WEBVTT - Venezuela Regroups With New President, Old Repression Tactics

0:00:02.520 --> 0:00:10.520
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, Podcasts, radio News. This is Bloomberg Business

0:00:10.520 --> 0:00:14.400
<v Speaker 1>Week Daily reporting from the magazine that helps global leaders

0:00:14.440 --> 0:00:18.360
<v Speaker 1>stay ahead with insight on the people, companies, and trends

0:00:18.360 --> 0:00:23.360
<v Speaker 1>shaping today's complex economy. Plus global business finance and tech

0:00:23.440 --> 0:00:27.320
<v Speaker 1>news as it happens. The Bloomberg Business Week Daily Podcast

0:00:27.640 --> 0:00:31.720
<v Speaker 1>with Carol Masser and Tim Stenebeck on Bloomberg Radio.

0:00:32.440 --> 0:00:35.120
<v Speaker 2>While the US ray that captured Venezuela and President Nicholas

0:00:35.159 --> 0:00:39.640
<v Speaker 2>Maduro put America's allies and adversaries definitely unnoticed, President Trump

0:00:39.720 --> 0:00:42.120
<v Speaker 2>has a new World Order tim of his own. At

0:00:42.200 --> 0:00:44.000
<v Speaker 2>least that's how it's been reporting out.

0:00:44.080 --> 0:00:46.320
<v Speaker 3>Yeah. In the aftermath of the stunning late night operation

0:00:46.400 --> 0:00:49.280
<v Speaker 3>at Sammaduro and his wife wist from a guarded military

0:00:49.320 --> 0:00:52.840
<v Speaker 3>base near Caracas to a New York jail, President Trump

0:00:52.840 --> 0:00:55.200
<v Speaker 3>demonstrated just how far the US is willing to go

0:00:55.240 --> 0:00:57.760
<v Speaker 3>to eliminate a leader seen as a threat to American

0:00:57.760 --> 0:01:01.880
<v Speaker 3>interests and security. So we're looking at the challenges that

0:01:02.160 --> 0:01:04.160
<v Speaker 3>come next. Those are the ones that are presented by

0:01:04.160 --> 0:01:07.960
<v Speaker 3>the US raid on Venezuela. We welcome Rockford Whites, President,

0:01:08.560 --> 0:01:11.280
<v Speaker 3>Professor of Practice and Director of the Maritime Studies program

0:01:11.319 --> 0:01:15.080
<v Speaker 3>at Toft's Universities, Fletcher's School, Fletcher School of Law and Diplomacy.

0:01:15.120 --> 0:01:17.720
<v Speaker 3>He joins US from Tucson, Arizona. Professor, Good to have

0:01:17.760 --> 0:01:21.280
<v Speaker 3>you on the program. What do you believe is the

0:01:21.319 --> 0:01:24.800
<v Speaker 3>true motivation of the US when it comes to Venezuela,

0:01:26.400 --> 0:01:27.039
<v Speaker 3>great question.

0:01:27.520 --> 0:01:29.840
<v Speaker 4>What we're looking at here is this is a geopolitical

0:01:29.840 --> 0:01:33.679
<v Speaker 4>competition between the United States and China and Russia over

0:01:33.800 --> 0:01:39.200
<v Speaker 4>who is the main ally of Venezuela in the Caribbean.

0:01:40.640 --> 0:01:41.080
<v Speaker 5>Wow.

0:01:41.280 --> 0:01:46.400
<v Speaker 3>Okay, So before what we saw at late Friday and

0:01:46.440 --> 0:01:49.440
<v Speaker 3>early Saturday, what would you have said is the true ally?

0:01:50.160 --> 0:01:52.080
<v Speaker 3>Who would you have said is a true ally? And

0:01:52.120 --> 0:01:55.600
<v Speaker 3>then now after how does the US become the true ally?

0:01:56.560 --> 0:01:59.160
<v Speaker 5>Okay? All right, so great quest. I love these questions.

0:01:59.320 --> 0:02:03.280
<v Speaker 4>So before it was a combination of China was their

0:02:03.400 --> 0:02:07.920
<v Speaker 4>geoeconomic ally helping them with infrastructure, Russia was a military

0:02:07.960 --> 0:02:11.120
<v Speaker 4>ally with basing rights there and supporting their military. And

0:02:11.160 --> 0:02:13.720
<v Speaker 4>even Iran, even though it's not a great power, was

0:02:13.880 --> 0:02:17.520
<v Speaker 4>helping Venezuela. So they had that was their sort of

0:02:17.520 --> 0:02:20.639
<v Speaker 4>cast of characters, as well as Cuba. Cuba's frankly a

0:02:20.680 --> 0:02:24.560
<v Speaker 4>little bit more reliant on Venezuela than vice versa. Everything

0:02:24.600 --> 0:02:29.600
<v Speaker 4>has changed since Saturday morning in the sense that there

0:02:29.639 --> 0:02:35.799
<v Speaker 4>is obviously new leadership in Venezuela, a transition leadership. It's

0:02:35.880 --> 0:02:38.639
<v Speaker 4>unclear who will be in charge in the long run,

0:02:39.040 --> 0:02:42.840
<v Speaker 4>but it's very clear that the great power that's going

0:02:42.880 --> 0:02:45.440
<v Speaker 4>to have the most influence over Venezuela is now the

0:02:45.560 --> 0:02:46.240
<v Speaker 4>United States.

0:02:46.880 --> 0:02:50.800
<v Speaker 2>What I'm wondering, Professor White, you know, what's the international

0:02:50.840 --> 0:02:53.000
<v Speaker 2>precedent for doing something like this? I mean, how should

0:02:53.040 --> 0:02:56.040
<v Speaker 2>we read what is essentially a kidnapping of a leader

0:02:56.280 --> 0:02:59.880
<v Speaker 2>of a foreign country and his wife, removal of the

0:03:00.240 --> 0:03:03.880
<v Speaker 2>leader from said country. What's it akin to in our

0:03:03.960 --> 0:03:06.360
<v Speaker 2>past history, our recent past history. And to be fair,

0:03:06.440 --> 0:03:09.240
<v Speaker 2>it's not the first time the US or others have

0:03:09.320 --> 0:03:12.360
<v Speaker 2>removed a global leader or worked behind the scenes to

0:03:12.440 --> 0:03:16.680
<v Speaker 2>support US friendly groups leaders in foreign countries. So we

0:03:16.800 --> 0:03:19.720
<v Speaker 2>get that we're not all naive, but I'm just curious,

0:03:20.360 --> 0:03:23.280
<v Speaker 2>are we setting up for kind of a leader grab

0:03:23.360 --> 0:03:28.799
<v Speaker 2>around the world among countries and among global powers?

0:03:30.480 --> 0:03:30.720
<v Speaker 5>Great?

0:03:30.760 --> 0:03:33.280
<v Speaker 4>Another great question, thank you, So let me try to

0:03:33.280 --> 0:03:37.240
<v Speaker 4>answer it using history. So it was actually ironically thirty

0:03:37.280 --> 0:03:40.680
<v Speaker 4>six years ago to the day that the United States

0:03:40.920 --> 0:03:46.320
<v Speaker 4>took Noriega from Panama, and that's the closest parallel. So

0:03:47.160 --> 0:03:50.760
<v Speaker 4>he also was charged with narco trafficking. He was also

0:03:50.880 --> 0:03:54.040
<v Speaker 4>then taken to the United States for prosecution. They also

0:03:54.240 --> 0:03:56.320
<v Speaker 4>justified it in exactly the same way. There was an

0:03:56.320 --> 0:03:58.960
<v Speaker 4>indictment against him in the United States, so that covered

0:03:58.960 --> 0:04:02.680
<v Speaker 4>the domestic law piece. And then under the UN Charter,

0:04:03.280 --> 0:04:06.480
<v Speaker 4>countries are allowed self defense and it also self defense

0:04:06.520 --> 0:04:09.160
<v Speaker 4>of their population. So it was framed this was back

0:04:09.160 --> 0:04:13.400
<v Speaker 4>in nineteen ninety under Bush Senior as no Diego as

0:04:13.440 --> 0:04:17.640
<v Speaker 4>a narco trafficker and therefore must be taken care of

0:04:17.680 --> 0:04:20.960
<v Speaker 4>to protect the American people from the drug trade. That

0:04:21.160 --> 0:04:24.400
<v Speaker 4>is allowed under the UN Charter as self defense, so

0:04:24.480 --> 0:04:27.719
<v Speaker 4>that covers you under international law. Again, every legal issue

0:04:27.760 --> 0:04:30.600
<v Speaker 4>is gray, so people will say it's against international law,

0:04:30.640 --> 0:04:32.600
<v Speaker 4>but you can make a case that it's consistent with

0:04:32.680 --> 0:04:34.919
<v Speaker 4>international law and the UN Charter. You can make a

0:04:34.920 --> 0:04:38.479
<v Speaker 4>case that it's consistent with domestic law. And I would

0:04:38.480 --> 0:04:42.280
<v Speaker 4>say it does set a precedent that other narco trafficking

0:04:42.360 --> 0:04:46.680
<v Speaker 4>leaders around the world could be taken not just by

0:04:46.760 --> 0:04:48.279
<v Speaker 4>the United States but by others.

0:04:49.000 --> 0:04:50.760
<v Speaker 5>But this doesn't really apply to Taiwan.

0:04:51.160 --> 0:04:53.679
<v Speaker 4>I've spent a lot of time in Taiwan, and narco

0:04:53.720 --> 0:04:56.599
<v Speaker 4>trafficking is not their game, and so I think that

0:04:57.040 --> 0:04:58.599
<v Speaker 4>the precedent can be narrowed.

0:04:58.960 --> 0:05:01.599
<v Speaker 5>But it doesn't. It also means that.

0:05:02.040 --> 0:05:05.120
<v Speaker 4>Other large countries, other great powers like China and Russia,

0:05:05.200 --> 0:05:07.720
<v Speaker 4>will look at this to see how they can use

0:05:07.760 --> 0:05:08.640
<v Speaker 4>it to their advantage.

0:05:08.880 --> 0:05:11.479
<v Speaker 3>Well, you mentioned Taiwan, but what about Russia, and what

0:05:11.520 --> 0:05:14.200
<v Speaker 3>about Vladimir Putin in Russia? Could he use this as

0:05:14.839 --> 0:05:17.560
<v Speaker 3>justification for doing something to Zelenski.

0:05:18.880 --> 0:05:22.800
<v Speaker 4>So Putin will try to come up with any justification

0:05:22.920 --> 0:05:25.680
<v Speaker 4>to go after Zelenski. But Zelenski clearly is not a

0:05:25.800 --> 0:05:28.960
<v Speaker 4>narco trafficker. I don't think anyone's saying that, so we

0:05:29.040 --> 0:05:31.760
<v Speaker 4>can argue not. The other thing is Zelensky has very

0:05:31.800 --> 0:05:37.320
<v Speaker 4>powerful friends right next door, the NATO, the Northern Niactary Organization.

0:05:37.360 --> 0:05:42.560
<v Speaker 4>Poland borders Ukraine the US. Although Trump has not supported

0:05:42.640 --> 0:05:47.000
<v Speaker 4>as much as maybe previous presidents have, We're behind Zelensky.

0:05:47.080 --> 0:05:52.200
<v Speaker 4>Zelensky's got powerful friends. Venezuela really didn't have powerful friends

0:05:52.240 --> 0:05:54.360
<v Speaker 4>in this part of the world. China is a very

0:05:54.400 --> 0:05:57.760
<v Speaker 4>strong navy around Taiwan, for example, they don't have a

0:05:57.800 --> 0:06:00.760
<v Speaker 4>major naval presence in the Caribbean as well.

0:06:01.240 --> 0:06:02.720
<v Speaker 5>It is a naval power.

0:06:02.760 --> 0:06:05.000
<v Speaker 4>It's not nearly as strong as either China or the

0:06:05.080 --> 0:06:08.039
<v Speaker 4>United States, but it doesn't have a major Caribbean presence.

0:06:08.080 --> 0:06:12.400
<v Speaker 4>So what's fundamentally happened is in the Americas, the US

0:06:12.760 --> 0:06:16.240
<v Speaker 4>is the major great power with the major military And

0:06:16.520 --> 0:06:18.520
<v Speaker 4>I will just note this because it is important for

0:06:18.600 --> 0:06:22.839
<v Speaker 4>the bigger conversation. The Trump administration did issue its national

0:06:22.880 --> 0:06:26.880
<v Speaker 4>security strategy just last month. It said we're going to

0:06:26.920 --> 0:06:30.640
<v Speaker 4>focus more attention on the Americas, and it was consistent

0:06:30.760 --> 0:06:34.479
<v Speaker 4>with this operation in Venezuela, though I will admit I

0:06:34.520 --> 0:06:38.240
<v Speaker 4>was surprised at how much force was used to take

0:06:38.279 --> 0:06:40.480
<v Speaker 4>Maduro and his wife one hundred and fifty aircraft.

0:06:40.560 --> 0:06:43.200
<v Speaker 5>I mean, this was a major operation on Saturday.

0:06:44.480 --> 0:06:46.960
<v Speaker 2>Wow, so many different places to go. Well, having said that,

0:06:47.800 --> 0:06:49.560
<v Speaker 2>you know, listening to a lot of the coverage here

0:06:49.560 --> 0:06:54.359
<v Speaker 2>on Bloomberg, professor wise, it sounds also like that the

0:06:54.560 --> 0:06:57.840
<v Speaker 2>US intelligence has been on the ground for some time.

0:06:57.839 --> 0:06:59.240
<v Speaker 2>We're going to talk about this a little bit later

0:06:59.279 --> 0:07:04.479
<v Speaker 2>on on on our broadcast, but that they had help

0:07:04.880 --> 0:07:07.560
<v Speaker 2>in kind of pulling this together. Is that a bad

0:07:07.600 --> 0:07:13.680
<v Speaker 2>assumption or read into the US getting an assist from

0:07:14.000 --> 0:07:15.320
<v Speaker 2>other leaders in Venezuela.

0:07:16.760 --> 0:07:17.960
<v Speaker 5>I think it's an accurate read.

0:07:18.040 --> 0:07:22.280
<v Speaker 4>I've been following this basically United days since Saturday, a

0:07:22.280 --> 0:07:25.400
<v Speaker 4>lot of coffee. But basically what has happened is it's

0:07:25.440 --> 0:07:30.600
<v Speaker 4>not surprising the United States has been focused on Maduro

0:07:30.800 --> 0:07:35.920
<v Speaker 4>and his regime. Really, it's been bipartisan. Biden also had

0:07:35.920 --> 0:07:39.560
<v Speaker 4>a bounty out for Maduro to be removed. So Maduro

0:07:39.920 --> 0:07:43.720
<v Speaker 4>is not popular internationally, he's not popular domestically. He's essentially

0:07:43.800 --> 0:07:46.080
<v Speaker 4>clinging on to power. I thought one of the most

0:07:46.080 --> 0:07:49.640
<v Speaker 4>interesting things was that his almost his entire security staff

0:07:49.680 --> 0:07:53.120
<v Speaker 4>were Cubans. This has come out from multiple sources, so

0:07:53.520 --> 0:07:56.320
<v Speaker 4>it's not surprising that the United States would spend a

0:07:56.360 --> 0:08:01.440
<v Speaker 4>couple months gathering intelligence. I have to say that this

0:08:01.600 --> 0:08:05.680
<v Speaker 4>was almost perfectly executed from a special operations perspective. They

0:08:05.720 --> 0:08:11.040
<v Speaker 4>had one mission kidnap said what kidnapped, but sees Maduro

0:08:11.080 --> 0:08:14.640
<v Speaker 4>and his wife take them to the United States. At

0:08:14.720 --> 0:08:20.720
<v Speaker 4>the same time, essentially take out the Venezuelan military. So

0:08:20.800 --> 0:08:23.520
<v Speaker 4>the Venezuelan Navy essentially no longer exists. Same for the

0:08:23.520 --> 0:08:27.040
<v Speaker 4>Air Force, no more radar, any tanks they had are

0:08:27.080 --> 0:08:31.000
<v Speaker 4>probably gone. So this was executed very well, and of

0:08:31.040 --> 0:08:34.800
<v Speaker 4>course intelligence was involved, so and Trump even said that publicly,

0:08:34.920 --> 0:08:38.280
<v Speaker 4>CIA is already there. So I would say public sources

0:08:38.280 --> 0:08:40.720
<v Speaker 4>have verified it, multiple sources.

0:08:40.720 --> 0:08:43.360
<v Speaker 5>I think it's probably accurate to say that's correct.

0:08:43.800 --> 0:08:46.760
<v Speaker 3>Well, that's one part of the mission, and that was

0:08:47.240 --> 0:08:50.560
<v Speaker 3>certainly this mission. But I think many critics out there

0:08:50.640 --> 0:08:55.439
<v Speaker 3>and even observers saying, now comes the hard part, the

0:08:55.480 --> 0:08:58.600
<v Speaker 3>potential power vacuum. And we've seen what quote unquote nation

0:08:58.679 --> 0:09:01.640
<v Speaker 3>building for the United STS data has looked like in

0:09:01.679 --> 0:09:04.240
<v Speaker 3>the past. How does that play out? What is the

0:09:04.320 --> 0:09:06.120
<v Speaker 3>right way for the US to do that?

0:09:07.080 --> 0:09:09.440
<v Speaker 4>This is literally what I think is the most important

0:09:09.480 --> 0:09:12.160
<v Speaker 4>question for today. So I call this the Day After challenge.

0:09:13.080 --> 0:09:15.640
<v Speaker 4>This is a big deal. It's going to be very

0:09:15.679 --> 0:09:22.000
<v Speaker 4>difficult to smoothly create a transition to a new government

0:09:22.280 --> 0:09:28.119
<v Speaker 4>in a peaceful way without triggering an insurgency. The Venezuelan

0:09:28.160 --> 0:09:31.640
<v Speaker 4>military wasn't really strong before Saturday. They're really not strong

0:09:31.720 --> 0:09:36.120
<v Speaker 4>now that being said, similar to Vietnam, similar to Colombia.

0:09:36.160 --> 0:09:37.920
<v Speaker 4>I used to live in Colombia. I know the country well.

0:09:37.920 --> 0:09:39.680
<v Speaker 4>I've been to Venezuela as well as a tourist in

0:09:39.679 --> 0:09:43.800
<v Speaker 4>the nineties. There's parts of Venezuela that are the perfect

0:09:43.840 --> 0:09:47.880
<v Speaker 4>guerrilla warfare area. The United States has, I think no

0:09:48.040 --> 0:09:51.559
<v Speaker 4>interest in a long term occupation of Venezuela because it

0:09:51.600 --> 0:09:54.520
<v Speaker 4>would not be it would not be pretty, and it

0:09:54.520 --> 0:09:57.319
<v Speaker 4>would look similar to some of our misadventures in the

0:09:57.360 --> 0:10:02.160
<v Speaker 4>Middle East. I think the model to look cat is Panama.

0:10:02.880 --> 0:10:07.040
<v Speaker 4>You have in Venezuela a recognized opposition. You have Maria

0:10:07.120 --> 0:10:10.959
<v Speaker 4>Karina Machado, who is the recent Nobel Peace Prize winner.

0:10:11.080 --> 0:10:13.600
<v Speaker 4>You have at Mundo Gonzales, who is the declared winner

0:10:13.640 --> 0:10:18.240
<v Speaker 4>internationally recognized of the last presidential election. They're friends, They're

0:10:18.280 --> 0:10:22.040
<v Speaker 4>a good opposition. I think what can happen is that

0:10:22.080 --> 0:10:24.680
<v Speaker 4>they can be brought into this process and that the

0:10:24.800 --> 0:10:31.720
<v Speaker 4>US can help them establish some level of control. Probably

0:10:31.760 --> 0:10:36.800
<v Speaker 4>involves a few hundred, maybe a few thousand elite American

0:10:36.880 --> 0:10:42.080
<v Speaker 4>troops guarding say the presidential palace in Caracas, and essentially

0:10:42.080 --> 0:10:44.559
<v Speaker 4>having a presence at all the major military bases, certainly

0:10:44.600 --> 0:10:49.559
<v Speaker 4>around Caracas, and then eventually that gets transitioned over to

0:10:51.240 --> 0:10:55.840
<v Speaker 4>the new government. It's going to be hard. The essentially

0:10:55.920 --> 0:11:00.439
<v Speaker 4>Venezuela has had a dysfunctional government since nineteen ninety nine.

0:11:00.920 --> 0:11:03.960
<v Speaker 5>Maduro was in power for over ten years as a dictator.

0:11:04.320 --> 0:11:06.839
<v Speaker 4>All of his allies are in the National Assembly, they're

0:11:06.880 --> 0:11:10.480
<v Speaker 4>in the government, they're in the military. There's narco traffickers

0:11:10.480 --> 0:11:12.560
<v Speaker 4>who are well armed. So it's not going to be easy,

0:11:13.080 --> 0:11:14.160
<v Speaker 4>but I do think it's possible.

0:11:14.200 --> 0:11:15.000
<v Speaker 5>I also, I think it's.

0:11:15.000 --> 0:11:18.960
<v Speaker 4>Very different from Iraq or Afghanistan because there's no religious

0:11:19.000 --> 0:11:19.640
<v Speaker 4>element here.

0:11:20.080 --> 0:11:21.280
<v Speaker 5>Venezuelan's not only.

0:11:21.080 --> 0:11:23.240
<v Speaker 4>Are they all Christian, that are all Catholic, So there's

0:11:23.280 --> 0:11:25.680
<v Speaker 4>no that's not a piece of It doesn't mean it's easy.

0:11:26.200 --> 0:11:28.079
<v Speaker 4>I think it's going to take a lot of bandwidth

0:11:28.080 --> 0:11:28.440
<v Speaker 4>to do it.

0:11:28.480 --> 0:11:28.720
<v Speaker 5>Well.

0:11:28.800 --> 0:11:32.280
<v Speaker 4>I'm not sure if the Trump administration is ready to

0:11:33.080 --> 0:11:34.200
<v Speaker 4>do it, but we will see.

0:11:34.400 --> 0:11:35.080
<v Speaker 5>We will see.

0:11:36.240 --> 0:11:39.000
<v Speaker 3>Stay with us more from Bloomberg Business Week Daily coming

0:11:39.120 --> 0:11:40.000
<v Speaker 3>up after this.

0:11:44.240 --> 0:11:48.080
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Bloomberg Business Week Daily Podcast. Catch

0:11:48.160 --> 0:11:50.840
<v Speaker 1>us live weekday afternoons from two to five eas during

0:11:51.040 --> 0:11:54.280
<v Speaker 1>Listen on Apple Karplay and Android Auto with the Bloomberg

0:11:54.320 --> 0:11:57.760
<v Speaker 1>Business app, or watch us live on YouTube.

0:11:58.040 --> 0:12:00.520
<v Speaker 2>Money Managers, They've been loading up on Benel and debth

0:12:00.559 --> 0:12:03.080
<v Speaker 2>This is one of the stories that we've been reporting

0:12:03.120 --> 0:12:05.360
<v Speaker 2>out here at Bloomberg. This has been happening in the

0:12:05.400 --> 0:12:08.360
<v Speaker 2>past few months as President Trump ramped up pressure on

0:12:08.480 --> 0:12:11.760
<v Speaker 2>President Maduro, with some investors seeing the potential for restructuring

0:12:11.800 --> 0:12:13.960
<v Speaker 2>as early as this year. And then, of course Tim,

0:12:14.000 --> 0:12:15.480
<v Speaker 2>then we had the weekend happened.

0:12:15.679 --> 0:12:17.840
<v Speaker 3>So with more on that, let's head to Sarasota, Florida,

0:12:17.880 --> 0:12:21.280
<v Speaker 3>and to Mike Collins, managing director, an executive portfolio advisor

0:12:21.320 --> 0:12:24.120
<v Speaker 3>on the multisector team over at PGIM. PGIM fixed Income

0:12:24.160 --> 0:12:26.920
<v Speaker 3>approximately one and a half trillion dollars and total assets

0:12:27.000 --> 0:12:29.760
<v Speaker 3>under management for PGM fixed Income it's more than one

0:12:29.960 --> 0:12:33.520
<v Speaker 3>billion dollars, Mike, big picture, how big of a deal

0:12:34.080 --> 0:12:36.400
<v Speaker 3>is it what happened in Venezuela, especially when it comes

0:12:36.440 --> 0:12:38.520
<v Speaker 3>to the global market and investing landscape. How are you

0:12:38.520 --> 0:12:39.040
<v Speaker 3>looking at it?

0:12:40.080 --> 0:12:40.640
<v Speaker 6>Yeah?

0:12:40.679 --> 0:12:43.560
<v Speaker 5>Tim and Catroll, Happy New Year. Great, great to be here.

0:12:43.800 --> 0:12:45.760
<v Speaker 6>You know, I get these questions all the time whenever

0:12:45.800 --> 0:12:49.040
<v Speaker 6>you have these geopolitical flaw ups around the world, whether

0:12:49.120 --> 0:12:52.200
<v Speaker 6>they're in Asia, the Middle East, or Latin America. And

0:12:52.200 --> 0:12:54.000
<v Speaker 6>my answer is always the same, you know, kind of

0:12:54.040 --> 0:12:58.080
<v Speaker 6>fade the headlines is generally the knee jerk instinct that

0:12:58.120 --> 0:13:00.720
<v Speaker 6>you should have as an investor. You should really focus

0:13:01.360 --> 0:13:04.679
<v Speaker 6>on the fundamentals of the global economy, the fundamentals of

0:13:04.720 --> 0:13:07.520
<v Speaker 6>the US economy, where growth is going.

0:13:07.400 --> 0:13:08.920
<v Speaker 5>To be, where inflation is going to be.

0:13:09.000 --> 0:13:12.319
<v Speaker 6>Obviously, commodity prices are in the headlines today with the

0:13:12.360 --> 0:13:16.000
<v Speaker 6>Venezuela thing. But remember Venezuela is producing now less than

0:13:16.080 --> 0:13:19.719
<v Speaker 6>one percent of global oil. Remember sixty years ago, back

0:13:19.720 --> 0:13:23.360
<v Speaker 6>when I was born, they were producing fifteen percent of

0:13:23.400 --> 0:13:26.439
<v Speaker 6>the world's oil, and now they're less than one percent, right,

0:13:26.480 --> 0:13:29.199
<v Speaker 6>So they have taken a huge fall from grace. They

0:13:29.240 --> 0:13:33.080
<v Speaker 6>do not have a big impact economically on the global stage.

0:13:33.120 --> 0:13:35.440
<v Speaker 6>Sixty years ago, believe it or not, Venezuela was in

0:13:35.480 --> 0:13:38.959
<v Speaker 6>the top quartile of all countries in terms of GDP

0:13:39.160 --> 0:13:43.080
<v Speaker 6>per capita. Today they are at the bottom of the list, right,

0:13:43.520 --> 0:13:46.120
<v Speaker 6>And you think of other countries where they've been geopolitical

0:13:46.160 --> 0:13:51.120
<v Speaker 6>flare ups. Typically these countries don't have huge international economic implications.

0:13:51.160 --> 0:13:53.679
<v Speaker 6>So that's why the markets are just kind of, you know,

0:13:54.120 --> 0:13:57.360
<v Speaker 6>whistling past the graveyard here and just ignoring the geopolitical risk.

0:13:58.160 --> 0:13:59.440
<v Speaker 6>That is the standard playbook.

0:14:00.000 --> 0:14:02.559
<v Speaker 3>Michael, just forgive me. I want to go back more

0:14:02.600 --> 0:14:06.240
<v Speaker 3>than a trillion dollars over at PGM fixed income under management.

0:14:06.360 --> 0:14:09.920
<v Speaker 3>I misspoke earlier, Okay, so if that's why, if that's

0:14:09.960 --> 0:14:13.240
<v Speaker 3>why we're seeing sort of the relative calm today, let's

0:14:13.280 --> 0:14:17.320
<v Speaker 3>then focused on focus on kind of what comes next

0:14:17.360 --> 0:14:20.040
<v Speaker 3>and the political and potential implications for that, because I

0:14:20.080 --> 0:14:22.880
<v Speaker 3>think that is a big question that investors have right now.

0:14:22.920 --> 0:14:26.080
<v Speaker 3>I mean, certainly people don't want to see some prolonged

0:14:27.040 --> 0:14:29.160
<v Speaker 3>and you know, dare I say boots on the ground

0:14:29.160 --> 0:14:32.480
<v Speaker 3>mission in the country. But but I think that I mean,

0:14:32.520 --> 0:14:34.680
<v Speaker 3>to me, going into this week, that was a big

0:14:34.680 --> 0:14:37.200
<v Speaker 3>concern that I thought investors would have. What if this

0:14:37.280 --> 0:14:40.320
<v Speaker 3>actually gets turns into something a kind of like we've

0:14:40.320 --> 0:14:44.160
<v Speaker 3>seen with past quote unquote nation building activities from the US.

0:14:45.160 --> 0:14:47.720
<v Speaker 6>We've spent most of the weekend and a lot of

0:14:47.760 --> 0:14:52.120
<v Speaker 6>this morning doing deep dives into the situation in ven Azuell.

0:14:52.200 --> 0:14:54.560
<v Speaker 6>I mean, I'm fortunate to work on this gigantic team

0:14:54.560 --> 0:14:58.360
<v Speaker 6>where we have you know, geopolitic political analysts, we have

0:14:59.120 --> 0:15:03.840
<v Speaker 6>really deep economic analytical resources. We have people who've been

0:15:03.880 --> 0:15:05.880
<v Speaker 6>in the military, so we have a lot of great

0:15:05.920 --> 0:15:09.120
<v Speaker 6>color just from our own team and our and our contacts.

0:15:09.160 --> 0:15:12.200
<v Speaker 6>And there's really two scenarios right One team is the

0:15:12.240 --> 0:15:15.000
<v Speaker 6>one you pointed out that that things do get ugly

0:15:15.800 --> 0:15:18.720
<v Speaker 6>that Venezuela kind of gets worse, conditions get worse, that

0:15:18.760 --> 0:15:22.040
<v Speaker 6>the US tries to do a more aggressive takeover, and

0:15:22.040 --> 0:15:25.040
<v Speaker 6>it gets really messy some of the situations in the

0:15:25.040 --> 0:15:27.320
<v Speaker 6>Middle East that your last guest was talking about. But

0:15:27.360 --> 0:15:30.640
<v Speaker 6>there's also this upside scenario, right, and I think it

0:15:30.720 --> 0:15:33.840
<v Speaker 6>kind of confirms the fact that we're moving into this,

0:15:34.200 --> 0:15:37.600
<v Speaker 6>you know, G three ish type of world and the

0:15:37.720 --> 0:15:40.120
<v Speaker 6>US is certainly trying to take the lead there and

0:15:40.120 --> 0:15:44.960
<v Speaker 6>showing that, hey, we have control of the Americas here,

0:15:45.720 --> 0:15:50.320
<v Speaker 6>which could result in better outcomes for countries like Venezuela,

0:15:50.400 --> 0:15:53.120
<v Speaker 6>could result in better outcomes for the US, could result

0:15:53.160 --> 0:15:56.560
<v Speaker 6>in better outcomes for other Latin American countries, right, And

0:15:56.560 --> 0:15:59.000
<v Speaker 6>I think that's what the markets are focusing on. And

0:15:59.040 --> 0:16:02.320
<v Speaker 6>we were looking at all the merging market debt quotes

0:16:02.360 --> 0:16:05.800
<v Speaker 6>and runs out there right now, and generally the bonds

0:16:06.000 --> 0:16:08.440
<v Speaker 6>are trading better, right, And I think they're looking at

0:16:08.440 --> 0:16:12.440
<v Speaker 6>this as potentially the upside scenario, not the downside.

0:16:12.280 --> 0:16:13.400
<v Speaker 5>But you're absolutely right.

0:16:13.440 --> 0:16:16.880
<v Speaker 6>I mean, we really have to keep our radar attentive

0:16:16.920 --> 0:16:18.800
<v Speaker 6>to those potential downside risks.

0:16:18.840 --> 0:16:21.320
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, Mike, on that point, A raftive investment firm Yeing

0:16:21.360 --> 0:16:27.080
<v Speaker 2>opportunities in Venezuela after that US strike. Trebeca Investment Partners

0:16:27.120 --> 0:16:30.480
<v Speaker 2>is sending a team to excuse me, Caracos this week

0:16:30.720 --> 0:16:33.280
<v Speaker 2>to inspect potential assets, calling it a gold rush.

0:16:33.320 --> 0:16:35.040
<v Speaker 5>Have you guys changed.

0:16:36.360 --> 0:16:40.520
<v Speaker 2>Any of your investment thesis when it comes to Venezuela

0:16:40.600 --> 0:16:41.520
<v Speaker 2>at this point are.

0:16:41.400 --> 0:16:45.360
<v Speaker 6>Not yet well. Remember they've been pretty heavily sanctioned in

0:16:45.480 --> 0:16:48.120
<v Speaker 6>terms of trading and also trading some of their security.

0:16:48.240 --> 0:16:51.040
<v Speaker 6>So good news is for people have a huge emerging

0:16:51.080 --> 0:16:54.880
<v Speaker 6>market debt team and big investments around the world in

0:16:54.920 --> 0:16:57.760
<v Speaker 6>emerging market debt. You know, this could potentially free up

0:16:57.760 --> 0:17:01.760
<v Speaker 6>trading opportunities and relative value opportunity. I mean again, these bonds,

0:17:01.840 --> 0:17:04.320
<v Speaker 6>some of their bonds have you know, doubled or tripled

0:17:05.160 --> 0:17:07.800
<v Speaker 6>over the last over the last few weeks, so they're

0:17:07.800 --> 0:17:10.200
<v Speaker 6>still creating It really just stress levels. Right, we're talking

0:17:10.400 --> 0:17:13.600
<v Speaker 6>you know, twenty thirty cents on the dollar. But you know,

0:17:13.680 --> 0:17:15.960
<v Speaker 6>there are opportunities, for sure, there are going to be

0:17:15.960 --> 0:17:19.040
<v Speaker 6>a lot of relative opportunities. We're looking at even places

0:17:19.040 --> 0:17:22.159
<v Speaker 6>like Columbia today we're talking about where their local interest

0:17:22.240 --> 0:17:25.119
<v Speaker 6>rates are really high and their credit spreads are pretty wide,

0:17:25.160 --> 0:17:27.560
<v Speaker 6>and so you know, I think it sets up the

0:17:27.560 --> 0:17:30.880
<v Speaker 6>world for better relative value trading opportunities, and that's something

0:17:30.880 --> 0:17:32.480
<v Speaker 6>we're really looking to capitalize on.

0:17:32.640 --> 0:17:34.320
<v Speaker 2>So, Mike, if you had to kind of make a bet,

0:17:34.400 --> 0:17:37.439
<v Speaker 2>I mean, is it fifty percent that the fortunes and

0:17:37.480 --> 0:17:41.439
<v Speaker 2>maybe economic and investment outlook for Venezuela are changing for

0:17:41.480 --> 0:17:43.080
<v Speaker 2>the better at this point?

0:17:43.320 --> 0:17:45.560
<v Speaker 6>Or is it? You know, I would say it's a

0:17:45.560 --> 0:17:49.359
<v Speaker 6>little better than a coin toss carola probably, but higher odds.

0:17:49.400 --> 0:17:52.520
<v Speaker 6>Maybe I'm just you know, talking our book or agreeing

0:17:52.560 --> 0:17:55.000
<v Speaker 6>with the market's reaction so far. But yeah, but it

0:17:55.040 --> 0:17:58.240
<v Speaker 6>certainly feels like, you know, when you're having more private

0:17:58.280 --> 0:18:02.760
<v Speaker 6>sector resources coming to a country that's been totally mismanaged

0:18:02.800 --> 0:18:06.600
<v Speaker 6>in terms of their natural resources in their politics, you know,

0:18:06.880 --> 0:18:09.840
<v Speaker 6>there is I think a higher likelihood of a better

0:18:09.880 --> 0:18:12.399
<v Speaker 6>outcome there. But you know, the road to that better

0:18:12.480 --> 0:18:16.200
<v Speaker 6>outcome can be really long, right, and what with all.

0:18:16.119 --> 0:18:18.359
<v Speaker 2>Kinds of problems, right, lots of bumps can always happen.

0:18:18.600 --> 0:18:21.240
<v Speaker 2>Certainly in a situation like this, many would.

0:18:21.080 --> 0:18:21.560
<v Speaker 5>Agree with that.

0:18:21.880 --> 0:18:24.960
<v Speaker 2>Hey, Mike, before you go, I'm thinking about the US

0:18:25.000 --> 0:18:27.240
<v Speaker 2>this week. We do get a jobs report on Friday,

0:18:27.480 --> 0:18:29.960
<v Speaker 2>We have a bunch of economic news. We did see

0:18:29.960 --> 0:18:32.919
<v Speaker 2>the US treasury curve move down today, a little bit

0:18:32.960 --> 0:18:36.119
<v Speaker 2>of economics news today. What is more important though, in

0:18:36.200 --> 0:18:38.280
<v Speaker 2>terms of the US Treasury trade at this point is

0:18:38.280 --> 0:18:41.720
<v Speaker 2>it the US economy what the Fed does ultimately, just

0:18:41.760 --> 0:18:44.200
<v Speaker 2>give us about thirty forty seconds on that, if you would.

0:18:44.960 --> 0:18:47.800
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, again, it's going back to the fundamentals, Carol, Right,

0:18:47.800 --> 0:18:50.760
<v Speaker 6>And if you're looking at US growth, I mean, if anything,

0:18:50.880 --> 0:18:55.040
<v Speaker 6>expectations for growth this year have ticked up over the

0:18:55.080 --> 0:18:58.040
<v Speaker 6>last few months. We're entering twenty twenty six with really

0:18:58.119 --> 0:19:03.680
<v Speaker 6>strong kind of real GDP or consumption and capital expenditure expectations,

0:19:03.720 --> 0:19:07.080
<v Speaker 6>you know, momentum going into this year. So most forecasts

0:19:07.119 --> 0:19:09.840
<v Speaker 6>now for US GDP have two handles right where it's

0:19:09.840 --> 0:19:11.600
<v Speaker 6>not that long ago, they're.

0:19:11.160 --> 0:19:11.640
<v Speaker 5>In the ones.

0:19:11.680 --> 0:19:15.520
<v Speaker 6>I think the recession risks have moderated in the US

0:19:15.560 --> 0:19:19.080
<v Speaker 6>and we've taken hour probabilities down, and the upside risk

0:19:19.600 --> 0:19:25.480
<v Speaker 6>to growth to more productivity from AI maybe too higher

0:19:25.480 --> 0:19:28.520
<v Speaker 6>inflation and permanently higher rates has gone up. And that's

0:19:28.560 --> 0:19:32.240
<v Speaker 6>actually not a great environment for risk assets necessarily.

0:19:32.359 --> 0:19:32.520
<v Speaker 7>Right.

0:19:32.560 --> 0:19:34.920
<v Speaker 6>So we've been threading this needle. We call it the

0:19:35.760 --> 0:19:38.399
<v Speaker 6>muddle through scenario where you kind of run at two percent,

0:19:38.480 --> 0:19:41.000
<v Speaker 6>you have inflation stuck. You know, between two and three

0:19:41.280 --> 0:19:43.800
<v Speaker 6>the fetiaeses a couple of times. That's a great environment

0:19:43.840 --> 0:19:47.440
<v Speaker 6>for growth and for inflation and for financial assets.

0:19:47.840 --> 0:19:51.720
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Bloomberg Business Week Daily podcast. Catch

0:19:51.760 --> 0:19:54.960
<v Speaker 1>us live weekday afternoons from two to five eastering. Listen

0:19:55.000 --> 0:19:58.600
<v Speaker 1>on Applecarplay and Android autto with the Bloomberg Business app,

0:19:58.760 --> 0:20:00.400
<v Speaker 1>or watch US Live on you too.

0:20:01.520 --> 0:20:03.679
<v Speaker 3>A big question that many people have been asking in

0:20:03.680 --> 0:20:05.560
<v Speaker 3>the wake of the US strikes in Venezuela and the

0:20:05.600 --> 0:20:09.119
<v Speaker 3>capture of President Nicholas Maduro is what comes next? The

0:20:09.119 --> 0:20:12.919
<v Speaker 3>surgical extraction of Maduro is done, but what about the

0:20:12.960 --> 0:20:16.640
<v Speaker 3>future of the country. Him and a Sunia is Bloomberg

0:20:16.680 --> 0:20:19.600
<v Speaker 3>Economics geoeconomic analysts for Latin America. She joins U from

0:20:19.600 --> 0:20:22.439
<v Speaker 3>the Bloomberg Buenos Aires Bureau Jimana, It's good to have

0:20:22.480 --> 0:20:24.560
<v Speaker 3>you on the program. You and the team right. The

0:20:24.640 --> 0:20:27.920
<v Speaker 3>range of possible outcomes is wide. What are some of

0:20:27.960 --> 0:20:28.639
<v Speaker 3>these outcomes?

0:20:29.920 --> 0:20:32.760
<v Speaker 8>Thank you thanks for having me. I think there are

0:20:32.800 --> 0:20:37.639
<v Speaker 8>We can point out three possible scenarios for Venezuela going forward.

0:20:38.320 --> 0:20:42.320
<v Speaker 8>The first one is that after this transition, there is

0:20:42.840 --> 0:20:47.399
<v Speaker 8>the establishment of a stable, market friendly, pro West democratic

0:20:47.440 --> 0:20:51.119
<v Speaker 8>government in Venezuela, and that would probably, of course be

0:20:51.960 --> 0:20:56.280
<v Speaker 8>the best and most favorable outcome for Venezuela on the world,

0:20:57.160 --> 0:21:01.440
<v Speaker 8>with consequences for debt markets, all prices, the Venezuela and

0:21:01.520 --> 0:21:03.200
<v Speaker 8>diaspora and beyond.

0:21:04.000 --> 0:21:05.119
<v Speaker 3>I just want to jump in. I just want to

0:21:05.160 --> 0:21:07.480
<v Speaker 3>jump in here on this one. Who would be the

0:21:07.560 --> 0:21:09.680
<v Speaker 3>leader of the country in a scenario such as this.

0:21:10.880 --> 0:21:13.240
<v Speaker 8>I think in this scenario there are two dise things possibility.

0:21:13.280 --> 0:21:15.920
<v Speaker 8>There could be one interpretation that is, the US has

0:21:16.040 --> 0:21:19.640
<v Speaker 8>just cleared the path for the constitutional order to be restored,

0:21:19.640 --> 0:21:22.359
<v Speaker 8>and in that case, the leader that should assume the

0:21:22.400 --> 0:21:25.200
<v Speaker 8>government should be the winner of the twenty twenty four

0:21:25.200 --> 0:21:29.119
<v Speaker 8>presidential elections. However, there's also the possibility that that leader,

0:21:29.200 --> 0:21:32.760
<v Speaker 8>because of all the constit institutional disorder that has been

0:21:32.760 --> 0:21:35.000
<v Speaker 8>in the past few years, there could be a call

0:21:35.080 --> 0:21:38.879
<v Speaker 8>for a constitutional assembly, a constituent assembly, so that the

0:21:38.920 --> 0:21:41.840
<v Speaker 8>government draft so that the country drafts the new constitution

0:21:42.080 --> 0:21:45.400
<v Speaker 8>and then calls for presidential elections again, in which I

0:21:45.440 --> 0:21:52.840
<v Speaker 8>think that Maria Corina Matchello, the winner of the Nobel

0:21:52.840 --> 0:21:56.040
<v Speaker 8>Peace Prize and the leading figure in the opposition the

0:21:56.080 --> 0:21:59.040
<v Speaker 8>winner of the twenty twenty three primaries who did not

0:21:59.160 --> 0:22:01.320
<v Speaker 8>could not run into a four because she was barred

0:22:01.320 --> 0:22:03.440
<v Speaker 8>by the government. I think she would be in the

0:22:03.480 --> 0:22:05.680
<v Speaker 8>most favorable position position to win.

0:22:05.680 --> 0:22:09.119
<v Speaker 2>A man how much of a guarantee, I guess is

0:22:09.359 --> 0:22:14.760
<v Speaker 2>the question. I want that Venezuela does ultimately have a lasting,

0:22:14.880 --> 0:22:17.480
<v Speaker 2>market friendly, pro democratic government.

0:22:19.240 --> 0:22:21.680
<v Speaker 8>I think, of course, that's a messy path, right, It's

0:22:21.720 --> 0:22:26.199
<v Speaker 8>not easy. Venezuela currently has still a military military that

0:22:26.280 --> 0:22:29.760
<v Speaker 8>for years has been very intertwined with the regime. They

0:22:29.800 --> 0:22:36.080
<v Speaker 8>have privileges, they have businesses. There's also paramilitary militias that

0:22:36.480 --> 0:22:40.800
<v Speaker 8>have arms and have interests and control certain areas. There

0:22:40.840 --> 0:22:45.040
<v Speaker 8>are elements of foreign governments like Hezbola and fark and

0:22:45.119 --> 0:22:49.640
<v Speaker 8>Eland from Colombia, and so it's a very challenging situation

0:22:49.720 --> 0:22:51.359
<v Speaker 8>for a government to take over. And that's part of

0:22:51.400 --> 0:22:55.800
<v Speaker 8>the reason why the Trump administration has said, however controversial,

0:22:55.840 --> 0:23:00.400
<v Speaker 8>this is that they are running the country, meaning that

0:23:00.440 --> 0:23:03.159
<v Speaker 8>they are allowing the vice president of the regime, now

0:23:03.520 --> 0:23:07.320
<v Speaker 8>sworn in President else Rodriguez, to take over because the

0:23:07.440 --> 0:23:11.440
<v Speaker 8>regime does actually have the levers of power to keep

0:23:11.480 --> 0:23:16.600
<v Speaker 8>things under control and avoid scenario of chaos and in fighting.

0:23:17.200 --> 0:23:20.680
<v Speaker 8>The key question is whether this is the first step

0:23:20.760 --> 0:23:24.159
<v Speaker 8>of a transition that over time, you know, for example,

0:23:24.160 --> 0:23:28.879
<v Speaker 8>by disarming our militias, by cracking down on drug trafficking,

0:23:29.240 --> 0:23:32.880
<v Speaker 8>et cetera, can lead to an opposition taking over down

0:23:32.960 --> 0:23:37.000
<v Speaker 8>the line under conditions that allow it to establish civilian

0:23:37.040 --> 0:23:41.480
<v Speaker 8>control of armed forces and project political and economic stability.

0:23:41.600 --> 0:23:44.320
<v Speaker 2>He man For those who aren't familiar with the Venezuelan economy,

0:23:45.720 --> 0:23:49.840
<v Speaker 2>what is it today and what are the Venezuelan people

0:23:50.000 --> 0:23:52.520
<v Speaker 2>facing in terms of inflation and the economy?

0:23:52.880 --> 0:23:53.840
<v Speaker 5>What could it be?

0:23:55.480 --> 0:23:57.560
<v Speaker 8>I think thank you for that question, because that's what

0:23:58.480 --> 0:24:01.119
<v Speaker 8>many people may not have so top of mind. Venezuela

0:24:01.240 --> 0:24:05.200
<v Speaker 8>used to be among the richest and largest economies in

0:24:05.280 --> 0:24:08.400
<v Speaker 8>the region, an economy of about four hundred billion dollars

0:24:08.800 --> 0:24:13.760
<v Speaker 8>with the GDP per capital of about thirteen thirteen thousand

0:24:15.080 --> 0:24:18.920
<v Speaker 8>per capita, which is puts it squarely in the middle

0:24:18.920 --> 0:24:23.000
<v Speaker 8>income bracket along with countries like Argentina or Uruguay. And

0:24:23.040 --> 0:24:25.680
<v Speaker 8>it was a country of regional and global relevance because

0:24:26.040 --> 0:24:29.639
<v Speaker 8>it also sits on the largest share of oil reserves.

0:24:29.880 --> 0:24:35.680
<v Speaker 8>And now Venezuela is a lower income country of about

0:24:35.800 --> 0:24:40.320
<v Speaker 8>the GDP about one hundred one hundred billion of GDP

0:24:40.440 --> 0:24:44.040
<v Speaker 8>per capita in the four thousands, and impoverished population. Eight

0:24:44.080 --> 0:24:47.640
<v Speaker 8>million people have left the country. And so the upside

0:24:47.640 --> 0:24:53.000
<v Speaker 8>if Venezuela could recover its political and economic normalcy, it's

0:24:53.200 --> 0:24:57.200
<v Speaker 8>enormous towards that path of economic significance it had in

0:24:57.240 --> 0:24:57.679
<v Speaker 8>the past.

0:24:57.840 --> 0:25:00.640
<v Speaker 3>Okay, you've certainly laid out one scenario here. Two more

0:25:00.840 --> 0:25:02.920
<v Speaker 3>scenarios that you mentioned. I want to make sure we

0:25:03.200 --> 0:25:06.760
<v Speaker 3>get to those two. What is the worst possible outcome

0:25:06.840 --> 0:25:07.760
<v Speaker 3>for Venezuela.

0:25:08.560 --> 0:25:11.119
<v Speaker 8>I think the worst possible outcome, the risks of that

0:25:11.200 --> 0:25:14.280
<v Speaker 8>one are reduced now, would be that there is not

0:25:14.359 --> 0:25:17.720
<v Speaker 8>a power vacuum right with the Exito Maduro, that there

0:25:17.760 --> 0:25:20.800
<v Speaker 8>is a power vacuum, and then different factions fight for power,

0:25:21.400 --> 0:25:27.280
<v Speaker 8>and therefore there is the establishment of a credible, stable,

0:25:27.480 --> 0:25:32.399
<v Speaker 8>democratic government. Is begins to seem unachievable. There could be

0:25:32.440 --> 0:25:36.000
<v Speaker 8>a search in violence, There could be exacerbating migration and

0:25:36.080 --> 0:25:38.959
<v Speaker 8>migration and securities spillovers to other countries in Latin America,

0:25:39.160 --> 0:25:43.280
<v Speaker 8>and things could go worse Latin America. Venezuela now has

0:25:43.320 --> 0:25:46.640
<v Speaker 8>a GDP about one hundred billion dollars, but it used

0:25:46.640 --> 0:25:52.960
<v Speaker 8>to be about half that much in the twenty twenty bottom.

0:25:53.359 --> 0:25:56.840
<v Speaker 8>Also similar with oil production, it's not about a million

0:25:57.280 --> 0:26:01.200
<v Speaker 8>down from two point five million bars day before the collapse,

0:26:01.240 --> 0:26:03.880
<v Speaker 8>but it was about half less than half this much

0:26:04.600 --> 0:26:08.199
<v Speaker 8>in the trough. So things could go worse, and so

0:26:08.800 --> 0:26:10.480
<v Speaker 8>that's definitely the worst case.

0:26:10.440 --> 0:26:12.200
<v Speaker 2>You know him And the other thing I think about

0:26:13.080 --> 0:26:16.359
<v Speaker 2>my daughter, you know, who has studied some of Latin America,

0:26:16.440 --> 0:26:18.840
<v Speaker 2>South American in terms of the history, it has had

0:26:18.920 --> 0:26:22.399
<v Speaker 2>kind of a tortured relationship, certainly with US involvement, and

0:26:22.440 --> 0:26:24.760
<v Speaker 2>it's not always been a good one. How do we

0:26:25.080 --> 0:26:29.520
<v Speaker 2>ensure that what happens isn't just protecting business interests but

0:26:29.840 --> 0:26:34.080
<v Speaker 2>instead really once again putting Venezuela on a path to

0:26:34.200 --> 0:26:35.280
<v Speaker 2>long term prosperity.

0:26:36.560 --> 0:26:38.600
<v Speaker 8>No, absolutely, I think that that brings me to a

0:26:38.640 --> 0:26:43.479
<v Speaker 8>third scenario, which is that the US sort of running

0:26:43.480 --> 0:26:48.960
<v Speaker 8>the country via the pressure exerted over the Zi Rodriguez

0:26:49.080 --> 0:26:54.080
<v Speaker 8>or elements of Javis who might succeed her. If this

0:26:54.359 --> 0:26:58.600
<v Speaker 8>lingers into the future, that's an intermediate outcome that might

0:26:58.640 --> 0:27:01.560
<v Speaker 8>you know, look more stable into so they're not being

0:27:01.560 --> 0:27:03.960
<v Speaker 8>in fighting or a very chaotic situation, but would still

0:27:03.960 --> 0:27:10.160
<v Speaker 8>be an authoritarian, non democratic government and non sovereign. In addition,

0:27:11.280 --> 0:27:14.480
<v Speaker 8>I think the risk of that scenario is there in

0:27:14.520 --> 0:27:16.760
<v Speaker 8>the sense that the US could be more focused on

0:27:17.880 --> 0:27:22.360
<v Speaker 8>the resources. The Trump administrations transaction or in nature, might

0:27:22.480 --> 0:27:28.040
<v Speaker 8>lead them to prioritize some economic policy measures and delay

0:27:28.320 --> 0:27:32.919
<v Speaker 8>the democratic transition. Trump may shift gears and focus on

0:27:32.960 --> 0:27:36.960
<v Speaker 8>domestic issues and leave the democratic transition and attended. But

0:27:37.160 --> 0:27:39.560
<v Speaker 8>there are also things mitigating that risk, And one key

0:27:39.640 --> 0:27:42.960
<v Speaker 8>issue I would highlight is that the Venezuela's incentives are

0:27:42.960 --> 0:27:45.880
<v Speaker 8>fairly aligned with the US incentives in the sense that

0:27:45.920 --> 0:27:51.399
<v Speaker 8>it is in Venezuela's interest also to recover its economic institutions,

0:27:51.560 --> 0:27:53.320
<v Speaker 8>open up its energy sectors so that it.

0:27:53.400 --> 0:27:54.120
<v Speaker 5>Can take off.

0:27:54.680 --> 0:27:59.200
<v Speaker 8>And probably a democratic opposition which would be ideally positioned

0:27:59.200 --> 0:28:03.240
<v Speaker 8>to win up elections, would probably also be pro West

0:28:03.240 --> 0:28:05.800
<v Speaker 8>and pro US. So I think that that limits the

0:28:05.920 --> 0:28:07.600
<v Speaker 8>risk that the US is says to stay.

0:28:07.440 --> 0:28:11.400
<v Speaker 3>On stay with us. More from Bloomberg Business Week Daily

0:28:11.440 --> 0:28:12.680
<v Speaker 3>coming up after this.

0:28:16.760 --> 0:28:20.600
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Bloomberg Business Week Daily podcast. Catch

0:28:20.680 --> 0:28:23.399
<v Speaker 1>us live weekday afternoons from two to fiveys During the

0:28:23.600 --> 0:28:27.199
<v Speaker 1>listen on Applecarplay and Android Otto with the Bloomberg Business

0:28:27.200 --> 0:28:30.240
<v Speaker 1>app or watch us live on YouTube.

0:28:30.480 --> 0:28:33.920
<v Speaker 2>We've got markets stocks in particular off their best levels

0:28:33.960 --> 0:28:35.840
<v Speaker 2>of the session, still up about seven tens of a

0:28:35.920 --> 0:28:38.960
<v Speaker 2>percent on the S and P five hundred, Nasdaq one

0:28:39.000 --> 0:28:41.160
<v Speaker 2>hundred and ten right now up about eight tens of

0:28:41.160 --> 0:28:44.880
<v Speaker 2>a percent. We have seen more names higher in today's session,

0:28:44.960 --> 0:28:47.520
<v Speaker 2>so it's been largely a risk on trade today. But

0:28:47.880 --> 0:28:50.080
<v Speaker 2>just feel like investors are kind of coming off some

0:28:50.120 --> 0:28:51.520
<v Speaker 2>of those highs or earlier highs.

0:28:51.600 --> 0:28:53.360
<v Speaker 3>This might not have been on the predictions for the

0:28:53.400 --> 0:28:56.120
<v Speaker 3>analysts out there who with their Wall Street target guessing

0:28:56.200 --> 0:28:59.480
<v Speaker 3>not well, let's see what says still politics maybe, but

0:29:00.440 --> 0:29:04.440
<v Speaker 3>in general right. Sam Stoveall's chief investment strategist at Safare Research.

0:29:04.440 --> 0:29:07.320
<v Speaker 3>He joins us from Allentown, Pennsylvania. Sam, we wanted to

0:29:07.320 --> 0:29:09.280
<v Speaker 3>talk general markets with you, but I mean we got

0:29:09.320 --> 0:29:13.000
<v Speaker 3>to talk about the topic that really is gathering all

0:29:13.040 --> 0:29:16.320
<v Speaker 3>the news today, and that's everything happening with Nicholas Maduro

0:29:16.520 --> 0:29:20.720
<v Speaker 3>and in Venezuela, and it's seemingly not affecting at least

0:29:20.760 --> 0:29:25.200
<v Speaker 3>the equity market in terms of investor concerns. Investors bullish today.

0:29:25.200 --> 0:29:26.080
<v Speaker 3>How do you explain it?

0:29:27.320 --> 0:29:30.000
<v Speaker 7>Well, Tim, I think it really is what we've seen

0:29:30.040 --> 0:29:34.320
<v Speaker 7>in the past that military events, going all the way

0:29:34.360 --> 0:29:37.400
<v Speaker 7>back to World War Two, most of them have really

0:29:37.440 --> 0:29:40.600
<v Speaker 7>ended up being more headline events than bottom line events,

0:29:41.240 --> 0:29:44.479
<v Speaker 7>and I think this one would be the same. Of course,

0:29:44.640 --> 0:29:47.440
<v Speaker 7>you know, you do have some areas like energy prices

0:29:47.440 --> 0:29:51.440
<v Speaker 7>that are rising for today, but expectations are that should

0:29:51.480 --> 0:29:56.800
<v Speaker 7>we be able to improve the transportation, refining, and so

0:29:56.880 --> 0:30:00.120
<v Speaker 7>forth coming out of Venezuela, then they're one percent and

0:30:00.200 --> 0:30:04.320
<v Speaker 7>exposure or contribution to worldwide energy could be on the

0:30:04.440 --> 0:30:07.720
<v Speaker 7>rise and that would bring down energy prices in the

0:30:07.760 --> 0:30:10.560
<v Speaker 7>longer term. So you know, in general, I think it

0:30:10.720 --> 0:30:14.480
<v Speaker 7>just adds to the overall risk on feeling that we

0:30:14.680 --> 0:30:17.000
<v Speaker 7>started to get at the beginning of this new year.

0:30:17.360 --> 0:30:19.600
<v Speaker 2>I will say, though, you know, Sam, it does feel

0:30:19.640 --> 0:30:22.000
<v Speaker 2>like there's like national security issues that a lot of

0:30:22.080 --> 0:30:25.480
<v Speaker 2>nations are thinking about what they need to be secure,

0:30:25.520 --> 0:30:29.960
<v Speaker 2>and maybe COVID taught us all having supply chains concentrated

0:30:30.000 --> 0:30:32.640
<v Speaker 2>in certain parts of the world not necessarily a good thing,

0:30:33.080 --> 0:30:36.080
<v Speaker 2>and so people are thinking about AI and the technology

0:30:36.960 --> 0:30:40.480
<v Speaker 2>and what's needed in terms of rare materials in order

0:30:40.520 --> 0:30:44.360
<v Speaker 2>to kind of keep that engine going. So I'm trying

0:30:44.360 --> 0:30:47.560
<v Speaker 2>to understand what that means then if there is a

0:30:47.560 --> 0:30:51.640
<v Speaker 2>bit of a grab around the world as different nations

0:30:51.680 --> 0:30:54.840
<v Speaker 2>shore up their national security interests and concerns, what that

0:30:54.920 --> 0:30:57.280
<v Speaker 2>means for the investment environment? Is it more friendly?

0:30:58.000 --> 0:30:59.400
<v Speaker 5>Is it more volatile?

0:30:59.560 --> 0:31:00.000
<v Speaker 2>In general?

0:31:02.000 --> 0:31:05.080
<v Speaker 7>I think it's probably a little less friendly. We started

0:31:05.120 --> 0:31:09.280
<v Speaker 7>out twenty twenty five to worry about tariffs, indicating that

0:31:09.320 --> 0:31:11.680
<v Speaker 7>we're probably going to get thrown back into a smooth

0:31:11.720 --> 0:31:15.280
<v Speaker 7>holly kind of situation back in nineteen thirty, where you

0:31:15.360 --> 0:31:18.120
<v Speaker 7>know that would end up causing all of the trading

0:31:18.120 --> 0:31:22.720
<v Speaker 7>partners to become adversaries. So with countries now playing it,

0:31:23.080 --> 0:31:27.240
<v Speaker 7>we're likely to play it very cautiously, wanting to hold

0:31:27.280 --> 0:31:30.840
<v Speaker 7>on to whatever rare earth minerals that they have, energy

0:31:30.880 --> 0:31:34.280
<v Speaker 7>that they have, etc. Then it would probably make these

0:31:35.160 --> 0:31:38.920
<v Speaker 7>trading partners less likely to cooperate, and that could end

0:31:39.000 --> 0:31:42.360
<v Speaker 7>up being a concern that could hold back prices and

0:31:42.440 --> 0:31:45.360
<v Speaker 7>optimism in the intermediate and longer term.

0:31:45.560 --> 0:31:49.600
<v Speaker 3>In your role at CFRA, how do you look at

0:31:49.880 --> 0:31:54.040
<v Speaker 3>oil prices. I know that's not necessarily your BALI wick,

0:31:54.120 --> 0:31:57.600
<v Speaker 3>but I'm wondering if that's if it does have a

0:31:57.600 --> 0:31:59.920
<v Speaker 3>broader effect, and we know it has a broader effect

0:32:00.200 --> 0:32:03.600
<v Speaker 3>on the economy, and therefore I'm wondering if, in your view,

0:32:03.600 --> 0:32:06.080
<v Speaker 3>how it affects markets, Like, what does it possibly mean

0:32:06.440 --> 0:32:09.080
<v Speaker 3>that all this oil could come online?

0:32:09.280 --> 0:32:11.920
<v Speaker 7>Well, there's an old saying that for every ten dollars

0:32:11.920 --> 0:32:15.960
<v Speaker 7>increase or decrease in the price of oil will raise

0:32:16.080 --> 0:32:20.960
<v Speaker 7>or lower GDP by about twenty percent of one basis points.

0:32:21.040 --> 0:32:25.080
<v Speaker 7>So you know, the thought being then that you know,

0:32:25.200 --> 0:32:28.400
<v Speaker 7>with higher energy prices that actually could end up slowing

0:32:29.040 --> 0:32:32.880
<v Speaker 7>overall growth, with lower energy prices could actually be contributing

0:32:32.960 --> 0:32:36.680
<v Speaker 7>to that. And so as a result, yes, longer term

0:32:36.800 --> 0:32:41.240
<v Speaker 7>energy because we still haven't switched over to sell powered

0:32:41.240 --> 0:32:46.800
<v Speaker 7>et cetera, that energy, you know, the carbon materials still

0:32:46.880 --> 0:32:50.000
<v Speaker 7>end up being the dominant energy force, and so we're

0:32:50.040 --> 0:32:51.600
<v Speaker 7>going to have to be playing with that for quite

0:32:51.600 --> 0:32:52.040
<v Speaker 7>some time.

0:32:52.480 --> 0:32:56.120
<v Speaker 2>Hey, Sam, you know, in terms of markets, and I'm

0:32:56.160 --> 0:32:58.840
<v Speaker 2>just thinking about here, we are coming off of three

0:32:59.000 --> 0:33:01.880
<v Speaker 2>really strong years for the S and P five hundred

0:33:01.920 --> 0:33:04.400
<v Speaker 2>one wonders whether or not it could be four in

0:33:04.440 --> 0:33:07.440
<v Speaker 2>a row. Having said that, I think a lot about earnings.

0:33:07.520 --> 0:33:10.040
<v Speaker 2>We know JP Morgan will kind of officially unofficially kick

0:33:10.040 --> 0:33:13.160
<v Speaker 2>it all off on January thirteenth. What are your expectations

0:33:13.200 --> 0:33:16.720
<v Speaker 2>for earnings and whether or not that is a fundamental

0:33:16.760 --> 0:33:20.160
<v Speaker 2>catalyst for equities in particular to maybe move to the

0:33:20.200 --> 0:33:21.840
<v Speaker 2>upside or continue to move higher.

0:33:22.640 --> 0:33:26.920
<v Speaker 7>Sure well, I'll answer a couple of those questions. First off,

0:33:26.960 --> 0:33:30.160
<v Speaker 7>we had a three peat. We've had three three peats

0:33:30.440 --> 0:33:32.600
<v Speaker 7>over the last eighty five years. In the S and

0:33:32.600 --> 0:33:36.520
<v Speaker 7>P five hundred, we've had two four peats and only

0:33:36.760 --> 0:33:41.960
<v Speaker 7>one five peat. So you could say that the atmosphere

0:33:42.000 --> 0:33:45.760
<v Speaker 7>is getting pretty rare up here and it's less likely

0:33:45.800 --> 0:33:48.160
<v Speaker 7>that we will end up with a four peat. Doesn't

0:33:48.200 --> 0:33:50.080
<v Speaker 7>mean we're not going to have a double digital or

0:33:50.120 --> 0:33:52.720
<v Speaker 7>that we will not have a positive move we don't

0:33:52.760 --> 0:33:56.800
<v Speaker 7>get the double digit gain. Actually, in that fourth year,

0:33:56.880 --> 0:34:01.120
<v Speaker 7>after the third double digit advance, we have seen the

0:34:01.160 --> 0:34:05.960
<v Speaker 7>market up by more about ten percent on average, rising

0:34:06.080 --> 0:34:09.160
<v Speaker 7>sixty percent of the time, So you could say that

0:34:09.160 --> 0:34:13.240
<v Speaker 7>that is favorable. What would be driving that well? Earnings growth?

0:34:13.760 --> 0:34:16.880
<v Speaker 7>The Q four twenty twenty five estimate right now is

0:34:16.920 --> 0:34:21.080
<v Speaker 7>for a seven percent gain. According to SMP capital IQ

0:34:21.239 --> 0:34:25.279
<v Speaker 7>consensus estimates, we're looking for a fourteen percent gain for

0:34:25.360 --> 0:34:29.080
<v Speaker 7>all of twenty twenty six and inching our way up

0:34:29.080 --> 0:34:32.520
<v Speaker 7>to about a fifteen percent advance in twenty twenty seven.

0:34:32.719 --> 0:34:37.640
<v Speaker 7>So with investors being concerned a bit about valuations, certainly

0:34:37.719 --> 0:34:41.480
<v Speaker 7>that is being in a sense whittled away at by

0:34:41.520 --> 0:34:45.040
<v Speaker 7>the improving earnings outlook that we've been seeing over this

0:34:45.160 --> 0:34:46.120
<v Speaker 7>year and next year.

0:34:46.600 --> 0:34:49.279
<v Speaker 2>What about midterms? Throw that into the mix. How does

0:34:49.280 --> 0:34:51.600
<v Speaker 2>that complicate or change things?

0:34:52.400 --> 0:34:55.800
<v Speaker 7>Yes, well, that ends up being a big headwind overall,

0:34:55.840 --> 0:35:00.960
<v Speaker 7>because midterm election years have actually seen the SMP post

0:35:01.160 --> 0:35:05.160
<v Speaker 7>only a three point eight percent annual increase, and that

0:35:05.280 --> 0:35:09.400
<v Speaker 7>compares with the nine point three percent that we normally

0:35:09.480 --> 0:35:11.680
<v Speaker 7>get in the S and P five hundred in those

0:35:11.719 --> 0:35:14.879
<v Speaker 7>three other years. Also, the frequency was really a coin

0:35:14.960 --> 0:35:18.960
<v Speaker 7>toss up fifty five percent of the time versus seventy

0:35:19.000 --> 0:35:21.680
<v Speaker 7>six percent of the time for the other three years.

0:35:22.000 --> 0:35:22.719
<v Speaker 5>And in terms of.

0:35:22.760 --> 0:35:27.360
<v Speaker 7>Volatility, average drawdown of eighteen percent, which is the highest

0:35:27.440 --> 0:35:31.839
<v Speaker 7>of the four years in the presidential cycle. So essentially,

0:35:32.680 --> 0:35:34.799
<v Speaker 7>we could end up with a good year, but it's

0:35:35.120 --> 0:35:36.680
<v Speaker 7>likely to be a very bumpy one.

0:35:37.440 --> 0:35:42.120
<v Speaker 1>This is the Bloomberg Business Week Daily podcast, available on Apple,

0:35:42.320 --> 0:35:46.640
<v Speaker 1>Spotify and anywhere else you get your podcasts. Listen live

0:35:46.719 --> 0:35:50.600
<v Speaker 1>weekday afternoons from two to five pm Eastern on Bloomberg

0:35:50.640 --> 0:35:54.560
<v Speaker 1>dot com, the iHeartRadio app tune In, and the Bloomberg

0:35:54.600 --> 0:35:57.680
<v Speaker 1>Business app. You can also watch us live every weekday

0:35:57.680 --> 0:36:00.720
<v Speaker 1>on YouTube and always on the bloom Burg terminal.

0:36:08.120 --> 0:36:08.440
<v Speaker 7>Mm HM