WEBVTT - The 10 Words You Cannot Say In 2026

0:00:11.440 --> 0:00:12.080
<v Speaker 1>Hey there, folks.

0:00:12.080 --> 0:00:16.639
<v Speaker 2>It is Sunday, January fourth, and we certainly hope you

0:00:16.840 --> 0:00:20.360
<v Speaker 2>left a certain number of words.

0:00:20.280 --> 0:00:22.120
<v Speaker 1>Back in twenty twenty five.

0:00:22.200 --> 0:00:26.320
<v Speaker 2>Yes, we have an annual list of banished words that

0:00:26.400 --> 0:00:28.600
<v Speaker 2>you should not be using this year.

0:00:28.600 --> 0:00:31.280
<v Speaker 1>And with that, welcome to this episode of Amy and Tday.

0:00:31.520 --> 0:00:34.280
<v Speaker 2>We got ten on the list, right off the bad

0:00:34.360 --> 0:00:38.720
<v Speaker 2>I agree with seventy eighty percent of the list, right.

0:00:38.640 --> 0:00:41.280
<v Speaker 3>The same and thankfully Same is not on the list,

0:00:41.320 --> 0:00:43.680
<v Speaker 3>but maybe it should be because I've annoyed myself by

0:00:43.760 --> 0:00:44.240
<v Speaker 3>saying that.

0:00:44.479 --> 0:00:46.160
<v Speaker 4>But yes, I agree with this list.

0:00:46.280 --> 0:00:48.879
<v Speaker 3>It made me laugh, and I have to admit I

0:00:48.960 --> 0:00:52.080
<v Speaker 3>did not know this was a thing. There was a

0:00:52.120 --> 0:00:56.680
<v Speaker 3>banished words words list, and this is the fiftieth annual list.

0:00:56.800 --> 0:00:59.840
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, we've been waiting for a big year to do that,

0:01:00.160 --> 0:01:02.440
<v Speaker 2>so once they got to the fiftieth, we thought this

0:01:02.560 --> 0:01:05.200
<v Speaker 2>was a good time. But no, give them credit for this,

0:01:05.280 --> 0:01:08.039
<v Speaker 2>and there is value and it is interesting to see

0:01:08.040 --> 0:01:10.480
<v Speaker 2>how words kind of evolve over time. But this is

0:01:10.480 --> 0:01:13.440
<v Speaker 2>out of Lake Superior State University up in of course,

0:01:14.000 --> 0:01:17.640
<v Speaker 2>uh Michigan. But they've been doing this for fifty years now.

0:01:17.800 --> 0:01:21.760
<v Speaker 2>They actually take submissions, they actually get public input in

0:01:21.760 --> 0:01:24.400
<v Speaker 2>this year, they got thousands from all over the world

0:01:24.440 --> 0:01:26.600
<v Speaker 2>as before, so they didn't just pluck these out and

0:01:26.640 --> 0:01:29.119
<v Speaker 2>make them up themselves. A lot of these and I'm

0:01:29.160 --> 0:01:32.080
<v Speaker 2>curious the listeners will agree with a lot of these said,

0:01:32.560 --> 0:01:34.399
<v Speaker 2>because don't you go down the list and go hell yeah,

0:01:34.480 --> 0:01:35.800
<v Speaker 2>please y'all stop saying that.

0:01:36.000 --> 0:01:39.240
<v Speaker 3>Exactly yes, and like, this is a list that basically

0:01:39.240 --> 0:01:43.679
<v Speaker 3>are words that are either misused or are useless or

0:01:43.720 --> 0:01:44.759
<v Speaker 3>maybe just annoying.

0:01:44.840 --> 0:01:47.040
<v Speaker 4>Correct, That's that's how it makes the list.

0:01:47.120 --> 0:01:49.640
<v Speaker 2>Okay, Another one for you here to tease Robes, is

0:01:49.720 --> 0:01:52.440
<v Speaker 2>of the list, are there any that you would say,

0:01:52.560 --> 0:01:54.320
<v Speaker 2>you know what that one can stay?

0:01:56.360 --> 0:01:56.600
<v Speaker 4>Yes?

0:01:56.960 --> 0:01:58.320
<v Speaker 1>Oh wow, more than one.

0:01:58.840 --> 0:01:59.680
<v Speaker 4>I would say that.

0:02:00.160 --> 0:02:01.400
<v Speaker 3>I know that.

0:02:01.560 --> 0:02:05.800
<v Speaker 2>I say that doesn't mean we should keep it, That's

0:02:05.840 --> 0:02:06.440
<v Speaker 2>what I say.

0:02:06.760 --> 0:02:09.079
<v Speaker 1>No, no, no, no, not based on your usage.

0:02:09.400 --> 0:02:11.720
<v Speaker 3>I think I can only think of one that I

0:02:11.760 --> 0:02:18.040
<v Speaker 3>feel like is okay to say, okay, so only one?

0:02:16.560 --> 0:02:21.440
<v Speaker 4>Anyone?

0:02:21.520 --> 0:02:26.440
<v Speaker 2>You not to keep? Only one because it doesn't annoy me. So,

0:02:26.639 --> 0:02:27.520
<v Speaker 2>but we will get into that.

0:02:27.560 --> 0:02:29.960
<v Speaker 1>Only one. It's the most boring one on the list. Probably.

0:02:30.120 --> 0:02:31.920
<v Speaker 2>Let's start at the bottom. And this is one that

0:02:32.000 --> 0:02:34.639
<v Speaker 2>took us a second that what are they actually talking

0:02:34.680 --> 0:02:37.160
<v Speaker 2>about here? But we'll go with number ten LEAs on

0:02:37.360 --> 0:02:41.119
<v Speaker 2>their list on the words that should be banished reach out.

0:02:41.480 --> 0:02:44.880
<v Speaker 3>Yes, So I think the concept is it just means

0:02:44.919 --> 0:02:47.480
<v Speaker 3>you don't really care whether or not you ever talk

0:02:47.560 --> 0:02:48.360
<v Speaker 3>to that person again.

0:02:48.440 --> 0:02:52.040
<v Speaker 4>So it's a dismissive way to leave someone.

0:02:51.840 --> 0:02:55.320
<v Speaker 3>Like, yeah, you should reach out instead of saying here's

0:02:55.360 --> 0:02:57.560
<v Speaker 3>my number, or if would you want to text me

0:02:57.680 --> 0:03:01.080
<v Speaker 3>or email me and actually make a real connection with

0:03:01.160 --> 0:03:04.799
<v Speaker 3>a real way to actually communicate afterwards?

0:03:04.800 --> 0:03:06.760
<v Speaker 4>If you just say reach out, it's so generic.

0:03:06.800 --> 0:03:07.760
<v Speaker 1>Do you hear it that often?

0:03:07.840 --> 0:03:08.000
<v Speaker 4>Oh?

0:03:08.040 --> 0:03:11.240
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, now that you describe it is pretty vague and

0:03:11.520 --> 0:03:15.280
<v Speaker 2>it seems whip it. Yeah, like I really don't care

0:03:15.320 --> 0:03:17.920
<v Speaker 2>to hear from you ever that maybe.

0:03:17.639 --> 0:03:20.000
<v Speaker 4>It actually means the opposite of what it sounds like.

0:03:20.080 --> 0:03:24.760
<v Speaker 2>You should reach out TOOM, to your assistant, to your

0:03:24.760 --> 0:03:27.760
<v Speaker 2>mom when wow.

0:03:27.400 --> 0:03:31.079
<v Speaker 3>How there's a lot of questions, okay, follow reach out

0:03:31.120 --> 0:03:32.760
<v Speaker 3>And so that's why people want it vanished.

0:03:32.800 --> 0:03:35.640
<v Speaker 2>It should be banished because it's rude. Basically, it's kind

0:03:35.680 --> 0:03:39.120
<v Speaker 2>of rude. The next one here isn't this this will

0:03:39.160 --> 0:03:41.640
<v Speaker 2>never go away? Haven't people been saying this forever? Number

0:03:41.720 --> 0:03:42.800
<v Speaker 2>nine on the list.

0:03:43.040 --> 0:03:46.240
<v Speaker 3>My bad, Yeah, I've been saying that for as long

0:03:46.320 --> 0:03:48.640
<v Speaker 3>as I can remember, But everybody.

0:03:48.120 --> 0:03:50.840
<v Speaker 1>Says that, it seems, and I guess it.

0:03:51.400 --> 0:03:54.840
<v Speaker 3>Feels like it's a fun way to say I was

0:03:54.880 --> 0:03:56.520
<v Speaker 3>wrong or I'm sorry.

0:03:56.640 --> 0:03:59.120
<v Speaker 4>So maybe that's why it's just too again, flip it.

0:04:00.520 --> 0:04:03.760
<v Speaker 3>Instead of saying I'm sorry or you know, my apology

0:04:03.800 --> 0:04:07.040
<v Speaker 3>is saying my bad is definitely flippant.

0:04:08.200 --> 0:04:10.480
<v Speaker 4>So rude. Yeah, I guess we're getting to the heart

0:04:10.480 --> 0:04:10.760
<v Speaker 4>of this.

0:04:11.680 --> 0:04:11.960
<v Speaker 1>Rude.

0:04:11.960 --> 0:04:15.120
<v Speaker 2>What's another way? Okay, how about this? We'll give alternatives

0:04:15.160 --> 0:04:17.880
<v Speaker 2>along the way. Instead of saying reach out, you could say.

0:04:18.520 --> 0:04:20.800
<v Speaker 4>Here's my number, I'd love to hear from you.

0:04:21.360 --> 0:04:23.320
<v Speaker 1>Nice, okay, instead of saying my bad.

0:04:23.279 --> 0:04:25.400
<v Speaker 4>What could one say I'm so sorry?

0:04:26.560 --> 0:04:29.640
<v Speaker 2>Oh that was easy. We'll keep wording up the list.

0:04:29.680 --> 0:04:31.320
<v Speaker 2>That was number ten, number nine, let's get up to

0:04:31.400 --> 0:04:34.800
<v Speaker 2>number eight. I hear this quite often, and now that

0:04:34.880 --> 0:04:36.880
<v Speaker 2>I read some of what they're saying about it, it

0:04:36.960 --> 0:04:38.880
<v Speaker 2>makes sense that it's annoying.

0:04:39.960 --> 0:04:41.880
<v Speaker 4>Because you're turning a noun into a verb.

0:04:41.960 --> 0:04:43.000
<v Speaker 1>Yes, people don't like that.

0:04:42.960 --> 0:04:45.600
<v Speaker 4>So hey, I gifted you this, Yes.

0:04:45.720 --> 0:04:47.560
<v Speaker 1>Gifted is on the list.

0:04:47.640 --> 0:04:50.960
<v Speaker 2>Gifted as a verb is annoying as all get out,

0:04:50.960 --> 0:04:53.719
<v Speaker 2>And I guess that makes sense this was gifted to

0:04:53.760 --> 0:04:55.920
<v Speaker 2>me by I've.

0:04:55.760 --> 0:04:58.159
<v Speaker 3>Never thought about it, but yes, because it's I guess

0:04:58.240 --> 0:05:02.720
<v Speaker 3>what they're saying grammatically technically incorrect. You can't just turn

0:05:02.760 --> 0:05:05.760
<v Speaker 3>a noun into a verb. Yes, and when people do it,

0:05:05.760 --> 0:05:08.560
<v Speaker 3>it's annoying. My mom used to get on and I

0:05:08.560 --> 0:05:10.400
<v Speaker 3>don't even know the origins of this. My mom was

0:05:10.440 --> 0:05:13.560
<v Speaker 3>an English teacher. She would get really upset. And there's

0:05:13.600 --> 0:05:15.440
<v Speaker 3>no way this is ever going away. When people say

0:05:15.480 --> 0:05:20.839
<v Speaker 3>you disrespected me, she's like respect and disrespect like disrespected me.

0:05:21.560 --> 0:05:24.040
<v Speaker 3>It's not a verb, but everyone uses that one as

0:05:24.080 --> 0:05:25.560
<v Speaker 3>a verb, so that would always annoy her.

0:05:25.560 --> 0:05:28.880
<v Speaker 1>Well's the other one that really annoys him. Nauseous and nauseating.

0:05:29.240 --> 0:05:32.160
<v Speaker 2>Okay, I hope she's not listening because she's getting pissed

0:05:32.240 --> 0:05:34.320
<v Speaker 2>just hearing when people are getting She'll.

0:05:34.040 --> 0:05:36.120
<v Speaker 3>Now know about this list and will start putting in

0:05:36.160 --> 0:05:38.800
<v Speaker 3>her her two cents and she has quite a few.

0:05:39.320 --> 0:05:41.560
<v Speaker 2>Okay, So hey, give me an example of the en robe.

0:05:41.839 --> 0:05:44.919
<v Speaker 2>Besides saying this was gifted to me, This is.

0:05:44.920 --> 0:05:45.400
<v Speaker 1>An easy one.

0:05:45.440 --> 0:05:46.800
<v Speaker 4>I guess this was given to me.

0:05:47.000 --> 0:05:47.800
<v Speaker 1>Period point play.

0:05:47.920 --> 0:05:50.000
<v Speaker 2>Keep going up the list here we have made it now.

0:05:50.000 --> 0:05:52.960
<v Speaker 2>It's in nine eight seven number seven on the list.

0:05:53.880 --> 0:05:55.039
<v Speaker 2>This is my one.

0:05:55.279 --> 0:05:58.080
<v Speaker 1>Same, okay, this is my one.

0:05:58.279 --> 0:06:01.760
<v Speaker 3>We might have the same feeling because look, it's a

0:06:01.800 --> 0:06:04.760
<v Speaker 3>positive word. I understand that. So the word is perfect.

0:06:04.880 --> 0:06:06.880
<v Speaker 3>Let's go ahead and say what it is. It's perfect.

0:06:06.920 --> 0:06:10.560
<v Speaker 3>And I do fully acknowledge I say this a lot.

0:06:10.680 --> 0:06:13.640
<v Speaker 3>So if you said, hey, lunch is set four twelve,

0:06:13.640 --> 0:06:16.720
<v Speaker 3>I would say perfect, and that's it would just be like,

0:06:17.080 --> 0:06:21.520
<v Speaker 3>couldn't have you know, had it happen any better? Is

0:06:21.560 --> 0:06:25.679
<v Speaker 3>it too aspirational or too annoying, or they're too untrue?

0:06:25.760 --> 0:06:27.480
<v Speaker 1>They're taking a little literally here.

0:06:27.560 --> 0:06:30.080
<v Speaker 2>I think anytime I've used the word perfect, it was

0:06:30.360 --> 0:06:32.560
<v Speaker 2>it was not It was figurative in some way. It

0:06:32.600 --> 0:06:34.560
<v Speaker 2>was fantasy in some way. When you say perfect, this

0:06:34.640 --> 0:06:37.320
<v Speaker 2>means that's ideal for me. That's I mean you look

0:06:37.320 --> 0:06:40.080
<v Speaker 2>at someone and say, oh you look perfect, your ideal.

0:06:40.480 --> 0:06:44.280
<v Speaker 2>Like it doesn't mean no imperfect no imperfections. So yeah,

0:06:44.279 --> 0:06:46.000
<v Speaker 2>that was the one I didn't have much of an

0:06:46.000 --> 0:06:46.400
<v Speaker 2>issue with.

0:06:46.600 --> 0:06:47.920
<v Speaker 4>I love that we had the same one.

0:06:47.960 --> 0:06:50.400
<v Speaker 2>Oh my goodness, here you go, so making it up

0:06:50.440 --> 0:06:55.040
<v Speaker 2>the list number six. I guess when I do hear it,

0:06:55.080 --> 0:06:58.320
<v Speaker 2>this does maybe it's because who ends up saying it

0:06:58.400 --> 0:06:59.760
<v Speaker 2>I don't know those gen z.

0:07:01.000 --> 0:07:04.240
<v Speaker 3>Yes, full stop. It's even the way I just said

0:07:04.240 --> 0:07:07.240
<v Speaker 3>that made it extra annoying, just instead of saying stop

0:07:07.440 --> 0:07:09.600
<v Speaker 3>full stop. It feels like something you would see on

0:07:09.600 --> 0:07:13.560
<v Speaker 3>social media when someone's performing to try and you know,

0:07:14.200 --> 0:07:15.400
<v Speaker 3>end an argument.

0:07:15.800 --> 0:07:19.239
<v Speaker 2>They're compared it to it's like saying period point blank

0:07:19.320 --> 0:07:21.880
<v Speaker 2>about it, like you're just putting something. The one they

0:07:21.960 --> 0:07:24.960
<v Speaker 2>use is period. They just period. Then people used to

0:07:24.960 --> 0:07:26.679
<v Speaker 2>say that for a while. Do they still?

0:07:26.880 --> 0:07:29.000
<v Speaker 4>I think I have recently.

0:07:29.920 --> 0:07:32.720
<v Speaker 3>I'd say, you know, instead of mic drop or whatever,

0:07:32.720 --> 0:07:33.640
<v Speaker 3>you would just say period.

0:07:33.720 --> 0:07:35.800
<v Speaker 2>Okay, this is a more difficult one for you. Then

0:07:36.120 --> 0:07:38.000
<v Speaker 2>what can people say instead of full stop?

0:07:40.600 --> 0:07:41.320
<v Speaker 4>Please stop?

0:07:42.520 --> 0:07:44.239
<v Speaker 1>No, that's not how it works.

0:07:44.400 --> 0:07:47.080
<v Speaker 4>Full stop check yourself.

0:07:47.840 --> 0:07:53.120
<v Speaker 2>Oh this is going great. Lake Superior State University is listening.

0:07:53.160 --> 0:07:55.280
<v Speaker 2>We're giving you some new goals for next year.

0:07:56.200 --> 0:07:57.080
<v Speaker 4>You need to stop.

0:07:58.240 --> 0:08:01.120
<v Speaker 2>But the way it's used full stop is to like

0:08:01.200 --> 0:08:05.040
<v Speaker 2>to put emphasis on something dith is I'm going to

0:08:05.120 --> 0:08:06.840
<v Speaker 2>go here and then I'm going to graduate, and then

0:08:06.840 --> 0:08:08.320
<v Speaker 2>we're going to this party and then we're going to

0:08:08.400 --> 0:08:11.440
<v Speaker 2>hit out here fullstop. That's how it was used. You're

0:08:11.640 --> 0:08:14.000
<v Speaker 2>using it literally like put pumping the brakes on the

0:08:14.000 --> 0:08:19.000
<v Speaker 2>Bronco right full Oh, let's go up the number five.

0:08:19.560 --> 0:08:22.080
<v Speaker 2>This is another case is this is a made up word?

0:08:22.400 --> 0:08:24.440
<v Speaker 2>How does this work? Incentivized?

0:08:25.640 --> 0:08:31.360
<v Speaker 3>I honestly didn't even recognize that incentivize was again taking

0:08:31.400 --> 0:08:34.520
<v Speaker 3>a nown an incentive and turning it into a verb,

0:08:34.559 --> 0:08:37.040
<v Speaker 3>even though it actually isn't one. I have said this

0:08:37.120 --> 0:08:42.680
<v Speaker 3>word plenty we get incentivized. What's the incentive that would

0:08:42.679 --> 0:08:45.240
<v Speaker 3>be the correct way to put it instead of how

0:08:45.280 --> 0:08:46.439
<v Speaker 3>could you incentivize me?

0:08:46.600 --> 0:08:47.560
<v Speaker 1>I hear that? Okay?

0:08:47.600 --> 0:08:50.600
<v Speaker 2>That one is why we hear all the time. The

0:08:50.640 --> 0:08:52.280
<v Speaker 2>next one on the list, number four. As we make

0:08:52.320 --> 0:08:56.240
<v Speaker 2>our way up this one, we actually just got off

0:08:56.520 --> 0:09:00.679
<v Speaker 2>the phone with Sabine asking about I don't hear this one,

0:09:00.840 --> 0:09:01.880
<v Speaker 2>but she says they do.

0:09:02.000 --> 0:09:04.559
<v Speaker 3>Oh so, and because there are plenty of ways to

0:09:04.679 --> 0:09:07.760
<v Speaker 3>use it literally and figuratively, And the way that Sabine

0:09:07.800 --> 0:09:11.000
<v Speaker 3>was talking about it was differently than even how I

0:09:11.040 --> 0:09:17.240
<v Speaker 3>would use it massive. So the argument is it's way overused,

0:09:17.280 --> 0:09:22.079
<v Speaker 3>and often incorrectly. The words massive overuse has secured its

0:09:22.080 --> 0:09:24.240
<v Speaker 3>place on this year's list is how they put it.

0:09:24.280 --> 0:09:28.120
<v Speaker 3>But I'll bomb but I would say something was massive

0:09:28.280 --> 0:09:29.840
<v Speaker 3>because it actually was huge.

0:09:29.880 --> 0:09:31.199
<v Speaker 4>But maybe it wasn't that big.

0:09:31.720 --> 0:09:35.400
<v Speaker 3>I do tend to exaggerate, or even some might say

0:09:35.440 --> 0:09:36.800
<v Speaker 3>over exaggerate.

0:09:36.480 --> 0:09:39.640
<v Speaker 4>But Sabine's use was I've heard the kids say this

0:09:39.760 --> 0:09:40.120
<v Speaker 4>as well.

0:09:40.240 --> 0:09:42.360
<v Speaker 2>Oh I this is not one I've picked up. They

0:09:42.520 --> 0:09:46.200
<v Speaker 2>just talk about something is important, this is going to

0:09:46.200 --> 0:09:47.960
<v Speaker 2>be a big deal. That's how she just said it.

0:09:49.080 --> 0:09:51.480
<v Speaker 2>This is not one, So I don't have a beef

0:09:51.520 --> 0:09:52.640
<v Speaker 2>with it because I haven't seen it.

0:09:52.720 --> 0:09:54.640
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, she was like that party's going to be massive,

0:09:55.040 --> 0:09:56.839
<v Speaker 3>not that there's going to be a lot of people there,

0:09:57.200 --> 0:09:59.160
<v Speaker 3>but that it's a big deal to be at the park.

0:10:00.200 --> 0:10:02.360
<v Speaker 3>And I could see how that could get confusing, because

0:10:02.400 --> 0:10:04.040
<v Speaker 3>if a kid told me a party was going to

0:10:04.080 --> 0:10:06.600
<v Speaker 3>be massive, I'd think probably not going to go because

0:10:06.600 --> 0:10:09.040
<v Speaker 3>we're thinking at least three hundred people. Yeah, that's not

0:10:09.080 --> 0:10:11.360
<v Speaker 3>what they meant. That's kind of funny.

0:10:12.200 --> 0:10:14.840
<v Speaker 2>The next one up to number two and number one here,

0:10:15.240 --> 0:10:17.720
<v Speaker 2>these will be obvious, don't you think?

0:10:18.040 --> 0:10:18.240
<v Speaker 3>Yeah?

0:10:18.360 --> 0:10:20.000
<v Speaker 1>Or was three three two? It was massive?

0:10:20.080 --> 0:10:24.439
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, and that massive was four so three two one.

0:10:24.679 --> 0:10:27.880
<v Speaker 2>Ah, I didn't go out. I took number one off

0:10:28.000 --> 0:10:30.880
<v Speaker 2>my screen. It was it wasn't even being considered here.

0:10:30.880 --> 0:10:36.040
<v Speaker 2>But obviously, yes, three two one will be I think

0:10:36.080 --> 0:10:40.840
<v Speaker 2>fairly obvious. I think number three here out of the

0:10:41.080 --> 0:10:44.560
<v Speaker 2>entire list, is the one I might hear most often.

0:10:45.880 --> 0:10:50.480
<v Speaker 1>Cooked. Everything cooked. If you get in a little trouble,

0:10:50.800 --> 0:10:51.440
<v Speaker 1>I'm cooked.

0:10:52.080 --> 0:10:53.160
<v Speaker 4>My brain is cooked.

0:10:53.440 --> 0:10:56.760
<v Speaker 2>The security lines long, don't know if I'll make my flight, Man,

0:10:56.880 --> 0:11:01.480
<v Speaker 2>I might be cooked. That's how it's used non stop,

0:11:01.559 --> 0:11:03.959
<v Speaker 2>because I do hear this from Sabina.

0:11:04.440 --> 0:11:06.920
<v Speaker 3>Yes, yes, they say that parents and guardians led the

0:11:06.960 --> 0:11:08.839
<v Speaker 3>charge on this one. So in terms of who wrote

0:11:08.840 --> 0:11:11.360
<v Speaker 3>in to say please, this is my word that needs

0:11:11.360 --> 0:11:14.199
<v Speaker 3>to be banned, a lot of grown ups were really

0:11:14.240 --> 0:11:17.480
<v Speaker 3>sick of hearing that from kids. I haven't heard that

0:11:17.520 --> 0:11:21.160
<v Speaker 3>as much. It's totally an age thing, a thing that's funny.

0:11:21.200 --> 0:11:24.360
<v Speaker 3>So I had not yeah wow, only from like Sabine's age.

0:11:24.400 --> 0:11:28.720
<v Speaker 1>That's jen a wawa awful. She's walking on the street.

0:11:28.800 --> 0:11:31.760
<v Speaker 1>She forgot her umbrella. Oh see some raine clouds. I

0:11:31.840 --> 0:11:32.520
<v Speaker 1>might be cooked.

0:11:33.000 --> 0:11:36.120
<v Speaker 2>It's constantly every little thing if I'm in.

0:11:36.040 --> 0:11:37.559
<v Speaker 1>Trouble, might be cooked.

0:11:37.720 --> 0:11:39.640
<v Speaker 4>I need to pay more attention. I have not heard

0:11:39.640 --> 0:11:41.360
<v Speaker 4>her say that that's hilarious annoying.

0:11:41.440 --> 0:11:43.720
<v Speaker 2>Number two took us a while. I remember when it

0:11:43.760 --> 0:11:47.480
<v Speaker 2>was big in the headlines and whatnot. I didn't necessarily

0:11:47.520 --> 0:11:50.000
<v Speaker 2>get it, then don't get it. Now it's annoying to people.

0:11:50.200 --> 0:11:54.680
<v Speaker 3>It is annoying demure because of the phrase very demure,

0:11:54.880 --> 0:11:59.400
<v Speaker 3>very mindful. Yes, it's just annoying. So now it's said

0:12:00.080 --> 0:12:02.319
<v Speaker 3>a lot more than it should be very demure, very demure.

0:12:02.559 --> 0:12:05.280
<v Speaker 3>I mean I've only heard it said in just like laughing,

0:12:05.360 --> 0:12:07.720
<v Speaker 3>making fun of the whole thing that people were saying.

0:12:07.760 --> 0:12:10.400
<v Speaker 3>But yeah, if you have somebody who's saying that a lot,

0:12:10.920 --> 0:12:12.079
<v Speaker 3>that could get super annoying.

0:12:12.120 --> 0:12:14.800
<v Speaker 2>All right, folks, we're up to number one on the list,

0:12:14.960 --> 0:12:19.720
<v Speaker 2>the number one words that most people want banished for

0:12:19.840 --> 0:12:22.000
<v Speaker 2>twenty twenty six. We're going to tell you right after

0:12:22.040 --> 0:12:25.360
<v Speaker 2>the break. Frankly, you already know what it is, and

0:12:25.400 --> 0:12:27.320
<v Speaker 2>it won't take you long to figure it out, but

0:12:27.360 --> 0:12:29.640
<v Speaker 2>we're going to use this as a tease anyway. Also,

0:12:29.720 --> 0:12:33.199
<v Speaker 2>we'll explain why there's a reason you might have heard

0:12:33.240 --> 0:12:35.520
<v Speaker 2>some of these words and thought, oh, surely that was

0:12:35.559 --> 0:12:37.720
<v Speaker 2>going to go away, that was going to go away. Well,

0:12:37.760 --> 0:12:41.800
<v Speaker 2>there's a reason that some words just won't die. We'll

0:12:41.800 --> 0:12:54.040
<v Speaker 2>give you some of those examples there. All right, we

0:12:54.120 --> 0:12:57.080
<v Speaker 2>continue here on Amy and TJ. After a terrible tease

0:12:57.120 --> 0:13:00.400
<v Speaker 2>to think that I teased what the number one the

0:13:00.440 --> 0:13:03.640
<v Speaker 2>most annoying word, essentially is that should be banished for

0:13:03.720 --> 0:13:07.200
<v Speaker 2>twenty twenty six. This was an obvious one, was it not.

0:13:07.400 --> 0:13:10.040
<v Speaker 4>It certainly was six seven?

0:13:10.840 --> 0:13:11.280
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

0:13:11.360 --> 0:13:14.000
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, And because you even have to say it a

0:13:14.000 --> 0:13:17.920
<v Speaker 3>certain way when you say it makes it even more annoying.

0:13:18.000 --> 0:13:19.679
<v Speaker 3>So yes, a lot of people had some fun with it,

0:13:19.720 --> 0:13:23.600
<v Speaker 3>saying it's time six seven should be eighty six. Yes,

0:13:24.040 --> 0:13:27.319
<v Speaker 3>I think that is a consensus vibe just about everybody

0:13:27.320 --> 0:13:30.000
<v Speaker 3>as the most annoying word of twenty twenty five, so

0:13:30.520 --> 0:13:32.520
<v Speaker 3>no one should be saying it in twenty twenty six.

0:13:32.640 --> 0:13:34.240
<v Speaker 1>The last several times you've heard it, has it been

0:13:34.280 --> 0:13:37.120
<v Speaker 1>from an adult or someone under twenty.

0:13:37.520 --> 0:13:40.960
<v Speaker 3>I've actually heard it more from adults, laughing about the

0:13:41.000 --> 0:13:43.400
<v Speaker 3>fact that they now know what it means, because they

0:13:43.440 --> 0:13:45.280
<v Speaker 3>only found out when it made Word of the Year,

0:13:45.640 --> 0:13:47.320
<v Speaker 3>and then it all made more sense to them, and

0:13:47.320 --> 0:13:49.760
<v Speaker 3>now they're trying to own it, which means it's totally

0:13:49.800 --> 0:13:52.640
<v Speaker 3>passe and completely uncool to say done now, so.

0:13:52.600 --> 0:13:53.240
<v Speaker 4>It should be done.

0:13:53.520 --> 0:13:59.160
<v Speaker 2>It should be cooked absolutely out of here. This was

0:13:59.240 --> 0:14:01.400
<v Speaker 2>interesting to me. They've been, like we said, they've been

0:14:01.400 --> 0:14:04.760
<v Speaker 2>doing this for fifty years. Some words, right, you put

0:14:04.760 --> 0:14:07.000
<v Speaker 2>it on there, it's supposed to be banished, you would think, okay,

0:14:07.360 --> 0:14:10.520
<v Speaker 2>that's probably done, or a word gets its run. But

0:14:10.559 --> 0:14:12.880
<v Speaker 2>there are several words they have given us over the

0:14:12.960 --> 0:14:17.520
<v Speaker 2>years here that have been on the list more than once.

0:14:18.080 --> 0:14:21.240
<v Speaker 2>One of them has been on the list three times

0:14:21.320 --> 0:14:26.200
<v Speaker 2>now romes. I'm looking and I see at least one

0:14:26.240 --> 0:14:29.360
<v Speaker 2>of them had a comeback, and the gap was about

0:14:29.400 --> 0:14:30.640
<v Speaker 2>thirty something years.

0:14:30.880 --> 0:14:31.720
<v Speaker 4>It's so funny.

0:14:32.160 --> 0:14:34.720
<v Speaker 2>Most of them were fairly close to each other with

0:14:34.760 --> 0:14:37.840
<v Speaker 2>the number five on the list is a is a

0:14:37.960 --> 0:14:40.560
<v Speaker 2>hilarious one that you would normally think about.

0:14:40.720 --> 0:14:43.400
<v Speaker 3>Yep, it reminded me of another one that probably has

0:14:43.440 --> 0:14:44.360
<v Speaker 3>made the list before too.

0:14:44.400 --> 0:14:45.840
<v Speaker 4>But we can get into this. So these are I

0:14:45.880 --> 0:14:47.760
<v Speaker 4>love how they call these repeat.

0:14:47.360 --> 0:14:51.000
<v Speaker 3>Offenders words that refused to stay banished.

0:14:51.360 --> 0:14:52.280
<v Speaker 4>Number five.

0:14:52.320 --> 0:14:54.240
<v Speaker 3>Should we start with like we did the last Okay,

0:14:54.400 --> 0:14:57.360
<v Speaker 3>hot water heater and you might think, well, what's wrong

0:14:57.400 --> 0:14:57.680
<v Speaker 3>with that?

0:14:58.760 --> 0:15:00.720
<v Speaker 1>So think about it a little longer. We'll give you

0:15:00.760 --> 0:15:01.600
<v Speaker 1>one more second here.

0:15:01.800 --> 0:15:03.320
<v Speaker 4>Hot hot water heater.

0:15:04.360 --> 0:15:06.280
<v Speaker 1>Why would there be a problem with that?

0:15:06.440 --> 0:15:09.280
<v Speaker 3>Just needs to be a water heater because if it's

0:15:09.360 --> 0:15:11.080
<v Speaker 3>hot water, it doesn't need to be heated.

0:15:11.120 --> 0:15:12.520
<v Speaker 4>So it makes zero sense.

0:15:12.560 --> 0:15:15.480
<v Speaker 3>So that was a banished word in nineteen eighty two,

0:15:15.880 --> 0:15:18.560
<v Speaker 3>and then somehow it made a resurgence and it came

0:15:18.680 --> 0:15:20.680
<v Speaker 3>back in twenty eighteen.

0:15:20.800 --> 0:15:21.960
<v Speaker 4>So it made the list twice.

0:15:22.680 --> 0:15:25.200
<v Speaker 3>Someone made the or a point or asked the question,

0:15:25.240 --> 0:15:26.640
<v Speaker 3>since when does hot water.

0:15:26.800 --> 0:15:27.600
<v Speaker 4>Need to be heated?

0:15:27.880 --> 0:15:29.880
<v Speaker 3>I always think of that as an ATM machine, because

0:15:29.880 --> 0:15:33.760
<v Speaker 3>I have done that before. ATM stands for automated teller machine.

0:15:33.800 --> 0:15:36.480
<v Speaker 3>What's still so ATM machine is hilarious because you're basically

0:15:36.480 --> 0:15:37.440
<v Speaker 3>saying machine machine.

0:15:37.520 --> 0:15:41.840
<v Speaker 2>Well, that's like RBIs in baseball runs batted in. But

0:15:41.880 --> 0:15:44.880
<v Speaker 2>we still a lot of people say RBIs. Yes, I'm

0:15:44.920 --> 0:15:46.240
<v Speaker 2>not mad at you for it.

0:15:46.360 --> 0:15:46.920
<v Speaker 1>I get it.

0:15:46.920 --> 0:15:50.360
<v Speaker 2>I'm looking for an ATM machine. I am that.

0:15:50.440 --> 0:15:52.120
<v Speaker 4>I immediately was like, oh, I might not have said

0:15:52.160 --> 0:15:53.520
<v Speaker 4>hot water heater, but maybe I have.

0:15:53.800 --> 0:15:56.040
<v Speaker 1>What about cash machine? I'm still on.

0:15:55.960 --> 0:15:57.000
<v Speaker 4>The cash machine?

0:15:57.080 --> 0:15:58.960
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, you ever say that a cash machine?

0:15:59.120 --> 0:15:59.160
<v Speaker 3>No?

0:15:59.480 --> 0:16:04.240
<v Speaker 4>Okay, ATM machine please? Okay? Number four on the list.

0:16:04.680 --> 0:16:05.400
<v Speaker 4>This is funny.

0:16:05.920 --> 0:16:09.760
<v Speaker 3>So this made its debut as a banished word in

0:16:09.800 --> 0:16:13.240
<v Speaker 3>two thousand and nine and then came back again last

0:16:13.280 --> 0:16:15.880
<v Speaker 3>year in twenty twenty five game changer.

0:16:16.960 --> 0:16:18.880
<v Speaker 4>Have you heard that a lot this year or last year.

0:16:19.960 --> 0:16:22.440
<v Speaker 2>I don't know if that is that's a game changer.

0:16:22.520 --> 0:16:23.640
<v Speaker 2>It's gonna be a game changer.

0:16:23.800 --> 0:16:24.120
<v Speaker 1>I watch.

0:16:24.200 --> 0:16:25.680
<v Speaker 2>I want a lot of watch a lot of sports,

0:16:25.720 --> 0:16:27.880
<v Speaker 2>so maybe. But yeah, that one doesn't bother me so much.

0:16:27.960 --> 0:16:30.560
<v Speaker 3>They said nothing is a game changer, if everything is

0:16:30.600 --> 0:16:33.520
<v Speaker 3>a game changer, the point being it's overused all the time,

0:16:33.600 --> 0:16:36.320
<v Speaker 3>like it's not really a game changer, but we just

0:16:36.440 --> 0:16:39.680
<v Speaker 3>like to say it is because well, yes, so many

0:16:39.680 --> 0:16:40.880
<v Speaker 3>of us like to exaggerate.

0:16:41.280 --> 0:16:42.080
<v Speaker 1>Number three is one.

0:16:42.240 --> 0:16:43.800
<v Speaker 2>I guess we just pick and choose when we get

0:16:43.800 --> 0:16:47.960
<v Speaker 2>annoyed by it because we hear it all the time. Awesome, awesome, Okay,

0:16:48.200 --> 0:16:50.080
<v Speaker 2>it depends on who says it, how they say it.

0:16:50.440 --> 0:16:53.040
<v Speaker 1>Awes and they say it well, yeah.

0:16:52.400 --> 0:16:54.680
<v Speaker 2>Eighty four and then in two thousand and seven, so

0:16:54.720 --> 0:16:57.640
<v Speaker 2>a pretty big gap between those two years. It annoyed

0:16:57.680 --> 0:17:01.880
<v Speaker 2>us all. Number two of it was okay, every ooh.

0:17:03.880 --> 0:17:06.720
<v Speaker 3>Heard this one coming out of my mouth, and it's

0:17:06.720 --> 0:17:09.720
<v Speaker 3>certainly been said a lot in this house, and this

0:17:09.840 --> 0:17:13.280
<v Speaker 3>is the one that made it for three years in

0:17:13.359 --> 0:17:17.359
<v Speaker 3>nineteen ninety nine, in twenty twenty two, and then again

0:17:17.400 --> 0:17:19.560
<v Speaker 3>in twenty twenty four, because it seems like it just

0:17:19.600 --> 0:17:22.040
<v Speaker 3>won't go away at the end of the day.

0:17:23.640 --> 0:17:26.680
<v Speaker 4>Stop, why does that want annoy you so much?

0:17:27.840 --> 0:17:34.639
<v Speaker 2>It's just filler. That means nothing. It means it's just

0:17:34.880 --> 0:17:37.040
<v Speaker 2>filler for emphasis.

0:17:37.320 --> 0:17:40.879
<v Speaker 4>At the end of the day. We all see things differently.

0:17:43.640 --> 0:17:47.200
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, so they say that that phrase has the unique

0:17:47.200 --> 0:17:51.600
<v Speaker 3>distinction of triple banishment. So yes, many people share your

0:17:51.640 --> 0:17:54.919
<v Speaker 3>disdain for that phrase. And number one, this is actually

0:17:54.960 --> 0:17:57.960
<v Speaker 3>a word that I know as a news anchor.

0:17:58.000 --> 0:17:59.120
<v Speaker 4>I think I've said this to.

0:17:59.040 --> 0:18:01.320
<v Speaker 3>You when I when it comes out of my mouth

0:18:01.720 --> 0:18:03.639
<v Speaker 3>or out of like go anchor's mouth, I know that

0:18:03.640 --> 0:18:08.680
<v Speaker 3>the person has nothing to say because the word is hilarious.

0:18:09.640 --> 0:18:13.680
<v Speaker 3>Absolutely nineteen ninety six and twenty twenty three.

0:18:14.240 --> 0:18:17.639
<v Speaker 4>It's just a default.

0:18:17.720 --> 0:18:23.160
<v Speaker 3>There's no actual reaction when you just say absolutely, I.

0:18:23.160 --> 0:18:24.879
<v Speaker 1>Got nothing, or I wasn't listening to you.

0:18:25.359 --> 0:18:27.520
<v Speaker 3>I don't know what to say. I have no way

0:18:27.520 --> 0:18:31.600
<v Speaker 3>to further the conversation, so I'm just going to say absolutely.

0:18:33.480 --> 0:18:38.879
<v Speaker 1>Folks, don't don't just break the bad hapbits, Okay, I should.

0:18:38.880 --> 0:18:43.159
<v Speaker 2>I wouldn't say these are overly annoying necessarily to six

0:18:43.240 --> 0:18:46.679
<v Speaker 2>y seven. Yes is, but it's interesting, and they make

0:18:46.720 --> 0:18:48.840
<v Speaker 2>a point. Look, it just it does, it helps us

0:18:49.080 --> 0:18:51.280
<v Speaker 2>learn understand I think it's just fascinating. It's part of

0:18:51.320 --> 0:18:55.840
<v Speaker 2>our education and just language evolving, yeah, all over the place.

0:18:55.840 --> 0:18:57.320
<v Speaker 3>So I do think it's cool and I love that

0:18:57.359 --> 0:18:59.280
<v Speaker 3>you pointed it out to me because I had never

0:18:59.280 --> 0:19:01.840
<v Speaker 3>seen this list be for so very happy to at

0:19:01.920 --> 0:19:05.960
<v Speaker 3>least bring it to our listeners here on their fiftieth anniversary.

0:19:06.040 --> 0:19:09.199
<v Speaker 3>So thank you to Lake Superior State University for that

0:19:09.440 --> 0:19:12.040
<v Speaker 3>very cool banished words list.

0:19:12.600 --> 0:19:12.840
<v Speaker 1>Folks.

0:19:12.880 --> 0:19:15.160
<v Speaker 2>Well, always appreciate to you spending a little time here

0:19:15.240 --> 0:19:18.160
<v Speaker 2>with us. For my dear Amy Rollbock, I am TJ.