WEBVTT - Alphabet Plans Record Spending in Race to Win AI Customers 

0:00:02.720 --> 0:00:10.559
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, podcasts, radio news. You're listening to the

0:00:10.600 --> 0:00:14.560
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Intelligence podcast. Catch us live weekdays at ten am.

0:00:14.600 --> 0:00:17.239
<v Speaker 1>He's done on Apple, Cocklay and Android Auto with the

0:00:17.280 --> 0:00:21.040
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Business App. Listen on demand wherever you get your podcasts,

0:00:21.360 --> 0:00:23.520
<v Speaker 1>or watch us live on YouTube.

0:00:24.040 --> 0:00:26.279
<v Speaker 2>Let's go back to big tech, because we can't stay

0:00:26.280 --> 0:00:29.160
<v Speaker 2>away from them for too long. We have one more

0:00:29.160 --> 0:00:32.120
<v Speaker 2>mags have a name reporting today. Amazon will be reporting.

0:00:32.320 --> 0:00:34.959
<v Speaker 2>Alphabet reported yesterday. And I want to go back to

0:00:35.000 --> 0:00:38.360
<v Speaker 2>that CAPEX number which just blew people's minds. One hundred

0:00:38.400 --> 0:00:40.960
<v Speaker 2>and eighty five billion dollars all full of your capex,

0:00:41.720 --> 0:00:44.320
<v Speaker 2>much much higher than what was anticipated. Man Deep Singh

0:00:44.760 --> 0:00:47.040
<v Speaker 2>is our go to guy for all things tech. He's

0:00:47.040 --> 0:00:49.600
<v Speaker 2>our global tech research head here at Bloomberg Intelligence and

0:00:49.680 --> 0:00:50.360
<v Speaker 2>joins us now.

0:00:50.640 --> 0:00:53.040
<v Speaker 3>One trader called it alphabets mic drop.

0:00:53.200 --> 0:00:57.560
<v Speaker 2>Capex highlights the have versus havenots and AI capabilities, commitments

0:00:57.680 --> 0:01:01.880
<v Speaker 2>and balance sheet. Once upon a time, spending on you know,

0:01:02.120 --> 0:01:05.880
<v Speaker 2>your future growth was a good thing. But now any

0:01:05.959 --> 0:01:09.200
<v Speaker 2>kind of CAPEX commitment bigger than what people anticipated as

0:01:09.200 --> 0:01:09.960
<v Speaker 2>seen as negative.

0:01:10.440 --> 0:01:13.319
<v Speaker 4>Well, I think in this case the market is thinking

0:01:13.680 --> 0:01:17.479
<v Speaker 4>what comes next. So for twenty twenty six. Yeah, they've

0:01:17.480 --> 0:01:20.960
<v Speaker 4>guided two hundred and eighty five billion dollars. I mean,

0:01:21.200 --> 0:01:24.479
<v Speaker 4>chances are the growth rates are going to decelerate from

0:01:24.480 --> 0:01:27.360
<v Speaker 4>this point on. So twenty twenty six will be the

0:01:27.440 --> 0:01:30.760
<v Speaker 4>peak capex for a lot of these companies, Especially in

0:01:30.880 --> 0:01:33.640
<v Speaker 4>terms of growth rates. You're not going to see you know,

0:01:33.680 --> 0:01:36.679
<v Speaker 4>fifty sixty percent growth in capex going forward.

0:01:36.640 --> 0:01:37.520
<v Speaker 5>From these numbers.

0:01:37.520 --> 0:01:39.679
<v Speaker 4>So that's a given, and that's why you know the

0:01:39.720 --> 0:01:43.240
<v Speaker 4>market will be anticipatory in that sense in terms of

0:01:43.280 --> 0:01:45.760
<v Speaker 4>how that capex growth is going to pan out from

0:01:45.760 --> 0:01:48.560
<v Speaker 4>this point on, because you know, for some of the

0:01:48.760 --> 0:01:54.480
<v Speaker 4>chip makers, their growth is directly correlated to capex growth

0:01:54.520 --> 0:01:56.960
<v Speaker 4>of the hyperscaler So yes, this year is going to

0:01:57.040 --> 0:02:00.800
<v Speaker 4>look phenomenal, but as you look past this year, you

0:02:00.880 --> 0:02:05.280
<v Speaker 4>will see deceleration. The point about I think Alphabet is

0:02:05.320 --> 0:02:08.000
<v Speaker 4>really how is it reflected in their numbers? And to

0:02:08.080 --> 0:02:11.840
<v Speaker 4>my mind, they've already seen a two hundred basis point

0:02:12.000 --> 0:02:15.800
<v Speaker 4>growth in their overall top line. So they were growing,

0:02:15.840 --> 0:02:18.160
<v Speaker 4>you know, fourteen to sixteen percent. Now they are growing

0:02:18.200 --> 0:02:21.400
<v Speaker 4>eighteen percent. And so for a business with four hundred

0:02:21.480 --> 0:02:25.000
<v Speaker 4>billion dollars in run rate, two hundred basis points is

0:02:25.080 --> 0:02:28.520
<v Speaker 4>like almost that's Romney eight billion, you know, So that's

0:02:28.680 --> 0:02:31.680
<v Speaker 4>the ROI on all this capex. Is that eight to

0:02:31.800 --> 0:02:34.640
<v Speaker 4>ten billion dollar left in top line that they're seeing

0:02:34.680 --> 0:02:38.680
<v Speaker 4>across search and cloud and cloud numbers were just monster

0:02:38.800 --> 0:02:41.480
<v Speaker 4>when it comes to what they had did last nine Yeah.

0:02:41.360 --> 0:02:43.560
<v Speaker 5>So is this AI spending?

0:02:44.400 --> 0:02:48.200
<v Speaker 6>Is it one time in nature or does this suggest

0:02:48.760 --> 0:02:52.400
<v Speaker 6>a higher level of ongoing capex question?

0:02:53.000 --> 0:02:56.600
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I mean, look, we know the public cloud businesses

0:02:57.080 --> 0:03:02.480
<v Speaker 4>were a data center of heavy in the sense you

0:03:02.639 --> 0:03:06.120
<v Speaker 4>had to replace your server gear every five years. So

0:03:06.240 --> 0:03:11.400
<v Speaker 4>there is a depreciation aspect to AI as well. And

0:03:11.600 --> 0:03:15.480
<v Speaker 4>the fact that Alphabet has built this enterprise business which

0:03:15.520 --> 0:03:17.760
<v Speaker 4>is almost a seventy billion dollar rund rate out of

0:03:17.800 --> 0:03:22.760
<v Speaker 4>there four hundred billion. Now it's phenomenal because that cloud

0:03:22.800 --> 0:03:25.880
<v Speaker 4>business is going to accelerate. So what we saw last

0:03:25.960 --> 0:03:29.120
<v Speaker 4>night forty eight percent. I won't be surprised if they

0:03:29.280 --> 0:03:33.760
<v Speaker 4>grow cloud over fifty percent for the next four quarters,

0:03:34.080 --> 0:03:37.520
<v Speaker 4>simply because a lot of that data center capacity that

0:03:37.560 --> 0:03:40.880
<v Speaker 4>they've been building will come online. They'll be renting a

0:03:40.920 --> 0:03:44.360
<v Speaker 4>lot of that, and they're very well taking share at

0:03:44.360 --> 0:03:46.800
<v Speaker 4>this point. Given the numbers we have seen so far

0:03:46.880 --> 0:03:51.600
<v Speaker 4>between Azure and Google Cloud. Google Cloud grew ten percent

0:03:51.720 --> 0:03:55.280
<v Speaker 4>more than Azure, and it probably grew more than twenty percent.

0:03:55.320 --> 0:03:58.280
<v Speaker 4>I mean, even if Amazon has a great quarter tonight,

0:03:58.680 --> 0:04:01.120
<v Speaker 4>they probably won't print more more than twenty five percent.

0:04:01.240 --> 0:04:04.320
<v Speaker 4>So there you go. You probably are seeing Shure shift

0:04:04.400 --> 0:04:05.600
<v Speaker 4>and it sounds like a.

0:04:05.520 --> 0:04:08.120
<v Speaker 2>Behind a weakness called I mean, clearly, Alphabet is the

0:04:08.200 --> 0:04:10.880
<v Speaker 2>big winner among the mag seven names when it comes

0:04:10.920 --> 0:04:14.040
<v Speaker 2>to AI, up sixty five percent over the past twelve months,

0:04:14.640 --> 0:04:16.320
<v Speaker 2>much better than Microsoft.

0:04:15.960 --> 0:04:17.120
<v Speaker 3>Which is down in that period.

0:04:17.440 --> 0:04:20.560
<v Speaker 2>So did this set of results justify that kind of

0:04:20.600 --> 0:04:21.120
<v Speaker 2>price action?

0:04:21.800 --> 0:04:25.039
<v Speaker 4>Yes, the market did anticipate that. And look, there was

0:04:25.120 --> 0:04:29.080
<v Speaker 4>a lot of bearishness around what chat ChiPT could do

0:04:29.240 --> 0:04:33.520
<v Speaker 4>to Alphabet's core search business. I mean, search grew seventeen

0:04:33.560 --> 0:04:38.279
<v Speaker 4>percent talking about ROI on spend. It's reflected not only

0:04:38.360 --> 0:04:42.200
<v Speaker 4>in cloud but also in core search, where the number

0:04:42.200 --> 0:04:45.360
<v Speaker 4>of clicks grew six percent. Who would have thought, you know,

0:04:45.720 --> 0:04:50.479
<v Speaker 4>Alphabet clicks going up when chatchipt has nine hundred million

0:04:50.520 --> 0:04:54.000
<v Speaker 4>monthly actives. I would have imagined pricing would hold steady

0:04:54.040 --> 0:04:57.800
<v Speaker 4>for Alphabet, but not clicks growth. How are the impressions

0:04:57.800 --> 0:05:03.120
<v Speaker 4>and clicks growing? It's unfathomable, you know, in Alphabet's case,

0:05:03.160 --> 0:05:05.880
<v Speaker 4>and partly it has to do with the success of Gemini.

0:05:06.279 --> 0:05:10.960
<v Speaker 4>That's seven hundred and fifty million standalone app users. Those

0:05:11.120 --> 0:05:14.840
<v Speaker 4>are people who are going directly to Gemini beyond.

0:05:14.720 --> 0:05:16.839
<v Speaker 6>Just using how I use it, which is when I

0:05:16.880 --> 0:05:18.840
<v Speaker 6>go to Google. Yeah, first thing that comes up is

0:05:18.920 --> 0:05:20.440
<v Speaker 6>often Gemini. That's my answer.

0:05:20.480 --> 0:05:22.560
<v Speaker 5>I'm done. Yeah, But there's people separately go to a

0:05:22.600 --> 0:05:23.560
<v Speaker 5>Gemini app.

0:05:23.560 --> 0:05:25.880
<v Speaker 4>And they are engaging for a lot longer that So

0:05:25.920 --> 0:05:29.000
<v Speaker 4>it's under which is people monetizing that they're I mean,

0:05:29.040 --> 0:05:32.280
<v Speaker 4>they're monetizing using subscriptions, and what they're saying is we

0:05:32.400 --> 0:05:36.320
<v Speaker 4>will not roll out ads anytime soon. Let Opening Eye

0:05:36.320 --> 0:05:39.240
<v Speaker 4>do it because that's going to interfere with the experience

0:05:39.279 --> 0:05:42.280
<v Speaker 4>that people have. So we'll monetize with subscriptions, and they're

0:05:42.360 --> 0:05:44.960
<v Speaker 4>bundling subscription Stay with us.

0:05:45.120 --> 0:05:47.480
<v Speaker 5>More from Bloomberg Intelligence coming up after this.

0:05:51.320 --> 0:05:55.039
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Bloomberg Intelligence podcast. Catch us live

0:05:55.120 --> 0:05:58.160
<v Speaker 1>weekdays at ten am Eastern on Apple, Corplay and Android

0:05:58.200 --> 0:06:01.520
<v Speaker 1>Auto with the Bloomberg Business App. Listen on demand wherever

0:06:01.560 --> 0:06:05.120
<v Speaker 1>you get your podcasts, or watch us live on YouTube.

0:06:05.520 --> 0:06:08.919
<v Speaker 2>I've been looking at the Philadelphia Semiconductor Index, which tracks

0:06:09.000 --> 0:06:11.479
<v Speaker 2>chip companies, and it's had a brutal couple of days.

0:06:11.480 --> 0:06:15.120
<v Speaker 2>It's rebounded today off a one month low. But you

0:06:15.200 --> 0:06:18.960
<v Speaker 2>look inside the index and Qualcomm is the biggest loser

0:06:19.160 --> 0:06:22.040
<v Speaker 2>in that group, down more than seven percent at the moment.

0:06:22.080 --> 0:06:26.320
<v Speaker 2>Kunjohn Sabani is our senior analyst on semiconductors, and Kunjohn,

0:06:26.440 --> 0:06:30.600
<v Speaker 2>when you look at Qualcom's results, Qualcomm is primarily making

0:06:30.880 --> 0:06:34.760
<v Speaker 2>chips for smartphones and this forecast that it gave is

0:06:34.800 --> 0:06:36.560
<v Speaker 2>not so great. What does that tell us? Is that

0:06:36.600 --> 0:06:39.240
<v Speaker 2>more a case of, you know, supply chain issues or

0:06:39.480 --> 0:06:41.680
<v Speaker 2>is there just not so much demand for new smartphones?

0:06:43.040 --> 0:06:45.880
<v Speaker 7>No, it's nothing to do with demand. There's two factors here.

0:06:45.960 --> 0:06:49.360
<v Speaker 7>One for Qualcomm, this year was a unique year where

0:06:49.400 --> 0:06:53.000
<v Speaker 7>most of their Android handset makers, so think of Samsung,

0:06:53.080 --> 0:06:57.120
<v Speaker 7>think of Jaumi, Opo, Vivo, launched their phones earlier than

0:06:57.160 --> 0:06:59.840
<v Speaker 7>they used to. So remember the handsut businesses are very

0:07:00.040 --> 0:07:02.400
<v Speaker 7>seasonal business, so you have up quarters when the phone

0:07:02.440 --> 0:07:05.360
<v Speaker 7>chart launched and really down quarters. So in the nutshell,

0:07:05.440 --> 0:07:08.200
<v Speaker 7>a lot of that revenue was sort of pulled ahead

0:07:08.240 --> 0:07:10.600
<v Speaker 7>of time. That's why what you saw is they beat

0:07:10.680 --> 0:07:13.760
<v Speaker 7>so strongly in the current quarter. So the flip part

0:07:13.760 --> 0:07:15.960
<v Speaker 7>of that is the next quarter, which is a tropt quarter,

0:07:16.000 --> 0:07:18.040
<v Speaker 7>is going to be even a word straff on top

0:07:18.080 --> 0:07:20.640
<v Speaker 7>of that. What's happening is as we are all aware

0:07:20.640 --> 0:07:23.520
<v Speaker 7>of the memory crunch happening because of HBM memory and

0:07:23.600 --> 0:07:27.040
<v Speaker 7>data centers and the rising memory costs, that's freaking out

0:07:27.160 --> 0:07:32.240
<v Speaker 7>the Chinese OEMs, which Qualcomm is now really disproposately exposed

0:07:32.280 --> 0:07:34.520
<v Speaker 7>to compared to all other hands at SEMIS. So the

0:07:34.560 --> 0:07:38.040
<v Speaker 7>guys like Apple and Samsung are probably doing fine. They

0:07:38.080 --> 0:07:41.120
<v Speaker 7>have their ability to get access to memory and procure

0:07:41.160 --> 0:07:43.560
<v Speaker 7>memory ahead of time, but the smaller players are not

0:07:43.600 --> 0:07:46.360
<v Speaker 7>as sophisticated. So those players are freaking out and they

0:07:46.480 --> 0:07:49.440
<v Speaker 7>basically have decided, we're going to stop ordering a lot

0:07:49.480 --> 0:07:51.240
<v Speaker 7>more chips and we're going to clear out what we

0:07:51.320 --> 0:07:53.640
<v Speaker 7>have in our inventory. And that's why what we're seeing

0:07:53.680 --> 0:07:56.440
<v Speaker 7>is basically the memory impacting Qualcom's guidance.

0:07:56.600 --> 0:07:59.280
<v Speaker 6>All right, So we step back from some of the

0:07:59.360 --> 0:08:01.880
<v Speaker 6>chip makers and they're earning something at am D and

0:08:01.880 --> 0:08:06.280
<v Speaker 6>that's soft again today Qualcom here, what are some of

0:08:05.760 --> 0:08:09.600
<v Speaker 6>the takeaways from an interships perspective are you chatting about

0:08:09.600 --> 0:08:10.160
<v Speaker 6>with clients?

0:08:11.640 --> 0:08:13.320
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, so you mean you know, the sort of the

0:08:13.360 --> 0:08:16.680
<v Speaker 7>software meltdown is trying to the fever is spreading in

0:08:16.720 --> 0:08:19.120
<v Speaker 7>a little bit into semis. I would not say as

0:08:19.200 --> 0:08:22.720
<v Speaker 7>broad strokes this earning season. What we're seeing is if

0:08:22.760 --> 0:08:25.200
<v Speaker 7>companies didn't come out and blow the quarter out of

0:08:25.240 --> 0:08:28.280
<v Speaker 7>the quarter, of the results and for their outlook, they're

0:08:28.280 --> 0:08:31.600
<v Speaker 7>basically getting punished. A lot of that has to also remember,

0:08:31.800 --> 0:08:34.079
<v Speaker 7>taking to context, a lot of these companies in the

0:08:34.160 --> 0:08:37.480
<v Speaker 7>last six to seven months have seen significant rallies because

0:08:37.679 --> 0:08:40.600
<v Speaker 7>a lot of good expectations, especially for the AI names

0:08:40.600 --> 0:08:43.160
<v Speaker 7>like AMD being priced in. So the market is now

0:08:43.160 --> 0:08:45.760
<v Speaker 7>in the mood where if you're not showing me real excitement,

0:08:46.880 --> 0:08:49.160
<v Speaker 7>you're sort of being ready for a little bit of

0:08:49.160 --> 0:08:50.360
<v Speaker 7>a pullback, right.

0:08:50.440 --> 0:08:53.600
<v Speaker 2>They call it a show me kind of market environment.

0:08:53.920 --> 0:08:57.680
<v Speaker 2>So our colleagues will be speaking with the CEO of Qualcom,

0:08:57.840 --> 0:09:01.080
<v Speaker 2>Christiano Aman, how would you grate his performance so far?

0:09:01.240 --> 0:09:05.319
<v Speaker 7>Con John, Well, look, he's doing everything right. It's just

0:09:05.400 --> 0:09:08.160
<v Speaker 7>the company is in a tough spot. Investors have been

0:09:08.200 --> 0:09:12.040
<v Speaker 7>wanting them to diversify away from handsets for many years now,

0:09:12.440 --> 0:09:15.200
<v Speaker 7>and since he's been the CEO, that's what his primary

0:09:15.240 --> 0:09:18.400
<v Speaker 7>objective has been. They're making good stries on the auto

0:09:18.440 --> 0:09:21.400
<v Speaker 7>and IoT. In fact, both of those segments had much

0:09:21.440 --> 0:09:23.560
<v Speaker 7>better than expected results and outlook.

0:09:23.840 --> 0:09:25.080
<v Speaker 4>But when you still think.

0:09:24.960 --> 0:09:27.600
<v Speaker 7>About the company now, even three four years down the road,

0:09:27.840 --> 0:09:33.120
<v Speaker 7>it's still majority significantly a handset revenue company. So until

0:09:33.360 --> 0:09:35.960
<v Speaker 7>the revenue exposure of hand sets doesn't get to at

0:09:36.040 --> 0:09:38.600
<v Speaker 7>least fifty percent or lower, I think that sort of

0:09:39.120 --> 0:09:42.320
<v Speaker 7>had been on the company. Impact from handsets is going

0:09:42.320 --> 0:09:44.600
<v Speaker 7>to continue, and I think Ristiana just has to keep

0:09:44.600 --> 0:09:46.360
<v Speaker 7>doing what he's doing and write this out.

0:09:47.160 --> 0:09:50.320
<v Speaker 6>So John, I know most of or much of the

0:09:50.520 --> 0:09:53.240
<v Speaker 6>selling in the tech spaces, in the software space, not

0:09:53.320 --> 0:09:56.280
<v Speaker 6>in your chip sector. But when you talk to investors,

0:09:56.400 --> 0:09:59.360
<v Speaker 6>we talk to clients, what's their mood over the last

0:09:59.400 --> 0:10:02.720
<v Speaker 6>week or so, Like they're just kind of selling in

0:10:02.720 --> 0:10:05.240
<v Speaker 6>a panic, selling because hey, I've got it such a

0:10:05.240 --> 0:10:08.360
<v Speaker 6>big gain, I've taken something off the table. My fundamental

0:10:08.440 --> 0:10:10.319
<v Speaker 6>view of AI is change. What's the tone.

0:10:11.600 --> 0:10:13.600
<v Speaker 7>I don't think the fundamental view has changed. I think

0:10:13.600 --> 0:10:15.800
<v Speaker 7>a couple of things. Once you said, if whatever is

0:10:15.840 --> 0:10:19.559
<v Speaker 7>happening in the other sectors will impact this sector as well, right,

0:10:19.559 --> 0:10:23.160
<v Speaker 7>because there is some definitely that risk of profit taking. Also,

0:10:23.200 --> 0:10:26.320
<v Speaker 7>remember getting into this year a lot of investors in

0:10:26.360 --> 0:10:29.800
<v Speaker 7>my sector are trying to reposition their books, right, they're revaluating.

0:10:30.000 --> 0:10:30.640
<v Speaker 4>Last year in.

0:10:30.600 --> 0:10:33.280
<v Speaker 7>Semis was like, look, everything was doing great. AI is

0:10:33.320 --> 0:10:35.880
<v Speaker 7>helping everyone. I think now it's becoming a more of

0:10:35.920 --> 0:10:38.240
<v Speaker 7>a stock pickers market in the sector, where people are

0:10:38.280 --> 0:10:41.679
<v Speaker 7>really focusing deep and thinking which guys are going to

0:10:41.679 --> 0:10:44.560
<v Speaker 7>be the real winners and let's focus on them, but

0:10:44.760 --> 0:10:47.040
<v Speaker 7>let's get off or at least take some profit off

0:10:47.040 --> 0:10:49.560
<v Speaker 7>the other folks which don't seem to be the top

0:10:49.679 --> 0:10:52.000
<v Speaker 7>number and one and two in the areas that they're playing.

0:10:52.720 --> 0:10:56.400
<v Speaker 2>You mentioned earlier how Christian among the CEO, is trying

0:10:56.400 --> 0:10:59.880
<v Speaker 2>to diversify Qualcom to not rely so much on smart

0:11:00.240 --> 0:11:03.520
<v Speaker 2>makers as its main line of business as it tries

0:11:03.600 --> 0:11:06.640
<v Speaker 2>to get into the AI data center business. And you

0:11:07.160 --> 0:11:10.240
<v Speaker 2>make chips that would compete with Nvidia, what kind of

0:11:10.480 --> 0:11:13.840
<v Speaker 2>capex do you anticipate Quacom will have to commit to.

0:11:15.520 --> 0:11:18.480
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, so Quacam predominantly is a fabulous semi company, so

0:11:18.640 --> 0:11:22.000
<v Speaker 7>they don't have or would not have a significant capex

0:11:22.080 --> 0:11:24.960
<v Speaker 7>like you hear from other AI hyperscalers. They would have

0:11:25.000 --> 0:11:27.960
<v Speaker 7>to commit to significant opex, which is R and D dollars.

0:11:28.000 --> 0:11:30.240
<v Speaker 7>If They are going into a new line of business

0:11:30.240 --> 0:11:33.079
<v Speaker 7>where they need to develop newer chips, newer programs. They

0:11:33.120 --> 0:11:36.079
<v Speaker 7>have acquired a company recently to do this, so they

0:11:36.120 --> 0:11:38.720
<v Speaker 7>have spent some capital there and I think they will

0:11:38.760 --> 0:11:40.880
<v Speaker 7>have to really boost of their R and D, which

0:11:40.880 --> 0:11:43.160
<v Speaker 7>is their opecs spending to compete with the likes of

0:11:43.200 --> 0:11:43.680
<v Speaker 7>in media.

0:11:44.679 --> 0:11:47.839
<v Speaker 5>Stay with us. More from Bloomberg Intelligence coming up after this.

0:11:51.720 --> 0:11:55.360
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Bloomberg Intelligence podcast. Catch us Live

0:11:55.520 --> 0:11:58.600
<v Speaker 1>weekdays at ten am Eastern on Apple, Cocklay and Android

0:11:58.600 --> 0:12:02.080
<v Speaker 1>Auto with the Bloomberginess app. Listen on demand wherever you

0:12:02.080 --> 0:12:05.080
<v Speaker 1>get your podcasts, or what's us Live on YouTube.

0:12:05.760 --> 0:12:07.920
<v Speaker 6>Lots of earnings coming out across the tape this week.

0:12:07.960 --> 0:12:09.719
<v Speaker 6>One of the busier weeks out there. One of the

0:12:09.800 --> 0:12:13.120
<v Speaker 6>names is Peloton or they can just not seem to

0:12:13.120 --> 0:12:16.400
<v Speaker 6>get any positive momentum going in that business. It kind

0:12:16.400 --> 0:12:19.000
<v Speaker 6>of for me at least, I'm like, does this company

0:12:19.000 --> 0:12:20.880
<v Speaker 6>need to be public? You know, it seems like they

0:12:20.920 --> 0:12:22.280
<v Speaker 6>should maybe be a private company.

0:12:22.280 --> 0:12:25.200
<v Speaker 3>But what did everyone call it the most expensive code rack.

0:12:25.200 --> 0:12:27.160
<v Speaker 6>Cot rap That's right exactly, Keith, it wrong enough, and

0:12:27.240 --> 0:12:30.400
<v Speaker 6>she covers Peloton as well as all of the media

0:12:30.720 --> 0:12:32.880
<v Speaker 6>and entertainment names for Bloomberg Intelligence.

0:12:33.559 --> 0:12:35.920
<v Speaker 5>What's the story this time, Keitha. With Peloton, they just

0:12:35.960 --> 0:12:37.360
<v Speaker 5>reported some results.

0:12:38.400 --> 0:12:41.920
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, Paul, So they had their biggest product refresh ever

0:12:42.040 --> 0:12:45.400
<v Speaker 8>in their history last fall. They had this huge price

0:12:45.480 --> 0:12:49.720
<v Speaker 8>increase that they implemented across all of their subscription offerings.

0:12:49.960 --> 0:12:52.240
<v Speaker 8>And even with all that and the benefit of a

0:12:52.280 --> 0:12:56.560
<v Speaker 8>holiday quarter, they basically disappointed on the sales number. And

0:12:56.640 --> 0:12:58.520
<v Speaker 8>you know, you have them kind of making all of

0:12:58.520 --> 0:13:01.640
<v Speaker 8>these making all of these cost efficiencies, You have a

0:13:01.679 --> 0:13:04.920
<v Speaker 8>lot of cost cuts. They are definitely making good progress

0:13:04.920 --> 0:13:07.800
<v Speaker 8>when it comes to profit, but boy, the top line

0:13:07.840 --> 0:13:10.800
<v Speaker 8>is just not moving and that's really causing a lot

0:13:10.840 --> 0:13:12.240
<v Speaker 8>of fear among investors.

0:13:12.800 --> 0:13:15.480
<v Speaker 2>And we always introduce U Gita as our media and

0:13:15.640 --> 0:13:18.200
<v Speaker 2>entertainment analysts here Bloomberg Intelligence.

0:13:18.480 --> 0:13:21.280
<v Speaker 3>Peloton makes exercise.

0:13:20.720 --> 0:13:23.240
<v Speaker 2>Bikes, but for a while it was trying to frame

0:13:23.280 --> 0:13:28.440
<v Speaker 2>itself as a media company. Much how reliant is it

0:13:28.600 --> 0:13:31.120
<v Speaker 2>on that software on the media side of its business?

0:13:32.320 --> 0:13:35.640
<v Speaker 8>Oh, it absolutely depends on the content, Scarlett. It is

0:13:35.679 --> 0:13:38.960
<v Speaker 8>the content that gave it it's cult following that you know,

0:13:39.040 --> 0:13:42.560
<v Speaker 8>gives it all of those sticky, affluent customers. The problem

0:13:42.600 --> 0:13:45.280
<v Speaker 8>for Peloton, right now is they're just not able to

0:13:45.320 --> 0:13:47.760
<v Speaker 8>move the needle. And yeah, you have all of these

0:13:47.880 --> 0:13:49.960
<v Speaker 8>new features that they're adding. I mean, you know you

0:13:50.040 --> 0:13:52.720
<v Speaker 8>have all of these AI powered features they're calling they've

0:13:52.720 --> 0:13:55.680
<v Speaker 8>added it to their entire product lineup. You know, they're

0:13:55.720 --> 0:13:57.880
<v Speaker 8>allowing you to kind of integrate all of your health

0:13:57.960 --> 0:14:01.440
<v Speaker 8>data from like garment and you know, basically making it

0:14:01.480 --> 0:14:04.600
<v Speaker 8>really really comfortable for the user. But those are all

0:14:04.640 --> 0:14:09.520
<v Speaker 8>really just incremental, they are not transformational. And basically the

0:14:09.559 --> 0:14:11.880
<v Speaker 8>company just coming out and saying that, you know, the

0:14:11.880 --> 0:14:14.720
<v Speaker 8>the upgrade cycle that they were expecting from the existing

0:14:14.760 --> 0:14:19.400
<v Speaker 8>customers just hasn't happened. So you know, it's You're absolutely

0:14:19.440 --> 0:14:21.560
<v Speaker 8>right that this is a content company in many ways

0:14:21.560 --> 0:14:23.720
<v Speaker 8>because you know, it relies on the content, but it

0:14:23.720 --> 0:14:27.600
<v Speaker 8>also needs the sales of its hardware to happen in

0:14:27.680 --> 0:14:29.600
<v Speaker 8>order for people to get access to that content, and

0:14:29.680 --> 0:14:31.440
<v Speaker 8>that just is not taking off.

0:14:32.040 --> 0:14:34.880
<v Speaker 2>Have you ever used a peloton before? We have in

0:14:34.920 --> 0:14:39.000
<v Speaker 2>our house, and do you follow any of the Karen from.

0:14:38.920 --> 0:14:41.440
<v Speaker 6>The Jersey Shore rides that every single day bides the

0:14:41.480 --> 0:14:44.960
<v Speaker 6>bike and the treadmill thing in our home.

0:14:46.640 --> 0:14:48.240
<v Speaker 5>You can't hide them. We don't have a basement. If

0:14:48.280 --> 0:14:50.280
<v Speaker 5>you can now take a forty five dollars pill from

0:14:50.360 --> 0:14:53.160
<v Speaker 5>him and hers? Why would you need a bit more?

0:14:53.160 --> 0:14:55.360
<v Speaker 6>So you need to keep tone up when you're losing weight,

0:14:55.480 --> 0:14:56.720
<v Speaker 6>and so they do the weight program.

0:14:56.800 --> 0:14:58.720
<v Speaker 5>So we use it. We haven't we use it, but

0:14:58.800 --> 0:15:00.040
<v Speaker 5>we're they're just not monetizing.

0:15:00.120 --> 0:15:00.600
<v Speaker 1>Uh.

0:15:00.640 --> 0:15:03.480
<v Speaker 6>Sokeitha real quickly, this is almost a time now at

0:15:03.520 --> 0:15:06.000
<v Speaker 6>one point nine billion market cap are people calling for

0:15:06.040 --> 0:15:09.360
<v Speaker 6>this company to go private to be sold? I mean

0:15:09.440 --> 0:15:12.000
<v Speaker 6>it doesn't seem to work as a publicly traded company.

0:15:12.960 --> 0:15:15.200
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, it doesn't fall. And you know, there's been so

0:15:15.320 --> 0:15:17.840
<v Speaker 8>much of chatter about whether an Apple or an Amazon

0:15:17.880 --> 0:15:21.200
<v Speaker 8>should buy this company. Nothing of course, has materialized. There's

0:15:21.200 --> 0:15:23.840
<v Speaker 8>also been you know, constant rumors about private equity maybe

0:15:23.880 --> 0:15:26.280
<v Speaker 8>kind of coming in milking it for whatever free cash

0:15:26.320 --> 0:15:29.520
<v Speaker 8>flow they can get. But again it's nobody really knows

0:15:29.520 --> 0:15:31.520
<v Speaker 8>what's going to happen here, all.

0:15:31.480 --> 0:15:33.640
<v Speaker 5>Right, So I guess I just don't know.

0:15:33.800 --> 0:15:35.600
<v Speaker 6>You know, what's interesting because some of the trainers they

0:15:35.640 --> 0:15:38.120
<v Speaker 6>have huge followings on social media and they're and they're

0:15:38.400 --> 0:15:41.640
<v Speaker 6>selling stuff all like crazy. So Keitha, does does Peloton

0:15:41.680 --> 0:15:45.600
<v Speaker 6>get any of the you know, the their employees, you know,

0:15:45.720 --> 0:15:47.800
<v Speaker 6>social media side hustle revenue at all.

0:15:49.120 --> 0:15:52.520
<v Speaker 8>No, not really. I mean it's it's just I guess

0:15:52.560 --> 0:15:53.600
<v Speaker 8>it's good for the brand.

0:15:54.240 --> 0:15:55.040
<v Speaker 3>But that's about it.

0:15:57.680 --> 0:16:00.000
<v Speaker 5>Stay with us. More from Bloomberg Intelligence coming up.

0:16:03.840 --> 0:16:07.520
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Bloomberg Intelligence podcast. Catch us live

0:16:07.600 --> 0:16:10.320
<v Speaker 1>weekdays at ten am. He's done on Apple, Coarclay, and

0:16:10.320 --> 0:16:13.600
<v Speaker 1>Android Auto with the Bloomberg Business app. Listen on demand

0:16:13.640 --> 0:16:17.200
<v Speaker 1>wherever you get your podcasts, or watch us live on YouTube.

0:16:18.240 --> 0:16:21.560
<v Speaker 6>Another area of movement is in the world of luxury Stually,

0:16:21.560 --> 0:16:22.720
<v Speaker 6>a lotter put out some results.

0:16:22.960 --> 0:16:25.240
<v Speaker 5>Market doesn't like it. The stocks down twenty two percent.

0:16:25.280 --> 0:16:25.440
<v Speaker 8>Here.

0:16:25.480 --> 0:16:27.600
<v Speaker 6>Let's check in with deb Ak and she covers all

0:16:27.640 --> 0:16:30.760
<v Speaker 6>the luxury good companies for Bloomberg Intelligence. She's based in

0:16:30.800 --> 0:16:34.000
<v Speaker 6>our London office. Boy, what did Esday Lauder have to

0:16:34.000 --> 0:16:35.400
<v Speaker 6>say here that so spooked the market?

0:16:36.200 --> 0:16:42.440
<v Speaker 9>Deb I think that, you know, we're if we think

0:16:42.480 --> 0:16:45.600
<v Speaker 9>about two years where they've been turning around the US

0:16:46.240 --> 0:16:48.480
<v Speaker 9>and all of a sudden for the Americas, they came

0:16:48.560 --> 0:16:50.960
<v Speaker 9>in flat with the US doing a little bit better,

0:16:51.040 --> 0:16:56.080
<v Speaker 9>but the Latin side pulling somewhatern results and the expectation

0:16:56.200 --> 0:17:00.560
<v Speaker 9>for Q three and Q four is quite subdued. A

0:17:01.040 --> 0:17:01.880
<v Speaker 9>four Q to come.

0:17:01.960 --> 0:17:04.080
<v Speaker 3>So this is their two key report where.

0:17:03.960 --> 0:17:06.480
<v Speaker 9>Actually they beat on the top line, they beat a

0:17:06.480 --> 0:17:09.479
<v Speaker 9>little bit on margin, then they raise their EPs, but

0:17:09.560 --> 0:17:13.200
<v Speaker 9>it all kinds of sits EPs. It's mid or four

0:17:13.240 --> 0:17:18.240
<v Speaker 9>cents below mid consensus ranger on EPs. So although it

0:17:18.359 --> 0:17:22.520
<v Speaker 9>was a beat, it wasn't transformational. And so we have

0:17:22.640 --> 0:17:25.359
<v Speaker 9>yet we have the Americas. We have also the fact

0:17:25.400 --> 0:17:29.200
<v Speaker 9>that Europe is a little bit kind of stabilized, subdued.

0:17:29.920 --> 0:17:32.200
<v Speaker 9>And then when you think about the China market, which

0:17:32.240 --> 0:17:35.600
<v Speaker 9>was one of their big transition markets, they are expecting

0:17:35.640 --> 0:17:38.440
<v Speaker 9>for the second half mid single digit growth. I've had

0:17:38.480 --> 0:17:42.199
<v Speaker 9>some good mid growth in the first half, but you

0:17:42.520 --> 0:17:46.440
<v Speaker 9>still have a big issue with travel retail. So when

0:17:46.480 --> 0:17:50.560
<v Speaker 9>you consider North America and what's happening with department stores

0:17:50.600 --> 0:17:53.199
<v Speaker 9>and then transitioning there to about thirty percent of the

0:17:53.240 --> 0:17:57.160
<v Speaker 9>portfolio overall ninto more multi and then you have some

0:17:57.200 --> 0:18:02.439
<v Speaker 9>retailers in travel retail out of China actually changeovers in retailers,

0:18:02.480 --> 0:18:07.040
<v Speaker 9>which is conflicting and causing issues with their supply chains.

0:18:07.400 --> 0:18:10.080
<v Speaker 9>It isn't an easy story for the next few months ahead.

0:18:10.200 --> 0:18:13.639
<v Speaker 9>And the stock rallied massively ahead of results or thirty

0:18:13.640 --> 0:18:15.080
<v Speaker 9>percent over the three months.

0:18:15.280 --> 0:18:17.120
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and if you expand that to over the past

0:18:17.160 --> 0:18:19.840
<v Speaker 2>twelve months, the stock had served eighty percent more than

0:18:19.880 --> 0:18:22.280
<v Speaker 2>eighty percent. So there is a lot, a lot built

0:18:22.280 --> 0:18:27.280
<v Speaker 2>into optimism here with this new CEO is the worst

0:18:27.280 --> 0:18:30.200
<v Speaker 2>then behind the company dev I mean, given what we heard,

0:18:30.560 --> 0:18:32.399
<v Speaker 2>sure the results were not good enough to keep the

0:18:32.400 --> 0:18:35.840
<v Speaker 2>stock moving higher. But have you know, have the restructuring

0:18:35.880 --> 0:18:39.000
<v Speaker 2>costs really been priced in and it's done your skies ahead?

0:18:40.280 --> 0:18:42.240
<v Speaker 9>I think so, yes, but I don't think it's going

0:18:42.280 --> 0:18:44.960
<v Speaker 9>to be as quick as some expected. If we think

0:18:44.960 --> 0:18:48.679
<v Speaker 9>about the market overall, the beauty market and what the

0:18:48.720 --> 0:18:52.479
<v Speaker 9>CEOs said and he reiterated it, they're looking for about

0:18:52.800 --> 0:18:55.359
<v Speaker 9>three percent growth in the beauty market this year, and

0:18:56.480 --> 0:18:59.160
<v Speaker 9>others such as Laurel will say that the market should

0:18:59.160 --> 0:19:03.399
<v Speaker 9>grow around four plus. And that's because they Laurel and

0:19:03.440 --> 0:19:07.960
<v Speaker 9>some others have a higher exposure into high end fragrances,

0:19:07.960 --> 0:19:12.480
<v Speaker 9>which are faster growth versus steal order. But aside from that,

0:19:12.960 --> 0:19:15.760
<v Speaker 9>you probably get that. You know, the idea from Steludo

0:19:15.920 --> 0:19:20.040
<v Speaker 9>for the full year is not to three percent on

0:19:20.400 --> 0:19:23.440
<v Speaker 9>constant currency, and they're hoping to get to the top

0:19:23.560 --> 0:19:26.040
<v Speaker 9>end of that. But that would mean that they're kind

0:19:26.040 --> 0:19:28.800
<v Speaker 9>of running a little bit behind the market still, but

0:19:28.880 --> 0:19:31.280
<v Speaker 9>that's because they have high travel retail and not so

0:19:31.359 --> 0:19:35.600
<v Speaker 9>much exposure as appeers on the fragrance side. So where

0:19:35.720 --> 0:19:39.199
<v Speaker 9>valuation sits right now, it's built in expectation that this

0:19:39.720 --> 0:19:42.639
<v Speaker 9>one point two to one point six billion restructuring costs

0:19:42.640 --> 0:19:45.560
<v Speaker 9>which is on track, does come through and that everything

0:19:45.600 --> 0:19:49.280
<v Speaker 9>cleans up through fiscal twenty seven. The company is shifting

0:19:49.359 --> 0:19:52.560
<v Speaker 9>to annual estimates only, which I think the US market

0:19:52.600 --> 0:19:56.800
<v Speaker 9>in particular won't like guidance only, you know, to try

0:19:56.880 --> 0:19:59.919
<v Speaker 9>and prevent volatility, but when it isn't a clear road ahead,

0:20:00.040 --> 0:20:03.600
<v Speaker 9>that's often needed to be able to really understand quarter

0:20:03.600 --> 0:20:06.720
<v Speaker 9>by quarter what's happening. So I think there are pros

0:20:06.760 --> 0:20:10.040
<v Speaker 9>and cons to this company overall, and I can understand

0:20:10.080 --> 0:20:11.199
<v Speaker 9>why it's down today.

0:20:12.000 --> 0:20:15.439
<v Speaker 6>What is este later saying about the market in China

0:20:15.560 --> 0:20:17.960
<v Speaker 6>and what are they saying about Chinese consumers in general?

0:20:18.520 --> 0:20:20.800
<v Speaker 6>Are where are they shopping? Are they coming to Europe?

0:20:20.800 --> 0:20:22.520
<v Speaker 6>Are they coming to the US? Are they staying in

0:20:22.560 --> 0:20:23.440
<v Speaker 6>Japan and China?

0:20:25.200 --> 0:20:30.960
<v Speaker 9>Japan, no, China. South Korea has taking some share and

0:20:30.640 --> 0:20:34.439
<v Speaker 9>some kind of domestic move out of China there's a

0:20:34.440 --> 0:20:38.120
<v Speaker 9>little bit of transition into Europe, but overall the way

0:20:38.160 --> 0:20:41.320
<v Speaker 9>that esther Lord used to account for their travel retail

0:20:41.359 --> 0:20:44.320
<v Speaker 9>in Europe and they shifted it, so it's separated with

0:20:44.520 --> 0:20:47.720
<v Speaker 9>China separate and then Asia, and within Asia you have

0:20:47.760 --> 0:20:51.760
<v Speaker 9>the travel retail business, so it's very clear what's happening

0:20:51.800 --> 0:20:54.399
<v Speaker 9>over there. So China is picking up, it's mid single

0:20:54.440 --> 0:20:57.560
<v Speaker 9>digit growth, but it's still down where it was versus

0:20:57.600 --> 0:21:01.159
<v Speaker 9>two years ago. There's still a lot of repaired to do,

0:21:01.520 --> 0:21:04.399
<v Speaker 9>and that's you know, the story from so many of

0:21:04.440 --> 0:21:08.360
<v Speaker 9>these companies. But certainly for still Auder and I think

0:21:08.400 --> 0:21:10.680
<v Speaker 9>we'll feel a bit of this pain. Also for Laurel,

0:21:11.480 --> 0:21:14.320
<v Speaker 9>they have high exposure to travel retail in China and

0:21:14.359 --> 0:21:17.800
<v Speaker 9>that isn't coming back. He Nan is solid, Macau not

0:21:17.880 --> 0:21:22.480
<v Speaker 9>so much. The Chinese aren't shopping in Japan, partly because

0:21:22.520 --> 0:21:25.359
<v Speaker 9>they're asked to shop at home and because there were

0:21:25.359 --> 0:21:28.360
<v Speaker 9>big comps from one or two years ago. And particularly

0:21:28.440 --> 0:21:32.560
<v Speaker 9>for ESDA Lauder two in Americas, they've already done so

0:21:32.680 --> 0:21:36.240
<v Speaker 9>much with third parties, which I should mention on digital

0:21:36.800 --> 0:21:39.240
<v Speaker 9>with Amazon and others, and they're going to be comping

0:21:39.280 --> 0:21:41.480
<v Speaker 9>against that as well, So it makes it hard there.

0:21:43.160 --> 0:21:47.840
<v Speaker 1>This is the Bloomberg Intelligence Podcast, available on Apple, Spotify,

0:21:48.040 --> 0:21:51.960
<v Speaker 1>and anywhere else you get your podcasts. Listen live each weekday,

0:21:52.200 --> 0:21:55.520
<v Speaker 1>ten am to Noone's Done on Bloomberg dot com, the

0:21:55.560 --> 0:21:59.439
<v Speaker 1>iHeartRadio app tune In, and the Bloomberg Business app. You

0:21:59.440 --> 0:22:02.760
<v Speaker 1>can also watch us live every weekday on YouTube and

0:22:02.960 --> 0:22:04.920
<v Speaker 1>always on the Bloomberg terminal