WEBVTT - MLB: Leading Off June 1st, 2022 (Ep. 522)

0:00:00.520 --> 0:00:17.200
<v Speaker 1>Insufferable. Let's play ball. Welcome in everybody to fantasy pros.

0:00:17.280 --> 0:00:19.759
<v Speaker 1>This is leading Off, brought you by bet MGM, the

0:00:19.880 --> 0:00:22.560
<v Speaker 1>King of sports folks. It's me, Joey p Joe Pi's

0:00:22.600 --> 0:00:25.599
<v Speaker 1>apia with me, of course, is the Welsh, and it's you,

0:00:26.120 --> 0:00:29.040
<v Speaker 1>all of our lovely peanuts and cracker jacks, hanging out

0:00:29.360 --> 0:00:32.879
<v Speaker 1>talking baseball, looking at last night's action, talking about some

0:00:32.920 --> 0:00:35.280
<v Speaker 1>of the most important things going on in Major League Baseball,

0:00:35.360 --> 0:00:36.640
<v Speaker 1>fantasy wagering.

0:00:36.960 --> 0:00:40.880
<v Speaker 2>We do it all here and that's how we roll. Welsh.

0:00:40.880 --> 0:00:42.440
<v Speaker 1>It's great to see you, my friend. How is your

0:00:42.440 --> 0:00:44.680
<v Speaker 1>holiday weekend? Because I didn't see it yesterday.

0:00:44.960 --> 0:00:48.440
<v Speaker 3>Oh, stupendous. Couldn't be better, couldn't be better for a

0:00:48.520 --> 0:00:49.879
<v Speaker 3>wonderful holiday weekend.

0:00:50.680 --> 0:00:52.640
<v Speaker 1>I'm sensing some sarcasm in your voice.

0:00:53.120 --> 0:00:56.200
<v Speaker 2>Really are you? No?

0:00:56.200 --> 0:00:59.920
<v Speaker 3>No, I can't tell why, but it does feel like

0:00:59.880 --> 0:01:02.960
<v Speaker 3>I've been uh not here forever. But it was since

0:01:03.080 --> 0:01:05.280
<v Speaker 3>last Friday. I was off and then I am back.

0:01:05.319 --> 0:01:08.319
<v Speaker 3>But I am back here for the next three days.

0:01:08.920 --> 0:01:09.880
<v Speaker 3>I am excited about that.

0:01:10.600 --> 0:01:11.720
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, buddy, let's go.

0:01:11.760 --> 0:01:13.360
<v Speaker 1>And I don't know if you notice, I've been a little

0:01:13.400 --> 0:01:16.080
<v Speaker 1>home run streak. I got the two from mister Alvarez. Oh,

0:01:16.520 --> 0:01:19.040
<v Speaker 1>I got Matt Olsen last night. So that's three and

0:01:19.120 --> 0:01:19.840
<v Speaker 1>two days.

0:01:20.280 --> 0:01:23.800
<v Speaker 2>Somebody's in double digits. Let's go. Let's go.

0:01:23.959 --> 0:01:25.880
<v Speaker 1>And Mike Mayor. I don't know what got into Mike Mayor.

0:01:25.880 --> 0:01:27.400
<v Speaker 1>He decided to do a deep dive all of a

0:01:27.400 --> 0:01:30.279
<v Speaker 1>sudden before the show. Right before the show, he starts

0:01:30.319 --> 0:01:33.160
<v Speaker 1>sending me all of these reviews of the show.

0:01:33.600 --> 0:01:35.399
<v Speaker 2>But I don't know what the reviews are like.

0:01:35.440 --> 0:01:39.200
<v Speaker 1>He is cherry picking ones that basically say I like

0:01:39.240 --> 0:01:43.160
<v Speaker 1>when Mike Mayor does things I don't like Joe Kizepia,

0:01:43.640 --> 0:01:46.480
<v Speaker 1>He's the worst. Those kind of things right before the show.

0:01:47.319 --> 0:01:49.080
<v Speaker 1>Not my confidence. I feel like a little bit. I

0:01:49.080 --> 0:01:51.160
<v Speaker 1>feel like this is just me by Mike Mayor.

0:01:51.000 --> 0:01:55.040
<v Speaker 3>One hundred percent. Mayor's on something right now too. He's

0:01:55.120 --> 0:01:57.440
<v Speaker 3>back at his old home run tricks. Just would like

0:01:57.480 --> 0:02:00.680
<v Speaker 3>to point out I actually, late in the night worked

0:02:00.680 --> 0:02:02.600
<v Speaker 3>on the sheet put a name up for the home

0:02:02.680 --> 0:02:06.120
<v Speaker 3>run call. Oh guess what name I see under Mike

0:02:06.200 --> 0:02:10.399
<v Speaker 3>Mayor this morning. Absolute villainry is going on from Mike

0:02:10.480 --> 0:02:14.760
<v Speaker 3>Mayor and people that don't podcast don't know. There's nothing

0:02:14.880 --> 0:02:17.720
<v Speaker 3>worse than being knocked down a few steps before you

0:02:17.840 --> 0:02:20.799
<v Speaker 3>go on air to like entertain and talk to people,

0:02:21.200 --> 0:02:23.959
<v Speaker 3>and you want to find maybe the worst of the worst,

0:02:24.720 --> 0:02:28.720
<v Speaker 3>talk about reviews, like podcast reviews. There's nothing worse on

0:02:28.760 --> 0:02:30.800
<v Speaker 3>the planet. I gave up on it. I couldn't do

0:02:30.880 --> 0:02:34.600
<v Speaker 3>it anymore because it's evil. It's evil stuff. And then

0:02:34.600 --> 0:02:37.480
<v Speaker 3>of course you were getting some nice fun ones like that.

0:02:37.520 --> 0:02:38.839
<v Speaker 2>He I was gotta say, nice one.

0:02:38.919 --> 0:02:40.960
<v Speaker 1>Well, look, I mean, it doesn't get much better than

0:02:41.400 --> 0:02:43.760
<v Speaker 1>Joe Pisapia is an insufferable d bag. I mean, that

0:02:43.880 --> 0:02:46.239
<v Speaker 1>is about as good as it gets. I might make

0:02:46.240 --> 0:02:48.680
<v Speaker 1>that my Twitter wallpaper. I think that's my favorite one.

0:02:49.000 --> 0:02:51.400
<v Speaker 1>And if anybody out there, you know, think about this.

0:02:51.880 --> 0:02:54.760
<v Speaker 1>We give you free content every day we work for

0:02:55.400 --> 0:02:57.680
<v Speaker 1>I know, I put in hours before the show trying

0:02:57.680 --> 0:02:59.160
<v Speaker 1>to figure out what we're going to talk about, what

0:02:59.200 --> 0:03:02.400
<v Speaker 1>the pieces are, researching stuff, going through things. Mike Mayer

0:03:02.440 --> 0:03:04.640
<v Speaker 1>does a lot of work, no matter what I tell you.

0:03:04.680 --> 0:03:07.080
<v Speaker 1>Welsh does a lot of work. Bogman does BVP stuff

0:03:07.080 --> 0:03:09.120
<v Speaker 1>every time he's on the show. He still contributes anyway,

0:03:09.120 --> 0:03:11.280
<v Speaker 1>even if it's one day a week. Imagine your life

0:03:11.320 --> 0:03:14.000
<v Speaker 1>is so sad that something's given to you for free

0:03:14.240 --> 0:03:16.080
<v Speaker 1>and you hate it so much that instead of just

0:03:16.120 --> 0:03:18.000
<v Speaker 1>not listening to it, you're gonna leave a bad review

0:03:18.000 --> 0:03:20.040
<v Speaker 1>of it. I just can't wrap my mind around that.

0:03:20.080 --> 0:03:22.120
<v Speaker 1>But I know a lot of you do like the show.

0:03:22.520 --> 0:03:25.959
<v Speaker 1>So if you do go out there today and counteract

0:03:26.360 --> 0:03:28.679
<v Speaker 1>a little bit of the negativity and take a time

0:03:28.760 --> 0:03:32.120
<v Speaker 1>to say something positive, because we appreciate it and we

0:03:32.160 --> 0:03:34.600
<v Speaker 1>love doing this show. And I just don't understand why

0:03:34.639 --> 0:03:36.800
<v Speaker 1>people have a problem. Sometimes I don't care.

0:03:36.840 --> 0:03:39.120
<v Speaker 3>I think it's gonna be this day. Like, look at

0:03:39.120 --> 0:03:40.800
<v Speaker 3>this right here. This is a prime example. This is

0:03:40.840 --> 0:03:42.480
<v Speaker 3>one hundred percent going to be with this day? Is

0:03:42.560 --> 0:03:45.960
<v Speaker 3>Joe Drew like love? I love Drew's comment here. Now

0:03:46.000 --> 0:03:48.880
<v Speaker 3>I know why Welsh is usually wearing a hat. You

0:03:48.920 --> 0:03:49.680
<v Speaker 3>want to talk about it.

0:03:49.720 --> 0:03:54.160
<v Speaker 1>That's good natured fun now here in front of your face.

0:03:54.200 --> 0:03:55.200
<v Speaker 2>And I think that's okay.

0:03:55.400 --> 0:03:59.760
<v Speaker 3>Oh you know what, it's a it's it's a not

0:04:01.000 --> 0:04:04.960
<v Speaker 3>itune reviews. But the bar has been set for today.

0:04:05.440 --> 0:04:08.720
<v Speaker 3>Thank you all. Drew dead to me, d bad guy

0:04:08.880 --> 0:04:12.480
<v Speaker 3>dead to me, and Mayor we know where to put

0:04:12.680 --> 0:04:15.320
<v Speaker 3>our villainry at. We know who the deal is and

0:04:15.360 --> 0:04:16.680
<v Speaker 3>somebody's got to be the bad guy.

0:04:17.680 --> 0:04:21.240
<v Speaker 1>Well, to be fair, we have over eleven hundred reviews,

0:04:21.320 --> 0:04:24.120
<v Speaker 1>and one thousand and ninety of them are five stars.

0:04:24.120 --> 0:04:24.880
<v Speaker 2>So there you go.

0:04:25.720 --> 0:04:27.960
<v Speaker 3>Well, now you know what those ten, those ten read.

0:04:28.320 --> 0:04:31.680
<v Speaker 3>It's hey, well I've got a really bad hairline. Joe's

0:04:31.720 --> 0:04:34.440
<v Speaker 3>the dbat Mike Mayer signed.

0:04:36.720 --> 0:04:38.680
<v Speaker 1>All right, Yes, he does look like John Lackey. We

0:04:38.680 --> 0:04:40.160
<v Speaker 1>all know he looks like John Lackey Welsh.

0:04:40.160 --> 0:04:40.960
<v Speaker 2>All right, let's get on.

0:04:41.720 --> 0:04:43.200
<v Speaker 3>I have many looks, many, many looks.

0:04:43.240 --> 0:04:43.800
<v Speaker 2>You have to have many.

0:04:43.880 --> 0:04:46.719
<v Speaker 1>You're so versatile. Let's get into the baseball here. Martin

0:04:46.760 --> 0:04:49.279
<v Speaker 1>Perez can't be stopped, no matter what. Mike Mayor actually

0:04:49.279 --> 0:04:51.040
<v Speaker 1>wrote a piece of him a Fantasy Pros yesterday. You

0:04:51.040 --> 0:04:53.880
<v Speaker 1>get check out about how you should trade Martin Perez.

0:04:54.040 --> 0:04:56.560
<v Speaker 1>He's not wrong when a guy's era is under two,

0:04:56.640 --> 0:04:59.920
<v Speaker 1>I mean seven more shutout frames on Tuesday for Mark

0:05:00.040 --> 0:05:04.200
<v Speaker 1>Team Perez. I'm telling you some contender is going to

0:05:04.520 --> 0:05:07.159
<v Speaker 1>go after him in the next thirty days. I don't

0:05:07.200 --> 0:05:09.159
<v Speaker 1>know who it's going to be. If it's gonna be

0:05:09.160 --> 0:05:10.760
<v Speaker 1>the Braves, if it's gonna be the Blue Jays, if

0:05:10.760 --> 0:05:12.800
<v Speaker 1>it's gonna be the Mets, somebody's going the Dodgers.

0:05:12.839 --> 0:05:13.159
<v Speaker 2>I don't know.

0:05:13.279 --> 0:05:15.719
<v Speaker 1>Somebody's gonna have to go get this guy, and when

0:05:15.720 --> 0:05:18.040
<v Speaker 1>they do, his stock will never be higher. So if

0:05:18.040 --> 0:05:20.799
<v Speaker 1>you could wait another couple days or a couple of weeks, okay,

0:05:21.040 --> 0:05:23.280
<v Speaker 1>if you want to sell him now, that's fine. Trey

0:05:23.320 --> 0:05:25.840
<v Speaker 1>Turner extends is hitting Street to twenty three straight games.

0:05:26.040 --> 0:05:29.960
<v Speaker 1>Matt Olsen exploded yesterday two doubles.

0:05:29.520 --> 0:05:30.240
<v Speaker 2>And a home run.

0:05:30.640 --> 0:05:33.560
<v Speaker 1>I am the slump breaker. Let's go baby. That's three

0:05:33.560 --> 0:05:36.839
<v Speaker 1>home runs in two days for Joey p. We had

0:05:37.000 --> 0:05:40.320
<v Speaker 1>Chaz McCool make a chazz picking up three hits in

0:05:40.360 --> 0:05:43.240
<v Speaker 1>the win. There a big late hit two in the

0:05:43.279 --> 0:05:47.000
<v Speaker 1>extra innings of Frankie Montas go seven strong innings, but

0:05:47.040 --> 0:05:48.720
<v Speaker 1>he ended up losing that game to the Astros.

0:05:48.760 --> 0:05:50.240
<v Speaker 2>Christian Javier was not good last night.

0:05:50.360 --> 0:05:52.520
<v Speaker 1>I'll take the l on that one, but he did

0:05:52.520 --> 0:05:54.599
<v Speaker 1>get a great performance from Adam Wainwright, who was my

0:05:54.640 --> 0:05:58.880
<v Speaker 1>favorite secondary DK pitcher last night. Ten k's against the Padres,

0:05:59.000 --> 0:06:00.880
<v Speaker 1>who could use him off as of help right now.

0:06:01.000 --> 0:06:03.360
<v Speaker 1>We talked about it yesterday, Welsh. We talked about Will

0:06:03.400 --> 0:06:05.839
<v Speaker 1>Myers not hitting, Trank Gresham not hitting. We brought up

0:06:05.880 --> 0:06:08.640
<v Speaker 1>the idea of Andrew Benintendi. Is there anybody else you

0:06:08.640 --> 0:06:10.480
<v Speaker 1>think might be able to help the outfield a little

0:06:10.480 --> 0:06:13.520
<v Speaker 1>bit offensively, because right now the Padres are struggling outside

0:06:13.520 --> 0:06:15.320
<v Speaker 1>of many Machado who got thrown out last night.

0:06:15.400 --> 0:06:18.040
<v Speaker 3>Do you think that you were speculating that the Royals

0:06:18.040 --> 0:06:20.240
<v Speaker 3>would move Benintendee.

0:06:20.400 --> 0:06:22.880
<v Speaker 1>I think that they Well, somebody at MLB network had

0:06:22.920 --> 0:06:26.279
<v Speaker 1>in MLB dot com, excuse me, how to peace yesterday

0:06:26.360 --> 0:06:27.760
<v Speaker 1>or over the weekend that I saw that I thought

0:06:27.800 --> 0:06:30.599
<v Speaker 1>was intriguing, So I of course brought it into discussion

0:06:30.640 --> 0:06:32.640
<v Speaker 1>of the show about here's five trades you know that

0:06:32.640 --> 0:06:34.440
<v Speaker 1>would be interesting to make for teams right now, and

0:06:34.480 --> 0:06:36.159
<v Speaker 1>one was Ben intending to the Padres, and I thought,

0:06:36.200 --> 0:06:38.119
<v Speaker 1>you know what, having a guy with a four hundred

0:06:38.120 --> 0:06:39.600
<v Speaker 1>ol VP would really help this team at the top

0:06:39.600 --> 0:06:41.240
<v Speaker 1>of this order because they're not getting anybody on base

0:06:41.240 --> 0:06:42.000
<v Speaker 1>ahead of my Shado.

0:06:42.440 --> 0:06:44.760
<v Speaker 3>Yeah. No, I mean I think, like logically that makes sense.

0:06:44.800 --> 0:06:46.560
<v Speaker 3>I don't think the Royal Ben and Tendi has been

0:06:46.600 --> 0:06:48.440
<v Speaker 3>one of their best players, which is crazy.

0:06:49.040 --> 0:06:49.720
<v Speaker 2>Where are they going?

0:06:49.880 --> 0:06:51.760
<v Speaker 3>Built out team? Yeah, I mean, but I think they're

0:06:51.800 --> 0:06:54.560
<v Speaker 3>still built. I think they still feel that they're in

0:06:54.640 --> 0:06:57.800
<v Speaker 3>a contention spot to win because I've had so many

0:06:57.800 --> 0:07:00.920
<v Speaker 3>guys that have underperformed from Carlos and Tan to mamy

0:07:01.000 --> 0:07:04.120
<v Speaker 3>Wit being maybe specifically the one while Benintendi is held up.

0:07:04.200 --> 0:07:07.160
<v Speaker 3>But I agree the Padres have to do something. They're

0:07:07.240 --> 0:07:10.840
<v Speaker 3>the most, the most willing to move, and I'm surprised

0:07:10.880 --> 0:07:14.800
<v Speaker 3>that these moves have not already been done because Grisham sucks.

0:07:15.280 --> 0:07:18.640
<v Speaker 3>It's brutal right now. They cannot get this thing going.

0:07:18.800 --> 0:07:23.160
<v Speaker 3>Tatus is probably still at least what a month away.

0:07:23.240 --> 0:07:26.080
<v Speaker 3>Probably post All Star Game is the most likely scenario.

0:07:26.520 --> 0:07:29.440
<v Speaker 3>They need an influx. Like I said, the Mets, even

0:07:29.520 --> 0:07:32.320
<v Speaker 3>though they just continue to win games, need that pitching influx.

0:07:32.960 --> 0:07:35.680
<v Speaker 3>The Padres should be doing the same thing. Yeah, ben

0:07:35.720 --> 0:07:37.480
<v Speaker 3>Intendi would be a great move. I don't know if

0:07:37.480 --> 0:07:39.560
<v Speaker 3>that's it. I'd love to see them bring CJ. Abrams

0:07:39.640 --> 0:07:41.600
<v Speaker 3>back for a little bit of a spark, and then

0:07:41.720 --> 0:07:43.760
<v Speaker 3>I'd like to see them I get what you're saying

0:07:43.800 --> 0:07:46.520
<v Speaker 3>with like the OBP guy, but I'd like to see

0:07:46.520 --> 0:07:50.120
<v Speaker 3>them really unload, like they've got these prospects. They still

0:07:50.160 --> 0:07:52.400
<v Speaker 3>got these guys in the minor leagues that they can use.

0:07:52.840 --> 0:07:55.000
<v Speaker 3>Take Robert Hassel if you have to, and go and

0:07:55.040 --> 0:07:57.720
<v Speaker 3>move and get a huge, big piece, a real piece

0:07:57.720 --> 0:07:59.680
<v Speaker 3>that can get on base a power not even a

0:07:59.720 --> 0:08:01.280
<v Speaker 3>speed guy, but a power guy.

0:08:01.920 --> 0:08:04.640
<v Speaker 1>I know the Nats just came out and said, everyone said,

0:08:04.680 --> 0:08:05.320
<v Speaker 1>we're not trading one.

0:08:05.600 --> 0:08:06.800
<v Speaker 3>No, don't do it.

0:08:07.720 --> 0:08:11.960
<v Speaker 1>But I'll tell you what if you offered them Mackenzie, Gore, Abrams,

0:08:12.200 --> 0:08:16.520
<v Speaker 1>whatever else like you mentioned there in that pile of prospects, man,

0:08:16.520 --> 0:08:18.920
<v Speaker 1>that's quite a haul. You'd have to at least listen.

0:08:18.640 --> 0:08:20.600
<v Speaker 2>To that trade. If you're the Washington National, you're not

0:08:20.640 --> 0:08:21.640
<v Speaker 2>going anywhere fast.

0:08:22.160 --> 0:08:25.960
<v Speaker 3>I love that Rizzo said, we're not trading like so no,

0:08:26.160 --> 0:08:28.800
<v Speaker 3>like it's we don't even need to discuss this. It's

0:08:28.840 --> 0:08:31.480
<v Speaker 3>not the move, it's not it's yeah, if they wanted

0:08:31.520 --> 0:08:34.120
<v Speaker 3>to go Gore and Abrams and they're not going to,

0:08:34.440 --> 0:08:36.679
<v Speaker 3>they're one hundred percent not going to. But I would

0:08:36.679 --> 0:08:39.280
<v Speaker 3>love to see them go and attack and find a

0:08:39.320 --> 0:08:41.520
<v Speaker 3>team that you know is a little bit middling and

0:08:41.559 --> 0:08:43.640
<v Speaker 3>get like a big middle of the order piece, because

0:08:43.640 --> 0:08:47.000
<v Speaker 3>that's what's struggling here. You know. Machada was great, come

0:08:47.040 --> 0:08:47.440
<v Speaker 3>back Down.

0:08:47.840 --> 0:08:50.079
<v Speaker 2>I don't know, but that's the album. I mean.

0:08:50.320 --> 0:08:53.079
<v Speaker 1>Then boguards play shortstop, so I mean bringing in a

0:08:53.080 --> 0:08:54.880
<v Speaker 1>piece like that, then you're gonna have to have to

0:08:54.920 --> 0:08:57.840
<v Speaker 1>relegate tattoos to the outfit, which maybe is a good idea.

0:08:58.040 --> 0:09:00.319
<v Speaker 2>Maybe you want to do that anyway for them to

0:09:00.360 --> 0:09:01.520
<v Speaker 2>be a little bit.

0:09:01.800 --> 0:09:04.480
<v Speaker 3>But this is why, this is why I've speculated that

0:09:04.840 --> 0:09:06.720
<v Speaker 3>I wonder if you're gonna really look at a situation

0:09:06.920 --> 0:09:10.720
<v Speaker 3>where trades are just gonna be silent. We're not gonna

0:09:10.720 --> 0:09:12.600
<v Speaker 3>get a bunch of trades all the way up until

0:09:12.600 --> 0:09:15.760
<v Speaker 3>the deadline, and the deadline could be a flurry because

0:09:15.760 --> 0:09:17.360
<v Speaker 3>there's so many teams that are gonna feel that they're

0:09:17.360 --> 0:09:20.240
<v Speaker 3>gonna be in it for you know, leading up to August.

0:09:20.480 --> 0:09:23.520
<v Speaker 3>I have to imagine so many teams with the expanded playoffs,

0:09:23.559 --> 0:09:26.080
<v Speaker 3>they're gonna go in. Diamondbacks would be a prime example.

0:09:26.280 --> 0:09:28.400
<v Speaker 3>They're middling right now. You know they're getting wins, but

0:09:28.400 --> 0:09:31.079
<v Speaker 3>they're still a middling team. That's a team that might

0:09:31.120 --> 0:09:33.120
<v Speaker 3>hold all the way to the very end and you

0:09:33.160 --> 0:09:35.400
<v Speaker 3>still might not get you know, teams that are gonna

0:09:35.440 --> 0:09:37.400
<v Speaker 3>jump into the fray, which I think makes it difficult

0:09:37.440 --> 0:09:40.040
<v Speaker 3>and it makes them more costly. So I think trades

0:09:40.080 --> 0:09:42.400
<v Speaker 3>are going to cost more and we're gonna look and

0:09:42.400 --> 0:09:45.800
<v Speaker 3>we're gonna be like good lord, like it took Robert

0:09:45.800 --> 0:09:48.160
<v Speaker 3>hassel to get. You know, I can't even think off

0:09:48.200 --> 0:09:50.160
<v Speaker 3>the top of my head. You know whoever it is,

0:09:50.440 --> 0:09:54.280
<v Speaker 3>you know some decent you know, some decent obp outfielder

0:09:54.320 --> 0:09:56.040
<v Speaker 3>out there, and we're gonna look back and we're gonna

0:09:56.080 --> 0:09:59.160
<v Speaker 3>be like Jesus, these trades do not make sense.

0:10:00.120 --> 0:10:01.720
<v Speaker 1>Louis Castillo is going to be on that trade block

0:10:01.720 --> 0:10:03.760
<v Speaker 1>pretty soon too, especially after another album like he had

0:10:03.800 --> 0:10:07.559
<v Speaker 1>last night. Ten strikeouts over six scoreless innings. The sinker

0:10:07.600 --> 0:10:10.960
<v Speaker 1>was topping out. I think I'm sorry. His fastball was

0:10:10.960 --> 0:10:14.920
<v Speaker 1>topping out in ninety nine last night, So that's very high.

0:10:15.400 --> 0:10:17.760
<v Speaker 3>You've seen some of those guys actually pop back. They're

0:10:17.760 --> 0:10:20.559
<v Speaker 3>doing some I cannot think of who the pitching coaches

0:10:20.600 --> 0:10:22.640
<v Speaker 3>off the top of my mind, but they're doing some

0:10:22.679 --> 0:10:25.240
<v Speaker 3>good stuff over there. Finally right now, because you've seen

0:10:25.400 --> 0:10:29.400
<v Speaker 3>Hunter Green make that deserted change of throwing sliders more,

0:10:29.440 --> 0:10:31.880
<v Speaker 3>throwing it more than his fastball, and he's finding success.

0:10:31.920 --> 0:10:34.800
<v Speaker 3>Maybe we'll see it tonight. You're seeing Tyler Molly, who's

0:10:34.840 --> 0:10:38.400
<v Speaker 3>been really brutal throughout the season, still kind of maintain

0:10:38.440 --> 0:10:40.280
<v Speaker 3>a lot of that underlying stuff and then what went

0:10:40.360 --> 0:10:43.200
<v Speaker 3>six no hit And now you're seeing Louis Castillo pop back.

0:10:43.480 --> 0:10:45.520
<v Speaker 3>There's a formula that they're clicking back with. Some of

0:10:45.559 --> 0:10:49.240
<v Speaker 3>these pitchers all decent. Bye, I would say Castillo and

0:10:49.280 --> 0:10:52.120
<v Speaker 3>Molly are interesting buys in fantasy right now. And Haunter

0:10:52.240 --> 0:10:55.040
<v Speaker 3>Green though, my take is that he is more sustainable.

0:10:55.240 --> 0:10:58.360
<v Speaker 3>So Luis Castillo getting better and then potentially going to

0:10:58.400 --> 0:11:01.600
<v Speaker 3>another team could be a room really interesting second half

0:11:01.720 --> 0:11:04.160
<v Speaker 3>boon for fantasy owners if it works out like that.

0:11:04.960 --> 0:11:08.280
<v Speaker 1>Now, we told you yesterday Gobo be proactive because Wander

0:11:08.320 --> 0:11:09.840
<v Speaker 1>Franco was gonna go to the IL, and guess what,

0:11:09.880 --> 0:11:11.760
<v Speaker 1>he went to the IL. So he tried to help

0:11:11.760 --> 0:11:13.280
<v Speaker 1>you out there. We tried to tell you some guys

0:11:13.280 --> 0:11:16.200
<v Speaker 1>you could add in the middle infield spot. Hopefully you did,

0:11:16.200 --> 0:11:18.080
<v Speaker 1>because he's going to be out till at least what

0:11:18.559 --> 0:11:21.199
<v Speaker 1>ten to fifteen days, depending on how long he's gonna

0:11:21.200 --> 0:11:23.320
<v Speaker 1>be out there. A Nolan Gorman also is out again

0:11:23.360 --> 0:11:25.000
<v Speaker 1>in the lineup. He's doing with a back issue. So

0:11:25.000 --> 0:11:27.000
<v Speaker 1>if you have daily transactions, you're gonna get him out

0:11:27.000 --> 0:11:30.240
<v Speaker 1>of there. That's no good. Nobody, no, nobody likes that.

0:11:31.000 --> 0:11:34.720
<v Speaker 1>Let's talk about this Welsh, the Phillies and Braves both

0:11:34.760 --> 0:11:38.240
<v Speaker 1>lost extra inning games last night, and as the calendar

0:11:38.320 --> 0:11:40.480
<v Speaker 1>turns to June, the Mets are ten and a half

0:11:40.520 --> 0:11:43.120
<v Speaker 1>games up on Atlanta, twelve and a half games up

0:11:43.160 --> 0:11:45.280
<v Speaker 1>on Philadelphia. The ten and a half game lead is

0:11:45.280 --> 0:11:47.280
<v Speaker 1>by far the biggest in baseball. The next biggest is

0:11:47.280 --> 0:11:49.560
<v Speaker 1>the Yankees eight and a half Excuday five and a half.

0:11:49.600 --> 0:11:54.280
<v Speaker 1>Excuse me over Toronto currently. Now some little stats about this,

0:11:54.800 --> 0:11:58.640
<v Speaker 1>the June first lead of that magnitude, we're talking to

0:11:58.679 --> 0:11:59.520
<v Speaker 1>two thousand.

0:11:59.200 --> 0:12:00.640
<v Speaker 2>And one Mariners fourteen.

0:12:01.240 --> 0:12:04.559
<v Speaker 1>We're talking to the two seventeen Astro twenty seventeen Astros with eleven.

0:12:04.880 --> 0:12:07.840
<v Speaker 1>The Mets are third at ten and a half, along

0:12:07.840 --> 0:12:10.280
<v Speaker 1>with the twenty nineteen Twins who were ten and a half,

0:12:10.440 --> 0:12:12.679
<v Speaker 1>and the nineteen seventy one Giants at ten and a half.

0:12:12.760 --> 0:12:17.080
<v Speaker 1>So that is some incredible elitist company. That Mariner team

0:12:17.080 --> 0:12:18.480
<v Speaker 1>from two thousand and one. I think we all remember

0:12:18.480 --> 0:12:20.960
<v Speaker 1>how good that team was and unfortunately they just didn't

0:12:20.960 --> 0:12:22.920
<v Speaker 1>get it done against the Yankees and the playoffs that year,

0:12:22.920 --> 0:12:25.120
<v Speaker 1>and that was the nine to eleven years, very emotional

0:12:25.200 --> 0:12:27.520
<v Speaker 1>time in New York. So they kind of went into

0:12:27.520 --> 0:12:29.720
<v Speaker 1>that series I think with a bit of a deficit,

0:12:30.120 --> 0:12:32.840
<v Speaker 1>you know, trying to win in that environment was very hard.

0:12:32.880 --> 0:12:34.559
<v Speaker 2>It was a very passionate group of people. It was

0:12:34.559 --> 0:12:35.679
<v Speaker 2>a very sensitive time.

0:12:36.840 --> 0:12:39.120
<v Speaker 1>But man, this is an unbelievable lead.

0:12:39.200 --> 0:12:40.679
<v Speaker 2>This offense just doesn't seem to quit.

0:12:40.679 --> 0:12:42.720
<v Speaker 1>It doesn't matter who they're plugging in their Welsh What

0:12:42.760 --> 0:12:44.520
<v Speaker 1>do you make of this enormous lead right now that

0:12:44.559 --> 0:12:48.319
<v Speaker 1>they just keep on piling on to this East which

0:12:48.400 --> 0:12:50.840
<v Speaker 1>was supposed to be the Kuyper competitive division, It looks

0:12:50.840 --> 0:12:51.560
<v Speaker 1>nothing like that.

0:12:51.960 --> 0:12:55.480
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, And what's interesting is that, you know the offense

0:12:55.520 --> 0:12:57.880
<v Speaker 3>had had some stuttery points earlier. You know, it was

0:12:57.960 --> 0:13:00.280
<v Speaker 3>kind of like Alonso and everybody else was just kind

0:13:00.280 --> 0:13:03.599
<v Speaker 3>of slowly trekking their way up, and then lind Or

0:13:03.840 --> 0:13:06.079
<v Speaker 3>has just started to pop off. Everybody ed whar to

0:13:06.240 --> 0:13:10.520
<v Speaker 3>Escobar has gone. Everybody is startings to this is what

0:13:10.600 --> 0:13:13.160
<v Speaker 3>they make an incredible player, and this is exactly what

0:13:13.200 --> 0:13:16.880
<v Speaker 3>they needed to maintain with those rotation pieces hurting. But

0:13:17.679 --> 0:13:20.760
<v Speaker 3>I think you have to be aggressive. If if I

0:13:20.760 --> 0:13:23.439
<v Speaker 3>had a ten game lead, I would be hyper aggressive,

0:13:23.720 --> 0:13:27.040
<v Speaker 3>pinpointing exactly what do I need? What do I need

0:13:27.080 --> 0:13:30.480
<v Speaker 3>to continue to maintain this because it's cyclical. You know,

0:13:30.640 --> 0:13:32.800
<v Speaker 3>it's great that they got this lead now, but there's

0:13:32.840 --> 0:13:34.760
<v Speaker 3>gonna be you know, there's gonna be a little run

0:13:34.880 --> 0:13:36.719
<v Speaker 3>that's gonna start kicking back on them. They're gonna lose

0:13:36.720 --> 0:13:39.480
<v Speaker 3>some games they shouldn't lose, sure, and might unravel a

0:13:39.480 --> 0:13:42.280
<v Speaker 3>little bit. So how do you maintain that lead? Maybe

0:13:42.280 --> 0:13:44.920
<v Speaker 3>it's not on offense. Maybe it is that continued run

0:13:45.080 --> 0:13:48.560
<v Speaker 3>on unpitching that they should be doing. But yeah, I mean,

0:13:48.920 --> 0:13:50.120
<v Speaker 3>you know, what do you make of it? They're one

0:13:50.160 --> 0:13:52.840
<v Speaker 3>of the best teams in baseball? Hey, any surprise that

0:13:53.240 --> 0:13:55.960
<v Speaker 3>you know lynnd'or with Pete Alonzo is working out to

0:13:55.960 --> 0:13:57.959
<v Speaker 3>be an incredible offense when you have a table setter

0:13:58.000 --> 0:13:58.920
<v Speaker 3>in Starling Marte.

0:13:59.080 --> 0:14:02.160
<v Speaker 1>No, it's just I mean, but we've been talking about

0:14:02.160 --> 0:14:03.520
<v Speaker 1>this all the time, and this is the difference in

0:14:03.559 --> 0:14:05.319
<v Speaker 1>a lot of offenses that we see nowadays in Major

0:14:05.360 --> 0:14:05.920
<v Speaker 1>League Baseball.

0:14:05.960 --> 0:14:06.800
<v Speaker 2>The station to station.

0:14:07.200 --> 0:14:09.240
<v Speaker 1>If we're not hitting home runs, we're not scoring offenses

0:14:09.320 --> 0:14:12.160
<v Speaker 1>versus the do you have athleticism, do you have guys

0:14:12.200 --> 0:14:14.120
<v Speaker 1>that can get on base, take an extra base, good

0:14:14.120 --> 0:14:17.280
<v Speaker 1>base runners. All of those things do add up eventually,

0:14:17.320 --> 0:14:18.840
<v Speaker 1>and then you have those guys to drive them in.

0:14:18.960 --> 0:14:21.320
<v Speaker 1>And it's look, I'd like to see a little bit

0:14:21.360 --> 0:14:23.560
<v Speaker 1>more of that style baseball played, and there are some

0:14:23.600 --> 0:14:24.760
<v Speaker 1>teams that are playing it right now.

0:14:24.800 --> 0:14:26.240
<v Speaker 2>You know that'say to be one of them.

0:14:26.440 --> 0:14:29.240
<v Speaker 3>It's actually funny that you that you bring that up,

0:14:29.280 --> 0:14:31.680
<v Speaker 3>because I was going through yesterday and I was just

0:14:31.720 --> 0:14:35.800
<v Speaker 3>starting to, you know, piece together and look at stolen bases,

0:14:35.840 --> 0:14:39.200
<v Speaker 3>particularly as a Diamondback fan speaking two thousand and one

0:14:39.320 --> 0:14:42.240
<v Speaker 3>as a Diamondback fan, and some of the bottom teams,

0:14:42.320 --> 0:14:47.720
<v Speaker 3>it's crazy frustrating the level of especially like not winning teams,

0:14:47.800 --> 0:14:50.920
<v Speaker 3>how much they don't look to manufacture runs. And I

0:14:50.960 --> 0:14:53.200
<v Speaker 3>found it interesting when I was going through and looking

0:14:53.240 --> 0:14:55.440
<v Speaker 3>at like stolen bases by teams. It's never a one

0:14:55.520 --> 0:14:57.400
<v Speaker 3>for one, but when you go and look at the

0:14:57.400 --> 0:14:59.760
<v Speaker 3>teams that are aggressive on the base pass number one,

0:15:00.640 --> 0:15:03.840
<v Speaker 3>Saint Louis, Hey, they're pretty good. Right now. Inside the

0:15:03.880 --> 0:15:06.840
<v Speaker 3>top ten, you've got Tampa Bay, You've got Cleveland, You've

0:15:06.840 --> 0:15:10.760
<v Speaker 3>got the Dodgers, You've got Milwaukee Angels. On the bottom end,

0:15:11.000 --> 0:15:12.880
<v Speaker 3>you know thet and I was specifically look in the

0:15:12.920 --> 0:15:16.600
<v Speaker 3>Diamondbacks are six worse in baseball, but you've also got

0:15:16.640 --> 0:15:21.280
<v Speaker 3>like Detroit is in there, Boston has struggled, Washington is

0:15:21.320 --> 0:15:24.080
<v Speaker 3>in there, and you're looking at the top teams averaging,

0:15:24.160 --> 0:15:28.080
<v Speaker 3>like the top ten teams are averaging almost double the

0:15:28.120 --> 0:15:31.400
<v Speaker 3>stolen bases per game than the bottom ten teams, and

0:15:31.400 --> 0:15:33.880
<v Speaker 3>that is such a weird way to play. Ironically, the

0:15:33.920 --> 0:15:35.880
<v Speaker 3>Mets are kind of in the middle. But it's also

0:15:35.880 --> 0:15:37.720
<v Speaker 3>because their bats have been hot. You know they have it.

0:15:37.720 --> 0:15:40.320
<v Speaker 1>It's not even stealing bases, it's going it's going from

0:15:40.320 --> 0:15:44.200
<v Speaker 1>first to third. It's it's having moving runners over runners,

0:15:44.360 --> 0:15:47.160
<v Speaker 1>but beating out an infield hit. Simple things like that.

0:15:47.240 --> 0:15:49.520
<v Speaker 1>Having speed on a team. Speed matters. By the way,

0:15:49.520 --> 0:15:51.640
<v Speaker 1>I saw this yesterday, it's a little trivia question I

0:15:51.640 --> 0:15:54.280
<v Speaker 1>could throw off for everybody. Who is the current the

0:15:54.400 --> 0:15:57.960
<v Speaker 1>current leader of active guys in stolen bases in Major

0:15:58.040 --> 0:16:00.760
<v Speaker 1>League Baseball? Anybody got an idea? Drop in the chat

0:16:00.800 --> 0:16:03.680
<v Speaker 1>over there Fantasy pros. Again, if you're watching live, who

0:16:03.760 --> 0:16:07.640
<v Speaker 1>is the current leader of stolen bases right now? Is

0:16:07.680 --> 0:16:10.680
<v Speaker 1>it Starling Marty? It is not Starling Marte. It's a

0:16:10.720 --> 0:16:12.280
<v Speaker 1>good guess, but we'll.

0:16:12.000 --> 0:16:13.000
<v Speaker 2>Go on to more things.

0:16:13.560 --> 0:16:17.080
<v Speaker 1>George Kirby picked up his first major league win last night.

0:16:17.480 --> 0:16:18.360
<v Speaker 2>Six shoutout innings.

0:16:18.360 --> 0:16:20.360
<v Speaker 1>Another picture we liked as a secondary arm on DK,

0:16:20.440 --> 0:16:22.600
<v Speaker 1>so we did pretty good on DK last night. On

0:16:22.680 --> 0:16:25.320
<v Speaker 1>the season twenty six innings, three forty six, a one

0:16:25.360 --> 0:16:28.640
<v Speaker 1>point one five whip, a two point eight walk rate,

0:16:28.920 --> 0:16:31.720
<v Speaker 1>a twenty five point nine k rate. Eric Cross tweeted

0:16:31.760 --> 0:16:35.320
<v Speaker 1>all this our good friend Eric Cross from Fantasy pros

0:16:35.520 --> 0:16:38.800
<v Speaker 1>fan Trax black Book. He says, top fifty pitcher rest

0:16:38.800 --> 0:16:40.720
<v Speaker 1>of season? Do you agree with that? Is he a

0:16:40.760 --> 0:16:44.240
<v Speaker 1>top fifty pitcher rest of season? George Kirby, I think

0:16:44.240 --> 0:16:46.560
<v Speaker 1>he's right around there, But I think it's a good question.

0:16:46.560 --> 0:16:49.080
<v Speaker 3>He's in that range. I don't know if I would

0:16:49.120 --> 0:16:52.480
<v Speaker 3>anoint him. I mean, it's fun after this start. He's

0:16:52.520 --> 0:16:54.920
<v Speaker 3>had two starts. I believe it's two. This last one

0:16:54.960 --> 0:16:58.000
<v Speaker 3>was great. By the way, I made this bet yesterday

0:16:58.040 --> 0:16:59.960
<v Speaker 3>and I did it as a solo bet and place it.

0:17:00.360 --> 0:17:03.760
<v Speaker 3>George Kirby's k prop was three and a half and

0:17:03.800 --> 0:17:05.480
<v Speaker 3>he had eight. That'll go away.

0:17:05.560 --> 0:17:06.720
<v Speaker 2>He talked about it yesterday.

0:17:06.920 --> 0:17:09.800
<v Speaker 3>It's gonna be yeah, it's gonna be probably five and

0:17:09.800 --> 0:17:11.960
<v Speaker 3>a half to maybe four and a half if you're lucky.

0:17:13.520 --> 0:17:18.040
<v Speaker 3>But like two starts ago, people were ready to send

0:17:18.119 --> 0:17:20.480
<v Speaker 3>him to the woodshed because he was he was allowing

0:17:20.520 --> 0:17:23.119
<v Speaker 3>all this contact. He was he was getting beat up

0:17:23.119 --> 0:17:25.520
<v Speaker 3>a little bit because all those pitches there weren't any

0:17:25.520 --> 0:17:28.600
<v Speaker 3>more whiffs, and he was getting hit hard and the

0:17:28.640 --> 0:17:31.119
<v Speaker 3>contact was getting hit hard, and you still see some

0:17:31.280 --> 0:17:34.840
<v Speaker 3>of that. He's I mean, it's not even in qualifications,

0:17:34.840 --> 0:17:37.280
<v Speaker 3>but he's bottom five in the league so far of

0:17:37.440 --> 0:17:40.240
<v Speaker 3>average exit velocity given up, and he's bottom five in

0:17:40.240 --> 0:17:42.520
<v Speaker 3>the league and hard hit given up right now, So

0:17:42.880 --> 0:17:44.720
<v Speaker 3>you know this is this is a dude who's dialed

0:17:44.720 --> 0:17:47.320
<v Speaker 3>it back. I've seen I've personally seen him pitch hit

0:17:47.320 --> 0:17:49.280
<v Speaker 3>one hundred miles an hour and he's now hitting in

0:17:49.320 --> 0:17:52.000
<v Speaker 3>that like ninety six range. He's got a good mix,

0:17:52.160 --> 0:17:55.080
<v Speaker 3>but his command is key. My problem is is I

0:17:55.080 --> 0:17:57.840
<v Speaker 3>still think he's a bit inconsistent, just like the Mariners.

0:17:58.080 --> 0:18:01.000
<v Speaker 3>So when you've got a guy who's in some inconsistencies

0:18:01.440 --> 0:18:04.720
<v Speaker 3>and his overall hard hit metrics are some of the

0:18:04.760 --> 0:18:06.800
<v Speaker 3>worst in baseball right now, I don't know if I'm

0:18:06.840 --> 0:18:09.639
<v Speaker 3>ready to anoint him. It's all adjustment and it's rookie pitching.

0:18:09.920 --> 0:18:11.879
<v Speaker 2>So the top fifty is not.

0:18:14.200 --> 0:18:17.119
<v Speaker 1>Fifty I think is right in that lane, and I

0:18:17.160 --> 0:18:18.080
<v Speaker 1>think it's achievable.

0:18:18.400 --> 0:18:21.240
<v Speaker 3>Okay, I agree, but I also feel like when you

0:18:21.280 --> 0:18:23.160
<v Speaker 3>go and you make it. And I'm not calling out

0:18:23.240 --> 0:18:24.639
<v Speaker 3>Eric or anything. I just did a podcast, so Eric,

0:18:24.680 --> 0:18:28.880
<v Speaker 3>that's all. But when you make a tweet specifically about

0:18:28.920 --> 0:18:31.560
<v Speaker 3>a player and you put a number like it's top

0:18:31.600 --> 0:18:34.560
<v Speaker 3>fifty sp I agree, that's not that big of a deal,

0:18:35.040 --> 0:18:37.359
<v Speaker 3>but you've made it a big deal. You're making it

0:18:37.440 --> 0:18:39.960
<v Speaker 3>this big marker. Hey, guys, he's this type of thing,

0:18:40.160 --> 0:18:41.879
<v Speaker 3>and I think what that does for a lot of people.

0:18:42.480 --> 0:18:44.320
<v Speaker 3>What I would usually see the fervor would be like,

0:18:45.640 --> 0:18:46.960
<v Speaker 3>let me give you a name, drop this guy for

0:18:47.000 --> 0:18:48.600
<v Speaker 3>this guy. Would you do this for this and I

0:18:48.600 --> 0:18:48.879
<v Speaker 3>think you.

0:18:48.840 --> 0:18:49.440
<v Speaker 2>Can give you name.

0:18:49.960 --> 0:18:54.240
<v Speaker 1>Would you rather have Alex Cobb or George Kirby?

0:18:54.680 --> 0:18:56.720
<v Speaker 3>I mean, I would be fine with Cobb had he

0:18:56.840 --> 0:18:58.840
<v Speaker 3>was one of those guys. I think he had the

0:18:59.080 --> 0:19:01.800
<v Speaker 3>MLB's worst to E RA in the first three innings

0:19:01.800 --> 0:19:04.960
<v Speaker 3>of baseball there's been some unluckiness. I would go with Kirby.

0:19:05.040 --> 0:19:11.560
<v Speaker 3>That's fine. What about I think I might go Sandoval.

0:19:12.240 --> 0:19:14.080
<v Speaker 3>I mean, the upside is there with Kirby, but I

0:19:14.080 --> 0:19:15.160
<v Speaker 3>think I might go Sandoval.

0:19:15.960 --> 0:19:18.080
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I'm just those just kind of names are floating

0:19:18.119 --> 0:19:20.679
<v Speaker 1>around there. The answer, by the way to the trivia

0:19:20.760 --> 0:19:24.000
<v Speaker 1>question bis Arizigiza got it? Uh it is de Strange

0:19:24.040 --> 0:19:28.000
<v Speaker 1>Gordon three hundred and thirty six stolen bases the Strange.

0:19:28.440 --> 0:19:30.240
<v Speaker 3>It's a good question too, by the way, with the ranks,

0:19:30.280 --> 0:19:33.320
<v Speaker 3>I'm doing a rank update on in this league dot

0:19:33.359 --> 0:19:36.600
<v Speaker 3>com for the Patreon and I'm updating my Redraft ranks

0:19:36.600 --> 0:19:39.199
<v Speaker 3>every month, and I have to go back and do

0:19:39.280 --> 0:19:41.000
<v Speaker 3>my next run of pitching, and it's going to be

0:19:41.000 --> 0:19:43.000
<v Speaker 3>going on this in the next day. That's going to

0:19:43.040 --> 0:19:45.120
<v Speaker 3>be an interesting one where I want to place him

0:19:45.119 --> 0:19:47.280
<v Speaker 3>because I think there's some rookie pitch. I think an

0:19:47.359 --> 0:19:51.320
<v Speaker 3>interesting debate could be Kirby versus Max Mayer. And I

0:19:51.400 --> 0:19:53.440
<v Speaker 3>know you could easily say Kirby because he's here, he's

0:19:53.480 --> 0:19:56.120
<v Speaker 3>had some success, but I'm a little bit hurried about

0:19:56.160 --> 0:19:58.040
<v Speaker 3>the hard hit and when and he has got the help.

0:19:58.080 --> 0:19:59.960
<v Speaker 3>But when Mayor comes up, you know, that could be

0:20:00.240 --> 0:20:02.760
<v Speaker 3>question of dominance or even Shane bos that's a better

0:20:02.800 --> 0:20:04.800
<v Speaker 3>one because Bozz is right around Shane Boss.

0:20:05.119 --> 0:20:06.719
<v Speaker 1>I think Shane bozz I would take ahead of him

0:20:06.760 --> 0:20:09.400
<v Speaker 1>right now, and just again I believe more in the race.

0:20:09.440 --> 0:20:09.640
<v Speaker 2>Now.

0:20:09.760 --> 0:20:11.639
<v Speaker 1>Look, the wonder Franco injury is a little concerning right

0:20:11.640 --> 0:20:13.600
<v Speaker 1>now that offense is not that great to begin with.

0:20:13.720 --> 0:20:15.679
<v Speaker 1>He was wander Franco for a couple weeks. Doesn't make

0:20:15.720 --> 0:20:17.879
<v Speaker 1>me warm and fuzzy. But they're gonna have to do something.

0:20:17.920 --> 0:20:19.320
<v Speaker 1>But I'm glad they put him on the eye out

0:20:19.320 --> 0:20:22.320
<v Speaker 1>because he's clearly not right. Give him some time to

0:20:22.320 --> 0:20:22.679
<v Speaker 1>get right.

0:20:22.880 --> 0:20:25.080
<v Speaker 3>And he says he was gonna be good by the way,

0:20:25.119 --> 0:20:27.480
<v Speaker 3>like he says, he's already feeling good and right after

0:20:27.520 --> 0:20:29.199
<v Speaker 3>the stint he should be right back up. So that's

0:20:29.200 --> 0:20:29.640
<v Speaker 3>a possibly.

0:20:29.640 --> 0:20:31.960
<v Speaker 1>He'll be fine. He'll be fine, Everything's to be fine.

0:20:32.040 --> 0:20:32.600
<v Speaker 1>Joe's tough.

0:20:32.640 --> 0:20:32.880
<v Speaker 2>Guys.

0:20:32.880 --> 0:20:35.000
<v Speaker 1>We haven't done this in a while, but there was

0:20:35.040 --> 0:20:39.159
<v Speaker 1>a moment last night. Jose quass Who what a crazy

0:20:39.200 --> 0:20:42.280
<v Speaker 1>story this is. This is a pitcher for the Royals

0:20:42.320 --> 0:20:45.800
<v Speaker 1>who came in last night pitched a scoreless enning of relief.

0:20:46.119 --> 0:20:49.000
<v Speaker 1>This was a guy who was drafted many years ago

0:20:49.040 --> 0:20:52.080
<v Speaker 1>as a position player, ended up getting converted to a pitcher.

0:20:52.160 --> 0:20:55.040
<v Speaker 1>Things didn't work out. He ends up in the Mexican League.

0:20:55.080 --> 0:20:58.280
<v Speaker 1>He starts pitching and dealing with another sort of the

0:20:58.480 --> 0:21:03.080
<v Speaker 1>side arm delivery that starts working for him. He goes

0:21:03.119 --> 0:21:05.720
<v Speaker 1>to independent league baseball. He ends up getting signed last

0:21:05.800 --> 0:21:08.240
<v Speaker 1>year and ends up getting dropped because of COVID a

0:21:08.240 --> 0:21:12.720
<v Speaker 1>couple of years ago. Just crazy situation. Right, Finally he

0:21:12.760 --> 0:21:15.200
<v Speaker 1>gets his opportunity. And the best part about this whole

0:21:15.240 --> 0:21:17.480
<v Speaker 1>story is that his brother, his younger brother, wouldn't let

0:21:17.520 --> 0:21:20.480
<v Speaker 1>him give up. The guy was working at FedEx, all right.

0:21:20.520 --> 0:21:22.920
<v Speaker 1>He was working at FedEx delivering packages.

0:21:22.960 --> 0:21:23.960
<v Speaker 2>Then he would come home.

0:21:23.960 --> 0:21:26.000
<v Speaker 1>And he would throw with his brother every single day,

0:21:26.160 --> 0:21:29.000
<v Speaker 1>doing bullpen sessions. And he pitched in the major leagues

0:21:29.040 --> 0:21:31.440
<v Speaker 1>last night. This is a kid from Brooklyn. So again,

0:21:31.480 --> 0:21:33.560
<v Speaker 1>shout out to my people. I am from Brooklyn. We

0:21:33.600 --> 0:21:37.240
<v Speaker 1>are very tough, we are insufferable in many many ways.

0:21:39.200 --> 0:21:43.320
<v Speaker 1>Absolutely absolutely so. This was a great story. If you

0:21:43.359 --> 0:21:45.560
<v Speaker 1>haven't seen it, go check it out. And good for

0:21:45.680 --> 0:21:48.199
<v Speaker 1>Jose And that is a nice story. No matter what

0:21:48.240 --> 0:21:50.600
<v Speaker 1>happens now, at least he got there and at least

0:21:50.600 --> 0:21:52.560
<v Speaker 1>he can say he did it. And I think you

0:21:52.600 --> 0:21:54.800
<v Speaker 1>see so many stories of these guys Welsh who have

0:21:54.880 --> 0:21:57.399
<v Speaker 1>all this talent and for one reason another it doesn't

0:21:57.400 --> 0:21:59.439
<v Speaker 1>click or it doesn't click in that organization and then

0:21:59.440 --> 0:22:01.199
<v Speaker 1>they just give up. And the guy just didn't give up.

0:22:01.200 --> 0:22:02.280
<v Speaker 1>And I think that's fantastic.

0:22:02.440 --> 0:22:04.320
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, and this segment brought to you by FedEx.

0:22:05.160 --> 0:22:08.040
<v Speaker 1>That's rights to you by FedEx, new sponsor of the show.

0:22:08.400 --> 0:22:10.600
<v Speaker 2>A lot of people asking about Grayson Rodriguez.

0:22:10.680 --> 0:22:11.800
<v Speaker 1>I see a lot of that going on in the

0:22:11.840 --> 0:22:13.200
<v Speaker 1>chat right now before we go on to the u

0:22:13.560 --> 0:22:16.320
<v Speaker 1>STAT heroes and zeros. Do you have any inside information

0:22:16.440 --> 0:22:18.639
<v Speaker 1>on any Grayson Rodriguez.

0:22:19.119 --> 0:22:22.280
<v Speaker 3>Potentially would say, you know what, I probably would take him.

0:22:22.800 --> 0:22:25.080
<v Speaker 3>It is so hard. The hardest thing I think on

0:22:25.119 --> 0:22:29.080
<v Speaker 3>the planet to do, especially in Redraft, is talk about

0:22:29.119 --> 0:22:32.760
<v Speaker 3>taking a prospect over another guy that is in the

0:22:32.760 --> 0:22:35.919
<v Speaker 3>majors right now, especially at Prospect with similar ish ceiling.

0:22:36.840 --> 0:22:39.879
<v Speaker 3>I do believe Grayson will be up soon, like within

0:22:40.080 --> 0:22:43.840
<v Speaker 3>the next two ish weeks. That's just my guess, and

0:22:44.520 --> 0:22:48.280
<v Speaker 3>he him and Elie Rushman are like this and they

0:22:48.320 --> 0:22:50.479
<v Speaker 3>are a great connection. It's a It would be a

0:22:50.480 --> 0:22:53.240
<v Speaker 3>great way for him to get to the majors. Guys

0:22:53.240 --> 0:22:56.600
<v Speaker 3>that know each other to a t. I would, if

0:22:56.640 --> 0:22:59.840
<v Speaker 3>all things considered, I would want Grayson Rodriguez over George Kirby,

0:23:00.200 --> 0:23:02.440
<v Speaker 3>regardless of what Kirby's doing right now. So if I

0:23:02.760 --> 0:23:04.200
<v Speaker 3>if he had insight that he would be here in

0:23:04.240 --> 0:23:07.040
<v Speaker 3>the next two weeks, I would say yes, I would say.

0:23:07.080 --> 0:23:12.360
<v Speaker 1>Look who's in the chat, Welsh cousin, Donnie's in the chat. Strong,

0:23:13.080 --> 0:23:14.520
<v Speaker 1>my cousin's in that chat.

0:23:14.560 --> 0:23:16.840
<v Speaker 3>Looking that us Brooklyn people always Donny is a made

0:23:16.840 --> 0:23:19.200
<v Speaker 3>man in the chat. So chat treat this, ye, he is.

0:23:19.160 --> 0:23:21.800
<v Speaker 1>A made man in the chat and all over Brooklyn

0:23:21.880 --> 0:23:23.080
<v Speaker 1>and Arizona as well.

0:23:23.119 --> 0:23:24.680
<v Speaker 3>You know, I forgot I got a made man. I

0:23:24.960 --> 0:23:26.840
<v Speaker 3>might have. I might have some work for this made

0:23:26.880 --> 0:23:28.680
<v Speaker 3>man to do, for some recent events of my life.

0:23:28.720 --> 0:23:30.200
<v Speaker 3>I might have some people for him to go.

0:23:30.720 --> 0:23:33.560
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, some people go visit, make a couple of conversations.

0:23:33.600 --> 0:23:35.320
<v Speaker 3>Hit Jem, Donnie, I might have need you to make

0:23:35.359 --> 0:23:36.320
<v Speaker 3>a couple of visits or two.

0:23:36.880 --> 0:23:39.720
<v Speaker 1>And if you think I'm insufferable, you ain't see nothing

0:23:39.760 --> 0:23:40.640
<v Speaker 1>to him at the rest.

0:23:40.440 --> 0:23:41.040
<v Speaker 2>Of my family.

0:23:41.119 --> 0:23:43.280
<v Speaker 1>Oh my god, forget it. You should see what Christmas

0:23:43.359 --> 0:23:46.119
<v Speaker 1>is like. All right, let's go to the stat.

0:23:45.840 --> 0:23:46.719
<v Speaker 2>Heroes and zeros.

0:23:47.520 --> 0:23:50.240
<v Speaker 1>Adam wayinwright brilliant ten K's Last Night, Seven Innings, No

0:23:50.280 --> 0:23:52.320
<v Speaker 1>Earned Castilla. We talked about him in the ten K's.

0:23:52.600 --> 0:23:55.879
<v Speaker 1>Martine Perez was great, Kirby was great, Blake Snell was

0:23:55.880 --> 0:23:59.360
<v Speaker 1>pretty good. Six innings, six K's to earn. Jordan Montgomery

0:23:59.440 --> 0:24:02.120
<v Speaker 1>had a gem last night against the Angels, four K,

0:24:02.240 --> 0:24:06.000
<v Speaker 1>seven innings, strong, one earned running. Frankie Montass give up

0:24:06.040 --> 0:24:09.040
<v Speaker 1>seven hits over seven innings, five k's, two earned. Lejandro

0:24:09.160 --> 0:24:11.240
<v Speaker 1>Kirk was three for four with two home runs. My

0:24:11.280 --> 0:24:14.480
<v Speaker 1>boy Matt Oles at four for five. Christian Walker thirteen

0:24:14.480 --> 0:24:14.960
<v Speaker 1>home runs.

0:24:15.000 --> 0:24:17.080
<v Speaker 2>That snuck up on me. I heard that last night

0:24:17.119 --> 0:24:18.040
<v Speaker 2>when I was watching that game.

0:24:18.680 --> 0:24:21.119
<v Speaker 1>He's got that many. It wasn't that funny.

0:24:20.640 --> 0:24:22.760
<v Speaker 3>Ray Hard hit. I mean he I don't know.

0:24:22.840 --> 0:24:24.719
<v Speaker 2>There's some guys to sneak up on you anyway.

0:24:24.920 --> 0:24:27.080
<v Speaker 3>Well I should have gone and looked too, because I

0:24:27.119 --> 0:24:30.080
<v Speaker 3>don't know how many twelve homer guys are not hitting

0:24:30.080 --> 0:24:33.280
<v Speaker 3>two hundred in baseball right now. That obviously improved last

0:24:33.359 --> 0:24:35.480
<v Speaker 3>night where he went three for four, but he got

0:24:35.520 --> 0:24:38.800
<v Speaker 3>on base. Dude smacks and crushes the body. He's done

0:24:38.840 --> 0:24:40.359
<v Speaker 3>this for a long time. You just got to be

0:24:40.359 --> 0:24:42.320
<v Speaker 3>more consistent. But think about what he could do if

0:24:42.359 --> 0:24:44.800
<v Speaker 3>he was hitting, you know, two fifty. He's hitting up

0:24:44.880 --> 0:24:47.640
<v Speaker 3>ninety eight he was, and he's crushing all those homers.

0:24:47.680 --> 0:24:50.080
<v Speaker 3>So he's definitely one of those underrated guys.

0:24:50.560 --> 0:24:53.280
<v Speaker 1>Speaking underrated. Andrew Vaughn four for five, another home run.

0:24:53.280 --> 0:24:54.159
<v Speaker 1>He's been underrated too.

0:24:54.200 --> 0:24:55.600
<v Speaker 3>You know the watch live.

0:24:56.240 --> 0:24:58.080
<v Speaker 1>I watched this hommer and live, But how much did

0:24:58.119 --> 0:24:59.760
<v Speaker 1>you and I talk about Andrew Vaughn? And then he

0:24:59.800 --> 0:25:02.560
<v Speaker 1>had like kind of an unceremonious beginning to his career,

0:25:02.920 --> 0:25:04.440
<v Speaker 1>and now nobody cares about him.

0:25:04.520 --> 0:25:07.600
<v Speaker 2>I care. He's doing great. Jonathan Scope two.

0:25:07.440 --> 0:25:09.679
<v Speaker 1>For three with a dinger, Jose Travino hit a home run,

0:25:10.000 --> 0:25:12.320
<v Speaker 1>Wilson Contreros two for four with a bomb as well,

0:25:12.359 --> 0:25:14.159
<v Speaker 1>Max Kepler a good night to play three for four

0:25:14.240 --> 0:25:16.919
<v Speaker 1>with three ribies, and Markana four for five. He's been

0:25:16.920 --> 0:25:19.119
<v Speaker 1>a great pickup for the Met's all right, here's the stat.

0:25:19.240 --> 0:25:24.600
<v Speaker 1>Zero is Patrick Corbin boy seven earned runs, twelve hits.

0:25:25.040 --> 0:25:26.040
<v Speaker 1>It's over, it's done.

0:25:27.440 --> 0:25:32.240
<v Speaker 3>We picked up his eighth loss of the season. Think

0:25:32.280 --> 0:25:34.679
<v Speaker 3>about that for a minute. I don't think. I don't believe.

0:25:35.200 --> 0:25:38.560
<v Speaker 3>I don't think there's a eight win pitcher so far

0:25:38.680 --> 0:25:44.119
<v Speaker 3>this season. He is one an eight well give given

0:25:43.960 --> 0:25:46.960
<v Speaker 3>earned all eight of them. When he starts, you're gonna

0:25:46.960 --> 0:25:50.000
<v Speaker 3>get a decision. He's not indecisive. You'll get a decision

0:25:50.000 --> 0:25:53.320
<v Speaker 3>for Patrick Corbin. Just almost ninety percent of it tells

0:25:53.400 --> 0:25:55.200
<v Speaker 3>us it's gonna be a loss. It's incredible.

0:25:56.240 --> 0:25:58.640
<v Speaker 1>By the way, Wonkeye Penguin, I feel you're paying She said,

0:25:59.040 --> 0:26:01.160
<v Speaker 1>I had Von everywhere last year and then figure Tony

0:26:01.200 --> 0:26:03.080
<v Speaker 1>Lewuss was never gonna let him play me too, and

0:26:03.119 --> 0:26:04.959
<v Speaker 1>I had no shares this year, and I pissed off

0:26:05.000 --> 0:26:08.960
<v Speaker 1>about it. So yeah, pretty frustrating stuff there. Noah Cindergard

0:26:08.960 --> 0:26:11.720
<v Speaker 1>also frustrating came back to New York City, not to

0:26:11.760 --> 0:26:13.760
<v Speaker 1>the Mets Stadium yet but to the Yankees and five

0:26:13.760 --> 0:26:16.040
<v Speaker 1>earned runs, no strikeouts. So he continues to be all

0:26:16.040 --> 0:26:18.080
<v Speaker 1>over the place. Gi Leo had a bad start. I'm

0:26:18.080 --> 0:26:20.119
<v Speaker 1>not worried about that, Heimer Candelario.

0:26:20.240 --> 0:26:20.920
<v Speaker 2>How about this one?

0:26:20.960 --> 0:26:24.680
<v Speaker 1>Oh for seven wa wow, three strikeouts, Trevor Story, oh

0:26:24.680 --> 0:26:28.000
<v Speaker 1>for four with three strikeouts. If only there was somebody

0:26:28.000 --> 0:26:30.240
<v Speaker 1>for the last week telling you it can't get any

0:26:30.240 --> 0:26:32.800
<v Speaker 1>better than this. If you could sell Trevor Story for

0:26:33.400 --> 0:26:35.760
<v Speaker 1>an overpay, go do it, because here comes, I mean

0:26:36.240 --> 0:26:38.879
<v Speaker 1>here comes coming around again. This is what happens, is

0:26:38.880 --> 0:26:39.359
<v Speaker 1>what he does.

0:26:39.640 --> 0:26:41.879
<v Speaker 3>He's tough too, because like he hit I think it

0:26:41.960 --> 0:26:45.480
<v Speaker 3>was two twenty four if I remember quickly in April

0:26:45.520 --> 0:26:47.920
<v Speaker 3>and we were like, you know, send him out, get him,

0:26:48.119 --> 0:26:51.760
<v Speaker 3>pitchforks and fire this month or in May? Is now

0:26:51.760 --> 0:26:54.160
<v Speaker 3>it to June? I forget In May the guy had

0:26:54.280 --> 0:26:57.200
<v Speaker 3>nine ten homers. Incredible. We're like, oh my god, he's back.

0:26:57.560 --> 0:26:59.560
<v Speaker 3>He had a worse batting average in May than he

0:26:59.600 --> 0:27:00.679
<v Speaker 3>did in April.

0:27:00.720 --> 0:27:01.560
<v Speaker 2>It was worse, dude.

0:27:01.560 --> 0:27:03.960
<v Speaker 1>I keep telling everybody the strikeout rates the same. What

0:27:04.040 --> 0:27:06.240
<v Speaker 1>happens when he stopped sitting home runs and stealing bases

0:27:06.280 --> 0:27:07.320
<v Speaker 1>because you can't steal first.

0:27:07.320 --> 0:27:08.720
<v Speaker 2>His OBP was under three hundred.

0:27:08.800 --> 0:27:11.960
<v Speaker 3>Biggest cell of all time, biggest, maybe the biggest fantasy

0:27:12.040 --> 0:27:12.919
<v Speaker 3>cell of the season.

0:27:13.840 --> 0:27:15.840
<v Speaker 2>I kept every week.

0:27:15.920 --> 0:27:18.080
<v Speaker 1>I did a video on here, on this very channel,

0:27:18.200 --> 0:27:21.920
<v Speaker 1>sell Trevor's Story's basically the title of the video right here.

0:27:22.400 --> 0:27:23.480
<v Speaker 2>Subscribe to the channel.

0:27:23.520 --> 0:27:26.800
<v Speaker 1>Adlie Rutchman over four or three ks. JD Martinez over

0:27:26.920 --> 0:27:29.280
<v Speaker 1>three with three g or show after a great night

0:27:29.520 --> 0:27:31.280
<v Speaker 1>went the other way over four to three ks.

0:27:31.320 --> 0:27:33.200
<v Speaker 2>Vlad euro Junior over five to one k.

0:27:33.720 --> 0:27:36.200
<v Speaker 1>I did a video about him yesterday, just came out

0:27:36.200 --> 0:27:39.560
<v Speaker 1>this morning. Look, I think this is your window in Dynasty,

0:27:39.680 --> 0:27:42.959
<v Speaker 1>especially to buy Vladdie. Gladdy's gonna have a great career.

0:27:43.359 --> 0:27:45.840
<v Speaker 1>And I think anybody right now is a little frustrated,

0:27:45.880 --> 0:27:49.120
<v Speaker 1>and you don't usually get a window on this kind

0:27:49.119 --> 0:27:50.320
<v Speaker 1>of player at all.

0:27:50.960 --> 0:27:51.640
<v Speaker 2>I think this is.

0:27:51.560 --> 0:27:53.240
<v Speaker 1>Your Dynasty window to buy Vladdie.

0:27:53.240 --> 0:27:54.080
<v Speaker 2>What do you think? Welsh?

0:27:54.359 --> 0:27:55.119
<v Speaker 3>Thousand percent?

0:27:55.240 --> 0:27:55.560
<v Speaker 4>I'm not.

0:27:56.520 --> 0:27:58.520
<v Speaker 3>I'm never an out on flat guy like in his

0:27:58.600 --> 0:28:01.359
<v Speaker 3>rookie year, Everyone's like, this guy can't get the ball

0:28:01.440 --> 0:28:03.320
<v Speaker 3>up in the air. What is going to happen here?

0:28:03.400 --> 0:28:04.720
<v Speaker 4>Da da da da da.

0:28:04.920 --> 0:28:08.119
<v Speaker 3>Nope, I'm always by and I'm always going to be

0:28:08.280 --> 0:28:11.240
<v Speaker 3>I'll get right back in and actually uh. On the

0:28:11.560 --> 0:28:13.800
<v Speaker 3>I Tail Baseball podcast coming up for tomorrow, we are

0:28:13.840 --> 0:28:17.600
<v Speaker 3>going to debate Vlad in redraft versus There's a couple

0:28:17.680 --> 0:28:20.480
<v Speaker 3>other popular first basemen that have been debated in there.

0:28:20.640 --> 0:28:22.520
<v Speaker 3>And you know that question. I think I actually might

0:28:22.560 --> 0:28:26.879
<v Speaker 3>have been cross or somebody had posed the question that

0:28:26.880 --> 0:28:27.639
<v Speaker 3>that is the one.

0:28:27.480 --> 0:28:32.000
<v Speaker 1>I think about Alonso or Vlad. I guess, well, let's

0:28:32.040 --> 0:28:33.560
<v Speaker 1>let's say Dynasty, who would you rather have?

0:28:33.680 --> 0:28:35.520
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, well, that is the question. That is the exact

0:28:35.560 --> 0:28:36.879
<v Speaker 3>debate we're gonna do. And we're going to put a

0:28:36.920 --> 0:28:40.400
<v Speaker 3>poll out there because if in that whole, like if

0:28:40.440 --> 0:28:43.560
<v Speaker 3>you were to draft, now, who would you take in Dynasty?

0:28:43.800 --> 0:28:46.240
<v Speaker 3>I'll still take Vlad. I'm not going to take Pete

0:28:46.240 --> 0:28:49.600
<v Speaker 3>Alonzo over them in redraft. You know, I think there's

0:28:49.800 --> 0:28:52.400
<v Speaker 3>there's a there's definite possibility that you could do that.

0:28:52.600 --> 0:28:55.760
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I don't we get the halfway point. We'll

0:28:55.760 --> 0:28:57.680
<v Speaker 1>redraft the first round here on the show, We'll do that.

0:28:57.680 --> 0:28:59.640
<v Speaker 3>That's a fun I just don't know what would you

0:28:59.680 --> 0:29:04.600
<v Speaker 3>take Alonso just hands down over Flat rest of season redraft.

0:29:04.960 --> 0:29:08.160
<v Speaker 1>I still think Vlad is the better overall hitter, but

0:29:08.240 --> 0:29:10.760
<v Speaker 1>it's really tough because Alonso is getting it done right now.

0:29:10.760 --> 0:29:14.200
<v Speaker 1>So that's that's the hot look in redraft. In redraft,

0:29:14.280 --> 0:29:16.760
<v Speaker 1>I could see where maybe Ladd has a down year

0:29:17.480 --> 0:29:20.360
<v Speaker 1>in dynasty, I still want Flat in redraft. I understand

0:29:20.440 --> 0:29:23.479
<v Speaker 1>wanting to hold tight with Alonso because it's working, So

0:29:23.520 --> 0:29:25.600
<v Speaker 1>why why muck with something that's.

0:29:25.440 --> 0:29:28.880
<v Speaker 3>Working and also is fine by me? And why move

0:29:29.360 --> 0:29:32.920
<v Speaker 3>a crazy performing player that's maybe two rounds less than

0:29:32.920 --> 0:29:35.440
<v Speaker 3>this other guy who's underperforming like that. It's not a

0:29:35.480 --> 0:29:38.360
<v Speaker 3>trade you can make, it's not necessarily applicable, but it

0:29:38.440 --> 0:29:40.400
<v Speaker 3>is fun to ask the question, like who would you

0:29:40.560 --> 0:29:42.320
<v Speaker 3>rather have the rest of this sek.

0:29:42.240 --> 0:29:45.800
<v Speaker 1>Right, all right, there's the leaderboard to Bloom to Bloom

0:29:46.360 --> 0:29:48.040
<v Speaker 1>to Bloom, it's the blum I like to call him

0:29:48.040 --> 0:29:51.920
<v Speaker 1>to Blue Looms. I thought that was Jeff Jeff de Blum. Yes,

0:29:52.360 --> 0:29:55.200
<v Speaker 1>you see the home run. The call that I make

0:29:55.400 --> 0:29:56.440
<v Speaker 1>goes upward.

0:29:56.640 --> 0:29:57.160
<v Speaker 2>You see.

0:29:57.640 --> 0:30:01.000
<v Speaker 1>So the Niking of the North has eighteens, Bill I

0:30:01.080 --> 0:30:03.320
<v Speaker 1>have after last night, I have twelve.

0:30:03.440 --> 0:30:05.479
<v Speaker 3>I believe, Holy Cow, I don't know where I'm at.

0:30:05.560 --> 0:30:06.320
<v Speaker 3>I have no idea.

0:30:06.320 --> 0:30:07.240
<v Speaker 2>I don't know where you're at.

0:30:07.240 --> 0:30:10.280
<v Speaker 1>But I am at twelve and I am getting very

0:30:10.440 --> 0:30:13.720
<v Speaker 1>dangerously close. Mike Mayor has fourteen. All I want to

0:30:13.720 --> 0:30:15.800
<v Speaker 1>do in life is get ahead of Mike Mayor on

0:30:15.840 --> 0:30:18.920
<v Speaker 1>that board first. At my only does he have in

0:30:18.920 --> 0:30:22.440
<v Speaker 1>my entire life, He's got fourteen. I've got twelve. I

0:30:22.480 --> 0:30:23.800
<v Speaker 1>can get two tonight from my guy.

0:30:23.880 --> 0:30:25.240
<v Speaker 2>We're tied. Let's go all.

0:30:25.200 --> 0:30:27.400
<v Speaker 1>Right, here we go, Let's go. Bet MGM, the King

0:30:27.880 --> 0:30:30.840
<v Speaker 1>of sports books. Bet ten dollars, win two hundred when

0:30:30.880 --> 0:30:33.240
<v Speaker 1>you've been on any game, regardless of the outcome. Sign

0:30:33.320 --> 0:30:36.720
<v Speaker 1>up today at betmgm dot com or download the betmgm app.

0:30:36.840 --> 0:30:40.200
<v Speaker 1>Use the promo code the leading off one word leading off.

0:30:40.400 --> 0:30:43.200
<v Speaker 1>I'm wearing a crown because that the King of sports books.

0:30:43.200 --> 0:30:43.760
<v Speaker 2>See it's a bit.

0:30:44.080 --> 0:30:46.040
<v Speaker 1>That's what I do every single day. I put the

0:30:46.040 --> 0:30:48.160
<v Speaker 1>crown on Bogman laughs every time someone say that.

0:30:48.400 --> 0:30:50.680
<v Speaker 3>I mean, it's a great bit, it's a great.

0:30:50.480 --> 0:30:52.959
<v Speaker 2>But it's fun. I mean, you know, I'm the king.

0:30:53.680 --> 0:30:56.720
<v Speaker 1>I'm the King of insufferableness. That's what I am.

0:30:57.360 --> 0:30:57.719
<v Speaker 2>Today.

0:30:57.840 --> 0:31:01.160
<v Speaker 1>I saw bet mgm one and a half total bases

0:31:01.720 --> 0:31:04.200
<v Speaker 1>minus one twenty on Jazz Chisholm in Colorado tonight.

0:31:04.240 --> 0:31:05.400
<v Speaker 2>I'll take that every day of the week.

0:31:05.640 --> 0:31:08.560
<v Speaker 1>I liked against the Phillies struggling, but this is I

0:31:08.560 --> 0:31:10.800
<v Speaker 1>think a trap one the numbers eight and a half.

0:31:11.880 --> 0:31:14.280
<v Speaker 1>You want to go the under on this one, Welsh

0:31:14.360 --> 0:31:16.120
<v Speaker 1>or the over at eight and a half with the Phillies.

0:31:16.120 --> 0:31:17.600
<v Speaker 1>I know the Phillies have been struggling. I think I

0:31:17.640 --> 0:31:19.560
<v Speaker 1>feel like this one's a trap. I kind of feel

0:31:19.600 --> 0:31:20.840
<v Speaker 1>like the under is the way to go tonight.

0:31:20.880 --> 0:31:21.360
<v Speaker 2>What do you think?

0:31:21.840 --> 0:31:22.080
<v Speaker 4>Uh?

0:31:22.120 --> 0:31:24.360
<v Speaker 3>You know when actually we were just talking about Rodon

0:31:24.400 --> 0:31:28.680
<v Speaker 3>the other day. Redon is a crazy home split or

0:31:28.800 --> 0:31:31.960
<v Speaker 3>split a home away split guy right now where he

0:31:32.080 --> 0:31:34.600
<v Speaker 3>is absolutely dominant, like a two two era at home,

0:31:34.760 --> 0:31:37.520
<v Speaker 3>but he's like four and a half or higher on

0:31:37.560 --> 0:31:40.840
<v Speaker 3>the road. So I look at this and I go, eh,

0:31:40.920 --> 0:31:42.800
<v Speaker 3>I would take the under. I'm not sure I make

0:31:42.840 --> 0:31:46.120
<v Speaker 3>this bet. The understrikeout ones are tough. But if it is,

0:31:46.120 --> 0:31:47.600
<v Speaker 3>is it really at eight and a half? Where is

0:31:47.640 --> 0:31:49.600
<v Speaker 3>it at eight and a half? Is that? M?

0:31:49.680 --> 0:31:51.280
<v Speaker 2>Jim at MGM.

0:31:51.320 --> 0:31:53.760
<v Speaker 3>If I'm feeling loose and I'm wanting to make some bet,

0:31:53.800 --> 0:31:56.200
<v Speaker 3>you know, because sometimes, you know, sometimes you're making bets

0:31:56.200 --> 0:31:57.720
<v Speaker 3>and you're like, all right, we gotta get like we

0:31:57.760 --> 0:32:00.520
<v Speaker 3>got a hammer down here, and sometimes feel a little

0:32:00.520 --> 0:32:02.320
<v Speaker 3>bit loose and you like them. I actually do like

0:32:02.400 --> 0:32:04.560
<v Speaker 3>this one eight and a half. I would take the

0:32:04.640 --> 0:32:06.760
<v Speaker 3>under because away is not great for him and this

0:32:06.840 --> 0:32:07.400
<v Speaker 3>is in Philly.

0:32:08.040 --> 0:32:10.480
<v Speaker 1>All right, we're running along today, so let's hammer these out.

0:32:10.640 --> 0:32:12.640
<v Speaker 1>Aaron Judge one and a half two A plus one

0:32:12.720 --> 0:32:16.240
<v Speaker 1>twelve at MGM. Also Kyle Wright five and a half

0:32:16.320 --> 0:32:18.720
<v Speaker 1>k's against the Arizona Diamondbacks. I like the over on

0:32:18.760 --> 0:32:20.600
<v Speaker 1>that it's minus one fifty two. It's a lot of juice,

0:32:20.640 --> 0:32:22.600
<v Speaker 1>but I don't care. Well, what were the props that

0:32:22.640 --> 0:32:24.160
<v Speaker 1>you had your eye on real quick before we go

0:32:24.200 --> 0:32:25.120
<v Speaker 1>to DFS.

0:32:24.760 --> 0:32:26.000
<v Speaker 3>And theirs was under? By the way, I want to

0:32:26.000 --> 0:32:27.800
<v Speaker 3>point out that one minus one fifty two is at

0:32:27.920 --> 0:32:30.280
<v Speaker 3>use on the underd I're going to get over. Nope,

0:32:30.520 --> 0:32:32.719
<v Speaker 3>I probably go over. The two I like the most

0:32:33.280 --> 0:32:36.120
<v Speaker 3>is Robbie Ray strikeouts six and a half Baltimore and

0:32:36.240 --> 0:32:39.480
<v Speaker 3>Copex strikeouts four and a half is against Blue Jays, though,

0:32:39.720 --> 0:32:42.160
<v Speaker 3>But I don't necessarily always say to do this, but

0:32:42.480 --> 0:32:45.520
<v Speaker 3>I put those two together in a little two strikeout parlay.

0:32:45.760 --> 0:32:47.600
<v Speaker 3>Those are my two favorites. I think there's actually a

0:32:47.640 --> 0:32:49.920
<v Speaker 3>lot of good ones. I also kind of like Jeffrey

0:32:49.920 --> 0:32:52.440
<v Speaker 3>Springs and you Darvish both at four and a half.

0:32:52.520 --> 0:32:54.600
<v Speaker 3>If I were, you know, wanting to maybe put a

0:32:54.640 --> 0:32:57.400
<v Speaker 3>little four team or together, you can bet solo Juice

0:32:57.480 --> 0:32:59.440
<v Speaker 3>is a little bit weird all over, but Robbie Ray

0:32:59.480 --> 0:33:01.320
<v Speaker 3>is the one. I think I might also solo bet.

0:33:01.360 --> 0:33:03.560
<v Speaker 3>I think it's the Juices round one thirty right now.

0:33:04.160 --> 0:33:06.440
<v Speaker 1>Speaking of Robbie Ray on DK nine and a half,

0:33:06.520 --> 0:33:08.920
<v Speaker 1>K for him, but I'm all Nesser Cortez tonight ten

0:33:08.960 --> 0:33:11.000
<v Speaker 1>point seven, pay for it, Just pay for it.

0:33:11.560 --> 0:33:12.960
<v Speaker 2>He's been so good to reach.

0:33:12.960 --> 0:33:14.640
<v Speaker 1>Schooble at ten point two is the pivot if you

0:33:14.680 --> 0:33:16.600
<v Speaker 1>want to have one lineup with Cortes and one with

0:33:16.640 --> 0:33:19.160
<v Speaker 1>somebody else, just in case, John Gray's just six point

0:33:19.200 --> 0:33:21.160
<v Speaker 1>four tonight. Again, it's a six point four, so go

0:33:21.200 --> 0:33:24.120
<v Speaker 1>get Cortes, go down to Gray Hope for the best,

0:33:24.160 --> 0:33:26.720
<v Speaker 1>and then hopefully you can get a w there on FanDuel.

0:33:26.800 --> 0:33:29.120
<v Speaker 2>Keep it simple, go right for Cortes a ten point eight.

0:33:29.240 --> 0:33:29.680
<v Speaker 2>Same thing.

0:33:29.840 --> 0:33:31.480
<v Speaker 1>If you want to differentiate in the tournament, go with

0:33:31.520 --> 0:33:34.959
<v Speaker 1>Schooble a ten point five. If Cortes loses Tonight has

0:33:35.000 --> 0:33:37.080
<v Speaker 1>a bad start, you have schoobl in the same lineup

0:33:37.120 --> 0:33:39.400
<v Speaker 1>that goes off all of a sudden, you're in good standing.

0:33:39.720 --> 0:33:41.760
<v Speaker 1>Like the Yankees. My favorite stack of the night. There

0:33:41.800 --> 0:33:44.200
<v Speaker 1>really is a lot of value tonight on the DFS

0:33:44.280 --> 0:33:46.280
<v Speaker 1>names in terms of guys in the lineup, So just

0:33:46.280 --> 0:33:48.440
<v Speaker 1>get that picture right. For me today, I'm going with

0:33:48.520 --> 0:33:51.200
<v Speaker 1>Raphael Devers for my home run. Call Welsh, who are

0:33:51.200 --> 0:33:51.960
<v Speaker 1>you going with tonight?

0:33:52.320 --> 0:33:54.920
<v Speaker 3>Well, I told you I just got cherry picked. I

0:33:55.200 --> 0:33:57.800
<v Speaker 3>made it before anybody else but Mike Marrige, you did

0:33:58.000 --> 0:33:59.600
<v Speaker 3>care and he just put it on the board. I

0:33:59.680 --> 0:34:02.680
<v Speaker 3>got Elson Cruz playing the true BVP. This is like

0:34:02.680 --> 0:34:04.640
<v Speaker 3>that Jonathan Scope one from a couple of weeks ago.

0:34:04.760 --> 0:34:07.520
<v Speaker 3>You look, there's one player that's dominant versus a picture.

0:34:07.560 --> 0:34:10.320
<v Speaker 3>It's Nelson Cruz Tonight on Carrasco. That's who I picked

0:34:10.560 --> 0:34:13.439
<v Speaker 3>and surprise, surprise, that's who Mike also picks, so guess

0:34:13.440 --> 0:34:15.319
<v Speaker 3>I won't be but I'm not looking to jump him.

0:34:15.320 --> 0:34:17.120
<v Speaker 3>I doesn't need to get some homers.

0:34:18.080 --> 0:34:21.640
<v Speaker 1>Spread the positivity, do something nice, leave a nice review

0:34:21.680 --> 0:34:24.000
<v Speaker 1>of the show. Leading off, we're in Juny first, we're

0:34:24.000 --> 0:34:26.919
<v Speaker 1>having fun, we're calling home runs. I'm wearing crowns. We're

0:34:26.920 --> 0:34:29.400
<v Speaker 1>doing good work. And look we see the numbers. The

0:34:29.480 --> 0:34:32.319
<v Speaker 1>numbers are growing. So we thank you for all for

0:34:32.400 --> 0:34:35.239
<v Speaker 1>listening because you guys are just crushing it in terms

0:34:35.280 --> 0:34:38.880
<v Speaker 1>of the downloads, the listens, the subscriptions were going on.

0:34:39.000 --> 0:34:40.840
<v Speaker 1>I'm telling you, you guys are the best. We love you

0:34:41.120 --> 0:34:43.120
<v Speaker 1>and we appreciate you being part of the show. So

0:34:43.160 --> 0:34:44.880
<v Speaker 1>that'll do it for us. But the story of the

0:34:44.880 --> 0:34:46.600
<v Speaker 1>game goes on. For the Welsh, I'm Joey P.

0:34:47.320 --> 0:34:48.279
<v Speaker 2>We'll see you next time.

0:34:48.400 --> 0:34:50.520
<v Speaker 3>Kids wearing a hat tomorrow.

0:34:51.400 --> 0:35:01.800
<v Speaker 4>Yeah. The