Speaker 1: You are entering the freedom much huge revelations and the
Speaker 1: Russia collusion hoax, more BLM riots attack, more cars and people,
Speaker 1: mail in ballots found discarded in Pennsylvania, and peaceful transfer
Speaker 1: of power panic. This is the Buck Sexon Show where
Speaker 1: the mission or mission is to decode what really matters
Speaker 1: with passionable intelligence. Make no mistake America, You're a great American. Again,
Speaker 1: the Buck Sexon Show begins. He's a great guy. No, welcome,
Speaker 1: friends to the Buck Sexton Show. Oh my, it is Friday.
Speaker 1: It is actually my favorite time of the year weatherwise,
Speaker 1: at least in New York. I like this. It's nice outside,
Speaker 1: but you probably want to wear a sweatshirt at night,
Speaker 1: also known as what you people in California have for
Speaker 1: most of the year. But anyway, I do really like it.
Speaker 1: And it's a time where we have to find everything
Speaker 1: we can to give us a little bit of peace
Speaker 1: because it's about to get wild out there. Friends, It's
Speaker 1: about to get wild this election. You got the debate
Speaker 1: coming up on Tuesday. You've got Joe Biden hiding from everybody,
Speaker 1: putting a lind day after day on the campaign. Oh
Speaker 1: he's doing debate prep. I don't know. I think I
Speaker 1: think he might be eating jello, sitting on a couch
Speaker 1: watching reruns of The Golden Girls. I'm not sure that
Speaker 1: Biden is doing all this strenuous debate prep but just
Speaker 1: be prepared for this. No matter what Biden does in
Speaker 1: the debate, the Democrats are going to say that he
Speaker 1: was amazing, he's brilliant, he's great. But I actually want
Speaker 1: to change our gears for room and here, away from COVID,
Speaker 1: away from the lockdowns and BLM. Well we'll get into
Speaker 1: that later, of course. But there's a story that you
Speaker 1: need to know about, and the media doesn't want to
Speaker 1: cover it. They don't want to touch this. And I
Speaker 1: understand that it's been a few years since some of
Speaker 1: these things have happened, so they just want to move
Speaker 1: past it. But here's the truth. When the President of
Speaker 1: the United States said that Russia collusion was a hoax,
Speaker 1: when the President of the United States called the Muller
Speaker 1: probe a witch hunt, he was just stating facts. Those
Speaker 1: things were true. Those things were true. So now here
Speaker 1: we go with why I can say that to you. Now,
Speaker 1: there's many reasons. We've been looking at this for a
Speaker 1: long time and I've never had to come on this show,
Speaker 1: which I started about a what was it now, a
Speaker 1: year before the Trump election, and I start, you know,
Speaker 1: I remember we first started looking at this issue, and
Speaker 1: I always thought this, there's just no way. It didn't
Speaker 1: makes sense. The Russia collusion story just didn't add up.
Speaker 1: They didn't have any proof. Why would Trump do this.
Speaker 1: It's so risky, it wouldn't even work. It's a dumb idea.
Speaker 1: And the President even told me once himself, face to face,
Speaker 1: He's like, Russia collusion, it doesn't even make any sense.
Speaker 1: And I said, yeah, you're telling me. He used more
Speaker 1: colorful language than that. But now I look at this
Speaker 1: and I say, it's impossible for anyone who's following this
Speaker 1: not to see exactly what happened here. Let me start
Speaker 1: with the big picture, and then we'll drill down into
Speaker 1: these facts. Courtesy of my friends over at the Federalist,
Speaker 1: Sean Davis and Molly Hemingway, who've just got a great
Speaker 1: piece of actual journalism, and we now know beyond any
Speaker 1: I mean, we've known, I should say, for a while,
Speaker 1: but now we've got just proof, proof that the whole
Speaker 1: thing was a scam, Proof that people were being absolutely
Speaker 1: partisan and reckless and abusing their power at the very
Speaker 1: top of the FBI and the DOJ. Comy struck page
Speaker 1: Brennan McCabe, all of them. But first, let me just
Speaker 1: say here's what really happened. There are people that are
Speaker 1: Democrats who are very became very powerful because a lot
Speaker 1: of people that like to be bureaucrats are Democrats, and
Speaker 1: they became powerful over a period of many years, rose
Speaker 1: up at the FBI and the DOJ and began to
Speaker 1: think of themselves as the praetorian guard, as the guardians
Speaker 1: of our republic. And also the establishment for them was
Speaker 1: represented by Hillary Clinton. So America needed Hillary Clinton to
Speaker 1: be president because Donald Trump was a threat to the system,
Speaker 1: a system that they viewed themselves as the ultimate guaranteurs of.
Speaker 1: And so they were looking and looking for something to
Speaker 1: claim that this president was a criminal. They were trying
Speaker 1: to use their investigative powers to stop a presidential candidate,
Speaker 1: and they cooked up this nonsense at every stage about Russians.
Speaker 1: This is just all based on rumors. And now we
Speaker 1: know from additional information. Let's come out the main source
Speaker 1: for the Steel dossier. It was Russian disinformation. Folks, that's right.
Speaker 1: Steel got completely bamboozled, but they told him what he
Speaker 1: wanted to hear. This is the worst. We call this
Speaker 1: tradecraft in the spy world. This is tradecraft. That is
Speaker 1: the most JV rookie mistake, crap imaginable, no vetting, just
Speaker 1: ran with the what the source gave him. That's called
Speaker 1: rument or rumor intelligence, which means not really intelligence. And
Speaker 1: then they started leaking based on the rumor intelligence. The
Speaker 1: f beyond the DUJ were leaking stuff to the press,
Speaker 1: and then had the gall to cite some of the
Speaker 1: press reports that they're fell FBI and DOJ people were
Speaker 1: leaking to get them printed in the first place, citing
Speaker 1: those press reports as justification for the investigation, the ultimate
Speaker 1: self licking ice cream cone of the bureaucracy. And then
Speaker 1: when they realized that Trump didn't win, and let me also,
Speaker 1: I'm sorry when that Hillary didn't win, let me also
Speaker 1: just say this. People always always say why would they
Speaker 1: do this if they thought Hillary was going to win.
Speaker 1: I think they were going to try to prosecute Trump
Speaker 1: after the election. They were going to try to take him.
Speaker 1: They thought they got this guy maybe, or they could
Speaker 1: get him. And then when it was clear they didn't
Speaker 1: have the evidence. What do you do? You've already broken
Speaker 1: the sacred trust the American people have in you. You've
Speaker 1: already broken the sacred trust that's been given to you
Speaker 1: at the f behind the DOJ. So what you got
Speaker 1: to justify it? Somehow? You got to find some there there? Right,
Speaker 1: If you ruin someone's life, investigate them for years. The
Speaker 1: tendency is and the Attorney General spoke about this recently
Speaker 1: in a speech He gave the tendencies say, well, I
Speaker 1: better prove that this person was bad. I better find something.
Speaker 1: I better find something on them. Okay, Well, yeah, so
Speaker 1: they fabricated things, so they lied to the fives a court,
Speaker 1: and every step of the way what they were doing
Speaker 1: was wrong. They knew it too. And that's the part
Speaker 1: of this latest revelation that you really have to pay
Speaker 1: attention to. Trump won the election and that afterwards they
Speaker 1: were all scrambling and they realized the only way that
Speaker 1: they could try to save themselves was to double down.
Speaker 1: And it's all told in messages from the FBI. FBI
Speaker 1: agents involved in these cases to each other. Their names
Speaker 1: are redacted, but we can guess who some of them are.
Speaker 1: And in a twist of irony. The only reason we
Speaker 1: know about this is because Judge em it's all of it,
Speaker 1: who has an unhealthy and bizarre hatred for Michael Flynn,
Speaker 1: as evidenced by his courtroom outpers he should have recused
Speaker 1: himself right after he accused General Flynt of treason, which
Speaker 1: no one has accused him of. Flynn did nothing wrong
Speaker 1: Flynn's conversation, I'll tell you this. You know, Trump always
Speaker 1: says his Ukraine phone call was a perfect phone call.
Speaker 1: The Flynn phone call at the Kisselgak was a perfect
Speaker 1: phone call. He did exactly what we would want the
Speaker 1: national incoming national security advisor to say, which is, look,
Speaker 1: just keep it, stay in line with what we've done,
Speaker 1: don't escalate things. I'm gonna come in and we're gonna
Speaker 1: we're going to address this with the new administration. It's
Speaker 1: exactly what you would want him to say. It was,
Speaker 1: it is truly, it was a perfect phone call. And
Speaker 1: then they jammed him up on this technicality. What was
Speaker 1: he talking about sanctions or was he talking about expulsions?
Speaker 1: And that was why there was a little bit of
Speaker 1: confusion perhaps in his answer about what he talked about
Speaker 1: But he also thought he was talking to colleagues, not FBI,
Speaker 1: Democrat Hillary vote hacks. But we're going to do everything
Speaker 1: in their power to ruin him and destroy him. We're
Speaker 1: setting an ambush for the incoming Natural Security Advisor. This, friends,
Speaker 1: is the biggest political scandal of my lifetime. Nothing else
Speaker 1: really even comes close. This was an attempt to undo
Speaker 1: a presidential election. This was an effort to break the
Speaker 1: sacred trust the American people have with our institutions, with
Speaker 1: our law enforcement agencies like the FBI, that they will
Speaker 1: enforce the law without fear or favor or prejudice or partisanship.
Speaker 1: And yet it's not what happened, is it? What do
Speaker 1: we have here? From from the Federalist again from Sean
Speaker 1: Davis and Molly Hemmingwell, you know we've had Sean on
Speaker 1: this show many times. Let's dive into these details. You're
Speaker 1: in the Freedom mund this is the Buck Sex and
Speaker 1: Show podcast. Trump was right. Explosive new FBI texts details
Speaker 1: internal Furrer over handling of Crossfire hurricane investigation. Newly disclosed
Speaker 1: internal FBI notes and text messages detail the extent of
Speaker 1: the FBI's desire to take down Trump and his associates
Speaker 1: at any cost. Again, this on the Federalist dot Com
Speaker 1: from Davis in Hemingway, and this piece is amazing because
Speaker 1: this is smoking gun stuff. Now we already know what happened,
Speaker 1: if but we already have all the circumstantial evidence we
Speaker 1: need for a conviction, at least in the court of
Speaker 1: public opinion, never mind if we're actually gonna get some
Speaker 1: criminal charges here, which I don't think we will, but
Speaker 1: for a conviction in a sense of the FBI, the
Speaker 1: DOJ in the Russia collusion hoax, and also the Special
Speaker 1: Council was an anti Trump headhunter operation. They were going
Speaker 1: after the administration. That's what they were doing. It was
Speaker 1: not about justice, it was not about Russian interference in
Speaker 1: the action. It was all a scam from slimy pro
Speaker 1: Hillary partisan lawyers posing as agents of justice. Disgusting and
Speaker 1: the media should never recover. I mean the same way
Speaker 1: that I have no respect for Senate Democrats or really
Speaker 1: the Democrat Party after what they did to Brett Kavanaugh.
Speaker 1: And I'm never going to forget it. I Am never
Speaker 1: going to forget CNN's role, Fake Tapper, Andersid Cooper, all
Speaker 1: of them, never going to forget their role in perpetuating
Speaker 1: this hoax that was meant to after the fact, disenfranchise
Speaker 1: over sixty million American voters who chose Donald Trump and
Speaker 1: who won. They can cry about it as much as
Speaker 1: they want. He won, and then they tried to undo
Speaker 1: it after they were done crying. Here's from the piece
Speaker 1: quote Federal Bureau of Investigation agents tasked by fired former
Speaker 1: director James Comey to take down Donald Trump during and
Speaker 1: after the twenty sixteen election. We're so concerned about the
Speaker 1: agencies potentially illegal behavior that they purchased liability insurance to
Speaker 1: protect themselves less than two weeks before Trump was inaugurated president,
Speaker 1: according to previously hidden FBI text messages. Friends, these are
Speaker 1: messages that took years to come out that the FBI
Speaker 1: thought would never be shown to anyone. They thought they
Speaker 1: were above the law, they thought they were above transparency.
Speaker 1: And the only reason this has come out now is
Speaker 1: because of the federal court action against General Flynn. I
Speaker 1: mean Sidney Powell. Sydney Powell should get the Medal of
Speaker 1: Freedom or something. And what she's doing is incredible because
Speaker 1: this has turned into more than just the very important
Speaker 1: cause of achieving justice for General Flynn. This is also
Speaker 1: about how in trying to take down Flynn, they created
Speaker 1: the opening for the truth to finally make its way out.
Speaker 1: And now, because Judge Sullivan is doing this psychotic judge
Speaker 1: as prosecutor routine after the dj has already said Flynn
Speaker 1: never should have been prosecuted, Judge Sullivan is doing this stuff,
Speaker 1: and that allows for the federal lawsuits and federal court
Speaker 1: disclosure requirements to get this information about what they did
Speaker 1: to Flynn as a centerpiece of the Russia collusion hoax
Speaker 1: and the Mueller witch hunt. This is all from This
Speaker 1: is all from this piece and the Federalist dot com.
Speaker 1: But it's because of Sidney Powell's work. Quote, we all
Speaker 1: went and purchased professional liability insurance. One agent texted on
Speaker 1: January tenth, twenty seventeen, the same day CNN leaked details
Speaker 1: that then President elect Trump had been briefed by Comey
Speaker 1: about the bogus Christopher Steele dossier. That briefing of Trump
Speaker 1: was used as a pretext to legitimize the debunked dossier,
Speaker 1: which was funded by the Democratic National Committee and the
Speaker 1: Clinton campaign and compiled by a foreign intelligence officer who
Speaker 1: was working for a sanctioned Russian oligarch, which'llvis add in
Speaker 1: there was oleg dera posca quote, Holy crap. An agent responded,
Speaker 1: all the analysts too, meaning all the analysts also got
Speaker 1: professional liability insurance on the case Crossfire Hurricane and Crossfire
Speaker 1: Razor Trump Russia collusion. General Flynn specific targeting those are
Speaker 1: the Crossfire Hurricane is the whole Trump with the Russians,
Speaker 1: the Trump campaign, and then Crossfire Razor is General Flynn
Speaker 1: is the point man of this complete fabrication. Papadopoulos was
Speaker 1: including with the Russians, carter Page was including with the Russians,
Speaker 1: and any person who said that they were even early
Speaker 1: on in this is so stupid that really they shouldn't
Speaker 1: be trusted to be around a hot stove. You know,
Speaker 1: they need to make sure that all the outlets are
Speaker 1: plugged in like a toddler around the house, because you
Speaker 1: don't know if they're going to hurt themselves. That's how
Speaker 1: dumb you'd have to be to believe the Carter Page
Speaker 1: and George Poppadopoulos were the point men on some international
Speaker 1: election conspiracy with the Russians. Continues in this text exchange
Speaker 1: quote Yup. The first agent said all the folks at
Speaker 1: the agency as well. And quote, let me tell you
Speaker 1: if somebody used to work at the agency. He means
Speaker 1: the CIA. So CIA people and FBI people right before
Speaker 1: the Trump inauguration are all purchasing professional liability insurance. Gee, folks,
Speaker 1: why would why would they be doing that? If they
Speaker 1: knew that they had done their jobs to the letter
Speaker 1: of the law, if they knew that they hadn't abused
Speaker 1: their power, and that there wouldn't be a problem with
Speaker 1: the incoming Attorney General Jeff Sessions week, why would they
Speaker 1: do that? I can tell you this, if the FBI
Speaker 1: was investigating some kind of a murder and their chief
Speaker 1: suspect had taken out a life insurance policy. You know,
Speaker 1: I thought the wife killed the husband and she just
Speaker 1: got a million dollar life insurance policy. Oh, two weeks
Speaker 1: before the husband disappears. They're gonna think that's a big
Speaker 1: red flag, aren't they. What are we supposed to think
Speaker 1: about this? All the analysts that this is the text
Speaker 1: messages that they never thought would come out. We're seeing
Speaker 1: all the analysts at the CIA, all the all the
Speaker 1: agents of the FBI working on this case are taking
Speaker 1: up professional liability insurance you know, unless all of a
Speaker 1: sudden they were doing you know, high value target detainee
Speaker 1: questioning or something at a at a covert site for
Speaker 1: the FBI or CIA or something somewhere. Unless they were
Speaker 1: doing some really high risk stuff all of a sudden,
Speaker 1: why why would they be getting professional liability insurance before
Speaker 1: they right? We know why, we know why. Okay, let's
Speaker 1: be very clear about that. Ha ha, who knows? Oh sorry? Quote?
Speaker 1: Can I ask who are the most likely litigators? An
Speaker 1: agent responded, as as far as potentially suing all of you? Haha,
Speaker 1: who knows? I think the concern when we got it
Speaker 1: was that there was a big league at the DOJ,
Speaker 1: the New York Times, among others, was going to do
Speaker 1: a piece, the first agent said, again texted. While the
Speaker 1: names of the agents responsible for the text are redacted,
Speaker 1: the legal filing from Powell, quoting communications for the Department
Speaker 1: of Justice, states that the latest document production included handwritten
Speaker 1: notes and texts from Peter Struck, Andrew McCabe, Lisa Page,
Speaker 1: and FBI analysts who worked on the FBI's investigation of Flynn.
Speaker 1: Top people involved the investigation all getting professional liability insurance. Oh, friends,
Speaker 1: it gets worse. So again, this is what you would
Speaker 1: call a clue an investigation. We're going to add up
Speaker 1: all these clues because this is really important. What was
Speaker 1: their next big concern? Oh, let's make sure we can't
Speaker 1: get sued, and then let's go to the next the
Speaker 1: next issue here, which is what happens when we don't
Speaker 1: have Loretta Lynch is the attorney general, when we don't
Speaker 1: have a Democrat hack at the top of the djh oh,
Speaker 1: thanks for listening to the Bus Show podcasts. Remember to
Speaker 1: subscribe on Apple podcasts, the iHeartRadio app or wherever you
Speaker 1: get your podcasts. Ah. The deep state proof of it,
Speaker 1: that's what we have now. We've known about it for
Speaker 1: a long time, and now we know that they were aware.
Speaker 1: They were coloring outside the lines. Folks, they were doing
Speaker 1: stuff that they should not have been doing and to
Speaker 1: betray the trust put in them and to exceed their
Speaker 1: legal authority and mandates in this pathetic partisan really just babyish, childish.
Speaker 1: Our person wasn't supposed to lose because Hillary it's for
Speaker 1: Hillary Clinton, really, because she's gonna be so much better
Speaker 1: than Trump. These people are nuts, but you know, look,
Speaker 1: it's gonna say it there's some great people who work
Speaker 1: in government. There are a lot of dumb, petty losers
Speaker 1: who work in government too. It's just it's a big organization, folks.
Speaker 1: That's the reality of it, including the FBI and the CIA,
Speaker 1: that's for sure. All right back into this, why were
Speaker 1: they purchasing professional liability insurance? And this is from this
Speaker 1: piece and the Federalist dot Com that I really think,
Speaker 1: you know, Sean Davison, Molly Hemingway, need need all due
Speaker 1: credit for I was talking about this last night on
Speaker 1: wr AND in New York City, and the President later
Speaker 1: on was reading from it during his rally, so that's
Speaker 1: clearly he also agreed this piece. There's a lot. There's
Speaker 1: a lot in this, but they were worried about professional liability,
Speaker 1: so they purchased additional insurance. Top FBI DOJ officials are saying,
Speaker 1: oh my gosh, we're gonna get sued for what we've
Speaker 1: done here. That's what's going on. Okay, Well, what I
Speaker 1: you want to find out is through some kind I
Speaker 1: don't know if we could do this, it's probably privacy issues.
Speaker 1: I don't know it through private companies, but I want
Speaker 1: to find out who exactly got the professional liability insurance
Speaker 1: because I have a feeling it is struck, it is page,
Speaker 1: it is Comy, it is Brendy. I am feeling the
Speaker 1: whole cabal we're you know, getting ensured up so they
Speaker 1: could lawyer up because they knew, oh remember Hillary was
Speaker 1: supposed to win. And then they could have presented Hillary
Speaker 1: with their Russia collusion stuff and just done immediate campaign
Speaker 1: to finish off the Trump movement forever. Maybe they don't
Speaker 1: bring criminal charges against Trump on the fabrications, although they're
Speaker 1: not above that. You'd say, buck, but there was no
Speaker 1: Russia collusion. Yeah, but they would have kept an investigation
Speaker 1: going if Hillary Clinton had won the twenty sixteen election her,
Speaker 1: you know, James Coomey and and the Brennan and these
Speaker 1: other deep state little tyrants, they could have continued to
Speaker 1: lead to the media, got an investigation going of Trump
Speaker 1: of his and they wouldn't have had the protection of
Speaker 1: being in the White House, in the Oval office. And
Speaker 1: maybe you get a few people, look at what they
Speaker 1: did while Trump was president. They get a few people
Speaker 1: to crack under pressure and to you know, misremember or
Speaker 1: lie about something because they're scared. But they didn't do
Speaker 1: anything wrong. They didn't break the law, but then they said, oh,
Speaker 1: we're just that's what they were hoping to do after
Speaker 1: defeating the Trump movement. They were they were going to
Speaker 1: the dj and the FBI were planning to go walk
Speaker 1: around the battlefield and bayonet the survivors. That's that's what
Speaker 1: they were going to do. They were setting this up
Speaker 1: so that they could have ruined reputations and lives when
Speaker 1: Hillary took office, and they would have had All they
Speaker 1: have to do is investigate you. You're a former presidential
Speaker 1: candidate and there are news stories out there that you
Speaker 1: that you colluded with the Russians. How do you how
Speaker 1: do you ever wipe that stain away? And how do
Speaker 1: you fight back? You're at that point, right, You're a loser,
Speaker 1: you lost, and you try to cheat with the Russians,
Speaker 1: don't you see? This was a way to destroy the
Speaker 1: Trump movement once and for all. That's why this storyline
Speaker 1: they always had. If if they were sure Hillary was
Speaker 1: going to win, why would they do any of this. No,
Speaker 1: there are a lot of reasons why they would do
Speaker 1: all of this. But agents were also worried about the
Speaker 1: new attorney general. Back to these text messages, quote, they
Speaker 1: were worried about how a new attorney general might view
Speaker 1: the actions taken against Trump during the investigation. Shortly after
Speaker 1: then Senator Jeff Sessions was confirmed to be Trump's new
Speaker 1: attorney general. Congressional Democrats, media and Obama holdovers within dj
Speaker 1: immediately moved to four Sessions to recuse himself from overseeing
Speaker 1: the department's investigations against Trump. Quote, the new ag might
Speaker 1: have some questions, then YadA, YadA, YadA, we all get screwed.
Speaker 1: One agent wrote, I'm sorry. Why would have senior FBI
Speaker 1: agent working on this case say that the new attorney
Speaker 1: general might have some questions and then they will all
Speaker 1: get screwed. I thought what James Comey said was that
Speaker 1: everything was fine. I thought that we were told this
Speaker 1: was all done by the book, this was all by
Speaker 1: the letter of the law. But of course that was
Speaker 1: all a lie. We all know that. Don't don't believe
Speaker 1: the media spin. They're gonna they're just trying to suppress this.
Speaker 1: They're not even covering it, they don't want to talk
Speaker 1: about it. They're just hoping that people are more focused on,
Speaker 1: you know, some BLM lunacy in some other part of
Speaker 1: the country. We'll get into that later too. Quote. The
Speaker 1: FBI agents also discussed how the investigation's leadership was consumed
Speaker 1: with conspiracy theories rather than evidence. I'm telling you, man,
Speaker 1: if this thing ever gets foied Freedom of Information Act requested,
Speaker 1: there are going to be some tough questions, one agent wrote,
Speaker 1: and a great deal of those will be related to
Speaker 1: Brian having a scope way outside the boundaries of logic.
Speaker 1: Let's unpack that phrase for a minute, shall we way
Speaker 1: outside the boundaries of logic. If the FBI were investigating you,
Speaker 1: and they were running around with theories that they were
Speaker 1: admitting to each other or outside the boundaries of logic,
Speaker 1: wouldn't you feel deeply violated? Wouldn't you feel like you're
Speaker 1: in some Kafka esque nightmare? Yes, you would. And let's remember,
Speaker 1: while these FBI aidents are ha ha ha hahaha laughing
Speaker 1: to each other over text message about some of this,
Speaker 1: clearly also nervous about some of what's coming out, Let's
Speaker 1: remember that they have the power to investigate people and
Speaker 1: ruin their lives. The FBI, if they choose, used to
Speaker 1: do so on very little I mean, they could just
Speaker 1: say it's on the basis of confidential informants right on
Speaker 1: the basis of garbage. They could investigate you and try
Speaker 1: to ruin you, destroy your family, destroy your livelihood, drive
Speaker 1: you to suicide. In some cases, that's what the FBI
Speaker 1: can do when they go outside the boundaries of logic.
Speaker 1: As they're saying here. It's also why, just as an aside,
Speaker 1: I think the Richard Jewel movie is so important for
Speaker 1: all of you to see. That's what it's like when
Speaker 1: you're dealing with the FBI. I'm sorry, but it's true.
Speaker 1: There's political pressure on a case. They want to give
Speaker 1: a scalp to the mob, and the mob is the
Speaker 1: Democrat Party, and the Democrat Party is the party of
Speaker 1: the state. This is the machine friends, quote redacted. Some
Speaker 1: senior FBI person we could guess, we don't know is
Speaker 1: one of the worst offenders of the rabbit holes and
Speaker 1: conspiracy theories. An agent texted, this guy traveled with that
Speaker 1: guy who put down guy as his visa sponsor. Third
Speaker 1: guy lives near a Navy base. Therefore dot dot dot
Speaker 1: end quote. Gee, doesn't that sound like the whole dossier?
Speaker 1: Doesn't that sound like everything in Russia collusion? Well, this
Speaker 1: guy was a Russian or talked to another Russian, or
Speaker 1: knew a guy who once ate a parogi and who
Speaker 1: knew a guy who lived next to the parogi players,
Speaker 1: who people who have built careers on this. There are
Speaker 1: complete morons with blue checks in the media who known
Speaker 1: had ever heard of like this guy who a Proof
Speaker 1: of Collusion, the dumbest book for the dumbest people I've
Speaker 1: ever seen in my life. And they built followings off
Speaker 1: of this lunacy. They were put on MSNBC and CNN
Speaker 1: for years just spewing crap. I have never had to
Speaker 1: come on this show about anything related to Russia collusion
Speaker 1: in four years and say, wow, guys, I was really wrong.
Speaker 1: I'm sorry I messed up on that one, or this
Speaker 1: wasn't true, or nothing I told you. I was wrong,
Speaker 1: this guy was actually never and the media just pretends
Speaker 1: like none of this stuff is happening on their side.
Speaker 1: They're wrong, constantly pretend like they had not nothing to
Speaker 1: do with it. That means CNN is a decrepid cesspool
Speaker 1: of stuff that I can't say on the radio. I mean,
Speaker 1: it's a terrible place and people should be embarrassed to
Speaker 1: work there now. They should be embarrassed. I'm just gonna
Speaker 1: say it, it's an embarrassing place to work. Quote. Several
Speaker 1: texts show that the order to close their criminal investigation
Speaker 1: against Flynn came as early as November eighteenth, twenty sixteen,
Speaker 1: the same day as the twenty sixteenth presidential election. It
Speaker 1: was later reopened in early January of twenty seventeen. Here's
Speaker 1: an agent texting, we have some loose sense to tie up,
Speaker 1: and we all need to meet to discuss what to
Speaker 1: do with each case. He said, shutdown Razor. One agent texted,
Speaker 1: referring to Crossfire Razor. So glad they're closing Razor. An
Speaker 1: agent responded, Wait, why are they so glad they're closing Razor?
Speaker 1: General Flynn, He's a bad guy who'll lie to the FBI? Right,
Speaker 1: Why do they have loose ends to tie up? If
Speaker 1: if they weren't FBI agents, if they were just people
Speaker 1: involved in some criminal conspiracy, and these were the text
Speaker 1: messages that the FBI pulled from their phones, then they'd
Speaker 1: all be going to prison, all of them. Okay, this
Speaker 1: would be enough to put them all away. If this
Speaker 1: were an insider trading case, and you and all these
Speaker 1: guys like, well, you know, I guess somebody got the
Speaker 1: information from the CEO of the company, you know, over drinks,
Speaker 1: and then you know, our trader Bob took a big
Speaker 1: steak in the company and you know, whoopsie, like they'd
Speaker 1: be done, they'd be done. People say, oh, but this
Speaker 1: isn't this doesn't improve any There's nothing you can do.
Speaker 1: And at this point you could have videotape of James
Speaker 1: Comey saying, yes, everything you've said about me is accurate.
Speaker 1: I tried to take down the president. I thought I
Speaker 1: was doing the right thing, and I used my power
Speaker 1: and authority and pretended to be a moron to get
Speaker 1: an investigation going that I never showed, even if he
Speaker 1: was on video saying that day would say, it doesn't
Speaker 1: prove anything. They don't. They don't care, folks, So don't expect,
Speaker 1: you know, your your idiot neighbor with a Harris Biden
Speaker 1: sign on his lawn to come around here. The new
Speaker 1: disclosures made by the DJ also show that the FBI
Speaker 1: used so called national security letters to spy on Flynn's finances.
Speaker 1: Unlike traditional subpoenas, which required judicial review at approval before
Speaker 1: authorities can seize an innocent person's property information, NSLs are
Speaker 1: never independently reviewed by courts. One of the agents noted
Speaker 1: in a text message that the NSLs were just being
Speaker 1: used as a pretext by FBI leadership to buy time
Speaker 1: to find dirt on Flynn. After the first investigation of
Speaker 1: him yielded no derogatory information, the decision to use NSL
Speaker 1: finances for Razor bought him time. One agent said, two
Speaker 1: weeks after the initial order to shut down the case,
Speaker 1: what we expect to get from the NSL? And agent
Speaker 1: texted on December fifth, twenty sixteen, we put out traces
Speaker 1: trip wires to the community and nothing. Bingo. Another FBI
Speaker 1: agent responded, so, what's an NSL going to do? No content?
Speaker 1: Ha ha ha, this is a nightmare. An agent said, Oh,
Speaker 1: I'm glad they think it's so funny. They think it's funny.
Speaker 1: You should know this about Stroke and Page and Comey
Speaker 1: and McCabe. These people think it's funny when they ruin
Speaker 1: someone's life because they're idiot democrat hacks. They think it's funny.
Speaker 1: This amuses them. If we're working to close down the case,
Speaker 1: I'm not sure what NSL results would do to help.
Speaker 1: One agent wrote, exactly, that makes no sense. I can
Speaker 1: tell you. I can tell you what's going on here.
Speaker 1: I probably figured it out already, but just a hammer
Speaker 1: at home. They were just desperate to keep this There
Speaker 1: was someone in the FBI was desperate to keep the
Speaker 1: Flynn case open, and then they hatched this plot in
Speaker 1: the Oval office to go after Flynn. They needed someone.
Speaker 1: Remember this all revolves around the National Security advisor for
Speaker 1: the Trump administration is a felon because he lied about
Speaker 1: a conversation with a Russian that was the storyline, and
Speaker 1: it's just propaganda, it's brainwashing bs. The incoming national Security
Speaker 1: advisor had a totally normal, respectable call where he said
Speaker 1: totally normal, respectable things, and then he thought he was
Speaker 1: speaking to colleagues about the contents of a call that
Speaker 1: he was supposed to be having. And there was a
Speaker 1: discrepancy about whether he's talking about expulsions versus sanctions. But
Speaker 1: did he talk about sanctions. No, he actually was talking
Speaker 1: about expulsions. But could you consider expulsions to be part
Speaker 1: of sanctions? Yes, Right, So there's this, and the FBI
Speaker 1: agents didn't even think that qualified as a lie. But
Speaker 1: then the Muller team of pro Hillary quizzling disgraces came
Speaker 1: along and charged Flynn. You're in the Freedom Hud. This
Speaker 1: is the Buck Sex and Show podcast. So why did
Speaker 1: they do it? Folks? Why would people in the FBI,
Speaker 1: the DJ betray the trust of the American people put
Speaker 1: in them, betray the Constitution, their oaths as law enforcement officers.
Speaker 1: Why would they do all that? Well, the text messages
Speaker 1: that have just come out and that the Federalist dot
Speaker 1: Com has posted and analyze for all of us, the
Speaker 1: text messages tell us why quote agents believe the investigation
Speaker 1: was being run by FBI officials who were in the
Speaker 1: tank for Hillary Clinton doing all this election research. I
Speaker 1: think some of these guys won a Clinton presidency. That
Speaker 1: was on August eleventh, shortly after the FBI opened the
Speaker 1: Crossfire Hurricane investigation against Trump, and one series of texts
Speaker 1: sent the same day as the infamous j Nuary fifth
Speaker 1: Oval office meeting with Obama, Biden, Comey, Sally Ates, and
Speaker 1: Susan Rice. One agent admits that Trump was right when
Speaker 1: he tweeted that the FBI was delaying his briefings as
Speaker 1: incoming president so they could cook up evidence against him.
Speaker 1: As a Federalist first reported last May that January fifth
Speaker 1: meeting was key to understand the entire anti Trump operation
Speaker 1: run out of Obama's FBI. The intelligence briefing on so
Speaker 1: called Russian hacking was delayed until Friday, perhaps more time
Speaker 1: needed to build a case. Trump tweeted on January third,
Speaker 1: very strange, so his razor going to stay open? An
Speaker 1: agent wrote on January fifth, yep. Another FBI agent responded,
Speaker 1: crimes report being drafted. F The first agent wrote back
Speaker 1: for a four letter word there, folks don't know. But
Speaker 1: people here are scrambling for info to support certain things,
Speaker 1: and it's a madhouse. An FBI agent responded, Jesus. An
Speaker 1: agent wrote back, Trump was right, Still not put together?
Speaker 1: Why did we do this to ourselves? What is wrong
Speaker 1: with these people? Oh? Wait, but the media told us
Speaker 1: and other so called national security experts who would try
Speaker 1: to debate me a little bit on this until they
Speaker 1: all just disappeared because I was smoking them. I thought
Speaker 1: everything was only up and up, Everything's fine. Why are
Speaker 1: FBI agents texting each other in a panic recognizing that
Speaker 1: they're fabricating a full scale investigation against the now president
Speaker 1: of the or soon to be president of the United
Speaker 1: States because they know what they're getting themselves into and
Speaker 1: they knew what it was going to require. No, they
Speaker 1: were gonna just do everything they had to here ban
Speaker 1: at all the survivors, so there are no eye witnesses
Speaker 1: to the treachery, the treachery of Komi and Brennan and
Speaker 1: the rest of these disgusting Democrat thugs. They should all
Speaker 1: rot in prison, But I'm sorry to tell you that's
Speaker 1: very unlikely to happen. But at least we know the truth.
Speaker 1: At least you and I know what really happened. And
Speaker 1: if we want justice, there's only one way to achieve it.
Speaker 1: Donald Trump has to get reelected. Thanks for listening to
Speaker 1: the buses and show podcasts. Remember to subscribe on Apple podcasts,
Speaker 1: the iHeartRadio app, or wherever you get your podcasts. Before
Speaker 1: I tell you about the latest insanity from the BLM protesters,
Speaker 1: these angry little lunatics running around ruining their communities, hurting people,
Speaker 1: destroying property, achieving nothing. Before before we get into that,
Speaker 1: I want to let you hear something that's inspirational. I
Speaker 1: want you to hear something that is a reminder of
Speaker 1: what's at stake here, but also the good, the upside,
Speaker 1: the promise of this election it's not all just we're
Speaker 1: in this fight and terrible things are going to happen.
Speaker 1: That's all true, but there can be lives that are inspired.
Speaker 1: There are people who can achieve a better future for
Speaker 1: themselves because of this political movement that Donald Trump represents
Speaker 1: and some of the policies that he will continue to
Speaker 1: pursue if he's president. I'm not a lib I don't
Speaker 1: think everything's perfect. I don't think Trump is gonna make
Speaker 1: everybody happy and everything wonderful. But I think that is
Speaker 1: a It is a positive for far more people to
Speaker 1: have Donald Trump in office than it would be to
Speaker 1: have his decrepit opponent. Here is a truck driver. This
Speaker 1: Donald Trump retweeted this himself, and it's it's worth watching
Speaker 1: the whole thing. I just wanted to play some of
Speaker 1: it for you. I believe his name is Gary Lamb,
Speaker 1: and he's a He's a black man in America doing
Speaker 1: a job, providing for his family. And here's his view
Speaker 1: of President Trump. Play it to me Trump. So when
Speaker 1: you say he's he's I'm like, nah, dude, he's way
Speaker 1: more than that. He's way more than that. You see,
Speaker 1: I don't have the luxury to worry about can grow
Speaker 1: vosed weed. I have no I don't have the luxury
Speaker 1: to worry about that. I'm too busy trying to keep
Speaker 1: my family fed to think about that. And for the
Speaker 1: first goddamn time in my life, I actually see a
Speaker 1: way out. I see a way out something I've never
Speaker 1: seen before. I see a way out, man, And just
Speaker 1: that little bit of hope is enough for me to
Speaker 1: have a fire in my belly powerful to freaking charts
Speaker 1: of goddamn world. Man. I'm ready to take over. But
Speaker 1: if Biden gets in office, man, I don't know him
Speaker 1: to do. He goes on for a couple of minutes.
Speaker 1: It's really powerful, and it's eloquent. You can tell it's
Speaker 1: just hard felt. It's from a guy who just sees.
Speaker 1: He sees that Trumpism is inspiration for individual people to
Speaker 1: try to achieve the life they want, to try to achieve,
Speaker 1: their respect for themselves and respect within their communities, of
Speaker 1: being free to rise, to make good choices, to build,
Speaker 1: and to be a really important and positive part of
Speaker 1: their community whatever wherever the community is across the country,
Speaker 1: whatever city, whatever state, wherever you live. There's something deeply
Speaker 1: positive about all of this, inspiring encouraging, and I just
Speaker 1: wish that fewer people in this country were subjected to
Speaker 1: the constant drumbeat of anti Trump propaganda, the straight up
Speaker 1: insanity of Trump is such a racist and he's a
Speaker 1: fascist because unfortunately, a lot of people are easily swayed.
Speaker 1: A lot of people believe what they hear, they believe
Speaker 1: what's repeated, and they either don't have the self confidence
Speaker 1: or they just don't have the critical faculties to work
Speaker 1: through and get past a very sophisticated and increasingly omnipresent
Speaker 1: left wing propaganda machine in this country. You know, they
Speaker 1: control the social media platforms, they control the traditional media platforms,
Speaker 1: They control academia, they control the levers of how are
Speaker 1: inside the federal bureaucracy. Still, that's what the deep state is.
Speaker 1: There are people like Gary Lamb who are saying, I
Speaker 1: want a better future. I want less regulations. I want
Speaker 1: a leader who tells people that they too can achieve,
Speaker 1: that they can be inspired, that doesn't make excuses for
Speaker 1: everybody who feels like they're left out. Who tells people
Speaker 1: who feel like they've been left behind by government policy.
Speaker 1: I'm going to fix that by addressing bad trade deals,
Speaker 1: by bringing things back home into America by trying to
Speaker 1: encourage investment, opportunity, production growth all here in America and
Speaker 1: have the benefits of that for the American people. Chinese
Speaker 1: government doesn't give a crap about any of you and
Speaker 1: doesn't feel bad about it. Doesn't sit around thinking, oh,
Speaker 1: you know, we are one world and why don't we know? No.
Speaker 1: But in America, the left has this constant undermining of
Speaker 1: america confidence. We're a bad country, where a racist country.
Speaker 1: We were founded on slavery and built on oppression and colonialism.
Speaker 1: And fight unjust wars. Okay, except for against the Nazis,
Speaker 1: they'll say, but fight unjust wars. And we have a
Speaker 1: lot of explaining to do and begging for forgiveness. Look
Speaker 1: at Obama going around the world. The Obama administration was
Speaker 1: actually going around the world President Obama himself asking for forgiveness.
Speaker 1: Think of what that does to the mass psychology of
Speaker 1: this country. To be an American under the Obama administration
Speaker 1: was to feel like you had things to be sorry for.
Speaker 1: We didn't do anything, not responsible for what was done
Speaker 1: fifty one hundred, one hundred and fifty years ago. Buy
Speaker 1: people in this country, it's not you It's not your fault.
Speaker 1: And I'm not saying that just to be in America
Speaker 1: makes you some superhero and everything is awesome either. But
Speaker 1: you can understand that the American ethos, if it's fostered
Speaker 1: and reported, is that you can be You can be
Speaker 1: someone that you aspire to. Here in this country. You
Speaker 1: have that opportunity, which is a beautiful thing, a beautiful thing.
Speaker 1: And if there was more focus on that and less
Speaker 1: on whining, nagging, complaining about things that have nothing. You know,
Speaker 1: I complained about bad Democrat policies, the ruining cities. Those
Speaker 1: are things that I want change for. No one can
Speaker 1: change what happened a hundred years ago. No one can
Speaker 1: be held responsible for what another person did. It's either
Speaker 1: undermining foundational concepts in our society of justice and responsibility
Speaker 1: and individuality with this left wing garbage. Gary Lamb understands.
Speaker 1: He understands that the implicit message of Trump and his
Speaker 1: supporters is we love our fellow Americans and we want
Speaker 1: everybody to know that the government is going to try
Speaker 1: to support good ideas, good policies, and a good future
Speaker 1: for everyone. You gotta it's on you, though, right. I mean,
Speaker 1: we're not we're not. You're constantly growing the welfare state
Speaker 1: even more and doing socialism and pulling others down to
Speaker 1: lift That's the that's the difference. Not ultimately doesn't make
Speaker 1: people feel better, that ultimately doesn't actually inspire. Dependency is
Speaker 1: a weakness. Dependency is something that people want to avoid.
Speaker 1: You know, if you're going to be dependent, yeah, you'd
Speaker 1: be dependent on your family, on your friends, on the government.
Speaker 1: You're always going to be disappointed, and the government will
Speaker 1: never say we've failed you. They'll always point to someone else.
Speaker 1: Gary Lamb understands this. I know. I could sit down
Speaker 1: with Gary Lamb and have a conversation with him about
Speaker 1: what he sees in Trump, and we would have a
Speaker 1: fantastic exchange and we'd see and a lot of off
Speaker 1: And I don't know where Gary's from, I don't know
Speaker 1: his background, but I'm sure there are some differences in
Speaker 1: you know, where we're from and how we you know,
Speaker 1: how we see certain things. But there'd be a lot
Speaker 1: where we would see eye to eye. I just hope
Speaker 1: there are a lot more Gary Lamb's out there across
Speaker 1: the country. This is the silent majority that everyone's speaking about.
Speaker 1: The more people who understand forget them. I mean, the
Speaker 1: media is atrocious and they are the enemy of the people.
Speaker 1: Trump was right, he was right. They're hurting this country.
Speaker 1: They're not helping. They make everything worse, everything worse, all
Speaker 1: for their own benefit and power. Let's hope the Trump
Speaker 1: movement has just a few million Gary Lambs out there.
Speaker 1: People who might get pressure from their community not to
Speaker 1: vote for Trump, might have a lot of friends who
Speaker 1: think voting for Trump is crazy, but they know it's not.
Speaker 1: It's better for us, better for America. You're in. This
Speaker 1: is the Buck Sex and Show podcast. There's another vision
Speaker 1: of this country, another view of who we are as
Speaker 1: a nation and what our path forward is. When the
Speaker 1: Democrats have embraced when the Democrats are spending a lot
Speaker 1: of time promoting everywhere that they can, and we see
Speaker 1: it with this BLM movement day in and day out,
Speaker 1: continuing to cause mayhem and destruction right injustice, in the
Speaker 1: name of justice. That is the central, the central theme
Speaker 1: of Black Lives Matter. They commit injustices because they care
Speaker 1: so much about justice, and they wonder why people like
Speaker 1: me do not respect the movement. Never bent the knee,
Speaker 1: never you know, and never said yeah let's let's do
Speaker 1: what BLM wants. No. No, And this is what ends
Speaker 1: up happening when you have corporations and major media entities
Speaker 1: and all the rest who spend a lot of time
Speaker 1: who really go out of their way to bend the
Speaker 1: knee to BELM. They make it feel stronger, they make
Speaker 1: it feel invulnerable, all right, They make it feel like
Speaker 1: they can just cross the line constantly. And here is
Speaker 1: in Louisville. This was last night. They created a space
Speaker 1: near a church. Protesters were able to gather near a
Speaker 1: church because you know, there are a lot of churches
Speaker 1: that are all about BLM, which I don't know. Does
Speaker 1: the priest think it's okay when people are dragged out
Speaker 1: of their cars and beat into a bloody pulp really
Speaker 1: want to support that movement? Father aunt Padre. Really a
Speaker 1: lot of priests, a lot of priests betraying the principles
Speaker 1: of their faith in the name of left wing politics,
Speaker 1: a lot of them. It's very upsetting, but conversations will
Speaker 1: continue to have more another time. Here's a protester explaining
Speaker 1: what the what he really thinks. This is a BLM
Speaker 1: protester explaining when he thinks of the fellow protests who
Speaker 1: happened to be white, who have also gathered in this
Speaker 1: space near a church in Louisville. Play six. Yeah, all
Speaker 1: you white people leave with a lot of bleeps. So
Speaker 1: much for being a white ally of the BLM movement.
Speaker 1: As far as this guy's concerned, all the white people leave.
Speaker 1: Can you imagine another another race of people being told
Speaker 1: that shows up and those are fellow protesters. He's saying,
Speaker 1: all all you white people out. Is there a black
Speaker 1: supremacist element to some of these BLM protests? You do
Speaker 1: have to ask the question, is there a new Black
Speaker 1: Panther Party style supremacist ideology that is, well, there's definitely
Speaker 1: an anti cop. Maybe let's go kill some cops eide all.
Speaker 1: We've seen that that's proven. Now. Oh, it turns out
Speaker 1: the guy who shot the two cops in Louisville young
Speaker 1: African American. He has BLM stuff all over his social media. Yeah,
Speaker 1: this is a standard BLM supporter guy. Yeah, it just
Speaker 1: thinks it's all man, the cops are doing these terrible things.
Speaker 1: You know. I tell you that that the the central
Speaker 1: lie of the BLM movement is that the police are
Speaker 1: hunting young black men for sport. You know how I
Speaker 1: tell you that that is the central inescapable lie that
Speaker 1: the whole thing is built on. I know that sounds
Speaker 1: like that must be extreme because it's so reckless and untrue.
Speaker 1: It's such an evil thing to say, the kind of
Speaker 1: thing that would, if someone believed it, drive people to violence.
Speaker 1: And yet it is a thing that you will hear
Speaker 1: said by protesters. It is a thing that you will
Speaker 1: hear repeated on TV. Biden voter here, a Biden voter
Speaker 1: tells CNN exactly that play fourteen. Quite frankly, I'm tired
Speaker 1: of turning on the news and watching people look like me,
Speaker 1: me or Slotter for sport. I really am just at
Speaker 1: the point now where I don't want to have to
Speaker 1: keep explaining some of our kids, like why they have
Speaker 1: to move differently because of the color of their skin.
Speaker 1: Black people being slaughtered for sports, she says on the
Speaker 1: air at CNN, it's a disgusting thing to say. No,
Speaker 1: in fact, what a black person in this country is
Speaker 1: shot by police under what are often, on its face,
Speaker 1: completely justifiable circumstances. There are often riots and a national
Speaker 1: conversation and a conflagration actual fires. As we know. I'm
Speaker 1: at that metaphorically, but actual fires being set to buildings.
Speaker 1: So how is it that in this society we pretend
Speaker 1: that black men are being murdered by police for sport
Speaker 1: when the actual reality that we see is that there
Speaker 1: are black men who are killed in the commission of
Speaker 1: a felony, including felony and perhaps even attempted murder against
Speaker 1: a police officer. And then there are national riots and
Speaker 1: there are people marching in the streets, and every politician
Speaker 1: has to have some you know, some somber conversation with
Speaker 1: the public about why it's just lies, it's just lies.
Speaker 1: They continue to lie about all of this. And the worst,
Speaker 1: the worst lie of all, is this claim that black
Speaker 1: people are being slaughtered for sport. Think about what that implication.
Speaker 1: That implication is that there are people in the police
Speaker 1: force who want to go through this. Even in the
Speaker 1: most justified shootings that you've seen by police officers, right,
Speaker 1: some of this on video, and some of it we
Speaker 1: just know from my witness testimony, even in the very
Speaker 1: clearly justified use of four situations, cops involved often have
Speaker 1: their lives ruined. The cops involved are going to have
Speaker 1: sleepless nights. You know, people don't often talk about this.
Speaker 1: You're involved in a fatal shooting, there's a very real
Speaker 1: chance that officer might have serious psychological difficulties PTSD afterwards.
Speaker 1: Cops don't take that job because they want to kill anybody.
Speaker 1: They take the job to protect people and to enforce
Speaker 1: the law because society needs that. But young people, particularly
Speaker 1: young black males across the country, are being told by
Speaker 1: some of their biggest role models, the most powerful, wealthy,
Speaker 1: influential voices, and by the mainstream media that there are
Speaker 1: police out there who get enjoyment out of murdering young
Speaker 1: black men. It's the most heinous lie you can you
Speaker 1: could come up with about law enforcement. If your intent
Speaker 1: was to just destroy and divide the country, what could
Speaker 1: be more ugly than that. And we're supposed to listen
Speaker 1: to this and believe this, treat this like it's a
Speaker 1: serious political movement. It's a serious threat to the country.
Speaker 1: But it's not a political movement that deserves your respect.
Speaker 1: It's not a movement that deserves that that is going
Speaker 1: to bring about reform. And I'm happy to see there
Speaker 1: are voices out there, There are voices in the black
Speaker 1: community who are coming forward and saying Okay, this stuff
Speaker 1: about defunding the police and how the police are hunting people.
Speaker 1: This is really bad. This is wrong Play thirteen to
Speaker 1: really be careful on. You know, I hear these foods
Speaker 1: on TV talking about defining the police and things like that.
Speaker 1: We need police reform and prison reform and things like that,
Speaker 1: because you know, who ain't going to defund the cops?
Speaker 1: White neighborhoods and rich neighborhoods, so that notional. They keep
Speaker 1: saying that. I'm like, wait a minute, we're just gonna leave.
Speaker 1: Who are black people are supposed to call ghostbusters when
Speaker 1: we have criming on neighborhoods. We need police reform, but
Speaker 1: like I say, white people, especially rich white people, they're
Speaker 1: always gonna hail cops, So we need to stop that
Speaker 1: defund or embolish the cops. Crap. What he's saying about
Speaker 1: the abolishing the police stuff is true, and I understand
Speaker 1: people say police reform. I never really hear any particularly
Speaker 1: good ideas about police reform. And this does go back
Speaker 1: to a role call question yesterday. Increased transparency about lawsuits
Speaker 1: about involving police. Maybe there are a lot of frivolous
Speaker 1: use of force lawsuits. It's kind of a slip and
Speaker 1: fall accident thing. There's some lawyers who specialize in that,
Speaker 1: though you have to be aware of that. There are
Speaker 1: excessive use of four situations. There wasn't no question, and
Speaker 1: it's horrible. The penalty is the public often doesn't know this,
Speaker 1: but the penalties if you have. I actually know a
Speaker 1: police officer very well who was doing a routine, routine
Speaker 1: arrest and the guy said that he groped him, that
Speaker 1: the officer groped him, and he was facing federal charges
Speaker 1: over that, over civil rights like a sexual assault, civil
Speaker 1: rights violation, and custody. Yeah, it was a lie. Fortunately
Speaker 1: the partner was there to back him up. But the
Speaker 1: penalties are already severe folks for law enforce and when
Speaker 1: they really do mess up. Thanks for listening to The
Speaker 1: Bus Show podcasts. Remember to subscribe on Apple Podcasts, the
Speaker 1: iHeart Radio app, or wherever you get your podcasts. These
Speaker 1: results from this grand jury Tamka Mallory. You know wanton
Speaker 1: endanger meant for the white neighbors apartment that lived next
Speaker 1: to her, But no, wanton endanger meant for the bullet
Speaker 1: trade that went into the apartment of the black neighbors
Speaker 1: above her. Appartment, and no want and endanger meant for
Speaker 1: the bullets that went actually into Brianna Taylor's apartment, and Lainita,
Speaker 1: no wanton murder charges for the bullets that mutilated Brianna
Speaker 1: Taylor's body. Mister Blake underscores what we have been saying
Speaker 1: all alone. There seems to be two justice systems in America,
Speaker 1: one of Black America and one of white America. And
Speaker 1: this has been emphasized by this grand jury proceeding into
Speaker 1: the killing of Brianna Taylor. A lot of yelling, a
Speaker 1: lot of emotion from Ben Crump, who's the attorney for
Speaker 1: Brianna Taylor's family. Brin Taylor's already received her family's already
Speaker 1: received twelve million dollars from the city of Louisville. Okay,
Speaker 1: so they've already said, look, this was a terrible accident.
Speaker 1: But this lawyer doesn't seem to care much about the law.
Speaker 1: What do they really think was supposed to happen here?
Speaker 1: That's what's never a lot of emotion, a lot of
Speaker 1: it's terrible, and it is terrible, or we're a nation
Speaker 1: of laws, not a nation of emotions, that then get
Speaker 1: to dictate what happens to people. What was supposed to
Speaker 1: go down here? You're going to charge an officer with
Speaker 1: murder for shooting at somebody who was shooting at him
Speaker 1: and missing. That's a murder, now, is that what they
Speaker 1: They should really have to say this what would have
Speaker 1: been justice? And they're gonna they're gonna try to convince
Speaker 1: a jury that a cop who is being or cops
Speaker 1: who are being shot at by somebody we're not even
Speaker 1: talking now, but oh we thought we saw gone or
Speaker 1: maybe he was. He already shot an officer in the leg,
Speaker 1: who could have bled out from his formoral artery in
Speaker 1: his thigh, already shot a cop. And I'm sorry, but
Speaker 1: who just starts blasting away at people at three am
Speaker 1: when they knock on the door. I mean, I understand
Speaker 1: you want to get your hand gun ready. You don't
Speaker 1: want to say who is it or whatever? You're gonna
Speaker 1: you without knowing what if it's a neighbor saying you
Speaker 1: got a gas leak, buddy to cole you know the
Speaker 1: you gotta get out. You just can start blasting away.
Speaker 1: Come on, Oh he thought it were this is now
Speaker 1: the guy the boyfriend of Browna Taylor. He thought they
Speaker 1: were drug dealers. How many of you are worried that
Speaker 1: drug dealers are going to try to rob you at
Speaker 1: three am. That's a very specific concern, isn't it. If
Speaker 1: drug dealers broke into my apartment at three am, they
Speaker 1: might get the sixty dollars I have in my wallet
Speaker 1: and my kind of old flat screen TV. No drugs,
Speaker 1: no cash here. Why would they do that? Some important
Speaker 1: facts laid out by Matt Walsh. It's one of the
Speaker 1: few people on you know, Matt Walsh, my man, Jesse Kelly.
Speaker 1: There are only a few people that have been just
Speaker 1: really solid on this BLM garbage, the lies from the
Speaker 1: very beginning. And I put those guys in that category.
Speaker 1: And you know, Dan Bongino was great on this and
Speaker 1: thoughts and prayers to Dan. I know he shared that
Speaker 1: he had some he has some health concerns right now.
Speaker 1: But Dan Bongino is going to beat that thing with
Speaker 1: his eyes closed. He's going to have no problems. But
Speaker 1: we are, we are thinking about him, we're praying for him.
Speaker 1: But Matt Walsh put this out. Brianna Taylor's car was
Speaker 1: spotted at a drug house multiple times. She was recorded
Speaker 1: talking about the drug house. A dead body was found
Speaker 1: in a car rented under her name. Taylor's ex boyfriend
Speaker 1: said she handled the money. That seems relevant to whether
Speaker 1: they were justified and exercising award against her home. Doesn't It?
Speaker 1: Doesn't it? How many of you I'm just wondering, how
Speaker 1: many of you listening have rented a car and while
Speaker 1: it was out under the rental in your name, there
Speaker 1: was a dead body found in the trunk. I'm going
Speaker 1: to guess the answer is zero. How many of you
Speaker 1: have a you know, a romantic partner who is caught
Speaker 1: on tapes from jail talking about your role in the
Speaker 1: drug trade that he engages in. I'm gonna guess zero. Now, again,
Speaker 1: that's not to say that she that it was justified
Speaker 1: that she was shot. It's to say the warrant on
Speaker 1: her home was justified and the use of force in
Speaker 1: response to someone shooting at the cops was justified. All
Speaker 1: I'm saying is just what the law did find here.
Speaker 1: But I will say Ben Crumpy, attorney for the Taylor family,
Speaker 1: he's he's doing a pretty intelligent thing from his completely
Speaker 1: unethical and slimy and disgusting perspective, but it's it's a
Speaker 1: smart tactic. They why charging with the wanton and endangerment.
Speaker 1: That was clearly just to try and buy off the
Speaker 1: mob and all it's no one is made. It seemed
Speaker 1: like the justice system does give into the whims of
Speaker 1: the mob. So why give him, Why give into the
Speaker 1: whims of the mob a little bit? Why not go
Speaker 1: all in? Bring that murder charge? Look with it again
Speaker 1: against the cop in Atlanta brought that murder charge. Look
Speaker 1: at it against Kyle Rittenhouse. First degree murder charge. By
Speaker 1: the way, I think that cop in Atlanta is absolutely
Speaker 1: going to He's gonna request a bench trial and he
Speaker 1: will be he will be found not guilty. That's my
Speaker 1: that's my hope and pray. But that's what I think
Speaker 1: is going to happen. Rittenhouse. I'm worried about. I had
Speaker 1: an argument recently with a conservative friend of mine who
Speaker 1: believe that Rittenhouse's lawyers are just because they were, i know,
Speaker 1: involved in the salmon defamation. That's not the same not
Speaker 1: the same kind of lawyer, folks. I'm concerned about the
Speaker 1: counsel that Rittenhouse has, and that matters that matter all.
Speaker 1: You just just watch my cousin, Vinny. You know you
Speaker 1: don't want to be charged with the murder and have
Speaker 1: the wrong legal representation. The Democrats are responsible for all this, right,
Speaker 1: we understand that. I don't want anyone to forget that.
Speaker 1: I don't want that to get left aside in all
Speaker 1: of this. The Democrats are the reason that all of
Speaker 1: this is continuing to happen as it is. They won't
Speaker 1: call it out. They could certainly stifle this, they could
Speaker 1: try to shut this down, but they won't. And I
Speaker 1: think the President is on very solid ground here when
Speaker 1: he says that this is something that Biden should be
Speaker 1: held responsible for. The Democrats are on an anti police
Speaker 1: jihad Play nineteen. He's called for the ridiculous cutting a
Speaker 1: police funding, abolishing cash bail if you can believe that,
Speaker 1: and the closing of our prisons. They want to close
Speaker 1: our prisons. That's a good idea. Even described law enforcement
Speaker 1: as the enemy. He said law enforcements here, what I mean? Now,
Speaker 1: you know, I assume I'll ask the fake this. Has
Speaker 1: he taken it back at yourself because he's taken everything back.
Speaker 1: He's taken anti brack and back. He's taken pretty much
Speaker 1: everything back. But remember it's the first thing they say,
Speaker 1: that's what they stick with. Biden's anti police crusade must
Speaker 1: As president, I will always stand with the heroes of
Speaker 1: law enforcement. It's amazing to me that the Democrat of
Speaker 1: the Democrat Party can even show its face anymore on
Speaker 1: issues involving police. I can't imagine being a member of
Speaker 1: law enforcement and having anything but the most seething contempt
Speaker 1: for people like Biden and Kamala Harris, because they're at
Speaker 1: the top of this whole Democrat machinery which is constantly
Speaker 1: trashing police, trashing the cops, that is what they do,
Speaker 1: undermining them, putting him at risk. Cops are dying because
Speaker 1: the Democrats will not confront the lie. If Joe Biden
Speaker 1: were a man of honor who cared about our law
Speaker 1: enforcement professionals across the country, he would say in a speech,
Speaker 1: in a public statement, guys, there are cases of police
Speaker 1: brutality and police should always be held accountable, and we
Speaker 1: will work to strengthen oversight of that. But the story
Speaker 1: that black men are hunted by the police for sport
Speaker 1: is not true. Why won't Joe Biden say that? Why
Speaker 1: won't Kamala Harris say that? Do they not think that
Speaker 1: that's the case. Do they believe that police are hunting
Speaker 1: black men for sport. Because if the answer to that
Speaker 1: is yes, oh, they definitely need to tell us that
Speaker 1: everybody should know that. But no, they'll play this halfway game.
Speaker 1: They won't denounce the central lie of their own side.
Speaker 1: They won't denounce the foundational mythology of BLM, and they'll
Speaker 1: do this very boiler plate wrote, yeah, sure, you know
Speaker 1: cops are you know, we like cops sometimes, but you
Speaker 1: know they've got to make sure we throw some in
Speaker 1: prison if people don't like what they're doing. It's unacceptable, friends,
Speaker 1: absolutely unacceptable. You're in the freedom undets. This is the
Speaker 1: Buck Sexton Show podcast. Have to be very careful with
Speaker 1: the ballots. The ballots, that's a whole big scam. You know.
Speaker 1: They found I understand eight ballots at a waste paper basket.
Speaker 1: In some locations they found a was reported in one
Speaker 1: of the newspapers that they found a lot of ballots
Speaker 1: in a river. They throw them out if they have
Speaker 1: the name Trump on it, I guess. But they had
Speaker 1: ballots the name gone okay, Well, they still found them
Speaker 1: in a river that they had a name on it
Speaker 1: or not. But the other one has had the Trump
Speaker 1: name on it and they were thrown into a waste
Speaker 1: paper basket. We want to make sure the election is honest,
Speaker 1: and I'm not sure that it can be. I don't
Speaker 1: I don't know that it can be with this whole situation.
Speaker 1: Unsolicited ballots, they're unslicited minions being sent to everybody, and
Speaker 1: we'll see. But if you remember, Hillary Clinton just a
Speaker 1: week ago or so, told Joe Biden do not accept
Speaker 1: the results of the election under any circumstances. But you
Speaker 1: don't ask her that question, You only ask me the question.
Speaker 1: This goes into a couple of things here we need
Speaker 1: to talk about. One is they're already finding mail in
Speaker 1: ballots that are discarded. They're they're already, they're already coming up.
Speaker 1: And look, is anyone surprised by this? Does anyone think
Speaker 1: that this is not going to happen? Here? You go,
Speaker 1: this is the the NPR, So you know you're taxpayer
Speaker 1: funded communist but domestic American propaganda. FEDS an unusual statement
Speaker 1: announced they're investigating discarded ballots. The FBI, the US attorney
Speaker 1: for the Middle District of Pennsylvania, said Thursday they're investigating
Speaker 1: potential issues with nine military ballots in one county. They
Speaker 1: believe the ballots were opened improperly, though they've not taken
Speaker 1: any any action or filed any charges. US Attorney David
Speaker 1: Freed said the investigation remains active. Voting Rights and Justice
Speaker 1: Department veterans said the proximity election and preliminary nature of
Speaker 1: the investigation it makes us highly unusual. Oh why why See,
Speaker 1: this is the classic thing whenever stuff comes out that
Speaker 1: hurts the Democrat and narrative. It's why is there so
Speaker 1: much transparency? That's what you hear from the journalists. They're
Speaker 1: doing it with the doj FBI text messages too. There's
Speaker 1: too much transparency. Goal I got here, Yeah, because the
Speaker 1: journalis really want to bring you the truth. Say the
Speaker 1: moronsh my god. White House Press Secretary Kaylee MacKinnon he
Speaker 1: also waited on the lost ballots play three. In the
Speaker 1: last twenty four hours, police in Greenville, Wisconsin found mail
Speaker 1: in a ditch and it included absentee ballots. And also,
Speaker 1: I can confirm for you that Trump ballots, ballots for
Speaker 1: the president, we're found in Pennsylvania, and I believe you
Speaker 1: should be getting more information on that shortly. Here in
Speaker 1: the last twenty four hours, they were found cast aside.
Speaker 1: For every ballot that you find cast aside right now
Speaker 1: that you happen to find at this stage before a
Speaker 1: vast majority of people have actually voted every ballot you
Speaker 1: find cast aside, there's a lot more that you're not
Speaker 1: finding that have somehow disappeared, been thrown in a ditch,
Speaker 1: aren't in a garbage can. And that's why sending out
Speaker 1: live ballots to everybody on a voter roll, will we
Speaker 1: no voter rolls have a whole lot of people who
Speaker 1: are dead or moved or gone is a reckless policy.
Speaker 1: But that's why Democrats want it. They want the reckless policy.
Speaker 1: They want this to be happening the way that it is.
Speaker 1: It's pretty appalling, but that way they'll have an opening
Speaker 1: to They'll have an opening to contest the result of
Speaker 1: the election no matter what. They're mandating looser election protections
Speaker 1: so that as a backup plan they could say, look
Speaker 1: at how loose these election protections were, look at how
Speaker 1: our election was not secured. They demand the insecurity so
Speaker 1: that later they can complain about the insecurity if they say,
Speaker 1: if there's the possibility that or if they lose rather
Speaker 1: Nancy Pelosi, I also want to get to this. Nancy
Speaker 1: Pelosi given us a sense of just what extremes they're
Speaker 1: going to try to go to in order to stop.
Speaker 1: Assuming it's Amy Coney Barrett, we find out tomorrow. But
Speaker 1: if it is her or anyone else for that matter,
Speaker 1: the Trump with a point. Here's the Pelosi approached this
Speaker 1: because she's such an institutionalist and a law and order person.
Speaker 1: Right play twelve. I'm sorry, I know play eleven. Many
Speaker 1: you know I have and privilege of being a leader
Speaker 1: in the most diverse party in every possible way, including opinion.
Speaker 1: A large number of people outside, not in the House,
Speaker 1: but outside wanted me to shut down government because of
Speaker 1: what they're doing on justice Skinsburg. Shut down government. I'm
Speaker 1: not a big believer in shutting down government. But when
Speaker 1: the West is on fire and the South is battered,
Speaker 1: storms in the whole country is suffering from a pandemic,
Speaker 1: and we have a downturn in our economy and the
Speaker 1: people we need so that we can do our jobs
Speaker 1: public employees, we're going to shut them down now only thinks,
Speaker 1: but think about that. Democrats right now, we're telling, according
Speaker 1: to Anti Pelosi, were saying shut down the government because
Speaker 1: of the Supreme Court pick. That shows you the mentality folks.
Speaker 1: I don't know what they're gonna do yet, and I
Speaker 1: think that they're in a panic because the character assassination thing,
Speaker 1: I mean, attacking her Catholicism with everything they've got that
Speaker 1: might backfire. That's not like saying this guy's a secret rapist,
Speaker 1: even though no intelligent person believes that. You know that. Emotionally,
Speaker 1: some people might will be scared to disagree with it.
Speaker 1: But attacking her Catholicism, I don't know, And it's a
Speaker 1: little bit like the attacking Trump for not you know,
Speaker 1: the same thing they're doing with the ballots, by the way,
Speaker 1: where they're creating a circumstance where they have a built
Speaker 1: in excuse for why they lose. You also have this
Speaker 1: with a peaceful transition of power thing that they keep
Speaker 1: bringing up with Trump. Oh he's not gonna peacefully. The
Speaker 1: Democrats in twenty sixteen didn't allow the peaceful transition of power.
Speaker 1: The Obama team was trying to destroy the president as
Speaker 1: he came in. We know that now, and this is
Speaker 1: all just meant to create an upfront narrative the Democrats
Speaker 1: can latch onto that an election result that they don't
Speaker 1: like is illegitimate. That's all this is. It's the whole point,
Speaker 1: it's the whole plan. So we should be clear on
Speaker 1: that right now. There's no good faith in this process.
Speaker 1: There's no effort to you know, no effort to just
Speaker 1: accept come what may with this election. No, they're definitely
Speaker 1: gonna do what they can to make sure that there
Speaker 1: is panic and outrage if Trump wins. I certainly hope
Speaker 1: he does. I'm just trying to think of what sore
Speaker 1: winner victory dance I'm gonna do and post on social
Speaker 1: media because that's the kind of mood albem. But we
Speaker 1: got to get their first. Friends, got to get there first.
Speaker 1: Thanks for listening to the show. Podcasts. Remember to subscribe
Speaker 1: on Apple Podcasts, the iHeartRadio app, or wherever you get
Speaker 1: your podcasts. Judge Janine in the house, everybody, she's joining
Speaker 1: us now. You know her from her show Saturday Nights
Speaker 1: on Fox News where she's a host. But she's got
Speaker 1: a new book out, Don't Lie to Me, Don't lie
Speaker 1: to me and stop trying to my liberty. Judge Junine.
Speaker 1: Great to have you on. Well, it's great to be
Speaker 1: with you. Buck. It's nice, you know, I've missed you.
Speaker 1: I haven't seen you that much on Fox, and although
Speaker 1: you do, you do come around. But I love listening
Speaker 1: to you and it's great to be with you today.
Speaker 1: Thanks so much for having the time with us. We
Speaker 1: appreciate it. So tell us who's lying to you and
Speaker 1: why are they taking your liberty? Well, the left is
Speaker 1: lying to us from the day Donald Trump came down
Speaker 1: the escalator. I won't even say the day he walked
Speaker 1: into the oval, because the corruption started the day he
Speaker 1: said he was going to run for president, where they
Speaker 1: tried to frame him. And you know, every day there's
Speaker 1: more and more corroboration of it. So my first book, Liars, Leakers,
Speaker 1: and Liberals, was all about the Russia collusion delusion, and
Speaker 1: you know my background as a prosecutor and a DA
Speaker 1: and a judge, it was pretty obvious what was going
Speaker 1: on there. And then I moved to radical's resistance and revenge,
Speaker 1: where you know, they were so full of revenge for
Speaker 1: not having it dragged Hillary across across the finish line
Speaker 1: that they resisted everything that Donald Trump did, and they
Speaker 1: were radical. But at this point, you know, they're just
Speaker 1: out and out lying to us, and they're trying to
Speaker 1: steal our free tom Buck. Look what they want us
Speaker 1: to do is they want to, you know, lock us
Speaker 1: in our homes, open the borders, defund the police, and
Speaker 1: take away our guns. None of that works for me,
Speaker 1: and I doubt it works for you. And you know,
Speaker 1: some of it, they say is to protect us, you know,
Speaker 1: and that the police are serial racist murderers. I mean,
Speaker 1: the nonsense that's going on in this country with the
Speaker 1: insistence that you know, we stay in our homes, and
Speaker 1: then we find out, well, hey, wait a minute, people
Speaker 1: in the homes who don't get the fresh air, don't
Speaker 1: get the vitamin C, you know, who aren't out there
Speaker 1: and who are on top of each other that are
Speaker 1: getting the problems and the illnesses. And then what they
Speaker 1: say to us, you know, you can't open your business
Speaker 1: as a result of that, people you know, suffer from depression,
Speaker 1: they go back to alcohol, you know, drugs, you know,
Speaker 1: suicide kids, you know. And I did this as a
Speaker 1: prosecutor child abuse, sexual abuse in the home, domestic violence,
Speaker 1: nicolac that's not being identified because nobody's out in public.
Speaker 1: I mean, it's just a nightmare. And then we've got
Speaker 1: this Kamala Harris, the most leftist senator in the Senate,
Speaker 1: who says the Constitution does not prevent her from confiscating
Speaker 1: our guns and so and open the borders and you know,
Speaker 1: everything will be great. And if you're from New York,
Speaker 1: as i am, you've got the mayor's wife, Charlene McCrae,
Speaker 1: who says that to get rid of the police in
Speaker 1: New York would be like living in Nirvana. She of course,
Speaker 1: has not bothered to get rid of her police detail.
Speaker 1: So as we go forward, I think the most important
Speaker 1: thing people can understand and take from the book is
Speaker 1: number one of a lot of footnotes to support everything
Speaker 1: I'm saying. If you get in an argument with one,
Speaker 1: just go to the book. That's number one. And number
Speaker 1: two is the fact that so much as at stake
Speaker 1: right now as they're trying to turn this country, as
Speaker 1: you well know book, into a socialist country, and that
Speaker 1: would be the worst thing that could happen to us.
Speaker 1: Talking to Judge Jannine Pierrou books don't lie to me
Speaker 1: and stop trying to steal our freedom Billbell now on
Speaker 1: Amazon dot com. Judge, are we going to see, in
Speaker 1: your opinion, any justice for the either through the Durham
Speaker 1: probe or as a result of the Russia collusion hoax.
Speaker 1: You know, the federalists just had this great piece out
Speaker 1: about all these text messages from the FBI agents. They knew,
Speaker 1: they knew that they were acting improperly, and yet they're
Speaker 1: going to get away with it. What do you think, Well,
Speaker 1: they not only knew that they were acting improperly, they
Speaker 1: knew that it was that it was maddening, that it
Speaker 1: was crazy. In that oval meeting in the White House
Speaker 1: with President Obama and Jim Comey and Biden was in
Speaker 1: there too, and they said that they're there, you know,
Speaker 1: it's like a madhouse and trying to collect information. They're
Speaker 1: using NSL letters, national security letters so they don't have
Speaker 1: to get approvals from judges. And they knew that what
Speaker 1: they were doing was beyond the pale. It wasn't authorized,
Speaker 1: it wasn't legal. So they go out and get insurance.
Speaker 1: Not the insurance they were talking about as if you know,
Speaker 1: if Donald Trump wins, let's get insurance, which was to
Speaker 1: kick in the impeachment piece. It's insurance for them, professional
Speaker 1: liability insurance to protect them from their own criminal, irresponsible,
Speaker 1: immoral actions. And then I gotta tell you, buck, this guy,
Speaker 1: Chris Raves, they headed the FBI. This guy's gotta go
Speaker 1: because a year later, in the Extended Intel hearings, the
Speaker 1: FBI is still going along with their lying narrative about
Speaker 1: the Steel dossier paid for by Hillary Clinton. There was
Speaker 1: nothing more than barroom talk that they know was unverified.
Speaker 1: They knew the sub source. You know, it had a
Speaker 1: counterintelligence investigation against him, and it was now working in
Speaker 1: the United States and was being paid for by Hillary Clinton.
Speaker 1: I mean, and this is just crazy. Is there going
Speaker 1: to be any accountability though, Judge but that I had
Speaker 1: a crystal ball book. What I can tell you is this,
Speaker 1: if there isn't, I have spent more than three decades,
Speaker 1: and I've run for office five times as a prosecutor,
Speaker 1: in a DA and a judge, that will all have
Speaker 1: been lost. Because I believe in the system. I believe
Speaker 1: in Lady Justice. I believe she's blind. If there are
Speaker 1: no prosecutions other than the one indictment against Kevin Klein,
Speaker 1: a low level FBI attorney, I will be extremely disappointed.
Speaker 1: In wonder if it was all for not Judge Denin Pierre,
Speaker 1: everybody check out obviously on Fox News, her show Justice
Speaker 1: with Judge nine, and her book It's out Now. Don't
Speaker 1: lie to me and stop trying to steal our freedom.
Speaker 1: Judge Denin, always fun to talk to you. Thanks for
Speaker 1: joining us, Thank you for talking with me. I appreciate it.
Speaker 1: Take care of Buck, you do. I don't see a
Speaker 1: prosecution coming out of any of this Duram stuff. As
Speaker 1: I've been telling you, I don't see it happening. I
Speaker 1: think that they're kind of the deep state. Is they're
Speaker 1: a slippery bunch. Yes, they should all be fired, and
Speaker 1: some of them have been, but they're they're able to
Speaker 1: keep their stuff in that realm of that gray area
Speaker 1: of professional culpability without clear violations of criminal law that
Speaker 1: they could be. You know, you could try to get
Speaker 1: them on conspiracy. I think it's possible, but it would
Speaker 1: be quite a fight. And remember this, friends, because I
Speaker 1: know people are gonna you know, people ask me this, Buck.
Speaker 1: If you don't believe that there is any justice, why
Speaker 1: do you Why do you support bar so much? I
Speaker 1: think that bars doing what he can with the laws
Speaker 1: we have and the system that exists as it does.
Speaker 1: If you bring federal charges against let's say, Comey and
Speaker 1: it's in DC, and you're in that DC federal court.
Speaker 1: Guess what, the DC Circuit Court. You're gonna get a
Speaker 1: jury of lunatic Trump haters, and they're going to see
Speaker 1: it as an opportunity to make sure that James Comey
Speaker 1: walks right away. I mean you, well, you're never gonna
Speaker 1: get a jury in DC to convict James Comey, not
Speaker 1: in Washington, DC. Friends, So you gotta remember that. You
Speaker 1: gotta remember that, even if they brought charges, the chance
Speaker 1: of a conviction against these deep state henchmen. Folks, I
Speaker 1: know you don't want to hear this, but I never
Speaker 1: lie to you. I'm always gonna tell you the truth.
Speaker 1: Chance of them getting a conviction is probably about the
Speaker 1: same thing as a chance of anybody dying from COVID
Speaker 1: who's healthy and under the age of fifty. It's very
Speaker 1: very low, not zero, but low. You're in them. This
Speaker 1: is the Buck Sex and Show podcast. Grow Up and
Speaker 1: Vote for Trump? Why twenty twenties your last chance to
Speaker 1: become an adults? That is the very enticing title from
Speaker 1: our friend Eddie's Scary over at the Washington Examiner's book
Speaker 1: is out now. He can get a copy of it
Speaker 1: grow up and vote for Trump. Eddie my man, good
Speaker 1: to have you on. Why should folks grow up and
Speaker 1: vote for Trump? Well, it's it's actually very simple. I
Speaker 1: think that people there's a lot of undecided voters out there.
Speaker 1: I know a lot. I'm sure you've talked to a
Speaker 1: lot who say, you know, I don't like the way
Speaker 1: Trump talks, I don't like the way he tweets, I
Speaker 1: don't like the way you know. He's not someone I
Speaker 1: would invite some of my Thanksgiving dinner. And on the
Speaker 1: other hands, but I'm really scared of this Black Lives
Speaker 1: Matter rioting. I'm not sure that Joe Biden's the guy
Speaker 1: for the economy. I don't know that anyone else has
Speaker 1: the answer on the coronavirus. Well, those are the stakes
Speaker 1: and they're very high. So whereas Trump maybe isn't someone
Speaker 1: you want to you want to set your children on
Speaker 1: his lap, he is the person who has done well
Speaker 1: with the economy. He is the wall standing between normal
Speaker 1: people in the Black Lives Matter mob. So it's time
Speaker 1: to just kind of suck it up be responsible adult.
Speaker 1: Being responsible adult often means making the choice that is hard,
Speaker 1: that maybe you don't want to make, but growing up
Speaker 1: isn't fun, but it definitely means voting for Donald Trump.
Speaker 1: And when you say that, you know you know and
Speaker 1: people that haven't decided yet. I'll be honest with you,
Speaker 1: I don't know anyone who hasn't decided yet. I know
Speaker 1: people that are the idea of voting for and I'm
Speaker 1: talking about in personal life, not you know, people that
Speaker 1: I know in the media or that write in and such.
Speaker 1: But everyone I know is either horrified at the idea
Speaker 1: of Trump getting reelected or just completely outraged at the
Speaker 1: notion of Trump not getting reelected. So when you talk
Speaker 1: when you talk to independence or people that are undecided,
Speaker 1: and I'm sure you must have done some of that
Speaker 1: for the book, what are they undecided on at this point?
Speaker 1: I always kind of wonder about that. I mean, are
Speaker 1: they just looking at where the economy is and going
Speaker 1: to decide on that or is it just I worry
Speaker 1: that it's the last news broadcast they see that determines
Speaker 1: whether or not some of these people are going to
Speaker 1: vote in Ohio and Florida and Pennsylvania for Trump or Biden, Right,
Speaker 1: I mean, and I can I can tell you there
Speaker 1: are two women, young women, um ones engaged. The other
Speaker 1: one is married with children, when lives in Arizona, when
Speaker 1: lives in Indiana, and I talked to them all the time.
Speaker 1: Neither of them are completely settled when we when we
Speaker 1: have these conversations, I always kind of view it as
Speaker 1: an exercise just to form my own and form my
Speaker 1: own thinking on this and what people are thinking outside
Speaker 1: of DC. And yet it is kind of the same
Speaker 1: thing that comes up over again. It's a it's a distaste,
Speaker 1: a personal distaste for Trump. You kind of look at
Speaker 1: it as the opposite of what the deal was with
Speaker 1: m President Obama. A lot of people personally liked him,
Speaker 1: but they didn't like his policies. You see the opposite
Speaker 1: going with Trump. They do not like him personally, but
Speaker 1: they are in favor of his policies. If they don't,
Speaker 1: if they don't necessarily associate the two um. But that's
Speaker 1: what that's why I write the book. It's about it's
Speaker 1: a matter of drawing that link, getting it through people
Speaker 1: that again, you may not like him personally, you may
Speaker 1: not want to sit next to him at dinner, but again,
Speaker 1: growing up isn't always easy. But it means voting for Trump,
Speaker 1: it means voting for the guy who's who's saying we've
Speaker 1: had enough of this vandalism, deluding, the rioting, because I'm
Speaker 1: telling you the other side is basically the base now
Speaker 1: is it acts, it behaves as children. They say, we're
Speaker 1: gonna make as much noise, We're gonna we're gonna terrify you,
Speaker 1: We're gonna just make it so unbearable for you every day,
Speaker 1: your everyday life, that you're just gonna want to give
Speaker 1: us the power. And that's what children do. They wind
Speaker 1: until they get what they want. Um. You know, but
Speaker 1: it's time to be the adult in the room and
Speaker 1: say we're not going to do that. That's not how
Speaker 1: we're going to do things in this country. And Donald
Speaker 1: Trump is the person. He's the only alternative to seeing
Speaker 1: that happen. Do you get into his response to COVID
Speaker 1: as part of the pitch of grow up and vote
Speaker 1: for Trump or do you really focus just on BLM
Speaker 1: and the law and order issue. No, there's an entire chapter.
Speaker 1: I think the first chapter really is about the COVID
Speaker 1: response M And my book is not exactly easy on
Speaker 1: the president. I am critical of the president. I don't
Speaker 1: think there's a single person out there, a reasonable person
Speaker 1: out there who can say that the President his administration
Speaker 1: as has done a bang up job on the response
Speaker 1: to COVID. I think he made a lot of mistakes.
Speaker 1: But and yet what is now that we are where
Speaker 1: we are? Do do we want to go to the
Speaker 1: party of lockdowns? That's what Democrats are saying, That's what
Speaker 1: Joe Biden saying, is I'll shut it down the second
Speaker 1: an expert tells me too. Well, the experts have said
Speaker 1: a lot of things, and they've turned out to be
Speaker 1: wrong in a lot of cases. They said massed nothing.
Speaker 1: Now they save lives. They said everyone stay indoors. Now
Speaker 1: they're saying, you stay indoors. We're gonna see more infection,
Speaker 1: We're going to see more deaths. So there's been a
Speaker 1: lot of things that we shouldn't necessarily have looked to
Speaker 1: the experts for. So do we want to go forward?
Speaker 1: Working through the coronavirus? Working through the pandemic should mean
Speaker 1: literally working through it. And that's what we're trying to do.
Speaker 1: And yet Joe Biden, the aocs of the Democratic Party,
Speaker 1: they're saying, you know what, you give up your job,
Speaker 1: give up your life, give up any sense of what
Speaker 1: you believe to be normal. We'll give you a little
Speaker 1: check here and there to keep you tied. You over,
Speaker 1: but stay inside, stay inside. And we're never going to
Speaker 1: go back to normal. They say that. By the way,
Speaker 1: they say we're never going back to normal. Normal is
Speaker 1: still an option. And normal again, the only way we're
Speaker 1: gonna get there is if we reelect Donald Trump. Oh wait,
Speaker 1: so out of curiosity, Eddie, So you say that you
Speaker 1: think that Trump has made mistakes. And I think there
Speaker 1: are things that Trump has done that I did not
Speaker 1: want him to do, or that in retrospect look like
Speaker 1: they weren't the right move for the pandemic. But it
Speaker 1: seems to me that those things were the things that
Speaker 1: he was told to do by the experts that he's
Speaker 1: supposed to listen to, right, I mean, So this is
Speaker 1: where I think it's interesting the Democrat criticism of Trump
Speaker 1: on this in a sense, when we're relying on the
Speaker 1: CDC and the NIH to come up with policy and
Speaker 1: we're told if you don't listen to them, you're reckless,
Speaker 1: and then we do listen to them, and I think
Speaker 1: Trump did at every stage. I cannot find I don't
Speaker 1: know one thing where Trump didn't do what the experts
Speaker 1: in the government said that he was supposed to do,
Speaker 1: including extending lockdowns. So I can't quibble with Yeah, there
Speaker 1: are things that I think that we're done that were wrong.
Speaker 1: But it seems to me that the things that Trump
Speaker 1: that he did in core that that didn't work out
Speaker 1: the way they were supposed to that were the wrong
Speaker 1: decision of the time was when he was listening to
Speaker 1: the experts or do you see it differently? No, I
Speaker 1: think about that a lot, and I think there's a
Speaker 1: lot of truth to it. Um. I think thee where
Speaker 1: he made mistakes, um was when they eventually said, um,
Speaker 1: to start wearing the masks. And from the beginning I
Speaker 1: believed I had believed when they were saying nobody wear masks.
Speaker 1: I thought, there's no convincing me that these masks don't
Speaker 1: work at least a little bit. Um. For him to
Speaker 1: make fun of Joe Biden for wearing one, for him
Speaker 1: to go to his rallies and say this is going
Speaker 1: to disappear overnight. Um, there were a lot of situations
Speaker 1: like that where I thought these are not the right
Speaker 1: the right comments to be making about something that even
Speaker 1: though and I've been writing a lot of it about
Speaker 1: the set the Washington Examine, or the risk for most
Speaker 1: buy and large for most people, particularly people under the
Speaker 1: age of you know, fifty five, is very minimal. It's
Speaker 1: like infinitest it's almost zero. And yet still it is
Speaker 1: a risk. It's right, it's still it's still a risk.
Speaker 1: It's still life. There are things that we should be
Speaker 1: looking at to be taken seriously, to be protecting certain people.
Speaker 1: So to be so cavalier, um, to brush it off
Speaker 1: is something that's going to disappear. We have fifteen people dead.
Speaker 1: We're soon going to see the number dropped to zero.
Speaker 1: I think, um, like you're saying, I think in a
Speaker 1: lot of ways, he was following what the experts said. Um.
Speaker 1: And yet there was also there's has all been strong Yeah,
Speaker 1: I mean Faucci was saying. Foucci was saying in February
Speaker 1: that it was like no big deal. So, I mean,
Speaker 1: I remember, I remember Fauci, Hey, I don't worry about it.
Speaker 1: It's like, okay, well, you know, now turn out of
Speaker 1: trashing Trump. I'm much more concerned. And you raise this
Speaker 1: point about what Democrats are going to do. There had
Speaker 1: been this theory, this concern on the right that oh,
Speaker 1: as soon as Biden wins, this all goes away. I
Speaker 1: think that's a total misread. I think if Biden wins,
Speaker 1: then they leverage this whole situation. Then they say everyone's
Speaker 1: got to wear their masks and everyone's got to mobilize
Speaker 1: the same way to fight climate change and every you know,
Speaker 1: they used this moment of fear and political mobilization as
Speaker 1: as a Democrat agenda tool. Oh sure, exactly. I completely
Speaker 1: agree with you. I'm so glad there's somebody in a
Speaker 1: prominent position saying the exact same thing, because I've been
Speaker 1: I thought the same thing. You know, people say this
Speaker 1: is going to go away after the election because it's
Speaker 1: a political school. No, it's going to be ramped up
Speaker 1: times ten. And don't think for one second. The people
Speaker 1: like um Andrew Cuomo don't enjoy being on TV, called
Speaker 1: called an authority, called a leader. Um certain even certain
Speaker 1: scientists to go on CNN every day and predict the
Speaker 1: most dire things they can say and tell. And you know,
Speaker 1: they think they're the voice of reason, the sound expertise.
Speaker 1: They really really enjoy that. They enjoy it a little
Speaker 1: bit too much. They enjoy the power because there's a
Speaker 1: lot of power that comes with telling people to stay inside,
Speaker 1: live off of us, Depend on us. We're going to
Speaker 1: be the ones who give you money. Don't worry about
Speaker 1: your business, don't worry about what you've built your life
Speaker 1: saving up for. Don't worry about the dream you creative
Speaker 1: for yourself. Count on us. Um, there's a lot of
Speaker 1: there's a lot of intoxicating power there for the Democratic Party.
Speaker 1: There's a lot of people too comfortable with these lockdowns. Um.
Speaker 1: So yes, I think I completely agree. I'm so glad
Speaker 1: you're saying And because I hadn't heard anybody else say it,
Speaker 1: is that this is going to get a lot worse
Speaker 1: after the election if Joe Biden is elected. Yeah, I'm
Speaker 1: trying to spread the word out. It's you, me, and
Speaker 1: Ann Coulter so far that have all been saying, Hey, guys,
Speaker 1: guess what. It gets worse if Biden ways with the lockdowns.
Speaker 1: But everyone should check out Eddie's book, Grow Up and
Speaker 1: Vote for Trump? Why twenty twenties your last chance to
Speaker 1: come an adult Eddie's Garrett good luck with a book,
Speaker 1: my friend. We'll talk to you soon. Thanks Buck, Thanks
Speaker 1: for listening to the bus seson show podcast. Remember to
Speaker 1: subscribe on Apple Podcast, the iHeartRadio app, or wherever you
Speaker 1: get your podcasts. Team buck it's time for roll call.
Speaker 1: All right, role call everybody, Facebook dot com, slash Buck Sexton,
Speaker 1: Team buck at, iHeartMedia dot com. That's the way to
Speaker 1: reach out to us. Or on Instagram, which I hope
Speaker 1: you're all following me on because we do more and
Speaker 1: more posting there. Go to team buck at I'm sorry
Speaker 1: Buck Sexton on Instagram. It's pretty easy. So there you
Speaker 1: have it, CJ. Right, dear Buck, I saw something last
Speaker 1: night on andys Twitter that I'd like to ask you about.
Speaker 1: An officer was hitting the back of the head full
Speaker 1: force with a baseball bat in Seattle. Seemed like an
Speaker 1: obvious assault, but it didn't even appear as though the
Speaker 1: perpetrator got arrested. Having been a police officer, can you
Speaker 1: help me understand how this is permitted and if there
Speaker 1: are no repercussions for striking a police officer, what's to
Speaker 1: stop it from happening over and over again? CJ. First off,
Speaker 1: I was never actually a police officer. I was an
Speaker 1: intelligent specialist in the NYPD's Intelligence Division, effectively a CIA
Speaker 1: analyst who was borrowed by the NYPD to help them
Speaker 1: on counter terrorism cases. So I never was a uniform
Speaker 1: law enforcement officer, was never a patrol officer or anything
Speaker 1: like that, but I did work for the NYPD on
Speaker 1: their most sensitive counter terrorism cases as for and so
Speaker 1: that means running informants and doing you know, drafting the
Speaker 1: surveillance statements and things like that, doing some of the
Speaker 1: surveillance depending on what we're talking about. As for why
Speaker 1: the person wasn't arrested to hit the cop of the bat, yeah, well,
Speaker 1: in these situations where you have so much just madness
Speaker 1: going on, there's such a a frenzy of activity, sometimes
Speaker 1: the cops aren't able to get the person. They're more
Speaker 1: concerned about addressing immediate officer safety. But yeah, I agree.
Speaker 1: I can you imagine you're at a protest and you're
Speaker 1: just gonna go up to a cop with a baseball
Speaker 1: bat and hit him in the head. And the guy
Speaker 1: had a helmet on, thank god, but still, you know,
Speaker 1: I can tell you this, You get hit in the
Speaker 1: head with a baseball bat and you got a helmet on,
Speaker 1: and you're still probably getting a concussion. You just might
Speaker 1: not die. You don't want to getit in the head
Speaker 1: with a baseball, you know, baseball bat. That's that's gonna hurt,
Speaker 1: no matter what kind of helmet you have on. So
Speaker 1: and dangerous. Honestly, even with a helmet on. As for
Speaker 1: what we see going on here, I just think the
Speaker 1: cops in some places, in some cases are overwhelm holms
Speaker 1: and aren't really able to handle this. They're just not
Speaker 1: They don't have the manpower, they don't have the resources
Speaker 1: the personnel to handle this, and there's so many maniacs
Speaker 1: running around in the streets. That's what ends up going on. CJ.
Speaker 1: That's terrible and it's a really bad sign the future
Speaker 1: of law and order in this country when CoP's gonna
Speaker 1: be attack like that without consequence. Noah, I live in Logan,
Speaker 1: Ohio and have firsthand information about the woman arrested for
Speaker 1: not wearing a mask. Everyone at the game was required
Speaker 1: to wear a mask. My co worker, who was at
Speaker 1: the game sitting behind his father, was told by the
Speaker 1: same cop, a very well known cop, a good guy,
Speaker 1: school cop for years, to put on his mask. His dad,
Speaker 1: who was sitting beside him, wasn't wearing a mask because
Speaker 1: he was eating. The cop said, you have to wear
Speaker 1: a mask or leave unless you're eating. Everyone locally is
Speaker 1: defending the cop because he had to enforce it and
Speaker 1: is a good man. But this is the absurdity we've
Speaker 1: come to. I hope this helps give insight. Finally something
Speaker 1: happens in our little town. Noah, thank you for bringing
Speaker 1: that perspective. And yeah, we always want that ground truth
Speaker 1: and that, you know, the important facts to be front
Speaker 1: and center whenever we talk about about any news story. Look,
Speaker 1: I think it's wrong to have cops in forcing mask mandates.
Speaker 1: I think mask I think that mask guidance should be
Speaker 1: voluntary and left to individuals. People want to wear a
Speaker 1: mask great. Forcing other people to wear masks outdoors is
Speaker 1: not scientifically based. It's just it's just people. Other people
Speaker 1: are frightened, and so you're being forced Your liberties are
Speaker 1: being compromised because there are other people who are frightened. Well,
Speaker 1: that's a very slippery slope, friends, And you know, part
Speaker 1: of I think people are forgetting this part of liberty
Speaker 1: is there's a there's a trade off, right. I mean,
Speaker 1: we would all theoretically be safer from kidnapping if the
Speaker 1: government was allowed implant a chip in all of our
Speaker 1: arms to track us, but you'd be trading something off there.
Speaker 1: But sure, people who are are kidnapped or people who
Speaker 1: get lost in the wars or whatever it may be.
Speaker 1: That's very sad, and that could be stopped if we
Speaker 1: all had government chips implanted it in our arms. But
Speaker 1: we recognize we don't want to do that. There's some
Speaker 1: there's some trade off there, and mandating mask wearing outside
Speaker 1: is in that category of it's it's really very minimal
Speaker 1: benefit to anyone, and it's an intrusion on liberty, and
Speaker 1: the risk is acceptable. The risk is acceptable for society.
Speaker 1: And you know, anybody can get COVID. Anyone's loved ones
Speaker 1: can get COVID. There are only so many things that
Speaker 1: it's reasonable to demand people do in response to this,
Speaker 1: and I do not think that outdoor mask mandates fall
Speaker 1: in that category. As for the cop, you know, I
Speaker 1: that's a tough circumstance. I think law enforcement just needs
Speaker 1: to start nullifying these unacceptable But then you say, well, buck,
Speaker 1: what are they They're going to get fired from their
Speaker 1: job over this, and it's that really fair. It's it's tough.
Speaker 1: I can tell you this. I would use my I
Speaker 1: would use my law enforcement discretion. If I were a
Speaker 1: cop and I'm at a mask situation like this, I
Speaker 1: talked to the person and say, look, this is the rule.
Speaker 1: People around you were going to get you know, they're
Speaker 1: gonna get very uptight about this, and I would say
Speaker 1: to them, you know, can you just out of courtesy
Speaker 1: so we can diffuse the situation. But I couldn't put
Speaker 1: cuffs on somebody and say you're under rest for this.
Speaker 1: I'm sorry. I couldn't do it. I couldn't do it,
Speaker 1: and yeah maybe, I mean, but really, is that going
Speaker 1: to cost you your job? I mean, come on, I
Speaker 1: don't think so. But you know, with these crazy Democrats,
Speaker 1: you never know, Donna Rights, Hello Buck and producer Mark.
Speaker 1: Do the Democrats just forget history? F dr change the
Speaker 1: retirement age of the Supreme Court to make justices retire
Speaker 1: so he could pack the court? Donna, Democrats do not
Speaker 1: care about history, do not care about precedent. It's all
Speaker 1: about whatever the emotions of the moment demand and require.
Speaker 1: So there you go, Toby Buck, Producer Mark. I've been
Speaker 1: down for the count because of getting COVID nineteen and
Speaker 1: I'm starting a new job this week. I'm going over
Speaker 1: the road. US truckers like milkshakes, but the country runs
Speaker 1: on diesel and caffeine. US smarter truckers make black rifle
Speaker 1: coffee right in our caves. Toby, Well, God bless man.
Speaker 1: I hope you're okay and all back and recovered from
Speaker 1: getting COVID. And and as for Tris producer, Mark, truckers
Speaker 1: do like milkshakes. I never denied that they like milkshakes.
Speaker 1: My point was that they don't sit around in circles
Speaker 1: every night and drink milkshakes. And I think he just
Speaker 1: proof that by saying that America runs on diesel and caffeine. Well,
Speaker 1: that's certainly true. And the fact that it runs on
Speaker 1: black rifle makes me very happy. So that's my coffee.
Speaker 1: As for um, yeah, no, I think he answered. I
Speaker 1: think he answered it all there, Toby. Anyway, God bless
Speaker 1: hope you're healthy, and thanks for reaching out to us
Speaker 1: and Team Buck Truckers. We love all of you, some
Speaker 1: of our most bible. We're riding along with Team Buck
Speaker 1: Truckers all across this country and have been for years,
Speaker 1: and that's just cool, man. It's cool to know that
Speaker 1: while you guys are driving making sure that commerce can
Speaker 1: actually happen in this country, and you've got the freedom
Speaker 1: hunt riding along with you. Alex. There's so many bad
Speaker 1: things happening in the world that the lib mob could
Speaker 1: put their energy toward Christian genocide in Nigeria, the treatment
Speaker 1: of wagers in China, child sex trafficking, violent cartels, etc.
Speaker 1: Instead of the made up narrative of black people being
Speaker 1: hunted every day in the US. Yes, Alex, I often
Speaker 1: say this about climate change, where there is a real
Speaker 1: cost to climate change, not just in economic terms and
Speaker 1: in terms of liberty, but there's a real cost because
Speaker 1: of the opportunity cost of using those resources and energy
Speaker 1: to something that would actually make a difference. You could
Speaker 1: actually help people, or you can go around lecturing everybody
Speaker 1: on CO two in the air, right, but it feels
Speaker 1: better to people and they're more likely to be able
Speaker 1: to control everyone and and to virtue signal in front
Speaker 1: of everyone, to be the great warriors against CO two emissions.
Speaker 1: But to do there are other things that you would
Speaker 1: do that would be helpful but would require real effort,
Speaker 1: real work ending human ending child trafficking, for example, or
Speaker 1: human trafficking that is as as honorable emission as anyone
Speaker 1: could have, but you're going to have to do stuff.
Speaker 1: You know, you're going to have to raise the funds,
Speaker 1: work with law enforcement. You know, there's action that must
Speaker 1: be taken ending climate change. You just get to walk
Speaker 1: around with like a T shirt and a hashtag on
Speaker 1: your social media and everyone's like, oh, you're doing the
Speaker 1: great fight. So that's why that stuff appeals so much
Speaker 1: more to lives. They don't want to have to actually
Speaker 1: get their hands dirty and do charitable work. Oh my gosh.
Speaker 1: They don't have to help people in need, take their
Speaker 1: own time to do it. Oh no, No, much much
Speaker 1: more fun to go to fancy conferences where everyone arrives
Speaker 1: a private jet to talk about how much global carbon
Speaker 1: emissions are going to end the human race. But we,
Speaker 1: the chosen people, are all coming together in our private
Speaker 1: jets to end the threat of climate change. That's pretty
Speaker 1: much liberalism these days. The Libs defined you're in the
Speaker 1: freedom hunt. This is the Buck Sexton Show podcast. All right,
Speaker 1: more roll call coming our way here. But before we
Speaker 1: dive into that, producer, mark An, any fun plants at
Speaker 1: the weekend. You know you're doing some tango lessons with
Speaker 1: the missus. I don't know why I would be doing
Speaker 1: tango lessons with the missus. Our weddings long gone. I'm
Speaker 1: just gonna hang out with some friends tomorrow. I think
Speaker 1: my friends having a barbecue and watch football a weekend.
Speaker 1: That's what I do. What is the most delicious barbecue
Speaker 1: staple for you? What is the thing that you're like?
Speaker 1: If I could, you can always make sure there's one thing,
Speaker 1: and I mean anything, any meet, any condiment, any side drink.
Speaker 1: What is the thing you always want to have at
Speaker 1: a barbecue? I mean the staple and the most common
Speaker 1: because obviously, if you're going thinking barbecue, thinking brisk it
Speaker 1: or something like that. But for an average barbecue, it's
Speaker 1: a good burger. I personally say there's nothing better than
Speaker 1: a good burger on a charcoal grill. I think that's
Speaker 1: a fair I think that's a fair choice. I would
Speaker 1: say that, but I would also throw in I would
Speaker 1: agree with you, but I would also throw in there.
Speaker 1: It's great to have sausage at a barbecue because it's
Speaker 1: one thing that will always be delicious, and that no
Speaker 1: matter how crappy the cook maybe or how you know,
Speaker 1: old and dirty the grill, is that sausage, you know,
Speaker 1: like Italian sausage or a polar sausage or whatever. All
Speaker 1: it has to do is be heated up and charred,
Speaker 1: and it's going to be delicious. That's fair. I do
Speaker 1: like a good sausage and pepper sandwich, exact kind of stuff,
Speaker 1: because the thing is you can't mess it up. I'd
Speaker 1: love to say a steak, but if you get somebody
Speaker 1: work a working a charcoal grow with a steak and
Speaker 1: they don't know what they're doing, easy to overcook it,
Speaker 1: char the outside kind of cold and raw on the inside,
Speaker 1: you know. So I'm just saying, if you're looking for
Speaker 1: if you're looking for foolproof sausage out, a barbecue always
Speaker 1: gets it done, Always gets it done, Yeah, because you
Speaker 1: can't really overcook a sausage. And they're pre cooked too,
Speaker 1: so you don't have to worry about it being raw
Speaker 1: or whatever, and it's gonna be delicious. So I'm just
Speaker 1: saying that that's one thing that I've learned from having to,
Speaker 1: you know, throw many a barbecue in college, and it's
Speaker 1: because you know, there's nothing really quite as m as
Speaker 1: when you bite into one of those pre made burger
Speaker 1: patties and it's just blackened, charred, on the outside and
Speaker 1: then you get in the inside. You go, oh, it's
Speaker 1: nice and cold in here, like fridgerator cold. You know
Speaker 1: what I mean. It's impressive to scrubber burger. I don't
Speaker 1: know how you do it on a grill. People do,
Speaker 1: I'm telling you, I know they do. But yeah, wow, yeah,
Speaker 1: I mean hot. I guess say a hot dog is
Speaker 1: good too. A hot dog is because you don't. I
Speaker 1: also eat these things without buns because I have to,
Speaker 1: like a weirdo. But you don't just bring your own
Speaker 1: gluten free buns everywhere you go. No, I don't pull
Speaker 1: the Hillary with that. I have hot sauce in my bag.
Speaker 1: I've got gluten free. No, I don't. So if your
Speaker 1: family's having a barbecue, they don't like have gluten free
Speaker 1: buns for you, or you don't bring your own. I
Speaker 1: would think you would. I said, if your family's throwing
Speaker 1: a barbecue, they don't have gluten free buns for you,
Speaker 1: you don't bring your own? Oh no, they always hook
Speaker 1: up the I figured your family. Yeah, of course they
Speaker 1: always got the gluten free from me once family. But
Speaker 1: I'm talking when you go to friends. Oh yeah, unless
Speaker 1: it's like a really good friend, they're not doing that
Speaker 1: for you. Yeah, no, no, no, no, that's that's not happening. Um.
Speaker 1: All right, let's get back into some of a roll call.
Speaker 1: You're John Buck. You said you wanted to send us
Speaker 1: our thoughts on the dem strategy for thwarting the Trump
Speaker 1: Supreme Court nominee. So here's mine. No matter who it is,
Speaker 1: the Democrat politicians are going to slander the individual, even
Speaker 1: if it's a woman. The mob, however, will do the
Speaker 1: dirty work. They'll try and intimidate the nominee and their
Speaker 1: family as well as friends. They'll make the nominate nominee
Speaker 1: feel unsafe in their own own home. I believe they'll
Speaker 1: try and intimidate the person. Trump of points out of
Speaker 1: the job. I don't think the Libs are above attempting
Speaker 1: to take a Supreme Court nominee's life. Geez. Unfortunately, this
Speaker 1: is what we've come to. Political assassinations are about the
Speaker 1: only step in their playbook they have not yet exercised.
Speaker 1: They're definitely, okay, John, let's go through this. I agree
Speaker 1: they're definitely going to slander the person, but I also
Speaker 1: agree with you that I'm concerned about the dirty work
Speaker 1: of the mob, not even using the political process, but
Speaker 1: using you know, mafia style threats. You know, hey, you know,
Speaker 1: I know where your kids are going to school. I
Speaker 1: don't think you want to be a Supreme Court justice,
Speaker 1: right that kind of behind the scenes stuff, or even
Speaker 1: against the sitting US senator. You know, friends, it's not
Speaker 1: hard to do, and you only need to turn two senators.
Speaker 1: So I think that's I think they go entirely outside
Speaker 1: the system and honestly illegal. I think the Democrats will
Speaker 1: try illegal maneuvers now that not the official party apparatus,
Speaker 1: but the Democrat left to prevent a Amy Coney Barrett
Speaker 1: or whoever. I think it's any and we'll find out
Speaker 1: by Monday, we'll be able to say, all right, we
Speaker 1: know the nominee. It looks like it's gonna be Amy
Speaker 1: Coney Barrett. We'll know tomorrow on Saturday. But that I
Speaker 1: think that that's, uh, you're on the right path and answer,
Speaker 1: I mean, I certainly, look, I just pray to God.
Speaker 1: I mean, you know, we you know that'sassination. Is it
Speaker 1: just this that should never happen in this country, should
Speaker 1: never happened in any country, but that should never happen
Speaker 1: in this country. And I certainly hope that that doesn't
Speaker 1: occur ever for any political party for any reason. You
Speaker 1: know that should never be what happens. Susie. I agree
Speaker 1: with you in other voices in the media. The Republicans
Speaker 1: just need to vote to confirm the Supreme Court justice
Speaker 1: skip the hearing. If I had to guess, the left
Speaker 1: will try to mint Romney her and say that Barrett
Speaker 1: will wage a war on birth control because she is
Speaker 1: pro life and Catholic. Look at the kind of meltdowns
Speaker 1: the left had what RBG died. I think they'll make
Speaker 1: it a feminist issue from personal experience. If you're a
Speaker 1: woman and you don't carry water for modern feminism, you
Speaker 1: don't count as a woman to them. Yeah, Susie, I
Speaker 1: agree with you obviously. I think everything you're saying is true.
Speaker 1: That is going to be part of their attack on
Speaker 1: on ACB, assuming that she is the pick for the
Speaker 1: RBG vacancy, and they're going to be very nasty and
Speaker 1: very gross about this. So let's go here. Next we
Speaker 1: get Kyle Buck. If you're wondering what the level do
Speaker 1: regarding Trump's Scotus pick, I think I might know where
Speaker 1: they are headed. I believe that We're at the point
Speaker 1: where they believe their legal options are exhausted and they
Speaker 1: will resort to targeted violence. Whoever Trump nominates, they'll they'll
Speaker 1: need close protection and immediately. By the way, Jupiter Florida
Speaker 1: is lovely and riot free. If you're looking to relocate Kyle,
Speaker 1: producer Mark would be very happy. If we like a
Speaker 1: happy producer Mark, so Jupiter Florida would not be a
Speaker 1: bad move for us outs for sure. Thank you so
Speaker 1: much for writing into us team pass the buck this weekend.
Speaker 1: Do me that solid. Do me a favor. Get one
Speaker 1: person in your life who listens to this show to
Speaker 1: start listening, either on their local station or on the
Speaker 1: iHeart app, Spotify, or wherever you listen to podcasts. Until
Speaker 1: next week, my friends, have a great weekend. Shield Tie