WEBVTT - Best NFL Bets for Week 15 | Top Picks and Predictions (Ep. 619)

0:00:01.040 --> 0:00:03.160
<v Speaker 1>Welcome in everybody to Betting Pros. It's time to place

0:00:03.240 --> 0:00:05.720
<v Speaker 1>your bets. It is be Joey p joe Pisapia and

0:00:05.760 --> 0:00:08.879
<v Speaker 1>this is BP NFL. We're looking at the best bets

0:00:08.880 --> 0:00:11.880
<v Speaker 1>for week fifteen. All the teams are back playing, and

0:00:11.960 --> 0:00:15.720
<v Speaker 1>all the best players are back here as well. Andrew Ericson,

0:00:15.800 --> 0:00:17.759
<v Speaker 1>Terrell Furman Junior here to help you with the best

0:00:17.760 --> 0:00:20.239
<v Speaker 1>bets for the week. Should be a fun one. We've

0:00:20.239 --> 0:00:23.520
<v Speaker 1>got some lines that are well, pretty large if you're

0:00:23.520 --> 0:00:25.599
<v Speaker 1>looking at say the Giants and Ravens. You've got some

0:00:25.640 --> 0:00:28.000
<v Speaker 1>ones that are pretty tight and some that I think

0:00:28.040 --> 0:00:30.720
<v Speaker 1>are just flat out wrong. And we'll get to all

0:00:30.760 --> 0:00:32.239
<v Speaker 1>of them. Baby, We're gonna get to all of them.

0:00:32.240 --> 0:00:34.320
<v Speaker 1>Before we do. Just a quick reminder, don't forget to

0:00:34.320 --> 0:00:37.080
<v Speaker 1>download the Betting Pros app sink your sportsbooks for free

0:00:37.360 --> 0:00:39.920
<v Speaker 1>and utilize all the tools, including a couple free days

0:00:39.960 --> 0:00:43.240
<v Speaker 1>of the premium tools that we have available. So dip

0:00:43.280 --> 0:00:46.440
<v Speaker 1>your toes in the water of wagering. That's nice alliteration.

0:00:46.560 --> 0:00:48.919
<v Speaker 1>Actually I'm gonna keep that for some other shows. And

0:00:49.080 --> 0:00:51.680
<v Speaker 1>of course don't forget to check out all the VP

0:00:51.840 --> 0:00:53.800
<v Speaker 1>interactive tools that you could find out there. To help

0:00:53.880 --> 0:00:57.680
<v Speaker 1>you start betting smarter, not harder. Gentlemen's Week fifteen. We've

0:00:57.720 --> 0:01:00.640
<v Speaker 1>got some playoff field kind of games going on here,

0:01:00.800 --> 0:01:04.080
<v Speaker 1>but I want to start here with the Pittsburgh Steelers. Becauseterrell.

0:01:04.160 --> 0:01:07.679
<v Speaker 1>You always say it, it's always Mike Tomlin as an underdog.

0:01:07.720 --> 0:01:09.880
<v Speaker 1>You love Mike Tomlin as an underdog. He's on the road.

0:01:09.920 --> 0:01:12.560
<v Speaker 1>It's plus five and a half. But no George Pickens

0:01:12.800 --> 0:01:16.000
<v Speaker 1>gives me pause. Make me feel better about the Steelers

0:01:16.040 --> 0:01:17.119
<v Speaker 1>versus the Eagles this week.

0:01:17.440 --> 0:01:21.160
<v Speaker 2>No Pickens, no problem. It doesn't matter. Tomlin has gone

0:01:21.160 --> 0:01:24.520
<v Speaker 2>out there in won games with the way worse staffs.

0:01:24.840 --> 0:01:27.759
<v Speaker 2>This is all you need. All you need is Mike Tomlin.

0:01:27.880 --> 0:01:30.319
<v Speaker 2>You need him to be an underdog, and you need CJ. Watt.

0:01:30.360 --> 0:01:32.440
<v Speaker 2>As long as you have those three things, you are

0:01:32.520 --> 0:01:35.440
<v Speaker 2>always good. It doesn't matter what else who else is

0:01:35.480 --> 0:01:38.720
<v Speaker 2>out there. We've seen Duck Hodges, We've seen Mason Rudolph

0:01:38.720 --> 0:01:40.680
<v Speaker 2>can't even beat Will Levis for the starting job. And

0:01:40.720 --> 0:01:43.080
<v Speaker 2>Will Levis is throwing to the other team. He's throwing

0:01:43.080 --> 0:01:44.560
<v Speaker 2>to the other team, and he can't beat him for

0:01:44.600 --> 0:01:48.680
<v Speaker 2>the starting job because Tomlin made him better. It doesn't matter.

0:01:48.840 --> 0:01:53.440
<v Speaker 2>He's reinvigorated Russ and Russ actually is Russ not corny anymore?

0:01:54.000 --> 0:01:57.120
<v Speaker 2>I mean, Russ is going out here, they're beating the Commanders.

0:01:57.120 --> 0:02:02.840
<v Speaker 2>He's doing the Antonio Brown dance, and like, this team

0:02:03.040 --> 0:02:05.200
<v Speaker 2>is different. Look at hard knocks. Look how this team

0:02:05.200 --> 0:02:07.960
<v Speaker 2>gets behind them. How do you feed this Tomlin team?

0:02:08.160 --> 0:02:10.519
<v Speaker 2>They are completely locked in. And I think this is

0:02:10.560 --> 0:02:13.440
<v Speaker 2>another spot where, hey, they're looking at this Philadelphia Eagles team.

0:02:13.480 --> 0:02:15.840
<v Speaker 2>It's a little crosstown rivalry here. It's going to be

0:02:15.880 --> 0:02:18.440
<v Speaker 2>a lot of people at the game. Steelers Nation is

0:02:18.480 --> 0:02:20.960
<v Speaker 2>going to be everywhere. I think that it's a fifty

0:02:20.960 --> 0:02:24.160
<v Speaker 2>to fifty split in the crowd. And this Eagles team

0:02:24.240 --> 0:02:26.760
<v Speaker 2>just has a bunch of turmoil going on on the inside.

0:02:26.760 --> 0:02:29.200
<v Speaker 2>They're trying to figure out why they're not better, why

0:02:29.280 --> 0:02:31.120
<v Speaker 2>are they not covering these lines. If you look at

0:02:31.120 --> 0:02:33.359
<v Speaker 2>the Eagles this season as a home favorite of more

0:02:33.400 --> 0:02:36.079
<v Speaker 2>than three and a half points, they're one in four ats.

0:02:36.120 --> 0:02:38.760
<v Speaker 2>They cannot handle business when they're supposed to handle business.

0:02:38.800 --> 0:02:40.600
<v Speaker 2>And so I think this is a spot where I'm

0:02:40.639 --> 0:02:43.880
<v Speaker 2>fading them. I'm trusting the system. I'm trusting the system.

0:02:43.880 --> 0:02:46.359
<v Speaker 2>I'm trusting the system. Tomlin as a dog you taking

0:02:46.400 --> 0:02:46.920
<v Speaker 2>no matter.

0:02:46.720 --> 0:02:48.239
<v Speaker 3>What I mean, I think five and a half is

0:02:48.320 --> 0:02:50.200
<v Speaker 3>too many points. Plus five and a half, that's the

0:02:50.280 --> 0:02:52.280
<v Speaker 3>number that we're getting with Mike Tomlin on the road

0:02:52.280 --> 0:02:54.640
<v Speaker 3>as an underdog, which you should just basically take them

0:02:54.639 --> 0:02:56.040
<v Speaker 3>on the money line right at this point. They just

0:02:56.080 --> 0:02:58.000
<v Speaker 3>based on his track record eight and six on the

0:02:58.080 --> 0:03:00.600
<v Speaker 3>road against the spread money line, they're eight and six

0:03:00.639 --> 0:03:03.239
<v Speaker 3>on the road. So I mean, if you really want

0:03:03.320 --> 0:03:05.560
<v Speaker 3>a fat pay day, you're just looking at Steelers went

0:03:05.600 --> 0:03:07.760
<v Speaker 3>out right because they've done this act before. When the

0:03:07.919 --> 0:03:10.440
<v Speaker 3>backs against the wall, Oh they don't have George Pickens, Well,

0:03:10.639 --> 0:03:12.040
<v Speaker 3>I mean George Pickens was gonna have a tough match

0:03:12.080 --> 0:03:14.600
<v Speaker 3>up anyway. And if anything, I was impressed a lot

0:03:14.600 --> 0:03:16.799
<v Speaker 3>by what I saw from Mike Williams last week. He's

0:03:16.800 --> 0:03:19.400
<v Speaker 3>getting more integrated into this offense. It just takes one

0:03:19.400 --> 0:03:22.480
<v Speaker 3>moon ball from h Russell Wilson to kind of change

0:03:22.520 --> 0:03:26.760
<v Speaker 3>the tides of the game. Williams like Big Mike, and

0:03:26.760 --> 0:03:29.240
<v Speaker 3>the thing with Big Mike and why I'm not like

0:03:29.400 --> 0:03:32.119
<v Speaker 3>overly concerned about Oh well, it's like tough cornerbacks Erickson. Well,

0:03:32.760 --> 0:03:34.920
<v Speaker 3>Mike Williams is gonna be covered anyway. Like he's not

0:03:35.000 --> 0:03:37.480
<v Speaker 3>a separator, but he can just go up and snag

0:03:37.520 --> 0:03:39.680
<v Speaker 3>the ball in the air. So that's why I like

0:03:39.720 --> 0:03:42.040
<v Speaker 3>Mike Williams is kind of like an underrated X factor

0:03:42.320 --> 0:03:44.280
<v Speaker 3>in this matchup. I know, Joe, you talked about earlier

0:03:44.280 --> 0:03:46.320
<v Speaker 3>in some shows about maybe a little bit more justin

0:03:46.360 --> 0:03:48.840
<v Speaker 3>fields in this game. How do the Eagles respond to

0:03:48.920 --> 0:03:52.600
<v Speaker 3>that type of offensive wrinkle? And Mike Thomas gotta be

0:03:52.600 --> 0:03:56.720
<v Speaker 3>loving all this AJ Brown, This Jalen Hurts that he's

0:03:56.720 --> 0:03:59.320
<v Speaker 3>gonna take advantage of that because you know that they're

0:03:59.320 --> 0:04:02.080
<v Speaker 3>gonna try to force targets to AJ Brown and the

0:04:02.080 --> 0:04:04.640
<v Speaker 3>Steelers are gonna sit on that pick six. That's what

0:04:04.640 --> 0:04:06.600
<v Speaker 3>they're gonna do. I mean, Jalen Hurts is gonna throw

0:04:06.640 --> 0:04:09.400
<v Speaker 3>more attempts than he should in this game because the

0:04:09.440 --> 0:04:11.600
<v Speaker 3>Eagles have a narrative to set. Oh no, we do

0:04:11.800 --> 0:04:14.160
<v Speaker 3>like our receivers. We do throw the ball and what's

0:04:14.200 --> 0:04:16.880
<v Speaker 3>gonna happen is that's gonna give more opportunities for TJ. Watt.

0:04:17.320 --> 0:04:19.919
<v Speaker 3>This is such a psychological matchup where it plays so

0:04:20.080 --> 0:04:23.000
<v Speaker 3>much into the Steelers, where the Eagles are just so

0:04:23.040 --> 0:04:25.359
<v Speaker 3>stuck inside their own minds right now that they're not

0:04:25.400 --> 0:04:27.400
<v Speaker 3>even focused on winning the game like they're focused on it.

0:04:27.400 --> 0:04:29.240
<v Speaker 3>We gotta keep our players happy this and that. I

0:04:29.240 --> 0:04:31.080
<v Speaker 3>think the Steelers are gonna take full advantage. So plus

0:04:31.160 --> 0:04:33.200
<v Speaker 3>five and a half and like Treel Furman always says,

0:04:33.720 --> 0:04:35.800
<v Speaker 3>sprint going on the money line those dogs.

0:04:36.000 --> 0:04:39.640
<v Speaker 1>Yes, you're getting plus two hundred on the money line.

0:04:39.640 --> 0:04:39.960
<v Speaker 3>I see.

0:04:39.960 --> 0:04:42.880
<v Speaker 1>And yesterday I did bring up on the live if

0:04:42.880 --> 0:04:45.320
<v Speaker 1>you missed it. If you missed it, you can go

0:04:45.360 --> 0:04:47.040
<v Speaker 1>back and watch on the YouTube channel. But we did

0:04:47.040 --> 0:04:50.279
<v Speaker 1>the livestream now on Wednesdays at three pm Eastern, so

0:04:50.279 --> 0:04:52.200
<v Speaker 1>when you ring your belt notifications, you won't miss it.

0:04:52.240 --> 0:04:53.760
<v Speaker 1>But if you did, we talked about it yesterday and

0:04:53.800 --> 0:04:55.560
<v Speaker 1>I brought up maybe you do see some packages with

0:04:55.680 --> 0:04:57.400
<v Speaker 1>justin fields. If you don't have you know, Pickens on

0:04:57.400 --> 0:04:59.120
<v Speaker 1>the field, maybe you're gonna see a little bit more,

0:05:00.080 --> 0:05:01.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, cleverness, try to throw the Eagles off their

0:05:01.960 --> 0:05:03.200
<v Speaker 1>game a little bit, especially when you get in the

0:05:03.240 --> 0:05:04.920
<v Speaker 1>red zone. I could see that also, like the over

0:05:05.000 --> 0:05:06.960
<v Speaker 1>on Friarmouth Props this week too. More on that in

0:05:07.000 --> 0:05:08.800
<v Speaker 1>the show tomorrow we'll talk about. Let's get to the

0:05:08.800 --> 0:05:10.440
<v Speaker 1>next game on the list here, Terrell, you like the

0:05:10.480 --> 0:05:13.440
<v Speaker 1>Bengals at minus five now the Bengals are going against

0:05:13.560 --> 0:05:17.839
<v Speaker 1>Tennessee Titans. Defensively, again, they have been respectable most of

0:05:17.880 --> 0:05:19.599
<v Speaker 1>the year. I know the number for this game is

0:05:19.640 --> 0:05:22.000
<v Speaker 1>forty six, but let's talk about the Bengals here. Do

0:05:22.040 --> 0:05:24.320
<v Speaker 1>you why are you confident in this minus five because

0:05:24.320 --> 0:05:28.120
<v Speaker 1>that defense continues against any offense really to be a liability.

0:05:28.600 --> 0:05:31.479
<v Speaker 1>I know the Tennessee offense is worse than most, but

0:05:31.600 --> 0:05:34.080
<v Speaker 1>we've seen lesser offenses go up there and still put

0:05:34.160 --> 0:05:35.839
<v Speaker 1>up points against the Bengals regardless.

0:05:36.240 --> 0:05:38.720
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I mean, shoot, the twenty points to the Cowboys

0:05:38.800 --> 0:05:42.919
<v Speaker 2>was not impressive for that defense and giving up that

0:05:43.000 --> 0:05:44.640
<v Speaker 2>to Cooper Rush and how they were able to move

0:05:44.680 --> 0:05:48.080
<v Speaker 2>the football. But I think that nonetheless Joe Burrown, this

0:05:48.160 --> 0:05:50.479
<v Speaker 2>offense is going to score points like that is going

0:05:50.520 --> 0:05:53.120
<v Speaker 2>to happen, and if you're not able to match them,

0:05:53.440 --> 0:05:56.720
<v Speaker 2>regardless of how bad the defense is. I just think

0:05:56.760 --> 0:05:59.440
<v Speaker 2>that will Levis turns the ball over way too much,

0:05:59.600 --> 0:06:02.680
<v Speaker 2>very unprotected with the football. Even if it's not Will Levis.

0:06:02.760 --> 0:06:04.800
<v Speaker 2>Even if Will Levis is out of the game for

0:06:04.800 --> 0:06:07.479
<v Speaker 2>some reason and it's now Mason Rudolph, he still has

0:06:07.520 --> 0:06:09.880
<v Speaker 2>the same problem with The Titans are horrible on special

0:06:09.920 --> 0:06:12.720
<v Speaker 2>teams they give up, block punts, block field goals, all

0:06:12.760 --> 0:06:14.560
<v Speaker 2>this other stuff. So you have a third aspect of

0:06:14.600 --> 0:06:17.000
<v Speaker 2>the game that I think the Cincinnati Bengals are gonna

0:06:17.000 --> 0:06:20.000
<v Speaker 2>take advantage of because they're a desperate team. Every single

0:06:20.040 --> 0:06:22.760
<v Speaker 2>game they're playing for their lives. You only have a

0:06:22.800 --> 0:06:24.719
<v Speaker 2>shot at the playoffs if you're nine to eight. You

0:06:24.760 --> 0:06:27.440
<v Speaker 2>can't take a ninth loss. So this team thinks that

0:06:27.480 --> 0:06:31.039
<v Speaker 2>they're relatively there. Joe Burrow is shaking up about his

0:06:31.120 --> 0:06:33.560
<v Speaker 2>home getting broken into. I think that's gonna turn out

0:06:33.560 --> 0:06:36.560
<v Speaker 2>on the field as well, like I and See Higgins.

0:06:36.680 --> 0:06:39.239
<v Speaker 2>See Higgins is unhappy, and that's Joe Burrow's guy. Still,

0:06:39.320 --> 0:06:41.040
<v Speaker 2>Like he's gonna go feed him the ball, like I

0:06:41.040 --> 0:06:44.800
<v Speaker 2>think he's gonna continue to get his pass catchers the football,

0:06:45.160 --> 0:06:47.840
<v Speaker 2>and they're gonna be really, really good. And they've been

0:06:47.839 --> 0:06:51.119
<v Speaker 2>scoring on everybody, like everybody as a blake. They've been scoring.

0:06:51.160 --> 0:06:52.760
<v Speaker 2>It's just the defense has been given up a bunch

0:06:52.760 --> 0:06:56.120
<v Speaker 2>of points. And I'm just gonna I'm good fading Will Levis.

0:06:56.480 --> 0:06:58.479
<v Speaker 2>Will Levis can prove it to me this is a

0:06:58.520 --> 0:07:00.920
<v Speaker 2>complete one eighty from week one, Will Levis, you can

0:07:00.960 --> 0:07:03.120
<v Speaker 2>prove it to me. I love the Bengals here laying

0:07:03.160 --> 0:07:05.560
<v Speaker 2>the points they covered against the Cowboys, and I think

0:07:05.600 --> 0:07:07.720
<v Speaker 2>it can be the exact same game script where maybe

0:07:07.760 --> 0:07:10.080
<v Speaker 2>this is a tighter game for a couple of quarters,

0:07:10.120 --> 0:07:11.800
<v Speaker 2>but when it comes down to the end, they make

0:07:11.840 --> 0:07:13.960
<v Speaker 2>the right play, get a touchdown, and we get to cover.

0:07:14.600 --> 0:07:17.000
<v Speaker 1>The last time the Carolina Panthers were a favorite in

0:07:17.040 --> 0:07:20.680
<v Speaker 1>the game, it was December eighteenth, twenty twenty two. That's

0:07:21.240 --> 0:07:24.520
<v Speaker 1>two years ago, just almost to the date. So this

0:07:24.600 --> 0:07:27.360
<v Speaker 1>week against the Dallas Cowboys they are That is an

0:07:27.360 --> 0:07:30.440
<v Speaker 1>incredible thing here to sit here and have this evolution

0:07:31.000 --> 0:07:35.200
<v Speaker 1>of or evolution of the Carolina Panthers and de evolution

0:07:35.520 --> 0:07:39.920
<v Speaker 1>of the Dallas Cowboys, and here we are ericson not

0:07:40.000 --> 0:07:43.120
<v Speaker 1>only are you confident that the Panthers will win, but

0:07:43.160 --> 0:07:45.119
<v Speaker 1>you're confident they're going to cover this two and a half?

0:07:45.360 --> 0:07:47.000
<v Speaker 3>I am, and I thought you were going to open

0:07:47.040 --> 0:07:49.760
<v Speaker 3>that little line with Carolina about all right, quiz time,

0:07:49.800 --> 0:07:52.160
<v Speaker 3>who was the quarterback of the Carolina Panthers in twenty

0:07:52.200 --> 0:07:55.000
<v Speaker 3>twenty two when they were favored? If I had guess

0:07:55.320 --> 0:07:56.000
<v Speaker 3>what I mean?

0:07:56.040 --> 0:07:56.080
<v Speaker 1>So?

0:07:56.240 --> 0:07:59.680
<v Speaker 3>Was he there some rendition of Sam Darnold Baker Mayfield? Maybe?

0:08:00.120 --> 0:08:02.040
<v Speaker 3>But you said it was in December, so I don't know.

0:08:02.680 --> 0:08:04.680
<v Speaker 1>Who have Steelers.

0:08:05.040 --> 0:08:06.840
<v Speaker 3>Oh, so it must have been against like what's the

0:08:06.880 --> 0:08:07.880
<v Speaker 3>space Duck Hodges.

0:08:08.560 --> 0:08:12.160
<v Speaker 2>Well, guess what, I know they didn't cover that game, quarterback.

0:08:12.480 --> 0:08:14.600
<v Speaker 2>But I know for a fact they didn't cover the game.

0:08:14.880 --> 0:08:17.520
<v Speaker 2>I don't even Oh, I could tell you right now

0:08:17.600 --> 0:08:18.040
<v Speaker 2>they did not.

0:08:18.160 --> 0:08:22.280
<v Speaker 3>Okay, so again, you said de evolution of Dallas Cowboys.

0:08:22.320 --> 0:08:24.560
<v Speaker 3>I think you meant to say destruction of the Dallas

0:08:24.560 --> 0:08:26.800
<v Speaker 3>Cowboys because that's kind of that's kind of what we're

0:08:26.800 --> 0:08:28.680
<v Speaker 3>seeing here with Dallas.

0:08:28.840 --> 0:08:31.320
<v Speaker 1>Look like, by the way, Pittsburgh Steelers won twenty four

0:08:31.320 --> 0:08:34.880
<v Speaker 1>to sixteen. I found it right, Yes it was and Sam.

0:08:36.480 --> 0:08:40.760
<v Speaker 3>This quarterback? Wow, anyway, it was a plus five and a half, folks.

0:08:40.760 --> 0:08:42.240
<v Speaker 3>I mean, if you don't need any more evidence than that,

0:08:42.880 --> 0:08:44.959
<v Speaker 3>man Mitchell Trubisky on the road.

0:08:45.280 --> 0:08:46.120
<v Speaker 1>Oh my god.

0:08:46.280 --> 0:08:49.319
<v Speaker 3>All right, so right down, obviously the massive turnaround. They

0:08:49.320 --> 0:08:51.200
<v Speaker 3>are five and oh against the spread over their last

0:08:51.240 --> 0:08:54.439
<v Speaker 3>five games. They're two and oh straight up against teams

0:08:54.440 --> 0:08:56.079
<v Speaker 3>with losing records. So the only reason they haven't won

0:08:56.080 --> 0:08:57.960
<v Speaker 3>any of these games over the last two weeks because

0:08:58.000 --> 0:08:59.760
<v Speaker 3>these have actually been good teams that they've gone up

0:08:59.760 --> 0:09:02.480
<v Speaker 3>again but they've covered the spread with ease. They should

0:09:02.480 --> 0:09:04.440
<v Speaker 3>have won. I think a lot of these games I

0:09:04.440 --> 0:09:06.160
<v Speaker 3>don't need you guys to be convinced of that. And

0:09:06.200 --> 0:09:08.520
<v Speaker 3>now they're getting Dallas on a short week. We know

0:09:08.640 --> 0:09:11.200
<v Speaker 3>Dallas is bad. It took the Giants for them to

0:09:11.200 --> 0:09:13.679
<v Speaker 3>finally win a home game, the New York Giants, who

0:09:13.679 --> 0:09:16.880
<v Speaker 3>are currently sixteen and a half point underdogs and counting

0:09:17.160 --> 0:09:19.559
<v Speaker 3>with Tommy DeVito as a quarterback at home against the

0:09:19.559 --> 0:09:22.360
<v Speaker 3>Baltimore Ravens. I just think that doubt like this is

0:09:22.360 --> 0:09:24.600
<v Speaker 3>the spot, like this is where everything kind of comes

0:09:24.640 --> 0:09:27.520
<v Speaker 3>to a head. With Carolina, we've seen the improved play,

0:09:27.559 --> 0:09:30.640
<v Speaker 3>it hasn't translated into wins, but now finally it's going

0:09:30.720 --> 0:09:33.480
<v Speaker 3>to get them a w against the Dallas Cowboys team

0:09:33.520 --> 0:09:36.360
<v Speaker 3>that again, it's not a good team overall. Yes, they

0:09:36.360 --> 0:09:38.959
<v Speaker 3>put another linebacker on into preserve Overshaw is going to

0:09:39.000 --> 0:09:40.200
<v Speaker 3>be out for the rest of the season. Yes, they

0:09:40.240 --> 0:09:43.000
<v Speaker 3>have Micaeh Parsons. That's the one factor of their defense

0:09:43.000 --> 0:09:45.600
<v Speaker 3>that maybe we're concerned about. But the thing that's impressed

0:09:45.640 --> 0:09:47.560
<v Speaker 3>me the most about Bryce Young is we're seeing that

0:09:47.600 --> 0:09:50.360
<v Speaker 3>offscript playmaking ability that we saw at Alabama. So even

0:09:50.360 --> 0:09:52.760
<v Speaker 3>if he is getting pressure from Micah Parsons from this

0:09:52.800 --> 0:09:55.640
<v Speaker 3>pass rush from Dallas. Well, he's shown the last five

0:09:55.640 --> 0:09:58.120
<v Speaker 3>weeks that he can deliver. He can deliver those plays

0:09:58.200 --> 0:10:00.240
<v Speaker 3>on the room, on the move, when he's scrambling, when

0:10:00.240 --> 0:10:01.920
<v Speaker 3>he's making plays. That's why I love his rushing prop

0:10:01.960 --> 0:10:03.840
<v Speaker 3>this week. He's going to be the reason to win

0:10:04.080 --> 0:10:07.000
<v Speaker 3>for the Carolina Panthers this week. So dare I say

0:10:07.000 --> 0:10:11.080
<v Speaker 3>the Cardiac Cats are back? Yes, they are, Carolina min

0:10:11.160 --> 0:10:11.760
<v Speaker 3>two and a half.

0:10:11.920 --> 0:10:13.760
<v Speaker 1>We've got a huge game coming up this week too,

0:10:13.760 --> 0:10:15.520
<v Speaker 1>could be a Super Bowl preview. We're going to talk

0:10:15.559 --> 0:10:17.360
<v Speaker 1>about that one next Before we do, just a quick

0:10:17.400 --> 0:10:20.480
<v Speaker 1>reminder make sure you join our discord Bettingpros dot com

0:10:20.480 --> 0:10:22.760
<v Speaker 1>slash Chat. It's a great way for you to interact

0:10:22.760 --> 0:10:25.320
<v Speaker 1>with our betting community and of course get expert picks.

0:10:25.520 --> 0:10:27.880
<v Speaker 1>So Bettingpros dot Com slash Chat it's free, it's fun.

0:10:28.160 --> 0:10:30.040
<v Speaker 1>We want you to be part of our ever growing

0:10:30.120 --> 0:10:34.200
<v Speaker 1>discord community. Joined today and don't forget when you download

0:10:34.200 --> 0:10:37.520
<v Speaker 1>that VP app join our contest to Bettingpros dot Com

0:10:37.520 --> 0:10:40.200
<v Speaker 1>slash NFL contest. It's available for you if you have

0:10:40.240 --> 0:10:43.200
<v Speaker 1>the app. Just go right to the groups there and

0:10:43.240 --> 0:10:45.120
<v Speaker 1>you could join that way, or you could just go

0:10:45.120 --> 0:10:47.600
<v Speaker 1>to Betting pros dot com slash NFL contest. It's free.

0:10:47.679 --> 0:10:49.880
<v Speaker 1>You don't have to do anything, make picks with the

0:10:49.960 --> 0:10:52.840
<v Speaker 1>quick Pick feature on BP and you don't even have

0:10:52.880 --> 0:10:54.400
<v Speaker 1>to make bets. You just have to make picks. So

0:10:54.440 --> 0:10:56.400
<v Speaker 1>if you can't make wagers in the state you live

0:10:56.440 --> 0:10:59.920
<v Speaker 1>in for very depressing reasons, don't worry. You could still

0:11:00.120 --> 0:11:01.600
<v Speaker 1>have some fun, pick some games and win some free

0:11:01.600 --> 0:11:04.200
<v Speaker 1>stuff because we're doing weekly and monthly prizes for that

0:11:04.360 --> 0:11:06.880
<v Speaker 1>as well. All right, gentlemen, let's get to the big

0:11:06.920 --> 0:11:09.760
<v Speaker 1>one here. We've got Buffalo, We've got Detroit. I am

0:11:09.880 --> 0:11:11.840
<v Speaker 1>fascinated to see where you guys land on this one.

0:11:12.200 --> 0:11:15.040
<v Speaker 1>It's gonna be in Detroit, so obviously scoring could be

0:11:15.040 --> 0:11:17.400
<v Speaker 1>a bonanza. Terrell Ferman and start with you. What's your

0:11:17.440 --> 0:11:20.040
<v Speaker 1>take on Detroit Buffalo? What is the best bet for

0:11:20.080 --> 0:11:21.040
<v Speaker 1>the biggest game of the week.

0:11:21.440 --> 0:11:24.160
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, simple and easy for me. Let's lay the two

0:11:24.160 --> 0:11:25.760
<v Speaker 2>and a half here with the Lions. I think the

0:11:25.800 --> 0:11:28.480
<v Speaker 2>Lions go ahead and get this done against the Buffalo Bills.

0:11:28.920 --> 0:11:32.400
<v Speaker 2>I can't first of all, quick little mini rare, I

0:11:32.480 --> 0:11:36.520
<v Speaker 2>cannot fathom how you can lose a game and people

0:11:36.559 --> 0:11:38.760
<v Speaker 2>can say you locked up the MVP and a loss,

0:11:39.400 --> 0:11:42.680
<v Speaker 2>because when Lamar Jackson loses, that is the reason why

0:11:42.679 --> 0:11:45.840
<v Speaker 2>they say, oh, we cannot give him MVP. Lamar Jackson

0:11:45.840 --> 0:11:49.320
<v Speaker 2>has more passing yards, more passing touchdowns. He has beaten

0:11:49.400 --> 0:11:52.720
<v Speaker 2>Josh Allen head to head, and Josh Allen couldn't score

0:11:52.720 --> 0:11:54.880
<v Speaker 2>the football at all. Not saying Josh Allen is not

0:11:54.920 --> 0:11:57.600
<v Speaker 2>a great quarterback. He's having an amazing season. But how

0:11:57.600 --> 0:11:59.640
<v Speaker 2>do you lock up the MVP on a loss? And

0:11:59.679 --> 0:12:02.120
<v Speaker 2>I think this is gonna be the spot where they're like, Okay,

0:12:02.160 --> 0:12:04.840
<v Speaker 2>they take the loss, and everybody's like, the Bills are

0:12:04.840 --> 0:12:06.880
<v Speaker 2>gonna bounce back in this game. They're gonna try to

0:12:06.960 --> 0:12:10.680
<v Speaker 2>keep a spitting distance of the Chiefs, and they're forgetting

0:12:11.120 --> 0:12:14.959
<v Speaker 2>that this Lions team has a horseshoe up their ass.

0:12:15.520 --> 0:12:20.160
<v Speaker 2>There is something good about this Lions team where they constantly, constantly,

0:12:20.200 --> 0:12:22.800
<v Speaker 2>constantly find ways to win games. And at this point,

0:12:23.520 --> 0:12:26.720
<v Speaker 2>I'm not fading it no way. I saw this Jared

0:12:26.760 --> 0:12:29.160
<v Speaker 2>Goff throw five interceptions and this team still win the game.

0:12:29.720 --> 0:12:32.040
<v Speaker 2>I saw that with my eyes. I saw him throw

0:12:32.080 --> 0:12:34.640
<v Speaker 2>five interceptions and still within the game. There's something there,

0:12:34.800 --> 0:12:38.000
<v Speaker 2>we've seen Caleb Williams and he gotta coach fire. This

0:12:38.040 --> 0:12:40.160
<v Speaker 2>Lions team gotta coach fire because he was in act.

0:12:40.240 --> 0:12:42.120
<v Speaker 2>He couldn't beat this Lions team because he just went

0:12:42.160 --> 0:12:44.800
<v Speaker 2>there and didn't even use the timeout and eber flew.

0:12:44.960 --> 0:12:47.120
<v Speaker 2>So how do you beat the Bills? You beat the

0:12:47.120 --> 0:12:49.360
<v Speaker 2>Bills by running the football. Well, what do the Lions

0:12:49.400 --> 0:12:52.439
<v Speaker 2>do really really really well? David Montgomery and Jamier Gibbs.

0:12:52.480 --> 0:12:54.320
<v Speaker 2>I think both of them aren't gonna have amazing days.

0:12:54.400 --> 0:12:56.000
<v Speaker 2>Jered Goff is not gonna have to do a lot

0:12:56.040 --> 0:12:58.440
<v Speaker 2>of work here. This is gonna be the stereotypical Lions

0:12:58.440 --> 0:13:01.000
<v Speaker 2>game this season where they dominate on the ground. Jared

0:13:01.000 --> 0:13:03.440
<v Speaker 2>Golf doesn't give you this all world performance, but you

0:13:03.440 --> 0:13:05.160
<v Speaker 2>look at the score and you're like, oh wow, they

0:13:05.200 --> 0:13:08.120
<v Speaker 2>came out with the win. Again. The defenses lied. They're

0:13:08.120 --> 0:13:12.320
<v Speaker 2>flying around, and I really really credit the defense with

0:13:12.360 --> 0:13:14.960
<v Speaker 2>all the injuries that they have to still be able

0:13:14.960 --> 0:13:17.480
<v Speaker 2>to put together a unit that can be competent every

0:13:17.520 --> 0:13:21.280
<v Speaker 2>single given week. So I think that we could see

0:13:21.280 --> 0:13:25.080
<v Speaker 2>some scoring here, and I think that here we have

0:13:25.280 --> 0:13:28.040
<v Speaker 2>a spot where this run game just dominates time and

0:13:28.080 --> 0:13:30.920
<v Speaker 2>possession for the Lions and they're able to squeak out

0:13:30.920 --> 0:13:32.360
<v Speaker 2>of this with the win. Is this going to be

0:13:32.360 --> 0:13:35.160
<v Speaker 2>a big blowout win. I don't think so. But one

0:13:35.200 --> 0:13:37.760
<v Speaker 2>to ten win by the Lions absolutely, and I think

0:13:37.760 --> 0:13:40.040
<v Speaker 2>they get it by three or more. Gimme Lions laying

0:13:40.040 --> 0:13:40.960
<v Speaker 2>two and a half.

0:13:41.120 --> 0:13:43.120
<v Speaker 1>I think the only counter argument. And I like what

0:13:43.120 --> 0:13:45.000
<v Speaker 1>you're saying too about the MVP race too. If Josh

0:13:45.040 --> 0:13:47.840
<v Speaker 1>Allen keeps losing games, has becomes kind of tricky, especially

0:13:47.840 --> 0:13:49.880
<v Speaker 1>if you're saying, well, Lamar loses games, so he's out

0:13:49.880 --> 0:13:52.320
<v Speaker 1>of it. I think the difference is Lamar's lost enough

0:13:52.360 --> 0:13:55.960
<v Speaker 1>games here so far at least where the division is

0:13:56.000 --> 0:13:58.560
<v Speaker 1>slightly out of reach for them, not completely, but slightly,

0:13:59.280 --> 0:14:01.679
<v Speaker 1>especially after this week. If the Steelers win again, it

0:14:01.679 --> 0:14:04.840
<v Speaker 1>gets even tighter. So that's the only thing is, Yeah,

0:14:04.920 --> 0:14:07.240
<v Speaker 1>the East is easy. Yeah they're dominating their division, but

0:14:07.240 --> 0:14:09.439
<v Speaker 1>they're gonna win their division and they still have a

0:14:09.480 --> 0:14:12.520
<v Speaker 1>shot even if they lose this week, to still make

0:14:12.520 --> 0:14:13.920
<v Speaker 1>a run at that one seed two in the next

0:14:13.960 --> 0:14:16.280
<v Speaker 1>couple weeks. Again, I think I think that's the only thing.

0:14:16.320 --> 0:14:18.360
<v Speaker 1>And this game is if this game was Week seventeen,

0:14:18.440 --> 0:14:20.400
<v Speaker 1>I think would stick in people's minds just a little

0:14:20.440 --> 0:14:22.280
<v Speaker 1>bit more, but the fact of this week fifteen is

0:14:22.280 --> 0:14:24.880
<v Speaker 1>still a little bit of time. And also there's just

0:14:24.880 --> 0:14:27.640
<v Speaker 1>that narrative of the fatigue of Lamar Jackson, which isn't right,

0:14:28.320 --> 0:14:31.880
<v Speaker 1>but it's reality where they just get sick of voting

0:14:31.920 --> 0:14:33.720
<v Speaker 1>for the same guy over and over again in the media,

0:14:33.760 --> 0:14:35.600
<v Speaker 1>and that is just what happens. I get sick of

0:14:35.640 --> 0:14:37.560
<v Speaker 1>my homes and againstick of Lamar, and then they'll love

0:14:37.640 --> 0:14:39.200
<v Speaker 1>Josh Allen to get sick at him and they want

0:14:39.240 --> 0:14:43.360
<v Speaker 1>to go start, you know, dropping bo Nick's MVP stuff

0:14:43.360 --> 0:14:45.480
<v Speaker 1>in there. All right, let's get your take on this game.

0:14:45.560 --> 0:14:48.920
<v Speaker 1>So Andrew dare I even have to ask where you're going.

0:14:48.960 --> 0:14:52.320
<v Speaker 1>I mean, you love to talk about this game. He's

0:14:52.360 --> 0:14:54.720
<v Speaker 1>the undertaker, but this is also the cores field, as

0:14:54.720 --> 0:14:56.760
<v Speaker 1>he loves to tell us every week of the NFL.

0:14:57.200 --> 0:15:00.440
<v Speaker 1>So I gotta imagine, with all these weapons here and

0:15:00.480 --> 0:15:02.800
<v Speaker 1>now all these quarterbacks that are playing so well, that

0:15:02.840 --> 0:15:04.280
<v Speaker 1>you're going to take the over in this one.

0:15:04.440 --> 0:15:08.040
<v Speaker 3>Yep, over Lions Bills fifty four and a half points. Yes,

0:15:08.120 --> 0:15:11.120
<v Speaker 3>it is a massive number. It's actually the highest projected

0:15:11.160 --> 0:15:14.080
<v Speaker 3>total that we've seen in the NFL this season. But

0:15:14.200 --> 0:15:16.960
<v Speaker 3>keep in mind fifty four and a half points is

0:15:17.000 --> 0:15:21.040
<v Speaker 3>the average, not the projected total, the average of resulting

0:15:21.080 --> 0:15:24.160
<v Speaker 3>games played in Detroit over the last three plus seasons.

0:15:24.720 --> 0:15:27.440
<v Speaker 3>So we're hitting this number fifty percent of the time

0:15:27.560 --> 0:15:30.600
<v Speaker 3>on average. So and that's not considering the matchup that

0:15:30.640 --> 0:15:33.120
<v Speaker 3>we have against Obviously, I don't need convincing about. We

0:15:33.160 --> 0:15:35.520
<v Speaker 3>have two explosive offenses that can move the ball at will.

0:15:35.880 --> 0:15:37.880
<v Speaker 3>For I'm just talked about Detroit. They're going to score.

0:15:37.880 --> 0:15:40.320
<v Speaker 3>They score against literally everybody. You have Josh Allen who

0:15:40.320 --> 0:15:43.240
<v Speaker 3>scored six touchdowns last week, he might score six touchdowns

0:15:43.240 --> 0:15:45.160
<v Speaker 3>again in a losing effort. I don't know, but I

0:15:45.160 --> 0:15:46.760
<v Speaker 3>don't really care who wins this game, because all I

0:15:46.800 --> 0:15:49.520
<v Speaker 3>know this are gonna be points. And even when you

0:15:49.560 --> 0:15:52.960
<v Speaker 3>look at just this season, Lions games on average are

0:15:53.200 --> 0:15:55.840
<v Speaker 3>hitting fifty five points per game at home. The last

0:15:55.960 --> 0:15:58.360
<v Speaker 3>five home games for the Lions have seen four go

0:15:58.440 --> 0:16:01.440
<v Speaker 3>for fifty eight or more points sixty one point average.

0:16:01.480 --> 0:16:04.560
<v Speaker 3>So I understand that there might be hesitants about well, this,

0:16:04.720 --> 0:16:06.480
<v Speaker 3>this this number is so big, there's no value, there's

0:16:06.480 --> 0:16:09.640
<v Speaker 3>no virus, like, maybe there's no value, but it's gonna hit.

0:16:09.680 --> 0:16:12.000
<v Speaker 3>It's kind of good. But it's gonna go over the totals.

0:16:12.360 --> 0:16:14.080
<v Speaker 1>And there's I think there's a need for the Buffalo

0:16:14.120 --> 0:16:17.200
<v Speaker 1>Bills after last week that you know they feel, man,

0:16:17.200 --> 0:16:19.720
<v Speaker 1>we really you know should have been should have had

0:16:19.720 --> 0:16:21.680
<v Speaker 1>that game. You know, we should have beaten a Rams team.

0:16:21.720 --> 0:16:24.280
<v Speaker 1>But you know that's you get caught that trap week

0:16:24.320 --> 0:16:27.080
<v Speaker 1>in between. And I think there's a not desperation, but

0:16:27.120 --> 0:16:29.560
<v Speaker 1>a little bit of motivation here where like Buffalo is like, Okay, look,

0:16:29.600 --> 0:16:31.480
<v Speaker 1>this is this is our new measuring stick because everybody

0:16:31.480 --> 0:16:32.680
<v Speaker 1>thinks the line is the best even in the NFL.

0:16:32.680 --> 0:16:34.640
<v Speaker 1>Is how good are we? And I feel like Josh

0:16:34.640 --> 0:16:36.160
<v Speaker 1>Allen w lance for that Bill, don't you?

0:16:36.440 --> 0:16:39.160
<v Speaker 3>I do? And I think that from a mindset perspective,

0:16:39.200 --> 0:16:41.520
<v Speaker 3>you know, both teams are going coaching into this game.

0:16:41.800 --> 0:16:44.880
<v Speaker 3>Do you think the Bills are even considering punting at

0:16:44.920 --> 0:16:47.800
<v Speaker 3>any point? Like they're they're on their own forty yard?

0:16:47.840 --> 0:16:49.040
<v Speaker 3>But I'm like, well, we got to go for it

0:16:49.040 --> 0:16:51.640
<v Speaker 3>because you know Dan Campbell's going for it. So I

0:16:51.680 --> 0:16:52.320
<v Speaker 3>just think he's.

0:16:52.200 --> 0:16:53.800
<v Speaker 1>Got to get that out of a system too, Dude,

0:16:53.840 --> 0:16:55.800
<v Speaker 1>I I am. I mean, when you get the playoffs,

0:16:55.800 --> 0:16:57.760
<v Speaker 1>you gotta stop doing that crap. It's gonna kill you.

0:16:57.920 --> 0:16:59.360
<v Speaker 1>I mean, it's just going to no.

0:16:59.440 --> 0:17:01.320
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, oh, that's gonna be the reason they don't win

0:17:01.360 --> 0:17:04.919
<v Speaker 2>a super Bowl, regardless of whether it happens in the

0:17:04.960 --> 0:17:08.080
<v Speaker 2>Divisional round, or whether it happens in the Conference championship,

0:17:08.119 --> 0:17:11.000
<v Speaker 2>or whether it happens in the super Bowl Bowl prediction. Here.

0:17:11.040 --> 0:17:13.240
<v Speaker 2>You heard it right here, right now. The reason the

0:17:13.320 --> 0:17:15.840
<v Speaker 2>Lions get knocked out of the playoffs is because they

0:17:15.880 --> 0:17:18.080
<v Speaker 2>go for it randomly on fourth down in a game

0:17:18.119 --> 0:17:20.520
<v Speaker 2>and they don't get it and it actually kicks them

0:17:20.560 --> 0:17:21.119
<v Speaker 2>into butt.

0:17:21.240 --> 0:17:22.920
<v Speaker 1>It's one of the things that worries me the most

0:17:23.000 --> 0:17:26.080
<v Speaker 1>about them playing Kansas City in the Super Bowl because

0:17:26.359 --> 0:17:29.800
<v Speaker 1>Kansas City, with Andy Reid and the way that they operate,

0:17:30.040 --> 0:17:32.240
<v Speaker 1>right there's such a well owed machine in terms of operation.

0:17:32.320 --> 0:17:34.840
<v Speaker 1>Maybe not always execution in the last two years, but operation.

0:17:36.200 --> 0:17:38.159
<v Speaker 1>That's not where you want Dan Campbell to be against

0:17:38.200 --> 0:17:41.359
<v Speaker 1>Andy Reid again. There's gonna be a decision making process

0:17:41.400 --> 0:17:43.240
<v Speaker 1>at some point that's gonna go awry. And I'm with

0:17:43.280 --> 0:17:45.240
<v Speaker 1>you one hundred percent. That's why I think you do

0:17:45.280 --> 0:17:47.119
<v Speaker 1>want the Buffalo Bills. I think the Buffalo Bills are

0:17:47.119 --> 0:17:48.560
<v Speaker 1>an easier win for you if you do get the

0:17:48.640 --> 0:17:50.159
<v Speaker 1>Super Bowl on the AFC side, I even think the

0:17:50.240 --> 0:17:53.879
<v Speaker 1>Ravens are an easier win for you. It's specifically Andy

0:17:53.920 --> 0:17:57.000
<v Speaker 1>Reid that I worry about the most, potentially andrew anything

0:17:57.040 --> 0:17:59.120
<v Speaker 1>else before we move on to the next game here

0:17:59.240 --> 0:18:00.040
<v Speaker 1>on this last.

0:17:59.800 --> 0:18:02.160
<v Speaker 3>One, actually I did, so I don't have anything else again,

0:18:02.240 --> 0:18:03.960
<v Speaker 3>love the over. I did want to bring back up

0:18:04.000 --> 0:18:06.879
<v Speaker 3>the topic of the MVP with with Josh Allen, like

0:18:06.920 --> 0:18:09.920
<v Speaker 3>Furman laid out talking about well again, so like, let's

0:18:10.160 --> 0:18:13.000
<v Speaker 3>let's say that we're right here, it's a shootout over Cashes.

0:18:13.040 --> 0:18:15.600
<v Speaker 3>The Lions win again, so the Bills have lost too straight.

0:18:16.240 --> 0:18:19.520
<v Speaker 3>The MVP obviously doesn't get it doesn't strengthen for Josh Allen,

0:18:19.560 --> 0:18:21.520
<v Speaker 3>right if they lose again, like I can't imagine that

0:18:21.600 --> 0:18:24.000
<v Speaker 3>unless it's another six touchdown effort and people don't care.

0:18:24.400 --> 0:18:26.000
<v Speaker 3>And what if the Eagles.

0:18:26.040 --> 0:18:29.760
<v Speaker 2>That losses in December? Yeah, in December, Like that's the

0:18:30.240 --> 0:18:34.120
<v Speaker 2>early in the season. Okay, in December, Batan back losses.

0:18:33.840 --> 0:18:36.679
<v Speaker 1>Like yeah, but I mean again, if you lose to

0:18:36.720 --> 0:18:39.200
<v Speaker 1>the best team in football in the NFC, like I

0:18:39.560 --> 0:18:41.679
<v Speaker 1>it depends. It does depend on the performance, because what

0:18:41.720 --> 0:18:44.160
<v Speaker 1>if it is this incredible game that it goes to overtime,

0:18:44.200 --> 0:18:46.520
<v Speaker 1>and none of it's Josh Allen's fault. He's not throwing

0:18:46.520 --> 0:18:49.120
<v Speaker 1>any picks right, the defense just giving up points every time.

0:18:49.480 --> 0:18:51.240
<v Speaker 1>I do think it matters because I think that's the

0:18:51.320 --> 0:18:53.560
<v Speaker 1>narrative from last week's game that people were riding as well. Well,

0:18:53.600 --> 0:18:55.920
<v Speaker 1>Josh Allen did all he could to win that football game.

0:18:55.960 --> 0:18:58.560
<v Speaker 1>What else? What else could he possibly do? And I

0:18:58.600 --> 0:18:59.960
<v Speaker 1>don't think that's wrong necessary?

0:19:00.200 --> 0:19:02.639
<v Speaker 3>Do you think that I'm just trying to like go

0:19:02.680 --> 0:19:04.679
<v Speaker 3>through the scenarios in my mind. Do you think that

0:19:04.880 --> 0:19:07.080
<v Speaker 3>it might make sense? Well, once you think Lamar Jackson

0:19:07.200 --> 0:19:09.760
<v Speaker 3>is dead as m VP, because well, look.

0:19:09.600 --> 0:19:11.520
<v Speaker 1>The market does because he's plus fourteen hundred. Now he's

0:19:11.520 --> 0:19:13.760
<v Speaker 1>gonna put up hug numbers against You're.

0:19:13.640 --> 0:19:17.240
<v Speaker 3>Gonna put up huge numbers this week. The Steelers could lose,

0:19:17.920 --> 0:19:20.159
<v Speaker 3>so are the Ravens like they're not? I mean, the

0:19:20.160 --> 0:19:22.320
<v Speaker 3>Steelers have a tough schedule, so if they lose more games,

0:19:22.359 --> 0:19:24.160
<v Speaker 3>the Ravens could sneak up and win that division still

0:19:24.160 --> 0:19:24.840
<v Speaker 3>and then if it.

0:19:24.800 --> 0:19:26.359
<v Speaker 2>Depends, Wary still have a matchup.

0:19:26.440 --> 0:19:29.520
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, Barkley is still on pace for that Dickerson record too,

0:19:30.040 --> 0:19:32.000
<v Speaker 1>So if Barkley is a big game against the Steelers

0:19:32.400 --> 0:19:35.400
<v Speaker 1>and they romp over the Steelers, then you know these

0:19:35.400 --> 0:19:37.359
<v Speaker 1>plus five hundred. He's the closest one. Allen is minus

0:19:37.400 --> 0:19:41.080
<v Speaker 1>four fifty. For that to come back into the positive

0:19:41.200 --> 0:19:43.920
<v Speaker 1>even with a loss, Josh Allen would have to play

0:19:43.960 --> 0:19:46.440
<v Speaker 1>incredibly poorly in this game and they have to get

0:19:46.440 --> 0:19:48.680
<v Speaker 1>blown out. I think that's the only way it even

0:19:49.440 --> 0:19:50.679
<v Speaker 1>like comes even more anywhere.

0:19:51.440 --> 0:19:53.520
<v Speaker 3>If he just has a matter of how he plays,

0:19:53.520 --> 0:19:54.399
<v Speaker 3>it doesn't matter if they win.

0:19:54.480 --> 0:19:57.760
<v Speaker 1>You think, That's what I think, especially the structure of what's.

0:19:57.560 --> 0:19:59.919
<v Speaker 2>Going on the gay Look who they played this season,

0:20:00.040 --> 0:20:04.040
<v Speaker 2>and let's look at them. Relatives matter. They haven't. I mean,

0:20:04.359 --> 0:20:08.200
<v Speaker 2>Cardinals Dolphin doesn't matter. I'm telling you that they're not

0:20:08.240 --> 0:20:11.000
<v Speaker 2>gonna care. Every time they played except the Chiefs the

0:20:11.080 --> 0:20:13.239
<v Speaker 2>chief And it seems like the Chiefs win is what

0:20:13.320 --> 0:20:15.560
<v Speaker 2>got him the MVP. Honestly, it feels like the Chiefs

0:20:15.600 --> 0:20:17.879
<v Speaker 2>win is the marquee win that's gonna get him the MVP.

0:20:18.200 --> 0:20:20.560
<v Speaker 2>Because they lost to the Texans, they lost to the Ravens,

0:20:20.720 --> 0:20:23.760
<v Speaker 2>and if they lose to the Lions, that's like, come on, now,

0:20:23.880 --> 0:20:25.920
<v Speaker 2>those are three of the four best teams in the

0:20:26.000 --> 0:20:27.200
<v Speaker 2>league and you lost three of them.

0:20:27.320 --> 0:20:29.520
<v Speaker 1>Oh look, man, I'm hedging with the Bills for the

0:20:29.520 --> 0:20:31.840
<v Speaker 1>Super Bowl. I'm still sticking with my Lions and Chiefs,

0:20:31.840 --> 0:20:33.720
<v Speaker 1>and everybody can hit on the Chiefs all they want.

0:20:33.760 --> 0:20:36.040
<v Speaker 1>The end of the day, as you said, you know,

0:20:36.119 --> 0:20:38.359
<v Speaker 1>the Bills have shown they can compete against the Chiefs.

0:20:38.400 --> 0:20:41.560
<v Speaker 1>We know that, but if the Bills getting it done

0:20:41.600 --> 0:20:43.600
<v Speaker 1>in big spots is still something that I'm concerned with

0:20:43.680 --> 0:20:45.320
<v Speaker 1>when we get into the playoff time. That's just where

0:20:45.320 --> 0:20:47.640
<v Speaker 1>I'm that. I want to get to the Chargers game too,

0:20:47.640 --> 0:20:50.119
<v Speaker 1>because we always like Baker Mayfield when he's an underdog.

0:20:50.160 --> 0:20:53.120
<v Speaker 1>He's an underdog this week, but it is against the Chargers,

0:20:53.200 --> 0:20:55.120
<v Speaker 1>and you're on the side of the Chargers, and typically

0:20:55.160 --> 0:20:56.560
<v Speaker 1>I want to be on the Baker Mayfield side. But

0:20:56.560 --> 0:20:58.320
<v Speaker 1>I've been undecided about this one because I feel like

0:20:58.359 --> 0:21:02.439
<v Speaker 1>the Chargers are really starting to I mean, they're becoming

0:21:02.440 --> 0:21:04.840
<v Speaker 1>a really formidable team. The injuries have been a bit

0:21:04.840 --> 0:21:07.600
<v Speaker 1>of an issue lately. But let's talk about this minus

0:21:07.600 --> 0:21:10.000
<v Speaker 1>three and why you're comfortable with it as a best

0:21:10.000 --> 0:21:11.639
<v Speaker 1>bet this week, because this is a game that actually

0:21:11.640 --> 0:21:12.080
<v Speaker 1>worries me.

0:21:12.640 --> 0:21:15.480
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. No, I feel pretty good about it. And I'm

0:21:15.520 --> 0:21:19.159
<v Speaker 2>watching the lat Maconkee News. From what I'm hearing is

0:21:19.200 --> 0:21:21.840
<v Speaker 2>that he looks like he's gonna go. He's been limited

0:21:21.880 --> 0:21:24.920
<v Speaker 2>in practice, and that's a good sign to him playing,

0:21:25.240 --> 0:21:28.480
<v Speaker 2>because if he plays, he's absolutely torching this secondary. And

0:21:28.560 --> 0:21:30.320
<v Speaker 2>that's what it is for me. I think that this

0:21:30.480 --> 0:21:34.760
<v Speaker 2>is the Justin Herbert I prove to you that I'm

0:21:34.840 --> 0:21:37.399
<v Speaker 2>better than an average quarterback type game where he just

0:21:37.520 --> 0:21:40.000
<v Speaker 2>kind of cooks this secondary that's been giving the Buccaneers

0:21:40.119 --> 0:21:43.879
<v Speaker 2>issues all season. It's never really been about Baker Mayfield.

0:21:43.880 --> 0:21:46.160
<v Speaker 2>I think Baker Mayfield actually would be fine in the game.

0:21:46.640 --> 0:21:49.880
<v Speaker 2>He'll be okay. This Chargers defense is still really good.

0:21:49.920 --> 0:21:52.479
<v Speaker 2>They are really really still pesky to given up points.

0:21:52.720 --> 0:21:55.720
<v Speaker 2>It's only a handful of times that they actually literally

0:21:55.800 --> 0:21:59.040
<v Speaker 2>just a handful against the Cincinnati Bengals and the Baltimore

0:21:59.119 --> 0:22:01.760
<v Speaker 2>Ravens where they gave up more than three touchdowns. So

0:22:01.920 --> 0:22:04.919
<v Speaker 2>if you're not scoring three touchdowns against this team, I

0:22:04.960 --> 0:22:08.000
<v Speaker 2>think that the Chargers can score three touchdowns against the

0:22:08.119 --> 0:22:11.280
<v Speaker 2>Tampa Bay Buccaneers. So I'm back in. Justin Herbert is

0:22:11.280 --> 0:22:14.360
<v Speaker 2>looking like an actual more than average quarterback. And I'm

0:22:14.359 --> 0:22:16.480
<v Speaker 2>not even a guy that's really really high on Justin Herbert.

0:22:16.520 --> 0:22:18.879
<v Speaker 2>I think he's slightly overrated, but I think this is

0:22:18.880 --> 0:22:21.040
<v Speaker 2>a really good spot where he's getting a soft defense,

0:22:21.080 --> 0:22:23.280
<v Speaker 2>a soft secondary. He's a they're not going to be

0:22:23.320 --> 0:22:25.280
<v Speaker 2>able to generate as much pressure. And then I love

0:22:25.320 --> 0:22:29.080
<v Speaker 2>the coaching and I'm taking Harball. I think Harball is

0:22:29.080 --> 0:22:32.000
<v Speaker 2>a great coach. He's got this team, this defense really

0:22:32.040 --> 0:22:36.159
<v Speaker 2>really solidified out of a team last year whose defense

0:22:36.200 --> 0:22:39.160
<v Speaker 2>was horrible, and they're essentially the same pieces, Like it's

0:22:39.240 --> 0:22:42.080
<v Speaker 2>essentially the same pieces. He's coached them up better. And

0:22:42.160 --> 0:22:44.920
<v Speaker 2>so yeah, I'm fading Tampa Bay here. I think they're

0:22:44.920 --> 0:22:47.200
<v Speaker 2>going to have some issues. I'm really really worried because

0:22:47.280 --> 0:22:49.600
<v Speaker 2>in my big money fantasy league I have Mike Evans

0:22:49.880 --> 0:22:51.720
<v Speaker 2>and I really really need Mike Evans to have a

0:22:51.720 --> 0:22:53.280
<v Speaker 2>good week. But I don't think it's gonna happen. I

0:22:53.320 --> 0:22:54.919
<v Speaker 2>really don't. I think Chargers are going to play some

0:22:54.960 --> 0:22:56.240
<v Speaker 2>good defense and be able to get a win.

0:22:56.720 --> 0:22:58.600
<v Speaker 1>All right, We've been talking about it all week, so

0:22:58.640 --> 0:23:03.560
<v Speaker 1>now we're here on Thursday. So the Houston Miami situation,

0:23:03.680 --> 0:23:06.000
<v Speaker 1>Miami can't be good teams. It's used to a good team,

0:23:06.800 --> 0:23:08.919
<v Speaker 1>Andrew are we just gonna look past all of it?

0:23:09.000 --> 0:23:10.359
<v Speaker 1>And just go to the total instead.

0:23:10.640 --> 0:23:15.600
<v Speaker 3>Yes, because I'm a coward and I wanted to put

0:23:15.600 --> 0:23:18.560
<v Speaker 3>Dolphins plus three, but it just burned in my memory

0:23:18.560 --> 0:23:20.399
<v Speaker 3>as I review this game, be like, why did I

0:23:20.400 --> 0:23:22.400
<v Speaker 3>pick the dolphinscause the team against a big record? Why

0:23:22.520 --> 0:23:24.560
<v Speaker 3>why did I did this to myself? So instead, I'm

0:23:24.560 --> 0:23:26.399
<v Speaker 3>just gonna fade both teams, and the easiest way to

0:23:26.440 --> 0:23:28.040
<v Speaker 3>do that is to take the under in the game.

0:23:28.160 --> 0:23:31.439
<v Speaker 3>Forty seven points is a pretty high total, and I

0:23:31.440 --> 0:23:33.159
<v Speaker 3>think that's if we were getting c J strived from

0:23:33.200 --> 0:23:35.680
<v Speaker 3>last year, where we'd feel confident about, oh, like, let's

0:23:35.680 --> 0:23:36.160
<v Speaker 3>take the over.

0:23:36.200 --> 0:23:36.440
<v Speaker 1>C J.

0:23:36.560 --> 0:23:39.000
<v Speaker 3>Stroud firing on all cylinders. Has not been the case

0:23:39.000 --> 0:23:41.720
<v Speaker 3>so whatsoever this year. And we just look at the trends.

0:23:42.280 --> 0:23:44.480
<v Speaker 3>Six of the Texans last nine games as favorites have

0:23:44.560 --> 0:23:47.280
<v Speaker 3>gone under the total at home this year, they've played

0:23:47.440 --> 0:23:49.320
<v Speaker 3>one game that has gone over the total. They're one

0:23:49.359 --> 0:23:52.960
<v Speaker 3>and five towards the over forty five points per game.

0:23:53.320 --> 0:23:56.560
<v Speaker 3>The Dolphins six of the seven last road games have

0:23:56.680 --> 0:24:00.680
<v Speaker 3>gone under the total. So yeah, I just really want

0:24:00.680 --> 0:24:03.480
<v Speaker 3>to fade both these teams in this situation. I get

0:24:03.520 --> 0:24:05.960
<v Speaker 3>that the texts are coming off of bye week. Maybe

0:24:05.960 --> 0:24:10.600
<v Speaker 3>we see more of a offensive you know, improvement, or

0:24:10.640 --> 0:24:12.280
<v Speaker 3>maybe we just see more of the same from them,

0:24:12.320 --> 0:24:15.280
<v Speaker 3>where it really hasn't been this high flying show and

0:24:15.320 --> 0:24:16.720
<v Speaker 3>they just want to run the ball with Joe Mixon

0:24:16.800 --> 0:24:18.520
<v Speaker 3>because that's really what's worked for them the best all

0:24:18.600 --> 0:24:21.399
<v Speaker 3>year long. And every time you feel comfortable with the

0:24:21.400 --> 0:24:23.640
<v Speaker 3>Dolphins say oh, well they're at a dome this time, Well,

0:24:23.680 --> 0:24:25.480
<v Speaker 3>you know, they played the last two road games that

0:24:25.480 --> 0:24:29.160
<v Speaker 3>they've played that they've had with really high totals. I'm

0:24:29.160 --> 0:24:30.760
<v Speaker 3>looking at the numbers here at forty seven and a

0:24:30.760 --> 0:24:33.240
<v Speaker 3>half and forty nine and a half, they sailed under

0:24:33.280 --> 0:24:36.960
<v Speaker 3>the projected total. It was the Rams and Dolphins game

0:24:37.000 --> 0:24:38.800
<v Speaker 3>that was at forty nine and a half in a dome.

0:24:38.880 --> 0:24:42.080
<v Speaker 3>Everyone's like, oh, this game is gonna go way over.

0:24:42.680 --> 0:24:46.120
<v Speaker 3>Wasn't even close. The Dolphins couldn't do anything on offense

0:24:46.200 --> 0:24:49.080
<v Speaker 3>because they're on the road against a good team. So

0:24:49.359 --> 0:24:53.000
<v Speaker 3>I just yeah, for me, it's under forty seven points. Again.

0:24:53.040 --> 0:24:55.720
<v Speaker 3>I wanted to come on here and confidently back the Dolphins,

0:24:55.720 --> 0:24:57.679
<v Speaker 3>but just can't do that to myself because I'm going

0:24:57.720 --> 0:24:59.679
<v Speaker 3>to look up and be like, well you got what

0:24:59.760 --> 0:25:02.000
<v Speaker 3>you just Erickson, because you bet on the Dolphins against

0:25:02.040 --> 0:25:03.080
<v Speaker 3>a team with a winning record.

0:25:05.000 --> 0:25:08.720
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, it's it's tough. I think I'm not gonna call

0:25:08.760 --> 0:25:10.840
<v Speaker 1>you a coward about this. I just think it's probably

0:25:10.960 --> 0:25:13.920
<v Speaker 1>the path of least resistance, to be honest with you,

0:25:14.000 --> 0:25:15.719
<v Speaker 1>I think that's where it is and and and that's

0:25:15.720 --> 0:25:18.080
<v Speaker 1>what we're trying to do here. I'm trying to win money,

0:25:18.200 --> 0:25:20.320
<v Speaker 1>and that little bit of variance is enough. I think

0:25:20.320 --> 0:25:21.919
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna make you nervous. I think I would just

0:25:21.920 --> 0:25:24.160
<v Speaker 1>go with this under two. So we'll see what happens there.

0:25:24.240 --> 0:25:25.720
<v Speaker 1>One more game for each of the guys, and we're

0:25:25.720 --> 0:25:27.560
<v Speaker 1>gonna talk about the upset special in the parlay of

0:25:27.600 --> 0:25:30.240
<v Speaker 1>the week. Let's get the Broncos game in here. The

0:25:30.240 --> 0:25:33.320
<v Speaker 1>Broncos are four point favorites this week. They've earned this.

0:25:33.760 --> 0:25:37.000
<v Speaker 1>They're in a spot here against the Indianapolis Colts where

0:25:37.280 --> 0:25:40.040
<v Speaker 1>you are looking at, you know, Anthony Richardson trying to

0:25:40.080 --> 0:25:43.679
<v Speaker 1>claw his way back into relevance, the Denver Broncos at

0:25:43.680 --> 0:25:45.720
<v Speaker 1>home with bow Nicks playing so well, it's hard not

0:25:45.840 --> 0:25:48.400
<v Speaker 1>to like where this team is going. They're a playoff

0:25:48.400 --> 0:25:50.360
<v Speaker 1>team right now, and it feels like a game they

0:25:50.400 --> 0:25:53.800
<v Speaker 1>should win. So obviously, Trell, you're pretty confident that they're

0:25:53.800 --> 0:25:55.600
<v Speaker 1>gonna win this one very handily.

0:25:56.480 --> 0:26:03.840
<v Speaker 2>Would you beolieve me if Fassett I'm in love some

0:26:04.320 --> 0:26:08.720
<v Speaker 2>mean yes, all the way on the side of bow Knicks.

0:26:08.880 --> 0:26:11.879
<v Speaker 2>And I mean, if you just go and watch my

0:26:12.000 --> 0:26:15.480
<v Speaker 2>progression of how if he I was on bow knicks

0:26:15.520 --> 0:26:18.159
<v Speaker 2>and this Broncos team still taking them, but if he

0:26:18.840 --> 0:26:22.600
<v Speaker 2>to now me being confident in saying that Sean Payton

0:26:22.640 --> 0:26:25.560
<v Speaker 2>has figured out bow Knicks and it's so easy, it's

0:26:25.560 --> 0:26:27.440
<v Speaker 2>so easy. We're not gonna put it. We're not gonna

0:26:27.440 --> 0:26:29.400
<v Speaker 2>put them in danger, guys, and we're gonna play really

0:26:29.440 --> 0:26:31.919
<v Speaker 2>really good defense. And now we have a quarterback that

0:26:32.040 --> 0:26:35.520
<v Speaker 2>will actually give us the football without us asking. He's

0:26:35.560 --> 0:26:38.560
<v Speaker 2>just gonna give it to us sometimes. And and the

0:26:38.640 --> 0:26:42.919
<v Speaker 2>little whatever whatever voodoo that the Colts had that they

0:26:43.000 --> 0:26:46.280
<v Speaker 2>kept covering games with Joe Flacco with Anthony Richardson, that

0:26:46.359 --> 0:26:48.360
<v Speaker 2>has died off in the last couple of weeks. Here

0:26:48.400 --> 0:26:52.080
<v Speaker 2>they're four and five. No, yeah, for their last five games,

0:26:52.080 --> 0:26:54.600
<v Speaker 2>they haven't covered the spread at all. They didn't cover

0:26:54.640 --> 0:26:57.280
<v Speaker 2>a six point dogs against Minnesota, and they didn't cover

0:26:57.320 --> 0:26:59.199
<v Speaker 2>against the Bills. They didn't cover against the Lions. They

0:26:59.200 --> 0:27:02.360
<v Speaker 2>didn't even covers two and a half point favorites against

0:27:02.359 --> 0:27:06.199
<v Speaker 2>the Patriots. Like, there's so many reasons of why this

0:27:06.280 --> 0:27:08.199
<v Speaker 2>Colts team is just not good, and I think the

0:27:08.240 --> 0:27:10.320
<v Speaker 2>markets just not catching up or they don't want to

0:27:10.320 --> 0:27:12.959
<v Speaker 2>make bo Nicks too big of a favorite. Nonetheless, bo

0:27:13.080 --> 0:27:17.400
<v Speaker 2>Nicks six and zero is a favorite, so I'm not afraid.

0:27:17.560 --> 0:27:20.040
<v Speaker 2>He's already given me all the pedigree of showing hey

0:27:20.040 --> 0:27:22.239
<v Speaker 2>when they trust this guy, of being a favorite. This

0:27:22.320 --> 0:27:25.600
<v Speaker 2>Denver Broncos team ten and three, ats I keep winning

0:27:25.600 --> 0:27:27.679
<v Speaker 2>with this team. I want to stop betting them. But

0:27:27.960 --> 0:27:31.120
<v Speaker 2>they're just a wagon and they just haven't adjusted. And

0:27:31.160 --> 0:27:33.639
<v Speaker 2>maybe it's because it's a rookie quarterback and they're playing

0:27:33.680 --> 0:27:35.680
<v Speaker 2>really well. But this is a solid team. This is

0:27:35.720 --> 0:27:38.240
<v Speaker 2>a playoff team. They look really good and I'm taking

0:27:38.240 --> 0:27:40.320
<v Speaker 2>bo Knicks yet again to be able to get this done.

0:27:40.359 --> 0:27:42.119
<v Speaker 2>I think they're gonna play really really good defense, and

0:27:42.160 --> 0:27:45.840
<v Speaker 2>he's just gonna protect the football and not do too much,

0:27:46.040 --> 0:27:47.280
<v Speaker 2>just get the ball downfield.

0:27:47.800 --> 0:27:49.760
<v Speaker 1>The Commanders might not have to do too much because

0:27:49.760 --> 0:27:51.879
<v Speaker 1>there's nobody left to play for the New Orleans Saints

0:27:52.560 --> 0:27:57.400
<v Speaker 1>this week. Obviously another injury bug for the Saints. They

0:27:57.400 --> 0:27:59.399
<v Speaker 1>lost Taysom Hill a couple of weeks ago. Now they

0:27:59.440 --> 0:28:02.800
<v Speaker 1>lost Derek are Alvin Kamaraz, somebody should put him bubble wrap.

0:28:02.880 --> 0:28:04.800
<v Speaker 1>If I'm Kamara, I just I'm like, look, maybe I

0:28:04.840 --> 0:28:05.760
<v Speaker 1>should just call it a day.

0:28:06.160 --> 0:28:06.280
<v Speaker 3>Uh.

0:28:06.440 --> 0:28:09.840
<v Speaker 1>These Saints are at home, but it doesn't matter. You're

0:28:09.840 --> 0:28:12.480
<v Speaker 1>seeing seven seven and a half here on Washington on

0:28:12.600 --> 0:28:16.160
<v Speaker 1>the road and frankly ericson they should go in there

0:28:16.280 --> 0:28:18.680
<v Speaker 1>after a bye and just pound on the Saints and

0:28:19.080 --> 0:28:22.400
<v Speaker 1>solidify this playoff run because they're right there. They're towards

0:28:22.480 --> 0:28:24.560
<v Speaker 1>the end of the bracket right now. But the Commanders,

0:28:24.960 --> 0:28:26.960
<v Speaker 1>this is a game that you have to win to

0:28:27.119 --> 0:28:29.840
<v Speaker 1>maintain that lead you have in the NFC, in that

0:28:29.920 --> 0:28:32.879
<v Speaker 1>playoff hunt. And it feels like a game that's not

0:28:33.000 --> 0:28:35.080
<v Speaker 1>lost on Dan Quinn, It's not lost on Jane Daniels.

0:28:35.119 --> 0:28:37.320
<v Speaker 1>In this crew, they should win this game. The question

0:28:37.480 --> 0:28:40.040
<v Speaker 1>is covering the seven? You say, yes, I do, and.

0:28:40.200 --> 0:28:42.000
<v Speaker 3>I know that everyone's looking at Oh, the Ravens are

0:28:42.040 --> 0:28:44.160
<v Speaker 3>just going to destroy the Giants, going to be forty enough. No,

0:28:44.320 --> 0:28:46.520
<v Speaker 3>this is the game where the Commanders are going to

0:28:46.560 --> 0:28:48.240
<v Speaker 3>go in and destroy the We're on sane, so you.

0:28:48.240 --> 0:28:50.040
<v Speaker 2>Think the Giants are covering. Is that what you're saying?

0:28:50.080 --> 0:28:52.400
<v Speaker 2>I is that what you just said? I'm sorry, I

0:28:52.400 --> 0:28:53.360
<v Speaker 2>didn't mean to interrupt him.

0:28:53.360 --> 0:28:56.960
<v Speaker 1>Now that's not a best bet, but you make the

0:28:57.080 --> 0:28:59.440
<v Speaker 1>Giants are not covering the fourteen and a half that

0:28:59.560 --> 0:29:01.480
<v Speaker 1>I got on Monday or the sixteen and a half

0:29:01.560 --> 0:29:02.240
<v Speaker 1>that it is today.

0:29:02.360 --> 0:29:04.640
<v Speaker 3>I trust the process. Double digit dogs at home don't care.

0:29:05.120 --> 0:29:05.800
<v Speaker 3>Trust the process.

0:29:06.760 --> 0:29:09.040
<v Speaker 1>Well, you can trust it all you want. It's gonna

0:29:09.080 --> 0:29:13.120
<v Speaker 1>be it's gonna be thirty seven to four or seven whatever,

0:29:13.400 --> 0:29:16.360
<v Speaker 1>whether I don't even know what kind of nuts trust.

0:29:16.520 --> 0:29:18.320
<v Speaker 3>I trust the process. Do with the numbers telling me

0:29:18.400 --> 0:29:21.120
<v Speaker 3>to do regardless, the Commanders are going to cover again.

0:29:21.120 --> 0:29:23.000
<v Speaker 3>If anything, I'm laying the points of the Commanders before

0:29:23.040 --> 0:29:24.680
<v Speaker 3>I do with the Ravens. So that's where I'm gonna

0:29:24.680 --> 0:29:27.160
<v Speaker 3>put my money. Commanders cover the spread eight or last

0:29:27.240 --> 0:29:29.320
<v Speaker 3>nine games against teams with a losing record. They've also

0:29:29.360 --> 0:29:31.160
<v Speaker 3>won seven or last eight games against teams that held

0:29:31.200 --> 0:29:33.440
<v Speaker 3>a losing record. So the Commanders is a team that

0:29:33.760 --> 0:29:36.400
<v Speaker 3>entering this year obviously came in with low expectations. We

0:29:36.480 --> 0:29:38.560
<v Speaker 3>weren't really sure what they would be. Rookie quarterback. New

0:29:38.600 --> 0:29:40.960
<v Speaker 3>coaches are up and down the board, and they've taken

0:29:41.000 --> 0:29:43.000
<v Speaker 3>our of business against really bad teams as a result. Right,

0:29:43.280 --> 0:29:45.040
<v Speaker 3>So I think we're a year away from them being

0:29:45.080 --> 0:29:48.000
<v Speaker 3>a legitimate, like playoff contender. Even if they make the postseason,

0:29:48.040 --> 0:29:50.160
<v Speaker 3>they're probably gonna be a one and done team look

0:29:50.160 --> 0:29:52.800
<v Speaker 3>ahead till twenty twenty five. But against a team like

0:29:52.840 --> 0:29:55.600
<v Speaker 3>the New Orleans Saints, like you said, Joe, on their

0:29:55.680 --> 0:29:57.480
<v Speaker 3>last leg, we don't know who else they have left.

0:29:57.520 --> 0:29:59.400
<v Speaker 3>We don't even know who they're starting a quarterback because

0:29:59.480 --> 0:30:01.400
<v Speaker 3>they probably I don't know who the better option is

0:30:01.440 --> 0:30:04.040
<v Speaker 3>at this point because the scene Spencer Ratler, he played

0:30:04.040 --> 0:30:06.320
<v Speaker 3>a couple of games, wasn't great. Jake Hayner is the

0:30:06.360 --> 0:30:08.160
<v Speaker 3>guy that's always the guy that comes in and never

0:30:08.240 --> 0:30:10.720
<v Speaker 3>looks good after Derek Carr gets hurt for the third

0:30:10.760 --> 0:30:14.720
<v Speaker 3>time all season long. So I just think we're forgetting that.

0:30:14.760 --> 0:30:17.680
<v Speaker 3>The last time he saw the Commanders, they steam rolled

0:30:17.840 --> 0:30:20.720
<v Speaker 3>the Tennessee Titans, who allegedly had a good run defense.

0:30:21.560 --> 0:30:23.680
<v Speaker 3>The Saints do not have a good run defense against

0:30:23.800 --> 0:30:26.280
<v Speaker 3>bad teams. Twenty ninth and run defense this year. The

0:30:26.600 --> 0:30:29.720
<v Speaker 3>Washington Commanders have the third most efficient run game. And

0:30:29.800 --> 0:30:33.920
<v Speaker 3>I know that we like to favor teams just intertally

0:30:34.000 --> 0:30:35.960
<v Speaker 3>coming off a bye week, But I think that the

0:30:36.000 --> 0:30:38.320
<v Speaker 3>Commanders really need because their guys were actually hurt, right,

0:30:38.400 --> 0:30:40.120
<v Speaker 3>Like Jane Daniel was dealing with a rib injury. We

0:30:40.160 --> 0:30:42.560
<v Speaker 3>know Brian Robinson was on the injury report. Maybe Marsha

0:30:42.600 --> 0:30:47.200
<v Speaker 3>Latimer finally plays for the Washington Commanders in a revenge Yeah,

0:30:47.280 --> 0:30:49.160
<v Speaker 3>in a revenge game. So maybe he actually suits up

0:30:49.200 --> 0:30:50.840
<v Speaker 3>since they traded a third round pick for him and

0:30:50.880 --> 0:30:53.600
<v Speaker 3>he still hasn't played for their team. But yeah, I

0:30:53.680 --> 0:30:56.120
<v Speaker 3>think that they're gonna be healthier and the Saints, man,

0:30:56.160 --> 0:30:58.240
<v Speaker 3>they barely beat the Giants, as we alluded to again,

0:30:58.280 --> 0:31:01.320
<v Speaker 3>a team that is laughable at this point. So I'm

0:31:01.360 --> 0:31:03.280
<v Speaker 3>gonna lay the points with the Commanders on the road.

0:31:03.720 --> 0:31:06.840
<v Speaker 3>It's uh, it's a homecoming right for Jaye Daniels going

0:31:06.880 --> 0:31:09.360
<v Speaker 3>back to played at LSU for two years. I think

0:31:09.400 --> 0:31:11.280
<v Speaker 3>that it's a game where he's gonna want to show

0:31:11.320 --> 0:31:13.080
<v Speaker 3>up and put up a lot of points. I think

0:31:13.080 --> 0:31:13.800
<v Speaker 3>the Commander's role.

0:31:14.280 --> 0:31:17.480
<v Speaker 1>Speaking of a lot of points, I'm gonna say thirty

0:31:17.520 --> 0:31:20.320
<v Speaker 1>seven to ten for the Giants score. Charle's that sound right?

0:31:20.400 --> 0:31:22.600
<v Speaker 1>This week? Yeah, I'm gonna give him a touchdown in

0:31:22.640 --> 0:31:24.360
<v Speaker 1>a field goal. I think somehow they scratch out a

0:31:24.400 --> 0:31:25.080
<v Speaker 1>touchdown at.

0:31:24.960 --> 0:31:26.959
<v Speaker 3>The end turn for a touchdown last week, I call

0:31:27.000 --> 0:31:29.719
<v Speaker 3>it back they had.

0:31:31.520 --> 0:31:34.200
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, that's that field right to you.

0:31:35.320 --> 0:31:38.120
<v Speaker 1>Actually, yeah, it does all that clears the sixteen and

0:31:38.120 --> 0:31:40.200
<v Speaker 1>a half everybody comfortably. I just want to put that

0:31:40.240 --> 0:31:44.120
<v Speaker 1>out there also comfortable. Well my run of picking the

0:31:44.160 --> 0:31:46.760
<v Speaker 1>Seattle Seahawks in the last month, oh baby, guess what.

0:31:47.240 --> 0:31:49.440
<v Speaker 1>They are underdogs again, this time at home to the

0:31:49.480 --> 0:31:51.720
<v Speaker 1>Green Bay Packers. Andrew Erickson has taught me something this

0:31:51.840 --> 0:31:54.800
<v Speaker 1>year in twenty twenty four. Anybody that plays the Detroit

0:31:54.880 --> 0:31:56.960
<v Speaker 1>Lions the next week is not good.

0:31:57.280 --> 0:31:58.240
<v Speaker 2>It's not good, yeps.

0:31:58.840 --> 0:32:02.640
<v Speaker 1>The hangover is And it's the Green Bay Packers this week,

0:32:02.720 --> 0:32:04.760
<v Speaker 1>going on the road into Seattle. And look, I know

0:32:04.840 --> 0:32:07.360
<v Speaker 1>the twelfth Man used to be a thing. It's been

0:32:07.400 --> 0:32:09.160
<v Speaker 1>a while since the Seahawks fans had a lot to

0:32:09.240 --> 0:32:11.320
<v Speaker 1>cheer about. They've got a team in first place. It

0:32:11.440 --> 0:32:15.360
<v Speaker 1>feels like a moment for them to really get up

0:32:15.440 --> 0:32:19.160
<v Speaker 1>for this game. It's gonna be a standalone prime time night.

0:32:19.280 --> 0:32:23.320
<v Speaker 1>You're gonna have your Seahawks fans ready to go, and

0:32:23.400 --> 0:32:25.120
<v Speaker 1>I think there's gonna be energy in the building.

0:32:25.200 --> 0:32:25.320
<v Speaker 3>Here.

0:32:25.440 --> 0:32:27.320
<v Speaker 1>The Packers are a good team, they know it. The

0:32:27.400 --> 0:32:30.360
<v Speaker 1>Seahawks continue to find ways to create turnovers, and those

0:32:30.400 --> 0:32:34.000
<v Speaker 1>turnovers create havoc in the momentum of these games, and

0:32:34.120 --> 0:32:37.040
<v Speaker 1>it swings back to the Seahawks every time. They keep

0:32:37.160 --> 0:32:39.360
<v Speaker 1>doing it, and they keep getting w's, and I think

0:32:39.360 --> 0:32:42.760
<v Speaker 1>they're gonna get another w here this weekend. So give

0:32:42.800 --> 0:32:45.200
<v Speaker 1>me the Seattle Seahawks plus one thirty eight on the

0:32:45.280 --> 0:32:48.240
<v Speaker 1>money line. Let's go to do it again. And that's

0:32:48.320 --> 0:32:49.840
<v Speaker 1>not only the upset special of the week, and it's

0:32:49.880 --> 0:32:50.720
<v Speaker 1>in the parlay of the week.

0:32:50.760 --> 0:32:50.920
<v Speaker 3>Two.

0:32:51.280 --> 0:32:53.640
<v Speaker 1>Give me the Seattle Seahawks on the money line. Give

0:32:53.680 --> 0:32:55.520
<v Speaker 1>me the Ravens on the money line, because I mean,

0:32:55.600 --> 0:32:57.560
<v Speaker 1>where's that guy who bet three million dollars last week?

0:32:57.600 --> 0:32:59.600
<v Speaker 1>This is the game to bet it on. And give

0:32:59.640 --> 0:33:01.040
<v Speaker 1>me the case he has the City Chiefs on the

0:33:01.080 --> 0:33:03.160
<v Speaker 1>money line against the Browns. I know it's on the road.

0:33:03.200 --> 0:33:05.320
<v Speaker 1>I know it's a little dangerous. I don't care. Chiefs

0:33:05.360 --> 0:33:07.040
<v Speaker 1>always find a way to win games. That's what they do.

0:33:07.280 --> 0:33:09.320
<v Speaker 1>Put those three things together, get plus two to seventy one.

0:33:10.160 --> 0:33:11.840
<v Speaker 1>That's hardly the way.

0:33:11.760 --> 0:33:14.200
<v Speaker 2>The price was without the Ravens money line. Because that's

0:33:14.280 --> 0:33:15.320
<v Speaker 2>like minus fit seed.

0:33:17.200 --> 0:33:19.880
<v Speaker 1>It was like two seventy and then moving to seventy one. No,

0:33:20.040 --> 0:33:22.280
<v Speaker 1>it was it was close, it was in there. But again,

0:33:22.360 --> 0:33:23.760
<v Speaker 1>I want to make an easy one. I want to

0:33:23.800 --> 0:33:27.400
<v Speaker 1>take my upset special every week betting the Seahawks, like

0:33:27.440 --> 0:33:29.840
<v Speaker 1>I've been talking about on this show, every single week

0:33:30.040 --> 0:33:31.800
<v Speaker 1>and every single week is coming through. And you put

0:33:31.800 --> 0:33:33.600
<v Speaker 1>all these confluence of events together, I think it's a

0:33:33.640 --> 0:33:36.440
<v Speaker 1>really good situation here for the Seattle Seahawks. So and

0:33:36.520 --> 0:33:38.680
<v Speaker 1>I'll take the two sure things that I feel like

0:33:38.800 --> 0:33:41.440
<v Speaker 1>should be chiefs. Don't let me down. Don't let this

0:33:41.560 --> 0:33:44.320
<v Speaker 1>be the letdown. Please. All right, that'll do it for us,

0:33:44.400 --> 0:33:46.520
<v Speaker 1>But the story of the game goes on for Terrell

0:33:46.560 --> 0:33:49.360
<v Speaker 1>Furman Junior and the Undertaker Andrew Erickson. Have a great

0:33:49.400 --> 0:33:53.640
<v Speaker 1>week fifteen. We'll see you next time. Kids. Thanks for

0:33:53.720 --> 0:33:56.520
<v Speaker 1>listening to the Betting Pros podcast. If you love the show,

0:33:56.760 --> 0:33:58.880
<v Speaker 1>the best freeway to support us is by leaving a

0:33:58.960 --> 0:34:02.600
<v Speaker 1>positive review on Apple Podcasts or Spotify. Follow us on

0:34:02.840 --> 0:34:05.800
<v Speaker 1>x and TikTok at Betting Pros and Instagram at Betting

0:34:05.840 --> 0:34:09.480
<v Speaker 1>Pros NFL. Also subscribe to our YouTube channel at YouTube

0:34:09.520 --> 0:34:10.960
<v Speaker 1>dot com slash Betting Pros