WEBVTT - Best Of - Travis Kelce & Chiefs MONSTER bounce back, Lakers should go ALL IN on Luka & LeBron

0:00:00.320 --> 0:00:02.520
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the best of the week for What's Right

0:00:02.600 --> 0:00:05.240
<v Speaker 1>with Nick Right the best takes in moments from this

0:00:05.320 --> 0:00:09.080
<v Speaker 1>week on the show. Enjoy.

0:00:09.200 --> 0:00:11.000
<v Speaker 2>So Mahomes came out and said, I'm going to do

0:00:11.000 --> 0:00:13.920
<v Speaker 2>whatever it takes to win, whether that's passing for a

0:00:13.920 --> 0:00:17.079
<v Speaker 2>lot of yards or not passing for a lot of yards.

0:00:17.160 --> 0:00:19.840
<v Speaker 2>So we've seen Kansas City win in a number of

0:00:19.840 --> 0:00:22.239
<v Speaker 2>different ways. How do you think that the offense or

0:00:22.280 --> 0:00:24.439
<v Speaker 2>the Chiefs need to look in order to succeed this year?

0:00:25.360 --> 0:00:27.800
<v Speaker 1>Listen, I do think there's an element of they need

0:00:27.840 --> 0:00:32.000
<v Speaker 1>to get their swagger back and pump the ball down

0:00:32.040 --> 0:00:39.200
<v Speaker 1>the field. Now, I think people need to remember how

0:00:39.280 --> 0:00:41.800
<v Speaker 1>we got kind of to the point that we got

0:00:41.840 --> 0:00:45.519
<v Speaker 1>to with this offense being the way it is. And

0:00:45.560 --> 0:00:47.479
<v Speaker 1>I talked about this yesterday on TV, but I think

0:00:47.520 --> 0:00:54.040
<v Speaker 1>it's worth revisiting. Three years ago, they're playing the number

0:00:54.200 --> 0:00:58.800
<v Speaker 1>one defense in the NFL in the Super Bowl. They

0:00:58.920 --> 0:01:06.000
<v Speaker 1>score third thirty eight points without a single play longer

0:01:06.040 --> 0:01:10.000
<v Speaker 1>than twenty five yards and the longest play of the

0:01:10.040 --> 0:01:14.640
<v Speaker 1>game is a Mahomes scramble. The very next year they

0:01:14.760 --> 0:01:19.920
<v Speaker 1>come back, they're in the Super Bowl, having the offense

0:01:19.959 --> 0:01:25.560
<v Speaker 1>having struggled all year long receivers just openly revolting against Patrick.

0:01:27.160 --> 0:01:30.560
<v Speaker 1>In the Super Bowl, the biggest drive up to that

0:01:30.680 --> 0:01:37.320
<v Speaker 1>point of Mahomes's life eleven play, sixty four yard dank

0:01:37.520 --> 0:01:43.240
<v Speaker 1>dunk DNK dunk field goal, and then in overtime one

0:01:43.319 --> 0:01:49.520
<v Speaker 1>of the greatest drives in NFL history thirteen play, seventy

0:01:49.600 --> 0:01:54.120
<v Speaker 1>five yard drive where the longest play once again is

0:01:54.160 --> 0:01:59.120
<v Speaker 1>a Mahomes scramble, dank dunk, dnk dunk. No big explosives.

0:02:00.240 --> 0:02:07.080
<v Speaker 1>Last year offense just eking along and pulling games out

0:02:07.080 --> 0:02:13.040
<v Speaker 1>of the fire. So why am I saying when they

0:02:13.160 --> 0:02:16.080
<v Speaker 1>gone Super Bowl win, Super Bowl win, Super Bowl loss,

0:02:16.120 --> 0:02:19.959
<v Speaker 1>after being seventeen and one going into the Super Bowl

0:02:20.000 --> 0:02:24.920
<v Speaker 1>with Mahomes' starter, Because I think one of the reasons

0:02:25.880 --> 0:02:30.520
<v Speaker 1>Patrick started to press early in that Super Bowl demonsay

0:02:31.800 --> 0:02:36.440
<v Speaker 1>is because being down fourteen for last year's Chiefs felt

0:02:36.480 --> 0:02:40.760
<v Speaker 1>so different than any of the previous year Chiefs. Down

0:02:40.840 --> 0:02:45.520
<v Speaker 1>fourty eighteen three years ago was okay, we can start

0:02:45.560 --> 0:02:50.360
<v Speaker 1>playing now. Down ten in every Super Bowl they've ever

0:02:50.440 --> 0:02:54.280
<v Speaker 1>played in, take the lead back in a heartbeat, And

0:02:54.400 --> 0:02:58.840
<v Speaker 1>so because it was so death by a thousand cuts,

0:03:00.160 --> 0:03:05.200
<v Speaker 1>they felt they needed to. I think Patrick felt like

0:03:05.320 --> 0:03:08.360
<v Speaker 1>man we better score, right, because we don't have this

0:03:08.600 --> 0:03:11.840
<v Speaker 1>one playability. So I think they need to get that back.

0:03:12.160 --> 0:03:15.919
<v Speaker 1>And I think the better offensive line, hopefully healthier receivers,

0:03:15.960 --> 0:03:18.640
<v Speaker 1>even though she's now dealing with the growing Hollywood Brown

0:03:18.720 --> 0:03:22.040
<v Speaker 1>still out with an ankle, that's not great. That should

0:03:22.040 --> 0:03:27.560
<v Speaker 1>help that. I also saw there's an unbelievable stack courtesy

0:03:27.720 --> 0:03:33.959
<v Speaker 1>an unbelievable stack courtesy of Warren Sharp that I would

0:03:34.080 --> 0:03:44.560
<v Speaker 1>like to go over for a moment. But so, quarterbacks

0:03:45.040 --> 0:03:50.720
<v Speaker 1>record when trailing entering the fourth quarter over the last

0:03:50.760 --> 0:03:56.119
<v Speaker 1>five years. Let me give you the top three from

0:03:56.160 --> 0:04:02.840
<v Speaker 1>three to one. Demonse in third place, best record when

0:04:02.960 --> 0:04:08.520
<v Speaker 1>trailing entering the fourth last five years. Okay, Jalen hurts

0:04:09.440 --> 0:04:13.120
<v Speaker 1>eight and fourteen, so that's pretty good. I mean it's

0:04:13.160 --> 0:04:17.320
<v Speaker 1>third best. That so thirty six percent of the time

0:04:18.040 --> 0:04:21.719
<v Speaker 1>the Eagles are trailing going into the fourth, they win

0:04:21.839 --> 0:04:30.160
<v Speaker 1>anyway when Jalen starts. Second place, Lamar Jackson seven and

0:04:30.320 --> 0:04:36.000
<v Speaker 1>ten forty one percent of the time, So that's almost

0:04:36.040 --> 0:04:39.360
<v Speaker 1>half the time bro that the Ravens are trailing entering

0:04:39.400 --> 0:04:44.520
<v Speaker 1>the fourth, they win when Lamar's the quarterback. So third

0:04:44.560 --> 0:04:49.800
<v Speaker 1>place is thirty six percent. Jalen second place is forty

0:04:49.839 --> 0:04:55.320
<v Speaker 1>one percent. Lamar is again courtesy Warrensharp first place record

0:04:55.360 --> 0:04:59.400
<v Speaker 1>the last five years when trailing entering the fourth quarter.

0:05:00.120 --> 0:05:10.159
<v Speaker 1>Patrick Mahomes fourteen and seven sixty seven percent. That means

0:05:10.200 --> 0:05:15.279
<v Speaker 1>the Chiefs would be an eleven twelve win team if

0:05:15.440 --> 0:05:20.080
<v Speaker 1>every game they trailed going into the fourth quarter and

0:05:20.200 --> 0:05:25.120
<v Speaker 1>the other like CJ. Demonse is one two, three, four,

0:05:25.279 --> 0:05:30.520
<v Speaker 1>five six seven, He's eighth on this list, two and

0:05:30.600 --> 0:05:37.520
<v Speaker 1>ten twenty percent. Josh Allen is above average three and

0:05:37.600 --> 0:05:45.760
<v Speaker 1>fourteen eighteen percent, Joe Burrow four and twenty three fifteen percent,

0:05:47.240 --> 0:05:54.440
<v Speaker 1>Brock Purdy one in ten nine percent. Like, so, I

0:05:54.560 --> 0:06:01.120
<v Speaker 1>say that for this reason, it's under standable that the

0:06:01.240 --> 0:06:05.760
<v Speaker 1>Chiefs kind of carry themselves like, eh, we'll figure it out.

0:06:06.560 --> 0:06:09.400
<v Speaker 1>But it's harder to do that after you've got your

0:06:09.440 --> 0:06:10.880
<v Speaker 1>teeth kicked in in the Super Bowl.

0:06:11.720 --> 0:06:14.520
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, and.

0:06:15.680 --> 0:06:16.280
<v Speaker 4>That is.

0:06:17.960 --> 0:06:18.920
<v Speaker 3>They need to.

0:06:21.600 --> 0:06:27.160
<v Speaker 1>They need to go ahead, Demani, Yeah, and I think

0:06:27.240 --> 0:06:31.560
<v Speaker 1>Josh Simmons, the rookie left tackle, and Xavier Worthy's ascension

0:06:32.120 --> 0:06:34.160
<v Speaker 1>is going to help that quite a bit. By the way,

0:06:35.720 --> 0:06:40.520
<v Speaker 1>late the Madden ratings for this year, Xavier Worthy a

0:06:40.640 --> 0:06:45.839
<v Speaker 1>higher rating than Marvin Harrison Junior and Rome A doonsday

0:06:46.640 --> 0:06:49.720
<v Speaker 1>to top ten now just barely, but still like that

0:06:49.920 --> 0:06:55.640
<v Speaker 1>is the highest rated rookie receivers were neighbors than Brian Thomas,

0:06:56.120 --> 0:07:02.320
<v Speaker 1>then Xavier Worthy. So yeah, I do think they need

0:07:02.360 --> 0:07:05.479
<v Speaker 1>to bring back, as brew would call it, the light

0:07:05.600 --> 0:07:09.840
<v Speaker 1>show a bit, and I'm optimistic that they can. All right,

0:07:09.920 --> 0:07:12.000
<v Speaker 1>let's talk a little more cheap before we get some

0:07:12.040 --> 0:07:12.600
<v Speaker 1>other stuff.

0:07:12.880 --> 0:07:15.840
<v Speaker 2>Andy Reid's been hyping up. You got Travis Kelcey. He's

0:07:15.880 --> 0:07:19.360
<v Speaker 2>saying that he's calling him. He's calling him, felt saying

0:07:19.400 --> 0:07:22.760
<v Speaker 2>he looks twenty, he's all slender. A year ago, you said,

0:07:22.760 --> 0:07:26.080
<v Speaker 2>Travis Kelsey's got about eight more good games in him,

0:07:27.200 --> 0:07:30.840
<v Speaker 2>games great games, not good, Sorry, got eight great games

0:07:30.920 --> 0:07:31.440
<v Speaker 2>left at him.

0:07:31.680 --> 0:07:33.840
<v Speaker 3>Has that number changed since?

0:07:34.000 --> 0:07:36.440
<v Speaker 1>Like what would he have now at this time? Well?

0:07:36.560 --> 0:07:46.000
<v Speaker 1>So this year? Yeah, so I felt he. I thought

0:07:46.040 --> 0:07:51.200
<v Speaker 1>he used a couple last year. Certainly the playoff game

0:07:51.240 --> 0:07:56.800
<v Speaker 1>against Houston Texans was peak Travis. And I also thought

0:07:57.400 --> 0:08:01.560
<v Speaker 1>he left a lot out on the field the Christmas

0:08:01.600 --> 0:08:04.960
<v Speaker 1>Day game against Pittsburgh that if they knew they won,

0:08:05.760 --> 0:08:08.160
<v Speaker 1>they were going to get the long rest that they

0:08:08.200 --> 0:08:12.200
<v Speaker 1>all desperately needed. Now, those aren't the only big games

0:08:12.240 --> 0:08:14.480
<v Speaker 1>he had all year, but some of the other big

0:08:14.520 --> 0:08:17.280
<v Speaker 1>games yet I just thought, were you.

0:08:17.240 --> 0:08:17.560
<v Speaker 3>Know, the.

0:08:19.160 --> 0:08:21.400
<v Speaker 1>Teams not being able to deal with him, or you know,

0:08:21.480 --> 0:08:28.320
<v Speaker 1>the how the game play in philadelph So again, swifties, please,

0:08:28.400 --> 0:08:31.960
<v Speaker 1>because I got absolutely crushed for this take last year

0:08:32.559 --> 0:08:37.480
<v Speaker 1>because people misunderstood what I was saying. I think when

0:08:37.480 --> 0:08:41.240
<v Speaker 1>you are Travis's age at that position, you have to

0:08:41.360 --> 0:08:48.000
<v Speaker 1>be very diligent about when you go full throttle, and

0:08:48.720 --> 0:08:53.959
<v Speaker 1>I think he knows that he only has so many

0:08:56.440 --> 0:09:06.920
<v Speaker 1>full throttle games left now. I think that added chip

0:09:06.960 --> 0:09:09.800
<v Speaker 1>on his shoulder for the fact that he didn't play

0:09:09.880 --> 0:09:12.280
<v Speaker 1>up to his standard he said last year, and the

0:09:12.280 --> 0:09:14.200
<v Speaker 1>way they got their ass kicked in the Super Bowl,

0:09:14.720 --> 0:09:18.000
<v Speaker 1>and the fact that he shed some weight, had probably

0:09:18.040 --> 0:09:23.160
<v Speaker 1>a better offseason, maybe replenish some of those games that

0:09:23.240 --> 0:09:26.120
<v Speaker 1>game count. Yeah, I've got to see him in Week

0:09:26.200 --> 0:09:29.640
<v Speaker 1>one to give this a real answer. But I'm going

0:09:29.720 --> 0:09:33.200
<v Speaker 1>to go out on a lemon say this. I think

0:09:33.280 --> 0:09:39.360
<v Speaker 1>Travis this year will once again be one of the

0:09:39.440 --> 0:09:46.040
<v Speaker 1>three most impactful players at his position. I think Travis

0:09:46.040 --> 0:09:52.560
<v Speaker 1>and brock Bowers and then maybe Kittle, maybe Laporta, maybe

0:09:52.559 --> 0:09:57.560
<v Speaker 1>the kid in Arizona or the other candidates. But I

0:09:57.600 --> 0:09:59.960
<v Speaker 1>think Travis and brock Bauers are going to be up

0:10:00.040 --> 0:10:03.719
<v Speaker 1>there at and I'm Travis is especially because teams are

0:10:03.720 --> 0:10:08.160
<v Speaker 1>gonna have to respect the deep ball more this year.

0:10:08.559 --> 0:10:10.800
<v Speaker 1>He's gonna have a lot more room to work with

0:10:11.240 --> 0:10:15.600
<v Speaker 1>over that intermediate middle where he wants to all right,

0:10:15.720 --> 0:10:18.800
<v Speaker 1>dog days summer, which means it's time for the boys

0:10:18.840 --> 0:10:20.440
<v Speaker 1>this summer to kick it into gear. And the best

0:10:20.440 --> 0:10:23.120
<v Speaker 1>way to cash in on your baseball IQ is with

0:10:23.280 --> 0:10:28.319
<v Speaker 1>DraftKings Sports Book. As the stretch drive begins, DraftKings Sportsbook

0:10:28.600 --> 0:10:33.000
<v Speaker 1>has you covered with live betting, home run props, odds, boosts,

0:10:33.000 --> 0:10:36.840
<v Speaker 1>and more. Whether you're chasing dingers or jumping in mid game,

0:10:37.240 --> 0:10:40.920
<v Speaker 1>there's always action to be had. Never bet on baseball before,

0:10:41.200 --> 0:10:44.000
<v Speaker 1>simple pick a guy to go yard, hammer some live

0:10:44.040 --> 0:10:46.800
<v Speaker 1>odds mid game, or just ride with your squad and

0:10:46.880 --> 0:10:50.280
<v Speaker 1>hope for the best. No spreadsheets, just vibes and dines

0:10:50.320 --> 0:10:53.800
<v Speaker 1>and odds subject to change. Something special for first timers.

0:10:54.120 --> 0:10:57.560
<v Speaker 1>New DraftKings customers bet five bucks, get two hundred dollars

0:10:57.600 --> 0:11:00.920
<v Speaker 1>in bonus bets. Instantly download DraftKings a gap and use

0:11:01.000 --> 0:11:03.840
<v Speaker 1>code right. That's code right for new customers to get

0:11:03.880 --> 0:11:06.880
<v Speaker 1>two hundred dollars in bonus best bets instantly when you

0:11:06.960 --> 0:11:10.160
<v Speaker 1>got just five bucks only on DraftKings, the crown is yours.

0:11:10.480 --> 0:11:13.160
<v Speaker 5>Gambling problem called one eight hundred gambler in New York

0:11:13.240 --> 0:11:15.680
<v Speaker 5>called eight seven seven eight open wire, text hope and

0:11:15.679 --> 0:11:18.239
<v Speaker 5>wy at four six seven three six nine. In Connecticut,

0:11:18.240 --> 0:11:20.520
<v Speaker 5>help is available for a problem gambling called eight eight

0:11:20.520 --> 0:11:22.800
<v Speaker 5>eight seven eight nine seven seven seven seven or visit

0:11:22.880 --> 0:11:26.200
<v Speaker 5>CCPG dot org. Please play responsibly on behalf of boothilk

0:11:26.200 --> 0:11:29.280
<v Speaker 5>A Cinamin Resorting Kansas twenty one on over agent. Eligibility

0:11:29.360 --> 0:11:32.040
<v Speaker 5>varies by jurisdiction VOYD and Ontario. Bet must win to

0:11:32.080 --> 0:11:35.520
<v Speaker 5>receive reward minimum minus five hundred odds required. Bonus bets

0:11:35.559 --> 0:11:37.640
<v Speaker 5>expire one hundred and sixty eight hours after issue.

0:11:37.679 --> 0:11:37.960
<v Speaker 1>Ins four.

0:11:38.000 --> 0:11:41.680
<v Speaker 5>Additional terms and responsible gaming resources see DKNG dot co,

0:11:41.840 --> 0:11:42.600
<v Speaker 5>slash audio.

0:11:44.400 --> 0:11:46.680
<v Speaker 2>A Seleuca sign is three year, one hundred and sixty

0:11:46.679 --> 0:11:49.440
<v Speaker 2>five million extension with the Lakers over the weekend. We've

0:11:49.480 --> 0:11:52.200
<v Speaker 2>all been waiting on that. So now that's finally happened,

0:11:52.200 --> 0:11:54.600
<v Speaker 2>do you think that it's time for eled to really

0:11:54.640 --> 0:11:57.160
<v Speaker 2>press the gas on trying to succeed in the now?

0:11:58.280 --> 0:12:02.640
<v Speaker 1>Well, listen, I got it, I said after they didn't

0:12:02.640 --> 0:12:05.520
<v Speaker 1>re sign Dorian Finney Smith that I thought there was

0:12:05.559 --> 0:12:09.480
<v Speaker 1>a chance I put Lucas signing the extension. Was it

0:12:09.679 --> 0:12:12.800
<v Speaker 1>ninety percent? I had it. I dropped it to like

0:12:12.880 --> 0:12:16.000
<v Speaker 1>seventy five percent. So I do think this is good, important,

0:12:16.040 --> 0:12:20.920
<v Speaker 1>real news. I also think that because he signed the extension,

0:12:21.360 --> 0:12:25.079
<v Speaker 1>they are able to slow walk this a bit if

0:12:25.120 --> 0:12:28.120
<v Speaker 1>they want to, because Luca is not going anywhere over

0:12:28.120 --> 0:12:30.200
<v Speaker 1>the next three years. And by the way, the next

0:12:30.200 --> 0:12:36.000
<v Speaker 1>deal he'll signed Demons will be the league's first million

0:12:36.080 --> 0:12:38.920
<v Speaker 1>dollar a game deal super Max.

0:12:39.040 --> 0:12:42.160
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, well, was that what he was supposed to? Was

0:12:42.240 --> 0:12:44.000
<v Speaker 2>that what he was coming up on in Dallas?

0:12:44.480 --> 0:12:47.240
<v Speaker 1>No, it was No, he could have signed.

0:12:47.280 --> 0:12:48.400
<v Speaker 3>No, the.

0:12:50.280 --> 0:12:53.040
<v Speaker 1>He would have gotten the biggest deal ever in Dallas.

0:12:53.080 --> 0:12:53.720
<v Speaker 3>But it wouldn't.

0:12:53.960 --> 0:12:58.240
<v Speaker 1>We wouldn't have gotten that threshold yet. But three years

0:12:58.280 --> 0:13:01.720
<v Speaker 1>from now his contract will average more than eighty two

0:13:01.800 --> 0:13:04.480
<v Speaker 1>million a year, and there's eighty two games. It's a

0:13:04.480 --> 0:13:10.200
<v Speaker 1>really remarkable thing. Here is though my general Lakers take that.

0:13:10.440 --> 0:13:14.880
<v Speaker 1>No One, even the biggest anti lebron folks, haven't been

0:13:14.920 --> 0:13:18.360
<v Speaker 1>able to explain to me where I'm wrong on this.

0:13:19.440 --> 0:13:26.120
<v Speaker 1>I think it is overwhelmingly likely that over the lifetime

0:13:26.280 --> 0:13:31.600
<v Speaker 1>of this extension, these next three years, Luca never has

0:13:31.640 --> 0:13:36.440
<v Speaker 1>a teammate better than Lebron is right now. Now, listen,

0:13:37.120 --> 0:13:41.920
<v Speaker 1>maybe they're gonna get Yannis, and I'll be wrong. Maybe

0:13:42.080 --> 0:13:46.200
<v Speaker 1>they're you know, they have their eyes on Joker, and

0:13:46.240 --> 0:13:52.200
<v Speaker 1>I'll be wrong. But Shay ain't going anywhere, and Tatum's

0:13:52.240 --> 0:13:55.160
<v Speaker 1>not going anywhere, and now we're like running out of

0:13:55.200 --> 0:14:02.360
<v Speaker 1>people who are better than Lebron right now. Okay, So

0:14:02.720 --> 0:14:07.280
<v Speaker 1>I would, if I were the Lakers, prioritize trying to

0:14:07.400 --> 0:14:12.439
<v Speaker 1>win right now, because if they think this is their

0:14:12.520 --> 0:14:15.520
<v Speaker 1>last year with Lebron, I do not know that Luca

0:14:15.600 --> 0:14:17.520
<v Speaker 1>is going to have a better running mate than Lebron

0:14:17.960 --> 0:14:20.680
<v Speaker 1>over these next three years. Now, again, if they have

0:14:20.800 --> 0:14:25.240
<v Speaker 1>real intel that if they keep the cap sheet clean

0:14:26.800 --> 0:14:31.200
<v Speaker 1>in two years, Yannis plans on just coming there in

0:14:31.320 --> 0:14:35.160
<v Speaker 1>free agency, then so be it. Then you know what,

0:14:35.600 --> 0:14:38.400
<v Speaker 1>if they like then see you know, it's not like

0:14:38.440 --> 0:14:42.360
<v Speaker 1>they're drawing dead this season, like they've got a nice roster,

0:14:43.280 --> 0:14:46.920
<v Speaker 1>then then keep it flexible. But that's a hell of

0:14:46.960 --> 0:14:50.160
<v Speaker 1>a gamble to take, like a hell of a gamble

0:14:50.200 --> 0:14:50.520
<v Speaker 1>to take.

0:14:50.840 --> 0:14:52.760
<v Speaker 2>Do you are you worried at all that there's like

0:14:52.800 --> 0:14:56.840
<v Speaker 2>a riff potentially forming between Luca and Lebron or do

0:14:56.880 --> 0:14:58.240
<v Speaker 2>you think that Luca knows that it's.

0:14:58.320 --> 0:15:01.440
<v Speaker 1>I don't think yeah, yeah, I don't think it's between

0:15:01.520 --> 0:15:05.560
<v Speaker 1>Luca and Lebron at all. Lebron was Luca's all time

0:15:05.600 --> 0:15:08.680
<v Speaker 1>favorite player. Luca is the guy Lebron tried to sign

0:15:08.720 --> 0:15:12.480
<v Speaker 1>to his shoe line. Luca like, I don't think there

0:15:12.560 --> 0:15:16.280
<v Speaker 1>is anything between them at all. I think there is

0:15:17.040 --> 0:15:23.520
<v Speaker 1>some obvious frustration for Lebron, fair or not that the

0:15:23.600 --> 0:15:28.640
<v Speaker 1>Lakers are not pressing the gas even more on this season. Now,

0:15:28.680 --> 0:15:31.360
<v Speaker 1>you can say that's unfair, that they shouldn't whatever, but

0:15:31.480 --> 0:15:34.720
<v Speaker 1>that is to me, the entirety of the frustration is

0:15:35.320 --> 0:15:36.160
<v Speaker 1>that right there.

0:15:37.120 --> 0:15:39.880
<v Speaker 2>Oh yeah, So Baker Mayfield came in into that number fifty

0:15:39.960 --> 0:15:42.760
<v Speaker 2>in the NFL Top hundred list. He answers this year

0:15:42.760 --> 0:15:45.720
<v Speaker 2>as the eighth best odds for MVP in Tampa Bay

0:15:45.720 --> 0:15:49.000
<v Speaker 2>also just drafted Amika Agbuka and they're getting gowing back

0:15:49.000 --> 0:15:52.240
<v Speaker 2>from his injury. What are your expectations for Baker this year?

0:15:54.760 --> 0:15:59.280
<v Speaker 1>Expectations already has another really good season. Ceiling is he

0:15:59.480 --> 0:16:04.160
<v Speaker 1>is a frontline MVP candidate and they are a true

0:16:04.200 --> 0:16:07.920
<v Speaker 1>contender in the NFC, Like, I think that's on the board.

0:16:08.280 --> 0:16:09.240
<v Speaker 1>And here's the thing.

0:16:10.040 --> 0:16:10.840
<v Speaker 3>In order for.

0:16:10.840 --> 0:16:13.360
<v Speaker 1>Them to be a contender, he has to be an

0:16:13.440 --> 0:16:16.720
<v Speaker 1>MVP candidate because that defense is not going to be great.

0:16:17.200 --> 0:16:19.960
<v Speaker 1>They are gonna have to outscore people. But Baker had

0:16:20.000 --> 0:16:24.840
<v Speaker 1>forty touchdowns last year. He was a badass, man. Yeah,

0:16:24.920 --> 0:16:27.680
<v Speaker 1>I mean he was a badass last year. I'm so

0:16:28.120 --> 0:16:31.400
<v Speaker 1>and he right now has I want to make sure

0:16:31.440 --> 0:16:34.320
<v Speaker 1>I'm right about this that I didn't miss it yet.

0:16:34.600 --> 0:16:37.720
<v Speaker 1>He's on the best non rookie contract in the NFL.

0:16:39.320 --> 0:16:44.640
<v Speaker 1>Three years, one hundred million bucks for Baker Mayfield. He

0:16:44.840 --> 0:16:52.400
<v Speaker 1>is one more good season away from getting a two

0:16:52.520 --> 0:16:56.480
<v Speaker 1>hundred and fifty million dollar deal. He's been that level

0:16:56.480 --> 0:16:59.280
<v Speaker 1>of player and I'm just happy for him, man, because

0:16:59.320 --> 0:17:01.800
<v Speaker 1>this shit went so sideways on him.

0:17:02.160 --> 0:17:03.720
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, and.

0:17:04.960 --> 0:17:11.639
<v Speaker 1>His teammates love him. He is true to himself. He's tough.

0:17:12.160 --> 0:17:17.080
<v Speaker 1>He is a legit awesome playoff performer. Like this is

0:17:17.119 --> 0:17:21.600
<v Speaker 1>the thing that people I think underrate with Baker. He

0:17:21.720 --> 0:17:25.240
<v Speaker 1>has played I think five career playoff games. I'm gonna

0:17:25.240 --> 0:17:28.320
<v Speaker 1>tell you what he did in the first playoff game ever.

0:17:29.119 --> 0:17:34.400
<v Speaker 1>The Cleveland Browns go into Pittsburgh, hang forty eight on him.

0:17:34.480 --> 0:17:38.280
<v Speaker 1>Baker throws for two sixty three touchdowns a one fifteen rating.

0:17:39.680 --> 0:17:43.320
<v Speaker 1>Second playoff game ever, his only ever bad playoff game.

0:17:43.760 --> 0:17:49.360
<v Speaker 1>He's against the two time defending AFC champion. Uh oh,

0:17:49.359 --> 0:17:53.440
<v Speaker 1>I'm sorry. He's against the defending Super Bowl champion Chiefs,

0:17:54.080 --> 0:17:56.560
<v Speaker 1>and he's twenty three to thirty seven for two hundred yards,

0:17:56.560 --> 0:17:58.840
<v Speaker 1>one touchdown, one pick, seventy five rating. But he's in

0:17:59.040 --> 0:18:03.119
<v Speaker 1>arrowhead and round two against the twenty twenty Chiefs, like

0:18:03.160 --> 0:18:07.280
<v Speaker 1>no shame in that. He then makes the playoffs with Tampa.

0:18:07.600 --> 0:18:12.120
<v Speaker 1>His first playoff game ever against Philly, and again, it's

0:18:12.160 --> 0:18:16.679
<v Speaker 1>so crazy, this is Philly. This game was in January

0:18:16.800 --> 0:18:20.880
<v Speaker 1>of twenty twenty four. Yeah, exactly, thirty two to nine,

0:18:21.359 --> 0:18:25.080
<v Speaker 1>three touchdowns, no picks, a one to twenty rating. The

0:18:25.119 --> 0:18:31.080
<v Speaker 1>next game against Detroit three hundred and fifty yards, three touchdowns,

0:18:31.080 --> 0:18:33.840
<v Speaker 1>two picks, a ninety five rating, they lose by eight.

0:18:34.400 --> 0:18:37.720
<v Speaker 1>And in the game against Washington last year, a wild

0:18:37.840 --> 0:18:42.520
<v Speaker 1>one where he only throws eighteen times, but he's fifteen

0:18:42.600 --> 0:18:46.959
<v Speaker 1>of eighteen for a buck eighty five, two touchdowns and

0:18:47.040 --> 0:18:51.280
<v Speaker 1>a one forty seven rating. In his playoff career, he's

0:18:51.280 --> 0:18:53.879
<v Speaker 1>got a one zero six rating twelve touchdowns, three picks,

0:18:55.200 --> 0:19:00.240
<v Speaker 1>like he's just been awesome in the big yeah. So yeah,

0:19:00.320 --> 0:19:04.800
<v Speaker 1>So I'm a Baker believer through and through. All Right,

0:19:05.520 --> 0:19:07.280
<v Speaker 1>let's do these last two real quick.

0:19:07.640 --> 0:19:09.639
<v Speaker 2>James Cook is holding in as he looks for his

0:19:09.720 --> 0:19:13.280
<v Speaker 2>contract extension. After a few years a big dollar running

0:19:13.280 --> 0:19:15.800
<v Speaker 2>backs paying off. It seemed like the debate was put

0:19:15.880 --> 0:19:19.359
<v Speaker 2>to rest, but that conversation opens back up again. Or

0:19:19.400 --> 0:19:20.440
<v Speaker 2>do you think Cook is just.

0:19:20.359 --> 0:19:23.240
<v Speaker 1>Not that guy? Well? No, I just I think Cook's

0:19:23.320 --> 0:19:26.760
<v Speaker 1>really good. But I the Bills have no cap space.

0:19:27.240 --> 0:19:29.719
<v Speaker 1>He's under contract for five million bucks. They know they

0:19:29.720 --> 0:19:31.120
<v Speaker 1>can franchise tag.

0:19:30.960 --> 0:19:34.120
<v Speaker 3>Him for not much. And even if you.

0:19:34.040 --> 0:19:35.919
<v Speaker 1>Think he's awesome, do you think he's gonna be awesome

0:19:36.040 --> 0:19:37.240
<v Speaker 1>four years from now?

0:19:38.359 --> 0:19:41.080
<v Speaker 2>So like go, I ask me a huge part of

0:19:41.080 --> 0:19:44.440
<v Speaker 2>their offense last year, like huge buffalo the.

0:19:44.400 --> 0:19:47.440
<v Speaker 1>Last two years, right, I just think they think he's

0:19:47.480 --> 0:19:51.000
<v Speaker 1>gonna blink. Bro. I don't think it's that they you

0:19:51.040 --> 0:19:52.880
<v Speaker 1>know what I mean? I think that they think we'll

0:19:52.920 --> 0:19:56.280
<v Speaker 1>give him a little more money, but not long term,

0:19:56.680 --> 0:19:58.639
<v Speaker 1>you know what I mean? Nothing long term and then

0:19:59.080 --> 0:20:02.399
<v Speaker 1>or maybe a one year extension. But the report is

0:20:02.480 --> 0:20:04.320
<v Speaker 1>he wants you know, I don't know if it's what

0:20:04.359 --> 0:20:05.840
<v Speaker 1>he wants. I don't want to get this wrong, but

0:20:05.920 --> 0:20:09.119
<v Speaker 1>I saw four years forty million bouncing around, which is

0:20:09.160 --> 0:20:11.600
<v Speaker 1>only ten million a year. But I just think they

0:20:11.600 --> 0:20:14.399
<v Speaker 1>think at that position, his style, in two years he

0:20:14.440 --> 0:20:17.359
<v Speaker 1>could be done and they just it's just such a

0:20:17.440 --> 0:20:20.600
<v Speaker 1>tough business for running backs. Man, It's just such a

0:20:20.640 --> 0:20:23.640
<v Speaker 1>tough business for running backs.

0:20:24.760 --> 0:20:27.800
<v Speaker 2>So, yeah, the media has been super high on the Broncos.

0:20:27.880 --> 0:20:30.880
<v Speaker 2>You have not been so is Sean Payton. He came

0:20:30.880 --> 0:20:34.000
<v Speaker 2>out and said, the short term goal is winning the division.

0:20:34.400 --> 0:20:36.760
<v Speaker 2>But this is a team capable of winning the super Bowl.

0:20:37.080 --> 0:20:39.000
<v Speaker 2>I've coached six teams that I thought could win a

0:20:39.040 --> 0:20:43.560
<v Speaker 2>super Bowl. This is my seventh. Yes, should we believe

0:20:43.600 --> 0:20:46.000
<v Speaker 2>in this? Is he too high? Too low?

0:20:46.760 --> 0:20:49.440
<v Speaker 1>He also said Bo Nicks in the next two years

0:20:49.440 --> 0:20:52.200
<v Speaker 1>is going to be a top four or five quarterback

0:20:52.240 --> 0:20:56.639
<v Speaker 1>in the world. He also said he's going to be

0:20:56.720 --> 0:21:01.880
<v Speaker 1>a superstar. Also, by the way, check out when you're

0:21:01.920 --> 0:21:04.960
<v Speaker 1>subscribing to What's Right with Nick Wright on YouTube, there's

0:21:05.000 --> 0:21:07.520
<v Speaker 1>another new channel you can subscribe to on YouTube. Did

0:21:07.560 --> 0:21:12.159
<v Speaker 1>you see this? Demanse uh bo Nix's new YouTube channel?

0:21:13.200 --> 0:21:20.560
<v Speaker 4>And my my take that Bo Nicks My take going

0:21:20.600 --> 0:21:25.440
<v Speaker 4>into the draft was bo Nicks was Mac Jones.

0:21:26.160 --> 0:21:30.640
<v Speaker 1>For those of you wondering how that has how that

0:21:30.680 --> 0:21:34.879
<v Speaker 1>looks so far, well, Mac Jones. In year one with

0:21:35.080 --> 0:21:36.760
<v Speaker 1>new the New England.

0:21:36.400 --> 0:21:38.640
<v Speaker 3>Patriots made a.

0:21:39.040 --> 0:21:42.639
<v Speaker 1>Somewhat fraudulent Pro Bowl as an alternate bon Nicks check.

0:21:43.080 --> 0:21:48.240
<v Speaker 1>The team won ten games, kind of surprisingly made the playoffs.

0:21:48.359 --> 0:21:51.800
<v Speaker 1>Bon Nicks check. The team played the Buffalo Bills in

0:21:51.920 --> 0:21:57.000
<v Speaker 1>Round one, lost by four touchdowns. Bo Nicks check, and

0:21:57.320 --> 0:22:02.520
<v Speaker 1>Mac Jones that offseason trademarked Mac ten and all this

0:22:02.680 --> 0:22:06.679
<v Speaker 1>silly stuff because he was a future star. Go follow

0:22:06.800 --> 0:22:13.440
<v Speaker 1>Bonnix on YouTube. Here is my problem with the Broncos

0:22:13.640 --> 0:22:18.199
<v Speaker 1>hype and discussion. Gosh darn it, you know what I

0:22:18.320 --> 0:22:23.359
<v Speaker 1>you know what? I actually think it's value add it

0:22:23.440 --> 0:22:30.080
<v Speaker 1>draws attention exactly right here is here is what I

0:22:30.119 --> 0:22:36.040
<v Speaker 1>think people are not recognizing when they are talking about

0:22:36.600 --> 0:22:40.919
<v Speaker 1>the Broncos as content. Broncos have an excellent defense and

0:22:40.960 --> 0:22:45.440
<v Speaker 1>that matters now. Dre Greenlaw's dealing with a quad already,

0:22:45.720 --> 0:22:49.120
<v Speaker 1>and Hufanga, who I love as a player, has been

0:22:49.119 --> 0:22:52.000
<v Speaker 1>injured every year since his rookie season. Those are their

0:22:52.040 --> 0:22:58.680
<v Speaker 1>two big additions. The other problem is this last year, demonse.

0:22:59.680 --> 0:23:05.160
<v Speaker 1>They ten games. Okay, the first game they won, they

0:23:05.160 --> 0:23:10.960
<v Speaker 1>beat Baker Mayfield, salute, that's a real thing. Who's who

0:23:10.960 --> 0:23:16.919
<v Speaker 1>they beat after that? Okay, Aaron Rodgers, who the Jets

0:23:16.960 --> 0:23:24.000
<v Speaker 1>then got rid of. They then beat Spencer Rattler, who

0:23:24.080 --> 0:23:27.200
<v Speaker 1>is in a quarterback the Saddus quarterback Battle of the year.

0:23:28.200 --> 0:23:33.160
<v Speaker 1>They then beat Bryce before Bryce got hot. They then

0:23:33.240 --> 0:23:37.560
<v Speaker 1>beat Kirk Cousins right before they benched him. They then

0:23:37.600 --> 0:23:41.679
<v Speaker 1>beat Gardner Minshew who I left that out earlier. They

0:23:41.680 --> 0:23:46.640
<v Speaker 1>actually beat Gardner twice. They then beat whoever the hell

0:23:47.080 --> 0:23:51.000
<v Speaker 1>was starting for the Browns at the time, Jamis, who

0:23:51.080 --> 0:23:55.720
<v Speaker 1>is currently I think a third string quarterback. They then

0:23:55.840 --> 0:24:02.359
<v Speaker 1>beat Anthony Richardson and they then beat Chad Henney. That's

0:24:02.400 --> 0:24:06.760
<v Speaker 1>all their wins. Now we are now saying they're contenders.

0:24:07.480 --> 0:24:11.760
<v Speaker 1>Well to be contenders, Let's just start with the conference.

0:24:12.560 --> 0:24:17.320
<v Speaker 1>How did you do against playoff teams in your conference? Well,

0:24:17.359 --> 0:24:19.800
<v Speaker 1>you played Pittsburgh week two and lost. You played the

0:24:19.880 --> 0:24:23.080
<v Speaker 1>Chargers week six and lost. You played the Ravens week

0:24:23.200 --> 0:24:26.119
<v Speaker 1>nine and lost. You played the Chiefs week ten and lost.

0:24:26.160 --> 0:24:29.080
<v Speaker 1>You played the Chargers week sixteen and lost. You played

0:24:29.080 --> 0:24:31.920
<v Speaker 1>the Bengals, who weren't in the playoffs, but that was

0:24:31.960 --> 0:24:34.280
<v Speaker 1>a playoff level game that game because they were still

0:24:34.280 --> 0:24:38.160
<v Speaker 1>alive Week seventeen and lost. You then played the Bills

0:24:38.240 --> 0:24:43.159
<v Speaker 1>in the actual playoffs and lost thirty one to seven.

0:24:44.840 --> 0:24:47.080
<v Speaker 1>Why am I supposed to believe that team all of

0:24:47.119 --> 0:24:51.440
<v Speaker 1>a sudden is going to be great? Now? Folks out

0:24:51.440 --> 0:24:54.240
<v Speaker 1>there like, oh, Nick, you always just hate on the Broncos.

0:24:55.359 --> 0:25:02.320
<v Speaker 1>Last year preseason gambling show our favorite win total of

0:25:02.480 --> 0:25:07.880
<v Speaker 1>the year Broncos over five and a half, even though

0:25:07.920 --> 0:25:10.520
<v Speaker 1>I didn't believe in bo Nicks because that number was

0:25:10.560 --> 0:25:13.399
<v Speaker 1>too low. They had a last place schedule. Russ, it

0:25:13.600 --> 0:25:16.800
<v Speaker 1>was so terrible for him. I'm just calling it as

0:25:16.800 --> 0:25:23.120
<v Speaker 1>I see it. And right now, is there any other

0:25:23.320 --> 0:25:28.480
<v Speaker 1>team this year or any year that you can remember

0:25:29.880 --> 0:25:34.920
<v Speaker 1>that had the pretty universally accepted worst quarterback in their

0:25:34.960 --> 0:25:39.520
<v Speaker 1>own division that we were like, yep, that team look

0:25:39.560 --> 0:25:43.960
<v Speaker 1>out for him. Like, let's just look at the other

0:25:44.160 --> 0:25:49.320
<v Speaker 1>teams across the league who have the worst quarterback in

0:25:49.359 --> 0:25:53.159
<v Speaker 1>the division. What we think of them? Justin Field's and

0:25:53.240 --> 0:25:58.800
<v Speaker 1>the Jets were we afraid of them? Whoever's starting for

0:25:58.840 --> 0:26:06.680
<v Speaker 1>the Browns, Lacko, how are they looking? The the Colts

0:26:06.960 --> 0:26:18.080
<v Speaker 1>with Daniel Jones, the Giants with Russ, the Vikings with JJ,

0:26:19.840 --> 0:26:22.760
<v Speaker 1>and again that's harsh on him, but he's just young

0:26:23.000 --> 0:26:27.560
<v Speaker 1>now maybe Demondic. Maybe it's Caleb. Yeah, I mean the again,

0:26:28.080 --> 0:26:31.400
<v Speaker 1>I don't think. I don't think people is even though

0:26:31.440 --> 0:26:34.879
<v Speaker 1>Caleb stock is dropping, have JJ ahead of him. In

0:26:34.960 --> 0:26:39.760
<v Speaker 1>the South, the Saints with whatever they're dealing with. And

0:26:39.880 --> 0:26:44.600
<v Speaker 1>in the West Seattle with Darnold or Arizona. I guess

0:26:44.640 --> 0:26:52.040
<v Speaker 1>with like I, I just they just believe in them.

0:26:52.119 --> 0:26:55.120
<v Speaker 3>I am.

0:26:56.040 --> 0:26:57.080
<v Speaker 2>They believe in themselves.

0:26:57.080 --> 0:27:02.480
<v Speaker 1>Sean Payton has talked a lot of ship though, and yeah,

0:27:02.520 --> 0:27:07.560
<v Speaker 1>and listen, this is a tricky one because Sean Payton,

0:27:07.600 --> 0:27:10.520
<v Speaker 1>as great of a coach as he is, he must

0:27:10.560 --> 0:27:17.000
<v Speaker 1>be a better hang because the media loves him. So

0:27:17.040 --> 0:27:19.240
<v Speaker 1>many of my colleagues at Fox just from the one

0:27:19.320 --> 0:27:22.560
<v Speaker 1>year of working with him, they love him. I think

0:27:22.960 --> 0:27:27.200
<v Speaker 1>Peter Schrager, my pal, he loves him. And we kind

0:27:27.240 --> 0:27:33.879
<v Speaker 1>of give Sean Payton a you know, like he walks

0:27:33.920 --> 0:27:37.440
<v Speaker 1>into Denver, does the interview about what a clown show

0:27:37.480 --> 0:27:40.960
<v Speaker 1>it was under Nat Hackett, and by week three the

0:27:41.040 --> 0:27:48.280
<v Speaker 1>Dolphins are hanging seventy on him. Last year, after sneaking

0:27:48.320 --> 0:27:57.040
<v Speaker 1>into the playoffs and then getting absolutely demolished by Buffalo

0:27:57.920 --> 0:28:03.359
<v Speaker 1>has the audacity to say, if we had won this game,

0:28:03.760 --> 0:28:07.280
<v Speaker 1>we really liked our next matchup, which was going to

0:28:07.320 --> 0:28:11.280
<v Speaker 1>be against the Chiefs, a Chiefs team that then beat

0:28:11.320 --> 0:28:14.720
<v Speaker 1>the Buffalo team that he lost to by one hundred

0:28:15.600 --> 0:28:20.719
<v Speaker 1>and now he's like, talking Division isn't big enough for us,

0:28:21.040 --> 0:28:23.879
<v Speaker 1>We need to be talking super Bowl when that team

0:28:24.320 --> 0:28:28.000
<v Speaker 1>has not won the division since the last year they

0:28:28.160 --> 0:28:29.560
<v Speaker 1>won the Super Bowl.

0:28:31.119 --> 0:28:34.080
<v Speaker 2>I just now, I think, is what's going on?

0:28:35.560 --> 0:28:37.159
<v Speaker 3>Maybe?

0:28:38.000 --> 0:28:43.040
<v Speaker 1>And here's the other thing, Demanse, I am very, very

0:28:43.080 --> 0:28:51.080
<v Speaker 1>prepared for a month into the year the Broncos to

0:28:51.200 --> 0:28:57.080
<v Speaker 1>maybe be four and ugh and people and people are

0:28:57.480 --> 0:29:03.400
<v Speaker 1>firing stuff back at me because their softest part of

0:29:03.440 --> 0:29:07.840
<v Speaker 1>their schedule is the beginning in my opinion, home for

0:29:07.960 --> 0:29:11.920
<v Speaker 1>Tennessee at the Colts at the Chargers, which is a

0:29:11.920 --> 0:29:18.280
<v Speaker 1>home game home for Cincinnati. But I'm curious how the

0:29:18.320 --> 0:29:24.680
<v Speaker 1>rest of that's going to go for them. And we'll see.

0:29:24.920 --> 0:29:29.080
<v Speaker 1>But I am I this is one where I've put

0:29:29.120 --> 0:29:31.840
<v Speaker 1>my money where my mouth is. I'm in the process

0:29:31.960 --> 0:29:37.880
<v Speaker 1>right now of negotiating a real Broncos bet with Poker

0:29:38.000 --> 0:29:42.280
<v Speaker 1>Legend and one of the best sports betters ever, David Baker.

0:29:44.160 --> 0:29:47.000
<v Speaker 1>I think I'm going to give him Broncos to win

0:29:47.040 --> 0:29:50.160
<v Speaker 1>the division at plus three twenty. And I think we're

0:29:50.160 --> 0:29:54.880
<v Speaker 1>also going to what demands you look fussered by that.

0:29:56.720 --> 0:29:58.600
<v Speaker 2>He wants to bet and give you money for the

0:29:58.640 --> 0:29:59.920
<v Speaker 2>Broncos winning the division.

0:30:00.400 --> 0:30:03.120
<v Speaker 1>Well, I got to give him plus three twenty. So

0:30:03.320 --> 0:30:06.280
<v Speaker 1>you know what I mean, if we bet one thousand bucks,

0:30:06.840 --> 0:30:10.560
<v Speaker 1>he can win thirty two hundred. But yeah, he wants

0:30:10.640 --> 0:30:15.800
<v Speaker 1>that bet and he but I'll also I think bet

0:30:15.840 --> 0:30:21.800
<v Speaker 1>him make miss playoffs and so like maybe I'll be wrong,

0:30:22.520 --> 0:30:31.760
<v Speaker 1>but I'm I want this take understood and I want

0:30:31.760 --> 0:30:34.520
<v Speaker 1>to see and you know what, maybe I'll maybe I'll

0:30:34.520 --> 0:30:37.720
<v Speaker 1>make a third bet with David if we can find

0:30:37.720 --> 0:30:42.360
<v Speaker 1>a fair price on this and have it be an

0:30:42.360 --> 0:30:45.800
<v Speaker 1>either or and if it's neither, then it's no action.

0:30:46.800 --> 0:30:52.560
<v Speaker 1>Which is the Broncos are so much more likely to

0:30:52.720 --> 0:30:58.440
<v Speaker 1>finish last in the AFC West than finish first. They

0:30:58.440 --> 0:31:03.960
<v Speaker 1>are like I think the Chargers are a are better

0:31:04.000 --> 0:31:06.840
<v Speaker 1>than them. I know the Chiefs are better than them,

0:31:07.800 --> 0:31:14.959
<v Speaker 1>and I think the Raiders, because of schedule, coaching, quarterback,

0:31:15.360 --> 0:31:19.680
<v Speaker 1>I think the Raiders can pop. Now the most likely

0:31:19.800 --> 0:31:24.440
<v Speaker 1>outcome is the Broncos finished third. I understand that, but

0:31:24.520 --> 0:31:28.720
<v Speaker 1>I see no outcome whatsoever where the Broncos finish first.

0:31:29.080 --> 0:31:35.760
<v Speaker 1>And we'll see, we'll see how the future superstar bo

0:31:35.960 --> 0:31:41.520
<v Speaker 1>Nicks looks come November. Maybe I'll be wrong. I doubt it, though,

0:31:42.480 --> 0:31:50.280
<v Speaker 1>uh and boss Ajs says in the chat show us

0:31:50.320 --> 0:31:53.200
<v Speaker 1>the team and quarterbacks the Chiefs beat, it's not that

0:31:53.320 --> 0:31:55.400
<v Speaker 1>impressive last year.

0:31:56.320 --> 0:31:59.640
<v Speaker 2>If we can do that, that's pretty funny.

0:32:00.560 --> 0:32:03.920
<v Speaker 1>I let's see who are the teams in the who

0:32:03.920 --> 0:32:17.600
<v Speaker 1>are the quarterbacks the Chiefs beat last year? Lamar, Josh Allen, Cousins, Herbert, Carr, Purty, Minshew, Baker, Nix, Bryce,

0:32:18.920 --> 0:32:26.360
<v Speaker 1>Minshew Herbert. I thought, I said Burrow, oh Cleveland, whoever

0:32:26.480 --> 0:32:34.640
<v Speaker 1>was their quarterback? Then CIJ whoever the Steelers quarterback? Oh Ross,

0:32:35.680 --> 0:32:40.280
<v Speaker 1>then CJ again, then Josh Allen, So every single quarterback

0:32:40.280 --> 0:32:46.400
<v Speaker 1>in football. Though, yeah, they didn't play their guys. They

0:32:46.560 --> 0:32:50.600
<v Speaker 1>said everyone and U and then they got crushed in

0:32:50.680 --> 0:32:52.760
<v Speaker 1>the Super Bowl. They beat every So in other words,

0:32:52.800 --> 0:32:55.080
<v Speaker 1>they beat every single good quarterback in football except for

0:32:55.200 --> 0:32:57.720
<v Speaker 1>Jaden who they never played, Hurts who beat them, and

0:32:57.800 --> 0:33:00.480
<v Speaker 1>Stafford who they never played. Good try good effort