WEBVTT - P&L: Venezuela Is Going to Collapse, New America's CEO Says

0:00:04.760 --> 0:00:08.080
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the Bloomberg pim L Podcast. I'm pim Fox.

0:00:08.119 --> 0:00:11.200
<v Speaker 1>Along with my co host Lisa Abramowitz. Each day we

0:00:11.280 --> 0:00:14.480
<v Speaker 1>bring you the most important, noteworthy, and useful interviews for

0:00:14.520 --> 0:00:16.880
<v Speaker 1>you and your money, whether at the grocery store or

0:00:16.920 --> 0:00:20.680
<v Speaker 1>the trading floor. Find the Bloomberg p L Podcast on iTunes,

0:00:20.840 --> 0:00:30.160
<v Speaker 1>SoundCloud and at Bloomberg dot com. We are broadcasting live

0:00:30.240 --> 0:00:32.720
<v Speaker 1>from the Bloomberg ear Ahead Summer at the Park Hyatt

0:00:32.800 --> 0:00:36.639
<v Speaker 1>in New York City. Our next guest is No Stranger

0:00:36.760 --> 0:00:40.320
<v Speaker 1>to news events or two policy changes in the world.

0:00:40.600 --> 0:00:43.280
<v Speaker 1>Joining us now is and Marie Slaughter, the president and

0:00:43.320 --> 0:00:48.519
<v Speaker 1>the chief executive of New America Foundation UH, formerly policy

0:00:48.520 --> 0:00:51.480
<v Speaker 1>advisor in the U. S. State Department. And Marie Slaughter,

0:00:51.560 --> 0:00:53.320
<v Speaker 1>thank you very much for being with us. My pleasure.

0:00:53.880 --> 0:00:57.960
<v Speaker 1>You wanted to focus on equality and women's rights and

0:00:58.600 --> 0:01:01.560
<v Speaker 1>the workforce, and I'm wondering if you could just give

0:01:01.600 --> 0:01:04.600
<v Speaker 1>us a sort of encapsulated version of what your presentation

0:01:04.720 --> 0:01:07.800
<v Speaker 1>was about and what you hope to achieve. So with

0:01:07.880 --> 0:01:10.399
<v Speaker 1>the greatest thing about being in here was that the

0:01:10.440 --> 0:01:13.679
<v Speaker 1>audience was certainly majority men. Often when we have this

0:01:13.760 --> 0:01:16.640
<v Speaker 1>conversation as women and I had a very simple message,

0:01:16.720 --> 0:01:20.000
<v Speaker 1>which was, we are never going to get to gender

0:01:20.000 --> 0:01:25.840
<v Speaker 1>equality unless we change our expectations of men as much

0:01:25.880 --> 0:01:29.640
<v Speaker 1>as we've changed our expectations of women, so that all

0:01:29.760 --> 0:01:33.680
<v Speaker 1>policies have to be gender neutral. You can't have maternity leave, uh,

0:01:33.680 --> 0:01:36.880
<v Speaker 1>and no paternity leave or long maternity leave but short

0:01:36.880 --> 0:01:39.840
<v Speaker 1>paternity leave. You have to assume all human beings have children.

0:01:40.000 --> 0:01:43.080
<v Speaker 1>Think about same sex couples, for instance, our adoption. But

0:01:43.120 --> 0:01:46.520
<v Speaker 1>you also have to assume that you know a man

0:01:46.600 --> 0:01:48.960
<v Speaker 1>with children is going to slow down if you assume

0:01:49.000 --> 0:01:51.000
<v Speaker 1>that a woman with children is gonna slow down, or

0:01:51.160 --> 0:01:53.560
<v Speaker 1>assume a woman has a lead parent at home the

0:01:53.600 --> 0:01:55.880
<v Speaker 1>way you assume a man has a lead parent at home.

0:01:56.240 --> 0:01:59.600
<v Speaker 1>And finally, you're going to have to change the automatic

0:01:59.640 --> 0:02:02.160
<v Speaker 1>as some and uh that you know the person who

0:02:02.160 --> 0:02:05.680
<v Speaker 1>works longest works best and actually look at results rather

0:02:05.760 --> 0:02:10.520
<v Speaker 1>than FaceTime. You wrote a story an article, uh, why

0:02:10.720 --> 0:02:13.000
<v Speaker 1>women still can't have it all in the Atlantic in

0:02:13.000 --> 0:02:17.800
<v Speaker 1>two thousand twelve. Um, you have two boys going back.

0:02:17.840 --> 0:02:20.240
<v Speaker 1>If you could do it all over again, what would

0:02:20.240 --> 0:02:27.119
<v Speaker 1>you have done differently? Let's make it easier? Oh? Nothing, really?

0:02:27.200 --> 0:02:29.200
<v Speaker 1>I mean you know, I was a tenured professor and

0:02:29.240 --> 0:02:32.000
<v Speaker 1>my husband was a tenured professor. It doesn't get better

0:02:32.080 --> 0:02:37.160
<v Speaker 1>than that. And I was a dean, and but Andy

0:02:37.240 --> 0:02:40.320
<v Speaker 1>was a tenured professor, so we had that flexibility. So

0:02:40.440 --> 0:02:42.840
<v Speaker 1>the only thing, you know, I could have not taken

0:02:42.880 --> 0:02:45.799
<v Speaker 1>the job with Secretary Clinton, but I would never say

0:02:45.800 --> 0:02:48.680
<v Speaker 1>I should have done that, because even as hard as

0:02:48.720 --> 0:02:54.360
<v Speaker 1>it was, it was totally worth it. And um, you know,

0:02:54.400 --> 0:02:56.480
<v Speaker 1>I tell young women all the time if they're going

0:02:56.520 --> 0:02:58.600
<v Speaker 1>to go work on the National Security Council, I say,

0:02:59.040 --> 0:03:00.800
<v Speaker 1>do it. You know you'll love it. It's great for

0:03:00.800 --> 0:03:03.040
<v Speaker 1>your resume. But just to understand, you're not going to

0:03:03.120 --> 0:03:05.200
<v Speaker 1>see your children, so don't try to do both. And

0:03:05.240 --> 0:03:07.400
<v Speaker 1>if your spouse is not willing to be redparent, you've

0:03:07.400 --> 0:03:09.840
<v Speaker 1>got a big problem because you really aren't gonna be

0:03:09.880 --> 0:03:13.519
<v Speaker 1>able to do both. So I wouldn't change it. Um,

0:03:13.560 --> 0:03:16.920
<v Speaker 1>And you know, I have been home as much as

0:03:16.919 --> 0:03:19.240
<v Speaker 1>I'm ever home. My kids would say my definition of

0:03:19.240 --> 0:03:23.919
<v Speaker 1>being home is different than many people's, but for for

0:03:23.960 --> 0:03:25.480
<v Speaker 1>both of them, all the way through the end of

0:03:25.560 --> 0:03:28.120
<v Speaker 1>high school. And I wouldn't trade that. Now. You served

0:03:28.160 --> 0:03:31.560
<v Speaker 1>as a Director of Policy Planning for the US State

0:03:31.600 --> 0:03:36.080
<v Speaker 1>Department from two thousand nine to two tholeven. You were

0:03:36.120 --> 0:03:39.280
<v Speaker 1>the first woman to actually hold that position. What did

0:03:39.320 --> 0:03:43.720
<v Speaker 1>you learn as a result of your tenure and are

0:03:43.760 --> 0:03:49.200
<v Speaker 1>there things that you wish you knew about? What was accomplishable?

0:03:49.360 --> 0:03:52.480
<v Speaker 1>What was the real world versus the policy world. Can

0:03:52.480 --> 0:03:55.800
<v Speaker 1>you give us some some insight. Yeah, well, so I

0:03:55.880 --> 0:03:57.920
<v Speaker 1>learned a lot. So you have to start with a proposition.

0:03:58.000 --> 0:04:01.000
<v Speaker 1>Having been a tenured professor, I was fifty years old

0:04:01.040 --> 0:04:03.600
<v Speaker 1>before I ever had a boss, because at the academy

0:04:03.640 --> 0:04:05.280
<v Speaker 1>you do not have a boss. So getting used to

0:04:05.320 --> 0:04:08.800
<v Speaker 1>having a boss, even a fabulous boss like like Hillary Clinton,

0:04:09.160 --> 0:04:12.800
<v Speaker 1>took some doing. Um, I would say, I really did

0:04:12.920 --> 0:04:16.840
<v Speaker 1>experience something I had read about but not not seen that.

0:04:18.480 --> 0:04:21.159
<v Speaker 1>You know, women, anybody will be cut out of a

0:04:21.200 --> 0:04:24.960
<v Speaker 1>meeting in Washington, but effectively to be in the meeting

0:04:25.000 --> 0:04:27.600
<v Speaker 1>you have to act like, of course, I'm going to

0:04:27.680 --> 0:04:29.440
<v Speaker 1>be in this meeting, which I think is harder for

0:04:29.440 --> 0:04:32.480
<v Speaker 1>women to do than men. The other thing is that

0:04:32.560 --> 0:04:34.839
<v Speaker 1>the you know, this should have been obvious too, but

0:04:34.920 --> 0:04:38.280
<v Speaker 1>the in this case young men networks. They weren't a

0:04:38.320 --> 0:04:40.280
<v Speaker 1>whole boy networks. They were young men. There were thirty

0:04:40.360 --> 0:04:43.080
<v Speaker 1>two year olds through from the White House, through the

0:04:43.160 --> 0:04:46.400
<v Speaker 1>Treasury to d O D to State that's where the

0:04:46.440 --> 0:04:50.800
<v Speaker 1>information traveled, and information is gold in politics, and so

0:04:51.320 --> 0:04:54.360
<v Speaker 1>they just weren't enough women to have that kind of

0:04:54.440 --> 0:04:57.479
<v Speaker 1>network so that you always were one step ahead of

0:04:57.480 --> 0:05:00.680
<v Speaker 1>your boss. Given your experience an international relations I would

0:05:00.720 --> 0:05:02.800
<v Speaker 1>be remiss not to ask you. Looking around right now,

0:05:02.839 --> 0:05:05.039
<v Speaker 1>people are worried about a lot of crises around the world.

0:05:05.240 --> 0:05:09.120
<v Speaker 1>Which do you think is most imminent and important to

0:05:09.160 --> 0:05:12.640
<v Speaker 1>watch and that the U S could potentially help to abeliate.

0:05:14.400 --> 0:05:17.920
<v Speaker 1>It's hard to know where to where to start. Uh,

0:05:18.120 --> 0:05:22.840
<v Speaker 1>you know, I do so imminent. We are watching the

0:05:22.880 --> 0:05:26.480
<v Speaker 1>implosion of the entire Middle East and we are not

0:05:26.560 --> 0:05:29.159
<v Speaker 1>going to be able to cabin that. I disagree sharply

0:05:29.240 --> 0:05:33.280
<v Speaker 1>with the President on his Syria policy because I think

0:05:33.440 --> 0:05:37.440
<v Speaker 1>not just refugees, but we're just incubating another whole generation

0:05:37.480 --> 0:05:40.719
<v Speaker 1>of terrorists and we are destabilizing a region that is

0:05:40.839 --> 0:05:44.279
<v Speaker 1>very important to us. So I think that that is critical.

0:05:44.760 --> 0:05:50.840
<v Speaker 1>The crisis I worry about most is a accidental collision

0:05:51.160 --> 0:05:54.800
<v Speaker 1>or incident in the South or East China Sea, where

0:05:55.360 --> 0:05:59.560
<v Speaker 1>for domestic political reasons, Japan goes on alert. Japan is

0:05:59.720 --> 0:06:03.280
<v Speaker 1>archery d the ally we back Japan, China goes on alert.

0:06:03.400 --> 0:06:07.359
<v Speaker 1>China has to feed its nationalist youth, and suddenly it

0:06:07.360 --> 0:06:09.680
<v Speaker 1>looks like nineteen fourteen, where nobody really wants to go

0:06:09.720 --> 0:06:12.280
<v Speaker 1>to war, but no one can see a way out.

0:06:12.480 --> 0:06:15.599
<v Speaker 1>So that's one I worry about. And then the last one,

0:06:15.640 --> 0:06:18.760
<v Speaker 1>which we could do much more about, is Venezuela is

0:06:18.800 --> 0:06:22.640
<v Speaker 1>going to collapse. And when Venezuela collapses, it's gonna be

0:06:22.640 --> 0:06:25.640
<v Speaker 1>bad for energy markets, it's going to be terrible for refugees,

0:06:25.800 --> 0:06:29.800
<v Speaker 1>It's could further destabilize Colombia. You know, we we need

0:06:29.839 --> 0:06:32.280
<v Speaker 1>to be paying much more attention and doing what we

0:06:32.320 --> 0:06:35.440
<v Speaker 1>can to help stabilize that country, preferably with the rest

0:06:35.480 --> 0:06:38.680
<v Speaker 1>of the Oias. Thank you so much. This was really

0:06:38.720 --> 0:06:43.440
<v Speaker 1>really tremendous. And Maurice Slaughter, a long time UH policy

0:06:43.440 --> 0:06:48.560
<v Speaker 1>adviser to the president but also professor and UH now

0:06:48.600 --> 0:06:51.919
<v Speaker 1>currently president and CEO of New America, thank you so

0:06:52.000 --> 0:06:53.640
<v Speaker 1>much for being with us. We heard a lot of

0:06:53.680 --> 0:06:56.320
<v Speaker 1>really fantastic things for the year ahead. I'm hopeful, paim

0:06:56.320 --> 0:06:57.839
<v Speaker 1>I've got to tell you a little bit more helpful

0:06:57.880 --> 0:06:59.760
<v Speaker 1>than I was when I started. I'm hopeful for your

0:07:10.000 --> 0:07:14.960
<v Speaker 1>We are here with an esteemed guest, Valerie Jarrett, Senior,

0:07:15.040 --> 0:07:20.960
<v Speaker 1>adviser to President Barack Obama and longtime confidante here at

0:07:21.040 --> 0:07:24.440
<v Speaker 1>the Bloomberg Here Ahead Summit to talk about some of

0:07:24.480 --> 0:07:29.400
<v Speaker 1>the issues and some of the progress made in workplace issues. Valerie,

0:07:29.400 --> 0:07:31.040
<v Speaker 1>thank you so much for being with us. Thank you,

0:07:31.120 --> 0:07:33.200
<v Speaker 1>Lisa and Pim. It's a delight for me to be here,

0:07:33.200 --> 0:07:35.480
<v Speaker 1>and I appreciate you putting a spotlight on these issues

0:07:35.480 --> 0:07:38.240
<v Speaker 1>that are so important to working families. So what have

0:07:38.440 --> 0:07:42.080
<v Speaker 1>some of the biggest surprises been for you as you've

0:07:42.120 --> 0:07:46.280
<v Speaker 1>pushed through some of your workplace agenda. Well, frankly, how

0:07:46.320 --> 0:07:49.160
<v Speaker 1>easy it is to convince businesses about what's in their

0:07:49.160 --> 0:07:52.920
<v Speaker 1>self interest once you show them the data. So, for example, UM,

0:07:52.920 --> 0:07:55.920
<v Speaker 1>eight years ago, it was hard to get businesses to

0:07:56.000 --> 0:07:58.520
<v Speaker 1>really talk about investing in their workforce in the form

0:07:58.600 --> 0:08:03.600
<v Speaker 1>of paid leave, paid sick days, workplace flexibility, affordable childcare,

0:08:03.680 --> 0:08:06.120
<v Speaker 1>equal pay. There wasn't fun and center. In fact, I

0:08:06.120 --> 0:08:08.240
<v Speaker 1>would venture to guess if I'd been invited to Bloomberg,

0:08:08.280 --> 0:08:10.000
<v Speaker 1>that wouldn't have been the topic that you'd wanted me

0:08:10.080 --> 0:08:13.320
<v Speaker 1>to address. And I've been so hardened to see truly

0:08:13.360 --> 0:08:15.400
<v Speaker 1>a transformation over the eight years in terms of the

0:08:15.440 --> 0:08:19.280
<v Speaker 1>awareness and not just with the large companies publicly health companies,

0:08:19.320 --> 0:08:22.120
<v Speaker 1>but small businesses who care about their culture and care

0:08:22.120 --> 0:08:25.400
<v Speaker 1>about retaining their workforce and recognizing it's not just enough

0:08:25.440 --> 0:08:27.080
<v Speaker 1>to get him in the door. You've got to be

0:08:27.120 --> 0:08:31.320
<v Speaker 1>able to compete in the twenty one century UM marketplace,

0:08:31.640 --> 0:08:35.720
<v Speaker 1>and that's dependent upon recognizing the needs of the century worker.

0:08:36.480 --> 0:08:40.160
<v Speaker 1>The President has just signed an executive order having to

0:08:40.280 --> 0:08:43.600
<v Speaker 1>do with companies that do business with the federal government.

0:08:43.600 --> 0:08:46.040
<v Speaker 1>Wonder if you could just expand on that. Sure, well,

0:08:46.320 --> 0:08:49.960
<v Speaker 1>we recognize right now that there's no national paid sick

0:08:50.280 --> 0:08:54.240
<v Speaker 1>day requirement UM, and so there's legislation pending called the

0:08:54.240 --> 0:08:56.920
<v Speaker 1>Healthy Families Act that would require companies to give their

0:08:57.280 --> 0:09:00.439
<v Speaker 1>workforce at least seven days of paid sick time. I

0:09:00.440 --> 0:09:02.719
<v Speaker 1>would mention also that we're the only developed country in

0:09:02.760 --> 0:09:05.040
<v Speaker 1>the world that doesn't have a federal paid lea paid

0:09:05.120 --> 0:09:08.680
<v Speaker 1>sickly policy. So, in light of Congress is failure to act,

0:09:08.720 --> 0:09:11.120
<v Speaker 1>the President sign an executive order saying all right, well,

0:09:11.160 --> 0:09:14.800
<v Speaker 1>at least if we're spending federal taxpayer dollars, we want

0:09:14.840 --> 0:09:17.080
<v Speaker 1>to know that the workers are going to at least

0:09:17.120 --> 0:09:19.240
<v Speaker 1>have seven days of paid sick time. And so if

0:09:19.280 --> 0:09:21.480
<v Speaker 1>you want to do business with the federal government, then

0:09:21.520 --> 0:09:24.240
<v Speaker 1>you're going to have to pay your workers um paid

0:09:24.240 --> 0:09:26.959
<v Speaker 1>sick days for seven days. Everybody gets sick, and I

0:09:26.960 --> 0:09:29.079
<v Speaker 1>don't know about you, but if I go to a restaurant,

0:09:29.480 --> 0:09:32.040
<v Speaker 1>I actually want the worker to be healthy. So this

0:09:32.080 --> 0:09:34.160
<v Speaker 1>isn't just that it's good for the worker and good.

0:09:34.320 --> 0:09:36.360
<v Speaker 1>If I'm a mom and my daughter sick, I don't

0:09:36.360 --> 0:09:38.440
<v Speaker 1>want to get doctor day's work because I want to

0:09:38.440 --> 0:09:39.959
<v Speaker 1>stay home and take care of her. I want to

0:09:39.960 --> 0:09:44.040
<v Speaker 1>be able to do that. And all too often, particularly

0:09:44.040 --> 0:09:47.439
<v Speaker 1>lower wage workers can't afford to choose between going to

0:09:47.520 --> 0:09:50.640
<v Speaker 1>work or missing that day's pay, or little losing your

0:09:50.679 --> 0:09:52.720
<v Speaker 1>job if you don't show up. So that's what the

0:09:52.720 --> 0:09:55.839
<v Speaker 1>executive and we're very familiar as consumers about following the

0:09:55.880 --> 0:09:57.720
<v Speaker 1>whole supply chain. In this case, it goes back to

0:09:57.760 --> 0:10:00.760
<v Speaker 1>a person. It goes back to a person exactly. And

0:10:00.920 --> 0:10:03.280
<v Speaker 1>if you're an employer, you're only going to be as

0:10:03.280 --> 0:10:06.240
<v Speaker 1>good as the people who you employ, and recognizing that

0:10:06.280 --> 0:10:08.000
<v Speaker 1>you've got to take care of them and invest in

0:10:08.080 --> 0:10:10.600
<v Speaker 1>them is not just good for women. This is a

0:10:10.640 --> 0:10:13.320
<v Speaker 1>working family issue, but it's also good for business, and

0:10:13.360 --> 0:10:15.840
<v Speaker 1>it's good for our economy. We're now competing with companies

0:10:15.880 --> 0:10:18.120
<v Speaker 1>all over the world. I just mentioned I was here

0:10:18.160 --> 0:10:22.160
<v Speaker 1>several months ago at Spotify, and they just announced twelve

0:10:22.559 --> 0:10:27.080
<v Speaker 1>months of paid leave. Twelve months. Why because their headquarted

0:10:27.120 --> 0:10:29.360
<v Speaker 1>in Sweden where they offer eighteen months, and they're having

0:10:29.400 --> 0:10:31.839
<v Speaker 1>a hard time with their workforce because the ones that

0:10:31.920 --> 0:10:33.520
<v Speaker 1>work here are going or wait a minute, look what's

0:10:33.520 --> 0:10:35.920
<v Speaker 1>happening over in Sweden. So they're needing to close that gap.

0:10:36.320 --> 0:10:38.680
<v Speaker 1>And that's happening all over the world. And so companies

0:10:38.720 --> 0:10:41.480
<v Speaker 1>that recognize the importance of investing in their work in

0:10:41.559 --> 0:10:46.160
<v Speaker 1>their workforce are seeing the results of that investment. As

0:10:46.200 --> 0:10:49.000
<v Speaker 1>the mother of two small children who works full time

0:10:49.000 --> 0:10:52.160
<v Speaker 1>and as a husband who some time, I totally understand this.

0:10:52.200 --> 0:10:54.560
<v Speaker 1>But I also understand, you know, when you hear about

0:10:54.640 --> 0:10:56.520
<v Speaker 1>equality of pay for women, and you hear about the

0:10:56.559 --> 0:10:59.960
<v Speaker 1>child care issues, how complicated it is and how they're

0:11:00.040 --> 0:11:02.200
<v Speaker 1>so many factors that go into it with respect to

0:11:02.800 --> 0:11:05.600
<v Speaker 1>the wishes and sort of whether people are directed by

0:11:05.679 --> 0:11:09.679
<v Speaker 1>virtue of getting time off to be the primary caregiver

0:11:10.080 --> 0:11:12.920
<v Speaker 1>going forward, what do you think needs to happen. That's

0:11:12.920 --> 0:11:15.040
<v Speaker 1>a really good question where one of the steps of

0:11:15.040 --> 0:11:19.400
<v Speaker 1>the president has also taken is to require companies um

0:11:19.400 --> 0:11:21.640
<v Speaker 1>that are over a hundred have over a hundred employees

0:11:21.960 --> 0:11:24.560
<v Speaker 1>to collect data on pay and send it to the

0:11:24.600 --> 0:11:27.200
<v Speaker 1>Department of Labor. And it's a tool for the companies,

0:11:27.280 --> 0:11:29.880
<v Speaker 1>but it's also a tool for policymakers to try to

0:11:29.920 --> 0:11:33.160
<v Speaker 1>figure out whether or not there is a discrepancy and pay.

0:11:33.200 --> 0:11:35.720
<v Speaker 1>And if you get to the fact that there is,

0:11:35.760 --> 0:11:38.160
<v Speaker 1>then you can go behind the numbers and figure out why.

0:11:38.960 --> 0:11:41.480
<v Speaker 1>We've also asked companies to take what we're calling an

0:11:41.480 --> 0:11:44.440
<v Speaker 1>equal Pay pledge. We have fifty seven companies around the country,

0:11:44.440 --> 0:11:48.640
<v Speaker 1>big companies you know, from Amazon to Google to um GM,

0:11:48.679 --> 0:11:50.679
<v Speaker 1>who have taken this pledge. And what the pledge requires

0:11:50.760 --> 0:11:53.400
<v Speaker 1>is once a year, look at your data, look at

0:11:53.440 --> 0:11:56.040
<v Speaker 1>what are the structural impediments to equal pay and other

0:11:56.320 --> 0:11:59.000
<v Speaker 1>impediments to keeping work women in the workplace, and then

0:11:59.000 --> 0:12:01.640
<v Speaker 1>make a commitment to try to deal with them. And

0:12:01.679 --> 0:12:03.200
<v Speaker 1>what we do with the White House is try to

0:12:03.559 --> 0:12:06.160
<v Speaker 1>show what are those best practices and if we're keeping

0:12:06.200 --> 0:12:08.440
<v Speaker 1>women in the workforce, half of our horse is now

0:12:08.480 --> 0:12:11.360
<v Speaker 1>comprised of women. Women are graduating from college that higher

0:12:11.440 --> 0:12:13.680
<v Speaker 1>rates than men. Thank you, I'm familiar with that. But

0:12:14.080 --> 0:12:16.440
<v Speaker 1>in a field such as computer science, they're only staying

0:12:16.480 --> 0:12:18.600
<v Speaker 1>in three years and the number one reason they give

0:12:18.640 --> 0:12:22.040
<v Speaker 1>for leaving the field culture. And so it's also not

0:12:22.080 --> 0:12:25.800
<v Speaker 1>just a matter of lease of having these important policies

0:12:25.800 --> 0:12:28.440
<v Speaker 1>on your books of your company, but you also have

0:12:28.520 --> 0:12:30.720
<v Speaker 1>to create a culture where people feel comfortable to take them.

0:12:30.760 --> 0:12:33.360
<v Speaker 1>At the White House, we have three months paid leave

0:12:33.600 --> 0:12:36.800
<v Speaker 1>for men and women equal because we think they should.

0:12:37.040 --> 0:12:40.280
<v Speaker 1>But just let's for one second. I mean, your job

0:12:40.320 --> 0:12:42.560
<v Speaker 1>is incredibly important as it is, you do a lot

0:12:42.640 --> 0:12:46.480
<v Speaker 1>of things. If if you were in that position, would

0:12:46.480 --> 0:12:49.160
<v Speaker 1>you be able to extract yourself for three months or

0:12:49.400 --> 0:12:51.439
<v Speaker 1>kind of a fallacy? No, you could, And that's what

0:12:51.600 --> 0:12:53.520
<v Speaker 1>That's why I always give the White House as an example,

0:12:53.520 --> 0:12:56.360
<v Speaker 1>because what's more high powered, high pressure than that? Where

0:12:56.400 --> 0:12:58.800
<v Speaker 1>do we all think we're indispensable? But we have had

0:12:58.840 --> 0:13:01.560
<v Speaker 1>several senior member is in the White House team, including

0:13:01.960 --> 0:13:04.480
<v Speaker 1>my own deputy who left for three months, and we

0:13:04.520 --> 0:13:06.440
<v Speaker 1>have now created the kind of culture where if you

0:13:06.559 --> 0:13:09.439
<v Speaker 1>don't take that three months, then there's pure pressure and

0:13:09.440 --> 0:13:11.080
<v Speaker 1>it's like, well what are you doing back here? And

0:13:11.120 --> 0:13:13.360
<v Speaker 1>so you reinforce it. You know what happens while you're

0:13:13.400 --> 0:13:16.520
<v Speaker 1>going somebody steps up and we all cover for each other,

0:13:16.640 --> 0:13:18.960
<v Speaker 1>and we've created the environment where there isn't any resentment

0:13:19.000 --> 0:13:21.080
<v Speaker 1>for it because it gives younger people a chance to

0:13:21.080 --> 0:13:23.560
<v Speaker 1>move up for a second and get and sometimes that

0:13:23.640 --> 0:13:26.040
<v Speaker 1>leads to promotion because people more senior get to see

0:13:26.040 --> 0:13:28.199
<v Speaker 1>them in action. So if you can do it in

0:13:28.240 --> 0:13:29.880
<v Speaker 1>the White House, and you can do it equally for

0:13:29.920 --> 0:13:32.559
<v Speaker 1>men and women, and you work on that culture, and

0:13:32.720 --> 0:13:35.240
<v Speaker 1>it takes a deliberate effort, you can't just say yes,

0:13:35.280 --> 0:13:37.520
<v Speaker 1>you can do it. You have to model. People can't

0:13:37.520 --> 0:13:41.079
<v Speaker 1>be what they can't see. And so when the Press Secretary,

0:13:41.080 --> 0:13:45.000
<v Speaker 1>who's a man, Josh Ernist, takes paternity leave, that sends

0:13:45.000 --> 0:13:47.760
<v Speaker 1>a message throughout his entire core group that if the

0:13:47.800 --> 0:13:50.400
<v Speaker 1>Press Secretary can be out of pockets, so can everybody else.

0:13:50.679 --> 0:13:54.000
<v Speaker 1>Just give you a quick twenty seconds here. Eight years

0:13:54.360 --> 0:13:57.800
<v Speaker 1>Obama is ending his two terms. You're going to be

0:13:57.920 --> 0:14:01.000
<v Speaker 1>ending eight years at the Washington White House. And so right,

0:14:01.600 --> 0:14:05.400
<v Speaker 1>what are you going to miss the most? Oh my gosh,

0:14:05.640 --> 0:14:08.680
<v Speaker 1>or what are you gonna miss the least? Congress? Okay,

0:14:09.880 --> 0:14:12.000
<v Speaker 1>that was a much easier because I'm gonna miss so much.

0:14:12.040 --> 0:14:14.600
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna I'm gonna miss the people and I don't

0:14:14.679 --> 0:14:16.280
<v Speaker 1>just mean the people with whom I work, but the

0:14:16.280 --> 0:14:18.960
<v Speaker 1>people across this country who I have the privilege of

0:14:19.000 --> 0:14:21.440
<v Speaker 1>meeting every day from all walks of life, who are

0:14:21.520 --> 0:14:24.000
<v Speaker 1>really just trying to do right by their family. And

0:14:24.040 --> 0:14:28.160
<v Speaker 1>I've met the most ordinary people who do extraordinary things,

0:14:28.280 --> 0:14:30.880
<v Speaker 1>and we try to lift them up by inviting them

0:14:30.920 --> 0:14:33.320
<v Speaker 1>to the White House and see them around. Um. So

0:14:33.400 --> 0:14:36.120
<v Speaker 1>I will miss just the diversity of my day, and

0:14:36.200 --> 0:14:39.400
<v Speaker 1>I'll miss the majesty of coming through those gates every morning,

0:14:39.520 --> 0:14:41.800
<v Speaker 1>right every single day for nearly eight years. I just

0:14:41.880 --> 0:14:44.880
<v Speaker 1>pinched myself at the privilege of working at the White House.

0:14:46.240 --> 0:14:48.080
<v Speaker 1>I don't drink coffee, but I bet it's pretty good

0:14:48.320 --> 0:14:50.320
<v Speaker 1>everything else from the White House mess. Maybe mess is

0:14:50.360 --> 0:14:53.440
<v Speaker 1>really good. Thanks very much for joining us. A Valerie Jarrett,

0:14:53.720 --> 0:15:08.440
<v Speaker 1>senior advisor to President Barack Obama. This is Bloomberg him.

0:15:08.440 --> 0:15:10.400
<v Speaker 1>No better person for us to talk to you in

0:15:10.440 --> 0:15:12.800
<v Speaker 1>the morning when I could be on my third cup

0:15:12.840 --> 0:15:16.840
<v Speaker 1>of coffee than Andrea Ellie, Chairman and Ellie Cafees of

0:15:16.880 --> 0:15:21.080
<v Speaker 1>Ellie Cafees, sp a on about his life. I want

0:15:21.080 --> 0:15:24.040
<v Speaker 1>to talk to you first before we talk about climate change.

0:15:25.680 --> 0:15:27.720
<v Speaker 1>I want to talk first about the fact that you

0:15:27.800 --> 0:15:30.400
<v Speaker 1>are four years old when you had your first cup

0:15:30.440 --> 0:15:32.760
<v Speaker 1>of coffee. Can you please explain to me how that

0:15:32.840 --> 0:15:34.680
<v Speaker 1>how that came about as a mom of a four

0:15:34.760 --> 0:15:40.040
<v Speaker 1>year old. Well, I was sipping coffee by the spoon,

0:15:40.480 --> 0:15:43.440
<v Speaker 1>not drinking coffee four years old, but I was assisting

0:15:43.480 --> 0:15:47.160
<v Speaker 1>my mother preparing the very first espresso. There was no

0:15:47.240 --> 0:15:51.560
<v Speaker 1>expresso technology for home at that time, so she was

0:15:51.960 --> 0:15:56.520
<v Speaker 1>grinding and dozing and waiting and then tamping. It took

0:15:56.760 --> 0:15:59.480
<v Speaker 1>probably half an hour up to forty five minutes to

0:15:59.480 --> 0:16:03.040
<v Speaker 1>get the one, and we were probably spoiling, you know,

0:16:03.440 --> 0:16:05.880
<v Speaker 1>wasting three of them in order to get the good.

0:16:06.000 --> 0:16:08.800
<v Speaker 1>But then the coffee was perfect. So all these has

0:16:08.840 --> 0:16:13.960
<v Speaker 1>been completely revolutionized with the first paper pot that my

0:16:14.040 --> 0:16:17.880
<v Speaker 1>father was able to innovate at the beginning of the eighties,

0:16:18.440 --> 0:16:23.000
<v Speaker 1>and suddenly, uh, with the easy pots and the successful

0:16:23.160 --> 0:16:28.720
<v Speaker 1>technology with capsules, these espresso technology became available worldwide and

0:16:28.760 --> 0:16:32.280
<v Speaker 1>made the espresso to become global and loved by you know,

0:16:32.720 --> 0:16:36.480
<v Speaker 1>consumers all over the world, and made the basically espresso

0:16:36.560 --> 0:16:40.880
<v Speaker 1>to become the most you know, enjoyed way of drinking

0:16:40.880 --> 0:16:46.440
<v Speaker 1>coffee even by tea drinkers and filter coffee drinkers. Let's

0:16:46.440 --> 0:16:49.800
<v Speaker 1>talk about the Elie brand and the reach right now,

0:16:49.880 --> 0:16:53.600
<v Speaker 1>because you're here at the Year Ahead Summit to learn,

0:16:53.680 --> 0:16:56.600
<v Speaker 1>to meet, but also to share some of the new

0:16:56.640 --> 0:16:59.680
<v Speaker 1>programs that you would put together at Elie to draw

0:17:00.040 --> 0:17:03.680
<v Speaker 1>b in and to expand the brand when it is

0:17:03.760 --> 0:17:08.919
<v Speaker 1>the is the most global coffee brand. Were present in

0:17:08.960 --> 0:17:12.960
<v Speaker 1>over forty one hundred forty countries and we do basically

0:17:13.000 --> 0:17:15.680
<v Speaker 1>one third of our stays in our domestic country, Italy.

0:17:15.760 --> 0:17:18.320
<v Speaker 1>So I feel when I hear in New York, I

0:17:18.359 --> 0:17:21.840
<v Speaker 1>feel really I'm at home. And um, it's a family

0:17:21.880 --> 0:17:26.560
<v Speaker 1>business controlled by the family. So we grow set finance,

0:17:26.640 --> 0:17:30.640
<v Speaker 1>which is a challenge because we are the private company

0:17:30.960 --> 0:17:36.120
<v Speaker 1>which grows the more relatively in percentage compared to let's

0:17:36.119 --> 0:17:41.359
<v Speaker 1>say other strictly private one. So that means that only

0:17:41.400 --> 0:17:45.800
<v Speaker 1>companies which grow more than us are public realist okay,

0:17:46.119 --> 0:17:51.439
<v Speaker 1>and we are obsessively focused only on quality. As a

0:17:51.480 --> 0:17:54.280
<v Speaker 1>matter of fact, the company was founded upon the dream

0:17:54.320 --> 0:17:57.800
<v Speaker 1>of my grandfather, the founder, to offer the greatest coffee

0:17:57.800 --> 0:18:01.639
<v Speaker 1>to the world, and this dream became a mission the

0:18:01.760 --> 0:18:04.679
<v Speaker 1>lighting lovers of goodness and beauty all over the world

0:18:04.760 --> 0:18:08.200
<v Speaker 1>with the best coffee nature can provide enhanced by technology

0:18:08.240 --> 0:18:10.520
<v Speaker 1>and the beauty of the arts. This is our mission

0:18:11.400 --> 0:18:14.080
<v Speaker 1>and UH we stick to it to such an extent

0:18:14.160 --> 0:18:17.359
<v Speaker 1>where we are the only coffee company in the world

0:18:17.440 --> 0:18:20.040
<v Speaker 1>offering only one coffee, because if you want to offer

0:18:20.080 --> 0:18:22.680
<v Speaker 1>the best, it can be only one. So the famous

0:18:22.720 --> 0:18:26.600
<v Speaker 1>really Blend this is it's done with the nine ingredients

0:18:26.600 --> 0:18:30.560
<v Speaker 1>of the best Arabbica that we source directly from all

0:18:30.560 --> 0:18:32.880
<v Speaker 1>over the world in in in twenty countries. So next

0:18:32.920 --> 0:18:36.640
<v Speaker 1>week there will be November one here in New York

0:18:36.680 --> 0:18:42.840
<v Speaker 1>the very first international award awarding the best growers of

0:18:42.960 --> 0:18:47.320
<v Speaker 1>the nine countries sourcing our our our blend. And then

0:18:47.320 --> 0:18:49.560
<v Speaker 1>there will be also the best of the Best awarded

0:18:49.600 --> 0:18:53.080
<v Speaker 1>by International jewel So with that, this Illy Blend is

0:18:53.119 --> 0:18:57.560
<v Speaker 1>served globally and omni channel you can enjoy in the

0:18:57.600 --> 0:19:04.080
<v Speaker 1>hospitality restaurants, cafes, hotels at home through different channels. On

0:19:04.080 --> 0:19:07.120
<v Speaker 1>on the air, we are we have been recently appointed

0:19:07.160 --> 0:19:10.800
<v Speaker 1>as the official coffee of the United Airlines and UH

0:19:10.880 --> 0:19:13.160
<v Speaker 1>and so on the go. We also have this partnership

0:19:13.160 --> 0:19:15.640
<v Speaker 1>with Coca Cola for the really ready to drink, so

0:19:15.680 --> 0:19:18.080
<v Speaker 1>you can get it everywhere. Well, Andrea, you know I'm

0:19:18.240 --> 0:19:20.439
<v Speaker 1>as I hear you talk. I'm kind of torn because

0:19:20.720 --> 0:19:22.600
<v Speaker 1>I grew up in a family where my father is

0:19:22.600 --> 0:19:24.440
<v Speaker 1>a professor and he spends a lot of his day

0:19:24.440 --> 0:19:27.359
<v Speaker 1>tamping down the espresso and grind to get and measuring it.

0:19:27.400 --> 0:19:29.399
<v Speaker 1>I mean, this is a very important pursuit in my household.

0:19:29.600 --> 0:19:31.280
<v Speaker 1>On the other hand, you know, we hear so much

0:19:31.280 --> 0:19:34.560
<v Speaker 1>about burning down the rainforests, and you know, and flattening

0:19:34.640 --> 0:19:37.880
<v Speaker 1>areas and and sort of the unsustainability of a lot

0:19:37.880 --> 0:19:40.120
<v Speaker 1>of the coffee industry. Can you speak to that? I mean,

0:19:40.160 --> 0:19:42.159
<v Speaker 1>how do you deal with that? So it used to be,

0:19:42.160 --> 0:19:46.080
<v Speaker 1>it's much better now. Coffee has been uh, let's say,

0:19:46.480 --> 0:19:51.359
<v Speaker 1>well negative negative lee known until three decades ago for

0:19:51.480 --> 0:19:55.960
<v Speaker 1>deforestation and also harsh working condition in the producing countries.

0:19:56.320 --> 0:20:00.800
<v Speaker 1>Situation has dramatically improved, let's say, since the the eighties,

0:20:01.520 --> 0:20:05.680
<v Speaker 1>thanks to let's say, the revolution of good MC coffee.

0:20:06.800 --> 0:20:11.080
<v Speaker 1>The revolution gour mc coffee made coffee to develop three virtues,

0:20:11.280 --> 0:20:16.000
<v Speaker 1>which are pleasure, health, and sustainability. Pleasure. There is much

0:20:16.000 --> 0:20:20.920
<v Speaker 1>better quality around, better preparation, better places of consumption, more

0:20:21.000 --> 0:20:25.879
<v Speaker 1>variety so people can have fun and enjoy health. The

0:20:25.920 --> 0:20:29.919
<v Speaker 1>perception of health has dramatical increase Now not only sixty

0:20:30.359 --> 0:20:35.960
<v Speaker 1>of people and the the reverted ratio before before believe

0:20:36.000 --> 0:20:38.840
<v Speaker 1>that coffee is good for health. There are several studies

0:20:38.880 --> 0:20:41.879
<v Speaker 1>which confirm all confirmed that coffee makes you live longer

0:20:41.920 --> 0:20:46.160
<v Speaker 1>and better and even the WORLL The Health Organization did

0:20:46.200 --> 0:20:50.800
<v Speaker 1>reclassify coffee from possibly consinergenic to non consumer genny so,

0:20:50.840 --> 0:20:53.560
<v Speaker 1>which is a huge achievement. And last, but the least,

0:20:53.560 --> 0:20:59.720
<v Speaker 1>sustainability didn't improve. Environmental one, uh, no deforestation any longer.

0:21:00.040 --> 0:21:02.879
<v Speaker 1>The last two decades there has been a fifty increase

0:21:02.960 --> 0:21:06.440
<v Speaker 1>in production with no more actors, So no more the deforestation.

0:21:07.119 --> 0:21:12.800
<v Speaker 1>We can always confirmed that coffee planting contributes positively to

0:21:13.119 --> 0:21:18.359
<v Speaker 1>a carbon sequestration. You know, also the water consumption has

0:21:18.400 --> 0:21:23.200
<v Speaker 1>been dramatically reduced and the water pollution has been very limited.

0:21:23.560 --> 0:21:27.119
<v Speaker 1>So this is all positive. Of course, on average there

0:21:27.160 --> 0:21:31.199
<v Speaker 1>can be always negative situations and the social one. The

0:21:31.240 --> 0:21:34.359
<v Speaker 1>only thing that we can say is that the human

0:21:34.400 --> 0:21:37.320
<v Speaker 1>development index of most of the producing countries in the

0:21:37.400 --> 0:21:40.480
<v Speaker 1>last twenties did improve. Is it enough? No, it is

0:21:40.520 --> 0:21:43.800
<v Speaker 1>not enough. There's still a lot to do, but the

0:21:43.880 --> 0:21:47.280
<v Speaker 1>situation is improving. Can I just give you about twenty seconds,

0:21:47.400 --> 0:21:49.760
<v Speaker 1>very short, you're on your way to Boston, home to

0:21:49.760 --> 0:21:52.080
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg twelve. But if you can just tell us what

0:21:52.119 --> 0:21:54.760
<v Speaker 1>are you planning to do in Boston. Well, in Boston,

0:21:54.880 --> 0:21:59.200
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to have a conversation at the university level

0:21:59.600 --> 0:22:02.199
<v Speaker 1>about the coffee culture in Jenna. This is just how

0:22:02.240 --> 0:22:04.640
<v Speaker 1>people wear it is and what it's about. What this

0:22:04.720 --> 0:22:08.920
<v Speaker 1>is a at the university at Boston and the detail

0:22:08.960 --> 0:22:12.800
<v Speaker 1>I will tell you later. I still alright, alright, alright,

0:22:13.119 --> 0:22:15.159
<v Speaker 1>but you're gonna be at Boston University. It was that

0:22:15.280 --> 0:22:18.800
<v Speaker 1>private say all right, you're gonna learn everything you need

0:22:18.840 --> 0:22:22.440
<v Speaker 1>to know about coffee. Thank you very much. We certainly did. Uh.

0:22:22.560 --> 0:22:26.879
<v Speaker 1>Andrea Eally he is the chairman of Elie Cafe is

0:22:26.920 --> 0:22:29.320
<v Speaker 1>the worldwide. Did you feel like you've got a little

0:22:29.320 --> 0:22:33.520
<v Speaker 1>coffee just even being next to someone who has just

0:22:33.560 --> 0:22:35.480
<v Speaker 1>experienced it and lived it for so long. I think

0:22:35.480 --> 0:22:37.720
<v Speaker 1>he's going to get you a cup of espresso right now.

0:22:38.119 --> 0:22:41.200
<v Speaker 1>So yeah, alright, this is Bloomberg Markets. I'm pim Fox.

0:22:41.240 --> 0:22:53.679
<v Speaker 1>My co host Lisa Brahma, It's this is Bloomberg. I

0:22:53.680 --> 0:22:56.399
<v Speaker 1>want to take a look now at Apple and what

0:22:56.480 --> 0:22:59.879
<v Speaker 1>to expect after the bell today when they report earning.

0:23:00.160 --> 0:23:05.360
<v Speaker 1>David Garretty CEO at g v A research here with us. Now, Dave,

0:23:05.600 --> 0:23:07.480
<v Speaker 1>what are you expecting to see from Apple? At least,

0:23:07.600 --> 0:23:10.680
<v Speaker 1>thank you. We're looking today for revenues to be approximately

0:23:10.760 --> 0:23:14.760
<v Speaker 1>forty UM billion dollars, which is gonna be down about

0:23:14.880 --> 0:23:18.040
<v Speaker 1>nine percent year every year. Earnings about a dollar sixty five,

0:23:18.040 --> 0:23:20.400
<v Speaker 1>which is gonna be down about sixteen percent year every year.

0:23:20.760 --> 0:23:24.439
<v Speaker 1>In terms of iPhones shipments uh number about forty six million,

0:23:24.600 --> 0:23:27.480
<v Speaker 1>which actually is down as well. Note that for Apple,

0:23:27.560 --> 0:23:29.760
<v Speaker 1>this is gonna be the third consecutive quarter in which

0:23:29.760 --> 0:23:33.520
<v Speaker 1>you've seen actually revenues and earnings down year over years.

0:23:33.560 --> 0:23:35.080
<v Speaker 1>You have, but nothing can stop them, right, I mean,

0:23:35.080 --> 0:23:38.000
<v Speaker 1>their shares are up almost four percent this year. Certainly

0:23:38.119 --> 0:23:40.680
<v Speaker 1>who cares? If we look back over the last six months,

0:23:40.680 --> 0:23:42.800
<v Speaker 1>I mean, the stocks up almost thirty percent, while the

0:23:42.880 --> 0:23:44.760
<v Speaker 1>S and P five hundred is up you know, roughly

0:23:44.800 --> 0:23:49.440
<v Speaker 1>about ten. So clearly people trading what typically has been

0:23:49.480 --> 0:23:51.879
<v Speaker 1>sort of the product cycles for Apple, obviously by the

0:23:51.880 --> 0:23:54.280
<v Speaker 1>stock ahead of a new phone launched with the iPhone seven,

0:23:54.520 --> 0:23:56.439
<v Speaker 1>you know, certainly they've been benefiting here, and not just

0:23:56.480 --> 0:23:58.119
<v Speaker 1>from what they've been doing with their own product, but

0:23:58.160 --> 0:24:01.680
<v Speaker 1>the fact that Samsung is basically fully recalled the Galaxy

0:24:01.720 --> 0:24:04.800
<v Speaker 1>Note seven. I'm just trying to wrap my mind around

0:24:04.840 --> 0:24:07.240
<v Speaker 1>the fact that this is a company that at least

0:24:07.240 --> 0:24:10.720
<v Speaker 1>has already done or will do forty seven billion dollars

0:24:11.240 --> 0:24:14.880
<v Speaker 1>in profit. Right, that's more. I think that GM did

0:24:15.080 --> 0:24:19.200
<v Speaker 1>sales for the quarter of like forty eight. That might

0:24:19.240 --> 0:24:21.600
<v Speaker 1>be a good year for GM. No. No, this is

0:24:21.600 --> 0:24:25.720
<v Speaker 1>a great cash on their balance, like Bolivia has for

0:24:25.760 --> 0:24:29.040
<v Speaker 1>their entire condom. I mean, this is I just want

0:24:29.040 --> 0:24:31.439
<v Speaker 1>to try to get my mind around the juggernaut that

0:24:31.520 --> 0:24:34.200
<v Speaker 1>this machine is because people keep looking and I mean

0:24:34.240 --> 0:24:37.400
<v Speaker 1>in relation to the stock, not into the ge whiz.

0:24:37.400 --> 0:24:39.479
<v Speaker 1>We're gonna have an iPhone sixteen and it's gonna make

0:24:39.480 --> 0:24:42.520
<v Speaker 1>dinner for me. The stock itself, do you think it's

0:24:42.560 --> 0:24:45.120
<v Speaker 1>under priced? I think the stock right now still has

0:24:45.160 --> 0:24:47.280
<v Speaker 1>some further legs on it and certainly has been assisted

0:24:47.280 --> 0:24:49.399
<v Speaker 1>here by Samsung. I mean, we are going into the

0:24:49.480 --> 0:24:54.160
<v Speaker 1>strongest period seasonally year end holiday shopping in the Western Hemisphere.

0:24:54.359 --> 0:24:55.879
<v Speaker 1>You go to the first quarter of next year, you

0:24:55.920 --> 0:24:57.560
<v Speaker 1>have the lunar New Year in China. But you see,

0:24:57.560 --> 0:24:59.720
<v Speaker 1>you're talking about the consumer. I'm talking about the stock.

0:24:59.760 --> 0:25:02.760
<v Speaker 1>Here's my my my thesis, right is that if you

0:25:02.800 --> 0:25:05.639
<v Speaker 1>want to buy into the revolution that smartphones are going

0:25:05.680 --> 0:25:07.960
<v Speaker 1>to be with us forever. If you want to invest

0:25:07.960 --> 0:25:11.000
<v Speaker 1>in a company who produces a balance sheet and a

0:25:11.040 --> 0:25:13.240
<v Speaker 1>profit and loss statement that you can read in English

0:25:13.280 --> 0:25:17.600
<v Speaker 1>and understand, there really are not that many out there, right,

0:25:17.640 --> 0:25:20.359
<v Speaker 1>I mean Samsung has it, and I'm not saying problems,

0:25:20.359 --> 0:25:23.680
<v Speaker 1>no problems, but what else is there? Right? Apple is

0:25:23.680 --> 0:25:27.359
<v Speaker 1>still very much your suit, your default way to trade

0:25:27.560 --> 0:25:31.280
<v Speaker 1>smartphones on a pure play basis. Clearly though if you

0:25:31.280 --> 0:25:32.760
<v Speaker 1>look at some of the things that are being enabled

0:25:32.760 --> 0:25:36.000
<v Speaker 1>by the technology, mean, Google remains a far more interesting

0:25:36.080 --> 0:25:39.560
<v Speaker 1>company in terms of what it's actually making possible. And

0:25:39.640 --> 0:25:41.960
<v Speaker 1>I'm not going to say that the Google Pixel is

0:25:41.960 --> 0:25:44.479
<v Speaker 1>going to be suddenly like the new phone that they

0:25:44.520 --> 0:25:47.520
<v Speaker 1>came out, correct, and it's not making is that Hawawei

0:25:47.640 --> 0:25:50.639
<v Speaker 1>making it for that? That's actually it's a HTC I right.

0:25:50.720 --> 0:25:52.800
<v Speaker 1>But but in terms of having the Pixel out, I

0:25:52.800 --> 0:25:56.480
<v Speaker 1>mean having the Galaxy Notes seven from Samsung fully off

0:25:56.480 --> 0:26:00.399
<v Speaker 1>the market, clearly, consumers want to have a competing product

0:26:00.480 --> 0:26:03.120
<v Speaker 1>relative to whatever Apple has two. So in some respects

0:26:03.119 --> 0:26:06.760
<v Speaker 1>in this holiday season, it becomes default, perhaps the Google Pixel.

0:26:07.160 --> 0:26:10.119
<v Speaker 1>So there's so much optimism here and and and good feeling.

0:26:10.280 --> 0:26:11.560
<v Speaker 1>I have to bring it down a little bit and

0:26:11.600 --> 0:26:14.360
<v Speaker 1>talk about Twitter. Um. You know, they said that they're

0:26:14.359 --> 0:26:17.240
<v Speaker 1>going to plan job cuts, perhaps as much as three

0:26:17.320 --> 0:26:21.480
<v Speaker 1>hundred people. Uh, they're expecting to report earnings later this week.

0:26:21.640 --> 0:26:24.119
<v Speaker 1>What could they say that wouldn't be regarded as a

0:26:24.160 --> 0:26:27.080
<v Speaker 1>catastrophe from the market's point of view. I mean, the

0:26:27.119 --> 0:26:30.240
<v Speaker 1>issue around Twitter primarily is just the fact of slowing

0:26:30.359 --> 0:26:33.080
<v Speaker 1>user growth, I mean, less engagement. I mean, there's only

0:26:33.119 --> 0:26:35.440
<v Speaker 1>so much that you can do historically within the confines

0:26:35.520 --> 0:26:38.159
<v Speaker 1>of a hundred and forty characters. Granted they've expanded this.

0:26:38.240 --> 0:26:40.720
<v Speaker 1>If you want to start writing novels on Twitter, you

0:26:40.800 --> 0:26:43.320
<v Speaker 1>might think about it, but nope, but nobody uses Twitter

0:26:43.400 --> 0:26:46.600
<v Speaker 1>for having anything longer than basically sort of a very short,

0:26:46.720 --> 0:26:50.280
<v Speaker 1>concise thought. Uh. And obviously, when Donald Trump goes away,

0:26:50.320 --> 0:26:52.119
<v Speaker 1>I mean, obviously the Twitter user rates are going to

0:26:52.200 --> 0:26:55.359
<v Speaker 1>go down. Um. But the thing that's more important to

0:26:55.359 --> 0:26:57.200
<v Speaker 1>look at in terms of Twitter is that they've gone

0:26:57.240 --> 0:27:00.080
<v Speaker 1>out to the market in terms of possibly looking the

0:27:00.119 --> 0:27:05.359
<v Speaker 1>strategic engagement of sale. Obviously pretty much everybody has walked away. Um.

0:27:05.359 --> 0:27:07.320
<v Speaker 1>Clearly the company is sort of saying we need to

0:27:07.359 --> 0:27:09.560
<v Speaker 1>retrench and we need to retrench now. And they really

0:27:09.560 --> 0:27:11.480
<v Speaker 1>haven't figured out where they gonna go with this. So

0:27:11.840 --> 0:27:13.919
<v Speaker 1>I'm not gonna say here ahead of Thanksgiving that we

0:27:13.960 --> 0:27:16.679
<v Speaker 1>take Twitter and stick a fork in it, but nonetheless,

0:27:16.760 --> 0:27:19.600
<v Speaker 1>until such time as as things to come, well, it

0:27:19.640 --> 0:27:22.760
<v Speaker 1>won't last that long. It'll only be in morsel, not

0:27:22.840 --> 0:27:26.119
<v Speaker 1>a full meal in any event. In any event, but

0:27:26.160 --> 0:27:28.760
<v Speaker 1>the issue for Twitter here is that they've They've tried

0:27:28.800 --> 0:27:31.960
<v Speaker 1>to go, they tried to engage, they've failed, and there

0:27:31.960 --> 0:27:34.840
<v Speaker 1>has to be a retrenchment. Uh. The question is how

0:27:34.920 --> 0:27:38.200
<v Speaker 1>far does this extend going out into two thousand seventeen?

0:27:38.760 --> 0:27:41.439
<v Speaker 1>David Carty? Are we're gonna be talking about Twitter in

0:27:41.480 --> 0:27:43.520
<v Speaker 1>the next year ahead? I mean we're at the twenty

0:27:43.560 --> 0:27:45.600
<v Speaker 1>you know, we're at the Year Ahead Bloomberg Summit here

0:27:45.640 --> 0:27:47.960
<v Speaker 1>at the at the bar quiet um. We've got a

0:27:48.040 --> 0:27:50.119
<v Speaker 1>variety of guests looking at and are we really going

0:27:50.160 --> 0:27:52.640
<v Speaker 1>to be talking about a company that does about two

0:27:52.680 --> 0:27:56.080
<v Speaker 1>point two billion in sales, loses half a billion a year,

0:27:56.480 --> 0:27:58.560
<v Speaker 1>and has a market capit twelve billion? Oh? Yes, it

0:27:58.640 --> 0:28:00.800
<v Speaker 1>just happens to be Twitter. I mean, why do we care?

0:28:01.000 --> 0:28:03.600
<v Speaker 1>Would I would only argue that Twitter is something that

0:28:03.640 --> 0:28:05.359
<v Speaker 1>you'll be looking at in the rear view mirror in

0:28:05.400 --> 0:28:08.960
<v Speaker 1>two thousand seventeen is basically being technology road kill. You're

0:28:08.960 --> 0:28:11.840
<v Speaker 1>going to continue to talk about companies like Facebook. Obviously,

0:28:11.880 --> 0:28:14.199
<v Speaker 1>Apple is going to have the tenth anniversary of the

0:28:14.240 --> 0:28:18.120
<v Speaker 1>two thousands of the iPhone coming out. It's expected that

0:28:18.200 --> 0:28:20.560
<v Speaker 1>the next generation of the iPhone, the iPhone eight, is

0:28:20.560 --> 0:28:23.719
<v Speaker 1>going to be something more significant. The company has the opportunity,

0:28:23.800 --> 0:28:27.640
<v Speaker 1>given Samsung's missteps, to possibly move ahead of Samsung, which

0:28:27.680 --> 0:28:30.400
<v Speaker 1>is important from an innovation standpoint. People have been very

0:28:30.440 --> 0:28:33.359
<v Speaker 1>critical of what Apple has not been doing in technology,

0:28:33.359 --> 0:28:36.800
<v Speaker 1>whether it's around artificial intelligence, whether it's around virtual reality,

0:28:36.840 --> 0:28:41.800
<v Speaker 1>augmented reality. There's clearly much wood for Apple to chop,

0:28:41.960 --> 0:28:45.480
<v Speaker 1>so to speak. Well, thank you very much, David Garrity.

0:28:46.240 --> 0:28:49.440
<v Speaker 1>He is the chief executive of g v A Research.

0:28:49.520 --> 0:28:52.880
<v Speaker 1>I'm not I'm not giving up my Twitter again. Don't

0:28:52.920 --> 0:29:00.520
<v Speaker 1>give you. You're very good. Thanks for listening to Bloomberg

0:29:00.520 --> 0:29:03.920
<v Speaker 1>pien L podcast. You can subscribe and listen to interviews

0:29:03.960 --> 0:29:09.120
<v Speaker 1>at iTunes, SoundCloud, or whatever podcast platform you prefer. I'm

0:29:09.160 --> 0:29:12.200
<v Speaker 1>pim Fox. I'm out there on Twitter at pim Fox.

0:29:12.480 --> 0:29:15.200
<v Speaker 1>I'm out there on Twitter at Lisa Abramo. It's one

0:29:15.480 --> 0:29:18.200
<v Speaker 1>before the podcast. You can always catch us worldwide on

0:29:18.240 --> 0:29:19.040
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Radio