WEBVTT - Harry Litman & Jeff Jarvis

0:00:00.720 --> 0:00:04.200
<v Speaker 1>Hi, I'm Molly John Fast and this is Fast Politics,

0:00:04.440 --> 0:00:07.200
<v Speaker 1>where we discussed the top political headlines with some of

0:00:07.240 --> 0:00:11.680
<v Speaker 1>today's best minds, and Donald Trump sent seven COVID tests

0:00:11.840 --> 0:00:16.520
<v Speaker 1>of Vladimir Putin in twenty twenty during the height of

0:00:16.600 --> 0:00:20.120
<v Speaker 1>the pandemic. We have such a great show for you today.

0:00:20.440 --> 0:00:24.600
<v Speaker 1>Talking Fed's host Harry Littman stops by to talk to

0:00:24.680 --> 0:00:29.840
<v Speaker 1>us about the latest of Trump's legal woes. Then we'll

0:00:29.840 --> 0:00:35.040
<v Speaker 1>talk to Professor Jeff Jarvis about his new book, The

0:00:35.080 --> 0:00:40.839
<v Speaker 1>Web we Weave, Why we must reclaim the Internet from moguls, misanthropes,

0:00:40.920 --> 0:00:42.239
<v Speaker 1>and moral panic.

0:00:42.440 --> 0:00:45.000
<v Speaker 2>But first the news.

0:00:45.400 --> 0:00:50.200
<v Speaker 3>Somali Bob Woodward been putting out blockbuster headlines for longer

0:00:50.200 --> 0:00:52.000
<v Speaker 3>than you and I have been alive. He's got some

0:00:52.040 --> 0:00:53.400
<v Speaker 3>more for us. What are you seeing here?

0:00:53.560 --> 0:00:57.680
<v Speaker 1>Bob Woodward back with another blockbuster book, filled with information

0:00:57.840 --> 0:01:01.600
<v Speaker 1>that might have been useful as a little bit earlier,

0:01:01.640 --> 0:01:04.560
<v Speaker 1>but we'll take it. I think that we saw the

0:01:04.959 --> 0:01:08.640
<v Speaker 1>COVID test, the Putin COVID test mailings came from that.

0:01:08.720 --> 0:01:14.560
<v Speaker 1>But also, perhaps even more bafflingly and importantly, Woodward recounts

0:01:14.560 --> 0:01:16.959
<v Speaker 1>a moment in mar Lago where Trump tells his senior

0:01:17.000 --> 0:01:19.119
<v Speaker 1>aide to leave the room so he can have a

0:01:19.160 --> 0:01:22.959
<v Speaker 1>private conversation. This is after he's left the presidency with

0:01:23.120 --> 0:01:27.560
<v Speaker 1>Vladimir Putin. According to Trump's aids, Trump and Putin have

0:01:27.720 --> 0:01:31.679
<v Speaker 1>talked on the phone multiple times and maybe as many

0:01:31.720 --> 0:01:35.240
<v Speaker 1>as seven calls during the period since he's been president.

0:01:35.600 --> 0:01:39.639
<v Speaker 1>Woodward even went so far as to ask Chason Miller

0:01:39.720 --> 0:01:43.520
<v Speaker 1>whether Trump and Putin had spoken after he left the

0:01:43.560 --> 0:01:48.880
<v Speaker 1>White House. Chason Miller came shot back with the very definitive.

0:01:48.480 --> 0:01:51.880
<v Speaker 2>Um, uh not that, uh not that I'm aware of.

0:01:52.120 --> 0:01:58.480
<v Speaker 1>Miller told Bob Woodward, expect more of these shocking revelations.

0:01:58.960 --> 0:02:01.680
<v Speaker 3>Smile as we learn this week. Trump didn't want to

0:02:01.680 --> 0:02:04.360
<v Speaker 3>do sixteen Minutes because they would fact check him, so

0:02:04.400 --> 0:02:07.320
<v Speaker 3>he went to the warm arms of Fox News is

0:02:07.360 --> 0:02:09.720
<v Speaker 3>Laura Ingram, who then fact checked him.

0:02:09.880 --> 0:02:12.800
<v Speaker 1>We were talking before this about the Trump fact check

0:02:12.880 --> 0:02:15.080
<v Speaker 1>and putting it in the news section, and you said

0:02:15.080 --> 0:02:17.680
<v Speaker 1>that was Laura Ingram and I said, no, that can't

0:02:17.720 --> 0:02:21.600
<v Speaker 1>be right. I said it cannot have been that Laura

0:02:21.960 --> 0:02:24.280
<v Speaker 1>Ingram fact checked Donald Trump.

0:02:24.600 --> 0:02:26.760
<v Speaker 3>The funny thing is I had done this before because

0:02:26.840 --> 0:02:29.079
<v Speaker 3>I didn't believe it. The only reason I was confident

0:02:29.160 --> 0:02:31.200
<v Speaker 3>about is because I'd already fact checked.

0:02:30.919 --> 0:02:31.639
<v Speaker 2>This, right.

0:02:32.000 --> 0:02:35.119
<v Speaker 1>I went online and I said, oh my god, I'm shocked.

0:02:35.280 --> 0:02:39.000
<v Speaker 1>So imagine the level of lying that has to happen

0:02:39.160 --> 0:02:43.000
<v Speaker 1>for Laura Ingram to interject. Donald Trump was musing about

0:02:43.040 --> 0:02:46.480
<v Speaker 1>how Vice President Harris was not where she should have

0:02:46.600 --> 0:02:51.639
<v Speaker 1>been in North Carolina visiting people who had been ravaged

0:02:51.680 --> 0:02:55.280
<v Speaker 1>by this most recent hurricane, not the hurricane that is coming,

0:02:55.680 --> 0:03:00.000
<v Speaker 1>and Laura interjected, she was there today for three hours,

0:03:00.360 --> 0:03:05.560
<v Speaker 1>I believe. Now, I would love to know what producers

0:03:05.600 --> 0:03:09.880
<v Speaker 1>were saying in her ear and what the thinking was

0:03:10.040 --> 0:03:15.399
<v Speaker 1>where they actually interrupted Trump lying to fact check.

0:03:15.440 --> 0:03:19.040
<v Speaker 2>But whatever it was, whoe whoa whoa.

0:03:19.480 --> 0:03:22.000
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I was not in the sea of disinformation that

0:03:22.080 --> 0:03:23.880
<v Speaker 3>I think a lot of us have been very shocked

0:03:23.919 --> 0:03:27.399
<v Speaker 3>about how much disinformation has come out around this hurricane.

0:03:27.600 --> 0:03:30.560
<v Speaker 3>I did not expect Laura Ingram to be a beacon of.

0:03:30.480 --> 0:03:35.800
<v Speaker 1>Hope speaking of disinformation. Oh yes, it gets us right

0:03:35.880 --> 0:03:39.240
<v Speaker 1>to our next thing in news, Well, what.

0:03:39.160 --> 0:03:41.960
<v Speaker 3>Would you expect to happen when Elon Musk sits down

0:03:41.960 --> 0:03:44.120
<v Speaker 3>with Tucker Carlson for his podcast.

0:03:44.320 --> 0:03:49.480
<v Speaker 1>Elon Musk son of Pennsylvania because he went to University

0:03:49.520 --> 0:03:52.720
<v Speaker 1>of Pennsylvania for three years and is now saying that

0:03:52.760 --> 0:03:55.800
<v Speaker 1>he actually lived in Pennsylvania. By the way, I love

0:03:55.880 --> 0:03:59.600
<v Speaker 1>the idea that the right is claiming to be the

0:03:59.640 --> 0:04:03.720
<v Speaker 1>party of the working man while having a Trump surrogate

0:04:03.760 --> 0:04:09.160
<v Speaker 1>who is a nefarious South African billionaire whose only contact

0:04:09.280 --> 0:04:11.360
<v Speaker 1>was the state was the three years he went to

0:04:11.400 --> 0:04:15.960
<v Speaker 1>an Ivy League college there. Okay, sure, but this is

0:04:16.000 --> 0:04:18.880
<v Speaker 1>not actually why he's on the news cycle today. He

0:04:19.360 --> 0:04:24.880
<v Speaker 1>and you may remember Tucker Carlson, America's favorite frozen Fish Air,

0:04:25.279 --> 0:04:28.000
<v Speaker 1>did a little video together where they're like sitting in

0:04:28.080 --> 0:04:32.400
<v Speaker 1>space being served by a woman, which is like looks

0:04:32.440 --> 0:04:36.200
<v Speaker 1>sort of like they're in some kind of afterlife simulation.

0:04:36.680 --> 0:04:40.320
<v Speaker 3>I saw this as the anti Charlie Rose space right.

0:04:40.240 --> 0:04:44.520
<v Speaker 2>A white box, a female assistant.

0:04:44.160 --> 0:04:46.680
<v Speaker 3>Make it the White Power Hour, have its own aesthetic.

0:04:47.000 --> 0:04:51.440
<v Speaker 1>They were joking because that's what these two humorous fellows do,

0:04:51.600 --> 0:04:55.479
<v Speaker 1>and they were joking about killing the president and the

0:04:55.560 --> 0:05:00.000
<v Speaker 1>Vice president. Elon Musk sits atop of tons and tons

0:05:00.080 --> 0:05:03.880
<v Speaker 1>of government contracts. He's a contractor. In fact, he has

0:05:04.240 --> 0:05:09.240
<v Speaker 1>security clearances, numerous ones. He is working on things that

0:05:09.279 --> 0:05:11.760
<v Speaker 1>are being paid for by the federal government right now,

0:05:12.120 --> 0:05:15.400
<v Speaker 1>and he is joking about why no one has tried

0:05:15.440 --> 0:05:20.839
<v Speaker 1>to kill Joe Biden. Musk ads it's pointless, and then

0:05:20.960 --> 0:05:25.120
<v Speaker 1>Carlson Fozen Fish Air to the Stars replies, totally.

0:05:25.240 --> 0:05:28.920
<v Speaker 3>He actually said that's deep and true though, about them

0:05:28.920 --> 0:05:32.080
<v Speaker 3>putting it a puppet, which really he's hit rock bottom,

0:05:32.120 --> 0:05:34.880
<v Speaker 3>even lower than his Fox show about just aggregating the

0:05:34.920 --> 0:05:38.880
<v Speaker 3>most unhingish conspiracy theories. Just Alex Jones, shit.

0:05:39.000 --> 0:05:42.200
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I also think that it's just sort of beyond

0:05:42.200 --> 0:05:47.000
<v Speaker 1>the pale and just as shocking as one could guess,

0:05:47.279 --> 0:05:50.279
<v Speaker 1>and one could expect it's even worse. So here we

0:05:50.360 --> 0:05:53.559
<v Speaker 1>have two bits of news that make actually Fox seem

0:05:53.640 --> 0:05:56.320
<v Speaker 1>better than elon a pretty low bar.

0:05:56.640 --> 0:05:59.600
<v Speaker 3>I'll say, well, let's take the bar even lower. We're

0:05:59.600 --> 0:06:01.000
<v Speaker 3>going to go a place where we should have a

0:06:01.080 --> 0:06:03.680
<v Speaker 3>very high bar, which is the Supreme Court. And there's

0:06:03.800 --> 0:06:08.200
<v Speaker 3>new news about how Justice Brett Kegstan Kavanaugh got confirmed.

0:06:08.600 --> 0:06:15.560
<v Speaker 1>Yes, yes, yes, you'll remember Justice Kavanaugh. Keggstand September twenty eighteen,

0:06:15.640 --> 0:06:19.599
<v Speaker 1>and Donald Trump says that the FBI would have free

0:06:19.640 --> 0:06:24.200
<v Speaker 1>reign to vet the claims that he had sexually harassed

0:06:24.240 --> 0:06:27.919
<v Speaker 1>and assaulted women in college. Trump said the FBI was

0:06:27.960 --> 0:06:30.480
<v Speaker 1>free to talk to everyone he had it on social media.

0:06:30.560 --> 0:06:33.440
<v Speaker 1>I want them to interview whoever they deem appropriate at

0:06:33.440 --> 0:06:35.880
<v Speaker 1>their discretion. Well, guess what, I know you're going to

0:06:35.960 --> 0:06:38.360
<v Speaker 1>be shocked to hear this. But Donald Trump was lying

0:06:39.080 --> 0:06:42.600
<v Speaker 1>and those comments came as a surprise the FBI, who,

0:06:42.640 --> 0:06:46.040
<v Speaker 1>according to a new report, which would not have been

0:06:46.560 --> 0:06:49.960
<v Speaker 1>released had it not been for a friend of this podcast,

0:06:50.080 --> 0:06:56.800
<v Speaker 1>Senator Sheldon white House, actually requested the directed them to

0:06:56.880 --> 0:07:00.680
<v Speaker 1>conduct a very limited inquiry in a week's time, requested

0:07:00.760 --> 0:07:04.000
<v Speaker 1>additional guidance from the White House, citing public remarks by

0:07:04.000 --> 0:07:08.400
<v Speaker 1>Trump and other officials describing a free, willing investigation. But

0:07:08.440 --> 0:07:11.880
<v Speaker 1>the White House never authorized the agency to independently probe

0:07:11.880 --> 0:07:17.680
<v Speaker 1>these sexual misconduct allegations. So Justice Kavanaugh just got pushed

0:07:17.720 --> 0:07:21.240
<v Speaker 1>in there without the formal vetting that he should have gotten.

0:07:21.360 --> 0:07:23.600
<v Speaker 2>Why are none of us surprised?

0:07:28.040 --> 0:07:30.760
<v Speaker 3>We have even more tour dates for you. Did you

0:07:30.800 --> 0:07:33.320
<v Speaker 3>know the Lincoln Projects, Rick Wilson have Fast Politics. Male

0:07:33.440 --> 0:07:35.480
<v Speaker 3>jug Fast are heading out on tour to bring you

0:07:35.880 --> 0:07:38.920
<v Speaker 3>a night of laughs for our dark political landscape. Join

0:07:39.000 --> 0:07:41.080
<v Speaker 3>us on August twenty sixth at San Francisco at the

0:07:41.080 --> 0:07:44.400
<v Speaker 3>Swedish American Hall, or in La on August twenty seventh

0:07:44.400 --> 0:07:47.000
<v Speaker 3>at the Regent Theater. Then we're headed to the Midwest.

0:07:47.280 --> 0:07:49.640
<v Speaker 3>We'll be at the Bavariam in Milwaukee on the twenty

0:07:49.680 --> 0:07:52.240
<v Speaker 3>first of September, and on the twenty second, we'll be

0:07:52.280 --> 0:07:54.480
<v Speaker 3>in Chicago at City Winery. Then we're going to hit

0:07:54.520 --> 0:07:57.200
<v Speaker 3>the East coast on September thirtieth. We'll be in Boston

0:07:57.240 --> 0:07:59.520
<v Speaker 3>that arts at the Armory. On the first of October,

0:07:59.600 --> 0:08:02.280
<v Speaker 3>will be in affiliate City Winery, and then DC on

0:08:02.320 --> 0:08:04.600
<v Speaker 3>the second at the Miracle Theater. And today we just

0:08:04.640 --> 0:08:06.680
<v Speaker 3>announced that we'll be in New York on the fourteenth

0:08:06.680 --> 0:08:09.600
<v Speaker 3>of October at Citywinery. If you need to laugh as

0:08:09.600 --> 0:08:12.160
<v Speaker 3>we get through this election and hopefully never hear from

0:08:12.200 --> 0:08:14.240
<v Speaker 3>a guy who lives in a golf club again, we

0:08:14.360 --> 0:08:16.880
<v Speaker 3>got you covered. Join us in our surprise guests to

0:08:16.880 --> 0:08:18.720
<v Speaker 3>help you laugh instead of cry your way through this

0:08:18.800 --> 0:08:21.640
<v Speaker 3>election season and give you the inside analysis of what's

0:08:21.680 --> 0:08:24.280
<v Speaker 3>really going on right now. Buy your tickets now by

0:08:24.280 --> 0:08:28.520
<v Speaker 3>heading to Politics as Unusual dot bio. That's Politics as

0:08:28.720 --> 0:08:30.320
<v Speaker 3>Unusual dot bio.

0:08:32.040 --> 0:08:35.040
<v Speaker 1>Harry Littman is a former US attorney and host of

0:08:35.080 --> 0:08:37.640
<v Speaker 1>the podcast Talking Fans.

0:08:37.440 --> 0:08:41.719
<v Speaker 4>Oh Yes, Oh Yes, Oh Yes, it's our latest Molly mashup.

0:08:42.120 --> 0:08:45.280
<v Speaker 4>Really so happy to be joined by Mollie john Fast

0:08:45.320 --> 0:08:49.200
<v Speaker 4>and are now I can't even count them. Regular gigs

0:08:49.240 --> 0:08:55.280
<v Speaker 4>of exchanging political questions that I feeled I throw at

0:08:55.320 --> 0:08:59.280
<v Speaker 4>Molly and legal questions she throws back in me. Thanks

0:08:59.320 --> 0:09:00.960
<v Speaker 4>as always? Should I start?

0:09:01.320 --> 0:09:02.120
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, all right.

0:09:02.280 --> 0:09:05.680
<v Speaker 4>I don't normally go international, I don't normally go Jewish,

0:09:05.920 --> 0:09:10.000
<v Speaker 4>but yesterday was the one year anniversary of the slaughter

0:09:10.760 --> 0:09:15.720
<v Speaker 4>in Israel, and of course we're between Russia, shot and Yankipoor.

0:09:15.880 --> 0:09:18.280
<v Speaker 4>So I just wanted to ask you, Mollie. You had

0:09:18.320 --> 0:09:22.320
<v Speaker 4>an article in Vanity Fair about what you called Trump's

0:09:22.440 --> 0:09:27.040
<v Speaker 4>efforts to divide American Jews? What inspired you to write

0:09:27.040 --> 0:09:30.920
<v Speaker 4>the article and why now? And a quick follow up

0:09:31.120 --> 0:09:33.320
<v Speaker 4>is what do you make of this claim that a

0:09:33.360 --> 0:09:36.120
<v Speaker 4>lot of American Jews buy that Trump is, in fact,

0:09:36.160 --> 0:09:38.800
<v Speaker 4>whatever else, he may be better for Israel?

0:09:39.120 --> 0:09:42.000
<v Speaker 1>So, yeah, thank you for that question. I did write

0:09:42.040 --> 0:09:44.400
<v Speaker 1>about that. I completely forgot I wrote about it, which

0:09:44.480 --> 0:09:47.880
<v Speaker 1>is such a great moment to be in. I do

0:09:47.960 --> 0:09:50.480
<v Speaker 1>think that this has been a long time thing where

0:09:50.480 --> 0:09:53.320
<v Speaker 1>the right tells the laugh that they can't be good

0:09:53.400 --> 0:09:57.679
<v Speaker 1>Jews because they should be more loyal to Israel.

0:09:58.000 --> 0:10:00.480
<v Speaker 2>This is yet another moment where everything is weird.

0:10:00.559 --> 0:10:00.719
<v Speaker 4>Right.

0:10:00.840 --> 0:10:04.319
<v Speaker 1>During that speech, which was about quote unquote fighting anti Semitism,

0:10:04.520 --> 0:10:08.720
<v Speaker 1>Trump talked about how Jews are actually more loyal to

0:10:08.800 --> 0:10:11.160
<v Speaker 1>Israel than they are to the United States, and so

0:10:11.200 --> 0:10:14.079
<v Speaker 1>they should vote for him because he really likes Israel,

0:10:14.400 --> 0:10:17.240
<v Speaker 1>which is of course an anti Semitic trope, right, the

0:10:17.320 --> 0:10:20.040
<v Speaker 1>idea that Jews cannot be loyal to the country that

0:10:20.120 --> 0:10:22.720
<v Speaker 1>they come from. I don't know, you know, my grandparents

0:10:22.760 --> 0:10:25.200
<v Speaker 1>were all born in this country, so we've been here

0:10:25.280 --> 0:10:26.400
<v Speaker 1>many generations.

0:10:26.559 --> 0:10:27.800
<v Speaker 2>I've never been to Israel.

0:10:28.160 --> 0:10:31.880
<v Speaker 1>I think that the reality of my Jewishness does not

0:10:32.320 --> 0:10:37.320
<v Speaker 1>define how I feel about politics, and the idea that

0:10:37.440 --> 0:10:42.480
<v Speaker 1>another country should take president over my feeling towards America

0:10:42.640 --> 0:10:43.360
<v Speaker 1>is wild.

0:10:43.760 --> 0:10:45.240
<v Speaker 2>So, but it's a long time thing.

0:10:45.280 --> 0:10:48.320
<v Speaker 1>And it's funny because it's like my grandfather, who was

0:10:48.760 --> 0:10:52.599
<v Speaker 1>a Communist writer or jailed for the House of American Activities,

0:10:52.920 --> 0:10:55.720
<v Speaker 1>would often fight with these conservative Jews.

0:10:55.760 --> 0:10:59.880
<v Speaker 2>And he was a Zionist as anyone, right, because he

0:11:00.000 --> 0:11:02.160
<v Speaker 2>he really I mean, he had lived.

0:11:01.920 --> 0:11:04.400
<v Speaker 1>Through the Holocaust and he had I mean, he had

0:11:04.440 --> 0:11:06.959
<v Speaker 1>been in the United States, obviously, but yet he had

0:11:06.960 --> 0:11:10.520
<v Speaker 1>worked for the United States government during World War Two,

0:11:10.840 --> 0:11:14.200
<v Speaker 1>and he was as committed a patriot as anyone, but

0:11:14.280 --> 0:11:18.200
<v Speaker 1>he understood the importance of a Jewish homeland after the

0:11:18.520 --> 0:11:20.360
<v Speaker 1>you know, the slaughterer of so many Jews.

0:11:20.360 --> 0:11:23.680
<v Speaker 2>But he also really did fight.

0:11:23.520 --> 0:11:26.920
<v Speaker 1>It out with those right wingers who called liberal je

0:11:27.000 --> 0:11:29.320
<v Speaker 1>just disloyal. I mean, it's just an argument that the

0:11:29.520 --> 0:11:31.559
<v Speaker 1>right has been using against the left for a very,

0:11:31.640 --> 0:11:34.400
<v Speaker 1>very long time, and I just wanted to write about

0:11:34.400 --> 0:11:34.920
<v Speaker 1>it a little bit.

0:11:35.320 --> 0:11:35.640
<v Speaker 3>Got it.

0:11:35.960 --> 0:11:38.160
<v Speaker 4>I'll just say quickly, all right, what Trump has said

0:11:38.160 --> 0:11:40.520
<v Speaker 4>about October seventh, if he had been president, it wouldn't

0:11:40.520 --> 0:11:42.400
<v Speaker 4>have happened. You know, it's not at all clear to

0:11:42.440 --> 0:11:43.840
<v Speaker 4>me that he's the better candidate.

0:11:43.880 --> 0:11:46.640
<v Speaker 1>But anyway, he's certainly not the better candidate for Israel,

0:11:46.760 --> 0:11:50.040
<v Speaker 1>and the idea that net Yahoo is the best president

0:11:50.160 --> 0:11:53.600
<v Speaker 1>for Israel also is something that many of the Israeli

0:11:53.640 --> 0:11:56.679
<v Speaker 1>people would disagree with. So my question for you is

0:11:57.120 --> 0:12:00.000
<v Speaker 1>it seems like all of the Trump prosecutions are stalled.

0:12:00.559 --> 0:12:03.040
<v Speaker 2>Is that correct? And how is this.

0:12:03.200 --> 0:12:06.080
<v Speaker 1>Possible that this guy who has you know, he's out

0:12:06.120 --> 0:12:08.480
<v Speaker 1>on bail, he's you know, Judge Cannon.

0:12:08.600 --> 0:12:10.640
<v Speaker 2>I mean, where are we with all these Trump cases?

0:12:10.960 --> 0:12:11.440
<v Speaker 5>Yeah.

0:12:11.480 --> 0:12:14.240
<v Speaker 4>So the short answer is yes with two asterisks. But

0:12:14.320 --> 0:12:17.480
<v Speaker 4>you know, we were fighting the clock and we've lost.

0:12:17.600 --> 0:12:20.640
<v Speaker 4>You know, there was such a thirst for accountability in

0:12:20.679 --> 0:12:24.200
<v Speaker 4>the manner in the guise of an actual trial, and

0:12:24.280 --> 0:12:26.439
<v Speaker 4>apart from New York, which I'll get to in a moment,

0:12:26.520 --> 0:12:29.840
<v Speaker 4>it hasn't happened. He's been able largely to forestall it.

0:12:30.280 --> 0:12:33.240
<v Speaker 4>And now we're at a point where if it happens,

0:12:33.640 --> 0:12:36.439
<v Speaker 4>it'll be after the election. If he wins, the two

0:12:36.520 --> 0:12:40.200
<v Speaker 4>federal ones go away automatically, and the state ones, I

0:12:40.320 --> 0:12:44.079
<v Speaker 4>think will in one fashion another be smothered or at

0:12:44.200 --> 0:12:47.800
<v Speaker 4>least delayed. On the other hand, if he loses, justice

0:12:47.880 --> 0:12:51.520
<v Speaker 4>will grind on. The two asterisks I wanted to note,

0:12:51.559 --> 0:12:55.480
<v Speaker 4>Molly are first, he's gonna be sentenced in New York,

0:12:55.520 --> 0:13:00.080
<v Speaker 4>and people are just wondering will he be after the election,

0:13:00.120 --> 0:13:04.040
<v Speaker 4>And we'll have a short incarceratory penalty. Maybe after the election,

0:13:04.120 --> 0:13:06.680
<v Speaker 4>maybe not, but it won't be a short incarceratory penalty.

0:13:07.080 --> 0:13:09.520
<v Speaker 4>But if you've had friends, and I'm not saying you

0:13:09.600 --> 0:13:13.600
<v Speaker 4>have who are subject to probation and parole, that's a

0:13:13.640 --> 0:13:18.079
<v Speaker 4>fairly pronounced deprivation of liberty. And I think that itself

0:13:18.160 --> 0:13:20.960
<v Speaker 4>gives the court a measure of control over him, so

0:13:21.000 --> 0:13:23.800
<v Speaker 4>he's in the clutches of the criminal justice system in

0:13:23.840 --> 0:13:24.520
<v Speaker 4>some ways.

0:13:24.600 --> 0:13:27.160
<v Speaker 2>In the long run, I mean, he's basically gotten away

0:13:27.200 --> 0:13:28.480
<v Speaker 2>with it so far.

0:13:28.559 --> 0:13:31.440
<v Speaker 4>I think that's right. It'll all come down to the

0:13:31.480 --> 0:13:36.000
<v Speaker 4>reckoning will be after One big exception that's been interesting

0:13:36.240 --> 0:13:39.760
<v Speaker 4>is everyone wanted the trial in the Jack Smith case.

0:13:39.840 --> 0:13:43.199
<v Speaker 4>The Supreme Court snatched it away. Then the mini trial,

0:13:43.240 --> 0:13:45.800
<v Speaker 4>which I just didn't think was feasible, but he came

0:13:45.840 --> 0:13:48.680
<v Speaker 4>out with a long brief that lays it out in

0:13:48.800 --> 0:13:51.440
<v Speaker 4>chapter and verse. So to the extent people wanted it

0:13:51.640 --> 0:13:55.080
<v Speaker 4>exposed to the American people as it was in January sixth,

0:13:55.400 --> 0:13:57.560
<v Speaker 4>it's done that, and there's a lot of bombshells, but

0:13:57.600 --> 0:14:01.840
<v Speaker 4>it really goes back to you political because it looks

0:14:01.880 --> 0:14:05.160
<v Speaker 4>to me like it hasn't had quite a seismic effect,

0:14:05.480 --> 0:14:08.240
<v Speaker 4>and it's not, you know, the big October surprise people

0:14:08.320 --> 0:14:11.440
<v Speaker 4>might might have wanted, notwithstanding that we have it all

0:14:11.520 --> 0:14:14.960
<v Speaker 4>laid out. But somehow even all these extra details you

0:14:15.040 --> 0:14:17.320
<v Speaker 4>would know better, but seem kind of baked into the

0:14:17.360 --> 0:14:18.440
<v Speaker 4>politics of things.

0:14:18.679 --> 0:14:22.760
<v Speaker 1>I mean, it's sort of got a perfunctory news coverage,

0:14:22.840 --> 0:14:27.400
<v Speaker 1>but largely just didn't capture the imagination of the public

0:14:27.440 --> 0:14:27.880
<v Speaker 1>at all.

0:14:28.160 --> 0:14:29.880
<v Speaker 4>It seems to me that's right. I mean, when he

0:14:29.960 --> 0:14:32.440
<v Speaker 4>was convicted in New York, the polls kind of went

0:14:32.520 --> 0:14:35.080
<v Speaker 4>down for him, and there are this is going to

0:14:35.120 --> 0:14:37.680
<v Speaker 4>give rise to some other details. I just had a

0:14:37.720 --> 0:14:42.240
<v Speaker 4>long YouTube with Marcy Wheeler. There's more stuff to mine there.

0:14:42.560 --> 0:14:45.560
<v Speaker 4>But it just it hasn't been the huge thing that

0:14:45.600 --> 0:14:47.320
<v Speaker 4>people were asking for.

0:14:47.640 --> 0:14:50.440
<v Speaker 2>So does this mean the law has not.

0:14:51.000 --> 0:14:53.440
<v Speaker 4>Just means they haven't done the job that people wanted

0:14:53.480 --> 0:14:55.440
<v Speaker 4>them to do, but it's really not the law's job

0:14:55.520 --> 0:14:59.120
<v Speaker 4>to do by this certain point, by the election. It

0:14:59.240 --> 0:15:01.440
<v Speaker 4>means it's up to the people to decide.

0:15:01.720 --> 0:15:03.920
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, But I mean I understand that.

0:15:04.080 --> 0:15:07.840
<v Speaker 1>But don't you think that ultimately, if you do a

0:15:07.840 --> 0:15:11.200
<v Speaker 1>lot of crimes when you're president, that the law should

0:15:11.400 --> 0:15:15.160
<v Speaker 1>hold you accountable. Yes, naked, so you can run for

0:15:15.200 --> 0:15:16.880
<v Speaker 1>a president again, hot take.

0:15:17.080 --> 0:15:19.960
<v Speaker 4>The Constitution says so as well, especially if it's a

0:15:20.000 --> 0:15:22.360
<v Speaker 4>certain kind of crime like swearing an oath to the

0:15:22.480 --> 0:15:25.400
<v Speaker 4>United States and then mounting an insurrection. We're in a

0:15:25.520 --> 0:15:28.920
<v Speaker 4>very funky spot. That's a much longer conversation. And look

0:15:28.960 --> 0:15:31.960
<v Speaker 4>to the US Supreme Court, which just started its term yesterday,

0:15:32.000 --> 0:15:35.280
<v Speaker 4>But yes I do. On the other hand, if he loses,

0:15:35.360 --> 0:15:38.640
<v Speaker 4>he is by no means out of the woods, right.

0:15:38.680 --> 0:15:40.760
<v Speaker 2>Only if he loses. If he wins.

0:15:41.560 --> 0:15:43.800
<v Speaker 4>If he wins, all that's left I think is some

0:15:43.880 --> 0:15:46.760
<v Speaker 4>of the state stuff and you know New York, which

0:15:46.800 --> 0:15:49.640
<v Speaker 4>has already happened, and I think the Supreme Court would

0:15:49.640 --> 0:15:53.000
<v Speaker 4>put that on hold. If he wins. His big roll

0:15:53.040 --> 0:15:56.840
<v Speaker 4>of the dice has succeeded if he wins, and people,

0:15:56.880 --> 0:15:59.440
<v Speaker 4>of course will decide what president they want without the

0:15:59.560 --> 0:16:04.480
<v Speaker 4>nawledg of you know, whether he's convicted on multiple cases.

0:16:04.640 --> 0:16:08.560
<v Speaker 4>All right. Kama Harris has been fielding all these criticisms,

0:16:08.640 --> 0:16:13.240
<v Speaker 4>but mainly from elite commentariats, guys like us and the

0:16:13.360 --> 0:16:16.240
<v Speaker 4>right wing, which it seems to me, is flailing to

0:16:16.280 --> 0:16:19.000
<v Speaker 4>try to get at her that she's got to be

0:16:19.080 --> 0:16:22.960
<v Speaker 4>more open to the media and she's now begun to

0:16:23.040 --> 0:16:25.200
<v Speaker 4>do it. She's going to do another sixty minutes. But

0:16:25.320 --> 0:16:27.480
<v Speaker 4>is that right? We're down to three weeks. Does it

0:16:27.600 --> 0:16:32.040
<v Speaker 4>really matter that she exposed herself to unscripted interviews and

0:16:32.160 --> 0:16:35.800
<v Speaker 4>possibly make a gaff or should she just like forget

0:16:35.840 --> 0:16:38.240
<v Speaker 4>this and pedal to the metal and what she's doing

0:16:38.320 --> 0:16:39.840
<v Speaker 4>with rally after rally.

0:16:40.120 --> 0:16:42.720
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I think she should just do rallies and call

0:16:42.760 --> 0:16:47.200
<v Speaker 1>her Daddy and the haunt ones and whatever else she

0:16:47.320 --> 0:16:50.640
<v Speaker 1>wants to do and ignore. I mean, this is interesting

0:16:50.840 --> 0:16:53.640
<v Speaker 1>in the fact that it shows that the mainstream media

0:16:53.720 --> 0:16:59.480
<v Speaker 1>no longer matters. There are people who are fancy pundans

0:16:59.520 --> 0:17:02.600
<v Speaker 1>who care about her doing sixty minutes, but she doesn't

0:17:02.640 --> 0:17:05.080
<v Speaker 1>need to do sixty minutes. Like in fact, there was

0:17:05.160 --> 0:17:07.919
<v Speaker 1>some statistic that if you read the newspaper, you're like

0:17:08.400 --> 0:17:11.120
<v Speaker 1>significantly more likely to vote for Harris, right, if.

0:17:11.040 --> 0:17:12.399
<v Speaker 2>You can even read right.

0:17:12.800 --> 0:17:17.840
<v Speaker 1>So obviously this is the thing about like false equivalencies.

0:17:18.320 --> 0:17:25.240
<v Speaker 1>She cannot make people not push her for comments, right,

0:17:25.800 --> 0:17:29.679
<v Speaker 1>She cannot make people push her for policy. Trump's policy

0:17:29.840 --> 0:17:33.159
<v Speaker 1>is childcare is childcare, and he's going to fix the

0:17:33.280 --> 0:17:37.320
<v Speaker 1>price of housing by deporting millions and millions of people

0:17:37.640 --> 0:17:40.720
<v Speaker 1>wait till he has to build camps to concentrate them in.

0:17:41.200 --> 0:17:45.680
<v Speaker 1>I mean, it's just a like completely on an even

0:17:45.840 --> 0:17:49.320
<v Speaker 1>sense in which these two people are being compared. And

0:17:49.400 --> 0:17:52.600
<v Speaker 1>what Harris should do, I think is just ignore it.

0:17:53.040 --> 0:17:56.399
<v Speaker 1>Do whatever the fuck she wants be out there, like

0:17:56.640 --> 0:18:00.719
<v Speaker 1>doing realies, doing talks, doing whatever. But you know, she

0:18:00.760 --> 0:18:04.120
<v Speaker 1>doesn't like those interviews where they press her and who cares?

0:18:04.440 --> 0:18:07.080
<v Speaker 1>And by the way, like, I think that what is

0:18:07.160 --> 0:18:10.119
<v Speaker 1>irritating the mainstream media is they think it's about her hiding,

0:18:10.200 --> 0:18:13.080
<v Speaker 1>but I think the reality is it's about the diminished

0:18:13.119 --> 0:18:17.160
<v Speaker 1>state of the mainstream media. Like, editorial endorsements don't move

0:18:17.200 --> 0:18:21.879
<v Speaker 1>the needle anymore, editorial board endorsements don't change people's minds.

0:18:22.040 --> 0:18:22.640
<v Speaker 2>Sitting for a.

0:18:22.600 --> 0:18:25.399
<v Speaker 1>Long interview with the journalists for the New York Times

0:18:25.480 --> 0:18:27.560
<v Speaker 1>might be great for you or me, but it's not

0:18:27.560 --> 0:18:28.680
<v Speaker 1>going to do anything for her.

0:18:28.880 --> 0:18:31.280
<v Speaker 4>And the question is always what vote is she going

0:18:31.359 --> 0:18:33.520
<v Speaker 4>to get? That she wouldn't have any way by doing

0:18:33.560 --> 0:18:34.679
<v Speaker 4>sixteen minutes right.

0:18:34.800 --> 0:18:38.080
<v Speaker 1>Right and the call her daddy vote. Those are women

0:18:38.400 --> 0:18:41.600
<v Speaker 1>that she really needs to win a lot of independence,

0:18:41.720 --> 0:18:44.920
<v Speaker 1>a lot of Republicans, and they need to care about

0:18:44.920 --> 0:18:48.199
<v Speaker 1>their reproductive health care. I think that's very smart. I

0:18:48.200 --> 0:18:51.600
<v Speaker 1>think that was really a hole in one. I think

0:18:51.640 --> 0:18:55.760
<v Speaker 1>Walls should go on Joe Rogan one hundred percent. Put

0:18:55.880 --> 0:18:59.639
<v Speaker 1>Walls on Joe Rogan. Do it because he Walls is

0:18:59.640 --> 0:19:02.639
<v Speaker 1>a great candidate. Put him on Joe Rogan. That's my take.

0:19:02.880 --> 0:19:04.480
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I saw him just a couple of days ago,

0:19:04.760 --> 0:19:06.480
<v Speaker 4>he's really winning. Okay, your turn.

0:19:06.760 --> 0:19:10.040
<v Speaker 1>I just read some reporting today that the Supreme Court

0:19:10.440 --> 0:19:16.480
<v Speaker 1>that Roberts, who loves to like say bullshit, was upset

0:19:16.560 --> 0:19:19.880
<v Speaker 1>by the pushback he got on the Trump is immune

0:19:19.920 --> 0:19:22.120
<v Speaker 1>forever and ever and he is a god king. Make

0:19:22.200 --> 0:19:24.560
<v Speaker 1>it make sense and also tell me what you think

0:19:24.640 --> 0:19:25.400
<v Speaker 1>might happen here.

0:19:25.840 --> 0:19:29.639
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, Roberts, So first, you know he's wanted to be

0:19:29.800 --> 0:19:33.160
<v Speaker 4>mister statesman. But the big story I would say last year,

0:19:33.240 --> 0:19:36.119
<v Speaker 4>Mollie is it was latent all the time, which is

0:19:36.160 --> 0:19:38.720
<v Speaker 4>when the chips are down, and by that I mean

0:19:39.160 --> 0:19:44.040
<v Speaker 4>for the Republican Party. No, mister statesman. Really, he's in

0:19:44.280 --> 0:19:48.000
<v Speaker 4>lockstep now. He wrote, you know, he's within the cocoon

0:19:48.040 --> 0:19:51.000
<v Speaker 4>of the Supreme Court, and he wrote an opinion that

0:19:51.119 --> 0:19:56.040
<v Speaker 4>he actually saw as being somewhat tempered. Had to go

0:19:56.119 --> 0:20:00.520
<v Speaker 4>a little bit right to get Alito in talk and

0:20:00.520 --> 0:20:04.399
<v Speaker 4>maybe Gorse it's not to right separately, but you know,

0:20:04.920 --> 0:20:08.159
<v Speaker 4>we had this really remarkable I know it doesn't seem

0:20:08.200 --> 0:20:10.199
<v Speaker 4>so astonishing if you haven't been in the court, but

0:20:10.320 --> 0:20:13.320
<v Speaker 4>having corked there, the leak of that memo where he

0:20:13.680 --> 0:20:17.919
<v Speaker 4>just is scathing towards the DC Circuit is you know,

0:20:18.000 --> 0:20:22.720
<v Speaker 4>the whole thing with immunity, and that immunity opinion. You know,

0:20:22.840 --> 0:20:26.199
<v Speaker 4>they're just living in a different world. It's not just

0:20:26.320 --> 0:20:30.280
<v Speaker 4>judges everywhere, but academics and people who think something is

0:20:30.440 --> 0:20:33.320
<v Speaker 4>deeply wrong about this. So what is going to happen?

0:20:33.560 --> 0:20:36.720
<v Speaker 4>The first question actually is will Trump succeed in making

0:20:36.760 --> 0:20:38.760
<v Speaker 4>it go up and down, up and down, up and down,

0:20:38.800 --> 0:20:42.520
<v Speaker 4>because the goal of Chuckin and Smith is not But

0:20:42.600 --> 0:20:45.600
<v Speaker 4>even that one up and down trip that's left, that

0:20:46.040 --> 0:20:50.480
<v Speaker 4>means Smith is already accepted that no trials'll say twenty

0:20:50.560 --> 0:20:55.600
<v Speaker 4>twenty six, And I personally think that Chuckin she's likely

0:20:55.640 --> 0:20:59.040
<v Speaker 4>to be where Smith is, and I would have zero

0:20:59.200 --> 0:21:04.840
<v Speaker 4>surprise if the court again smacks her down on what

0:21:04.960 --> 0:21:07.960
<v Speaker 4>she says about the immunity, which is now going to

0:21:07.960 --> 0:21:11.600
<v Speaker 4>be sort of sentenced by sentence on the indictment. So

0:21:11.720 --> 0:21:15.040
<v Speaker 4>I did say, you know, eight minutes ago that he's

0:21:15.080 --> 0:21:18.200
<v Speaker 4>not out of the woods yet. But it's a very

0:21:18.320 --> 0:21:22.360
<v Speaker 4>long path, and you know there's going to be national

0:21:22.440 --> 0:21:26.440
<v Speaker 4>fatigue and everything else over this most important and righteous prosecution.

0:21:27.000 --> 0:21:30.720
<v Speaker 4>But I think the Supreme Court isn't done putting its

0:21:30.760 --> 0:21:34.800
<v Speaker 4>stamp on. Okay to you, JD Vance and one of

0:21:34.880 --> 0:21:37.760
<v Speaker 4>your recent podcasts, you noted how he in some way

0:21:38.040 --> 0:21:40.680
<v Speaker 4>is Trump isn't without Trump. So what do you mean

0:21:40.760 --> 0:21:43.680
<v Speaker 4>by that and what do you see as let's say

0:21:43.720 --> 0:21:46.480
<v Speaker 4>Trump loses for this question just because it's a more

0:21:46.520 --> 0:21:47.560
<v Speaker 4>interesting way to put it.

0:21:47.720 --> 0:21:48.520
<v Speaker 2>Who is JD.

0:21:48.680 --> 0:21:53.000
<v Speaker 4>Vance? And what is the Republican Party post Trump?

0:21:53.119 --> 0:21:54.480
<v Speaker 2>Okay? So I would say two things.

0:21:54.640 --> 0:21:58.000
<v Speaker 1>A lot of people watch that debate and thought what

0:21:58.119 --> 0:22:02.680
<v Speaker 1>I thought, which was this eye is good at making

0:22:02.760 --> 0:22:06.600
<v Speaker 1>Trumpism without Trump work, and the way he's able to

0:22:06.680 --> 0:22:10.000
<v Speaker 1>do it is by lying. One of the things about

0:22:10.040 --> 0:22:14.199
<v Speaker 1>trump Ism without Trump is that Trump he lies. He

0:22:14.320 --> 0:22:18.480
<v Speaker 1>leaves open the possibility that he will not have a

0:22:18.600 --> 0:22:20.560
<v Speaker 1>national abortion ban. Of course he's gonna have a national

0:22:20.600 --> 0:22:24.040
<v Speaker 1>abortion ban. He leaves open the door to things that

0:22:24.240 --> 0:22:28.720
<v Speaker 1>otherwise would be so unpalatable that people wouldn't vote for them.

0:22:29.040 --> 0:22:32.280
<v Speaker 1>Jadevans takes a step further and he just lies. So

0:22:32.440 --> 0:22:36.520
<v Speaker 1>for example, there was this exchange about Obamacare. Right, Trump

0:22:36.560 --> 0:22:41.159
<v Speaker 1>wanted to end Obamacare, but the way jd. Van spun it,

0:22:41.200 --> 0:22:43.520
<v Speaker 1>he was like, he wanted to fix the exchanges.

0:22:43.680 --> 0:22:47.080
<v Speaker 2>They were too expensive. We were trying to cost cut.

0:22:47.560 --> 0:22:49.479
<v Speaker 1>I mean, they were trying to cost cut yeah, but

0:22:49.520 --> 0:22:52.000
<v Speaker 1>they were trying to cut cut and it struck me that,

0:22:52.080 --> 0:22:55.800
<v Speaker 1>like one of Trump's things that he doesn't do because

0:22:55.840 --> 0:22:59.879
<v Speaker 1>he's not organized and because he's so erratic, is that

0:23:00.240 --> 0:23:04.160
<v Speaker 1>he gets so wrapped up in his craziness that he's

0:23:04.200 --> 0:23:09.560
<v Speaker 1>not focused. And a really focused politician who didn't have

0:23:09.680 --> 0:23:15.159
<v Speaker 1>the same kind of distractions. It strikes me that perhaps

0:23:15.240 --> 0:23:18.760
<v Speaker 1>it's emotionality that's bubbling below the circumpus, who knows, or

0:23:18.800 --> 0:23:23.800
<v Speaker 1>maybe it's some larger issue with cognitive decline. Someone like

0:23:23.920 --> 0:23:26.879
<v Speaker 1>that would be able to sell trump Ism in a

0:23:26.920 --> 0:23:29.000
<v Speaker 1>way where you wouldn't even know you were buying it.

0:23:29.200 --> 0:23:32.720
<v Speaker 1>Part of the problem with DeSantis is when Desanta's got there

0:23:32.800 --> 0:23:34.840
<v Speaker 1>up there and tried to sell trump Ism, none of

0:23:34.840 --> 0:23:37.520
<v Speaker 1>that's very popular, right. People don't like the idea of

0:23:37.560 --> 0:23:41.440
<v Speaker 1>losing Social Security. They paid into it, they feel it's theirs,

0:23:41.760 --> 0:23:45.320
<v Speaker 1>they feel they are entitled to it as well they are.

0:23:45.520 --> 0:23:47.680
<v Speaker 1>But like when someone like jade Van says like we're

0:23:47.680 --> 0:23:50.000
<v Speaker 1>going to take away you know, he doesn't quite say

0:23:50.000 --> 0:23:52.400
<v Speaker 1>it like that, but he tries to leave the door

0:23:52.440 --> 0:23:55.360
<v Speaker 1>open the way Trump does. It doesn't work because he's

0:23:55.359 --> 0:23:58.280
<v Speaker 1>not a charismatic guy. But what Vance did where he

0:23:58.400 --> 0:24:00.760
<v Speaker 1>just lied about it. I thought, this is the way

0:24:00.800 --> 0:24:02.439
<v Speaker 1>they're going to if they can do it, this is

0:24:02.480 --> 0:24:04.560
<v Speaker 1>the way they're going to do it. I could see

0:24:04.560 --> 0:24:06.720
<v Speaker 1>that as a future of Trump is I also think

0:24:06.760 --> 0:24:09.679
<v Speaker 1>that if Trump gets elected now, I don't think he

0:24:09.720 --> 0:24:13.280
<v Speaker 1>did so much actual running of the place four years ago.

0:24:13.800 --> 0:24:18.320
<v Speaker 1>It's hard for me to imagine that, older, less interested,

0:24:18.480 --> 0:24:21.040
<v Speaker 1>he's going to be doing more. So that makes me

0:24:21.119 --> 0:24:24.520
<v Speaker 1>wonder how much of it will fall to Vance. And

0:24:24.720 --> 0:24:28.400
<v Speaker 1>I think Vance is much more organized than Trump, and

0:24:28.480 --> 0:24:31.359
<v Speaker 1>so ultimately he could get a lot more done. Also,

0:24:31.480 --> 0:24:33.879
<v Speaker 1>you have Project twenty twenty five of all the GOP

0:24:34.040 --> 0:24:36.760
<v Speaker 1>think tanks are ready to go the minute he wins.

0:24:36.760 --> 0:24:39.640
<v Speaker 4>If he wins, last question this round to Molly Jong

0:24:39.760 --> 0:24:42.359
<v Speaker 4>fast and I will make my answer short to please

0:24:42.400 --> 0:24:43.440
<v Speaker 4>your great producer.

0:24:45.720 --> 0:24:49.679
<v Speaker 1>Is there any chance the document's case is the most

0:24:49.680 --> 0:24:53.560
<v Speaker 1>open and chuckcase. It is the case that has been

0:24:53.640 --> 0:24:58.159
<v Speaker 1>dismissed for seemingly no reason.

0:24:58.400 --> 0:24:59.879
<v Speaker 4>A lotless reasons, poor reasons.

0:25:00.440 --> 0:25:02.880
<v Speaker 2>Is there any world in which that keeps going? I mean,

0:25:02.880 --> 0:25:03.840
<v Speaker 2>what happens there?

0:25:04.320 --> 0:25:06.960
<v Speaker 4>Yeah? So I think there is. As you say, it

0:25:07.040 --> 0:25:09.200
<v Speaker 4>is the most open and shut It's conic when he

0:25:09.280 --> 0:25:13.440
<v Speaker 4>isn't president that anything remotely like that would have been prosecuted.

0:25:13.840 --> 0:25:16.159
<v Speaker 4>Cannon's in the tank. She's done all the work she

0:25:16.240 --> 0:25:18.440
<v Speaker 4>sort of can for him, So we pause it. If

0:25:18.440 --> 0:25:21.800
<v Speaker 4>he wins again federal case, he just orders DOJ to

0:25:21.920 --> 0:25:25.800
<v Speaker 4>stand down. If he loses, I think the Eleventh Circuit

0:25:25.960 --> 0:25:28.960
<v Speaker 4>in a matter of months will reverse that. The DOJ

0:25:29.240 --> 0:25:32.000
<v Speaker 4>I thought was, we're kind of weenies in not moving

0:25:32.040 --> 0:25:34.920
<v Speaker 4>to recuse her. But I think there's only so much

0:25:35.080 --> 0:25:38.359
<v Speaker 4>she can do. Yeah, my betting odds would be I

0:25:38.400 --> 0:25:42.360
<v Speaker 4>would bet that if he loses, that one will proceed.

0:25:42.560 --> 0:25:46.359
<v Speaker 4>We'll go to conviction and will be a fairly substantial

0:25:46.600 --> 0:25:50.320
<v Speaker 4>term of imprisonment for the former president of the United States.

0:25:50.520 --> 0:25:55.119
<v Speaker 2>Pure false. Affluent white men can get away with anything.

0:25:55.119 --> 0:25:58.800
<v Speaker 4>False, but more a lot more but false. And I'll

0:25:58.800 --> 0:26:01.080
<v Speaker 4>say one more thing because I'm I'm a former fat

0:26:01.160 --> 0:26:04.439
<v Speaker 4>and prosecutor. People who are charged mainly have done it,

0:26:04.600 --> 0:26:08.119
<v Speaker 4>and yet good lawyering helps, and I'm not saying it doesn't.

0:26:08.280 --> 0:26:11.640
<v Speaker 4>But get away with anything, nag I won't go that far.

0:26:11.840 --> 0:26:14.000
<v Speaker 2>But he's gotten away with this so far.

0:26:14.240 --> 0:26:14.920
<v Speaker 4>Yes he has.

0:26:15.160 --> 0:26:18.080
<v Speaker 2>Thanks Harry, always a pleasure.

0:26:18.560 --> 0:26:21.360
<v Speaker 1>Are you concerned about Project twenty twenty five and how

0:26:21.400 --> 0:26:25.080
<v Speaker 1>awful Trump's second term could be. Well, so are we,

0:26:25.359 --> 0:26:27.600
<v Speaker 1>which is why we teamed up with iHeart to make

0:26:27.640 --> 0:26:31.280
<v Speaker 1>a limited series with the experts on what a disaster

0:26:31.760 --> 0:26:35.440
<v Speaker 1>Project twenty twenty five would be for America's future. Right now,

0:26:35.480 --> 0:26:38.800
<v Speaker 1>we have just released the final episode of this five

0:26:38.880 --> 0:26:42.880
<v Speaker 1>episode series. They're all available by looking up Molly John

0:26:43.040 --> 0:26:46.520
<v Speaker 1>Fast Project twenty twenty five on YouTube, and if you

0:26:46.600 --> 0:26:50.200
<v Speaker 1>are more of a podcast person and not say a YouTuber,

0:26:50.720 --> 0:26:53.040
<v Speaker 1>you can hit play and put your phone in the

0:26:53.080 --> 0:26:56.120
<v Speaker 1>lock screen and it will play back just like a podcast.

0:26:56.400 --> 0:26:59.680
<v Speaker 1>All five episodes are online now. We need to educate

0:26:59.680 --> 0:27:02.879
<v Speaker 1>a Maria Keons on what Trump's second term would or

0:27:02.960 --> 0:27:05.679
<v Speaker 1>could do to this country, So please watch it and

0:27:05.720 --> 0:27:12.280
<v Speaker 1>spread the word. Jeff Jarvis is the director of the

0:27:12.440 --> 0:27:18.600
<v Speaker 1>tow Night Center of Entrepreneurial Journalism and the author of

0:27:18.640 --> 0:27:21.560
<v Speaker 1>the Web we Weave Why we Must Reclaim the Internet

0:27:21.600 --> 0:27:29.840
<v Speaker 1>from moguls, misanthropes, and moral panic. Welcome, Welcome, Welcome, Jeff Jarvis,

0:27:29.960 --> 0:27:31.600
<v Speaker 1>Too Fast Politics.

0:27:31.960 --> 0:27:35.240
<v Speaker 5>Thank you. So you know it's reflexed to say, oh,

0:27:35.320 --> 0:27:38.080
<v Speaker 5>thanks for having me, but I really mean it. I

0:27:38.160 --> 0:27:42.080
<v Speaker 5>am a disciple of yours. I hang on your every word.

0:27:42.720 --> 0:27:45.439
<v Speaker 5>I'm grateful when I see you on TV and grateful

0:27:45.440 --> 0:27:48.440
<v Speaker 5>to MSNBC for making you a contributor. So really thank

0:27:48.480 --> 0:27:50.920
<v Speaker 5>you for having me. I've been hoping for this conversation.

0:27:51.160 --> 0:27:54.800
<v Speaker 1>Well, I'm I'm such a fan of yours because you

0:27:54.880 --> 0:27:57.080
<v Speaker 1>were very much the pundits pundit.

0:27:56.840 --> 0:27:57.600
<v Speaker 5>Oh well shucks.

0:27:58.320 --> 0:27:59.800
<v Speaker 2>And you also do a.

0:27:59.720 --> 0:28:03.360
<v Speaker 1>Thing that many of us don't do as much as

0:28:03.400 --> 0:28:07.000
<v Speaker 1>probably we should, which is you hold people to account,

0:28:07.400 --> 0:28:10.239
<v Speaker 1>which you know, the whole system of being in the

0:28:10.280 --> 0:28:14.320
<v Speaker 1>media is that we're all you know, we're doing this job,

0:28:14.359 --> 0:28:17.080
<v Speaker 1>but there's a feeling like maybe we're buddy buddy, and

0:28:17.160 --> 0:28:20.280
<v Speaker 1>maybe we shouldn't say, you know, we shouldn't do media

0:28:20.320 --> 0:28:23.639
<v Speaker 1>on media violands. You're here to talk about the state

0:28:23.680 --> 0:28:26.240
<v Speaker 1>of the mainstream media, and hopefully you will come back

0:28:26.280 --> 0:28:28.840
<v Speaker 1>many more times and do that. But you are also

0:28:28.880 --> 0:28:31.600
<v Speaker 1>here because you have a new book out, and talk

0:28:31.640 --> 0:28:32.600
<v Speaker 1>to me about this book.

0:28:32.720 --> 0:28:34.840
<v Speaker 5>We can get rid of that pretty quickly. So it's

0:28:34.840 --> 0:28:37.600
<v Speaker 5>a book about defending the freedoms of the Internet called

0:28:37.640 --> 0:28:39.600
<v Speaker 5>The Web We Weave. And this is the first interview

0:28:39.640 --> 0:28:41.280
<v Speaker 5>I've done about the book. So we'll make it quick

0:28:41.320 --> 0:28:43.680
<v Speaker 5>because then we want to dish on media, but it's

0:28:43.720 --> 0:28:48.160
<v Speaker 5>basically a critique of media's moral panic about the Internet.

0:28:48.360 --> 0:28:52.560
<v Speaker 5>And my fear is the more that media treat the

0:28:52.560 --> 0:28:56.160
<v Speaker 5>Internet as the enemy, the worse the policy will be

0:28:56.400 --> 0:29:01.840
<v Speaker 5>about it. The same thing happened with novels and Nickelodeon's.

0:29:01.240 --> 0:29:02.920
<v Speaker 2>Yes, printing press everything.

0:29:03.040 --> 0:29:05.240
<v Speaker 5>I have another book out called the Gutenberg Parenthesis about

0:29:05.240 --> 0:29:08.280
<v Speaker 5>the printing press, and I delve deeply into that. So

0:29:08.680 --> 0:29:10.720
<v Speaker 5>this is an effort to say I defend the Internet,

0:29:10.760 --> 0:29:12.760
<v Speaker 5>not the companies, but the Internet because somebody has to.

0:29:12.960 --> 0:29:16.320
<v Speaker 5>And the only area where you and I have disagreed

0:29:16.440 --> 0:29:17.840
<v Speaker 5>on the socials over time.

0:29:18.240 --> 0:29:20.840
<v Speaker 1>That's right, and you actually know a lot more about

0:29:20.880 --> 0:29:22.680
<v Speaker 1>it than I do, so I'd love for you to

0:29:22.720 --> 0:29:25.640
<v Speaker 1>talk about it because it's a topic that is very

0:29:25.640 --> 0:29:27.640
<v Speaker 1>misunderstood section two thirty.

0:29:27.880 --> 0:29:30.600
<v Speaker 5>So you have said over time and you're among many

0:29:30.680 --> 0:29:33.440
<v Speaker 5>who say something must be done and how can the

0:29:33.440 --> 0:29:35.840
<v Speaker 5>companies get away with this? And then I respond to

0:29:35.880 --> 0:29:38.280
<v Speaker 5>you and saying we need to have this conversation because

0:29:38.320 --> 0:29:40.960
<v Speaker 5>Section two thirty is kind of a first Amendment for

0:29:41.080 --> 0:29:44.880
<v Speaker 5>the Internet in that it enables freedom of expression. That

0:29:45.000 --> 0:29:46.760
<v Speaker 5>you might say, oh, well, that's what the problem, but

0:29:46.760 --> 0:29:48.880
<v Speaker 5>there's a whole bunch of awful expression. But it's also

0:29:48.920 --> 0:29:52.400
<v Speaker 5>a case that the Internet has enabled communities who were

0:29:52.440 --> 0:29:55.480
<v Speaker 5>always there but for too long not heard in big,

0:29:55.520 --> 0:29:57.680
<v Speaker 5>old mass media run by people who look like me.

0:29:57.760 --> 0:30:00.440
<v Speaker 5>Old white men now have their spot light and their

0:30:00.480 --> 0:30:03.240
<v Speaker 5>microphone and their ability to be heard. And my fear

0:30:03.520 --> 0:30:09.200
<v Speaker 5>is that if we hold platforms accountable and suable for

0:30:09.360 --> 0:30:11.479
<v Speaker 5>everything that's said there, they will use that as an

0:30:11.480 --> 0:30:15.960
<v Speaker 5>excuse to get rid of much speech, especially those who

0:30:15.960 --> 0:30:16.960
<v Speaker 5>are not otherwise heard.

0:30:17.240 --> 0:30:17.440
<v Speaker 2>Right.

0:30:17.520 --> 0:30:20.760
<v Speaker 1>And that's a really good point. I come from nineties magazines,

0:30:21.120 --> 0:30:23.760
<v Speaker 1>so I remember when you wanted to write a piece

0:30:23.840 --> 0:30:27.200
<v Speaker 1>in Vogue, you had to get it through five editors

0:30:27.280 --> 0:30:31.040
<v Speaker 1>and then Anna Winter, and it was like really a production,

0:30:31.160 --> 0:30:34.200
<v Speaker 1>and sometimes people would change their minds about what they wanted,

0:30:34.640 --> 0:30:37.360
<v Speaker 1>and so you really there was just such a barrier

0:30:37.400 --> 0:30:40.720
<v Speaker 1>to entry. And now if you have a good idea,

0:30:40.840 --> 0:30:44.040
<v Speaker 1>even if it's not fully developed, you can share it

0:30:44.120 --> 0:30:46.880
<v Speaker 1>with you know, hundreds of thousands, maybe as many as

0:30:46.920 --> 0:30:48.080
<v Speaker 1>a million people.

0:30:48.320 --> 0:30:51.800
<v Speaker 5>Right, and we can hear voices and communities that otherwise

0:30:52.080 --> 0:30:55.280
<v Speaker 5>are not heart Black Twitter is an amazing and wonderful thing.

0:30:55.640 --> 0:30:57.840
<v Speaker 5>I don't know if you saw this as you're traveling

0:30:58.040 --> 0:31:00.600
<v Speaker 5>from one weird city to the next. But right before

0:31:00.600 --> 0:31:02.719
<v Speaker 5>we went on the air, Taylor Lorenz announced that she's

0:31:02.800 --> 0:31:05.040
<v Speaker 5>leaving the Washington Post and starting her own substock. So

0:31:05.080 --> 0:31:07.080
<v Speaker 5>now she can say what she wants to say without

0:31:07.120 --> 0:31:09.240
<v Speaker 5>that kind of gauntlet she would have to go through

0:31:09.280 --> 0:31:10.880
<v Speaker 5>and had to go through in the New York Times

0:31:10.880 --> 0:31:13.040
<v Speaker 5>of the Washington Post. And I can't wait to see

0:31:13.080 --> 0:31:14.040
<v Speaker 5>her unchained.

0:31:14.560 --> 0:31:17.360
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I think there's still a lot to recommend a

0:31:17.400 --> 0:31:20.320
<v Speaker 1>lot of these places, especially because they find well, we're

0:31:20.360 --> 0:31:23.000
<v Speaker 1>on the opinion side, so it's much easier, you.

0:31:22.880 --> 0:31:24.320
<v Speaker 2>Know, to write stuff we don't have to.

0:31:24.440 --> 0:31:26.880
<v Speaker 1>But you know that there are a lot of journalists

0:31:26.920 --> 0:31:29.360
<v Speaker 1>who are these Like one of my best friends is

0:31:29.400 --> 0:31:32.280
<v Speaker 1>a reporter for the New York Times, and she writes

0:31:32.320 --> 0:31:35.080
<v Speaker 1>these stories that take months and months to report out

0:31:35.120 --> 0:31:39.040
<v Speaker 1>and need endless fact checking and legal and it's just

0:31:39.080 --> 0:31:41.440
<v Speaker 1>a very intense process.

0:31:41.520 --> 0:31:44.840
<v Speaker 5>And I respect that I started young, but I've been

0:31:44.840 --> 0:31:48.600
<v Speaker 5>in the field for fifty years. I have some regrets

0:31:48.680 --> 0:31:53.920
<v Speaker 5>now about how I've spent my life in mainstreams, so

0:31:53.960 --> 0:31:58.959
<v Speaker 5>called mainstream air quotes, mass media. I'm disappointed, in disillusioned,

0:31:59.040 --> 0:32:01.480
<v Speaker 5>especially these days with the institutions like the New York

0:32:01.480 --> 0:32:04.200
<v Speaker 5>Times and the Washington Post and CNN, and the right

0:32:04.240 --> 0:32:07.959
<v Speaker 5>has always gone after instream media, fake news, Lougan Press,

0:32:07.960 --> 0:32:10.640
<v Speaker 5>a awful, awful right. One could track it back to

0:32:11.040 --> 0:32:12.800
<v Speaker 5>the Iraq War and so on, but really, in the

0:32:12.920 --> 0:32:17.000
<v Speaker 5>last I think two years or so, the disappointment and

0:32:17.120 --> 0:32:20.640
<v Speaker 5>anger on the left about the New York Times, Washington

0:32:20.640 --> 0:32:24.720
<v Speaker 5>Post at all is loud and palpable, and I think

0:32:24.760 --> 0:32:27.400
<v Speaker 5>that there are things going wrong at those institutions that

0:32:27.440 --> 0:32:29.640
<v Speaker 5>they're not listening to this criticism. They're getting all the

0:32:29.720 --> 0:32:31.680
<v Speaker 5>more defensive about it. I was on a podcast this

0:32:31.760 --> 0:32:34.320
<v Speaker 5>morning and recording one with someone from big Old Media

0:32:34.440 --> 0:32:37.840
<v Speaker 5>who just was constantly defensive about big media, and they're

0:32:37.880 --> 0:32:41.360
<v Speaker 5>not understanding. I think that there are huge issues there.

0:32:41.440 --> 0:32:44.320
<v Speaker 5>What do you see in the reaction to big old media.

0:32:44.440 --> 0:32:45.840
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it's a really good point.

0:32:46.000 --> 0:32:49.160
<v Speaker 1>It's something that I think a lot about because, you know,

0:32:49.240 --> 0:32:52.360
<v Speaker 1>especially now that we're on this tour, people ask we

0:32:52.440 --> 0:32:55.280
<v Speaker 1>do questions at the end, and people have complaints about

0:32:55.320 --> 0:32:57.840
<v Speaker 1>mainstream media questions about it.

0:32:57.920 --> 0:32:58.280
<v Speaker 2>You see.

0:32:58.640 --> 0:33:03.120
<v Speaker 1>I feel that the opinion side, and this is as

0:33:03.160 --> 0:33:05.640
<v Speaker 1>someone who is on the opinion side, is such a

0:33:05.920 --> 0:33:10.680
<v Speaker 1>small smattering of content, and while it can be you know,

0:33:10.760 --> 0:33:14.200
<v Speaker 1>for example, there are certainly opinion columnists whose beliefs I

0:33:14.280 --> 0:33:17.000
<v Speaker 1>do not share. I think a lot of the reporting

0:33:17.240 --> 0:33:20.120
<v Speaker 1>is super important, and I think that some of that stuff,

0:33:20.160 --> 0:33:22.600
<v Speaker 1>I mean, Pro Publica does it, The New York Times

0:33:22.680 --> 0:33:24.760
<v Speaker 1>does it, the Washington Post does it, but not a

0:33:24.920 --> 0:33:27.760
<v Speaker 1>ton of places do it, and that's because it's super expensive.

0:33:27.960 --> 0:33:31.360
<v Speaker 1>And I think that is important enough. And we haven't

0:33:31.360 --> 0:33:35.440
<v Speaker 1>seen substacks really be able to kind of do that yet.

0:33:35.520 --> 0:33:37.560
<v Speaker 1>Now maybe there's a time when they'll be able to

0:33:37.560 --> 0:33:39.400
<v Speaker 1>do it. But you know, if we don't have the reporting,

0:33:39.760 --> 0:33:42.880
<v Speaker 1>it's hard to write those opinion pieces if we especially

0:33:42.960 --> 0:33:45.959
<v Speaker 1>with an administration like if Trump comes back into power,

0:33:46.400 --> 0:33:49.000
<v Speaker 1>like there were so many stories we would absolutely not

0:33:49.080 --> 0:33:51.080
<v Speaker 1>have known about it were it not for reporting, Like

0:33:51.120 --> 0:33:54.320
<v Speaker 1>I'm thinking about all the Scott prud stuff or the

0:33:54.680 --> 0:33:58.520
<v Speaker 1>Ryan Zink stuff. So much corruption, and even with these

0:33:58.560 --> 0:34:01.120
<v Speaker 1>court cases, with the Trump court cases, you need someone

0:34:01.240 --> 0:34:03.760
<v Speaker 1>in there to like look at the filings and to

0:34:03.880 --> 0:34:06.560
<v Speaker 1>know how to make sense of them. And even like

0:34:06.640 --> 0:34:11.480
<v Speaker 1>I think of Jason Leopold, who does these amazing Foier requests.

0:34:10.840 --> 0:34:12.919
<v Speaker 2>It's hours and hours and.

0:34:12.920 --> 0:34:16.680
<v Speaker 1>Hours of work with very little content produced, sometimes for

0:34:16.880 --> 0:34:19.160
<v Speaker 1>months and months and months. So I think that stuff

0:34:19.200 --> 0:34:22.240
<v Speaker 1>is so important that people should just hold their nose

0:34:22.320 --> 0:34:24.719
<v Speaker 1>when they don't like the opinion stuff. I also think

0:34:24.880 --> 0:34:27.319
<v Speaker 1>the mainstream media has not met the moment. I think

0:34:27.400 --> 0:34:31.560
<v Speaker 1>everyone who is that they the conventional framing highly problematic,

0:34:31.800 --> 0:34:35.799
<v Speaker 1>does not tell the story, elevates the autocrat, creates a

0:34:35.840 --> 0:34:38.759
<v Speaker 1>false equivalency. I truly believe that, and I think a

0:34:38.760 --> 0:34:41.720
<v Speaker 1>lot of smart people do too. It's hard because there's

0:34:41.760 --> 0:34:46.840
<v Speaker 1>not really a handbook for covering the rise of autocracy

0:34:46.880 --> 0:34:47.840
<v Speaker 1>in a free press.

0:34:48.080 --> 0:34:50.960
<v Speaker 5>But there is, and it's Hannah Arrant.

0:34:51.320 --> 0:34:53.759
<v Speaker 2>Oh interesting, Okay, let's talk about that.

0:34:53.920 --> 0:34:57.440
<v Speaker 5>I've been rereading Hannah Iran. I even reread William Shier's

0:34:57.560 --> 0:34:59.960
<v Speaker 5>Rise and Fall of the Third Break, which might be

0:35:00.080 --> 0:35:02.319
<v Speaker 5>you want to commit me because I'm wacky, but it's not.

0:35:02.440 --> 0:35:05.880
<v Speaker 5>It's because I want to understand the parallels. And I

0:35:05.920 --> 0:35:08.040
<v Speaker 5>have another book out called The Gutenberg Parenthesis, and in

0:35:08.080 --> 0:35:12.080
<v Speaker 5>there I quote Errant at some length where she explains

0:35:12.200 --> 0:35:16.239
<v Speaker 5>the beginnings of totalitarianism in a way that I think

0:35:16.320 --> 0:35:19.480
<v Speaker 5>puts a different challenge on journalism. It's this, it's a

0:35:19.560 --> 0:35:22.719
<v Speaker 5>challenge of belonging because what Arod says is that is

0:35:22.719 --> 0:35:27.120
<v Speaker 5>that the totalitarians and authoritarians separate people from their communities

0:35:27.239 --> 0:35:29.040
<v Speaker 5>so that they are lonely. And I don't mean lonely

0:35:29.080 --> 0:35:31.640
<v Speaker 5>in the trivial way of the surgeon General and in

0:35:31.760 --> 0:35:34.040
<v Speaker 5>sell people and not getting dates. I mean a profound

0:35:34.120 --> 0:35:38.279
<v Speaker 5>loneliness in being alienated from society, and then they are

0:35:38.400 --> 0:35:42.000
<v Speaker 5>vulnerable to the siren call of the cultist, the fascist,

0:35:42.080 --> 0:35:44.960
<v Speaker 5>the authoritarian. So the problem becomes that we don't have

0:35:44.960 --> 0:35:47.560
<v Speaker 5>a pluralistic society where some of these people have that

0:35:47.680 --> 0:35:52.000
<v Speaker 5>other pull on them, and Arrant I think shows us

0:35:52.400 --> 0:35:56.080
<v Speaker 5>what happens. So the most recent example of this is

0:35:56.160 --> 0:35:59.880
<v Speaker 5>the Springfield Dogs and Cats story where Jamel Bowie did

0:35:59.920 --> 0:36:03.720
<v Speaker 5>a great TikTok videos. TikTok videos are spectacular, folks, if

0:36:03.760 --> 0:36:07.360
<v Speaker 5>you were subscribed, and he explained that as blood libel,

0:36:07.719 --> 0:36:11.520
<v Speaker 5>as trying to stir race hate. Now we can see

0:36:11.520 --> 0:36:13.960
<v Speaker 5>that and it's obvious, but in the coverage of it,

0:36:14.000 --> 0:36:17.080
<v Speaker 5>we don't see that. We see, well, it was proven

0:36:17.120 --> 0:36:19.600
<v Speaker 5>to be false. Bart Walls Retjournal. Okay, it's not about facts,

0:36:19.800 --> 0:36:22.600
<v Speaker 5>because I also believe that when people say this crazy stuff,

0:36:22.880 --> 0:36:26.000
<v Speaker 5>it's not about their belief it's about signaling, and it's

0:36:26.000 --> 0:36:29.319
<v Speaker 5>about a loyalty test to their god Trump, And so

0:36:29.560 --> 0:36:33.240
<v Speaker 5>what does a journalism look like that's not about facts

0:36:33.239 --> 0:36:36.160
<v Speaker 5>and fact checking and information. I mean, all that's fine

0:36:36.200 --> 0:36:38.720
<v Speaker 5>and we need that. But the deeper struggle in society

0:36:38.760 --> 0:36:43.040
<v Speaker 5>right now, I think is about belonging and about education

0:36:43.880 --> 0:36:47.440
<v Speaker 5>and about people's ability to think critically. And I'm not

0:36:47.560 --> 0:36:50.360
<v Speaker 5>sure where a new journalism fits in there.

0:36:50.760 --> 0:36:52.480
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I mean, I think that's right.

0:36:52.680 --> 0:36:54.840
<v Speaker 1>I think that it's still very hard to kind of

0:36:54.880 --> 0:36:56.040
<v Speaker 1>get our heads around it.

0:36:56.160 --> 0:36:58.160
<v Speaker 2>That would be my take on this.

0:36:58.440 --> 0:37:01.800
<v Speaker 1>And I also think that we are in a moment

0:37:02.120 --> 0:37:03.920
<v Speaker 1>where mainstream.

0:37:03.520 --> 0:37:04.880
<v Speaker 2>Media is really I don't know.

0:37:04.880 --> 0:37:07.880
<v Speaker 1>I don't want to defend the mainstream media because I

0:37:07.920 --> 0:37:12.280
<v Speaker 1>think that what you're doing is useful, and I think

0:37:12.320 --> 0:37:15.919
<v Speaker 1>that there's way too much like we're all buddies here

0:37:16.719 --> 0:37:20.040
<v Speaker 1>kind of stuff, which I don't think is helpful. So

0:37:20.520 --> 0:37:23.920
<v Speaker 1>I appreciate what you're doing, but I do think it's

0:37:24.239 --> 0:37:27.040
<v Speaker 1>just a very tough moment an American life for a

0:37:27.080 --> 0:37:30.480
<v Speaker 1>lot of us. And look, if Trump wins, the mainstream

0:37:30.480 --> 0:37:32.960
<v Speaker 1>media will be off the hook because we'll all be

0:37:33.239 --> 0:37:33.720
<v Speaker 1>in jail.

0:37:34.040 --> 0:37:36.560
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, not to put too fine a point, on.

0:37:36.640 --> 0:37:39.000
<v Speaker 5>It, but I think that's true, or.

0:37:39.000 --> 0:37:42.320
<v Speaker 2>Losing our cable licenses or whatever.

0:37:42.160 --> 0:37:44.880
<v Speaker 5>We become scum and not heard from. I haven't been

0:37:44.880 --> 0:37:47.680
<v Speaker 5>on MSBCT for about four years. Joe Scarborough can drive

0:37:47.719 --> 0:37:50.800
<v Speaker 5>me nuts every other day, but he's out there calling

0:37:50.880 --> 0:37:54.640
<v Speaker 5>fascism fascism. Nicole Wallace, I think is the greatest, and

0:37:54.680 --> 0:37:58.240
<v Speaker 5>she's a former Republican who's calling fascism fascism and racism

0:37:58.320 --> 0:38:02.840
<v Speaker 5>racism and they're considered opinion, whereas our mainstream reported media

0:38:03.120 --> 0:38:07.239
<v Speaker 5>aren't doing it. They won't call lies, lies, racism, racism, misogyny, misogyny,

0:38:07.239 --> 0:38:09.600
<v Speaker 5>and fascism fascism, and I think that means that they

0:38:09.719 --> 0:38:12.960
<v Speaker 5>ultimately lie to the public when they try to treat

0:38:13.000 --> 0:38:16.120
<v Speaker 5>everything asymmetrically with their white glove euphemisms.

0:38:16.120 --> 0:38:18.919
<v Speaker 1>For all this, I don't know that it's an intentional lie,

0:38:18.960 --> 0:38:23.080
<v Speaker 1>as much as it's trouble addressing it. I think again,

0:38:23.120 --> 0:38:26.520
<v Speaker 1>the answer there is ref working right, because the right

0:38:26.880 --> 0:38:30.080
<v Speaker 1>is always saying, you know, this is unfair to us.

0:38:30.200 --> 0:38:33.799
<v Speaker 1>You're making false equivalencies, and they're very good at it,

0:38:33.920 --> 0:38:36.360
<v Speaker 1>and they're very good at being furious. I think that

0:38:36.560 --> 0:38:39.279
<v Speaker 1>mainstream media is a little bit terrified, but there's also

0:38:39.400 --> 0:38:41.920
<v Speaker 1>like a corporate structure for a lot of this media,

0:38:42.440 --> 0:38:45.600
<v Speaker 1>so if the right push is hard enough, they can

0:38:45.920 --> 0:38:49.600
<v Speaker 1>kind of unravel the whole thing by boycotting or saying,

0:38:49.640 --> 0:38:52.759
<v Speaker 1>you know, someone's gone too far. It's ironic because then

0:38:52.840 --> 0:38:55.520
<v Speaker 1>on their side, if one of them goes too far,

0:38:56.040 --> 0:39:00.000
<v Speaker 1>they instead are like, you know, unapologetic, and if anything,

0:39:00.080 --> 0:39:00.759
<v Speaker 1>they double down.

0:39:01.040 --> 0:39:02.840
<v Speaker 5>What frightens me is I think the one out that

0:39:02.920 --> 0:39:06.600
<v Speaker 5>we do have these days is MSNBC. It's on constantly.

0:39:06.640 --> 0:39:08.239
<v Speaker 5>That's how I see you all the time. I don't

0:39:08.239 --> 0:39:11.200
<v Speaker 5>think that's because Comcast is an enlightened company. I think

0:39:11.200 --> 0:39:13.440
<v Speaker 5>it was because that was the market opportunity. It is.

0:39:13.480 --> 0:39:15.479
<v Speaker 5>As someone inside the company once said to me, Jeff,

0:39:15.520 --> 0:39:19.440
<v Speaker 5>remember it's a Republican company. So I fear that with pressure,

0:39:19.880 --> 0:39:22.960
<v Speaker 5>even that outlet for us could disappear.

0:39:23.400 --> 0:39:26.480
<v Speaker 1>I mean, the good news I would say is that

0:39:26.920 --> 0:39:31.200
<v Speaker 1>the way it works with all of these now, especially

0:39:31.280 --> 0:39:34.719
<v Speaker 1>where there is such a lower bar to entry, is

0:39:34.760 --> 0:39:39.960
<v Speaker 1>that ultimately, if there's appetite, the thing will exist. Yes,

0:39:40.200 --> 0:39:42.120
<v Speaker 1>And if you look at for example, one of the

0:39:42.239 --> 0:39:46.600
<v Speaker 1>big problems right now is that the cable has been

0:39:46.640 --> 0:39:49.960
<v Speaker 1>too slow to go to streaming, so you have all

0:39:50.040 --> 0:39:53.239
<v Speaker 1>these people in this country who are under the age

0:39:53.239 --> 0:39:55.920
<v Speaker 1>of forty five who do not have cable boxes because

0:39:55.920 --> 0:39:58.279
<v Speaker 1>that's not how they watch TV. But they want to

0:39:58.320 --> 0:40:01.560
<v Speaker 1>watch news and they can't right because they don't you know,

0:40:01.600 --> 0:40:02.239
<v Speaker 1>they either have.

0:40:02.239 --> 0:40:05.200
<v Speaker 2>To stream MSNBC. It's not organic.

0:40:05.440 --> 0:40:07.760
<v Speaker 1>And I think there's a place for an organic streamer

0:40:07.840 --> 0:40:11.360
<v Speaker 1>where you turn on your Apple TV and there's news going.

0:40:11.880 --> 0:40:14.320
<v Speaker 1>And I think that that's going to happen pretty soon.

0:40:14.480 --> 0:40:17.719
<v Speaker 1>As my guess, if there's appetite, it is the capitalist

0:40:17.760 --> 0:40:21.240
<v Speaker 1>system still, and I think there is appetite for liberal

0:40:21.239 --> 0:40:21.719
<v Speaker 1>news now.

0:40:22.120 --> 0:40:23.920
<v Speaker 2>The thing that I worry about.

0:40:23.680 --> 0:40:26.640
<v Speaker 1>Is someone who comes from magazines, is magazines were too

0:40:26.640 --> 0:40:30.520
<v Speaker 1>slow to get online and so they ended up really

0:40:30.560 --> 0:40:33.440
<v Speaker 1>sort of playing themselves. So my anxiety is more like,

0:40:33.920 --> 0:40:36.560
<v Speaker 1>can news get online in the way it needs too

0:40:36.600 --> 0:40:39.239
<v Speaker 1>fast enough to capture audiences.

0:40:40.000 --> 0:40:42.640
<v Speaker 5>So not to overplug myself. But I have a third

0:40:42.680 --> 0:40:45.960
<v Speaker 5>book out right now called Magazine. It's a short little book.

0:40:46.000 --> 0:40:48.760
<v Speaker 5>I started the magazine Entertainment Weekly. I worked for people

0:40:48.800 --> 0:40:49.359
<v Speaker 5>at Time Inc.

0:40:49.480 --> 0:40:53.080
<v Speaker 2>I love magazines, really Time Magazine. Yeah, but I think.

0:40:52.960 --> 0:40:55.480
<v Speaker 5>That magazines are coming to their end. They're at the

0:40:55.560 --> 0:40:57.720
<v Speaker 5>end of their arc because of what you just said.

0:40:57.960 --> 0:41:03.200
<v Speaker 5>They didn't understand how to update themselves for a community

0:41:03.239 --> 0:41:06.440
<v Speaker 5>and conversational based media rather than a content based media.

0:41:06.480 --> 0:41:08.319
<v Speaker 5>They still insisted that we have to make this thing

0:41:08.360 --> 0:41:10.920
<v Speaker 5>that makes us special, when in fact, what magazines should

0:41:10.920 --> 0:41:13.720
<v Speaker 5>have seen was that they were maypoles that people gathered

0:41:13.760 --> 0:41:16.600
<v Speaker 5>around of common interest and taste. And they lost the

0:41:16.640 --> 0:41:19.960
<v Speaker 5>opportunity and they wasted millions and millions of dollars to

0:41:19.960 --> 0:41:22.120
<v Speaker 5>try to figure out the Internet and never did. It's

0:41:22.120 --> 0:41:22.680
<v Speaker 5>a tragedy.

0:41:22.880 --> 0:41:26.360
<v Speaker 1>As someone who loves magazines comes from magazines, there was

0:41:26.560 --> 0:41:27.480
<v Speaker 1>a great opportunity.

0:41:27.600 --> 0:41:30.359
<v Speaker 2>I mean, I think some magazines have survived Vanity Fair.

0:41:30.520 --> 0:41:32.839
<v Speaker 1>It's much smaller than it was, you know, Vanny Fairs

0:41:32.840 --> 0:41:34.440
<v Speaker 1>where I work, and I love them, and I'm very

0:41:34.480 --> 0:41:37.880
<v Speaker 1>happy there, a New Yorker and a couple of different places.

0:41:37.880 --> 0:41:41.400
<v Speaker 1>But I do think ultimately they had the market share

0:41:41.600 --> 0:41:42.960
<v Speaker 1>and they gave it away.

0:41:43.560 --> 0:41:46.840
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, and I think they misinterpreted what their role in

0:41:46.880 --> 0:41:49.680
<v Speaker 5>society was. As I went back to the history of magazines, Welly,

0:41:49.880 --> 0:41:53.440
<v Speaker 5>it fascinated me that in eighteen fifty when Harper's Magazine started,

0:41:53.560 --> 0:41:56.239
<v Speaker 5>it started in a time of the industrialization and mechanization

0:41:56.280 --> 0:41:59.160
<v Speaker 5>of print Before that, the average circulation of a daily

0:41:59.200 --> 0:42:01.480
<v Speaker 5>newspaper in the US was four thousand. It was a

0:42:01.480 --> 0:42:05.880
<v Speaker 5>good substack newsletter, right, So long comes this avalanche of

0:42:05.920 --> 0:42:09.200
<v Speaker 5>new content and new speech, and Harper's came along, and

0:42:09.239 --> 0:42:12.200
<v Speaker 5>their mission at the beginning was curatorial. There's so much

0:42:12.239 --> 0:42:14.240
<v Speaker 5>good stuff out there. Somebody has to find the good stuff.

0:42:14.239 --> 0:42:16.040
<v Speaker 5>That's why we're here. And that's what it did before

0:42:16.080 --> 0:42:19.080
<v Speaker 5>it eventually developed its own voice. And so I wonder

0:42:19.280 --> 0:42:22.280
<v Speaker 5>where is the Harper's of eighteen fifty four today? Where

0:42:22.320 --> 0:42:25.080
<v Speaker 5>is that role that magazines used to play to say,

0:42:25.080 --> 0:42:27.560
<v Speaker 5>we're going to find the good and interesting and authoritative

0:42:27.600 --> 0:42:31.440
<v Speaker 5>voices and experience not just the writers we assigned, but

0:42:31.480 --> 0:42:34.680
<v Speaker 5>the people who were already out there on YouTube, on substack,

0:42:34.800 --> 0:42:37.880
<v Speaker 5>on the socials. I think there's a huge opportunity to

0:42:38.040 --> 0:42:41.319
<v Speaker 5>rethink a magazine's role in society around the speech that

0:42:41.440 --> 0:42:42.120
<v Speaker 5>now exists.

0:42:42.400 --> 0:42:45.000
<v Speaker 1>Oh yeah, I mean, I think that was the secret

0:42:45.000 --> 0:42:50.360
<v Speaker 1>of Drudge too, was able to put together, was able

0:42:50.360 --> 0:42:52.920
<v Speaker 1>to find everything in a way, and that was really

0:42:52.960 --> 0:42:56.680
<v Speaker 1>the secret of Twitter now whatever it is. The thing

0:42:56.719 --> 0:42:59.600
<v Speaker 1>that really haunts me, if you want to go down

0:42:59.600 --> 0:43:03.319
<v Speaker 1>this wrap, is we are this enormous country right. Three

0:43:03.400 --> 0:43:06.480
<v Speaker 1>hundred plus three hundred and thirty million people in this country,

0:43:06.680 --> 0:43:10.399
<v Speaker 1>and very small amount of us read the news, So

0:43:10.480 --> 0:43:13.080
<v Speaker 1>where are people getting their news? Where are they getting

0:43:13.080 --> 0:43:13.799
<v Speaker 1>their information?

0:43:14.760 --> 0:43:16.839
<v Speaker 5>So that I think is a failure of our old

0:43:16.880 --> 0:43:20.640
<v Speaker 5>mainstream media. And I started newspaper sites for Advance, the

0:43:20.640 --> 0:43:24.440
<v Speaker 5>same company as Vanity Fair, and my boss, Steve Neuhaus

0:43:24.520 --> 0:43:26.520
<v Speaker 5>is now the chairman of the company, was brilliant about

0:43:26.600 --> 0:43:30.560
<v Speaker 5>understanding that the Internet was fundamentally about conversation. But it

0:43:30.600 --> 0:43:33.960
<v Speaker 5>was really hard to take what was seen as the

0:43:34.080 --> 0:43:37.719
<v Speaker 5>content of magazines and bring it to online. Almost every

0:43:37.760 --> 0:43:40.200
<v Speaker 5>magazine company out there thought we ought to have TV shows,

0:43:40.480 --> 0:43:43.360
<v Speaker 5>we ought to have a website, rather than understanding that

0:43:43.400 --> 0:43:47.600
<v Speaker 5>they should, I think loose their people onto TikTok as

0:43:47.600 --> 0:43:50.719
<v Speaker 5>long as it exists, and Twitter I'll not call it

0:43:50.920 --> 0:43:55.040
<v Speaker 5>X and other places to build relationships with this public

0:43:55.080 --> 0:43:57.840
<v Speaker 5>in new ways. That's anathetical to how they think, but

0:43:57.920 --> 0:44:00.160
<v Speaker 5>I think that's what's going to if anything can and

0:44:00.200 --> 0:44:03.080
<v Speaker 5>rescue them. It's about letting the Taylor Lorenzs of the

0:44:03.080 --> 0:44:06.719
<v Speaker 5>world Louis within the Washington Post, rather than putting handcuffs

0:44:06.760 --> 0:44:09.240
<v Speaker 5>orders such that she can't do what she did wants

0:44:09.280 --> 0:44:10.799
<v Speaker 5>to do and has to leave right.

0:44:10.920 --> 0:44:11.719
<v Speaker 2>No, you have to be.

0:44:11.880 --> 0:44:14.400
<v Speaker 1>I mean that is one of the nice things about

0:44:14.400 --> 0:44:16.759
<v Speaker 1>being a vany fairs that I don't have the same

0:44:16.880 --> 0:44:17.560
<v Speaker 1>kind of right.

0:44:17.760 --> 0:44:19.719
<v Speaker 2>They want your voice right, and I just.

0:44:19.680 --> 0:44:22.759
<v Speaker 1>Don't have the same kind of regulations that they do

0:44:22.920 --> 0:44:23.759
<v Speaker 1>at the Washington Post.

0:44:23.880 --> 0:44:26.320
<v Speaker 2>This is so interesting. I hope you will come back.

0:44:26.719 --> 0:44:27.719
<v Speaker 5>Oh, I hope you'll have me.

0:44:28.040 --> 0:44:29.319
<v Speaker 2>Yes, I absolutely will.

0:44:29.360 --> 0:44:31.879
<v Speaker 1>And it's so interesting and I think it's a really

0:44:31.920 --> 0:44:32.920
<v Speaker 1>important conversation.

0:44:33.239 --> 0:44:35.920
<v Speaker 5>Thank you, Willy.

0:44:36.160 --> 0:44:41.640
<v Speaker 3>No moment Thicko Jesse Cannon probly judged fast. I kind

0:44:41.640 --> 0:44:46.160
<v Speaker 3>of consider myself the terrible culture reporter sometimes on this podcast.

0:44:46.320 --> 0:44:48.319
<v Speaker 3>So to tee up what we're going to do here,

0:44:48.480 --> 0:44:50.920
<v Speaker 3>I have to explain to our audience who theo Vona is,

0:44:50.920 --> 0:44:52.880
<v Speaker 3>because I imagine some of them are smart enough to

0:44:52.920 --> 0:44:56.280
<v Speaker 3>not realize that this is a comedian who got famous

0:44:56.280 --> 0:44:59.400
<v Speaker 3>by powering around the Joe Rogan and Tim Dillon world.

0:44:59.560 --> 0:45:04.239
<v Speaker 3>But that is like they're sober but seamstoned buddy that

0:45:04.600 --> 0:45:08.880
<v Speaker 3>somehow has taken a real liking to interviewing all sides

0:45:08.880 --> 0:45:11.520
<v Speaker 3>of politics. He's recently hat on Bernie and Mark Cuban

0:45:11.560 --> 0:45:15.000
<v Speaker 3>in addition to Trump, and today his guest was Teamster's

0:45:15.120 --> 0:45:17.359
<v Speaker 3>union president Sean O'Brien. Tell us what you saw here.

0:45:17.520 --> 0:45:21.600
<v Speaker 2>Teamsters were in big trouble. They were rescued by a

0:45:21.640 --> 0:45:24.879
<v Speaker 2>man called Joe Biden as a reward for that.

0:45:25.200 --> 0:45:30.120
<v Speaker 1>The Democrats are being completely fucked over by the Teamsters

0:45:30.200 --> 0:45:34.560
<v Speaker 1>who are not endorsing Harris and who are largely just

0:45:34.960 --> 0:45:39.479
<v Speaker 1>going their own way. Teamster President Sewan O'Brien rips into

0:45:39.520 --> 0:45:43.000
<v Speaker 1>Democrats on THEO Vaughn's podcast, saying that the party fucked

0:45:43.000 --> 0:45:46.200
<v Speaker 1>over his union members and revealing that a recent meeting

0:45:46.680 --> 0:45:50.279
<v Speaker 1>with Chuck Schumer got fucking ugly. I'm going to give

0:45:50.320 --> 0:45:53.160
<v Speaker 1>this guy a hearty fuck. That guy can't wait to

0:45:53.200 --> 0:45:57.000
<v Speaker 1>see what Republicans with their right to work states do

0:45:57.760 --> 0:46:02.040
<v Speaker 1>to union members. Ain't going to be pretty. You guys

0:46:02.080 --> 0:46:06.319
<v Speaker 1>should vote in your own interests. That's it for this

0:46:06.480 --> 0:46:12.560
<v Speaker 1>episode of Fast Politics. Tune in every Monday, Wednesday, Thursday

0:46:13.040 --> 0:46:16.960
<v Speaker 1>and Saturday to hear the best minds in politics make

0:46:17.080 --> 0:46:21.000
<v Speaker 1>sense of all the chaos. If you enjoyed this podcast,

0:46:21.040 --> 0:46:23.719
<v Speaker 1>please send it to a friend or an enemy and

0:46:23.880 --> 0:46:25.280
<v Speaker 1>keep the conversation going