WEBVTT - Mark Harris on Mike Nichols’ Incomparable Life

0:00:02.240 --> 0:00:05.360
<v Speaker 1>I'm Alec Baldwin and you're listening to Here's the Thing

0:00:05.840 --> 0:00:10.000
<v Speaker 1>from My Heart Radio. Mike Nichols was one of the

0:00:10.039 --> 0:00:14.360
<v Speaker 1>most celebrated directors of the last century, and he is

0:00:14.440 --> 0:00:18.119
<v Speaker 1>the subject of a compelling new biography written by My

0:00:18.239 --> 0:00:22.400
<v Speaker 1>guest Today, Mark Harris, drawn from more than two hundred

0:00:22.440 --> 0:00:27.040
<v Speaker 1>and fifty interviews. Mike Nichols. A Life traces nichols lonely

0:00:27.040 --> 0:00:30.600
<v Speaker 1>and difficult childhood onto the highs and lows of his

0:00:30.960 --> 0:00:36.479
<v Speaker 1>astonishingly productive fifty year career. Nichols was the rare director

0:00:36.560 --> 0:00:41.360
<v Speaker 1>who moved fluidly between Broadway and Hollywood. His films include

0:00:41.400 --> 0:00:45.600
<v Speaker 1>The Graduate, Who's Afraid of Virginia, Wolf, Silkwood, and Working Girl,

0:00:45.960 --> 0:00:49.960
<v Speaker 1>Where I had My chance to experience firsthand his ability

0:00:50.000 --> 0:00:54.880
<v Speaker 1>to connect with actors on the stage. Nichols was prolific

0:00:54.960 --> 0:00:58.640
<v Speaker 1>in shepherding the casts of everything from Neil Simon's Barefoot

0:00:58.640 --> 0:01:01.880
<v Speaker 1>in the Park and Tom Stoppard's The Real Thing to

0:01:02.200 --> 0:01:05.560
<v Speaker 1>Monty Python's Smam a Lot. And before all of that,

0:01:05.720 --> 0:01:09.800
<v Speaker 1>Mike Nichols was a performer, one half of the influential

0:01:09.840 --> 0:01:13.120
<v Speaker 1>sketch comedy team Nichols in May, which he developed with

0:01:13.200 --> 0:01:17.640
<v Speaker 1>the incomparable Elaine May. One thing Mark Harris knew when

0:01:17.640 --> 0:01:20.560
<v Speaker 1>he started working on this book was there would be

0:01:20.560 --> 0:01:25.440
<v Speaker 1>plenty of material. I don't know how you wake up

0:01:25.480 --> 0:01:27.920
<v Speaker 1>every day and go to bed every night with the

0:01:27.959 --> 0:01:31.720
<v Speaker 1>same person in your head while you're working on something.

0:01:32.240 --> 0:01:35.559
<v Speaker 1>And I just thought that with Nichols, whatever I found

0:01:35.600 --> 0:01:39.000
<v Speaker 1>out good or bad, there probably would not be boring parts.

0:01:39.040 --> 0:01:42.039
<v Speaker 1>I mean, he had such a long, interesting career and

0:01:42.520 --> 0:01:46.000
<v Speaker 1>it was always on two tracks, movie directing and theater directing,

0:01:46.240 --> 0:01:48.480
<v Speaker 1>and before that there was all of his work with

0:01:48.520 --> 0:01:50.920
<v Speaker 1>Elaine May. So I thought, I'm not going to hit

0:01:51.080 --> 0:01:55.360
<v Speaker 1>a whole decade where nothing interesting happens or I can't

0:01:55.360 --> 0:01:58.160
<v Speaker 1>find out anything good. And I just felt like I

0:01:58.200 --> 0:02:00.400
<v Speaker 1>would never be bored. And and I also I felt

0:02:00.600 --> 0:02:03.440
<v Speaker 1>truly that there was that what I didn't know was

0:02:03.480 --> 0:02:05.960
<v Speaker 1>a much much longer list than what I thought. I

0:02:06.040 --> 0:02:10.400
<v Speaker 1>knew now. Diane and his children were not interviewed for

0:02:10.440 --> 0:02:13.280
<v Speaker 1>the book. No, they weren't. I went to them before

0:02:13.520 --> 0:02:17.200
<v Speaker 1>I really sat down with Penguin to try to make

0:02:17.240 --> 0:02:19.920
<v Speaker 1>a deal, because I had no interest in doing the

0:02:19.919 --> 0:02:23.560
<v Speaker 1>book if they were opposed to it. But they gave

0:02:23.600 --> 0:02:27.079
<v Speaker 1>their consent. They never asked to see anything advanced. They

0:02:27.080 --> 0:02:29.760
<v Speaker 1>never asked for me to leave anything out, So I

0:02:29.800 --> 0:02:33.440
<v Speaker 1>felt like what I really needed from them was they're okay,

0:02:33.520 --> 0:02:36.480
<v Speaker 1>and they're okay to make their okay public. When they

0:02:36.520 --> 0:02:39.360
<v Speaker 1>don't agree to sit down, why don't they do it?

0:02:39.960 --> 0:02:42.800
<v Speaker 1>I felt like, in different ways, it was a very

0:02:42.919 --> 0:02:47.520
<v Speaker 1>big ask. Mike's three kids are pretty private people, and

0:02:47.880 --> 0:02:50.400
<v Speaker 1>Mike made no secret of the fact that when they

0:02:50.400 --> 0:02:53.640
<v Speaker 1>were growing up he wasn't always as present a father

0:02:53.760 --> 0:02:56.480
<v Speaker 1>as he felt he should have been. And I really

0:02:56.560 --> 0:03:01.320
<v Speaker 1>understand the idea of not wanting to play out a

0:03:01.400 --> 0:03:04.360
<v Speaker 1>whole parent child drama in the pages of a book.

0:03:04.800 --> 0:03:08.880
<v Speaker 1>Diane was in a uniquely complicated position because if she

0:03:09.000 --> 0:03:11.760
<v Speaker 1>had sat down and done an interview with me, I

0:03:11.800 --> 0:03:16.440
<v Speaker 1>think everyone would have taken that as tacit approval of

0:03:17.240 --> 0:03:20.440
<v Speaker 1>everything that was in the book, which she could not give,

0:03:20.560 --> 0:03:23.080
<v Speaker 1>of course, because she didn't know what was in the book.

0:03:23.280 --> 0:03:25.880
<v Speaker 1>So they put a lot of trust in me letting

0:03:25.880 --> 0:03:28.280
<v Speaker 1>me do this. Everybody that worked with Mike, he's such

0:03:28.320 --> 0:03:30.959
<v Speaker 1>a fizzy character. I would imagine your work was made

0:03:31.040 --> 0:03:34.680
<v Speaker 1>easier by how much people remember their time with Mike completely.

0:03:34.760 --> 0:03:37.160
<v Speaker 1>That was a really particular thing, Even if he said

0:03:37.240 --> 0:03:40.400
<v Speaker 1>something to them forty years ago. They held onto it.

0:03:40.840 --> 0:03:43.800
<v Speaker 1>Whether it was a great funny piece of advice or

0:03:43.880 --> 0:03:47.440
<v Speaker 1>a brutal insult, it stayed inside them when it went in.

0:03:47.640 --> 0:03:50.040
<v Speaker 1>That's interesting. I didn't know Mike well. I worked with

0:03:50.120 --> 0:03:52.000
<v Speaker 1>them that one time in the eighties, and but I

0:03:52.040 --> 0:03:53.800
<v Speaker 1>would always see him. He was very kind and he

0:03:53.840 --> 0:03:56.120
<v Speaker 1>loved actors. And it was at a time in my

0:03:56.200 --> 0:04:00.160
<v Speaker 1>life when I was being tortured by a girlfriend I

0:04:00.280 --> 0:04:03.680
<v Speaker 1>had like she was so resentful of my starting to

0:04:03.720 --> 0:04:06.120
<v Speaker 1>work and being more successful. This is the beginning of

0:04:06.200 --> 0:04:09.800
<v Speaker 1>me making films. This is the beginning of me throwing

0:04:09.840 --> 0:04:12.160
<v Speaker 1>my clothes in a suitcase and leaving the moment after

0:04:12.200 --> 0:04:14.320
<v Speaker 1>I hung up the phone, Hollywood was calling me to

0:04:14.360 --> 0:04:16.800
<v Speaker 1>make movies and I was going to go no matter what.

0:04:17.279 --> 0:04:20.400
<v Speaker 1>And you were gonna start missing everything, birthdays, anniversary as

0:04:20.400 --> 0:04:23.560
<v Speaker 1>you didn't care. And I'm sitting lamenting this with Mike

0:04:24.200 --> 0:04:27.159
<v Speaker 1>in his trailer when we were doing Working Girl, and

0:04:27.200 --> 0:04:29.680
<v Speaker 1>he said to me, well, you know the relationship is dead.

0:04:29.720 --> 0:04:32.960
<v Speaker 1>He said. There's two metrics. One is he says, there's

0:04:33.000 --> 0:04:35.599
<v Speaker 1>just not enough other people in the room when you're

0:04:35.600 --> 0:04:37.880
<v Speaker 1>with your girlfriend. They just aren't enough other people in

0:04:37.920 --> 0:04:41.320
<v Speaker 1>the room. The other one is he says, how quickly

0:04:41.320 --> 0:04:43.760
<v Speaker 1>do you get back into your ship after you come

0:04:47.120 --> 0:04:50.359
<v Speaker 1>the thing to say, I mean, he really really like

0:04:50.520 --> 0:04:53.159
<v Speaker 1>beguiled me. He was beguiling. Everything that came out of

0:04:53.160 --> 0:04:56.480
<v Speaker 1>his mouth was smart and funny and rich. Well, I

0:04:56.520 --> 0:04:59.520
<v Speaker 1>think you got him at a really interesting point in

0:04:59.600 --> 0:05:02.159
<v Speaker 1>his life, not just because it was Working Girl, which

0:05:02.200 --> 0:05:04.160
<v Speaker 1>of course is one of the movies that people still

0:05:04.400 --> 0:05:08.000
<v Speaker 1>talk about and watch, but because he was on his

0:05:08.120 --> 0:05:12.680
<v Speaker 1>way to marrying Diane. And I think at that point,

0:05:13.000 --> 0:05:16.400
<v Speaker 1>you know, he had recovered from a big breakdown that

0:05:16.440 --> 0:05:18.600
<v Speaker 1>he had had a couple of years earlier. He got

0:05:18.600 --> 0:05:22.280
<v Speaker 1>addicted to halcyon and all of that, and he recovered,

0:05:22.480 --> 0:05:25.600
<v Speaker 1>and Working Girl came along, and he said, it's too

0:05:25.640 --> 0:05:29.560
<v Speaker 1>elaborate and location driven a production. I'm gonna make Biloxi

0:05:29.600 --> 0:05:31.440
<v Speaker 1>Blues first, which is a movie that I can do

0:05:31.480 --> 0:05:34.040
<v Speaker 1>in my sleep, and then I'll get my muscles back,

0:05:34.080 --> 0:05:35.800
<v Speaker 1>and then I want to do Working Girl. But it

0:05:35.880 --> 0:05:39.200
<v Speaker 1>was a point when he was trying to fix himself

0:05:39.360 --> 0:05:41.479
<v Speaker 1>in some ways. You know, you go into your fourth

0:05:41.520 --> 0:05:45.200
<v Speaker 1>marriage and obviously why the first three didn't work, and

0:05:45.240 --> 0:05:49.320
<v Speaker 1>what your part was in that must be very front

0:05:49.360 --> 0:05:52.520
<v Speaker 1>of mine. So I think you got him an unusually

0:05:52.680 --> 0:05:59.200
<v Speaker 1>kind of vulnerable and tense and excited time in his life.

0:05:59.680 --> 0:06:02.680
<v Speaker 1>There's up moment you have in the book which is

0:06:02.720 --> 0:06:05.440
<v Speaker 1>just so thrilling about Fiffer. When Fifer leaves the room

0:06:05.480 --> 0:06:08.320
<v Speaker 1>and comes back, he says, my god, he's dazzled by

0:06:08.320 --> 0:06:10.400
<v Speaker 1>what Nichols does and he says, it's all in there.

0:06:10.960 --> 0:06:12.719
<v Speaker 1>And that was the thing about Mike. If there's ten

0:06:12.800 --> 0:06:16.760
<v Speaker 1>things you want, the average director has four, maybe five

0:06:17.000 --> 0:06:18.880
<v Speaker 1>of the ten things you want, and Nichols, of course

0:06:18.920 --> 0:06:20.760
<v Speaker 1>had all ten of those things. And because his mind

0:06:20.800 --> 0:06:23.200
<v Speaker 1>was on everything. If he was talking to you about

0:06:23.200 --> 0:06:26.320
<v Speaker 1>the scene. I remember vividly he was talking about the

0:06:26.360 --> 0:06:28.880
<v Speaker 1>scene we were going to do, and I'm sitting on

0:06:28.920 --> 0:06:30.280
<v Speaker 1>a bed and he's sitting on the bed, and as

0:06:30.320 --> 0:06:32.120
<v Speaker 1>he's talking to me, he's looking over my shoulder. He says,

0:06:32.320 --> 0:06:34.279
<v Speaker 1>what is this painting doing on the wall. He says,

0:06:34.320 --> 0:06:37.160
<v Speaker 1>take this down, He says, I hate this painting. And

0:06:37.160 --> 0:06:39.400
<v Speaker 1>they're like the set design is in his mind. It's

0:06:39.400 --> 0:06:42.880
<v Speaker 1>all of one. I was really surprised when I was

0:06:42.920 --> 0:06:45.560
<v Speaker 1>doing the research and interviews how many stories I heard

0:06:45.640 --> 0:06:51.120
<v Speaker 1>in different contexts about Mike freaking out about some physical

0:06:51.600 --> 0:06:56.360
<v Speaker 1>location or surroundings based thing. This really bothered him. There

0:06:56.360 --> 0:06:59.760
<v Speaker 1>was one point when he had an entire Broadway set

0:06:59.800 --> 0:07:03.200
<v Speaker 1>re built because a hallway that was on the stage

0:07:03.200 --> 0:07:06.200
<v Speaker 1>in the center he decided was eight inches too narrow

0:07:06.480 --> 0:07:09.200
<v Speaker 1>and that he needed those extra eight inches. There's another

0:07:09.240 --> 0:07:11.920
<v Speaker 1>point when he's doing Who's Afraid of Virginia Wolf on

0:07:12.040 --> 0:07:15.120
<v Speaker 1>stage with Elane May at the Long Wharf and they're

0:07:15.120 --> 0:07:18.920
<v Speaker 1>in the living room set and he realizes that there

0:07:18.960 --> 0:07:21.880
<v Speaker 1>are only three places to sit and there are four characters,

0:07:22.200 --> 0:07:25.520
<v Speaker 1>and it he just completely blows a gasket. He completely

0:07:25.520 --> 0:07:28.400
<v Speaker 1>freaks out. He can't let it go for days and days,

0:07:28.600 --> 0:07:32.520
<v Speaker 1>and it was a really interesting kind of glimpse for

0:07:32.600 --> 0:07:36.000
<v Speaker 1>me in what he needed in order to work now.

0:07:36.040 --> 0:07:40.000
<v Speaker 1>You wrote a book about a battery of directors who

0:07:40.000 --> 0:07:43.280
<v Speaker 1>were very influential in the seventies, as well as your

0:07:43.320 --> 0:07:45.840
<v Speaker 1>other book about a battery of directors during the wartime.

0:07:46.400 --> 0:07:48.880
<v Speaker 1>Nichols is someone who you really when you say his name,

0:07:49.160 --> 0:07:51.400
<v Speaker 1>your heart pressed to think of anybody who was as

0:07:51.480 --> 0:07:55.880
<v Speaker 1>adept at directing actors. There are directors who cast well,

0:07:56.560 --> 0:07:58.160
<v Speaker 1>and they cast the prison and there's everything that just

0:07:58.200 --> 0:08:00.120
<v Speaker 1>wind upup and let him go. You've come to do

0:08:00.240 --> 0:08:01.640
<v Speaker 1>this thing I know you can do when I just

0:08:01.760 --> 0:08:03.640
<v Speaker 1>let you go, do that and it puts a costume

0:08:03.680 --> 0:08:06.440
<v Speaker 1>on you and we go. Whereas Mike really this idea,

0:08:06.680 --> 0:08:09.320
<v Speaker 1>the vanity of certain directors who believe they quote unquote

0:08:09.360 --> 0:08:12.200
<v Speaker 1>get a performance out of you is completely nonsense. But

0:08:12.280 --> 0:08:15.640
<v Speaker 1>with Mike, it really was true. Mike got a performance

0:08:15.680 --> 0:08:17.400
<v Speaker 1>out of you. Do you think that made him completely

0:08:17.440 --> 0:08:19.800
<v Speaker 1>unique in the business. I do think it made him

0:08:19.800 --> 0:08:22.480
<v Speaker 1>pretty unique. And I also think it's the reason that

0:08:22.800 --> 0:08:26.040
<v Speaker 1>a lot of people have kind of had trouble pinning

0:08:26.280 --> 0:08:29.360
<v Speaker 1>down what makes him special as a director. Because Mike

0:08:29.400 --> 0:08:32.560
<v Speaker 1>didn't write his own movies. I mean that already sets

0:08:32.600 --> 0:08:34.400
<v Speaker 1>him apart from a lot of the directors. Like when

0:08:34.400 --> 0:08:36.880
<v Speaker 1>we talk about a Cohen Brothers movie or Paul Thomas

0:08:36.960 --> 0:08:40.320
<v Speaker 1>Anderson movie or a Tarantino movie. We know where he's

0:08:40.360 --> 0:08:42.800
<v Speaker 1>coming from as a writer as much as we do

0:08:42.880 --> 0:08:47.040
<v Speaker 1>as a director. But if Mike's really special gift was

0:08:47.800 --> 0:08:49.880
<v Speaker 1>connecting with each actor in a way that was going

0:08:49.880 --> 0:08:53.000
<v Speaker 1>to bring the best performance out of them. If that works,

0:08:53.800 --> 0:08:56.960
<v Speaker 1>that is sort of something that it's supposed to end

0:08:57.040 --> 0:08:59.240
<v Speaker 1>up being invisible, Like You're not supposed to watch the

0:08:59.280 --> 0:09:03.839
<v Speaker 1>movie and think, oh, that's a impeccably directed performance. You're

0:09:03.840 --> 0:09:06.040
<v Speaker 1>supposed to watch the movie and think that's a great performance.

0:09:06.120 --> 0:09:08.440
<v Speaker 1>And so I think the thing that made him special

0:09:09.040 --> 0:09:12.440
<v Speaker 1>is something that isn't always evident to people who watch

0:09:12.520 --> 0:09:15.000
<v Speaker 1>his movies. But what's interesting is that he did do

0:09:15.120 --> 0:09:17.200
<v Speaker 1>a lot of writing. I mean, he was right in

0:09:17.240 --> 0:09:22.160
<v Speaker 1>there with Piffer and Simon and other writers giving them

0:09:22.240 --> 0:09:25.200
<v Speaker 1>his ideas about cuts. I mean, decorating the house is

0:09:25.240 --> 0:09:28.360
<v Speaker 1>one thing, Building the house is another. And Mike didn't

0:09:28.400 --> 0:09:31.400
<v Speaker 1>build the house. He didn't write the pieces, but he contributed.

0:09:31.559 --> 0:09:33.440
<v Speaker 1>Why do you think he never wrote his own stuff

0:09:33.480 --> 0:09:37.360
<v Speaker 1>for motion pictures. Well, some people say that it was

0:09:37.960 --> 0:09:40.720
<v Speaker 1>because he was uncomfortable from the beginning of his life

0:09:40.760 --> 0:09:44.200
<v Speaker 1>with literal writing, Like he hated his handwriting. He didn't

0:09:44.240 --> 0:09:47.520
<v Speaker 1>like putting things down on paper. And of course there's

0:09:47.559 --> 0:09:51.200
<v Speaker 1>the interesting thing about his work with Elaine May, which

0:09:51.280 --> 0:09:53.880
<v Speaker 1>is that all of the most famous sketches that they

0:09:53.880 --> 0:09:56.600
<v Speaker 1>did together, some of which they did hundreds of times,

0:09:56.760 --> 0:09:59.440
<v Speaker 1>were never actually written down. They were just things that

0:09:59.480 --> 0:10:02.840
<v Speaker 1>were work doubt between the two of them until every

0:10:02.880 --> 0:10:05.920
<v Speaker 1>word was locked. But it was never locked on paper.

0:10:05.920 --> 0:10:10.000
<v Speaker 1>It was just locked in their performance. They were too childish.

0:10:10.080 --> 0:10:12.360
<v Speaker 1>That quote you have where she says they talked about

0:10:12.400 --> 0:10:13.960
<v Speaker 1>they don't want to break up anymore on the show,

0:10:14.000 --> 0:10:16.320
<v Speaker 1>and she says it's so childish, and she says, she

0:10:16.320 --> 0:10:20.199
<v Speaker 1>said it was the most responsible conversation we'd ever had. Yeah,

0:10:20.240 --> 0:10:22.880
<v Speaker 1>I love that story so much that there there are

0:10:22.880 --> 0:10:26.160
<v Speaker 1>these two people in there I guess late twenties by

0:10:26.240 --> 0:10:28.640
<v Speaker 1>that point, saying we have to stop laughing on this

0:10:28.720 --> 0:10:31.640
<v Speaker 1>Broadway stage. People are paying to see this, and they

0:10:31.720 --> 0:10:34.760
<v Speaker 1>couldn't keep it together. They really didn't think of it

0:10:34.840 --> 0:10:41.760
<v Speaker 1>as a grown up job that they had. Author Mark Harris.

0:10:42.440 --> 0:10:45.960
<v Speaker 1>If you love behind the scenes stories of Hollywood legends,

0:10:46.440 --> 0:10:49.720
<v Speaker 1>check out my conversation with Sam Wasson, author of The

0:10:49.800 --> 0:10:54.319
<v Speaker 1>Big Goodbye Chinatown and The Last Years of Hollywood. Wasson

0:10:54.440 --> 0:10:57.240
<v Speaker 1>spent a lot of time with producer Robert Evans, who

0:10:57.320 --> 0:11:01.199
<v Speaker 1>was credited with turning Paramount Studio Is around in the

0:11:01.200 --> 0:11:05.160
<v Speaker 1>early nineties seventies. He loved it, he loved it, he

0:11:05.280 --> 0:11:09.160
<v Speaker 1>loved show business, he loved movies, he loved people, he

0:11:09.400 --> 0:11:14.280
<v Speaker 1>loved talent. It's actually that simple. I asked him this question.

0:11:14.320 --> 0:11:17.160
<v Speaker 1>I said, Evans. Is it as simple as you bet

0:11:17.160 --> 0:11:20.440
<v Speaker 1>on talent? Do you have an easy job? And he said,

0:11:20.720 --> 0:11:26.320
<v Speaker 1>you goddamn right, that was and it's true. Here more

0:11:26.480 --> 0:11:30.000
<v Speaker 1>of my conversation with author Sam wasson that Here's the

0:11:30.040 --> 0:11:34.080
<v Speaker 1>Thing dot Org. After the break, Mark Harris talks about

0:11:34.080 --> 0:11:38.400
<v Speaker 1>a fundamental truth of Hollywood. Success has a way of

0:11:38.440 --> 0:11:52.600
<v Speaker 1>limiting your choices. I'm Alec Baldwin and you're listening to

0:11:52.760 --> 0:11:56.520
<v Speaker 1>Here's the Thing. Mike Nichols was known for bringing out

0:11:56.559 --> 0:12:01.280
<v Speaker 1>remarkable performances from his actors, but not always. Two stories

0:12:01.440 --> 0:12:04.360
<v Speaker 1>of when Nichols struggled stood out to me and Mark

0:12:04.440 --> 0:12:08.960
<v Speaker 1>Harris's biography, nichols frustration with Gary Shandling as the lead

0:12:09.000 --> 0:12:12.040
<v Speaker 1>in What Planet Are You From? And his decision to

0:12:12.120 --> 0:12:16.280
<v Speaker 1>fire Mandy Patakon just a week into rehearsals for Heartburn,

0:12:16.679 --> 0:12:20.080
<v Speaker 1>a role that went to Jack Nicholson instead. It's so

0:12:20.200 --> 0:12:23.200
<v Speaker 1>interesting to me. I mean, Mike did know how important

0:12:23.240 --> 0:12:25.800
<v Speaker 1>casting was, and yet the list of actors that he

0:12:25.840 --> 0:12:28.800
<v Speaker 1>fired over the decades is really pretty impressive. It's like

0:12:28.880 --> 0:12:32.320
<v Speaker 1>Gene Hackman, Robert de Niro and in that case, Mandy Pottakin.

0:12:32.800 --> 0:12:35.600
<v Speaker 1>I know that Mike was very impressed by his work

0:12:35.640 --> 0:12:38.320
<v Speaker 1>on stage, and that was a moment when he was

0:12:38.360 --> 0:12:40.679
<v Speaker 1>really coming up. He was a big deal on Broadway,

0:12:40.960 --> 0:12:44.880
<v Speaker 1>and Mike often felt that could carry over. I mean,

0:12:45.120 --> 0:12:47.560
<v Speaker 1>he would fill out the supporting cast of his movies

0:12:47.600 --> 0:12:49.520
<v Speaker 1>a lot of the time with people he had seen

0:12:49.679 --> 0:12:52.840
<v Speaker 1>on Broadway or off Broadway because he knew they could deliver. Yeah,

0:12:52.880 --> 0:12:55.720
<v Speaker 1>he even flew them to Texas when he was doing Silkwood.

0:12:56.000 --> 0:13:00.360
<v Speaker 1>But that's different, obviously than casting a romantic leading man

0:13:00.400 --> 0:13:04.040
<v Speaker 1>opposite Meryl Streep. I mean, so it could have been

0:13:04.040 --> 0:13:06.720
<v Speaker 1>the jewishness, it could have been that he just felt

0:13:06.760 --> 0:13:10.000
<v Speaker 1>a good connection with that character. But whatever it was,

0:13:10.280 --> 0:13:15.680
<v Speaker 1>clearly it was something that he Nichols decided pretty early

0:13:15.760 --> 0:13:18.679
<v Speaker 1>on was a wrong call. I mean, they shot for

0:13:18.720 --> 0:13:22.440
<v Speaker 1>a week before he fired Mandy Patinkin, but it sounded

0:13:22.480 --> 0:13:24.800
<v Speaker 1>to me like even before that, in the read throughs,

0:13:24.840 --> 0:13:28.400
<v Speaker 1>in the rehearsals, Nichols had a really strong sense that

0:13:28.640 --> 0:13:33.320
<v Speaker 1>it was not going well on a character level and

0:13:33.400 --> 0:13:36.680
<v Speaker 1>maybe not going so well on a personal level. Meryl

0:13:36.760 --> 0:13:39.760
<v Speaker 1>said that Mandy was very rabbinical in his questioning and

0:13:39.800 --> 0:13:42.839
<v Speaker 1>then his character development. Right, I loved that word. That's

0:13:42.840 --> 0:13:44.680
<v Speaker 1>exactly what she said. She said he was rabbinical, that

0:13:44.720 --> 0:13:48.320
<v Speaker 1>he had to kind of interrogate everything about the character,

0:13:48.400 --> 0:13:50.640
<v Speaker 1>maybe even to the point of torturing people a little.

0:13:50.840 --> 0:13:52.880
<v Speaker 1>But one thing that seemed to come up a lot,

0:13:53.000 --> 0:13:55.080
<v Speaker 1>and I can understand how this would be a sticking

0:13:55.120 --> 0:13:58.880
<v Speaker 1>point was he kept saying, I don't understand this. Why

0:13:58.880 --> 0:14:01.320
<v Speaker 1>would a man ever cheat on his wife? Why would

0:14:01.360 --> 0:14:03.920
<v Speaker 1>a man ever cheat on his pregnant wife? And heartburn

0:14:04.040 --> 0:14:06.600
<v Speaker 1>was obviously like the facts of the case, we're not

0:14:06.679 --> 0:14:09.560
<v Speaker 1>in dispute. It's based on this real thing that happened

0:14:09.559 --> 0:14:12.920
<v Speaker 1>between carlburn Steen and or Evran. So I think there

0:14:12.960 --> 0:14:15.480
<v Speaker 1>was a feeling that at some point we got to

0:14:15.520 --> 0:14:19.120
<v Speaker 1>get off the y and just move on to it happened.

0:14:19.600 --> 0:14:22.400
<v Speaker 1>So you have to figure out why this like this

0:14:22.440 --> 0:14:25.000
<v Speaker 1>guy did this, and that's what you have to play.

0:14:25.360 --> 0:14:28.160
<v Speaker 1>I love how you write. When Nicholson comes on the project,

0:14:28.320 --> 0:14:31.240
<v Speaker 1>he says, Mike, if you need me, I'm there, and

0:14:31.240 --> 0:14:33.880
<v Speaker 1>then later on they interpreted Mike, if you need me,

0:14:35.040 --> 0:14:37.600
<v Speaker 1>what he meant was if you need me, which is

0:14:37.680 --> 0:14:40.880
<v Speaker 1>means an eight million dollar price ticket, I'm there. Well,

0:14:40.920 --> 0:14:43.520
<v Speaker 1>I was just gonna say that decision just completely changed

0:14:43.560 --> 0:14:46.360
<v Speaker 1>the budget of the movie. Heartburn was not an expensive movie,

0:14:46.360 --> 0:14:48.800
<v Speaker 1>and it turned into a much more expensive movie the

0:14:48.840 --> 0:14:51.760
<v Speaker 1>second Nicholson came on board, but he did it with

0:14:51.880 --> 0:14:54.960
<v Speaker 1>very few days. Notice, well, you know, Mike decides that

0:14:55.000 --> 0:14:57.400
<v Speaker 1>in order to have the Hollywood career he wants to

0:14:57.400 --> 0:14:59.800
<v Speaker 1>have in the budgets and get paid what he wants

0:14:59.840 --> 0:15:03.840
<v Speaker 1>to paid. The budgets inflate in direct proportion to Mike's

0:15:03.880 --> 0:15:08.920
<v Speaker 1>salary inflating. If Mike's salary becomes six seven eight million dollars,

0:15:09.120 --> 0:15:13.440
<v Speaker 1>the budget goes from fifty sixty five million dollars, and

0:15:13.520 --> 0:15:16.640
<v Speaker 1>that the canoe tips over. In terms of casting, you

0:15:16.760 --> 0:15:19.200
<v Speaker 1>have to have the star. We go, we're gonna get

0:15:19.240 --> 0:15:22.440
<v Speaker 1>less creative maybe about who should play the part, and

0:15:22.440 --> 0:15:24.200
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna start talking about who we need to play

0:15:24.240 --> 0:15:26.560
<v Speaker 1>the part to sell tickets. And I wonder if you

0:15:26.640 --> 0:15:31.000
<v Speaker 1>felt that he ever express any anxiety or regret about

0:15:31.040 --> 0:15:33.200
<v Speaker 1>the fact that, in order to make big ticket movies

0:15:33.400 --> 0:15:36.240
<v Speaker 1>he couldn't cast who he wanted in the film. Well,

0:15:36.320 --> 0:15:38.400
<v Speaker 1>I don't know if it turned into a casting thing,

0:15:38.440 --> 0:15:41.960
<v Speaker 1>but probably the worst example of a movie where his

0:15:42.600 --> 0:15:45.960
<v Speaker 1>ask his fee changed the whole nature of the movie

0:15:46.200 --> 0:15:48.720
<v Speaker 1>was what planeted Are You from? The comedy he made

0:15:48.760 --> 0:15:53.280
<v Speaker 1>with Gary Sandling, because everyone who wrote that movie, which

0:15:53.480 --> 0:15:55.400
<v Speaker 1>seems like a pretty long list of people when you

0:15:55.800 --> 0:15:57.960
<v Speaker 1>add everyone who took a crack at the script and

0:15:57.960 --> 0:16:00.760
<v Speaker 1>and even people who were in it, like and At Benning,

0:16:00.840 --> 0:16:04.120
<v Speaker 1>said this was this really should have been a small movie.

0:16:04.200 --> 0:16:08.040
<v Speaker 1>There should have been an indie style, Charlie Kaufman, quirky

0:16:08.080 --> 0:16:12.160
<v Speaker 1>little comedy, and instead I think it becomes maybe with

0:16:12.240 --> 0:16:16.160
<v Speaker 1>the exception of Primary Colors, the biggest fee that Mike

0:16:16.240 --> 0:16:18.920
<v Speaker 1>ever got for a movie. In the minute you're paying

0:16:18.960 --> 0:16:22.400
<v Speaker 1>someone like Mike Nichols eight million dollars in the nineties

0:16:22.440 --> 0:16:25.360
<v Speaker 1>to direct a movie, suddenly it becomes a completely different

0:16:25.440 --> 0:16:27.960
<v Speaker 1>kind of movie. So what planet are you from? Turned

0:16:28.000 --> 0:16:31.560
<v Speaker 1>into this movie with big sets and special effects and

0:16:31.560 --> 0:16:35.600
<v Speaker 1>and sort of elaborate costumes and kind of heaviness of

0:16:35.800 --> 0:16:40.400
<v Speaker 1>production value that crushed the comedy under its weight. And

0:16:40.600 --> 0:16:43.680
<v Speaker 1>I think that was the only time where money actually

0:16:44.280 --> 0:16:46.720
<v Speaker 1>did damage in a kind of material way to a

0:16:46.720 --> 0:16:48.960
<v Speaker 1>movie that Mike was making. I mean, he did get

0:16:48.960 --> 0:16:52.680
<v Speaker 1>a lot of money for Primary Colors, but Primary Colors

0:16:52.720 --> 0:16:54.720
<v Speaker 1>was probably always going to be a movie where you

0:16:54.800 --> 0:16:57.640
<v Speaker 1>wanted to see a couple of stars play those parts.

0:16:57.680 --> 0:17:00.120
<v Speaker 1>When you're doing a movie about a potential president and

0:17:00.200 --> 0:17:03.760
<v Speaker 1>first lady, you want to see big names, And in

0:17:03.800 --> 0:17:06.639
<v Speaker 1>that case, to Mike's credit, he did resist. You know,

0:17:06.680 --> 0:17:10.200
<v Speaker 1>there was a lot of pressure to turn the main character,

0:17:10.359 --> 0:17:14.880
<v Speaker 1>the narrator of the novel Primary Colors, who was African

0:17:14.920 --> 0:17:17.560
<v Speaker 1>American on the page, into a white character. People were

0:17:17.600 --> 0:17:20.159
<v Speaker 1>openly saying, like, why don't you give this to Michael J. Fox.

0:17:20.280 --> 0:17:23.000
<v Speaker 1>This is a perfect part for him, And Mike resisted

0:17:23.040 --> 0:17:26.119
<v Speaker 1>that and actually cast an unknown actor, Adrian Lester in

0:17:26.160 --> 0:17:28.200
<v Speaker 1>the part. So I don't think there are too many

0:17:28.240 --> 0:17:31.080
<v Speaker 1>cases where money got in the way of him casting

0:17:31.080 --> 0:17:33.040
<v Speaker 1>a movie the right way. I mean, I know that

0:17:33.119 --> 0:17:35.399
<v Speaker 1>on Working Girl there was a lot of back and

0:17:35.440 --> 0:17:39.040
<v Speaker 1>forth with the studio right about whether they could afford

0:17:39.560 --> 0:17:42.919
<v Speaker 1>two stars in the leading part or they wanted Melanie

0:17:42.920 --> 0:17:44.959
<v Speaker 1>and I to play the two leads, right, And then

0:17:44.960 --> 0:17:46.320
<v Speaker 1>he said, and he said to me point there was

0:17:46.400 --> 0:17:48.600
<v Speaker 1>one of my favorite conversation with Mike. He said, if

0:17:48.640 --> 0:17:50.240
<v Speaker 1>I put you in Melanie in the leads, where they're

0:17:50.240 --> 0:17:52.480
<v Speaker 1>gonna give me twenty million dollars to make my movie,

0:17:52.880 --> 0:17:54.479
<v Speaker 1>and if I cast these other people, they're gonna give

0:17:54.520 --> 0:17:56.720
<v Speaker 1>me fifty million dollars to make my movie. She said,

0:17:56.720 --> 0:17:58.639
<v Speaker 1>I hope you don't mind, but I'm gonna have to

0:17:58.680 --> 0:18:00.199
<v Speaker 1>go with them in order to make my That was

0:18:00.240 --> 0:18:03.880
<v Speaker 1>one of my first indoctrinations into that. And meaning there's

0:18:03.880 --> 0:18:06.200
<v Speaker 1>a metric, there's an arithmetic to this, which is there's

0:18:06.240 --> 0:18:08.120
<v Speaker 1>just nothing I can do about it. I can't make

0:18:08.160 --> 0:18:10.760
<v Speaker 1>my movie for twenty million dollars. And he said, would

0:18:10.800 --> 0:18:13.080
<v Speaker 1>you play this other part? Would you play this smaller?

0:18:13.119 --> 0:18:14.280
<v Speaker 1>I said, you got. I mean I just wanted to

0:18:14.280 --> 0:18:16.800
<v Speaker 1>be around him and work with him. I once said

0:18:16.800 --> 0:18:19.880
<v Speaker 1>to someone, Travolta is the last movie star in the timeline,

0:18:19.880 --> 0:18:21.760
<v Speaker 1>mean that old movie stars after that are all about

0:18:21.760 --> 0:18:24.840
<v Speaker 1>effects and guns and cars and computer generating, and that

0:18:24.920 --> 0:18:28.760
<v Speaker 1>the star of themselves is the hood ornament on a vehicle.

0:18:29.800 --> 0:18:32.760
<v Speaker 1>Travolta is a very old school movie star in terms

0:18:32.760 --> 0:18:34.760
<v Speaker 1>of you build the movie around what he can do

0:18:35.840 --> 0:18:38.040
<v Speaker 1>you and if you don't make the movie built around

0:18:38.040 --> 0:18:40.680
<v Speaker 1>what he can do as primary colors, you suffer because

0:18:40.760 --> 0:18:44.560
<v Speaker 1>he's not really right for that role. And in my mind, well,

0:18:44.600 --> 0:18:47.480
<v Speaker 1>and he was the second choice. I mean, Mike really

0:18:47.520 --> 0:18:50.119
<v Speaker 1>wanted Tom Hanks for that part, and it sounded to

0:18:50.160 --> 0:18:53.919
<v Speaker 1>me like he came actually quite close to getting Tom Hanks,

0:18:53.920 --> 0:18:56.960
<v Speaker 1>and then Hanks backed away. Some people said because he

0:18:57.000 --> 0:18:59.520
<v Speaker 1>didn't want to offend the Clinton's I read that when

0:18:59.560 --> 0:19:01.640
<v Speaker 1>Hanks said to me, was I thought of myself as

0:19:01.880 --> 0:19:06.240
<v Speaker 1>an old young man but still not quite old enough

0:19:06.280 --> 0:19:08.480
<v Speaker 1>to play a president. Well, someone said that to me.

0:19:08.560 --> 0:19:09.840
<v Speaker 1>Was They said, oh, if you do that part in

0:19:09.880 --> 0:19:11.760
<v Speaker 1>that movie, they go, you'll be middle aged for the

0:19:11.760 --> 0:19:14.920
<v Speaker 1>rest of your life. And then you also write about

0:19:14.960 --> 0:19:19.720
<v Speaker 1>how the timing of the Clinton scandal and the film collide. Yeah.

0:19:19.760 --> 0:19:22.040
<v Speaker 1>I had kind of forgotten that. I knew that they

0:19:22.040 --> 0:19:25.240
<v Speaker 1>were intermingled, but I didn't remember that we're talking about

0:19:25.359 --> 0:19:29.000
<v Speaker 1>two separate scandals. That the Primary Colors was really springing

0:19:29.000 --> 0:19:32.879
<v Speaker 1>off the Jennifer Flowers story, and then in the middle

0:19:32.920 --> 0:19:36.560
<v Speaker 1>of it, the Monica Lewinsky story breaks. Yeah, I mean

0:19:36.800 --> 0:19:39.919
<v Speaker 1>a story that makes Primary Colors suddenly looks quite a

0:19:40.000 --> 0:19:44.040
<v Speaker 1>children's book, right exactly. And um, Emma Thompson, this speaks

0:19:44.040 --> 0:19:47.720
<v Speaker 1>to Travolta's stardom. Emma Thompson tells a really funny story

0:19:47.720 --> 0:19:50.360
<v Speaker 1>about the moment they all found out, which is they

0:19:50.359 --> 0:19:53.760
<v Speaker 1>were sitting around and Emma Thompson said, Mike and I

0:19:53.800 --> 0:19:56.080
<v Speaker 1>were reading, you know, rice and beans out of all

0:19:56.119 --> 0:19:58.760
<v Speaker 1>the starring containers, and John Travolta had like a seventy

0:19:58.800 --> 0:20:02.199
<v Speaker 1>five course chef's meal. He had his own chef on

0:20:02.240 --> 0:20:04.800
<v Speaker 1>the set, And I thought that was like, of all

0:20:04.880 --> 0:20:08.880
<v Speaker 1>the star indulgences, that struck me as one that like Mike,

0:20:08.920 --> 0:20:11.720
<v Speaker 1>would be the most forgiving of because he loved food

0:20:11.800 --> 0:20:15.960
<v Speaker 1>so much. What's rehearsal without donuts? Right from Barefoot in

0:20:16.000 --> 0:20:18.320
<v Speaker 1>the Park. So it happened a couple of times in

0:20:18.320 --> 0:20:22.280
<v Speaker 1>Mike's life that this thing just from out of left

0:20:22.320 --> 0:20:25.760
<v Speaker 1>field kind of derailed a movie at the last minute.

0:20:25.800 --> 0:20:28.800
<v Speaker 1>Once was Catch twenny two when they saw Mash just

0:20:28.840 --> 0:20:31.240
<v Speaker 1>a couple of months before Catch twenny two was supposed

0:20:31.240 --> 0:20:33.800
<v Speaker 1>to open and realized that Match was going to take

0:20:33.840 --> 0:20:36.600
<v Speaker 1>the entire audience that they were hoping to get and

0:20:36.680 --> 0:20:39.240
<v Speaker 1>Catch twenty two. And the other was Primary Colors, where

0:20:39.320 --> 0:20:41.560
<v Speaker 1>they all said, I don't really know what's going to

0:20:41.640 --> 0:20:43.560
<v Speaker 1>happen to the movie, but they knew what was going

0:20:43.600 --> 0:20:45.240
<v Speaker 1>to happen to the movie. They knew that it was

0:20:45.520 --> 0:20:48.440
<v Speaker 1>totally eclipsed by the scandal, right, And when you read

0:20:48.640 --> 0:20:50.520
<v Speaker 1>the reviews of it at the time, some of them

0:20:50.560 --> 0:20:53.720
<v Speaker 1>even say explicitly, like we see this on the news

0:20:53.760 --> 0:20:56.680
<v Speaker 1>every night, and this movie feels like it's about something

0:20:56.720 --> 0:20:59.199
<v Speaker 1>that happened two years ago, and nobody's mind is on

0:20:59.320 --> 0:21:01.600
<v Speaker 1>that anymore. I got a little choked up reading this

0:21:01.640 --> 0:21:04.280
<v Speaker 1>book because it's like you get to those forks in

0:21:04.280 --> 0:21:06.399
<v Speaker 1>the road of career versus personal life, and you have

0:21:06.400 --> 0:21:08.119
<v Speaker 1>to say to yourself, am I willing to do what

0:21:08.160 --> 0:21:10.440
<v Speaker 1>it takes for some people? The answer to that question

0:21:10.520 --> 0:21:13.639
<v Speaker 1>is very easy. I mean, it's just reflective that they

0:21:13.720 --> 0:21:16.400
<v Speaker 1>when you're offered that opportunity. I remember when I would

0:21:16.400 --> 0:21:18.879
<v Speaker 1>be working in films early on and things were getting

0:21:18.880 --> 0:21:21.359
<v Speaker 1>a little shinier. People looked at me with there was

0:21:21.400 --> 0:21:24.120
<v Speaker 1>an unmistakable look. At least I thought it was unmistakable

0:21:24.119 --> 0:21:26.200
<v Speaker 1>where they looked at me, like, you realize, we don't

0:21:26.240 --> 0:21:29.080
<v Speaker 1>ask just anybody to do this, don't you? You realize

0:21:29.080 --> 0:21:30.840
<v Speaker 1>that they are at bus loads of people coming here

0:21:30.840 --> 0:21:34.040
<v Speaker 1>who want to be sitting exactly where you are right

0:21:34.040 --> 0:21:35.960
<v Speaker 1>now discussing with us. I mean, they really put a

0:21:35.960 --> 0:21:39.840
<v Speaker 1>pressure on me to want to spend the big wheel

0:21:39.880 --> 0:21:42.520
<v Speaker 1>of the movie star game, whether it was gratifying creatively

0:21:42.600 --> 0:21:46.000
<v Speaker 1>or not. And I had grown up tortured by wanting

0:21:46.040 --> 0:21:47.639
<v Speaker 1>to be a better actor. And I thought it, well,

0:21:47.680 --> 0:21:49.600
<v Speaker 1>that's not going to get me there, and they were like,

0:21:50.000 --> 0:21:52.720
<v Speaker 1>you need to go get a vaccine for that. We

0:21:52.760 --> 0:21:55.080
<v Speaker 1>need to get you disabused of that, because who gives

0:21:55.080 --> 0:21:57.119
<v Speaker 1>a shit about that? Where we're gonna, I'll be offering

0:21:57.119 --> 0:22:00.359
<v Speaker 1>you your own seat up here on Mount Olympus. And

0:22:00.400 --> 0:22:02.840
<v Speaker 1>I always struggled with that, and I see that with Mike,

0:22:03.000 --> 0:22:04.919
<v Speaker 1>and that that leads me to the question, do you

0:22:04.920 --> 0:22:09.200
<v Speaker 1>think he was happy? I think it depends on when

0:22:09.520 --> 0:22:12.600
<v Speaker 1>you're asking about for a long time, I think the

0:22:12.640 --> 0:22:15.440
<v Speaker 1>answer is no, and he would have said no. I mean,

0:22:15.880 --> 0:22:17.600
<v Speaker 1>I was shocked. This was when I was working on

0:22:17.680 --> 0:22:20.080
<v Speaker 1>my first book. But I was shocked when I asked

0:22:20.119 --> 0:22:23.199
<v Speaker 1>him about coming to the Oscars and winning for the

0:22:23.240 --> 0:22:26.320
<v Speaker 1>Graduate and for Best Director his second film, and he

0:22:26.440 --> 0:22:30.240
<v Speaker 1>basically said, and his face almost fell when he said that.

0:22:30.280 --> 0:22:33.920
<v Speaker 1>He said, I really have no memory of that experience,

0:22:34.000 --> 0:22:37.200
<v Speaker 1>but misery and wanting to get back to the hotel

0:22:37.640 --> 0:22:41.200
<v Speaker 1>and feeling like being alone at the hotel at midnight

0:22:41.440 --> 0:22:44.800
<v Speaker 1>was the entire experience of winning that Oscar. He described

0:22:45.000 --> 0:22:48.560
<v Speaker 1>himself as Mr. And Hedonia, And I think that lasted

0:22:48.640 --> 0:22:51.960
<v Speaker 1>well past nine eight I think there were long stretches.

0:22:52.320 --> 0:22:55.960
<v Speaker 1>Even when Mike was being fairly productive, like in the

0:22:56.040 --> 0:22:58.919
<v Speaker 1>early eighties when he was not directing movies but directing

0:22:58.960 --> 0:23:02.680
<v Speaker 1>a lot on stage. He described himself as sleepwalking through

0:23:03.320 --> 0:23:07.679
<v Speaker 1>entire productions that he did, just feeling totally disconnected from it.

0:23:07.720 --> 0:23:10.080
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I think depression was something that he really

0:23:10.080 --> 0:23:12.600
<v Speaker 1>wrestled with for a very long time. I do think

0:23:12.720 --> 0:23:17.240
<v Speaker 1>later in life, Mike was more happy, more settled, more

0:23:17.240 --> 0:23:20.359
<v Speaker 1>comfortable with the kind of work he did and the

0:23:20.400 --> 0:23:22.879
<v Speaker 1>way he made his choices and what he was doing.

0:23:22.920 --> 0:23:25.160
<v Speaker 1>And I think his marriage to Diane had a lot

0:23:25.200 --> 0:23:27.439
<v Speaker 1>to do with that. And also I feel like he

0:23:27.520 --> 0:23:30.359
<v Speaker 1>always wanted to work, but he didn't necessarily feel that

0:23:30.400 --> 0:23:32.719
<v Speaker 1>he had that much to prove anymore, and so that

0:23:32.760 --> 0:23:35.160
<v Speaker 1>made him happy. But now there were long stretches when

0:23:35.200 --> 0:23:38.440
<v Speaker 1>I think what was externally going on in his world

0:23:38.480 --> 0:23:41.080
<v Speaker 1>in terms of the creative work he was doing, did

0:23:41.119 --> 0:23:45.040
<v Speaker 1>not match his mood, his happiness at all. It seems

0:23:45.080 --> 0:23:49.480
<v Speaker 1>like there's a fracture was an impact of Mike's personal

0:23:49.520 --> 0:23:52.399
<v Speaker 1>life and his personal psyche from when things end with

0:23:52.440 --> 0:23:58.239
<v Speaker 1>Elaine until he meets Diane. Mike isn't healed until he

0:23:58.280 --> 0:24:01.560
<v Speaker 1>finds Diane. When he finds Diane, he finds a woman

0:24:01.680 --> 0:24:04.280
<v Speaker 1>that is really the woman who makes him feel better

0:24:05.200 --> 0:24:07.080
<v Speaker 1>and is the right fit for him in terms of

0:24:07.119 --> 0:24:09.800
<v Speaker 1>a companion and a wife. Do you think that's true.

0:24:10.080 --> 0:24:12.640
<v Speaker 1>I think that's true. Yeah, I really think that's true.

0:24:12.680 --> 0:24:15.640
<v Speaker 1>I love the thing that he said to Doug Wick,

0:24:15.760 --> 0:24:18.480
<v Speaker 1>the producer of Working Girl, which you know, it was

0:24:18.520 --> 0:24:20.919
<v Speaker 1>a movie he made while he was sort of preparing

0:24:21.080 --> 0:24:23.520
<v Speaker 1>to marry Diane, which was he said, if I don't

0:24:23.560 --> 0:24:25.959
<v Speaker 1>find a woman who will kick my ass when I'm

0:24:26.000 --> 0:24:28.439
<v Speaker 1>rude to a cab driver, I'm doomed. I mean, he

0:24:28.520 --> 0:24:30.560
<v Speaker 1>was immensely proud of Diane and what she did, and

0:24:30.560 --> 0:24:33.879
<v Speaker 1>he he loved her celebrity. He genuinely did. But I

0:24:33.920 --> 0:24:37.560
<v Speaker 1>think he also felt that he needed someone to tether

0:24:37.720 --> 0:24:40.600
<v Speaker 1>him to humanity and to say behave yourself and to

0:24:40.680 --> 0:24:43.639
<v Speaker 1>say treat other people well. But yeah, I do think

0:24:43.680 --> 0:24:47.320
<v Speaker 1>there's this long stretch after his big rift with Elane.

0:24:47.359 --> 0:24:51.760
<v Speaker 1>May happens in ninety two, sixty three, and by sixty

0:24:51.800 --> 0:24:54.680
<v Speaker 1>five or sixty six, they're friends again, and they're they're

0:24:54.680 --> 0:24:59.159
<v Speaker 1>doing occasional performances for benefits and she the love of

0:24:59.200 --> 0:25:02.800
<v Speaker 1>his life. The book to screams that not from you,

0:25:03.080 --> 0:25:05.080
<v Speaker 1>but you lay out the fact. You go, my God,

0:25:05.240 --> 0:25:07.000
<v Speaker 1>Was this just the love of his love? Was he

0:25:07.080 --> 0:25:09.959
<v Speaker 1>so deeply in love with this woman? I think he

0:25:10.040 --> 0:25:13.240
<v Speaker 1>was deeply in love with her. I don't know enough, honestly,

0:25:13.359 --> 0:25:17.359
<v Speaker 1>about Mike's third marriage, which lasted a really long time

0:25:17.480 --> 0:25:20.440
<v Speaker 1>and was a serious relationship with someone who really cared

0:25:20.440 --> 0:25:22.520
<v Speaker 1>about him and who he really cared about. I feel

0:25:22.560 --> 0:25:25.080
<v Speaker 1>like it's not my place to rank loves, but I

0:25:25.600 --> 0:25:29.280
<v Speaker 1>absolutely know that Elaine was his first love, and he,

0:25:29.640 --> 0:25:32.800
<v Speaker 1>I mean, his first wife, looks exactly like her, so

0:25:33.000 --> 0:25:38.800
<v Speaker 1>it's hard not to draw conclusions from that. Mark Harris,

0:25:38.880 --> 0:25:43.640
<v Speaker 1>author of Mike Nichols Alive. If you're enjoying this conversation,

0:25:44.080 --> 0:25:46.359
<v Speaker 1>be sure to follow Here's the Thing on the I

0:25:46.520 --> 0:25:51.360
<v Speaker 1>Heart Radio app, Apple Podcasts or wherever you get your podcasts.

0:25:51.840 --> 0:25:55.280
<v Speaker 1>When we come back. Mark Harris talks about Mike nichols

0:25:55.359 --> 0:25:58.760
<v Speaker 1>later years and how, at long last he started to

0:25:58.840 --> 0:26:12.399
<v Speaker 1>become Mark tent. I'm Alec Baldwin and you're listening to

0:26:12.520 --> 0:26:16.639
<v Speaker 1>Here's the Thing. Mike Nichols was married four times. His

0:26:16.800 --> 0:26:20.920
<v Speaker 1>last two journalists, Diane Sawyer. They were together twenty six

0:26:21.000 --> 0:26:25.000
<v Speaker 1>years until Mike's death in two thousand fourteen. She was

0:26:25.040 --> 0:26:27.280
<v Speaker 1>someone who had to get on a plane and go

0:26:27.440 --> 0:26:29.840
<v Speaker 1>a lot of the times, I mean at a moment's notice,

0:26:29.880 --> 0:26:33.360
<v Speaker 1>because she worked in news, and um, I just remember

0:26:33.400 --> 0:26:35.560
<v Speaker 1>a few times from the years when I knew Mike

0:26:35.760 --> 0:26:39.440
<v Speaker 1>he would really miss her when she was gone, but

0:26:39.560 --> 0:26:42.160
<v Speaker 1>he would also be so proud of the fact that

0:26:42.200 --> 0:26:45.919
<v Speaker 1>she was doing it. And the combination of two super

0:26:46.000 --> 0:26:50.480
<v Speaker 1>high achievers in completely different fields is really interesting because

0:26:50.480 --> 0:26:53.760
<v Speaker 1>there's no real competition there. Mike did not aspire to

0:26:53.800 --> 0:26:56.800
<v Speaker 1>be in television news and Diane didn't aspire to be

0:26:56.840 --> 0:26:59.400
<v Speaker 1>in the movie business. And that's a good combination. Yeah,

0:27:00.040 --> 0:27:03.399
<v Speaker 1>to get back to Gary Shandling, only because you handle

0:27:03.520 --> 0:27:08.240
<v Speaker 1>that beautifully. You write in Shandling, a congenitally nervous comedian

0:27:08.400 --> 0:27:12.600
<v Speaker 1>insecure about his attractiveness, two women, terrified that people were

0:27:12.640 --> 0:27:15.639
<v Speaker 1>smirking at his hair. He had seen a nightmare version

0:27:15.680 --> 0:27:18.400
<v Speaker 1>of his own reflection. For his entire life, he had

0:27:18.400 --> 0:27:23.120
<v Speaker 1>worked to compose a surface self and impeccably polished Mike Nichols,

0:27:23.160 --> 0:27:27.359
<v Speaker 1>capable of concealing any insecurity with an epigram A decisive

0:27:27.400 --> 0:27:32.159
<v Speaker 1>piece of direction where brilliantly inscrutable, wide eyed grin whose

0:27:32.560 --> 0:27:36.320
<v Speaker 1>infinite variations could meet anything from how true to what

0:27:36.440 --> 0:27:39.080
<v Speaker 1>a terrible idea? To only you and I know we're

0:27:39.160 --> 0:27:45.400
<v Speaker 1>on the Titanic. I just love that. I love that.

0:27:45.640 --> 0:27:48.320
<v Speaker 1>He told George Siegel. So this was as early as

0:27:48.400 --> 0:27:50.600
<v Speaker 1>you know, the mid sixties. It takes me three hours

0:27:50.640 --> 0:27:53.760
<v Speaker 1>to become Mike Nichols every day. And and I held

0:27:53.800 --> 0:27:57.639
<v Speaker 1>onto that line so tightly because it tells you so

0:27:57.760 --> 0:28:01.440
<v Speaker 1>much like what it costs you to compose a self,

0:28:01.680 --> 0:28:03.480
<v Speaker 1>like to feel that you can't go into the world

0:28:03.520 --> 0:28:07.920
<v Speaker 1>without creating this external self that is someone you can

0:28:07.960 --> 0:28:11.000
<v Speaker 1>carry off. But also what are you afraid that people

0:28:11.040 --> 0:28:13.119
<v Speaker 1>are going to see if you don't do that? I

0:28:13.160 --> 0:28:18.040
<v Speaker 1>think that's what Gary Schandling triggered. That Gary Shandling was

0:28:18.480 --> 0:28:23.000
<v Speaker 1>somehow to Mike the person that Mike was afraid other

0:28:23.080 --> 0:28:26.200
<v Speaker 1>people saw when they looked at him. And which which

0:28:26.200 --> 0:28:29.639
<v Speaker 1>tragic is that Mike in the casting realm, when you

0:28:29.680 --> 0:28:33.199
<v Speaker 1>talk about that collision of the budget, the star, the

0:28:33.320 --> 0:28:36.280
<v Speaker 1>nature of the person. That was a fifteen million dollar movie,

0:28:36.840 --> 0:28:41.080
<v Speaker 1>right and then suddenly it's a what fifty nine million

0:28:41.120 --> 0:28:44.320
<v Speaker 1>dollar movie? I mean all wrong, and there's no way

0:28:44.360 --> 0:28:47.320
<v Speaker 1>he can I think Mike's worst fear was to be

0:28:47.360 --> 0:28:49.480
<v Speaker 1>painted into a corner and there was nothing he could do.

0:28:49.560 --> 0:28:52.240
<v Speaker 1>He was so resourceful. You present him with a problem

0:28:52.240 --> 0:28:54.800
<v Speaker 1>and it was fun, It was a game. He was

0:28:54.840 --> 0:28:58.240
<v Speaker 1>always with clever people. Sondheim, who's more clever than son Teim,

0:28:58.280 --> 0:29:00.440
<v Speaker 1>you know what I mean, Bernstein, all the friends of

0:29:00.480 --> 0:29:03.320
<v Speaker 1>his in Connecticut and up in a Cape cod in

0:29:03.400 --> 0:29:05.800
<v Speaker 1>Martha's vineyard or wherever he was, and everything seemed to

0:29:05.840 --> 0:29:09.200
<v Speaker 1>be people who had built these towering careers out of

0:29:09.280 --> 0:29:12.760
<v Speaker 1>problem solving and loving the challenge. But when you put

0:29:12.840 --> 0:29:14.640
<v Speaker 1>him in a situation where there was no way out,

0:29:14.840 --> 0:29:17.800
<v Speaker 1>you were trapped and no wonder he decided to just

0:29:17.960 --> 0:29:21.520
<v Speaker 1>decimate Shandling. Right. I don't get the impression that Mike

0:29:21.600 --> 0:29:25.719
<v Speaker 1>minded if an actor was momentarily stuck on a scene

0:29:25.920 --> 0:29:28.720
<v Speaker 1>or a line or something that neither to be talked through,

0:29:28.800 --> 0:29:31.720
<v Speaker 1>because that was an interesting puzzle to try to figure out,

0:29:31.760 --> 0:29:34.280
<v Speaker 1>and if he believed in the actor, Mike even had

0:29:34.320 --> 0:29:37.280
<v Speaker 1>pleasure in that. But with Shandling, he later said that

0:29:37.320 --> 0:29:40.360
<v Speaker 1>he was sort of fooled that he thought from watching

0:29:40.400 --> 0:29:42.880
<v Speaker 1>the Larry Sanders show which was of course so brilliant

0:29:43.080 --> 0:29:47.040
<v Speaker 1>that Gary Shandling was just a completely facile, natural actor,

0:29:47.240 --> 0:29:49.240
<v Speaker 1>and when that turned out not to be the case,

0:29:49.480 --> 0:29:52.200
<v Speaker 1>and that was probably Mike's fault in many ways for

0:29:52.320 --> 0:29:55.600
<v Speaker 1>not having spent some real time with Shandling to get

0:29:55.640 --> 0:29:58.680
<v Speaker 1>to know him beforehand, it was I mean, it reminded

0:29:58.720 --> 0:30:00.640
<v Speaker 1>me of something that someone said in an another context

0:30:00.680 --> 0:30:03.160
<v Speaker 1>about him, which was when he couldn't get something from

0:30:03.200 --> 0:30:08.040
<v Speaker 1>an actor, he was like a musician whose instrument suddenly

0:30:08.320 --> 0:30:11.360
<v Speaker 1>refused to play, that he just got stuck. He did

0:30:11.360 --> 0:30:15.080
<v Speaker 1>not know how to move forward. And what's unfortunate with

0:30:15.160 --> 0:30:17.920
<v Speaker 1>what planet are you from, is that in that case,

0:30:18.880 --> 0:30:22.560
<v Speaker 1>it really sent him into this just terrible temper where

0:30:22.600 --> 0:30:25.240
<v Speaker 1>he really did, by all accounts, take it out on

0:30:25.280 --> 0:30:28.440
<v Speaker 1>Gary Chandling in a pretty terrible way. But when you

0:30:28.480 --> 0:30:31.920
<v Speaker 1>said it about Diane tethering him when he's abusive towards

0:30:31.960 --> 0:30:34.760
<v Speaker 1>cab drivers, you can almost hear people like that in

0:30:34.840 --> 0:30:37.400
<v Speaker 1>his life saying you're not so all fault anymore, so

0:30:37.480 --> 0:30:39.720
<v Speaker 1>a little less tarib if you don't mind, you know,

0:30:39.760 --> 0:30:43.400
<v Speaker 1>I mean, he's so he that grown man who loses

0:30:43.480 --> 0:30:46.400
<v Speaker 1>control of himself. Believe it, I've been there and that's

0:30:46.440 --> 0:30:49.760
<v Speaker 1>not great. Now. I was at Mike and some people

0:30:49.800 --> 0:30:51.640
<v Speaker 1>I don't really remember. It's kind of weird. Was thrown

0:30:51.680 --> 0:30:53.960
<v Speaker 1>together so hastily, or at least it wasn't my mind.

0:30:54.480 --> 0:30:59.400
<v Speaker 1>We did this benefit one of those highly improvhasatory, wonderful evening.

0:30:59.440 --> 0:31:01.360
<v Speaker 1>It was one of the funny evenings I've ever had.

0:31:01.400 --> 0:31:03.840
<v Speaker 1>We did, I think at Carnegie Hall called Short Talks

0:31:03.880 --> 0:31:08.200
<v Speaker 1>on the Universe, and any Lane wrote up vignette, but

0:31:08.440 --> 0:31:11.520
<v Speaker 1>I did a scene with Ellen Barkin and Ellen Ellen

0:31:11.600 --> 0:31:13.640
<v Speaker 1>and I play two people that are flirting with each other,

0:31:14.120 --> 0:31:15.720
<v Speaker 1>or think they're going to flirt with each other and

0:31:15.760 --> 0:31:18.120
<v Speaker 1>think that's what's happening, and they wind up just tearing

0:31:18.120 --> 0:31:20.320
<v Speaker 1>each other to pieces, saying with such horrible things to

0:31:20.360 --> 0:31:22.479
<v Speaker 1>each other. And it was very funny. I mean normally

0:31:22.520 --> 0:31:25.719
<v Speaker 1>that kind of Albi esque thing wears a little thin

0:31:25.840 --> 0:31:27.680
<v Speaker 1>on me after a while. Virginia Wolf and that kind

0:31:27.680 --> 0:31:30.200
<v Speaker 1>of thing that there's the shouting and the venom and everything,

0:31:30.680 --> 0:31:32.920
<v Speaker 1>I'm like, oh God, I get exhausted. But we did it.

0:31:33.000 --> 0:31:35.360
<v Speaker 1>It was very funny, and in that way that he

0:31:35.520 --> 0:31:38.800
<v Speaker 1>loved to improvise, he loved to get people to just

0:31:39.040 --> 0:31:41.120
<v Speaker 1>fling it against the wall and play with it, which

0:31:41.160 --> 0:31:44.480
<v Speaker 1>is probably his greatest gift. Because other other directors are

0:31:44.640 --> 0:31:47.560
<v Speaker 1>astute with a camera and cutting and so forth, and

0:31:48.000 --> 0:31:50.800
<v Speaker 1>other people know how to manufacture a movie, even a

0:31:50.880 --> 0:31:55.840
<v Speaker 1>hit movie, But getting actors, shepherding them toward the breakthroughs

0:31:55.840 --> 0:31:57.440
<v Speaker 1>and they're acting, is the thing that I think he's

0:31:57.480 --> 0:32:00.560
<v Speaker 1>the most memorable for and come from all of his

0:32:00.640 --> 0:32:04.800
<v Speaker 1>improphessitory work. In fact, Eline was sitting behind me. Wow,

0:32:05.160 --> 0:32:07.000
<v Speaker 1>I went on stage and did my thing that I

0:32:07.000 --> 0:32:08.800
<v Speaker 1>took my seat in the audience. They held a seat

0:32:08.800 --> 0:32:12.920
<v Speaker 1>and Eline was behind me with Donnin and I turned

0:32:12.920 --> 0:32:15.120
<v Speaker 1>her and I said, what a Stanley Donnin have that

0:32:15.200 --> 0:32:19.280
<v Speaker 1>I don't have? I think, he said an Oscar. I said,

0:32:19.320 --> 0:32:22.080
<v Speaker 1>that's true, that's true, But I mean everybody who knew

0:32:22.120 --> 0:32:25.160
<v Speaker 1>Elaine was just madly in love with Ela, and Emiline

0:32:25.160 --> 0:32:27.000
<v Speaker 1>couldn't give a ship me. Lane was like, she's kind

0:32:27.000 --> 0:32:29.560
<v Speaker 1>of thrived from the fact that does she really care

0:32:29.760 --> 0:32:32.720
<v Speaker 1>what you thought? She talked to you? Correct, she said,

0:32:32.800 --> 0:32:34.720
<v Speaker 1>the only things I can remember are the things I'm

0:32:34.720 --> 0:32:37.560
<v Speaker 1>not going to tell you. It was difficult to get

0:32:37.560 --> 0:32:40.720
<v Speaker 1>her to commit to do it. It always seemed to

0:32:40.720 --> 0:32:43.600
<v Speaker 1>be postpond and prest bond. Once we sat down and talked.

0:32:43.680 --> 0:32:46.240
<v Speaker 1>Other than that very scary first thing that she said

0:32:46.280 --> 0:32:49.520
<v Speaker 1>to me, she was great. There's so little that she

0:32:49.600 --> 0:32:53.400
<v Speaker 1>has done in terms of real, sit down, non joky

0:32:53.480 --> 0:32:57.040
<v Speaker 1>interviews over the last fifty years that I really didn't

0:32:57.080 --> 0:32:59.360
<v Speaker 1>know what it was going to be. And I couldn't

0:32:59.400 --> 0:33:03.320
<v Speaker 1>believe how not only forthcoming she was, but how specific

0:33:03.400 --> 0:33:07.640
<v Speaker 1>she was about the dynamic between her and Mike professionally

0:33:07.640 --> 0:33:10.080
<v Speaker 1>and personally, the work that they had done together, the

0:33:10.160 --> 0:33:14.720
<v Speaker 1>pain of that breakup, the way their relationship was different

0:33:14.920 --> 0:33:18.280
<v Speaker 1>after the breakup and after their reconciliation, the way they

0:33:18.280 --> 0:33:21.960
<v Speaker 1>stayed together for fifty five years after that. I mean,

0:33:22.080 --> 0:33:25.440
<v Speaker 1>I feel like an enormous amount of what I came

0:33:25.480 --> 0:33:30.600
<v Speaker 1>to learn and understand about Mike grew out of that interview,

0:33:30.640 --> 0:33:34.160
<v Speaker 1>which fortunately was an interview that happened quite early in

0:33:34.280 --> 0:33:37.480
<v Speaker 1>my interviewing process, so I was able to I mean,

0:33:37.520 --> 0:33:42.080
<v Speaker 1>she was the first person I went after, and really

0:33:42.560 --> 0:33:45.120
<v Speaker 1>the only person in the book who if she had

0:33:45.120 --> 0:33:47.880
<v Speaker 1>said no, it would be a different book. I really

0:33:47.880 --> 0:33:49.840
<v Speaker 1>don't know how I would have done it. It would

0:33:49.840 --> 0:33:53.400
<v Speaker 1>have been hamstrung there. Yeah, Kushner, of course, Angels is

0:33:53.440 --> 0:33:56.440
<v Speaker 1>done by Mike for HBO. Did you get to know

0:33:56.520 --> 0:33:58.320
<v Speaker 1>him at all during the shoot? Did you become friendly

0:33:58.320 --> 0:34:00.160
<v Speaker 1>with Mike at all? Yeah, that was the first time

0:34:00.160 --> 0:34:02.920
<v Speaker 1>I met him was probably when he was in Central

0:34:02.960 --> 0:34:07.000
<v Speaker 1>Park one night directing this cruising scene and I remember

0:34:07.040 --> 0:34:09.440
<v Speaker 1>Tony and I he called Lake because he was having

0:34:09.480 --> 0:34:11.600
<v Speaker 1>trouble with the scene or something, and he said, get

0:34:11.600 --> 0:34:13.920
<v Speaker 1>out of your apartment, come down here because I need you.

0:34:14.360 --> 0:34:16.799
<v Speaker 1>And so Tony and I walked down there, which was

0:34:16.840 --> 0:34:19.680
<v Speaker 1>just a fifteen minute walk, and we were saying, I

0:34:19.719 --> 0:34:21.640
<v Speaker 1>wonder if we're gonna be able to find the shoot,

0:34:21.680 --> 0:34:23.959
<v Speaker 1>and then we rounded the corner onto Central Park South

0:34:24.000 --> 0:34:27.920
<v Speaker 1>and like the whole Central Park South is floodless circus

0:34:27.920 --> 0:34:30.120
<v Speaker 1>is there? That was our first understanding that this was

0:34:30.160 --> 0:34:32.359
<v Speaker 1>going to be a big production. But yeah, the first

0:34:32.400 --> 0:34:36.400
<v Speaker 1>time I ever met Mike was watching him direct a

0:34:36.440 --> 0:34:38.360
<v Speaker 1>scene that he was having trouble with and that was

0:34:38.400 --> 0:34:42.560
<v Speaker 1>an amazing introduction just getting to see him sort of

0:34:43.160 --> 0:34:46.080
<v Speaker 1>figure out is this an actor problem? Is this a

0:34:46.320 --> 0:34:49.640
<v Speaker 1>visual problem? Do I not have enough fog? Is this

0:34:49.719 --> 0:34:52.839
<v Speaker 1>a staging problem? Is this the way guys would walk

0:34:52.920 --> 0:34:55.600
<v Speaker 1>toward each other, away from each other? It was really

0:34:55.640 --> 0:34:59.840
<v Speaker 1>interesting to watch him kind of struggle, but also almost

0:35:00.120 --> 0:35:03.839
<v Speaker 1>mathematically or forensically work out like what am I not

0:35:04.280 --> 0:35:06.759
<v Speaker 1>getting here that I need to get? And it wasn't

0:35:06.800 --> 0:35:09.040
<v Speaker 1>a case where he was taking it out on anyone.

0:35:09.239 --> 0:35:11.839
<v Speaker 1>And I was always interested that he called Tony that

0:35:11.960 --> 0:35:14.840
<v Speaker 1>night and and said like, come help me, which was

0:35:14.920 --> 0:35:20.000
<v Speaker 1>not Mike's away necessarily, but he didn't mind asking for guidance.

0:35:21.120 --> 0:35:23.520
<v Speaker 1>Was the book in your mind then, no, not at all.

0:35:23.760 --> 0:35:26.280
<v Speaker 1>I never thought of doing a book about Mike until

0:35:26.560 --> 0:35:30.240
<v Speaker 1>after he passed away. I urged Mike to write his autobiography,

0:35:30.320 --> 0:35:33.239
<v Speaker 1>and he wouldn't do it. No, interesting no, And he

0:35:33.360 --> 0:35:35.120
<v Speaker 1>used to say, not only do I not want to

0:35:35.160 --> 0:35:37.160
<v Speaker 1>do it, but I'm very proud that I have made

0:35:37.200 --> 0:35:41.640
<v Speaker 1>any future biographer's job impossible by burning all my papers.

0:35:41.880 --> 0:35:44.080
<v Speaker 1>Towards the very end of his life, he did for

0:35:44.120 --> 0:35:46.719
<v Speaker 1>the first time expressed some interest and maybe doing a

0:35:46.760 --> 0:35:49.200
<v Speaker 1>book where he would sit with the writer and they

0:35:49.200 --> 0:35:51.520
<v Speaker 1>would just go project by project and he would talk

0:35:51.520 --> 0:35:55.520
<v Speaker 1>about directing. So his papers are not donated somewhere. Nothing

0:35:55.600 --> 0:35:59.239
<v Speaker 1>was left to any academic institution. No, I I don't

0:35:59.280 --> 0:36:02.160
<v Speaker 1>think they're not then he like library or university or

0:36:02.200 --> 0:36:04.759
<v Speaker 1>anything like that, and maybe that will happen down the road.

0:36:05.120 --> 0:36:08.239
<v Speaker 1>Luckily for me, everybody who might ever wrote a note

0:36:08.239 --> 0:36:10.640
<v Speaker 1>to or an email too, seems to have saved it.

0:36:11.000 --> 0:36:13.799
<v Speaker 1>So I was able to get his own voice into

0:36:13.840 --> 0:36:16.680
<v Speaker 1>the book, which was really important to me. Well, whenever

0:36:16.719 --> 0:36:17.960
<v Speaker 1>I saw him, he was very sweet to me. He

0:36:17.960 --> 0:36:20.160
<v Speaker 1>would hug me and he was so nice. I think

0:36:20.200 --> 0:36:22.239
<v Speaker 1>I saw him the Lincoln Center maybe a year before

0:36:22.239 --> 0:36:24.480
<v Speaker 1>he died. He was with Diane, but he asked me

0:36:24.520 --> 0:36:27.799
<v Speaker 1>to do postcards from the edge. I remember we were

0:36:27.880 --> 0:36:30.200
<v Speaker 1>under the cloak of the holidays one year, it was

0:36:30.239 --> 0:36:32.359
<v Speaker 1>like January, and he said, I want you to come

0:36:32.360 --> 0:36:33.840
<v Speaker 1>to do this movie with me. I want you to

0:36:33.840 --> 0:36:36.680
<v Speaker 1>play this part. I said, I really don't know. I said, uh,

0:36:36.920 --> 0:36:39.040
<v Speaker 1>we're not shooting until May. I said, well, I've been

0:36:39.360 --> 0:36:41.600
<v Speaker 1>having this problem with my same girlfriend. I said, been

0:36:41.640 --> 0:36:43.400
<v Speaker 1>having this problem that I keep trying to end this

0:36:43.480 --> 0:36:46.520
<v Speaker 1>relationship and it's so painful, it's just so miserable of

0:36:46.600 --> 0:36:48.920
<v Speaker 1>and I thought of old people. He wouldn't understand lingering,

0:36:49.000 --> 0:36:51.200
<v Speaker 1>nagging problems. But he had this great line. He goes,

0:36:51.400 --> 0:36:54.040
<v Speaker 1>what kind of problems could you possibly have that couldn't

0:36:54.040 --> 0:36:59.840
<v Speaker 1>be solved by May? He said, and I thought, well,

0:37:00.280 --> 0:37:02.040
<v Speaker 1>you really made me feel like ship. Now you have

0:37:02.120 --> 0:37:05.120
<v Speaker 1>a point there, But I didn't do the movie, and

0:37:05.200 --> 0:37:07.400
<v Speaker 1>I that when you did, when he invited you and

0:37:07.440 --> 0:37:10.080
<v Speaker 1>you didn't come, it was not good. Matthew Broderick told

0:37:10.080 --> 0:37:12.040
<v Speaker 1>me an interesting thing, which as he said that he

0:37:12.160 --> 0:37:17.480
<v Speaker 1>felt that actors men came in and out of Mike's scope,

0:37:17.560 --> 0:37:20.799
<v Speaker 1>that for a while the bright light really shone upon you,

0:37:20.880 --> 0:37:23.120
<v Speaker 1>and you were the guy, and it could only be you,

0:37:23.560 --> 0:37:27.040
<v Speaker 1>and then it would move on. But actresses he tended

0:37:27.120 --> 0:37:30.080
<v Speaker 1>to hold onto forever, like he didn't really let go

0:37:30.160 --> 0:37:33.120
<v Speaker 1>of an actress once he loved her. On the Richard

0:37:33.120 --> 0:37:36.160
<v Speaker 1>Burton documentary that was on PBS, there's a wonderful line

0:37:36.160 --> 0:37:39.719
<v Speaker 1>that Mike himself had and he said something along the

0:37:39.760 --> 0:37:43.200
<v Speaker 1>lines of he said, Richard had completely lost the distinction

0:37:43.239 --> 0:37:47.440
<v Speaker 1>between being and seeming until his life had become only

0:37:47.480 --> 0:37:51.200
<v Speaker 1>about seeming. And I thought, was that true of Mike

0:37:51.280 --> 0:37:53.640
<v Speaker 1>as well, where where a large part of his life

0:37:53.840 --> 0:37:57.080
<v Speaker 1>was he was obsessed with people's perception of him as

0:37:57.120 --> 0:37:59.600
<v Speaker 1>opposed to how he really lived his life. I'm sort

0:37:59.640 --> 0:38:03.040
<v Speaker 1>of pay shuring that question as a diagram, and I'm

0:38:03.080 --> 0:38:06.880
<v Speaker 1>thinking that like maybe as the years and the decades

0:38:06.960 --> 0:38:10.840
<v Speaker 1>go on, the being and seeming lines get closer and closer,

0:38:11.080 --> 0:38:15.000
<v Speaker 1>until Mike finally was what he seemed to be or

0:38:15.480 --> 0:38:17.839
<v Speaker 1>seemed to be what he was. I guess depending on

0:38:17.880 --> 0:38:19.799
<v Speaker 1>what angle you look at it from. But I think

0:38:20.080 --> 0:38:22.880
<v Speaker 1>who Mike was and who Mike wanted to be finally

0:38:22.960 --> 0:38:26.560
<v Speaker 1>did come together despite of this childhood. I would say, so. Yeah.

0:38:26.760 --> 0:38:28.919
<v Speaker 1>He talked about how directing put him in the place

0:38:28.920 --> 0:38:31.520
<v Speaker 1>where he was the father to the room full of people. Right.

0:38:31.600 --> 0:38:33.880
<v Speaker 1>That's such a striking thing to me in that he

0:38:33.960 --> 0:38:36.640
<v Speaker 1>felt it when he was thirty one or thirty two

0:38:36.680 --> 0:38:39.520
<v Speaker 1>years old and he walks into a rehearsal room for

0:38:39.560 --> 0:38:41.680
<v Speaker 1>the first time for Barefoot in the Park and says, oh,

0:38:41.880 --> 0:38:43.160
<v Speaker 1>I get it. This is what I want to be.

0:38:43.160 --> 0:38:45.440
<v Speaker 1>I want to be a director because the directors the dad.

0:38:45.920 --> 0:38:48.840
<v Speaker 1>I think of myself at thirty one and not aware

0:38:48.960 --> 0:38:52.200
<v Speaker 1>enough being the dad was not like high on my

0:38:52.280 --> 0:38:57.719
<v Speaker 1>list year, but my paternal nature exactly. So it's an

0:38:57.719 --> 0:39:01.319
<v Speaker 1>interesting instinct at that young age to decide that, oh,

0:39:01.480 --> 0:39:04.200
<v Speaker 1>this is who I am. I'm the father. But it's

0:39:04.239 --> 0:39:07.400
<v Speaker 1>like to me, I mean, I only have a silly

0:39:07.440 --> 0:39:09.839
<v Speaker 1>analysis of it, but it's like Mike was like the

0:39:09.880 --> 0:39:13.880
<v Speaker 1>somalia of human emotion and feeling. He had this hyper

0:39:14.000 --> 0:39:17.200
<v Speaker 1>developed sense of what people were feeling and why and

0:39:17.239 --> 0:39:19.960
<v Speaker 1>how it was expressed. So when he was directing actors,

0:39:20.120 --> 0:39:22.839
<v Speaker 1>he'd be listening and he'd be sitting there going, you know, no, no, no, no,

0:39:22.880 --> 0:39:25.360
<v Speaker 1>not that, do it again, and and we're going to

0:39:25.400 --> 0:39:27.759
<v Speaker 1>get closer to the thing that he knew was the

0:39:27.800 --> 0:39:30.799
<v Speaker 1>perfect take, or the right take, the truest take, the

0:39:30.840 --> 0:39:33.719
<v Speaker 1>funniest take. He had to such an ear and an

0:39:33.719 --> 0:39:37.000
<v Speaker 1>eye for that kind of thing. And so maybe that

0:39:37.040 --> 0:39:39.279
<v Speaker 1>guy that has that hyper developed sense is the kind

0:39:39.320 --> 0:39:41.160
<v Speaker 1>of guy that could say I'm the father in the

0:39:41.200 --> 0:39:42.920
<v Speaker 1>room and I'm thirty one years old. He was so

0:39:43.280 --> 0:39:47.160
<v Speaker 1>developed emotionally. Maybe so because by that time he had

0:39:47.160 --> 0:39:52.239
<v Speaker 1>spent his whole childhood and adolescence watching other kids, like

0:39:52.680 --> 0:39:56.479
<v Speaker 1>kids who looked to him like quote unquote normal kids

0:39:56.520 --> 0:39:58.600
<v Speaker 1>and who sounded like normal kids. I mean, he spent

0:39:58.680 --> 0:40:00.680
<v Speaker 1>so much of his childhood sta to get apart from

0:40:00.680 --> 0:40:03.239
<v Speaker 1>the crowd, thinking what does it look like? What does

0:40:03.280 --> 0:40:06.560
<v Speaker 1>exactly it looked like when someone is popular or when

0:40:06.560 --> 0:40:09.959
<v Speaker 1>someone's unpopular, or when someone's awkward. I think that went

0:40:10.000 --> 0:40:13.080
<v Speaker 1>into him really early, that you figured out human nature

0:40:13.120 --> 0:40:16.680
<v Speaker 1>by watching other people. Yes, Oh God, that that resonated

0:40:16.680 --> 0:40:19.680
<v Speaker 1>for me so incredibly. I want to just say, this book,

0:40:19.719 --> 0:40:21.759
<v Speaker 1>Mike Nickles of Life. I went into this and I

0:40:21.800 --> 0:40:25.000
<v Speaker 1>thought I knew everything about Nichols. You made me see

0:40:25.239 --> 0:40:28.160
<v Speaker 1>Nichols in a different light. And because the order of

0:40:28.200 --> 0:40:29.719
<v Speaker 1>the book and the way you put it together, in

0:40:29.760 --> 0:40:31.800
<v Speaker 1>the whole arc of the book, you made me see

0:40:31.840 --> 0:40:35.239
<v Speaker 1>this guy in a light that that much of it

0:40:35.320 --> 0:40:38.239
<v Speaker 1>I knew, but I didn't really know. And this book

0:40:38.320 --> 0:40:41.759
<v Speaker 1>really so definitive. It's just just a beautifully written book.

0:40:41.760 --> 0:40:44.560
<v Speaker 1>To congratulations, Thank you so much. And I have to

0:40:44.600 --> 0:40:47.080
<v Speaker 1>say I don't think I've done an interview for this

0:40:47.239 --> 0:40:50.440
<v Speaker 1>with someone who has read the book as carefully as

0:40:50.680 --> 0:40:52.400
<v Speaker 1>you have. No, I loved it. I loved it. I

0:40:52.440 --> 0:40:54.520
<v Speaker 1>couldn't put it down. I really mean that, I couldn't

0:40:54.560 --> 0:41:00.080
<v Speaker 1>put it down. So anyway, thank you, thank you for

0:41:00.400 --> 0:41:04.319
<v Speaker 1>Mark Harris on legendary director Mike Nichols. The book is

0:41:04.480 --> 0:41:09.440
<v Speaker 1>Mike Nichols Alive. We're produced by Kathleen Russo, Karry Donohue,

0:41:09.480 --> 0:41:14.160
<v Speaker 1>and Zach McNeice. Our engineer is Frank Imperial. I'm Alec Baldwin,

0:41:14.239 --> 0:41:17.040
<v Speaker 1>here's the thing. Is brought to you by iHeart Radio