WEBVTT - New Research Shows Insider Trading Is Everywhere

0:00:01.800 --> 0:00:04.440
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg Business Week. I'm Carol Masser and I'm

0:00:04.480 --> 0:00:07.280
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Quick Takes Tim Stanovk. We're here every day bringing

0:00:07.320 --> 0:00:09.799
<v Speaker 1>you the latest news from the world to business and finance,

0:00:09.840 --> 0:00:13.680
<v Speaker 1>plus technology, politics, economics, all purtnising the power of Business

0:00:13.680 --> 0:00:17.159
<v Speaker 1>Week reporters and editors, not to mention our journalists and

0:00:17.120 --> 0:00:20.000
<v Speaker 1>analysts in more than one twenty countries. You can download

0:00:20.000 --> 0:00:23.239
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Business Week and iTunes, SoundCloud, or Bloomberg dot Com.

0:00:23.400 --> 0:00:25.200
<v Speaker 1>You can also listen to our radio show at two

0:00:25.200 --> 0:00:27.880
<v Speaker 1>pm Eastern Time on Bloomberg Radio or watch us on

0:00:27.920 --> 0:00:31.360
<v Speaker 1>YouTube search Bloomberg clovel News. All right, let's get back

0:00:31.360 --> 0:00:33.640
<v Speaker 1>to COVID and the virus. Tim. We've mentioned some of

0:00:33.640 --> 0:00:36.320
<v Speaker 1>the headlines, the US recovery from the latest COVID nineteen

0:00:36.320 --> 0:00:39.479
<v Speaker 1>wave taking hold cases dropping or poised to start falling

0:00:39.520 --> 0:00:42.600
<v Speaker 1>in the vast majority states. That makes me hopeful. It

0:00:43.560 --> 0:00:45.760
<v Speaker 1>makes me hopeful as well. Also, the f d A

0:00:45.760 --> 0:00:48.720
<v Speaker 1>is leaning toward authorizing half dost booster shots of the

0:00:48.760 --> 0:00:52.040
<v Speaker 1>MODERNA vaccine. And we're also seeing that an anti viral

0:00:52.080 --> 0:00:55.080
<v Speaker 1>drug from Murk appears to inhibit several major COVID variants,

0:00:55.120 --> 0:00:58.440
<v Speaker 1>including the highly contagious delta strain. That's according to early

0:00:58.560 --> 0:01:01.000
<v Speaker 1>stage data. It's really interesting stuff going on. So let's

0:01:01.040 --> 0:01:04.039
<v Speaker 1>get to our daily check on COVID nineteen. Dr Amy

0:01:04.080 --> 0:01:06.800
<v Speaker 1>Compton Phillips is back with us. She's president of Clinical

0:01:06.800 --> 0:01:10.320
<v Speaker 1>Care at Providence Health System. She's on the phone from Seattle.

0:01:10.360 --> 0:01:12.720
<v Speaker 1>Remember we've told you this before. The first known US

0:01:12.800 --> 0:01:16.600
<v Speaker 1>case of COVID nineteen was confirmed in Washington State at Providence.

0:01:17.080 --> 0:01:19.800
<v Speaker 1>That was back in January. She and her team were

0:01:19.840 --> 0:01:21.360
<v Speaker 1>the first to know this and really have to deal

0:01:21.400 --> 0:01:24.520
<v Speaker 1>with it. The hospital is part of a massive system,

0:01:24.640 --> 0:01:27.880
<v Speaker 1>uh and it includes about fifty one hospitals clinics. It

0:01:28.040 --> 0:01:30.360
<v Speaker 1>is huge, so they see a lot and as I said,

0:01:30.400 --> 0:01:33.320
<v Speaker 1>she joins us from Seattle. Dr Compton Phillips, So nice

0:01:33.360 --> 0:01:35.120
<v Speaker 1>to have you back here with Tim and myself. How

0:01:35.160 --> 0:01:38.039
<v Speaker 1>are you. I'm doing great. Thank you so much for

0:01:38.080 --> 0:01:40.120
<v Speaker 1>having me today. So what are you seeing when it

0:01:40.200 --> 0:01:44.880
<v Speaker 1>comes to COVID nineteen cases treatment? How would you assess

0:01:44.920 --> 0:01:47.039
<v Speaker 1>the current situation when it comes to our fight against

0:01:47.040 --> 0:01:51.680
<v Speaker 1>this pandemic. Well, you know, it's great that we're finally

0:01:51.760 --> 0:01:54.040
<v Speaker 1>seeing a little bit of light at the end of

0:01:54.080 --> 0:01:56.240
<v Speaker 1>our current tunnel that we've been going through. You know,

0:01:56.280 --> 0:01:58.280
<v Speaker 1>we keep thinking it's the last tunnel we have to hit,

0:01:58.360 --> 0:02:00.160
<v Speaker 1>and I would love this to be the last one.

0:02:00.760 --> 0:02:04.919
<v Speaker 1>We still do have in some of our markets, particularly

0:02:04.960 --> 0:02:08.919
<v Speaker 1>in Alaska and in the eastern side of Washington State.

0:02:09.520 --> 0:02:12.600
<v Speaker 1>UM crisis standards of care, So we're not completely out

0:02:12.639 --> 0:02:15.280
<v Speaker 1>of the woods yet, But then explain what Explain what

0:02:15.280 --> 0:02:17.000
<v Speaker 1>that is for people who aren't familiar with that yet.

0:02:17.080 --> 0:02:20.280
<v Speaker 1>Crisis standard of care. Yeah, Crisis standards of care is

0:02:20.360 --> 0:02:23.360
<v Speaker 1>what you don't want if you go into the emergency room. UM.

0:02:23.360 --> 0:02:26.880
<v Speaker 1>It means that we really are beyond our capacity to

0:02:27.040 --> 0:02:29.760
<v Speaker 1>help people with all the cutting edge care that you

0:02:29.960 --> 0:02:33.680
<v Speaker 1>normally used to that we are either having to use

0:02:33.880 --> 0:02:36.360
<v Speaker 1>UM and the kind of the mnemonic that we use

0:02:36.400 --> 0:02:41.639
<v Speaker 1>this spaces, supplies and staff, So UM spaces. We're using

0:02:42.040 --> 0:02:44.520
<v Speaker 1>places for care that don't normally take care of patients.

0:02:44.520 --> 0:02:46.959
<v Speaker 1>So we might be using conference rooms, for example, to

0:02:47.120 --> 0:02:51.320
<v Speaker 1>put patients in. UM supplies, we might not have every

0:02:51.400 --> 0:02:54.320
<v Speaker 1>ventilator that we need to put people on if they're

0:02:54.440 --> 0:02:57.519
<v Speaker 1>breeding sails, and instead we'll start using alternatives like high

0:02:57.520 --> 0:03:01.960
<v Speaker 1>blow oxygen. And staff means we're using people to extend

0:03:02.240 --> 0:03:05.440
<v Speaker 1>the skilled staff we normally have two staff I see us.

0:03:05.520 --> 0:03:08.679
<v Speaker 1>For example, so we might have one ICU nurse that's

0:03:08.680 --> 0:03:12.000
<v Speaker 1>supervising to other nurses that came in from an outpatient

0:03:12.080 --> 0:03:15.080
<v Speaker 1>clinic that don't normally work in an ICU UM, but

0:03:15.200 --> 0:03:19.160
<v Speaker 1>to be able to extend what we typically do. Crisis

0:03:19.160 --> 0:03:23.760
<v Speaker 1>then crisis then absolutely. It's like I said, it's not

0:03:23.840 --> 0:03:25.639
<v Speaker 1>what you would want for you or your family, it's

0:03:25.639 --> 0:03:27.720
<v Speaker 1>not what we want to provide. You do what you

0:03:27.760 --> 0:03:29.919
<v Speaker 1>can when you have to. So and I thought it

0:03:29.960 --> 0:03:32.440
<v Speaker 1>was so important what you said, seeing the life at

0:03:32.440 --> 0:03:34.840
<v Speaker 1>the end of the current tunnel. And I do feel

0:03:34.920 --> 0:03:39.560
<v Speaker 1>like every conversation we have, the caveat is well depending

0:03:39.560 --> 0:03:42.040
<v Speaker 1>on COVID and depending on the trajectory of this virus,

0:03:42.520 --> 0:03:47.240
<v Speaker 1>because we just don't know. UM, what optimism do you

0:03:47.280 --> 0:03:52.000
<v Speaker 1>hold on to? What worries you? So the optimism I

0:03:52.080 --> 0:03:56.520
<v Speaker 1>have is we now have seen around the globe countries

0:03:56.760 --> 0:03:59.560
<v Speaker 1>that have been able to get things under control, even

0:03:59.600 --> 0:04:02.120
<v Speaker 1>in that they of delta. And the way they're doing

0:04:02.200 --> 0:04:05.920
<v Speaker 1>that is with the layered containment strategies we know work,

0:04:06.360 --> 0:04:11.040
<v Speaker 1>so really really pushing on vaccines and vaccines um that

0:04:11.040 --> 0:04:13.920
<v Speaker 1>that allow us to get back to life. So in

0:04:14.000 --> 0:04:16.640
<v Speaker 1>countries where they for example, like over in the EU,

0:04:16.880 --> 0:04:19.680
<v Speaker 1>where they're requiring proof of vaccination to go out to

0:04:19.720 --> 0:04:23.480
<v Speaker 1>dinner or into museum, vaccination rates have increased and they've

0:04:23.480 --> 0:04:26.880
<v Speaker 1>gotten control of the pandemic. When we do things like

0:04:27.520 --> 0:04:32.960
<v Speaker 1>use masks and congregate settings, particularly in places like schools,

0:04:33.080 --> 0:04:36.440
<v Speaker 1>it works. When we increase a ventilation, increase social distancing,

0:04:36.560 --> 0:04:40.080
<v Speaker 1>it works. So I do believe that if we actually

0:04:40.120 --> 0:04:43.800
<v Speaker 1>put science into practice that we would get control of

0:04:44.000 --> 0:04:46.680
<v Speaker 1>this wave and have it be the last one that

0:04:46.720 --> 0:04:49.000
<v Speaker 1>we have to deal with. One challenging thing to hear,

0:04:49.000 --> 0:04:50.440
<v Speaker 1>and I think for many people to hear right now

0:04:50.520 --> 0:04:52.880
<v Speaker 1>is that yes, we can get it under control, but

0:04:52.920 --> 0:04:54.560
<v Speaker 1>it requires a lot of sacrifice. I think on an

0:04:54.560 --> 0:04:57.640
<v Speaker 1>individual basis, like you know, we haven't seen family and

0:04:57.720 --> 0:04:59.880
<v Speaker 1>over two years, for example, we're not playing on flying

0:05:00.000 --> 0:05:04.080
<v Speaker 1>because we have a young child before he's vaccinated. So

0:05:04.160 --> 0:05:06.680
<v Speaker 1>it's it's like this new normal. Even though we can

0:05:06.760 --> 0:05:09.039
<v Speaker 1>keep it under control, it's it's it's not something that

0:05:09.640 --> 0:05:11.640
<v Speaker 1>I'm you know, we're all wearing masks around the office,

0:05:11.680 --> 0:05:16.000
<v Speaker 1>like it's not great. Yeah. And the really interesting thing

0:05:16.080 --> 0:05:18.920
<v Speaker 1>is over in the EU, to look at Denmark, for example,

0:05:19.000 --> 0:05:21.640
<v Speaker 1>they're back to normal. They're not wearing masks, but it's

0:05:21.680 --> 0:05:24.440
<v Speaker 1>because they did the work to get it under control,

0:05:25.200 --> 0:05:28.960
<v Speaker 1>rather than having to keep going on um with with

0:05:29.279 --> 0:05:33.520
<v Speaker 1>the containment strategies. As soon as particularly our kids can

0:05:33.520 --> 0:05:36.280
<v Speaker 1>get vaccinated, it really will allow us to get back

0:05:36.279 --> 0:05:37.880
<v Speaker 1>to normal and we won't have to do all the

0:05:37.960 --> 0:05:41.920
<v Speaker 1>layer containment. It'll just be contained now. The challenge we

0:05:41.960 --> 0:05:48.640
<v Speaker 1>have is the misinformation that is stoking anti vaccination fears

0:05:48.279 --> 0:05:52.600
<v Speaker 1>is really really traumatizing for communities. We have doctors and

0:05:52.720 --> 0:05:56.440
<v Speaker 1>nurses that are you know, zipping up body bags again

0:05:56.760 --> 0:05:59.400
<v Speaker 1>in our I see us and then go out to

0:05:59.440 --> 0:06:02.920
<v Speaker 1>their car and find a flyer on their windshield saying

0:06:03.040 --> 0:06:08.640
<v Speaker 1>that vaccinations cause and then choose your misinformation um fact um,

0:06:08.680 --> 0:06:10.800
<v Speaker 1>and that they will be held accountable and that they're

0:06:10.800 --> 0:06:16.120
<v Speaker 1>contributing to genocide. So it is incredibly challenging for our

0:06:16.160 --> 0:06:19.080
<v Speaker 1>people who have been putting their lives and health and

0:06:19.160 --> 0:06:22.080
<v Speaker 1>families lives on the line for the past eighteen months,

0:06:22.560 --> 0:06:25.040
<v Speaker 1>to be seen as the problem rather than the solution

0:06:25.120 --> 0:06:27.560
<v Speaker 1>to the pandemic. That has got to be difficult. I

0:06:27.560 --> 0:06:29.480
<v Speaker 1>want to get back to our guest. At this hour,

0:06:29.520 --> 0:06:32.520
<v Speaker 1>it's Dr Amy compted Phillips. She's president of Clinical Care

0:06:32.560 --> 0:06:35.400
<v Speaker 1>at Providence Health System. UH still with us on the

0:06:35.440 --> 0:06:39.120
<v Speaker 1>phone from Seattle. Dr Compton Phillips. Let's talk a little

0:06:39.120 --> 0:06:41.400
<v Speaker 1>bit about pregnant women. It's something Tim and I have

0:06:41.400 --> 0:06:43.480
<v Speaker 1>talked a lot about. I know are friends who are

0:06:43.520 --> 0:06:46.799
<v Speaker 1>thinking about getting pregnant. There are those that are pregnant

0:06:46.800 --> 0:06:49.800
<v Speaker 1>who've been vaccinated. There are others who don't want to

0:06:49.800 --> 0:06:52.440
<v Speaker 1>get the vaccine ahead of it. Um, what can you

0:06:52.480 --> 0:06:55.000
<v Speaker 1>tell us? There's lots of research and information being put

0:06:55.080 --> 0:06:59.000
<v Speaker 1>out there. There is lots of research and the great

0:06:59.080 --> 0:07:02.279
<v Speaker 1>news that the vaccines are safe and effective and pregnant women.

0:07:02.760 --> 0:07:06.160
<v Speaker 1>The reason that's great news is because moms and babies

0:07:06.240 --> 0:07:09.920
<v Speaker 1>are at real risk from COVID. That particularly with the

0:07:09.920 --> 0:07:14.679
<v Speaker 1>Delta wave, with the increased contagiousness of this particular germ,

0:07:14.680 --> 0:07:17.040
<v Speaker 1>and the fact that it is affecting so many young people.

0:07:17.640 --> 0:07:21.880
<v Speaker 1>We have seen, um, you know, one is too many.

0:07:21.960 --> 0:07:25.400
<v Speaker 1>We have seen so many women who have come in

0:07:25.520 --> 0:07:28.880
<v Speaker 1>pregnant and have either lost their baby because of the

0:07:28.960 --> 0:07:32.720
<v Speaker 1>blood clotting that COVID itself causes um and then disrupting

0:07:32.720 --> 0:07:35.080
<v Speaker 1>flow to the placentas of them the baby doesn't make

0:07:35.120 --> 0:07:39.480
<v Speaker 1>it UM and or moms themselves because of the mild

0:07:39.520 --> 0:07:43.040
<v Speaker 1>immune suppression you get from pregnancy itself, not being able

0:07:43.080 --> 0:07:46.440
<v Speaker 1>to fight off COVID, and then you know the whole O, B, G,

0:07:46.680 --> 0:07:50.119
<v Speaker 1>Y N trying to decide do we deliver this baby

0:07:50.160 --> 0:07:52.280
<v Speaker 1>early to try to save mom's life or what do

0:07:52.320 --> 0:07:55.040
<v Speaker 1>we do? It's just a horrible thing for pregnant women

0:07:55.280 --> 0:07:58.920
<v Speaker 1>to get severely ill from COVID. Preventing yourself with the

0:07:58.960 --> 0:08:01.760
<v Speaker 1>shot is absolute, literally the best course, but it's not

0:08:01.840 --> 0:08:05.200
<v Speaker 1>something that many pregnant women are doing. Only of pregnant

0:08:05.200 --> 0:08:08.920
<v Speaker 1>people have been vaccinated, lower rates among Hispanic and Black people.

0:08:09.640 --> 0:08:11.000
<v Speaker 1>How do you get that number? Why, why do you

0:08:11.040 --> 0:08:14.280
<v Speaker 1>think that's happening? And how do you get that number up? Well?

0:08:14.320 --> 0:08:17.880
<v Speaker 1>I think pregnant women are women who are even considering pregnancy,

0:08:18.000 --> 0:08:21.200
<v Speaker 1>are always really really worried about doing anything that might

0:08:21.200 --> 0:08:24.320
<v Speaker 1>put the baby at risk and appropriately So it's why

0:08:24.440 --> 0:08:27.360
<v Speaker 1>why so many pregnant women I know um are are

0:08:27.400 --> 0:08:29.960
<v Speaker 1>hesitant to take a tile at all, much less anything else.

0:08:30.560 --> 0:08:34.080
<v Speaker 1>And and so I think having been appropriately cautious is

0:08:34.120 --> 0:08:37.280
<v Speaker 1>absolutely the right thing to do. I don't know that

0:08:37.320 --> 0:08:40.520
<v Speaker 1>women know the fact that the risk of COVID while

0:08:40.559 --> 0:08:43.439
<v Speaker 1>pregnant is so much higher than the risk of the

0:08:43.600 --> 0:08:46.360
<v Speaker 1>vaccine that we have a lot of data now, and

0:08:46.400 --> 0:08:49.280
<v Speaker 1>I know this vaccine is reasonably new. But when you

0:08:49.360 --> 0:08:52.720
<v Speaker 1>do a new vaccine in billions of people literally across

0:08:52.760 --> 0:08:55.640
<v Speaker 1>the globe, you get data very quickly, and we know

0:08:55.800 --> 0:08:59.240
<v Speaker 1>that this vaccine is now safe and effective for pregnant

0:08:59.280 --> 0:09:03.040
<v Speaker 1>women and tificantly more safe than getting COVID is when

0:09:03.080 --> 0:09:06.520
<v Speaker 1>you're pregnant. Getting that word out is hard, and so

0:09:06.760 --> 0:09:11.120
<v Speaker 1>it is part of the conversation um to to help

0:09:11.360 --> 0:09:14.240
<v Speaker 1>ensure that we do get the word out. So are O,

0:09:14.400 --> 0:09:17.080
<v Speaker 1>B G y N s are are beating the drums

0:09:17.200 --> 0:09:20.040
<v Speaker 1>were in, the papers were beating it. The American College

0:09:20.040 --> 0:09:23.840
<v Speaker 1>of Obstetrics and Gynecology ACOG is making sure that it's known.

0:09:23.840 --> 0:09:27.120
<v Speaker 1>CDC is putting the information out. And still it takes

0:09:27.240 --> 0:09:30.000
<v Speaker 1>really one on one conversation with women to know that

0:09:30.360 --> 0:09:32.160
<v Speaker 1>the best thing they can do for a safe and

0:09:32.240 --> 0:09:34.839
<v Speaker 1>healthy pregnancy is get a shot dr one thing I

0:09:34.840 --> 0:09:36.760
<v Speaker 1>want to do. Playing Devil's advocate, We've only got about

0:09:36.760 --> 0:09:38.640
<v Speaker 1>forty five seconds. Here is there's somewhere, say we'll wait

0:09:38.640 --> 0:09:40.719
<v Speaker 1>a minute. We don't know the data. We don't know

0:09:40.760 --> 0:09:43.600
<v Speaker 1>when a kid is five or ten, whether there's some

0:09:43.640 --> 0:09:46.480
<v Speaker 1>complications or something. What do you say to that? And

0:09:46.520 --> 0:09:49.880
<v Speaker 1>I am playing Devil's advocate a bit here. Yeah, I'd

0:09:49.920 --> 0:09:53.080
<v Speaker 1>say that delivering a baby to term and being able

0:09:53.120 --> 0:09:55.439
<v Speaker 1>to raise that baby till their five or ten is

0:09:55.480 --> 0:10:00.480
<v Speaker 1>a definite benefit rather than having having a complicated pregnancy

0:10:00.559 --> 0:10:03.559
<v Speaker 1>that doesn't go to term because of COVID. Alright, we're

0:10:03.559 --> 0:10:05.200
<v Speaker 1>going to leave it on that note. Always good to

0:10:05.200 --> 0:10:07.600
<v Speaker 1>get your time with you. Please stay safe and we

0:10:07.640 --> 0:10:11.199
<v Speaker 1>wish you well you and your team. Dr Amy Compton Phillips,

0:10:11.240 --> 0:10:13.560
<v Speaker 1>president of Clinical Care at Providence Health System, on the

0:10:13.559 --> 0:10:18.440
<v Speaker 1>phone from Seattle, Washington. You're listening to Bloomberg Business Week

0:10:18.640 --> 0:10:22.640
<v Speaker 1>with Carol Masser and Bloomberg Quick Takes Tim Stinovic on

0:10:22.760 --> 0:10:25.800
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Radio. Oh my god, we're already talking about this story.

0:10:25.840 --> 0:10:28.000
<v Speaker 1>We've been talking since it hit the terminal this morning.

0:10:28.080 --> 0:10:30.959
<v Speaker 1>It's the cover story of Bloomberg Business which happens to

0:10:31.000 --> 0:10:33.480
<v Speaker 1>also be the big take on the Terminal. It's about

0:10:33.520 --> 0:10:38.520
<v Speaker 1>insiders winning trades. When I read in, I mean I

0:10:38.679 --> 0:10:40.679
<v Speaker 1>just I was reading in this morning. I usually scan.

0:10:40.760 --> 0:10:42.720
<v Speaker 1>You couldn't put it on. I could not. I was

0:10:42.720 --> 0:10:45.880
<v Speaker 1>sitting there with my coffee and just kept going because, UM,

0:10:46.280 --> 0:10:48.880
<v Speaker 1>I don't know, there's just it's a fascinating story, it

0:10:48.920 --> 0:10:50.880
<v Speaker 1>really is, and it's a cover story for insight into

0:10:50.960 --> 0:10:52.679
<v Speaker 1>something that I don't think a lot of people know

0:10:52.760 --> 0:10:57.280
<v Speaker 1>about it and understandably, um it's a little wonky too.

0:10:57.320 --> 0:10:59.200
<v Speaker 1>Let's let's get into it. Joe Weber is editor at

0:10:59.200 --> 0:11:01.600
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Business. We Ke's with us in the Bloomberg Interactive

0:11:01.640 --> 0:11:04.520
<v Speaker 1>Broker studio. Liam Bond is Projects and Investigations reporter for

0:11:04.520 --> 0:11:09.439
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg News, joining us on the phone from London. Joel, Okay, insiders,

0:11:10.200 --> 0:11:14.160
<v Speaker 1>that's right, how are they defined? So? UH gonna be

0:11:14.720 --> 0:11:17.240
<v Speaker 1>careful here because there's a I can I can hear

0:11:17.280 --> 0:11:21.280
<v Speaker 1>my my legal counsel on my on my my shoulder

0:11:21.280 --> 0:11:25.319
<v Speaker 1>advising on how to say this. So, uh, corporate executives

0:11:26.080 --> 0:11:30.120
<v Speaker 1>get some privilege information, right, and some of that information

0:11:30.200 --> 0:11:33.160
<v Speaker 1>is obviously non public because you know, helps them do

0:11:33.200 --> 0:11:37.240
<v Speaker 1>their jobs. But it also turns out that they have

0:11:37.320 --> 0:11:40.800
<v Speaker 1>some special abilities to like trade, and it also means

0:11:40.840 --> 0:11:44.599
<v Speaker 1>that those trades get disclosed, so eventually we get to

0:11:44.640 --> 0:11:46.719
<v Speaker 1>see what they do and that's long been known. And

0:11:47.080 --> 0:11:49.480
<v Speaker 1>what's really interesting about the story I thought was also

0:11:49.520 --> 0:11:51.960
<v Speaker 1>that now there are like websites set up to like

0:11:52.120 --> 0:11:56.240
<v Speaker 1>track and rank who's the best insider at trading and

0:11:56.280 --> 0:11:59.560
<v Speaker 1>you can subscribe and you can subscribe three dollars a month. Um.

0:11:59.600 --> 0:12:03.080
<v Speaker 1>But a new artier also, you know, it gets to

0:12:03.160 --> 0:12:07.080
<v Speaker 1>some the heart of capitalism is like is somebody getting

0:12:07.120 --> 0:12:09.800
<v Speaker 1>an unfair advantage over the rest of us? So, so Liam,

0:12:09.840 --> 0:12:12.719
<v Speaker 1>what's how does that breakdown? And and how is this?

0:12:13.120 --> 0:12:18.360
<v Speaker 1>How is this legal? Because it is? Yeah, so so

0:12:18.400 --> 0:12:21.679
<v Speaker 1>I can look like the kind of Um, the stories

0:12:21.720 --> 0:12:25.920
<v Speaker 1>that dominate, like financial coverage inside of trading always like

0:12:25.960 --> 0:12:28.120
<v Speaker 1>rears its head like it was. It was really big

0:12:28.120 --> 0:12:31.800
<v Speaker 1>in the eighties with Michael milk Un and Bowski and

0:12:31.840 --> 0:12:34.760
<v Speaker 1>then again you know when you have Sack Capital and

0:12:34.840 --> 0:12:38.360
<v Speaker 1>pre Berra and stuff. But the thing is like the

0:12:38.440 --> 0:12:41.240
<v Speaker 1>stories keep coming, but the issue never goes away. And

0:12:41.760 --> 0:12:43.880
<v Speaker 1>I think fundamentally the reason for that is that the

0:12:44.040 --> 0:12:48.520
<v Speaker 1>law in America around inside of trading is just really

0:12:48.600 --> 0:12:53.559
<v Speaker 1>shoddy and isn't really up to the task. Um. So,

0:12:53.640 --> 0:12:56.840
<v Speaker 1>for example, there's no crime of insider trading in America

0:12:57.320 --> 0:12:58.880
<v Speaker 1>in the same way that there is in the UK

0:12:59.160 --> 0:13:03.040
<v Speaker 1>or another place. Um. What happens in America is that

0:13:03.280 --> 0:13:07.120
<v Speaker 1>you have to charge people with securities fraud UM, and

0:13:07.160 --> 0:13:09.480
<v Speaker 1>it's all done via kind of case law. There isn't

0:13:09.520 --> 0:13:12.400
<v Speaker 1>an insider trading statue, even though people are pushing for

0:13:12.440 --> 0:13:16.560
<v Speaker 1>that UM, and essentially that really raises the bar but

0:13:16.760 --> 0:13:19.560
<v Speaker 1>behind bringing these cases because to prove frauard you have

0:13:19.640 --> 0:13:24.280
<v Speaker 1>to demonstrate this thing called scienter, which is like criminal intent.

0:13:24.559 --> 0:13:27.880
<v Speaker 1>So you have to demonstrate that this inside the trade

0:13:27.960 --> 0:13:30.720
<v Speaker 1>and use their head inside instivation and liberally set out

0:13:30.840 --> 0:13:33.680
<v Speaker 1>to take advantage of it UM. And the problem with

0:13:33.760 --> 0:13:36.120
<v Speaker 1>that is that even though you can sort of see, well,

0:13:36.200 --> 0:13:39.400
<v Speaker 1>the CEO keeps getting very lucky, they can turn around

0:13:39.400 --> 0:13:41.920
<v Speaker 1>and say, well, if you look at the information that

0:13:42.000 --> 0:13:45.199
<v Speaker 1>was in the public domain already, you know it was

0:13:45.240 --> 0:13:47.000
<v Speaker 1>pretty obvious that the shares were going to go up,

0:13:47.120 --> 0:13:50.199
<v Speaker 1>or you know, I just had better ability to judge

0:13:50.240 --> 0:13:51.960
<v Speaker 1>what was already out there, and it's very hard to

0:13:52.000 --> 0:13:54.199
<v Speaker 1>prove them wrong. And if you think about like normal

0:13:54.240 --> 0:13:57.680
<v Speaker 1>insider trading cases that you think of like the fat

0:13:57.720 --> 0:14:00.400
<v Speaker 1>capitals of this world, and hopefully if you're a secuty,

0:14:00.400 --> 0:14:03.640
<v Speaker 1>you'll find some email or find some witness, whereas in

0:14:03.640 --> 0:14:07.680
<v Speaker 1>this it's really just all going on in the executive's head. Um, So,

0:14:07.840 --> 0:14:09.880
<v Speaker 1>you know, I spoke to a bunch of you know,

0:14:10.120 --> 0:14:12.840
<v Speaker 1>x SEC folks, ex prosecutors, and they all said that

0:14:12.880 --> 0:14:15.760
<v Speaker 1>these cases are just absolute pigs and that's why they're

0:14:15.800 --> 0:14:20.160
<v Speaker 1>largely you know, it's almost like an unprosecutable crime essentially,

0:14:20.240 --> 0:14:23.400
<v Speaker 1>meaning that they're not necessary isn't necessarily a case there

0:14:23.400 --> 0:14:29.160
<v Speaker 1>you're saying, well, it's just incredibly hard to demonstrate wrong

0:14:29.240 --> 0:14:34.760
<v Speaker 1>for criminal prosecutors. Yeah. Liam, What I found so fascinating

0:14:34.760 --> 0:14:37.920
<v Speaker 1>about this was that even you know, some government lawyers

0:14:37.920 --> 0:14:41.640
<v Speaker 1>who you talked to question how much damage the executive

0:14:41.880 --> 0:14:45.280
<v Speaker 1>trading really causes, which makes me think it's like, wait

0:14:45.320 --> 0:14:49.480
<v Speaker 1>a second, is it really is it a victimless Yeah,

0:14:49.480 --> 0:14:51.240
<v Speaker 1>that that really struck out to me about this story.

0:14:51.240 --> 0:14:53.720
<v Speaker 1>So explain that because not everybody thinks this is necessarily

0:14:53.720 --> 0:14:56.520
<v Speaker 1>that bad. Well, I think that's the thing that really

0:14:56.560 --> 0:14:58.720
<v Speaker 1>appealed to me about the story is the kind of

0:14:59.200 --> 0:15:02.680
<v Speaker 1>moral and for esophical questions that it it raises. So

0:15:02.760 --> 0:15:05.520
<v Speaker 1>you've got someone like Free Berrara, who kind of made

0:15:05.600 --> 0:15:07.600
<v Speaker 1>his name as the Sheriff of Wall Street and he

0:15:07.680 --> 0:15:10.600
<v Speaker 1>brought down all these insider traders, and then a load

0:15:10.600 --> 0:15:13.000
<v Speaker 1>of his cases ended up having to be quashed because

0:15:13.480 --> 0:15:16.280
<v Speaker 1>just down to this you know, function of this kind

0:15:16.320 --> 0:15:20.280
<v Speaker 1>of squiggly law and the case law. But he would argue, look,

0:15:20.400 --> 0:15:26.400
<v Speaker 1>it's about fairness. Like fundamentally, um, you know, elites in

0:15:26.480 --> 0:15:30.520
<v Speaker 1>society shouldn't have an advantage when you know, trading our

0:15:30.560 --> 0:15:33.480
<v Speaker 1>financial markets over other people. And even if the losses

0:15:33.520 --> 0:15:37.160
<v Speaker 1>are small or they're disparate and spread out, that's you know,

0:15:37.240 --> 0:15:41.400
<v Speaker 1>fundamentally the principle at stake, where other people, particularly economists,

0:15:42.040 --> 0:15:46.400
<v Speaker 1>so around and say well, actually, you know, by trading,

0:15:46.960 --> 0:15:50.440
<v Speaker 1>these guys are helping making markets more efficient because they

0:15:50.480 --> 0:15:53.640
<v Speaker 1>make disclosures. People can look at the disclosures and ultimately

0:15:53.640 --> 0:15:57.360
<v Speaker 1>it kind of helps wheel the grease the wheels of capitalism.

0:15:57.400 --> 0:16:01.080
<v Speaker 1>And therefore it's a bit like you know, I sort

0:16:01.080 --> 0:16:05.359
<v Speaker 1>of make the analogy of of of like drug enforcement.

0:16:05.400 --> 0:16:08.120
<v Speaker 1>It's almost like an unwitnable thing. So prosecutors will be

0:16:08.120 --> 0:16:12.760
<v Speaker 1>better off just ignoring it all together and accepting that

0:16:12.800 --> 0:16:14.200
<v Speaker 1>this is kind of part of parting of the way

0:16:14.240 --> 0:16:17.800
<v Speaker 1>that the world works. So the picture side this is

0:16:18.200 --> 0:16:22.000
<v Speaker 1>it's also rather timely because you know, we have new

0:16:22.120 --> 0:16:25.760
<v Speaker 1>new chair in SEC. There's been some shatter in d C.

0:16:27.000 --> 0:16:30.240
<v Speaker 1>What what what has been that chattering and where could

0:16:30.280 --> 0:16:34.640
<v Speaker 1>we see this this conversation go on the regulatory front. Yes,

0:16:34.720 --> 0:16:39.280
<v Speaker 1>so there's two. One is at the higher level political

0:16:39.400 --> 0:16:42.880
<v Speaker 1>legislative level, where they're talking about actually introducing inside of

0:16:42.960 --> 0:16:46.560
<v Speaker 1>trading statutes and rules which would have a quite profound impact.

0:16:47.120 --> 0:16:49.480
<v Speaker 1>And then there's the more kind of rule based stuff

0:16:49.520 --> 0:16:51.960
<v Speaker 1>that's going on at the SEC where they have actually

0:16:52.000 --> 0:16:53.920
<v Speaker 1>talked about and it looks like it could happen quite

0:16:53.960 --> 0:16:58.720
<v Speaker 1>quickly reforming. One of the main culprits of this whole story,

0:16:58.720 --> 0:17:01.560
<v Speaker 1>which these kind of the will tend be five trading

0:17:01.640 --> 0:17:04.560
<v Speaker 1>plans and basically what it is, if you're an executive

0:17:05.000 --> 0:17:06.880
<v Speaker 1>and you want to sell your stock, you could enter

0:17:06.880 --> 0:17:09.560
<v Speaker 1>a plan with like a third party that says I'm

0:17:09.560 --> 0:17:12.119
<v Speaker 1>going to trade x amount of stock over this period

0:17:12.119 --> 0:17:14.679
<v Speaker 1>of time. But the problem is these things are kind

0:17:14.720 --> 0:17:17.640
<v Speaker 1>of right with loopholes and um, you know, it's been

0:17:17.680 --> 0:17:22.080
<v Speaker 1>various kind of research showing how how vulnerable they are

0:17:22.119 --> 0:17:24.040
<v Speaker 1>to abuse. So it looks like at least on that

0:17:24.080 --> 0:17:26.840
<v Speaker 1>side of things, on the trading plans thing, there could

0:17:26.920 --> 0:17:30.400
<v Speaker 1>be some movement. But again, the way that the law

0:17:30.480 --> 0:17:33.600
<v Speaker 1>is written, my you know, my understanding of people are spoken.

0:17:33.680 --> 0:17:35.800
<v Speaker 1>He says that there's only certain things they can do.

0:17:35.880 --> 0:17:39.560
<v Speaker 1>They can't completely solve the problems in the way that

0:17:39.560 --> 0:17:42.119
<v Speaker 1>they'd like to without ripping up the rule because and

0:17:42.200 --> 0:17:44.480
<v Speaker 1>rewriting the hole inside the trading law. But there is

0:17:44.520 --> 0:17:48.800
<v Speaker 1>an advantage. Let's be fair, like an insider, whether they

0:17:48.840 --> 0:17:51.280
<v Speaker 1>just soak up stuff as they work around the office,

0:17:51.359 --> 0:17:54.200
<v Speaker 1>is uh fair to say that they soak up a

0:17:54.280 --> 0:17:56.920
<v Speaker 1>certain amount of information. There's got to be a little

0:17:56.920 --> 0:17:59.840
<v Speaker 1>bit of bias in any trade that they do potentially,

0:18:00.040 --> 0:18:02.560
<v Speaker 1>and you know, maybe maybe that's right that you get

0:18:02.600 --> 0:18:04.920
<v Speaker 1>rewarded for that for doing such a good job, right

0:18:05.000 --> 0:18:07.080
<v Speaker 1>or maybe not? And maybe this is something that we're

0:18:07.080 --> 0:18:09.880
<v Speaker 1>going to hear more about. I love love, Love Love

0:18:09.920 --> 0:18:12.119
<v Speaker 1>This story Must read Bloomberg Big Take cover story of

0:18:12.160 --> 0:18:15.240
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Business this Week. Joe Weber, editor of Bloomberg Business Week.

0:18:15.320 --> 0:18:18.040
<v Speaker 1>Here in our studio, Bloomberg News Projects and Investigations. Reporter

0:18:18.400 --> 0:18:22.240
<v Speaker 1>Liam Bond on the phone in London. Check it out.

0:18:22.680 --> 0:18:27.159
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg. This is Bloomberg Business Week with Carol

0:18:27.240 --> 0:18:32.560
<v Speaker 1>Messer and Bloomberg Quick Takes. Tim Stinovic on Bloomberg Radio. Well,

0:18:32.640 --> 0:18:36.840
<v Speaker 1>meet George Jetson. Maybe a little bit um not really really,

0:18:36.880 --> 0:18:41.560
<v Speaker 1>but are you ready to welcome in Amazon's astro robot? Me?

0:18:42.160 --> 0:18:44.560
<v Speaker 1>I don't know, are you know? I'm actually not? Okay,

0:18:44.960 --> 0:18:47.479
<v Speaker 1>that's sorry, all right? And really what is it for?

0:18:47.680 --> 0:18:50.600
<v Speaker 1>And that's exactly what our Bloomberg News technology reporter Matt

0:18:50.640 --> 0:18:53.879
<v Speaker 1>Day is asking in his latest story. He joins us

0:18:53.920 --> 0:18:56.359
<v Speaker 1>on the phone in Seattle. Matt, good to have you

0:18:56.440 --> 0:18:58.680
<v Speaker 1>here with Tim and myself. So tell us a little

0:18:58.680 --> 0:19:04.080
<v Speaker 1>bit about the astro robot. So. Astro is a little

0:19:04.200 --> 0:19:06.480
<v Speaker 1>foot and a half tall kind of a touch screen

0:19:06.560 --> 0:19:09.280
<v Speaker 1>on wheels, um Amazon that it can follow you around,

0:19:09.359 --> 0:19:11.399
<v Speaker 1>it could meet the family, It can do little security

0:19:11.440 --> 0:19:13.480
<v Speaker 1>sweeps in your home. And if it comes to a

0:19:13.520 --> 0:19:16.919
<v Speaker 1>lot of the same voice activated shops and capabilities that

0:19:16.920 --> 0:19:19.439
<v Speaker 1>people would note from their their Amazon smart speakers and

0:19:19.640 --> 0:19:23.960
<v Speaker 1>Alexa devices, Well, what is the need for this? Right? Like?

0:19:24.040 --> 0:19:27.560
<v Speaker 1>What is what is the problem this is solving? That

0:19:27.720 --> 0:19:29.479
<v Speaker 1>is a great question, and if you read the initial

0:19:29.480 --> 0:19:34.160
<v Speaker 1>coverage since Amazon's launch yesterday, everybody is asking that question. Um. Amazon,

0:19:34.240 --> 0:19:37.159
<v Speaker 1>for their part, says, you know, home security is a

0:19:37.240 --> 0:19:39.320
<v Speaker 1>key capability of this thing. You know, if if you're gone,

0:19:39.359 --> 0:19:41.720
<v Speaker 1>you can have it stream video of your kitchen or

0:19:41.760 --> 0:19:44.560
<v Speaker 1>whatever to your smartphone. Um, which is in keeping with

0:19:44.600 --> 0:19:46.760
<v Speaker 1>a lot of Amazon's pitch recently there if their home

0:19:46.800 --> 0:19:49.840
<v Speaker 1>devices is it's basically a home security thing. Um. That's

0:19:49.960 --> 0:19:52.120
<v Speaker 1>there's that off to that. But aside from that, there's

0:19:52.119 --> 0:19:54.520
<v Speaker 1>not a whole lot um that this can do that

0:19:55.040 --> 0:19:57.199
<v Speaker 1>you know, your your smart speaker can't already do or

0:19:57.400 --> 0:19:58.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, if you might not need to be get

0:19:58.960 --> 0:20:01.040
<v Speaker 1>done at all. Okay, and just did at launch just

0:20:01.119 --> 0:20:03.280
<v Speaker 1>to you know, be devil's advocate here I went. I

0:20:03.359 --> 0:20:05.840
<v Speaker 1>had the same reaction when the first Alexa device came

0:20:05.840 --> 0:20:08.240
<v Speaker 1>out years ago. I saw the video that Amazon put

0:20:08.240 --> 0:20:09.520
<v Speaker 1>out and I was like, what is this thing? And

0:20:09.560 --> 0:20:12.080
<v Speaker 1>that thing ended up just being an absolute home run

0:20:12.119 --> 0:20:14.600
<v Speaker 1>for the company. Is there any kind of feeling like that, like, Okay,

0:20:14.600 --> 0:20:16.520
<v Speaker 1>this could be a sleeper hit or this is like

0:20:16.600 --> 0:20:18.679
<v Speaker 1>Amazon just throwing something against the wall and see if

0:20:18.680 --> 0:20:23.480
<v Speaker 1>it sticks. The Amazon's position if they think it's ripe

0:20:23.560 --> 0:20:25.560
<v Speaker 1>enough that they want to try, right, Like just as

0:20:25.600 --> 0:20:27.679
<v Speaker 1>they could put into the world a bare box you know,

0:20:27.800 --> 0:20:30.120
<v Speaker 1>Echo and Eleca device that couldn't really do much at launch,

0:20:30.200 --> 0:20:32.040
<v Speaker 1>it might evolve into something else. They're kind of planting

0:20:32.080 --> 0:20:34.320
<v Speaker 1>the flag here, and I think, um, you know, you're

0:20:34.320 --> 0:20:36.760
<v Speaker 1>you're right to raise the echo example, But that's that's

0:20:36.800 --> 0:20:39.439
<v Speaker 1>definitely the optimistic take from inside Amazon is that we

0:20:39.480 --> 0:20:41.320
<v Speaker 1>think the tech is good enough that there's gonna be

0:20:41.359 --> 0:20:43.479
<v Speaker 1>home robots. We might as well be there in some

0:20:43.560 --> 0:20:46.280
<v Speaker 1>form or fashion and see if we can, you know, frankly,

0:20:46.280 --> 0:20:48.400
<v Speaker 1>help customers figure out what to do with the thing. Well,

0:20:48.440 --> 0:20:50.280
<v Speaker 1>and maybe it's the first step. I mean, we've all

0:20:50.320 --> 0:20:54.680
<v Speaker 1>remember Boston Dynamics, right, and those incredible robots that can

0:20:54.760 --> 0:20:57.880
<v Speaker 1>that are lifelike terrifying, whether it's the dog, Yeah, terrifying

0:20:57.880 --> 0:21:01.879
<v Speaker 1>works too. But you you you wonder about kind of

0:21:01.880 --> 0:21:04.440
<v Speaker 1>where this is all going, and whether it's Amazon or

0:21:04.480 --> 0:21:07.359
<v Speaker 1>other companies. I do feel like the world Matt to

0:21:07.400 --> 0:21:10.000
<v Speaker 1>some extent is slowly moving in that direction. I mean,

0:21:10.080 --> 0:21:11.840
<v Speaker 1>we don't mind that we've got a robot that vacuums

0:21:11.840 --> 0:21:14.800
<v Speaker 1>are floor floors or or rugs. Like, we're all in

0:21:14.880 --> 0:21:19.840
<v Speaker 1>on that. So it's not too unusual, right to kind

0:21:19.840 --> 0:21:21.840
<v Speaker 1>of stretch a little bit that at some point we

0:21:21.920 --> 0:21:24.920
<v Speaker 1>might have some robot that's moving around in our house,

0:21:25.040 --> 0:21:28.960
<v Speaker 1>maybe checking on kids, maybe checking on elderly family members.

0:21:29.040 --> 0:21:32.560
<v Speaker 1>Maybe I don't know, you know, I'm not quite sure

0:21:32.600 --> 0:21:35.720
<v Speaker 1>where this goes. I think nobody is. But we're really

0:21:35.720 --> 0:21:37.639
<v Speaker 1>going to have to decide how comfortably want to be

0:21:37.680 --> 0:21:40.760
<v Speaker 1>with surveillance, which is one theme that Amazon to keep talking.

0:21:40.880 --> 0:21:43.440
<v Speaker 1>You know, new devices with cameras and microphones on them,

0:21:43.440 --> 0:21:45.000
<v Speaker 1>and you know that's that's great as long as you

0:21:45.040 --> 0:21:47.800
<v Speaker 1>trust the company and faith and what's gonna be done

0:21:47.800 --> 0:21:49.760
<v Speaker 1>with that data? But you know that's that's not something

0:21:49.800 --> 0:21:51.919
<v Speaker 1>we traditionally had in our owns. Well, what are you

0:21:51.960 --> 0:21:55.040
<v Speaker 1>hearing about that? Because it isn't It's interesting with younger

0:21:55.119 --> 0:21:56.880
<v Speaker 1>generations sometimes I feel like, yeah, I don't want people

0:21:56.880 --> 0:21:59.000
<v Speaker 1>watching me, and then you know they're on their phone

0:21:59.000 --> 0:22:01.720
<v Speaker 1>constantly with cation services, and yeah, you can find me

0:22:01.720 --> 0:22:04.560
<v Speaker 1>wherever you want to find me. Um, Increasingly you walk

0:22:04.600 --> 0:22:07.200
<v Speaker 1>into an office and you've got badges and different things

0:22:07.480 --> 0:22:10.640
<v Speaker 1>and cameras throughout that are tracking you. You know, Uh,

0:22:10.800 --> 0:22:12.920
<v Speaker 1>we see increasingly in the United States. You see it

0:22:12.920 --> 0:22:14.920
<v Speaker 1>a lot over in Europe or the UK. There's cameras

0:22:15.000 --> 0:22:19.719
<v Speaker 1>outside everywhere, certainly over in China. So, uh, isn't that

0:22:19.840 --> 0:22:22.320
<v Speaker 1>just kind of the whether, however you feel about it,

0:22:22.359 --> 0:22:25.240
<v Speaker 1>that's kind of where we're all moving towards and there's

0:22:25.240 --> 0:22:28.359
<v Speaker 1>a big chunk of the retail public that will tell you,

0:22:28.359 --> 0:22:30.720
<v Speaker 1>you know, yeah, they're taking all of my data. Anyway,

0:22:30.840 --> 0:22:32.680
<v Speaker 1>you might as well just get the cool news services.

0:22:32.800 --> 0:22:34.040
<v Speaker 1>But I think what we've seen in the last couple

0:22:34.040 --> 0:22:36.359
<v Speaker 1>of years of companies like Amazon and like Google that

0:22:36.400 --> 0:22:39.440
<v Speaker 1>do a mass a frankly great frightening throw v intol

0:22:39.440 --> 0:22:41.000
<v Speaker 1>on us. They know they have to take this seriously.

0:22:41.119 --> 0:22:43.000
<v Speaker 1>At least so they have seen I don't know whether

0:22:43.040 --> 0:22:45.240
<v Speaker 1>we could call it a backlash, but enough of a

0:22:45.720 --> 0:22:47.840
<v Speaker 1>ground towel of concern among consumers that they have to

0:22:47.880 --> 0:22:50.199
<v Speaker 1>at least pay proper lift service of privacy and then

0:22:50.240 --> 0:22:53.600
<v Speaker 1>ideally you know, yeah, um, listen to us on it. Hey, Matt,

0:22:53.640 --> 0:22:56.560
<v Speaker 1>I gotta ask you about other Amazon announcements yesterday that

0:22:56.680 --> 0:22:59.360
<v Speaker 1>we saw from the company. The company announcing uh, it's

0:22:59.800 --> 0:23:03.560
<v Speaker 1>a Halo fitness service that competes with Apple and also

0:23:03.600 --> 0:23:06.440
<v Speaker 1>competes with Peloton's app. We saw Peloton stock take a

0:23:06.520 --> 0:23:11.200
<v Speaker 1>hit yesterday. I take us into everything they're offering. So

0:23:11.320 --> 0:23:14.520
<v Speaker 1>Halo Fitness. You know, for a long time after Amazon

0:23:14.720 --> 0:23:18.119
<v Speaker 1>released as Halo Band originally didn't have a screen. Um, folks,

0:23:18.400 --> 0:23:21.320
<v Speaker 1>Speculative Courses is going to go into health and fitness

0:23:21.359 --> 0:23:24.280
<v Speaker 1>tracking and loan behold it is bone Behold, it does

0:23:24.359 --> 0:23:27.199
<v Speaker 1>have a screen on on the second version of the device. UM.

0:23:27.240 --> 0:23:29.080
<v Speaker 1>Amazon's hoping this is all going to be enough a

0:23:29.080 --> 0:23:31.760
<v Speaker 1>package to get to subscribed to pay a monthly fee

0:23:32.080 --> 0:23:35.680
<v Speaker 1>um something like four bucks a month to um to

0:23:35.880 --> 0:23:39.560
<v Speaker 1>activate all of the sort of health tracking benefits that

0:23:39.680 --> 0:23:41.720
<v Speaker 1>they say come with this thing. Um. You know, Halo

0:23:41.840 --> 0:23:43.440
<v Speaker 1>was another Amazon for I think I kind of mixture

0:23:43.600 --> 0:23:46.480
<v Speaker 1>used at launch, So it makes beteen whether it gonna

0:23:46.480 --> 0:23:48.400
<v Speaker 1>be a big market for it. But certainly Wallster's taken

0:23:48.520 --> 0:23:51.280
<v Speaker 1>through hey match just quickly. So how much does any

0:23:51.320 --> 0:23:53.360
<v Speaker 1>of this move the financial needle or have the potential

0:23:53.440 --> 0:23:58.600
<v Speaker 1>to at Amazon, be it the robot or fitness it

0:23:58.760 --> 0:24:00.560
<v Speaker 1>is unclear. They don't release a a lot of data

0:24:00.600 --> 0:24:01.800
<v Speaker 1>on it, but you know it's it's part of a

0:24:01.920 --> 0:24:03.800
<v Speaker 1>long term play to just keep us all engaged in

0:24:03.840 --> 0:24:05.640
<v Speaker 1>their system and you know, ideally buying some more stuff

0:24:05.680 --> 0:24:07.440
<v Speaker 1>in the retail site while we're at it. Astro a

0:24:07.560 --> 0:24:10.720
<v Speaker 1>robot for you, Matt Day, Oh, I don't know. I'm

0:24:10.720 --> 0:24:13.840
<v Speaker 1>not sure I can afford one at launch a thousand

0:24:13.920 --> 0:24:17.800
<v Speaker 1>bucks or if you don't buy it at launch, right man, Yeah,

0:24:17.840 --> 0:24:20.040
<v Speaker 1>that's training and when is it going to be obsolete?

0:24:20.240 --> 0:24:22.200
<v Speaker 1>And if you want like pedigree or a name for

0:24:22.560 --> 0:24:24.120
<v Speaker 1>a specific name, you have to pay even more. Nowns

0:24:24.240 --> 0:24:26.280
<v Speaker 1>Obazos is you know he's he's no longer CEO of

0:24:26.320 --> 0:24:27.720
<v Speaker 1>the company, but maybe he should have brought one to

0:24:28.040 --> 0:24:31.760
<v Speaker 1>space a few months ago. Stay tuned. Yeah, brother for

0:24:31.920 --> 0:24:35.480
<v Speaker 1>that one. Matt Day, thank you, technology reporter at Bloomberg

0:24:35.480 --> 0:24:38.439
<v Speaker 1>News on the phone from Seattle. You know, we all

0:24:38.520 --> 0:24:40.080
<v Speaker 1>left at Elon Musk when he was going to try

0:24:40.119 --> 0:24:43.120
<v Speaker 1>and disrupt the car industry, and look where we are.

0:24:43.440 --> 0:24:47.280
<v Speaker 1>He disrupted it and everybody's really following in his path. Hey,

0:24:47.359 --> 0:24:50.040
<v Speaker 1>but he doesn't have that robot out yet. Remember what

0:24:50.119 --> 0:24:52.520
<v Speaker 1>happened at the announcement a few months ago. It was

0:24:52.560 --> 0:24:54.320
<v Speaker 1>like the person dressed up as a robot. This is

0:24:54.359 --> 0:24:56.680
<v Speaker 1>a real robot. That was kind of funny. I felt

0:24:56.680 --> 0:24:58.480
<v Speaker 1>like it was at Momon Chance or something or what

0:24:58.640 --> 0:25:03.960
<v Speaker 1>is that called I'm roam. Yeah, but you let me drive?

0:25:04.240 --> 0:25:09.440
<v Speaker 1>Oh no, no, no, no, this is not a twin. Please,

0:25:09.600 --> 0:25:15.320
<v Speaker 1>I'll do the riding gravels. I want to drive. It's

0:25:15.320 --> 0:25:21.679
<v Speaker 1>a good question. This is the drive to the clobe

0:25:24.400 --> 0:25:27.840
<v Speaker 1>down on the blue Bird Radio. So just about ten

0:25:27.920 --> 0:25:30.280
<v Speaker 1>and a half minutes left in today's trading session. It

0:25:30.440 --> 0:25:33.080
<v Speaker 1>is time for the close Carol Master along with Tim Stanovic,

0:25:33.640 --> 0:25:36.520
<v Speaker 1>and we are seeing stocks taking another leg down there

0:25:36.520 --> 0:25:38.879
<v Speaker 1>off their highs and lows of the session. Mixed trained,

0:25:39.119 --> 0:25:41.840
<v Speaker 1>little change on the SMP up about four tens of

0:25:41.880 --> 0:25:43.600
<v Speaker 1>a percent on the down, down about one tenth of

0:25:43.640 --> 0:25:45.680
<v Speaker 1>a percent on the NASTAC Charlie breaking that down for

0:25:45.760 --> 0:25:49.000
<v Speaker 1>you as well, looking forward to our drive to the close.

0:25:49.119 --> 0:25:51.560
<v Speaker 1>Guest Coast James Chuck Mark is back with us, partner

0:25:51.640 --> 0:25:55.880
<v Speaker 1>and technology analyst at the asset management from Clock's Clockwise Capital,

0:25:56.520 --> 0:25:59.160
<v Speaker 1>and James is back with us on the phone from Miami. James,

0:25:59.200 --> 0:26:03.200
<v Speaker 1>how are you? I'm doing great. How are you so

0:26:03.280 --> 0:26:05.159
<v Speaker 1>still in Miami? James? Not not moving back to New

0:26:05.240 --> 0:26:09.000
<v Speaker 1>York yet. I was just in New York about a

0:26:09.080 --> 0:26:12.240
<v Speaker 1>month ago for some meetings, but um kind of permanently

0:26:12.280 --> 0:26:16.440
<v Speaker 1>in Miami. From the frezealable future. You're one of the

0:26:16.600 --> 0:26:20.800
<v Speaker 1>one of the many, then help me make some sense

0:26:21.040 --> 0:26:23.600
<v Speaker 1>out of the market trade. It feels like things are

0:26:23.600 --> 0:26:26.680
<v Speaker 1>getting a little tired there. We're definitely seeing more volatility,

0:26:26.960 --> 0:26:30.200
<v Speaker 1>especially when it comes to some of the big tech names.

0:26:30.359 --> 0:26:33.120
<v Speaker 1>We took out the ninety day moving average this week,

0:26:33.240 --> 0:26:35.480
<v Speaker 1>or definitely below the fifty day on the S and

0:26:35.560 --> 0:26:37.879
<v Speaker 1>P five hundred, But we are bouncing off and just

0:26:38.040 --> 0:26:41.200
<v Speaker 1>hovering at that ninety day. We talk about, you know,

0:26:42.119 --> 0:26:43.800
<v Speaker 1>dip buying and so on and so forth, but it

0:26:43.840 --> 0:26:46.679
<v Speaker 1>feels like that's becoming a weaker and weaker trade. How

0:26:46.720 --> 0:26:51.480
<v Speaker 1>do you see it? Sure? So at the beginning of

0:26:51.560 --> 0:26:53.880
<v Speaker 1>this year, obviously there was a lot of concerns around

0:26:53.920 --> 0:26:56.440
<v Speaker 1>inflation and what's going to happen with interest rates and

0:26:56.520 --> 0:26:59.920
<v Speaker 1>when it said going to temper um, and it appeared

0:27:00.080 --> 0:27:02.360
<v Speaker 1>that the market is seeing that those fears are coming

0:27:02.400 --> 0:27:05.199
<v Speaker 1>into fruition. Now the question I think that investors are

0:27:05.240 --> 0:27:08.679
<v Speaker 1>asking themselves is this something that is a prolonged thing

0:27:08.800 --> 0:27:12.520
<v Speaker 1>or a sustainable upward trend that's going to move against

0:27:12.560 --> 0:27:17.480
<v Speaker 1>the market, against technology stocks particularly, or is this something

0:27:17.600 --> 0:27:21.520
<v Speaker 1>that's a temporary phenomenon where we have supply constraints and

0:27:21.840 --> 0:27:24.040
<v Speaker 1>will be able to go through it and see some

0:27:24.160 --> 0:27:26.600
<v Speaker 1>positivity on the other side. So a lot of the

0:27:26.800 --> 0:27:30.720
<v Speaker 1>I think the moves are being exacerated by algorithmic trading,

0:27:30.920 --> 0:27:33.240
<v Speaker 1>But at the end of the day, that's the question

0:27:33.320 --> 0:27:37.000
<v Speaker 1>that a lot of investors are asking themselves, including us,

0:27:37.480 --> 0:27:39.360
<v Speaker 1>what do you think is it permanent or is it temporary?

0:27:40.440 --> 0:27:43.000
<v Speaker 1>We think it's temporary. We think we The analogy we

0:27:43.119 --> 0:27:47.359
<v Speaker 1>make is this is a classic traffic jam where you know,

0:27:47.560 --> 0:27:52.360
<v Speaker 1>this was somewhat self inflicted by closing out the economy um,

0:27:52.520 --> 0:27:55.040
<v Speaker 1>but what as we reopen it, there are going to

0:27:55.119 --> 0:27:58.080
<v Speaker 1>be constraints in terms of getting distribution back on track

0:27:58.160 --> 0:28:02.000
<v Speaker 1>on the supply side, and also getting stocking back on track.

0:28:02.119 --> 0:28:04.560
<v Speaker 1>So that's going to take time. We think it's going

0:28:04.680 --> 0:28:07.919
<v Speaker 1>to be um it could last you know, several quarters,

0:28:08.080 --> 0:28:11.360
<v Speaker 1>potentially longer. But there is um brightness on the other

0:28:11.440 --> 0:28:13.720
<v Speaker 1>side of it, because at the end of the day,

0:28:13.800 --> 0:28:17.600
<v Speaker 1>the supply and demand will we calibrate. The only caveat

0:28:17.680 --> 0:28:20.840
<v Speaker 1>that we make outside of what we do, which is

0:28:20.880 --> 0:28:24.520
<v Speaker 1>predominantly technologies on the energy side, where the inflation that

0:28:24.680 --> 0:28:27.960
<v Speaker 1>you see there um could be more prolonged than the

0:28:28.040 --> 0:28:30.320
<v Speaker 1>rest of the sectors. But if you're looking at the

0:28:30.480 --> 0:28:34.840
<v Speaker 1>predominant drivers of the market, technology of being at the forefront,

0:28:35.040 --> 0:28:38.400
<v Speaker 1>which is inherently deflationary in nature. We continue to have

0:28:38.560 --> 0:28:42.320
<v Speaker 1>a very bullish posture over the near term as well,

0:28:42.400 --> 0:28:44.760
<v Speaker 1>as the longer term. What you said about inflation really

0:28:44.800 --> 0:28:47.800
<v Speaker 1>mirrors what we heard from J. Pow, Christine Leguard, Andrew

0:28:47.840 --> 0:28:52.080
<v Speaker 1>Balley of the Bank of the the UK Bank a

0:28:52.080 --> 0:28:54.080
<v Speaker 1>Bank of England, i should say, and B of J's

0:28:54.400 --> 0:28:58.080
<v Speaker 1>Kuroda at that ECB form. They all talked about inflation

0:28:58.200 --> 0:29:01.000
<v Speaker 1>really dominated the discussion, and they basically said, it's a

0:29:01.040 --> 0:29:05.680
<v Speaker 1>supply chain constraints. The problem is, you know, everybody feels

0:29:05.680 --> 0:29:07.360
<v Speaker 1>in the dark right now because we don't know what

0:29:07.440 --> 0:29:10.360
<v Speaker 1>the next leg of the pandemic. We understand the current leg,

0:29:10.640 --> 0:29:12.600
<v Speaker 1>but we don't know what the next leg is. Having

0:29:12.760 --> 0:29:16.520
<v Speaker 1>said that, you look at technology, what have you been buying?

0:29:16.640 --> 0:29:20.400
<v Speaker 1>What have you been selling? Sure? I think right now

0:29:20.560 --> 0:29:23.480
<v Speaker 1>what you have to do is move up in quality.

0:29:23.840 --> 0:29:26.560
<v Speaker 1>You know what you saw in the the initial part

0:29:26.600 --> 0:29:28.800
<v Speaker 1>of the reopening that people were willing to move down

0:29:28.880 --> 0:29:31.640
<v Speaker 1>balance sheet and the lower quality names just to get

0:29:31.720 --> 0:29:35.280
<v Speaker 1>that reopening bump. But at this point, given the lack

0:29:35.360 --> 0:29:38.120
<v Speaker 1>of visible visibility that we have in terms of the

0:29:38.240 --> 0:29:41.400
<v Speaker 1>duration of these impacts, not that it's going to be prolonged,

0:29:41.440 --> 0:29:44.600
<v Speaker 1>but how long will actually laugh um, you have to

0:29:44.680 --> 0:29:47.720
<v Speaker 1>move up into higher quality names. And secondly to that,

0:29:48.200 --> 0:29:51.320
<v Speaker 1>you have to expose yourself and get get exposure to

0:29:51.400 --> 0:29:54.680
<v Speaker 1>the themes that are going to dominate the next cycle.

0:29:55.080 --> 0:29:58.760
<v Speaker 1>We're moving toward a centralized world to a decentralized one,

0:29:59.000 --> 0:30:02.160
<v Speaker 1>and every company that you analyze it will this company,

0:30:02.320 --> 0:30:04.240
<v Speaker 1>given the direction that the world is going into, the

0:30:04.360 --> 0:30:07.800
<v Speaker 1>direction that society is going, Will these companies be more

0:30:07.880 --> 0:30:11.200
<v Speaker 1>relevant in several years times? And they are today? So

0:30:11.440 --> 0:30:15.200
<v Speaker 1>with that in mind, you know, we really have exposure

0:30:15.480 --> 0:30:21.000
<v Speaker 1>longtime exposure in in data management and data security, companies

0:30:21.080 --> 0:30:25.360
<v Speaker 1>that are involved in the next wave of social interaction

0:30:25.440 --> 0:30:28.680
<v Speaker 1>with the metaverse, and and the companies that bridge the

0:30:28.760 --> 0:30:31.680
<v Speaker 1>gap between the analog world and the digital world of

0:30:31.880 --> 0:30:34.760
<v Speaker 1>via logistics. What's the metaverse company that you're focused on?

0:30:34.880 --> 0:30:36.720
<v Speaker 1>Facebook would like it to be the itself to be

0:30:36.760 --> 0:30:38.600
<v Speaker 1>the metaphorst company. We heard that from Mark Zuckerberg in

0:30:38.600 --> 0:30:42.320
<v Speaker 1>the most recent earnings called what are you betting on? Sure? Sure?

0:30:42.400 --> 0:30:44.960
<v Speaker 1>I mean Facebook? You know, we have a position in

0:30:45.040 --> 0:30:47.080
<v Speaker 1>that UM and we think that there's going to be

0:30:47.120 --> 0:30:50.320
<v Speaker 1>an integral part of it UM just given the the

0:30:51.160 --> 0:30:54.160
<v Speaker 1>number of people that they serve UM. But we're looking

0:30:54.200 --> 0:30:57.640
<v Speaker 1>at more UM as far as the next gen, bigger

0:30:58.120 --> 0:31:01.160
<v Speaker 1>opportunities are concerned with the more your play entities like

0:31:01.320 --> 0:31:05.760
<v Speaker 1>roadblocks and Unity. We have a small position and Unity software. UM,

0:31:07.040 --> 0:31:09.120
<v Speaker 1>so that's the one that we're playing right now. You

0:31:09.200 --> 0:31:18.840
<v Speaker 1>also like, from what I understand, CrowdStrike holdings. You like Uber, Amazon, Square, YEP, Square,

0:31:18.960 --> 0:31:23.600
<v Speaker 1>and Snowflake. UM. You know all those tackle the big

0:31:23.760 --> 0:31:26.600
<v Speaker 1>beams in the future. You know, we're moving to the cloud.

0:31:26.840 --> 0:31:29.880
<v Speaker 1>Cloud Strike helps you secure that moving to the cloud.

0:31:29.920 --> 0:31:34.720
<v Speaker 1>Snowplank stolps you manage that. Square is just disintermediating the

0:31:34.800 --> 0:31:39.040
<v Speaker 1>card networks and financial institutions and Unity we talked about

0:31:39.080 --> 0:31:42.120
<v Speaker 1>in Uber Amazon tackled the whole US again. Is there

0:31:42.200 --> 0:31:44.800
<v Speaker 1>just quickly we just have about thirty seconds left here.

0:31:44.960 --> 0:31:46.520
<v Speaker 1>Is there a tech name that you think people are

0:31:46.560 --> 0:31:48.640
<v Speaker 1>still plowing into, a big tech that you're like, m

0:31:49.240 --> 0:31:55.280
<v Speaker 1>it's done. The one big tech name where we're starting

0:31:55.360 --> 0:31:57.560
<v Speaker 1>to second guest ourselves, and this has been a long

0:31:57.720 --> 0:32:01.560
<v Speaker 1>term position is Apple. We are looking at it with

0:32:01.680 --> 0:32:06.960
<v Speaker 1>greater scrutiny. Now. Obviously the growth opportunities are still pervasive.

0:32:07.000 --> 0:32:11.680
<v Speaker 1>They're just given their proliferation of their devices. But when

0:32:11.720 --> 0:32:14.680
<v Speaker 1>you look at the economics of the business, UM, it's

0:32:14.800 --> 0:32:18.600
<v Speaker 1>predominantly going to be driven by their ability to continue

0:32:18.640 --> 0:32:22.440
<v Speaker 1>to buy back shares versus more littlebust growth on the

0:32:22.520 --> 0:32:25.440
<v Speaker 1>top line. So that's one where we're kind of second

0:32:25.520 --> 0:32:28.120
<v Speaker 1>casting in terms of how much of a position do

0:32:28.200 --> 0:32:30.640
<v Speaker 1>we really want to have in this into the next chapter.

0:32:31.200 --> 0:32:33.720
<v Speaker 1>It's something I talked about with Kathy Wood, who said

0:32:33.720 --> 0:32:36.120
<v Speaker 1>Apple's great, but ARC is about new technology and she

0:32:36.240 --> 0:32:39.760
<v Speaker 1>was looking forward, um, always looking forward to. James Chalkmak

0:32:39.800 --> 0:32:41.440
<v Speaker 1>comes on with us. He's partner in Tech analyst over

0:32:41.560 --> 0:32:46.320
<v Speaker 1>Clockwise Capital on the phone from Miami. Thanks for listening

0:32:46.360 --> 0:32:49.800
<v Speaker 1>to Bloomberg Business Week. Download the podcast on iTunes, SoundCloud,

0:32:49.960 --> 0:32:52.080
<v Speaker 1>or Bloomberg dot com, and you can also listen to

0:32:52.120 --> 0:32:54.720
<v Speaker 1>our radio show at two pm Eastern on Bloomberg Radio

0:32:54.840 --> 0:32:57.560
<v Speaker 1>or watch us on YouTube. Search to Bloomberg Global News.