WEBVTT - Featuring Neil deGrasse Tyson

0:00:02.080 --> 0:00:04.560
<v Speaker 1>Hey guys, it's Sammy Jay and welcome back to this

0:00:04.600 --> 0:00:07.960
<v Speaker 1>week's episode of The Left Bureau Podcast. I am so

0:00:08.039 --> 0:00:11.920
<v Speaker 1>thrilled you're here. This week's episode is so special. We've

0:00:11.960 --> 0:00:14.160
<v Speaker 1>never had an episode like this before, and we're probably

0:00:14.160 --> 0:00:16.440
<v Speaker 1>never going to have an episode like this again because

0:00:16.480 --> 0:00:20.240
<v Speaker 1>I got to chat with astrophysicists Neil de grass Tyson.

0:00:20.600 --> 0:00:23.400
<v Speaker 1>You heard that right, And I am so excited for

0:00:23.440 --> 0:00:26.680
<v Speaker 1>you to listen to this episode because I genuinely learned

0:00:26.800 --> 0:00:29.600
<v Speaker 1>so much and I know you will too. I hope

0:00:29.600 --> 0:00:34.040
<v Speaker 1>you guys enjoy it. Welcome to my podcast. I am

0:00:34.120 --> 0:00:37.320
<v Speaker 1>so honored that you're here. You're my first astrophysicist on

0:00:37.360 --> 0:00:39.839
<v Speaker 1>the show. And now I have to say, science is

0:00:39.880 --> 0:00:43.000
<v Speaker 1>something that I've always been super fascinated by, but it's

0:00:43.040 --> 0:00:46.920
<v Speaker 1>something I've always struggled with learning and understanding like many others.

0:00:47.440 --> 0:00:49.479
<v Speaker 1>And I just want to simply start with what do

0:00:49.520 --> 0:00:51.360
<v Speaker 1>you love about what you do? What do you love

0:00:51.400 --> 0:00:57.920
<v Speaker 1>about space in the universe? So much? Everything, And first

0:00:57.960 --> 0:01:01.120
<v Speaker 1>of all, for you to say i'm your astro physicists

0:01:01.200 --> 0:01:04.800
<v Speaker 1>on the show, there aren't many of us in the world, Okay,

0:01:05.720 --> 0:01:09.039
<v Speaker 1>So basically everything, I like the immensity of it, I

0:01:09.160 --> 0:01:13.400
<v Speaker 1>like that that the boundary between what is known and unknown,

0:01:14.120 --> 0:01:16.440
<v Speaker 1>and you put one foot in what is known and

0:01:16.480 --> 0:01:20.040
<v Speaker 1>one foot in the unknown, and you try to deduce

0:01:20.840 --> 0:01:29.200
<v Speaker 1>or invent or discover what lies beyond. And so so

0:01:29.280 --> 0:01:32.480
<v Speaker 1>I think that the takeaway is as a scientist, you

0:01:32.560 --> 0:01:37.240
<v Speaker 1>have to learn to love the questions themselves, because if

0:01:37.280 --> 0:01:39.800
<v Speaker 1>you if you only think of science the way the

0:01:39.840 --> 0:01:42.720
<v Speaker 1>media reports on it, because the media does a story

0:01:42.760 --> 0:01:45.560
<v Speaker 1>when there's a discovery, right, and you think their discoveries

0:01:45.560 --> 0:01:47.840
<v Speaker 1>are happening all the time. But you have to learn

0:01:47.880 --> 0:01:50.640
<v Speaker 1>to love the journey. And in your whole life you

0:01:50.720 --> 0:01:55.040
<v Speaker 1>might make only one discovery or no discoveries. So the

0:01:55.200 --> 0:02:00.120
<v Speaker 1>journey is what excites you every morning, the possibility of

0:02:00.360 --> 0:02:04.320
<v Speaker 1>reaching into the unknown and pulling something back in and say, WHOA,

0:02:04.840 --> 0:02:07.800
<v Speaker 1>I knew this before. Does that give you any comfort

0:02:07.840 --> 0:02:10.000
<v Speaker 1>in knowing everything you know? Or does it make you

0:02:10.000 --> 0:02:13.119
<v Speaker 1>a little bit more terrified of the beyond? I think

0:02:13.160 --> 0:02:15.880
<v Speaker 1>you have to train yourself. I don't think it's natural

0:02:16.560 --> 0:02:21.320
<v Speaker 1>to walk around in stupefied ignorance of what's going on.

0:02:21.520 --> 0:02:24.960
<v Speaker 1>You know, nobody wants that, all right, And I get it.

0:02:25.120 --> 0:02:28.359
<v Speaker 1>I have sympathy for people who feel that way. And

0:02:28.520 --> 0:02:32.920
<v Speaker 1>one way that that shows up is someone might ask

0:02:32.960 --> 0:02:36.959
<v Speaker 1>me what was around before the Big Bang, and I'll say,

0:02:37.040 --> 0:02:39.720
<v Speaker 1>I don't know. Go top people working on it, and

0:02:39.720 --> 0:02:42.400
<v Speaker 1>they say, that had to be something. It must have

0:02:42.480 --> 0:02:45.680
<v Speaker 1>been something, it must have been God, God did it. Yeah,

0:02:45.800 --> 0:02:49.480
<v Speaker 1>that was it. And so once they say God, they

0:02:49.520 --> 0:02:53.000
<v Speaker 1>have their answer. And then you know, if you wanted

0:02:53.040 --> 0:02:56.560
<v Speaker 1>to insert deity every place where we have yet to

0:02:56.639 --> 0:03:02.079
<v Speaker 1>tread scientifically, then that's that's kind of a slippery slope,

0:03:02.200 --> 0:03:09.279
<v Speaker 1>because science ever moves forward. So I empathize with the

0:03:09.360 --> 0:03:14.360
<v Speaker 1>need to have an explanation for everything. But if that's

0:03:14.400 --> 0:03:18.000
<v Speaker 1>how you are, you won't make a good scientist because

0:03:18.120 --> 0:03:21.160
<v Speaker 1>most of what we think about every day has no

0:03:21.240 --> 0:03:24.200
<v Speaker 1>answer yet yet, and we don't even know if we're

0:03:24.240 --> 0:03:30.680
<v Speaker 1>asking the right questions. Crazy, it's crazy, It's completely crazy. So,

0:03:30.800 --> 0:03:35.200
<v Speaker 1>Storry Messenger, A Cosmic Perspective on Civilization. You said, the

0:03:35.360 --> 0:03:38.080
<v Speaker 1>troll of insights, informed by the universe and brought to

0:03:38.120 --> 0:03:42.160
<v Speaker 1>you by methods and tools of science. I love that sentence,

0:03:42.240 --> 0:03:45.400
<v Speaker 1>and I was wondering if you can expand more upon that. Well,

0:03:45.440 --> 0:03:51.000
<v Speaker 1>thank you, thank you. So this book, Starry Messenger Cosmic

0:03:51.240 --> 0:03:57.800
<v Speaker 1>Perspectives on civilization. Each chapter has a different title, as

0:03:58.320 --> 0:04:02.680
<v Speaker 1>most chapters would, but in this case, the chapters address

0:04:03.280 --> 0:04:09.480
<v Speaker 1>different sectors of society that have historically been rather combative,

0:04:10.440 --> 0:04:14.960
<v Speaker 1>uh in social settings. So there's a chapter on truth

0:04:15.000 --> 0:04:18.159
<v Speaker 1>and beauty, All right, that that might be good sort

0:04:18.200 --> 0:04:21.000
<v Speaker 1>of bar conversations there, But let's get a little more

0:04:21.040 --> 0:04:26.120
<v Speaker 1>intense a conflict and resolution where I go into political

0:04:26.200 --> 0:04:30.920
<v Speaker 1>factions who are battling for who has access to, if

0:04:30.960 --> 0:04:35.960
<v Speaker 1>not control of the truth. Objective truths, which I'd like

0:04:36.000 --> 0:04:38.680
<v Speaker 1>to distinguish from other kinds of truths. There is an

0:04:38.720 --> 0:04:41.040
<v Speaker 1>objective truth, and there is opinion. Then those need to

0:04:41.160 --> 0:04:44.520
<v Speaker 1>be right right right, Or there's there's like political truths.

0:04:44.520 --> 0:04:47.320
<v Speaker 1>I'll call it that because the politicians think it's true,

0:04:47.320 --> 0:04:51.080
<v Speaker 1>but it's what becomes true simply by them repeating it

0:04:51.640 --> 0:04:56.880
<v Speaker 1>often and with intensity. And our brain has a weakness

0:04:57.279 --> 0:05:00.440
<v Speaker 1>in it where if you see something repeat he did it,

0:05:00.560 --> 0:05:03.640
<v Speaker 1>or here's something repeated, the urge to think that it

0:05:03.720 --> 0:05:07.719
<v Speaker 1>must be true, otherwise why would it be repeated so often? Exactly,

0:05:08.279 --> 0:05:11.760
<v Speaker 1>So I applaud the fact that we have that urge

0:05:11.920 --> 0:05:15.560
<v Speaker 1>to think that way, But that urge that evolutionary urs

0:05:15.920 --> 0:05:19.960
<v Speaker 1>can be and has been hijacked by people who would

0:05:20.560 --> 0:05:24.400
<v Speaker 1>want to exercise control over you and what you think.

0:05:24.400 --> 0:05:26.760
<v Speaker 1>In the old days they called it brainwashing. Yeah, so

0:05:26.760 --> 0:05:28.279
<v Speaker 1>that would be a political truth. And then there's a

0:05:28.279 --> 0:05:31.560
<v Speaker 1>personal truth, right. Personal truth is just stuff that you believe,

0:05:31.680 --> 0:05:34.560
<v Speaker 1>and they don't require that other people have to believe.

0:05:34.600 --> 0:05:37.680
<v Speaker 1>It is your own personal sense of the world. And

0:05:37.720 --> 0:05:41.279
<v Speaker 1>all religions come under personal truths. So that's why I

0:05:41.320 --> 0:05:45.560
<v Speaker 1>distinguish those truths from objective truths. And objective truths are

0:05:45.600 --> 0:05:50.440
<v Speaker 1>true whether or not you believe in them, and high science.

0:05:50.640 --> 0:05:55.280
<v Speaker 1>And so getting back to the sentence that you extracted, Um,

0:05:55.320 --> 0:05:57.840
<v Speaker 1>and thank you for looking for cool sentences, because I

0:05:57.880 --> 0:06:01.240
<v Speaker 1>do spend a lot of effort composing sentences that go

0:06:01.320 --> 0:06:04.360
<v Speaker 1>in the book, and if the fact that they sort

0:06:04.360 --> 0:06:07.719
<v Speaker 1>of rise up off the page or in your because

0:06:07.720 --> 0:06:10.600
<v Speaker 1>you listen to the audiobook, as you told me, I'd

0:06:10.600 --> 0:06:15.560
<v Speaker 1>want those sentences to to live within you. You're very powerful.

0:06:15.839 --> 0:06:19.120
<v Speaker 1>The methods and tools of science are exquisitely tuned to

0:06:19.160 --> 0:06:22.840
<v Speaker 1>find objective truths, and when you do, you then apply

0:06:23.040 --> 0:06:27.800
<v Speaker 1>them to these sectors of society that are famous for

0:06:27.880 --> 0:06:31.800
<v Speaker 1>not embracing objective truths. And because of such people, fight

0:06:32.680 --> 0:06:37.560
<v Speaker 1>and so so, and other chapters are a gender and identity,

0:06:38.080 --> 0:06:43.080
<v Speaker 1>race and color, risk and reward. People really don't understand

0:06:43.200 --> 0:06:46.240
<v Speaker 1>risk and probability and statistics, and I don't want to

0:06:46.240 --> 0:06:50.560
<v Speaker 1>blame people for that. Somehow, it's it's just not natural

0:06:50.720 --> 0:06:53.920
<v Speaker 1>to think statistically about the world, all right. I mean,

0:06:53.920 --> 0:06:57.880
<v Speaker 1>here's't just in an example. Let's say you're ready to

0:06:57.960 --> 0:07:00.359
<v Speaker 1>drive a car off the lot. You just it, and

0:07:00.480 --> 0:07:04.760
<v Speaker 1>someone is driving into the lot saying, wanting to return

0:07:04.800 --> 0:07:07.200
<v Speaker 1>the cars. There's the worst card had it broke the

0:07:07.600 --> 0:07:10.160
<v Speaker 1>wheel fell off. I hate it. And you're just watching

0:07:10.200 --> 0:07:16.600
<v Speaker 1>this and you begin questioning your decision. And it's amazing

0:07:16.960 --> 0:07:21.560
<v Speaker 1>how impactful the testimony of one person can land within

0:07:21.680 --> 0:07:25.640
<v Speaker 1>you relative to the statistics of thousands. You mentioned a

0:07:25.680 --> 0:07:28.040
<v Speaker 1>really interesting point in your book that scientists don't look

0:07:28.080 --> 0:07:30.800
<v Speaker 1>for other scientists opinions but their data, which I think

0:07:30.840 --> 0:07:33.040
<v Speaker 1>is a very important distinction. I don't care how you

0:07:33.120 --> 0:07:37.040
<v Speaker 1>feel or think. I don't care. That has nothing to

0:07:37.080 --> 0:07:39.400
<v Speaker 1>do with my research here, But I just have nothing

0:07:39.440 --> 0:07:44.840
<v Speaker 1>to do with the data less. How you feel biases

0:07:44.880 --> 0:07:49.000
<v Speaker 1>your data. So we have methods and tools to establish

0:07:49.400 --> 0:07:55.200
<v Speaker 1>objective truths, and it requires repeated, verified experiments on whatever

0:07:55.240 --> 0:07:57.920
<v Speaker 1>the first thing is you said was true. So we're

0:07:57.960 --> 0:08:01.640
<v Speaker 1>living in a world today where social media and misinformation

0:08:02.400 --> 0:08:06.720
<v Speaker 1>is traveling so fast. I feel like as soon as

0:08:06.720 --> 0:08:08.840
<v Speaker 1>you pull up a social media app, there's just new

0:08:08.880 --> 0:08:11.280
<v Speaker 1>information you don't and it's hard to verify whether it's

0:08:11.320 --> 0:08:12.880
<v Speaker 1>true or not. I mean, I want to take away

0:08:12.880 --> 0:08:15.560
<v Speaker 1>from this conversation is what advice do you have for

0:08:15.640 --> 0:08:18.240
<v Speaker 1>like a go to way to shut down a flat earther.

0:08:19.080 --> 0:08:22.880
<v Speaker 1>I'm not that aggressive. It may feel that way sometimes

0:08:22.920 --> 0:08:26.600
<v Speaker 1>if you read my tweets. Uh So, I just tweeted

0:08:26.680 --> 0:08:31.880
<v Speaker 1>yesterday last night there was a total lunar eclipse, and

0:08:31.960 --> 0:08:36.079
<v Speaker 1>I said, here's a lunar eclipse flat earthers have never seen.

0:08:38.840 --> 0:08:42.280
<v Speaker 1>It would be like the disc of Earth casting horizontal shadow,

0:08:42.480 --> 0:08:46.080
<v Speaker 1>which would just be a skinny, little thin thing. And

0:08:46.720 --> 0:08:49.640
<v Speaker 1>that it went almost viral. I mean it was, it

0:08:49.679 --> 0:08:52.120
<v Speaker 1>went pretty high up there. That's so good. Point is,

0:08:52.280 --> 0:08:54.800
<v Speaker 1>in a free country, I'm not going to beat you

0:08:54.840 --> 0:08:57.120
<v Speaker 1>on the head if you want to think Earth is flat.

0:08:57.480 --> 0:09:00.080
<v Speaker 1>There are plenty of jobs for you where you and

0:09:00.120 --> 0:09:02.280
<v Speaker 1>still think Earth is flight. Science isn't one of them.

0:09:03.040 --> 0:09:06.160
<v Speaker 1>Science is not one of them. Here's here's one thing

0:09:06.200 --> 0:09:11.000
<v Speaker 1>to do. You say, what would be the best evidence

0:09:11.480 --> 0:09:15.840
<v Speaker 1>you would need to show that Earth was a sphere

0:09:16.240 --> 0:09:20.320
<v Speaker 1>in space? What what evidence would you seek? If you

0:09:20.440 --> 0:09:25.880
<v Speaker 1>ask that of such people, typically there is none, There

0:09:26.760 --> 0:09:29.680
<v Speaker 1>is none. Well, sorry, I did that once with someone

0:09:29.679 --> 0:09:32.559
<v Speaker 1>who was sure we didn't go to the moon, okay, okay,

0:09:33.800 --> 0:09:37.200
<v Speaker 1>And I said, well, what evidence? I went through this exercise.

0:09:37.240 --> 0:09:41.840
<v Speaker 1>What evidence would you want? And he said, well, photographs

0:09:42.000 --> 0:09:45.640
<v Speaker 1>of the landing sites? That would that would work. So

0:09:45.679 --> 0:09:48.000
<v Speaker 1>I said, well, we do have photos of the landing site.

0:09:48.000 --> 0:09:51.040
<v Speaker 1>You said really, I said, because there are satellites that

0:09:51.080 --> 0:09:54.480
<v Speaker 1>were put in orbit around the Moon. That's close enough

0:09:54.679 --> 0:09:56.920
<v Speaker 1>and you could see the rover tracks. You can see

0:09:56.960 --> 0:09:59.520
<v Speaker 1>the landing site. And so go to this web page.

0:10:00.600 --> 0:10:02.839
<v Speaker 1>So he so the next day, but this is a

0:10:02.880 --> 0:10:11.040
<v Speaker 1>full grown adult human being with with kids, always concerning right.

0:10:11.400 --> 0:10:16.320
<v Speaker 1>So the next day, uh, he says, nil, I went

0:10:16.440 --> 0:10:18.800
<v Speaker 1>to that website and sure enough I saw the tracks

0:10:18.840 --> 0:10:20.880
<v Speaker 1>and I saw this. But then I looked at the

0:10:20.920 --> 0:10:25.079
<v Speaker 1>bottom and it said that the web page was sponsored

0:10:25.080 --> 0:10:28.559
<v Speaker 1>by NASA. So how am I going to know that

0:10:28.640 --> 0:10:33.559
<v Speaker 1>they didn't fake this? And I said, pause, hold up, rewind.

0:10:34.640 --> 0:10:38.560
<v Speaker 1>You asked me what would convince you, and I provided

0:10:38.600 --> 0:10:42.600
<v Speaker 1>that evidence, and now that evidence isn't working for you.

0:10:42.800 --> 0:10:45.880
<v Speaker 1>So this is the end of our conversation. But anyhow,

0:10:45.960 --> 0:10:49.960
<v Speaker 1>so a good test would be ask what would convince

0:10:50.000 --> 0:10:53.480
<v Speaker 1>you otherwise if you don't really have a good answer

0:10:53.520 --> 0:10:58.040
<v Speaker 1>for that then, or if your only answer is I

0:10:58.240 --> 0:11:01.680
<v Speaker 1>know the truth, it's just be hidden from us by

0:11:01.760 --> 0:11:05.360
<v Speaker 1>this organization. It's never going to be good enough, never

0:11:05.480 --> 0:11:08.840
<v Speaker 1>good enough. Correct. There's an old saying in the skeptics

0:11:08.840 --> 0:11:14.679
<v Speaker 1>community which I think is correct. It's you can't use

0:11:14.760 --> 0:11:19.000
<v Speaker 1>reason to argue someone out of a point of view

0:11:19.520 --> 0:11:22.480
<v Speaker 1>that they didn't use reason to get into. So true.

0:11:24.160 --> 0:11:27.240
<v Speaker 1>Something that I'm very interested in talking about is what

0:11:27.320 --> 0:11:31.479
<v Speaker 1>are your thoughts on managing space trash and programs like starlink,

0:11:32.160 --> 0:11:35.480
<v Speaker 1>especially with the impact of satellites in space imaging. Yeah,

0:11:36.000 --> 0:11:38.679
<v Speaker 1>so those are two separate issues. Starlink is you know,

0:11:38.800 --> 0:11:42.000
<v Speaker 1>how many elon how many satellites do you need in space?

0:11:42.120 --> 0:11:46.600
<v Speaker 1>How how many? How many do you need? And it

0:11:46.600 --> 0:11:49.640
<v Speaker 1>it becomes a form of light pollution, where especially we

0:11:49.679 --> 0:11:52.040
<v Speaker 1>have a telescope about to come online this coming year

0:11:52.600 --> 0:11:55.839
<v Speaker 1>that will be taking basically snapshots of the entire sky

0:11:56.120 --> 0:12:00.480
<v Speaker 1>every night and and stitching them together. It basedically in

0:12:00.480 --> 0:12:05.000
<v Speaker 1>a movie, which will allow you to watch asteroids that

0:12:05.080 --> 0:12:08.480
<v Speaker 1>might be headed towards Earth. But if while we're trying

0:12:08.480 --> 0:12:11.560
<v Speaker 1>to find an asteroid headed towards Earth, there's you know,

0:12:11.760 --> 0:12:15.640
<v Speaker 1>hundred seventy eleven Starlink satellites coming through your field. If

0:12:15.679 --> 0:12:19.920
<v Speaker 1>you I don't want to miss the asteroid, because you're

0:12:19.960 --> 0:12:23.760
<v Speaker 1>contaminating my data with things that otherwise look like asteroids

0:12:24.360 --> 0:12:30.319
<v Speaker 1>but they're not. So there's the how it will contaminate science,

0:12:30.840 --> 0:12:34.000
<v Speaker 1>but there's also how it will change what the night

0:12:34.040 --> 0:12:37.040
<v Speaker 1>sky will beat to you as you look up affect

0:12:37.040 --> 0:12:41.040
<v Speaker 1>the Earth. So there's fortunately, there are there's an organ

0:12:41.120 --> 0:12:44.520
<v Speaker 1>there are people today who are thinking about this and

0:12:44.559 --> 0:12:48.400
<v Speaker 1>trying to find ways to reduce the impact of this

0:12:49.320 --> 0:12:53.040
<v Speaker 1>technological progress on what is otherwise the sanctity of the

0:12:53.160 --> 0:12:57.240
<v Speaker 1>night sky. And as for trash, we've got nothing for you, okay.

0:12:57.280 --> 0:12:59.240
<v Speaker 1>And I think people say, where the aliens? How come

0:12:59.280 --> 0:13:01.120
<v Speaker 1>they haven't visited. I think they tried to visit and

0:13:01.160 --> 0:13:04.840
<v Speaker 1>they saw all the trash around the Earth. We're going

0:13:04.880 --> 0:13:07.440
<v Speaker 1>to pass on this one. Let's let's let's go to

0:13:07.480 --> 0:13:12.080
<v Speaker 1>the next planet. Okay. Yeah, these folks are just nasty.

0:13:12.520 --> 0:13:15.480
<v Speaker 1>It's the trash that's in the higher orbits that will

0:13:15.520 --> 0:13:18.680
<v Speaker 1>basically be there forever unless someone goes around and vacuums

0:13:18.679 --> 0:13:22.080
<v Speaker 1>it up. And we have no such plans nor such

0:13:22.120 --> 0:13:25.320
<v Speaker 1>ideas about how to make that happen. It's too trashy.

0:13:25.600 --> 0:13:27.720
<v Speaker 1>We need to fix it, too trashy. Give it up.

0:13:28.800 --> 0:13:30.440
<v Speaker 1>We have to take a quick break. But when we

0:13:30.480 --> 0:13:32.360
<v Speaker 1>come back, I'm going to talk about what types of

0:13:32.400 --> 0:13:34.440
<v Speaker 1>research and that's going on in the world of science

0:13:34.720 --> 0:13:38.120
<v Speaker 1>you're most excited about and what you love list about learning.

0:13:38.440 --> 0:13:47.760
<v Speaker 1>We'll be right back and we're back. Are there any

0:13:47.760 --> 0:13:52.720
<v Speaker 1>scientists work that you're really interested in that isn't very

0:13:52.800 --> 0:13:56.160
<v Speaker 1>well known or talked about. I generally look at sort

0:13:56.160 --> 0:13:59.959
<v Speaker 1>of consensus work. So uh, it's not whether one science

0:14:00.080 --> 0:14:04.120
<v Speaker 1>just did one particular thing, because that's not what makes

0:14:04.120 --> 0:14:07.240
<v Speaker 1>an objective truth. As I said earlier, it hasn't been

0:14:07.320 --> 0:14:10.679
<v Speaker 1>verified by someone else. So for me, one of the

0:14:10.720 --> 0:14:15.680
<v Speaker 1>more interesting sub branches of astrophysics is one where we

0:14:15.720 --> 0:14:19.720
<v Speaker 1>have people looking for bio markers in the atmospheres of

0:14:19.840 --> 0:14:23.840
<v Speaker 1>exo planets. Well, so, can you explain what bio markers

0:14:23.880 --> 0:14:27.480
<v Speaker 1>are for totally? Well, first, ex planet is so exo

0:14:27.480 --> 0:14:32.680
<v Speaker 1>planets are planets orbiting other stars, and the first of

0:14:32.720 --> 0:14:37.880
<v Speaker 1>these was discovered in all right, so what year were

0:14:37.920 --> 0:14:43.040
<v Speaker 1>you BORNO? Two two? So you count as someone who

0:14:43.040 --> 0:14:47.680
<v Speaker 1>has been born since and so I now I will

0:14:47.840 --> 0:14:55.400
<v Speaker 1>night you generation X planet. You've only known life in

0:14:55.440 --> 0:14:58.080
<v Speaker 1>a world where we've had exo planets to talk about,

0:14:58.480 --> 0:15:00.880
<v Speaker 1>all right, that is that is if you want to

0:15:00.920 --> 0:15:04.520
<v Speaker 1>attach a generation to a scientific result, there you have it,

0:15:04.880 --> 0:15:06.480
<v Speaker 1>all right. And when you were born, we might have

0:15:06.560 --> 0:15:10.920
<v Speaker 1>known maybe a few dozen exoplanets, and now we know

0:15:11.000 --> 0:15:13.640
<v Speaker 1>more than five thousand. That's how old you are. We're

0:15:13.680 --> 0:15:16.080
<v Speaker 1>up in the five thousands. A lot can happen in

0:15:16.120 --> 0:15:19.560
<v Speaker 1>twenty years. A lot can happen in twenty years. So

0:15:19.640 --> 0:15:21.480
<v Speaker 1>you're just an old fart now because we're up in

0:15:21.520 --> 0:15:26.160
<v Speaker 1>the thousands. But will we ever know if they have life? Well,

0:15:26.200 --> 0:15:30.400
<v Speaker 1>if the planet has an atmosphere, light from the star

0:15:30.560 --> 0:15:34.960
<v Speaker 1>will pass through the atmosphere on the edges and continue

0:15:35.080 --> 0:15:38.640
<v Speaker 1>on to us, so that whatever is the chemistry of

0:15:38.680 --> 0:15:43.240
<v Speaker 1>that atmosphere, it leaves its fingerprint on the starlight. Oh,

0:15:43.480 --> 0:15:47.360
<v Speaker 1>this is this opened up an entire new field in

0:15:47.400 --> 0:15:50.800
<v Speaker 1>the search for life in the universe, because if your

0:15:50.800 --> 0:15:57.520
<v Speaker 1>planet has life. Life has certain gaseous consequences. Alright, Oxygen

0:15:57.600 --> 0:16:02.160
<v Speaker 1>on Earth is only here because we have photosynthesizing life,

0:16:02.760 --> 0:16:07.440
<v Speaker 1>trees and plankton. That's the only reason why we have oxygen.

0:16:08.240 --> 0:16:10.600
<v Speaker 1>And so if you find an exo planet and you

0:16:10.800 --> 0:16:14.040
<v Speaker 1>let the light of the star pass through and you

0:16:14.080 --> 0:16:17.240
<v Speaker 1>see oxygen in that atmosphere, oh yeah, I put that

0:16:17.400 --> 0:16:20.040
<v Speaker 1>higher on your list of one of the first planets

0:16:20.040 --> 0:16:22.720
<v Speaker 1>you might want to visit. So what am I following.

0:16:23.000 --> 0:16:26.480
<v Speaker 1>I'm following the work of that group of researchers who

0:16:26.760 --> 0:16:31.440
<v Speaker 1>are searching for bio markers in the atmospheres of exoplanets,

0:16:31.560 --> 0:16:33.920
<v Speaker 1>and the James Web Space Telescope is helping with that.

0:16:34.600 --> 0:16:37.480
<v Speaker 1>By the way, Sorry, I'm just processing all that you said.

0:16:37.520 --> 0:16:40.760
<v Speaker 1>That's incredible. Yeah, No, I'm totally I'm all in on it.

0:16:40.840 --> 0:16:45.960
<v Speaker 1>Oh yeah, that's amazing. Yeah. So I'm assuming you love stars,

0:16:47.400 --> 0:16:50.160
<v Speaker 1>don't we all? Actually, I'm sure I'm not alone there.

0:16:50.280 --> 0:16:53.240
<v Speaker 1>You know, our star is pretty important. I think clouds

0:16:53.240 --> 0:16:57.320
<v Speaker 1>are also very underrated. I love seeing them. They're so

0:16:57.360 --> 0:17:00.000
<v Speaker 1>beautiful and I just see them. Gonna go shout out

0:17:00.040 --> 0:17:02.960
<v Speaker 1>clouds because they don't get enough appreciation out there. Okay,

0:17:03.120 --> 0:17:10.560
<v Speaker 1>So uh, in the book Starry Messenger. Um, I quote clouds.

0:17:10.600 --> 0:17:15.200
<v Speaker 1>I quote a line from Joni Mitchell her song both Sides. Now,

0:17:15.520 --> 0:17:17.399
<v Speaker 1>that's so good. Wait wait, wait, we have to be

0:17:17.520 --> 0:17:24.320
<v Speaker 1>very precise here. Okay, I just want to properly quote. Okay,

0:17:24.359 --> 0:17:26.919
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna pull up this quote. The glasses are coming on.

0:17:27.000 --> 0:17:28.760
<v Speaker 1>That's when you know it's been serious. I've got to

0:17:28.800 --> 0:17:32.320
<v Speaker 1>go there. Okay. Yes, So clouds are one of the

0:17:32.359 --> 0:17:35.159
<v Speaker 1>things she looks at in one of the verses. But

0:17:35.640 --> 0:17:38.520
<v Speaker 1>I get that's not the verse I chose. I'm really

0:17:38.560 --> 0:17:40.480
<v Speaker 1>I'm remembering now, but I will get you that cloud

0:17:40.560 --> 0:17:42.399
<v Speaker 1>verse because you sound like a cloud person. I'm a

0:17:42.480 --> 0:17:46.439
<v Speaker 1>cloud person because they're just not appreciated and they do

0:17:46.600 --> 0:17:49.760
<v Speaker 1>so much. Okay, they make my day. So here we

0:17:49.800 --> 0:17:55.040
<v Speaker 1>go rose and flows of angel hair, and I scream

0:17:55.200 --> 0:17:58.520
<v Speaker 1>castles forgive Mike because I can't. I think you should

0:17:58.520 --> 0:18:02.920
<v Speaker 1>become a singer and a rare path for you. Everywhere

0:18:03.640 --> 0:18:09.040
<v Speaker 1>looked at clouds that way, but now they only block

0:18:09.200 --> 0:18:14.040
<v Speaker 1>the sun. They rain, and they snow on everyone. So

0:18:14.080 --> 0:18:18.639
<v Speaker 1>many things I would have done, but clouds got in

0:18:18.840 --> 0:18:24.399
<v Speaker 1>my way. I've looked at clouds from both sides, now

0:18:24.760 --> 0:18:30.480
<v Speaker 1>from up and down and still somehow it's clouds illusions.

0:18:30.760 --> 0:18:36.080
<v Speaker 1>I recall I really don't know cloud so any that

0:18:36.080 --> 0:18:37.600
<v Speaker 1>that's all those singing I'm going to give you here

0:18:37.640 --> 0:18:40.280
<v Speaker 1>because I was like, I do not expect a performance.

0:18:40.400 --> 0:18:42.199
<v Speaker 1>I feel like this is a new career path for you.

0:18:42.880 --> 0:18:45.480
<v Speaker 1>So here's the so for me, obviously, it's a song,

0:18:45.520 --> 0:18:50.119
<v Speaker 1>it's a poem. It's it's metaphorical of course, and so

0:18:51.080 --> 0:18:54.400
<v Speaker 1>um So she starts out by saying, clouds they rain

0:18:54.520 --> 0:18:57.680
<v Speaker 1>and snow on everyone. Yes, they do, but when they're not,

0:18:57.960 --> 0:19:01.280
<v Speaker 1>they're not right. And most of the time they're not,

0:19:01.920 --> 0:19:04.800
<v Speaker 1>They're just floating there. And if you look at it

0:19:04.840 --> 0:19:07.919
<v Speaker 1>from both sides. And I really don't know clouds, and

0:19:08.000 --> 0:19:11.159
<v Speaker 1>most people don't understand what clouds are. Why they up

0:19:11.160 --> 0:19:13.760
<v Speaker 1>there and they're not down here? Well, sometimes they are

0:19:13.840 --> 0:19:16.000
<v Speaker 1>down here. But we have a different word for them.

0:19:16.080 --> 0:19:19.240
<v Speaker 1>You know what we call them? Am I totally missing? Yes,

0:19:19.280 --> 0:19:24.800
<v Speaker 1>it's just it's a cloud that's in your face. So

0:19:24.800 --> 0:19:26.280
<v Speaker 1>so we just have a different word for it. But

0:19:26.280 --> 0:19:30.560
<v Speaker 1>it's a cloud, all right. So all air in most

0:19:30.560 --> 0:19:34.639
<v Speaker 1>parts of the Earth has some amount of moisture in it. Yeah, okay,

0:19:35.400 --> 0:19:39.720
<v Speaker 1>And if the air gets heated, and then it rises.

0:19:40.680 --> 0:19:44.440
<v Speaker 1>As you ascend, the temperature drops, so as you ascend

0:19:44.440 --> 0:19:46.840
<v Speaker 1>in the atmosphere, it gets colder and colder and colder.

0:19:47.000 --> 0:19:49.080
<v Speaker 1>You might notice that from the temperature if you see

0:19:49.080 --> 0:19:52.200
<v Speaker 1>it on the video monitor of airplanes outside, it's forty

0:19:52.240 --> 0:19:56.600
<v Speaker 1>degrees below zero outside the window. Okay, so it's because

0:19:56.680 --> 0:20:00.080
<v Speaker 1>the ground is what's heating the air. The sunda and

0:20:00.160 --> 0:20:02.960
<v Speaker 1>heat the air. The sun heats the ground and the

0:20:03.000 --> 0:20:05.120
<v Speaker 1>ground heats the air. So I watched it happens if

0:20:05.119 --> 0:20:06.880
<v Speaker 1>a pocket of air with a little bit of moisture,

0:20:07.119 --> 0:20:10.919
<v Speaker 1>as it ascends, it gets colder, and the colder is

0:20:11.000 --> 0:20:14.719
<v Speaker 1>the pocket of air, the less capable it is of

0:20:14.880 --> 0:20:19.400
<v Speaker 1>carrying that moisture. And so what happens is something called

0:20:19.400 --> 0:20:23.880
<v Speaker 1>the relative humidity goes up because the air can it's

0:20:24.040 --> 0:20:27.119
<v Speaker 1>becoming less and less able to hold the moisture. And

0:20:27.200 --> 0:20:31.000
<v Speaker 1>at a particular temperature at the dew point, which is

0:20:31.000 --> 0:20:32.879
<v Speaker 1>a combination of how much humidity is in it and

0:20:33.000 --> 0:20:38.359
<v Speaker 1>the temperature at that dew point, the the water molecules

0:20:39.000 --> 0:20:44.240
<v Speaker 1>they coalesce and they become basically droplets. Okay, it's no

0:20:44.320 --> 0:20:49.240
<v Speaker 1>longer water vapor, it's water droplets. And in that moment

0:20:49.400 --> 0:20:51.880
<v Speaker 1>that that pocket of air is high above your head

0:20:52.040 --> 0:20:55.080
<v Speaker 1>and bend, a cloud forms and there it is. You're

0:20:55.119 --> 0:20:58.000
<v Speaker 1>making me love clouds even more. Okay, No, it's a

0:20:58.000 --> 0:21:00.919
<v Speaker 1>beautiful thing. That's why the clouds are high up and

0:21:01.240 --> 0:21:04.880
<v Speaker 1>rarely on the ground. How do you know all this information?

0:21:05.720 --> 0:21:08.879
<v Speaker 1>Just off the bat? What about learning do you love?

0:21:08.920 --> 0:21:11.800
<v Speaker 1>I know that's a two parter, but you've just so

0:21:11.880 --> 0:21:14.280
<v Speaker 1>much information. Here's what I here's my normal and we

0:21:14.320 --> 0:21:17.560
<v Speaker 1>only just met, so I don't know, but it for

0:21:17.640 --> 0:21:20.359
<v Speaker 1>most people, for many people in the United States, here's

0:21:20.359 --> 0:21:22.280
<v Speaker 1>what I would tell them. They said, how does it

0:21:22.320 --> 0:21:24.120
<v Speaker 1>you know all of this? How do you have time

0:21:24.160 --> 0:21:26.639
<v Speaker 1>to write these books? And how does you do this?

0:21:26.960 --> 0:21:31.320
<v Speaker 1>And my answer is I bet I watched less football

0:21:31.440 --> 0:21:37.880
<v Speaker 1>than you do. That's a great answer. That's my simplest answer. Okay,

0:21:38.200 --> 0:21:41.120
<v Speaker 1>So whatever you do on the weekends or when you're

0:21:41.160 --> 0:21:46.879
<v Speaker 1>otherwise doing nothing, are you binging? You know the Bachelor?

0:21:47.000 --> 0:21:50.800
<v Speaker 1>Are you whatever else is going on or Jersey Shore

0:21:51.440 --> 0:21:57.520
<v Speaker 1>or whatever whatever people do. I'm not doing that, and

0:21:58.000 --> 0:21:59.560
<v Speaker 1>I'll do it a little bit just so I know

0:21:59.680 --> 0:22:03.199
<v Speaker 1>what interests people, because that I value that. But no,

0:22:03.640 --> 0:22:06.280
<v Speaker 1>I spend a lot of time a lot of time

0:22:06.359 --> 0:22:10.600
<v Speaker 1>that other people spend doing nothing, I spend learning. That's

0:22:10.640 --> 0:22:14.960
<v Speaker 1>so awesome and so cool. I have always loved learning,

0:22:15.040 --> 0:22:16.520
<v Speaker 1>but it's always been a struggle for me because I've

0:22:16.520 --> 0:22:20.720
<v Speaker 1>grown up with learning differences, so being able to understand

0:22:21.000 --> 0:22:24.560
<v Speaker 1>information has been a struggle. But when it's you're very

0:22:24.600 --> 0:22:28.399
<v Speaker 1>good at visualizing it and just explaining it very complicated topics.

0:22:28.520 --> 0:22:30.760
<v Speaker 1>Thank you, Thank you for that. And I try to

0:22:30.800 --> 0:22:33.840
<v Speaker 1>be a responsive to the what do they call it,

0:22:33.920 --> 0:22:37.840
<v Speaker 1>the neurodiversity of us all? Uh, some people think in pictures,

0:22:37.880 --> 0:22:41.639
<v Speaker 1>some in words, some in gestures, you know, hand gestures.

0:22:42.000 --> 0:22:44.720
<v Speaker 1>So I try to fold all of that in. So

0:22:45.040 --> 0:22:48.040
<v Speaker 1>thank you for noticing that. But what I would say

0:22:48.200 --> 0:22:50.840
<v Speaker 1>is with all the learning differences that exist out there,

0:22:50.880 --> 0:22:56.000
<v Speaker 1>and finally the education system is coming to terms with that,

0:22:56.480 --> 0:23:01.560
<v Speaker 1>figuring out slowly but surely slowly. Um My daughter was

0:23:01.600 --> 0:23:05.919
<v Speaker 1>a special ed teacher and people ask her what's different

0:23:05.960 --> 0:23:11.080
<v Speaker 1>about a special ed teacher? She said, She said, especially

0:23:11.200 --> 0:23:16.199
<v Speaker 1>teachers are simply better teachers. I went to a special

0:23:16.359 --> 0:23:19.440
<v Speaker 1>ed school, so I can vouch for that. Yeah, they're

0:23:19.440 --> 0:23:21.959
<v Speaker 1>just better teachers. They know more about they know how

0:23:22.000 --> 0:23:26.600
<v Speaker 1>to teach in different ways exactly exactly. Oh, I got

0:23:26.600 --> 0:23:30.040
<v Speaker 1>in big trouble one time. What happened? I should have

0:23:30.200 --> 0:23:34.280
<v Speaker 1>left it to my forbidden Twitter file. Um, so I tweeted.

0:23:34.920 --> 0:23:39.720
<v Speaker 1>I said, for the teachers who feel compelled to say,

0:23:40.480 --> 0:23:43.639
<v Speaker 1>these students just don't want to learn, And I said,

0:23:44.320 --> 0:23:47.679
<v Speaker 1>maybe they should consider the possibility that they suck at

0:23:47.680 --> 0:23:53.399
<v Speaker 1>their job. I believe you're not wrong, but you know,

0:23:53.440 --> 0:23:56.679
<v Speaker 1>I put it out there. I've had a maybe in

0:23:56.720 --> 0:24:00.879
<v Speaker 1>front of it. I said possibly, like a possible. You know,

0:24:01.000 --> 0:24:03.200
<v Speaker 1>people said, do you remember? Remember? And then of course

0:24:03.200 --> 0:24:08.200
<v Speaker 1>it's Twitter, so it's the cesspool of opinions. Yeah. So

0:24:08.240 --> 0:24:13.359
<v Speaker 1>not every teacher is sainted, okay, and we all had

0:24:13.440 --> 0:24:15.840
<v Speaker 1>bad teachers in our lives. Well maybe you didn't because

0:24:16.080 --> 0:24:18.639
<v Speaker 1>you had speciales. I did before I moved to special

0:24:18.680 --> 0:24:20.320
<v Speaker 1>at and then I went there. You go, and you know,

0:24:20.480 --> 0:24:22.919
<v Speaker 1>and you can you can list not here, don't do it,

0:24:22.960 --> 0:24:25.680
<v Speaker 1>but you can list bad teachers right who really should

0:24:25.720 --> 0:24:30.159
<v Speaker 1>have never entered the profession. All right, we have to

0:24:30.200 --> 0:24:32.160
<v Speaker 1>take one more quick break. But when we come back,

0:24:32.240 --> 0:24:34.760
<v Speaker 1>I want to talk about how you define success for yourself.

0:24:35.160 --> 0:24:44.679
<v Speaker 1>We'll be right back and we're back. You've accomplished so

0:24:44.720 --> 0:24:47.720
<v Speaker 1>many incredible things. Throughout your career, and everyone has a

0:24:47.720 --> 0:24:50.119
<v Speaker 1>different definition of what success means to them, and I

0:24:50.119 --> 0:24:52.720
<v Speaker 1>was wondering, how do you personally define success for yourself?

0:24:53.080 --> 0:24:57.520
<v Speaker 1>Thank you? That's an excellent question. It's excellent on many levels.

0:24:58.080 --> 0:25:01.600
<v Speaker 1>And I don't often get that because now it gives

0:25:01.640 --> 0:25:06.600
<v Speaker 1>me the opportunity to for me redefined success. All right,

0:25:07.280 --> 0:25:13.679
<v Speaker 1>uh so let me take a slightly windy route to

0:25:13.680 --> 0:25:16.640
<v Speaker 1>get there. So let's say you have someone who wants

0:25:16.680 --> 0:25:19.119
<v Speaker 1>to be an actor, and then you say what kind

0:25:19.119 --> 0:25:20.320
<v Speaker 1>of actor you want to be? Well, I want to

0:25:20.320 --> 0:25:22.680
<v Speaker 1>be a famous actor. Oh so they don't want to

0:25:22.720 --> 0:25:23.960
<v Speaker 1>be a good actor, they just want to be a

0:25:23.960 --> 0:25:29.159
<v Speaker 1>famous actor. So that's a different goal, always the same

0:25:29.240 --> 0:25:32.840
<v Speaker 1>thing as you want to be the best actor you

0:25:32.880 --> 0:25:36.320
<v Speaker 1>can be. Sometimes I would even say often being the

0:25:36.320 --> 0:25:38.760
<v Speaker 1>best actor you can be will lead to that. But

0:25:38.840 --> 0:25:42.160
<v Speaker 1>if your goal is simply to be famous, then all

0:25:42.200 --> 0:25:46.280
<v Speaker 1>the times you're not famous, you're miserable. Right. You put

0:25:46.320 --> 0:25:49.000
<v Speaker 1>so much like definition on one thing and you're not

0:25:49.040 --> 0:25:52.160
<v Speaker 1>that right, right, right, and so much emphasis, and you're miserable.

0:25:52.640 --> 0:25:55.520
<v Speaker 1>If you instead say I want to be the best

0:25:55.560 --> 0:25:58.239
<v Speaker 1>actor I can be, then every performance you give on

0:25:58.359 --> 0:26:01.120
<v Speaker 1>stage or in a uh, which is I'm from New York,

0:26:01.200 --> 0:26:05.879
<v Speaker 1>so we entirely value stage performances in New York. Okay,

0:26:06.160 --> 0:26:09.080
<v Speaker 1>at the end of that performance, how'd you do? What

0:26:09.160 --> 0:26:11.160
<v Speaker 1>would you have done differently? How can you And now

0:26:11.200 --> 0:26:13.359
<v Speaker 1>that you've given that and you deliver that line that way,

0:26:13.520 --> 0:26:15.720
<v Speaker 1>is there a better way to deliver that line? And

0:26:15.720 --> 0:26:19.840
<v Speaker 1>then this is you constantly and persistently focusing on how

0:26:19.920 --> 0:26:23.160
<v Speaker 1>much better you can be at your craft. The goal

0:26:23.200 --> 0:26:25.040
<v Speaker 1>here to be as good as you possibly could be.

0:26:26.080 --> 0:26:31.159
<v Speaker 1>And what I've done in my life is whatever I've attempted,

0:26:32.000 --> 0:26:33.679
<v Speaker 1>I tried to be as good at it as I

0:26:33.720 --> 0:26:38.280
<v Speaker 1>could possibly be without regard to how people see it

0:26:38.440 --> 0:26:42.240
<v Speaker 1>or receive it or value it. And well that that's

0:26:42.280 --> 0:26:45.520
<v Speaker 1>not entirely true. So for example, let's go back to

0:26:47.040 --> 0:26:53.159
<v Speaker 1>the first what was discovered? Shoot, what was discovered? A

0:26:53.240 --> 0:26:58.840
<v Speaker 1>nineteen oh the uh space um a planet thing with

0:26:58.960 --> 0:27:04.560
<v Speaker 1>my age twenty years Okay, you gotta be plus on that,

0:27:06.040 --> 0:27:09.840
<v Speaker 1>but you know is in it? Okay? Yeah, So the

0:27:09.960 --> 0:27:16.359
<v Speaker 1>first exo planet was discovered, Okay, generation X planet, and

0:27:16.480 --> 0:27:21.520
<v Speaker 1>so I was interviewed by I was then the interim

0:27:21.560 --> 0:27:25.479
<v Speaker 1>director of the Hayden Planetarium in New York City, This

0:27:25.560 --> 0:27:29.720
<v Speaker 1>was banner headlines that exo planet was discovered. So NBC

0:27:29.840 --> 0:27:32.919
<v Speaker 1>News sent one of their action cams, you know, up

0:27:32.960 --> 0:27:36.239
<v Speaker 1>to do an interview to air that evening. And they

0:27:36.280 --> 0:27:38.679
<v Speaker 1>sent them up and and they said, and they didn't

0:27:38.680 --> 0:27:41.080
<v Speaker 1>know me yet. I just they just wanted me for

0:27:41.160 --> 0:27:45.280
<v Speaker 1>my title. And I gave my best profess soil response.

0:27:45.640 --> 0:27:48.320
<v Speaker 1>I talked about the Doppler shift and the physics of

0:27:48.359 --> 0:27:50.800
<v Speaker 1>the movement of the stars and the center of mass

0:27:50.880 --> 0:27:53.840
<v Speaker 1>of the system. And I did all of this, and

0:27:53.880 --> 0:27:56.040
<v Speaker 1>I said, and once we discovered that there was the

0:27:56.119 --> 0:27:58.320
<v Speaker 1>Doppler shift on that star, and you can make it

0:27:58.440 --> 0:28:02.800
<v Speaker 1>very hard measurement. And because the star is kind of moving,

0:28:03.280 --> 0:28:06.240
<v Speaker 1>it's like jiggling. Uh, And so that's what you're going

0:28:06.280 --> 0:28:09.760
<v Speaker 1>to measure. And so I moved my body and in

0:28:09.760 --> 0:28:12.920
<v Speaker 1>the way the star would move. And all they used

0:28:12.920 --> 0:28:18.600
<v Speaker 1>from that interview was me jiggling my That was it, okay,

0:28:18.760 --> 0:28:23.320
<v Speaker 1>And maybe one sentence, you know, And so I said, oh, well,

0:28:23.359 --> 0:28:27.040
<v Speaker 1>they don't want to hear my professor reply. They want

0:28:27.040 --> 0:28:30.960
<v Speaker 1>to sound bite. So I went home and practiced sound bites,

0:28:31.359 --> 0:28:34.040
<v Speaker 1>and so the next time I got asked, I just

0:28:34.080 --> 0:28:36.880
<v Speaker 1>get handled them sound bites and they came back for more,

0:28:36.920 --> 0:28:39.320
<v Speaker 1>and then other people came back, and this just continued

0:28:39.360 --> 0:28:44.040
<v Speaker 1>to build. And I said, I'm a servant of their curiosity.

0:28:44.160 --> 0:28:46.600
<v Speaker 1>I want to be the best servant I can be.

0:28:47.160 --> 0:28:50.680
<v Speaker 1>And one other example I'll give is the first time

0:28:50.720 --> 0:28:54.240
<v Speaker 1>I was on The Daily Show with Jon Stewart, okay

0:28:54.320 --> 0:28:58.400
<v Speaker 1>before Trevor Noah. John Stewart hosted that. And he's sharp,

0:28:58.840 --> 0:29:03.360
<v Speaker 1>he's smart, and he's funny. And I've seen politicians deer

0:29:03.400 --> 0:29:06.120
<v Speaker 1>in the headlights as he's dancing circles around them because

0:29:06.120 --> 0:29:08.680
<v Speaker 1>they're trying to get their speech out and he's not

0:29:08.800 --> 0:29:11.400
<v Speaker 1>letting them, and it's a disaster. I said, that is

0:29:11.400 --> 0:29:14.360
<v Speaker 1>not going to happen to me. So I studied him,

0:29:14.400 --> 0:29:16.920
<v Speaker 1>and I said, with a stopwatch, and I said, how

0:29:16.920 --> 0:29:20.360
<v Speaker 1>many seconds does he give you on average to speak

0:29:20.440 --> 0:29:24.720
<v Speaker 1>before he comedically interrupts, Okay, it's like time back. He

0:29:24.880 --> 0:29:27.280
<v Speaker 1>really studied this. I forgot the number like between eight

0:29:27.320 --> 0:29:29.680
<v Speaker 1>and twelve seconds, which doesn't sound like much, but it's

0:29:29.680 --> 0:29:32.280
<v Speaker 1>actually you can say a lot in ten seconds. So

0:29:33.040 --> 0:29:35.320
<v Speaker 1>I got on the show. I also had to know

0:29:35.720 --> 0:29:39.840
<v Speaker 1>three days of current events, I judged, because he's blending

0:29:39.960 --> 0:29:42.840
<v Speaker 1>it's a new show. He's blending current events with whatever

0:29:42.880 --> 0:29:45.120
<v Speaker 1>he's talking about. Because I did this, and I get

0:29:45.160 --> 0:29:48.480
<v Speaker 1>on the show and I deliver the ten seconds and

0:29:48.520 --> 0:29:51.160
<v Speaker 1>he jokes and then I come back, so I complete

0:29:51.200 --> 0:29:53.200
<v Speaker 1>the idea. He completes the joke, we go on to

0:29:53.320 --> 0:29:57.120
<v Speaker 1>the next thing. So it's it's working like it's it's

0:29:57.600 --> 0:30:00.760
<v Speaker 1>But was your dance, thank you, beautiful reference. It's a dance.

0:30:01.440 --> 0:30:05.600
<v Speaker 1>It's a dance. So in dancing in the interview and

0:30:05.680 --> 0:30:08.520
<v Speaker 1>at the end of it, people came up to me

0:30:09.200 --> 0:30:13.880
<v Speaker 1>and said, Neil, you and Johnston would have such good chemistry.

0:30:14.560 --> 0:30:19.680
<v Speaker 1>That's it's so natural. Little do you know? You have

0:30:19.880 --> 0:30:24.120
<v Speaker 1>no freaking idea? What kind of homework went into this?

0:30:24.720 --> 0:30:26.920
<v Speaker 1>And that was trying to be the best I can be.

0:30:27.520 --> 0:30:31.440
<v Speaker 1>So for me, I am successful if whatever I did

0:30:32.480 --> 0:30:35.120
<v Speaker 1>it was the best I could do in that time

0:30:35.160 --> 0:30:38.880
<v Speaker 1>for the research I was able to conduct. That's that's

0:30:38.920 --> 0:30:40.760
<v Speaker 1>how I measure my success. And if that, if the

0:30:40.760 --> 0:30:43.360
<v Speaker 1>public happens to like that, that's just bonus. I'm glad.

0:30:43.720 --> 0:30:45.120
<v Speaker 1>And that's all you can do at the end of

0:30:45.160 --> 0:30:49.520
<v Speaker 1>the day is be the best version of yourself correct

0:30:50.160 --> 0:30:52.479
<v Speaker 1>And if you're not that I think you are, how

0:30:52.520 --> 0:30:55.000
<v Speaker 1>should I put this you. If you don't do that,

0:30:56.240 --> 0:30:59.880
<v Speaker 1>I think this one time you have on life is

0:31:00.920 --> 0:31:06.960
<v Speaker 1>under capitalized for all that you could do, think, accomplish, feel,

0:31:08.480 --> 0:31:12.880
<v Speaker 1>and why waste any of it. So if a day

0:31:13.000 --> 0:31:15.720
<v Speaker 1>goes by where I didn't learn something or improve something

0:31:15.760 --> 0:31:19.800
<v Speaker 1>about myself, that's a wasted day. And you can guarantee

0:31:20.040 --> 0:31:23.000
<v Speaker 1>unless you happen to be the generation that will live forever.

0:31:23.040 --> 0:31:26.080
<v Speaker 1>And I don't think they're born yet, that's another sort

0:31:26.080 --> 0:31:29.680
<v Speaker 1>of generation where we increase life expectancy. So right now,

0:31:30.760 --> 0:31:34.920
<v Speaker 1>increasing life expectancy by one year every five years something

0:31:35.000 --> 0:31:38.600
<v Speaker 1>like that, okay for of the general population. So but

0:31:38.720 --> 0:31:41.240
<v Speaker 1>what the day will come where we increase life expectancy

0:31:41.360 --> 0:31:44.400
<v Speaker 1>by one year for every year of research that we do,

0:31:45.040 --> 0:31:48.920
<v Speaker 1>that generation will live forever. I think that's younger than

0:31:48.960 --> 0:31:52.280
<v Speaker 1>you at this point, because we agreed you're an old part.

0:31:52.560 --> 0:31:56.360
<v Speaker 1>That is going to be my new bio on Instagram.

0:31:56.840 --> 0:31:59.560
<v Speaker 1>So I don't really want to live forever because I

0:31:59.640 --> 0:32:04.120
<v Speaker 1>like a motivation knowing that I'm going to die. Because guaranteed,

0:32:04.400 --> 0:32:07.000
<v Speaker 1>if a day goes by that you do not serve

0:32:07.360 --> 0:32:11.680
<v Speaker 1>your own curiosities and your own enlightenment in your own wisdom,

0:32:11.720 --> 0:32:14.560
<v Speaker 1>that's you've seen the calendars on the prison walls. It's

0:32:14.600 --> 0:32:18.600
<v Speaker 1>an X in a day that you're never getting back,

0:32:19.600 --> 0:32:23.480
<v Speaker 1>and so my motivation correlates with that. Okay, the fewer

0:32:23.520 --> 0:32:25.720
<v Speaker 1>days I have left, the more motivated I am to

0:32:25.760 --> 0:32:29.440
<v Speaker 1>get stuff done. And so I don't envy the first

0:32:29.480 --> 0:32:32.400
<v Speaker 1>generation who will live forever, because I wouldn't want to

0:32:32.440 --> 0:32:35.880
<v Speaker 1>live forever. That sounds exhausting, Yeah, it can be exhausted.

0:32:35.880 --> 0:32:37.560
<v Speaker 1>Why put why do today what you can put off

0:32:37.640 --> 0:32:42.080
<v Speaker 1>until tomorrow? Well, thank you so much. This conversation has

0:32:42.120 --> 0:32:44.160
<v Speaker 1>really been eye opening for me. I feel like I've

0:32:44.240 --> 0:32:46.400
<v Speaker 1>learned a lot today and I've been really inspired, and

0:32:46.400 --> 0:32:48.280
<v Speaker 1>I would now want to learn a lot more. So

0:32:48.400 --> 0:32:52.640
<v Speaker 1>I really appreciate why why not? Right? You know the

0:32:52.680 --> 0:32:56.120
<v Speaker 1>people who graduate from school and throw their books in

0:32:56.160 --> 0:32:59.640
<v Speaker 1>the air and say schools out? It's like, why are

0:32:59.640 --> 0:33:02.640
<v Speaker 1>you be about that? What I know isn't you should

0:33:02.640 --> 0:33:05.160
<v Speaker 1>always be curious and want to keep larring correct what

0:33:05.200 --> 0:33:08.600
<v Speaker 1>school should teach? I granted school is a pain, I

0:33:08.640 --> 0:33:11.400
<v Speaker 1>get that, But the least that should happen in school

0:33:11.560 --> 0:33:15.160
<v Speaker 1>is when you do graduate, you you your curiosity is

0:33:15.240 --> 0:33:19.000
<v Speaker 1>stoked to continue to learn on your own. So my

0:33:19.160 --> 0:33:22.760
<v Speaker 1>great regret in the system is that school doesn't teach

0:33:22.840 --> 0:33:25.880
<v Speaker 1>us all to continue to be curious. It's kind of

0:33:25.920 --> 0:33:28.160
<v Speaker 1>like you stop when it's done. If you stop it,

0:33:28.200 --> 0:33:29.960
<v Speaker 1>and then you get ossified, which is a great s

0:33:30.000 --> 0:33:33.880
<v Speaker 1>a t word. You get ossified in your thinking. Whatever

0:33:34.040 --> 0:33:35.840
<v Speaker 1>was your last thoughts the last time you were in

0:33:35.880 --> 0:33:39.040
<v Speaker 1>a classroom, that's it. And then you want to start life.

0:33:39.080 --> 0:33:41.920
<v Speaker 1>You get married, have kids, and that's how you're going

0:33:41.960 --> 0:33:44.920
<v Speaker 1>to think about the world. And do you see these

0:33:44.920 --> 0:33:47.080
<v Speaker 1>older folks that are just sort of crusty in their

0:33:47.120 --> 0:33:50.040
<v Speaker 1>ways because they didn't keep learning. They didn't they didn't

0:33:50.040 --> 0:33:54.480
<v Speaker 1>stay flexible, nimble, nimble in the mind. There's a quote

0:33:54.480 --> 0:33:57.920
<v Speaker 1>in the book, second to last page of the entire book,

0:33:58.600 --> 0:34:01.880
<v Speaker 1>which is from Horace and an educator, and there's school

0:34:01.920 --> 0:34:05.000
<v Speaker 1>is named after him. He's a brilliant educated in New

0:34:05.080 --> 0:34:08.359
<v Speaker 1>York City right in the Bronx, actually from two centuries ago.

0:34:08.760 --> 0:34:12.640
<v Speaker 1>And he was giving a commencement speech and he used

0:34:12.640 --> 0:34:15.920
<v Speaker 1>the word beseech in his Nobody uses that word anymore,

0:34:15.920 --> 0:34:18.719
<v Speaker 1>and it's very I feel like it's Shakespearean, but maybe

0:34:18.760 --> 0:34:21.719
<v Speaker 1>we should bring it back. He says, I beseech you

0:34:23.120 --> 0:34:29.000
<v Speaker 1>to treasure in your heart. These my parting words be

0:34:29.120 --> 0:34:33.400
<v Speaker 1>ashamed to die until you have scored some victority for

0:34:33.560 --> 0:34:37.879
<v Speaker 1>humanity that I want that on my tombstone and has

0:34:37.920 --> 0:34:40.080
<v Speaker 1>nothing to do with being famous or rich. And it

0:34:40.480 --> 0:34:43.400
<v Speaker 1>is the world a little better off for you having

0:34:43.480 --> 0:34:46.400
<v Speaker 1>lived in it. And here's what I'm gonna recommend. Because

0:34:46.400 --> 0:34:48.600
<v Speaker 1>I don't like telling people what to do. I like

0:34:48.880 --> 0:34:50.839
<v Speaker 1>compelling them to want to do something on their own,

0:34:51.080 --> 0:34:52.440
<v Speaker 1>but not going to tell people what to do. I

0:34:52.760 --> 0:34:55.680
<v Speaker 1>tell all your your viewers and listeners, I'm gonna say,

0:34:55.800 --> 0:34:59.480
<v Speaker 1>if you're gonna get this book at all, do it

0:34:59.600 --> 0:35:05.360
<v Speaker 1>be for Thanksgiving. So all of your arguments will be honed.

0:35:06.239 --> 0:35:09.160
<v Speaker 1>So that when the crazy and and the and the

0:35:09.360 --> 0:35:12.279
<v Speaker 1>weird uncle will all come over and they want to

0:35:12.320 --> 0:35:15.560
<v Speaker 1>talk about the flat earth they wanted to, you'll be equipped.

0:35:15.840 --> 0:35:18.840
<v Speaker 1>You have answers for everything, for every comeback, and ways

0:35:18.880 --> 0:35:22.000
<v Speaker 1>to help them think through what as they're thinking about,

0:35:22.400 --> 0:35:27.239
<v Speaker 1>because a cosmic perspective is and always is transformative of

0:35:27.280 --> 0:35:32.879
<v Speaker 1>whoever basks in its light. Well, thank you so much

0:35:32.920 --> 0:35:35.239
<v Speaker 1>for coming on my podcast. I am truly honored to

0:35:35.280 --> 0:35:37.719
<v Speaker 1>have had this conversation. It's truly also made my day.

0:35:37.840 --> 0:35:39.759
<v Speaker 1>I'm delighted sim Thanks for having me