Speaker 1: Well, we have come to your city. Way against sing
Speaker 1: you a conscious will all be desire.
Speaker 2: And if you want a little banging a yuni, I
Speaker 2: come along.
Speaker 3: Are you for defunding the police?
Speaker 4: Are you for a serious reform that people can see
Speaker 4: under bound?
Speaker 2: I am in favor of defunding the police.
Speaker 3: Your meeting was our mom, Donnie. You have not endorsed
Speaker 3: him yet, what do you say to people?
Speaker 2: Say?
Speaker 1: What games?
Speaker 5: I look forward to sitting down and talking to him.
Speaker 4: I didn't get involved in that primary election and I
Speaker 4: don't know him well.
Speaker 6: Sarn MONDONI is an incredible talent for not to be
Speaker 6: won over.
Speaker 1: You have aoc is aron and that's a meaning comment.
Speaker 2: Freedom is back in style. Welcome to the revolution coming.
Speaker 3: To your city.
Speaker 1: Don't the way against and saying you a conscious son?
Speaker 6: The New Sean Hennity Show more VI I'm the scenes,
Speaker 6: information on freaking news and more bold inspired solutions for America.
Speaker 1: All right, thanks Scott.
Speaker 6: On an hour two Sean Hannity Show, toll free. It
Speaker 6: is eight hundred and nine to four one, Shawn. If
Speaker 6: you want to be a part of the program, We're
Speaker 6: going to get to Senator Rampaul here in just a second,
Speaker 6: it was pretty interesting the congenital liar Adam Schiff called
Speaker 6: out by the President about this issue of getting a
Speaker 6: mortgage in Maryland when he's supposed to be a Congressman
Speaker 6: and Senator from California, which would be illegal.
Speaker 2: Now.
Speaker 6: I believe he was one of the people that got
Speaker 6: one of these preemptive pardons on the way out the door.
Speaker 6: I don't know if he got the one of the
Speaker 6: autopen pardons, which is under heavy scrutiny, which we'll talk
Speaker 6: about later in more detail on the program. But Adam
Speaker 6: Shiff was actually asked a question about mortgage fraud yesterday,
Speaker 6: didn't that much to say about it. Listen, Senator, do
Speaker 6: you have a response to Trump saying you're going to
Speaker 6: see a mortgage for Do you any response?
Speaker 7: Senator?
Speaker 2: Senator?
Speaker 5: Why did you decide to make your primary residence in
Speaker 5: Maryland for ten years for a decade, not California?
Speaker 3: Any comment on Trump accusing you of mortgage fraud?
Speaker 8: Sir?
Speaker 2: Any response?
Speaker 1: Oh? Anyway? Senator Ram Paul joins us if in fact.
Speaker 6: He was, he's supposed to represent California and he claims
Speaker 6: Maryland does his residence to get a better deal on
Speaker 6: a mortgage.
Speaker 1: What do you call that?
Speaker 2: Definitely not being fourth right or honest. You know, these
Speaker 2: these questions have come up for a long period of time,
Speaker 2: and you know people who run for office under no
Speaker 2: better Your your primary residence is very important. Where he evode,
Speaker 2: but he represent let's stay like I represent Kentucky. I'm
Speaker 2: in the same house I've been into the last twenty
Speaker 2: six years. And some people do sell and have no
Speaker 2: property in their state, and that's a sad, sad statement.
Speaker 2: But to list your home state is a difer state
Speaker 2: than yours is a big problem with the electric usually.
Speaker 1: Yeah, I think that might be a bit of a problem.
Speaker 1: All right.
Speaker 6: So there's a lot going on in DC, not the
Speaker 6: least of which is this use of the autopen. We'll
Speaker 6: get into more details and specifics yesterday, I mean later
Speaker 6: in the program that happened yesterday. And my question to
Speaker 6: you is when did you first notice that Joe Biden
Speaker 6: was in a significant cognitive decline. I first started calling
Speaker 6: it out about August or September of twenty nineteen.
Speaker 2: Yeah, I think it's been noticeable for years. The shuffling gate,
Speaker 2: the distant look, the discompopulated response, is the sort of
Speaker 2: word salid responses. So you know, it's been going on
Speaker 2: for years, and I don't know how the mainstream media,
Speaker 2: or really the rather the left wing media, you know,
Speaker 2: was able to make excuses, but nobody. You know, it's
Speaker 2: only something that you know, my lying eyes deceived me somehow.
Speaker 2: So I think people knew and saw it, and in
Speaker 2: the end, it all came to ahead with that debate
Speaker 2: when American people saw it firsthand. You know, some people
Speaker 2: don't follow politics as closely as you, and I know
Speaker 2: that's hard to believe, but their attention is focused by
Speaker 2: the presidential debates, and when that happened, I think it
Speaker 2: came to a head for all America to see. And
Speaker 2: you know, I've never the first time in our history
Speaker 2: someone's been actually pushed out with only months ago and
Speaker 2: then replaced.
Speaker 6: All right, let me ask you this question because I
Speaker 6: know that you were not, for example, in support of
Speaker 6: the big beautiful bill. I know you wanted more cuts,
Speaker 6: have more controls on spending.
Speaker 1: We just got some data back though.
Speaker 6: Number One, the projections in terms of the tariffs that
Speaker 6: Donald Trump has put on other countries is bringing him
Speaker 6: far more income than any economic guru or commentator or
Speaker 6: a pundit anybody in the punditry class ever anticipated and
Speaker 6: for the first time in in June, we had a
Speaker 6: budget surplus, for first time in twenty years. What is
Speaker 6: your reaction to that, because I know that's an issue
Speaker 6: that matters a lot to you.
Speaker 2: You know, it's good news, and I'm the first one
Speaker 2: to compliment President Trump when something goes his way. I
Speaker 2: still believe that ultimately, if you look at tariff revenue
Speaker 2: for on an annual basis, it's looking like it'll be
Speaker 2: about one hundred to one hundred and fifty billion more
Speaker 2: than it was the previous year. To put that in context,
Speaker 2: that we're running about a two trillion dollar deficit, so
Speaker 2: it might make it smaller on an annual basis, but
Speaker 2: we still have a big problem. And you saw last
Speaker 2: night we were up all night to cut nine billion,
Speaker 2: and one of the senators looked at me last night
Speaker 2: and he said, well, you realize that's three days of
Speaker 2: interest on the national debt. We paved up three billion
Speaker 2: dollars a day in interest, and so it's a start,
Speaker 2: you know, I supported it. We've got to do more.
Speaker 2: I don't think the tariff income can be enough to
Speaker 2: really balance a budget, we actually act to cut spending
Speaker 2: as well.
Speaker 6: Yeah, I don't disagree with you, but this is my
Speaker 6: analysis of what the President is doing economically, which I
Speaker 6: support and I've always believed in supply side economics. The
Speaker 6: President also, just with the tariff threat, has been able
Speaker 6: to get in the next four years over eleven trillion
Speaker 6: dollars now in commitments for manufacturing in this country, and
Speaker 6: by the way, vital manufacturing. We're going to bring back
Speaker 6: automobile manufacturing. We're going to have pharmaceutical manufacturing. I know
Speaker 6: it's critically important. The fact that we have outsourced that
Speaker 6: is insane. We learned that during COVID as you know,
Speaker 6: also semiconductor chips. We're now going into mining and getting
Speaker 6: rare earths and magnets and things that are critical to
Speaker 6: our infrastructure and defense programs and automobile manufacturing. So between
Speaker 6: all of that and the President's push and openness and
Speaker 6: design to achieve energy dominance, and I don't think we
Speaker 6: can calculate how much revenue that will bring into the country.
Speaker 1: I think it's we can be an energy rich country.
Speaker 6: I think foundationally the President has set us up for
Speaker 6: great economic prosperity and that the amount of money that
Speaker 6: the government will bring in as a result is incalculable
Speaker 6: at this time. And the CBO has slant solidly left.
Speaker 6: They get it wrong more often than not.
Speaker 2: Yeah, I agree with the way you've characterized that. You know,
Speaker 2: I supported the tax cuts in twenty seventeen, really support
Speaker 2: him today. If the bill had been just the tax cuts,
Speaker 2: that would have voted for it. I do believe in
Speaker 2: supply side economics. I'm a big fan of Art Laugher.
Speaker 2: I think he was right back in the eighties and
Speaker 2: is right today. When we cut taxes in twenty seventeen
Speaker 2: in the first Trump administration, the economy did grow, and
Speaker 2: it grew to such extent that in the end we
Speaker 2: didn't lose revenue. We actually got more revenue with lower rates.
Speaker 2: I think that can and will happen again, and so
Speaker 2: I do support that. And the problem I had still
Speaker 2: some of my reservations are that the bill had about
Speaker 2: five hundred billion dollars in new spending, and I just
Speaker 2: don't think when we have a two trillion dollar deficit
Speaker 2: we should spending new money. I think we should be
Speaker 2: actually cutting spending. So it's sort of the debate going
Speaker 2: around here, and we often have this debate. You know,
Speaker 2: if to bring in five trillion and we spend seven trillion,
Speaker 2: we can balance the budget in one of two ways.
Speaker 2: You could raise taxes two trillion and balance the budget,
Speaker 2: or you could cut spending two trillion. I'm much more
Speaker 2: on the side of the cutting. I don't really want
Speaker 2: to raise taxes to balance the budget because I think,
Speaker 2: for example, if the twenty seventeen tax cuts had expired
Speaker 2: and we went up in taxes and made the budget smaller,
Speaker 2: I think would have crippled the economy, and then you
Speaker 2: end up with less revenue anyway. So I don't accept
Speaker 2: the CBO. I think they're wrong. They've been wrong historically,
Speaker 2: So I do accept the tax cuts are a good idea,
Speaker 2: but I think there still needs to be a voice
Speaker 2: around here saying that we're spending too much money.
Speaker 6: I support you in that and agree with all of it.
Speaker 6: What about your discussions with Senator Lindsey Graham, because I
Speaker 6: know he's had conversations with you about a second reconciliation
Speaker 6: bill to do just that, and I think most Republicans
Speaker 6: would support it.
Speaker 1: I'd certainly support it.
Speaker 2: Well. You know, we had an example of where we are.
Speaker 2: Last night we ended up having a vote to cut
Speaker 2: nine billion. So that's a point one percent, a tenth
Speaker 2: of one percent. It's a good start. I mean it
Speaker 2: is a start. I don't say it's a good start.
Speaker 2: It's ay start. It's going in the right direction. I
Speaker 2: supported it, but we lost you know, three people on
Speaker 2: it initially, and then in the end we lost two.
Speaker 2: So we have to push harder. And really we need
Speaker 2: more recision packages and bigger we have to encourage among Republicans.
Speaker 2: And so when people say, oh, we're going to do
Speaker 2: a second reconciliation package, had a simple majority, I'm for it,
Speaker 2: but I've sort of tongue in cheeks said yeah, well
Speaker 2: we need a big operation up here though, because we're
Speaker 2: going to need a spine transplant for half a dozen
Speaker 2: of these Republicans that lack like Republicans and not Democrats
Speaker 2: and actually vote to cut spending.
Speaker 1: You know, it's pretty amazing to me.
Speaker 6: Now, for example, they put in work requirements for Medicare,
Speaker 6: et cetera, et cetera, which I support. Democrats are out
Speaker 6: there doing what they always do. They're demagoguing and they're lying.
Speaker 6: For example, they're saying that Medicaid is having cuts.
Speaker 1: That's not true.
Speaker 6: There's a seven percent increase over the course of the
Speaker 6: next number of years in Medicaid spending, and that is
Speaker 6: called an increase in spending, but Democrats characterize it as
Speaker 6: a cut because it's not the rate of increase that
Speaker 6: they previously had planned for, and in other words, a
Speaker 6: reduction in the rate of growth, which is probably the
Speaker 6: only way you're going to prevent them from headed towards
Speaker 6: insolvency of my Rome.
Speaker 2: Yeah, this is the kind of shenanigans the Democrats have
Speaker 2: been up to forever, saying that the cut and the
Speaker 2: rate of increase is spending is devastating and people will
Speaker 2: be thrown on the street. I think the real message
Speaker 2: Republicans need to get better at is that I want
Speaker 2: Medicaid to be smaller. I want less people on Medicaid,
Speaker 2: but I want them I don't want them to go
Speaker 2: without insurance. I want them to have private insurance. There
Speaker 2: are jobs everywhere in our country, and what we need
Speaker 2: to be is not pessimistic towards our young people. I
Speaker 2: went to an HVAC class at a tech school reason
Speaker 2: we in Louisville, about sixty to eighty young people in
Speaker 2: the class young adults. Every one of them's tuition was
Speaker 2: paid for by an employer and when they finished, they
Speaker 2: already had a job. Oh it was complete the course.
Speaker 2: This is the same for electricians, carpenters, welders, plumbers. You know,
Speaker 2: when I talk to people have got electricians, they say,
Speaker 2: everybody's fifty five and older. And where we're running out,
Speaker 2: We got to have younger people become electricians. All of
Speaker 2: this stuff are great opportunities for people. It's not a
Speaker 2: woe is me, you got to be uncovered assistance. It
Speaker 2: should be this is an exciting time. Let's get more
Speaker 2: people pulling the wagon and less people in the wagon.
Speaker 2: And really, if you talk to a hospital and they say, oh,
Speaker 2: we want, you know, more medicaid so we could make
Speaker 2: make a profit, I said, well do you want why
Speaker 2: don't we make one hundred percent medicaid and so, oh,
Speaker 2: we don't want that. We lose money. So really, what
Speaker 2: you want is a small percentage of your public five
Speaker 2: to ten percent of people to be on welfare or
Speaker 2: on free government insurance, and ninety percent need to be
Speaker 2: on private and.
Speaker 6: It's a step up.
Speaker 2: That's what we need to encourage you those jobs are everywhere.
Speaker 2: We just got to get back work ethic and we've
Speaker 2: got to get people in training programs for the trades
Speaker 2: or college if that's your deal. But it should be
Speaker 2: an optimism out there for our next generation, not a pesasimism.
Speaker 6: All right, quick break right back. We'll continue more with
Speaker 6: Senator ram Paula, Kentucky on the other side than your
Speaker 6: calls coming up eight hundred and ninety four one, Sean.
Speaker 6: If you want to be a part of the program,
Speaker 6: all right, we continue now. Senator ram Paula is with
Speaker 6: us from Kentucky. If you look at the president now
Speaker 6: where you know on Sunday it's going to be you know,
Speaker 6: we'll be at the six month mark of him being president.
Speaker 6: This is how I view his presidency. He's been able
Speaker 6: to secure the borders. He's in the process of deporting criminals.
Speaker 6: We've had known terrorists, rapist murderers, other violent criminals, cartel members, gang,
Speaker 6: drug dealers that Joe Biden allowed into the country.
Speaker 1: I think that's a big success.
Speaker 6: I think the eleven trillion in commitments I mentioned, I
Speaker 6: think that's in manufacturing, that's a big success. It's somewhat history,
Speaker 6: a historic and transformational six months.
Speaker 2: Yeah, no, I agree, and I would say that, you know,
Speaker 2: people know me as sometimes being a high profile opponent
Speaker 2: of the president, but they should also know that it
Speaker 2: doesn't mean that I'm not supportive or a friend. Frankly,
Speaker 2: I played golf with him a week ago and I
Speaker 2: told him to his face, I think you're the best
Speaker 2: president of my lifetime. And he knows I'm not sucking
Speaker 2: up to do this because I do oppose him publicly.
Speaker 2: I think he's in some ways.
Speaker 1: I've talked to him about you. You annoy the hell
Speaker 1: out of him.
Speaker 2: But when you talk about things like differ but he.
Speaker 1: Still likes you personally. I'm just but at times you
Speaker 1: annoy him.
Speaker 6: Yeah, but I'll tell you one person he doesn't like
Speaker 6: from Kentucky's Tom Massey.
Speaker 2: Yeah. But unlike the Department of Education, Reagan talked a
Speaker 2: good line. We supported Reagan against Ford. I was there
Speaker 2: in nineteen seventy six at the convention with my dad
Speaker 2: as a kid. We were Reagan people because he was
Speaker 2: for smaller government. But he won. Reagan got elected. He
Speaker 2: never did anything to get makes the prow of education
Speaker 2: go away. But Trump is actually attacking that. Trump's all
Speaker 2: the dose stuff has done, you know, amazing things that
Speaker 2: no other Republican would have done. So I'm highly complimentary
Speaker 2: to that.
Speaker 6: But it just by the way the Dog's website says
Speaker 6: they've saved the average taxpayer up till now over eleven
Speaker 6: hundred dollars a year in savings.
Speaker 1: That's a lot of money. It's a good start. It's
Speaker 1: not enough.
Speaker 2: I think they've done some amazing things, and we need
Speaker 2: to continue to work to copy it. And it needs
Speaker 2: to be something that doesn't go away. It should be
Speaker 2: a permanent assessment of waste and fraud and abuse in
Speaker 2: our government should be permanently part of this checking to
Speaker 2: make government better. We've done it. From the congressional side,
Speaker 2: we expose all this stuff. A lot of the stuff
Speaker 2: does talks about, we talked about. But from legislative side
Speaker 2: we can pass laws, which is hard, but the executive
Speaker 2: branch can actually do it and begin doing it. One
Speaker 2: of the great things is that the Supreme Court is
Speaker 2: now uphold upheld the president's right to fire employees and
Speaker 2: to do most things with employment. So that's a great
Speaker 2: advantage for downsize and government. Anyway, Like I say, I
Speaker 2: have great compliments, I still have disagreements with President Trump
Speaker 2: on certain things. I'm still uncertain. I think that the
Speaker 2: effect of the tariffs ultimately could be negative for our country,
Speaker 2: and the results will come in over the next year.
Speaker 2: But that doesn't mean I don't support him on taxes.
Speaker 2: The border, my goodness, they should spend every day, all
Speaker 2: day talking about the success of the border. He basically
Speaker 2: through force of personality, sending some troops down there, sending
Speaker 2: people down there and directed, and announcing to the world
Speaker 2: that we weren't allowing people just to invade our country.
Speaker 2: He transformed it in a matter of months. It's just
Speaker 2: it's like nothing I've ever seen before as far as
Speaker 2: transforming something. By sure the personality.
Speaker 6: The biggest, most preventable national security disaster in the history
Speaker 6: of the country, and we're all at risk and remain
Speaker 6: at risk because of it. Senator around Oh, appreciate you,
Speaker 6: Thank you, sir for your time. Eight hundred nine four one, Shawn.
Speaker 6: If you want to be a part of the program driving.
Speaker 1: The Liberals nuts, Sean Hannity is.
Speaker 6: Back on the radio right now, by twenty five till
Speaker 6: the top of the hour, eight hundred and ninety four one,
Speaker 6: Shawn on number you want to be a part of
Speaker 6: the program. Listen, everyone needs a private personal safety security
Speaker 6: plan and sometimes the only option to protect your life,
Speaker 6: your family's life, your employees' lives is lethal force. Sad reality,
Speaker 6: a lot of evil, dangerous people. Now, you have to
Speaker 6: be prepared to be safe and stay safe. Whether you're
Speaker 6: at home or away at work doesn't matter. And that's
Speaker 6: why six Hour. They are the world's leading manufacturer of firearms, optics,
Speaker 6: ammunition and suppressors. Now six hour is the military issued
Speaker 6: firearm of choice. Six Hour Now celebrating the US Army's
Speaker 6: two hundred and fiftieth anniversary, they have a very special
Speaker 6: offer on their M s M eighteen pistols now the
Speaker 6: six seventeen and eighteen pistols. They are the official side
Speaker 6: arm of the US Army, the most innovative handguns ever
Speaker 6: for our military.
Speaker 1: I own them. They're amazing and now.
Speaker 6: Through September the first you'll get up to two hundred
Speaker 6: and fifty bucks in SIG cash when you buy one
Speaker 6: of these amazing pistols. Now today SIG Sour firearms all
Speaker 6: proudly made right here in the USA in New Hampshire
Speaker 6: by American workers, many former military about four thousand employees.
Speaker 6: They are the only company that's out there innovating the
Speaker 6: next generation of weaponry now sig sour firearms, optic suppressors.
Speaker 6: They include the industries unique and only infinite guarantee if
Speaker 6: God forbid something breaks, and it probably won't, but if
Speaker 6: it does, if they can't fix it, they'll replace it.
Speaker 6: And you don't need a receipt, you don't need a
Speaker 6: warranty card, fully transferable forever. And I am telling you
Speaker 6: they have the most advanced manufacturing facilities any place in
Speaker 6: the world which delivers unprecedented quality and precision. Anyway, go
Speaker 6: to their website sigsur dot com slash Hannity that's SI
Speaker 6: G s a U e er dot com slash Hannity.
Speaker 6: Find out more and don't miss your chance to get
Speaker 6: up to two hundred and fifty bucks and sig cash
Speaker 6: when you buy one of these amazing pistols. That's sigsur
Speaker 6: dot com slash Hannity two day. All right, let's get
Speaker 6: to our busy, busy telephones. Dale in the United Socialist
Speaker 6: Utopia of California, Gavin Newsom territory. There's a lot of
Speaker 6: Gavin Newsom news today. How are you serve goodren talk
Speaker 6: to you.
Speaker 1: Pleasure is all mine. What's on your mind today?
Speaker 8: Oh, it's a communist country that we're turning into with
Speaker 8: the Democrats. I think they don't have to live by
Speaker 8: what they propose their selves.
Speaker 6: Well, I mean it's really sad. Yeah, I mean I
Speaker 6: look at your state of California. I mean us special
Speaker 6: Envoy for example for Special Missions, Rick Ornell. He actually
Speaker 6: was out there accusing Newsom yesterday of lying about the
Speaker 6: state's intention to conduct a land grab within areas hit
Speaker 6: by the La fires in the Pacific Palisades and anyway,
Speaker 6: it's been an ongoing fight between the administration and the governor,
Speaker 6: and it came as local residents are in an uproar
Speaker 6: out there over apparently the governor's plan to build low
Speaker 6: income housing on some of the fire ravaged lands. And
Speaker 6: last week Newsom allocated one hundred and one million dollars
Speaker 6: for developers to build low income housing in the areas
Speaker 6: hit by the January fires, according to these reports I'm reading.
Speaker 6: And that decision came just days after Newsom signed a
Speaker 6: rollback of environmental regulations that has been blocking the construction
Speaker 6: of multi unit housing structures in cities what is often
Speaker 6: called quote urban infill. Newsom also said it's time for
Speaker 6: Trump to grow up in a rebuke on the president,
Speaker 6: and he also called Trump a son of a beat
Speaker 6: And it's not doing it's not helping the state of
Speaker 6: California because the Trump administration, they they're firing back. They
Speaker 6: pulled a whopping four billion dollars for this ridiculous train
Speaker 6: to nowhere that you guys have been talking. How long
Speaker 6: you've been talking about a train from LA to San
Speaker 6: Francisco that became a train from Bakersfield to Mercer?
Speaker 1: How did that happen?
Speaker 8: A long time? That train and never get built.
Speaker 6: Now the trains by the way, sixteen years of failure,
Speaker 6: no completed high speed track, escalating costs. Why should one
Speaker 6: taxpayer dollar go to this project. It's a waste of money.
Speaker 6: John Duffy said, after a decade of failures, the mismanagement
Speaker 6: and competence has proven it cannot build its train to
Speaker 6: nowhere on time or on budget. It's time for this
Speaker 6: boondoggle to die. President Trump, and I will always fight
Speaker 6: to ensure your tax dollars only go to that accomplished, great, big,
Speaker 6: beautiful things. And the review found zero miles of high
Speaker 6: speed track have been laid since ground was broken ten
Speaker 6: wopping years ago, and costs continued to balloon. I mean,
Speaker 6: I mean, how does that even happen? And by the way,
Speaker 6: you know what's happening in Los Angeles as long as
Speaker 6: we're talking about your state, and Los Angeles is now
Speaker 6: so rough and tough that tech companies are buying dummies
Speaker 6: to use as fake homeless people as they test their
Speaker 6: new delivery robots. I mean, this is like an Orwellian
Speaker 6: dystopian nightmare. I mean, what is going on out there?
Speaker 8: Yeah, that's why we're all eving well.
Speaker 6: I mean, wait till Mam Nanni gets elected. I mean,
Speaker 6: can you imagine six months later, California Democrats have done
Speaker 6: basically nothing to allow homeowners in the Pacific Palisades to rebuild.
Speaker 6: I think that I saw a picture that I think
Speaker 6: one house was rebuilt, but they had them ahead of
Speaker 6: ahead of the fires. Yeah, it's it's it's pretty unbelievable.
Speaker 6: And I'm sure I haven't checked, but I wonder are
Speaker 6: they paying taxes property taxes on homes that don't exist.
Speaker 6: They had hydrants without water in them, they had reservoirs
Speaker 6: that were empty, and Newsom's answers, Well, I'll ask local officials. Oh,
Speaker 6: that's that's taken responsibility.
Speaker 8: Yes, sure, I'd like to see something happen. Yeah, he's
Speaker 8: doing a great job and he won't give up what
Speaker 8: he's doing.
Speaker 6: I'm telling you, if you want, if you want New
Speaker 6: York and California to become the rest of America, vote
Speaker 6: for one of these people.
Speaker 1: Good luck. Uh no, not gonna happen.
Speaker 6: Uh, let me play Zora and Mom Donnie supporting the
Speaker 6: abolition of private property.
Speaker 5: Listen, my platform is that every single person should have house.
Speaker 5: And I think faced with these two options, the system,
Speaker 5: the system has hundreds of thousands of people on how
Speaker 5: right for what? And if there was any system that
Speaker 5: could guarantee each person housing, whether you call it the
Speaker 5: abolition of private property or you call it, you know,
Speaker 5: just a state wide housing guarantee, it is preferable to
Speaker 5: what is going on right now. And I think that
Speaker 5: people try and play like gotcha games about these kinds
Speaker 5: of things, and it's like, look, I care more about
Speaker 5: whether somebody has a home.
Speaker 6: M All right, back to our phones as we say
Speaker 6: hi to Tracy in New Orleans. What's going on, Tracy?
Speaker 1: How are you.
Speaker 7: I'm well, thank you? How are you, honey?
Speaker 8: I hope you're well.
Speaker 7: I'm good.
Speaker 6: How many people call me honey? I appreciate it. I
Speaker 6: didn't think you were allowed to use those words anymore.
Speaker 6: But I'm perfectly fine with it.
Speaker 7: I'm sorry. I'm from the South, I'm from New Orleans.
Speaker 6: I'm totally messing with you. This is not a woke
Speaker 6: triggered show.
Speaker 7: Thank goodness, because I wanted to get on your case yesterday.
Speaker 7: You told Linda you were giving her.
Speaker 6: Oh jeez, Okay, let me interpret what When she goes
Speaker 6: mm hmm, that is her expressing her displeasure that I
Speaker 6: don't run the show the way she wants me to
Speaker 6: run the show. Now, she's entitled to her opinion, but
Speaker 6: it's like, you know, the voice of condemnation, rather than
Speaker 6: an appreciation for the fact that I've only been doing
Speaker 6: this since nineteen eighty seven.
Speaker 7: Mm No, seriously. Now, it's also meaning I know you're wrong,
Speaker 7: but I'm wrong. I'm right, but I'm going to go
Speaker 7: ahead and give in to you about them.
Speaker 1: We should take a poll and I can.
Speaker 2: Oh.
Speaker 3: I'd love to be a part of that poll.
Speaker 4: I think that Tracy, first of all, we should play
Speaker 4: the breaking new sounder because Sean Hannity has just said,
Speaker 4: Sean Hannity, Sean Hannity has just said he can eat
Speaker 4: a woman's mind, which I can tell you no other
Speaker 4: man can. You just said you know what I mean
Speaker 4: and what I'm thinking when I say mmmm, So, don't you.
Speaker 3: Think that's breaking? You know?
Speaker 6: First of all, no, there's a little distortion herey again,
Speaker 6: but it's not accurate. You don't go, that sounds like
Speaker 6: you're eating a good, good sandwich. I go, I have
Speaker 6: a friend of mine, Rodney. When I'm in d C.
Speaker 6: You sometimes use somebody who you know's house, Well, Rodney's
Speaker 6: to stay in okay, right, And I will cook for
Speaker 6: for this friend of mine and sweet baby James and
Speaker 6: he loves my cookie loves everybody goes. Now that's it.
Speaker 6: There's one, and then there's your The way you did
Speaker 6: it is not how you do it well, regardless.
Speaker 4: Of how I did it at that moment. My standard
Speaker 4: is it is a very judgmental. But again to Tracy's point,
Speaker 4: I think it is wonderful that you have now discovered
Speaker 4: a new hidden talent of telepathy into the female mind.
Speaker 4: And again kudos to you. Boss, because that is something
Speaker 4: many men have tried for years. So it's a pretty
Speaker 4: big day for you. So let's go around the horn,
Speaker 4: Uncle James when we get them.
Speaker 3: First of all, you can't usk, Uncle James. You're related.
Speaker 3: It's not even a thing with me.
Speaker 1: That's one in my corner. He's like, that's a shock.
Speaker 3: To all of us. Another breaking news sounder of the time.
Speaker 1: Right, Well, let's go to Jason.
Speaker 6: Jason, is it done in a in a way that
Speaker 6: that expresses disapproval or not?
Speaker 1: Of course it is wrong. Here's the bus I'm dry Katie,
Speaker 1: Katie is it?
Speaker 6: Is it a voice of disapproval that she wants me
Speaker 6: to do it her way and I just am doing
Speaker 6: it my way.
Speaker 1: I don't care what she says.
Speaker 3: I mean, I'm with Jason.
Speaker 2: You know.
Speaker 3: It doesn't mean it's wrong. The tough room, the tough room.
Speaker 4: It's basically the sound same sound that Katie makes when
Speaker 4: her when her callers don't listen to her and they
Speaker 4: do the exact opposite of what she tells them.
Speaker 3: She's doing a lot of ms in here.
Speaker 6: I'll tell you that much, all right, Tracy, Do you
Speaker 6: understand it is a it is an expression of condemnation.
Speaker 7: Well, you know, it's like getting a text from somebody
Speaker 7: and reading into the text, you know, and so you
Speaker 7: can not reading into it.
Speaker 1: I mean, everyone on the staff agreement.
Speaker 4: Four people have agreed with him, Tracy, And that's all
Speaker 4: there is to it, all right, all right, it was
Speaker 4: the four people that know anyway, anyway, comments about Mom Donnie.
Speaker 7: I do have a comment about Mom Donnie. And here's
Speaker 7: here's the here's what I wanted to say about this.
Speaker 7: I lived in New York for eight years, all right,
Speaker 7: and I was there during Giuliani's term, and New York
Speaker 7: was the best.
Speaker 2: Place, all right.
Speaker 7: You know, he had cleaned it up, and it was
Speaker 7: just a wonderful place since I left. I was left
Speaker 7: during the Bluebern Bloomberg years, and you know I could
Speaker 7: kind of see it like changing and changing and changeing.
Speaker 7: And here we are today. Curtis who we don't.
Speaker 1: He was great last night. I don't know if you
Speaker 1: saw him on TV. He was great.
Speaker 7: Yeah. But that's the thing, Okay, So here here's the
Speaker 7: way that Mandannie is running his campaign. He's doing it
Speaker 7: through you know, YouTube, TikTok, social media. And that's the
Speaker 7: that's why everybody thinks it's like he's great. You know,
Speaker 7: he looks good on camera. He you know, he's he's charming,
Speaker 7: he's you know what I'm saying. It's like that's he's
Speaker 7: going after that, and.
Speaker 6: He's got a little Gavin new cementum is the Gavin
Speaker 6: is slick, personable. I mean on a personal level, I
Speaker 6: can tell you I get along, well, I used to
Speaker 6: get along. He doesn't like me anymore, but we used
Speaker 6: to get along. I mean, he's he can be charming
Speaker 6: and slick, but I think his policies are atrocious.
Speaker 7: Absolutely, And that's the same thing as as Mamdani. So
Speaker 7: I'm trying like Trump went on TikTok and does that
Speaker 7: whole social media thing because of Baron Barren is young,
Speaker 7: I have. I have teenagers. I have three teenagers there, fourteen, fifteen,
Speaker 7: and sixteen, and then I have a twenty two year old.
Speaker 2: So my twenty two.
Speaker 7: Year old is now voting age right, and my twenty
Speaker 7: two year old gets his information from logging into sites
Speaker 7: and watching YouTube. Now here's the bad part of that
Speaker 7: is when you log into Google, Yahoo, all of these
Speaker 7: different things, the first thing that comes up is how
Speaker 7: terrible Trump is. You know what I'm saying, it's like
Speaker 7: every meeting.
Speaker 1: I see it every day every day.
Speaker 6: I don't have a computer, but I use my phone
Speaker 6: every day and I search everywhere every day. And if
Speaker 6: Linda did have a ride to complain, it would be
Speaker 6: me texting her at any hour of the day and night,
Speaker 6: seven days a week. She would be right to complain
Speaker 6: about that. But I'm not telling her to do anything
Speaker 6: with it at that point. It's when she gets back
Speaker 6: to work. I want her to have it in her inbox.
Speaker 7: Right, I mean, but sorry, Linda, he's bringing me up again.
Speaker 3: But all right, Tracy, forgive you this one time.
Speaker 1: You know, I can't stand that.
Speaker 6: You know, every caller that that Katie puts up only
Speaker 6: sucks up to you when it comes between.
Speaker 4: Okay, first of all, stop crying like they're calling the
Speaker 4: Sean Hannity Show.
Speaker 3: So they've already admitted.
Speaker 6: Sean Hannity like, Hannity, you're right and Linda's wrong. You
Speaker 6: never get that call put up on the call.
Speaker 4: Get like a hundred of those a day. I got Tracy.
Speaker 4: Let me have Tracy. She's the only one I have. Please,
Speaker 4: it's like a setup. I think you have some secret
Speaker 4: deal going on.
Speaker 6: I'm being conspiratorial here. All right, Well, Tracy, are you
Speaker 6: glad you called now?
Speaker 7: No, but I want to I want to know Sean, like,
Speaker 7: what can we do in order to have you know,
Speaker 7: Curtis Leewag go out like I didn't. I've never heard
Speaker 7: of him, you know. And he was saying, well, I'm
Speaker 7: famous for being a guardian angel, and yet.
Speaker 6: Curtis has been in the streets of New York, putting
Speaker 6: himself in harm's way, helping young people. He's not been perfect.
Speaker 6: I mean, nobody's perfect, and but he lives, eat, breathes, sleep.
Speaker 6: Him and Mark Simone are just they're gonna they will
Speaker 6: never leave New York. Like Mark Simone swore to me,
Speaker 6: I'm gonna come back, and I'm like, no, I'm not.
Speaker 6: I'm never coming back. It's not happening. I may visit
Speaker 6: my family like once or twice a year. That's about it.
Speaker 6: That's there. But I have no intention of ever going back.
Speaker 6: And I can tell you I'm never I'm never going
Speaker 6: back anyway. I gotta run, Tracy. I kind of half
Speaker 6: appreciate your call, Thank you. She was cold to me.