WEBVTT - You Can be Fired for Protesting in Most States

0:00:00.480 --> 0:00:05.680
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to Bloomberg Law with June Grasso from Bloomberg Radio.

0:00:06.559 --> 0:00:09.920
<v Speaker 1>Many businesses are taking steps to support their workers during

0:00:09.920 --> 0:00:13.680
<v Speaker 1>protests against police brutality after the death of George Floyd.

0:00:14.120 --> 0:00:17.439
<v Speaker 1>But on the flip side, workers have few legal protections

0:00:17.480 --> 0:00:21.040
<v Speaker 1>if an employer decides to fire them for protesting outside

0:00:21.040 --> 0:00:23.960
<v Speaker 1>of work. Joining me is Mark ros Saying, a professor

0:00:23.960 --> 0:00:26.440
<v Speaker 1>at the City University of New York School of Law.

0:00:27.120 --> 0:00:32.919
<v Speaker 1>In general, what should employers be doing for workers at

0:00:32.960 --> 0:00:36.879
<v Speaker 1>these times of social unrest, even if the workers are

0:00:36.920 --> 0:00:43.320
<v Speaker 1>at home. Well, First of all, well, employers must recognize

0:00:43.400 --> 0:00:49.040
<v Speaker 1>the tremendous trauma with the convergence of the COVID crisis,

0:00:50.000 --> 0:00:56.040
<v Speaker 1>and I would say the structural racism crisis, said white

0:00:56.040 --> 0:01:01.040
<v Speaker 1>America has finally learned and woken up to. I'm a

0:01:01.080 --> 0:01:04.640
<v Speaker 1>white person, so I'm saying that from my own perspective. Also,

0:01:05.040 --> 0:01:08.759
<v Speaker 1>although I have been studying this field for many decades,

0:01:09.560 --> 0:01:14.080
<v Speaker 1>but I think it's really important that employers, as corporate citizens,

0:01:14.160 --> 0:01:17.959
<v Speaker 1>have to recognize what is going on in this tremendous

0:01:18.000 --> 0:01:23.480
<v Speaker 1>inflection point in history and recognize that their own employees

0:01:23.520 --> 0:01:28.559
<v Speaker 1>are being impacted by this trauma, particularly their employees of color,

0:01:29.280 --> 0:01:32.479
<v Speaker 1>and so should they be reaching out to them? Should

0:01:32.520 --> 0:01:36.280
<v Speaker 1>they be offering programs? You know, what should they do

0:01:36.520 --> 0:01:40.160
<v Speaker 1>to send a signal or to help? Yes, first of all,

0:01:40.319 --> 0:01:44.720
<v Speaker 1>they should be reaching out um and uh. The employers

0:01:44.760 --> 0:01:50.200
<v Speaker 1>and companies should be training their managers who are interacting

0:01:50.320 --> 0:01:54.800
<v Speaker 1>with their line employees and say you must really reach

0:01:54.840 --> 0:01:57.800
<v Speaker 1>out to them and don't just say how are you doing,

0:01:57.920 --> 0:02:02.640
<v Speaker 1>but specifically ask how are you feeling? Is the COVID

0:02:02.760 --> 0:02:08.240
<v Speaker 1>crisis impacting you right now? Is all the demonstrations in

0:02:08.280 --> 0:02:11.359
<v Speaker 1>the streets and all the news impacting you right now?

0:02:11.480 --> 0:02:14.400
<v Speaker 1>How can I help you? Do you need some type

0:02:14.400 --> 0:02:19.200
<v Speaker 1>of accommodation? That's one thing. Number two. I think that companies,

0:02:19.280 --> 0:02:25.279
<v Speaker 1>many companies have employee system plans that allow for employee

0:02:25.320 --> 0:02:29.720
<v Speaker 1>to reach out to a counselor to get counseling. But

0:02:29.919 --> 0:02:32.280
<v Speaker 1>I think all companies really have to look at that

0:02:32.520 --> 0:02:37.280
<v Speaker 1>programs are are they sufficient? Are they really addressing the

0:02:37.840 --> 0:02:42.440
<v Speaker 1>huge trauma, the psychological trauma that people are feeling. And

0:02:42.480 --> 0:02:45.920
<v Speaker 1>we now know that the trauma is not just current,

0:02:46.040 --> 0:02:51.120
<v Speaker 1>but it is intergenerational, particularly for communities of color and

0:02:51.200 --> 0:02:55.600
<v Speaker 1>more specifically for the African American community because we're now

0:02:55.720 --> 0:03:00.000
<v Speaker 1>beginning to understand that go back four hundred years from

0:03:00.040 --> 0:03:03.560
<v Speaker 1>the Middle Passage of bringing enslaved people to this country,

0:03:03.680 --> 0:03:08.640
<v Speaker 1>to the slavery period, to the Jim Crow period, to

0:03:08.919 --> 0:03:13.120
<v Speaker 1>the period where the United States government and state governments

0:03:13.120 --> 0:03:19.160
<v Speaker 1>were providing benefits primarily to the white communities and discriminating

0:03:19.240 --> 0:03:23.200
<v Speaker 1>against communities of color. So today we recognize that there

0:03:23.240 --> 0:03:28.160
<v Speaker 1>is a tremendous disparity in wealth and an ownership, and

0:03:28.240 --> 0:03:33.040
<v Speaker 1>it has created a tremendous amount of trauma in people

0:03:33.120 --> 0:03:38.119
<v Speaker 1>of color. So now suppose someone says, you know, it's

0:03:38.120 --> 0:03:40.960
<v Speaker 1>too much for me or I have to take care

0:03:40.960 --> 0:03:45.880
<v Speaker 1>of my family. Can they get paid leave, paid medical leave,

0:03:46.040 --> 0:03:50.200
<v Speaker 1>or paid leave of any kind. Well, of course, you know,

0:03:50.280 --> 0:03:55.600
<v Speaker 1>in terms of what statutory and legal programs are set up.

0:03:55.960 --> 0:03:59.480
<v Speaker 1>There are some states where there is paid leaves. But

0:03:59.640 --> 0:04:02.520
<v Speaker 1>to pay leaves is generally to take care of a

0:04:02.640 --> 0:04:05.760
<v Speaker 1>family member or to take care of yourself. But but

0:04:05.920 --> 0:04:09.120
<v Speaker 1>that's limited to a number, just a handful of states.

0:04:09.600 --> 0:04:14.080
<v Speaker 1>There is no national program. But what I'm advising employers

0:04:14.160 --> 0:04:17.440
<v Speaker 1>now is to say, as a corporate citizen, this is

0:04:17.480 --> 0:04:21.200
<v Speaker 1>a point in history where you have to really say, Okay,

0:04:21.279 --> 0:04:27.680
<v Speaker 1>does this very important employee need some additional help, and

0:04:27.720 --> 0:04:31.240
<v Speaker 1>can we provide paid leaves? And so I think companies

0:04:31.279 --> 0:04:34.839
<v Speaker 1>really should look inward and say, yes, this is very

0:04:34.880 --> 0:04:38.680
<v Speaker 1>important to do at this point and develop these programs.

0:04:39.240 --> 0:04:42.800
<v Speaker 1>Companies won't be getting any assistance from this the states

0:04:43.200 --> 0:04:47.960
<v Speaker 1>or is it just dependent on your own insurance program? Well,

0:04:48.000 --> 0:04:50.440
<v Speaker 1>a number of states and you're probably familiar with it

0:04:50.600 --> 0:04:54.839
<v Speaker 1>during the COVID period now have said, okay, if you

0:04:54.960 --> 0:04:58.080
<v Speaker 1>have a paid leave program for some employees but not

0:04:58.240 --> 0:05:01.720
<v Speaker 1>other employees, you must give it to a everybody. But generally,

0:05:02.600 --> 0:05:05.320
<v Speaker 1>what this has really shown is that we really do

0:05:05.680 --> 0:05:11.279
<v Speaker 1>need a paid leave program for all groups of workers,

0:05:11.279 --> 0:05:15.880
<v Speaker 1>similar to what most other industrialized countries, certainly the European

0:05:16.000 --> 0:05:19.640
<v Speaker 1>nations but also a number of Asian countries also have

0:05:19.800 --> 0:05:23.520
<v Speaker 1>been providing to their employees and to their citizens. And

0:05:23.600 --> 0:05:28.200
<v Speaker 1>so the COVID crisis has really put forward in front

0:05:28.240 --> 0:05:32.440
<v Speaker 1>of our eyes all the inequities where the so called

0:05:32.520 --> 0:05:36.039
<v Speaker 1>essential workers that were we are now celebrating that they're

0:05:36.080 --> 0:05:39.880
<v Speaker 1>helping those of us who have the privilege like myself

0:05:39.920 --> 0:05:43.200
<v Speaker 1>to be able to work at home on computers and

0:05:43.400 --> 0:05:47.480
<v Speaker 1>to continue getting my pay. And I have paid sickly

0:05:47.600 --> 0:05:51.560
<v Speaker 1>through through by employer. We are recognizing that many of

0:05:51.560 --> 0:05:55.400
<v Speaker 1>these center workers, the lower wage workers, and mostly people

0:05:55.400 --> 0:05:58.719
<v Speaker 1>of color, many immigrants, do not have these benfits, and

0:05:58.800 --> 0:06:01.920
<v Speaker 1>so it's the time for us to re examine moving

0:06:02.000 --> 0:06:05.799
<v Speaker 1>forward whether we want a society that is really living

0:06:05.920 --> 0:06:10.000
<v Speaker 1>up to what the Constitution put forward in equality. Fool

0:06:10.640 --> 0:06:14.280
<v Speaker 1>Coming up next? Can an employer fire you for engaging

0:06:14.320 --> 0:06:17.599
<v Speaker 1>in protests? I'm jun Brasso and this is the bird

0:06:19.640 --> 0:06:22.480
<v Speaker 1>I've been talking to Professor marrickros Saying of the City

0:06:22.560 --> 0:06:25.839
<v Speaker 1>University of New York School of Law about steps businesses

0:06:25.839 --> 0:06:29.200
<v Speaker 1>are taking to support their workers during this time. How

0:06:29.279 --> 0:06:34.320
<v Speaker 1>far behind other countries as far as workers rights in

0:06:34.400 --> 0:06:40.960
<v Speaker 1>this area is the US? We are way behind other countries.

0:06:41.000 --> 0:06:43.800
<v Speaker 1>And if we just examine, you know, the countries that

0:06:43.880 --> 0:06:47.159
<v Speaker 1>we have interacted with, that we trade with more the

0:06:47.920 --> 0:06:51.039
<v Speaker 1>European Union countries that I'm not just talking about the

0:06:51.080 --> 0:06:57.640
<v Speaker 1>Scandinavian countries. Many people will say, well, of course, Denmark, Sweden, Finland, Norway,

0:06:57.800 --> 0:07:02.760
<v Speaker 1>they're different. They they've had a kind of social democracy. Um.

0:07:02.800 --> 0:07:05.560
<v Speaker 1>But if we look at Germany, if we look at Spain,

0:07:05.680 --> 0:07:09.400
<v Speaker 1>if we look at Italy, um, all these countries have

0:07:09.600 --> 0:07:14.960
<v Speaker 1>paid leaf programs. They differ somewhere, UM, but they they

0:07:15.200 --> 0:07:20.080
<v Speaker 1>have many programs that benefit all of their employees much

0:07:20.240 --> 0:07:22.520
<v Speaker 1>more than we do. And of course, if you look

0:07:22.520 --> 0:07:25.960
<v Speaker 1>at the health statistics we have been even before the

0:07:26.000 --> 0:07:29.119
<v Speaker 1>COVID crisis, we have been way behind between in terms

0:07:29.120 --> 0:07:33.480
<v Speaker 1>of instant mortality rates and maternal mortality rates during the

0:07:33.680 --> 0:07:38.640
<v Speaker 1>pregnancy and childbirth, we are way behind. So now let's

0:07:38.680 --> 0:07:42.560
<v Speaker 1>turn to another concern in this area, and that is

0:07:43.000 --> 0:07:46.760
<v Speaker 1>so a lot of people are protesting. Can you be

0:07:46.920 --> 0:07:51.000
<v Speaker 1>fired if your employer finds out you've been protesting peacefully

0:07:51.240 --> 0:07:54.280
<v Speaker 1>and they don't like the look of it. There is

0:07:54.320 --> 0:07:59.320
<v Speaker 1>no federal protection to people who are protesting legally, except

0:07:59.400 --> 0:08:02.760
<v Speaker 1>if you are are a public employee because you have

0:08:02.920 --> 0:08:08.200
<v Speaker 1>limited constitutional rights. But primarily the constitution does not apply

0:08:08.400 --> 0:08:13.040
<v Speaker 1>to private sector employees. There are a few states that

0:08:13.120 --> 0:08:20.560
<v Speaker 1>have statutes that prohibit employers from disciplining workers for outside

0:08:20.600 --> 0:08:26.400
<v Speaker 1>activity lawful outside activity, um, California, New York, New Jersey,

0:08:26.440 --> 0:08:30.120
<v Speaker 1>a few states, probably a few more. But this is

0:08:30.160 --> 0:08:33.120
<v Speaker 1>something that I think that employers should look at very

0:08:33.200 --> 0:08:37.239
<v Speaker 1>carefully and recognize that this is once again an inflection

0:08:37.280 --> 0:08:42.600
<v Speaker 1>point in history where people are going out and demanding

0:08:42.880 --> 0:08:48.559
<v Speaker 1>really structural changes not only at the workplace but throughout society.

0:08:49.000 --> 0:08:53.000
<v Speaker 1>And I think that it would be beneficial to companies

0:08:53.040 --> 0:08:57.040
<v Speaker 1>to recognize that they should participate in trying to make

0:08:57.080 --> 0:09:01.920
<v Speaker 1>these structural reforms so that their employees can be fully

0:09:01.960 --> 0:09:05.680
<v Speaker 1>contributing employees and that we could all be part of

0:09:05.679 --> 0:09:09.840
<v Speaker 1>the society that is moving to heal as opposed to

0:09:09.920 --> 0:09:13.679
<v Speaker 1>the tremendous divisions that we have. So is there a

0:09:13.720 --> 0:09:18.679
<v Speaker 1>difference if an employee, let's say, is arrested during a protest.

0:09:18.720 --> 0:09:21.120
<v Speaker 1>Does that make a difference even in those states that

0:09:21.240 --> 0:09:26.959
<v Speaker 1>have laws about this, Well, you know generally those states

0:09:26.960 --> 0:09:30.360
<v Speaker 1>would say we were talking about lawful activity. Um, But

0:09:30.440 --> 0:09:34.240
<v Speaker 1>we have to be very careful about examining the arrest

0:09:34.360 --> 0:09:36.480
<v Speaker 1>right now. First of all, there's a legal process that

0:09:36.559 --> 0:09:39.960
<v Speaker 1>has to go through. And as we know that, there

0:09:39.960 --> 0:09:44.920
<v Speaker 1>have been many instances of unlawful activity by the law

0:09:45.040 --> 0:09:49.640
<v Speaker 1>enforcement agencies. For instance, in an example in New York

0:09:49.760 --> 0:09:53.960
<v Speaker 1>City in the Bronx last week, there was a peaceful

0:09:54.000 --> 0:09:58.319
<v Speaker 1>demonstration and there were legal observice, lawyers and law students

0:09:58.480 --> 0:10:02.240
<v Speaker 1>who were clearly at identified and the mayor's order to

0:10:02.400 --> 0:10:07.440
<v Speaker 1>the law enforcement agency, the NYPD was these legal observers

0:10:07.559 --> 0:10:09.960
<v Speaker 1>have a right to be looking at what's going on.

0:10:10.840 --> 0:10:14.520
<v Speaker 1>Ten of them were arrested. That's an unlawful arrest. But

0:10:14.679 --> 0:10:17.480
<v Speaker 1>until the legal process goes on, and some of those

0:10:17.880 --> 0:10:22.000
<v Speaker 1>lawyers might be working for different companies and they certainly

0:10:22.040 --> 0:10:26.760
<v Speaker 1>should not be disciplined for that type of activity. There

0:10:26.800 --> 0:10:29.280
<v Speaker 1>was an incident in Central Park that got a lot

0:10:29.280 --> 0:10:33.600
<v Speaker 1>of publicity where a woman called police after an African

0:10:33.640 --> 0:10:36.200
<v Speaker 1>American man asked her to put her dog on a leash,

0:10:36.240 --> 0:10:40.800
<v Speaker 1>which is required in New York. She was fired. Is

0:10:40.840 --> 0:10:44.679
<v Speaker 1>that kind of firing permissible? Can she appeal that? In

0:10:44.760 --> 0:10:50.160
<v Speaker 1>any way? It is permissible? What what she actually did

0:10:50.440 --> 0:10:53.920
<v Speaker 1>might not be unlawful, although I noticed that the state

0:10:54.280 --> 0:10:59.880
<v Speaker 1>legislatures new state legislature yesterday pass some legislation which would

0:11:00.240 --> 0:11:04.000
<v Speaker 1>cause that type of activity be the wilful in the future.

0:11:04.040 --> 0:11:07.880
<v Speaker 1>If you call nine one one and reports something that

0:11:08.080 --> 0:11:11.319
<v Speaker 1>is not true, that that would be a violation. That's

0:11:11.360 --> 0:11:15.319
<v Speaker 1>criminal law. It's not so clear that that was a violation,

0:11:15.440 --> 0:11:17.839
<v Speaker 1>but there might have been a violation. But yes, an

0:11:17.840 --> 0:11:23.440
<v Speaker 1>employer could discipline and discharge that employee. That particular employer

0:11:23.559 --> 0:11:28.360
<v Speaker 1>was concerned about their reputational harm with the publicity, uh,

0:11:28.960 --> 0:11:32.800
<v Speaker 1>with this woman kind of being attached to them because

0:11:33.080 --> 0:11:37.160
<v Speaker 1>her job and her employer were out there in the

0:11:37.280 --> 0:11:41.439
<v Speaker 1>in the media. So I just wanted to sum this up. So, basically,

0:11:41.920 --> 0:11:45.000
<v Speaker 1>workers who don't have contracts can be fired at will.

0:11:45.920 --> 0:11:50.040
<v Speaker 1>So if an employer sees that you're involved in protest,

0:11:50.120 --> 0:11:55.440
<v Speaker 1>let's say, an employer can basically fire that worker. That

0:11:55.600 --> 0:11:58.840
<v Speaker 1>is correct except in those, um, you know, few states

0:11:58.840 --> 0:12:02.880
<v Speaker 1>where there are states attutes. However, I would think that

0:12:02.960 --> 0:12:07.840
<v Speaker 1>it would behoove employers at this moment a profound change

0:12:07.840 --> 0:12:13.600
<v Speaker 1>in American history to look at that very carefully and say, well,

0:12:13.960 --> 0:12:18.000
<v Speaker 1>maybe I actually will support the peaceful protests. The number

0:12:18.040 --> 0:12:21.800
<v Speaker 1>of companies have actually indicated that they're going to make

0:12:21.960 --> 0:12:25.520
<v Speaker 1>be making contributions to such organizations at the as the

0:12:25.679 --> 0:12:29.160
<v Speaker 1>n a c T Legal Defense Funds, who are providing

0:12:29.320 --> 0:12:34.120
<v Speaker 1>legal assistance to the protests and also providing assistance to

0:12:34.720 --> 0:12:38.000
<v Speaker 1>to Congress and state legislatures, and in terms of trying

0:12:38.040 --> 0:12:43.120
<v Speaker 1>to reform various laws, particularly around law enforcement issues. I

0:12:43.120 --> 0:12:46.400
<v Speaker 1>think it might be curious to some workers that what

0:12:46.480 --> 0:12:49.280
<v Speaker 1>they do in their private time, that an employer has

0:12:49.320 --> 0:12:52.040
<v Speaker 1>anything to say about what they do in their private time.

0:12:53.200 --> 0:12:57.320
<v Speaker 1>Absolutely you know, most employees believe that they have certain

0:12:57.360 --> 0:13:00.319
<v Speaker 1>First Amendment rights and that what they do out side

0:13:00.320 --> 0:13:04.200
<v Speaker 1>of work, they can do along as it's lawful. However,

0:13:04.480 --> 0:13:09.640
<v Speaker 1>the Constitution does not apply to private sector employees and

0:13:10.000 --> 0:13:15.240
<v Speaker 1>the employer. As you mentioned earlier, most employees of our

0:13:15.280 --> 0:13:20.480
<v Speaker 1>employees will present. Unionized employees have certain protection, and some

0:13:20.920 --> 0:13:24.520
<v Speaker 1>public employees have certain protections. But for the private sector

0:13:24.559 --> 0:13:27.760
<v Speaker 1>employees who do not have contracts, and the only people

0:13:27.760 --> 0:13:31.679
<v Speaker 1>who really have contracts of employment are high level management

0:13:31.679 --> 0:13:36.240
<v Speaker 1>and executives. So all employees are employees at will, which

0:13:36.280 --> 0:13:41.040
<v Speaker 1>means that employer can squire that employee for any reason whatsoever,

0:13:41.240 --> 0:13:45.199
<v Speaker 1>accept an unlawful reason. It could be a bad reason,

0:13:45.240 --> 0:13:49.400
<v Speaker 1>is stupid reason and irrational reason, but unless it's unlawful

0:13:49.480 --> 0:13:52.920
<v Speaker 1>by a law, there is no protection for that employee.

0:13:53.200 --> 0:13:56.319
<v Speaker 1>Thanks Rick. That's Merrick Ross saying of the City University

0:13:56.440 --> 0:14:02.640
<v Speaker 1>of New York School of Law. It turned some legal

0:14:02.679 --> 0:14:06.960
<v Speaker 1>heads when two lawyers known for policing workplace discrimination during

0:14:07.000 --> 0:14:11.360
<v Speaker 1>the Obama administration joined Morgan Lewis, a huge law firm

0:14:11.440 --> 0:14:15.920
<v Speaker 1>that often defends companies accused of violating workers rights. Bloomberg

0:14:15.960 --> 0:14:19.720
<v Speaker 1>Law reporter Chris Offer talked to former Equal Employment Opportunity

0:14:19.760 --> 0:14:22.920
<v Speaker 1>Commission member high Fell Bloom and her chief of staff,

0:14:22.960 --> 0:14:26.600
<v Speaker 1>Sharon Massling, about leaving the plaintiff side of the labor

0:14:26.600 --> 0:14:30.480
<v Speaker 1>and employment bar for their new roles as management side lawyers,

0:14:30.680 --> 0:14:33.360
<v Speaker 1>and he joins me. Now, so Chris start by telling

0:14:33.440 --> 0:14:37.360
<v Speaker 1>us about their careers up to this point. So these

0:14:37.400 --> 0:14:40.280
<v Speaker 1>are a pair of civil rights attorneys who have dedicated

0:14:40.600 --> 0:14:45.560
<v Speaker 1>UH the last several decades of their career to workplace advocacy,

0:14:45.760 --> 0:14:50.320
<v Speaker 1>largely on the workers side UM, focusing in particular on

0:14:50.400 --> 0:14:55.920
<v Speaker 1>issues like disability rights UH, sex discrimination, and harassment in

0:14:55.960 --> 0:14:59.880
<v Speaker 1>the workplace. UM. The pair of folks who are se

0:15:00.320 --> 0:15:03.400
<v Speaker 1>in the democratic side of the aisle when it comes

0:15:03.440 --> 0:15:07.840
<v Speaker 1>to Capitol Hill. UH. Fell Bloom had started UM at

0:15:07.880 --> 0:15:09.960
<v Speaker 1>the a c. L U as a lawyer working on

0:15:10.400 --> 0:15:15.360
<v Speaker 1>legislative issues for their HIV AIDS project, went into academia

0:15:15.560 --> 0:15:20.240
<v Speaker 1>and started a disability rights clinic, was heavily involved in

0:15:20.360 --> 0:15:24.680
<v Speaker 1>efforts on Capitol Hill to pass legislation UH enacting gay

0:15:24.800 --> 0:15:28.640
<v Speaker 1>rights UM, and then was tapped by former President Obama

0:15:28.840 --> 0:15:33.840
<v Speaker 1>for a seat on the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, where

0:15:33.880 --> 0:15:38.880
<v Speaker 1>she served for two terms UH and was actually appointed

0:15:38.920 --> 0:15:42.320
<v Speaker 1>for a third term by President Trump because the e

0:15:42.320 --> 0:15:45.200
<v Speaker 1>E s C has designated Democrat seats, so she was

0:15:45.680 --> 0:15:48.520
<v Speaker 1>appointed by Trump to fill Um one of the Democrats

0:15:48.520 --> 0:15:53.880
<v Speaker 1>teats there. Uh that appointment. That nomination was scuttled as

0:15:53.920 --> 0:15:57.520
<v Speaker 1>a result of some misgivings by a small group of

0:15:57.560 --> 0:16:02.360
<v Speaker 1>Republicans led by Senators Um, Mike Lee and Marco Rubio. Uh.

0:16:02.480 --> 0:16:05.280
<v Speaker 1>Fell Bloom, of course, was the E s c s

0:16:05.320 --> 0:16:10.360
<v Speaker 1>first openly gay member, UM and again was a champion

0:16:10.520 --> 0:16:15.320
<v Speaker 1>for some of the LGBT rights issues. UM and in

0:16:15.360 --> 0:16:19.280
<v Speaker 1>a small group of Republicans UM were concerned, they said,

0:16:19.320 --> 0:16:23.520
<v Speaker 1>about whether or not she could balance that advocacy with

0:16:23.600 --> 0:16:29.320
<v Speaker 1>respect for employers religious rights. Um masling Um, who often

0:16:29.440 --> 0:16:33.520
<v Speaker 1>is considered a sort of a sidekick for fell Bloom,

0:16:34.080 --> 0:16:37.080
<v Speaker 1>Uh is no slaps in her own rights. These are

0:16:37.480 --> 0:16:42.200
<v Speaker 1>you know, Harvard and one trained lawyer, Um who worked

0:16:42.240 --> 0:16:45.840
<v Speaker 1>on Capitol Hill on the Democratic side of the aisles

0:16:45.880 --> 0:16:49.440
<v Speaker 1>and worked in the Justice Department Civil Rights Division working

0:16:49.440 --> 0:16:53.480
<v Speaker 1>on disability rights issues before joining the E s C

0:16:53.640 --> 0:16:57.360
<v Speaker 1>and serving as Fell Blooms chief of staff. UM and

0:16:57.440 --> 0:17:02.160
<v Speaker 1>so once Um Sell blooms nomination with scuttle last year,

0:17:02.800 --> 0:17:06.119
<v Speaker 1>UH had to go looking for work and UM. What

0:17:06.280 --> 0:17:09.359
<v Speaker 1>was surprising to some folks UM that has worked with

0:17:09.400 --> 0:17:12.479
<v Speaker 1>them or know them was where they wound up going.

0:17:12.960 --> 0:17:16.040
<v Speaker 1>UM gets It was late last year they announced that

0:17:16.080 --> 0:17:19.639
<v Speaker 1>they were jumping ship and joining Morgan Lewis, which is

0:17:19.680 --> 0:17:24.960
<v Speaker 1>one of these ships huge mega law firms. Morgan Lewis

0:17:25.240 --> 0:17:29.280
<v Speaker 1>is known more as a defense firm. It's defended companies

0:17:29.320 --> 0:17:32.760
<v Speaker 1>and even President Trump and his companies. So tell us

0:17:32.800 --> 0:17:36.200
<v Speaker 1>a little bit about Morgan Lewis and what it stands for.

0:17:36.800 --> 0:17:40.639
<v Speaker 1>So this is a huge global law firm UM that

0:17:40.840 --> 0:17:45.000
<v Speaker 1>gets a large share of this income from UM advising

0:17:45.440 --> 0:17:48.480
<v Speaker 1>a wide range of companies and employment matters and also

0:17:48.560 --> 0:17:51.680
<v Speaker 1>defending them in court when they're accused of all all

0:17:51.720 --> 0:17:55.800
<v Speaker 1>sorts of things from labor violations and union busting to

0:17:56.160 --> 0:18:02.000
<v Speaker 1>employment discrimination and harassment. UM. Recently they've been UM defending

0:18:02.040 --> 0:18:04.720
<v Speaker 1>Amazon and some of the notable litigation going on over

0:18:04.760 --> 0:18:08.680
<v Speaker 1>there with respect to the company's treatment of workers and

0:18:08.840 --> 0:18:14.520
<v Speaker 1>safety issues at Amazon facility. UM and so the firm

0:18:14.800 --> 0:18:17.639
<v Speaker 1>also has been in the news recently because on the

0:18:17.680 --> 0:18:21.919
<v Speaker 1>tax side that their tax practice represents President Trump and

0:18:22.000 --> 0:18:25.240
<v Speaker 1>also the Trump organization in the wide range of the

0:18:25.400 --> 0:18:30.800
<v Speaker 1>tax related issues UH stemming from uh, not only President

0:18:30.880 --> 0:18:36.240
<v Speaker 1>Trump's UM refusal to release his tax his his personal

0:18:36.520 --> 0:18:40.800
<v Speaker 1>UH income tax returns, but also some tax issues related

0:18:40.840 --> 0:18:43.560
<v Speaker 1>to the Trump organization at large. You spoke to a

0:18:43.720 --> 0:18:48.520
<v Speaker 1>Chicago lawyer who was surprised by Felblum's career move, as

0:18:48.560 --> 0:18:52.040
<v Speaker 1>I expect many other lawyers are as well. What did

0:18:52.080 --> 0:18:56.640
<v Speaker 1>she say? Yeah, Brenda Faith actually had had done the

0:18:56.800 --> 0:19:00.720
<v Speaker 1>opposite which UM she had defended UM large law frooms

0:19:00.720 --> 0:19:05.119
<v Speaker 1>that I'm sorry large employers that take our shop before

0:19:05.160 --> 0:19:09.040
<v Speaker 1>flipping to the plainist side to represent workers and discrimination

0:19:09.080 --> 0:19:12.199
<v Speaker 1>and related cases. And she and other attorneys that I

0:19:12.240 --> 0:19:15.199
<v Speaker 1>spoke to on both sides of the political spectrum and

0:19:15.280 --> 0:19:19.320
<v Speaker 1>on both sides of the UH labor management bar express

0:19:19.400 --> 0:19:22.879
<v Speaker 1>some surprise, UM, just based on their experience having worked

0:19:22.880 --> 0:19:26.000
<v Speaker 1>with Heelb women Massling and also being familiar with the

0:19:26.040 --> 0:19:28.840
<v Speaker 1>body of work in their backgrounds in the issues they

0:19:28.840 --> 0:19:32.199
<v Speaker 1>had focused on, that these two lawyers would jump ships

0:19:32.240 --> 0:19:36.600
<v Speaker 1>and quote switch sides UM to a management firm known

0:19:36.680 --> 0:19:40.359
<v Speaker 1>for defending companies accused the violation. Stay right there, Chris,

0:19:40.359 --> 0:19:43.520
<v Speaker 1>We're going to continue this conversation and coming up next

0:19:43.520 --> 0:19:48.400
<v Speaker 1>on Bloomberg Law, how the coronavirus pandemic disrupted the plans

0:19:48.480 --> 0:19:51.760
<v Speaker 1>of Fell Bloom and mass Ling at their new firm,

0:19:51.800 --> 0:19:55.639
<v Speaker 1>and later why the Trump administration keeps losing in court

0:19:55.760 --> 0:19:59.240
<v Speaker 1>by ignoring climate change. And remember you can get the

0:19:59.320 --> 0:20:02.480
<v Speaker 1>latest legal news on our Bloomberg Law podcast. You can

0:20:02.520 --> 0:20:06.399
<v Speaker 1>find them on iTunes, SoundCloud or at Bloomberg dot com,

0:20:06.480 --> 0:20:11.000
<v Speaker 1>slash podcast Slash Law. I'm June Grosso and this is Bloomberg.

0:20:13.640 --> 0:20:18.840
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to Bloomberg Law with June Grasso from Bloomberg Radio.

0:20:19.359 --> 0:20:22.800
<v Speaker 1>I've been talking to Bloomberg Law reporter Chris Offer about

0:20:22.800 --> 0:20:27.480
<v Speaker 1>two Obama civil rights lawyers switching signs. Chris, often we

0:20:27.680 --> 0:20:33.119
<v Speaker 1>hear about lawyers who work their entire careers in government

0:20:33.440 --> 0:20:38.080
<v Speaker 1>and at regulatory agencies, and then they make the switch

0:20:38.320 --> 0:20:42.240
<v Speaker 1>to big law firms where they can command a lot

0:20:42.320 --> 0:20:47.159
<v Speaker 1>of money because of their prior connections and prior experience.

0:20:47.200 --> 0:20:51.160
<v Speaker 1>So is this really that surprising? So when I closed

0:20:51.200 --> 0:20:54.000
<v Speaker 1>to all Bloom and Masking, they certainly recognize that this

0:20:54.040 --> 0:20:56.080
<v Speaker 1>would be a pay bump for them, and it is

0:20:56.119 --> 0:20:59.680
<v Speaker 1>not out of the ordinary, generally speaking for official belief

0:20:59.800 --> 0:21:03.040
<v Speaker 1>of them in service and to command um a high

0:21:03.040 --> 0:21:06.920
<v Speaker 1>price tag. Often in these large corporate law firms. We've

0:21:06.960 --> 0:21:09.680
<v Speaker 1>seen a lot of that out of the Obama administration

0:21:09.760 --> 0:21:13.080
<v Speaker 1>since President Obama left office, but there is a in

0:21:13.119 --> 0:21:16.400
<v Speaker 1>the labor unemployment space that it is uh an oddity.

0:21:16.760 --> 0:21:19.840
<v Speaker 1>UM are analysis show that she's sells Bloom, that is,

0:21:19.960 --> 0:21:23.679
<v Speaker 1>is the first Democratic Commissioner to jump side after leaving

0:21:23.680 --> 0:21:27.879
<v Speaker 1>the E s C in two decades UM. And what

0:21:28.000 --> 0:21:31.480
<v Speaker 1>Publom and Measling said is that UM, in addition to

0:21:31.680 --> 0:21:34.800
<v Speaker 1>the pay bump, UH, this is a situation that allows

0:21:34.840 --> 0:21:38.120
<v Speaker 1>them to help companies do the right thing, to get

0:21:38.119 --> 0:21:41.399
<v Speaker 1>in on the ground floor, to advise them on the

0:21:41.440 --> 0:21:44.800
<v Speaker 1>front end, rather than defending them in court when they're

0:21:44.800 --> 0:21:48.159
<v Speaker 1>facing a lawsuit. And they're focusing in particular on what

0:21:48.200 --> 0:21:52.199
<v Speaker 1>they call workplace culture UM, which is an issue that

0:21:52.280 --> 0:21:53.879
<v Speaker 1>they spent a lot of time on that the E

0:21:53.880 --> 0:21:58.160
<v Speaker 1>E s C, particularly in the harassment realm UH following

0:21:58.200 --> 0:22:02.000
<v Speaker 1>the Harvey line seen uh a UM both of them

0:22:02.040 --> 0:22:06.160
<v Speaker 1>looking at this idea that workplaces can enhance their culture

0:22:06.640 --> 0:22:10.040
<v Speaker 1>and sort of combat some of the latent harassment discrimination

0:22:10.119 --> 0:22:13.920
<v Speaker 1>that may go on. UM. By actively managing that culture,

0:22:14.600 --> 0:22:18.200
<v Speaker 1>I imagine they'll get a lot of clients who see

0:22:18.240 --> 0:22:22.920
<v Speaker 1>them as sources of information about how the other side works.

0:22:23.680 --> 0:22:27.480
<v Speaker 1>Absolutely if nothing else, you could see a client a

0:22:27.560 --> 0:22:30.159
<v Speaker 1>company getting a letter from the e s C starting

0:22:30.200 --> 0:22:34.160
<v Speaker 1>to ask questions about a particular case or allegation, UM,

0:22:34.200 --> 0:22:36.600
<v Speaker 1>wanting to speak to people who are fresh off of

0:22:37.240 --> 0:22:40.439
<v Speaker 1>working over there and have a really uh sort of

0:22:40.480 --> 0:22:43.400
<v Speaker 1>insiders view as to how the agency works, how they

0:22:43.480 --> 0:22:47.159
<v Speaker 1>handle these cases, UM, and how they prosecute them. In

0:22:47.200 --> 0:22:51.119
<v Speaker 1>addition to that, UM, again it's it's sort of this

0:22:51.280 --> 0:22:54.760
<v Speaker 1>idea that UM, if you put in the time and

0:22:54.880 --> 0:22:58.600
<v Speaker 1>effort and make the commitment to work with some of

0:22:58.640 --> 0:23:01.680
<v Speaker 1>these attorneys to address some of these issues and nipped

0:23:01.680 --> 0:23:04.119
<v Speaker 1>them in the bud, it may very well save you

0:23:04.200 --> 0:23:06.240
<v Speaker 1>on the back end by keeping you out of court

0:23:06.400 --> 0:23:09.800
<v Speaker 1>or at least limiting your liability on the back end.

0:23:10.400 --> 0:23:14.480
<v Speaker 1>So when did they join Morgan Lewis? Uh? It was

0:23:14.600 --> 0:23:16.919
<v Speaker 1>right at the tail end of last year. So I

0:23:16.960 --> 0:23:19.600
<v Speaker 1>want to say the announcement came out in this or

0:23:19.760 --> 0:23:27.960
<v Speaker 1>of So then how has the pandemic affected their work? Right? So? UM,

0:23:28.000 --> 0:23:31.080
<v Speaker 1>you know the Massing and Pelblem had planned to really

0:23:31.119 --> 0:23:36.040
<v Speaker 1>focus on this advisory role, uh, particularly with respect to

0:23:36.720 --> 0:23:41.439
<v Speaker 1>discrimination and harassment and addressing workplace culture in that space. UM.

0:23:41.520 --> 0:23:44.840
<v Speaker 1>But they told me they found themselves shifting like pretty

0:23:44.920 --> 0:23:49.040
<v Speaker 1>much everyone else who practices labor and employment law UM

0:23:49.280 --> 0:23:53.880
<v Speaker 1>to tackling a wide range of questions posed by the coronavirus.

0:23:54.160 --> 0:23:57.560
<v Speaker 1>Because both of them have a background and expertise and

0:23:57.680 --> 0:24:01.919
<v Speaker 1>disability discrimination in particular, there UH they've been called on

0:24:02.080 --> 0:24:05.879
<v Speaker 1>to UM taxle a wide range of questions related to

0:24:06.760 --> 0:24:13.280
<v Speaker 1>UM testing employees for coronavirus, potentially testing employees for antibodies

0:24:13.840 --> 0:24:17.600
<v Speaker 1>for the coronavirus, and a wide range of other issues

0:24:17.640 --> 0:24:21.080
<v Speaker 1>related to the virus as companies start to think about

0:24:21.080 --> 0:24:24.760
<v Speaker 1>opening their doors and potentially bringing workers back to the

0:24:24.840 --> 0:24:28.280
<v Speaker 1>job and sell Bloom had a lot to do with

0:24:28.359 --> 0:24:32.760
<v Speaker 1>the Americans with Disabilities Act. She did, yes, And I

0:24:32.920 --> 0:24:37.479
<v Speaker 1>for one, UM would have guests that Congress UH thirty

0:24:37.560 --> 0:24:40.840
<v Speaker 1>years ago when they passed the Americans with Disabilities Act,

0:24:41.240 --> 0:24:44.359
<v Speaker 1>had no idea that any sort of pandemic the likes

0:24:44.440 --> 0:24:49.000
<v Speaker 1>of coronavirus would be striking us now here three decades later.

0:24:49.040 --> 0:24:52.639
<v Speaker 1>But what fell Bloom and Maslin said UM was that

0:24:52.760 --> 0:24:55.840
<v Speaker 1>actually it strikes a very similar chord to a lot

0:24:55.880 --> 0:24:59.240
<v Speaker 1>of the discussions that they had had regarding the HIV

0:24:59.440 --> 0:25:03.720
<v Speaker 1>aid UM pandemic at the time the epidemics UM which

0:25:03.800 --> 0:25:06.920
<v Speaker 1>was really piking. We're talking about the late eighties, early

0:25:07.000 --> 0:25:11.160
<v Speaker 1>nineties UM. And and it was interesting what Felblum, who

0:25:11.240 --> 0:25:13.199
<v Speaker 1>was working as an A C. L U lawyer at

0:25:13.200 --> 0:25:16.440
<v Speaker 1>the time and was up on Capitol Hill advising them,

0:25:16.480 --> 0:25:20.760
<v Speaker 1>particularly about HIV eight issues, said, UM, is that some

0:25:20.840 --> 0:25:23.080
<v Speaker 1>of the language that's being used now to address the

0:25:23.119 --> 0:25:26.760
<v Speaker 1>coronavirus UH is language that was written into the Act

0:25:27.280 --> 0:25:31.879
<v Speaker 1>to address concerns from lawmakers regarding HIV eight. In your story,

0:25:31.920 --> 0:25:35.440
<v Speaker 1>you discuss the question that employers are facing about whether

0:25:35.480 --> 0:25:39.240
<v Speaker 1>an employee poses a direct threat tell us about that.

0:25:39.240 --> 0:25:42.680
<v Speaker 1>That's right, it's a complicated analysis. The direct threat UM

0:25:42.720 --> 0:25:47.000
<v Speaker 1>analysis comes into play with employees who do not have

0:25:47.160 --> 0:25:51.080
<v Speaker 1>the virus but may have some underlying medical condition that

0:25:51.160 --> 0:25:56.879
<v Speaker 1>makes them particularly susceptible UM to you know, a really

0:25:56.880 --> 0:25:59.639
<v Speaker 1>bad bout of the virus or or maybe even death

0:26:00.040 --> 0:26:02.919
<v Speaker 1>if they contract the viry. And the question is what

0:26:02.960 --> 0:26:06.159
<v Speaker 1>can employees do and I'm sorry, what can employers do

0:26:06.720 --> 0:26:12.000
<v Speaker 1>in those situations in regards to bringing those employees back

0:26:12.040 --> 0:26:16.280
<v Speaker 1>into the workplace knowing that they may be particularly susceptible.

0:26:16.600 --> 0:26:18.639
<v Speaker 1>And so what was written into the A. D. A

0:26:19.400 --> 0:26:22.560
<v Speaker 1>UH to deal with the hiv A virus was this

0:26:22.680 --> 0:26:26.120
<v Speaker 1>direct threat language. And what it says is that UH

0:26:26.119 --> 0:26:28.920
<v Speaker 1>an employer making those kinds of decisions has to look

0:26:28.960 --> 0:26:32.240
<v Speaker 1>at every employee individually, has to look at what sort

0:26:32.240 --> 0:26:36.879
<v Speaker 1>of reasonable accommodations can be made um to protect that

0:26:37.040 --> 0:26:40.520
<v Speaker 1>employee on the job UM, and then based on those

0:26:40.520 --> 0:26:44.520
<v Speaker 1>reasonable accommodations, whether or not the employee would still constitute

0:26:44.600 --> 0:26:47.960
<v Speaker 1>quote a direct threat either to the employee themselves or

0:26:48.040 --> 0:26:50.560
<v Speaker 1>to their co workers. And if the answer is yes,

0:26:50.640 --> 0:26:53.520
<v Speaker 1>there is a direct threat there, then the company can

0:26:53.560 --> 0:26:55.560
<v Speaker 1>say we're not going to bring you back to the

0:26:55.640 --> 0:26:57.720
<v Speaker 1>job right now. But they have to go through that

0:26:57.760 --> 0:27:01.280
<v Speaker 1>whole uh you know, sort of comp like legal analysis

0:27:01.359 --> 0:27:05.960
<v Speaker 1>before making that decision. So finally, Chris, did either of

0:27:06.000 --> 0:27:09.440
<v Speaker 1>them tell you about any backlash they may have gotten

0:27:09.520 --> 0:27:13.760
<v Speaker 1>from fellow lawyers about going to the other side. Not

0:27:13.960 --> 0:27:17.399
<v Speaker 1>a lot, they acknowledged, maybe a couple of eyebrows rates

0:27:17.520 --> 0:27:19.960
<v Speaker 1>here and there at toptail parties and that kind of thing.

0:27:20.080 --> 0:27:23.520
<v Speaker 1>But um, you know, the labor and employment bar is

0:27:23.600 --> 0:27:28.600
<v Speaker 1>a fairly narrow universe, and uh, you know, these people

0:27:28.680 --> 0:27:31.280
<v Speaker 1>like to or try their best to play well together

0:27:31.359 --> 0:27:34.440
<v Speaker 1>even when they're on opposing sides in the courtroom um

0:27:34.560 --> 0:27:37.120
<v Speaker 1>or at the negotiating tables. So not a ton of that,

0:27:37.280 --> 0:27:40.440
<v Speaker 1>particularly knowing you know who knows down the road. In

0:27:40.600 --> 0:27:44.480
<v Speaker 1>a future democratic administration, you could see both fell bloom

0:27:44.520 --> 0:27:47.600
<v Speaker 1>and Massling back in some sort of leadership role, whether

0:27:47.640 --> 0:27:51.800
<v Speaker 1>that's at the sc or elsewhere. Thanks Chris. That's Chris Offer.

0:27:52.040 --> 0:27:54.920
<v Speaker 1>He's the Bloomberg Law team leader for the business of law.

0:27:55.359 --> 0:27:59.080
<v Speaker 1>Coming up next to Bloomberg Law. Why the Trump administration

0:27:59.200 --> 0:28:03.080
<v Speaker 1>keeps losing in court by ignoring climate change. I'm June

0:28:03.119 --> 0:28:04.720
<v Speaker 1>Brasso and this is Luberg