They overwhelming almost eight out of ten say they support
Speaker 1: having to show that they are an American citizen to
Speaker 1: vote in our elections. Think about that because the Democrats,
Speaker 1: to try to undermine the Save Act, have said it's
Speaker 1: racist to ask a minority to show that they are
Speaker 1: a citizen of this country. In fact, more than half
Speaker 1: of voters fifty six percent, said it is at least
Speaker 1: somewhat likely that non citizens are illegally registered to vote
Speaker 1: in their state, including thirty three percent who said it's
Speaker 1: very likely. Now among that group, ninety two percent want
Speaker 1: the Senate to pass the Save Act. Seventy five percent
Speaker 1: of Republicans consider it at least somewhat likely. Compare with
Speaker 1: forty four percent of Democrats and fifty three percent of
Speaker 1: independence that believe that illegal immigrants are voting in our elections.
Speaker 1: Here's something else that's interesting. If you break it down
Speaker 1: by sex, more men than women, sixty two percent to
Speaker 1: fifty two percent, said it is at least somewhat likely
Speaker 1: that non citizens are illegally registered in their state. The
Speaker 1: majorities of both men and women also support the Save
Speaker 1: Act at sixty five percent and fifty nine percent for women, respectively.
Speaker 1: Now here's the part that matters. Time is running short
Speaker 1: for the proposal to affect the November elections. That's part
Speaker 1: of the reason why there has been stalling. Democrats don't
Speaker 1: want this, and the Republicans that hate Donald Trump in
Speaker 1: the Senate who lost their reelection campaigns trying to stick
Speaker 1: it to the president also don't want the Save Act
Speaker 1: to have any implications for the midterm elections coming up.
Speaker 2: That is obviously messed up.
Speaker 1: Senator Rick Scott, Republican from Florida, told Newsmax on Tuesday
Speaker 1: that Senate Republicans can still pass core pieces of the
Speaker 1: Save Act before the November mid terms. Scott also urged
Speaker 1: the Republicans to force final congressional approval of the legislation
Speaker 1: requiring voter identification and proof of citizenship through either budget
Speaker 1: reconciliation or a talking filibuster. I've been an advocate for
Speaker 1: that for quite some time. He also went on to
Speaker 1: say that Senate Republicans should not allow the measure to
Speaker 1: languish as the Chamber prepares for its August recess. Scott's
Speaker 1: push comes as the bill is again installed in the Senate,
Speaker 1: where Republicans are in charge, despite two years of House
Speaker 1: past versions and backing from President Donald Trump. Now, this
Speaker 1: polling data shows us one thing, no matter how much
Speaker 1: you try to undermine and slander, the simple idea of
Speaker 1: having to be a US citizen and showing proof that
Speaker 1: you're assistant to register to vote in this country, while
Speaker 1: the American people they still want to save, act at
Speaker 1: an overwhelmingly large number. This is bipartisan. And the question
Speaker 1: now is why on earth are the Republicans in the
Speaker 1: Senate not moving this forward. The answer, unfortunately is sad.
Speaker 1: There's just a handful of them that hate Donald Trump
Speaker 1: more than they love this country. And that's why we're
Speaker 1: having this conversation right now. We had an election. It
Speaker 1: was a big one that happened around the country, and
Speaker 1: it was a primary that was going to tell us
Speaker 1: what was coming moving forward with the Democratic Party. Well,
Speaker 1: the Democratic Party, my friends, it is dead. They have
Speaker 1: been taken over by the communists, socialist Marxist some call
Speaker 1: them the DSA, the Democratic Socialists of America, But to
Speaker 1: be clear, they're not socialists, they're communists, they are Marxists.
Speaker 1: And now we know how much the Democratic Party was
Speaker 1: afraid of them. We now have learned that the establishment
Speaker 1: Democrats spent more than sixty three point nine million trying
Speaker 1: to take down Mohammed Abdul l said, yes, the radical
Speaker 1: extremist Marxists of the Democratic Party, the Democrats in Washington
Speaker 1: over sixty million in support of Representative Hailey Stevens and
Speaker 1: her bid for the US Michigan Senate nomination and the
Speaker 1: Democratic Party and it still wasn't enough. Now the takeaway
Speaker 1: is this, the Democratic Party is dead. They have completely
Speaker 1: been overrun by the Marxist socialists and the communists. And
Speaker 1: this primary picking is getting worse, not better for Democratic candidates,
Speaker 1: even those that were extreme progressives. They have been replaced
Speaker 1: by the radical Marxists, the communists, who are saying that
Speaker 1: America is evil, that America is a place that should
Speaker 1: not be celebrated, that America is a country that needs
Speaker 1: to in essence, be overthrown from within. The candidates that
Speaker 1: are winning the primaries now are the ones that say
Speaker 1: get rid of the Supreme Court, or get rid of
Speaker 1: the presidency, or get rid of Congress. Certainly they're in
Speaker 1: favor of getting rid of law order. Now this radical
Speaker 1: agenda of Abdul l Said and many others are seeing
Speaker 1: a record amount of outside spending coming in to try
Speaker 1: to stop them, and it is not working at all,
Speaker 1: and that's why Democrats are freaking out.
Speaker 2: Now. Stevens has seen.
Speaker 1: A majority of AD support targeting the primary. Sixty three
Speaker 1: point nine million, seventy eight percent of all spending targeting
Speaker 1: the primary went towards supporting Hailey. Stevens against el said
Speaker 1: he has seen seven point five million in AD support.
Speaker 1: That is nothing compared to the sixty three point nine
Speaker 1: million dollars that was spent to support Stevens. This is
Speaker 1: truly incredible. Now, the pro Israel organization APAC spent the
Speaker 1: most of any group backing Stevens, with more than thirty
Speaker 1: million in spending over the past year. That funding came
Speaker 1: via United Democracy Project, doubling them mounted spent to defeat
Speaker 1: former Democratic Representative Jamal Bowman of New York in twenty
Speaker 1: twenty four. Just to put it in perspective, now, stevens
Speaker 1: bid was heavily supported also by the leadership of the
Speaker 1: Democratic Party. That's the second takeaway. The Senate Minority Leader
Speaker 1: Chuck Schumer, for example, was all in The New York
Speaker 1: Times wrote in June that Schumer had asked party donors
Speaker 1: to support Stevens heavily, calling her the quote strongest candidate,
Speaker 1: and spawned efforts giving her a sizeable edge from big
Speaker 1: spinning Democratic donors. Well in spite of the record spending
Speaker 1: Stevens could not match. El said on the campaign trail
Speaker 1: and what he was selling. The public health officials toured
Speaker 1: the state with a cast of far left supporters, including
Speaker 1: Hassan Piker, who literally said that America deserved nine to
Speaker 1: eleven and that played well in the minority Muslim community
Speaker 1: all across the state to Michigan. You out on top
Speaker 1: of that Vermont Center, Bernie Sanders coming in New York
Speaker 1: representative AOC, and that was the trifecta of the radical
Speaker 1: left taking over now. El said also brought in more
Speaker 1: contributions to his own campaign than Stevens. The preliminary FEC
Speaker 1: reports show that l Saez raids about fourteen point four
Speaker 1: million to Stevens nine point nine. The enthusiasm from Democratic
Speaker 1: Socialists of America aligned activists delivered one of the most
Speaker 1: stunning upsets in democratic politics history of our lifetime.
Speaker 2: So what is the warning from this well.
Speaker 1: The warning to Michigan voters who now faced a choice
Speaker 1: between el Said in a Republican nominee, a hardcore conservative
Speaker 1: in Mike Rogers, now Democrats. They're all falling in line
Speaker 1: now because they're terrified of being against el said.
Speaker 2: They don't care what he says at this point.
Speaker 1: Schumer and Stevens have already both publicly back to him
Speaker 1: in their statements, saying that they cannot wait for the
Speaker 1: Democrats to win in November. Abdul l said has run
Speaker 1: an energetic campaign that inspired thousands of Michiganders across the state,
Speaker 1: with a clear focus on lowering costs and standing up
Speaker 1: for working families. Democrats are united by a common purpose
Speaker 1: quote putting a check on Donald Trump by defeating his
Speaker 1: Republican enablers and taking back the Senate. We look forward
Speaker 1: to working with Abdul and Democrats across Michigan to win
Speaker 1: the seat in November. Is a statement from the Democratic
Speaker 1: Senatorial Campaign Committee. That's the same committee that put together
Speaker 1: tens of millions of dollars to try to beat el said,
Speaker 1: because even they knew he was a radical. Now, this
Speaker 1: wasn't the only election that should raise eyebrows Representative Shri
Speaker 1: Thanadar also lost the Michigan primary to a socialist state lawmaker. Now,
Speaker 1: Shri lost this primary race in an even more progressive
Speaker 1: foe that said, oh, no, I'm crazier than you are.
Speaker 1: You may remember Street from TV. This is one of
Speaker 1: the most crazy elected Democrats in America.
Speaker 2: But the Democratic.
Speaker 1: Socialists found someone even more progressive, making him the latest
Speaker 1: Democrat to be ousted by an open socialist in the
Speaker 1: mid term election cycle. Now, when I say open socialists,
Speaker 1: I'm saying the person that beat him said, I am
Speaker 1: a communist, I'm a Marxist, I'm a socialist, I'm not
Speaker 1: a Democrat. And the Indian born congressman lost to the
Speaker 1: Detroit native Donovan McKinney, a state representative of Michigan's House
Speaker 1: of Representatives, a member of the Democratic Socialists of America DSA,
Speaker 1: and McKinney one by fifty one point nine percent of
Speaker 1: the vote over the incumbent at forty eight point one,
Speaker 1: with the race being called by the AP Wednesday. Mone
Speaker 1: Now Fanadar was endorsed by the US House Minority Leader
Speaker 1: Hakeem Jeffries, another radical, and the Congressional Progressive Caucus.
Speaker 2: Yeah this guy was crazy.
Speaker 1: McKinny, however, won support of the well known socialist lawmaker
Speaker 1: Bernie Sanders and squad members Rashida talib Elamomar and AOC Now.
Speaker 1: McKenny also secured endorsements from other members of the Congressional
Speaker 1: Black Caucus, with Omar and Pressly both part of that.
Speaker 1: So what is the takeaway? It is this the Democratic
Speaker 1: Party has lost total control of their party. They are
Speaker 1: now being run by the socialists, the Marxists, and the communists.
Speaker 1: And get ready America, because many of these people I'm
Speaker 1: talking about now are going to actually be in Congress
Speaker 1: casting votes to destroy America. And that's why we all
Speaker 1: need to be paying attention to this. Some breaking news
Speaker 1: that a top advisor to the commander of Iran's Islamic
Speaker 1: Revolutionary Guard is now saying that Tehran could deliberately prolong
Speaker 1: its war with the United States of America in an
Speaker 1: effort to outlast President Donald Trump. As Washington now doubles
Speaker 1: down on a quote wall of steel naval blockade that
Speaker 1: the US and Israeli officials say, is officials say is
Speaker 1: steadily worsening the Islamic Republic's economic crisis. Quote one way
Speaker 1: is to prolong the war until we get the next
Speaker 1: term of the presidency and cause attrition so that if
Speaker 1: anyone else wants to attack Iran, they will know there
Speaker 1: is a cost. That is what the brigadier general told
Speaker 1: PBS in a rare interview that was published on Tuesday.
Speaker 2: Now.
Speaker 1: The long time senior IRGC figure, who served as the
Speaker 1: Forces Coordinating Deputy from nineteen to twenty twenty five and
Speaker 1: now serves a senior advisor to its laid out the
Speaker 1: potential strategy as Iran's newly reshuffled military leadership increasingly prepares
Speaker 1: for a prolonged confrontation, as they described it with Washington
Speaker 1: and specifically with Donald Trump, quote, we have to obtain
Speaker 1: deterrent so that the enemy never dares to attack us,
Speaker 1: so we can live with security now. This general went
Speaker 1: on to argue that time would favor Tehran, claiming the
Speaker 1: conflict has given Iran valuable experience fighting the United States
Speaker 1: while exposing the American military is quote weaker than what
Speaker 1: we perceived. The longer this will lasts, the more experience
Speaker 1: we gain, is what the ERGC official said. He added
Speaker 1: that Iran had never previously experienced a war that allowed
Speaker 1: it to learn firsthand how to fight the United States,
Speaker 1: but claim that in these five months we have learned how,
Speaker 1: yet again clearly showing that this is something they're using
Speaker 1: as propaganda.
Speaker 2: Here's more of that interview.
Speaker 3: No, we have not yet reached our final objective. This
Speaker 3: is clear. Up until now, we are victorious. In the future,
Speaker 3: we will continue to be victorious. The longer this war lasts,
Speaker 3: the more experience we gained. We had never seen a
Speaker 3: real war to gain real experience to learn how to
Speaker 3: fight with America. In these five months we have learned how.
Speaker 3: We have also seen how the American military is weaker
Speaker 3: than what we perceived it.
Speaker 2: Now this is clearly not only propaganda that's going to
Speaker 2: the people in Iran, but also to the world.
Speaker 1: The White House, by the way, answered the proposed attrition
Speaker 1: strategy with a blunt warning to Tehran, saying, quote, it
Speaker 1: would be wise for Rand to agree to a deal.
Speaker 1: The White House told PBS in response to their interview, saying, quote,
Speaker 1: otherwise they know what will happen now. This proposal to
Speaker 1: try to outlast Trump runs directly against the strategy that
Speaker 1: President Trump has increasingly embraced maintain overwhelming military leverage around
Speaker 1: Iran while allowing the blockade, frozen assets, sanctions, and Tehran's
Speaker 1: mounting economic problems to steadily tighten the pressure. Quote the
Speaker 1: USA has total control over the Strait of Hormuz. I
Speaker 1: think we will keep it, Donald Trump declared on True
Speaker 1: Social saying our naval blockade is being called by everyone
Speaker 1: a wall of steel and there is nothing Iran can
Speaker 1: do about it.
Speaker 2: Now. The President Trump was not finished there.
Speaker 1: He went on to say they have no navy, they
Speaker 1: have no air force, their remaining soldiers are unpaid. The
Speaker 1: IRGC is decimated in fleeing, and their leadership quote unquote
Speaker 1: is uncertain at best. They have no money, Their country
Speaker 1: is shot. All they have is fake news and three
Speaker 1: hundred percent inflation and getting worse. Iran is all talk
Speaker 1: and no o, the bully of the Middle East is
Speaker 1: no longer.
Speaker 2: Praise be to Allah. President Donald J. Trump. That was
Speaker 2: his latest True Social tweet.
Speaker 1: Now, all of this rhetoric coming from the IRGC commander
Speaker 1: who did this interview, comes after we learned the bigger
Speaker 1: story that the Iranian government was apparently trying to assassinate
Speaker 1: Donald Trump yet again, and there was a major threat
Speaker 1: against the president Air Force one. Now, that story was
Speaker 1: obviously one that was breaking while they were deciding to
Speaker 1: do this interview with PBS. And let me remind you
Speaker 1: of some of those details of the reporting came in
Speaker 1: from Fox.
Speaker 2: If it the very latest, Hey Trey, Yeah, Hey guys,
Speaker 2: good morning.
Speaker 4: It's a story that has captured the world attention this week,
Speaker 4: a threat by the Iranian regime on President Trump's life
Speaker 4: in Turkey last month. The Wall Street Journal reports it
Speaker 4: was actually Israeli intelligence that tipped off the administration to
Speaker 4: a specific danger. The report explains the sourcing on this information,
Speaker 4: saying the US official said Israel brief the Trump administration
Speaker 4: on the intelligence, which included a threat to use shoulder
Speaker 4: to air missiles to target Air Force One. Ultimately, the
Speaker 4: President was reportedly moved from Air Force One to another
Speaker 4: plane using a catering truck. Fox has not independently confirmed
Speaker 4: that detail.
Speaker 5: So, President, can you tell us about your ride on
Speaker 5: the airport catering truck in Perty? Why did he need
Speaker 5: to do that? Well, it's only up to Secret Service.
Speaker 5: I just follow what they'd like to do. So I
Speaker 5: go by Secret Service and the military. They wanted me
Speaker 5: to go in a different flight, a different plane, equal safety.
Speaker 5: But hey, they wanted me to do it, so I
Speaker 5: do it. I do what they say.
Speaker 1: President Trump yet again there saying hey, I'm not giving
Speaker 1: you the exact story that you want me to confirm,
Speaker 1: but stating yes, he did go on a different plane.
Speaker 1: So you look at all of this and you see
Speaker 1: where we are now. It is very clear the Presidence
Speaker 1: putting maximum pressure on I Ran, doing everything to choke
Speaker 1: hold their economy. Inflation is now at three hundred percent
Speaker 1: or more, and the Iranian I RGC radicals are saying
Speaker 1: they want to try to wait out the president. That
Speaker 1: would be a very long two plus years. Now, the
Speaker 1: President saying he wants to get this deal done, but
Speaker 1: he will continue to use maximum pressure to do everything
Speaker 1: he can to have a RANS leadership fold. I hope
Speaker 1: you'll take all the audio that I just played for you.
Speaker 1: Please share our podcast wherever you are on social media
Speaker 1: to help us grow, and I will see you back
Speaker 1: here tomorrow