WEBVTT - Elon Musk Is Back at the Twitter Deal Table

0:00:02.200 --> 0:00:05.560
<v Speaker 1>From the heart of where innovation, money and power collive

0:00:06.320 --> 0:00:10.880
<v Speaker 1>in Silicon Valley and beyond. This is Bloomberg Technology with

0:00:10.920 --> 0:00:27.360
<v Speaker 1>Emily Jay. I'm Emily Chang in San Francisco, and this

0:00:27.400 --> 0:00:30.840
<v Speaker 1>is Bloomberg Technology. Coming up in the next hour, Elon

0:00:30.960 --> 0:00:34.479
<v Speaker 1>Musk changes his mind again, saying he will buy Twitter

0:00:34.840 --> 0:00:38.440
<v Speaker 1>after all at the original price. The Bloomberg scoop sends

0:00:38.479 --> 0:00:43.080
<v Speaker 1>Twitter share soaring and Testlas shares falling. Why the change

0:00:43.080 --> 0:00:45.760
<v Speaker 1>of heart after spending a fortune a lawyers trying to

0:00:45.760 --> 0:00:47.839
<v Speaker 1>get out of the deal to buy a company he's

0:00:47.880 --> 0:00:51.159
<v Speaker 1>now criticized for months? Will tip Twitter just drop it

0:00:51.280 --> 0:00:53.519
<v Speaker 1>suit or try to get more certainty that Musk will

0:00:53.560 --> 0:00:56.080
<v Speaker 1>actually go through with it this time? And how will

0:00:56.120 --> 0:01:00.360
<v Speaker 1>this all impact? Musts roll at Tesla in Spain Sex

0:01:00.560 --> 0:01:03.600
<v Speaker 1>We've got experts on all angles. Will ask those questions

0:01:03.800 --> 0:01:06.160
<v Speaker 1>throughout this hour, But first I want to start with

0:01:06.560 --> 0:01:09.760
<v Speaker 1>the market reaction. Bloomberg's Ludlow has been across this all

0:01:09.840 --> 0:01:12.800
<v Speaker 1>day in New York and walk us through the ups

0:01:12.880 --> 0:01:15.479
<v Speaker 1>and the downs. Yeah, so, I mean Twitter shares surge

0:01:15.560 --> 0:01:17.840
<v Speaker 1>right the most sense. April fourth, which was the day

0:01:17.920 --> 0:01:21.640
<v Speaker 1>when Musk first disclosed his stake in Twitter, let alone

0:01:21.680 --> 0:01:24.520
<v Speaker 1>before he announced that he would try to buy the

0:01:24.560 --> 0:01:27.040
<v Speaker 1>company and take it private. Ultimately, we ended up with

0:01:27.120 --> 0:01:31.480
<v Speaker 1>gain of the stock was halted at one point for

0:01:31.560 --> 0:01:35.200
<v Speaker 1>volatility and then resume trading. And by that point Muscut

0:01:35.280 --> 0:01:37.920
<v Speaker 1>updated is thirteen D filing to let us know what

0:01:38.000 --> 0:01:40.200
<v Speaker 1>go it was going on, and a Twitter spokesman has

0:01:40.240 --> 0:01:42.080
<v Speaker 1>spoken as well. Let's take a look at this terminal chart,

0:01:42.080 --> 0:01:45.120
<v Speaker 1>which is the spread, right, the difference between the fifty

0:01:45.440 --> 0:01:49.480
<v Speaker 1>dollar twenty cents per share price and the current share price,

0:01:49.520 --> 0:01:51.840
<v Speaker 1>and now it's off the chart, right. We're really closing

0:01:51.880 --> 0:01:55.440
<v Speaker 1>that gap as we moved towards something that we expect

0:01:55.440 --> 0:01:57.680
<v Speaker 1>to happen quite quickly. All of the conditions of the

0:01:57.680 --> 0:02:02.040
<v Speaker 1>original April agreement have largely been satisfied. And that is

0:02:02.040 --> 0:02:04.320
<v Speaker 1>what must talks about in his letter to Twitter that

0:02:04.520 --> 0:02:07.360
<v Speaker 1>was disclosed on Tuesday. He is going with the original

0:02:07.480 --> 0:02:10.119
<v Speaker 1>terms of the deal. You also mentioned Tesla. We did

0:02:10.120 --> 0:02:12.440
<v Speaker 1>see that stock pair a gain of as much as

0:02:12.480 --> 0:02:15.560
<v Speaker 1>six percent after that Bloom Blow scoop closing up by

0:02:15.600 --> 0:02:18.000
<v Speaker 1>around three percent. I think what's interesting here is that

0:02:18.520 --> 0:02:20.919
<v Speaker 1>the feeling in the market is Musk will at some

0:02:21.040 --> 0:02:24.160
<v Speaker 1>point have to sell some more Tessa stock to cover

0:02:24.200 --> 0:02:27.000
<v Speaker 1>the equity portion of the financing for this deal. But

0:02:27.040 --> 0:02:29.480
<v Speaker 1>there's also an element of key Man risk. Right Elon

0:02:29.560 --> 0:02:33.120
<v Speaker 1>Musk is the CEO of both Tesla and space x. Well,

0:02:33.200 --> 0:02:35.080
<v Speaker 1>if he is going to buy Twitter, how much of

0:02:35.080 --> 0:02:37.000
<v Speaker 1>a distraction is that. I know you've got some great guests.

0:02:37.040 --> 0:02:39.120
<v Speaker 1>You can put that to question too. But we're back

0:02:39.120 --> 0:02:41.600
<v Speaker 1>to where we started him. What a day. It's not

0:02:41.639 --> 0:02:44.720
<v Speaker 1>a done deal yet. So because I've got the letter here,

0:02:44.720 --> 0:02:47.000
<v Speaker 1>which you can look at Bloomberg dot com, the letter

0:02:47.080 --> 0:02:49.280
<v Speaker 1>saying we write to know notify you that the Musk

0:02:49.360 --> 0:02:52.359
<v Speaker 1>parties intend to proceed to the closing of the transaction

0:02:52.760 --> 0:02:57.079
<v Speaker 1>subject to the conditions set for therein and pending receipts

0:02:57.320 --> 0:03:00.520
<v Speaker 1>the proceeds of the debt financing. So he's trying to

0:03:00.520 --> 0:03:04.120
<v Speaker 1>put some conditions on the deal. We look back in April,

0:03:04.200 --> 0:03:07.680
<v Speaker 1>Musk raised or secured twelve point five billion dollars of

0:03:07.720 --> 0:03:11.400
<v Speaker 1>debt financing and an additional five million revolving credit line.

0:03:11.440 --> 0:03:14.239
<v Speaker 1>That's split between a six point five billion leverage loan,

0:03:14.520 --> 0:03:18.000
<v Speaker 1>three billions of secure bonds, three billions of unscured bonds.

0:03:18.000 --> 0:03:21.240
<v Speaker 1>What's changed is yields are soaring the market has changed

0:03:21.240 --> 0:03:24.880
<v Speaker 1>and it's a really difficult time to sell leverage debt

0:03:25.560 --> 0:03:28.400
<v Speaker 1>or buy out debt. And so basically the banks that

0:03:28.480 --> 0:03:31.640
<v Speaker 1>Musk has engaged we have to go to asset managers

0:03:31.720 --> 0:03:33.920
<v Speaker 1>and try and get this debt sold. It's a much

0:03:34.000 --> 0:03:37.320
<v Speaker 1>harder sell in present day than it was back in April,

0:03:37.360 --> 0:03:39.720
<v Speaker 1>so there's an uncertainty there. But as I said, go

0:03:39.800 --> 0:03:42.480
<v Speaker 1>back to the original or April agreement. Look at section

0:03:42.560 --> 0:03:46.520
<v Speaker 1>two point to the closing and the conditions, and a

0:03:46.560 --> 0:03:49.840
<v Speaker 1>lot of those conditions are now met, shareholder approval from Twitter,

0:03:50.120 --> 0:03:53.400
<v Speaker 1>regulatory waiting periods have surpassed, so it could be interesting

0:03:53.400 --> 0:03:56.960
<v Speaker 1>to see how quickly the closing of this deal proceeds.

0:03:57.000 --> 0:03:59.000
<v Speaker 1>And as Kurt's going to go through some of the reporting,

0:03:59.320 --> 0:04:01.640
<v Speaker 1>I think haf and st Je mccule make the Chance

0:04:01.640 --> 0:04:05.040
<v Speaker 1>Street judge, who was due to preside over the child

0:04:05.120 --> 0:04:08.040
<v Speaker 1>in October. She's basically saying, how is this going to

0:04:08.160 --> 0:04:10.920
<v Speaker 1>go moving forward? Right? She said, come back to us

0:04:10.960 --> 0:04:13.880
<v Speaker 1>with a proposal. Okay, thank you. We're going to talk

0:04:13.880 --> 0:04:15.960
<v Speaker 1>to a little bit later in the show. It all

0:04:16.000 --> 0:04:19.159
<v Speaker 1>started with a Bloomberg scoop, Bloomberg obtaining a letter from

0:04:19.240 --> 0:04:21.520
<v Speaker 1>Elon Musk's team stating that he wants to go ahead

0:04:21.520 --> 0:04:24.280
<v Speaker 1>and buy Twitter after all for the original price and

0:04:24.320 --> 0:04:27.159
<v Speaker 1>twenty cents a share. Let's get right to Bloombergs Kurt Wagner,

0:04:27.200 --> 0:04:29.799
<v Speaker 1>who helped break this story, as well as Geruber Kawasaki

0:04:29.839 --> 0:04:33.200
<v Speaker 1>President and CEO Ross Gerber, who owns Tesla but sold

0:04:33.240 --> 0:04:36.120
<v Speaker 1>his stake in Twitter over the course of all of this, Kurt,

0:04:36.160 --> 0:04:38.120
<v Speaker 1>I want to start with you, what is the very

0:04:38.240 --> 0:04:41.120
<v Speaker 1>very latest that we know? Yeah, I mean you and

0:04:41.240 --> 0:04:44.160
<v Speaker 1>Edward kind of hitting on it. Right. Obviously, Elon Musk

0:04:44.279 --> 0:04:46.760
<v Speaker 1>is saying, hey, let's get back to this original deal

0:04:46.800 --> 0:04:49.720
<v Speaker 1>that we had in April. Twitter has said, hey, we

0:04:49.760 --> 0:04:53.120
<v Speaker 1>want to close this at per share, which is what

0:04:53.160 --> 0:04:55.000
<v Speaker 1>they've been saying all along. Now, you would think, okay,

0:04:55.040 --> 0:04:57.680
<v Speaker 1>both sides are at the exact same spot, right, that

0:04:57.760 --> 0:05:00.000
<v Speaker 1>was the agreement that was in April. Now, the fact

0:05:00.080 --> 0:05:02.320
<v Speaker 1>that there is a little bit of reservation here or

0:05:02.360 --> 0:05:06.680
<v Speaker 1>hesitation just goes to show how much distrust has you know,

0:05:06.760 --> 0:05:09.320
<v Speaker 1>come up between these two sides over this process. Right.

0:05:09.360 --> 0:05:11.120
<v Speaker 1>So the fact that both of them are saying they

0:05:11.160 --> 0:05:13.479
<v Speaker 1>want the exact same thing on the same day, and

0:05:13.560 --> 0:05:16.360
<v Speaker 1>yet people are still waiting to say, well, let's wait

0:05:16.440 --> 0:05:18.960
<v Speaker 1>until it's officially signed on the dotted line. That just

0:05:19.000 --> 0:05:20.400
<v Speaker 1>kind of gives you a sense of how this has

0:05:20.440 --> 0:05:23.240
<v Speaker 1>played out, that that everyone is gonna hold their breath

0:05:23.320 --> 0:05:26.360
<v Speaker 1>until this becomes final final, which we may find out

0:05:26.360 --> 0:05:28.320
<v Speaker 1>in the next couple of days. Right, and who can

0:05:28.360 --> 0:05:32.200
<v Speaker 1>blame them? Right? As a Tesla investor, Ross, you weren't

0:05:32.240 --> 0:05:35.839
<v Speaker 1>happy about Elon Musk trying to buy Twitter at all.

0:05:35.920 --> 0:05:38.560
<v Speaker 1>You got out of Twitter. What are you thinking now?

0:05:40.200 --> 0:05:43.960
<v Speaker 1>I'm thinking it's gonna make the business books on how

0:05:44.040 --> 0:05:47.960
<v Speaker 1>not to buy a company. Um, he's literally created a

0:05:48.120 --> 0:05:51.640
<v Speaker 1>huge loss for himself by really the way he's handled this,

0:05:51.800 --> 0:05:55.119
<v Speaker 1>because a lot has changed inside Twitter in the last

0:05:55.120 --> 0:05:57.920
<v Speaker 1>four months as well, and including a mass amount of

0:05:58.080 --> 0:06:01.279
<v Speaker 1>high quality individuals who worked at Twitter leaving and a

0:06:01.320 --> 0:06:05.080
<v Speaker 1>lot more planning on leaving. So he's paying the highest

0:06:05.080 --> 0:06:07.599
<v Speaker 1>price possible. He's trying to get dead at the worst

0:06:07.640 --> 0:06:11.640
<v Speaker 1>time possible. He's basically being forced to buy this company.

0:06:11.760 --> 0:06:13.360
<v Speaker 1>It's not like he changed his heart. I think his

0:06:13.440 --> 0:06:15.919
<v Speaker 1>lawyers just told him he was gonna lose. And so

0:06:16.440 --> 0:06:18.440
<v Speaker 1>this is what I thought the whole time, And I

0:06:18.480 --> 0:06:20.120
<v Speaker 1>got out of this mess because I didn't want to

0:06:20.160 --> 0:06:21.920
<v Speaker 1>be involved with this mess, and I'm grateful I did.

0:06:21.960 --> 0:06:24.479
<v Speaker 1>I lost a little money, but but this is a mess.

0:06:24.720 --> 0:06:28.880
<v Speaker 1>It's really not great for Ellen. That said, I'm glad

0:06:28.920 --> 0:06:31.640
<v Speaker 1>that it's going to come to a conclusion and and

0:06:31.680 --> 0:06:34.680
<v Speaker 1>hopefully as a Tesla investor, we can get back to

0:06:34.720 --> 0:06:37.880
<v Speaker 1>focusing on the most exciting company in the world. Kurt,

0:06:38.560 --> 0:06:42.440
<v Speaker 1>let's talk a little bit about how Twitter is digesting this,

0:06:42.680 --> 0:06:46.280
<v Speaker 1>you know, because they haven't dropped their litigation and talking

0:06:46.360 --> 0:06:50.279
<v Speaker 1>to my sources, you know, if your Twitter, you're gonna

0:06:50.279 --> 0:06:53.880
<v Speaker 1>want some certainty. Is he really serious right now? Is

0:06:53.920 --> 0:06:57.839
<v Speaker 1>this really what are you hearing from the Twitter camp

0:06:57.960 --> 0:07:02.120
<v Speaker 1>about what their next move is? Right Well, to your point,

0:07:02.160 --> 0:07:04.640
<v Speaker 1>going back to that distrust I was talking about earlier,

0:07:04.760 --> 0:07:08.080
<v Speaker 1>right there, there's not a lot of incentive for anyone

0:07:08.120 --> 0:07:11.320
<v Speaker 1>to simply say we're gonna drop everything we're doing because

0:07:11.320 --> 0:07:14.080
<v Speaker 1>this guy said X. Right, and so I think, you know,

0:07:14.440 --> 0:07:18.200
<v Speaker 1>my understanding is that Twitter would need to stay or essentially,

0:07:18.240 --> 0:07:21.120
<v Speaker 1>you know, retract its lawsuit against Musk in order for

0:07:21.200 --> 0:07:24.160
<v Speaker 1>him to sign this um. Presumably, you know, if they

0:07:24.200 --> 0:07:26.280
<v Speaker 1>believe that he's operating in good faith. That would be

0:07:26.280 --> 0:07:28.600
<v Speaker 1>the next step was that they'd say, okay, the lawsuits over,

0:07:28.920 --> 0:07:32.640
<v Speaker 1>let's get back to the original agreement. But again, the

0:07:32.680 --> 0:07:36.080
<v Speaker 1>fact that we're even discussing this, it just shows how

0:07:36.120 --> 0:07:38.720
<v Speaker 1>fractured that relationship has been. And Emily, we've talked about

0:07:38.720 --> 0:07:41.720
<v Speaker 1>this before. What's crazy is this is now who they

0:07:41.760 --> 0:07:44.160
<v Speaker 1>want to run Twitter, right, A person that they've kind

0:07:44.160 --> 0:07:46.400
<v Speaker 1>of painted as a liar, someone that they painted as

0:07:46.760 --> 0:07:50.680
<v Speaker 1>as uh, you know, not prepared to operate the social network,

0:07:50.680 --> 0:07:52.080
<v Speaker 1>and yet they're fighting to get him to do it.

0:07:52.400 --> 0:07:55.080
<v Speaker 1>That's where employees are today, right there, suddenly waking up

0:07:55.080 --> 0:07:57.920
<v Speaker 1>and saying, okay, now, this kind of in some of

0:07:57.960 --> 0:08:00.320
<v Speaker 1>their minds worst case scenario is coming true, which means

0:08:00.400 --> 0:08:02.200
<v Speaker 1>that they're going to have a new boss very shortly,

0:08:02.240 --> 0:08:04.360
<v Speaker 1>and it's someone that they might not necessarily agree with

0:08:04.440 --> 0:08:06.800
<v Speaker 1>on a bunch of different things. Right. And you know,

0:08:06.840 --> 0:08:09.160
<v Speaker 1>from many perspective, Twitters in a worse position than it

0:08:09.280 --> 0:08:11.920
<v Speaker 1>was when Elon Musk decided to buy the company because

0:08:11.920 --> 0:08:14.960
<v Speaker 1>of what's happened with morale, what's happened with folks leaving

0:08:15.000 --> 0:08:18.760
<v Speaker 1>the company on the Tesla side. Ross. You know, clearly

0:08:18.760 --> 0:08:21.720
<v Speaker 1>investors are concerned about this, given the reaction to the stock.

0:08:22.680 --> 0:08:24.920
<v Speaker 1>Do you believe the concern is more that he might

0:08:25.040 --> 0:08:28.120
<v Speaker 1>sell Tesla stock to finance this deal, or the key

0:08:28.120 --> 0:08:32.199
<v Speaker 1>man risk that his attentions are going to be even

0:08:32.280 --> 0:08:37.560
<v Speaker 1>more divided. So you know, from the perspective of Tesla,

0:08:37.920 --> 0:08:39.679
<v Speaker 1>he sold a lot of stock already and it's been

0:08:39.720 --> 0:08:42.680
<v Speaker 1>an overhang all year from those sales. And if he

0:08:42.720 --> 0:08:45.080
<v Speaker 1>has to sell you know, another couple of billion, it's

0:08:45.120 --> 0:08:47.400
<v Speaker 1>a huge company and and that will be that and

0:08:47.480 --> 0:08:50.600
<v Speaker 1>so it takes away that uncertainty either way. I don't

0:08:50.600 --> 0:08:54.400
<v Speaker 1>think it's that material from an economic perspective. But I

0:08:54.400 --> 0:08:57.080
<v Speaker 1>think the second issue brought up is material, which is

0:08:57.520 --> 0:09:01.600
<v Speaker 1>being CEO of three major companies is not something humans

0:09:01.600 --> 0:09:05.439
<v Speaker 1>can do well. And so I get that he thinks

0:09:05.440 --> 0:09:08.320
<v Speaker 1>he can do this, but this is now a media property,

0:09:08.360 --> 0:09:10.719
<v Speaker 1>which is very different than running a space or e

0:09:10.840 --> 0:09:14.120
<v Speaker 1>V which are both technology companies, and and the dynamics

0:09:14.240 --> 0:09:16.840
<v Speaker 1>it takes to run a media company is completely opposite

0:09:16.840 --> 0:09:19.320
<v Speaker 1>from his skill set. And that's been more than proven

0:09:19.360 --> 0:09:21.960
<v Speaker 1>by the way he's handled the employees of Twitter, like

0:09:21.960 --> 0:09:23.920
<v Speaker 1>at all hands meeting. And I think you guys are

0:09:23.920 --> 0:09:27.680
<v Speaker 1>being nice saying that there's distrust. It's not distrust, it's hate.

0:09:28.120 --> 0:09:32.680
<v Speaker 1>They hate him. Okay, he's created a situation. He created it,

0:09:32.720 --> 0:09:35.480
<v Speaker 1>and I love Ellen, you know, I'm I'm a fan

0:09:35.520 --> 0:09:38.240
<v Speaker 1>and supporter, don't get me wrong, but I have friends

0:09:38.240 --> 0:09:41.480
<v Speaker 1>at Twitter and they hate him. So this is like

0:09:41.920 --> 0:09:45.200
<v Speaker 1>to getting to divorced people who hate each other to

0:09:45.320 --> 0:09:49.320
<v Speaker 1>now get married again. Now, if I'm Twitter, I'm not

0:09:49.440 --> 0:09:52.080
<v Speaker 1>gonna get rid of this lawsuit at all. I'm going

0:09:52.120 --> 0:09:56.120
<v Speaker 1>to force specific performance on Elon because there's no trust

0:09:56.120 --> 0:09:59.520
<v Speaker 1>there at all. So this is a really really difficult situation,

0:09:59.520 --> 0:10:01.240
<v Speaker 1>and I think that it's the risk, the key man

0:10:01.360 --> 0:10:05.080
<v Speaker 1>risk to Tesla is that now he gets this company

0:10:05.120 --> 0:10:08.560
<v Speaker 1>and you know, like, tell me what day is gonna

0:10:08.600 --> 0:10:11.680
<v Speaker 1>be easy for him at Twitter? And the reality is, Kurt,

0:10:12.760 --> 0:10:14.320
<v Speaker 1>let me know if I'm right here, I mean, Elon

0:10:14.400 --> 0:10:17.720
<v Speaker 1>Musk could own Twitter in a matter of days, right,

0:10:18.080 --> 0:10:21.000
<v Speaker 1>This could all happen really quickly, That's right. Well, all

0:10:21.000 --> 0:10:24.720
<v Speaker 1>of the kind of stipulations for the deal closing have

0:10:24.720 --> 0:10:27.760
<v Speaker 1>have already happened, uh, including the shareholder vote, which we

0:10:27.920 --> 0:10:31.280
<v Speaker 1>you know covered last in September last month, and so

0:10:31.720 --> 0:10:34.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, yes, this could all happen very quickly. What

0:10:34.160 --> 0:10:38.280
<v Speaker 1>I find kind of crazy and sort of ironic and hilarious, right,

0:10:38.360 --> 0:10:40.839
<v Speaker 1>is that the last guy who are on Twitter essentially

0:10:41.160 --> 0:10:43.959
<v Speaker 1>was asked to leave because he had two jobs, right,

0:10:44.000 --> 0:10:45.719
<v Speaker 1>and now the guy who's running Twitter is going to

0:10:45.800 --> 0:10:49.200
<v Speaker 1>have three jobs. This has been said before, but the

0:10:49.240 --> 0:10:53.880
<v Speaker 1>irony here Emily is quite strong strong indeed, uh ross

0:10:53.920 --> 0:10:59.920
<v Speaker 1>As a Tesla shareholder, what's your biggest concern about how

0:11:00.240 --> 0:11:02.400
<v Speaker 1>you know he plans to run Twitter, If he plans

0:11:02.400 --> 0:11:04.959
<v Speaker 1>to run Twitter, how involved he plans to be in management?

0:11:04.960 --> 0:11:07.480
<v Speaker 1>And what would you like to see. I'm assuming a

0:11:07.559 --> 0:11:12.240
<v Speaker 1>more hands off approach, you know, this whole face. You know,

0:11:12.880 --> 0:11:14.719
<v Speaker 1>I don't know how he got himself into this, but

0:11:15.320 --> 0:11:17.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, and he's a very smart guy, so I

0:11:17.559 --> 0:11:22.560
<v Speaker 1>don't know. But that's said, I mean, I just don't

0:11:22.559 --> 0:11:26.800
<v Speaker 1>know where this goes. Like, uh So, I think the

0:11:26.840 --> 0:11:30.079
<v Speaker 1>most important thing is that he stayed as much out

0:11:30.080 --> 0:11:33.400
<v Speaker 1>of politics as possible, And obviously that's just not gonna happen,

0:11:33.440 --> 0:11:36.160
<v Speaker 1>and it's going to create a lot of a lot

0:11:36.200 --> 0:11:40.319
<v Speaker 1>of negativity towards him, and and you know, I just

0:11:40.600 --> 0:11:44.880
<v Speaker 1>it's a really politically difficult environment to have an opinion

0:11:44.960 --> 0:11:47.000
<v Speaker 1>about politics in the day and age. And of course

0:11:47.520 --> 0:11:49.600
<v Speaker 1>you all in the media know this. More than anybody,

0:11:50.240 --> 0:11:55.319
<v Speaker 1>and and every time he makes political statements, he's attacked mercilessly,

0:11:55.559 --> 0:11:58.160
<v Speaker 1>and much of it for good reason. So that I

0:11:58.200 --> 0:12:00.920
<v Speaker 1>think is the problem with him run in Twitter is

0:12:00.960 --> 0:12:02.839
<v Speaker 1>it put some square in the face of a lot

0:12:02.880 --> 0:12:05.720
<v Speaker 1>of issues that have nothing to do with Tesla that

0:12:05.800 --> 0:12:09.880
<v Speaker 1>will affect people's perception of Tesla. And you know, I

0:12:09.920 --> 0:12:12.199
<v Speaker 1>think it's there's a point at time where Tesla is

0:12:12.200 --> 0:12:14.880
<v Speaker 1>a big enough company, and it's it's now where it's

0:12:14.880 --> 0:12:18.600
<v Speaker 1>not that it's like Ellen needs to give a little

0:12:18.600 --> 0:12:21.880
<v Speaker 1>bit of control up so that investors feel more confident

0:12:21.920 --> 0:12:24.040
<v Speaker 1>about the secession plan. This is what I've been talking

0:12:24.080 --> 0:12:26.360
<v Speaker 1>about for like years, that there needs to be a

0:12:26.400 --> 0:12:29.160
<v Speaker 1>strong number too at Tesla and there needs to be

0:12:29.400 --> 0:12:32.440
<v Speaker 1>a deeper management best bench. And Tesla tells me all

0:12:32.440 --> 0:12:34.880
<v Speaker 1>the time how great all these young people are, which

0:12:34.880 --> 0:12:37.160
<v Speaker 1>I agree, but I'm like, you need to promote these

0:12:37.200 --> 0:12:40.079
<v Speaker 1>people and you need to show and give these people

0:12:40.160 --> 0:12:43.959
<v Speaker 1>some power over the business, because the perception right now

0:12:44.000 --> 0:12:45.880
<v Speaker 1>is exactly what you're saying, is now this guy runs

0:12:45.880 --> 0:12:49.559
<v Speaker 1>three public companies and in different industries, Like once again,

0:12:49.640 --> 0:12:53.240
<v Speaker 1>I don't think that's possible. So something's got to give,

0:12:53.840 --> 0:12:56.960
<v Speaker 1>and you know, hopefully it's not Tesla, that's for sure,

0:12:57.240 --> 0:13:02.600
<v Speaker 1>And Kurt, four weeks away from an election. Um, you

0:13:02.640 --> 0:13:04.640
<v Speaker 1>know how our folks at Twitter thinking about this if

0:13:04.640 --> 0:13:07.280
<v Speaker 1>this does happen right in a matter of days. The

0:13:07.320 --> 0:13:10.520
<v Speaker 1>election is four weeks away. And Ellen has said repeatedly

0:13:10.520 --> 0:13:13.040
<v Speaker 1>he doesn't you know, agree with a lot of Twitter's policies.

0:13:13.080 --> 0:13:16.839
<v Speaker 1>He doesn't necessarily think they're necessary. Right, these are things

0:13:16.880 --> 0:13:19.160
<v Speaker 1>that have been kind of implemented over years, right over

0:13:19.240 --> 0:13:22.280
<v Speaker 1>multiple election cycles. And uh, you know, the big one,

0:13:22.280 --> 0:13:24.720
<v Speaker 1>of course, is he said he would bring back President

0:13:24.800 --> 0:13:27.440
<v Speaker 1>Donald Trump on the Twitter if if he was owning

0:13:27.440 --> 0:13:29.720
<v Speaker 1>the company, right, and there is a chance that all

0:13:29.760 --> 0:13:32.280
<v Speaker 1>of those different things could come, you know, into play

0:13:32.320 --> 0:13:34.080
<v Speaker 1>over these next couple of weeks in the lead up

0:13:34.120 --> 0:13:37.040
<v Speaker 1>to the US mid terms and and you know, not

0:13:37.160 --> 0:13:40.560
<v Speaker 1>even looking ahead to whatever happens in four So I

0:13:40.600 --> 0:13:42.400
<v Speaker 1>do think that there's a lot of people who are

0:13:42.520 --> 0:13:46.160
<v Speaker 1>very conscious of that. We're probably very worried about that,

0:13:46.360 --> 0:13:49.040
<v Speaker 1>mostly because they just don't exactly know what he's going

0:13:49.080 --> 0:13:51.520
<v Speaker 1>to repeal or take away if he indeed, you know,

0:13:51.640 --> 0:13:53.600
<v Speaker 1>becomes a CEO, and how quickly they would move on

0:13:53.679 --> 0:13:56.480
<v Speaker 1>something like that. But given where we are with this election.

0:13:56.600 --> 0:13:58.200
<v Speaker 1>It has to be noted that that that kind of

0:13:58.200 --> 0:14:01.160
<v Speaker 1>stuff could play a factor. It's gonna be hard, probably

0:14:01.360 --> 0:14:05.320
<v Speaker 1>impossible to stay out of politics given the timing. Okay,

0:14:05.360 --> 0:14:07.800
<v Speaker 1>Bloomer's Kurt Wagner, thank you. We're going to continue to

0:14:07.840 --> 0:14:11.280
<v Speaker 1>watch your reporting. Great job breaking that story. Gerber's Kawasaki

0:14:11.320 --> 0:14:14.680
<v Speaker 1>President and CEO, Ross Gerber, always appreciate your commentary here.

0:14:15.080 --> 0:14:27.480
<v Speaker 1>Thank you. All right. Today's big story Elon Muska Green

0:14:27.560 --> 0:14:30.040
<v Speaker 1>to buy Twitter at the original price. What does it

0:14:30.080 --> 0:14:32.800
<v Speaker 1>all mean for the months long legal battle between the two.

0:14:32.880 --> 0:14:35.560
<v Speaker 1>Let's bring into a law school's associate Dean and Lipton

0:14:35.960 --> 0:14:39.520
<v Speaker 1>for more and from a legal perspective, given Elon Musk

0:14:39.560 --> 0:14:41.760
<v Speaker 1>has already spent a lot of money trying to make

0:14:41.800 --> 0:14:45.360
<v Speaker 1>this go away, what do you think changed on his end?

0:14:46.000 --> 0:14:48.480
<v Speaker 1>I think, um, in many ways this is almost the

0:14:48.520 --> 0:14:51.360
<v Speaker 1>most expected outcome of all, which is settling on the

0:14:51.440 --> 0:14:54.680
<v Speaker 1>eve of trial just before deposition of the main players,

0:14:54.720 --> 0:14:57.280
<v Speaker 1>the Elon Musk himself. I mean in that sense it's

0:14:57.280 --> 0:15:01.520
<v Speaker 1>actually very traditional sort of settlement, and so he doesn't

0:15:01.520 --> 0:15:04.160
<v Speaker 1>want to be deposed. He has, you know, probably some

0:15:04.240 --> 0:15:07.920
<v Speaker 1>embarrassing text messages and conflicting statements and all of that

0:15:07.960 --> 0:15:10.440
<v Speaker 1>would make for a very unpleasant deposition for him. He

0:15:10.560 --> 0:15:14.520
<v Speaker 1>is was scheduled to be deposed later this week. Everyone

0:15:14.560 --> 0:15:17.320
<v Speaker 1>on Twitter's end has been deposed, So perhaps you're right

0:15:17.520 --> 0:15:19.440
<v Speaker 1>he didn't want to go through that process. But it's

0:15:19.480 --> 0:15:24.160
<v Speaker 1>not really a settlement at all because he's not essentially

0:15:24.480 --> 0:15:29.440
<v Speaker 1>winning anything. I mean, the price is the same. Yeah, yeah,

0:15:29.480 --> 0:15:32.120
<v Speaker 1>he's he Yeah. I mean I think the idea must

0:15:32.160 --> 0:15:37.480
<v Speaker 1>be something like um uh, Twitter already took a shareholder vote. Uh.

0:15:38.000 --> 0:15:40.200
<v Speaker 1>To go back to the shareholders and ask them to

0:15:40.280 --> 0:15:44.480
<v Speaker 1>accept less would not only be time, it would be

0:15:44.480 --> 0:15:47.240
<v Speaker 1>time consuming, It would be embarrassing. Twitter would have to

0:15:47.320 --> 0:15:49.400
<v Speaker 1>explain why it was doing this when in fact it's

0:15:49.440 --> 0:15:52.080
<v Speaker 1>in a very strong legal position. And if the goal

0:15:52.200 --> 0:15:55.840
<v Speaker 1>year is to stop the proceedings in court, there may

0:15:56.120 --> 0:15:58.000
<v Speaker 1>not have been enough time. I mean, trial was supposed

0:15:58.040 --> 0:16:01.080
<v Speaker 1>to start in two weeks, getting the papers together just

0:16:01.120 --> 0:16:03.560
<v Speaker 1>to have a second share hold the vote, would you know,

0:16:03.880 --> 0:16:08.240
<v Speaker 1>very possibly not get the goal of stopping the delaware

0:16:08.240 --> 0:16:12.040
<v Speaker 1>of proceedings going forward. So that is ultimately likely. It

0:16:12.240 --> 0:16:14.880
<v Speaker 1>is part of must thinking in terms of not even

0:16:15.560 --> 0:16:19.360
<v Speaker 1>pushing further to get a couple of dollars off the price. Interesting,

0:16:19.440 --> 0:16:22.800
<v Speaker 1>so walk as there. How this will likely play out

0:16:22.840 --> 0:16:25.720
<v Speaker 1>in court because if you're Twitter, you're wanting to get

0:16:25.760 --> 0:16:28.600
<v Speaker 1>some certainty that he really means it. This time he

0:16:28.680 --> 0:16:32.640
<v Speaker 1>threw in some language about dead financing and a condition,

0:16:32.840 --> 0:16:35.440
<v Speaker 1>and I'm sure that's making the Twitter folks say, hey,

0:16:35.440 --> 0:16:38.960
<v Speaker 1>what does he mean by this? Could they still go

0:16:39.160 --> 0:16:43.840
<v Speaker 1>to a judge and ask the judge to somehow uh,

0:16:43.880 --> 0:16:47.520
<v Speaker 1>you know, be part of the agreement or somehow further

0:16:47.800 --> 0:16:50.880
<v Speaker 1>enforce an agreement. Yeah, I think, and I think that's

0:16:50.920 --> 0:16:53.440
<v Speaker 1>probably what Twitter wants. I mean, the defining thing thing

0:16:53.480 --> 0:16:55.320
<v Speaker 1>was always a condition for him to follow through, So

0:16:55.360 --> 0:16:58.440
<v Speaker 1>I don't think that necessarily adds anything like he was always,

0:16:59.080 --> 0:17:00.760
<v Speaker 1>um not going to be under an obligation to close

0:17:00.800 --> 0:17:03.240
<v Speaker 1>unless he at the debt financing in place. But I

0:17:03.280 --> 0:17:06.560
<v Speaker 1>think that um, but his his letter was very kneeling.

0:17:06.600 --> 0:17:09.520
<v Speaker 1>Now it's very unclear exactly how much he was committing

0:17:09.520 --> 0:17:11.880
<v Speaker 1>to in that letter. And Twitter obviously is not gonna

0:17:11.920 --> 0:17:15.159
<v Speaker 1>want to give up its trial date and undo the

0:17:15.359 --> 0:17:17.960
<v Speaker 1>depositions that are scheduled or what other proceivings are scheduled.

0:17:18.119 --> 0:17:20.040
<v Speaker 1>It's not gonna want to change any of that until

0:17:20.040 --> 0:17:23.719
<v Speaker 1>it's rock solid that this is for real, absolutely definitely happening,

0:17:23.720 --> 0:17:26.520
<v Speaker 1>no bacsies. So they might seek some kind of court

0:17:26.680 --> 0:17:29.280
<v Speaker 1>order that requires him to go through with the deal,

0:17:29.400 --> 0:17:32.520
<v Speaker 1>or some kind of court representation that he's not going

0:17:32.560 --> 0:17:36.359
<v Speaker 1>to make any additional arguments and so forth, and gathered

0:17:36.440 --> 0:17:38.320
<v Speaker 1>that's exactly what they're going to be trying to work

0:17:38.320 --> 0:17:41.480
<v Speaker 1>out next and being told that's called a consent judgment.

0:17:41.560 --> 0:17:44.359
<v Speaker 1>Is that what you're talking about by a court order? Yeah? Yeah,

0:17:44.400 --> 0:17:46.520
<v Speaker 1>it could be something like that, some kind of you know,

0:17:47.200 --> 0:17:49.879
<v Speaker 1>exactly some kind of judgment by the court that he

0:17:50.080 --> 0:17:53.680
<v Speaker 1>has agreed to uh buy the company in particular price,

0:17:53.760 --> 0:17:56.280
<v Speaker 1>go through whatever that needs to go through, and that way,

0:17:56.440 --> 0:17:58.560
<v Speaker 1>if he defies it and he's defined a court order

0:17:58.560 --> 0:18:01.080
<v Speaker 1>of using the chance of court, given all of these

0:18:01.119 --> 0:18:03.400
<v Speaker 1>you know, legal issues to work out, is it your

0:18:03.480 --> 0:18:06.119
<v Speaker 1>understanding that this could happen in a matter of days.

0:18:06.520 --> 0:18:08.600
<v Speaker 1>Do you think it's likely we get to that October

0:18:08.640 --> 0:18:11.960
<v Speaker 1>seventeenth trial date or that this is you know, said

0:18:12.000 --> 0:18:14.320
<v Speaker 1>and done before then. I think it's very possible it's

0:18:14.320 --> 0:18:16.359
<v Speaker 1>going to be done. I mean, obviously Twitter is suspicious.

0:18:16.359 --> 0:18:19.040
<v Speaker 1>Twitter is you know, suspicious that this is some kind

0:18:19.080 --> 0:18:22.000
<v Speaker 1>of game by must to delay things and they don't

0:18:22.000 --> 0:18:24.600
<v Speaker 1>want to let that happen. And if he is actually

0:18:24.640 --> 0:18:26.560
<v Speaker 1>trying to play some town of game, then obviously we're

0:18:26.600 --> 0:18:29.240
<v Speaker 1>still going to go forward everything. But I think it's

0:18:29.359 --> 0:18:32.280
<v Speaker 1>very likely that this is serious and as soon as

0:18:32.600 --> 0:18:36.119
<v Speaker 1>must can get the assurances the Twitter needs, UM, things

0:18:36.119 --> 0:18:38.359
<v Speaker 1>can probably happen very quickly. After that. The company has

0:18:38.359 --> 0:18:41.080
<v Speaker 1>already gotten the regulatory aprouvals and the shareholder approval that

0:18:41.080 --> 0:18:43.080
<v Speaker 1>it needs to close, so it's really just a matter

0:18:43.080 --> 0:18:45.840
<v Speaker 1>of getting the financing and that probably won't take very long.

0:18:46.080 --> 0:18:50.240
<v Speaker 1>So yes, I think that this could definitely close soon.

0:18:50.520 --> 0:18:55.240
<v Speaker 1>And uh with the trial date will will be suspended

0:18:55.240 --> 0:18:56.800
<v Speaker 1>that there won't be a trial. I think that's very long.

0:18:57.359 --> 0:19:01.439
<v Speaker 1>So after let's say that happens Moscow's Twitter, you know,

0:19:01.440 --> 0:19:03.800
<v Speaker 1>we're a few weeks out from an election, what happens?

0:19:03.840 --> 0:19:08.159
<v Speaker 1>You know, how quickly could he just start making changes? Right?

0:19:08.200 --> 0:19:10.320
<v Speaker 1>I mean, you know, he's in charge of the company,

0:19:09.920 --> 0:19:12.680
<v Speaker 1>and he can make whatever changes. Lots I suppose he

0:19:12.800 --> 0:19:15.080
<v Speaker 1>orders it on. The question is whether he really does

0:19:15.160 --> 0:19:17.760
<v Speaker 1>want to. I mean, I think um, part of the

0:19:17.760 --> 0:19:20.520
<v Speaker 1>reason that he may have gotten cold feet about the

0:19:20.560 --> 0:19:23.280
<v Speaker 1>whole deal was because he didn't necessarily want to change

0:19:23.280 --> 0:19:26.120
<v Speaker 1>responsibility for all of that. And I don't know if

0:19:26.119 --> 0:19:28.440
<v Speaker 1>he wants to thrust himself into that kind of political

0:19:28.440 --> 0:19:31.600
<v Speaker 1>spotlight right away, but I mean, you know, once it's

0:19:31.680 --> 0:19:33.639
<v Speaker 1>his company, he can order what he wants, all right.

0:19:33.720 --> 0:19:36.600
<v Speaker 1>So much to continue to tease out here, to continue

0:19:36.600 --> 0:19:39.200
<v Speaker 1>to follow and lipped into Lane Law School's associate Dean

0:19:39.680 --> 0:19:42.960
<v Speaker 1>always appreciate you um sharing your legal perspective with us.

0:19:42.960 --> 0:19:44.760
<v Speaker 1>Thank you. We're gonna have much more come up next.

0:19:44.960 --> 0:19:57.800
<v Speaker 1>Stay with us. This is Bloomberg. Some more stories were

0:19:57.800 --> 0:19:59.720
<v Speaker 1>following micro and I said it plans to invest as

0:19:59.800 --> 0:20:02.600
<v Speaker 1>much as a hundred billion dollars over the next twenty

0:20:02.680 --> 0:20:05.680
<v Speaker 1>years to build a factory in upstate New York. This

0:20:05.800 --> 0:20:09.160
<v Speaker 1>in an effort to boost US production of memory chips.

0:20:09.280 --> 0:20:12.560
<v Speaker 1>The company says this is the largest private investment in

0:20:12.680 --> 0:20:17.879
<v Speaker 1>New York state history. This comes in conjunction with the

0:20:18.040 --> 0:20:20.760
<v Speaker 1>investment that we had announced in Boise a few weeks

0:20:20.760 --> 0:20:24.120
<v Speaker 1>ago the leading edge memory manufacturing fab Data as well,

0:20:24.440 --> 0:20:28.760
<v Speaker 1>and the two together with helpers bring our domestic production

0:20:28.840 --> 0:20:33.040
<v Speaker 1>to by the end of the decade versus ten percent

0:20:33.200 --> 0:20:38.080
<v Speaker 1>currently meantime. Tesla rival Rivan reported progress in ramping up production.

0:20:38.280 --> 0:20:43.440
<v Speaker 1>Van also reaffirmed its goals building electric vehicles this year.

0:20:43.920 --> 0:20:46.679
<v Speaker 1>Rivan says it produced more than seventy three hundred cars

0:20:46.760 --> 0:20:48.960
<v Speaker 1>in the third quarter. Will have more on that later

0:20:49.000 --> 0:20:52.080
<v Speaker 1>this hour. And Meta plans to close one of its

0:20:52.080 --> 0:20:55.359
<v Speaker 1>New York offices as the company winds back expansion plans

0:20:55.359 --> 0:20:59.040
<v Speaker 1>in the city. According to Bloomberg sources, Meta has been

0:20:59.160 --> 0:21:03.639
<v Speaker 1>consolidated it's New York workforce, building out offices and Hudson Yards,

0:21:03.720 --> 0:21:06.840
<v Speaker 1>and moving ahead with other office plans near Penn Station.

0:21:07.359 --> 0:21:10.480
<v Speaker 1>Last week, met It announced the hiring freeze and restructuring.

0:21:19.760 --> 0:21:22.840
<v Speaker 1>Welcome back to Bloomer Technology and Emily Chang in San Francisco.

0:21:23.080 --> 0:21:26.159
<v Speaker 1>Back to today's top story. Are at Ludlow, Uh and

0:21:26.240 --> 0:21:29.720
<v Speaker 1>the whole newsroom really following the Musk Twitter saga since

0:21:29.760 --> 0:21:31.840
<v Speaker 1>the start and you've actually been talking to some folks

0:21:32.000 --> 0:21:35.280
<v Speaker 1>at Twitter. How is this all going down on the inside. Yeah, Well,

0:21:35.320 --> 0:21:38.320
<v Speaker 1>when news broke the Elon Musk had sent Twitter a

0:21:38.400 --> 0:21:41.399
<v Speaker 1>letter saying he would perceive in the original terms. A

0:21:41.520 --> 0:21:44.159
<v Speaker 1>number of very wide range of Twitter staff were in

0:21:44.240 --> 0:21:48.680
<v Speaker 1>a three hour long quarterly strategic planning meeting and apparently

0:21:48.720 --> 0:21:52.480
<v Speaker 1>in the first fifteen minutes, paragag Rol, the CEO of Twitter,

0:21:52.640 --> 0:21:56.159
<v Speaker 1>was delivering some opening remarks, and pretty much for the

0:21:56.359 --> 0:21:59.000
<v Speaker 1>entire duration of the three hour meeting, not a single

0:21:59.080 --> 0:22:02.080
<v Speaker 1>word was said about the news that was breaking all

0:22:02.119 --> 0:22:05.400
<v Speaker 1>around these employees. There was no sort of official comment.

0:22:06.080 --> 0:22:09.879
<v Speaker 1>We later in a memo that was shared to Bloomberg

0:22:09.920 --> 0:22:12.200
<v Speaker 1>News or shared with Bloomberg News from Shaw and Edgett,

0:22:12.240 --> 0:22:16.000
<v Speaker 1>whose general counsel. Eventually, once it was already in the

0:22:16.040 --> 0:22:19.480
<v Speaker 1>public domain, employees were informed of what was going on.

0:22:19.600 --> 0:22:21.840
<v Speaker 1>But you know, it's a very tough time right now

0:22:21.840 --> 0:22:23.760
<v Speaker 1>if you're a Twitter employee, especially if you're working on

0:22:23.800 --> 0:22:26.800
<v Speaker 1>the product, you really don't know where you stand. Reminders

0:22:26.880 --> 0:22:30.359
<v Speaker 1>at what Musk has said about his vision for the platform.

0:22:30.480 --> 0:22:33.199
<v Speaker 1>We know he's concerned about barts and spam. We know

0:22:33.400 --> 0:22:38.680
<v Speaker 1>he said he potentially would reinstate uh, former President Trump.

0:22:39.119 --> 0:22:42.280
<v Speaker 1>You know what, what's our sense of what he'll do

0:22:42.840 --> 0:22:46.440
<v Speaker 1>once he potentially in a matter of days, owns Twitter. Yeah,

0:22:46.560 --> 0:22:48.600
<v Speaker 1>I mean it's worth remembering as well what we learned

0:22:48.760 --> 0:22:50.840
<v Speaker 1>in the text messages that came out as part of

0:22:50.880 --> 0:22:54.280
<v Speaker 1>discovery through court filings, you know, and the whole reason

0:22:54.520 --> 0:22:58.480
<v Speaker 1>for must take taking Twitter private largely comes from conversations

0:22:58.480 --> 0:23:01.199
<v Speaker 1>with Jack Dawesy right that they need to enact changes

0:23:01.560 --> 0:23:05.760
<v Speaker 1>that they felt couldn't be done if Twitter were republic entity,

0:23:05.840 --> 0:23:07.960
<v Speaker 1>a public company, and a lot of that revolves around

0:23:07.960 --> 0:23:10.800
<v Speaker 1>the ad model, moving away from an ad model, you know,

0:23:10.840 --> 0:23:13.040
<v Speaker 1>they want to tackle the box issue on the platform.

0:23:13.119 --> 0:23:15.760
<v Speaker 1>Musk has also talked about, you know, paying for the

0:23:15.840 --> 0:23:20.159
<v Speaker 1>privilege essentially a verification um, and finding new ways to

0:23:20.200 --> 0:23:23.760
<v Speaker 1>monetize the platform beyond just relying on ads. And of course,

0:23:23.800 --> 0:23:27.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, the big technological one for Muskar is open

0:23:27.600 --> 0:23:31.359
<v Speaker 1>sourcing the algorithm that kind of drives the Twitter platform itself.

0:23:31.400 --> 0:23:33.040
<v Speaker 1>So those are the key areas that we think you'll

0:23:33.040 --> 0:23:37.680
<v Speaker 1>focus on, But broadly, the kind of principle or ideological

0:23:37.760 --> 0:23:40.480
<v Speaker 1>changes are this idea that he believes that it should

0:23:40.520 --> 0:23:42.919
<v Speaker 1>be a place where freedom of speech is protected and

0:23:42.960 --> 0:23:46.879
<v Speaker 1>that as long as that no one uses the Twitter

0:23:46.920 --> 0:23:49.880
<v Speaker 1>platform to cause harm or offense, that a broad range

0:23:50.200 --> 0:23:52.520
<v Speaker 1>of voices should be allowed onto it. And that seems

0:23:52.560 --> 0:23:56.160
<v Speaker 1>to be Vlon Musk's philosophy. All right, I'd love They'll

0:23:56.200 --> 0:24:00.000
<v Speaker 1>thank you, of course for you're reporting throughout the day. Um,

0:24:00.000 --> 0:24:01.159
<v Speaker 1>I want to take a look at this from a

0:24:01.200 --> 0:24:04.679
<v Speaker 1>slightly different angle now, with the news of Elon Moscow

0:24:04.680 --> 0:24:06.919
<v Speaker 1>greening to proceed with this Twitter deal, the idea of

0:24:06.920 --> 0:24:09.639
<v Speaker 1>free speech on the internet of course back front and center.

0:24:10.400 --> 0:24:13.520
<v Speaker 1>He has said that he would reverse former President Trump's

0:24:13.520 --> 0:24:17.399
<v Speaker 1>permanent ban on Twitter that took place days after the

0:24:17.480 --> 0:24:20.919
<v Speaker 1>US capital attack. That attack had been in part fueled

0:24:20.920 --> 0:24:23.679
<v Speaker 1>by Trumps Stop the Steel movement, a meme that became

0:24:23.800 --> 0:24:27.200
<v Speaker 1>larger than life, with real world consequences. That's the subject

0:24:27.280 --> 0:24:30.200
<v Speaker 1>of a new book, Meme Wars, The Untold Story of

0:24:30.200 --> 0:24:34.040
<v Speaker 1>the online battles up ending Democracy in America, by researchers

0:24:34.040 --> 0:24:37.440
<v Speaker 1>at Harvard Shorenstein Center on Media, Politics and Public Policy.

0:24:38.119 --> 0:24:41.680
<v Speaker 1>Research director and co author of that book joined Joan

0:24:41.720 --> 0:24:44.240
<v Speaker 1>Donovan is with us now for more. So, Joean a

0:24:44.240 --> 0:24:48.560
<v Speaker 1>lot to digest here. Elon Musk is a meme starter,

0:24:48.760 --> 0:24:51.920
<v Speaker 1>one of the biggest meme tweeters in the world. He's

0:24:51.960 --> 0:24:55.320
<v Speaker 1>the butt of a number of memes as well. What

0:24:55.400 --> 0:25:00.000
<v Speaker 1>do you think him owning Twitter means for the platform?

0:25:00.040 --> 0:25:03.800
<v Speaker 1>You know, when he first started making hay saying he

0:25:03.880 --> 0:25:06.560
<v Speaker 1>was going to buy it, I thought it was going

0:25:06.600 --> 0:25:11.320
<v Speaker 1>to be nonsensical. Um, now that he's invested in this

0:25:11.400 --> 0:25:13.960
<v Speaker 1>is going to go through. One of the things that

0:25:14.000 --> 0:25:16.440
<v Speaker 1>we looked at was, you know, what is Elon Musk

0:25:16.520 --> 0:25:19.000
<v Speaker 1>like to tweet? And he does tend to get right

0:25:19.000 --> 0:25:27.119
<v Speaker 1>in the middle of very important worlds, historic geopolitical flame wars.

0:25:27.200 --> 0:25:31.840
<v Speaker 1>UH just recently with Slinsky, for instance, about the war

0:25:31.920 --> 0:25:36.600
<v Speaker 1>in Ukraine, and so UM he's he's not a politician,

0:25:36.640 --> 0:25:39.160
<v Speaker 1>but he's very much a political figure, and he now

0:25:39.200 --> 0:25:45.320
<v Speaker 1>has bought one of the most consequential communication technologies of

0:25:45.520 --> 0:25:49.560
<v Speaker 1>our present day. And so we have to be on

0:25:49.680 --> 0:25:55.000
<v Speaker 1>alert and very careful about UH charting these changes that

0:25:55.040 --> 0:25:57.520
<v Speaker 1>are going to come about. It Twitter very rapidly, and

0:25:58.000 --> 0:25:59.560
<v Speaker 1>when he first started saying that he was going to

0:25:59.600 --> 0:26:03.080
<v Speaker 1>buy the form of cross, UH many good employees left

0:26:03.200 --> 0:26:07.680
<v Speaker 1>right away. And so I'm I'm afraid that the people

0:26:07.680 --> 0:26:10.399
<v Speaker 1>who are there that are doing excellent work are not

0:26:10.440 --> 0:26:12.400
<v Speaker 1>going to want to stay there because of the political

0:26:12.440 --> 0:26:15.199
<v Speaker 1>climate that their new boss brings. You make a very

0:26:15.240 --> 0:26:17.080
<v Speaker 1>good point that just in the last twenty four hours

0:26:17.080 --> 0:26:21.480
<v Speaker 1>he got right in the middle of a war between

0:26:21.560 --> 0:26:26.680
<v Speaker 1>Russia and Ukraine, got a really heated response from Ukraine's

0:26:26.680 --> 0:26:33.200
<v Speaker 1>President Zelinski himself. What are your biggest concerns about someone

0:26:33.240 --> 0:26:37.199
<v Speaker 1>like Elon Musk owning this platform. UM And would you

0:26:37.240 --> 0:26:40.440
<v Speaker 1>say concern is your overwhelming sentiment right now or are

0:26:40.480 --> 0:26:44.240
<v Speaker 1>you also intrigued or potentially even a little bit excited

0:26:44.640 --> 0:26:48.960
<v Speaker 1>about the possibilities. Well, if you read the book mean

0:26:49.000 --> 0:26:53.560
<v Speaker 1>More as it starts with the occupy movement, and Twitter

0:26:53.680 --> 0:26:57.439
<v Speaker 1>is a key figure throughout the book as a place

0:26:57.480 --> 0:27:01.840
<v Speaker 1>where people do launch mean mores and start and spark

0:27:01.960 --> 0:27:05.960
<v Speaker 1>political movements, and where politicians have gotten their voice and

0:27:06.000 --> 0:27:09.600
<v Speaker 1>their audience all the way up to where we end

0:27:09.640 --> 0:27:13.320
<v Speaker 1>the book at the insurrection where events sitting president at

0:27:13.320 --> 0:27:16.560
<v Speaker 1>the United States was able to use memes and hashtags

0:27:16.640 --> 0:27:22.800
<v Speaker 1>in order to UH foment an insurrection With Elon Musk,

0:27:23.200 --> 0:27:29.840
<v Speaker 1>I imagine more than being concerned, I don't know the

0:27:29.880 --> 0:27:33.480
<v Speaker 1>way in which he's going to come at questions of

0:27:33.560 --> 0:27:39.800
<v Speaker 1>content moderation that are, you know, under the purview of

0:27:39.920 --> 0:27:44.680
<v Speaker 1>UH what are obstensively called trust and safety teams. UM

0:27:44.720 --> 0:27:48.439
<v Speaker 1>And particularly some of the tweets and memes that Elon

0:27:48.560 --> 0:27:53.040
<v Speaker 1>has been sharing over the years do tend to run

0:27:53.160 --> 0:27:55.879
<v Speaker 1>right up on the line of terms of service, whether

0:27:55.880 --> 0:28:01.919
<v Speaker 1>they're transforment, transphobic, or homophobic or anti a woman, UM

0:28:02.080 --> 0:28:07.359
<v Speaker 1>or almost financial scams. He was also behind UH the

0:28:07.520 --> 0:28:12.960
<v Speaker 1>early calls for people to take hydroxy chloroquine to cure coronavirus,

0:28:13.119 --> 0:28:17.320
<v Speaker 1>and so everywhere we look and see his opinions floating

0:28:17.320 --> 0:28:21.919
<v Speaker 1>around UM, we have to wonder to what degree is

0:28:21.960 --> 0:28:27.679
<v Speaker 1>he also spreading misinformation and disinformation on the platform. But

0:28:27.880 --> 0:28:31.560
<v Speaker 1>business model wise, I can't imagine that this is gonna

0:28:31.640 --> 0:28:35.720
<v Speaker 1>be big boon for Twitter over time, because if the

0:28:35.800 --> 0:28:38.640
<v Speaker 1>quality of the information people have access to on this

0:28:38.760 --> 0:28:43.000
<v Speaker 1>platform degrades much further than people are going to seek

0:28:43.000 --> 0:28:49.080
<v Speaker 1>out UH similar technologies. Public trust is fairly low when

0:28:49.080 --> 0:28:52.360
<v Speaker 1>you look at the surveys in social media are on

0:28:52.480 --> 0:28:57.760
<v Speaker 1>social media. Given your work covering and researching to stop

0:28:57.800 --> 0:29:01.000
<v Speaker 1>the Steel movement, UM, what do you make of the

0:29:01.080 --> 0:29:05.000
<v Speaker 1>timing of this UM and how Elon Musk could influence

0:29:05.000 --> 0:29:09.120
<v Speaker 1>the moderation of content on the platform just weeks days

0:29:09.800 --> 0:29:13.880
<v Speaker 1>before mid Jorm elections. It's a really good question because

0:29:14.440 --> 0:29:17.840
<v Speaker 1>we don't know. What's interesting about bureaucracies in general is

0:29:17.880 --> 0:29:22.280
<v Speaker 1>they're usually so big and inflexible that it would be

0:29:22.360 --> 0:29:26.360
<v Speaker 1>hard for him to undo everything all at once, unless

0:29:26.400 --> 0:29:28.080
<v Speaker 1>he were to say we're going to get rid of

0:29:28.080 --> 0:29:32.440
<v Speaker 1>the algorithms that remove hate speech. For instance. Uh, there

0:29:32.440 --> 0:29:37.240
<v Speaker 1>are other algorithms that remove gore and pornography. Maybe they

0:29:37.280 --> 0:29:40.920
<v Speaker 1>leave those in, but maybe they remove the filters that

0:29:40.960 --> 0:29:45.720
<v Speaker 1>take out hate speech. UM. That could be really horrible

0:29:45.880 --> 0:29:50.240
<v Speaker 1>for people who are using Twitter to look up information

0:29:50.240 --> 0:29:56.600
<v Speaker 1>about voting or information about civic participation. UM, and they're

0:29:56.640 --> 0:29:58.959
<v Speaker 1>looking at it from the perspective of wanting to know

0:29:59.000 --> 0:30:02.840
<v Speaker 1>if a candidate is black or Latino, and they yet

0:30:02.880 --> 0:30:08.360
<v Speaker 1>then inundated with a bunch of hates, breech and slurs

0:30:08.360 --> 0:30:13.120
<v Speaker 1>and insults, because that that stuff is the stuff of

0:30:13.160 --> 0:30:19.000
<v Speaker 1>content moderation. That's why UM, our Twitter feed isn't like

0:30:19.480 --> 0:30:22.640
<v Speaker 1>a o L in the nineties, which was just um

0:30:22.880 --> 0:30:27.960
<v Speaker 1>heinously full of stam and I think that, uh, based

0:30:28.000 --> 0:30:31.800
<v Speaker 1>on the way he was talking about bots, I don't

0:30:31.920 --> 0:30:36.600
<v Speaker 1>know if he really in depthely understands the way in

0:30:36.640 --> 0:30:40.440
<v Speaker 1>which this platform has evolved over time, and that boughts

0:30:40.440 --> 0:30:44.600
<v Speaker 1>have been there since very early on on Twitter. And

0:30:44.720 --> 0:30:47.200
<v Speaker 1>so the idea that you could get rid of bots,

0:30:47.320 --> 0:30:50.200
<v Speaker 1>it's not just a question of figuring out what's automated,

0:30:50.680 --> 0:30:54.160
<v Speaker 1>but also figuring out, well is that business that is

0:30:54.320 --> 0:30:59.120
<v Speaker 1>using a bot that is totally legitimate Are they able

0:30:59.160 --> 0:31:01.400
<v Speaker 1>to keep using bought in that way? So I think

0:31:02.040 --> 0:31:05.440
<v Speaker 1>he's gonna I mean, unfortunately, I think he he bought

0:31:05.440 --> 0:31:10.640
<v Speaker 1>a big bag of problems. Right, So last quick question, we're,

0:31:10.760 --> 0:31:12.760
<v Speaker 1>you know, weeks away from an election. How do you

0:31:12.760 --> 0:31:15.800
<v Speaker 1>think the meme wars are going to pick up between

0:31:15.800 --> 0:31:21.080
<v Speaker 1>now and then? Elon Musk aside, Well, Elon Musk is

0:31:21.280 --> 0:31:24.640
<v Speaker 1>a voracious memer and he does tend to get a

0:31:24.640 --> 0:31:27.640
<v Speaker 1>lot of his memes from from Reddit, so I have

0:31:27.680 --> 0:31:30.720
<v Speaker 1>a feeling he'll be in the game. If Trump comes back,

0:31:31.280 --> 0:31:36.240
<v Speaker 1>We're gonna see the the reanimation of Q and on Uh.

0:31:36.280 --> 0:31:39.520
<v Speaker 1>It's already happening over on truth Social. I think the

0:31:39.560 --> 0:31:42.560
<v Speaker 1>mean more to watch right now is between Dr Odds

0:31:42.680 --> 0:31:45.680
<v Speaker 1>and Fetterman. Uh. Fetterman has been coming out with a

0:31:45.720 --> 0:31:50.600
<v Speaker 1>bunch of memes linking different things that Odds has done

0:31:50.600 --> 0:31:54.560
<v Speaker 1>in his past too funny and quippy sayings and short videos.

0:31:55.480 --> 0:32:00.320
<v Speaker 1>Odds too has been trying to uh make Fetterman uh

0:32:01.480 --> 0:32:05.720
<v Speaker 1>or expose Fetterman for having some medical issues, and so

0:32:06.000 --> 0:32:08.800
<v Speaker 1>that is ongoing. We are also seeing a mean moore

0:32:08.880 --> 0:32:14.160
<v Speaker 1>develop around Dark Brandon. This idea that Joe Biden isn't

0:32:15.040 --> 0:32:19.200
<v Speaker 1>what the insults have been saying all along, that he's

0:32:19.320 --> 0:32:24.720
<v Speaker 1>the senile old man. No, instead, he's this uh, hyper

0:32:24.800 --> 0:32:29.240
<v Speaker 1>aware man would laser eyes that is organizing some kind

0:32:29.240 --> 0:32:34.680
<v Speaker 1>of deep state takeover by having Trump's family charged. Um

0:32:34.760 --> 0:32:38.040
<v Speaker 1>and of course what's going on in mar Lago, And

0:32:38.720 --> 0:32:41.479
<v Speaker 1>as we watch these things play out, what we know

0:32:41.680 --> 0:32:48.960
<v Speaker 1>that is underneath mean moors of course are um lies, disinformation.

0:32:49.440 --> 0:32:52.960
<v Speaker 1>They're made to trick you. They're uh, they're made to

0:32:53.040 --> 0:32:56.320
<v Speaker 1>incite you. They're made to be confusing. But at the

0:32:56.400 --> 0:32:59.120
<v Speaker 1>end of the day, because they function in the medics,

0:32:59.680 --> 0:33:05.680
<v Speaker 1>they're also emotionally contagious, and so people do share them

0:33:05.720 --> 0:33:09.160
<v Speaker 1>because it feels good. Uh. It's it's some dark and

0:33:09.240 --> 0:33:12.640
<v Speaker 1>scary stuff that you've just walked us through there, uh

0:33:12.640 --> 0:33:13.960
<v Speaker 1>And if you want to learn more about it, of

0:33:14.040 --> 0:33:19.000
<v Speaker 1>course you could read jones book Memoirs. Joan Donovan, great

0:33:19.040 --> 0:33:21.560
<v Speaker 1>to have you on the show. Thanks for helping us

0:33:21.600 --> 0:33:24.680
<v Speaker 1>walk through this breaking news as well. You can check

0:33:24.720 --> 0:33:28.840
<v Speaker 1>out Jones book now. Okay, coming up, how Musks take

0:33:28.880 --> 0:33:33.440
<v Speaker 1>over impacts the tech m and a landscape. That's next.

0:33:33.760 --> 0:33:47.160
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg, the revival of Elon Musk's planned to

0:33:47.240 --> 0:33:49.600
<v Speaker 1>take Twitter private. I want to bring in Robert cant Well,

0:33:49.640 --> 0:33:54.440
<v Speaker 1>now portfolio manager at the Hedge fund Upholdings. Uh, Robert,

0:33:54.640 --> 0:33:57.160
<v Speaker 1>you don't hold Twitter, you don't hold Tesla. So just

0:33:57.240 --> 0:34:00.440
<v Speaker 1>to clarifying that at the start, what's your take? Well,

0:34:01.400 --> 0:34:05.719
<v Speaker 1>our take is that Ellen, the whole negotiation was an

0:34:05.720 --> 0:34:09.759
<v Speaker 1>option that didn't pay out, and it was a perfectly

0:34:09.880 --> 0:34:12.800
<v Speaker 1>rational thing for him to pursue and put money into.

0:34:13.360 --> 0:34:16.040
<v Speaker 1>And you know, folks are wondering how much money to

0:34:16.080 --> 0:34:17.880
<v Speaker 1>lose on the lawyers, but you know, he had the

0:34:17.880 --> 0:34:20.960
<v Speaker 1>opportunity to win billions back in a in a purchase price.

0:34:21.440 --> 0:34:24.080
<v Speaker 1>And clearly, as as the case wore on and as

0:34:24.120 --> 0:34:27.719
<v Speaker 1>the text messages even began to leak, our suspicion is

0:34:27.760 --> 0:34:30.440
<v Speaker 1>that his financial backers are not comfortable with that stuff

0:34:30.480 --> 0:34:33.319
<v Speaker 1>being transparent. And so when he's facing you know, the

0:34:33.320 --> 0:34:37.040
<v Speaker 1>potential loss of his co investors versus you know, having

0:34:37.040 --> 0:34:38.520
<v Speaker 1>to pay a little bit more of a premium for

0:34:38.520 --> 0:34:41.600
<v Speaker 1>the deal, I think it's become clear here that he

0:34:41.680 --> 0:34:44.240
<v Speaker 1>was willing to take the deal at the higher price

0:34:44.800 --> 0:34:48.080
<v Speaker 1>without losing the backing of his partners. Well, and it's

0:34:48.120 --> 0:34:50.480
<v Speaker 1>even more of a premium now that you know Twitter

0:34:50.520 --> 0:34:54.359
<v Speaker 1>shares orders so much pressure after he pulled out of

0:34:54.680 --> 0:34:57.200
<v Speaker 1>the deal. You know, do you think it's likely he's

0:34:57.200 --> 0:34:59.680
<v Speaker 1>going to get the financing that he needs to do

0:34:59.719 --> 0:35:01.839
<v Speaker 1>this banks, that the banks are going to be able

0:35:01.880 --> 0:35:04.879
<v Speaker 1>to sell that well. The markets have been bouncing back

0:35:04.920 --> 0:35:08.360
<v Speaker 1>a little bit. You've seen liquidity returning in little pieces.

0:35:08.520 --> 0:35:11.720
<v Speaker 1>M and A has has frankly been the biggest driver

0:35:11.880 --> 0:35:15.400
<v Speaker 1>of the market. You had the Adobe acquisition of Figma

0:35:15.480 --> 0:35:18.000
<v Speaker 1>that was a public over a private deal. You had

0:35:18.080 --> 0:35:21.000
<v Speaker 1>Posh Mark acquired by an Asian business that's a public

0:35:21.040 --> 0:35:24.799
<v Speaker 1>going private. Uh, now you've got Ellen now coming back

0:35:24.840 --> 0:35:27.440
<v Speaker 1>to the Twitter deal, and there's a lot of this

0:35:27.560 --> 0:35:31.080
<v Speaker 1>could be also framed around knowing that that price that

0:35:31.080 --> 0:35:33.960
<v Speaker 1>he negotiated in April, the market had come down a

0:35:33.960 --> 0:35:36.359
<v Speaker 1>little bit. We hadn't reached the June lows yet, so

0:35:36.440 --> 0:35:38.600
<v Speaker 1>there was a ninety day window there where he was

0:35:38.600 --> 0:35:40.600
<v Speaker 1>trying to get a little bit cute around the price

0:35:40.640 --> 0:35:42.640
<v Speaker 1>that he was paying. But now that you're seeing the

0:35:42.640 --> 0:35:46.560
<v Speaker 1>market recovering, now that you're hearing from other federal reserves

0:35:46.600 --> 0:35:49.200
<v Speaker 1>around the world that they're starting to think about loosening

0:35:49.880 --> 0:35:51.879
<v Speaker 1>how far they're going to go on interest rates, you're

0:35:51.880 --> 0:35:55.240
<v Speaker 1>starting to see equity multiples come back, and that also

0:35:55.280 --> 0:35:58.080
<v Speaker 1>could have been a consideration where if if you really

0:35:58.080 --> 0:36:00.080
<v Speaker 1>did still want Twitter in his heart of hearts, he

0:36:00.160 --> 0:36:02.000
<v Speaker 1>might have had to pay even more for a year

0:36:02.040 --> 0:36:05.000
<v Speaker 1>from now. So as market prices are improving, that also

0:36:05.120 --> 0:36:07.680
<v Speaker 1>made the deal financially more attractive at where he had

0:36:07.719 --> 0:36:11.840
<v Speaker 1>agreed to previously. And there's still a very long path

0:36:12.200 --> 0:36:16.520
<v Speaker 1>from here until the deal closing, but it certainly seems

0:36:16.520 --> 0:36:19.840
<v Speaker 1>as likely as it's ever been now right, it's not

0:36:19.960 --> 0:36:22.160
<v Speaker 1>over till it's over and then over again. You do

0:36:22.280 --> 0:36:25.000
<v Speaker 1>own a number of you do have a huge tech portfolio,

0:36:25.080 --> 0:36:30.400
<v Speaker 1>including you know, social media advertising revenue based companies. How

0:36:30.400 --> 0:36:34.560
<v Speaker 1>do you think this impacts the advertising revenue stream for Twitter?

0:36:34.560 --> 0:36:38.560
<v Speaker 1>I mean, advertisers have been you know, understandably spooked over

0:36:38.600 --> 0:36:41.759
<v Speaker 1>the last few months um whether or not they should

0:36:41.800 --> 0:36:44.319
<v Speaker 1>be back, you know, putting their money into Twitter at

0:36:44.320 --> 0:36:47.759
<v Speaker 1>all anymore. So for context, Twitter they've got about five

0:36:47.800 --> 0:36:50.359
<v Speaker 1>and a half billion dollars of revenue, Snapchat about four

0:36:50.360 --> 0:36:53.279
<v Speaker 1>and a half, met about a hundred and twenty so

0:36:53.440 --> 0:36:56.360
<v Speaker 1>for orders of magnitude that we're talking here, Twitter is

0:36:56.520 --> 0:36:59.600
<v Speaker 1>still a relatively small player. But the thing that's different

0:36:59.600 --> 0:37:02.960
<v Speaker 1>about Twitter relative to a snapchet. Twitter is a top

0:37:03.200 --> 0:37:08.040
<v Speaker 1>five global web property, so when you talk about the reach,

0:37:08.200 --> 0:37:10.080
<v Speaker 1>and if you look at the top thirty web properties

0:37:10.080 --> 0:37:13.120
<v Speaker 1>in the world, they're basically owned by Googler Meta. So

0:37:13.360 --> 0:37:19.520
<v Speaker 1>Twitter was the last remaining independent top ten worldwide internet property,

0:37:19.600 --> 0:37:22.200
<v Speaker 1>and that's got to be the one thing that they're

0:37:22.680 --> 0:37:24.839
<v Speaker 1>in their heart of hearts telling themselves, this is why

0:37:24.840 --> 0:37:27.480
<v Speaker 1>this thing is worth forty four billion dollars, because there's

0:37:27.520 --> 0:37:29.080
<v Speaker 1>a lot more ways that we're gonna be able to

0:37:29.120 --> 0:37:33.360
<v Speaker 1>extract value from it beyond just advertising. So advertising is

0:37:33.400 --> 0:37:35.440
<v Speaker 1>likely to look reasonably healthy in the fourth quarter. You've

0:37:35.440 --> 0:37:37.320
<v Speaker 1>got the mid terms coming up in a month. Political

0:37:37.400 --> 0:37:41.680
<v Speaker 1>quarters are always pretty good for digital advertisers, and they

0:37:41.719 --> 0:37:44.120
<v Speaker 1>also may have heard that Twitter's numbers were improving and

0:37:44.200 --> 0:37:46.319
<v Speaker 1>must wanted to get ahead of that as well. So

0:37:46.480 --> 0:37:48.600
<v Speaker 1>that's what we're mainly looking out for, is the digital

0:37:48.840 --> 0:37:51.799
<v Speaker 1>digital advertiser performance in the fourth quarter of this year.

0:37:51.920 --> 0:37:56.200
<v Speaker 1>All right, Robert kentwell, upholding portfolio manager. Good to have

0:37:56.280 --> 0:37:59.760
<v Speaker 1>you hear you on this. Thank you so much for stopping.

0:38:09.680 --> 0:38:11.200
<v Speaker 1>Now wrap it all up. I want to bring in

0:38:11.239 --> 0:38:14.200
<v Speaker 1>our own Sarah Fryar or Bloomberg Tech editor to cap

0:38:14.239 --> 0:38:16.840
<v Speaker 1>this crazy day and talk about what this means for

0:38:16.840 --> 0:38:20.560
<v Speaker 1>the future. Sarah, A lot of huge existential questions here.

0:38:20.680 --> 0:38:24.680
<v Speaker 1>Let's say Elon Musk does buy Twitter, it's a done deal.

0:38:25.160 --> 0:38:27.240
<v Speaker 1>How do you imagine, as someone who has covered social

0:38:27.239 --> 0:38:29.360
<v Speaker 1>media for the better part of a decade, how do

0:38:29.400 --> 0:38:33.520
<v Speaker 1>you think he'll change Twitter and social media? I think

0:38:33.520 --> 0:38:35.959
<v Speaker 1>he's very quickly going to find out that a lot

0:38:36.000 --> 0:38:39.200
<v Speaker 1>of the things that he wanted to do to change it, um,

0:38:39.239 --> 0:38:42.960
<v Speaker 1>such as you know, these broad notions, notions of advocating

0:38:42.960 --> 0:38:46.640
<v Speaker 1>for free speech, are a lot easier said than done. UM.

0:38:46.760 --> 0:38:49.880
<v Speaker 1>I think that he, as we've seen in his text messages,

0:38:50.239 --> 0:38:53.520
<v Speaker 1>gets a lot of feedback from very powerful people around

0:38:53.520 --> 0:38:56.400
<v Speaker 1>the world and sometimes acts on it. And so I

0:38:56.400 --> 0:39:00.439
<v Speaker 1>think he's going to be UM really grappling with that

0:39:00.680 --> 0:39:04.120
<v Speaker 1>and trying to figure out what principles to push for

0:39:04.360 --> 0:39:07.320
<v Speaker 1>and and what is worth ignoring. I wonder if Twitter

0:39:07.400 --> 0:39:11.839
<v Speaker 1>will be under even more scrutiny also with Musk as

0:39:11.880 --> 0:39:15.080
<v Speaker 1>a sole owner, you know, I think about the scrutiny

0:39:15.080 --> 0:39:20.240
<v Speaker 1>that Mark Zuckerberg has gotten at Facebook, will the pressure

0:39:20.280 --> 0:39:24.520
<v Speaker 1>to be even higher? The pressure might be higher, but

0:39:24.800 --> 0:39:26.800
<v Speaker 1>we're not going to get as much information. It's gonna

0:39:26.840 --> 0:39:30.000
<v Speaker 1>be more of a black box. I think that as

0:39:30.000 --> 0:39:33.279
<v Speaker 1>a private company, Twitter is much less likely to tell

0:39:33.360 --> 0:39:36.200
<v Speaker 1>us how it's growing or or how its business is doing,

0:39:36.640 --> 0:39:40.640
<v Speaker 1>and UM Elon Musk will be the main source of information,

0:39:40.760 --> 0:39:43.960
<v Speaker 1>So it's going to be even more critical for journalists

0:39:43.960 --> 0:39:47.160
<v Speaker 1>like us to really find out what's happening behind the scenes.

0:39:47.480 --> 0:39:50.480
<v Speaker 1>UM I. I do think that there are going to

0:39:50.520 --> 0:39:54.560
<v Speaker 1>be a lot of disgruntled employees, people who already tell

0:39:54.640 --> 0:39:58.360
<v Speaker 1>us that they're they're not looking forward to UM leadership

0:39:58.440 --> 0:40:01.480
<v Speaker 1>under Musk for whatever reason. UM, and I think that

0:40:01.560 --> 0:40:04.240
<v Speaker 1>it's going to be a big cultural change for the company,

0:40:04.320 --> 0:40:07.640
<v Speaker 1>especially UM in in issues as simple as as work

0:40:07.680 --> 0:40:09.759
<v Speaker 1>from home. As Elon Musk has said that he's not

0:40:10.160 --> 0:40:12.319
<v Speaker 1>he's not a big supporter of that quickly. Are you

0:40:12.360 --> 0:40:16.880
<v Speaker 1>expecting an exodus of employees or you know, also potentially

0:40:16.920 --> 0:40:20.640
<v Speaker 1>and in flux definitely both right. I think that we're

0:40:20.640 --> 0:40:23.040
<v Speaker 1>going to see people who are are huge fans of

0:40:23.040 --> 0:40:25.960
<v Speaker 1>Elon Musk and what he's accomplished elsewhere UM say that

0:40:26.000 --> 0:40:27.680
<v Speaker 1>they'd love to work for him in Twitter. I think

0:40:27.719 --> 0:40:31.719
<v Speaker 1>we're also going to see employees who disagree with with

0:40:31.800 --> 0:40:34.880
<v Speaker 1>him UM try to find other employment. But that's that

0:40:35.040 --> 0:40:37.480
<v Speaker 1>It is a tough time. There are hiring freezes across

0:40:37.520 --> 0:40:40.400
<v Speaker 1>the board of tech companies UM companies that are cutting

0:40:40.400 --> 0:40:43.720
<v Speaker 1>their budgets. So if you are a Twitter employee who's

0:40:43.800 --> 0:40:46.360
<v Speaker 1>trying to get out of there, you probably already tried

0:40:46.400 --> 0:40:49.920
<v Speaker 1>to UM to start your search. I think that a

0:40:49.960 --> 0:40:52.439
<v Speaker 1>lot of employees are are sort of figuring that out

0:40:52.560 --> 0:40:55.360
<v Speaker 1>right now, and we're a little uncertain. I think there's

0:40:55.400 --> 0:40:58.160
<v Speaker 1>still some uncertainty about whether this is going to actually happen.

0:40:58.440 --> 0:41:00.439
<v Speaker 1>All right, Sarah, thank you for giving us a little

0:41:00.520 --> 0:41:04.200
<v Speaker 1>view into your version of the crystal Ball, Big hard

0:41:04.320 --> 0:41:08.239
<v Speaker 1>Questions at hand, Bloomberg, Sarah Fryar, thank you. That does

0:41:08.239 --> 0:41:11.279
<v Speaker 1>it for this edition of Bloomberg Technology. We're gonna be

0:41:11.280 --> 0:41:14.800
<v Speaker 1>across all developments on this tomorrow, of course. And also,

0:41:14.880 --> 0:41:18.560
<v Speaker 1>Francis Howgan is joining us the Facebook whistle blower, one

0:41:18.800 --> 0:41:23.680
<v Speaker 1>year after her historic testimony before Congress. I'm sure she

0:41:23.760 --> 0:41:27.160
<v Speaker 1>has some thoughts on Elon Musk owning Twitter as well.

0:41:27.480 --> 0:41:30.560
<v Speaker 1>I'm Emily Chang in San Francisco. This is Bloomberg