WEBVTT - Iran Blows Up US Drone

0:00:10.800 --> 0:00:17.040
<v Speaker 1>You are entering the freedom hunt. The Iranians shoot down

0:00:17.160 --> 0:00:22.160
<v Speaker 1>a US drone. President Trump says it was a big mistake.

0:00:22.760 --> 0:00:26.840
<v Speaker 1>Are we heading toward a military conflict of some kind

0:00:27.080 --> 0:00:30.960
<v Speaker 1>with the Mullahs in Tehran? We'll get into that whilst

0:00:31.040 --> 0:00:33.320
<v Speaker 1>everything else going on today on the buck Sexton Show.

0:00:34.680 --> 0:00:38.320
<v Speaker 1>This is the bus Sexton Show, where the mission or

0:00:38.400 --> 0:00:42.560
<v Speaker 1>mission is to decode what really matters with actionable intelligence.

0:00:44.720 --> 0:00:48.720
<v Speaker 1>Magno mistake, American. You're a great American. Again, the buck

0:00:48.760 --> 0:00:58.880
<v Speaker 1>Sexton Show begins. He's a great guy. Now, Lauran made

0:00:58.880 --> 0:01:03.120
<v Speaker 1>a big mistake. This drone was in international waters. Clearly,

0:01:03.160 --> 0:01:07.120
<v Speaker 1>we have it all documented. It's documented scientifically, not just words.

0:01:07.880 --> 0:01:15.800
<v Speaker 1>And they made a very bad mistake. Okay, you'll find out.

0:01:16.319 --> 0:01:22.040
<v Speaker 1>You'll find out. You'll find out, obviously, obviously you know

0:01:22.080 --> 0:01:24.520
<v Speaker 1>we're not going to be talking too much about it.

0:01:24.680 --> 0:01:26.600
<v Speaker 1>You're gonna find out. They made a very big mistake,

0:01:27.800 --> 0:01:33.760
<v Speaker 1>a very big mistake, the President says about Uranians. Welcome

0:01:33.760 --> 0:01:35.640
<v Speaker 1>to the buck sex and show everybody. Great to have

0:01:35.680 --> 0:01:38.800
<v Speaker 1>you here. Privilege and the pleasures always. So here's what

0:01:38.800 --> 0:01:43.960
<v Speaker 1>we've got going on. Possibility of a millet, not just

0:01:44.000 --> 0:01:47.960
<v Speaker 1>a military showdown, but real military action here. I can

0:01:48.000 --> 0:01:50.920
<v Speaker 1>tell you that some in the news business because they

0:01:50.920 --> 0:01:52.920
<v Speaker 1>tend to reach out ahead of time and want to

0:01:52.960 --> 0:01:56.600
<v Speaker 1>know availability for folks like me who have a national

0:01:56.600 --> 0:01:59.560
<v Speaker 1>security background to speak to these issues. There's at least

0:01:59.640 --> 0:02:07.480
<v Speaker 1>a a preparation for a getting ready for the possibility

0:02:07.600 --> 0:02:12.040
<v Speaker 1>of US strikes. Don't know when, don't know where, don't

0:02:12.040 --> 0:02:14.960
<v Speaker 1>know if they'll happen at all, but there are whisperers

0:02:15.000 --> 0:02:19.480
<v Speaker 1>of it right now in DC. We may fire a

0:02:19.480 --> 0:02:22.200
<v Speaker 1>whole bunch of missiles or who knows what and who

0:02:22.200 --> 0:02:26.440
<v Speaker 1>knows where, But that the Iranians need to be taught

0:02:26.560 --> 0:02:30.440
<v Speaker 1>a lesson here that they're lashing out against the Trump

0:02:30.480 --> 0:02:33.959
<v Speaker 1>administration in response to yes to pull out from the

0:02:34.000 --> 0:02:36.720
<v Speaker 1>Iran nuclear Deal, but also the crippling sanctions Irani and

0:02:36.800 --> 0:02:41.280
<v Speaker 1>economies in really rough shape right now, that we need

0:02:41.320 --> 0:02:43.440
<v Speaker 1>to send the Iranians a message that this will not

0:02:43.600 --> 0:02:47.919
<v Speaker 1>be tolerated. This is not going to not going to fly.

0:02:48.080 --> 0:02:49.840
<v Speaker 1>Pardon the expression, because they shot a drone out of

0:02:49.840 --> 0:02:54.280
<v Speaker 1>the sky. There's no human casualty in this. But the

0:02:54.360 --> 0:02:58.960
<v Speaker 1>drone they shot out of the sky was a hundred

0:02:58.960 --> 0:03:04.320
<v Speaker 1>million dollar p of equipment flying in international airspace. Shot

0:03:04.360 --> 0:03:08.880
<v Speaker 1>down by a sophisticated surface to air missile system. This

0:03:09.000 --> 0:03:12.880
<v Speaker 1>was the drone was an RQ for a Global Hawk,

0:03:13.919 --> 0:03:22.040
<v Speaker 1>which gives intelligence, real time surveillance, reconnaissance, and intelligence gathering capability. Clearly,

0:03:22.080 --> 0:03:24.079
<v Speaker 1>the US wants to keep an eye on what's going

0:03:24.120 --> 0:03:28.320
<v Speaker 1>on in the Strait of Hormus, and so that's why

0:03:28.320 --> 0:03:31.560
<v Speaker 1>we had this one hundred and thirty million dollar playing

0:03:31.600 --> 0:03:33.840
<v Speaker 1>with a wingspan of about one hundred and thirty feet,

0:03:35.080 --> 0:03:36.880
<v Speaker 1>flying around trying to keep an eye on things. The

0:03:36.880 --> 0:03:40.200
<v Speaker 1>Iranian shot it out of the sky. This is what

0:03:40.320 --> 0:03:43.480
<v Speaker 1>you would call in the history textbooks an international incident,

0:03:44.560 --> 0:03:47.480
<v Speaker 1>and these are the types of incidents that can lead

0:03:47.520 --> 0:03:52.680
<v Speaker 1>to much more severe, much more serious conflicts. Depends on

0:03:53.240 --> 0:03:56.600
<v Speaker 1>how one side chooses to escalate and how the other

0:03:56.640 --> 0:04:03.080
<v Speaker 1>side retaliates. Here's just my baseline on all of this.

0:04:03.360 --> 0:04:07.160
<v Speaker 1>I think that a war with Iran would be a

0:04:07.240 --> 0:04:10.360
<v Speaker 1>terrible idea. I think that we should have learned at

0:04:10.360 --> 0:04:12.880
<v Speaker 1>this point the lessons of a Rock and Afghanistan. It

0:04:13.040 --> 0:04:16.120
<v Speaker 1>is not only is it not our job to try

0:04:16.320 --> 0:04:22.160
<v Speaker 1>and overthrow the government in Iran and rebuild that country

0:04:22.200 --> 0:04:26.880
<v Speaker 1>and help them bring about a multi confession, well just

0:04:26.960 --> 0:04:32.080
<v Speaker 1>a multi ethnic if not multi confessional democracy. That's not

0:04:32.120 --> 0:04:34.479
<v Speaker 1>our mandate, that's not our job. And not only should

0:04:34.520 --> 0:04:38.520
<v Speaker 1>we not try it, but I would offer to you

0:04:38.560 --> 0:04:41.080
<v Speaker 1>that we would be foolish to try it, given what

0:04:41.120 --> 0:04:44.200
<v Speaker 1>we already know about our efforts in that part of

0:04:44.200 --> 0:04:46.320
<v Speaker 1>the world. I would really like to have a whole

0:04:46.320 --> 0:04:48.720
<v Speaker 1>generation pass where we don't have a real war going

0:04:48.760 --> 0:04:52.359
<v Speaker 1>on in the Middle East that we are fighting. Wouldn't

0:04:52.360 --> 0:04:56.120
<v Speaker 1>that be nice? We have since I was in college,

0:04:56.120 --> 0:04:57.880
<v Speaker 1>and I'm now getting to be old enough that I

0:04:57.920 --> 0:05:00.479
<v Speaker 1>can't I can't even find all the gray hairs my beard.

0:05:01.240 --> 0:05:04.400
<v Speaker 1>We have been at war in the Middle East in

0:05:04.400 --> 0:05:10.360
<v Speaker 1>some capacity now, stretching back for almost twenty years. I

0:05:10.440 --> 0:05:12.480
<v Speaker 1>really don't think we should be adding another war on

0:05:12.560 --> 0:05:15.560
<v Speaker 1>our play now. This is where a lot of people

0:05:15.680 --> 0:05:19.640
<v Speaker 1>that are very hawkish on the issue of Iran would

0:05:19.680 --> 0:05:23.200
<v Speaker 1>come forward and say, but we're not saying that it

0:05:23.240 --> 0:05:25.520
<v Speaker 1>would be a war. We're just saying, if to do something,

0:05:25.560 --> 0:05:28.960
<v Speaker 1>you have to send a message, all right. I can

0:05:29.080 --> 0:05:32.320
<v Speaker 1>understand that we did have the Trump administration fire a

0:05:32.320 --> 0:05:36.840
<v Speaker 1>whole bunch of missiles into Syria after children had been

0:05:36.839 --> 0:05:40.240
<v Speaker 1>gassed there. So the president United States did that, and

0:05:40.320 --> 0:05:43.400
<v Speaker 1>we're not at war with the Assad regime as a result,

0:05:44.200 --> 0:05:46.280
<v Speaker 1>even though that is certainly an active war, but they

0:05:46.279 --> 0:05:48.160
<v Speaker 1>did not declare war on us. We're not at war

0:05:48.200 --> 0:05:51.839
<v Speaker 1>with the Assad regime. How would the Iranians react, though

0:05:51.880 --> 0:05:55.200
<v Speaker 1>nobody really particularly knows. I'm not even sure in some

0:05:55.240 --> 0:06:01.760
<v Speaker 1>ways the Iranians know. But Trump is going back and

0:06:01.800 --> 0:06:04.479
<v Speaker 1>forth in public on this a bit. He's saying that, well, Wan,

0:06:04.640 --> 0:06:07.159
<v Speaker 1>he's making sure it is known that there will be

0:06:07.200 --> 0:06:10.760
<v Speaker 1>action taken against the irudience that this happens again, or

0:06:11.320 --> 0:06:15.000
<v Speaker 1>perhaps he'll already be reaction to this one incident. As

0:06:15.000 --> 0:06:17.520
<v Speaker 1>it is, he has said that this was a He

0:06:17.600 --> 0:06:19.680
<v Speaker 1>keeps saying it's a mistake, it's a mistake. Well, we'll

0:06:19.680 --> 0:06:24.440
<v Speaker 1>see what exactly he means by that. Play eleven. I

0:06:24.520 --> 0:06:28.280
<v Speaker 1>have a feeling I may be wrong, and I may

0:06:28.320 --> 0:06:30.400
<v Speaker 1>be right, but I'm right a lot. I have a

0:06:30.440 --> 0:06:33.479
<v Speaker 1>feeling that it was a mistake made by somebody that

0:06:33.560 --> 0:06:36.720
<v Speaker 1>shouldn't have been doing what they did. I think they

0:06:36.720 --> 0:06:38.560
<v Speaker 1>made a mistake, and I'm not just talking to the

0:06:38.600 --> 0:06:41.359
<v Speaker 1>country made a mistake. I think that somebody under the

0:06:41.400 --> 0:06:46.440
<v Speaker 1>command of that country made a big hip. Let's just

0:06:46.480 --> 0:06:48.760
<v Speaker 1>see what happens. She just let's see what happens. It's

0:06:48.839 --> 0:06:50.800
<v Speaker 1>all going to work out. I find it hard to

0:06:50.800 --> 0:06:52.840
<v Speaker 1>believe it was intentional, if you want to know the truth.

0:06:52.880 --> 0:06:54.839
<v Speaker 1>I think that it could have been somebody who was

0:06:55.720 --> 0:07:00.040
<v Speaker 1>loose and stupid that that it will be able to

0:07:00.120 --> 0:07:02.840
<v Speaker 1>we put back and you'll understand exactly what happened. But

0:07:02.880 --> 0:07:05.960
<v Speaker 1>it was a very foolish move, that I can tell you.

0:07:06.520 --> 0:07:10.120
<v Speaker 1>So the President saying here that he finds it hard

0:07:10.200 --> 0:07:13.480
<v Speaker 1>to believe it was intentional, says it was a very

0:07:14.640 --> 0:07:19.600
<v Speaker 1>foolish move. Well, I think what he's saying is that

0:07:19.640 --> 0:07:21.880
<v Speaker 1>he doesn't believe that this order was necessarily given from

0:07:21.920 --> 0:07:25.160
<v Speaker 1>the very top of the Iranian government, and I think

0:07:25.160 --> 0:07:28.600
<v Speaker 1>that they's probably wrong on that. I think the Iranians

0:07:28.680 --> 0:07:31.520
<v Speaker 1>this is exactly this is exactly what you would expect

0:07:32.200 --> 0:07:37.679
<v Speaker 1>as an escu esculatory measure against us from the Iranians.

0:07:37.720 --> 0:07:40.840
<v Speaker 1>It doesn't no casualties because I think they realize if

0:07:40.880 --> 0:07:44.120
<v Speaker 1>they kill a bunch of American sailors or airman airman,

0:07:44.240 --> 0:07:48.000
<v Speaker 1>or or anybody for that matter, there's a very real

0:07:48.080 --> 0:07:55.760
<v Speaker 1>chance that the US response would be severe, that we

0:07:55.800 --> 0:07:59.360
<v Speaker 1>would come back and hit them in ways that would

0:07:59.400 --> 0:08:02.840
<v Speaker 1>be way worse than anything they've experienced up to this point.

0:08:03.600 --> 0:08:09.160
<v Speaker 1>So if you're looking for a measured response to the Iranians,

0:08:09.160 --> 0:08:10.480
<v Speaker 1>you have to keep in mind that it's likely the

0:08:10.560 --> 0:08:14.440
<v Speaker 1>Iranians themselves we're taking a measured response here. There are

0:08:14.440 --> 0:08:16.320
<v Speaker 1>other things that they could do, the other ways that

0:08:16.360 --> 0:08:23.280
<v Speaker 1>they could hit us. But then there's this. It's in

0:08:23.320 --> 0:08:26.440
<v Speaker 1>the area you're hearing about it that there are people

0:08:26.480 --> 0:08:28.280
<v Speaker 1>you have to remember, who are very senior in the

0:08:28.360 --> 0:08:33.040
<v Speaker 1>national security complex in this country. There are people who

0:08:34.520 --> 0:08:40.880
<v Speaker 1>have been hoping to get to a new Iranian regime somehow.

0:08:40.920 --> 0:08:43.200
<v Speaker 1>They've been hoping to push us towards, push the Iranians

0:08:43.200 --> 0:08:46.360
<v Speaker 1>toward that for the better part now of thirty or

0:08:46.400 --> 0:08:50.960
<v Speaker 1>forty years. And some of those who have been working

0:08:50.960 --> 0:08:53.839
<v Speaker 1>the issue at least for a few decades are still

0:08:53.880 --> 0:08:57.280
<v Speaker 1>in Capitol Hill, are still in the White House, in

0:08:57.320 --> 0:09:01.320
<v Speaker 1>the National Security apparatus. They really want that to happen.

0:09:01.800 --> 0:09:03.880
<v Speaker 1>And Trump is being asked about this a little bit.

0:09:03.920 --> 0:09:06.720
<v Speaker 1>Trump is being asked questions like, are you on board

0:09:06.760 --> 0:09:08.920
<v Speaker 1>with all of your advisors? Is there anybody who's pushing

0:09:08.960 --> 0:09:11.600
<v Speaker 1>you in directions that you're uncomfortable with? In terms of

0:09:11.600 --> 0:09:16.480
<v Speaker 1>your Iran response, and here's the presence that played twelve. Yeah,

0:09:16.520 --> 0:09:18.040
<v Speaker 1>that has of your administration. Who are I find to

0:09:18.160 --> 0:09:21.000
<v Speaker 1>push you into No, not at all, not at all.

0:09:21.080 --> 0:09:23.560
<v Speaker 1>In fact, in many cases it's the opposite. But I

0:09:23.600 --> 0:09:25.920
<v Speaker 1>will say, look, I said I want to get out

0:09:25.920 --> 0:09:28.360
<v Speaker 1>of these endless wars. I campaigned on that. I want

0:09:28.360 --> 0:09:31.280
<v Speaker 1>to get out. We've been in Afghanistan for nineteen years.

0:09:31.280 --> 0:09:34.920
<v Speaker 1>As you know, we've reduced very substantially in Afghanistan. We

0:09:35.679 --> 0:09:37.800
<v Speaker 1>beat the Caliphate. We took back one hundred percent of

0:09:37.800 --> 0:09:40.560
<v Speaker 1>the Caliphate when it was ninety nine percent. Justin I

0:09:40.600 --> 0:09:43.160
<v Speaker 1>said we're gonna get out, We're gonna start peeling back,

0:09:43.160 --> 0:09:45.120
<v Speaker 1>and everybody went crazy because it was ninety nine. So

0:09:45.120 --> 0:09:46.600
<v Speaker 1>I said, all right, so we'll finish it up. So

0:09:46.600 --> 0:09:49.440
<v Speaker 1>we got one hundred percent, and we're pulling that back

0:09:49.440 --> 0:09:51.440
<v Speaker 1>out of Syria. We're pulling a lot of people back.

0:09:52.160 --> 0:09:54.319
<v Speaker 1>But this is something, this is a new wrinkle, this

0:09:54.400 --> 0:09:57.000
<v Speaker 1>is a new fly in the ointment. What happened shooting

0:09:57.000 --> 0:10:01.080
<v Speaker 1>down the drone and this kind will not stand forth

0:10:01.080 --> 0:10:05.319
<v Speaker 1>that I can tell you. Thank you very much. I

0:10:05.360 --> 0:10:09.600
<v Speaker 1>appreciate that the president understands that part of his mandate,

0:10:09.679 --> 0:10:13.280
<v Speaker 1>part of what got him elected and it wasn't. An

0:10:13.320 --> 0:10:16.760
<v Speaker 1>insignificant way that he separated himself from the rest of

0:10:16.760 --> 0:10:19.319
<v Speaker 1>the republican field was that he was willing to say

0:10:19.320 --> 0:10:21.880
<v Speaker 1>the Iraq war was a bad idea and that we

0:10:21.920 --> 0:10:24.640
<v Speaker 1>should not be engaged in these wars for regime changed

0:10:24.640 --> 0:10:27.800
<v Speaker 1>purposes in the Middle East. I know that the the

0:10:27.920 --> 0:10:30.800
<v Speaker 1>regime change advocates, and there are many of them out there,

0:10:32.200 --> 0:10:34.439
<v Speaker 1>they will generally not say, let's land one hundred and

0:10:34.440 --> 0:10:40.240
<v Speaker 1>fifty thousand soldiers in Iran and do this whole thing

0:10:40.280 --> 0:10:43.959
<v Speaker 1>all over again that we've done before. But I also

0:10:44.080 --> 0:10:48.439
<v Speaker 1>note that there's a there is a correlation, not a causation,

0:10:48.520 --> 0:10:52.120
<v Speaker 1>but there are certainly there's a momentum to we're going

0:10:52.200 --> 0:10:56.079
<v Speaker 1>to start with some military strikes against Iran, and then

0:10:56.200 --> 0:11:00.200
<v Speaker 1>if that isn't enough, then what if we just side

0:11:00.200 --> 0:11:03.240
<v Speaker 1>that Iran has to be stopped or Iran has to

0:11:03.240 --> 0:11:05.800
<v Speaker 1>be punished severely enough that they will change their behavior,

0:11:05.800 --> 0:11:08.920
<v Speaker 1>and they don't change their behavior. How far away are

0:11:08.920 --> 0:11:16.319
<v Speaker 1>we really becoming much more heavily invested in in Iranian

0:11:16.360 --> 0:11:19.840
<v Speaker 1>regime change than we want to be? It is true,

0:11:19.880 --> 0:11:23.600
<v Speaker 1>and I just because Democrats are even some very far

0:11:23.679 --> 0:11:25.800
<v Speaker 1>left to say it doesn't mean that it's necessarily wrong.

0:11:26.280 --> 0:11:27.880
<v Speaker 1>It is true that a war in Iran would be

0:11:27.920 --> 0:11:31.680
<v Speaker 1>a disaster, one for which this country has no stomach.

0:11:31.880 --> 0:11:36.320
<v Speaker 1>We just it's not our fight. Stopping the Iranians from

0:11:36.400 --> 0:11:40.680
<v Speaker 1>bad behavior by being willing to slap at them when

0:11:40.679 --> 0:11:46.120
<v Speaker 1>necessary with military precision strikes, the continued crush of sections

0:11:46.120 --> 0:11:49.000
<v Speaker 1>on their economy, freezing them out from the international community.

0:11:49.000 --> 0:11:52.400
<v Speaker 1>That all makes sense, But this is the blunder I

0:11:52.480 --> 0:11:56.560
<v Speaker 1>just don't want Trump to make. He's in such a

0:11:56.600 --> 0:11:58.960
<v Speaker 1>good position going into this twenty twenty election. There's so

0:11:59.040 --> 0:12:02.199
<v Speaker 1>much about everything that he's done up to this point.

0:12:03.360 --> 0:12:04.920
<v Speaker 1>I think he should be proud of, and that has

0:12:04.920 --> 0:12:08.080
<v Speaker 1>really shown the American people the kind of results that

0:12:08.120 --> 0:12:11.920
<v Speaker 1>would make us want to vote for him again. But

0:12:12.040 --> 0:12:15.240
<v Speaker 1>a way to throw it all in the trash been

0:12:15.320 --> 0:12:18.680
<v Speaker 1>very quickly is to find himself dragged into some war

0:12:18.960 --> 0:12:22.319
<v Speaker 1>in the Iran. Look in the early days with Obama

0:12:22.320 --> 0:12:26.000
<v Speaker 1>and Syria, I was I was writing pieces about how

0:12:26.520 --> 0:12:28.280
<v Speaker 1>we can do a little bit here, a little bit there,

0:12:28.320 --> 0:12:30.520
<v Speaker 1>but it better be very minimal, no ground troops. Syria

0:12:30.559 --> 0:12:34.400
<v Speaker 1>is not our war, and I stand behind that, and

0:12:34.880 --> 0:12:38.240
<v Speaker 1>that's the case in Iran. This is not. It's it's

0:12:38.280 --> 0:12:40.480
<v Speaker 1>our fight when they do things to us, and we

0:12:40.520 --> 0:12:44.760
<v Speaker 1>need to respond to that. But the overall narrative of

0:12:44.800 --> 0:12:48.600
<v Speaker 1>events for our relationship or lack thereof, with Iran can't

0:12:48.640 --> 0:12:51.040
<v Speaker 1>be that we really are just trying to find a

0:12:51.080 --> 0:12:55.040
<v Speaker 1>way to overthrow their government and help get something else

0:12:55.080 --> 0:12:58.520
<v Speaker 1>going there. That's just a terrible idea, and it's a

0:12:58.559 --> 0:13:00.679
<v Speaker 1>way for the president to lose the second term of

0:13:00.720 --> 0:13:06.160
<v Speaker 1>his presidency. If Trump gets dragged into a protracted conflict

0:13:06.160 --> 0:13:09.400
<v Speaker 1>with Iran, I don't know if he can win re election.

0:13:09.840 --> 0:13:12.120
<v Speaker 1>I think people are we're all so tired of it.

0:13:12.160 --> 0:13:13.560
<v Speaker 1>We're all so sick of it. We don't want to

0:13:13.559 --> 0:13:16.360
<v Speaker 1>hear it anymore. And for those of you were saying, oh, Buck,

0:13:16.400 --> 0:13:18.680
<v Speaker 1>but you don't want to be don't do Neville, chamberlain

0:13:18.720 --> 0:13:21.360
<v Speaker 1>an appeasement, everything else. Okay, Well, you know, if I'm

0:13:21.360 --> 0:13:24.679
<v Speaker 1>not saying if the Iranian start blowing civilian airliners out

0:13:24.679 --> 0:13:28.400
<v Speaker 1>of the sky, or if the IRGC starts landing in

0:13:28.920 --> 0:13:32.040
<v Speaker 1>rubber Dinghy's on Long Island trying to do sabotage operations,

0:13:32.400 --> 0:13:34.480
<v Speaker 1>that we don't do whatever we have to do. I'm

0:13:34.480 --> 0:13:37.040
<v Speaker 1>just saying, insofar as we have a choice in these matters.

0:13:37.840 --> 0:13:40.880
<v Speaker 1>In so far as this is not yet determined that

0:13:40.960 --> 0:13:44.920
<v Speaker 1>we have to go to a full scale military conflict

0:13:44.920 --> 0:13:48.800
<v Speaker 1>with Iran, we need to avoid it at almost all costs,

0:13:48.800 --> 0:13:53.199
<v Speaker 1>not at all costs, at almost all costs. My generation,

0:13:53.280 --> 0:13:57.120
<v Speaker 1>the generation above me, the generation below me, many of

0:13:57.200 --> 0:13:59.160
<v Speaker 1>us have spent way too much time already in parts

0:13:59.200 --> 0:14:01.600
<v Speaker 1>the Middle East that he didn't want to visit and

0:14:01.840 --> 0:14:05.880
<v Speaker 1>really don't want to go back to. And I certainly

0:14:06.760 --> 0:14:09.240
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't want to. I'll tell you this, all of you

0:14:09.320 --> 0:14:11.000
<v Speaker 1>who are listening this. I know many of you who

0:14:11.000 --> 0:14:14.480
<v Speaker 1>listen serve yourselves, but I wouldn't want to be the

0:14:14.520 --> 0:14:16.200
<v Speaker 1>officer or the I wouldn't want to be the commander

0:14:16.200 --> 0:14:18.240
<v Speaker 1>in chief. That's a better way of saying it. That

0:14:18.400 --> 0:14:20.280
<v Speaker 1>told your son or your daughter, yeah, you're going to

0:14:20.400 --> 0:14:24.080
<v Speaker 1>now go and be part of the provincial reconstruction team

0:14:24.680 --> 0:14:27.680
<v Speaker 1>for Tehran, you know, because we just took over that

0:14:27.760 --> 0:14:32.560
<v Speaker 1>country again. It's just it's very unnerving that we could

0:14:32.560 --> 0:14:35.560
<v Speaker 1>even be having a discussion about that as a possibility.

0:14:36.160 --> 0:14:38.240
<v Speaker 1>That's where we are. I think that Trump's got this though.

0:14:38.280 --> 0:14:42.040
<v Speaker 1>I think he knows that you can project strength, you

0:14:42.080 --> 0:14:45.880
<v Speaker 1>can do things without doing everything and as long as

0:14:45.920 --> 0:14:48.640
<v Speaker 1>that's his mantra and that's his focus, I think he'll

0:14:48.640 --> 0:14:52.640
<v Speaker 1>come out of this okay. But everyone is a bit

0:14:52.680 --> 0:14:56.320
<v Speaker 1>on edge over this right now, and I can understand why,

0:14:57.000 --> 0:15:00.360
<v Speaker 1>because there's the Iranian response. We have to consider perhaps

0:15:00.360 --> 0:15:02.880
<v Speaker 1>to talk a bit more about that. On the flip side,

0:15:02.920 --> 0:15:10.040
<v Speaker 1>Stay with me. A US Navy RQ four was flying

0:15:10.080 --> 0:15:12.680
<v Speaker 1>over the Gulf of Oman and the Strait of Hormus

0:15:12.760 --> 0:15:15.880
<v Speaker 1>on a recent surveillance mission in international airspace in the

0:15:15.960 --> 0:15:20.720
<v Speaker 1>vicinity of recent IRGC maritime attacks when it was shot

0:15:20.760 --> 0:15:24.680
<v Speaker 1>down by an IRGC surface to air missile fired from

0:15:24.680 --> 0:15:28.800
<v Speaker 1>a location in the vicinity of Goruk, Iran. This was

0:15:28.840 --> 0:15:32.640
<v Speaker 1>an unprovoked attack on the US surveillance asset that had

0:15:32.680 --> 0:15:36.920
<v Speaker 1>not violated Iranian airspace at any time during its mission.

0:15:37.840 --> 0:15:41.600
<v Speaker 1>This attack is an attempt to disrupt our ability to

0:15:41.680 --> 0:15:46.000
<v Speaker 1>monitor the area following recent threats to international shipping and

0:15:46.160 --> 0:15:50.800
<v Speaker 1>the free flow of commerce. Iranian reports that this aircraft

0:15:50.920 --> 0:15:56.520
<v Speaker 1>was shot down over Iran are categorically false. The aircraft

0:15:56.640 --> 0:16:00.720
<v Speaker 1>was over the Strait of Hormuz and fell into international waters.

0:16:01.760 --> 0:16:05.280
<v Speaker 1>I mean, Trump, I think said that he doesn't believe

0:16:06.280 --> 0:16:08.480
<v Speaker 1>that this was intentional from the Iranians at the very

0:16:08.520 --> 0:16:10.960
<v Speaker 1>top of the command chain to give the Iranians a

0:16:11.040 --> 0:16:14.360
<v Speaker 1>chance to back down. That would be my guess as

0:16:14.360 --> 0:16:16.360
<v Speaker 1>to why Trump would say that, because this was clearly

0:16:16.360 --> 0:16:20.440
<v Speaker 1>the Iranians and very likely that they did get this

0:16:20.560 --> 0:16:22.920
<v Speaker 1>order from the very top. I don't think there's some

0:16:23.000 --> 0:16:25.480
<v Speaker 1>rogue Samsite operator who's like, Yeah, I'm just gonna blow

0:16:25.520 --> 0:16:27.800
<v Speaker 1>a one hundred and thirty million dollars us playing out

0:16:27.840 --> 0:16:29.600
<v Speaker 1>of the sky and see what that does for me,

0:16:29.800 --> 0:16:33.800
<v Speaker 1>See what that does for my career. But it is

0:16:33.840 --> 0:16:36.520
<v Speaker 1>interesting to watch the media go back and forth, depending

0:16:36.520 --> 0:16:40.400
<v Speaker 1>on the hour of the day between Trump is a

0:16:40.480 --> 0:16:42.760
<v Speaker 1>warmonger who wants to go to war with Iran and

0:16:42.880 --> 0:16:47.000
<v Speaker 1>Trump isn't being strong enough in response to the Iran

0:16:47.080 --> 0:16:51.480
<v Speaker 1>of to Iran. There's never any wow. Trump is handling

0:16:51.520 --> 0:16:53.000
<v Speaker 1>this the way we want him to. And that just

0:16:53.040 --> 0:16:56.080
<v Speaker 1>goes to show you that the press isn't even rooting

0:16:56.160 --> 0:17:01.320
<v Speaker 1>for an outcome here. The press is rooting for something

0:17:01.400 --> 0:17:07.040
<v Speaker 1>to be bad for Trump. The press is rooting for

0:17:07.080 --> 0:17:12.800
<v Speaker 1>the Trump. For President Trump to have some negative result,

0:17:14.680 --> 0:17:17.280
<v Speaker 1>that's the most important thing. So it doesn't matter what

0:17:17.320 --> 0:17:19.040
<v Speaker 1>he does. They're going to be opposed to it. They're

0:17:19.080 --> 0:17:21.520
<v Speaker 1>going to say that's that's bad and we should all

0:17:21.560 --> 0:17:24.600
<v Speaker 1>be very, very concerned about this. I will say Nancy

0:17:24.640 --> 0:17:29.560
<v Speaker 1>Pelosi surprisingly is willing to say that Trump does not

0:17:29.680 --> 0:17:32.199
<v Speaker 1>want to go to war. So play clip five. I

0:17:32.240 --> 0:17:35.159
<v Speaker 1>think it's a dangerous situation. The high tension wires are

0:17:35.240 --> 0:17:40.240
<v Speaker 1>up in the region. We have to be strong and

0:17:40.359 --> 0:17:43.760
<v Speaker 1>strategic about how we protect our interest. We also cannot

0:17:43.800 --> 0:17:46.960
<v Speaker 1>be reckless in what we do. So it would be

0:17:47.000 --> 0:17:50.159
<v Speaker 1>interesting to see what they have to say whether the

0:17:51.359 --> 0:17:53.480
<v Speaker 1>I don't think the president wants to go to war.

0:17:53.600 --> 0:17:56.440
<v Speaker 1>There's no appetite for going to war in our country.

0:17:58.400 --> 0:17:59.960
<v Speaker 1>The president doesn't want to go to wars. She said,

0:18:00.080 --> 0:18:04.520
<v Speaker 1>there's no appetite for going to war in our country. Um, true,

0:18:05.920 --> 0:18:09.040
<v Speaker 1>that is true. I think the country does not want

0:18:09.080 --> 0:18:10.600
<v Speaker 1>to go to war. The president does not want to

0:18:10.600 --> 0:18:12.639
<v Speaker 1>go to war. I don't think we're going to go

0:18:12.720 --> 0:18:16.560
<v Speaker 1>to war. We just need to urge caution here. There's

0:18:16.560 --> 0:18:20.359
<v Speaker 1>another component of this, though, and that is remember they

0:18:20.359 --> 0:18:22.560
<v Speaker 1>were telling us the Iran deal with some great deal.

0:18:24.440 --> 0:18:28.960
<v Speaker 1>Isn't that a laughable proposition in retrospect, isn't that And

0:18:29.040 --> 0:18:32.800
<v Speaker 1>that's absolutely ridiculous when you see what this Iranian regime,

0:18:32.840 --> 0:18:34.600
<v Speaker 1>how it acts and what it's doing. We'll get the

0:18:34.640 --> 0:18:40.479
<v Speaker 1>more this coming up. They made a big mistake by

0:18:40.520 --> 0:18:43.960
<v Speaker 1>shooting our drone down in and of itself to tweet that, no,

0:18:44.080 --> 0:18:47.720
<v Speaker 1>pus provocative is to shoot the drone down. PUS provocative

0:18:48.000 --> 0:18:50.679
<v Speaker 1>is to blow up a Japanese oil tanker with a

0:18:50.800 --> 0:18:55.400
<v Speaker 1>Japanese prime minister in your office trying to start negotiations

0:18:55.400 --> 0:18:59.880
<v Speaker 1>with the United States. Push provocative is having your proxy

0:19:00.080 --> 0:19:05.440
<v Speaker 1>shoot into Saudi Arabia. Trump's not the problem. The Iranians

0:19:05.440 --> 0:19:09.000
<v Speaker 1>are the problem, which will be easy to forget in

0:19:09.000 --> 0:19:11.520
<v Speaker 1>the days ahead as the media covers this, they will

0:19:12.359 --> 0:19:14.679
<v Speaker 1>use every opportunity. Look, this is where you really do

0:19:14.760 --> 0:19:17.200
<v Speaker 1>see the mainstream media rooting against the country and rooting

0:19:17.200 --> 0:19:22.040
<v Speaker 1>against America, because the interests of this country right now

0:19:22.080 --> 0:19:28.560
<v Speaker 1>are to have some calm restored to the situation in

0:19:28.600 --> 0:19:31.040
<v Speaker 1>the Middle East and have the Iranians back down and

0:19:31.200 --> 0:19:35.960
<v Speaker 1>stop acting like this belligerent party. You know, we don't

0:19:35.960 --> 0:19:41.080
<v Speaker 1>have sanctions against Uruguay. We're not bullying Thailand all the time,

0:19:41.119 --> 0:19:44.720
<v Speaker 1>you know, we don't. America doesn't just pick random countries

0:19:44.760 --> 0:19:47.480
<v Speaker 1>to say, hey, you know what, we just want you

0:19:47.520 --> 0:19:49.840
<v Speaker 1>to do some things differently. So we're going to cut

0:19:49.840 --> 0:19:54.359
<v Speaker 1>you off from the international financial system and have you know,

0:19:55.200 --> 0:19:59.320
<v Speaker 1>military might right next door in case you really step

0:19:59.320 --> 0:20:01.400
<v Speaker 1>out of line. I mean, that's not how we operate.

0:20:02.200 --> 0:20:05.720
<v Speaker 1>We're in this situation because the Iranians are the largest

0:20:05.760 --> 0:20:08.720
<v Speaker 1>state sponsor of terror in the world, and the Iranian

0:20:08.760 --> 0:20:13.680
<v Speaker 1>regime very much wants to continue acting in this way

0:20:13.760 --> 0:20:17.160
<v Speaker 1>even though they got this sweet deal from the Obama administration.

0:20:18.640 --> 0:20:21.359
<v Speaker 1>You know, if the Iranians had a different mindset, if

0:20:21.359 --> 0:20:24.440
<v Speaker 1>the Iranian leadership a different mindset, once Trump walked away

0:20:24.440 --> 0:20:26.280
<v Speaker 1>from the deal, they should have just gone to the

0:20:26.280 --> 0:20:29.920
<v Speaker 1>European European partners and said, guys, come on, we sign

0:20:29.960 --> 0:20:32.960
<v Speaker 1>this in good faith. We you know, you need to

0:20:33.000 --> 0:20:35.320
<v Speaker 1>work with us here. We need to But no, I

0:20:35.320 --> 0:20:38.760
<v Speaker 1>mean their response is, Okay, you're gonna do that. We're

0:20:38.760 --> 0:20:42.440
<v Speaker 1>gonna put limpet minds on the side on the wholes

0:20:42.200 --> 0:20:45.760
<v Speaker 1>of ships and international waters. In the straighter horror moves,

0:20:45.760 --> 0:20:49.960
<v Speaker 1>We're gonna threaten the whole world. I mean, remember, the

0:20:49.960 --> 0:20:53.400
<v Speaker 1>the oil issue as it pertains to the straighter horror

0:20:53.400 --> 0:20:55.560
<v Speaker 1>moves is way more than just a US issue, where

0:20:55.680 --> 0:20:58.560
<v Speaker 1>every major country in the world is affected by this.

0:20:58.640 --> 0:21:01.399
<v Speaker 1>So this isn't something the Iranians can just do and

0:21:01.440 --> 0:21:04.640
<v Speaker 1>then say, well, we're trying to upset the Americans. This

0:21:04.840 --> 0:21:07.280
<v Speaker 1>very quickly would turn into Iran versus the world. In

0:21:07.400 --> 0:21:11.080
<v Speaker 1>Iran doesn't have the doesn't have the fight for that.

0:21:13.000 --> 0:21:16.200
<v Speaker 1>So here we have a circumstance where the Trump administration

0:21:16.480 --> 0:21:19.160
<v Speaker 1>may get the Mullahs to back down, and it may

0:21:19.240 --> 0:21:21.840
<v Speaker 1>require us to slap them down first. I think that's very,

0:21:22.720 --> 0:21:25.440
<v Speaker 1>very possible. But the Obama administration deal that so many

0:21:25.480 --> 0:21:29.320
<v Speaker 1>of us were deeply critical of at the time, it

0:21:29.400 --> 0:21:32.600
<v Speaker 1>was a bad deal. That is a true thing. It

0:21:32.680 --> 0:21:37.919
<v Speaker 1>was a very poorly conceived, poorly constructed deal that was

0:21:37.960 --> 0:21:46.920
<v Speaker 1>all about getting a foreign policy legacy for President Obama,

0:21:47.040 --> 0:21:49.000
<v Speaker 1>and it did not solve any of our problems in

0:21:49.000 --> 0:21:50.720
<v Speaker 1>Ita East. In fact, I think you could argue very

0:21:50.720 --> 0:21:54.239
<v Speaker 1>clearly it made them worse. There were decisions made by

0:21:54.280 --> 0:21:58.360
<v Speaker 1>the Obama administration about foreign policy that revolved around how

0:21:58.400 --> 0:22:03.000
<v Speaker 1>the Iranians would react to this. In essence, we don't

0:22:03.040 --> 0:22:05.199
<v Speaker 1>want the Iranians to be too upset with us, so

0:22:05.280 --> 0:22:08.959
<v Speaker 1>we won't do this in Syria or that in Yemen,

0:22:09.160 --> 0:22:12.400
<v Speaker 1>or this in Iraq. That was the approach for years,

0:22:14.000 --> 0:22:17.040
<v Speaker 1>and that's how you have in Iran that was emboldened

0:22:17.080 --> 0:22:20.440
<v Speaker 1>and felt like it was in its best strategic position

0:22:21.240 --> 0:22:22.879
<v Speaker 1>in decades in the Middle East, which I think you

0:22:22.880 --> 0:22:27.200
<v Speaker 1>could vary. Now with the Iraqi rival taken out, Egypt

0:22:27.280 --> 0:22:29.480
<v Speaker 1>is really a shadow of it of its former self

0:22:29.520 --> 0:22:32.359
<v Speaker 1>in terms of military force projection and then broader Middle East,

0:22:32.359 --> 0:22:37.800
<v Speaker 1>and our only real counterbalance against the Iranians is Saudi Arabia,

0:22:37.840 --> 0:22:41.400
<v Speaker 1>which as we all know, brings its own huge set

0:22:41.400 --> 0:22:47.120
<v Speaker 1>of problems. The Iranians felt like they were making real

0:22:47.160 --> 0:22:49.159
<v Speaker 1>progress and if you look at a map in the

0:22:49.160 --> 0:22:53.480
<v Speaker 1>Middle East where they had proxy armies, whether it's Hezbollah

0:22:53.520 --> 0:22:59.520
<v Speaker 1>in Lebanon, Palestinian Islamic Jihad and Hamas in Gaza and

0:22:59.560 --> 0:23:05.760
<v Speaker 1>the West, the Houthy militia and Yemen, the Shia Militia's

0:23:05.960 --> 0:23:08.760
<v Speaker 1>and mulkata Alsader's outfit of THEO the Soders have had

0:23:08.800 --> 0:23:13.040
<v Speaker 1>a break with the Iranians. But in Iraq, there's a

0:23:13.080 --> 0:23:16.720
<v Speaker 1>lot of places where Iran has been able to extend

0:23:16.720 --> 0:23:21.640
<v Speaker 1>its influence pretty dramatically, and it had an economic recovery

0:23:21.680 --> 0:23:24.160
<v Speaker 1>because of what Obama was willing to do. Now Trump

0:23:24.200 --> 0:23:27.320
<v Speaker 1>has turned that around at some point, the Iranians may

0:23:27.359 --> 0:23:30.840
<v Speaker 1>decide that it's just worth it to do what the

0:23:30.840 --> 0:23:34.919
<v Speaker 1>president do what Trumps is telling them to do, and

0:23:35.040 --> 0:23:37.200
<v Speaker 1>that's how you win. You know, this is one part

0:23:37.240 --> 0:23:40.200
<v Speaker 1>of Trump's approach on foreign policy, on all policy issues,

0:23:40.840 --> 0:23:43.280
<v Speaker 1>is he has an understanding of the need for leverage

0:23:43.280 --> 0:23:46.560
<v Speaker 1>and pressure that you can only get so far by

0:23:46.840 --> 0:23:50.119
<v Speaker 1>asking really politely, by going up, whether it's dealing with

0:23:50.160 --> 0:23:54.200
<v Speaker 1>the political opposition Nancy Pelosi, the Democrats and Schumer, or

0:23:54.240 --> 0:23:58.360
<v Speaker 1>it's dealing with Kim Jong owner. Although look the Kim

0:23:58.440 --> 0:24:00.679
<v Speaker 1>jong un stuff with Trump, I can and explain it,

0:24:00.840 --> 0:24:02.600
<v Speaker 1>I don't. I don't know why he thinks it's a

0:24:02.600 --> 0:24:06.119
<v Speaker 1>good idea to be so tight and so cozy with

0:24:06.200 --> 0:24:08.320
<v Speaker 1>Kim Jong un. I don't know what to tell you.

0:24:08.800 --> 0:24:11.399
<v Speaker 1>It strikes me as odd. But I give him a

0:24:11.440 --> 0:24:13.880
<v Speaker 1>lot of leeway because everyone else has failed an issue.

0:24:13.920 --> 0:24:16.760
<v Speaker 1>But on these other foreign policy matters, dealing with Mexico

0:24:17.200 --> 0:24:19.640
<v Speaker 1>and the migrant issue, threatened to put tariffs in place,

0:24:19.720 --> 0:24:22.560
<v Speaker 1>tariffs with China, and the trade war. If you want

0:24:22.560 --> 0:24:25.280
<v Speaker 1>people to do stuff that they're not just willing to do,

0:24:25.320 --> 0:24:28.880
<v Speaker 1>you have to have some reason for them to do it.

0:24:29.560 --> 0:24:32.800
<v Speaker 1>Because Trump has negotiated deals before. He has an understanding

0:24:32.840 --> 0:24:35.440
<v Speaker 1>of this, and there's winners and losers. It's not you

0:24:35.480 --> 0:24:37.959
<v Speaker 1>know that the congressional version of negotiating deal is Okay,

0:24:38.080 --> 0:24:40.880
<v Speaker 1>we'll spend the taxpayers money, and you'll spend the taxpayers money,

0:24:40.880 --> 0:24:42.879
<v Speaker 1>and we'll just all spend a lot of their money

0:24:42.920 --> 0:24:44.720
<v Speaker 1>and then let's push it all through and then we'll

0:24:44.760 --> 0:24:46.879
<v Speaker 1>pretend at election time that you know, we did everything

0:24:46.960 --> 0:24:50.360
<v Speaker 1>right and didn't mess up. Has Trump died everything right

0:24:50.440 --> 0:24:53.000
<v Speaker 1>on Iran? Right now? I don't know. We have to see.

0:24:53.000 --> 0:24:54.800
<v Speaker 1>I think that there's going to be a response in

0:24:54.840 --> 0:24:57.960
<v Speaker 1>the next forty eight hours. I really do. I think

0:24:58.000 --> 0:25:00.680
<v Speaker 1>something's going to happen. Something is going to change in

0:25:00.720 --> 0:25:02.960
<v Speaker 1>the next forty eight hours here. I don't know what

0:25:03.000 --> 0:25:05.920
<v Speaker 1>it's going to be. I've heard some things, but I'm

0:25:05.960 --> 0:25:08.359
<v Speaker 1>obviously not on the inside anymore, so I can't tell you.

0:25:08.359 --> 0:25:10.520
<v Speaker 1>And if I wasn't the inside, I definitely couldn't tell you.

0:25:11.200 --> 0:25:15.600
<v Speaker 1>So there's keep your fingers, keep your fingers crossed. Are

0:25:15.640 --> 0:25:19.119
<v Speaker 1>better than that prey, and we have that the commander

0:25:19.119 --> 0:25:20.679
<v Speaker 1>in chief has the right response here and that we

0:25:20.680 --> 0:25:22.400
<v Speaker 1>don't get into something we don't want to get into

0:25:22.400 --> 0:25:24.879
<v Speaker 1>that this doesn't escalate beyond what we want. A friend,

0:25:25.080 --> 0:25:27.160
<v Speaker 1>Lieutenant Colonel Tony Schaefer is going to join and give

0:25:27.160 --> 0:25:29.359
<v Speaker 1>his thoughts on this. Then we'll switch past the Iron

0:25:29.440 --> 0:25:32.240
<v Speaker 1>topic for the second hour. Stay with me. So here's

0:25:32.280 --> 0:25:37.479
<v Speaker 1>the deal. Trump's not the problem, Ditele is this drone

0:25:37.600 --> 0:25:41.480
<v Speaker 1>was in international waters. We've been flying patterns like this

0:25:41.760 --> 0:25:45.800
<v Speaker 1>for months. We're trying to collect intelligence to make informed decisions.

0:25:46.680 --> 0:25:51.080
<v Speaker 1>We've told the Iranians before they shot the drone down

0:25:51.119 --> 0:25:54.440
<v Speaker 1>that I can engage against American personnel or assets. You

0:25:54.560 --> 0:25:58.320
<v Speaker 1>do so at your own peril. The present does not

0:25:58.480 --> 0:26:01.959
<v Speaker 1>want a war with Iran anybody else. President doesn't want

0:26:02.000 --> 0:26:04.920
<v Speaker 1>a war the Iran. Lindsey Graham is saying, So what

0:26:05.000 --> 0:26:08.600
<v Speaker 1>do we want? What should happen here? We have our friend,

0:26:08.600 --> 0:26:11.440
<v Speaker 1>Lieutenant Colonel Tony Schaeffer joining us now. Is the author

0:26:11.440 --> 0:26:13.879
<v Speaker 1>of Operation dark Heart. He is a fellow at the

0:26:13.920 --> 0:26:17.440
<v Speaker 1>London Center and he joined us to talk about what's

0:26:17.440 --> 0:26:20.680
<v Speaker 1>going on. Tony, thanks so much, Hey, Buck, always great

0:26:20.680 --> 0:26:22.280
<v Speaker 1>to be on with you. Thanks for having me. All right,

0:26:22.320 --> 0:26:25.440
<v Speaker 1>so they shot they shot our drone down. What should

0:26:25.480 --> 0:26:29.040
<v Speaker 1>we do now? Well? I think there's two things. First,

0:26:29.200 --> 0:26:33.639
<v Speaker 1>we need to state our objectives one last time. I

0:26:33.680 --> 0:26:37.159
<v Speaker 1>think this is an I agree with Senator Graham President Trump,

0:26:37.680 --> 0:26:40.600
<v Speaker 1>based on folks I've talked to at a tooral about

0:26:40.600 --> 0:26:43.720
<v Speaker 1>this today, I think he President Trump's been completely right

0:26:43.760 --> 0:26:46.920
<v Speaker 1>about Iran with us said, there's nothing in a case

0:26:46.960 --> 0:26:48.679
<v Speaker 1>to me that we want to go to war. But

0:26:48.840 --> 0:26:50.879
<v Speaker 1>after we make that second warning, Buck, I think we

0:26:50.960 --> 0:26:54.560
<v Speaker 1>have to be prepared for military action. And I don't

0:26:54.600 --> 0:26:56.959
<v Speaker 1>want to say this in a threatening way, but if

0:26:56.960 --> 0:27:00.480
<v Speaker 1>the President says he's done with the Iranians their navy,

0:27:00.920 --> 0:27:03.640
<v Speaker 1>their navy will be pretty much evaporated in about twenty

0:27:03.680 --> 0:27:08.040
<v Speaker 1>four hours. So I think we can safely use military

0:27:08.080 --> 0:27:13.080
<v Speaker 1>precision strikes against specific military targets which have been used

0:27:13.359 --> 0:27:15.960
<v Speaker 1>as part of the Iranian effort in the Gulf of

0:27:16.080 --> 0:27:19.160
<v Speaker 1>Oman and in the Straits of Homoth to cause problems.

0:27:19.520 --> 0:27:23.119
<v Speaker 1>So you know, I'm not one for war, but I

0:27:23.160 --> 0:27:26.080
<v Speaker 1>am one to say, if you continue to poke me

0:27:26.119 --> 0:27:27.680
<v Speaker 1>in the eye with a stick, I'm going to take

0:27:27.720 --> 0:27:30.240
<v Speaker 1>that stick, break it in half, and put it in

0:27:30.280 --> 0:27:32.320
<v Speaker 1>your ear. And I think that's to the point where

0:27:32.320 --> 0:27:34.840
<v Speaker 1>we're at right now. Now, what would you say to

0:27:35.200 --> 0:27:39.119
<v Speaker 1>the concerns from from some including on the right that

0:27:39.400 --> 0:27:41.240
<v Speaker 1>if we do that. Let's say, if we, as you

0:27:41.280 --> 0:27:45.920
<v Speaker 1>pointed out, made the Iranian navy effectively no more. Iran

0:27:46.320 --> 0:27:49.520
<v Speaker 1>has a whole bunch of other things that they could do,

0:27:50.160 --> 0:27:53.359
<v Speaker 1>ground based missiles, firing them at ships in the Straits

0:27:53.359 --> 0:27:56.200
<v Speaker 1>of Straight, of Hormos, firing it off at oil tankers.

0:27:56.640 --> 0:27:58.320
<v Speaker 1>You know, if they're what do we do if they

0:27:58.520 --> 0:28:02.480
<v Speaker 1>escalate in response to our escalation or how concerned are

0:28:02.520 --> 0:28:05.560
<v Speaker 1>you that they would do that? At this point? I

0:28:06.040 --> 0:28:07.560
<v Speaker 1>got to be honest with you, I don't think that

0:28:07.680 --> 0:28:10.360
<v Speaker 1>they would respond in that level of kind. I think

0:28:10.480 --> 0:28:13.440
<v Speaker 1>the more we appease them, And I think President Trump

0:28:13.480 --> 0:28:15.680
<v Speaker 1>has tried to kind of split the baby here. He's

0:28:15.760 --> 0:28:18.320
<v Speaker 1>trying to say, look, I don't want to go to war,

0:28:18.480 --> 0:28:20.760
<v Speaker 1>don't push me. At the same time, if you push me,

0:28:20.800 --> 0:28:24.720
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to go to war. In this case, they

0:28:24.760 --> 0:28:29.080
<v Speaker 1>have continued to ratchet up their bad behavior. And by

0:28:29.080 --> 0:28:30.840
<v Speaker 1>the way, this drone being down, this is not the

0:28:30.880 --> 0:28:35.199
<v Speaker 1>first time that they've harassed drones over international waters in

0:28:35.240 --> 0:28:37.760
<v Speaker 1>the past. The Obama administration just kind of gave in.

0:28:38.600 --> 0:28:40.800
<v Speaker 1>So this is where I think Uranians are trying to

0:28:40.840 --> 0:28:43.760
<v Speaker 1>push the president to the point of where they think

0:28:43.760 --> 0:28:45.880
<v Speaker 1>you'll get in. I just don't think the understanding is

0:28:45.920 --> 0:28:48.479
<v Speaker 1>not going to get in. And while I don't believe

0:28:48.600 --> 0:28:52.600
<v Speaker 1>we need to be looking at military troops on the ground, again,

0:28:52.680 --> 0:28:55.480
<v Speaker 1>if the moment a military weapon is used against a

0:28:55.520 --> 0:28:59.120
<v Speaker 1>commercial entity, I think we have the right to attack it.

0:28:59.480 --> 0:29:02.000
<v Speaker 1>So if the Rainings do what you stipulate Buck is

0:29:02.040 --> 0:29:06.600
<v Speaker 1>they start firing missiles off and commercial ships, I think

0:29:06.680 --> 0:29:09.520
<v Speaker 1>those those missile sites need to be dealt with very

0:29:09.600 --> 0:29:12.040
<v Speaker 1>quickly and very effectively. And so this is why I

0:29:12.080 --> 0:29:13.719
<v Speaker 1>don't think the Rains are going to do that, because

0:29:13.840 --> 0:29:17.560
<v Speaker 1>the more they deal with us militarily, the more they're

0:29:17.560 --> 0:29:20.960
<v Speaker 1>going to lose capability, which makes them more vulnerable to

0:29:21.120 --> 0:29:24.600
<v Speaker 1>others who you know, may not be as welling as

0:29:24.640 --> 0:29:27.520
<v Speaker 1>us to restrain ourselves. So I don't think they want

0:29:27.560 --> 0:29:29.440
<v Speaker 1>to do that, and I think they'll recognize I'd like

0:29:29.440 --> 0:29:33.320
<v Speaker 1>to believe they'll be rational and understanding that if they

0:29:33.400 --> 0:29:36.160
<v Speaker 1>use military force, we're going to be forced to use

0:29:36.240 --> 0:29:38.840
<v Speaker 1>force back. What do you think is the proportional response?

0:29:38.880 --> 0:29:41.560
<v Speaker 1>What is a proportional response to them shooting a one

0:29:41.640 --> 0:29:43.880
<v Speaker 1>hundred million dollar drone out of the sky. Look like

0:29:45.360 --> 0:29:49.280
<v Speaker 1>my response would be to take out every like weapon side.

0:29:49.400 --> 0:29:51.480
<v Speaker 1>That is, say, if they use, say, for example, the

0:29:51.560 --> 0:29:54.680
<v Speaker 1>Chinese made surface to air missile that comes off the

0:29:54.720 --> 0:29:57.840
<v Speaker 1>shore one of the ships, then we take them all out.

0:29:57.880 --> 0:30:00.440
<v Speaker 1>And that's why I'm saying, you know, if the navy

0:30:00.480 --> 0:30:03.160
<v Speaker 1>continues to be a problem, we take out the entire navy.

0:30:03.440 --> 0:30:05.880
<v Speaker 1>And so it's one of those things where I don't

0:30:05.880 --> 0:30:08.120
<v Speaker 1>believe for a minute we will be we will benefit

0:30:08.280 --> 0:30:11.800
<v Speaker 1>from just HIG one site. I think if if you

0:30:11.880 --> 0:30:16.200
<v Speaker 1>continue to do things to the level of attacking commercial entities,

0:30:16.360 --> 0:30:18.440
<v Speaker 1>we need to do it, you know, kind of take

0:30:18.480 --> 0:30:21.040
<v Speaker 1>out the whole capability. And let me say something else here,

0:30:21.040 --> 0:30:23.480
<v Speaker 1>which may seem a bit odd, but the Chinese have

0:30:23.560 --> 0:30:26.880
<v Speaker 1>been stalking up on oil. The reason the Chinese are

0:30:26.880 --> 0:30:29.320
<v Speaker 1>stocking up on oil is because they have an economy

0:30:29.600 --> 0:30:31.360
<v Speaker 1>that has no more than two or weeks supply of

0:30:31.480 --> 0:30:35.200
<v Speaker 1>oil in a given time. So I think others that

0:30:35.360 --> 0:30:38.240
<v Speaker 1>would not normally be on our side on this may

0:30:38.280 --> 0:30:42.040
<v Speaker 1>well be on our side on this because while we

0:30:42.080 --> 0:30:44.520
<v Speaker 1>don't need a rainy and oil, while we don't need

0:30:44.840 --> 0:30:48.680
<v Speaker 1>oil from any source, we don't want to see commercial

0:30:48.800 --> 0:30:52.360
<v Speaker 1>entities attacked in the Gulf, which result in the diminishing

0:30:53.040 --> 0:30:57.040
<v Speaker 1>and other parts of the world's economy crashing. So and

0:30:57.080 --> 0:30:59.520
<v Speaker 1>I don't think the Chinese want their economy to crash either.

0:30:59.600 --> 0:31:02.600
<v Speaker 1>So what I'm saying is we have to be very

0:31:02.600 --> 0:31:05.200
<v Speaker 1>clear on our result, and there may be a need

0:31:05.240 --> 0:31:07.800
<v Speaker 1>for some level of military force. And again, let me

0:31:07.920 --> 0:31:10.480
<v Speaker 1>be clear on this, I'm not proposing a military invasion.

0:31:10.720 --> 0:31:12.720
<v Speaker 1>I don't think we want booths on the ground. At

0:31:12.720 --> 0:31:15.160
<v Speaker 1>the same time, we cannot allow the Iranians to continue

0:31:15.520 --> 0:31:18.480
<v Speaker 1>unimpeded to act badly and try to interferece with an

0:31:18.520 --> 0:31:21.720
<v Speaker 1>interfere with commercial operations within the Gulf. You hear a

0:31:21.760 --> 0:31:26.880
<v Speaker 1>lot about John Bolton's influence on the president's national security policy. Yeah,

0:31:26.920 --> 0:31:31.000
<v Speaker 1>what do you think of John generally, Tony And should

0:31:31.040 --> 0:31:32.719
<v Speaker 1>this be the concern that a lot of people make

0:31:32.720 --> 0:31:34.760
<v Speaker 1>it out to be? Essentially that Look, I'll just say

0:31:34.800 --> 0:31:36.920
<v Speaker 1>that they say that John is a warmonger. Now that's

0:31:36.960 --> 0:31:39.320
<v Speaker 1>obviously a slur, but you think he's a little too

0:31:39.400 --> 0:31:41.239
<v Speaker 1>quick to go for the go for the you know,

0:31:41.440 --> 0:31:44.680
<v Speaker 1>the fire button. I think in the past John has

0:31:44.680 --> 0:31:48.080
<v Speaker 1>had a record of encouraging military operations against Iran which

0:31:48.120 --> 0:31:52.480
<v Speaker 1>would have not produced good results. And I'm one of

0:31:52.480 --> 0:31:55.320
<v Speaker 1>those where you know. Remember but back during the time

0:31:55.320 --> 0:31:58.400
<v Speaker 1>that John was most vocal, he was trying to encourage

0:31:58.400 --> 0:32:00.680
<v Speaker 1>the Bush forty three administer Creation to go in and

0:32:00.720 --> 0:32:04.680
<v Speaker 1>do air strikes against nuclear sites. I was opposed to

0:32:04.680 --> 0:32:08.160
<v Speaker 1>that because, first off, we just don't know how many

0:32:08.160 --> 0:32:11.000
<v Speaker 1>sites they have, how many you know, if we miss one,

0:32:11.200 --> 0:32:13.480
<v Speaker 1>what happens if you know, they continue to do it.

0:32:13.560 --> 0:32:15.840
<v Speaker 1>So I think there was a lot of issues that

0:32:15.960 --> 0:32:18.360
<v Speaker 1>we just didn't know enough to do accurate air strikes.

0:32:18.720 --> 0:32:20.520
<v Speaker 1>And I think that could have resulted in a larger

0:32:20.520 --> 0:32:23.360
<v Speaker 1>war because that would have been an active aggression. In

0:32:23.400 --> 0:32:26.800
<v Speaker 1>this case we're talking about here, if the Iranians shoot first.

0:32:26.840 --> 0:32:29.440
<v Speaker 1>And this goes back to I use the Reagan metaphor

0:32:29.840 --> 0:32:34.680
<v Speaker 1>in Libyan. You know, the Libyans were in the Mediterranean

0:32:35.120 --> 0:32:38.040
<v Speaker 1>essentially shooting at our airplanes, and when Reagan was asked

0:32:38.040 --> 0:32:39.880
<v Speaker 1>by my friend Budd McFarland, what do you want to do?

0:32:40.000 --> 0:32:43.719
<v Speaker 1>Regan says, shoot them down. So I'm not for aggressive

0:32:43.720 --> 0:32:47.800
<v Speaker 1>offensive operations. I am for very aggressive defensive operations. It's

0:32:47.800 --> 0:32:50.680
<v Speaker 1>based on the predicate of someone shooting at us or

0:32:50.840 --> 0:32:53.320
<v Speaker 1>interfering with our commerce. And I think this is where

0:32:54.040 --> 0:32:55.400
<v Speaker 1>maybe in the past, John there was a little bit

0:32:55.400 --> 0:32:59.960
<v Speaker 1>too aggressive regarding trying to create offensive operations without a

0:33:00.200 --> 0:33:02.600
<v Speaker 1>clear predicate, and I think that's where John got a

0:33:02.600 --> 0:33:05.480
<v Speaker 1>bad rep. Is John doing better now and that I

0:33:05.520 --> 0:33:08.080
<v Speaker 1>think John is being much more in tune with what

0:33:08.120 --> 0:33:10.440
<v Speaker 1>President Trump would want done. I really do believe that.

0:33:10.800 --> 0:33:15.000
<v Speaker 1>Talking Lieutenant Colonel Tony Schaeffer, author of Operation dark Heart

0:33:15.080 --> 0:33:18.920
<v Speaker 1>also you know him from the London Center for Policy Research.

0:33:19.560 --> 0:33:23.800
<v Speaker 1>All right, Tony, what about if the Iranians follow through

0:33:23.840 --> 0:33:26.800
<v Speaker 1>on their threat to enrich uranium? What is it up

0:33:26.800 --> 0:33:29.640
<v Speaker 1>to twenty percent? Which puts them in very quick striking

0:33:29.680 --> 0:33:34.800
<v Speaker 1>distance of weaponizing uranium? What should should our policy just

0:33:34.880 --> 0:33:38.080
<v Speaker 1>be keep the sanctions on, be patient, keep the squeeze on,

0:33:38.160 --> 0:33:41.040
<v Speaker 1>or should it be stronger than that? Now? I'm one

0:33:41.040 --> 0:33:44.040
<v Speaker 1>of those again that I think the sanctions and the

0:33:44.280 --> 0:33:49.600
<v Speaker 1>very severe economic restrictions we've placed on them are actually

0:33:49.640 --> 0:33:53.560
<v Speaker 1>having an effect. And I again, I've never been one

0:33:53.680 --> 0:33:56.400
<v Speaker 1>for the idea of air strikes buck because we just

0:33:56.440 --> 0:33:59.080
<v Speaker 1>don't know what we don't know to kind of do

0:33:59.160 --> 0:34:04.840
<v Speaker 1>a quote of Don Rumstone, there's no unknowns and all

0:34:04.840 --> 0:34:07.360
<v Speaker 1>this other stuff. So I'm not comfortable with the idea

0:34:07.400 --> 0:34:10.000
<v Speaker 1>of going in there and trying to bomb these things.

0:34:10.400 --> 0:34:14.759
<v Speaker 1>So I think the use of sanctions to strangle their

0:34:14.760 --> 0:34:19.120
<v Speaker 1>ability to do things. And by the way, that infusion

0:34:19.160 --> 0:34:22.919
<v Speaker 1>of billions of dollars the Obama administration aid them did

0:34:22.960 --> 0:34:26.680
<v Speaker 1>not help us and help them move their weapons programs along.

0:34:27.040 --> 0:34:28.520
<v Speaker 1>So I think the best thing we can do is

0:34:28.520 --> 0:34:30.799
<v Speaker 1>try to get them back to the negotiating table and

0:34:30.840 --> 0:34:34.160
<v Speaker 1>go from there. But I'm not for military action at

0:34:34.160 --> 0:34:36.480
<v Speaker 1>this point regarding a nuclear program. What that said, the

0:34:36.480 --> 0:34:38.719
<v Speaker 1>other thing we should be encouraging, and I'm saying this

0:34:38.719 --> 0:34:41.719
<v Speaker 1>as Tony Shaper, Senior fellow at the London Center, not

0:34:41.760 --> 0:34:44.160
<v Speaker 1>as a member or not as someone who advises the

0:34:44.160 --> 0:34:47.840
<v Speaker 1>Trump administration, but I think we need to encourage a

0:34:47.920 --> 0:34:53.080
<v Speaker 1>regime change. A democratic Iran run by someone like the

0:34:53.160 --> 0:34:57.200
<v Speaker 1>Green Movement, who are predisposed to not be trying to

0:34:57.360 --> 0:34:59.880
<v Speaker 1>develop weapons of mass structure would be in our ent

0:35:00.520 --> 0:35:02.440
<v Speaker 1>and the Green Movement back in two thousand and nine,

0:35:02.440 --> 0:35:05.440
<v Speaker 1>I would argue the Obama administration made a huge problem

0:35:05.480 --> 0:35:10.200
<v Speaker 1>by not supporting the Persian Spring. They supported the Arab Spring,

0:35:10.600 --> 0:35:13.000
<v Speaker 1>but the Persians they had a Green movement who was

0:35:13.000 --> 0:35:16.680
<v Speaker 1>seeking democracy, and the Obama administration had absolutely nothing to

0:35:16.719 --> 0:35:20.160
<v Speaker 1>help them. There's still a very strong movement within Iran

0:35:20.239 --> 0:35:22.239
<v Speaker 1>that wants to get rid of the Molas to move

0:35:22.280 --> 0:35:25.960
<v Speaker 1>towards democracy. I think we should encourage that. And frankly,

0:35:26.120 --> 0:35:28.680
<v Speaker 1>if they're having their own internal problems, it gives them

0:35:28.719 --> 0:35:33.640
<v Speaker 1>less opportunity to terrorize or be troublesome to their neighbors

0:35:33.640 --> 0:35:37.600
<v Speaker 1>around them. Well, Tennant, Colonel Tony Shaff for everybody. Tony,

0:35:37.640 --> 0:35:40.240
<v Speaker 1>thanks so much for joining us. Always appreciate your insights,

0:35:40.239 --> 0:35:42.359
<v Speaker 1>Sir hey Buck, always great to be on with you.

0:35:42.360 --> 0:35:46.240
<v Speaker 1>Thank you, all right, team, We'll be right back about

0:35:46.280 --> 0:35:48.840
<v Speaker 1>our ABC News investigation this morning. And did Joe Biden's

0:35:48.840 --> 0:35:51.480
<v Speaker 1>son Hunter and questions about money he made from foreign

0:35:51.520 --> 0:35:54.799
<v Speaker 1>business dealings while his father was Vice president? Was Hunter

0:35:54.920 --> 0:35:58.080
<v Speaker 1>Biden profiting off his dad's work as vice president? And

0:35:58.200 --> 0:36:00.800
<v Speaker 1>did Joe Biden allow it? We're talking about millions of

0:36:00.840 --> 0:36:03.680
<v Speaker 1>dollars in at least two countries. Mister Vice President Tom

0:36:03.719 --> 0:36:05.520
<v Speaker 1>Yamas with ABC News, How you doing. I got a

0:36:05.600 --> 0:36:08.160
<v Speaker 1>quick question for you. It's a question we tried to

0:36:08.200 --> 0:36:11.680
<v Speaker 1>ask repeatedly. Can we ask you about Ukraine and China?

0:36:11.760 --> 0:36:15.239
<v Speaker 1>But kept getting blocked questions about foreign deals? His son

0:36:15.360 --> 0:36:19.680
<v Speaker 1>Hunter Biden pursued my father Joden in countries where Joe

0:36:19.719 --> 0:36:22.799
<v Speaker 1>Biden was working as a Miracle's top diplomat. How do

0:36:22.880 --> 0:36:25.560
<v Speaker 1>you judge what Hunter Biden was doing. I think that

0:36:25.760 --> 0:36:29.359
<v Speaker 1>Hunter Biden did a very bad thing and he was

0:36:29.560 --> 0:36:36.520
<v Speaker 1>very wrong. He allowed his name to be abused. ABC

0:36:36.800 --> 0:36:41.799
<v Speaker 1>News here doing a little rundown on some of the

0:36:41.840 --> 0:36:46.759
<v Speaker 1>problems facing Hunter Biden, whom I believe is the same

0:36:46.840 --> 0:36:51.400
<v Speaker 1>Hunter Biden who took up a relationship with the widow

0:36:51.440 --> 0:36:56.400
<v Speaker 1>of Bobiden, his brother, after Bobiden died, which that strikes

0:36:56.440 --> 0:37:00.960
<v Speaker 1>me as a quite odd thing to do. But at

0:37:01.000 --> 0:37:03.759
<v Speaker 1>issue here is that Hunter Biden may have been receiving

0:37:03.880 --> 0:37:08.520
<v Speaker 1>money that was really just an influence peddling scheme. What

0:37:08.560 --> 0:37:12.400
<v Speaker 1>does Hunter Biden have to do with these deals in

0:37:12.840 --> 0:37:17.200
<v Speaker 1>Ukraine and in China where he was making millions of dollars?

0:37:17.560 --> 0:37:20.839
<v Speaker 1>What expertise does he bring to them? Why would they

0:37:20.880 --> 0:37:23.480
<v Speaker 1>put him on either the board of any of these

0:37:23.520 --> 0:37:26.080
<v Speaker 1>companies or involved in deals with these companies. Why would

0:37:26.080 --> 0:37:29.200
<v Speaker 1>they do any of that unless it was because they

0:37:29.200 --> 0:37:33.920
<v Speaker 1>were trying to buy favor and buy access to his father.

0:37:34.000 --> 0:37:37.040
<v Speaker 1>And this is what I will never let this go.

0:37:39.320 --> 0:37:46.799
<v Speaker 1>The Clintons were so corrupt, They were so completely brazenly

0:37:46.840 --> 0:37:51.400
<v Speaker 1>willing to sell access to themselves and to sell access

0:37:51.440 --> 0:37:54.640
<v Speaker 1>to the Clinton enterprise, that it was hard to keep

0:37:54.719 --> 0:37:58.279
<v Speaker 1>up with it. And they almost created a perception of

0:37:58.320 --> 0:38:01.720
<v Speaker 1>that activity in those behaviors as normal on their own,

0:38:02.200 --> 0:38:05.280
<v Speaker 1>just by being so flagrant in their violations of those laws.

0:38:07.120 --> 0:38:09.600
<v Speaker 1>How is it that the guardians of our republic, the

0:38:09.680 --> 0:38:11.919
<v Speaker 1>mainstream media that always pretends to be willing to speak

0:38:11.920 --> 0:38:15.719
<v Speaker 1>truth to power, how is it that they were unable

0:38:15.920 --> 0:38:19.400
<v Speaker 1>or uninterested in figuring out what was really going on?

0:38:19.400 --> 0:38:22.560
<v Speaker 1>To the Clinton Foundation? How the heck did Hillary Clinton

0:38:22.560 --> 0:38:24.360
<v Speaker 1>and it being worth and her husband worth over a

0:38:24.520 --> 0:38:30.279
<v Speaker 1>hundred million dollars, never mind the I think it was

0:38:30.400 --> 0:38:33.320
<v Speaker 1>two billion that they raised for the Clinton Global Initiative.

0:38:35.520 --> 0:38:38.720
<v Speaker 1>How did all that happen? Why was all of that happening?

0:38:39.960 --> 0:38:44.040
<v Speaker 1>These were questions that journalists knew. If they wanted advancement,

0:38:44.080 --> 0:38:46.520
<v Speaker 1>if they wanted to keep their privilege purchase, if they

0:38:46.520 --> 0:38:52.640
<v Speaker 1>wanted to just be on the upward trajectory, they had

0:38:52.640 --> 0:38:58.719
<v Speaker 1>to completely forget, completely abandon any pretense of neutrality of journalism,

0:38:58.760 --> 0:39:03.799
<v Speaker 1>of honesty and earnestness in their endeavors, and cover for

0:39:03.880 --> 0:39:07.480
<v Speaker 1>Hillary Clinton and the Clinton Foundation and everywhere that they could.

0:39:08.320 --> 0:39:10.680
<v Speaker 1>I don't know if they'll be quite as willing to

0:39:10.680 --> 0:39:15.320
<v Speaker 1>do that for the Biden family. The Bidens have shown

0:39:15.440 --> 0:39:20.200
<v Speaker 1>that they are very interested in making money. For all

0:39:20.239 --> 0:39:22.480
<v Speaker 1>the talk about being public servants. I mean, Hunter Biden

0:39:22.560 --> 0:39:26.040
<v Speaker 1>here shown up in foreign countries. Well, think about this,

0:39:26.080 --> 0:39:27.600
<v Speaker 1>what would he have to bring to the table, and

0:39:28.320 --> 0:39:32.040
<v Speaker 1>with some oil company in Ukraine, or of course is

0:39:32.040 --> 0:39:35.120
<v Speaker 1>that his dad's a vice president. There's nothing else here.

0:39:35.160 --> 0:39:39.120
<v Speaker 1>There's nothing else that makes any sense. We know what

0:39:39.200 --> 0:39:41.799
<v Speaker 1>this was all about, We understand what the game was

0:39:41.840 --> 0:39:45.359
<v Speaker 1>that was being played. Just be better if we could

0:39:45.400 --> 0:39:48.800
<v Speaker 1>be honest about it, and if our journalists would be

0:39:48.840 --> 0:39:52.040
<v Speaker 1>a bit honest about it. My old colleague, former colleague

0:39:52.040 --> 0:39:54.200
<v Speaker 1>at the Hill, John Solomon, he's been breaking stories on

0:39:54.280 --> 0:39:57.479
<v Speaker 1>this and he's saying, look this, this stuff is real.

0:39:57.920 --> 0:40:01.200
<v Speaker 1>He says that Joe Biden made sure that there was

0:40:01.239 --> 0:40:04.560
<v Speaker 1>the firing of a prosecutor who was looking into in Ukraine.

0:40:05.360 --> 0:40:11.560
<v Speaker 1>The prosecutor was looking into a fossil fuel production company

0:40:12.239 --> 0:40:15.719
<v Speaker 1>that a Hunter Biden was on was involved with in

0:40:15.760 --> 0:40:18.600
<v Speaker 1>some capacity I think consulting and getting some fat fees,

0:40:19.520 --> 0:40:23.160
<v Speaker 1>and Biden shut the whole thing down. But these people

0:40:23.200 --> 0:40:25.799
<v Speaker 1>want to want to get mad if someone from like

0:40:25.840 --> 0:40:29.040
<v Speaker 1>the Embassy of Japan buys a hamburger the Trump International Hotel.

0:40:29.120 --> 0:40:34.200
<v Speaker 1>I think that's a violation of the emoluments Clause. Sorry,

0:40:34.200 --> 0:40:36.440
<v Speaker 1>I don't. I don't think so. I don't think we

0:40:36.480 --> 0:40:42.440
<v Speaker 1>should accept that kind of nonsense at all. By the way,

0:40:42.480 --> 0:40:46.360
<v Speaker 1>you know, I think that we're starting to also see

0:40:48.440 --> 0:40:52.080
<v Speaker 1>that people are running out of patients with this continued

0:40:53.840 --> 0:40:58.719
<v Speaker 1>discussion over reparations. And I didn't get to play this

0:40:58.800 --> 0:41:01.759
<v Speaker 1>for you yesterday, but because the reparation ideas, it's never

0:41:01.800 --> 0:41:06.000
<v Speaker 1>going to go anywhere significant. It really is just for show.

0:41:06.440 --> 0:41:11.239
<v Speaker 1>It is moral theater, and really mostly moral theater for

0:41:11.440 --> 0:41:14.440
<v Speaker 1>white liberals who want to feel like they're doing the

0:41:14.520 --> 0:41:17.759
<v Speaker 1>right thing and they feel good about themselves. But here's

0:41:17.800 --> 0:41:21.560
<v Speaker 1>what Burgess Owens, who is a former NFL player we've

0:41:21.560 --> 0:41:24.240
<v Speaker 1>had on the show many times. Here's what he says

0:41:24.280 --> 0:41:27.680
<v Speaker 1>about reparations. Play clip two. How about a Democratic party

0:41:27.719 --> 0:41:31.240
<v Speaker 1>pay for all the misery brought to my race and those,

0:41:31.320 --> 0:41:34.880
<v Speaker 1>after we learn our history decide to stay there, they

0:41:34.920 --> 0:41:38.719
<v Speaker 1>should pay. Also, they're complicit, and every white American Republican

0:41:38.800 --> 0:41:41.160
<v Speaker 1>or democrat, it feels guilty because they'll be your white skin.

0:41:41.719 --> 0:41:46.840
<v Speaker 1>You should need to pony up also the guilt, my friends,

0:41:47.200 --> 0:41:51.160
<v Speaker 1>It's very powerful tool in the hands of liberals. They

0:41:51.280 --> 0:41:54.799
<v Speaker 1>use it on any number of things. They use it

0:41:56.080 --> 0:42:00.480
<v Speaker 1>with trying to push for things that are essentially racial

0:42:00.520 --> 0:42:04.279
<v Speaker 1>preferences or some form of racial distinction within the law.

0:42:05.880 --> 0:42:11.120
<v Speaker 1>They use it to convince us all that environmental policy

0:42:11.239 --> 0:42:16.399
<v Speaker 1>should be dictated from a kind of green priesthood that

0:42:16.400 --> 0:42:19.000
<v Speaker 1>thinks that they're saving the world, even if they won't

0:42:19.080 --> 0:42:22.200
<v Speaker 1>change their own behavior, and make no effort to be

0:42:22.320 --> 0:42:24.640
<v Speaker 1>part of the solution other than to make everybody else

0:42:25.120 --> 0:42:26.920
<v Speaker 1>part of a solution that will never happen, that will

0:42:26.960 --> 0:42:33.520
<v Speaker 1>never really, never really occur. I think that in the

0:42:33.560 --> 0:42:37.720
<v Speaker 1>aftermath of yesterday's hearing, a lot of people on reparations,

0:42:37.719 --> 0:42:39.319
<v Speaker 1>A lot of people walk around saying, why was that

0:42:39.400 --> 0:42:45.120
<v Speaker 1>hearing even necessary? What would it mean for English common

0:42:45.200 --> 0:42:48.280
<v Speaker 1>law based American law? I should say it was comona,

0:42:48.320 --> 0:42:50.040
<v Speaker 1>But what I mean for English commonla based American law,

0:42:50.080 --> 0:42:53.240
<v Speaker 1>if all of a sudden you could be held responsible

0:42:54.200 --> 0:42:57.040
<v Speaker 1>for the sins of your parents, or your grandparents or

0:42:57.080 --> 0:43:01.040
<v Speaker 1>your great grandparents, you personally could be it could be

0:43:01.080 --> 0:43:03.839
<v Speaker 1>held out that you were going to be the one

0:43:03.920 --> 0:43:09.040
<v Speaker 1>that had to pay the price. That would very quickly

0:43:09.080 --> 0:43:12.120
<v Speaker 1>erode our entire system of jurisprudence, whereby you can only

0:43:12.160 --> 0:43:16.719
<v Speaker 1>be guilty if you've done something wrong. You can only

0:43:16.760 --> 0:43:19.799
<v Speaker 1>be the person who has to be has to be

0:43:19.800 --> 0:43:22.600
<v Speaker 1>punished if you've taken some action, If there's some part

0:43:22.640 --> 0:43:25.320
<v Speaker 1>of this process where you have an you're an active

0:43:25.360 --> 0:43:29.520
<v Speaker 1>participant in it. But I just thought that the reparations

0:43:29.680 --> 0:43:32.040
<v Speaker 1>case that was being made yesterday in Capitol Hill, it

0:43:32.120 --> 0:43:35.560
<v Speaker 1>was very weak and just does not make any sense.

0:43:35.600 --> 0:43:37.160
<v Speaker 1>And I didn't even get into yesterday, And this was

0:43:37.200 --> 0:43:39.439
<v Speaker 1>a part of it that I always think about, Well,

0:43:39.440 --> 0:43:42.200
<v Speaker 1>what if you're what if you're somebody who's half black,

0:43:42.239 --> 0:43:47.640
<v Speaker 1>half white, somebody like Barack Obama, Where does do reparations

0:43:47.719 --> 0:43:51.759
<v Speaker 1>go to you directly if you're from a mixed racial background,

0:43:51.800 --> 0:43:54.960
<v Speaker 1>in the same to you to the same percentage as

0:43:55.000 --> 0:43:59.479
<v Speaker 1>somebody that comes from an entirely African American background? Would

0:43:59.520 --> 0:44:02.520
<v Speaker 1>that be there? You know, who would qualify for this?

0:44:02.560 --> 0:44:04.200
<v Speaker 1>And at ultimately that's when you realize it's just going

0:44:04.239 --> 0:44:06.840
<v Speaker 1>to be a slush fund. It's just gonna be money

0:44:06.840 --> 0:44:09.520
<v Speaker 1>set aside for left wing causes and the promotion of

0:44:09.600 --> 0:44:14.439
<v Speaker 1>left wing ideas and everything else very quickly just would

0:44:14.480 --> 0:44:17.600
<v Speaker 1>be meaningless. It would be billions and billions of dollars

0:44:17.600 --> 0:44:21.800
<v Speaker 1>for progressive institutions, the kind that build really fancy mansions

0:44:21.840 --> 0:44:24.200
<v Speaker 1>here in DC and you walk past them and you

0:44:24.239 --> 0:44:27.640
<v Speaker 1>say yourself, what an organization is that? Did they have

0:44:27.719 --> 0:44:31.320
<v Speaker 1>this kind of money throw around? Well, a lot of unions,

0:44:31.320 --> 0:44:34.520
<v Speaker 1>by the way, some of these unions AFLCIO and all

0:44:34.520 --> 0:44:36.400
<v Speaker 1>this stuff, I know they would say, oh, we represent

0:44:36.480 --> 0:44:39.160
<v Speaker 1>huge memberships. Man, They've got fancy buildings down here in DC,

0:44:40.400 --> 0:44:45.840
<v Speaker 1>very very fancy indeed. So oh, one more thing, do

0:44:45.840 --> 0:44:50.160
<v Speaker 1>you want to get a quick lesson from AOC on? Well,

0:44:50.480 --> 0:44:53.160
<v Speaker 1>I don't have time for the Yeah, no, enough time

0:44:53.160 --> 0:44:56.520
<v Speaker 1>for it. We'll have to hold that one for tomorrow. Corruption, though,

0:44:56.600 --> 0:45:01.480
<v Speaker 1>is this is one of the clear worst areas of

0:45:01.520 --> 0:45:05.240
<v Speaker 1>the law, where there's a Republican standard and a Democrat standard.

0:45:05.280 --> 0:45:07.000
<v Speaker 1>And you're seeing this with the hunter Biden thing. Why

0:45:07.000 --> 0:45:09.919
<v Speaker 1>didn't we know about this before? It's only breaking now

0:45:09.960 --> 0:45:14.399
<v Speaker 1>because hunter Biden has become more expendable with the left.

0:45:14.480 --> 0:45:15.680
<v Speaker 1>In fact, I think there are a lot of people

0:45:15.680 --> 0:45:18.520
<v Speaker 1>on the left that want Biden to step aside. I

0:45:18.560 --> 0:45:20.800
<v Speaker 1>do think that the smart people on the left realize

0:45:20.840 --> 0:45:23.400
<v Speaker 1>that Biden just does not does not have it in

0:45:23.480 --> 0:45:26.840
<v Speaker 1>any sense. He will not be able to beat President Trump.

0:45:27.239 --> 0:45:29.319
<v Speaker 1>And so that means that the same left that was

0:45:29.320 --> 0:45:32.120
<v Speaker 1>willing to fight so dirty with you and me, they're

0:45:32.120 --> 0:45:33.759
<v Speaker 1>going to start fighting dirty with their own And I

0:45:33.760 --> 0:45:37.000
<v Speaker 1>think you saw that with Kamala Harris and Corey Booker.

0:45:37.960 --> 0:45:40.960
<v Speaker 1>They're going to be willing to really take it up

0:45:40.960 --> 0:45:43.640
<v Speaker 1>a notch here. So team, we have a much more

0:45:43.640 --> 0:45:46.080
<v Speaker 1>show coming up in just a moment. Somebody running for

0:45:46.120 --> 0:45:49.279
<v Speaker 1>president United States, somebody running to be the leader of

0:45:49.320 --> 0:45:53.600
<v Speaker 1>our party should know that using the word boy and

0:45:53.680 --> 0:45:57.480
<v Speaker 1>the way he did can cause hurt and pain, to

0:45:57.480 --> 0:46:01.719
<v Speaker 1>coddle the reputations of segreds of people who, if they

0:46:01.800 --> 0:46:04.080
<v Speaker 1>had their way, I would literally not be standing here

0:46:04.120 --> 0:46:07.279
<v Speaker 1>to remember le and I've state Senate is I think, um,

0:46:08.120 --> 0:46:13.520
<v Speaker 1>it's just it's misinformed. What happened all of a sudden,

0:46:13.560 --> 0:46:16.440
<v Speaker 1>the Democrats are going and turning on Biden. Some of

0:46:16.440 --> 0:46:23.439
<v Speaker 1>the prominent, i would say, the most prominent establishment connected

0:46:23.520 --> 0:46:28.040
<v Speaker 1>Democrat candidates here, Kamala Harris and Corey Booker, I'd say

0:46:28.080 --> 0:46:31.160
<v Speaker 1>they're two of the very top, both US senators from

0:46:31.200 --> 0:46:35.840
<v Speaker 1>big blue states, very friendly with the media, very cozy

0:46:35.840 --> 0:46:39.319
<v Speaker 1>with the Democrat media establishment. They're going after Biden here

0:46:40.239 --> 0:46:42.960
<v Speaker 1>and let's just go over a little well, well, let's

0:46:43.000 --> 0:46:45.959
<v Speaker 1>just set the stage and then I'll tell you what's

0:46:46.040 --> 0:46:53.160
<v Speaker 1>what's really happening here. So Biden recently said of some

0:46:53.320 --> 0:46:56.160
<v Speaker 1>of his colleague He was at a New York fundraiser

0:46:56.480 --> 0:47:02.279
<v Speaker 1>yesterday when he pointed to the relationship he had with

0:47:02.400 --> 0:47:06.239
<v Speaker 1>senators like James Eastland of Mississippi and Herman Talmadge of

0:47:06.280 --> 0:47:11.359
<v Speaker 1>Georgia to say that DC or Washington, the swamp used

0:47:11.400 --> 0:47:14.200
<v Speaker 1>to function with more civility and more smoothly than it

0:47:14.280 --> 0:47:22.400
<v Speaker 1>does today. He was effectively a decrying the hyperpartisan atmosphere

0:47:22.640 --> 0:47:26.240
<v Speaker 1>of the current moment we are in now. Put aside

0:47:26.239 --> 0:47:28.279
<v Speaker 1>whether or not you agree with that, or that's a

0:47:28.360 --> 0:47:30.920
<v Speaker 1>worthwhile thing for Biden is SAA or whether everyone should

0:47:30.920 --> 0:47:35.680
<v Speaker 1>care about any of that. The problem here is that

0:47:37.800 --> 0:47:43.239
<v Speaker 1>Senators James Eastland and Herman Talmadge are or well they're

0:47:43.239 --> 0:47:48.960
<v Speaker 1>not long dead, but they were segregationists. Ah, so you

0:47:49.040 --> 0:47:51.920
<v Speaker 1>have Joe Biden who's saying that these two segregation of senators.

0:47:51.960 --> 0:47:54.799
<v Speaker 1>We worked together really closely, and it was great because

0:47:54.800 --> 0:47:58.040
<v Speaker 1>there was a lot of civility. There were civility, we

0:47:58.160 --> 0:48:03.719
<v Speaker 1>got things done, he said. And man, did his Democrat

0:48:03.800 --> 0:48:08.840
<v Speaker 1>colleagues begin this pylon all of a sudden, quote Corey

0:48:08.840 --> 0:48:11.640
<v Speaker 1>Booker jumped in, I have to tell Vice President Biden,

0:48:11.640 --> 0:48:13.759
<v Speaker 1>as someone I respect, that he's wrong for using his

0:48:13.800 --> 0:48:16.880
<v Speaker 1>relationship with Eastland and Talmadge as examples of how to

0:48:16.880 --> 0:48:20.799
<v Speaker 1>bring our country together. New York City mayor build a Blasio,

0:48:21.640 --> 0:48:24.520
<v Speaker 1>who is also Democratic Candidate's a mayor. He's married to

0:48:24.640 --> 0:48:27.520
<v Speaker 1>a black woman in New York City, he tweeted out, quote,

0:48:27.520 --> 0:48:29.759
<v Speaker 1>it's twenty nineteen and Joe Biden is longing for the

0:48:29.800 --> 0:48:34.520
<v Speaker 1>good old days of civility typified by James Eastland. Eastland

0:48:34.520 --> 0:48:40.320
<v Speaker 1>thought my multi racial family should be illegal. California Senator

0:48:40.360 --> 0:48:43.280
<v Speaker 1>Kamala Harris, a black presidential candidate, said Biden was coddling

0:48:43.320 --> 0:48:47.160
<v Speaker 1>segregationist in a way that suggests that he doesn't understand

0:48:47.160 --> 0:48:50.480
<v Speaker 1>the dark history of our country. And then Beto O'Rourke,

0:48:50.920 --> 0:48:52.920
<v Speaker 1>Oh my gosh, what did Biden say? What do you

0:48:53.000 --> 0:48:55.799
<v Speaker 1>do for the Vice president to somehow say that we're

0:48:55.840 --> 0:48:59.640
<v Speaker 1>seeing in this country today is a function of partisanship

0:48:59.719 --> 0:49:04.600
<v Speaker 1>or of bipartisanship, completely ignores the legacy of slavery, the

0:49:04.600 --> 0:49:07.840
<v Speaker 1>active suppression of African American and community of colors, communities

0:49:07.840 --> 0:49:12.800
<v Speaker 1>of color right now. So they're all jumping in here, folks,

0:49:12.800 --> 0:49:14.960
<v Speaker 1>they're all pilot on with Biden saying, oh, how could

0:49:14.960 --> 0:49:19.120
<v Speaker 1>he say that he worked with these senators back in

0:49:19.200 --> 0:49:20.680
<v Speaker 1>the day and that they were civil to each other.

0:49:20.680 --> 0:49:27.520
<v Speaker 1>That's not allowed, that's unacceptable. Biden has perhaps learned a

0:49:27.600 --> 0:49:30.400
<v Speaker 1>little bit since the last time he was the subject

0:49:30.400 --> 0:49:33.200
<v Speaker 1>of a pylon, which was over whether there should be

0:49:33.239 --> 0:49:35.360
<v Speaker 1>a repeal of the High Amendment. Remember, the High Amendment

0:49:35.360 --> 0:49:38.799
<v Speaker 1>prevents federal funding for abortions. Taxpayer dollars to go to abortions,

0:49:39.000 --> 0:49:43.160
<v Speaker 1>which is really a giveaway with no substance. Because your

0:49:43.200 --> 0:49:46.560
<v Speaker 1>tax dollars, I can tell you do you go to abortion?

0:49:46.560 --> 0:49:50.319
<v Speaker 1>They go to planned parenthood. And Planned parenthood may say

0:49:50.320 --> 0:49:53.840
<v Speaker 1>that money doesn't go to abortions, but yeah, if you

0:49:53.920 --> 0:49:56.279
<v Speaker 1>give me ten thousand dollars and I tell you that

0:49:56.320 --> 0:49:58.719
<v Speaker 1>it's not going to my new sports car, it's going

0:49:58.760 --> 0:50:00.799
<v Speaker 1>to my education, well okay, but you just give me

0:50:00.840 --> 0:50:02.719
<v Speaker 1>ten thousand dollars, So I can spend the money on

0:50:02.760 --> 0:50:06.440
<v Speaker 1>whatever I want. That doesn't really make all that much difference.

0:50:06.440 --> 0:50:10.239
<v Speaker 1>That Biden got caught being somebody without much in the

0:50:10.239 --> 0:50:17.040
<v Speaker 1>way of principles or any particular core and so now

0:50:17.080 --> 0:50:20.600
<v Speaker 1>he's decided that he's not going to apologize for this

0:50:20.719 --> 0:50:26.160
<v Speaker 1>latest moment, this latest gaff. Play clip four. Corey should apologize.

0:50:27.120 --> 0:50:30.240
<v Speaker 1>He knows better. There's not a racist bone in my body.

0:50:30.280 --> 0:50:36.120
<v Speaker 1>I've been involved in civil rights my whole career. Period, period, period.

0:50:38.080 --> 0:50:39.759
<v Speaker 1>It's kind of going on offense a little bit there.

0:50:39.800 --> 0:50:41.920
<v Speaker 1>Corey should know better. Although I don't think that's I

0:50:41.920 --> 0:50:44.320
<v Speaker 1>don't think that's gonna cut it. I don't think Corey

0:50:44.360 --> 0:50:47.640
<v Speaker 1>and Kamal and the rest are going to say, oh, okay, well,

0:50:47.680 --> 0:50:50.120
<v Speaker 1>if Biden wants us leave us alone, we will. Let

0:50:50.160 --> 0:50:53.839
<v Speaker 1>me say this, Where does the left draw the line here?

0:50:54.760 --> 0:50:58.200
<v Speaker 1>If you were a senator, and you've been a senator

0:50:58.239 --> 0:50:59.960
<v Speaker 1>for a very long time, and you had to serve

0:51:00.120 --> 0:51:04.040
<v Speaker 1>with fellow senators who were not just people who are segregationists,

0:51:04.040 --> 0:51:06.640
<v Speaker 1>but what about people who, oh, give it some time,

0:51:06.680 --> 0:51:08.319
<v Speaker 1>what about people who are for a traditional marriage in

0:51:08.320 --> 0:51:14.200
<v Speaker 1>the Senate? Will that be considered a mark against senators

0:51:14.239 --> 0:51:19.520
<v Speaker 1>decades from now, What also do we say about the

0:51:19.560 --> 0:51:22.560
<v Speaker 1>fact that then anybody who served in the Senate at

0:51:22.600 --> 0:51:26.919
<v Speaker 1>that time on the Democrat side and worked with these

0:51:27.000 --> 0:51:29.360
<v Speaker 1>two segregationists, because they would have had to work with

0:51:29.400 --> 0:51:30.759
<v Speaker 1>them if they're going to be in the same party

0:51:30.760 --> 0:51:33.239
<v Speaker 1>and they're going to try to get bills past, are

0:51:33.280 --> 0:51:40.839
<v Speaker 1>they all guilty of being allies or activists or supporters

0:51:40.920 --> 0:51:44.359
<v Speaker 1>of the segregationist senators? Is that is that what we're

0:51:44.400 --> 0:51:49.040
<v Speaker 1>supposed to take from this. The left doesn't really establish

0:51:49.160 --> 0:51:52.960
<v Speaker 1>any clear guidelines. It's it's often just left to be

0:51:53.280 --> 0:51:56.879
<v Speaker 1>whatever it is, that's what it's going to be. They

0:51:56.880 --> 0:51:59.840
<v Speaker 1>make it up as they go along, and on this

0:52:00.360 --> 0:52:04.440
<v Speaker 1>you just have some Democrat candidates who are clearly upset,

0:52:04.719 --> 0:52:06.920
<v Speaker 1>not about what Joe Biden said so much as they're

0:52:07.000 --> 0:52:10.239
<v Speaker 1>upset I think that their campaigns haven't caught on more,

0:52:10.239 --> 0:52:12.000
<v Speaker 1>and that Joe Biden's getting so much of the attention

0:52:12.000 --> 0:52:15.560
<v Speaker 1>and so much of the money. He managed without an

0:52:15.640 --> 0:52:19.040
<v Speaker 1>endorsement from Obama and without any particularly impressive career of

0:52:19.040 --> 0:52:21.240
<v Speaker 1>his own, he managed to put himself in a position

0:52:21.239 --> 0:52:24.520
<v Speaker 1>where he's just the he is the front runner, he

0:52:24.680 --> 0:52:30.360
<v Speaker 1>is the guy. And based on what I mean that

0:52:30.400 --> 0:52:35.400
<v Speaker 1>it's based on eight years of Obama is pretty stunning

0:52:35.440 --> 0:52:37.680
<v Speaker 1>because Biden didn't do all that much to speak of

0:52:37.760 --> 0:52:41.640
<v Speaker 1>in those Obama years, and usually a vice president like

0:52:41.680 --> 0:52:43.719
<v Speaker 1>that doesn't necessarily just get to be at the very

0:52:43.800 --> 0:52:46.040
<v Speaker 1>very front of the pack in a crowded field in

0:52:46.120 --> 0:52:51.200
<v Speaker 1>the next general election. But Biden, I've been you know,

0:52:51.239 --> 0:52:53.640
<v Speaker 1>I've been saying all along. He's a weak candidate. He's

0:52:53.680 --> 0:52:55.600
<v Speaker 1>not going to be stronger as a candidate. There's no

0:52:55.640 --> 0:53:00.000
<v Speaker 1>way that Joe Biden can beat Donald Trump in my opinion,

0:53:00.160 --> 0:53:05.440
<v Speaker 1>unless something just completely unforeseen, unforeseeable and crazy happens. There's

0:53:05.560 --> 0:53:12.320
<v Speaker 1>just no way, because why why would anyone vote for

0:53:12.360 --> 0:53:15.720
<v Speaker 1>this guy change his positions on a whim? What ideas

0:53:15.880 --> 0:53:18.160
<v Speaker 1>it does? Does he have? Oh, I'm gonna be more civil,

0:53:18.640 --> 0:53:22.279
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna be more friendly people by the team. I'm

0:53:22.320 --> 0:53:25.320
<v Speaker 1>sorry my voice. I'm I've got a cold in June,

0:53:25.360 --> 0:53:27.160
<v Speaker 1>which is really I don't know, that's the thing that

0:53:27.200 --> 0:53:29.560
<v Speaker 1>really happened to people. So my voice keeps cracking and

0:53:30.120 --> 0:53:32.120
<v Speaker 1>my head's all stuffed up, and you know, I'm on

0:53:32.320 --> 0:53:34.640
<v Speaker 1>taking some meds to try to get through the show.

0:53:34.640 --> 0:53:36.480
<v Speaker 1>But I apologize if you hear my voice crack or

0:53:36.520 --> 0:53:39.160
<v Speaker 1>something bad goes down during the show like that. I'm

0:53:39.160 --> 0:53:43.040
<v Speaker 1>fighting through a team because neither rain nor snow nor

0:53:43.400 --> 0:53:47.000
<v Speaker 1>sleet or whatever that is. Blah blah, I have a cold.

0:53:47.040 --> 0:53:50.000
<v Speaker 1>I'll keep doing my show. We'll grab back, Congresswoman. Tens

0:53:50.040 --> 0:53:52.759
<v Speaker 1>of thousands were also brutalized, tortured, starved, and ultimately died

0:53:52.760 --> 0:53:57.080
<v Speaker 1>in concentration camps camps like Takau. If you want to

0:53:57.120 --> 0:53:59.919
<v Speaker 1>criticize the shameful treatment of people at our southern border, fine,

0:54:00.280 --> 0:54:03.600
<v Speaker 1>they'll have plenty of company, but be careful comparing them

0:54:03.640 --> 0:54:08.400
<v Speaker 1>to Nazi concentration camps, because they're not at all comparable

0:54:08.480 --> 0:54:12.680
<v Speaker 1>in the slightest But here's where upsetting as are comments.

0:54:12.719 --> 0:54:15.279
<v Speaker 1>Some Democrats have been relucting to condemn her remarks, and

0:54:15.280 --> 0:54:17.120
<v Speaker 1>I don't want to get criticized on Twitter. Fellow New

0:54:17.120 --> 0:54:19.680
<v Speaker 1>Our Congressman Jerry Nadler tweeted in response, one of the

0:54:19.760 --> 0:54:21.880
<v Speaker 1>lessons from the Holocaust is never again. We fail to

0:54:21.960 --> 0:54:24.799
<v Speaker 1>learn that lesson when we don't call out such inhumanity

0:54:24.960 --> 0:54:27.840
<v Speaker 1>right in front of us. Darry Nadler Shirley knows migrant

0:54:27.920 --> 0:54:30.960
<v Speaker 1>detainment camps are not the same as concentration camps. So

0:54:31.000 --> 0:54:33.239
<v Speaker 1>why didn't he just say that? Why are we so

0:54:33.400 --> 0:54:36.160
<v Speaker 1>cheapest calling out people we agree with politically these days?

0:54:37.800 --> 0:54:42.840
<v Speaker 1>So Chuck Todd maybe accidentally is engaging in an active,

0:54:43.640 --> 0:54:50.000
<v Speaker 1>somewhat sane journalism here Chuck Todd NBC? Why does this

0:54:50.000 --> 0:54:52.280
<v Speaker 1>guy have the job he has? What is he particularly

0:54:52.320 --> 0:54:54.600
<v Speaker 1>good at? Why shouldn't even listen to him? I can't

0:54:54.600 --> 0:54:56.560
<v Speaker 1>answer any of those questions for you, folks. I don't know.

0:54:57.320 --> 0:54:58.840
<v Speaker 1>You get a lot of these guys that we're just

0:54:58.880 --> 0:55:01.000
<v Speaker 1>supposed to listen to because they've been around for a

0:55:01.000 --> 0:55:04.280
<v Speaker 1>while and they're friends with the execs that run these companies. Basically,

0:55:05.480 --> 0:55:08.080
<v Speaker 1>what is it about Chuck Tbwell, who cares Chuck Todd?

0:55:08.160 --> 0:55:15.080
<v Speaker 1>Meanwhile he's calling out AOC, and who wants to just

0:55:15.800 --> 0:55:17.319
<v Speaker 1>in their own head here for a second, just just

0:55:17.360 --> 0:55:20.360
<v Speaker 1>give it a little guess. Did Chuck Todd get treated

0:55:20.400 --> 0:55:24.319
<v Speaker 1>like he was doing the right thing for calling out

0:55:24.320 --> 0:55:27.480
<v Speaker 1>of Casey Cortez? Or was the response response to him

0:55:27.880 --> 0:55:30.480
<v Speaker 1>that he's a terrible person and he's the worst and

0:55:30.480 --> 0:55:37.320
<v Speaker 1>he's a sellout and everything else. Oh, that's right, it's

0:55:38.600 --> 0:55:42.640
<v Speaker 1>defend AOC no matter what time. That's where the left

0:55:42.760 --> 0:55:46.440
<v Speaker 1>is that is where the left heart and soul is

0:55:46.560 --> 0:55:52.200
<v Speaker 1>right now, whatever it has to be, defend AOC. She

0:55:52.680 --> 0:55:56.239
<v Speaker 1>tripled down yesterday. She keeps going with this concentration thing.

0:55:56.239 --> 0:55:58.799
<v Speaker 1>She said, we are calling these camps. We're calling these

0:55:58.800 --> 0:56:00.880
<v Speaker 1>camps what they are because they fit squarely in an

0:56:00.920 --> 0:56:04.440
<v Speaker 1>academic consensus and definition. History will be kind to those

0:56:04.480 --> 0:56:07.319
<v Speaker 1>who stood up to this injustice. So say what you will.

0:56:07.440 --> 0:56:09.080
<v Speaker 1>Kids are dying, and I'm not here to make people

0:56:09.120 --> 0:56:16.719
<v Speaker 1>free feel comfortable about that. Okay, Again, just demagoguery, I

0:56:16.760 --> 0:56:20.640
<v Speaker 1>mean shameless demagoguery when she says kids are dying. There

0:56:20.680 --> 0:56:23.279
<v Speaker 1>are no kids who are dying in the detention facilities

0:56:23.320 --> 0:56:27.719
<v Speaker 1>because of the conditions or because of unsafe you know,

0:56:27.960 --> 0:56:31.560
<v Speaker 1>unsafe holding cells or anything like that. The kids who

0:56:31.600 --> 0:56:34.000
<v Speaker 1>have died have showed up at the border incredibly sick

0:56:34.600 --> 0:56:37.279
<v Speaker 1>because they're going through a dangerous passage to get there

0:56:37.320 --> 0:56:39.839
<v Speaker 1>in the first place. Those kids have showed up, they've

0:56:39.880 --> 0:56:43.440
<v Speaker 1>been very ill, and they've been immediately taken to get

0:56:43.520 --> 0:56:48.920
<v Speaker 1>first world taxpayer funded American healthcare right away. But if

0:56:48.920 --> 0:56:50.439
<v Speaker 1>you show up with the kid who was one hundred

0:56:50.480 --> 0:56:53.160
<v Speaker 1>and four fever and is dehydrated, and you know, bad

0:56:53.200 --> 0:56:55.759
<v Speaker 1>things can happen. It's terrible, it's a tragedy, but that's

0:56:56.600 --> 0:57:00.600
<v Speaker 1>what has been happening. But see her suggestion question here

0:57:00.680 --> 0:57:02.799
<v Speaker 1>is that the kids are dying because of immigration and

0:57:02.800 --> 0:57:07.280
<v Speaker 1>custom enforcement or because of border patrol, which is just wrong.

0:57:08.160 --> 0:57:10.400
<v Speaker 1>I mean, it's it's wrong on the facts. It's also

0:57:10.600 --> 0:57:14.680
<v Speaker 1>morally wrong. It's wrong to suggest that to make it

0:57:14.719 --> 0:57:17.120
<v Speaker 1>seem like the men and women or border patrol are

0:57:17.880 --> 0:57:22.040
<v Speaker 1>killing kids. Don't even get me started on how AOC

0:57:22.240 --> 0:57:25.520
<v Speaker 1>and so much of the left only cares about kids

0:57:26.240 --> 0:57:28.840
<v Speaker 1>in the context of migrants, not in the womb. You know,

0:57:28.880 --> 0:57:32.280
<v Speaker 1>there was a really interesting Cleveland Clinic video that they

0:57:32.320 --> 0:57:41.360
<v Speaker 1>put out showing a cartoon essentially or a visualization of

0:57:41.400 --> 0:57:48.160
<v Speaker 1>a spina bifida surgery being done on a fetus. And

0:57:48.240 --> 0:57:51.000
<v Speaker 1>it's incredible and they just did the first successful one ever.

0:57:51.480 --> 0:57:53.960
<v Speaker 1>And this was making the rounds on Twitter and on

0:57:54.040 --> 0:57:57.919
<v Speaker 1>social media because people were asking the obvious question, if

0:57:57.920 --> 0:58:02.760
<v Speaker 1>this is basically this fetus is basically a tumor or

0:58:02.800 --> 0:58:06.920
<v Speaker 1>a parasite or a clump of cells or the other stuff,

0:58:07.480 --> 0:58:12.320
<v Speaker 1>the other deeply disingenuous, non scientific stuff that is said

0:58:12.320 --> 0:58:14.400
<v Speaker 1>about it by libs who just want to justify what

0:58:14.440 --> 0:58:18.880
<v Speaker 1>they're doing. Why are they doing a very complicated spina

0:58:18.880 --> 0:58:22.840
<v Speaker 1>bifitous surgery on that fetus. You don't do a spina

0:58:22.880 --> 0:58:27.680
<v Speaker 1>as in spine surgery on a clump of random cells.

0:58:27.960 --> 0:58:32.760
<v Speaker 1>Who certainly wouldn't do that on a tumor. But this

0:58:33.040 --> 0:58:35.240
<v Speaker 1>is this is where we are now. The people that

0:58:35.360 --> 0:58:40.040
<v Speaker 1>claim to embrace science reject science so blatantly in the

0:58:40.080 --> 0:58:44.760
<v Speaker 1>case of life and the fight over life. Oh wait,

0:58:44.800 --> 0:58:47.080
<v Speaker 1>here we go, there's more from me. I'm sorry, there's

0:58:47.320 --> 0:58:52.120
<v Speaker 1>This is from Walter shab who is the Office of

0:58:52.200 --> 0:58:58.280
<v Speaker 1>Government Ethics, former director of that. Okay, oh yeah, he's

0:58:58.320 --> 0:59:00.200
<v Speaker 1>one of these guys who's always coming out now out

0:59:00.200 --> 0:59:02.720
<v Speaker 1>to say like Trump is breaking this law or that laws.

0:59:03.120 --> 0:59:05.000
<v Speaker 1>There's a whole industry of people that come up with

0:59:05.000 --> 0:59:10.400
<v Speaker 1>obscure laws or bizarre interpretations of laws that allows someone

0:59:10.440 --> 0:59:13.240
<v Speaker 1>to try to throw Trump in prison. That's what they try,

0:59:13.320 --> 0:59:16.120
<v Speaker 1>that's what they want, or at least tell themselves they

0:59:16.120 --> 0:59:19.400
<v Speaker 1>maybe do that one day. Sky Walter Shaubs wrote here

0:59:19.440 --> 0:59:22.160
<v Speaker 1>about the AOC dust up in the future of the

0:59:22.240 --> 0:59:24.360
<v Speaker 1>history books, if there are history books, will have much

0:59:24.400 --> 0:59:28.840
<v Speaker 1>to say about the people who did the normalizing this phenomenon.

0:59:28.960 --> 0:59:30.840
<v Speaker 1>Is not notable for its uniqueness of the times that,

0:59:31.120 --> 0:59:35.080
<v Speaker 1>similar to other periods of darkness, the lessons have not

0:59:35.560 --> 0:59:39.360
<v Speaker 1>been learned. And that's in response to a Kazi Ortel's

0:59:39.440 --> 0:59:41.920
<v Speaker 1>writing to Chuck Todd. The fact that you slipped in

0:59:42.080 --> 0:59:45.240
<v Speaker 1>Nazi when I never said that is pretty unfortunate, Almost

0:59:45.440 --> 0:59:47.360
<v Speaker 1>as unfortunate as the fact that you spent this whole

0:59:47.360 --> 0:59:53.520
<v Speaker 1>time without discussing DHS, freezers, dog pounds, missing children, and

0:59:53.640 --> 0:59:56.800
<v Speaker 1>human rights abuses that uphold use of this term. She's

0:59:56.800 --> 0:59:59.040
<v Speaker 1>not backing off of saying concentration camps at the border.

0:59:59.080 --> 1:00:04.520
<v Speaker 1>She's not, folks, After all the information that has been

1:00:04.520 --> 1:00:07.280
<v Speaker 1>pushed her way, after all the free history lessons that

1:00:07.360 --> 1:00:11.440
<v Speaker 1>she's been given, she's still saying concentration camps. Why because

1:00:11.560 --> 1:00:15.160
<v Speaker 1>ultimately this is not really about those kids. It's not.

1:00:16.400 --> 1:00:19.120
<v Speaker 1>She might say it is, she pretends it is. But

1:00:19.240 --> 1:00:22.560
<v Speaker 1>by calling what's going on in a southern border concentration camps,

1:00:23.080 --> 1:00:26.720
<v Speaker 1>it serves two very important purposes for the left. One

1:00:27.880 --> 1:00:32.560
<v Speaker 1>is that it ties into the whole Trump is basically

1:00:33.200 --> 1:00:39.640
<v Speaker 1>basically Hitler is a fascist. And two, it keeps the

1:00:39.680 --> 1:00:43.440
<v Speaker 1>focus off of the fact that the Democrats have no

1:00:43.560 --> 1:00:45.240
<v Speaker 1>answers as to what should be done at the border,

1:00:45.920 --> 1:00:48.360
<v Speaker 1>have no theories about how we can make this better,

1:00:48.840 --> 1:00:50.920
<v Speaker 1>and so all they would like to do is continue

1:00:50.920 --> 1:00:53.960
<v Speaker 1>to point the Republicans and say, see, these guys are bad.

1:00:54.360 --> 1:00:57.080
<v Speaker 1>They don't like the migrants. Bad, bad, bad, and that's

1:00:57.080 --> 1:01:04.840
<v Speaker 1>what they're doing. AOC is an intellectual abomination, but she's

1:01:04.960 --> 1:01:07.959
<v Speaker 1>very powerful and has a lot of people. Wow, four

1:01:08.080 --> 1:01:14.280
<v Speaker 1>point four three million Twitter followers, she has a massive audience.

1:01:14.360 --> 1:01:17.640
<v Speaker 1>I mean for somebody who is a third tier intellect,

1:01:17.920 --> 1:01:22.080
<v Speaker 1>I mean somebody who's just not impressive at all in

1:01:22.680 --> 1:01:25.920
<v Speaker 1>terms of the grasp of information and knowledge and her

1:01:25.960 --> 1:01:31.800
<v Speaker 1>synthesis of all of that. It's appalling. But people are

1:01:31.800 --> 1:01:35.000
<v Speaker 1>still backing her up. People are still pretending that what

1:01:35.080 --> 1:01:40.320
<v Speaker 1>she said was not the outrageous and stupid comparison that

1:01:40.400 --> 1:01:44.520
<v Speaker 1>it was. But Chuck Todd, I'm surprised to see that

1:01:44.520 --> 1:01:48.480
<v Speaker 1>he was willing to be not even a journalist, just

1:01:48.760 --> 1:01:51.600
<v Speaker 1>be normal for a moment, just to speak the truth

1:01:51.640 --> 1:01:56.520
<v Speaker 1>about something like this. So many journalists are just running

1:01:56.600 --> 1:02:00.200
<v Speaker 1>scared from AOC all the time. They think that they

1:02:00.320 --> 1:02:04.800
<v Speaker 1>have to constantly prop her up. They have to find

1:02:04.840 --> 1:02:06.720
<v Speaker 1>some way to justify whatever it is that she says

1:02:06.800 --> 1:02:09.760
<v Speaker 1>it's pretty pathetic. It is pretty pathetic. And I know

1:02:09.800 --> 1:02:11.840
<v Speaker 1>that the left would say, oh, but the right, or

1:02:11.880 --> 1:02:14.240
<v Speaker 1>at least the conservative journals do that for Trump. It's

1:02:14.240 --> 1:02:15.880
<v Speaker 1>not true. I know a lot of people on the

1:02:15.960 --> 1:02:18.760
<v Speaker 1>right who will disagree with something Trump said or how

1:02:18.760 --> 1:02:21.200
<v Speaker 1>he said it. They just support Trump as the movement.

1:02:21.480 --> 1:02:23.280
<v Speaker 1>They don't think that everything he does is perfect. We

1:02:23.520 --> 1:02:26.840
<v Speaker 1>don't have some Messiah complex with Trump. I think they do.

1:02:26.880 --> 1:02:28.960
<v Speaker 1>With AOC coming up in a few moments, we're going

1:02:29.000 --> 1:02:36.000
<v Speaker 1>to talk about the injustice of the exoneration and now

1:02:36.040 --> 1:02:40.560
<v Speaker 1>the lionization of the Central Park five, the individuals who

1:02:40.560 --> 1:02:45.200
<v Speaker 1>are initially convicted of a brutal rape and attempted murder

1:02:45.720 --> 1:02:48.080
<v Speaker 1>in Central Park back in nineteen eighty nine. They're now

1:02:48.720 --> 1:02:54.560
<v Speaker 1>being turned into civil rights icons, folk heroes, and Hollywood

1:02:54.680 --> 1:02:59.040
<v Speaker 1>is just completely completely changing the history and the facts

1:02:59.040 --> 1:03:01.160
<v Speaker 1>to suit this this narrative. We all know what the

1:03:01.200 --> 1:03:05.640
<v Speaker 1>narrative is. The narrative is that evil white cops who

1:03:05.640 --> 1:03:09.200
<v Speaker 1>were racist just grabbed the nearest black boys that they

1:03:09.200 --> 1:03:13.880
<v Speaker 1>could in order to try and you know, get false

1:03:13.920 --> 1:03:16.840
<v Speaker 1>confessions out of them because of pressure from city hall.

1:03:16.880 --> 1:03:18.640
<v Speaker 1>You know that that's the narrative. That's the thing that

1:03:18.680 --> 1:03:23.880
<v Speaker 1>they tried to do, and that's not what reality was.

1:03:23.920 --> 1:03:25.640
<v Speaker 1>But I will get into that a few minutes. But

1:03:25.680 --> 1:03:30.000
<v Speaker 1>I do have some good news here today from the

1:03:30.080 --> 1:03:32.360
<v Speaker 1>legal front, because that that is bad news, that does

1:03:32.400 --> 1:03:34.919
<v Speaker 1>not work. But some good news from the legal front

1:03:34.960 --> 1:03:37.800
<v Speaker 1>would be that the you may recall this, I talked

1:03:37.800 --> 1:03:41.000
<v Speaker 1>about the story here on the show, the Sheila Jackson

1:03:41.120 --> 1:03:47.960
<v Speaker 1>Lee staffer who decided to docks meaning to share the

1:03:48.240 --> 1:03:54.080
<v Speaker 1>private information of members of the Republican Senate in order

1:03:54.120 --> 1:03:56.160
<v Speaker 1>to do them harm just because they're Republicans. I mean,

1:03:56.200 --> 1:03:59.280
<v Speaker 1>this was a this was a political hit, and this

1:03:59.360 --> 1:04:04.080
<v Speaker 1>happened during the final hearing for Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh.

1:04:04.760 --> 1:04:09.080
<v Speaker 1>That Democrat congressional staffer has just been sentenced to four

1:04:09.200 --> 1:04:16.640
<v Speaker 1>years in prison. This from the Daily Daily Wire today.

1:04:16.840 --> 1:04:21.640
<v Speaker 1>Jackson Costco was described by prosecutors as having self righteous

1:04:22.040 --> 1:04:25.680
<v Speaker 1>entitlement and believing that he could violate the sanctity of

1:04:25.680 --> 1:04:29.440
<v Speaker 1>the United States Senate at will and threaten individual senators

1:04:29.480 --> 1:04:33.840
<v Speaker 1>as he pleased. Prosecutors sought to make an example of

1:04:33.880 --> 1:04:37.000
<v Speaker 1>Costco because his crime allegedly led to other incidents of

1:04:37.040 --> 1:04:42.280
<v Speaker 1>attacks on political opposition. Costco is the son of the

1:04:42.320 --> 1:04:45.480
<v Speaker 1>CEO of a major construction company who has ties to

1:04:45.520 --> 1:04:49.160
<v Speaker 1>House Speaker Nancy Pelosi and Senator Diane Feinstein. He had

1:04:49.160 --> 1:04:53.440
<v Speaker 1>previously worked as a staffer in Maggie Hassan's office, but

1:04:53.520 --> 1:04:58.040
<v Speaker 1>has since moved on to working for Lee. While Senator's

1:04:58.120 --> 1:05:03.120
<v Speaker 1>Question cabin On, doctor Christine Blasi Award Costco snuck into

1:05:03.200 --> 1:05:08.120
<v Speaker 1>his former boss's office to use a computer to publish

1:05:08.200 --> 1:05:14.040
<v Speaker 1>the private information of senators who supported Kavanaugh. Now, this

1:05:14.600 --> 1:05:16.960
<v Speaker 1>should not be surprising in a sense that this happens

1:05:17.880 --> 1:05:20.920
<v Speaker 1>because the Left has adopted very much an attitude of

1:05:21.000 --> 1:05:24.120
<v Speaker 1>anything that hurts the opposition is good. There are no

1:05:24.120 --> 1:05:26.920
<v Speaker 1>more rules that we have to abide by. There's no

1:05:26.920 --> 1:05:29.880
<v Speaker 1>more decency that we have to strive for or try

1:05:29.920 --> 1:05:33.320
<v Speaker 1>to hold ourselves too. It's just about how do you

1:05:33.360 --> 1:05:35.840
<v Speaker 1>crush the other side? How do you mess the other

1:05:35.920 --> 1:05:41.640
<v Speaker 1>guy up who disagrees with you? And doxing, which is

1:05:41.680 --> 1:05:44.480
<v Speaker 1>the release of private information into a public domain in

1:05:44.560 --> 1:05:49.840
<v Speaker 1>order to create harassment, threats, embarrassment. Doxing is a tactic

1:05:49.920 --> 1:05:54.240
<v Speaker 1>that mainstream media outlets will use. I will never forget

1:05:54.240 --> 1:05:58.920
<v Speaker 1>that CNN because somebody created a meme that CNN didn't like,

1:05:59.600 --> 1:06:03.720
<v Speaker 1>you know, pro Trump meme that they threatened to docks

1:06:03.760 --> 1:06:06.160
<v Speaker 1>the person, like, we're gonna we found out who you are,

1:06:06.200 --> 1:06:09.040
<v Speaker 1>and we're gonna tell everybody unless you take this down

1:06:09.120 --> 1:06:12.640
<v Speaker 1>and do what we say. That's a major media organization.

1:06:12.680 --> 1:06:14.880
<v Speaker 1>I mean, CNN is also a terrible joke and a

1:06:16.760 --> 1:06:21.400
<v Speaker 1>festering boil on American journalism. But it is a big

1:06:21.440 --> 1:06:23.080
<v Speaker 1>place with a lot of money and a lot of influence,

1:06:23.120 --> 1:06:27.280
<v Speaker 1>a lot of reach. But if you really believe the rhetoric,

1:06:27.320 --> 1:06:30.840
<v Speaker 1>and I keep coming back to this because it's so important,

1:06:31.680 --> 1:06:34.840
<v Speaker 1>if you believe the rhetoric of the left, that we

1:06:34.880 --> 1:06:37.320
<v Speaker 1>are in an existential fight for the future of this country,

1:06:38.480 --> 1:06:44.160
<v Speaker 1>that Trump is a threat to this republic, that anybody

1:06:44.200 --> 1:06:47.680
<v Speaker 1>who stands with Trump needs to be made an example of. Well,

1:06:47.680 --> 1:06:52.960
<v Speaker 1>why wouldn't you do this? Isn't it more important to

1:06:53.120 --> 1:06:55.720
<v Speaker 1>defeat such a terrible opposition. Isn't it more important to

1:06:55.720 --> 1:06:59.200
<v Speaker 1>do that than to play by whatever the Senate rules are? Well,

1:06:59.200 --> 1:07:01.080
<v Speaker 1>this guy's gonna find four years. By the way, that's

1:07:01.120 --> 1:07:04.240
<v Speaker 1>a pretty that's a real sentence. I mean, that's real,

1:07:04.320 --> 1:07:07.760
<v Speaker 1>that's real prison time. That's not messing around, but it's

1:07:07.800 --> 1:07:10.480
<v Speaker 1>deserved you have to make an example of somebody like

1:07:10.520 --> 1:07:13.280
<v Speaker 1>this that he would use his government access in this

1:07:13.280 --> 1:07:17.760
<v Speaker 1>way for such a petty, spiteful part as an operation.

1:07:19.480 --> 1:07:25.120
<v Speaker 1>And by the way, he even went further. He according

1:07:25.200 --> 1:07:30.440
<v Speaker 1>to according to here in the Daily Wire, he threatened

1:07:30.680 --> 1:07:35.600
<v Speaker 1>somebody who knew what he tried to do and said

1:07:35.600 --> 1:07:38.600
<v Speaker 1>that he would release all of the stuff as essentially

1:07:38.680 --> 1:07:45.560
<v Speaker 1>was holding the information hostage. Costco pleaded guilty in April

1:07:45.560 --> 1:07:49.360
<v Speaker 1>to crimes related to an unparalleled effort to ransaka Senate office,

1:07:49.760 --> 1:07:53.200
<v Speaker 1>extorting a Democratic senator, illegally harming Republicans for their political views,

1:07:53.200 --> 1:07:57.840
<v Speaker 1>and blackmailing a witness. Here you go, another staffer and

1:07:57.960 --> 1:08:03.200
<v Speaker 1>Hassen's office recognized Costco and reported him. So he sent

1:08:03.360 --> 1:08:07.680
<v Speaker 1>that staffer an email threatening to quote leak it all

1:08:07.720 --> 1:08:12.800
<v Speaker 1>if the staffer told anyone what he had done. He said, emails,

1:08:13.200 --> 1:08:20.479
<v Speaker 1>signal conversations, gmails, senators, children's health information, and social security numbers.

1:08:21.720 --> 1:08:28.080
<v Speaker 1>This guy, Costco wrote, what a sick maniac. He knew

1:08:28.120 --> 1:08:31.479
<v Speaker 1>exactly what he was doing. He knew exactly what the

1:08:31.560 --> 1:08:37.080
<v Speaker 1>results of this would be, which was just a total

1:08:37.840 --> 1:08:40.000
<v Speaker 1>nightmare for the people that would have been affected by

1:08:40.000 --> 1:08:41.920
<v Speaker 1>it and all their socials and everything out there, or

1:08:41.920 --> 1:08:45.880
<v Speaker 1>their phone numbers, their home addresses, everything to violate the

1:08:46.080 --> 1:08:49.679
<v Speaker 1>trust of the United States Senate in that way. Why

1:08:49.760 --> 1:08:52.080
<v Speaker 1>isn't the medium more interested in this story? We know why.

1:08:52.120 --> 1:08:54.480
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I asked that. I asked that question rhetorically,

1:08:55.479 --> 1:09:00.120
<v Speaker 1>but it's so fascinating that's someone who was entrusted with

1:09:00.200 --> 1:09:02.880
<v Speaker 1>that access on Capitol Hill would go to these lengths.

1:09:02.920 --> 1:09:05.960
<v Speaker 1>But Kavanaugh, I keep coming back to it. Cavanaugh was

1:09:06.120 --> 1:09:11.920
<v Speaker 1>a turning point in my mind in American politics. Cavanaugh

1:09:11.960 --> 1:09:16.880
<v Speaker 1>was something else. It was different. It was proof of

1:09:16.880 --> 1:09:18.400
<v Speaker 1>what many of us had known was there for a

1:09:18.400 --> 1:09:20.960
<v Speaker 1>long time, but now it was staring us in the

1:09:21.000 --> 1:09:25.240
<v Speaker 1>face that the Left will do anything to destroy people

1:09:25.240 --> 1:09:27.479
<v Speaker 1>that stand in the way of their power, that they

1:09:27.720 --> 1:09:32.519
<v Speaker 1>have no demands of honor or decency in the way

1:09:32.520 --> 1:09:36.880
<v Speaker 1>that they fight, and that they were cheering on that

1:09:36.880 --> 1:09:40.880
<v Speaker 1>destruction of Cavana. I mean, anyone in public life who

1:09:40.960 --> 1:09:45.080
<v Speaker 1>was a part of defaming Brett Kavanaugh, who was hoping

1:09:45.200 --> 1:09:48.760
<v Speaker 1>for and advocating for him to be destroyed, should be

1:09:48.800 --> 1:09:54.160
<v Speaker 1>deeply ashamed. It was grotesque. It was grotesque. But the

1:09:54.240 --> 1:09:57.680
<v Speaker 1>left's response to all this is not to try to

1:09:57.720 --> 1:10:01.200
<v Speaker 1>clean up their act. It's not to be better going forward.

1:10:02.080 --> 1:10:04.040
<v Speaker 1>They just feel like they lost that one, but they'll

1:10:04.040 --> 1:10:06.960
<v Speaker 1>win the next one. And that's how you have people

1:10:07.000 --> 1:10:10.000
<v Speaker 1>like this Costco guy who figure, well, if we can't

1:10:10.000 --> 1:10:12.519
<v Speaker 1>get our way and stop Kavanaugh, we might as well

1:10:13.520 --> 1:10:17.360
<v Speaker 1>create problems, personal problems, put the safety of senators families

1:10:17.400 --> 1:10:23.960
<v Speaker 1>in jeopardy. Given the that moment in politics, you think

1:10:24.000 --> 1:10:26.640
<v Speaker 1>it's really a good idea to put the Republican senators

1:10:26.640 --> 1:10:29.200
<v Speaker 1>who are willing to stand out for Kavanaugh do the

1:10:29.320 --> 1:10:31.120
<v Speaker 1>right thing to put their information out there in the

1:10:31.120 --> 1:10:34.679
<v Speaker 1>public domain for anyone to see, not just their address,

1:10:34.720 --> 1:10:41.920
<v Speaker 1>of their phone numbers, their kids health information. Does this

1:10:41.960 --> 1:10:43.880
<v Speaker 1>stuff happen on the right, folks, because I never see

1:10:43.880 --> 1:10:48.120
<v Speaker 1>it. It It always seems to happen the left. The really vicious, vindictive,

1:10:48.800 --> 1:10:53.360
<v Speaker 1>crazy stuff seems to be stuck on the left. I

1:10:53.360 --> 1:10:55.479
<v Speaker 1>don't think I'm imagining that. I don't think that's just

1:10:55.640 --> 1:11:02.720
<v Speaker 1>my perception. Here, you and us, who you were in

1:11:02.760 --> 1:11:07.639
<v Speaker 1>the park with, oh names, I's got a loss. Where

1:11:07.640 --> 1:11:11.920
<v Speaker 1>did you see the lady one lady, the female charger.

1:11:11.960 --> 1:11:16.640
<v Speaker 1>It was severely beaten and raped. Every blackmail who was

1:11:16.680 --> 1:11:19.880
<v Speaker 1>in the park last night is a suspect. I need

1:11:19.920 --> 1:11:24.320
<v Speaker 1>all of them. What's going on with my son? Your

1:11:24.360 --> 1:11:30.559
<v Speaker 1>certains are involved and we're rape in Central part they

1:11:30.600 --> 1:11:33.960
<v Speaker 1>saw you rape the lady. Didn't see a lady or

1:11:34.040 --> 1:11:37.080
<v Speaker 1>hit anyone. I didn't see any lady, Kevin, I didn't

1:11:37.080 --> 1:11:39.200
<v Speaker 1>see any I want to see my son right now,

1:11:39.320 --> 1:11:49.960
<v Speaker 1>right now. Whatever they said I did, I didn't. So

1:11:52.360 --> 1:11:54.719
<v Speaker 1>in These Boys State Matches the central facts of the crime.

1:11:55.800 --> 1:12:00.559
<v Speaker 1>Let Netflix show when they see us about the Central

1:12:00.600 --> 1:12:04.519
<v Speaker 1>Park what people known as a Central Park five. And

1:12:04.760 --> 1:12:10.400
<v Speaker 1>this is a very politically charged documentary on a very

1:12:10.479 --> 1:12:13.200
<v Speaker 1>politically charge, a very sensitive case that I remember, even

1:12:13.240 --> 1:12:14.640
<v Speaker 1>though I was quite young at the time, I was

1:12:14.680 --> 1:12:16.920
<v Speaker 1>eight years old, but I remember people talking about it.

1:12:17.800 --> 1:12:21.920
<v Speaker 1>I grew up three blocks from Central Park in New

1:12:21.960 --> 1:12:24.240
<v Speaker 1>York City. I used to go into the park for

1:12:24.320 --> 1:12:27.960
<v Speaker 1>all of my school years to play sports. And when

1:12:27.960 --> 1:12:30.840
<v Speaker 1>I was growing up, you were told that if you

1:12:30.880 --> 1:12:35.599
<v Speaker 1>went into Central Park at night, bad things were likely

1:12:35.640 --> 1:12:39.080
<v Speaker 1>to happen, which in retrospect is just that's almost like

1:12:39.200 --> 1:12:41.400
<v Speaker 1>saying that there's a whole area of a city that's

1:12:42.560 --> 1:12:46.920
<v Speaker 1>been ceded to you know, bad guys or insurgents or something.

1:12:46.920 --> 1:12:52.120
<v Speaker 1>I mean, this was just completely insane. I couldn't go

1:12:52.160 --> 1:12:55.000
<v Speaker 1>to a park at night, a park in what is

1:12:55.000 --> 1:12:57.880
<v Speaker 1>a very wealthy part of New York City, because there

1:12:57.920 --> 1:13:01.120
<v Speaker 1>was a real threat of physical violence against you. Central

1:13:01.120 --> 1:13:04.080
<v Speaker 1>Park is not that big. I mean it's a really

1:13:04.560 --> 1:13:09.000
<v Speaker 1>maybe four or five miles north to south and maybe

1:13:09.040 --> 1:13:11.840
<v Speaker 1>two miles across. It's not that big of an area.

1:13:12.240 --> 1:13:16.320
<v Speaker 1>So when you when you look at what the city

1:13:16.439 --> 1:13:18.479
<v Speaker 1>was like at this time and the feelings that people had.

1:13:18.680 --> 1:13:21.760
<v Speaker 1>As a native New Yorker growing up there, there was

1:13:21.800 --> 1:13:25.120
<v Speaker 1>a sense that there was this lawlessness and this violence.

1:13:25.120 --> 1:13:26.760
<v Speaker 1>I could break it at any moment. And that's why

1:13:26.800 --> 1:13:29.519
<v Speaker 1>when the Central Park jogger case happened, where a young

1:13:29.520 --> 1:13:34.680
<v Speaker 1>woman who was jogging in the park was just viciously, brutally,

1:13:35.800 --> 1:13:42.080
<v Speaker 1>horrifically beaten to within an inch of her life, raped horribly.

1:13:43.120 --> 1:13:47.400
<v Speaker 1>The whole the whole incident just appalled and shocked the city.

1:13:48.120 --> 1:13:52.679
<v Speaker 1>And you had these this group of of they were kids,

1:13:52.680 --> 1:13:56.519
<v Speaker 1>I mean, they were young, young, predominantly black. I think

1:13:56.520 --> 1:13:59.799
<v Speaker 1>one of them was Hispanic men who were all arrested

1:14:00.200 --> 1:14:05.439
<v Speaker 1>and prosecuted and convicted for their role in the Central

1:14:05.439 --> 1:14:10.800
<v Speaker 1>Park jogger case. And now Hollywood has decided that this

1:14:10.880 --> 1:14:14.120
<v Speaker 1>is all a racial injustice, and this is something that

1:14:14.160 --> 1:14:16.000
<v Speaker 1>we have to we have to look back on and

1:14:16.880 --> 1:14:20.600
<v Speaker 1>have a full accounting of the racism that led to

1:14:20.640 --> 1:14:22.800
<v Speaker 1>this outcome. I mean, I'm here to tell you that

1:14:22.920 --> 1:14:26.400
<v Speaker 1>based on the facts as I know them, it could

1:14:26.400 --> 1:14:29.120
<v Speaker 1>not be more clear to me that the people that

1:14:29.680 --> 1:14:34.560
<v Speaker 1>did this were the people who were initially arrested and convicted,

1:14:35.360 --> 1:14:40.599
<v Speaker 1>and that politics, not the justice system, dictated that they

1:14:40.640 --> 1:14:45.320
<v Speaker 1>would be quote exonerated, and this has now turned into

1:14:45.400 --> 1:14:50.760
<v Speaker 1>a disgraceful injustice that we are we are to treat

1:14:50.800 --> 1:14:55.160
<v Speaker 1>these individuals like they are civil rights heroes, and I

1:14:55.280 --> 1:14:59.680
<v Speaker 1>give when they are anything but that they committed a

1:14:59.680 --> 1:15:02.599
<v Speaker 1>Haines sack. I mean, I know there were fourteen fifteen.

1:15:02.640 --> 1:15:04.639
<v Speaker 1>One was sixteen years old when they were a part

1:15:04.640 --> 1:15:07.920
<v Speaker 1>of this. But if a sixteen year old holds a

1:15:07.920 --> 1:15:09.920
<v Speaker 1>woman down while she's being rape, I want that sixteen

1:15:09.960 --> 1:15:14.759
<v Speaker 1>year old to suffer very serious consequences, decades in prison

1:15:14.800 --> 1:15:19.120
<v Speaker 1>at a minimum. That's what I believe should happen. And

1:15:19.760 --> 1:15:22.439
<v Speaker 1>there are very few voices right now, because there's such

1:15:22.479 --> 1:15:26.439
<v Speaker 1>a breathtaking rewriting of history that's going on here, there

1:15:26.439 --> 1:15:29.840
<v Speaker 1>are very few voices that will speak honestly about this case.

1:15:30.240 --> 1:15:34.639
<v Speaker 1>And that's why I just so appreciate and I'll reach out.

1:15:34.680 --> 1:15:36.800
<v Speaker 1>She's tough to get on radio sometimes she's a very

1:15:36.840 --> 1:15:39.320
<v Speaker 1>busy lady. But I really do appreciate the work that

1:15:39.360 --> 1:15:42.639
<v Speaker 1>Ann Coulter does on this because she'll just tell you

1:15:43.439 --> 1:15:46.320
<v Speaker 1>this is all a lie, folks, This is a lie.

1:15:46.720 --> 1:15:50.439
<v Speaker 1>Then a whole generation now that wasn't around during the

1:15:50.439 --> 1:15:53.599
<v Speaker 1>Central Park jogger case, that doesn't have any that doesn't

1:15:53.600 --> 1:15:55.360
<v Speaker 1>have any connection in any knowledge of what New York

1:15:55.400 --> 1:15:58.400
<v Speaker 1>City was like at the time and what the atmosphere was.

1:15:58.920 --> 1:16:03.040
<v Speaker 1>They are being told old through movies, through Hollywood, through Netflix,

1:16:03.080 --> 1:16:05.519
<v Speaker 1>and now that the press and these different I think

1:16:05.520 --> 1:16:08.280
<v Speaker 1>there's a Ken Burns documentary, and it as well that

1:16:08.320 --> 1:16:13.280
<v Speaker 1>this was essentially racism, that the Central Park jogger case

1:16:13.560 --> 1:16:16.280
<v Speaker 1>was about racism from the police force, that they just

1:16:16.320 --> 1:16:20.320
<v Speaker 1>grabbed whatever black men they could to pin it on

1:16:20.680 --> 1:16:24.240
<v Speaker 1>and they coerced confessions and this was an injustice. The

1:16:24.320 --> 1:16:27.559
<v Speaker 1>injustice is that these men are now being treated like

1:16:27.600 --> 1:16:31.200
<v Speaker 1>heroes and are given tens of millions of dollars for

1:16:31.400 --> 1:16:33.280
<v Speaker 1>being a part of one of the most heinous acts

1:16:33.280 --> 1:16:36.439
<v Speaker 1>that anybody can think of. In the recent history of

1:16:36.439 --> 1:16:40.439
<v Speaker 1>New York City. That's the injustice and we all need

1:16:40.439 --> 1:16:44.280
<v Speaker 1>to be very clear on that. I watched this play

1:16:44.320 --> 1:16:46.320
<v Speaker 1>out and I think to myself, how long is it

1:16:46.400 --> 1:16:50.919
<v Speaker 1>before the narrative of the OJ Simpson case turns into

1:16:51.360 --> 1:16:54.400
<v Speaker 1>OJ was really innocent? You see. It's just that there

1:16:54.400 --> 1:16:58.000
<v Speaker 1>were all these very racist white people in the District

1:16:58.000 --> 1:17:01.559
<v Speaker 1>Attorney's office in Los Ange Jellis County, and they tried

1:17:01.560 --> 1:17:03.320
<v Speaker 1>to pin it on OJ, who was an innocent man.

1:17:03.600 --> 1:17:06.360
<v Speaker 1>You hear me say that, and you probably think that's absurd. Buck.

1:17:06.360 --> 1:17:10.599
<v Speaker 1>Everyone knows OJ's guilty. Well at the time, everybody knew

1:17:10.760 --> 1:17:14.000
<v Speaker 1>that these young men were guilty too. These young boys,

1:17:14.040 --> 1:17:15.639
<v Speaker 1>they were boys at the time when they were arrested,

1:17:15.680 --> 1:17:20.200
<v Speaker 1>fourteen years old. They were guilty. What's the evidence for this?

1:17:21.320 --> 1:17:24.479
<v Speaker 1>Ane's got a column out today that picks that picks

1:17:24.560 --> 1:17:28.639
<v Speaker 1>from important evidence in this trial. I mean, a few

1:17:28.640 --> 1:17:31.080
<v Speaker 1>things that we all need to know before we even

1:17:31.120 --> 1:17:33.280
<v Speaker 1>get into the evidence. Is that one Michael Bloomberg, whom

1:17:33.280 --> 1:17:36.800
<v Speaker 1>I worked for at the NYPD, he refused to give

1:17:37.040 --> 1:17:42.800
<v Speaker 1>these individuals any money from the city, and the City

1:17:42.840 --> 1:17:46.880
<v Speaker 1>of New York paid forty million dollars as soon as

1:17:47.240 --> 1:17:49.519
<v Speaker 1>de Blasio came into office. That was just a payment,

1:17:50.200 --> 1:17:53.320
<v Speaker 1>that was just essentially a white guilt payment from Deblasio

1:17:55.160 --> 1:17:59.080
<v Speaker 1>to try and buy support from the minority community, to

1:17:59.080 --> 1:18:03.160
<v Speaker 1>try to buy support from white liberals who always feel

1:18:03.280 --> 1:18:06.640
<v Speaker 1>guilt in any of these these situations. They feel like

1:18:06.680 --> 1:18:09.360
<v Speaker 1>there's something that they've they have to atone for, they

1:18:09.400 --> 1:18:10.680
<v Speaker 1>have to make up for it, even if they had

1:18:10.720 --> 1:18:14.519
<v Speaker 1>nothing to do with it. So here's some of what

1:18:14.560 --> 1:18:16.679
<v Speaker 1>Anne talks about on this column today. And you really

1:18:16.680 --> 1:18:19.519
<v Speaker 1>need to know this because you're you're being lied to

1:18:19.520 --> 1:18:21.200
<v Speaker 1>you right now about the Central Park five. I mean,

1:18:21.280 --> 1:18:24.920
<v Speaker 1>these these kids were out there and the Anna isn't

1:18:24.880 --> 1:18:27.559
<v Speaker 1>even get into all the evidence against the First of all,

1:18:27.600 --> 1:18:30.320
<v Speaker 1>they were out there attacking people. They put people in

1:18:30.320 --> 1:18:32.599
<v Speaker 1>the hospital that weren't even this woman. They were out

1:18:32.600 --> 1:18:37.440
<v Speaker 1>there engaging in gang violence effectively in the park at night, attacking,

1:18:37.680 --> 1:18:44.000
<v Speaker 1>attacking people, mugging people. So these are not these were

1:18:44.040 --> 1:18:46.680
<v Speaker 1>not these were not good kids. Start. Let's start with that.

1:18:46.720 --> 1:18:48.920
<v Speaker 1>Let's understand these were not kids that were pulled out

1:18:48.920 --> 1:18:51.680
<v Speaker 1>of their beds at night and made to, you know,

1:18:52.160 --> 1:18:53.720
<v Speaker 1>confess to something they had nothing to do with. They

1:18:53.720 --> 1:18:56.519
<v Speaker 1>were in the park, they were attacking people. Now that

1:18:56.560 --> 1:18:58.320
<v Speaker 1>doesn't mean that they were guilty of a gang rape.

1:18:58.320 --> 1:19:00.160
<v Speaker 1>But let's just understand they were in the park that

1:19:00.280 --> 1:19:04.360
<v Speaker 1>night and they were attacking people, So they were criminals.

1:19:04.920 --> 1:19:08.400
<v Speaker 1>They were criminals. Attacking somebody's a criminal act. So the

1:19:08.479 --> 1:19:11.400
<v Speaker 1>question is just what degree of criminal are we really

1:19:11.960 --> 1:19:16.360
<v Speaker 1>talking about here? Here's what Anne writes. The five accused rapists,

1:19:16.840 --> 1:19:23.200
<v Speaker 1>Kevin Richardson, Anton McCrary, A McCray, Raymond Santana, Yusuf Salam,

1:19:23.280 --> 1:19:26.840
<v Speaker 1>and Carrie Wise were convicted of the nineteen eighty nine

1:19:26.920 --> 1:19:29.360
<v Speaker 1>Central Park rape, as well as other assaults in the

1:19:29.360 --> 1:19:33.280
<v Speaker 1>park that night. They were quote exonerated thirteen years later,

1:19:34.080 --> 1:19:36.080
<v Speaker 1>and more than a decade after that, paid forty million

1:19:36.120 --> 1:19:37.720
<v Speaker 1>dollars by the City of New York to settle a

1:19:37.760 --> 1:19:42.919
<v Speaker 1>malicious prosecution case within months of Buildablasia becoming mayor, despite

1:19:42.920 --> 1:19:47.519
<v Speaker 1>city lawyer's confidence that they would win at trial. Today,

1:19:47.520 --> 1:19:49.920
<v Speaker 1>they are treated as civil rights heroes to Hollywood airheads

1:19:49.920 --> 1:19:52.280
<v Speaker 1>and others completely unfamiliar with the facts of the case.

1:19:52.800 --> 1:19:59.680
<v Speaker 1>So here is some of the evidence against them. You

1:19:59.680 --> 1:20:02.000
<v Speaker 1>know what, team, let me let's hit a quick take,

1:20:02.040 --> 1:20:03.680
<v Speaker 1>a quick breather. I want to come back on the

1:20:03.720 --> 1:20:04.960
<v Speaker 1>other side here, and I want to I want to

1:20:04.960 --> 1:20:07.200
<v Speaker 1>work through the piece of evidence that are in the

1:20:07.280 --> 1:20:11.439
<v Speaker 1>record that these young men initially were convicted based on,

1:20:12.640 --> 1:20:14.920
<v Speaker 1>and then we can all come to our own decisions

1:20:14.920 --> 1:20:19.600
<v Speaker 1>as to whether this is just the most despicable rewriting

1:20:19.600 --> 1:20:22.240
<v Speaker 1>of history that's going on, and that to me seems

1:20:22.320 --> 1:20:24.320
<v Speaker 1>quite quite clear. But let me come back to the

1:20:24.400 --> 1:20:26.439
<v Speaker 1>start of this break and we'll talk about what is

1:20:26.479 --> 1:20:30.320
<v Speaker 1>the evidence of guilt of the so called Central Park Five.

1:20:30.880 --> 1:20:33.080
<v Speaker 1>Stay with me, all right, team, We're talking about the

1:20:33.760 --> 1:20:38.920
<v Speaker 1>evidence in the Central Park Jogger case that it involves

1:20:38.920 --> 1:20:43.439
<v Speaker 1>the Central Park Five as they are now known, And

1:20:43.560 --> 1:20:46.600
<v Speaker 1>I want you to really think about how could it

1:20:46.640 --> 1:20:50.240
<v Speaker 1>be possible that this evidence is what it is. But

1:20:50.439 --> 1:20:55.000
<v Speaker 1>now we are supposed to believe that these these men,

1:20:55.160 --> 1:20:58.519
<v Speaker 1>who at the time we're boys, were teenagers, were not

1:20:58.640 --> 1:21:01.719
<v Speaker 1>involved in the raven Keep in mind, if you hold

1:21:01.760 --> 1:21:04.040
<v Speaker 1>somebody down during a rape, even if you're not the

1:21:04.040 --> 1:21:07.400
<v Speaker 1>one who does the penetration, you are culpable. You are

1:21:07.439 --> 1:21:10.719
<v Speaker 1>guilty of that rape. That is the way the law sees,

1:21:10.720 --> 1:21:12.479
<v Speaker 1>at least law in New York in New York State.

1:21:13.439 --> 1:21:17.439
<v Speaker 1>So there's not this Oh, they were just there, you know,

1:21:18.200 --> 1:21:20.280
<v Speaker 1>holding her down while this was happening. By the way,

1:21:20.479 --> 1:21:23.200
<v Speaker 1>just as a as a little bit of a fair

1:21:23.240 --> 1:21:25.400
<v Speaker 1>warning here some of this. I'm not going to use

1:21:25.439 --> 1:21:30.719
<v Speaker 1>any improper words, but this is tough stuff to hear about.

1:21:30.800 --> 1:21:33.160
<v Speaker 1>So just a little bit of a content warning on that.

1:21:34.280 --> 1:21:36.200
<v Speaker 1>So he mentioned the names of the boys, Kevin Richardson,

1:21:36.280 --> 1:21:40.519
<v Speaker 1>Anton McCray, Raymond Santana, Yusuf Salam and carry wise are

1:21:40.640 --> 1:21:42.840
<v Speaker 1>those in the names. Here's some of the evidence that

1:21:42.840 --> 1:21:47.040
<v Speaker 1>Ann Coulter has pulled together on her in her most

1:21:47.080 --> 1:21:52.640
<v Speaker 1>recent column dealing with this issue. Santana was one of

1:21:52.640 --> 1:21:54.960
<v Speaker 1>the first boys picked up in the dark the night

1:21:55.000 --> 1:21:59.719
<v Speaker 1>of the attacks on April nineteenth, nineteen eighty nine. While

1:21:59.800 --> 1:22:03.880
<v Speaker 1>being driven to the precinct, he blurted out, quote, I

1:22:03.960 --> 1:22:07.400
<v Speaker 1>had nothing to do with the rape. All I did

1:22:07.600 --> 1:22:13.840
<v Speaker 1>was feel the woman's blank. The police didn't even know

1:22:13.880 --> 1:22:17.960
<v Speaker 1>at that point that there had been a jogger even

1:22:17.960 --> 1:22:21.360
<v Speaker 1>found that the police knew nothing about the rape when

1:22:21.400 --> 1:22:26.680
<v Speaker 1>he said that. So in the record, we now have

1:22:27.320 --> 1:22:30.560
<v Speaker 1>a teenager in the park that night, picked up in

1:22:30.600 --> 1:22:34.880
<v Speaker 1>the park, who says he's obviously scared because he realizes

1:22:34.880 --> 1:22:36.479
<v Speaker 1>that he might be in trouble for something he doesn't

1:22:36.479 --> 1:22:38.519
<v Speaker 1>know what, doesn't know what the police know. He says,

1:22:38.640 --> 1:22:40.880
<v Speaker 1>I didn't rape her. I just felt her. I just

1:22:40.920 --> 1:22:45.639
<v Speaker 1>felt her chest. It's a very strange thing to say

1:22:45.680 --> 1:22:47.880
<v Speaker 1>for an innocent young man who wasn't there to nothing

1:22:47.880 --> 1:22:49.479
<v Speaker 1>to do with it, right, that's a that's a very

1:22:49.520 --> 1:22:55.360
<v Speaker 1>weird thing for him to have said. Richardson quote road

1:22:56.200 --> 1:22:58.799
<v Speaker 1>to the precinct with another boy who announced the police

1:22:58.840 --> 1:23:04.520
<v Speaker 1>that he knew who the murder, naming Anton McCrary I mcray.

1:23:05.360 --> 1:23:10.160
<v Speaker 1>Richardson concurred, saying, yeah, that's who did it. Keep in

1:23:10.200 --> 1:23:12.720
<v Speaker 1>mind the police did not know about the jogger yet.

1:23:14.080 --> 1:23:19.360
<v Speaker 1>Over the next five days, five teenage boys gave detailed

1:23:19.360 --> 1:23:21.479
<v Speaker 1>confessions about the attack on the woman, as well as

1:23:21.479 --> 1:23:24.680
<v Speaker 1>the other attacks. All five made their confessions in the

1:23:24.720 --> 1:23:31.639
<v Speaker 1>presence of their parents or guardians. It is absolute madness

1:23:31.680 --> 1:23:34.840
<v Speaker 1>to imagine these officers did anything to coerce these confessions.

1:23:34.880 --> 1:23:38.200
<v Speaker 1>Culter rights. When the boys confessed, No one, not that

1:23:38.280 --> 1:23:41.240
<v Speaker 1>I'm not the prosecutors, not the police interviewing them, had

1:23:41.320 --> 1:23:45.519
<v Speaker 1>any idea whether the jogger would emerge from her coma

1:23:45.680 --> 1:23:51.760
<v Speaker 1>remembering everything. Mercifully, she remembered nothing Why on earth would

1:23:51.800 --> 1:23:56.240
<v Speaker 1>cops bully five random teenagers into false confessions knowing the

1:23:56.320 --> 1:23:58.720
<v Speaker 1>victim might wake up at any moment and announced my

1:23:58.800 --> 1:24:01.880
<v Speaker 1>boyfriend did it. That would be rather awkward for any

1:24:01.880 --> 1:24:07.320
<v Speaker 1>cop who'd gotten someone else to confess. Does anybody want

1:24:07.320 --> 1:24:10.479
<v Speaker 1>to try to explain that one? So these confessions were

1:24:10.520 --> 1:24:15.240
<v Speaker 1>allegedly coerced. They were coerced in the presence of adult

1:24:15.320 --> 1:24:19.960
<v Speaker 1>relatives of the accused, and the police would have been

1:24:20.000 --> 1:24:23.720
<v Speaker 1>coercing them with the possibility that the woman who was

1:24:23.760 --> 1:24:27.040
<v Speaker 1>in a coma therefore was alive and still did live

1:24:27.080 --> 1:24:31.400
<v Speaker 1>after this incident, could have woken up and destroyed all

1:24:31.439 --> 1:24:36.519
<v Speaker 1>the confessions that they had allegedly coerced. Right, because they

1:24:36.560 --> 1:24:39.680
<v Speaker 1>weren't coerced. Folks, We're not idiots, right, We all understand this.

1:24:39.720 --> 1:24:44.360
<v Speaker 1>They were not coerced. These kids admitted it. They admitted

1:24:44.360 --> 1:24:48.200
<v Speaker 1>that they had a role in this. But there's more.

1:24:49.800 --> 1:24:53.280
<v Speaker 1>The police had incriminating testimony from friends and acquaintances of

1:24:53.320 --> 1:24:56.960
<v Speaker 1>the defendants. Quote Dennis Comedo, one of the boys who

1:24:57.040 --> 1:24:59.360
<v Speaker 1>was part of the larger group, told the police that

1:24:59.400 --> 1:25:01.400
<v Speaker 1>when he ran in Richardson in the park that night,

1:25:01.840 --> 1:25:08.120
<v Speaker 1>he'd said, quote, we just raped somebody, Carrie Wise, told

1:25:08.200 --> 1:25:12.080
<v Speaker 1>a friend's sister, Melody Jackson, that he didn't rape the jogger,

1:25:12.120 --> 1:25:15.760
<v Speaker 1>He only quote held her legs down while Kevin Richardson

1:25:16.000 --> 1:25:20.519
<v Speaker 1>blanked her. Jackson volunteered this information to police, thinking it

1:25:20.560 --> 1:25:24.439
<v Speaker 1>would help Wise. That's right. Somebody thought, oh, I'm gonna

1:25:24.439 --> 1:25:27.080
<v Speaker 1>help my friend out by telling the cops, Well, he

1:25:27.080 --> 1:25:30.920
<v Speaker 1>didn't actually rape her, he just held her down. Was

1:25:31.240 --> 1:25:33.400
<v Speaker 1>she was she part of the coerced confession too? I

1:25:33.439 --> 1:25:37.479
<v Speaker 1>just want to know. Was that was that the big, bad,

1:25:37.640 --> 1:25:43.920
<v Speaker 1>mean white cops that were doing that? Okay? Two of

1:25:43.960 --> 1:25:46.320
<v Speaker 1>Wise his friends, Carrie Wise, remember, one of the cues,

1:25:46.320 --> 1:25:48.280
<v Speaker 1>said the next day he told them, you heard about

1:25:48.280 --> 1:25:49.800
<v Speaker 1>that woman that was beat up and raped the park

1:25:49.880 --> 1:25:54.640
<v Speaker 1>last night. That was us. Another boy arrested for the

1:25:54.680 --> 1:25:57.440
<v Speaker 1>attacks but not the rape, told the detectives on videotape

1:25:57.760 --> 1:26:01.120
<v Speaker 1>that he overheard Santana and a friend and laughing in

1:26:01.120 --> 1:26:04.160
<v Speaker 1>the park about how they'd quote made a woman bleed.

1:26:06.760 --> 1:26:13.040
<v Speaker 1>The defendants also new facts about the attack that only

1:26:13.080 --> 1:26:16.439
<v Speaker 1>someone who had been there could possibly know. Two of

1:26:16.439 --> 1:26:20.759
<v Speaker 1>the boys, Santana and Richardson, independently pointed out the exact

1:26:20.800 --> 1:26:25.680
<v Speaker 1>location where the rape had occurred wide Wise told the

1:26:25.680 --> 1:26:28.040
<v Speaker 1>detective interviewing him that someone he thought was named Rudy

1:26:28.080 --> 1:26:32.839
<v Speaker 1>had stolen the joggers walkman. The officer notes state quote

1:26:32.880 --> 1:26:40.320
<v Speaker 1>persons present when girl raped Rudy took walkman. At that point,

1:26:40.320 --> 1:26:42.559
<v Speaker 1>the jogger was still in a coma. Police investigators had

1:26:42.640 --> 1:26:45.599
<v Speaker 1>no way of knowing that she'd been carrying a walkman.

1:26:46.560 --> 1:26:50.320
<v Speaker 1>Thirteen years later, the sixth rapist, Matthias Reyes, the only

1:26:50.400 --> 1:26:54.040
<v Speaker 1>rapist according to Hollywood and former District Attorney Robert Morgenthaw,

1:26:54.600 --> 1:26:57.320
<v Speaker 1>told police that in addition to raping the jogger, he

1:26:57.439 --> 1:27:02.760
<v Speaker 1>had stolen her walkman. Someone explained to me, how would

1:27:02.760 --> 1:27:05.280
<v Speaker 1>the cops be so slick, so smooth in they're set

1:27:05.360 --> 1:27:10.439
<v Speaker 1>up here that they would have contemporaneous notes about somebody

1:27:10.479 --> 1:27:13.679
<v Speaker 1>at the attack stealing or walkman, and then only thirteen

1:27:13.760 --> 1:27:18.360
<v Speaker 1>years later did they have anybody confirming that, yes, in fact,

1:27:18.360 --> 1:27:22.439
<v Speaker 1>they stole a walkman. Unless the kids who were saying

1:27:22.479 --> 1:27:24.880
<v Speaker 1>they were there at the time knew that this guy

1:27:24.920 --> 1:27:30.559
<v Speaker 1>stole or walkman. These people were part of a vicious

1:27:30.640 --> 1:27:37.400
<v Speaker 1>gang rape less than two miles from where I grew up,

1:27:38.600 --> 1:27:41.800
<v Speaker 1>right in an area where I spent many years of

1:27:41.840 --> 1:27:47.760
<v Speaker 1>my life playing sports, going for walks. They were a

1:27:47.800 --> 1:27:50.759
<v Speaker 1>part of a heinous incident, and now they're being treated

1:27:50.800 --> 1:27:55.360
<v Speaker 1>as heroes. There was no adjudication of their innocence. There

1:27:55.439 --> 1:28:02.080
<v Speaker 1>was just DNA exoneration. That is an exoneration and a

1:28:02.120 --> 1:28:05.880
<v Speaker 1>politicized decision by a mayor who is a left wing

1:28:05.960 --> 1:28:10.280
<v Speaker 1>idiot to write a massive check to them. And now

1:28:10.320 --> 1:28:13.040
<v Speaker 1>you have Hollywood all jumping on this bandwagon too. There

1:28:13.200 --> 1:28:16.880
<v Speaker 1>is real racism in America. There is a long history

1:28:16.880 --> 1:28:21.760
<v Speaker 1>of very real and very disgraceful racism in this country.

1:28:22.600 --> 1:28:28.160
<v Speaker 1>When the left creates stories like this, they undermine our

1:28:28.280 --> 1:28:32.880
<v Speaker 1>ability to see and tackle and deal with the real

1:28:32.960 --> 1:28:35.000
<v Speaker 1>racings out that's out there. This was not a case

1:28:35.040 --> 1:28:38.439
<v Speaker 1>of racism. This wasn't just the police acting out and

1:28:38.520 --> 1:28:41.880
<v Speaker 1>grabbing five black boys to make an example of them.

1:28:42.520 --> 1:28:45.200
<v Speaker 1>These people confessed they were guilty. They did a horrible thing.

1:28:45.840 --> 1:28:51.880
<v Speaker 1>And now the media that is so unconcerned with real

1:28:51.920 --> 1:28:56.360
<v Speaker 1>innocence or guilt pat themselves on the shoulders because they

1:28:56.400 --> 1:28:59.120
<v Speaker 1>say that this is now justice. This is a grave

1:28:59.280 --> 1:29:01.759
<v Speaker 1>injustice that is being done with this rewriting of history

1:29:01.760 --> 1:29:05.120
<v Speaker 1>of the Central Park. Five very important question I'm about

1:29:05.120 --> 1:29:09.640
<v Speaker 1>to pose to all of you, what is your comfort

1:29:09.720 --> 1:29:13.840
<v Speaker 1>food of choice? Now? I can't necessarily hear your answers,

1:29:13.880 --> 1:29:15.680
<v Speaker 1>although you could all write into me on Facebook dot

1:29:15.720 --> 1:29:21.040
<v Speaker 1>com slashbuck Sexton. That's one way to go, Mark, what

1:29:21.320 --> 1:29:24.599
<v Speaker 1>is your comfort food of choice? Don't think, just give

1:29:24.600 --> 1:29:26.479
<v Speaker 1>me the answer. The first thing that popped into my

1:29:26.479 --> 1:29:31.400
<v Speaker 1>head was mac and cheese. Very solid choice, very solid

1:29:31.439 --> 1:29:34.120
<v Speaker 1>I mac and cheese. I think I have to put

1:29:34.200 --> 1:29:37.920
<v Speaker 1>in my number two spot. I do love and people

1:29:37.960 --> 1:29:40.240
<v Speaker 1>super poking to you mac and cheese. There's excellent gluten

1:29:40.240 --> 1:29:41.920
<v Speaker 1>free mac and cheese. It's all over the place. It's

1:29:42.000 --> 1:29:44.839
<v Speaker 1>very easy to find. It's very good. It tastes exactly

1:29:44.880 --> 1:29:48.640
<v Speaker 1>the same. Some of you're saying, no, it doesn't. I'm

1:29:48.680 --> 1:29:52.280
<v Speaker 1>telling you it does. Excellent mac and cheese in the

1:29:52.280 --> 1:29:54.800
<v Speaker 1>gluten free community. Does gluten free you get to call

1:29:54.840 --> 1:29:58.000
<v Speaker 1>itself a community? Now? I hope so. But the different

1:29:58.080 --> 1:30:04.600
<v Speaker 1>twenty twenty candidates have had their various comfort foods of

1:30:04.680 --> 1:30:10.760
<v Speaker 1>choice compiled here by The New York Times. And there

1:30:10.760 --> 1:30:14.760
<v Speaker 1>are some excellent choices, and there are some choices that

1:30:14.800 --> 1:30:18.080
<v Speaker 1>are so terrible. It's important we talk about them because

1:30:18.120 --> 1:30:20.800
<v Speaker 1>it tells you a lot about the candidate that would

1:30:20.840 --> 1:30:23.240
<v Speaker 1>ever say such a thing. I mean, I think the

1:30:23.280 --> 1:30:27.880
<v Speaker 1>winner is Kamala Harris who said fries, because that's mine

1:30:27.960 --> 1:30:31.599
<v Speaker 1>as well. French fries, for me, are the perfect food.

1:30:31.720 --> 1:30:34.559
<v Speaker 1>I love French fries. I eat them too often. I'd

1:30:34.600 --> 1:30:36.960
<v Speaker 1>probably be about five or ten pounds lighter if I

1:30:37.000 --> 1:30:39.679
<v Speaker 1>did not eat French fries because I just love French

1:30:39.680 --> 1:30:43.200
<v Speaker 1>fries and it's a weakness. French fries, chocolate, I got

1:30:43.240 --> 1:30:45.080
<v Speaker 1>a few things, but French fries are very high on

1:30:45.120 --> 1:30:48.120
<v Speaker 1>my list. It reminds me when I was a teenager,

1:30:48.200 --> 1:30:51.799
<v Speaker 1>people say, don't eat chocolate or French fries, you'll get pimples.

1:30:51.800 --> 1:30:54.439
<v Speaker 1>Such a stupid wives tale. Has nothing to do with anything.

1:30:54.520 --> 1:30:57.960
<v Speaker 1>It's hormonal and oil and secretion on the skin base

1:30:58.080 --> 1:31:00.320
<v Speaker 1>that has nothing to do with chocolate or french But

1:31:00.720 --> 1:31:02.200
<v Speaker 1>did you ever hear that mark was or is that

1:31:02.360 --> 1:31:04.320
<v Speaker 1>my just tool? I definitely heard that, Yeah, right, don't

1:31:04.320 --> 1:31:06.720
<v Speaker 1>eat chocolate you'll get ziz. It's not true. There's no

1:31:06.760 --> 1:31:09.160
<v Speaker 1>basis and science for that whatsoever. People are just absurd.

1:31:09.680 --> 1:31:11.240
<v Speaker 1>But you know, it's just because people want to be

1:31:11.240 --> 1:31:13.840
<v Speaker 1>mean to teenagers all the time. They'll tell us not

1:31:13.880 --> 1:31:17.800
<v Speaker 1>to have any fun. Uh, so Warren said fries, which

1:31:17.840 --> 1:31:20.360
<v Speaker 1>is a very solid choice. Mark said mac and cheese,

1:31:20.400 --> 1:31:22.160
<v Speaker 1>also very solid, but no one on this list said

1:31:22.439 --> 1:31:25.559
<v Speaker 1>mac and cheese. I'm sorry, Harris said fries. Warren said

1:31:25.600 --> 1:31:29.920
<v Speaker 1>chips and guac. Chips and guac. That's now, first of all,

1:31:30.000 --> 1:31:33.000
<v Speaker 1>Elizabeth Warren. Once again, I'm just saying cultural appropriation from

1:31:33.040 --> 1:31:37.040
<v Speaker 1>Lizabeth Warren, culturally appropriating from Mexico. But chips and guac

1:31:37.160 --> 1:31:45.320
<v Speaker 1>is a very solid choice. Buddha Judge said beef jerky, which, okay,

1:31:45.520 --> 1:31:48.240
<v Speaker 1>I'm not a beef jerky guy, but you know, he's

1:31:48.280 --> 1:31:51.000
<v Speaker 1>from Indiana and he served overseas and they probably ate

1:31:51.040 --> 1:31:52.960
<v Speaker 1>a lot of beef jerky. I can I can respect that.

1:31:54.240 --> 1:31:59.040
<v Speaker 1>Jillah Brand Kristen Jillibrand said whiskey. She's just trying to

1:31:59.080 --> 1:32:01.639
<v Speaker 1>sound cool, not think that that is our comfort food.

1:32:02.120 --> 1:32:04.280
<v Speaker 1>But that's a very Gilibrand answer. What can I say

1:32:04.360 --> 1:32:07.240
<v Speaker 1>that will make people think I'm more interesting than I am?

1:32:07.479 --> 1:32:13.960
<v Speaker 1>Tulsi Gabbard said vegan cupcakes, which I can believe. I

1:32:14.000 --> 1:32:17.320
<v Speaker 1>can believe that that's something that she's really into vegan

1:32:17.360 --> 1:32:20.680
<v Speaker 1>cupcakes or I've had vegan cupcakes that are good. You know,

1:32:21.280 --> 1:32:23.200
<v Speaker 1>the thing is. I don't know if people who are

1:32:23.280 --> 1:32:25.960
<v Speaker 1>vegan or people who are keto are more excited about

1:32:25.960 --> 1:32:30.080
<v Speaker 1>telling you their dietary restrictions and plans, but there's keto

1:32:30.120 --> 1:32:35.520
<v Speaker 1>and vegan people. And then Klobaschar said a baked potato,

1:32:36.560 --> 1:32:40.320
<v Speaker 1>which that's you know. I think Klobaschar's candidacy is about

1:32:40.320 --> 1:32:43.120
<v Speaker 1>as exciting as a baked potato. But the worst dancer

1:32:43.280 --> 1:32:46.240
<v Speaker 1>on here, well, the second worst answer was Mary and Williamson,

1:32:46.280 --> 1:32:49.920
<v Speaker 1>who said quote, I have no comfort food, which is

1:32:49.960 --> 1:32:51.680
<v Speaker 1>such an annoying and weird thing to say. I mean,

1:32:51.680 --> 1:32:55.200
<v Speaker 1>everyone has some kind of a comfort food. But the

1:32:55.320 --> 1:32:59.840
<v Speaker 1>single worst answer given by a candidate who should be

1:32:59.840 --> 1:33:01.479
<v Speaker 1>doing so much better than he is, but when he

1:33:01.520 --> 1:33:04.160
<v Speaker 1>says things like this, it's clear to me why he's

1:33:04.200 --> 1:33:08.760
<v Speaker 1>not doing better than he is. The worst answer on here,

1:33:08.840 --> 1:33:15.519
<v Speaker 1>Corey Booker said, veggis. That's disgusting. Veggis what is wrong

1:33:15.560 --> 1:33:19.200
<v Speaker 1>with him? Veggis are not a com First of all,

1:33:19.280 --> 1:33:21.639
<v Speaker 1>veggis is so broad that it doesn't even mean anything,

1:33:21.920 --> 1:33:24.760
<v Speaker 1>saying well, veggies are not a comfort food. I know

1:33:24.840 --> 1:33:28.000
<v Speaker 1>he's a is he a vegetarian? I think he's a vegan. Actually,

1:33:29.200 --> 1:33:31.320
<v Speaker 1>that's all you have to know. I you know, I

1:33:31.320 --> 1:33:35.080
<v Speaker 1>don't think I think that this country could handle somebody

1:33:36.000 --> 1:33:39.320
<v Speaker 1>who was an atheist to be president long before they

1:33:39.320 --> 1:33:42.479
<v Speaker 1>could handle a vegan, because at least with an atheist,

1:33:42.479 --> 1:33:45.599
<v Speaker 1>you know what's going on vegans? I don't know. Something

1:33:45.720 --> 1:33:49.240
<v Speaker 1>something funky there, something I'm inevitably going to get people

1:33:49.240 --> 1:33:50.800
<v Speaker 1>reading to me. Who are vegans listening to the show.

1:33:50.800 --> 1:33:52.760
<v Speaker 1>What's wrong with you? Buck? I'm just kidding. I love

1:33:52.800 --> 1:33:56.519
<v Speaker 1>you vegans. Calm down, and you love yourselves, that's for sure,

1:33:56.560 --> 1:33:59.200
<v Speaker 1>because you like to talk about your veganism. Oh we'll

1:33:59.200 --> 1:34:19.479
<v Speaker 1>be right back, team Buck. It's time for roll call. Team.

1:34:19.479 --> 1:34:21.799
<v Speaker 1>Sorry if my voice is a little bit less powerful

1:34:21.800 --> 1:34:24.040
<v Speaker 1>than it usually is. I managed to get a cold

1:34:24.439 --> 1:34:27.320
<v Speaker 1>in mid June. We look up this morning. I was like,

1:34:27.320 --> 1:34:29.360
<v Speaker 1>I don't understand. How do I have a cold. This

1:34:29.439 --> 1:34:31.479
<v Speaker 1>doesn't make any sense. I know that it's a virus

1:34:31.479 --> 1:34:33.280
<v Speaker 1>that has nothing to do with the temperature outside, but

1:34:33.880 --> 1:34:38.120
<v Speaker 1>who gets a cold virus in June? I'm uh, it

1:34:38.200 --> 1:34:41.839
<v Speaker 1>is what it is? Facebook dot com, slash Buck Sexton,

1:34:42.720 --> 1:34:45.120
<v Speaker 1>that's where you throw the roll call noise and let's

1:34:45.160 --> 1:34:49.519
<v Speaker 1>get into it. Owen right, Hey, Buck, My eleven year

1:34:49.520 --> 1:34:51.960
<v Speaker 1>old son has named his baseball player for the PS

1:34:52.000 --> 1:34:55.400
<v Speaker 1>four game The Show twenty eighteen. He's named the player

1:34:56.000 --> 1:35:00.280
<v Speaker 1>Buck Shields High. Well, that's awesome, Owen. It's a great name.

1:35:00.320 --> 1:35:06.519
<v Speaker 1>It's a strong name. It's a name that people will remember, hopefully,

1:35:07.200 --> 1:35:09.920
<v Speaker 1>so I appreciate that. I'm not even sure if it's

1:35:10.000 --> 1:35:12.559
<v Speaker 1>named for me, but I'll take it. I'll take it.

1:35:12.560 --> 1:35:15.920
<v Speaker 1>It's a good name. You gotta you gotta lean into it. Though.

1:35:15.920 --> 1:35:17.880
<v Speaker 1>If your name is Buck, you can't shy away from it.

1:35:18.880 --> 1:35:20.880
<v Speaker 1>There's no easy way to be Buck. You got you

1:35:20.920 --> 1:35:26.280
<v Speaker 1>gotta be Buck all the time. Claudia, Hello Buck. Just

1:35:26.320 --> 1:35:29.400
<v Speaker 1>a quick note regarding free Medicare for all, it is

1:35:29.479 --> 1:35:32.200
<v Speaker 1>not free. My husband, who will be turning sixty five

1:35:32.200 --> 1:35:34.120
<v Speaker 1>in November, has a work history of fifty years and

1:35:34.200 --> 1:35:37.120
<v Speaker 1>is paid into the Medicare fund. He will be eligible

1:35:37.160 --> 1:35:40.280
<v Speaker 1>for coverage in November, and the governmentill begin automatically taking

1:35:40.320 --> 1:35:42.400
<v Speaker 1>one hundred and thirty eight dollars per month from his

1:35:42.439 --> 1:35:45.639
<v Speaker 1>Social Security check, as done to all persons on Medicare.

1:35:45.960 --> 1:35:48.639
<v Speaker 1>In addition, Medicare does not cover all his health needs.

1:35:48.680 --> 1:35:50.600
<v Speaker 1>We will need to add an additional supplement at a

1:35:50.600 --> 1:35:53.800
<v Speaker 1>few hundred dollars a month. Again, Medicare is not free

1:35:53.800 --> 1:35:56.840
<v Speaker 1>and does not cover all one's needs. Claudia, I know

1:35:56.880 --> 1:35:59.880
<v Speaker 1>that that is all true, and I appreciate you walking

1:36:00.080 --> 1:36:04.240
<v Speaker 1>us all through some of the realities of the Medicare program.

1:36:04.280 --> 1:36:07.160
<v Speaker 1>But that's why I've always said that what Bernie Sanders

1:36:07.840 --> 1:36:12.440
<v Speaker 1>has often talked about is really a true single payer program,

1:36:12.920 --> 1:36:15.400
<v Speaker 1>which is different than Medicare because Medicare has a lot

1:36:15.439 --> 1:36:19.479
<v Speaker 1>of cost sharing. You spend money from your tax or

1:36:19.520 --> 1:36:21.720
<v Speaker 1>you pay money through your taxes into Medicare for a

1:36:21.720 --> 1:36:26.680
<v Speaker 1>long time. And then beyond that there is also a

1:36:26.800 --> 1:36:32.960
<v Speaker 1>state and local government that excuse me, that will be

1:36:33.000 --> 1:36:35.960
<v Speaker 1>a part of the whole Medicare situation. So there's a

1:36:35.960 --> 1:36:38.519
<v Speaker 1>bunch of different things coming together there. And you are

1:36:38.600 --> 1:36:41.600
<v Speaker 1>right that Medicare is not It's certainly not free, and

1:36:41.640 --> 1:36:47.080
<v Speaker 1>it does not cover everything. Fill up. A few days ago,

1:36:47.240 --> 1:36:50.840
<v Speaker 1>you were searching for Howard Dean's yeah A moment. The

1:36:50.920 --> 1:36:54.160
<v Speaker 1>reason for his instantaneous implosion was it reminded everyone of

1:36:54.920 --> 1:37:00.320
<v Speaker 1>Slim Pickens writing an a bomb in doctor Strange Glove. Well,

1:37:00.320 --> 1:37:02.040
<v Speaker 1>this is where I have to admit that I've never

1:37:02.040 --> 1:37:05.760
<v Speaker 1>seen doctor Strange Glove. So Mark, should I go back

1:37:05.760 --> 1:37:09.000
<v Speaker 1>and watch this one. Are we talking about Doctor Strange

1:37:09.080 --> 1:37:12.599
<v Speaker 1>the Marvel movie or Doctor Strange Glove? No, Doctor Strange Glove.

1:37:12.840 --> 1:37:16.120
<v Speaker 1>They've never heard of it. It's an older one. And

1:37:16.200 --> 1:37:17.880
<v Speaker 1>I'm somebody that gets into a lot of trouble, I know,

1:37:17.880 --> 1:37:20.840
<v Speaker 1>with this audience, because I think that there is a

1:37:21.080 --> 1:37:24.840
<v Speaker 1>bias in favor of older movies. I think that people

1:37:25.080 --> 1:37:27.240
<v Speaker 1>tend to just assume, oh, if it's if it's an

1:37:27.240 --> 1:37:30.040
<v Speaker 1>old classic, then it has to still be really worth

1:37:30.080 --> 1:37:32.559
<v Speaker 1>watching today. Truth is that a lot of older movies

1:37:32.560 --> 1:37:35.080
<v Speaker 1>don't really hold up. I know, I know people can

1:37:35.160 --> 1:37:37.160
<v Speaker 1>get mad at me and say, oh, back, that's terrible

1:37:37.280 --> 1:37:40.240
<v Speaker 1>and how could you say such a thing, And but no,

1:37:40.360 --> 1:37:42.400
<v Speaker 1>that's that's just the way it is, folks. A lot

1:37:42.400 --> 1:37:45.400
<v Speaker 1>of older movies, the acting is kind of lame. There's

1:37:45.479 --> 1:37:49.360
<v Speaker 1>just there's just stuff going on that's not it's not great.

1:37:49.840 --> 1:37:53.599
<v Speaker 1>So there there you have it. I know people get

1:37:53.640 --> 1:37:55.760
<v Speaker 1>mad at me, but I speak the truth. It is

1:37:55.760 --> 1:37:58.120
<v Speaker 1>what I do here on the show. There's a lot

1:37:58.120 --> 1:38:01.960
<v Speaker 1>of indicating instead of act right, yeah, thank you Mark.

1:38:02.080 --> 1:38:03.639
<v Speaker 1>A lot of this stuff people go, oh, it's black

1:38:03.680 --> 1:38:07.920
<v Speaker 1>and white, it's got to be good. False. The storylines

1:38:07.960 --> 1:38:12.479
<v Speaker 1>are cheesy. It's ridiculous. You know what I'm saying. Yeah,

1:38:12.640 --> 1:38:19.240
<v Speaker 1>you know what I'm saying. Joey writes you just uh oh, No,

1:38:19.400 --> 1:38:22.000
<v Speaker 1>Joey has fallen up on his message from yesterday. Okay, Joey,

1:38:22.000 --> 1:38:25.759
<v Speaker 1>thank you. Kristin. Listen to Rush live on Newstalk twelve

1:38:25.880 --> 1:38:29.160
<v Speaker 1>ninety whichtop Falls and heard your Trump twenty coin commercial.

1:38:29.680 --> 1:38:32.439
<v Speaker 1>So cool to hear your voice when listening to someone else. Well,

1:38:32.520 --> 1:38:34.559
<v Speaker 1>christ and that is cool. I'm glad that people get

1:38:34.600 --> 1:38:38.360
<v Speaker 1>to hear me on some of the other platforms out there.

1:38:38.400 --> 1:38:41.560
<v Speaker 1>That's kind of fun. That's very cool. So yes, indeed,

1:38:43.720 --> 1:38:48.880
<v Speaker 1>James Rights, hey Buck, bring back the haya buck slap sound?

1:38:49.120 --> 1:38:51.280
<v Speaker 1>I chuckle to myself every time I hear it. Do

1:38:51.360 --> 1:38:56.720
<v Speaker 1>we have that one? Mark we hand? Exactly? There we go.

1:38:57.600 --> 1:38:59.880
<v Speaker 1>That's the that's got to be the buck slap sound,

1:39:00.000 --> 1:39:01.719
<v Speaker 1>even though it makes no sense, like if you're gonna

1:39:01.720 --> 1:39:05.080
<v Speaker 1>slap somebody, I don't think you'd go hey, But that's

1:39:05.320 --> 1:39:08.200
<v Speaker 1>that is the buck slap because it's so powerful that

1:39:08.320 --> 1:39:10.439
<v Speaker 1>even though it's just a slap, you have to psych

1:39:10.520 --> 1:39:17.960
<v Speaker 1>yourself up for it. There we go, Glenn Rights, hey Buck.

1:39:18.000 --> 1:39:20.080
<v Speaker 1>I live in Massachusetts and I do believe it is

1:39:20.160 --> 1:39:23.479
<v Speaker 1>part of the state electoral compact. Was curious if the

1:39:23.479 --> 1:39:26.280
<v Speaker 1>compact is constitutional, whether anyone has looked at a class

1:39:26.320 --> 1:39:29.479
<v Speaker 1>action lawsuit to revoke it. Things like this really make

1:39:29.560 --> 1:39:32.080
<v Speaker 1>my blood boil. Anyway, great show, keep up the good work.

1:39:32.080 --> 1:39:35.920
<v Speaker 1>We'll Glenn, thank you so much. I don't know anything

1:39:35.920 --> 1:39:40.479
<v Speaker 1>about the electoral Compact, so I don't have a smart

1:39:40.560 --> 1:39:43.160
<v Speaker 1>thing to say here. I just will say that I

1:39:43.240 --> 1:39:45.639
<v Speaker 1>appreciate you writing in and you listen to the show,

1:39:45.680 --> 1:39:49.320
<v Speaker 1>and you're a great guy and a great American. Michael

1:39:49.160 --> 1:39:52.719
<v Speaker 1>A right, Buck, I love these solidad O'Brien buck slap story.

1:39:52.960 --> 1:39:57.080
<v Speaker 1>The only thing missing was the he have producer Mike

1:39:57.120 --> 1:40:00.320
<v Speaker 1>teed up next time field tie from Lost Us. Yeah. See,

1:40:00.400 --> 1:40:03.920
<v Speaker 1>people really like it. We gotta Mark, you gotta have

1:40:03.960 --> 1:40:05.439
<v Speaker 1>that one ready going forward when I call for the

1:40:05.439 --> 1:40:07.400
<v Speaker 1>buck slap, now you know, man, that's the one. So

1:40:07.840 --> 1:40:11.120
<v Speaker 1>that's the new buck slap. That is the one that

1:40:11.240 --> 1:40:16.120
<v Speaker 1>is the one that people like. Here we go, Robert, Hey, Buck,

1:40:16.160 --> 1:40:18.880
<v Speaker 1>I'd love to have a serious conversation about reparations for

1:40:18.960 --> 1:40:22.760
<v Speaker 1>the descendants of slaves without turning it into a name

1:40:22.800 --> 1:40:26.760
<v Speaker 1>calling session. How are today's African Americans harmed by slavery.

1:40:27.080 --> 1:40:31.960
<v Speaker 1>An argument can be made that they about whoa Okay,

1:40:33.439 --> 1:40:35.040
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna at Robert, I don't have to dive into

1:40:35.040 --> 1:40:40.240
<v Speaker 1>this one little bit more. Thank you for writing in though, Carla,

1:40:40.320 --> 1:40:42.880
<v Speaker 1>hey Buck, I'm wondering if AOC truly believes all the

1:40:42.880 --> 1:40:44.920
<v Speaker 1>propaganda she is spewing her if she's just trying to

1:40:44.960 --> 1:40:47.040
<v Speaker 1>get a reaction out of everyone, like a child looking

1:40:47.040 --> 1:40:49.960
<v Speaker 1>for attention. I wonder if the best way for us

1:40:50.400 --> 1:40:54.120
<v Speaker 1>to handle her is to write her off and ignore her,

1:40:54.360 --> 1:40:56.599
<v Speaker 1>dismiss her as a child, or to recognize her as

1:40:56.600 --> 1:40:59.840
<v Speaker 1>a real threat and continue to vocally oppose her. What

1:41:00.160 --> 1:41:02.679
<v Speaker 1>your thoughts. Thank you for always speaking the truth, sending

1:41:02.680 --> 1:41:06.479
<v Speaker 1>you prayers for wisdom and encouraged to keep on keeping on. Carlo,

1:41:06.520 --> 1:41:07.960
<v Speaker 1>thank you so much for the kind note. You know,

1:41:08.000 --> 1:41:11.200
<v Speaker 1>I think that AOC the problem with trying to ignore

1:41:11.280 --> 1:41:14.639
<v Speaker 1>her is that she has such a large social media

1:41:14.720 --> 1:41:18.439
<v Speaker 1>following that if you ignore her, what often ends up

1:41:18.479 --> 1:41:22.200
<v Speaker 1>happening is you allow her to preach to her side unopposed.

1:41:22.760 --> 1:41:24.519
<v Speaker 1>So I don't think that that's a good thing, because

1:41:24.520 --> 1:41:27.280
<v Speaker 1>there are a lot of very impressionable Unfortunately, a lot

1:41:27.320 --> 1:41:30.479
<v Speaker 1>of very ignorant people out there who if they hear

1:41:30.560 --> 1:41:35.519
<v Speaker 1>AOC able to say things without someone pointing out that

1:41:35.600 --> 1:41:39.559
<v Speaker 1>what she says is nonsense and lies, they're more likely

1:41:39.600 --> 1:41:43.519
<v Speaker 1>to believe it. So I don't think we can just

1:41:43.600 --> 1:41:48.639
<v Speaker 1>write her off. I do believe that she is the

1:41:48.680 --> 1:41:52.280
<v Speaker 1>future of the Democratic Party, not necessarily just her personally,

1:41:52.760 --> 1:41:55.240
<v Speaker 1>but her view of the world and the way that

1:41:55.280 --> 1:41:59.360
<v Speaker 1>she approaches governance, and her thoughts on things like social

1:41:59.400 --> 1:42:05.920
<v Speaker 1>justice and socialism and the size and mission of the state.

1:42:06.720 --> 1:42:09.200
<v Speaker 1>I think that the Democratic Party is trending toward AOC

1:42:09.400 --> 1:42:12.160
<v Speaker 1>and not the other way around. So I don't think

1:42:12.200 --> 1:42:14.280
<v Speaker 1>we can ignore her. I do think there's a little

1:42:14.280 --> 1:42:20.440
<v Speaker 1>bit of a right wing media fixation on diving into

1:42:20.520 --> 1:42:24.400
<v Speaker 1>everything that she says, and occasionally it has backfired. I mean,

1:42:24.520 --> 1:42:27.960
<v Speaker 1>the people that were getting all upset about her, well, no,

1:42:28.040 --> 1:42:29.800
<v Speaker 1>that's not even true, because no one really got upset

1:42:29.840 --> 1:42:31.360
<v Speaker 1>about her dance video. That was a lie. That was

1:42:31.400 --> 1:42:34.280
<v Speaker 1>fake news. There was I never saw a single person

1:42:34.320 --> 1:42:36.640
<v Speaker 1>who was upset about her having a dance video, but

1:42:36.720 --> 1:42:38.960
<v Speaker 1>the left created this all. Oh, they're just upset about

1:42:38.960 --> 1:42:41.760
<v Speaker 1>her video where she's dancing. Why would anyone be upset

1:42:41.800 --> 1:42:44.400
<v Speaker 1>about that? There's nothing people out to dance and have fun.

1:42:44.760 --> 1:42:46.800
<v Speaker 1>This is one thing I wish conservatives did a better

1:42:46.920 --> 1:42:52.680
<v Speaker 1>job of promoting, just as publicly as they can do

1:42:52.680 --> 1:42:54.880
<v Speaker 1>as many people as they can. Conservatives want people to

1:42:54.920 --> 1:42:57.240
<v Speaker 1>have fun. I want people to enjoy themselves. I want

1:42:57.240 --> 1:43:00.120
<v Speaker 1>them to enjoy their lives. I think joy is a

1:43:00.200 --> 1:43:04.519
<v Speaker 1>very important part of life, and you know, I'm all

1:43:04.560 --> 1:43:06.240
<v Speaker 1>for it. I like people to dance. I like people

1:43:06.240 --> 1:43:11.920
<v Speaker 1>to have fun, drink responsibly, eat delicious food, go out

1:43:12.880 --> 1:43:17.120
<v Speaker 1>see friends, you know, if you're not married, you know,

1:43:17.240 --> 1:43:20.960
<v Speaker 1>go out on dates, meet new people. You know. I'm

1:43:21.000 --> 1:43:23.840
<v Speaker 1>a big believer in all this. You know, the left

1:43:23.920 --> 1:43:27.240
<v Speaker 1>is able to get away with creating this, this perception

1:43:27.680 --> 1:43:30.960
<v Speaker 1>that conservatives don't like fun, don't want people to smile,

1:43:31.000 --> 1:43:32.759
<v Speaker 1>don't want people out the I don't think it's really true.

1:43:33.280 --> 1:43:35.680
<v Speaker 1>And one example of all this is that all the

1:43:35.960 --> 1:43:39.240
<v Speaker 1>or one example of how this is the perception doesn't

1:43:39.280 --> 1:43:44.640
<v Speaker 1>match up with the reality is that people who are conservatives,

1:43:44.800 --> 1:43:47.840
<v Speaker 1>and I believe this the statistic or the studies that

1:43:47.920 --> 1:43:51.920
<v Speaker 1>conservatives who are married enjoy sex more than people who

1:43:51.960 --> 1:43:54.560
<v Speaker 1>are not married. And it really makes a lot of

1:43:54.560 --> 1:43:56.200
<v Speaker 1>sense when you think about it. I mean, people that

1:43:56.280 --> 1:43:59.320
<v Speaker 1>are married are going to feel more comfortable, and that's

1:43:59.320 --> 1:44:00.840
<v Speaker 1>a very important part of it. There's going to be

1:44:00.920 --> 1:44:04.920
<v Speaker 1>much greater connection and appreciation between those individuals for what

1:44:04.960 --> 1:44:07.720
<v Speaker 1>they're doing. There's not the tremendous anxiety of like what

1:44:07.760 --> 1:44:10.000
<v Speaker 1>if this goes wrong or what if this person doesn't

1:44:10.000 --> 1:44:13.240
<v Speaker 1>call me, or any of those things. So conservatives in

1:44:13.280 --> 1:44:14.880
<v Speaker 1>a lot of ways do have more fun, and we

1:44:15.000 --> 1:44:18.320
<v Speaker 1>certainly have more fun in the realm of ideas. I

1:44:18.360 --> 1:44:21.360
<v Speaker 1>think that the funniest people I know now are all conservatives.

1:44:21.360 --> 1:44:24.360
<v Speaker 1>I mean, the people that are the most entertaining are

1:44:24.400 --> 1:44:26.439
<v Speaker 1>all the funniest people I know in life. This is

1:44:26.479 --> 1:44:28.680
<v Speaker 1>I've never really thought about this until now. All of

1:44:28.680 --> 1:44:31.599
<v Speaker 1>my funniest friends now are conservatives, none of them. None

1:44:31.640 --> 1:44:33.720
<v Speaker 1>of the funniest people I know are liberals. And I

1:44:34.040 --> 1:44:35.600
<v Speaker 1>and some of the people I know who would have

1:44:35.600 --> 1:44:39.400
<v Speaker 1>considered themselves liberal who are very funny are now pretty

1:44:39.479 --> 1:44:42.559
<v Speaker 1>much conservatives, And they've kind of switched over a little

1:44:42.600 --> 1:44:45.880
<v Speaker 1>bit because there's just been this change. If you're going

1:44:45.920 --> 1:44:48.680
<v Speaker 1>to be a little bit provocative, a little bit contrarian,

1:44:49.439 --> 1:44:53.920
<v Speaker 1>different in your thinking, willing to push some buttons, you're

1:44:53.960 --> 1:44:57.040
<v Speaker 1>going to be a conservative these days because the Libs,

1:44:57.040 --> 1:44:58.880
<v Speaker 1>they all they're all just repeating the same crap to

1:44:58.920 --> 1:45:03.000
<v Speaker 1>each other all the time, and it's all very disingenuous,

1:45:03.080 --> 1:45:05.960
<v Speaker 1>and it's it's not clever, it's not funny. It's really

1:45:05.960 --> 1:45:09.479
<v Speaker 1>often just quite nasty. So yeah, the funniest people I know,

1:45:09.960 --> 1:45:12.599
<v Speaker 1>I mean, the people that can make me laugh very

1:45:12.720 --> 1:45:15.040
<v Speaker 1>very hard, are my friends who are a right wing

1:45:15.880 --> 1:45:17.759
<v Speaker 1>And you know, I've got a great right wing posse.

1:45:17.920 --> 1:45:21.719
<v Speaker 1>So a lot of right wing, right wing, right wing

1:45:21.920 --> 1:45:24.599
<v Speaker 1>squad down here in DC is a lot of fun.

1:45:25.600 --> 1:45:30.439
<v Speaker 1>Let's see here. Gina hey Buck Opera. I love opera.

1:45:30.600 --> 1:45:33.360
<v Speaker 1>I love a wide variety of music, from Volbeat to

1:45:33.520 --> 1:45:37.599
<v Speaker 1>Fleetwood Mac to Counting Crows to def Leopard, But lately,

1:45:37.640 --> 1:45:40.439
<v Speaker 1>when I'm cooking or stressed, it's labo am. I love

1:45:40.640 --> 1:45:43.480
<v Speaker 1>this opera. My favorite version on YouTube is with Paparatti

1:45:43.560 --> 1:45:47.639
<v Speaker 1>the Full Opera. It's musically perfect, gets me from pasta

1:45:47.680 --> 1:45:50.840
<v Speaker 1>to parmesan at a salad, Dude brusqueta, brilliant and probably

1:45:50.840 --> 1:45:52.800
<v Speaker 1>designed that way. My next go to is Mozart the

1:45:52.880 --> 1:45:56.280
<v Speaker 1>Full Opera Requiem, darker but so moving, chow and as

1:45:56.280 --> 1:45:58.840
<v Speaker 1>always shields high. It's a nice one to end on today. Team,

1:45:58.880 --> 1:46:00.839
<v Speaker 1>thank you so much for hanging out with me. Always

1:46:00.880 --> 1:46:02.280
<v Speaker 1>great to be with you. The Freedom Hut Talk to

1:46:02.320 --> 1:46:03.679
<v Speaker 1>you tomorrow. She'll tie