1 00:00:00,800 --> 00:00:04,360 Speaker 1: You're listening to the Bloomberg Sound on podcast. Catch us 2 00:00:04,360 --> 00:00:07,560 Speaker 1: live weekdays at one Eastern on Bloomberg dot Com, the 3 00:00:07,640 --> 00:00:10,600 Speaker 1: iHeart Radio app, and the Bloomberg Business happ We're listening 4 00:00:10,640 --> 00:00:14,480 Speaker 1: on demand wherever you get your podcast. We do have 5 00:00:14,520 --> 00:00:17,480 Speaker 1: new information on the indictment now facing Donald Trump in Manhattan. 6 00:00:17,480 --> 00:00:20,200 Speaker 1: Bloomberg News reporting the former president will be arraigned on 7 00:00:20,239 --> 00:00:22,640 Speaker 1: Tuesday at the New York State Supreme Court House in 8 00:00:22,760 --> 00:00:26,560 Speaker 1: Lower Manhattan. Now we've added a time two fifteen pm. 9 00:00:26,680 --> 00:00:30,360 Speaker 1: He will enter a plea of not guilty. Trump attorney 10 00:00:30,400 --> 00:00:33,480 Speaker 1: Joe Tacopina on ABC's Good Morning America. Understand, they're gonna 11 00:00:33,479 --> 00:00:36,040 Speaker 1: be closing off blocks around the courthouse, shutting down the courthouse. 12 00:00:37,440 --> 00:00:40,400 Speaker 1: You know. We'll go in there and we'll proceed to 13 00:00:40,440 --> 00:00:43,880 Speaker 1: see a judge at some point plead dot guilty, start 14 00:00:44,320 --> 00:00:47,640 Speaker 1: talking about filing motions, which we will do immediately and 15 00:00:48,240 --> 00:00:53,080 Speaker 1: very aggressively. Regarding the legal viability of this case, Tacopeda 16 00:00:53,120 --> 00:00:55,680 Speaker 1: says his client was surprised by the news last night. 17 00:00:55,720 --> 00:00:58,400 Speaker 1: Even though Donald Trump predicted he would be arrested in 18 00:00:58,440 --> 00:01:00,840 Speaker 1: this case almost two weeks ago. He predicted his own 19 00:01:00,880 --> 00:01:03,120 Speaker 1: arrest based on a leak George that had happened about 20 00:01:03,200 --> 00:01:06,119 Speaker 1: three weeks ago, where there was a law enforcement meeting 21 00:01:06,280 --> 00:01:08,039 Speaker 1: that was happening the day before to go through the 22 00:01:08,120 --> 00:01:11,920 Speaker 1: logistics of an arrayment. So he predicted based on rumors 23 00:01:11,920 --> 00:01:14,759 Speaker 1: and leaks and whatnot. And this case has been permeated 24 00:01:14,959 --> 00:01:18,399 Speaker 1: with rumors and leaks. President Biden chose not to comment 25 00:01:18,440 --> 00:01:19,920 Speaker 1: on the case when he was asked on his way 26 00:01:19,959 --> 00:01:24,759 Speaker 1: out of the White House this morning country for the indictment. 27 00:01:25,160 --> 00:01:31,920 Speaker 1: I'm no comment on that, the indictment. No, I'm not 28 00:01:32,040 --> 00:01:33,800 Speaker 1: done the park about Trumpton that I'm not going to 29 00:01:33,880 --> 00:01:36,120 Speaker 1: talk about it. That's been consistent. Of course, we heard 30 00:01:36,120 --> 00:01:39,520 Speaker 1: the same from the Press Office. Don't expect the White 31 00:01:39,520 --> 00:01:41,800 Speaker 1: House to weigh in. You better believe, though Michael Cohen 32 00:01:41,959 --> 00:01:46,959 Speaker 1: is Donald Trump's former lawyer and former fixer who sort 33 00:01:47,000 --> 00:01:49,680 Speaker 1: of jail time for making the payments to Storey Daniel, 34 00:01:49,720 --> 00:01:51,440 Speaker 1: he is about to get a taste of what I 35 00:01:51,520 --> 00:01:57,360 Speaker 1: went through, and I promise you it's not fun. Trump's 36 00:01:57,400 --> 00:01:59,320 Speaker 1: former Vice president of Mike Pence, was asked about it 37 00:01:59,400 --> 00:02:03,280 Speaker 1: last evening on CNN. Well, I think the unprecedented indictment 38 00:02:04,040 --> 00:02:06,440 Speaker 1: of a former president of the United States on a 39 00:02:06,520 --> 00:02:12,920 Speaker 1: campaign finance issue is an outrage, and it appears to 40 00:02:13,880 --> 00:02:18,280 Speaker 1: millions of Americans mean nothing more than a political prosecution 41 00:02:18,400 --> 00:02:21,320 Speaker 1: that's driven by a prosecutor who literally ran for office 42 00:02:21,360 --> 00:02:24,799 Speaker 1: on the pledge to indict the former president. That's where 43 00:02:24,840 --> 00:02:27,800 Speaker 1: we begin with Stephanie Murphy, the former congresswoman from Florida 44 00:02:27,800 --> 00:02:29,960 Speaker 1: who served on the January six Committee, is with us 45 00:02:29,960 --> 00:02:33,000 Speaker 1: now on Bloomberg Radio. Congress Woman, thanks for your time. 46 00:02:33,040 --> 00:02:34,440 Speaker 1: It's good to have you back. Was it right for 47 00:02:34,480 --> 00:02:37,440 Speaker 1: the Manhattan DA to make history with this case in 48 00:02:37,520 --> 00:02:41,360 Speaker 1: indicting a former president? Well, let's be really clear that 49 00:02:41,400 --> 00:02:44,880 Speaker 1: it wasn't just the Manhattan DA. It was actually a 50 00:02:44,919 --> 00:02:48,800 Speaker 1: grand jury that, when presented with the information, thought that 51 00:02:48,840 --> 00:02:51,800 Speaker 1: there might be something criminal that had happened here and 52 00:02:51,919 --> 00:02:55,399 Speaker 1: proceeded with the charges. So I know there's a lot 53 00:02:55,400 --> 00:02:58,519 Speaker 1: of focus on the DA, but this is working through 54 00:02:58,560 --> 00:03:02,040 Speaker 1: the system the way that the American judicial system is 55 00:03:02,040 --> 00:03:06,400 Speaker 1: supposed to work. And those folks saw something that they 56 00:03:06,480 --> 00:03:10,120 Speaker 1: got needed further examination, and the former president is going 57 00:03:10,160 --> 00:03:15,440 Speaker 1: to have an opportunity to have a jury of his 58 00:03:15,560 --> 00:03:22,600 Speaker 1: peers and you have due process through this system. Well, Tacopina, 59 00:03:22,680 --> 00:03:24,600 Speaker 1: and you look you've heard the reaction from your former 60 00:03:25,040 --> 00:03:28,519 Speaker 1: Republican colleagues in the House. They say that not only 61 00:03:28,600 --> 00:03:33,240 Speaker 1: is this unprecedented, it destroys the rule of law, that 62 00:03:33,320 --> 00:03:36,200 Speaker 1: this case, they see not rising to the level of indictment, 63 00:03:36,640 --> 00:03:39,280 Speaker 1: was not the way to break precedent, to set history 64 00:03:39,280 --> 00:03:41,760 Speaker 1: and indicting a former president, knowing that we have several 65 00:03:41,760 --> 00:03:44,920 Speaker 1: other cases out there that folks might feel differently about 66 00:03:45,120 --> 00:03:47,760 Speaker 1: allegedly attempting to overturn the election the material that you 67 00:03:47,840 --> 00:03:50,080 Speaker 1: dealt with, for instance, on the January sixth committee, Is 68 00:03:50,080 --> 00:03:52,840 Speaker 1: this the case to crack the seal on this? You know, 69 00:03:52,920 --> 00:03:58,720 Speaker 1: I think that there are a lot of there's a 70 00:03:58,720 --> 00:04:01,560 Speaker 1: lot more information that needs to be seen. None of 71 00:04:01,640 --> 00:04:06,640 Speaker 1: us have actually seen what the indictment says. But what 72 00:04:06,720 --> 00:04:09,680 Speaker 1: I will say is that I believe in our judicial system, 73 00:04:09,720 --> 00:04:13,280 Speaker 1: and I find it offensive that there are people who, 74 00:04:13,440 --> 00:04:19,000 Speaker 1: for partisan purposes, are attacking our judicial system. We don't 75 00:04:19,000 --> 00:04:22,920 Speaker 1: need one other institution of the American government that is 76 00:04:23,000 --> 00:04:27,160 Speaker 1: undermined by the very leaders that we've elected. You make 77 00:04:27,160 --> 00:04:29,479 Speaker 1: a great point, it's not just the DA and we 78 00:04:29,560 --> 00:04:32,760 Speaker 1: continue to hear the sorost dog whistle describing him, but 79 00:04:32,839 --> 00:04:36,479 Speaker 1: this was in fact a grand jury, CNN reporting, and 80 00:04:36,520 --> 00:04:39,880 Speaker 1: it was something to hear last night. We could have 81 00:04:39,880 --> 00:04:45,400 Speaker 1: over thirty counts involved here. The idea, Stephanie, is that 82 00:04:45,440 --> 00:04:48,120 Speaker 1: there could be much more than Michael Cohen's testimony at hand, 83 00:04:48,160 --> 00:04:50,320 Speaker 1: that there was other evidence that he was looking at. 84 00:04:50,440 --> 00:04:52,200 Speaker 1: Is that your feel at the stage of the game, 85 00:04:53,920 --> 00:04:56,480 Speaker 1: You know, I'm waiting to get the facts, and I 86 00:04:56,520 --> 00:05:01,400 Speaker 1: think that we have to recognize that the grand jury 87 00:05:01,520 --> 00:05:04,440 Speaker 1: actually has all of that information and they're moving forward 88 00:05:04,480 --> 00:05:08,039 Speaker 1: based on that information. But you know, we would be 89 00:05:08,120 --> 00:05:11,839 Speaker 1: naive to not acknowledge that there is also a public 90 00:05:11,880 --> 00:05:17,720 Speaker 1: perception and a political strategy issue and perspective here in 91 00:05:17,760 --> 00:05:22,520 Speaker 1: addition to just the courts and the judicial system doing 92 00:05:22,520 --> 00:05:24,839 Speaker 1: what they're doing. And I think that's what makes this 93 00:05:25,040 --> 00:05:29,159 Speaker 1: news worthy, is that you know, there are implications from 94 00:05:29,720 --> 00:05:34,280 Speaker 1: a political and a public perspective, but those things shouldn't 95 00:05:34,360 --> 00:05:38,040 Speaker 1: stop our system from holding people to account, right like, 96 00:05:38,120 --> 00:05:40,840 Speaker 1: nobody should be above the law, no matter what kind 97 00:05:40,880 --> 00:05:46,280 Speaker 1: of public outrage or political consequences exist. Yeah, look, we 98 00:05:46,360 --> 00:05:49,479 Speaker 1: just played Michael Cohen reacting to this. He did jail 99 00:05:49,520 --> 00:05:52,080 Speaker 1: time for this, and a lot of people think that 100 00:05:52,080 --> 00:05:55,200 Speaker 1: that should be played out equally here that you know, 101 00:05:55,279 --> 00:05:58,560 Speaker 1: quote unquote, no one is above the law. But Congresswoman, 102 00:05:58,600 --> 00:06:00,640 Speaker 1: how does this affect the other case against him? Do 103 00:06:00,640 --> 00:06:02,320 Speaker 1: you have a sense of that, knowing that we have 104 00:06:02,760 --> 00:06:05,120 Speaker 1: the special counsel here in Washington, the grand jury in 105 00:06:05,120 --> 00:06:08,040 Speaker 1: Fulton County, or are these all separate entities that could 106 00:06:08,040 --> 00:06:11,280 Speaker 1: all do whatever they want on their own time. I 107 00:06:11,320 --> 00:06:14,480 Speaker 1: think they need to all be separate entities because they 108 00:06:14,520 --> 00:06:19,279 Speaker 1: are all separate issues, and nobody should proceed in this 109 00:06:19,360 --> 00:06:22,040 Speaker 1: way unless they have a case that they think can prevail. 110 00:06:22,480 --> 00:06:28,200 Speaker 1: Because the reality is that whenever folks try to swing 111 00:06:28,360 --> 00:06:31,200 Speaker 1: at the former president and if they miss, they just 112 00:06:31,240 --> 00:06:36,280 Speaker 1: make him stronger. And I think it's important that we 113 00:06:36,400 --> 00:06:42,960 Speaker 1: have systems that actually move on fact and evidence and 114 00:06:43,880 --> 00:06:50,560 Speaker 1: move forward with the ability to actually see these cases 115 00:06:50,600 --> 00:06:57,480 Speaker 1: to their rightful end as opposed to being political mechanisms. 116 00:06:57,839 --> 00:07:00,400 Speaker 1: I want to ask you about the reaction that we've 117 00:07:00,440 --> 00:07:02,680 Speaker 1: heard from members of Congress. Of course, a lot of 118 00:07:02,680 --> 00:07:05,880 Speaker 1: it predictable. We're hearing from, you know, in many cases, 119 00:07:05,920 --> 00:07:09,560 Speaker 1: extremes on the left and the right who have predetermined ideas. Here, 120 00:07:10,480 --> 00:07:14,080 Speaker 1: we'll start with the Democrats. Maxine Waters was essentially celebrating this. 121 00:07:14,160 --> 00:07:17,840 Speaker 1: It's about time exclamation point on Twitter. Is that helpful 122 00:07:17,960 --> 00:07:21,320 Speaker 1: or does that actually create the potential for some blowback 123 00:07:21,360 --> 00:07:23,720 Speaker 1: on the Democratic Party If it looks like this, this 124 00:07:23,880 --> 00:07:29,920 Speaker 1: is a celebration. We shouldn't neither celebrate or mourn, right 125 00:07:30,600 --> 00:07:35,480 Speaker 1: it Just doing either further divides this country at a 126 00:07:35,520 --> 00:07:40,240 Speaker 1: time when we are already quite divided. What we need 127 00:07:40,320 --> 00:07:45,000 Speaker 1: to do is to believe in our system and believe 128 00:07:45,040 --> 00:07:48,480 Speaker 1: that nobody is above the law and if there was 129 00:07:48,520 --> 00:07:51,920 Speaker 1: a crime that was committed, the person whoever they are, 130 00:07:52,000 --> 00:07:55,400 Speaker 1: will behold held to account, and if they weren't, they'll 131 00:07:55,440 --> 00:07:59,920 Speaker 1: have an opportunity for due process. I think there's we're 132 00:08:00,160 --> 00:08:03,640 Speaker 1: losing faith in our institutions that if you look at polling, 133 00:08:03,800 --> 00:08:06,880 Speaker 1: the American people are losing faith in their institutions. And 134 00:08:07,800 --> 00:08:11,040 Speaker 1: it's one thing to lose faith in Congress. It's a 135 00:08:11,200 --> 00:08:15,320 Speaker 1: totally different thing to lose faith in our judicial system too. 136 00:08:15,720 --> 00:08:18,800 Speaker 1: And so it's really important that people who are elected 137 00:08:19,120 --> 00:08:23,120 Speaker 1: use their words wisely and understand that their rhetoric has consequences, 138 00:08:23,520 --> 00:08:26,120 Speaker 1: and they should flip the coin right and think to 139 00:08:26,160 --> 00:08:29,040 Speaker 1: themselves if it was somebody of their own party, would 140 00:08:29,080 --> 00:08:32,000 Speaker 1: they respond or behave the way that they are in 141 00:08:32,040 --> 00:08:34,400 Speaker 1: this case. Well, on the other side of the aisle, 142 00:08:34,400 --> 00:08:37,520 Speaker 1: we heard from the Speaker himself. Kevin McCarthy tweets, Alvin 143 00:08:37,520 --> 00:08:41,080 Speaker 1: Bragg is irreparably damaged our country in an attempt to 144 00:08:41,080 --> 00:08:44,480 Speaker 1: interfere in our presidential election. He goes on to write 145 00:08:44,480 --> 00:08:47,680 Speaker 1: from there, But that's a lot just to start that 146 00:08:47,800 --> 00:08:52,440 Speaker 1: one line. Irreparable damage interference with an election? How do 147 00:08:52,480 --> 00:08:56,640 Speaker 1: you respond to that? You know that is Speaker mccayy 148 00:08:56,960 --> 00:09:01,120 Speaker 1: not understanding our judicial system, because it isn't just about 149 00:09:01,240 --> 00:09:06,000 Speaker 1: the DA The folks who decided to move forward with 150 00:09:06,040 --> 00:09:10,160 Speaker 1: this with the indictment was a grand jury. This is 151 00:09:10,200 --> 00:09:13,360 Speaker 1: the way our country is set up. You have a 152 00:09:13,400 --> 00:09:17,440 Speaker 1: grand jury, you have an opportunity to file to dismiss, 153 00:09:17,880 --> 00:09:23,160 Speaker 1: you have multiple opportunities of due process throughout this, and 154 00:09:23,200 --> 00:09:28,640 Speaker 1: then eventually you get tried before a jury of your peers. 155 00:09:29,200 --> 00:09:33,160 Speaker 1: And so for him to attack a person individually is 156 00:09:33,240 --> 00:09:38,040 Speaker 1: irresponsible because we have seen what has happened when people 157 00:09:38,040 --> 00:09:43,640 Speaker 1: who are in elected positions target individual people. I served 158 00:09:43,679 --> 00:09:47,360 Speaker 1: on the January sixth Committee. I know that way too. Well. Well, 159 00:09:47,400 --> 00:09:49,960 Speaker 1: let's get into that for a moment. There are barricades 160 00:09:50,480 --> 00:09:52,800 Speaker 1: up in front of Capitol Hill, where you used to 161 00:09:52,840 --> 00:09:55,000 Speaker 1: work until a short time ago. There are barricades up 162 00:09:55,040 --> 00:09:57,840 Speaker 1: in front of the courthouse in New York. We haven't 163 00:09:57,880 --> 00:10:01,320 Speaker 1: actually seen organized at least protests breakout the one that 164 00:10:01,360 --> 00:10:04,079 Speaker 1: we were following in New York earlier this week or 165 00:10:04,080 --> 00:10:05,960 Speaker 1: I guess it was last week. There are more reporters 166 00:10:05,960 --> 00:10:08,040 Speaker 1: showed up than protesters. Do you feel like this is 167 00:10:08,040 --> 00:10:11,600 Speaker 1: a real threat of violence right now? I certainly hope 168 00:10:11,600 --> 00:10:15,120 Speaker 1: it is not, because what we saw in January sixth 169 00:10:15,320 --> 00:10:18,719 Speaker 1: was that there are a lot of people who believed 170 00:10:19,600 --> 00:10:22,280 Speaker 1: powerful people in this country. They believed the lies that 171 00:10:22,360 --> 00:10:26,760 Speaker 1: these powerful people spread, and they acted on them, and 172 00:10:26,840 --> 00:10:33,599 Speaker 1: now their lives are you know, they are changed irreparably. 173 00:10:34,040 --> 00:10:39,520 Speaker 1: They and I listened to so many testimonies where they're like, well, 174 00:10:40,440 --> 00:10:42,920 Speaker 1: you know this person told me this, I believe them. 175 00:10:43,000 --> 00:10:46,040 Speaker 1: I showed up, I did these things, and now my 176 00:10:46,120 --> 00:10:50,960 Speaker 1: life is ruined and I don't see anybody else experiencing 177 00:10:51,000 --> 00:10:55,160 Speaker 1: the consequences that I am. Right, you wonder, and yeah, 178 00:10:55,200 --> 00:10:57,760 Speaker 1: this is the this is the problem here is that 179 00:10:57,760 --> 00:10:59,679 Speaker 1: there are a lot of people who are in powerful 180 00:10:59,679 --> 00:11:05,439 Speaker 1: positions who are not being very responsible about their platform 181 00:11:05,600 --> 00:11:07,840 Speaker 1: and what they are telling people, and there are a 182 00:11:07,840 --> 00:11:13,439 Speaker 1: lot of Americans who believe them and will act on it, 183 00:11:13,720 --> 00:11:19,840 Speaker 1: and it will result in devastating consequences for those average Americans, 184 00:11:20,120 --> 00:11:23,040 Speaker 1: but not for the powerful people. Well, I wonder if 185 00:11:23,320 --> 00:11:25,320 Speaker 1: the events of January six and the hundreds of people 186 00:11:25,360 --> 00:11:30,280 Speaker 1: who were jailed for attacking the capital informs what's happening now. 187 00:11:30,559 --> 00:11:33,040 Speaker 1: The law enforcement officials we've spoken with say that, you know, 188 00:11:33,080 --> 00:11:35,840 Speaker 1: they're more worried about a lone wolf, for instance, than 189 00:11:35,880 --> 00:11:40,280 Speaker 1: an actual organized attack like we saw in January sixth? 190 00:11:40,440 --> 00:11:43,320 Speaker 1: Is that your fear a congresswoman, as someone who served 191 00:11:43,480 --> 00:11:46,280 Speaker 1: on the committee, do you feel safe? Do you fear 192 00:11:46,320 --> 00:11:50,720 Speaker 1: for your own safety? You know, my step and I 193 00:11:50,840 --> 00:11:56,200 Speaker 1: always used to sort of gallows humor joke about we 194 00:11:56,200 --> 00:11:58,960 Speaker 1: weren't worried about the people who called us a hundred 195 00:11:58,960 --> 00:12:00,880 Speaker 1: times to tell us they are coming to hurt me, 196 00:12:01,280 --> 00:12:03,160 Speaker 1: but they were. We were worried about the person who 197 00:12:03,200 --> 00:12:08,040 Speaker 1: never called at all, that just showed up. And you know, 198 00:12:08,120 --> 00:12:11,400 Speaker 1: the head of the US Capitol Police just a few 199 00:12:11,440 --> 00:12:14,040 Speaker 1: months ago said that there's not a more dangerous time 200 00:12:14,120 --> 00:12:18,480 Speaker 1: to be an elected official than there is today, and 201 00:12:18,559 --> 00:12:21,480 Speaker 1: so we need to turn down the rhetoric you know 202 00:12:21,559 --> 00:12:25,120 Speaker 1: these people, I genuinely believe I worked with people who 203 00:12:25,160 --> 00:12:28,040 Speaker 1: cared about their community and their country, and we're trying 204 00:12:28,080 --> 00:12:31,600 Speaker 1: to serve And while we may not all agree on 205 00:12:31,720 --> 00:12:38,880 Speaker 1: policy perspectives, the way to resolve those things is through words, 206 00:12:39,120 --> 00:12:41,640 Speaker 1: not through your fists. Like I tell my children all 207 00:12:41,679 --> 00:12:43,720 Speaker 1: the time, you know, use your words, not your hands. 208 00:12:44,960 --> 00:12:49,080 Speaker 1: And you know, we we have to reclaim that there's 209 00:12:49,120 --> 00:12:51,360 Speaker 1: a lot of challenges in front of this country right now. 210 00:12:51,600 --> 00:12:54,760 Speaker 1: We need to have a debate, but not debate that 211 00:12:54,840 --> 00:12:57,040 Speaker 1: results in violence. You know, if we all just listen 212 00:12:57,080 --> 00:12:58,920 Speaker 1: to our moms, we wouldn't have half the problems we 213 00:12:58,960 --> 00:13:00,760 Speaker 1: had in this country right now. I think we're all 214 00:13:00,840 --> 00:13:03,920 Speaker 1: well aware of that. With regard to the investigations into 215 00:13:03,960 --> 00:13:06,520 Speaker 1: January six specifically, we've got the Special Counsel as I 216 00:13:06,559 --> 00:13:09,920 Speaker 1: mentioned here in Washington, we've also got Fulton County in Georgia. 217 00:13:10,000 --> 00:13:12,920 Speaker 1: You were dealing with many of the same materials that 218 00:13:13,040 --> 00:13:16,840 Speaker 1: these investigations are in tandem as part of the January 219 00:13:16,920 --> 00:13:19,400 Speaker 1: sixth committee. And I know there was talk about cooperation. 220 00:13:19,880 --> 00:13:21,840 Speaker 1: Can you shed any light on that. Do you have 221 00:13:21,920 --> 00:13:27,640 Speaker 1: any expectation for either of these cases to resolve soon? Well? So, 222 00:13:27,720 --> 00:13:31,160 Speaker 1: When we wrapped up the January sixth Select Committee, we 223 00:13:32,520 --> 00:13:39,560 Speaker 1: released our data and all of the information, the depositions, 224 00:13:39,640 --> 00:13:45,360 Speaker 1: the transcripts, etc. Are widely available. We are seeing Republicans 225 00:13:45,440 --> 00:13:49,200 Speaker 1: weaponize that in ways where they cherry pick things that 226 00:13:49,800 --> 00:13:52,520 Speaker 1: support their narrative, and I think that's a bit unfair. 227 00:13:52,640 --> 00:13:55,800 Speaker 1: But all of the information is out there, and I 228 00:13:55,880 --> 00:14:00,120 Speaker 1: stand by the report. What I hope is for some 229 00:14:00,200 --> 00:14:03,280 Speaker 1: of these other investigations to be able to leverage the 230 00:14:03,280 --> 00:14:08,640 Speaker 1: information that we were able to gather to further their investigations, 231 00:14:08,679 --> 00:14:11,360 Speaker 1: and then they need to come to a decision as 232 00:14:11,400 --> 00:14:15,840 Speaker 1: to whether or not they believe there's something that was criminal, 233 00:14:16,400 --> 00:14:19,480 Speaker 1: criminal conduct happened, and whether or not they have a 234 00:14:19,680 --> 00:14:23,040 Speaker 1: case that can be prosecuted. I'm sure that you're waiting 235 00:14:23,040 --> 00:14:25,760 Speaker 1: for news much like we are, and we'd love to 236 00:14:25,760 --> 00:14:27,200 Speaker 1: talk to you when we learn more. It's great to 237 00:14:27,240 --> 00:14:30,320 Speaker 1: have you back. Congresswoman Stephanie Murphy, a former member of 238 00:14:30,320 --> 00:14:33,040 Speaker 1: the January six Committee, former congresswoman from Florida, with us 239 00:14:33,040 --> 00:14:36,880 Speaker 1: here to get things started. You're listening to Bloomberg. You 240 00:14:37,000 --> 00:14:44,000 Speaker 1: sound on with Joe Matthew on Bloomberg Radio. No handcuffs 241 00:14:44,000 --> 00:14:47,960 Speaker 1: when Donald Trump goes to the courthouse next Tuesday, set 242 00:14:48,000 --> 00:14:52,400 Speaker 1: to enter a not guilty plea, his lawyer Joe Tacopina, 243 00:14:53,040 --> 00:14:55,920 Speaker 1: making the round series on, among other programs, Good Morning 244 00:14:55,920 --> 00:15:00,600 Speaker 1: America on ABC, talking with George Stephanopolis about not so 245 00:15:00,680 --> 00:15:03,400 Speaker 1: much the agreement, but at least the items that we 246 00:15:03,520 --> 00:15:05,960 Speaker 1: already know about the way this will unfold next week. 247 00:15:06,240 --> 00:15:08,800 Speaker 1: The president will not be putting handcuffs. As far as 248 00:15:08,800 --> 00:15:11,600 Speaker 1: the most shots concerned purp walk. I mean, you know, 249 00:15:12,200 --> 00:15:14,360 Speaker 1: as I said, I'm sure they'll try to make sure 250 00:15:14,840 --> 00:15:18,440 Speaker 1: they get some you know, joy out of this by 251 00:15:18,560 --> 00:15:21,720 Speaker 1: bye parading him, remembering he wanted to be paraded, at 252 00:15:21,760 --> 00:15:24,120 Speaker 1: least that that's what had been reported. Should he smile? 253 00:15:24,120 --> 00:15:25,960 Speaker 1: He wondered if he should wear a tie. He wanted 254 00:15:26,000 --> 00:15:29,880 Speaker 1: to be handcuffed and given the purp walk for the 255 00:15:29,920 --> 00:15:33,440 Speaker 1: sake of the photographs and the potential fundraising, the potential 256 00:15:33,440 --> 00:15:36,680 Speaker 1: political impact. Let's assemble our panel. It's the day after 257 00:15:36,800 --> 00:15:39,000 Speaker 1: and we have the two voices you want to hear 258 00:15:39,000 --> 00:15:41,360 Speaker 1: from Rick Davis and Jeannie Schanzeyo, both of whom weighed 259 00:15:41,400 --> 00:15:44,200 Speaker 1: in last evening here on Bloomberg, but now on sound 260 00:15:44,240 --> 00:15:48,320 Speaker 1: On or of course signature panel. They're all ours right now. Rick, 261 00:15:48,560 --> 00:15:52,479 Speaker 1: I'll start with you here. Donald Trump apparently was surprised 262 00:15:52,520 --> 00:15:56,320 Speaker 1: by this, even though he predicted it were you. Yeah, 263 00:15:56,360 --> 00:15:59,040 Speaker 1: I think that Alvin Bragg had the head fake of 264 00:15:59,040 --> 00:16:02,440 Speaker 1: the year. It is all convinced that the grand jury 265 00:16:02,440 --> 00:16:05,280 Speaker 1: wasn't going to meet again and turn out a indictment 266 00:16:06,000 --> 00:16:11,080 Speaker 1: until later in April. Everyone was following the schedule, and 267 00:16:10,720 --> 00:16:14,840 Speaker 1: and next thing you know, yesterday afternoon, the indictment is announced. 268 00:16:14,840 --> 00:16:18,840 Speaker 1: So I think Donald Trump claims he was surprised by that, 269 00:16:18,920 --> 00:16:21,680 Speaker 1: and I think everybody else should be too, because I 270 00:16:21,720 --> 00:16:24,840 Speaker 1: think they actually kept this under wraps pretty well, different 271 00:16:24,880 --> 00:16:28,480 Speaker 1: from what the President's attorney was saying today. If this 272 00:16:28,560 --> 00:16:30,360 Speaker 1: was a grand jury that was a leaking a lot, 273 00:16:30,400 --> 00:16:32,680 Speaker 1: we would have known yesterday that they were coming out, 274 00:16:32,680 --> 00:16:37,000 Speaker 1: and nobody did. So I think that Alvin Bragg at 275 00:16:37,080 --> 00:16:41,800 Speaker 1: least got the first shot in a clean environment where 276 00:16:41,800 --> 00:16:44,120 Speaker 1: he was able to paint the indictment for what it was, 277 00:16:44,800 --> 00:16:47,520 Speaker 1: which is I'm sure why he was trying to keep 278 00:16:47,520 --> 00:16:50,400 Speaker 1: it quiet until the time that they announced it. Genie, 279 00:16:50,440 --> 00:16:52,200 Speaker 1: we don't know what the charges are going to be. 280 00:16:52,320 --> 00:16:55,920 Speaker 1: There's talk reportedly thirty counts or something like that. Inside 281 00:16:55,920 --> 00:17:00,680 Speaker 1: this sealed AFT David, this sealed indictment. Was this the 282 00:17:00,760 --> 00:17:02,920 Speaker 1: case with the little we know about it? And I 283 00:17:02,960 --> 00:17:05,240 Speaker 1: want to be fair here because we don't know a lot. 284 00:17:06,200 --> 00:17:07,760 Speaker 1: But we also know there are a couple of other 285 00:17:07,760 --> 00:17:10,560 Speaker 1: grand juries looking at very important stuff like alleged attempts 286 00:17:10,600 --> 00:17:14,360 Speaker 1: to overturn an election, for instance, the handling of classified documents. 287 00:17:14,440 --> 00:17:18,760 Speaker 1: Is this matter, that of hush money payments, the reason 288 00:17:18,800 --> 00:17:21,040 Speaker 1: to set a precedent with the first ever indictment of 289 00:17:21,040 --> 00:17:23,720 Speaker 1: a former president. Yeah, I mean, I think it's an 290 00:17:23,720 --> 00:17:26,120 Speaker 1: important to underscore we don't know what's in this indictment, 291 00:17:26,119 --> 00:17:28,880 Speaker 1: and if there are thirty counts, it may include more 292 00:17:28,920 --> 00:17:30,840 Speaker 1: than what we think. But what we think at this 293 00:17:30,920 --> 00:17:34,280 Speaker 1: point at least is the falsified business records and a 294 00:17:34,480 --> 00:17:37,080 Speaker 1: tie in at the federal level to make it more 295 00:17:37,119 --> 00:17:40,520 Speaker 1: than a misdemeanor in terms of campaign finance violations. And 296 00:17:40,560 --> 00:17:44,680 Speaker 1: those are obviously serious, but maybe not in many people's minds, 297 00:17:44,760 --> 00:17:47,280 Speaker 1: quite as serious as what Fulton County George is looking 298 00:17:47,320 --> 00:17:52,120 Speaker 1: into the Mari Laco documents or January sixth, and so 299 00:17:52,520 --> 00:17:56,200 Speaker 1: I think you raise a really important question because we 300 00:17:56,280 --> 00:17:59,560 Speaker 1: are at a point where a norm in American politics 301 00:17:59,600 --> 00:18:01,840 Speaker 1: and am arc in history that has lasted over two 302 00:18:01,920 --> 00:18:06,639 Speaker 1: hundred years. Obviously, a sitting president shouldn't be indicted. But 303 00:18:06,800 --> 00:18:10,280 Speaker 1: now you have a former president being indicted, and in 304 00:18:10,400 --> 00:18:16,080 Speaker 1: many people's minds, when it involves business records documents, maybe 305 00:18:16,119 --> 00:18:18,639 Speaker 1: that doesn't rise to a level in which we break 306 00:18:18,720 --> 00:18:22,920 Speaker 1: that norm. And you know, a lot of people, particularly Republicans, 307 00:18:23,240 --> 00:18:26,159 Speaker 1: believe that. And that's why they believe when Donald Trump 308 00:18:26,200 --> 00:18:29,480 Speaker 1: says it is a political persecution. They believe that as well, 309 00:18:29,720 --> 00:18:33,000 Speaker 1: because you know, in Alvin Bragg's defense one hundred and seventeen, 310 00:18:33,080 --> 00:18:36,680 Speaker 1: we understand times in his you know, fourteen months as 311 00:18:36,760 --> 00:18:40,240 Speaker 1: Manhattan DA, he has charged this crime. But we are 312 00:18:40,280 --> 00:18:43,480 Speaker 1: not talking about an average person like me. We are 313 00:18:43,520 --> 00:18:47,119 Speaker 1: talking about a former president. And so you have to 314 00:18:47,160 --> 00:18:49,159 Speaker 1: be very careful when you do this. And this is 315 00:18:49,200 --> 00:18:52,159 Speaker 1: what is lending credence to Trump's argument that this is 316 00:18:52,160 --> 00:18:54,880 Speaker 1: a witch hunt. Rick, I've heard the name al Capone 317 00:18:55,240 --> 00:18:57,280 Speaker 1: thrown around here a lot lately the last couple of 318 00:18:57,359 --> 00:18:59,560 Speaker 1: days as people try to sort of qualify this or 319 00:18:59,560 --> 00:19:01,800 Speaker 1: put it in perspective. Those who think this is a 320 00:19:01,840 --> 00:19:04,439 Speaker 1: good idea say, hey, you know, they didn't get al 321 00:19:04,480 --> 00:19:07,600 Speaker 1: Capone on anything more than tax evasion. You take the 322 00:19:07,640 --> 00:19:10,879 Speaker 1: case that you can get or thirty counts of business fraud, 323 00:19:10,880 --> 00:19:14,480 Speaker 1: if that's what we're talking about here, worth it? You know, 324 00:19:14,520 --> 00:19:16,520 Speaker 1: it's hard to tell. I mean, you know, this is 325 00:19:16,600 --> 00:19:20,000 Speaker 1: the process of trying this case in the court of 326 00:19:20,000 --> 00:19:23,639 Speaker 1: public opinion. Right, Well, let's find a comparative example, like 327 00:19:23,680 --> 00:19:27,760 Speaker 1: al Capone, Uh that it's not a moral equivalent. Al 328 00:19:27,800 --> 00:19:30,760 Speaker 1: Capone was a criminal, right, they brought banks, you know, 329 00:19:31,200 --> 00:19:34,639 Speaker 1: and and and and so. Uh. Comparing that to the 330 00:19:34,960 --> 00:19:38,560 Speaker 1: former president United States is just not an a moral equivalent. Uh. 331 00:19:38,760 --> 00:19:41,280 Speaker 1: And I think this is the task that that Alvin 332 00:19:41,280 --> 00:19:43,200 Speaker 1: Bragg has in front of him. I mean, it's one 333 00:19:43,240 --> 00:19:46,639 Speaker 1: thing to have prepared a case and gotten his uh 334 00:19:46,800 --> 00:19:50,880 Speaker 1: grand jury to to report these indictments. But he's got 335 00:19:50,920 --> 00:19:53,680 Speaker 1: a job of convincing the American public that this is 336 00:19:53,720 --> 00:19:55,560 Speaker 1: the right thing to do. Um. You know, there's a 337 00:19:55,640 --> 00:19:58,639 Speaker 1: Quinnipiac poll out showing sixty two percent of all Americans 338 00:19:58,640 --> 00:20:02,480 Speaker 1: believe Bragg's motive by politics. This is not just Republicans, 339 00:20:02,600 --> 00:20:06,160 Speaker 1: this is Americans in general. And he's got to convince 340 00:20:06,240 --> 00:20:09,240 Speaker 1: them that this isn't about politics, that it's about the 341 00:20:09,320 --> 00:20:12,600 Speaker 1: rule of law. It's about maintaining, you know, the idea 342 00:20:12,640 --> 00:20:15,080 Speaker 1: that nobody is above the rule of law, and I 343 00:20:15,080 --> 00:20:18,040 Speaker 1: would say he's done a really poor job of setting 344 00:20:18,040 --> 00:20:20,040 Speaker 1: that up. I know that he had to get to 345 00:20:20,080 --> 00:20:22,720 Speaker 1: this point, but where is he this weekend? What is 346 00:20:22,720 --> 00:20:24,840 Speaker 1: he telling the public? Where are we going to be 347 00:20:24,880 --> 00:20:28,040 Speaker 1: in form that somehow this has risen to the occasion 348 00:20:28,080 --> 00:20:31,000 Speaker 1: it's the first time a president United States will ever 349 00:20:31,080 --> 00:20:35,480 Speaker 1: be indicted for a crime, either during or after their 350 00:20:35,560 --> 00:20:39,080 Speaker 1: term of office. Joe Tacopina, a Donald Trump's lawyer who 351 00:20:39,119 --> 00:20:42,119 Speaker 1: I've played a couple of clips from here, was asked 352 00:20:42,119 --> 00:20:44,800 Speaker 1: again on ABC about this idea of thirty counts of 353 00:20:44,840 --> 00:20:48,800 Speaker 1: business fraud, and it's interesting the way he words his answer. 354 00:20:48,880 --> 00:20:51,560 Speaker 1: I've been through this with a number of lawmakers over 355 00:20:51,600 --> 00:20:54,160 Speaker 1: the last couple of weeks and analysts who have come 356 00:20:54,200 --> 00:20:57,720 Speaker 1: on this program who speak about the payments. As a 357 00:20:57,760 --> 00:21:01,320 Speaker 1: matter of fact, here's Tacopina. I believe we'll focused around 358 00:21:01,320 --> 00:21:06,240 Speaker 1: this Stormy Daniel's confidentiality settlement agreement, completely legal settlement agreement 359 00:21:06,280 --> 00:21:09,240 Speaker 1: that was made years and years ago. I think what 360 00:21:09,280 --> 00:21:13,679 Speaker 1: they've done was take each check or payment and an 361 00:21:13,720 --> 00:21:16,560 Speaker 1: extrapolated account out of that. But I don't don't think 362 00:21:16,560 --> 00:21:19,520 Speaker 1: it's gonna be more than what we expected. As far 363 00:21:19,520 --> 00:21:21,600 Speaker 1: as the factual patterns are concerned. You never hear the 364 00:21:21,600 --> 00:21:24,560 Speaker 1: word alleged. You never hear supposedly or purportedly. Genie. He 365 00:21:24,640 --> 00:21:28,000 Speaker 1: just said, what they've done is take each check or 366 00:21:28,080 --> 00:21:32,680 Speaker 1: payment and extrapolate out of that. So they exist. They 367 00:21:32,760 --> 00:21:35,200 Speaker 1: do exist, and I think it's an acknowledgement of what 368 00:21:35,240 --> 00:21:38,040 Speaker 1: we all know that the payments did occur. But it 369 00:21:38,119 --> 00:21:42,280 Speaker 1: is still a very difficult case for the prosecution and 370 00:21:42,359 --> 00:21:44,520 Speaker 1: a number of ways in which the defense can go. 371 00:21:44,920 --> 00:21:48,680 Speaker 1: And another thing we are hearing is Alan Weisselberg's name 372 00:21:48,760 --> 00:21:51,720 Speaker 1: an awful lot. So as we think about these counts, 373 00:21:51,880 --> 00:21:55,480 Speaker 1: you keep wondering, is it more than the hush money 374 00:21:55,560 --> 00:21:58,600 Speaker 1: payments to the porn star. Obviously, that and of itself 375 00:21:58,840 --> 00:22:01,720 Speaker 1: is not a violated of the law. The violation would 376 00:22:01,760 --> 00:22:04,440 Speaker 1: be the falsification of their records. That's a violation of 377 00:22:04,480 --> 00:22:07,000 Speaker 1: New York state law. But I keep hearing the name 378 00:22:07,000 --> 00:22:10,240 Speaker 1: Alan Weisselberg. Is he going to come in and testify? 379 00:22:10,359 --> 00:22:13,160 Speaker 1: And are they going to be talking about something beyond 380 00:22:13,520 --> 00:22:16,720 Speaker 1: those payments? I think those are big questions, and you know, 381 00:22:16,760 --> 00:22:18,800 Speaker 1: I think we're going to all be watching this weekend 382 00:22:18,840 --> 00:22:21,680 Speaker 1: to see do we get a sense as to what 383 00:22:21,800 --> 00:22:25,640 Speaker 1: the charges are before the arrangement at two fifteen on Tuesday. 384 00:22:26,040 --> 00:22:28,560 Speaker 1: Is that going to leak out? So far it hasn't, 385 00:22:28,600 --> 00:22:30,760 Speaker 1: but it very well might, and that may give us 386 00:22:30,760 --> 00:22:33,479 Speaker 1: an indication of where they're headed on this I suspect 387 00:22:33,520 --> 00:22:36,119 Speaker 1: it could be a leaky weekend. Rick, what's your expectation 388 00:22:36,160 --> 00:22:37,919 Speaker 1: the next couple of days. We have to wait till Tuesday. 389 00:22:37,960 --> 00:22:40,280 Speaker 1: I think there's any evidence that this has actually been 390 00:22:40,400 --> 00:22:43,440 Speaker 1: much of a leaky process out of the prosecutor's office. 391 00:22:43,480 --> 00:22:45,320 Speaker 1: I mean, all the leaking that we've seen in the 392 00:22:45,400 --> 00:22:47,760 Speaker 1: last three weeks have come from Donald Trump, and according 393 00:22:47,800 --> 00:22:51,120 Speaker 1: to his lawyer, you know, he's just making this stuff up. So, 394 00:22:52,280 --> 00:22:54,560 Speaker 1: you know, I think that that we're going to learn 395 00:22:54,600 --> 00:22:57,919 Speaker 1: when when the process begins, and the process begins, it 396 00:22:57,960 --> 00:23:01,040 Speaker 1: sounds like on Tuesday afternoon, you know, when Donald Trump 397 00:23:01,080 --> 00:23:04,600 Speaker 1: reports for his arraignment, and and and so I would say, 398 00:23:04,640 --> 00:23:07,080 Speaker 1: just on the point that Jennie was making. Um, you know, 399 00:23:07,200 --> 00:23:10,040 Speaker 1: one of the things about these campaign finance violations is, 400 00:23:10,520 --> 00:23:13,680 Speaker 1: um you know, if you if you violate campaign financial 401 00:23:13,800 --> 00:23:17,520 Speaker 1: rules and you admit it, it's a misdemeanor. By and large, 402 00:23:17,560 --> 00:23:19,920 Speaker 1: if you violate a campaign financial rule and then try 403 00:23:19,960 --> 00:23:23,320 Speaker 1: to cover it up, like what I believe is alleged 404 00:23:23,359 --> 00:23:26,919 Speaker 1: in this indictment, Uh, then you have all kinds of 405 00:23:26,920 --> 00:23:29,639 Speaker 1: other implications because maybe one of the ways that this 406 00:23:29,720 --> 00:23:31,880 Speaker 1: was covered up was cooking the books within the Trump 407 00:23:32,000 --> 00:23:35,119 Speaker 1: organization to shield the payments that were being made to 408 00:23:35,160 --> 00:23:38,679 Speaker 1: the to Michael Cohen, his lawyer, who then made the 409 00:23:38,680 --> 00:23:42,159 Speaker 1: payments to Storey Daniels. So it triggers a lot of 410 00:23:42,280 --> 00:23:47,520 Speaker 1: downside risks for for the Trump organization depending upon how 411 00:23:47,520 --> 00:23:51,840 Speaker 1: they reported this. Again, it's the classic Washington dilemma. It's 412 00:23:51,880 --> 00:23:53,840 Speaker 1: not the crime, it's the cover up to get you 413 00:23:53,880 --> 00:23:56,720 Speaker 1: in trouble. What do you think of the arrangement, Jeanie, 414 00:23:56,800 --> 00:23:59,800 Speaker 1: no perp walk. Are you disappointed? I think Trump is 415 00:23:59,800 --> 00:24:01,719 Speaker 1: good to be disappointed. No, I think that is a 416 00:24:01,840 --> 00:24:03,760 Speaker 1: very good thing. I think the last thing we need 417 00:24:03,880 --> 00:24:06,320 Speaker 1: is a purp walk, you know. I do think this 418 00:24:06,400 --> 00:24:09,240 Speaker 1: mug shop may get out. And Alan Dershowitz yesterday was 419 00:24:09,320 --> 00:24:11,720 Speaker 1: saying that it could serve as a campaign poster for 420 00:24:11,760 --> 00:24:15,479 Speaker 1: the president former president if you can imagine, Kim. But 421 00:24:16,000 --> 00:24:18,880 Speaker 1: I hope we would save ourselves all seeing a purp walk, 422 00:24:18,880 --> 00:24:20,879 Speaker 1: and I'm glad to hear that he's not going to 423 00:24:20,920 --> 00:24:24,000 Speaker 1: be handcuffed. I think the more this is toned down 424 00:24:24,160 --> 00:24:27,919 Speaker 1: and the less divisive it is, if that's possible, the 425 00:24:28,040 --> 00:24:32,760 Speaker 1: better for all of us. You're listening to Bloomberg You 426 00:24:32,880 --> 00:24:39,320 Speaker 1: sound on with Joe Matthew on Bloomberg Radio. Thanks for 427 00:24:39,359 --> 00:24:41,680 Speaker 1: being with us on the fastest show in politics times 428 00:24:41,720 --> 00:24:44,040 Speaker 1: Joe Matthew Live from Washington today, as we get our 429 00:24:44,080 --> 00:24:48,480 Speaker 1: heads around everything that we have heard and the great 430 00:24:48,520 --> 00:24:51,040 Speaker 1: deal of information we have yet to learn involving this 431 00:24:51,080 --> 00:24:54,760 Speaker 1: Trump indictment, Will it help Donald Trump? Many ask, with 432 00:24:54,880 --> 00:24:57,600 Speaker 1: more than the magabase. He seems to think so, having 433 00:24:57,640 --> 00:25:00,960 Speaker 1: spent days raising money on the of an arrest, talked 434 00:25:00,960 --> 00:25:03,240 Speaker 1: about it in advance of the indictment on Fox News. 435 00:25:03,320 --> 00:25:05,040 Speaker 1: I don't know whether it helps or hurts. I can 436 00:25:05,080 --> 00:25:07,720 Speaker 1: tell you in my opinion, it's a new way of 437 00:25:07,800 --> 00:25:10,960 Speaker 1: cheating on elections. It's called election interference. What they're doing 438 00:25:11,720 --> 00:25:13,840 Speaker 1: is if they can't win in the ballot box, because 439 00:25:13,840 --> 00:25:16,120 Speaker 1: I'm leading everybody by a lot in the polls, from 440 00:25:16,240 --> 00:25:20,000 Speaker 1: every Republican frankly, and every Democrat by a lot, including Biden, 441 00:25:20,040 --> 00:25:23,360 Speaker 1: by a lot, and they can't beat you that way, 442 00:25:23,400 --> 00:25:25,840 Speaker 1: they're gonna do this kind of stuff. I can't tell 443 00:25:25,840 --> 00:25:27,639 Speaker 1: you what polls he's looking at, but indeed he is 444 00:25:27,760 --> 00:25:30,760 Speaker 1: leading the field here. Assuming the field gets bigger, let's 445 00:25:30,800 --> 00:25:34,680 Speaker 1: reassemble the panel. Rick Davis and Genie Chanzano, Bloomberg Politics contributors. 446 00:25:35,000 --> 00:25:36,800 Speaker 1: This is going to be the argument from here, Genie, 447 00:25:36,800 --> 00:25:40,840 Speaker 1: whether it's this indictment or three, which is entirely possible 448 00:25:41,000 --> 00:25:45,040 Speaker 1: in the scope of this presidential campaign cycle, that hey, 449 00:25:45,040 --> 00:25:47,760 Speaker 1: they can't beat me, so they're weaponizing the government. That's 450 00:25:47,760 --> 00:25:50,400 Speaker 1: been the line from the Republican Party. Can you see 451 00:25:50,400 --> 00:25:53,640 Speaker 1: that sticking with independent voters? No, you know, I think 452 00:25:53,640 --> 00:25:56,280 Speaker 1: he's going to have real trouble with independent voters. You know, 453 00:25:56,359 --> 00:25:58,879 Speaker 1: this is something that will stick with the base. But 454 00:25:58,920 --> 00:26:02,040 Speaker 1: the reality is Donald Trump lost in twenty twenty, and 455 00:26:02,119 --> 00:26:06,800 Speaker 1: he lost the Republicans Congress in twenty two. So how 456 00:26:06,920 --> 00:26:09,560 Speaker 1: is it that knowing that he paid off a porn 457 00:26:09,680 --> 00:26:12,200 Speaker 1: star who he had an affair with, going to help 458 00:26:12,320 --> 00:26:14,959 Speaker 1: him gain the votes of independent voters. It's you know, 459 00:26:15,240 --> 00:26:19,119 Speaker 1: it's mind numbing. And of course Joe Biden the Democrats 460 00:26:19,280 --> 00:26:21,920 Speaker 1: know that, and that's why they're hoping that the ticket 461 00:26:21,960 --> 00:26:25,399 Speaker 1: is Biden versus Trump, because they feel even though Biden 462 00:26:25,520 --> 00:26:28,520 Speaker 1: is underwater in his favorables, if he's running against Trump, 463 00:26:28,800 --> 00:26:30,760 Speaker 1: Trump isn't going to be able to add any votes 464 00:26:30,800 --> 00:26:33,280 Speaker 1: that he had in twenty and in fact, it's likely 465 00:26:33,320 --> 00:26:36,560 Speaker 1: to lose some votes. So you know, it's mind numbing 466 00:26:36,640 --> 00:26:39,440 Speaker 1: from that perspective. And I think that also raises the 467 00:26:39,560 --> 00:26:43,639 Speaker 1: question why yesterday were all of the people who are 468 00:26:43,720 --> 00:26:46,480 Speaker 1: running against him, from Ron de Santist to Mike Pence 469 00:26:46,520 --> 00:26:49,880 Speaker 1: and others, jumping out so fast before we even see 470 00:26:49,880 --> 00:26:54,480 Speaker 1: the indictment to defend Donald Trump. It is it's head scratching. 471 00:26:54,560 --> 00:26:56,879 Speaker 1: Are they running against him or not? If they're running 472 00:26:56,880 --> 00:26:59,640 Speaker 1: against him, they may want to hold their fire defending him, 473 00:27:00,040 --> 00:27:02,280 Speaker 1: and they may want to get out there because he 474 00:27:02,440 --> 00:27:05,160 Speaker 1: is leading them in the polls right now. Yeah, well, yes, 475 00:27:05,400 --> 00:27:07,960 Speaker 1: certainly speaks to his grip on the party here. I 476 00:27:08,040 --> 00:27:10,399 Speaker 1: don't know your thoughts on that, Rick, but if if 477 00:27:10,440 --> 00:27:14,720 Speaker 1: Americans are not trusting of government institutions right now, could 478 00:27:14,720 --> 00:27:17,399 Speaker 1: his argument not stick He's a victim here by a 479 00:27:17,440 --> 00:27:21,360 Speaker 1: weaponized government. Oh yeah, I mean, I think we need 480 00:27:21,359 --> 00:27:23,800 Speaker 1: to only look back as far as two years to 481 00:27:23,880 --> 00:27:29,359 Speaker 1: realize that Donald Trump barely lost this presidential campaign after 482 00:27:29,480 --> 00:27:34,919 Speaker 1: having really been the most anti government president of our time, 483 00:27:35,480 --> 00:27:41,680 Speaker 1: and even subsequent to his conduct around the January sixth 484 00:27:42,200 --> 00:27:45,119 Speaker 1: attack on the Capitol and really trying to undermine the 485 00:27:45,160 --> 00:27:48,680 Speaker 1: peaceful transfer of power in many different ways, he's still 486 00:27:48,680 --> 00:27:52,000 Speaker 1: the leading Republican in this field for the nomination for 487 00:27:52,040 --> 00:27:55,479 Speaker 1: twenty twenty. I would say that in that same connect 488 00:27:55,720 --> 00:27:59,000 Speaker 1: Back poll and I quoted earlier that had sixty believing 489 00:27:59,000 --> 00:28:03,000 Speaker 1: that this was a politically motivated prosecution, fifty seven percent 490 00:28:03,320 --> 00:28:08,760 Speaker 1: of all Americans believe this disqualifies him from running for office. 491 00:28:08,840 --> 00:28:12,040 Speaker 1: And so if that's a proxy, the problem that the 492 00:28:12,040 --> 00:28:15,560 Speaker 1: Republican Party has is he very well could be the nominee, 493 00:28:15,720 --> 00:28:18,280 Speaker 1: but under these terms, there's no way he could win 494 00:28:18,320 --> 00:28:21,720 Speaker 1: a general election. And so, you know, it's a real 495 00:28:21,840 --> 00:28:24,760 Speaker 1: trap that the party's gotten themselves into. And I do 496 00:28:24,840 --> 00:28:27,600 Speaker 1: think it calls into question this sort of you know, 497 00:28:27,960 --> 00:28:32,240 Speaker 1: you know, going to the safe place by Republicans by saying, oh, well, 498 00:28:32,240 --> 00:28:37,040 Speaker 1: this is a politically motivated prosecution that fits into the 499 00:28:37,400 --> 00:28:40,400 Speaker 1: you know, the normal public prosture, but it doesn't help 500 00:28:40,480 --> 00:28:44,720 Speaker 1: them look at winning a general election in twenty twenty four. Yeah, 501 00:28:44,800 --> 00:28:47,560 Speaker 1: Genie is the gag order. Next, we have a story 502 00:28:47,600 --> 00:28:51,640 Speaker 1: on the Terminal that asks this question, knowing that Donald 503 00:28:51,680 --> 00:28:54,400 Speaker 1: Trump has already taken to social media warning of death 504 00:28:54,440 --> 00:28:57,920 Speaker 1: and destruction, calling to action protests take our nation back. 505 00:28:57,960 --> 00:29:03,520 Speaker 1: We've seen certainly court is restricting what a defendant says 506 00:29:03,560 --> 00:29:07,760 Speaker 1: about the case. Is that. Next, Yeah, Donald Trump is leaky, 507 00:29:07,840 --> 00:29:10,120 Speaker 1: as they say, so it might be coming. And we 508 00:29:10,200 --> 00:29:13,920 Speaker 1: saw that with his his friend Roger Stone. I think 509 00:29:13,920 --> 00:29:18,480 Speaker 1: it's going to happen if Donald Trump takes to social media, 510 00:29:18,520 --> 00:29:21,760 Speaker 1: as you said in Truth social and other things, and starts, 511 00:29:21,920 --> 00:29:25,840 Speaker 1: you know, making statements say potentially about the judge that 512 00:29:26,000 --> 00:29:29,959 Speaker 1: trying to influence or you know, threatened as you know, 513 00:29:30,080 --> 00:29:32,360 Speaker 1: not that he I'm not saying he would, but threatened 514 00:29:32,400 --> 00:29:36,040 Speaker 1: the jury in anyway, then we might see them put 515 00:29:36,040 --> 00:29:38,000 Speaker 1: out a gag or the judge rather put out a 516 00:29:38,000 --> 00:29:40,360 Speaker 1: gag order. And that's why this is going to be really, 517 00:29:40,400 --> 00:29:43,040 Speaker 1: really tough for the judge in charge of this case. 518 00:29:43,080 --> 00:29:45,400 Speaker 1: And I mentioned Roger Stone because that is what happened 519 00:29:45,400 --> 00:29:48,200 Speaker 1: in the case of Roger Stone. We remember he had that, 520 00:29:49,040 --> 00:29:51,880 Speaker 1: you know, the the photo of the judge and you 521 00:29:51,880 --> 00:29:55,640 Speaker 1: know it is not unlike the photo that Donald Trump 522 00:29:55,640 --> 00:29:57,880 Speaker 1: put out and then backed away from with the bat 523 00:29:57,920 --> 00:30:01,200 Speaker 1: to Alvin Bragg's head. So I do think that if 524 00:30:01,240 --> 00:30:05,400 Speaker 1: he continues down that line, when it pretends pretends to 525 00:30:05,440 --> 00:30:08,760 Speaker 1: the jury, the judge, and or the prosecutor, we may 526 00:30:08,800 --> 00:30:10,800 Speaker 1: see a gag order. But I don't know how much 527 00:30:10,800 --> 00:30:13,160 Speaker 1: he's going to, you know, abide by it. You know 528 00:30:13,200 --> 00:30:14,840 Speaker 1: he's going to push the line on that Rick. But 529 00:30:14,960 --> 00:30:17,680 Speaker 1: you know, Roger Stone was not a presidential candidate. This 530 00:30:17,720 --> 00:30:21,560 Speaker 1: is this could be a First Amendment issue for Donald Trump. No, well, 531 00:30:21,640 --> 00:30:24,120 Speaker 1: it's not even a First Amendment issue. The Constitution is 532 00:30:24,200 --> 00:30:29,320 Speaker 1: very clear that states can't prohibit the conduct of a 533 00:30:29,360 --> 00:30:35,000 Speaker 1: presidential candidate. It's the it's the classic federal state divide. 534 00:30:35,440 --> 00:30:38,960 Speaker 1: And so I think the judge would have incredibly difficulty 535 00:30:39,760 --> 00:30:42,840 Speaker 1: trying to gag a presidential canon. Roger Stone wasn't a 536 00:30:42,840 --> 00:30:46,280 Speaker 1: presidential can He was a private citizen and had no 537 00:30:46,400 --> 00:30:49,800 Speaker 1: protections other than First Amendment which are not covered in 538 00:30:49,840 --> 00:30:53,440 Speaker 1: a court case. So I think Donald Trump is probably 539 00:30:53,440 --> 00:30:55,440 Speaker 1: going to get away with pretty much anything he wants 540 00:30:55,440 --> 00:30:57,920 Speaker 1: to in this case. Are you guys worried about the 541 00:30:57,960 --> 00:31:01,200 Speaker 1: next couple of days here? Are you worried about violent Genie. Yeah, 542 00:31:01,200 --> 00:31:05,080 Speaker 1: I mean we heard the NYPD called everybody out for Tuesday. 543 00:31:05,160 --> 00:31:08,719 Speaker 1: When the officer in uniform, every uniform non uniform, it's 544 00:31:08,720 --> 00:31:11,480 Speaker 1: going to be an absolute circus down in Lower Manhattan, 545 00:31:12,320 --> 00:31:14,800 Speaker 1: you know. So I do think and what we're hearing 546 00:31:14,960 --> 00:31:17,719 Speaker 1: is that just very much like we saw after Marlago. 547 00:31:18,160 --> 00:31:20,520 Speaker 1: You know, it's probably something more along the lines of 548 00:31:20,560 --> 00:31:24,840 Speaker 1: a lone wolf if something happens versus a big concerted 549 00:31:25,440 --> 00:31:27,960 Speaker 1: you know, sort of a rally. And you know, if 550 00:31:28,000 --> 00:31:31,880 Speaker 1: that does happen, certainly in New York, they are well 551 00:31:32,040 --> 00:31:35,400 Speaker 1: poised to address that. And we've already seen the barriers 552 00:31:35,480 --> 00:31:37,880 Speaker 1: go up down there, so you know, I don't think 553 00:31:37,920 --> 00:31:40,800 Speaker 1: that would turn violent, hopefully, but you know, we never 554 00:31:40,840 --> 00:31:43,720 Speaker 1: know what can happen. We did not predict January sixth, 555 00:31:43,760 --> 00:31:45,880 Speaker 1: after all the chatter that was out there leading up 556 00:31:45,880 --> 00:31:47,680 Speaker 1: to it. What do you think, Rick, Is it a 557 00:31:47,680 --> 00:31:49,960 Speaker 1: worry that you have? Are you more concerned about the 558 00:31:50,000 --> 00:31:53,120 Speaker 1: lone wolf as we heard from some law enforcement officials 559 00:31:53,120 --> 00:31:58,640 Speaker 1: this week? Yeah, I actually hope that's the case. It's 560 00:31:58,640 --> 00:32:02,240 Speaker 1: certainly no indication to day that the kind of death 561 00:32:02,240 --> 00:32:06,120 Speaker 1: and destruction that Donald Trump predicted would happen if he 562 00:32:06,200 --> 00:32:09,360 Speaker 1: were indicted. Has occurred, and I hope people keep their 563 00:32:09,360 --> 00:32:12,000 Speaker 1: heads and realize that this is going to be going 564 00:32:12,040 --> 00:32:16,080 Speaker 1: on probably for her the entire year ahead of us, 565 00:32:16,120 --> 00:32:20,480 Speaker 1: if not more. And and so I'm hoping that you know, 566 00:32:20,600 --> 00:32:25,400 Speaker 1: officials take opportunities over the weekend and early next week 567 00:32:25,840 --> 00:32:29,760 Speaker 1: to make public statements that help, you know, tamp down 568 00:32:29,840 --> 00:32:36,160 Speaker 1: any potential you know, violent activity. Rick Davis and Jennie 569 00:32:36,160 --> 00:32:40,680 Speaker 1: Shanzano our panel. This is Bloomberg. You're listening to the 570 00:32:40,680 --> 00:32:44,840 Speaker 1: Bloomberg Sound On podcast. Catch the program live weekdays at 571 00:32:44,880 --> 00:32:48,400 Speaker 1: one Eastern on Bloomberg Radio, the tune in app, Bloomberg 572 00:32:48,440 --> 00:32:51,280 Speaker 1: dot Com, and the Bloomberg Business App. You can also 573 00:32:51,320 --> 00:32:54,880 Speaker 1: listen live on Amazon Alexa from our flagship New York station, 574 00:32:55,160 --> 00:33:01,560 Speaker 1: Just say Alexa play Bloomberg eleven thirty. Manhattan District Attorney 575 00:33:01,600 --> 00:33:05,720 Speaker 1: Alton braggs firing back at Republicans in the House, primarily 576 00:33:05,760 --> 00:33:09,880 Speaker 1: here in Washington, demanding his testimony over the indictment of 577 00:33:09,880 --> 00:33:14,440 Speaker 1: Donald Trump. Remember, there were three House chairs who asked 578 00:33:14,680 --> 00:33:17,840 Speaker 1: for Bragg to come to Washington, sit for an interview 579 00:33:17,840 --> 00:33:22,000 Speaker 1: and provide materials from the investigation. He said no. And 580 00:33:22,000 --> 00:33:25,120 Speaker 1: when we asked Congressman Jim Comer, who chairs the Oversight Committee, 581 00:33:25,120 --> 00:33:28,040 Speaker 1: about this couple days ago. On balance of power. He 582 00:33:28,080 --> 00:33:32,600 Speaker 1: said he was open to sending mister Bragg a subpoena. 583 00:33:32,800 --> 00:33:35,320 Speaker 1: Bragg's grand jury course voting to bring charges against Donald 584 00:33:35,320 --> 00:33:39,280 Speaker 1: Trump and this hush money case involving Stormy Daniels sent 585 00:33:39,320 --> 00:33:43,360 Speaker 1: a letter to House Judiciary Committee Chairer Jim Jordan. Bragg's 586 00:33:43,600 --> 00:33:50,400 Speaker 1: general counsel, Leslie Dubeck, said the jurors had found probable 587 00:33:50,440 --> 00:33:53,080 Speaker 1: cause to charge Trump. Jim Jordan is on this Brian 588 00:33:53,200 --> 00:33:56,360 Speaker 1: style House Administration Committee. James Comer, who I just mentioned. 589 00:33:57,000 --> 00:34:03,120 Speaker 1: I've got the letter here March twenty twenty three, sent 590 00:34:03,160 --> 00:34:06,680 Speaker 1: by email, but we printed it anyway like any other defendant. 591 00:34:06,720 --> 00:34:09,040 Speaker 1: He writes, mister Trump is entitled to challenge these charges 592 00:34:09,040 --> 00:34:12,319 Speaker 1: in court and avail himself of all processes and protections 593 00:34:12,360 --> 00:34:17,439 Speaker 1: that New York States robust criminal procedure affords. What neither 594 00:34:17,440 --> 00:34:19,560 Speaker 1: mister Trump nor Congress may do is interfere with the 595 00:34:19,640 --> 00:34:23,359 Speaker 1: ordinary course of proceedings in New York State. We heard 596 00:34:23,400 --> 00:34:27,239 Speaker 1: this morning from Joe Tacopina, donald Trump's lawyer, talking on 597 00:34:27,400 --> 00:34:30,960 Speaker 1: ABC's Good Morning America that it's the end of justice. 598 00:34:31,000 --> 00:34:32,920 Speaker 1: As we know. In my thirty two years as lawyer, 599 00:34:32,920 --> 00:34:35,480 Speaker 1: both as a prosecutor and defense attorney, I feel like 600 00:34:35,520 --> 00:34:37,279 Speaker 1: the rule of law died yesterday in this country, and 601 00:34:37,320 --> 00:34:39,319 Speaker 1: it's not something that I'm happy about. The rule of 602 00:34:39,440 --> 00:34:42,400 Speaker 1: law died yesterday. Let's get into this right now with 603 00:34:42,520 --> 00:34:47,000 Speaker 1: Robert Mint's, former federal prosecutor partner at McCarter in English. Robert, 604 00:34:47,040 --> 00:34:49,520 Speaker 1: thank you for being with us. From your experience, do 605 00:34:49,600 --> 00:34:53,560 Speaker 1: you see it the same way? Well, I certainly has 606 00:34:53,560 --> 00:34:58,280 Speaker 1: seen cases where defense lawyers have challenged prosecutors. I've gone 607 00:34:58,320 --> 00:35:02,680 Speaker 1: public with their view that theory of prosecution is unsupported 608 00:35:02,680 --> 00:35:06,200 Speaker 1: by the law. But that's something that is generally hashed 609 00:35:06,239 --> 00:35:10,120 Speaker 1: out in court before the trial judge. And I've never 610 00:35:10,160 --> 00:35:13,799 Speaker 1: seen an instance where Congress has sought to question the 611 00:35:13,880 --> 00:35:17,960 Speaker 1: prosecutor about is theory of the case during an ongoing 612 00:35:17,960 --> 00:35:22,000 Speaker 1: criminal prosecution. It's something that is left to the discretion 613 00:35:22,040 --> 00:35:25,359 Speaker 1: of prosecutors in the first instance, and then ultimately it's 614 00:35:25,360 --> 00:35:28,560 Speaker 1: in the hands of the trial judge and the jurors 615 00:35:28,560 --> 00:35:30,960 Speaker 1: who have to decide the case. Well, I've been looking 616 00:35:31,000 --> 00:35:32,640 Speaker 1: forward to talking with you, Robert, because there are a 617 00:35:32,680 --> 00:35:36,040 Speaker 1: lot of people who have no legal experience saying a 618 00:35:36,120 --> 00:35:38,120 Speaker 1: lot about this case, and we don't even know what 619 00:35:38,160 --> 00:35:41,080 Speaker 1: the charges are. What are the most important questions that 620 00:35:41,120 --> 00:35:44,600 Speaker 1: you're asking right now, Well, one of them is what 621 00:35:44,640 --> 00:35:47,680 Speaker 1: you just said, which is, we haven't even seen the indictment. 622 00:35:47,760 --> 00:35:51,040 Speaker 1: So for people to challenge it without knowing what the 623 00:35:51,200 --> 00:35:54,719 Speaker 1: charges are its creature. And of course we don't even 624 00:35:54,760 --> 00:35:57,879 Speaker 1: know what evidence was presented to the grand jury because 625 00:35:57,920 --> 00:36:02,600 Speaker 1: that's something that was secret. And again, so individuals really 626 00:36:02,640 --> 00:36:05,919 Speaker 1: don't know the evidence behind this case. I mean, there's 627 00:36:05,920 --> 00:36:08,000 Speaker 1: obviously been some leaks, we know people that have been 628 00:36:08,000 --> 00:36:10,200 Speaker 1: in and out of the grand jury. So there's been 629 00:36:10,239 --> 00:36:13,440 Speaker 1: testimony given, but the full extent of that testimony, what 630 00:36:13,600 --> 00:36:16,640 Speaker 1: people said, and what documents procesures may or may not have, 631 00:36:16,760 --> 00:36:19,560 Speaker 1: we just don't know. There's a great chance that this 632 00:36:19,640 --> 00:36:24,560 Speaker 1: has to do with more than just payments to Stormy Daniels, 633 00:36:24,560 --> 00:36:28,000 Speaker 1: that there could be other evidence far beyond Michael Cohen's testimony. 634 00:36:28,080 --> 00:36:30,600 Speaker 1: If we ended up with some thirty counts, as CNN 635 00:36:30,719 --> 00:36:35,919 Speaker 1: is reporting, is that is that what you're inferring here, Well, 636 00:36:35,960 --> 00:36:38,360 Speaker 1: we just don't know what it's about, but certainly thirty 637 00:36:38,440 --> 00:36:42,400 Speaker 1: counts if that reporting proves to be accurate, would suggest 638 00:36:42,480 --> 00:36:46,279 Speaker 1: that it involves something beyond the hush money payments that 639 00:36:46,320 --> 00:36:50,239 Speaker 1: we're connected to Stormy Daniels. Bloomberg is reporting Robert that 640 00:36:50,360 --> 00:36:53,120 Speaker 1: Donald Trump will be a reigned two fifteen pm in 641 00:36:53,360 --> 00:36:56,839 Speaker 1: the courthouse on Tuesday in Lower Manhattan. We understand there 642 00:36:56,840 --> 00:36:59,279 Speaker 1: will not be a perp walk, He will not be handcuffed. 643 00:36:59,280 --> 00:37:01,920 Speaker 1: What else will have and though when he goes inside 644 00:37:01,920 --> 00:37:04,080 Speaker 1: the bowels of the court he'll have the Secret Service 645 00:37:04,120 --> 00:37:08,680 Speaker 1: with him. What will Donald Trump go through that day? Well, 646 00:37:08,719 --> 00:37:11,879 Speaker 1: for one thing, he'll go through history because we've never 647 00:37:11,920 --> 00:37:15,480 Speaker 1: seen a former president come in and have to go 648 00:37:15,600 --> 00:37:18,400 Speaker 1: through the process that any other defendant in this country 649 00:37:18,440 --> 00:37:21,600 Speaker 1: would go through, which he would include taking his fingerprints, 650 00:37:22,080 --> 00:37:24,960 Speaker 1: a mug shot will be taken, they will swab his 651 00:37:25,120 --> 00:37:28,840 Speaker 1: cheek to get a mandatory sample for New York's DNA database. 652 00:37:28,960 --> 00:37:33,080 Speaker 1: They'll get pedigree information. So that's all the standard process 653 00:37:33,120 --> 00:37:35,720 Speaker 1: that any defendant will go through and that the former 654 00:37:35,800 --> 00:37:38,640 Speaker 1: president will go through, except that he'll do it being 655 00:37:38,640 --> 00:37:41,719 Speaker 1: accompanied by Secret Service agents. And of course I think 656 00:37:41,760 --> 00:37:44,600 Speaker 1: additional steps will be taken so that this will all 657 00:37:44,600 --> 00:37:47,920 Speaker 1: be done outside of the view of the media and 658 00:37:48,040 --> 00:37:50,520 Speaker 1: other people who may be gathered at the courthouse. Does 659 00:37:50,560 --> 00:37:56,480 Speaker 1: that mean we don't see the mug shot or not. Well, 660 00:37:56,480 --> 00:37:58,640 Speaker 1: that's a good question. I don't know whether we'll see that, 661 00:37:58,760 --> 00:38:00,759 Speaker 1: you know, or not, but I can assure it will 662 00:38:00,800 --> 00:38:03,360 Speaker 1: be taken. And at that point he just leaves, He 663 00:38:03,480 --> 00:38:05,640 Speaker 1: enters them un guilty plea and then goes home. They're 664 00:38:05,680 --> 00:38:07,520 Speaker 1: not going to put him in some sort of holding cell. 665 00:38:07,600 --> 00:38:10,720 Speaker 1: I presume right now. No, I don't. We won't respect 666 00:38:10,719 --> 00:38:14,040 Speaker 1: that at all. This is really a low level felony. 667 00:38:14,120 --> 00:38:17,680 Speaker 1: Let's keep that in mind. While prosecutors here have charged 668 00:38:18,000 --> 00:38:20,880 Speaker 1: what could be a misdemeanor as a felony, given the 669 00:38:20,880 --> 00:38:23,799 Speaker 1: way that they've tied it to a leged campaign violation, 670 00:38:24,440 --> 00:38:27,440 Speaker 1: it's still the low level felony that in most cases 671 00:38:27,480 --> 00:38:30,400 Speaker 1: would not result in any jail time even if convicted. 672 00:38:30,640 --> 00:38:33,560 Speaker 1: And so we'll see a situation where he's immediately released 673 00:38:33,600 --> 00:38:36,000 Speaker 1: on bail and will not be detained for any period 674 00:38:36,040 --> 00:38:38,279 Speaker 1: of time. I expect there's been a lot of talk 675 00:38:38,320 --> 00:38:41,680 Speaker 1: about this exceeding the statute of limitations, that this is 676 00:38:42,120 --> 00:38:44,560 Speaker 1: more than seven years after the fact. Is that a 677 00:38:44,640 --> 00:38:48,880 Speaker 1: real issue, Robert or not something you're concerned with well, 678 00:38:48,960 --> 00:38:52,560 Speaker 1: the stactual limitations for the misdemeanor charges two years. The 679 00:38:52,600 --> 00:38:55,720 Speaker 1: stactual limitations for the felony, which is what we're expecting 680 00:38:55,760 --> 00:38:58,000 Speaker 1: to be charged here, is five years. But in New 681 00:38:58,080 --> 00:39:00,759 Speaker 1: York state also has your rule that that five year 682 00:39:00,920 --> 00:39:05,200 Speaker 1: statute is told, which means it stops running when a 683 00:39:05,360 --> 00:39:07,799 Speaker 1: defendant is out of state. So if you add up 684 00:39:07,800 --> 00:39:10,719 Speaker 1: all the time and mister Trump was in Washington, was 685 00:39:10,719 --> 00:39:13,239 Speaker 1: that Marlavo was outside the state of New York, all 686 00:39:13,280 --> 00:39:16,160 Speaker 1: of that doesn't count towards that five years. So I 687 00:39:16,200 --> 00:39:19,319 Speaker 1: don't expect that we're going to see a stashed limitations 688 00:39:19,320 --> 00:39:21,600 Speaker 1: issue at the end of the day here, how about that, 689 00:39:21,920 --> 00:39:23,759 Speaker 1: because that's a talking point you're going to keep hearing 690 00:39:23,800 --> 00:39:27,440 Speaker 1: all weekend. Robert Min's how concerned are you about violence 691 00:39:27,680 --> 00:39:31,960 Speaker 1: in Lower Manhattan in the coming days. Well, I think 692 00:39:31,960 --> 00:39:35,400 Speaker 1: we should be very concerned, given what we've seen previously 693 00:39:35,480 --> 00:39:38,719 Speaker 1: and given some of the heated rhetoric that's flying around here. Now, 694 00:39:39,520 --> 00:39:43,360 Speaker 1: this is a process that will ultimately go through the courts. 695 00:39:43,719 --> 00:39:46,920 Speaker 1: Mister Trump's lawyers will have an opportunity to make motions, 696 00:39:46,920 --> 00:39:49,960 Speaker 1: They'll have an opportunity to argue before a jury. If 697 00:39:49,960 --> 00:39:53,040 Speaker 1: it ultimately gets to a trial, and ultimately it will 698 00:39:53,080 --> 00:39:55,640 Speaker 1: be up to judge you to decide whether the prosecutor's 699 00:39:55,760 --> 00:39:59,239 Speaker 1: theory holds up here, if he's ultimately convicted, I think 700 00:39:59,239 --> 00:40:01,680 Speaker 1: we have to let that process go forward, and hopefully 701 00:40:02,040 --> 00:40:05,560 Speaker 1: people will protest if they believe that this is unjust. 702 00:40:05,600 --> 00:40:08,760 Speaker 1: But we do have a system in place, a judicial system, 703 00:40:09,000 --> 00:40:11,680 Speaker 1: the separate branch of government. It's not tied to the 704 00:40:11,719 --> 00:40:15,600 Speaker 1: executive branch, it's not tied to Congress, and we just 705 00:40:15,680 --> 00:40:18,560 Speaker 1: have to let this process move forward as we would 706 00:40:18,600 --> 00:40:21,640 Speaker 1: in any other case. We've had governor's charge, We've had 707 00:40:21,640 --> 00:40:24,680 Speaker 1: sitting senators charged with the crimes, and they've gone through 708 00:40:24,680 --> 00:40:27,600 Speaker 1: the process and ultimately they're either convicted or acquitted, and 709 00:40:27,680 --> 00:40:31,600 Speaker 1: that's what's going to happen here. Great conversation, Robert, Thank 710 00:40:31,600 --> 00:40:34,120 Speaker 1: you for your expertise. Robert Man's former federal prosecutor. He's 711 00:40:34,160 --> 00:40:36,880 Speaker 1: now a partner at mcarter. In English, I'm Joe, Matthew 712 00:40:36,880 --> 00:40:39,160 Speaker 1: and Washington been looking forward to talking with Tim O'Brien. 713 00:40:39,200 --> 00:40:41,319 Speaker 1: I can't imagine what is going through his head right now. 714 00:40:41,320 --> 00:40:45,000 Speaker 1: Bloomberg Opinion Senior executive editor and of course, the author 715 00:40:45,040 --> 00:40:48,879 Speaker 1: of the book Trump Nation, The art of being the Donald. Tim, 716 00:40:48,920 --> 00:40:50,520 Speaker 1: I wanted to talk to you because you spent so 717 00:40:50,600 --> 00:40:54,120 Speaker 1: much of your career focused on this individual, writing about 718 00:40:54,200 --> 00:40:59,759 Speaker 1: his alleged transgressions. Did you ever think you'd see this day, 719 00:41:00,719 --> 00:41:03,280 Speaker 1: you know, Joe, That's a good question, to be honest. 720 00:41:04,719 --> 00:41:08,839 Speaker 1: Until he became president, it wasn't something that I really 721 00:41:08,880 --> 00:41:12,560 Speaker 1: focused on. I think Donald Trump the businessman is very 722 00:41:12,560 --> 00:41:16,160 Speaker 1: different from Donald Trump, a global leader with his finger 723 00:41:16,200 --> 00:41:21,520 Speaker 1: on the nuclear button and able to rouse his followers 724 00:41:21,520 --> 00:41:25,359 Speaker 1: to attack the capital on January six. They're just completely 725 00:41:25,400 --> 00:41:28,200 Speaker 1: different forces in the world. And I think an issue 726 00:41:28,280 --> 00:41:31,440 Speaker 1: right now is whether or not he's going to be 727 00:41:31,440 --> 00:41:34,840 Speaker 1: held accountable under the rule of law. I think, to 728 00:41:34,920 --> 00:41:37,520 Speaker 1: a certain extent, it's unfortunate that I think the brag 729 00:41:37,600 --> 00:41:40,920 Speaker 1: case is the first test of that proposition, because I 730 00:41:40,960 --> 00:41:45,440 Speaker 1: think it is the weakest of the various cases of 731 00:41:45,560 --> 00:41:48,239 Speaker 1: rate against him right now. That's been the sort of 732 00:41:48,280 --> 00:41:51,600 Speaker 1: conventional wisdom that has based also on I haven't seen 733 00:41:51,600 --> 00:41:54,560 Speaker 1: the fall indictment, yes, of course, and it's smart to 734 00:41:54,560 --> 00:41:58,239 Speaker 1: continue reminding our listeners of that right and any of 735 00:41:58,280 --> 00:42:00,000 Speaker 1: us out here, any of us talking heads who are 736 00:42:00,160 --> 00:42:05,319 Speaker 1: saying and opining on the indictment and the merits or 737 00:42:05,400 --> 00:42:08,880 Speaker 1: lack thereof, of Alvin Bragg's suit. Have not seen the indictment, 738 00:42:08,920 --> 00:42:11,000 Speaker 1: and it's been reported that there's more than thirty counts 739 00:42:11,040 --> 00:42:14,480 Speaker 1: in it. And if that's the case, there's a possibility 740 00:42:14,560 --> 00:42:19,560 Speaker 1: that goes well beyond you know, falsification of business records 741 00:42:19,560 --> 00:42:22,759 Speaker 1: and campaign finance violation for the hush money page to 742 00:42:22,760 --> 00:42:26,400 Speaker 1: Stormy annuals. It may encompass other things that none of 743 00:42:26,480 --> 00:42:29,840 Speaker 1: us have known about, and Bragg may have a broader 744 00:42:29,960 --> 00:42:34,360 Speaker 1: and more robust set of facts behind him than is 745 00:42:34,400 --> 00:42:37,799 Speaker 1: currently known. I mean, he's got enough now it would 746 00:42:37,840 --> 00:42:42,160 Speaker 1: appear on a you know, for a minor felony charge, 747 00:42:44,600 --> 00:42:47,680 Speaker 1: but you know, you're you're waiting into really difficult territory 748 00:42:47,760 --> 00:42:51,200 Speaker 1: when when you're doing that and it involves a president 749 00:42:51,239 --> 00:42:53,839 Speaker 1: and partisan ranker and everything else put's in play right now. 750 00:42:54,360 --> 00:42:57,239 Speaker 1: You mentioned the thought that this is the weakest of 751 00:42:57,280 --> 00:42:59,960 Speaker 1: the three major cases that he could be facing possible 752 00:43:00,239 --> 00:43:03,400 Speaker 1: three indictments here. Michael Cohen weighed in on what I 753 00:43:03,400 --> 00:43:05,480 Speaker 1: believe is his podcast. Didn't know he had one, but 754 00:43:06,120 --> 00:43:08,080 Speaker 1: he really tried to put this in perspective, Say, my gosh, 755 00:43:08,120 --> 00:43:09,759 Speaker 1: don't we've been We've been working on this for a 756 00:43:09,800 --> 00:43:11,239 Speaker 1: long time, and this is a big deal. Some of 757 00:43:11,280 --> 00:43:14,120 Speaker 1: you may be disappointed that it's not enough, but you 758 00:43:14,200 --> 00:43:18,320 Speaker 1: must understand that getting to this point, breaking through Trump's 759 00:43:18,360 --> 00:43:23,080 Speaker 1: filings of lawyers and his daily obfuscation and intimidation, was 760 00:43:23,160 --> 00:43:26,399 Speaker 1: no small feat. This is a man who was used 761 00:43:26,440 --> 00:43:29,480 Speaker 1: to bending the wheels of justice to his favor and 762 00:43:29,560 --> 00:43:32,560 Speaker 1: has done so countless time. He certainly passionate about it. 763 00:43:32,560 --> 00:43:35,279 Speaker 1: Does he have appoints him? Well, it sounds like the 764 00:43:35,320 --> 00:43:41,520 Speaker 1: home shopping network right there. But um, I think you know, 765 00:43:41,680 --> 00:43:44,000 Speaker 1: Michael has his own acts to grind, as to many 766 00:43:44,040 --> 00:43:47,040 Speaker 1: observers around here around this, Here's here's what I think 767 00:43:47,120 --> 00:43:50,200 Speaker 1: you know. There's actually there's a potential of five major 768 00:43:50,280 --> 00:43:54,080 Speaker 1: cases against him right now. There's three actives that we 769 00:43:54,160 --> 00:43:57,239 Speaker 1: know of, the you know, the Manhattan District Triney criminal case, 770 00:43:57,560 --> 00:44:00,520 Speaker 1: New York City of General Attorney, general civil case, a 771 00:44:01,400 --> 00:44:04,279 Speaker 1: electoral fraud case in Georgia brought by the Faulkland County 772 00:44:04,280 --> 00:44:07,719 Speaker 1: District Attorney. But the real McGill and all of this 773 00:44:07,800 --> 00:44:09,920 Speaker 1: to me, is in the Justice Department. There are two 774 00:44:09,960 --> 00:44:14,120 Speaker 1: investigations going around going on right now pertaining to the 775 00:44:14,440 --> 00:44:18,040 Speaker 1: expropriation of classified records that went to mado Lago, and 776 00:44:18,200 --> 00:44:23,520 Speaker 1: Trump's role in the January sixth insurrection. Um. What ties 777 00:44:23,560 --> 00:44:25,920 Speaker 1: all these cases together are whether or not Donald Trump's 778 00:44:25,920 --> 00:44:28,840 Speaker 1: going to be held accountable. Where they diverge is the 779 00:44:28,920 --> 00:44:31,000 Speaker 1: extent to which he's going to be He's going to 780 00:44:31,040 --> 00:44:34,560 Speaker 1: suffer any penalty even if even if he has found 781 00:44:34,560 --> 00:44:37,720 Speaker 1: guilty in the Georgia and the two New York cases, 782 00:44:37,719 --> 00:44:39,319 Speaker 1: that's not going to keep him out of the White House. 783 00:44:39,640 --> 00:44:42,840 Speaker 1: I also think all three of them are unlikely to 784 00:44:42,920 --> 00:44:45,600 Speaker 1: land in the jail. The civil case definitely won't New York, 785 00:44:46,120 --> 00:44:51,319 Speaker 1: but the but the DOJ cases there are You know, 786 00:44:51,440 --> 00:44:53,960 Speaker 1: there are laws in which Donald Trump can if he 787 00:44:54,040 --> 00:44:57,279 Speaker 1: has found guilty of fomenting an insurrection and trying to 788 00:44:57,280 --> 00:45:01,320 Speaker 1: towards the Constitution. Under the fourteenth of an insurrection prevents 789 00:45:01,320 --> 00:45:04,040 Speaker 1: you from running for high office in the United States, 790 00:45:04,320 --> 00:45:06,640 Speaker 1: and so he could be prevented from running. Carrotus again, 791 00:45:07,920 --> 00:45:10,040 Speaker 1: I think that's where the rubber meets the road in 792 00:45:10,080 --> 00:45:12,080 Speaker 1: all of these and I think we sort of have 793 00:45:12,160 --> 00:45:16,560 Speaker 1: to sign them weight and relevance based on some of 794 00:45:16,600 --> 00:45:21,040 Speaker 1: those things. Having said that each of these prosecutors are 795 00:45:21,120 --> 00:45:25,160 Speaker 1: independent actors who have been charged with looking after the 796 00:45:25,239 --> 00:45:29,120 Speaker 1: law and enforcing its its rules and guidelines. They're doing 797 00:45:29,120 --> 00:45:31,759 Speaker 1: what they're supposed to do. By large, that's what we 798 00:45:31,800 --> 00:45:35,000 Speaker 1: ask of our institutions, even when they're flawed. And I 799 00:45:35,040 --> 00:45:39,400 Speaker 1: think it's important that this proceed peacefully. Michael Cohen refers 800 00:45:39,440 --> 00:45:43,400 Speaker 1: to the lawyers and the fixers and those surrounding Donald 801 00:45:43,440 --> 00:45:47,160 Speaker 1: Trump in Manhattan, or I guess in this case at Marlago, 802 00:45:47,480 --> 00:45:50,480 Speaker 1: Tim bring us inside the apparatus. What's happening inside the 803 00:45:50,480 --> 00:45:54,239 Speaker 1: Trump organization today? Well, I think, you know, I think 804 00:45:54,280 --> 00:45:57,080 Speaker 1: this is the world they've never been in before. Donald 805 00:45:57,120 --> 00:46:02,360 Speaker 1: Trump has spent decades weaponizing a legal system against his opponents, partners, 806 00:46:02,360 --> 00:46:06,879 Speaker 1: and critics, and without great consequence to himself. And this 807 00:46:06,960 --> 00:46:10,000 Speaker 1: is the first time that a media indictment has landed 808 00:46:10,040 --> 00:46:12,680 Speaker 1: on his doorstep. So I'm sure they're in shock. I 809 00:46:12,719 --> 00:46:16,120 Speaker 1: think for all his bravado about being able to take 810 00:46:16,120 --> 00:46:19,200 Speaker 1: on all opponents, he doesn't want to be humiliated in 811 00:46:19,239 --> 00:46:22,839 Speaker 1: a public sphere, and there's a possibility that he's going 812 00:46:22,840 --> 00:46:26,480 Speaker 1: to be handcuffed and perp walked in front of other people. 813 00:46:26,680 --> 00:46:29,800 Speaker 1: And for a man who is a media addict and 814 00:46:30,360 --> 00:46:33,239 Speaker 1: as an unquenchable need for attention. That's not the kind 815 00:46:33,280 --> 00:46:35,480 Speaker 1: of attention he wants to get. So I think that 816 00:46:35,560 --> 00:46:40,200 Speaker 1: he's I think he's very distressed and probably feeling cornered 817 00:46:39,920 --> 00:46:43,000 Speaker 1: and a cornered Donald Trump as a dangerous person. Well, 818 00:46:43,040 --> 00:46:44,759 Speaker 1: he was tweeting or a true thing. I guess it 819 00:46:44,840 --> 00:46:46,640 Speaker 1: was at three o'clock in the morning to him. I'm 820 00:46:46,640 --> 00:46:49,399 Speaker 1: guessing he was up all night. What what's your thought 821 00:46:49,440 --> 00:46:52,240 Speaker 1: when you look at the campaign ahead? Will Donald Trump 822 00:46:52,320 --> 00:46:55,320 Speaker 1: ever stand on a debate stage or does he consider 823 00:46:55,400 --> 00:46:58,040 Speaker 1: himself above that? Will he have to hear from other 824 00:46:58,120 --> 00:47:01,680 Speaker 1: candidates about this? That's a great that's a great question. 825 00:47:02,040 --> 00:47:04,160 Speaker 1: You know, I don't know if he'll consent and on 826 00:47:04,280 --> 00:47:07,960 Speaker 1: a debate stage. To a certain extent, that may be 827 00:47:08,040 --> 00:47:10,840 Speaker 1: irrelevant also because I think regardless, he's going to be 828 00:47:10,880 --> 00:47:15,680 Speaker 1: a very strong force in the Republican primary. He has 829 00:47:15,719 --> 00:47:18,760 Speaker 1: a tight grip on about thirty percent of Republican voters, 830 00:47:20,000 --> 00:47:22,880 Speaker 1: and an other candidates tack to deal with that reality, 831 00:47:22,920 --> 00:47:26,080 Speaker 1: which is why they all walk tentatively around him, and 832 00:47:26,120 --> 00:47:29,680 Speaker 1: he's sort of grotesque issues he may he's put front 833 00:47:30,200 --> 00:47:35,160 Speaker 1: and center. The problem is he's not a viable national candidate, 834 00:47:35,200 --> 00:47:37,879 Speaker 1: I don't think, and so he's got the party hell 835 00:47:38,000 --> 00:47:40,200 Speaker 1: hostage to a certain extent. You're not the first to 836 00:47:40,239 --> 00:47:42,520 Speaker 1: say that on the program today, Tim O'Brien, I'm delighted 837 00:47:42,560 --> 00:47:45,120 Speaker 1: you could have some time for us here Bloomberg Opinion 838 00:47:45,120 --> 00:47:48,040 Speaker 1: Teenior Executive Editor. I'm thinking, Tim, he's going to have 839 00:47:48,080 --> 00:47:49,200 Speaker 1: to start writing a new book.