WEBVTT - Words of Wisdom From Mr. ETF

0:00:05.960 --> 0:00:08.639
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to Trillions. I'm Joel Webber and I'm Eric Bell

0:00:08.680 --> 0:00:15.960
<v Speaker 1>Tunis Eric. This is a special episode of Trillions that

0:00:16.120 --> 0:00:20.480
<v Speaker 1>coincided with a live event where you were on stage.

0:00:20.520 --> 0:00:23.000
<v Speaker 1>I was in the audience actually, but it was like

0:00:23.120 --> 0:00:25.840
<v Speaker 1>the old times, the before times, um, and it was

0:00:25.880 --> 0:00:29.600
<v Speaker 1>part of this new Voices initiative at Bloomberg. Who is

0:00:29.640 --> 0:00:33.120
<v Speaker 1>our guest? Yeah, it was the one or only Reggie Brown,

0:00:33.159 --> 0:00:35.360
<v Speaker 1>who a lot of people in the industry. No, I

0:00:35.360 --> 0:00:38.040
<v Speaker 1>mean he's very popular inside the industry and out to

0:00:38.080 --> 0:00:41.559
<v Speaker 1>a degree, and he was, um a perfect guest for

0:00:41.640 --> 0:00:44.960
<v Speaker 1>a session like this in person, Um, somebody who can

0:00:44.960 --> 0:00:47.600
<v Speaker 1>go anywhere in the conversation. Reggie is a market maker,

0:00:48.120 --> 0:00:50.199
<v Speaker 1>so he's making markets in all different types of E

0:00:50.240 --> 0:00:52.319
<v Speaker 1>t F s. And the reason he sometimes is called

0:00:52.400 --> 0:00:55.160
<v Speaker 1>E t F Godfather is because a lot of times

0:00:55.200 --> 0:00:56.760
<v Speaker 1>if you're a small issue or you go to him

0:00:56.960 --> 0:00:59.120
<v Speaker 1>to see if he'll give you c capital, just a

0:00:59.160 --> 0:01:02.080
<v Speaker 1>little bit of assets to start your life. And so

0:01:02.840 --> 0:01:05.199
<v Speaker 1>you know, people come to him. Um. And so that's sorry,

0:01:05.200 --> 0:01:07.920
<v Speaker 1>you got how we got the nickname. And he's really good.

0:01:07.920 --> 0:01:10.000
<v Speaker 1>He's well versed in all topics and so we thought

0:01:10.000 --> 0:01:13.240
<v Speaker 1>it'd be good to interview him on stage live and

0:01:13.280 --> 0:01:15.399
<v Speaker 1>it was really it was fun. And the part of

0:01:15.480 --> 0:01:19.040
<v Speaker 1>Joel Weber on this episode will be played by Scarlet Foo,

0:01:19.160 --> 0:01:22.759
<v Speaker 1>our colleague who's now at Bloomberg Quicktick and knows a

0:01:22.800 --> 0:01:25.480
<v Speaker 1>ton about et F s as well. Like I mentioned earlier,

0:01:25.480 --> 0:01:28.880
<v Speaker 1>this is part of a the Bloomberg New Voices initiative

0:01:28.920 --> 0:01:34.120
<v Speaker 1>that started in to increase the representation of women both

0:01:34.240 --> 0:01:39.320
<v Speaker 1>online and on air on Bloomberg TV. It's since expanded

0:01:39.360 --> 0:01:42.120
<v Speaker 1>to include a cohort of black executives as well as

0:01:42.200 --> 0:01:48.080
<v Speaker 1>Latin X executives. If you're interested in learning more about

0:01:48.120 --> 0:01:51.640
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg New Voices, or if your company would like to

0:01:51.680 --> 0:01:55.120
<v Speaker 1>participate in the media training program, please go to Bloomberg

0:01:55.200 --> 0:02:00.440
<v Speaker 1>dot com back Slash New Voices this time on Brilliance,

0:02:01.240 --> 0:02:06.080
<v Speaker 1>Mr E T F. Reggie Brown, and we're now going

0:02:06.160 --> 0:02:11.280
<v Speaker 1>to turn it over to the Trillions Podcast with Reggie Brown,

0:02:12.080 --> 0:02:22.119
<v Speaker 1>principal at GTS and Bloomberg's Scarlet Food and Eric. Thank

0:02:22.160 --> 0:02:29.040
<v Speaker 1>you attended, Thank you, hi everyone, Thank you so much

0:02:29.080 --> 0:02:31.880
<v Speaker 1>for joining us. Reggie Brown great to have you, of course,

0:02:32.080 --> 0:02:35.760
<v Speaker 1>um principle at GTS, but also shares the et F

0:02:35.760 --> 0:02:38.280
<v Speaker 1>Fund Board at America and Century Investments and Eric bau

0:02:38.360 --> 0:02:41.919
<v Speaker 1>tunas co host of Trillions podcast. Also, he has a

0:02:41.960 --> 0:02:44.880
<v Speaker 1>new book coming out in April called The Bogle Effect.

0:02:44.880 --> 0:02:48.400
<v Speaker 1>It's on the massive impact that Vanguard's mutual ownership structure

0:02:48.440 --> 0:02:52.359
<v Speaker 1>has and will have on the financial industry, investors and portfolios.

0:02:52.360 --> 0:02:54.320
<v Speaker 1>He is my go to guy on all things et

0:02:54.520 --> 0:02:57.840
<v Speaker 1>F at Bloomberg. So let's get started here. Um, I

0:02:57.880 --> 0:02:59.480
<v Speaker 1>just kind of want to set the scene Eric, with

0:02:59.520 --> 0:03:01.640
<v Speaker 1>you kind of telling us what's going on in the

0:03:01.639 --> 0:03:05.040
<v Speaker 1>markets right now, because commodities are on fire, stocks and

0:03:05.080 --> 0:03:07.960
<v Speaker 1>bonds are stumbling because of rising inflation. We know the

0:03:07.960 --> 0:03:10.720
<v Speaker 1>Federal Reserve has raised interest rates and will continue to

0:03:10.760 --> 0:03:13.480
<v Speaker 1>do so give us a quick glimpse of what all

0:03:13.600 --> 0:03:17.480
<v Speaker 1>this looks like through the length of exchange traded funds. Sure, So,

0:03:17.520 --> 0:03:19.840
<v Speaker 1>I mean every year e t F has taken about

0:03:19.880 --> 0:03:23.040
<v Speaker 1>two billion a day. Really, It's it's almost like the

0:03:23.040 --> 0:03:24.919
<v Speaker 1>way people move from CD s to the MP three

0:03:25.040 --> 0:03:27.880
<v Speaker 1>or digital. There's just this baseline of flows. So even

0:03:27.880 --> 0:03:29.720
<v Speaker 1>equity e t s are taking your money, even fixed

0:03:29.720 --> 0:03:33.320
<v Speaker 1>in coming ts are taking money. But then there's this layer,

0:03:33.880 --> 0:03:36.160
<v Speaker 1>which is where the flows are basically moving to where

0:03:36.160 --> 0:03:39.840
<v Speaker 1>the performances and this year, we're seeing flows into things

0:03:39.840 --> 0:03:42.400
<v Speaker 1>that have lagged in the past, like commodities. They've been

0:03:42.440 --> 0:03:45.560
<v Speaker 1>basically beat up for a decade. They're finally having their

0:03:45.640 --> 0:03:49.480
<v Speaker 1>day goals, actually having a little revenge on bitcoin because

0:03:49.480 --> 0:03:52.520
<v Speaker 1>bitcoin's down, gold is up, so that gold's catching a bid.

0:03:53.080 --> 0:03:56.800
<v Speaker 1>Even broad based commodities, oil, natural gas, a lot of

0:03:56.800 --> 0:03:58.960
<v Speaker 1>the stuff that people wrote off. To be honest, this

0:03:59.240 --> 0:04:02.000
<v Speaker 1>is having a comeback this year. But that's I think

0:04:02.040 --> 0:04:04.560
<v Speaker 1>the main theme. But I think still you have the

0:04:04.640 --> 0:04:07.440
<v Speaker 1>blob of money is still buying into sort of cheap beta.

0:04:08.240 --> 0:04:10.920
<v Speaker 1>In the core, that sort of massive retail money seems

0:04:10.920 --> 0:04:15.040
<v Speaker 1>to be pretty unshaken. But on the outer edges, people

0:04:15.080 --> 0:04:18.000
<v Speaker 1>are rotating between sectors and asset classes and that's sort

0:04:18.000 --> 0:04:19.799
<v Speaker 1>of what we see. And when you say cheap beta,

0:04:19.839 --> 0:04:23.800
<v Speaker 1>you're referring to passive index funds. Yeah, like a total

0:04:23.880 --> 0:04:26.839
<v Speaker 1>market fund that holds, you know, four thousand stocks and

0:04:26.920 --> 0:04:29.440
<v Speaker 1>charges five basis points. It looks an awful lot, like

0:04:29.440 --> 0:04:31.640
<v Speaker 1>the SMP five hundred or the Russell to it could

0:04:31.640 --> 0:04:33.680
<v Speaker 1>be large cap or the whole market. Yeah, that's that's

0:04:33.720 --> 0:04:36.520
<v Speaker 1>what cheap data means. Okay, So Reggie, from where you sit,

0:04:37.120 --> 0:04:41.080
<v Speaker 1>have e t s complicated the current market dynamics complicated

0:04:41.160 --> 0:04:43.720
<v Speaker 1>or solved the problem? Well, which one? I think it's

0:04:43.720 --> 0:04:47.039
<v Speaker 1>solved the problem so well. Look, I think as the

0:04:47.040 --> 0:04:52.040
<v Speaker 1>marketplace reset around secumentation, ETS has offered liquidity, particularly this

0:04:52.120 --> 0:04:57.560
<v Speaker 1>year where the marketplace reset based on rising rates, higher inflation,

0:04:58.120 --> 0:05:01.920
<v Speaker 1>judicial problems in Europe. Et s provided at the exhaust

0:05:02.000 --> 0:05:05.799
<v Speaker 1>vow that the regulars look for and largely has solved

0:05:05.800 --> 0:05:08.120
<v Speaker 1>a problem, allowing retail investors to come in to the

0:05:08.160 --> 0:05:11.920
<v Speaker 1>marketplace that incredibly cheap prices is Eric reference and also

0:05:11.960 --> 0:05:14.880
<v Speaker 1>allows for price discovery because Russia stock market is closed,

0:05:14.920 --> 0:05:18.440
<v Speaker 1>but people are able to trade Russia through r s

0:05:18.600 --> 0:05:19.960
<v Speaker 1>X and E t F or at least they were

0:05:20.000 --> 0:05:23.839
<v Speaker 1>for a while. Yeah, I could see Eric signaling time out,

0:05:23.839 --> 0:05:27.040
<v Speaker 1>time out, the second time out. Yeah, no, they were.

0:05:27.160 --> 0:05:28.960
<v Speaker 1>This is the I'd love to hear your take on this.

0:05:29.600 --> 0:05:32.440
<v Speaker 1>Are normally E T F or like cockroaches. They trade

0:05:32.440 --> 0:05:37.479
<v Speaker 1>through anything, um, ten years ago the stock market. Yeah. Well,

0:05:37.520 --> 0:05:39.279
<v Speaker 1>if you come up with a better metaphor, let me know.

0:05:39.360 --> 0:05:42.920
<v Speaker 1>But they're definitely survivors. And ironically people are like, oh,

0:05:42.960 --> 0:05:45.280
<v Speaker 1>if the underlying is a liquid ETFs are going to

0:05:45.360 --> 0:05:48.640
<v Speaker 1>have problems. Actually, ETS tend to be the one thing

0:05:48.720 --> 0:05:51.280
<v Speaker 1>liquid when the underlying isn't. And we've seen this over

0:05:51.360 --> 0:05:54.280
<v Speaker 1>and over in different markets. But for the first time

0:05:55.200 --> 0:05:58.960
<v Speaker 1>rs X was halted and it's still traded. But then

0:05:59.000 --> 0:06:02.000
<v Speaker 1>the exchange that you and even trade the e t F. Obviously,

0:06:02.120 --> 0:06:05.280
<v Speaker 1>this is a unique geopolitical situation involving our own government,

0:06:05.640 --> 0:06:07.400
<v Speaker 1>but I've never seen that. In fact, we have Dave

0:06:07.480 --> 0:06:09.599
<v Speaker 1>Dave needed gone last week talking about this and he said,

0:06:09.600 --> 0:06:11.760
<v Speaker 1>you had to go back to Cuba or Iran, which

0:06:11.800 --> 0:06:14.080
<v Speaker 1>predates the e t F to find anything like this.

0:06:15.040 --> 0:06:18.000
<v Speaker 1>It is unique. Um, But if you look at market

0:06:18.080 --> 0:06:21.960
<v Speaker 1>closing for international investors, India had that problem once the

0:06:22.000 --> 0:06:27.040
<v Speaker 1>way they close off inflows from foreign investors, but exchanges

0:06:27.080 --> 0:06:29.120
<v Speaker 1>closed all the time. You hadn't in Greece, you had

0:06:29.160 --> 0:06:31.760
<v Speaker 1>in Egypt, So it's not really unique. But this is

0:06:31.880 --> 0:06:35.960
<v Speaker 1>unique where the exchange and the market value of that

0:06:36.279 --> 0:06:39.720
<v Speaker 1>country with the zero from a U S perspective. Now,

0:06:39.800 --> 0:06:41.920
<v Speaker 1>one thing that we should mention is Reggie Brown. You

0:06:42.040 --> 0:06:44.520
<v Speaker 1>are known within the e t F world. Forbes famously

0:06:44.560 --> 0:06:47.120
<v Speaker 1>called you the godfather of e t S because you

0:06:47.240 --> 0:06:50.640
<v Speaker 1>make markets in these products and you seed new funds

0:06:50.680 --> 0:06:52.679
<v Speaker 1>as well, which means you have a front row seat

0:06:52.720 --> 0:06:57.280
<v Speaker 1>to both innovation, new ideas and copycat efforts as well.

0:06:57.839 --> 0:06:59.720
<v Speaker 1>Can you guess an idea of how you spend your day.

0:06:59.760 --> 0:07:02.960
<v Speaker 1>What's the split between new ideas and recycled ideas? Is

0:07:03.000 --> 0:07:09.080
<v Speaker 1>it fifty? Is it no? I think largely it's new ideas.

0:07:09.360 --> 0:07:13.640
<v Speaker 1>Uh lately it is Asset managers recognize the need to

0:07:13.640 --> 0:07:16.440
<v Speaker 1>come into the et F space and talk to them

0:07:16.520 --> 0:07:20.240
<v Speaker 1>largely about how to do that, and then around thematics.

0:07:20.320 --> 0:07:23.880
<v Speaker 1>So right now that themes are rising rates inflation, their

0:07:23.920 --> 0:07:26.600
<v Speaker 1>e t fdeas coming into the marketplace to solve those

0:07:26.640 --> 0:07:30.679
<v Speaker 1>problems for investors. And then before then, you know, looking

0:07:30.720 --> 0:07:33.920
<v Speaker 1>at ets to have options inside of it to buffer

0:07:34.640 --> 0:07:38.880
<v Speaker 1>um certain market movements. So the the week to week

0:07:39.000 --> 0:07:42.600
<v Speaker 1>overall is pretty interesting. From a new idea situation, there

0:07:42.680 --> 0:07:45.800
<v Speaker 1>are always um et sponsor wanted to leverage someone else's

0:07:45.920 --> 0:07:48.840
<v Speaker 1>ideas because they have better distribution or they have better

0:07:48.920 --> 0:07:53.160
<v Speaker 1>pricing power. But that's a spitter competition. Yeah, a lot

0:07:53.200 --> 0:07:55.960
<v Speaker 1>of people would accuse the vanguards and the black rocks

0:07:56.000 --> 0:07:59.320
<v Speaker 1>out there of doing just that, copycatting other people's ideas,

0:07:59.440 --> 0:08:01.680
<v Speaker 1>but on a big their scale as opposed to coming

0:08:01.760 --> 0:08:05.840
<v Speaker 1>up with their new interesting innovative e t S. Well,

0:08:05.920 --> 0:08:07.880
<v Speaker 1>I'll take you to task. I would think that I

0:08:08.040 --> 0:08:10.680
<v Speaker 1>Shares have done a terrific job of opening new markets

0:08:10.760 --> 0:08:13.600
<v Speaker 1>to two sectors. There first to launch a bond ETF,

0:08:14.200 --> 0:08:18.120
<v Speaker 1>they were somewhat first looking at the style box UM

0:08:18.720 --> 0:08:22.720
<v Speaker 1>for multi factor situation, so they have their role. Van

0:08:22.800 --> 0:08:24.960
<v Speaker 1>Guard looks at it from I'm coming to marketplace and

0:08:25.120 --> 0:08:27.240
<v Speaker 1>be the cheapest in the marketplace. And that's going to

0:08:27.320 --> 0:08:32.120
<v Speaker 1>be uh competition between Schwab and Vanguard around the zero fee.

0:08:32.600 --> 0:08:35.680
<v Speaker 1>But look at it. Look in the United States, retail

0:08:35.720 --> 0:08:39.600
<v Speaker 1>investors have the opportunity coming into into the marketplace selecting

0:08:39.679 --> 0:08:44.000
<v Speaker 1>ETF and get exposure through some complex vehicles. It's important

0:08:44.320 --> 0:08:47.800
<v Speaker 1>that we as industry provide the education for them, make

0:08:47.800 --> 0:08:50.560
<v Speaker 1>sure understand what they're buying. E t F are complex,

0:08:57.200 --> 0:08:59.680
<v Speaker 1>So walk us through how the sausage is made, how

0:09:00.320 --> 0:09:02.400
<v Speaker 1>what happens when someone comes up with a new idea

0:09:02.520 --> 0:09:04.640
<v Speaker 1>for an e T F. Who do they go to

0:09:04.840 --> 0:09:08.120
<v Speaker 1>how do they get that done? Well, largely um for

0:09:08.200 --> 0:09:11.679
<v Speaker 1>a market maker like GTS, we're typically in the last

0:09:11.800 --> 0:09:15.000
<v Speaker 1>phase of the cycle. But we'll hear about it. But

0:09:15.320 --> 0:09:17.280
<v Speaker 1>you have to go through writing a perspectives got to

0:09:17.320 --> 0:09:20.280
<v Speaker 1>go through hiring a lawyer and going through that phase.

0:09:20.840 --> 0:09:22.960
<v Speaker 1>As a market maker, they're looking for us like would

0:09:22.960 --> 0:09:25.880
<v Speaker 1>you make a market in this classification? Some of the

0:09:25.960 --> 0:09:28.400
<v Speaker 1>stuff where it's like no way, stay away just because

0:09:28.480 --> 0:09:32.679
<v Speaker 1>it has a lot of hair. For example, UH commodity

0:09:32.920 --> 0:09:35.520
<v Speaker 1>e t s to have futures inside of it. The

0:09:35.600 --> 0:09:38.160
<v Speaker 1>futures are can be really thin, really difficult to trade.

0:09:38.679 --> 0:09:40.560
<v Speaker 1>Is something that we're not gonna want to touch. Because

0:09:41.000 --> 0:09:43.800
<v Speaker 1>a market maker such as GTS, we look at the

0:09:44.040 --> 0:09:46.480
<v Speaker 1>trade ability of the asset class, the ability to get

0:09:46.520 --> 0:09:49.240
<v Speaker 1>in and get out efficiently. For e t s to

0:09:49.320 --> 0:09:51.760
<v Speaker 1>have futures in it, there's a role cost that gets

0:09:51.800 --> 0:09:55.040
<v Speaker 1>pretty expensive, and that is a lot of complexity where

0:09:55.200 --> 0:09:59.120
<v Speaker 1>that cost is embedded into the spread. Most ets sponsors

0:09:59.200 --> 0:10:02.120
<v Speaker 1>they want their ets looked like sp y whereas a

0:10:02.160 --> 0:10:05.160
<v Speaker 1>penny what And a lot of times that's not practical

0:10:05.400 --> 0:10:08.520
<v Speaker 1>because one you don't have secondary trading um where a

0:10:09.080 --> 0:10:12.760
<v Speaker 1>retailer inside the trading spread. But then again, the onnerlying

0:10:12.760 --> 0:10:16.239
<v Speaker 1>asset class is a little bit wide expensive like international securities,

0:10:16.600 --> 0:10:20.079
<v Speaker 1>stamp taxes are embedded their access to the market real

0:10:20.160 --> 0:10:23.160
<v Speaker 1>time United States, So if you're you an US investor,

0:10:23.280 --> 0:10:27.000
<v Speaker 1>you want to invest in Japanese equities to two pm

0:10:27.160 --> 0:10:30.040
<v Speaker 1>in New York time, you need a market americrant to

0:10:30.080 --> 0:10:32.120
<v Speaker 1>give you a synthetic price. I have to go up

0:10:32.120 --> 0:10:35.319
<v Speaker 1>by futures, and then I'm taking you on risk and

0:10:35.440 --> 0:10:38.120
<v Speaker 1>that risk is transferred into a spread that with delivered

0:10:38.160 --> 0:10:40.720
<v Speaker 1>to you. So I think it's really important to understand

0:10:41.280 --> 0:10:43.520
<v Speaker 1>um the ask flass you're trading in and how best

0:10:43.559 --> 0:10:45.520
<v Speaker 1>to access it. So if you were to look at

0:10:45.520 --> 0:10:48.600
<v Speaker 1>a chart of state oil prices oil futures and then

0:10:48.640 --> 0:10:51.160
<v Speaker 1>looking at et F that trades oil, they don't line

0:10:51.240 --> 0:10:53.559
<v Speaker 1>up exactly because of the role, costs and all the

0:10:53.600 --> 0:10:56.360
<v Speaker 1>other complexities that you're just referring to. So there is

0:10:56.800 --> 0:11:00.520
<v Speaker 1>a whole cohort of commodity ETFs that are to relate

0:11:00.600 --> 0:11:03.760
<v Speaker 1>it that the role is either a contango of backckwardation

0:11:04.160 --> 0:11:06.679
<v Speaker 1>and that's reflecting in e t F. So again I

0:11:06.800 --> 0:11:10.000
<v Speaker 1>go through the complexity of the online asset class. It's

0:11:10.040 --> 0:11:12.840
<v Speaker 1>important to note that an e t F or mutual

0:11:12.880 --> 0:11:15.800
<v Speaker 1>fund has the same risk characteristics. A separate e t

0:11:15.960 --> 0:11:20.800
<v Speaker 1>F is traded on exchange open to global amount of investors,

0:11:21.160 --> 0:11:25.400
<v Speaker 1>where you don't have the filter provided by an advisor,

0:11:25.480 --> 0:11:29.560
<v Speaker 1>for example. So it's important that the individual investor understands

0:11:29.640 --> 0:11:33.440
<v Speaker 1>what they're investing in. Yeah, your music to my ears,

0:11:33.480 --> 0:11:36.520
<v Speaker 1>I will say those complex commodity type there three or

0:11:36.520 --> 0:11:39.360
<v Speaker 1>four percent of the assets I called the exotics, where

0:11:39.360 --> 0:11:42.600
<v Speaker 1>the rated R section of the industry. We actually created

0:11:42.640 --> 0:11:45.280
<v Speaker 1>a system to give green, yellow, and red. I think

0:11:45.320 --> 0:11:47.719
<v Speaker 1>this should be widely adopted. So if you can help

0:11:47.760 --> 0:11:49.880
<v Speaker 1>me out, I think you should. If you pull up

0:11:49.880 --> 0:11:51.800
<v Speaker 1>a robin Hood account and you want to buy like

0:11:52.200 --> 0:11:56.560
<v Speaker 1>I don't know VXX or USO, it should say bluebrig

0:11:56.600 --> 0:11:59.319
<v Speaker 1>Intelligence red light, and then you have to go and

0:11:59.520 --> 0:12:01.559
<v Speaker 1>we'll tell you why and then hey, if you're still

0:12:01.600 --> 0:12:03.600
<v Speaker 1>find buying it, fine, Um. But I think this would

0:12:03.600 --> 0:12:06.080
<v Speaker 1>be a way to protect the innocent while allowing innovation

0:12:06.200 --> 0:12:11.719
<v Speaker 1>in the exotic areas. Thoughts well, Eric, I'll take it

0:12:11.800 --> 0:12:16.720
<v Speaker 1>a task here. I think that there's levels of understanding.

0:12:17.040 --> 0:12:21.480
<v Speaker 1>I think that unlike the United States, Singapore had creative

0:12:21.480 --> 0:12:24.800
<v Speaker 1>a classification that if it was a complex CTF had

0:12:24.840 --> 0:12:26.640
<v Speaker 1>an X in front of a ticker, he had to

0:12:26.679 --> 0:12:29.880
<v Speaker 1>take a test. You know, the United States is free

0:12:29.920 --> 0:12:32.480
<v Speaker 1>and fair, and I think that we want to promote

0:12:32.520 --> 0:12:35.760
<v Speaker 1>competition to marketplace and allowed investor to make your own choice.

0:12:36.400 --> 0:12:39.240
<v Speaker 1>So you're talking about red lights. I think he's bringing

0:12:39.280 --> 0:12:42.000
<v Speaker 1>complexity because no one don't understand that understand the red

0:12:42.080 --> 0:12:45.599
<v Speaker 1>light to want to stand, but they copyrighted it. I

0:12:45.640 --> 0:12:48.439
<v Speaker 1>wanted to I actually literally wanted to use gpg p

0:12:49.480 --> 0:12:52.880
<v Speaker 1>R but NC seventeen maybe t vix so there was

0:12:52.920 --> 0:12:55.959
<v Speaker 1>only like four four products in the n C seventeen category.

0:12:56.080 --> 0:12:59.079
<v Speaker 1>So Eric, about leveraging here right, your your leveraging ideas

0:12:59.120 --> 0:13:04.439
<v Speaker 1>here right, it's some journalists here, Eric. So given all that, Eric,

0:13:04.520 --> 0:13:06.040
<v Speaker 1>just for a moment moment here, I feel like we

0:13:06.120 --> 0:13:07.920
<v Speaker 1>need to bring in bitcoin. What would be I T

0:13:08.080 --> 0:13:10.079
<v Speaker 1>O B. Would that be a red light? Would that

0:13:10.120 --> 0:13:12.199
<v Speaker 1>be a yellow light? Anything that rolls futures is a

0:13:12.240 --> 0:13:15.040
<v Speaker 1>red light because most people just don't, you know, normal

0:13:15.080 --> 0:13:17.760
<v Speaker 1>people don't even like you said cantango, most people think

0:13:17.800 --> 0:13:21.319
<v Speaker 1>that sounds like a dance, and really it's a punishing term.

0:13:21.800 --> 0:13:27.160
<v Speaker 1>Bid is contango is okay? When you when you buy

0:13:27.200 --> 0:13:30.600
<v Speaker 1>oil futures and they're going to expire soon, most people

0:13:30.679 --> 0:13:33.440
<v Speaker 1>know you don't want to take delivery, so you are

0:13:33.480 --> 0:13:35.439
<v Speaker 1>going to have to roll to the next one, and

0:13:35.480 --> 0:13:36.959
<v Speaker 1>the next one is going to be a little higher

0:13:37.200 --> 0:13:40.520
<v Speaker 1>to maintain that exposure. Do that twelve times and that

0:13:40.559 --> 0:13:43.800
<v Speaker 1>could be a year. And so if you hold a

0:13:43.880 --> 0:13:46.200
<v Speaker 1>long term that's mentioning e t F with with an

0:13:46.280 --> 0:13:48.319
<v Speaker 1>expense or issue of thirty, no one would buy it.

0:13:48.880 --> 0:13:50.959
<v Speaker 1>But most people don't understand that. And every now and

0:13:51.000 --> 0:13:52.840
<v Speaker 1>then when oil gets hot, people pile in the USO

0:13:53.679 --> 0:13:55.719
<v Speaker 1>or they pile into one of these ETFs. But I

0:13:55.760 --> 0:13:58.360
<v Speaker 1>would say it's it's usually at the fringes. Most of

0:13:58.440 --> 0:14:01.480
<v Speaker 1>the big, gigantic blob of money is into the rated

0:14:01.559 --> 0:14:04.959
<v Speaker 1>G stuff, the vanilla stuff. But I like that it's

0:14:05.000 --> 0:14:07.439
<v Speaker 1>a big tent makes my job interesting. I have a

0:14:07.679 --> 0:14:10.680
<v Speaker 1>short attention span and a love of novelty, and there's

0:14:10.720 --> 0:14:13.319
<v Speaker 1>always something new to try to figure out. So I

0:14:13.440 --> 0:14:15.160
<v Speaker 1>like the big tent aspect of it. But there are

0:14:15.160 --> 0:14:17.720
<v Speaker 1>definitely some products you can get hurt on. So we're

0:14:17.760 --> 0:14:20.800
<v Speaker 1>talking about new issues and how you spent a lot

0:14:20.840 --> 0:14:22.800
<v Speaker 1>of time focusing on that. There have been a lot

0:14:22.840 --> 0:14:25.640
<v Speaker 1>of attempts to have new biitcoin ETF spot bitcoin e

0:14:25.720 --> 0:14:28.120
<v Speaker 1>t s, but they've all been rebuffed by the SEC.

0:14:28.560 --> 0:14:30.760
<v Speaker 1>They're they're not moving forward with that. What's going on

0:14:31.240 --> 0:14:33.160
<v Speaker 1>when what is it going to take for the SEC

0:14:33.320 --> 0:14:36.280
<v Speaker 1>to approve spot bitcoin e t s, which clearly are

0:14:36.320 --> 0:14:39.320
<v Speaker 1>in demand by people. What do you think, Eric, Well,

0:14:39.760 --> 0:14:47.720
<v Speaker 1>you your opinion is worth more than mine because he well, well,

0:14:47.720 --> 0:14:50.840
<v Speaker 1>I have an opinion here. Yeah, people call him for advice.

0:14:50.880 --> 0:14:53.080
<v Speaker 1>I'll just put it down. I have an opinion. If

0:14:53.120 --> 0:14:55.800
<v Speaker 1>you look at UM, the e t F industries, first

0:14:55.840 --> 0:14:59.280
<v Speaker 1>of all ec F industry, UM came in existance in

0:14:59.400 --> 0:15:02.520
<v Speaker 1>ninety nine. They started in Philippi stock Change. I'm from Philadelphia.

0:15:03.920 --> 0:15:07.360
<v Speaker 1>Seven UM lawsuits went to Canada, came the United States.

0:15:08.320 --> 0:15:10.840
<v Speaker 1>So you know, we have thirty two years of empirical

0:15:11.240 --> 0:15:16.240
<v Speaker 1>data around around how ets behave in various markets. So

0:15:16.360 --> 0:15:20.560
<v Speaker 1>you look at bitcoin, there's a lot of investor interests

0:15:21.120 --> 0:15:24.560
<v Speaker 1>and Eric and I are talking earlier. To trade the

0:15:24.640 --> 0:15:28.080
<v Speaker 1>actual bitcoin, it's pretty expensive and no one understands the

0:15:28.240 --> 0:15:33.000
<v Speaker 1>implicit costs that you're paying. If you're buying a bitcoin,

0:15:33.080 --> 0:15:37.680
<v Speaker 1>you're gonna probably pay one and spread or commissioned to

0:15:37.800 --> 0:15:40.800
<v Speaker 1>buy that. Think about that. That's a hundred and fifty

0:15:40.840 --> 0:15:45.120
<v Speaker 1>basis points of your money going to someone's pocket. And

0:15:45.200 --> 0:15:48.000
<v Speaker 1>if you look at the exchanges, there's four and fifty

0:15:48.560 --> 0:15:52.479
<v Speaker 1>bitcoin exchanges around the world, and none of them are connected.

0:15:52.880 --> 0:15:55.200
<v Speaker 1>So like if you want to buy ge for example, right,

0:15:55.560 --> 0:15:58.720
<v Speaker 1>you pull up your retail trading app, I won't you

0:15:58.840 --> 0:16:01.160
<v Speaker 1>say a name? Then you get a price and you

0:16:01.280 --> 0:16:03.760
<v Speaker 1>hit a button and Edward comes to gts. Oh, by

0:16:03.800 --> 0:16:07.720
<v Speaker 1>the way, we are retail market maker. Um, when you're

0:16:07.760 --> 0:16:11.560
<v Speaker 1>buying a bitcoin, you're trading on that specific exchange associate

0:16:11.680 --> 0:16:15.040
<v Speaker 1>with their fee structure. So the e t F community

0:16:15.640 --> 0:16:19.760
<v Speaker 1>does a really good job of democratizing those costs pretty quickly.

0:16:20.200 --> 0:16:24.400
<v Speaker 1>And so we're looking forward to trading a spot bitcoin

0:16:24.600 --> 0:16:27.200
<v Speaker 1>e t F because we're going to flatten the costs,

0:16:27.720 --> 0:16:31.560
<v Speaker 1>open it to a wide range of investors, and then

0:16:31.680 --> 0:16:34.680
<v Speaker 1>bring liquidity. So for me to make a market and

0:16:35.320 --> 0:16:39.120
<v Speaker 1>a Bitcoin spot e t F, I need to essentially

0:16:39.240 --> 0:16:42.680
<v Speaker 1>have market connections to every four and fifty of those

0:16:42.720 --> 0:16:48.040
<v Speaker 1>exchanges in order to arbitrage the various prices, to close

0:16:48.120 --> 0:16:52.280
<v Speaker 1>down those prices and lower costs. So I'm advocating for

0:16:52.600 --> 0:16:55.160
<v Speaker 1>a bitcoin e t F. My friends a bit wise

0:16:55.720 --> 0:16:58.520
<v Speaker 1>are looking for an e t F. My friends at

0:16:58.600 --> 0:17:02.160
<v Speaker 1>great scale are eying to close up that discount in

0:17:02.280 --> 0:17:05.679
<v Speaker 1>their vehicle. Look, there is nine billion dollars of investor

0:17:05.760 --> 0:17:08.520
<v Speaker 1>money locked up in that product at a discount that

0:17:08.720 --> 0:17:12.120
<v Speaker 1>is not fair, and the government is holding that back

0:17:12.280 --> 0:17:14.959
<v Speaker 1>from being arbitraged. So I look at it as an

0:17:14.960 --> 0:17:18.680
<v Speaker 1>opportunity set um in my business. I've traveled the world

0:17:18.760 --> 0:17:21.920
<v Speaker 1>talking about e t F and liquidity and household inclusion.

0:17:22.800 --> 0:17:26.080
<v Speaker 1>In the higher feed countries. Japan, for example, the the

0:17:26.240 --> 0:17:29.720
<v Speaker 1>unitary fee is three. That means that the average fee

0:17:29.760 --> 0:17:34.480
<v Speaker 1>is three to invest in vehicles on that exchange in

0:17:34.600 --> 0:17:37.280
<v Speaker 1>that country. If you look at the United States, the

0:17:37.320 --> 0:17:42.040
<v Speaker 1>average fees hovering around fifty semi five basis points. Lower

0:17:42.119 --> 0:17:45.520
<v Speaker 1>prices bring more people into the marketplace to participate, So

0:17:45.760 --> 0:17:49.119
<v Speaker 1>I advocate for household inclusion through lower prices and competition.

0:17:50.280 --> 0:17:52.240
<v Speaker 1>What you're saying is sort of one of our theories,

0:17:52.280 --> 0:17:56.520
<v Speaker 1>which is the crypto really captivated the E t F world.

0:17:56.600 --> 0:17:58.200
<v Speaker 1>When's it going to launch? What's it going to be like?

0:17:58.640 --> 0:18:00.879
<v Speaker 1>And you know, James and Tom are back there. We

0:18:00.960 --> 0:18:04.080
<v Speaker 1>covered this like crazy for a year, but then we

0:18:04.080 --> 0:18:06.720
<v Speaker 1>started to realize, wait a second, be careful what you

0:18:06.760 --> 0:18:08.359
<v Speaker 1>wish were E t F s are going to rock

0:18:08.440 --> 0:18:11.240
<v Speaker 1>the bitcoin world. In the crypto world, especially the exchanges,

0:18:11.760 --> 0:18:13.960
<v Speaker 1>because some of these exchanges are used to getting like

0:18:14.040 --> 0:18:17.119
<v Speaker 1>a lot of money for trading, and we did the

0:18:17.200 --> 0:18:20.359
<v Speaker 1>numbers of crypto exchanges make about thirty to forty billion

0:18:20.400 --> 0:18:22.760
<v Speaker 1>dollars a year at least in the last twelve months,

0:18:23.359 --> 0:18:26.560
<v Speaker 1>and they do one trillion dollars worth of trading. E

0:18:26.680 --> 0:18:29.879
<v Speaker 1>t F market makers like Reggie do thirty six trillion

0:18:29.920 --> 0:18:32.440
<v Speaker 1>dollars of trading and make one fourth of that money.

0:18:33.200 --> 0:18:35.320
<v Speaker 1>So e t F s I think are going to

0:18:35.480 --> 0:18:38.200
<v Speaker 1>disrupt some of these changes and flatten those costs because

0:18:38.520 --> 0:18:40.320
<v Speaker 1>you'll be able to go and buy a bitcoin et

0:18:40.440 --> 0:18:42.560
<v Speaker 1>F for a spread of one basis point, not one fifty.

0:18:43.359 --> 0:18:45.280
<v Speaker 1>And I think the expense ratios will probably get down

0:18:45.320 --> 0:18:48.679
<v Speaker 1>to the forty basis point level and it'll be liquid,

0:18:48.760 --> 0:18:51.119
<v Speaker 1>and I think that's going to be a good competition.

0:18:51.160 --> 0:18:53.520
<v Speaker 1>I think the exchanges are probably due for a little disruption.

0:18:54.040 --> 0:18:56.000
<v Speaker 1>I mean that hiring Matt Damon left and right and

0:18:56.119 --> 0:18:58.720
<v Speaker 1>Larry David and they've got so much money there, you know,

0:18:58.880 --> 0:19:01.760
<v Speaker 1>they own the super Bowl. This your uh so if

0:19:01.800 --> 0:19:05.640
<v Speaker 1>they approved the spot bitcoin ETF crypto exchange, stupable commercials

0:19:05.680 --> 0:19:07.600
<v Speaker 1>will go down. So this sounds like it's a good

0:19:07.680 --> 0:19:10.960
<v Speaker 1>thing for retail investors. Then why is the government so cautious.

0:19:11.080 --> 0:19:13.679
<v Speaker 1>What is it waiting for in particular before it does

0:19:13.800 --> 0:19:16.679
<v Speaker 1>give the green light. There's a lot of fraud out there, unfortunately.

0:19:16.800 --> 0:19:20.720
<v Speaker 1>If you look at them the I c O market

0:19:20.760 --> 0:19:26.880
<v Speaker 1>where you're raising capital through internet offerings of securities, those

0:19:26.880 --> 0:19:30.760
<v Speaker 1>offerings are fraud. If you look at sanctions UM that

0:19:31.040 --> 0:19:33.920
<v Speaker 1>President Biden has placed on a country of Russia, the

0:19:34.000 --> 0:19:38.720
<v Speaker 1>Augo guards can transfer their wealth using bitcoins, so it's unregulated,

0:19:38.920 --> 0:19:42.600
<v Speaker 1>and I think that's fearful for the regulators, and that

0:19:42.880 --> 0:19:47.760
<v Speaker 1>where there is unregulation and gray areas, invariably mom pop

0:19:47.800 --> 0:19:50.879
<v Speaker 1>retailers are being run over. So I think there's a

0:19:50.960 --> 0:19:52.680
<v Speaker 1>lot of things that has to happen. I think we

0:19:52.760 --> 0:19:56.800
<v Speaker 1>made a lot of strides to entering recordtory concerns UM,

0:19:57.200 --> 0:19:59.159
<v Speaker 1>but there's still a lot of analysis that needs to

0:19:59.200 --> 0:20:03.879
<v Speaker 1>occur to bring comfort to folks in Washington and Brussels,

0:20:04.200 --> 0:20:07.520
<v Speaker 1>to globalize the regulation. I will say, though, you know,

0:20:07.600 --> 0:20:10.440
<v Speaker 1>there's probably what nine or ten countries who have approved

0:20:10.960 --> 0:20:13.320
<v Speaker 1>spot bitcoin ets and they seem okay with all that.

0:20:13.440 --> 0:20:19.680
<v Speaker 1>Why is the US in a different mindset empirical empirical

0:20:19.720 --> 0:20:23.040
<v Speaker 1>evidence where it's just you know, if you can't tax it,

0:20:24.359 --> 0:20:26.359
<v Speaker 1>you can't oversee it. They're not going to approve it.

0:20:26.480 --> 0:20:28.840
<v Speaker 1>It's just the way our government works. You know, I

0:20:29.520 --> 0:20:34.520
<v Speaker 1>can't necessarily argue that that's not incorrect. But again, what

0:20:34.680 --> 0:20:37.800
<v Speaker 1>I don't want is verbial. My grandmother trading and something

0:20:37.920 --> 0:20:40.520
<v Speaker 1>she heard on to on TV and then she looks

0:20:40.600 --> 0:20:42.640
<v Speaker 1>up and she paid two percent over what she uh

0:20:42.960 --> 0:20:45.359
<v Speaker 1>what was supposed to be paid for. So you know,

0:20:45.600 --> 0:20:48.720
<v Speaker 1>these are all just good examples of the need for

0:20:48.960 --> 0:20:54.119
<v Speaker 1>investor protections, transparency, and oversight for the best parts of

0:20:54.160 --> 0:20:56.280
<v Speaker 1>the market. I hear you that there's a lot of

0:20:56.320 --> 0:21:00.200
<v Speaker 1>market chasing. You know, if you approve if e t

0:21:00.359 --> 0:21:04.399
<v Speaker 1>f A spot e t f UM is approved, exchanges

0:21:04.600 --> 0:21:08.840
<v Speaker 1>will be flattened out through competition in the real estate market,

0:21:09.119 --> 0:21:12.920
<v Speaker 1>and UH in Puerto Rico will actually collapse because because

0:21:13.040 --> 0:21:15.120
<v Speaker 1>all those big boys guys will come out of Puerto

0:21:15.200 --> 0:21:18.400
<v Speaker 1>Rico and then come back to New York because accentsion

0:21:18.440 --> 0:21:21.920
<v Speaker 1>has gone away. So obviously there's a lot of clamoring

0:21:21.960 --> 0:21:23.760
<v Speaker 1>for bigcoin e t s, But you also hear a

0:21:23.800 --> 0:21:27.159
<v Speaker 1>lot of pitches um for everyone's ideas. People come to

0:21:27.200 --> 0:21:29.399
<v Speaker 1>you to get funding. You hear the good pitches, the

0:21:29.480 --> 0:21:32.480
<v Speaker 1>bad pitches, the ugly pitches. Can you give us a

0:21:32.560 --> 0:21:34.360
<v Speaker 1>sense of some of the ideas that you've turned down

0:21:34.400 --> 0:21:35.760
<v Speaker 1>that you said, you know what, I don't think this

0:21:35.880 --> 0:21:41.080
<v Speaker 1>is gonna work well. Famously I told the big was twins, no, no, no,

0:21:41.480 --> 0:21:44.400
<v Speaker 1>in two thousand and twelve. I've been right so far. Um.

0:21:45.640 --> 0:21:49.120
<v Speaker 1>But there are a lot of wacky ideas where folks

0:21:49.160 --> 0:21:51.639
<v Speaker 1>want to use the e t F rule to bypass

0:21:52.280 --> 0:21:56.240
<v Speaker 1>capital games and bring um, you know, non traded assets

0:21:56.280 --> 0:21:58.920
<v Speaker 1>and e t F format. I stopped those at the door,

0:21:59.119 --> 0:22:02.040
<v Speaker 1>Like what was the most wild one? Kind of put

0:22:02.080 --> 0:22:04.440
<v Speaker 1>my hedge fund inside of an ETF structure and launch

0:22:04.480 --> 0:22:07.040
<v Speaker 1>it as a structure we don't have marked the market.

0:22:07.080 --> 0:22:10.160
<v Speaker 1>You can't do that, you know. I think that, Um,

0:22:10.600 --> 0:22:12.960
<v Speaker 1>when you get into some of the hairy parts of

0:22:13.000 --> 0:22:16.159
<v Speaker 1>the industry where liquidity is then I mean, right now,

0:22:16.280 --> 0:22:20.240
<v Speaker 1>we saw an example of the London Metal Exchange around

0:22:20.359 --> 0:22:24.360
<v Speaker 1>nickel not performing well because as a class is thinly traded,

0:22:24.640 --> 0:22:28.240
<v Speaker 1>there's not enough supply and that you can get cornered

0:22:28.280 --> 0:22:30.920
<v Speaker 1>in the marketplace with the wrong side. Should you have

0:22:31.119 --> 0:22:33.800
<v Speaker 1>an e t F structure built on nickel solely? I

0:22:33.880 --> 0:22:37.880
<v Speaker 1>think you're seeing examples of just the problems around thinly

0:22:37.960 --> 0:22:42.399
<v Speaker 1>traded marketplaces. We at GTS, we thrive on efficiency and

0:22:42.480 --> 0:22:46.040
<v Speaker 1>we thrive on transparency putting capital to work in the marketplace.

0:22:46.560 --> 0:22:49.119
<v Speaker 1>It's very difficult for us to do our job if

0:22:49.160 --> 0:22:54.400
<v Speaker 1>the marketplace UM is then in the number of participants,

0:22:55.119 --> 0:22:58.680
<v Speaker 1>and then there's no depth in the marketplace associated with

0:22:59.280 --> 0:23:03.320
<v Speaker 1>what those market because you're seeing and in market wide

0:23:03.840 --> 0:23:07.680
<v Speaker 1>issues like what we went through UM with Ukraine and

0:23:07.840 --> 0:23:10.600
<v Speaker 1>just rising rates. When the market goes one way, it

0:23:10.720 --> 0:23:13.879
<v Speaker 1>goes one way pretty hard, and then we're seeing issues

0:23:13.960 --> 0:23:16.320
<v Speaker 1>right now in the treasury market there's less liquidity and

0:23:16.359 --> 0:23:20.720
<v Speaker 1>treasuries UM hide the bond ets to trading in a

0:23:20.800 --> 0:23:24.800
<v Speaker 1>discount right now because there's massive outflows. The mutual fund

0:23:24.880 --> 0:23:27.000
<v Speaker 1>managers are using the e t f s to priced

0:23:27.119 --> 0:23:31.760
<v Speaker 1>or mutual funds, but the spread to treasury is at

0:23:31.800 --> 0:23:36.359
<v Speaker 1>a historic gap that is signifying that the U stock

0:23:36.440 --> 0:23:39.760
<v Speaker 1>market is going to rise eight. So you're seeing all this,

0:23:40.040 --> 0:23:43.480
<v Speaker 1>but a lot of it's around illiquidity or the less

0:23:43.520 --> 0:23:46.320
<v Speaker 1>liquidity and how prices are being forecasted for the future.

0:23:47.040 --> 0:23:49.479
<v Speaker 1>Is there any new e t F that has come

0:23:49.520 --> 0:23:51.359
<v Speaker 1>out that you were not in favor of before, but

0:23:51.440 --> 0:23:53.320
<v Speaker 1>now you're like, I wish I could get a do

0:23:53.440 --> 0:23:56.880
<v Speaker 1>over on that one. Yeah, we we we we missed

0:23:56.920 --> 0:24:00.440
<v Speaker 1>a few over my long horizon in the career that

0:24:00.520 --> 0:24:04.399
<v Speaker 1>I've seen UM famously, I think we were slow on

0:24:04.960 --> 0:24:06.800
<v Speaker 1>on g l D and then and then in the

0:24:06.880 --> 0:24:11.360
<v Speaker 1>gold ETFs UM at that time Bear bear Stearns brought

0:24:11.440 --> 0:24:16.159
<v Speaker 1>that out. Um. We've seen iterations where it was like

0:24:16.280 --> 0:24:19.520
<v Speaker 1>time and place. So right now we talked about earlier,

0:24:19.920 --> 0:24:23.280
<v Speaker 1>um my friends at bomb blocks or bringing up sectorized

0:24:23.920 --> 0:24:26.960
<v Speaker 1>high yield um e t F s UM that was

0:24:27.040 --> 0:24:31.119
<v Speaker 1>tried by another issuer. Um it wasn't ready then it

0:24:31.200 --> 0:24:34.160
<v Speaker 1>seems like it's ready now, you know. So it really

0:24:34.200 --> 0:24:37.680
<v Speaker 1>comes down to what the market is thinking, market psychology,

0:24:38.200 --> 0:24:51.720
<v Speaker 1>investor mindset, and then what works given you know, other factors. So, Erica,

0:24:51.960 --> 0:24:54.680
<v Speaker 1>it seems like fun flows are you like to call

0:24:54.840 --> 0:24:58.200
<v Speaker 1>it barbelling between cheap beta which are those passive index

0:24:58.280 --> 0:25:00.920
<v Speaker 1>ones that often look a lot like the some or

0:25:00.960 --> 0:25:03.879
<v Speaker 1>other benchmarks like the Russell two thousand and therefore are

0:25:03.920 --> 0:25:08.679
<v Speaker 1>fairly cheap versus what you cause shiny new objects, new

0:25:08.760 --> 0:25:12.639
<v Speaker 1>fangled ideas with higher expense ratios that get people's attention

0:25:12.720 --> 0:25:17.159
<v Speaker 1>because the returns are astronomical at least initially. What are

0:25:17.200 --> 0:25:20.159
<v Speaker 1>you seeing there in terms of that balance. Yeah, this

0:25:20.320 --> 0:25:23.959
<v Speaker 1>is something that really challenges people, especially ARC. I think

0:25:24.119 --> 0:25:29.879
<v Speaker 1>ARC really showed this Woods Arc. People are mystified that

0:25:30.080 --> 0:25:34.200
<v Speaker 1>everybody hasn't left and there's like zero dollars left. Well,

0:25:34.520 --> 0:25:36.880
<v Speaker 1>and I will say, we correctly call this because there's

0:25:36.880 --> 0:25:38.280
<v Speaker 1>not there's not going to be a run on the CTF.

0:25:38.320 --> 0:25:42.240
<v Speaker 1>And here's why people have largely replaced this sort of

0:25:42.359 --> 0:25:46.600
<v Speaker 1>legacy active mutual fund with a like index fund or

0:25:46.760 --> 0:25:49.200
<v Speaker 1>we call cheap beta in their core. So they have

0:25:49.400 --> 0:25:52.200
<v Speaker 1>like a sixty forty that's probably five basis points in cost.

0:25:52.600 --> 0:25:57.080
<v Speaker 1>That's what the flow show. Well, that's really efficient, really good,

0:25:57.160 --> 0:25:59.080
<v Speaker 1>and if you wait a long time, that's probably the

0:25:59.200 --> 0:26:01.800
<v Speaker 1>almost the best thing you could probably do. But it's

0:26:02.200 --> 0:26:05.160
<v Speaker 1>so boring. It is, so it's like watching paint dry.

0:26:05.800 --> 0:26:08.280
<v Speaker 1>So people tend to want to have a little fun

0:26:08.400 --> 0:26:11.399
<v Speaker 1>and apply some hot sauce on the outside. So they

0:26:11.480 --> 0:26:13.800
<v Speaker 1>go and they buy ARC or theme ETFs which they

0:26:13.840 --> 0:26:17.159
<v Speaker 1>can relate to, or crypto. I think anything that is

0:26:17.680 --> 0:26:21.399
<v Speaker 1>has a possibility of asymmetric return, and it's very different

0:26:21.480 --> 0:26:24.639
<v Speaker 1>than the index, so it can compliment. We say, Cathy

0:26:25.119 --> 0:26:29.359
<v Speaker 1>is complimenting Vanguard, not competing with them, and that's a

0:26:29.440 --> 0:26:32.040
<v Speaker 1>good spot to be right now. And that's why I

0:26:32.119 --> 0:26:35.040
<v Speaker 1>think you're going to see more and more crazy, wacky,

0:26:35.400 --> 0:26:39.119
<v Speaker 1>hot saucy and products get launched because the lane for

0:26:39.280 --> 0:26:43.439
<v Speaker 1>complementing cheap beta is going to be vital and growing,

0:26:44.080 --> 0:26:46.280
<v Speaker 1>but the lane to compete with cheap beta will always

0:26:46.320 --> 0:26:50.280
<v Speaker 1>be very difficult. The value proposition is so good at

0:26:50.280 --> 0:26:52.840
<v Speaker 1>anybody who owns a four basis point total market fund,

0:26:53.400 --> 0:26:55.879
<v Speaker 1>it's just very difficult to let go of that or

0:26:55.920 --> 0:26:58.600
<v Speaker 1>replace it because you own all of the fundamentally way

0:26:58.640 --> 0:27:03.119
<v Speaker 1>to fundamentally sound serious investor stocks. There Therefore, if you

0:27:03.160 --> 0:27:05.560
<v Speaker 1>own all that, you have more patients with your hot sauce.

0:27:05.640 --> 0:27:08.160
<v Speaker 1>And that's why we haven't seen the kind of outflows

0:27:08.200 --> 0:27:10.600
<v Speaker 1>from our or theme ets that people thought we would see,

0:27:11.119 --> 0:27:14.800
<v Speaker 1>because they already have all the serious stocks covered and

0:27:14.920 --> 0:27:18.480
<v Speaker 1>so they're actually what people see as a bug with

0:27:18.680 --> 0:27:21.320
<v Speaker 1>her fund and others, and that why she keeps doubling

0:27:21.359 --> 0:27:24.119
<v Speaker 1>down on these crazy stocks. It's a feature to the

0:27:24.200 --> 0:27:27.240
<v Speaker 1>people who are looking for something to distract them and

0:27:27.400 --> 0:27:29.920
<v Speaker 1>possibly give them asymmetric a turn in the future, and

0:27:29.960 --> 0:27:32.080
<v Speaker 1>they don't want to miss out and so it would

0:27:32.080 --> 0:27:35.480
<v Speaker 1>be stupid of her or these funds to shift into

0:27:35.600 --> 0:27:38.479
<v Speaker 1>cash or value stocks. Uh. And so this is an

0:27:38.480 --> 0:27:40.800
<v Speaker 1>interesting phenomenon. And so I do think we're going to

0:27:40.880 --> 0:27:44.280
<v Speaker 1>continue to see this barbelling and the cheap lane is

0:27:44.280 --> 0:27:47.480
<v Speaker 1>obviously pretty saturated. I think Reggie's going to probably turn

0:27:47.560 --> 0:27:50.160
<v Speaker 1>down a couple more ideas in the next year because

0:27:50.160 --> 0:27:52.920
<v Speaker 1>I think they're gonna get crazier and crazier and stuff

0:27:52.960 --> 0:27:55.080
<v Speaker 1>you laugh at. I've laughed at many at E t F.

0:27:55.600 --> 0:27:57.760
<v Speaker 1>When I saw the filing and they got it's got

0:27:57.800 --> 0:27:59.760
<v Speaker 1>a billion dollars today or more. I swear to God

0:27:59.800 --> 0:28:02.239
<v Speaker 1>it's I don't laugh anymore. Every now and then I laugh.

0:28:02.280 --> 0:28:04.760
<v Speaker 1>I can't help it. But I don't doubt that some

0:28:04.920 --> 0:28:07.600
<v Speaker 1>of these products that sounds silly today will actually catch

0:28:07.680 --> 0:28:12.080
<v Speaker 1>on in the future because of this practical purpose they

0:28:12.080 --> 0:28:16.200
<v Speaker 1>serve in the portfolio. What do you think of that, Reggie, Well,

0:28:16.240 --> 0:28:20.400
<v Speaker 1>I think that the themes are nothing more than momentum

0:28:20.440 --> 0:28:24.840
<v Speaker 1>trades that folks are bringing out, and and those moment

0:28:24.920 --> 0:28:27.719
<v Speaker 1>trades are just grabbing a cheap beta. So to your

0:28:27.760 --> 0:28:32.800
<v Speaker 1>barbelling analogy, I think it's one transferred to another where

0:28:32.880 --> 0:28:37.360
<v Speaker 1>the themes around either housing or anti arc. I see

0:28:37.400 --> 0:28:41.360
<v Speaker 1>my friend Matt Tuttle there, um, who's a sponsor of

0:28:41.400 --> 0:28:45.440
<v Speaker 1>that E T F. You know, you know he's just

0:28:45.520 --> 0:28:47.560
<v Speaker 1>making a call, not necessarily on Cathy Would, but the

0:28:47.720 --> 0:28:52.360
<v Speaker 1>sector around the evaluation, and you know, is it time

0:28:52.440 --> 0:28:56.240
<v Speaker 1>to place a hedgebat against it? You know? So look,

0:28:57.160 --> 0:29:00.320
<v Speaker 1>Cathy Would. I know her when she left A and

0:29:00.400 --> 0:29:03.480
<v Speaker 1>B and had an idea. I think she's done incredible

0:29:03.560 --> 0:29:06.800
<v Speaker 1>job of bringing a new investor class into the marketplace.

0:29:07.280 --> 0:29:09.800
<v Speaker 1>You know, I joke with her when I see here

0:29:10.280 --> 0:29:13.400
<v Speaker 1>um that she's responsible for fifteen year old boys tearing

0:29:13.480 --> 0:29:16.320
<v Speaker 1>down the fair faucet poster and putting up the Kathy

0:29:16.360 --> 0:29:19.239
<v Speaker 1>Would poster in a bedroom. And then these fifteen year

0:29:19.240 --> 0:29:22.440
<v Speaker 1>old boys are opening up a robin Hood account, and

0:29:22.520 --> 0:29:24.760
<v Speaker 1>then their parents are finding out all of a sudden

0:29:24.760 --> 0:29:27.880
<v Speaker 1>they're buying their father a Mustang with worth their gains.

0:29:28.560 --> 0:29:31.320
<v Speaker 1>That is a society good because you brought a new

0:29:31.360 --> 0:29:34.160
<v Speaker 1>investor class in. So everything has his time in place.

0:29:34.360 --> 0:29:37.120
<v Speaker 1>I think as far as you know the themes, the

0:29:37.240 --> 0:29:41.280
<v Speaker 1>thematic stuff, I mean marijuana, you know when it came out,

0:29:42.480 --> 0:29:45.480
<v Speaker 1>No freaquing way what I touched marijuana when I don't

0:29:45.520 --> 0:29:51.440
<v Speaker 1>smoke it, uh, full disclosure, but literally, I think that

0:29:52.240 --> 0:29:56.240
<v Speaker 1>the banks didn't want to custody the cannabis because of

0:29:56.480 --> 0:29:59.520
<v Speaker 1>their f d I c um stance and regulation of that.

0:30:00.000 --> 0:30:02.560
<v Speaker 1>So it's very hard for a market maker to take

0:30:02.640 --> 0:30:06.200
<v Speaker 1>on that liability risk. So there are areas that we

0:30:06.400 --> 0:30:11.240
<v Speaker 1>missed on, missed out of because of just hypersensitivity around

0:30:11.400 --> 0:30:15.480
<v Speaker 1>just the optics around regulation. You've shepherded so much of

0:30:15.520 --> 0:30:17.680
<v Speaker 1>the development of the E t F industry since its birth.

0:30:18.680 --> 0:30:20.840
<v Speaker 1>Do you think we've reached peak e t F or

0:30:20.920 --> 0:30:24.240
<v Speaker 1>is there a lot more market share for this product

0:30:24.280 --> 0:30:25.680
<v Speaker 1>to take. I mean, you're you're looking at me like

0:30:25.720 --> 0:30:28.280
<v Speaker 1>I'm crazy right now, But we at different points we

0:30:28.320 --> 0:30:30.800
<v Speaker 1>all said we've reached peak ETF. Do you see those

0:30:30.880 --> 0:30:34.440
<v Speaker 1>mutual funds over there? We're coming for you, baby. So

0:30:34.600 --> 0:30:38.440
<v Speaker 1>I think there's an opportunity to transfer UM the mutual

0:30:38.480 --> 0:30:40.640
<v Speaker 1>fund industry and convert them into e t F format

0:30:40.760 --> 0:30:45.160
<v Speaker 1>and give investors lower pricing and choice around entry and exit.

0:30:45.600 --> 0:30:50.040
<v Speaker 1>It really comes down to UM retirement platforms and allowing

0:30:50.120 --> 0:30:53.040
<v Speaker 1>e t F s in our ecosystem and how people

0:30:53.120 --> 0:30:55.120
<v Speaker 1>get paid. But I think that there's a lot of

0:30:55.160 --> 0:30:58.640
<v Speaker 1>opportunity for growth. I see it. Every asset manager additionally,

0:30:58.640 --> 0:31:02.000
<v Speaker 1>who has an open to find complex wants to convert

0:31:02.120 --> 0:31:04.320
<v Speaker 1>into e t F s to offer their investor choices,

0:31:04.400 --> 0:31:07.480
<v Speaker 1>even at risk of cannibalizing their own fund. So I

0:31:07.600 --> 0:31:11.160
<v Speaker 1>think that long term, the E t F industry will

0:31:11.200 --> 0:31:14.400
<v Speaker 1>get to twenty five or thirty trillion UM in my

0:31:14.560 --> 0:31:18.280
<v Speaker 1>lifetime and I have another forty years ago. So you're

0:31:18.320 --> 0:31:20.480
<v Speaker 1>gonna have to change the name of your podcasts to

0:31:20.640 --> 0:31:25.480
<v Speaker 1>what what's after trillion? My son, actually, just my eleven

0:31:25.560 --> 0:31:26.920
<v Speaker 1>year old just told me I learned that word the

0:31:26.960 --> 0:31:30.160
<v Speaker 1>other day. He said, did you know that galaxies are

0:31:30.200 --> 0:31:32.800
<v Speaker 1>gonna cease to exist in the quadrillion years and there'll

0:31:32.800 --> 0:31:35.280
<v Speaker 1>be nothing but black holes left over? I was like, oh,

0:31:35.520 --> 0:31:37.280
<v Speaker 1>I was like, where did you hear that? He's like YouTube,

0:31:37.440 --> 0:31:41.120
<v Speaker 1>So anyway, f y YouTube quadrillion and it means one

0:31:41.200 --> 0:31:45.480
<v Speaker 1>thousand trillions, So anyway, Reggie, Thank you so much. Brown,

0:31:45.560 --> 0:31:48.240
<v Speaker 1>his principal at GTS, also chairs the et F fund

0:31:48.240 --> 0:31:50.360
<v Speaker 1>Board at American Centry Investments. Of course, our own Eric

0:31:50.400 --> 0:31:53.680
<v Speaker 1>out Tunist, senior et F analyst at Blomberg Intelligence, also

0:31:54.120 --> 0:31:57.360
<v Speaker 1>co host of the Trillions podcast and new author of

0:31:57.760 --> 0:32:08.120
<v Speaker 1>The Bogl Effect h Thanks for listening to Trillions until

0:32:08.160 --> 0:32:09.960
<v Speaker 1>next time. You can find us on the Bloomberg terminal,

0:32:10.080 --> 0:32:14.440
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg dot com, Apple podcast, Spotify, and wherever else you'd

0:32:14.480 --> 0:32:16.880
<v Speaker 1>like to listen. We'd love to hear from you. We're

0:32:16.920 --> 0:32:20.480
<v Speaker 1>on Twitter. I'm at Joel Weber Show. He's at Eric Fautuness.

0:32:20.880 --> 0:32:24.200
<v Speaker 1>This episode of Trillions was produced by Magnus Hendrickson. Francesca

0:32:24.280 --> 0:32:26.640
<v Speaker 1>Levie is the head of Bloomberg podcast by