WEBVTT - Bloomberg Surveillance TV: January 12th, 2026

0:00:00.080 --> 0:00:06.720
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, Podcasts, radio News.

0:00:11.640 --> 0:00:15.440
<v Speaker 2>This is the Bloomberg Surveillance Podcast. I'm Jonathan Ferrow, along

0:00:15.480 --> 0:00:18.720
<v Speaker 2>with Lisa Bromwitz and Amrie Hordert. Join us each day

0:00:18.720 --> 0:00:22.280
<v Speaker 2>for insight from the best in markets, economics, and geopolitics

0:00:22.440 --> 0:00:24.920
<v Speaker 2>from our global headquarters in New York City. We are

0:00:24.920 --> 0:00:27.680
<v Speaker 2>live on Bloomberg Television weekday mornings from six to nine

0:00:27.720 --> 0:00:31.240
<v Speaker 2>am Eastern. Subscribe to the podcast on Apple, Spotify or

0:00:31.320 --> 0:00:33.960
<v Speaker 2>anywhere else you listen, and as always on the Bloomberg

0:00:34.040 --> 0:00:37.159
<v Speaker 2>Terminal and the Bloomberg Business app. Turning back to the

0:00:37.200 --> 0:00:39.880
<v Speaker 2>Federal Reserve sources telling us our colleagues here at Bloomberg

0:00:40.120 --> 0:00:43.519
<v Speaker 2>that a driving force behind the DOJ's decision subpoena the

0:00:43.520 --> 0:00:47.600
<v Speaker 2>Central Bank is the Federal Housing Finance Agency Director Bill Pulty.

0:00:47.840 --> 0:00:50.040
<v Speaker 2>Director Porty has been busy over the last week, some

0:00:50.080 --> 0:00:52.960
<v Speaker 2>purchases of MBS and Focus as well. Director Poruty. Welcome

0:00:52.960 --> 0:00:55.240
<v Speaker 2>to the program sir. You are cited in our story

0:00:55.240 --> 0:00:57.640
<v Speaker 2>this morning. Just wanted to give the opportunity to respond

0:00:57.640 --> 0:01:00.360
<v Speaker 2>to it. But what was your role in the developside

0:01:00.320 --> 0:01:01.320
<v Speaker 2>of a weekend.

0:01:02.240 --> 0:01:04.760
<v Speaker 3>The DOJ's outside of my purview, This is out of

0:01:04.760 --> 0:01:06.840
<v Speaker 3>my purview. I don't know anything about it, and I

0:01:06.840 --> 0:01:08.800
<v Speaker 3>would refer you to the DOJ bill.

0:01:08.959 --> 0:01:10.760
<v Speaker 2>You haven't been shy of sharing your thoughts on the

0:01:10.800 --> 0:01:13.640
<v Speaker 2>Federal Reserve before, particularly over the last twelve months. You

0:01:13.840 --> 0:01:17.440
<v Speaker 2>thought that the chairman would ultimately resign. He's standing firm.

0:01:17.520 --> 0:01:19.800
<v Speaker 2>Do you think this push against the Federal Reserve is

0:01:19.840 --> 0:01:23.039
<v Speaker 2>actually leading to unintended consequences and leading this fed to

0:01:23.120 --> 0:01:23.520
<v Speaker 2>dig in.

0:01:24.600 --> 0:01:27.720
<v Speaker 3>My main focus, John has been on reducing mortgage rates

0:01:27.720 --> 0:01:29.760
<v Speaker 3>to the extent that we can do it and increasing

0:01:29.800 --> 0:01:33.520
<v Speaker 3>housing affordability. President Trump announced a huge thing last week

0:01:33.680 --> 0:01:36.360
<v Speaker 3>when he decided that he was going to ban institutions

0:01:36.520 --> 0:01:40.160
<v Speaker 3>from buying homes. Basically, the concept is that people should

0:01:40.200 --> 0:01:42.720
<v Speaker 3>be living in homes, not corporations. You know, we have

0:01:42.760 --> 0:01:45.520
<v Speaker 3>a supply problem in this country, and obviously we're working

0:01:45.520 --> 0:01:48.000
<v Speaker 3>on the demand side of things, because in some cases,

0:01:48.080 --> 0:01:50.880
<v Speaker 3>affordability has gotten so tough that people don't even want

0:01:50.880 --> 0:01:52.800
<v Speaker 3>to buy a home because of what Joe Biden did,

0:01:53.000 --> 0:01:55.640
<v Speaker 3>and so we're reversing that. That's what we're focused on.

0:01:55.760 --> 0:01:57.600
<v Speaker 3>We had a huge one to two punch last week.

0:01:57.640 --> 0:02:00.920
<v Speaker 3>You saw mortgage rates moved twenty five base points lower

0:02:01.120 --> 0:02:03.320
<v Speaker 3>on the news that Fanny and Freddie have started to

0:02:03.440 --> 0:02:07.720
<v Speaker 3>undergo a two hundred billion dollar mortgage bond buy. And

0:02:08.160 --> 0:02:09.880
<v Speaker 3>I think you're going to see some very exciting things

0:02:09.880 --> 0:02:12.640
<v Speaker 3>come out of Davos. With regard to the President on housing,

0:02:12.840 --> 0:02:13.960
<v Speaker 3>in a couple in a week.

0:02:13.960 --> 0:02:16.480
<v Speaker 4>Director BOLDI, you were with the President this weekend, I believe,

0:02:16.560 --> 0:02:19.200
<v Speaker 4>traveling with him on Air Force one from Washington to

0:02:19.280 --> 0:02:21.639
<v Speaker 4>Palm Beach. Did you talk about the Federal Reserve with

0:02:21.720 --> 0:02:22.440
<v Speaker 4>him this weekend?

0:02:23.320 --> 0:02:25.680
<v Speaker 3>Obviously I would never talk about anything that the President

0:02:25.880 --> 0:02:27.920
<v Speaker 3>and I talk about. I would say this that the

0:02:27.919 --> 0:02:32.720
<v Speaker 3>President is laser focused on housing affordability and reversing what

0:02:32.800 --> 0:02:35.280
<v Speaker 3>has happened these last four years. You look at the

0:02:35.320 --> 0:02:38.920
<v Speaker 3>average mortgage payment under Joe Biden, it's skyrocketed compared to

0:02:38.960 --> 0:02:41.800
<v Speaker 3>what it was under President Trump's first term. We are

0:02:41.840 --> 0:02:45.000
<v Speaker 3>focused on bringing down not only the mortgage rates, but

0:02:45.080 --> 0:02:49.400
<v Speaker 3>also the day to day cost in upkeeping homes, which

0:02:49.440 --> 0:02:51.520
<v Speaker 3>has to do with you know, whether it be your

0:02:51.560 --> 0:02:55.880
<v Speaker 3>ongoing expenses, mortgage insurance, etc. There are so many pieces

0:02:55.880 --> 0:02:59.040
<v Speaker 3>to the cost puzzle that at the FHFA US Federal

0:02:59.080 --> 0:03:02.400
<v Speaker 3>Housing we are working to reduce the costs bird and

0:03:02.440 --> 0:03:03.440
<v Speaker 3>that Americans have.

0:03:03.800 --> 0:03:05.880
<v Speaker 4>I know that you've seen the report from our colleagues.

0:03:05.919 --> 0:03:09.240
<v Speaker 4>I've also got calls last night about the subpoena handed

0:03:09.280 --> 0:03:11.880
<v Speaker 4>to the FED and was told that you were part

0:03:11.919 --> 0:03:14.200
<v Speaker 4>of it, pulling together a report that then went to

0:03:14.240 --> 0:03:16.960
<v Speaker 4>the DOJ. I just wanted to go since from you,

0:03:17.760 --> 0:03:20.919
<v Speaker 4>did the President know this was coming? The Treasury Secretary

0:03:20.960 --> 0:03:22.799
<v Speaker 4>know this was coming? Have you had any of these

0:03:22.840 --> 0:03:25.240
<v Speaker 4>conversations again.

0:03:25.000 --> 0:03:27.600
<v Speaker 3>On that matter, I'd refer you to the Department of Justice.

0:03:27.800 --> 0:03:29.919
<v Speaker 4>Okay, well, we'll wait to hear from the Department of Justice.

0:03:30.080 --> 0:03:32.200
<v Speaker 4>When it goes back to the mortgage backed securities that

0:03:32.240 --> 0:03:36.240
<v Speaker 4>you have been talking about. You already been purchasing about

0:03:36.360 --> 0:03:38.800
<v Speaker 4>north of two hundred and thirty billion dollars of them

0:03:38.920 --> 0:03:41.880
<v Speaker 4>last year. There is a cap. Do you expect to

0:03:41.920 --> 0:03:43.280
<v Speaker 4>reach that cap this year?

0:03:44.160 --> 0:03:46.280
<v Speaker 3>I think all options are on the table. President Trump

0:03:46.320 --> 0:03:48.560
<v Speaker 3>is a president who keeps all options on the table.

0:03:48.840 --> 0:03:52.000
<v Speaker 3>We announced this historic two hundred billion dollar buyback of

0:03:52.120 --> 0:03:55.480
<v Speaker 3>mortgage bonds. This is a huge deal, and you know

0:03:55.560 --> 0:03:57.520
<v Speaker 3>we'll keep all options on the table. Look, we're doing

0:03:57.520 --> 0:03:59.880
<v Speaker 3>our part of Fannie and Freddy. Most presidents didn't even

0:03:59.880 --> 0:04:03.080
<v Speaker 3>know Fanny and Freddie existed. Obviously, your community in Bloomberg

0:04:03.160 --> 0:04:04.920
<v Speaker 3>and all of us in the private sector. We know

0:04:05.000 --> 0:04:07.120
<v Speaker 3>the importance of Fanny and Freddy, but for the average

0:04:07.200 --> 0:04:10.320
<v Speaker 3>day American, they don't understand because the presidents haven't made

0:04:10.360 --> 0:04:14.640
<v Speaker 3>it a priority. Average Americans haven't understood that presidents had

0:04:14.720 --> 0:04:17.960
<v Speaker 3>this authority until President Trump found this authority, which is

0:04:18.000 --> 0:04:21.680
<v Speaker 3>basically to utilize these companies to be companies. Imagine that

0:04:21.960 --> 0:04:23.800
<v Speaker 3>get people to show up back to work. You know,

0:04:23.880 --> 0:04:26.520
<v Speaker 3>we had sixteen thousand people. We have sixteen thousand people

0:04:26.720 --> 0:04:29.120
<v Speaker 3>at the two companies. When I showed up on the

0:04:29.120 --> 0:04:31.280
<v Speaker 3>scene and President Trump came into office, they were all

0:04:31.279 --> 0:04:34.480
<v Speaker 3>working from home. We'd go to these big buildings, air conditioning,

0:04:34.520 --> 0:04:37.760
<v Speaker 3>spewing everywhere, spending fifty million dollars a year on leases.

0:04:37.920 --> 0:04:40.320
<v Speaker 3>Nobody was in these buildings. So we have turned around

0:04:40.360 --> 0:04:43.000
<v Speaker 3>Fanny and Freddy. They tried to get President Trump to

0:04:43.040 --> 0:04:45.800
<v Speaker 3>sell the companies, for the two companies together for one

0:04:45.839 --> 0:04:48.560
<v Speaker 3>hundred billion dollars. I think the valuation of the companies

0:04:48.560 --> 0:04:51.760
<v Speaker 3>is anywhere between five hundred billion and some say up

0:04:51.800 --> 0:04:52.800
<v Speaker 3>to a trillion dollars.

0:04:53.279 --> 0:04:54.719
<v Speaker 5>A lot of people are hoping that there is some

0:04:54.760 --> 0:04:57.520
<v Speaker 5>sort of initial public offering O those companies are you

0:04:57.560 --> 0:04:59.840
<v Speaker 5>preparing them for that at some point later this year

0:05:00.080 --> 0:05:00.520
<v Speaker 5>next year.

0:05:01.320 --> 0:05:03.479
<v Speaker 3>We are fully prepared to do whatever the President would

0:05:03.560 --> 0:05:04.640
<v Speaker 3>like us to do on that matter.

0:05:05.200 --> 0:05:06.520
<v Speaker 1>We have been getting prepared.

0:05:06.600 --> 0:05:09.279
<v Speaker 3>We are prepared, just like we are with the institutional

0:05:09.320 --> 0:05:12.120
<v Speaker 3>home buying ban, just like we are with home builders.

0:05:12.320 --> 0:05:14.560
<v Speaker 3>We have a full set of things to do, and

0:05:14.640 --> 0:05:16.799
<v Speaker 3>once the President decides what to do, we go about

0:05:16.839 --> 0:05:17.560
<v Speaker 3>executing them.

0:05:17.680 --> 0:05:19.680
<v Speaker 5>Director Pulty, A lot of people on Wall Street were

0:05:19.680 --> 0:05:23.000
<v Speaker 5>pretty excited actually about your purchases of mbs of mortgage

0:05:23.000 --> 0:05:25.240
<v Speaker 5>backed securities and saying that this should like it should

0:05:25.279 --> 0:05:28.360
<v Speaker 5>be something that would bring down spreads. They were less

0:05:28.360 --> 0:05:30.880
<v Speaker 5>excited about the idea of preventing institutions from buying single

0:05:30.880 --> 0:05:34.839
<v Speaker 5>family homes, saying that it really do wasn't based in economics,

0:05:34.880 --> 0:05:38.279
<v Speaker 5>considering that in certain regions in the country there's actually

0:05:38.279 --> 0:05:41.080
<v Speaker 5>a glut of houses that this is not because of

0:05:41.200 --> 0:05:45.160
<v Speaker 5>institutions that account for a relatively small portion of overall buyers.

0:05:45.560 --> 0:05:47.320
<v Speaker 3>What do you say back about.

0:05:47.040 --> 0:05:50.280
<v Speaker 5>The economic fundamentals behind this type of proposal and why

0:05:50.320 --> 0:05:53.720
<v Speaker 5>it would bring down fordability and an increase the supply

0:05:53.800 --> 0:05:55.640
<v Speaker 5>of houses, which is the ultimate issue that a lot

0:05:55.680 --> 0:05:56.280
<v Speaker 5>of people.

0:05:56.040 --> 0:05:58.280
<v Speaker 2>Say, Well, it just makes economic sense.

0:05:58.279 --> 0:05:59.920
<v Speaker 3>You talk about supply, I mean, you kind of gave

0:06:00.240 --> 0:06:02.120
<v Speaker 3>narrative there, but if you look at the economic supply

0:06:02.200 --> 0:06:04.520
<v Speaker 3>of things, the fact is you have you know, big

0:06:04.560 --> 0:06:08.359
<v Speaker 3>corporations buying using long term paper, using their balance sheets

0:06:08.600 --> 0:06:11.400
<v Speaker 3>to scoop up homes in a supply shortage as we

0:06:11.480 --> 0:06:14.080
<v Speaker 3>call it, and they're in some cases buying these homes

0:06:14.080 --> 0:06:18.280
<v Speaker 3>for twenty thirty forty percent less than Americans are doing it.

0:06:18.400 --> 0:06:20.880
<v Speaker 3>You know, President Trump was elected with a very very

0:06:20.920 --> 0:06:23.640
<v Speaker 3>popular mandate. You know, sometimes people don't remember because it

0:06:23.640 --> 0:06:25.640
<v Speaker 3>was a year ago, but it was a landslide victory,

0:06:25.880 --> 0:06:28.159
<v Speaker 3>and he was given a mandate to reverse these last

0:06:28.160 --> 0:06:31.440
<v Speaker 3>four years of crazy inflation that happened under Joe Biden.

0:06:31.760 --> 0:06:33.120
<v Speaker 1>And so I think it's very.

0:06:33.040 --> 0:06:35.360
<v Speaker 3>Appropriate that we're doing everything that we can to reduce

0:06:35.400 --> 0:06:37.560
<v Speaker 3>housing costs, and we're going to keep doing it, whether

0:06:37.600 --> 0:06:40.880
<v Speaker 3>it's the institutional ban on buying, looking at all of

0:06:40.920 --> 0:06:43.080
<v Speaker 3>the things that go into a home and owning a home.

0:06:43.320 --> 0:06:46.000
<v Speaker 3>Americans need to own homes in this country, and we're

0:06:46.000 --> 0:06:47.080
<v Speaker 3>committed to restoring that.

0:06:47.400 --> 0:06:49.599
<v Speaker 5>Director Bulty, did you study this in terms of this

0:06:49.640 --> 0:06:53.320
<v Speaker 5>apply demand dynamic and whether it actually would reduce the

0:06:53.800 --> 0:06:57.200
<v Speaker 5>cost of houses for individuals. Should there be a ban

0:06:57.440 --> 0:07:01.400
<v Speaker 5>on single family housing, on instation's buying single family homeless

0:07:01.400 --> 0:07:03.400
<v Speaker 5>because a lot of people in the markets who have

0:07:03.480 --> 0:07:06.560
<v Speaker 5>supported President Trump's policies and thinking of Neildunna in particular,

0:07:06.600 --> 0:07:08.839
<v Speaker 5>came out and said, this is faulty economics.

0:07:09.680 --> 0:07:11.520
<v Speaker 3>Well, of course, I've studied it. I've studied it my

0:07:11.560 --> 0:07:13.600
<v Speaker 3>whole life. I mean, I grew up in the housing business.

0:07:13.880 --> 0:07:15.360
<v Speaker 3>I grew up in the building business. I was on

0:07:15.400 --> 0:07:17.800
<v Speaker 3>the board of Pulti Homes for four years. I understand

0:07:17.840 --> 0:07:20.920
<v Speaker 3>what institutional buying does. It's very powerful. I understand why

0:07:20.920 --> 0:07:23.040
<v Speaker 3>Wall Street might not like it, but we serve the

0:07:23.040 --> 0:07:23.679
<v Speaker 3>American people.

0:07:23.720 --> 0:07:24.720
<v Speaker 1>We don't serve Wall Street.

0:07:24.880 --> 0:07:27.160
<v Speaker 3>And President Trump is laser focused on doing the right

0:07:27.200 --> 0:07:30.360
<v Speaker 3>thing no matter who it affects in terms of their pocketbooks.

0:07:30.520 --> 0:07:32.880
<v Speaker 3>At the Wall Street level, he has focused, laser focused

0:07:33.200 --> 0:07:36.400
<v Speaker 3>on action, not talk like so many of these Democrats,

0:07:36.440 --> 0:07:38.560
<v Speaker 3>like Elizabeth Warren. You know, for years she would talk

0:07:38.560 --> 0:07:41.440
<v Speaker 3>about all institutional buying. She didn't do anything. Joe Biden

0:07:41.480 --> 0:07:44.080
<v Speaker 3>didn't do anything about it. President Trump is doing something

0:07:44.120 --> 0:07:44.520
<v Speaker 3>about it.

0:07:44.880 --> 0:07:48.160
<v Speaker 4>Elizabeth Warren wanted to see an effort like this. Do

0:07:48.200 --> 0:07:50.440
<v Speaker 4>you think the president is taking cues from some of

0:07:50.480 --> 0:07:54.480
<v Speaker 4>the more populist wings of the Democratic Party.

0:07:55.280 --> 0:07:57.040
<v Speaker 3>No, I think Elizabeth Warren's going to have to take

0:07:57.080 --> 0:07:59.280
<v Speaker 3>cues from us or she's going to continue to look

0:07:59.360 --> 0:08:01.480
<v Speaker 3>like a fraud because she says all these things and

0:08:01.520 --> 0:08:03.720
<v Speaker 3>then she does nothing about it. You know, President Trump,

0:08:03.880 --> 0:08:06.040
<v Speaker 3>he gets things done. He said, look, we're going to

0:08:06.040 --> 0:08:08.960
<v Speaker 3>ban institutional buying, and then we're going about both on

0:08:09.040 --> 0:08:12.200
<v Speaker 3>an executive action front as well as codifying and a legislation.

0:08:12.440 --> 0:08:14.200
<v Speaker 3>I mean, the amount of momentum that we've had at

0:08:14.240 --> 0:08:17.440
<v Speaker 3>the legislative level from you know, different Congress people. I

0:08:17.520 --> 0:08:20.240
<v Speaker 3>was at the Financial Services Committee the other night. People

0:08:20.320 --> 0:08:23.720
<v Speaker 3>were ecstatic about this. I also talked with multiple US Senators,

0:08:24.000 --> 0:08:27.760
<v Speaker 3>many who are vying to sponsor the legislation. So this

0:08:27.800 --> 0:08:29.840
<v Speaker 3>is a very big deal, and I think it's going

0:08:29.880 --> 0:08:30.360
<v Speaker 3>to happen.

0:08:30.640 --> 0:08:33.240
<v Speaker 4>Is the President going to declare a housing emergency in

0:08:33.240 --> 0:08:34.120
<v Speaker 4>the United States?

0:08:34.960 --> 0:08:37.320
<v Speaker 3>That's entirely up to the president. I can tell you this.

0:08:37.400 --> 0:08:40.000
<v Speaker 3>He is treating it with great urgency. He understands real

0:08:40.080 --> 0:08:42.800
<v Speaker 3>estate very well. He understands the importance of keeping home

0:08:42.840 --> 0:08:45.600
<v Speaker 3>prices up. He understands this issue very well. And we're

0:08:45.600 --> 0:08:49.600
<v Speaker 3>working very well together, Secretary Turner, Secretary Best and Secretary Lutnik,

0:08:49.840 --> 0:08:53.240
<v Speaker 3>the Vice President Susie Wiles. This is an all hands effort,

0:08:53.440 --> 0:08:55.040
<v Speaker 3>James Blair in the White House. I mean, this is

0:08:55.080 --> 0:08:57.959
<v Speaker 3>an all hands effort to reduce the cost of home

0:08:58.000 --> 0:09:01.840
<v Speaker 3>ownership and get people, not corporations, back in homes.

0:09:02.240 --> 0:09:05.760
<v Speaker 2>Stay with US, mul Bloomberg surveillance coming up after this,

0:09:15.120 --> 0:09:17.560
<v Speaker 2>let's tent and at least a running officials saying they've

0:09:17.559 --> 0:09:20.679
<v Speaker 2>secured full control over the country after mass protests lane

0:09:20.720 --> 0:09:23.600
<v Speaker 2>to two weeks of upheoval and one hundreds reported killed.

0:09:23.760 --> 0:09:26.280
<v Speaker 2>President Trump set for a key briefing on potential US

0:09:26.320 --> 0:09:29.240
<v Speaker 2>involvement as soon as tomorrow. Joining us now is former

0:09:29.280 --> 0:09:32.320
<v Speaker 2>City of US Intelligence official Nomen Rule. Now, I'm welcome

0:09:32.360 --> 0:09:35.040
<v Speaker 2>to the program, sir. We've seen this in this country

0:09:35.320 --> 0:09:38.440
<v Speaker 2>many times over the last ten years. This felt different

0:09:38.720 --> 0:09:41.720
<v Speaker 2>over the last week. How different is it?

0:09:41.720 --> 0:09:43.839
<v Speaker 1>It's quite different, and good morning.

0:09:43.880 --> 0:09:47.280
<v Speaker 6>The current nationwide protest in Ron continue to have reached

0:09:47.320 --> 0:09:50.959
<v Speaker 6>a scaleon intensity that is unprecedented in the history of

0:09:50.960 --> 0:09:54.760
<v Speaker 6>the Islamic Republic. Virtually every major city in town is

0:09:54.800 --> 0:09:58.840
<v Speaker 6>experiencing some form of political protests against the government calling

0:09:58.920 --> 0:10:03.640
<v Speaker 6>for regime change, not just complaints against the specific economic policy.

0:10:03.960 --> 0:10:07.960
<v Speaker 6>And what you have is the tactical government efforts to

0:10:08.000 --> 0:10:11.880
<v Speaker 6>contain these protests through promises of economic reform have not

0:10:12.000 --> 0:10:17.079
<v Speaker 6>satisfied the protesters, and increasingly coercive and violent responses by

0:10:17.080 --> 0:10:21.320
<v Speaker 6>the government have not ended the protests thus far. And

0:10:21.480 --> 0:10:24.720
<v Speaker 6>the result is that we've seen deaths. We've seen hundreds

0:10:24.760 --> 0:10:27.520
<v Speaker 6>of protest or deaths. We've seen as many as forty

0:10:27.520 --> 0:10:31.240
<v Speaker 6>to fifty to one hundred security force personnel be killed,

0:10:31.440 --> 0:10:34.720
<v Speaker 6>and we've seen thousands of arrests. So we're watching a

0:10:34.840 --> 0:10:39.320
<v Speaker 6>very intensive, turbulent situation in Iran.

0:10:40.040 --> 0:10:43.720
<v Speaker 4>Nor absolutely horrific these images coming out of Iran. What

0:10:43.840 --> 0:10:47.800
<v Speaker 4>makes this protest though, different than prior protests we saw.

0:10:48.920 --> 0:10:52.800
<v Speaker 6>We're watching basically a very compressed situation. So in the

0:10:53.559 --> 0:10:57.080
<v Speaker 6>twenty twenty two to twenty twenty three situation, for example,

0:10:57.480 --> 0:11:01.400
<v Speaker 6>the number of the tragic number of deaths, for example,

0:11:01.480 --> 0:11:03.520
<v Speaker 6>that took place where it took place over a much

0:11:03.559 --> 0:11:06.000
<v Speaker 6>longer period of time. The number of arrests took place

0:11:06.040 --> 0:11:07.480
<v Speaker 6>over a much longer period of time.

0:11:07.520 --> 0:11:09.520
<v Speaker 1>So we're watching a compression of this.

0:11:09.600 --> 0:11:12.520
<v Speaker 6>And this is happening because the inflation, the collapse of

0:11:12.559 --> 0:11:15.960
<v Speaker 6>the currency, the dissolution with the government, the failed policy,

0:11:16.000 --> 0:11:19.840
<v Speaker 6>the impression it's built upon itself since twenty seventeen. So

0:11:19.880 --> 0:11:24.000
<v Speaker 6>you've got an extraordinarily unhappy population that fills the government

0:11:24.240 --> 0:11:28.720
<v Speaker 6>correctly so, feeling that the government is just unable to deliver.

0:11:28.880 --> 0:11:30.640
<v Speaker 6>And at the same time you have a government that

0:11:30.760 --> 0:11:34.480
<v Speaker 6>is broken, it's trying to it's trying to satisfy a

0:11:34.520 --> 0:11:37.640
<v Speaker 6>military that's taking a large portion of the budget, missiles,

0:11:38.160 --> 0:11:42.640
<v Speaker 6>regional militias, a nuclear program that's brought it sanctions upon

0:11:42.640 --> 0:11:46.120
<v Speaker 6>the government well at the same time trying to promise

0:11:46.880 --> 0:11:51.200
<v Speaker 6>economic relief to a population and in the end it

0:11:51.280 --> 0:11:51.920
<v Speaker 6>can't deliver.

0:11:52.280 --> 0:11:56.160
<v Speaker 1>And just the currency problem alone is extraordinary.

0:11:56.240 --> 0:11:58.000
<v Speaker 6>So when the time of the nuclear deal of the

0:11:58.000 --> 0:12:01.600
<v Speaker 6>Iranian rio was twenty nine thousand, five hundred to the dollar.

0:12:02.280 --> 0:12:05.559
<v Speaker 1>When the recently fired central Bank.

0:12:05.400 --> 0:12:09.200
<v Speaker 6>Governor took office, it was about nine hundred and twenty thousand.

0:12:09.000 --> 0:12:09.640
<v Speaker 1>To the dollar.

0:12:10.040 --> 0:12:13.000
<v Speaker 6>In December, when the protests began, it was one point

0:12:13.120 --> 0:12:13.840
<v Speaker 6>four to two.

0:12:13.760 --> 0:12:14.800
<v Speaker 1>Million to the dollar.

0:12:15.080 --> 0:12:17.440
<v Speaker 6>There's no reason to believe that this collapse will not

0:12:17.760 --> 0:12:20.920
<v Speaker 6>continue further because the government is broken.

0:12:21.480 --> 0:12:25.800
<v Speaker 4>Norman Overnight, the Ron's foreign Ministry said that there is

0:12:25.840 --> 0:12:29.200
<v Speaker 4>a communication channel between their foreign minister and mister Wickoff

0:12:29.280 --> 0:12:32.839
<v Speaker 4>now open. The President told reporters that the Iranian leaders

0:12:32.880 --> 0:12:35.920
<v Speaker 4>have reached out. He also went on to say a

0:12:36.000 --> 0:12:38.720
<v Speaker 4>meeting is being set up, but we may have to

0:12:38.800 --> 0:12:42.000
<v Speaker 4>act because of what's happening before the meeting. How should

0:12:42.000 --> 0:12:45.000
<v Speaker 4>we read the president's comments seriously?

0:12:45.480 --> 0:12:47.360
<v Speaker 6>So let's take a look first of what is the

0:12:47.480 --> 0:12:50.800
<v Speaker 6>likelihood that the president will conduct a military strike. If

0:12:50.840 --> 0:12:55.680
<v Speaker 6>you look at us behavior and the President's actions, there

0:12:55.760 --> 0:12:58.560
<v Speaker 6>is a high likelihood of a military strike. The President

0:12:58.559 --> 0:13:03.280
<v Speaker 6>has conducted surge limited military action following a series of

0:13:03.800 --> 0:13:07.920
<v Speaker 6>social media statements, a series of promises of action if

0:13:07.960 --> 0:13:12.920
<v Speaker 6>specific behavior is not undertaken, diplomatic outreach, and military moves.

0:13:13.200 --> 0:13:15.880
<v Speaker 6>A lot of this has happened thus far, and the

0:13:15.960 --> 0:13:19.079
<v Speaker 6>social media and the intensity that President's social media statements

0:13:19.120 --> 0:13:22.079
<v Speaker 6>have increased. We've seen a visit of the Omani foreign

0:13:22.160 --> 0:13:25.120
<v Speaker 6>minister to Iran which looked like a message one way

0:13:25.200 --> 0:13:27.960
<v Speaker 6>or the other. Now we have the Iranian outreach, so

0:13:28.080 --> 0:13:32.439
<v Speaker 6>why is that happening? Well, that offers the Iranian several advantages. First,

0:13:32.520 --> 0:13:35.079
<v Speaker 6>gives them a chance to tell their own population. Maybe

0:13:35.120 --> 0:13:40.079
<v Speaker 6>sanctions are being lifted, so that might break the unrest unlikely,

0:13:40.320 --> 0:13:43.240
<v Speaker 6>but it also might allow the United Tests, the United

0:13:43.280 --> 0:13:48.040
<v Speaker 6>States of delay the United States attack. I don't think

0:13:48.080 --> 0:13:51.040
<v Speaker 6>that's going to buy the much patience with the President

0:13:51.440 --> 0:13:51.959
<v Speaker 6>normal What.

0:13:51.920 --> 0:13:54.439
<v Speaker 5>Could the US do with respect to military strikes that

0:13:54.440 --> 0:13:56.840
<v Speaker 5>would be effective? I mean, how risky is this at

0:13:56.840 --> 0:14:00.840
<v Speaker 5>a time we're already there as an incredibly explosive feeling

0:14:01.000 --> 0:14:04.600
<v Speaker 5>in the region, and previous incursions have led to mixed results.

0:14:06.920 --> 0:14:08.400
<v Speaker 1>Frankly, I think it'd be unwise.

0:14:08.480 --> 0:14:11.160
<v Speaker 6>Do you give a lot of detail because the Iranians

0:14:11.160 --> 0:14:13.440
<v Speaker 6>are going to be interested in that question as well.

0:14:13.480 --> 0:14:17.520
<v Speaker 6>But US military power is vast. The Iranians have no

0:14:17.679 --> 0:14:20.680
<v Speaker 6>capability to really defend against it, as we've seen in June.

0:14:21.520 --> 0:14:25.760
<v Speaker 6>The press reports have talked about aerial attacks, other tools

0:14:25.760 --> 0:14:29.040
<v Speaker 6>are available, and the Iranians are very susceptible to this.

0:14:29.400 --> 0:14:34.160
<v Speaker 6>The US has the means to deliver an extraordinary punishing

0:14:34.200 --> 0:14:37.880
<v Speaker 6>blow against those units and personnel that would be involved

0:14:37.880 --> 0:14:40.560
<v Speaker 6>in violence against protesters, and that's what the President has

0:14:40.600 --> 0:14:46.360
<v Speaker 6>talked about, responding to those who have committed of violence

0:14:46.480 --> 0:14:51.880
<v Speaker 6>and against peaceful protesters, deaths against peaceful protesters, and We've

0:14:51.920 --> 0:14:55.640
<v Speaker 6>seen an extraordinary number of deaths in the last weekend.

0:14:55.880 --> 0:14:59.320
<v Speaker 5>Norman, we already have Venezuela with questions around who's going

0:14:59.400 --> 0:15:01.320
<v Speaker 5>to lead it if there is some sort of strike

0:15:01.400 --> 0:15:04.000
<v Speaker 5>that does imperil the Iranian leadership, Do we have a

0:15:04.040 --> 0:15:05.720
<v Speaker 5>sense of who is going to take over and how

0:15:05.760 --> 0:15:07.520
<v Speaker 5>intimately involved the US will be with that.

0:15:08.920 --> 0:15:10.560
<v Speaker 1>I've been working.

0:15:12.280 --> 0:15:15.840
<v Speaker 6>The Middle East other issues too long to make predictions

0:15:15.880 --> 0:15:19.560
<v Speaker 6>on who will lead governments in the future, predicting elections

0:15:19.600 --> 0:15:22.960
<v Speaker 6>of the Iranian people will no doubt choose their own leadership.

0:15:23.080 --> 0:15:25.960
<v Speaker 1>I would say that there is a deep.

0:15:28.000 --> 0:15:32.840
<v Speaker 6>Revolutionary guard network within the country and corporations and all

0:15:32.880 --> 0:15:34.200
<v Speaker 6>aspects of the leadership.

0:15:34.240 --> 0:15:35.680
<v Speaker 1>If you were to draw upon the.

0:15:36.120 --> 0:15:41.040
<v Speaker 6>Existing system of society of who might follow, if the

0:15:41.120 --> 0:15:44.320
<v Speaker 6>existing system remains in place, it's probably going to be

0:15:44.400 --> 0:15:47.600
<v Speaker 6>drawn from that DNA. And that's the sort of DNA

0:15:47.680 --> 0:15:51.680
<v Speaker 6>that would likely be willing to engage with the West

0:15:51.760 --> 0:15:57.320
<v Speaker 6>and with the region in a circuit manner protecting Iranian equities,

0:15:57.320 --> 0:16:00.560
<v Speaker 6>but it would engage with the West with US.

0:16:00.720 --> 0:16:12.840
<v Speaker 2>More Blindberg surveillance coming up after this. Towson Stock for

0:16:12.880 --> 0:16:15.440
<v Speaker 2>Apollo writes the following the market reaction, this morning is

0:16:15.520 --> 0:16:18.000
<v Speaker 2>very muted, which is talent investors that the key issue

0:16:18.080 --> 0:16:21.360
<v Speaker 2>continues to be the incoming data. Tolson joins us now

0:16:21.440 --> 0:16:23.480
<v Speaker 2>for more Torston, good morning, any nice tries is still

0:16:23.480 --> 0:16:25.560
<v Speaker 2>going to ask you to have this tell me your

0:16:25.560 --> 0:16:28.000
<v Speaker 2>thoughts this morning and your response response to what took

0:16:28.000 --> 0:16:28.800
<v Speaker 2>place yesterday.

0:16:28.800 --> 0:16:31.600
<v Speaker 7>Eve nick I do think the market reaction is absolutely critical,

0:16:31.720 --> 0:16:34.720
<v Speaker 7>especially the market reaction in long rates, the dollar, and

0:16:34.800 --> 0:16:38.000
<v Speaker 7>also inflation expectations, and on all three fronts we've had

0:16:38.000 --> 0:16:40.920
<v Speaker 7>a relatively muted reaction. So one conclusion is that the

0:16:40.960 --> 0:16:43.560
<v Speaker 7>market obviously is looking at this and the reaction has

0:16:43.600 --> 0:16:46.160
<v Speaker 7>been as you would have expected. That rates up a bit,

0:16:46.200 --> 0:16:48.760
<v Speaker 7>the dollar is down. We'll see inflation expectations if they

0:16:48.800 --> 0:16:50.800
<v Speaker 7>go up a bit more throughout the day, but it's

0:16:50.800 --> 0:16:54.400
<v Speaker 7>still relatively small compared to how much drama has been

0:16:54.440 --> 0:16:56.280
<v Speaker 7>made of this over the last twenty four hours.

0:16:56.360 --> 0:16:58.600
<v Speaker 5>Is that a huge by signal essentially that this is

0:16:58.640 --> 0:17:00.840
<v Speaker 5>a market that really believes in the institution of the

0:17:00.840 --> 0:17:03.400
<v Speaker 5>Federal Reserve in the United States checks and balances in

0:17:03.440 --> 0:17:06.680
<v Speaker 5>a way that encourages you to invest in the United States.

0:17:06.920 --> 0:17:09.439
<v Speaker 7>Because investors come to the US for two reasons. They

0:17:09.480 --> 0:17:12.080
<v Speaker 7>come for AI, and they come for higher yield. And

0:17:12.119 --> 0:17:14.040
<v Speaker 7>when they come for higher yield, of course it's because

0:17:14.080 --> 0:17:15.639
<v Speaker 7>the rest of the world doesn't have great growth at

0:17:15.680 --> 0:17:17.680
<v Speaker 7>the moment, and the level of uals for the FED

0:17:17.760 --> 0:17:19.240
<v Speaker 7>is of course higher than what it is for the

0:17:19.240 --> 0:17:21.120
<v Speaker 7>easy b and for a number of central banks around

0:17:21.160 --> 0:17:23.800
<v Speaker 7>the world. So for that reason, foreigners come to clip

0:17:23.800 --> 0:17:26.520
<v Speaker 7>a higher coupoon in bonds, and foreigners also come to

0:17:26.600 --> 0:17:29.919
<v Speaker 7>get AI exposure. So for that reason, this is not

0:17:30.119 --> 0:17:32.480
<v Speaker 7>directly linked as such to the AI story, But what

0:17:32.560 --> 0:17:34.919
<v Speaker 7>this could be linked to is of course the yield story.

0:17:34.960 --> 0:17:37.320
<v Speaker 7>If you begin to see the FED lower interest rates

0:17:37.359 --> 0:17:39.919
<v Speaker 7>not for economic reasons, then the big question becomes with

0:17:39.960 --> 0:17:41.640
<v Speaker 7>what would that mean for the steepness of yeal curve

0:17:41.920 --> 0:17:43.960
<v Speaker 7>where is it foreign investors are investing, And if foreign

0:17:43.960 --> 0:17:46.280
<v Speaker 7>investors are further out, then the risk is of course

0:17:46.320 --> 0:17:48.439
<v Speaker 7>that the yeald curve preb be even steeper, and therefore

0:17:48.480 --> 0:17:50.920
<v Speaker 7>foreigners would be getting an even higher level of yield

0:17:51.080 --> 0:17:52.960
<v Speaker 7>further out the curve. So there's a lot of issues

0:17:53.000 --> 0:17:55.560
<v Speaker 7>around this question of why is it allar not weaker,

0:17:55.920 --> 0:17:58.800
<v Speaker 7>namely because foreigners actually still like the AI story and

0:17:58.840 --> 0:18:00.480
<v Speaker 7>they still like the higher coupong that they get in

0:18:00.480 --> 0:18:00.879
<v Speaker 7>the US.

0:18:00.920 --> 0:18:03.159
<v Speaker 5>What would you have to see to suggest that the

0:18:03.200 --> 0:18:06.119
<v Speaker 5>Cell America trade truly is starting to take off. The

0:18:06.160 --> 0:18:07.880
<v Speaker 5>people are starting to take this seriously.

0:18:08.720 --> 0:18:11.920
<v Speaker 7>The dollar going down, because that, of course is ultimately

0:18:11.960 --> 0:18:14.080
<v Speaker 7>the risk that foreigners will begin to say, well, we

0:18:14.119 --> 0:18:16.679
<v Speaker 7>have less appetite for buying US assets. But the key

0:18:16.760 --> 0:18:19.199
<v Speaker 7>issue continues to be that the US growth outlook continues

0:18:19.240 --> 0:18:21.320
<v Speaker 7>to be much better than the growth outlook in Europe,

0:18:21.440 --> 0:18:23.919
<v Speaker 7>much better than the growth outlook in Canada, Australia, Japan,

0:18:24.240 --> 0:18:26.680
<v Speaker 7>because we have the AI Data center boom and energy

0:18:26.720 --> 0:18:29.639
<v Speaker 7>boom of course expanding everything over the next level quarters.

0:18:29.680 --> 0:18:31.280
<v Speaker 7>We have the one big boot of a bill. We

0:18:31.320 --> 0:18:33.480
<v Speaker 7>also have all prices lower. We also have the dollar

0:18:33.520 --> 0:18:37.119
<v Speaker 7>now marginally lower. All those tailwinds continue to support GDP

0:18:37.200 --> 0:18:38.919
<v Speaker 7>growth throughout this year. Let's not forget that the one

0:18:38.920 --> 0:18:40.960
<v Speaker 7>big bit of a bill is going to add zero

0:18:41.000 --> 0:18:43.720
<v Speaker 7>point nine percent to GDP growth according to the Congressional

0:18:43.720 --> 0:18:46.399
<v Speaker 7>Budget Office in twenty twenty six. That's a very meaningful

0:18:46.480 --> 0:18:48.720
<v Speaker 7>boost to GDP over the coming quarter. So that's why

0:18:48.760 --> 0:18:51.200
<v Speaker 7>the CONTENTUS expects. If I look at ECF, you go

0:18:51.280 --> 0:18:53.840
<v Speaker 7>on my Bloomberg that the unemployment rate will peak just

0:18:53.880 --> 0:18:56.080
<v Speaker 7>about now, and the tourment rate is about to go

0:18:56.160 --> 0:18:58.760
<v Speaker 7>down over the coming quarters. That's a very important point

0:18:58.880 --> 0:19:00.960
<v Speaker 7>when you think about the background for this story about

0:19:01.080 --> 0:19:03.200
<v Speaker 7>what's going on with the Federal Reserve mose days.

0:19:03.240 --> 0:19:05.720
<v Speaker 4>When it comes to sell America, what about instead of

0:19:05.760 --> 0:19:08.760
<v Speaker 4>the dollar depreciating, what about the fact that gold continues

0:19:08.800 --> 0:19:11.080
<v Speaker 4>to hit a new record highs almost on a daily basis.

0:19:11.280 --> 0:19:13.280
<v Speaker 7>I do think that this is also a reflection of

0:19:13.359 --> 0:19:15.720
<v Speaker 7>a broader thing, namely that there's also the issue, of

0:19:15.760 --> 0:19:18.800
<v Speaker 7>course that central banks that are imposed with sanctions are

0:19:18.840 --> 0:19:21.480
<v Speaker 7>now shifting away from dollars towards gold. You also have

0:19:21.640 --> 0:19:24.359
<v Speaker 7>that many Chinese investors have been buying gold. They've been

0:19:24.359 --> 0:19:27.040
<v Speaker 7>buying ETFs in China in a very significant way over

0:19:27.040 --> 0:19:29.040
<v Speaker 7>the last several quarters that we haven't seen before. So

0:19:29.160 --> 0:19:31.720
<v Speaker 7>retail demand is very strong, and you also have because

0:19:31.720 --> 0:19:33.879
<v Speaker 7>of sanctions, very strong demand, and of course inflation in

0:19:33.880 --> 0:19:36.120
<v Speaker 7>the US. Let's not forget, which we normally, of course

0:19:36.160 --> 0:19:38.080
<v Speaker 7>talk about, is that it's still not a two percent.

0:19:38.119 --> 0:19:40.120
<v Speaker 7>It's still closer to three than it is to two,

0:19:40.440 --> 0:19:43.000
<v Speaker 7>and that of course is the number one issue driving gold.

0:19:43.000 --> 0:19:45.159
<v Speaker 7>Most frequently named that if inflation is higher for longer

0:19:45.240 --> 0:19:46.840
<v Speaker 7>and we have an economy that's about to get better

0:19:46.880 --> 0:19:48.600
<v Speaker 7>because of the one big beautiful bill the AI and

0:19:48.680 --> 0:19:51.040
<v Speaker 7>Data Center spend well, that raises the risk that there's

0:19:51.080 --> 0:19:54.280
<v Speaker 7>also more upside risk to inflation over the next seven months.

0:19:54.320 --> 0:19:56.520
<v Speaker 2>Tolston GDP right now is tracking at world four to

0:19:56.600 --> 0:19:57.080
<v Speaker 2>five percent.

0:19:57.160 --> 0:19:58.840
<v Speaker 7>Well, their land of at GDP now, as you know,

0:19:59.000 --> 0:20:00.040
<v Speaker 7>is a very very high.

0:20:00.000 --> 0:20:01.960
<v Speaker 2>Pretty fantastic, and the last rate we had was pretty

0:20:02.000 --> 0:20:04.880
<v Speaker 2>decent too, four to five percent. And the president's going

0:20:04.920 --> 0:20:08.080
<v Speaker 2>after the Federal Reserve, the President's looking the camp interest rates,

0:20:08.080 --> 0:20:10.920
<v Speaker 2>the credit card companies. The President's going after things that

0:20:11.240 --> 0:20:13.080
<v Speaker 2>are one on the one hand, in home builders on

0:20:13.119 --> 0:20:14.840
<v Speaker 2>the other hand, might help them. These are things we

0:20:14.920 --> 0:20:17.560
<v Speaker 2>typically associated with GDP tracking closer to one or maybe

0:20:17.560 --> 0:20:19.520
<v Speaker 2>a negative territory. What's gone wrong?

0:20:19.720 --> 0:20:21.760
<v Speaker 7>Well, I think a very important part of this discussion

0:20:21.880 --> 0:20:24.920
<v Speaker 7>is that equity investors care about corporate earnings, and a

0:20:25.000 --> 0:20:27.439
<v Speaker 7>few earning seasons have actually been pretty good, and corporate

0:20:27.480 --> 0:20:29.640
<v Speaker 7>earnings still look pretty good if you look ahead. Contentious

0:20:29.680 --> 0:20:32.879
<v Speaker 7>expectations are that earnings throughout this year will continue to rise.

0:20:33.119 --> 0:20:34.280
<v Speaker 1>So if corporate earnings.

0:20:34.040 --> 0:20:36.639
<v Speaker 7>Are still good, well, then equities likely to say, you

0:20:36.640 --> 0:20:38.440
<v Speaker 7>know what, if earnings are still good and these things

0:20:38.480 --> 0:20:41.080
<v Speaker 7>are not impacting the bottom line, well, then we should still,

0:20:41.119 --> 0:20:43.520
<v Speaker 7>of course expect that equities could continue to do well.

0:20:43.680 --> 0:20:46.280
<v Speaker 2>Is really strang what's gone wrong for mainstream.

0:20:45.800 --> 0:20:48.639
<v Speaker 7>Well, credit and bond in bursters of course have a

0:20:48.640 --> 0:20:50.800
<v Speaker 7>lot of these things, certainly because this begins to matter

0:20:50.800 --> 0:20:52.520
<v Speaker 7>in a number of ten ways, especially of course when

0:20:52.520 --> 0:20:54.320
<v Speaker 7>it comes to rates. So that's why it's more the

0:20:54.359 --> 0:20:56.719
<v Speaker 7>bunt market that's paying more attention to these risks. But

0:20:56.800 --> 0:20:59.000
<v Speaker 7>even the bunt market, the reactions today has had a

0:20:59.080 --> 0:21:01.680
<v Speaker 7>very very muted reaction. So that's why the conclusion here

0:21:01.760 --> 0:21:03.880
<v Speaker 7>is as long as bunt markets and in credit markets

0:21:04.000 --> 0:21:08.200
<v Speaker 7>continue to view this from a relatively complacent and benign perspective,

0:21:08.400 --> 0:21:10.600
<v Speaker 7>then we should still be looking at this from the

0:21:10.600 --> 0:21:11.399
<v Speaker 7>fundamental perspects.

0:21:11.440 --> 0:21:13.280
<v Speaker 2>Can we just partner markets for a moment, just throw

0:21:13.359 --> 0:21:15.399
<v Speaker 2>markets over there. I just want to talk about the

0:21:15.400 --> 0:21:17.879
<v Speaker 2>fact that we're generating four to five percent GDP growth

0:21:18.400 --> 0:21:21.119
<v Speaker 2>and yet everyone seems to be terribly unhappy. What is

0:21:21.160 --> 0:21:23.240
<v Speaker 2>so bad about this kind of growth? What is the

0:21:23.320 --> 0:21:25.479
<v Speaker 2>character of this GDP growth compared to what it used

0:21:25.520 --> 0:21:27.720
<v Speaker 2>to be? Like the jobless growth this time around, What

0:21:27.760 --> 0:21:29.880
<v Speaker 2>has changed? What has gone wrong? Well under the growth

0:21:29.880 --> 0:21:30.600
<v Speaker 2>that we're producing.

0:21:30.680 --> 0:21:32.480
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, So the key issue to that is, of course,

0:21:32.600 --> 0:21:34.879
<v Speaker 7>is a key shaped outlook. Both for consumers we have

0:21:34.920 --> 0:21:37.560
<v Speaker 7>high end versus low, and we also have for corporates

0:21:37.560 --> 0:21:40.320
<v Speaker 7>are you in AI or not in AI? Those differences

0:21:40.359 --> 0:21:42.960
<v Speaker 7>continue to drive that high end consumers spend continues to

0:21:43.000 --> 0:21:45.720
<v Speaker 7>be strong, and AI, of course data center energy build

0:21:45.720 --> 0:21:48.560
<v Speaker 7>out continues to be strong. Those things dominate the negative

0:21:48.560 --> 0:21:50.240
<v Speaker 7>effect that might be coming from the lower leg of

0:21:50.280 --> 0:21:52.399
<v Speaker 7>the key, and the label market is really mainly a

0:21:52.480 --> 0:21:55.760
<v Speaker 7>reflection of immigration. Remember in the last several years, twenty

0:21:55.880 --> 0:21:58.720
<v Speaker 7>twenty two to twenty four, net immigration was about three million.

0:21:58.960 --> 0:22:01.040
<v Speaker 7>The congressional budget of this is now predicting will be

0:22:01.040 --> 0:22:04.120
<v Speaker 7>about five hundred thousand. That's why the Funeral Reserve produces

0:22:04.160 --> 0:22:07.000
<v Speaker 7>a lot of papers saying that the equilibrium rate for

0:22:07.080 --> 0:22:09.160
<v Speaker 7>non found pay rolls is no longer two hundred thousand

0:22:09.240 --> 0:22:11.160
<v Speaker 7>like it was for several years now.

0:22:10.960 --> 0:22:11.920
<v Speaker 2>It's thirty thousand.

0:22:12.119 --> 0:22:15.000
<v Speaker 7>So that's why last Friday is number on non found payrolls.

0:22:15.080 --> 0:22:16.440
<v Speaker 1>It's actually a pretty good number.

0:22:16.240 --> 0:22:18.320
<v Speaker 7>When you take that into account that we actually.

0:22:18.080 --> 0:22:19.520
<v Speaker 1>Have had such a dramatic.

0:22:19.080 --> 0:22:20.959
<v Speaker 2>Declient so in behind you with fifty k.

0:22:21.160 --> 0:22:23.240
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, so fifty k is actually better than this Saint

0:22:23.320 --> 0:22:26.000
<v Speaker 7>Louis estimate of equilibrium for non founday rolls, which is

0:22:26.000 --> 0:22:26.560
<v Speaker 7>thirty thousand.

0:22:26.680 --> 0:22:28.320
<v Speaker 2>Again, so why is everyone so miserable?

0:22:28.760 --> 0:22:31.120
<v Speaker 7>Well, the stock market doesn't seem too miserable.

0:22:31.200 --> 0:22:33.520
<v Speaker 2>Cricket break against those people in the stockma understood.

0:22:33.680 --> 0:22:35.800
<v Speaker 7>So, but this is right if you think about, of course,

0:22:35.800 --> 0:22:39.199
<v Speaker 7>consumer sentiment that's also been driven very differently according to

0:22:39.240 --> 0:22:41.840
<v Speaker 7>where people are in the income distribution. But overall it's

0:22:41.840 --> 0:22:43.760
<v Speaker 7>still very clear that the economy is actually still in

0:22:43.800 --> 0:22:45.520
<v Speaker 7>decent shape. And if you now have the tail who's

0:22:45.520 --> 0:22:47.800
<v Speaker 7>coming from the one big beautiful bill again one percent

0:22:47.840 --> 0:22:50.200
<v Speaker 7>according to the CBO in growth being added this year,

0:22:50.359 --> 0:22:52.119
<v Speaker 7>you have still had data, say under spend out and

0:22:52.160 --> 0:22:54.119
<v Speaker 7>you'll still have also, of course everything going on with

0:22:54.160 --> 0:22:56.720
<v Speaker 7>lower dollar, lower oil prices, all that a really strong

0:22:56.760 --> 0:22:58.919
<v Speaker 7>tail when the growth outlook for the next sevel quarters.

0:22:58.960 --> 0:23:01.400
<v Speaker 2>The American people filled the same way. Because the president's

0:23:01.400 --> 0:23:04.320
<v Speaker 2>claim responding to something when it goes to downa Switzerland

0:23:04.359 --> 0:23:06.639
<v Speaker 2>in a week and talks about this great affordability person

0:23:07.600 --> 0:23:11.000
<v Speaker 2>Obviously he doesn't believe that the consumers in America see

0:23:11.040 --> 0:23:11.920
<v Speaker 2>things the same way.

0:23:12.480 --> 0:23:15.360
<v Speaker 7>Well, of course, affordability is a little bit different discussion

0:23:15.480 --> 0:23:17.800
<v Speaker 7>because it is correct and a number of differferends. Of course,

0:23:17.840 --> 0:23:20.880
<v Speaker 7>home prices have not done particularly well. That's also of course,

0:23:20.880 --> 0:23:23.720
<v Speaker 7>other areas with tuition, healthcare, cetera, where the discussion has

0:23:23.720 --> 0:23:26.960
<v Speaker 7>been very important. But nevertheless, the wealth effect for consumers

0:23:26.960 --> 0:23:29.560
<v Speaker 7>has been strong. Job growth has still been relatively decent.

0:23:29.760 --> 0:23:31.720
<v Speaker 7>At the same time, you know, actually saw wages go

0:23:31.800 --> 0:23:34.320
<v Speaker 7>up on Friday, you still have a number of till

0:23:34.359 --> 0:23:36.679
<v Speaker 7>wins that mean that on average, the US consumer the

0:23:36.680 --> 0:23:40.159
<v Speaker 7>weekly data from red Book, Sametoor retail sales impressively strong,

0:23:40.400 --> 0:23:42.680
<v Speaker 7>still telling you that in aggregate, the net effect of

0:23:42.720 --> 0:23:45.080
<v Speaker 7>the key is still that the higher end of the

0:23:45.119 --> 0:23:48.040
<v Speaker 7>key is dominating the oral picture for where the macro

0:23:48.119 --> 0:23:48.480
<v Speaker 7>data is.

0:23:49.400 --> 0:23:52.960
<v Speaker 2>This is the Bloomberg Survendans podcast, bringing you the best

0:23:52.960 --> 0:23:56.040
<v Speaker 2>in market economics, an giet politics. You can watch the

0:23:56.080 --> 0:23:59.080
<v Speaker 2>show live on Bloomberg TV weekday mornings from six am

0:23:59.200 --> 0:24:02.359
<v Speaker 2>to nine am Eastern. Subscribe to the podcast on Apple,

0:24:02.640 --> 0:24:05.480
<v Speaker 2>Spotify or anywhere else you listen, and as always on

0:24:05.520 --> 0:24:08.000
<v Speaker 2>the Bloomberg Terminal and the Bloomberg Business app,