WEBVTT - BofA Dashes Hopes For Hefty Trader Bonuses This Year

0:00:01.400 --> 0:00:04.120
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the Bloomberg Markets Podcast. I'm Paul Sweeney, along

0:00:04.120 --> 0:00:06.240
<v Speaker 1>with my co host of Bonnie Quinn. Every business day

0:00:06.240 --> 0:00:10.400
<v Speaker 1>we bring you interviews from CEOs, market pros, and Bloomberg experts,

0:00:10.440 --> 0:00:13.600
<v Speaker 1>along with essential market moving news. Find the Bloomberg Markets

0:00:13.600 --> 0:00:17.000
<v Speaker 1>Podcast on Apple podcast or wherever you listen to podcasts,

0:00:17.000 --> 0:00:21.720
<v Speaker 1>and on Bloomberg dot com. Okay, having worked on Wall

0:00:21.760 --> 0:00:23.920
<v Speaker 1>Street for twenty years, there's a story on the terminal

0:00:23.960 --> 0:00:26.880
<v Speaker 1>today that really hit close to home for me. It's

0:00:26.880 --> 0:00:30.120
<v Speaker 1>a story where a Bank of America is floating an

0:00:30.160 --> 0:00:34.360
<v Speaker 1>idea to its traders to keep bonuses flat relative to

0:00:34.440 --> 0:00:37.680
<v Speaker 1>last year despite a huge profit year UH in the

0:00:37.880 --> 0:00:41.400
<v Speaker 1>trading environment. To get some more details here, we welcome

0:00:41.479 --> 0:00:44.800
<v Speaker 1>Lenon new in Financial reporter for Bloomberg News. Lennan, I've

0:00:44.800 --> 0:00:48.360
<v Speaker 1>sat across the desk from my manager many many times

0:00:48.400 --> 0:00:51.360
<v Speaker 1>around this time of year, arguing for a higher bonus. Hey,

0:00:51.440 --> 0:00:53.720
<v Speaker 1>look how well I did. Look how profitable our desk

0:00:53.920 --> 0:00:58.680
<v Speaker 1>was that. I think, what's can I borrow you? For

0:00:58.720 --> 0:01:02.440
<v Speaker 1>a humanus like manager? And I need to me exactly right. So, Lenan,

0:01:02.520 --> 0:01:04.839
<v Speaker 1>it doesn't sound like there's gonna be some open ears

0:01:04.840 --> 0:01:08.040
<v Speaker 1>for that kind of discussion this year. That's right, Paul,

0:01:08.080 --> 0:01:11.080
<v Speaker 1>I think these sources we spoke to across the street obviously,

0:01:11.400 --> 0:01:15.160
<v Speaker 1>I think that this is not enough. You know, it's

0:01:15.160 --> 0:01:17.840
<v Speaker 1>been a manner year for trading desks. The reality is

0:01:17.920 --> 0:01:20.640
<v Speaker 1>that they have jumped, you know, huge amounts, and Bank

0:01:20.680 --> 0:01:22.960
<v Speaker 1>of America I think is on the lower end of

0:01:23.000 --> 0:01:26.600
<v Speaker 1>the desks that have done extremely well throughout this year. Um.

0:01:26.640 --> 0:01:28.640
<v Speaker 1>So it comes as a kind of bitter pill at

0:01:28.680 --> 0:01:31.920
<v Speaker 1>your end to see that their bonuses are probably being

0:01:32.319 --> 0:01:34.640
<v Speaker 1>going to be flat and that you know, managers are

0:01:34.680 --> 0:01:40.640
<v Speaker 1>managing expectations about a more gloomy environment. So I mean,

0:01:40.720 --> 0:01:43.240
<v Speaker 1>given that a lot of people are experiencing reductions and

0:01:43.319 --> 0:01:46.200
<v Speaker 1>pay will it be something that traders will just have

0:01:46.280 --> 0:01:48.400
<v Speaker 1>to eat or will they look to other banks to

0:01:48.440 --> 0:01:52.640
<v Speaker 1>see what they're doing. How does this go down? Well,

0:01:52.760 --> 0:01:54.360
<v Speaker 1>vunny right now, it's going down like a red bull,

0:01:54.920 --> 0:01:58.360
<v Speaker 1>as you can imagine. But BA is a consumer bank,

0:01:58.720 --> 0:02:00.240
<v Speaker 1>you know, right now, less than a fifth of its

0:02:00.320 --> 0:02:03.040
<v Speaker 1>net income comes from trading. And on top of that,

0:02:03.200 --> 0:02:05.720
<v Speaker 1>you know, there is this legacy of a financial crisis

0:02:05.760 --> 0:02:09.280
<v Speaker 1>and rank of the optics of paying big bonuses when

0:02:09.320 --> 0:02:11.880
<v Speaker 1>the rest of the economy is doing so poorly. It's

0:02:11.919 --> 0:02:14.760
<v Speaker 1>something I think the banks leadership is acutely aware of.

0:02:15.000 --> 0:02:17.880
<v Speaker 1>So I don't think there are a lot of options here.

0:02:17.919 --> 0:02:20.720
<v Speaker 1>Of course, as Paul says, you know, managers will advocate

0:02:20.760 --> 0:02:23.560
<v Speaker 1>for their staff. They will point to those strong pm

0:02:23.639 --> 0:02:25.359
<v Speaker 1>L numbers and say, hey, look, we made a big

0:02:25.360 --> 0:02:29.080
<v Speaker 1>contribution to the banks making money this year. Um, so

0:02:29.120 --> 0:02:31.440
<v Speaker 1>we need to be properly compensated for it. But I'm

0:02:31.480 --> 0:02:34.400
<v Speaker 1>not sure that that's going to be particularly convincing given

0:02:34.440 --> 0:02:36.720
<v Speaker 1>this terrible environment that the rest of the U. S.

0:02:36.760 --> 0:02:39.840
<v Speaker 1>Economy is in. So Lennon, when I worked on Wall Street,

0:02:39.919 --> 0:02:43.360
<v Speaker 1>you know, bonuses would make up, particularly for senior people,

0:02:43.400 --> 0:02:49.160
<v Speaker 1>maybe of their total compensation. I believe that's changed really

0:02:49.240 --> 0:02:51.680
<v Speaker 1>since the financial crisis, is that they've gone to more

0:02:51.680 --> 0:02:55.280
<v Speaker 1>of a fixed salary model. But still, uh, the bonuses

0:02:55.320 --> 0:02:57.400
<v Speaker 1>have a big, big impact for a lot of folks.

0:02:58.680 --> 0:03:00.960
<v Speaker 1>That's right, Pearl, And well, we're not talking about the

0:03:01.000 --> 0:03:04.040
<v Speaker 1>outsized bonuses that you know you might have been discussing

0:03:04.080 --> 0:03:07.440
<v Speaker 1>in the nineties, but we're looking bonuses are still a

0:03:07.520 --> 0:03:11.160
<v Speaker 1>huge deal for everyone on Wall Street. So this comes

0:03:11.240 --> 0:03:15.320
<v Speaker 1>as a very disappointing signal. You know, the managers are

0:03:15.320 --> 0:03:19.040
<v Speaker 1>managing expectations, and as Bonnie said, other banks are watching

0:03:19.040 --> 0:03:22.280
<v Speaker 1>this closely as well to see how they'll compensate their

0:03:22.320 --> 0:03:24.920
<v Speaker 1>staff and to kind of see what the herd is doing. Right,

0:03:25.000 --> 0:03:27.560
<v Speaker 1>this might be cover for other banks to say, hey, listen,

0:03:27.639 --> 0:03:30.040
<v Speaker 1>Via is not paying as much, and um, you know,

0:03:30.160 --> 0:03:32.840
<v Speaker 1>the environment is bad for everyone. On top of which,

0:03:32.960 --> 0:03:36.200
<v Speaker 1>we have other banks that are actually planning to cut staff.

0:03:36.320 --> 0:03:38.560
<v Speaker 1>So right now, Beve has said they're going to keep

0:03:38.600 --> 0:03:41.840
<v Speaker 1>everyone's jobs fast this year, but then again they're managing

0:03:41.840 --> 0:03:44.320
<v Speaker 1>expectations that that might mean that everyone doesn't get paid

0:03:44.320 --> 0:03:49.120
<v Speaker 1>as well. So what options do dissatisfied traders have? I mean,

0:03:49.640 --> 0:03:53.760
<v Speaker 1>can they just walk across the street anymore? It sounds

0:03:53.800 --> 0:03:56.440
<v Speaker 1>like that's not really an option, and I think everyone

0:03:56.600 --> 0:03:59.040
<v Speaker 1>is fully aware of that. Right It's still early days,

0:03:59.040 --> 0:04:03.200
<v Speaker 1>and it's possible that managers can go back to executives

0:04:03.200 --> 0:04:05.840
<v Speaker 1>and say, look, my team deserves more and lobby really

0:04:05.880 --> 0:04:09.720
<v Speaker 1>hard for more. But still, you know, the jobs are

0:04:09.760 --> 0:04:12.640
<v Speaker 1>are hard to come by these days on Wall Street,

0:04:12.720 --> 0:04:15.080
<v Speaker 1>and I think everyone is pretty aware of that. So

0:04:15.240 --> 0:04:17.279
<v Speaker 1>right now, I think a lot of traders are happy

0:04:17.320 --> 0:04:20.320
<v Speaker 1>to still have their jobs. Um, and so you know,

0:04:20.640 --> 0:04:23.440
<v Speaker 1>they don't really have a lot of options, particularly if

0:04:23.480 --> 0:04:25.720
<v Speaker 1>we think that next year there may be some more

0:04:25.760 --> 0:04:28.840
<v Speaker 1>cuts to come across the industry. So have we heard

0:04:28.839 --> 0:04:31.960
<v Speaker 1>anything leland from some of the other big players the

0:04:32.400 --> 0:04:35.479
<v Speaker 1>Goldman Sachs is the Morgan Stanley's of the world, or

0:04:35.920 --> 0:04:39.440
<v Speaker 1>a kind of upfront floating this idea. I think the

0:04:39.520 --> 0:04:41.800
<v Speaker 1>ave is early floating this idea. And again I have

0:04:41.880 --> 0:04:45.040
<v Speaker 1>to stress that these are very early conversations, Paul. You

0:04:45.040 --> 0:04:48.000
<v Speaker 1>know that you know there are some expectations being managed

0:04:48.000 --> 0:04:51.880
<v Speaker 1>early on, but that obviously this will raise the level

0:04:51.880 --> 0:04:53.919
<v Speaker 1>of the discussion and you know, cause a lot of

0:04:54.040 --> 0:04:56.520
<v Speaker 1>debate I think, to go on internally about how much

0:04:56.520 --> 0:04:59.360
<v Speaker 1>trader should be paid. UM. We are watching the other

0:04:59.400 --> 0:05:02.200
<v Speaker 1>banks very closely as well to see what indications are

0:05:02.200 --> 0:05:06.120
<v Speaker 1>coming out of them. UM, and the survey consultants that

0:05:06.160 --> 0:05:08.320
<v Speaker 1>we talked to, you know, the recruitment consultants and the

0:05:08.400 --> 0:05:12.160
<v Speaker 1>pay consultants have guided higher on trading. And so this

0:05:12.200 --> 0:05:15.159
<v Speaker 1>comes as a real disappointment because the expectations are already

0:05:15.160 --> 0:05:18.719
<v Speaker 1>set high for this trading bonanza and now we're already

0:05:18.720 --> 0:05:21.320
<v Speaker 1>starting to see early signs that that's really being tamped

0:05:21.320 --> 0:05:23.760
<v Speaker 1>down across the street. And I think that that may

0:05:23.800 --> 0:05:26.280
<v Speaker 1>be a trend that we see with other banks coming

0:05:26.279 --> 0:05:28.360
<v Speaker 1>in the in the next couple of weeks. I mean,

0:05:28.400 --> 0:05:30.000
<v Speaker 1>what can you do. It's not exactly like you can

0:05:30.040 --> 0:05:33.279
<v Speaker 1>call in the union what happens in cases like this,

0:05:33.640 --> 0:05:37.560
<v Speaker 1>and surely we've seen it before. Yeah, it's interesting because

0:05:38.120 --> 0:05:40.560
<v Speaker 1>I think on the street, Um, you know, people talk

0:05:40.600 --> 0:05:44.359
<v Speaker 1>about everything being very merit and performance based, right, and

0:05:44.400 --> 0:05:45.920
<v Speaker 1>so a lot of people in the street, if they

0:05:46.240 --> 0:05:48.760
<v Speaker 1>if their division that their desk brought in you know,

0:05:49.800 --> 0:05:52.880
<v Speaker 1>bumping revenues, then they expect to get you know, not

0:05:52.880 --> 0:05:56.520
<v Speaker 1>not exactly that amount, but at least directionally a good

0:05:56.520 --> 0:06:00.839
<v Speaker 1>bump in their compensation, right. And so I think this

0:06:00.960 --> 0:06:03.599
<v Speaker 1>kind of flies in the face of what people on

0:06:03.640 --> 0:06:07.040
<v Speaker 1>the street, um, you know, really think they deserve. And um,

0:06:07.240 --> 0:06:09.599
<v Speaker 1>it's it's going to be a bit of a cultural shock,

0:06:09.640 --> 0:06:13.240
<v Speaker 1>I believe, because you know, it's just a very strange year.

0:06:13.560 --> 0:06:16.120
<v Speaker 1>In a normal year, if the trading test made a

0:06:16.200 --> 0:06:19.000
<v Speaker 1>lot of money, you'd expect to get a decent bonus.

0:06:19.080 --> 0:06:21.880
<v Speaker 1>And this year, I think, just because of the broader

0:06:21.920 --> 0:06:25.360
<v Speaker 1>context we're in the banks simply are aware that you know,

0:06:25.400 --> 0:06:27.880
<v Speaker 1>paying big banker bonuses is not going to be a

0:06:27.880 --> 0:06:30.640
<v Speaker 1>good look. Let's also just point out that they're still

0:06:30.680 --> 0:06:33.000
<v Speaker 1>getting bonuses, just not more than last year, but they're

0:06:33.080 --> 0:06:36.200
<v Speaker 1>the sales and trading pool is at last year's level,

0:06:36.520 --> 0:06:38.920
<v Speaker 1>even though revenue obviously has done this year. And we

0:06:38.960 --> 0:06:40.520
<v Speaker 1>have to leave it there. But thank you for your

0:06:40.560 --> 0:06:43.320
<v Speaker 1>story from lannan noon, and you can see on your

0:06:43.320 --> 0:06:46.560
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg about Bank of America and traders getting jewelhood. There

0:06:49.320 --> 0:06:51.720
<v Speaker 1>a slew of data to pass through today. We had

0:06:51.720 --> 0:06:54.920
<v Speaker 1>a whole bunch of jobs data earlier this morning, durable

0:06:55.000 --> 0:06:57.920
<v Speaker 1>goods orders, We have the fo m C minutes later

0:06:57.960 --> 0:07:00.320
<v Speaker 1>this afternoon, and then of course the non nation of

0:07:00.400 --> 0:07:04.479
<v Speaker 1>Janet Yellen to be Secretary of the Treasury. When you

0:07:04.520 --> 0:07:06.760
<v Speaker 1>have days like that, you just have to speak to

0:07:06.880 --> 0:07:10.760
<v Speaker 1>Danielle di Martino, Booth CEO and director of Intelligence at

0:07:10.840 --> 0:07:14.119
<v Speaker 1>Quill Intelligence. She's a former advisor at the Dallas Federal

0:07:14.160 --> 0:07:17.440
<v Speaker 1>Reserve and a Bloomberg opinion columnist. Danielle, thanks so much

0:07:17.480 --> 0:07:21.520
<v Speaker 1>for joining us on a very busy Thanksgiving Eve. First off,

0:07:21.520 --> 0:07:24.840
<v Speaker 1>I list love to get your thoughts on the nomination

0:07:24.880 --> 0:07:29.640
<v Speaker 1>of Janet Yellen for Secretary of the Treasury. Well, I

0:07:29.680 --> 0:07:33.480
<v Speaker 1>think that this was a very convenient political move on

0:07:33.720 --> 0:07:37.120
<v Speaker 1>president like Biden's part, I'm I'm no big fan of it,

0:07:37.160 --> 0:07:39.200
<v Speaker 1>and in fact, I wrote a long book about it

0:07:39.880 --> 0:07:44.760
<v Speaker 1>about and I detailed Janet Yellen's philosophy in it. And

0:07:44.800 --> 0:07:48.880
<v Speaker 1>we have to remember that she is a trained labor economists.

0:07:49.400 --> 0:07:51.320
<v Speaker 1>So you think back to her days at the San

0:07:51.360 --> 0:07:55.160
<v Speaker 1>Francisco Fete and companies that we haven't talked about in years,

0:07:55.240 --> 0:07:59.440
<v Speaker 1>like New Century and Countrywide Mortgage. These were in her backyard.

0:07:59.720 --> 0:08:02.880
<v Speaker 1>And at the root of being unaware of the subprime

0:08:03.000 --> 0:08:08.680
<v Speaker 1>crisis building on the West Coast was Janney Ellen's unappreciation

0:08:08.800 --> 0:08:12.520
<v Speaker 1>and lack of knowledge and experience with the financial markets.

0:08:12.800 --> 0:08:15.280
<v Speaker 1>If you think back to a year ago when we

0:08:15.280 --> 0:08:19.400
<v Speaker 1>were in the not QE era and overnight repo funding

0:08:19.480 --> 0:08:22.720
<v Speaker 1>strains and reserves not being kind of. These are very

0:08:22.760 --> 0:08:25.720
<v Speaker 1>technical type of issues that as Secretary of the Treasury

0:08:25.960 --> 0:08:28.920
<v Speaker 1>you would need to be highly familiar with. So again,

0:08:29.160 --> 0:08:32.000
<v Speaker 1>I think markets are applauding the fact that she has

0:08:32.000 --> 0:08:34.560
<v Speaker 1>said that that that you could reopen the Fed Reserve

0:08:34.600 --> 0:08:37.440
<v Speaker 1>Act and allow the Federal reserves by stocks, that negative

0:08:37.440 --> 0:08:41.360
<v Speaker 1>interest rates could be imposed under the under certain circumstances.

0:08:41.400 --> 0:08:45.160
<v Speaker 1>I think she would certainly spearhead a digital currency in

0:08:45.280 --> 0:08:49.040
<v Speaker 1>order to deliver money directly to individuals, helicopter money, so

0:08:49.120 --> 0:08:52.360
<v Speaker 1>to speak. But again, um, these are these are the

0:08:52.440 --> 0:08:56.320
<v Speaker 1>types of policies that have tended to UH to help

0:08:56.320 --> 0:09:00.640
<v Speaker 1>out the top one percent looking back in history, and

0:09:00.640 --> 0:09:04.640
<v Speaker 1>and end up being a backlash, if you will, against

0:09:04.679 --> 0:09:09.120
<v Speaker 1>those who need it the most. Yes, do you think

0:09:09.200 --> 0:09:11.840
<v Speaker 1>that just for the moment, she will work a sort

0:09:11.840 --> 0:09:14.120
<v Speaker 1>of hand in hand with the FED and try and

0:09:14.160 --> 0:09:19.160
<v Speaker 1>do something in terms of retrievings some of those emergency

0:09:19.200 --> 0:09:23.320
<v Speaker 1>funds that Stephen manutition is as buddhiside. Well, I certainly

0:09:23.320 --> 0:09:26.240
<v Speaker 1>think that that will be priority number one. Of course,

0:09:26.520 --> 0:09:29.920
<v Speaker 1>it's not as easy as look. I think of the

0:09:29.960 --> 0:09:32.160
<v Speaker 1>months and months we've been watching Minutian go back and

0:09:32.200 --> 0:09:35.959
<v Speaker 1>forth between McConnell and Pelosi. These are these You need

0:09:36.000 --> 0:09:40.520
<v Speaker 1>an extremely savvy politician UH to make these deals. And

0:09:40.559 --> 0:09:42.800
<v Speaker 1>it's not just a matter of flipping a switch. You

0:09:42.880 --> 0:09:46.960
<v Speaker 1>have to get congressional approval UH to have these funds reallocated.

0:09:47.320 --> 0:09:51.520
<v Speaker 1>And we don't know for sure what Manutions motivations are,

0:09:51.800 --> 0:09:55.280
<v Speaker 1>but this could be such that McConnell could, in the

0:09:55.320 --> 0:09:59.360
<v Speaker 1>Continuing Resolution December the eleventh, have his skinny stimulus bill

0:09:59.480 --> 0:10:02.440
<v Speaker 1>of a half trillion. You tack on what has been

0:10:02.800 --> 0:10:05.280
<v Speaker 1>taken away from the Fed and you get to a trillion.

0:10:05.600 --> 0:10:08.760
<v Speaker 1>But politically, the optics from McConnell would be very favorable

0:10:08.920 --> 0:10:11.600
<v Speaker 1>because there would only be a new half a trillion

0:10:11.640 --> 0:10:15.480
<v Speaker 1>stimulus package attached. So again, we don't know where Minutan

0:10:15.559 --> 0:10:18.320
<v Speaker 1>is coming from, but we do know that Congress would

0:10:18.360 --> 0:10:22.360
<v Speaker 1>have to would have to sign into law reopening these lines,

0:10:22.440 --> 0:10:26.800
<v Speaker 1>these credit uh facilities at the Reserve. All right, Daniel,

0:10:26.840 --> 0:10:29.600
<v Speaker 1>let's go to the ECO page on the Bloomberg terminal here.

0:10:29.880 --> 0:10:32.120
<v Speaker 1>What are some of your key takeaways here from some

0:10:32.200 --> 0:10:36.440
<v Speaker 1>of the economic data we saw this morning. So, you know,

0:10:37.280 --> 0:10:39.920
<v Speaker 1>besides the you know, as we were listening um coming

0:10:39.960 --> 0:10:43.000
<v Speaker 1>into the segment, the back to back increases in regular

0:10:43.040 --> 0:10:47.560
<v Speaker 1>state initial jobless claims. Yet we're trying at GROL Intelligence

0:10:47.640 --> 0:10:51.240
<v Speaker 1>right now to kind of back into what the survey

0:10:51.280 --> 0:10:55.040
<v Speaker 1>week looks like for non farm payrolds. Next week is

0:10:55.040 --> 0:10:57.760
<v Speaker 1>when we finally get the we call it the bathtub

0:10:57.800 --> 0:11:00.640
<v Speaker 1>where you get every source of a mayor are consclaiming

0:11:00.679 --> 0:11:05.040
<v Speaker 1>unemployment insurance in some form. We saw that tick up

0:11:05.720 --> 0:11:08.080
<v Speaker 1>this week for the weekend in November seventh to the

0:11:08.120 --> 0:11:11.640
<v Speaker 1>first time since August, and we know that the last

0:11:11.640 --> 0:11:14.240
<v Speaker 1>two weeks have come up, so we're anticipating that when

0:11:14.240 --> 0:11:16.520
<v Speaker 1>we get that final print for the survey week, which

0:11:16.520 --> 0:11:18.960
<v Speaker 1>always includes the twelfth of the month, we get that

0:11:18.960 --> 0:11:22.000
<v Speaker 1>next Thursday morning, right before the payroll report, we're anticipating

0:11:22.000 --> 0:11:25.000
<v Speaker 1>that that number goes up again. So you're seeing economists

0:11:25.040 --> 0:11:28.800
<v Speaker 1>across the street scrambled to take down their their November

0:11:28.840 --> 0:11:32.840
<v Speaker 1>unemployment payrolls forecast. And if you look inside the weeds

0:11:33.040 --> 0:11:36.320
<v Speaker 1>of the University of Mission Consumer Confidence report, you also

0:11:36.400 --> 0:11:40.280
<v Speaker 1>saw that employment expectations came in at the lowest levels

0:11:40.360 --> 0:11:45.040
<v Speaker 1>in April. So we're definitely starting to see some backtracking

0:11:45.280 --> 0:11:47.640
<v Speaker 1>in the labor data, which is of course key to

0:11:47.720 --> 0:11:51.880
<v Speaker 1>a consumer driven economy. So what are you anticipating, Danielle,

0:11:52.040 --> 0:11:55.920
<v Speaker 1>Does this economy show more scarring zone we're seeing forecast

0:11:56.040 --> 0:12:00.600
<v Speaker 1>of I don't think. I think we're about six weeks

0:12:00.720 --> 0:12:06.040
<v Speaker 1>behind Europe in terms of the coronavirus UH and by

0:12:06.040 --> 0:12:11.240
<v Speaker 1>the way, not imposing restrictions. So I do see economists

0:12:11.280 --> 0:12:14.600
<v Speaker 1>across the pond taking down their Q four estimates, and

0:12:14.600 --> 0:12:17.080
<v Speaker 1>I would foresee that the United States could easily slip

0:12:17.120 --> 0:12:20.439
<v Speaker 1>back into contractions into recession at the end of the

0:12:20.480 --> 0:12:25.360
<v Speaker 1>fourth quarter going into the first quarter of given purely

0:12:25.400 --> 0:12:28.480
<v Speaker 1>what we're seeing in terms of of of of people

0:12:28.679 --> 0:12:32.559
<v Speaker 1>choosing to be less mobile in states where there are

0:12:32.559 --> 0:12:35.800
<v Speaker 1>not even restrictions, and what we're seeing in terms of

0:12:35.840 --> 0:12:39.360
<v Speaker 1>small business revenues and small businesses that are open. These

0:12:39.360 --> 0:12:43.640
<v Speaker 1>are declining figures. Leisure and hospitality, job openings have come

0:12:43.840 --> 0:12:48.000
<v Speaker 1>down appreciately. There's their lowest August. These are all signs

0:12:48.080 --> 0:12:51.800
<v Speaker 1>that the economy is going into a retrenchment because the

0:12:51.840 --> 0:12:55.520
<v Speaker 1>coronavirus is becoming so severe in the United States that

0:12:55.559 --> 0:13:00.440
<v Speaker 1>it cannot be ignored. Danielle, we appears that we have

0:13:00.760 --> 0:13:04.439
<v Speaker 1>a new president here. Um it appears that it might

0:13:04.480 --> 0:13:07.880
<v Speaker 1>be a split government once again in terms of UH.

0:13:07.920 --> 0:13:11.360
<v Speaker 1>It appears that the Republicans may continue to control the center.

0:13:11.440 --> 0:13:13.840
<v Speaker 1>Off to see what happens in Georgia. How did you

0:13:14.000 --> 0:13:17.040
<v Speaker 1>view what was your key takeaway from this political season

0:13:17.040 --> 0:13:20.640
<v Speaker 1>and kind of where we find ourselves now? Well, I

0:13:20.679 --> 0:13:23.679
<v Speaker 1>think I think more than anything else, the American voters

0:13:24.040 --> 0:13:27.880
<v Speaker 1>have spoken that they're not divided at all, They're in

0:13:27.920 --> 0:13:32.199
<v Speaker 1>the middle. When you look at the least appreciative appreciated

0:13:32.320 --> 0:13:36.800
<v Speaker 1>story of this last election. It is the change of

0:13:36.800 --> 0:13:40.400
<v Speaker 1>of the change of the guard in the House of Representatives.

0:13:41.240 --> 0:13:43.000
<v Speaker 1>And you know, Nancy Pelosi is going to have the

0:13:43.040 --> 0:13:47.920
<v Speaker 1>slimmest margin of majority in two decades, and that I

0:13:48.000 --> 0:13:53.040
<v Speaker 1>think is less appreciated because you will have more of

0:13:53.080 --> 0:13:57.880
<v Speaker 1>a bifurcation between the administration, assuming these two Georgia's seats

0:13:57.920 --> 0:14:00.600
<v Speaker 1>go to the GOP, which is a big assumption. Assuming

0:14:00.640 --> 0:14:05.120
<v Speaker 1>that that is the case, you really will have an

0:14:05.120 --> 0:14:11.360
<v Speaker 1>administration in one party in a Congress largely in the other. Danielle,

0:14:11.360 --> 0:14:13.200
<v Speaker 1>really quickly, because we're out of time. Do we get

0:14:13.200 --> 0:14:17.000
<v Speaker 1>a fourth round of to meet us fiscal Oh? Oh, absolutely.

0:14:17.040 --> 0:14:18.800
<v Speaker 1>I think that this will be priority number one. You're

0:14:18.800 --> 0:14:21.160
<v Speaker 1>not going to see mass addictions and the Cares Act

0:14:21.280 --> 0:14:25.200
<v Speaker 1>unemployment benefits expire when upwards of thirteen million Americans are

0:14:25.200 --> 0:14:29.760
<v Speaker 1>collecting these emergency forms of unemployment insurance. Danielle, thank you

0:14:29.880 --> 0:14:32.200
<v Speaker 1>so much for joining us once again today. Danielle Di

0:14:32.320 --> 0:14:36.480
<v Speaker 1>Martineo Booth is CEO and director of Quill Intelligence, former

0:14:36.520 --> 0:14:40.480
<v Speaker 1>advisor of Course after Dallas FED also Bloomberg Opinion Columns,

0:14:40.480 --> 0:14:44.200
<v Speaker 1>and she's based in Dallas typically and we thank her again.

0:14:44.360 --> 0:14:48.160
<v Speaker 1>That raft of economic data today will pitch forward to

0:14:48.200 --> 0:14:51.160
<v Speaker 1>the f O m C meeting and all of that

0:14:51.360 --> 0:14:54.240
<v Speaker 1>later on, So do tune in from two pm onwards

0:14:54.320 --> 0:15:00.000
<v Speaker 1>for all that emerges from there. For the longest time

0:15:00.320 --> 0:15:03.160
<v Speaker 1>during this pandemic, oil has been just really hovering around

0:15:03.160 --> 0:15:05.600
<v Speaker 1>that forty level. We've actually had a lift here over

0:15:05.640 --> 0:15:08.200
<v Speaker 1>the past a week or so. We're up another one

0:15:08.200 --> 0:15:11.000
<v Speaker 1>percent today oil w t I oil trading at forty

0:15:11.000 --> 0:15:15.200
<v Speaker 1>five dollars thirty five cents per gown again, a lift

0:15:15.200 --> 0:15:17.960
<v Speaker 1>off of that forty range it had been hovering out

0:15:17.960 --> 0:15:19.120
<v Speaker 1>for a long time. To get a sense of kind

0:15:19.120 --> 0:15:23.200
<v Speaker 1>of what this means, what's driving it, we welcome John Kilduff.

0:15:23.320 --> 0:15:26.320
<v Speaker 1>He joins us. He's a founder of Again Capital. John,

0:15:26.320 --> 0:15:28.440
<v Speaker 1>thanks so much for joining us here. You know, it's

0:15:28.520 --> 0:15:32.200
<v Speaker 1>it appears that investors across various asset classes here are

0:15:32.280 --> 0:15:34.960
<v Speaker 1>willing to look towards the other side of this pandemic

0:15:35.000 --> 0:15:38.320
<v Speaker 1>and start to really discount uh pick up an economic

0:15:38.360 --> 0:15:41.480
<v Speaker 1>activity UH next year. What do you see in the

0:15:41.520 --> 0:15:47.320
<v Speaker 1>supply demand of the oil markets globally, I mean, for oil,

0:15:47.360 --> 0:15:49.760
<v Speaker 1>there's no doubt that that is a key factor here.

0:15:50.400 --> 0:15:54.000
<v Speaker 1>Oil has really been the covid trade or pandemic trade

0:15:54.080 --> 0:15:58.120
<v Speaker 1>or now vaccine trade across all the markets. Um. I mean,

0:15:58.440 --> 0:16:01.840
<v Speaker 1>we had a significant dip and things were looking rather bleak,

0:16:01.960 --> 0:16:04.600
<v Speaker 1>just as several weeks ago when we saw those renewed

0:16:04.640 --> 0:16:07.920
<v Speaker 1>lockdowns in Europe, and of course the raising Caselow is here,

0:16:07.960 --> 0:16:11.400
<v Speaker 1>but now with the successive VEX positive vaccine news, that's

0:16:11.400 --> 0:16:14.880
<v Speaker 1>exactly it. And the sort of connecting the dots here

0:16:14.920 --> 0:16:17.640
<v Speaker 1>is that you can see the pent up demand, um,

0:16:17.720 --> 0:16:21.280
<v Speaker 1>you know, for for transportation, for travel, um, just what

0:16:21.360 --> 0:16:23.080
<v Speaker 1>we saw over the weekend where there was you know,

0:16:23.160 --> 0:16:27.480
<v Speaker 1>the highest number of airport visitors since early March, and

0:16:27.560 --> 0:16:32.840
<v Speaker 1>so jet fuel has been crushed consistently down Paul, versus

0:16:32.880 --> 0:16:35.720
<v Speaker 1>that you know year on year measures um, and it's

0:16:35.720 --> 0:16:38.040
<v Speaker 1>really been weighing. That factor has really been weighing on

0:16:38.040 --> 0:16:41.080
<v Speaker 1>this market. And the pent up demand is obvious and

0:16:41.120 --> 0:16:43.880
<v Speaker 1>it's kind of come roaring back. And I really see

0:16:44.880 --> 0:16:48.440
<v Speaker 1>a big pick up next year for gasoline and for

0:16:48.440 --> 0:16:51.480
<v Speaker 1>for jet fuel and diesel fuels. John, why are you

0:16:51.520 --> 0:16:57.520
<v Speaker 1>convinced that this is longer than just a Thanksgiving blip? Well,

0:16:57.520 --> 0:17:03.360
<v Speaker 1>I think there's the hopefulness out there and and and

0:17:03.560 --> 0:17:04.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, I hate to say it, but the apparently

0:17:05.040 --> 0:17:09.600
<v Speaker 1>almost even disregard uh for for folks that they are

0:17:09.680 --> 0:17:11.920
<v Speaker 1>going to uh, they're going to travel. I mean they're

0:17:11.960 --> 0:17:14.320
<v Speaker 1>they're they're going to travel after this Thanksgiving. I think

0:17:14.359 --> 0:17:16.240
<v Speaker 1>that there's the setup is gonna be that you're gonna

0:17:16.240 --> 0:17:18.840
<v Speaker 1>go travel for Christmas as well, um, and get in

0:17:18.880 --> 0:17:22.000
<v Speaker 1>their cars this time even more so and and continue

0:17:22.000 --> 0:17:23.760
<v Speaker 1>to travel. The other thing too, is I think people

0:17:23.760 --> 0:17:26.880
<v Speaker 1>are starting to realize that it appears that air travel

0:17:27.520 --> 0:17:31.120
<v Speaker 1>is safe, that the the that the the planes air

0:17:31.160 --> 0:17:37.440
<v Speaker 1>systems are not engendering or in inculcating uh COVID nineteen cases.

0:17:37.760 --> 0:17:39.520
<v Speaker 1>And I think that word is getting out there and

0:17:39.560 --> 0:17:42.320
<v Speaker 1>that is helping as well. So we're sitting we're seeing

0:17:42.320 --> 0:17:44.760
<v Speaker 1>the beginning of the rebound. But the thing about it

0:17:44.800 --> 0:17:47.000
<v Speaker 1>is that, as Paul mentioned, we're looking ahead here and

0:17:47.040 --> 0:17:48.960
<v Speaker 1>there's a ton of pent up demand that's going to

0:17:49.080 --> 0:17:52.160
<v Speaker 1>hit the petroleum market. All right, So, John, so that's

0:17:52.240 --> 0:17:55.480
<v Speaker 1>kind of the demand side of the equation. Talk to

0:17:55.560 --> 0:17:59.480
<v Speaker 1>us about the supply side globally here, How is OPEC behaving,

0:17:59.480 --> 0:18:04.800
<v Speaker 1>how's RUSH behaving and meeting the US, Well, they're they're

0:18:04.800 --> 0:18:09.879
<v Speaker 1>they're OPEC plus, which includes Russia, UM have been rather disciplined.

0:18:09.920 --> 0:18:12.119
<v Speaker 1>I mean, there they are itching to put more oil

0:18:12.160 --> 0:18:14.320
<v Speaker 1>on the market, which is going to I think hold

0:18:14.359 --> 0:18:18.679
<v Speaker 1>back any kind of potentially substantial UH price rise. But

0:18:18.760 --> 0:18:22.760
<v Speaker 1>I think the discipline should prove sufficient to get UH,

0:18:22.880 --> 0:18:26.040
<v Speaker 1>certainly brent over fifty dollars a barrel with relative ease

0:18:26.160 --> 0:18:28.680
<v Speaker 1>come the beginning of the new year, UH and push

0:18:28.880 --> 0:18:33.160
<v Speaker 1>w T I prices similarly up towards that level. Right now,

0:18:33.320 --> 0:18:36.320
<v Speaker 1>if if things were to snap back meaningfully, UH, we

0:18:36.560 --> 0:18:40.280
<v Speaker 1>find ourselves in a very tightly supplied situation and and

0:18:40.280 --> 0:18:43.840
<v Speaker 1>see a draw down pretty quickly of global inventories. So

0:18:43.960 --> 0:18:46.240
<v Speaker 1>I mean, to the extent that these vaccines work out,

0:18:46.240 --> 0:18:48.479
<v Speaker 1>and again this thesis of mine that the pent up

0:18:48.480 --> 0:18:52.399
<v Speaker 1>demand is there, UM, it's gonna get real interesting in

0:18:52.400 --> 0:18:55.480
<v Speaker 1>in terms of prices in the US. Two now haven't

0:18:55.480 --> 0:18:59.240
<v Speaker 1>been you know, just raked over by this low price environment.

0:18:59.680 --> 0:19:02.960
<v Speaker 1>Um we UH, the US is going to be a

0:19:02.960 --> 0:19:05.680
<v Speaker 1>diminished factor and certainly won't get the encouragement in terms

0:19:05.720 --> 0:19:09.679
<v Speaker 1>of drilling uh an exploration activity under the Biden administration

0:19:09.720 --> 0:19:12.240
<v Speaker 1>that they had under the Trump administration. So that's also

0:19:12.280 --> 0:19:14.920
<v Speaker 1>a factor. So what do companies do at a time

0:19:15.000 --> 0:19:17.560
<v Speaker 1>like this, when their stock prices are just all over

0:19:17.600 --> 0:19:19.520
<v Speaker 1>the place, John, You know, every time oil goes up,

0:19:19.640 --> 0:19:22.240
<v Speaker 1>they see a nice gain and then a law something.

0:19:22.359 --> 0:19:27.360
<v Speaker 1>Do they just ignore their daily stock market fluctuations. Well,

0:19:27.359 --> 0:19:29.720
<v Speaker 1>they have to and I and actually what they've been doing,

0:19:30.040 --> 0:19:33.640
<v Speaker 1>uh is well suffering under it, suffering under the environment,

0:19:33.680 --> 0:19:38.120
<v Speaker 1>and and really retrenching. I mean there's been considerable capital

0:19:38.119 --> 0:19:43.520
<v Speaker 1>expenditure cutbacks, considerable you know, even self examination of what

0:19:43.600 --> 0:19:46.880
<v Speaker 1>their future holes in terms, especially with the climate uh

0:19:47.160 --> 0:19:50.919
<v Speaker 1>pushback movement. So um, but yeah, I mean so you know,

0:19:50.960 --> 0:19:52.920
<v Speaker 1>but you've seen the companies that have really done a

0:19:53.200 --> 0:19:56.400
<v Speaker 1>Holman's work on this, like Chevron get making themselves almost

0:19:56.400 --> 0:19:59.479
<v Speaker 1>a bulletproof Now. I think going forward and the prices

0:19:59.480 --> 0:20:02.280
<v Speaker 1>pick up, they'll only benefit. I think it's on Mobile

0:20:02.320 --> 0:20:05.399
<v Speaker 1>to a to a lesser degree. But um and the

0:20:05.440 --> 0:20:08.280
<v Speaker 1>other players that the companies that are left standing in

0:20:08.320 --> 0:20:10.480
<v Speaker 1>the aftermath of this are going to do well. It's

0:20:10.480 --> 0:20:13.400
<v Speaker 1>like almost a free call option on oil prices going

0:20:13.480 --> 0:20:16.720
<v Speaker 1>up from here. I think it's a very attractive sector, uh,

0:20:16.840 --> 0:20:19.640
<v Speaker 1>for for the upcoming year. John. And we can see

0:20:19.640 --> 0:20:21.680
<v Speaker 1>some more pain in the oil patch here. Maybe it's

0:20:21.680 --> 0:20:24.360
<v Speaker 1>more consolidation of some of the weaker balance heated players.

0:20:25.320 --> 0:20:27.320
<v Speaker 1>There's no doubt the pain. It's not over yet, and

0:20:27.359 --> 0:20:29.919
<v Speaker 1>I think to the extent that the prospects start to

0:20:29.960 --> 0:20:32.960
<v Speaker 1>look brighter price wise and industry wide. Uh, you'll see

0:20:32.960 --> 0:20:37.000
<v Speaker 1>another round of the stronger, you know, like the Chevrons

0:20:37.160 --> 0:20:40.160
<v Speaker 1>getting back out there on the acquisition trail and and

0:20:40.280 --> 0:20:43.720
<v Speaker 1>consolidating uh, their position even more so. So you're gonna

0:20:43.760 --> 0:20:48.000
<v Speaker 1>have a smaller group of stronger players with the bigger

0:20:48.119 --> 0:20:52.119
<v Speaker 1>portfolios of production, but also of discipline that they won't

0:20:52.160 --> 0:20:54.840
<v Speaker 1>just drill for drilling sake or to cover cash flow

0:20:54.880 --> 0:20:58.600
<v Speaker 1>requirements for their for their loans and inventures. They're gonna

0:20:58.680 --> 0:21:01.400
<v Speaker 1>they're gonna be moderate, and that would that should also

0:21:01.480 --> 0:21:04.880
<v Speaker 1>help to sort of set us up for a more

0:21:05.280 --> 0:21:09.560
<v Speaker 1>consistent higher price than what we just went through. All right, John,

0:21:09.600 --> 0:21:11.760
<v Speaker 1>Always a pleasure of speaking with you and getting an update.

0:21:11.920 --> 0:21:15.120
<v Speaker 1>That is, John killed off their founding partner again Capital

0:21:15.600 --> 0:21:18.080
<v Speaker 1>and of course crude oil today above forty five dollars

0:21:18.119 --> 0:21:20.720
<v Speaker 1>of barrel once again forty five thirty three of one

0:21:20.760 --> 0:21:23.520
<v Speaker 1>percent or forty two cents for a barrel of w

0:21:23.680 --> 0:21:27.959
<v Speaker 1>T I and Brent crude is above forty eight dollars

0:21:27.960 --> 0:21:30.040
<v Speaker 1>of arrel. Of course, there's always that spread there between

0:21:30.040 --> 0:21:36.000
<v Speaker 1>Brent and w T I. So a couple of little

0:21:36.000 --> 0:21:37.680
<v Speaker 1>items to take note all of the f o MC

0:21:37.840 --> 0:21:41.080
<v Speaker 1>meeting a little later on today, some more certainty as

0:21:41.080 --> 0:21:43.960
<v Speaker 1>to who we might be seeing populating the Treasury as

0:21:44.000 --> 0:21:45.880
<v Speaker 1>well as of course the Federal Reserve over the next

0:21:46.040 --> 0:21:49.200
<v Speaker 1>couple of years, and the possibility that those people might

0:21:49.240 --> 0:21:52.440
<v Speaker 1>actually cooperate. So let's bring in Laird Landman to see

0:21:52.440 --> 0:21:54.520
<v Speaker 1>what all this means for markets. Starred Landman is co

0:21:54.560 --> 0:21:57.440
<v Speaker 1>director for Fixed Income at tc W, which is two

0:21:57.760 --> 0:22:01.359
<v Speaker 1>thirty five billion dollars under management firm wide. So, Laard,

0:22:01.480 --> 0:22:06.240
<v Speaker 1>how different does the landscape look today versus just last week.

0:22:08.000 --> 0:22:10.200
<v Speaker 1>I think it's got We've gotten a lot of clarification

0:22:10.320 --> 0:22:14.080
<v Speaker 1>because of these political appointments that things are probably not

0:22:14.160 --> 0:22:18.200
<v Speaker 1>going to be quite as radical as uh people might

0:22:18.200 --> 0:22:21.960
<v Speaker 1>have initially feared in terms of policy changes. Obviously there

0:22:22.040 --> 0:22:25.880
<v Speaker 1>is some chance of increased cooperation as you pointed out,

0:22:25.880 --> 0:22:29.360
<v Speaker 1>between the FAT and the Treasury. I wouldn't be convinced

0:22:29.359 --> 0:22:31.800
<v Speaker 1>for bond markets that that's a great thing. We could

0:22:31.840 --> 0:22:35.000
<v Speaker 1>continue to see a trend of yield yields going higher

0:22:35.600 --> 0:22:37.159
<v Speaker 1>in the face of that in the long end of

0:22:37.200 --> 0:22:41.199
<v Speaker 1>the curve. So Lard, we had just this morning a

0:22:41.280 --> 0:22:43.520
<v Speaker 1>batch of economic data and I guess we could call

0:22:43.600 --> 0:22:47.200
<v Speaker 1>it mixed at best, derbal good orders. Uh, maybe better

0:22:47.200 --> 0:22:51.040
<v Speaker 1>than expect it. But boy, the the labor market remains

0:22:51.160 --> 0:22:55.159
<v Speaker 1>very challenging with the stubbornly high jobless claims. What's your

0:22:55.200 --> 0:22:58.399
<v Speaker 1>view of kind of where this economy is now and

0:22:58.400 --> 0:23:02.960
<v Speaker 1>and you know how it what may continue to progress? Well,

0:23:03.000 --> 0:23:06.400
<v Speaker 1>we've come through a recession like no recession we've ever had.

0:23:06.440 --> 0:23:09.719
<v Speaker 1>You know, wealth is up four personal incomes were up

0:23:09.760 --> 0:23:12.159
<v Speaker 1>six percent over the course of this. But obviously you

0:23:12.200 --> 0:23:15.159
<v Speaker 1>point out the weak spot is is unemployment. And when

0:23:15.200 --> 0:23:17.879
<v Speaker 1>you dig into that number and you realize that we

0:23:17.920 --> 0:23:22.560
<v Speaker 1>still have close unemployment for the lowest third of of

0:23:22.720 --> 0:23:25.800
<v Speaker 1>earners in the economy, there are people who have been

0:23:25.840 --> 0:23:29.080
<v Speaker 1>extremely damaged in this and that's sort of covered up

0:23:29.480 --> 0:23:32.639
<v Speaker 1>by this flood of money into the financial markets and

0:23:32.680 --> 0:23:35.840
<v Speaker 1>the bowl markets we've seen in stocks, uh, in corporate

0:23:35.840 --> 0:23:38.560
<v Speaker 1>bonds and high yield. But underneath all this, I would

0:23:38.600 --> 0:23:43.040
<v Speaker 1>say the underlying economic trends are not all that healthy. Uh.

0:23:43.080 --> 0:23:45.920
<v Speaker 1>And clearly the stimulus got into the economy, But I'm

0:23:45.920 --> 0:23:48.440
<v Speaker 1>not convinced it it went to the right people. If

0:23:48.480 --> 0:23:51.600
<v Speaker 1>if you dine out as much as I did, once

0:23:51.720 --> 0:23:54.879
<v Speaker 1>the restrictions were lifted, you saw plenty of people at

0:23:54.880 --> 0:24:00.359
<v Speaker 1>fancy restaurants using those their their their unemployment cards to

0:24:00.440 --> 0:24:02.560
<v Speaker 1>play tay for dinner. So I'm not sure that the

0:24:02.600 --> 0:24:05.480
<v Speaker 1>money necessarily it got into the economy, but I'm not

0:24:05.520 --> 0:24:07.480
<v Speaker 1>sure it went to that lowest third it got where

0:24:07.480 --> 0:24:11.040
<v Speaker 1>it needed to get to really cure the problem. I

0:24:11.040 --> 0:24:13.560
<v Speaker 1>think we still have to face the problem long term.

0:24:13.760 --> 0:24:17.000
<v Speaker 1>For sure. They'll obviously that that would in itself have

0:24:17.080 --> 0:24:20.480
<v Speaker 1>supported some jobs and so on as well. Laard Um,

0:24:20.520 --> 0:24:23.120
<v Speaker 1>you said that yields might go up at the long end.

0:24:23.440 --> 0:24:25.959
<v Speaker 1>Why would that necessarily be bad for markets? I mean,

0:24:25.960 --> 0:24:28.679
<v Speaker 1>I understand just in terms of looking for return or

0:24:28.720 --> 0:24:30.720
<v Speaker 1>what have you. But would it be such a bad

0:24:30.760 --> 0:24:33.320
<v Speaker 1>thing if fields did go up with it. Well, I

0:24:33.359 --> 0:24:36.760
<v Speaker 1>don't think it's it's it's it's not unhealthy for the economy. Obviously,

0:24:36.880 --> 0:24:39.439
<v Speaker 1>if you own ten your treasuries, um, you're not going

0:24:39.520 --> 0:24:42.520
<v Speaker 1>to be cheering as you see the prices go down

0:24:42.560 --> 0:24:46.840
<v Speaker 1>as the yields go up. UM. So I do think, uh,

0:24:46.880 --> 0:24:50.720
<v Speaker 1>it's indicative of I think a skepticism when the Fed

0:24:50.800 --> 0:24:54.000
<v Speaker 1>and the Treasury of historically worked together that has long

0:24:54.119 --> 0:24:59.280
<v Speaker 1>term resulted in increased inflation and inflation expectations. UM. Clearly

0:24:59.320 --> 0:25:02.919
<v Speaker 1>there's a lot of hugely in the market regarding inflation.

0:25:03.040 --> 0:25:05.520
<v Speaker 1>You know, tips are suggesting something a little bit above

0:25:05.600 --> 0:25:08.080
<v Speaker 1>one and a half. When you look at some of

0:25:08.119 --> 0:25:11.600
<v Speaker 1>the numbers that are actually coming in, UM, they're consistent

0:25:11.680 --> 0:25:14.240
<v Speaker 1>with that. When you take out some of the really

0:25:14.280 --> 0:25:19.320
<v Speaker 1>inflating sectors of the economy like housing, shelter and autos,

0:25:19.359 --> 0:25:21.400
<v Speaker 1>you know, you get back down to about point four

0:25:22.280 --> 0:25:25.680
<v Speaker 1>point five on the core. UM. So there's again and

0:25:25.960 --> 0:25:30.160
<v Speaker 1>in course in Europe you have some countries beginning to deflate. Actually,

0:25:30.160 --> 0:25:31.719
<v Speaker 1>so I think there's a lot of confusion out there

0:25:31.760 --> 0:25:35.919
<v Speaker 1>about that. UM. We don't think the underlying economy is

0:25:35.920 --> 0:25:40.800
<v Speaker 1>healthy enough to support true economic inflation, but you could

0:25:40.880 --> 0:25:44.160
<v Speaker 1>get monetary inflation if you get too much cooperation between

0:25:44.240 --> 0:25:48.720
<v Speaker 1>the the Essential Bank and the Treasury. So lared having

0:25:48.880 --> 0:25:51.879
<v Speaker 1>spoken to you when your TCW colleagues you know in

0:25:51.920 --> 0:25:54.879
<v Speaker 1>the past, UH, definitely sense that you folks have a

0:25:55.119 --> 0:25:58.360
<v Speaker 1>cautious view on the marketplace, maybe more so uh than

0:25:58.560 --> 0:26:02.600
<v Speaker 1>some of your peers. Where given that backdrop, where do

0:26:02.800 --> 0:26:07.399
<v Speaker 1>you see some opportunities here to deploy capital. Well, I

0:26:07.440 --> 0:26:09.800
<v Speaker 1>think you can look uh in a couple of places. One,

0:26:09.880 --> 0:26:13.000
<v Speaker 1>it's very possible that the bowl market in corporate bonds

0:26:13.040 --> 0:26:16.560
<v Speaker 1>continues because UH, we are going to continue to see

0:26:16.600 --> 0:26:19.639
<v Speaker 1>a flot of money coming in from Japan and Europe

0:26:19.760 --> 0:26:23.639
<v Speaker 1>as are hedged yields into corporate bonds is very attractive

0:26:23.760 --> 0:26:28.200
<v Speaker 1>versus what they can engineer. UM. At the same time,

0:26:28.240 --> 0:26:30.919
<v Speaker 1>you have to be cautious. This will probably be one

0:26:30.960 --> 0:26:33.600
<v Speaker 1>of the most Styrian periods that will ever see. There's

0:26:33.720 --> 0:26:37.160
<v Speaker 1>dramatic changes going on in the economy that will result

0:26:37.320 --> 0:26:40.399
<v Speaker 1>in winners and losers i e. More defaults in the

0:26:40.400 --> 0:26:42.399
<v Speaker 1>bond market, so you have to really do your credit

0:26:42.440 --> 0:26:45.880
<v Speaker 1>work in here and picking these companies. UH. The second

0:26:45.920 --> 0:26:49.840
<v Speaker 1>place is obviously, UH some of the legacy non agency

0:26:49.880 --> 0:26:52.879
<v Speaker 1>bonds in the mortgage market will continue to look attractive

0:26:52.880 --> 0:26:57.720
<v Speaker 1>in our opinion. Obviously, there's been a huge move of

0:26:57.359 --> 0:27:01.679
<v Speaker 1>of money into residential real estate, particularly in the suburbs,

0:27:01.680 --> 0:27:04.720
<v Speaker 1>so even where you're seeing increased delinquencies, you're not seeing

0:27:04.760 --> 0:27:08.280
<v Speaker 1>losses on those types of security, so they still represent

0:27:08.440 --> 0:27:12.520
<v Speaker 1>value for the fixed income investor c MBS. We think

0:27:12.520 --> 0:27:14.240
<v Speaker 1>will be an area that will be challenged over the

0:27:14.280 --> 0:27:16.480
<v Speaker 1>next couple of years as they deal with the long

0:27:16.600 --> 0:27:20.840
<v Speaker 1>term effects all those Styrian effects of work from home

0:27:21.800 --> 0:27:25.000
<v Speaker 1>et cetera that will have, you know, pretty devastating effects

0:27:25.520 --> 0:27:29.760
<v Speaker 1>on demand for commercial real estate. Right. Hey, Lart, thanks

0:27:29.760 --> 0:27:32.239
<v Speaker 1>so much for joining us. We really appreciate getting your

0:27:32.240 --> 0:27:35.800
<v Speaker 1>thoughts here on the fixed income markets. Landman, co director

0:27:35.880 --> 0:27:38.920
<v Speaker 1>for Fixed Income at tc W, a little shop out

0:27:38.920 --> 0:27:40.760
<v Speaker 1>on the West Coast and they have about two thirty

0:27:40.760 --> 0:27:44.480
<v Speaker 1>five billion dollars under management and datat When you go

0:27:44.520 --> 0:27:46.639
<v Speaker 1>to l a two big meetings you have to have.

0:27:46.760 --> 0:27:49.879
<v Speaker 1>Number one is Capital Group and the other one is TCW.

0:27:50.160 --> 0:27:54.480
<v Speaker 1>Just huge shops that they're all over the marketplace. Thanks

0:27:54.480 --> 0:27:57.720
<v Speaker 1>for listening to Boomberg Markets podcast. You can subscribe and

0:27:57.800 --> 0:28:01.600
<v Speaker 1>listen to interviews at Apple Podcasts or whatever podcast platform

0:28:01.640 --> 0:28:04.760
<v Speaker 1>you prefer. I'm Bonnie Quinn. I'm on Twitter at Bonnie

0:28:04.840 --> 0:28:07.640
<v Speaker 1>Quinn and I'm Paul Sweeney. I'm on Twitter at pt Sweeney.

0:28:07.680 --> 0:28:10.320
<v Speaker 1>Before the podcast, you can always catch us worldwide at

0:28:10.359 --> 0:28:11.160
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Radio