WEBVTT - Tech Selloff Day 2 and DoorDash Earnings

0:00:02.400 --> 0:00:05.760
<v Speaker 1>From the heart of where innovation, money and power collive

0:00:06.519 --> 0:00:11.080
<v Speaker 1>in Silicon Valley and beyond. This is Bloomberg Technology with

0:00:11.119 --> 0:00:26.720
<v Speaker 1>Emily Jay I'm only changing in San Francisco, and this

0:00:26.720 --> 0:00:30.400
<v Speaker 1>is Bloomberg Technology coming up of the next hour market malaise,

0:00:30.520 --> 0:00:33.599
<v Speaker 1>the SMP five hundred and the tech heavy NASDAQ one

0:00:33.680 --> 0:00:37.640
<v Speaker 1>hundred having their worst weekly run of declines for a

0:00:37.800 --> 0:00:41.320
<v Speaker 1>decade as US job numbers reinforce the idea that the

0:00:41.400 --> 0:00:45.680
<v Speaker 1>FED stay in the course on rates plus Doordas shares

0:00:45.720 --> 0:00:48.440
<v Speaker 1>get caught in the down draft, selling off for another day,

0:00:48.520 --> 0:00:51.720
<v Speaker 1>hitting an all time low, this despite strong earnings that

0:00:51.720 --> 0:00:55.000
<v Speaker 1>show customers still paying for takeaway as we move into

0:00:55.080 --> 0:00:58.600
<v Speaker 1>our post pandemic world. A conversation with DoorDash CEO Tony

0:00:58.680 --> 0:01:03.280
<v Speaker 1>Shoe is coming up, and Meta's latest leap into the

0:01:03.320 --> 0:01:07.039
<v Speaker 1>metaverse is a real world store. We go behind the

0:01:07.080 --> 0:01:10.840
<v Speaker 1>scenes and the company's first retail location ahead of its

0:01:10.840 --> 0:01:13.600
<v Speaker 1>grand opening. I want to stick with that volatility that

0:01:13.680 --> 0:01:16.200
<v Speaker 1>continues to dominate the markets and bring in Mark Mahaney

0:01:16.720 --> 0:01:18.839
<v Speaker 1>of ever Car and Mark. Some of these companies actually

0:01:18.840 --> 0:01:22.039
<v Speaker 1>a strong earnings results, but they're still getting caught up

0:01:22.680 --> 0:01:25.400
<v Speaker 1>in this down draft. You know, what's your take here,

0:01:25.440 --> 0:01:29.320
<v Speaker 1>how are you reading through this? Well, okay, Emily, I

0:01:29.760 --> 0:01:31.399
<v Speaker 1>think my take on it would be the companies that

0:01:31.440 --> 0:01:34.240
<v Speaker 1>actually had strong earnings actually did trade up, but there

0:01:34.240 --> 0:01:36.440
<v Speaker 1>were very few of those companies in tech land. So

0:01:36.560 --> 0:01:38.440
<v Speaker 1>let me try this. You know, you mentioned door Dash,

0:01:38.760 --> 0:01:41.600
<v Speaker 1>Door Dash, you know is fulminentals got stronger, but they're

0:01:41.600 --> 0:01:44.480
<v Speaker 1>not really yet putting up sustained gap earnings, and so

0:01:45.120 --> 0:01:48.520
<v Speaker 1>the market is not willing to bid up stocks despite

0:01:48.520 --> 0:01:50.680
<v Speaker 1>what happens on the top line. If they don't have

0:01:50.720 --> 0:01:52.720
<v Speaker 1>a lot of bottom line cushion, then they don't trade

0:01:52.720 --> 0:01:54.800
<v Speaker 1>somewhat close to our market multiple. It's gonna be a

0:01:54.880 --> 0:01:57.880
<v Speaker 1>challenge for pure growth equities like DoorDash. I like doordashes

0:01:57.960 --> 0:02:00.440
<v Speaker 1>the stock, but in this market it's gonna be challenge.

0:02:00.480 --> 0:02:03.480
<v Speaker 1>Airbnb put up really good numbers earlier this week, stock

0:02:03.520 --> 0:02:06.560
<v Speaker 1>couldn't hold the gains. Uber put up good numbers, Stock

0:02:06.600 --> 0:02:08.880
<v Speaker 1>couldn't hold the games. The one that could, though, was Booking,

0:02:09.480 --> 0:02:12.040
<v Speaker 1>and Booking had positive results. But they also have a

0:02:12.120 --> 0:02:15.800
<v Speaker 1>market multiple app you know, real earnings. Uh, they've had

0:02:15.840 --> 0:02:18.560
<v Speaker 1>them for a long time, a bulletproof balance sheet, etcetera.

0:02:18.680 --> 0:02:21.600
<v Speaker 1>So this market is very discriminating and it won't. It

0:02:21.639 --> 0:02:25.080
<v Speaker 1>won't tolerate growth assets right now. If you're a growth stock,

0:02:25.160 --> 0:02:28.440
<v Speaker 1>you better have a good earnings track record. In that case,

0:02:28.480 --> 0:02:30.120
<v Speaker 1>the stock can trade up. I think that's kind of

0:02:30.120 --> 0:02:32.400
<v Speaker 1>what's happening. People are just going to the defensive end

0:02:32.840 --> 0:02:35.240
<v Speaker 1>of growth tech in the Usually there's not too many

0:02:35.320 --> 0:02:38.000
<v Speaker 1>names in that space. Based on the actions the FED

0:02:38.120 --> 0:02:41.200
<v Speaker 1>is taking here, how concerned are you about a recession

0:02:41.360 --> 0:02:47.280
<v Speaker 1>and just a prolonged market meltdown? Well, I don't know.

0:02:47.680 --> 0:02:49.480
<v Speaker 1>I'm certainly no expert on that, but I can all

0:02:49.480 --> 0:02:52.480
<v Speaker 1>my My interpretation is simply that the market on Thursday

0:02:52.480 --> 0:02:55.399
<v Speaker 1>and Friday said we don't believe the FED can orchestrate

0:02:55.400 --> 0:02:58.440
<v Speaker 1>a soft landing. That's how I interpret what happened. Maybe

0:02:58.440 --> 0:03:00.880
<v Speaker 1>the FED can, maybe the FED can't. No expert on that,

0:03:01.120 --> 0:03:03.360
<v Speaker 1>I think the odd that's not going to be an

0:03:03.360 --> 0:03:05.720
<v Speaker 1>easy thing to do, but that's what the market is saying.

0:03:05.760 --> 0:03:08.040
<v Speaker 1>And then as a as an investor in tech stocks,

0:03:08.280 --> 0:03:10.160
<v Speaker 1>one thing I have to worry about is if there

0:03:10.160 --> 0:03:13.280
<v Speaker 1>really is a recession that's not estimated in. It maybe

0:03:13.280 --> 0:03:16.720
<v Speaker 1>priced in, but it's not estimated in. Almost all consumer

0:03:16.760 --> 0:03:19.320
<v Speaker 1>tech is cyclical, So if the consumer if they're gonna

0:03:19.400 --> 0:03:21.960
<v Speaker 1>entering in a recession. You know. Amazon on its earnings

0:03:21.960 --> 0:03:24.720
<v Speaker 1>call said they hadn't seen any sign of consumer softening.

0:03:24.720 --> 0:03:26.520
<v Speaker 1>They had a lot of issues in terms of costs,

0:03:26.680 --> 0:03:29.000
<v Speaker 1>but not in terms of demand. So things could get

0:03:29.000 --> 0:03:31.080
<v Speaker 1>worse at Amazon, they could get worse at Google, they

0:03:31.120 --> 0:03:33.760
<v Speaker 1>could get worse at Apple. None of these companies skated

0:03:33.800 --> 0:03:36.320
<v Speaker 1>away from a real recession. So that's potentially the other

0:03:36.360 --> 0:03:39.200
<v Speaker 1>shoe to drop here. That's what the market, the markets

0:03:39.240 --> 0:03:41.440
<v Speaker 1>fearing that it's pricing it in. And I hope the

0:03:41.440 --> 0:03:44.320
<v Speaker 1>market is wrong, but but that's the until proven otherwise.

0:03:44.360 --> 0:03:46.720
<v Speaker 1>I think that's what's gonna hold back tech stocks and

0:03:46.760 --> 0:03:49.440
<v Speaker 1>growth equities, you know, for the foreseeable future. I don't

0:03:49.480 --> 0:03:51.600
<v Speaker 1>know if that's a couple of weeks months, hopefully it's

0:03:51.640 --> 0:03:53.920
<v Speaker 1>not quarters, but it's that time of that that kind

0:03:53.920 --> 0:03:56.600
<v Speaker 1>of time frame we also might see be seeing a

0:03:56.760 --> 0:03:59.040
<v Speaker 1>changing of the guard in terms of what counts as

0:03:59.080 --> 0:04:02.120
<v Speaker 1>a tech company. Is folk With Robert Knwell of Upholding

0:04:02.640 --> 0:04:06.920
<v Speaker 1>Portfolio yesterday, he had this to say about Netflix and NATA.

0:04:07.080 --> 0:04:11.400
<v Speaker 1>Take a listen. Netflix is now being valued like a

0:04:11.480 --> 0:04:16.360
<v Speaker 1>cable station. Other investors are looking at Facebook's meta's capital intensity,

0:04:16.400 --> 0:04:19.000
<v Speaker 1>and saying is this does their future look more like

0:04:19.080 --> 0:04:21.800
<v Speaker 1>a T and T S than it does Google? And

0:04:22.040 --> 0:04:24.920
<v Speaker 1>you've seen multiples re rate faster than we've seen in

0:04:25.000 --> 0:04:27.880
<v Speaker 1>a really long time across these assets because investors not,

0:04:28.080 --> 0:04:30.480
<v Speaker 1>in our opinion, they've likely moved too far in that direction.

0:04:30.960 --> 0:04:32.479
<v Speaker 1>But you know, we've got to do our jobs and

0:04:32.520 --> 0:04:36.200
<v Speaker 1>passed through it and find the good deals here, Mark's

0:04:36.200 --> 0:04:39.680
<v Speaker 1>all you're nodding there? Do you agree? I think there's

0:04:39.839 --> 0:04:41.240
<v Speaker 1>a lot of really good points there. Look, you look

0:04:41.240 --> 0:04:44.480
<v Speaker 1>at Netflix, It's trade off seventy year to date. There's

0:04:44.480 --> 0:04:46.200
<v Speaker 1>about five or six someties. I looked at the trade

0:04:46.240 --> 0:04:49.000
<v Speaker 1>off seventy year to date now with Netflix because they

0:04:49.040 --> 0:04:51.240
<v Speaker 1>hit a growth wall. This stock was priced as if

0:04:51.279 --> 0:04:53.000
<v Speaker 1>and I thought it very beginning of the year. I

0:04:53.000 --> 0:04:56.480
<v Speaker 1>thought they could sustain million subs. You know going forward,

0:04:56.480 --> 0:04:58.680
<v Speaker 1>say's not the case, and that stock was standing at

0:04:58.720 --> 0:05:00.719
<v Speaker 1>a high multiple. So we had to take out the

0:05:00.760 --> 0:05:02.800
<v Speaker 1>premium that it had, uh and then you had the

0:05:02.839 --> 0:05:06.240
<v Speaker 1>lower estimates. That's what got me off the Netflix train,

0:05:06.360 --> 0:05:09.280
<v Speaker 1>you know, earlier this, earlier this year. But yeah, when

0:05:09.320 --> 0:05:12.400
<v Speaker 1>companies go X hype premium growth, they go X growth,

0:05:12.680 --> 0:05:14.680
<v Speaker 1>you can have a real reckoning in terms of the

0:05:14.720 --> 0:05:17.120
<v Speaker 1>stock price if they go x premium growth when they

0:05:17.120 --> 0:05:19.640
<v Speaker 1>are sitting there with high multiples. That was absolutely the

0:05:19.680 --> 0:05:21.440
<v Speaker 1>case with Netflix. Now I think there's a lot of

0:05:21.520 --> 0:05:23.960
<v Speaker 1>very interesting valuation arguments think be made about Netflix. You've

0:05:23.960 --> 0:05:26.760
<v Speaker 1>got thirteen dollars in pure gap burnings. What multiple do

0:05:26.800 --> 0:05:29.159
<v Speaker 1>you want to put on that a market multiple seventeen times,

0:05:29.160 --> 0:05:32.160
<v Speaker 1>fifteen times, twenty times were in that ballpark. So now

0:05:32.200 --> 0:05:34.880
<v Speaker 1>there's a lot of valuation support for the name Facebook.

0:05:34.920 --> 0:05:36.440
<v Speaker 1>I think it's different. And by the way, I really

0:05:36.480 --> 0:05:38.720
<v Speaker 1>like Facebook here. I think the stock can rerate. I

0:05:38.720 --> 0:05:40.359
<v Speaker 1>think the multiple can go higher. I think this is

0:05:40.360 --> 0:05:42.640
<v Speaker 1>going to recover to have being a premium growth name.

0:05:42.880 --> 0:05:45.520
<v Speaker 1>But I understand it's very controversial here. I like it.

0:05:45.600 --> 0:05:47.520
<v Speaker 1>It's also got a lot of cash on the balance sheet.

0:05:48.520 --> 0:05:51.160
<v Speaker 1>And you also, of course cover Twitter, which has got

0:05:51.200 --> 0:05:54.039
<v Speaker 1>its own story going on with this Elon Musk takeover.

0:05:54.120 --> 0:05:57.320
<v Speaker 1>He's lined up this long list of unusual investors to

0:05:57.480 --> 0:06:00.640
<v Speaker 1>back his bid to buy Twitter, from Larry Ellison to

0:06:00.800 --> 0:06:04.840
<v Speaker 1>a Saudi prince to the cryptocurrency firm Finance. He also

0:06:04.920 --> 0:06:08.039
<v Speaker 1>was tweeting earlier today some more incess to what he

0:06:08.080 --> 0:06:11.440
<v Speaker 1>plans to do with Twitter that'll be focusing on hardcore

0:06:11.480 --> 0:06:16.279
<v Speaker 1>software engineering, design, information security, server hardware. What do you

0:06:16.279 --> 0:06:21.400
<v Speaker 1>make of that? Well, I, um, I'm sorry I didn't

0:06:21.400 --> 0:06:24.120
<v Speaker 1>see his tweets earlier today, But if he's started to

0:06:24.160 --> 0:06:26.240
<v Speaker 1>develop a more detailed plan for what he wants to

0:06:26.240 --> 0:06:28.760
<v Speaker 1>do with the asset, I think that's great. Um. You know,

0:06:28.839 --> 0:06:31.160
<v Speaker 1>I think there's been a product innovation problem with Twitter

0:06:31.279 --> 0:06:33.360
<v Speaker 1>for I don't know the better part of five, six,

0:06:33.400 --> 0:06:35.880
<v Speaker 1>seven years, and so if somebody, if if it takes

0:06:35.920 --> 0:06:38.520
<v Speaker 1>new management team, takes a new owner to shake it

0:06:38.560 --> 0:06:40.240
<v Speaker 1>up and to really improve it, I think that's gonna

0:06:40.240 --> 0:06:42.520
<v Speaker 1>be great for all of us. I do worry one thing,

0:06:42.600 --> 0:06:44.640
<v Speaker 1>which is all the money for Twitter comes really from

0:06:44.640 --> 0:06:47.720
<v Speaker 1>marketers and advertisers, and I haven't heard anybody talk about

0:06:47.720 --> 0:06:49.680
<v Speaker 1>how they're going to improve the tools for them because

0:06:49.680 --> 0:06:51.120
<v Speaker 1>they're the ones who paid the bills. At the end

0:06:51.120 --> 0:06:52.839
<v Speaker 1>of the day. I don't think you're gonna make that

0:06:52.920 --> 0:06:56.200
<v Speaker 1>much money if you try to charge a subscription for

0:06:55.880 --> 0:06:58.760
<v Speaker 1>for for Twitter. So I hope he can improve Twitter

0:06:58.839 --> 0:07:00.800
<v Speaker 1>as a as a service as a user, right, I

0:07:00.800 --> 0:07:03.120
<v Speaker 1>think I want that. As an investor, I don't think

0:07:03.120 --> 0:07:04.680
<v Speaker 1>there's much to do with Twitter here, I think the

0:07:04.680 --> 0:07:06.920
<v Speaker 1>steel is going to go through. I think it's largely closed,

0:07:07.640 --> 0:07:09.400
<v Speaker 1>but but maybe we'll see it to get into public

0:07:09.400 --> 0:07:11.280
<v Speaker 1>markets in a few years. That's what I heard that

0:07:11.360 --> 0:07:12.760
<v Speaker 1>he intends to do. If he can come out with

0:07:12.800 --> 0:07:14.880
<v Speaker 1>a better asset, the market will be very interested in

0:07:14.920 --> 0:07:18.640
<v Speaker 1>Twitter all right. We'll always appreciate your insights here and

0:07:18.720 --> 0:07:21.760
<v Speaker 1>helping us wrap a really painful week for a lot

0:07:21.760 --> 0:07:34.880
<v Speaker 1>of investors. Mark Mahaney of Evercore, Thank you. The music

0:07:35.080 --> 0:07:38.720
<v Speaker 1>is stopping for some pandemic darlings like Peloton and Netflix's

0:07:38.760 --> 0:07:41.360
<v Speaker 1>people get back out into the world to live their lives.

0:07:41.400 --> 0:07:43.760
<v Speaker 1>But it is still humming so far for door Dash

0:07:44.160 --> 0:07:47.040
<v Speaker 1>revenue beating analysts estimates and a strong outlook ahead with

0:07:47.080 --> 0:07:50.480
<v Speaker 1>people still ordering more and more food for delivery. But

0:07:50.520 --> 0:07:52.840
<v Speaker 1>how long does that keep up with inflation and a

0:07:52.880 --> 0:07:55.800
<v Speaker 1>potential recession bearing down. I want to bring in door

0:07:55.840 --> 0:07:58.640
<v Speaker 1>Dos CEO Tony Shoe for more on all of this,

0:07:58.800 --> 0:08:01.240
<v Speaker 1>and Tony, it's a tough mark it to be in now.

0:08:01.320 --> 0:08:04.880
<v Speaker 1>Despite your strong results, we saw shares take a leg down.

0:08:05.360 --> 0:08:09.280
<v Speaker 1>You know, what is your takeaway from how investors are

0:08:09.320 --> 0:08:13.760
<v Speaker 1>evaluating these results? Well, I think it's certainly a tough

0:08:13.800 --> 0:08:16.120
<v Speaker 1>market out there, as you acknowledge, but you know, at

0:08:16.120 --> 0:08:18.560
<v Speaker 1>the same time at DoorDash, we're focused on the fundamentals,

0:08:18.560 --> 0:08:21.480
<v Speaker 1>and the fundamentals for doordesh are incredibly strong, as you saw,

0:08:21.640 --> 0:08:23.840
<v Speaker 1>you know, with this for most recent quarter, we announced

0:08:23.880 --> 0:08:28.080
<v Speaker 1>all time highs in our monthly active users or dash

0:08:28.080 --> 0:08:31.560
<v Speaker 1>has subscribers, as well as order frequency across cohorts. We're

0:08:31.560 --> 0:08:34.920
<v Speaker 1>continuing to build into new categories beyond restaurants and two grocery,

0:08:35.000 --> 0:08:38.200
<v Speaker 1>convenience retail. We're launching more than just you know, the

0:08:38.320 --> 0:08:41.120
<v Speaker 1>United States as a global business, and we're also making

0:08:41.240 --> 0:08:45.400
<v Speaker 1>tremendous progress on building our platform in which we're helping

0:08:45.400 --> 0:08:50.040
<v Speaker 1>physical businesses become digital powerhouses in addition to the local

0:08:50.040 --> 0:08:54.640
<v Speaker 1>marketplace that we've been building. So in times like these, especially, um,

0:08:54.679 --> 0:08:56.840
<v Speaker 1>you know, what I tell our teams is to focus on,

0:08:57.080 --> 0:09:00.760
<v Speaker 1>you know, the fundamentals and keep building the business. Investors

0:09:00.800 --> 0:09:04.480
<v Speaker 1>seem to really be punishing or at least questioning growth stocks,

0:09:04.760 --> 0:09:07.720
<v Speaker 1>and I know some are wondering, oh, was it because

0:09:07.720 --> 0:09:10.280
<v Speaker 1>of a Macron that DoorDash saw this boost in the

0:09:10.360 --> 0:09:13.160
<v Speaker 1>last quarter. Is not going to keep up quarter after

0:09:13.240 --> 0:09:16.160
<v Speaker 1>quarter after quarter. How do you respond to that well,

0:09:16.200 --> 0:09:18.560
<v Speaker 1>it's been two years now or maybe a little over

0:09:18.640 --> 0:09:22.040
<v Speaker 1>that um in during the pandemic season, and we've continued

0:09:22.120 --> 0:09:25.200
<v Speaker 1>to see growth. I mean, our US restaurants business has

0:09:25.240 --> 0:09:28.040
<v Speaker 1>grown two fifty percent over the last couple of years.

0:09:28.240 --> 0:09:31.040
<v Speaker 1>We've gained fourteen points of absolute share in the category.

0:09:31.320 --> 0:09:33.400
<v Speaker 1>And I think what you've seen, whether it was you know,

0:09:33.440 --> 0:09:35.960
<v Speaker 1>early on in the pandemic, is certain states opened up

0:09:36.000 --> 0:09:38.319
<v Speaker 1>maybe a little bit ahead of others or now where

0:09:38.559 --> 0:09:41.559
<v Speaker 1>everyone thankfully or finally getting back into their normal lives

0:09:41.559 --> 0:09:44.920
<v Speaker 1>of seeing their friends and family in person. It's that people,

0:09:45.280 --> 0:09:48.240
<v Speaker 1>you know, even though they can they eat out and celebrate,

0:09:48.640 --> 0:09:51.840
<v Speaker 1>they're continuing to order delivery. I mean, that's why you're seeing,

0:09:52.000 --> 0:09:54.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, the all time highs that we've seen in

0:09:54.040 --> 0:09:57.240
<v Speaker 1>the business. In addition to that, we've also increased our

0:09:57.280 --> 0:10:02.520
<v Speaker 1>profitability on top of it already profitable business um altogether,

0:10:02.600 --> 0:10:04.680
<v Speaker 1>and so you know, we've seen a lot of strength

0:10:04.679 --> 0:10:06.920
<v Speaker 1>in the business, both in terms of the demand but

0:10:07.040 --> 0:10:10.800
<v Speaker 1>also in terms of our bottom line. Consumers are under

0:10:10.800 --> 0:10:14.600
<v Speaker 1>pressure though inflation is rising, gas prices are rising. These

0:10:14.600 --> 0:10:17.400
<v Speaker 1>are factors beyond your control. How are you thinking about

0:10:17.440 --> 0:10:21.880
<v Speaker 1>the macroeconomic environment ahead? I mean, are you just kind

0:10:21.880 --> 0:10:26.880
<v Speaker 1>of preparing for more uncertainty. Well, we've been studying inflation

0:10:26.880 --> 0:10:29.040
<v Speaker 1>pretty carefully now for the past four or six quarters,

0:10:29.080 --> 0:10:32.680
<v Speaker 1>because I think it happened, actually, or the growth of inflation,

0:10:32.720 --> 0:10:35.280
<v Speaker 1>I should say, you know, occurred maybe a bit more

0:10:35.320 --> 0:10:38.800
<v Speaker 1>sharply than some had anticipated, and it certainly continues to

0:10:38.800 --> 0:10:41.199
<v Speaker 1>be a real concern. Um. So for us, the focus

0:10:41.240 --> 0:10:43.040
<v Speaker 1>is on taking care of all the audiences. You know,

0:10:43.120 --> 0:10:45.679
<v Speaker 1>obviously we can't control the rate of change of inflation,

0:10:45.960 --> 0:10:48.440
<v Speaker 1>but we can control um you know what we do

0:10:48.520 --> 0:10:51.160
<v Speaker 1>for dashers, making sure that we're giving tem percent cash

0:10:51.200 --> 0:10:54.280
<v Speaker 1>back on fuel expenses, making sure that we are paying

0:10:54.320 --> 0:10:58.200
<v Speaker 1>bonuses for longer distances driven, making sure that we're working

0:10:58.200 --> 0:11:01.480
<v Speaker 1>with merchants to find in new ways to grow as

0:11:01.480 --> 0:11:05.359
<v Speaker 1>they're dealing with both labor shortages as well as inflationary pressures.

0:11:05.440 --> 0:11:07.559
<v Speaker 1>And we can do that because we have a robust

0:11:07.840 --> 0:11:11.440
<v Speaker 1>restaurants business for consumer demand is still very resilient, which

0:11:11.440 --> 0:11:16.000
<v Speaker 1>gives us the ability to reinvest those profits into absorbing

0:11:16.040 --> 0:11:19.240
<v Speaker 1>any costs from inflation so that consumers don't have to

0:11:19.480 --> 0:11:22.240
<v Speaker 1>bear any of that burden. We did see a number

0:11:22.280 --> 0:11:25.760
<v Speaker 1>of analysts cut price targets on DoorDash this morning, and

0:11:25.800 --> 0:11:28.559
<v Speaker 1>I wonder how tight the labor market is for you

0:11:28.679 --> 0:11:31.120
<v Speaker 1>in particular. I mean, because it's not just you know,

0:11:31.200 --> 0:11:34.280
<v Speaker 1>restaurants that need labor. It's it's DoorDash and Uber and

0:11:34.480 --> 0:11:39.560
<v Speaker 1>Left and Domino's Pizza that are fighting for for drivers. Well,

0:11:39.679 --> 0:11:43.760
<v Speaker 1>we you know, we haven't actually seen any challenges in

0:11:43.800 --> 0:11:46.800
<v Speaker 1>getting drivers on the road. In fact, even before the

0:11:47.240 --> 0:11:49.840
<v Speaker 1>recent rises and fuel expenses or the sharp uptick I

0:11:49.840 --> 0:11:52.640
<v Speaker 1>should say in fuel expenses, we had plenty of drivers

0:11:52.720 --> 0:11:55.400
<v Speaker 1>on the road. And that's because structurally we have a

0:11:55.480 --> 0:11:59.480
<v Speaker 1>pool of drivers that that is just much larger than

0:11:59.480 --> 0:12:02.880
<v Speaker 1>other serve is like right sharing. Um, you know, of

0:12:02.920 --> 0:12:05.360
<v Speaker 1>the dashers on door Dash, of the three million plus

0:12:05.400 --> 0:12:08.559
<v Speaker 1>that come to our platform and and and does deliveries

0:12:08.640 --> 0:12:13.120
<v Speaker 1>on a quarterly basis, them deliver more fewer than ten

0:12:13.120 --> 0:12:16.640
<v Speaker 1>hours a week. The average dasher only completes about four

0:12:16.679 --> 0:12:18.800
<v Speaker 1>hours of work every week. And and so when you

0:12:18.840 --> 0:12:21.360
<v Speaker 1>think about it from that context, where it's truly part

0:12:21.440 --> 0:12:24.200
<v Speaker 1>time and supplemental income, and you compare to something like

0:12:24.280 --> 0:12:27.480
<v Speaker 1>right sharing, which is more full time, it's just orders

0:12:27.480 --> 0:12:29.960
<v Speaker 1>of magnitude larger in terms of the base of drivers

0:12:30.000 --> 0:12:33.520
<v Speaker 1>we can address and for those reasons, we actually haven't

0:12:33.559 --> 0:12:36.880
<v Speaker 1>seen any of those pressures of getting drivers on the road.

0:12:36.960 --> 0:12:40.760
<v Speaker 1>But that said, we do recognize that inflation is very real,

0:12:40.840 --> 0:12:43.079
<v Speaker 1>and that's why we decided to invest in those dasher

0:12:43.160 --> 0:12:47.440
<v Speaker 1>programs to make sure that their earnings would not be impacted. Interesting, Well,

0:12:48.000 --> 0:12:50.160
<v Speaker 1>on one hand, you're hearing Lifts say they're going to

0:12:50.200 --> 0:12:54.120
<v Speaker 1>have to invest significantly to incentivize drivers. We're saying they

0:12:54.160 --> 0:12:56.840
<v Speaker 1>don't have to. What they are making some changes to

0:12:56.920 --> 0:13:00.560
<v Speaker 1>the app, more transparency to keep those drivers coming back.

0:13:00.600 --> 0:13:03.720
<v Speaker 1>And I wonder are you going to prioritize the courier

0:13:03.760 --> 0:13:08.000
<v Speaker 1>app experience and how if your competitors are trying to

0:13:08.000 --> 0:13:12.360
<v Speaker 1>step up those levers. Well, we don't really compete against

0:13:12.559 --> 0:13:16.160
<v Speaker 1>right sharing for drivers. I mean nine cent of drivers

0:13:16.160 --> 0:13:18.280
<v Speaker 1>that we've surveyed, you know, on the door Dash platform

0:13:18.600 --> 0:13:22.640
<v Speaker 1>have no interest in um, you know, driving other people. Um.

0:13:22.679 --> 0:13:24.720
<v Speaker 1>They just prefer to do deliveries. I mean, if you

0:13:24.760 --> 0:13:26.960
<v Speaker 1>think about it, I mean, the two user basis couldn't

0:13:26.960 --> 0:13:29.280
<v Speaker 1>be you know, further apart in terms of how they

0:13:29.320 --> 0:13:32.680
<v Speaker 1>self select which platforms to work on. Um if what

0:13:32.760 --> 0:13:38.920
<v Speaker 1>about eight? What about Instacart? But you know, Dominoes. Sure sure,

0:13:39.040 --> 0:13:42.720
<v Speaker 1>sure sure. I mean, as the largest platform UM in

0:13:42.760 --> 0:13:45.880
<v Speaker 1>the US that you know, provides more work opportunities on

0:13:45.920 --> 0:13:49.880
<v Speaker 1>a daily basis across more geographies. Um, we're just the

0:13:49.880 --> 0:13:53.200
<v Speaker 1>first consideration for most of these workers. I mean we're

0:13:53.200 --> 0:13:55.240
<v Speaker 1>always going to you know, your question about investing the

0:13:55.840 --> 0:13:59.199
<v Speaker 1>Dasher app. Of course, we're always investing, you know, behind

0:13:59.240 --> 0:14:02.320
<v Speaker 1>that experience to make sure that it's lower friction UM

0:14:02.440 --> 0:14:04.920
<v Speaker 1>to earn whenever you want, wherever you want, and to

0:14:05.040 --> 0:14:07.840
<v Speaker 1>do it, you know, with consistent expectations of what you

0:14:07.880 --> 0:14:09.800
<v Speaker 1>will learn when you are on the road because the

0:14:09.840 --> 0:14:13.440
<v Speaker 1>work is so part time. Investors are also suggesting we're

0:14:13.440 --> 0:14:15.840
<v Speaker 1>going to see a lot more consolidation in this space.

0:14:16.080 --> 0:14:19.520
<v Speaker 1>And given that door Dash is the big player in

0:14:19.560 --> 0:14:23.480
<v Speaker 1>this market, that makes you potentially a prime acquirer. We

0:14:23.520 --> 0:14:26.040
<v Speaker 1>saw you buy volt for example. Are we going to

0:14:26.120 --> 0:14:28.520
<v Speaker 1>see you do more deals? Are you looking for more deals?

0:14:28.640 --> 0:14:32.120
<v Speaker 1>And if so, in what areas well? The bar for

0:14:32.480 --> 0:14:34.680
<v Speaker 1>M and A is is very high for us at Doorash,

0:14:34.720 --> 0:14:38.200
<v Speaker 1>and that's because we really respect how difficult it is

0:14:38.240 --> 0:14:40.880
<v Speaker 1>to actually do it really well. UM, So for us,

0:14:40.920 --> 0:14:43.240
<v Speaker 1>two things have to be true. Number one, it certainly

0:14:43.240 --> 0:14:45.760
<v Speaker 1>has to be a creative to the business. Number two,

0:14:45.840 --> 0:14:48.960
<v Speaker 1>it also has to be creative to the management bandwidth

0:14:48.960 --> 0:14:50.560
<v Speaker 1>that we have at DoorDash. I mean, we're trying to

0:14:50.600 --> 0:14:53.280
<v Speaker 1>build the largest local commerce business globally, so we have

0:14:53.320 --> 0:14:55.120
<v Speaker 1>a lot of work on our plate, so we have

0:14:55.200 --> 0:14:57.600
<v Speaker 1>to make sure that there can't be any distractions. That's

0:14:57.800 --> 0:15:00.400
<v Speaker 1>entirely focused. That's why you know volt with such a

0:15:00.400 --> 0:15:03.600
<v Speaker 1>perfect example. You know, Vulture only adds to our international

0:15:03.680 --> 0:15:08.000
<v Speaker 1>global footprint, doubling almost our addressable market. But the way

0:15:08.000 --> 0:15:11.160
<v Speaker 1>in which they build their business, the culture around building

0:15:11.200 --> 0:15:13.520
<v Speaker 1>the best product, making sure that they do it in

0:15:13.560 --> 0:15:16.480
<v Speaker 1>a capital efficient way that aligns very well with how

0:15:16.520 --> 0:15:18.520
<v Speaker 1>we do things. That dortsh and that was a perfect

0:15:18.560 --> 0:15:22.120
<v Speaker 1>example of when M and A made sense. All right, well,

0:15:22.240 --> 0:15:25.560
<v Speaker 1>we'll be watching your next moves there, do you know,

0:15:25.640 --> 0:15:28.160
<v Speaker 1>and co founder Tony Schu always going to have you

0:15:28.200 --> 0:15:39.520
<v Speaker 1>thank you for taking the time. Monday is opening day

0:15:39.560 --> 0:15:42.640
<v Speaker 1>for Meta's first ever physical store. It is a brick

0:15:42.680 --> 0:15:46.320
<v Speaker 1>and mortar bet on the metaverse. Facebook's parent Hoping hardware

0:15:46.760 --> 0:15:50.240
<v Speaker 1>plays a central role in its virtual and augmented reality strategy.

0:15:50.240 --> 0:15:52.960
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg's at Ludlow got a behind the scenes look at

0:15:53.000 --> 0:15:57.200
<v Speaker 1>the store in Burlingame, California. If you needed any more

0:15:57.240 --> 0:15:59.960
<v Speaker 1>proof that Meta is going cool in on Web three,

0:16:00.240 --> 0:16:02.720
<v Speaker 1>then look no further. Come take a look inside the

0:16:02.720 --> 0:16:06.760
<v Speaker 1>company's first retail store where VR and are hardware, or

0:16:06.840 --> 0:16:11.040
<v Speaker 1>at the forefront as the company charges into the Metaverse. Yes,

0:16:11.200 --> 0:16:18.600
<v Speaker 1>this is a Metaverse store in the real world. This

0:16:18.720 --> 0:16:21.080
<v Speaker 1>store is the size of a small house, less than

0:16:21.160 --> 0:16:24.760
<v Speaker 1>six square feet opening it is a pretty gutsy move

0:16:24.800 --> 0:16:27.840
<v Speaker 1>for Meta, considering other tech giants have tried and failed.

0:16:29.080 --> 0:16:32.720
<v Speaker 1>Microsoft shut down its store locations permanently to focus on

0:16:32.720 --> 0:16:36.400
<v Speaker 1>online sales, and earlier this year, Amazon announced it was

0:16:36.440 --> 0:16:40.800
<v Speaker 1>closing its physical bookstores, Amazon four Star locations, and more

0:16:40.840 --> 0:16:43.640
<v Speaker 1>pop up kiosks so that the company could better focus

0:16:43.680 --> 0:16:46.640
<v Speaker 1>on its grocery business. So why does Meta think it

0:16:46.640 --> 0:16:49.960
<v Speaker 1>will be more successful than its peers? Well, CEO Mark

0:16:50.040 --> 0:16:53.880
<v Speaker 1>Zuckerberg said quote the best way to understand virtual reality

0:16:54.240 --> 0:16:57.400
<v Speaker 1>is to experience it, and he believes that the metaverse

0:16:57.760 --> 0:17:01.200
<v Speaker 1>is the next major computing revolution after the invention of

0:17:01.240 --> 0:17:05.359
<v Speaker 1>cell phones. Here we have metas virtual reality goggles, the

0:17:05.440 --> 0:17:18.040
<v Speaker 1>quest to which sell for about two are the RayBan stories.

0:17:20.000 --> 0:17:27.439
<v Speaker 1>Hold tap for a photo, single tap, start filming, double

0:17:27.520 --> 0:17:33.160
<v Speaker 1>tap you get some music going volume up, volume down.

0:17:34.280 --> 0:17:36.600
<v Speaker 1>Meta wants this store to be a bridge that connects

0:17:36.680 --> 0:17:39.400
<v Speaker 1>users to the metaverse, but that means that it has

0:17:39.440 --> 0:17:42.639
<v Speaker 1>to rely on users actually being interested in the metaverse.

0:17:45.920 --> 0:17:48.760
<v Speaker 1>That might not be so hard. One out of the

0:17:48.800 --> 0:17:51.720
<v Speaker 1>eleven point to million A R and VR units sold

0:17:51.760 --> 0:17:56.919
<v Speaker 1>worldwide were metas quest two. So Meta does have a

0:17:56.960 --> 0:17:59.920
<v Speaker 1>large market share, but can it keep up the moment

0:18:00.080 --> 0:18:02.439
<v Speaker 1>to and will stores like this one help the company

0:18:02.480 --> 0:18:10.639
<v Speaker 1>expand its metaverse footprint. Bloomberg's ad Ludlow there at The

0:18:10.720 --> 0:18:14.680
<v Speaker 1>store opens next week, and here are some other stories

0:18:14.760 --> 0:18:18.200
<v Speaker 1>we are following. Peloton still trying to turn its business around.

0:18:18.359 --> 0:18:21.400
<v Speaker 1>According to Bloomberg sources, the fitness company trying to sell

0:18:21.400 --> 0:18:24.160
<v Speaker 1>a stake of about hoping to find a big name

0:18:24.200 --> 0:18:27.160
<v Speaker 1>corporation or a private equity firm that could help validate

0:18:27.200 --> 0:18:32.000
<v Speaker 1>the business with its investment. Peloton has been contacting potential buyers,

0:18:32.040 --> 0:18:36.400
<v Speaker 1>but the process is still at an early stage. Palant

0:18:36.440 --> 0:18:39.840
<v Speaker 1>Here meantime, just struck a ten million pound contract that's

0:18:39.840 --> 0:18:42.520
<v Speaker 1>twelve and a half million dollars with the UK's Ministry

0:18:42.560 --> 0:18:45.480
<v Speaker 1>of Defense. The data analytics company will offer support with

0:18:45.520 --> 0:18:49.240
<v Speaker 1>its Foundry platform which lets users cut costs by automating

0:18:49.280 --> 0:18:52.399
<v Speaker 1>work and reducing data processing time. This is the firm's

0:18:52.480 --> 0:19:04.800
<v Speaker 1>largest contract to date with the high profile department. Welcome

0:19:04.800 --> 0:19:07.000
<v Speaker 1>back to Bone More Technology and Emily Check in San Francisco.

0:19:07.119 --> 0:19:09.679
<v Speaker 1>Let's stay on Zillo and welcome back Spencer Raskov, one

0:19:09.680 --> 0:19:11.560
<v Speaker 1>of Zilla's co founders who ran the company for more

0:19:11.600 --> 0:19:14.000
<v Speaker 1>than a decade. He is also the co founder of

0:19:14.040 --> 0:19:17.399
<v Speaker 1>S and Sonny, a venture firm based in l A.

0:19:17.680 --> 0:19:20.679
<v Speaker 1>So I want your view, Spencer on the big market picture.

0:19:20.760 --> 0:19:23.800
<v Speaker 1>But let's start with the housing market and how all

0:19:23.840 --> 0:19:27.959
<v Speaker 1>of these trends, rising inflation, rising rates for the foreseeable future,

0:19:28.200 --> 0:19:32.000
<v Speaker 1>how that's going to bear down on the housing market. Well,

0:19:32.040 --> 0:19:36.679
<v Speaker 1>what's driving home price appreciation is limited supply. So for

0:19:36.760 --> 0:19:39.679
<v Speaker 1>most decades, starting in the sixties, we had twenty million

0:19:39.720 --> 0:19:42.840
<v Speaker 1>new homes be built. In the decade after the financial

0:19:42.840 --> 0:19:45.080
<v Speaker 1>crisis of two thousand eight, we only had ten million

0:19:45.119 --> 0:19:47.840
<v Speaker 1>homes that were built, and so there's just a lot

0:19:47.920 --> 0:19:51.159
<v Speaker 1>of missing supply and that's what's driven this huge uptake

0:19:51.160 --> 0:19:54.040
<v Speaker 1>and home price appreciation over the last five or so years.

0:19:54.080 --> 0:19:56.840
<v Speaker 1>So as mortgage rates have gone up and and they're

0:19:56.840 --> 0:19:59.639
<v Speaker 1>gonna they still have further to go. Clearly, homebuyers are

0:19:59.640 --> 0:20:01.959
<v Speaker 1>gonna have to trade down to slightly lower price points.

0:20:02.359 --> 0:20:04.399
<v Speaker 1>But most of the data that I've seen around housing

0:20:04.480 --> 0:20:07.879
<v Speaker 1>still predicts strong housing appreciation, not as high as it was,

0:20:07.920 --> 0:20:11.320
<v Speaker 1>not uh ten, but probably five to ten percent home

0:20:11.359 --> 0:20:14.800
<v Speaker 1>price appreciation. Now, the stocks that underlie this, like Zillo,

0:20:14.880 --> 0:20:17.640
<v Speaker 1>that's a bit of a whole other question. And there's

0:20:17.640 --> 0:20:20.080
<v Speaker 1>obviously been a risk off trade in the public markets

0:20:20.119 --> 0:20:23.240
<v Speaker 1>away from growth and more towards profitability, and that's hurting

0:20:23.240 --> 0:20:26.120
<v Speaker 1>companies like Zello and many other prop tech companies as well.

0:20:26.760 --> 0:20:28.440
<v Speaker 1>So I just want to lean around this because there's

0:20:28.440 --> 0:20:30.080
<v Speaker 1>a lot of people trying to get into the market

0:20:30.119 --> 0:20:33.320
<v Speaker 1>who think they just can't right now if they didn't

0:20:33.359 --> 0:20:36.479
<v Speaker 1>buy something first ten years ago. You're saying, prices are

0:20:36.480 --> 0:20:39.719
<v Speaker 1>still gonna go up, and there's still a lack of supply,

0:20:39.880 --> 0:20:43.680
<v Speaker 1>so there's still gonna be competition. Even though we're we're

0:20:43.680 --> 0:20:46.680
<v Speaker 1>seeing forty year inflation and rates going up and people's

0:20:46.720 --> 0:20:51.240
<v Speaker 1>portfolios are getting pummeled, we're still only at about one

0:20:51.280 --> 0:20:54.280
<v Speaker 1>to two months supply of housing, which is amazing. I mean,

0:20:54.280 --> 0:20:57.040
<v Speaker 1>a normal's market would have six months supply of homes

0:20:57.040 --> 0:21:00.000
<v Speaker 1>for sale, So homes there's just are not enough homes

0:21:00.000 --> 0:21:02.000
<v Speaker 1>for sale. We need home builders to build more homes

0:21:02.040 --> 0:21:04.119
<v Speaker 1>if you want this supply demand and balance to to

0:21:04.200 --> 0:21:08.360
<v Speaker 1>come back, uh, you know, into balance. So if if

0:21:09.240 --> 0:21:11.520
<v Speaker 1>home prices are still going to keep going up in

0:21:11.760 --> 0:21:13.919
<v Speaker 1>most major markets, not as quickly as they were, but

0:21:14.000 --> 0:21:17.159
<v Speaker 1>home prices are in fact still appreciating. So let's talk

0:21:17.200 --> 0:21:19.200
<v Speaker 1>about the sell off. How much worse does it get?

0:21:19.280 --> 0:21:22.360
<v Speaker 1>Has a bubble popped? Is this you know what we're

0:21:22.359 --> 0:21:26.160
<v Speaker 1>going to see for you know, the next several years. Well,

0:21:26.160 --> 0:21:28.080
<v Speaker 1>it's a bit of a blood blath out there. Obviously,

0:21:28.320 --> 0:21:31.359
<v Speaker 1>public market investors and viewers can see in the public

0:21:31.440 --> 0:21:34.639
<v Speaker 1>markets just how bad it is in among public companies.

0:21:34.680 --> 0:21:36.400
<v Speaker 1>I can give you a little insight into what's happening

0:21:36.480 --> 0:21:39.680
<v Speaker 1>in the private markets, and unfortunately it's pretty ugly there

0:21:39.720 --> 0:21:42.879
<v Speaker 1>as well. So the closer you are to being public,

0:21:43.119 --> 0:21:46.480
<v Speaker 1>the harder ago of it one will have. So companies

0:21:46.480 --> 0:21:48.960
<v Speaker 1>that were already in the I P O window hoping

0:21:49.040 --> 0:21:51.920
<v Speaker 1>to go public this year, that window is shut as

0:21:52.000 --> 0:21:54.320
<v Speaker 1>ones are being pulled. Those companies are not getting public

0:21:54.560 --> 0:21:58.800
<v Speaker 1>anytime soon. Late stage growth companies are pulling back. Early

0:21:58.880 --> 0:22:01.800
<v Speaker 1>stage companies are getting rounds done. I mean, there's a

0:22:01.880 --> 0:22:06.360
<v Speaker 1>real venture chill a foot, unfortunately, and I'm seeing companies

0:22:06.400 --> 0:22:09.760
<v Speaker 1>across all of the private sec all the venture funded

0:22:09.800 --> 0:22:12.200
<v Speaker 1>companies that I'm involved in, are pulling back in different ways.

0:22:12.359 --> 0:22:14.520
<v Speaker 1>So many of them are tightening headcount, many of them

0:22:14.680 --> 0:22:17.359
<v Speaker 1>are cutting marketing, most of them are hunkering down. Some

0:22:17.400 --> 0:22:19.960
<v Speaker 1>of them are doing inside rounds because they can't raise

0:22:19.960 --> 0:22:23.760
<v Speaker 1>outside rounds from new investors. So it's amazing how quickly

0:22:24.119 --> 0:22:27.240
<v Speaker 1>the weather has turned, and just really a couple of months,

0:22:27.280 --> 0:22:31.520
<v Speaker 1>we've gone from an incredibly ebulent market to one that's

0:22:31.520 --> 0:22:34.160
<v Speaker 1>extremely challenged. So how long are they going to hunger

0:22:34.160 --> 0:22:36.080
<v Speaker 1>down for? How long are they going to have to

0:22:36.119 --> 0:22:39.679
<v Speaker 1>be hiding well? I had one investment banker telling me

0:22:39.680 --> 0:22:41.560
<v Speaker 1>the other day that if you look back over the

0:22:41.640 --> 0:22:43.879
<v Speaker 1>last twenty years, the I p O window has only

0:22:43.920 --> 0:22:46.719
<v Speaker 1>ever been closed for about six months, and we're already

0:22:46.760 --> 0:22:49.879
<v Speaker 1>in month four of closure. So that bodes well for

0:22:50.080 --> 0:22:52.880
<v Speaker 1>reopening of the I p O market sometime later this year.

0:22:53.359 --> 0:22:57.119
<v Speaker 1>But private companies, venture funded companies, they're just assuming that

0:22:57.200 --> 0:22:59.240
<v Speaker 1>this year is kind of a write off. I mean,

0:22:59.280 --> 0:23:01.560
<v Speaker 1>every company I'm involved in, I've I've said you should

0:23:01.640 --> 0:23:03.760
<v Speaker 1>assume you should operate your business assuming you'll not be

0:23:03.800 --> 0:23:07.240
<v Speaker 1>able to raise a venture around this year. That's how

0:23:07.280 --> 0:23:09.680
<v Speaker 1>that's how conservative, at least at least my companies are

0:23:09.720 --> 0:23:12.360
<v Speaker 1>being so I think this could last for for quite

0:23:12.359 --> 0:23:14.880
<v Speaker 1>a while. It's this risk off trade. As interest rates

0:23:14.880 --> 0:23:18.800
<v Speaker 1>ticked up, public market and private market investors are prioritizing

0:23:18.800 --> 0:23:22.280
<v Speaker 1>profitability over growth, and that's increased the cost of capital.

0:23:22.320 --> 0:23:25.359
<v Speaker 1>It's made it difficult for high growth companies to raise money,

0:23:25.760 --> 0:23:27.960
<v Speaker 1>and they're all pulling back as a result. Sorry to

0:23:27.960 --> 0:23:30.760
<v Speaker 1>be the bearer of bad news on a Friday afternoon. Well,

0:23:31.200 --> 0:23:33.520
<v Speaker 1>given it to us straight, we appreciate it. There is

0:23:33.560 --> 0:23:35.720
<v Speaker 1>one person out there who seems to have no trouble

0:23:35.800 --> 0:23:38.879
<v Speaker 1>raising money, and that is Elon Musk, who has lined

0:23:39.000 --> 0:23:42.200
<v Speaker 1>up a long list of investors to help him take

0:23:42.240 --> 0:23:45.760
<v Speaker 1>over Twitter. He was tweeting earlier some of his ideas,

0:23:46.520 --> 0:23:48.800
<v Speaker 1>more ideas for how he plans to change the company

0:23:48.840 --> 0:23:51.439
<v Speaker 1>those there's still a lot of unknowns. You're a big

0:23:51.480 --> 0:23:55.080
<v Speaker 1>prolific tweeter, what do you think about Elon Musk owning

0:23:55.080 --> 0:23:58.159
<v Speaker 1>this company? Well, I was surprised, to be honest, and

0:23:58.160 --> 0:24:00.480
<v Speaker 1>I tweeted as such. I was surprised at this deal

0:24:00.520 --> 0:24:02.760
<v Speaker 1>got done, although it actually hasn't gotten done yet, so

0:24:02.760 --> 0:24:05.959
<v Speaker 1>so we'll see. But um, as a Twitter user, I'm

0:24:06.000 --> 0:24:09.000
<v Speaker 1>sort of excited to see what Elon's products insights are

0:24:09.000 --> 0:24:10.720
<v Speaker 1>going to bring to the product, the product that I've

0:24:10.800 --> 0:24:12.760
<v Speaker 1>used for so long and so many of us love,

0:24:12.880 --> 0:24:15.959
<v Speaker 1>so it should be interesting to watch. Um. I am

0:24:16.000 --> 0:24:19.000
<v Speaker 1>a little surprised that he's gotten so much financing lined up,

0:24:19.040 --> 0:24:21.879
<v Speaker 1>given that he has publicly stated that he's not going

0:24:21.960 --> 0:24:24.360
<v Speaker 1>to try to run this like a normal business. He's

0:24:24.400 --> 0:24:27.000
<v Speaker 1>not trying to maximize profit. He doesn't he's not even

0:24:27.040 --> 0:24:29.080
<v Speaker 1>really interested in a financial return, and yet he is

0:24:29.080 --> 0:24:32.200
<v Speaker 1>still convinced others to invest alongside him. This just goes

0:24:32.359 --> 0:24:36.560
<v Speaker 1>to show how much amazing magic and pixie Dust Elon

0:24:36.680 --> 0:24:39.760
<v Speaker 1>Musk has uh associated with him, that he's able to

0:24:39.800 --> 0:24:42.040
<v Speaker 1>get people to co invest, even when he says it's

0:24:42.040 --> 0:24:46.359
<v Speaker 1>an unconventional investment. Um. You know, I I do worry

0:24:46.400 --> 0:24:49.399
<v Speaker 1>as a Twitter user that the company has made great

0:24:49.440 --> 0:24:53.520
<v Speaker 1>strides to reduce spam, reduced bullying, and a lot of

0:24:53.560 --> 0:24:56.080
<v Speaker 1>the discussion about how we're going to restore free speech

0:24:56.119 --> 0:24:59.040
<v Speaker 1>to with Twitter On Twitter, it sounds really good, but

0:24:59.160 --> 0:25:01.600
<v Speaker 1>with free speech comes a lot of spam, a lot

0:25:01.640 --> 0:25:03.680
<v Speaker 1>of harassment, and a lot of bullying, and those are

0:25:03.680 --> 0:25:06.080
<v Speaker 1>things that Twitter management has worked very hard to reduce

0:25:06.119 --> 0:25:08.160
<v Speaker 1>over the last couple of years. So I worry about

0:25:08.160 --> 0:25:11.520
<v Speaker 1>a possible step back in that in that regard, but

0:25:11.720 --> 0:25:13.119
<v Speaker 1>benefit of the doubt has to go to one of

0:25:13.160 --> 0:25:15.919
<v Speaker 1>the greatest entrepreners of all time, who has created so

0:25:15.920 --> 0:25:18.800
<v Speaker 1>many extraordinary companies, and obviously he uses the product as

0:25:18.840 --> 0:25:21.600
<v Speaker 1>much as anybody, So it'll be amazing to watch. There'll

0:25:21.600 --> 0:25:23.399
<v Speaker 1>be plenty for for you to talk about and for

0:25:23.400 --> 0:25:25.639
<v Speaker 1>me to tweet about as as Elon takes this company

0:25:25.680 --> 0:25:27.440
<v Speaker 1>from it. What do you think about the role of

0:25:27.520 --> 0:25:30.280
<v Speaker 1>Jack Dorsey here and and the the future of a

0:25:30.359 --> 0:25:35.480
<v Speaker 1>decentralized Twitter. Is that a good idea? I'm not really

0:25:35.560 --> 0:25:38.840
<v Speaker 1>sure what that means, to be perfectly candid, Um, I mean,

0:25:39.080 --> 0:25:42.560
<v Speaker 1>I I there's talk about open sourcing the algorithm and

0:25:42.680 --> 0:25:46.800
<v Speaker 1>providing more transparency, but I don't really know what that

0:25:46.880 --> 0:25:48.760
<v Speaker 1>means to the user, and I don't know how it

0:25:48.760 --> 0:25:52.720
<v Speaker 1>affects the business model. Um. You know, this company has

0:25:52.840 --> 0:25:56.520
<v Speaker 1>always had it's always been a little dysfunctional right at

0:25:56.520 --> 0:25:59.080
<v Speaker 1>the board level of the management level. It's always had challenges,

0:25:59.200 --> 0:26:01.919
<v Speaker 1>It's always punched of its weight in terms of media

0:26:02.240 --> 0:26:06.600
<v Speaker 1>attention and consumer interest. And so you know, maybe out

0:26:06.640 --> 0:26:10.320
<v Speaker 1>of the public eye, maybe private for a couple of years,

0:26:10.400 --> 0:26:13.800
<v Speaker 1>it'll be able to stabilize its leadership team, stabilize its board,

0:26:14.359 --> 0:26:16.520
<v Speaker 1>focus on the product, and then hopefully come back out

0:26:16.600 --> 0:26:19.919
<v Speaker 1>the other side and improved company and hopefully an improved product.

0:26:21.200 --> 0:26:24.440
<v Speaker 1>All right, Spencer Rascoff, always appreciate your thoughts here on

0:26:24.480 --> 0:26:27.920
<v Speaker 1>the show, co founder of Zillo and seventy and Sonny

0:26:27.920 --> 0:26:30.520
<v Speaker 1>is such a great need for a venture firm given

0:26:30.560 --> 0:26:44.439
<v Speaker 1>today's weather. Thank you. It is time now for our

0:26:44.480 --> 0:26:47.479
<v Speaker 1>crypto report and bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies taking a beating

0:26:47.560 --> 0:26:50.960
<v Speaker 1>along with the rest of tech in this cell often works.

0:26:51.000 --> 0:26:54.720
<v Speaker 1>Katie Greifeld here with the big picture, Katie, what a week?

0:26:55.200 --> 0:26:57.680
<v Speaker 1>What a week? It was an especially bad week four

0:26:57.800 --> 0:27:01.480
<v Speaker 1>risk assets, an especially bad week for bitcoin in particular.

0:27:01.560 --> 0:27:05.520
<v Speaker 1>Actually didn't start out so bad. We actually rallied on Tuesday,

0:27:05.560 --> 0:27:09.440
<v Speaker 1>but you add in Thursday's nearly nine percent drop in bitcoin,

0:27:09.760 --> 0:27:12.840
<v Speaker 1>such a end the week with losses of nearly six percent.

0:27:13.160 --> 0:27:16.280
<v Speaker 1>It's training in about thirty six thousand dollars right now,

0:27:16.320 --> 0:27:19.240
<v Speaker 1>about a hair below at one point it hit forty

0:27:19.720 --> 0:27:23.760
<v Speaker 1>dollars this week. That is a distant memory at this point, Emily.

0:27:23.880 --> 0:27:26.320
<v Speaker 1>But a big reason why we saw bitcoin performs so

0:27:26.400 --> 0:27:28.640
<v Speaker 1>poorly is because it really trades like a tech sock

0:27:28.880 --> 0:27:32.719
<v Speaker 1>more than anything else. Bitcoin's correlation with the NASSEQ one

0:27:33.280 --> 0:27:35.760
<v Speaker 1>it's currently at its strongest level in data going back

0:27:35.760 --> 0:27:39.240
<v Speaker 1>to at least, which really tells you something. As you

0:27:39.280 --> 0:27:42.119
<v Speaker 1>can see in that chart there, that relationship has really

0:27:42.160 --> 0:27:44.520
<v Speaker 1>strengthened in the past couple of months, in the past

0:27:44.560 --> 0:27:47.000
<v Speaker 1>couple of weeks even, and now you have tech socks

0:27:47.080 --> 0:27:50.240
<v Speaker 1>really under pressure from rising rates. Bitcoin is two. And

0:27:50.280 --> 0:27:52.600
<v Speaker 1>what's interesting in this cell off, this tech cell off,

0:27:52.640 --> 0:27:55.159
<v Speaker 1>this crypto sell off. You have Ether. It's been a

0:27:55.160 --> 0:27:57.880
<v Speaker 1>relative haven, still down for the week about four point

0:27:57.920 --> 0:28:01.320
<v Speaker 1>five percent, but obviously less than Bitcoin. And that's interesting

0:28:01.359 --> 0:28:04.840
<v Speaker 1>because Bitcoin is built is digital gold. It's clearly not

0:28:04.960 --> 0:28:07.280
<v Speaker 1>acting as a haven lately, though, and as you can

0:28:07.320 --> 0:28:11.160
<v Speaker 1>see or Ether, rather it's outperformed not just this week

0:28:11.200 --> 0:28:13.800
<v Speaker 1>but over the past few years. At this point, Emily,

0:28:14.400 --> 0:28:18.080
<v Speaker 1>you're not safe anywhere, are you. I want to ask

0:28:18.119 --> 0:28:21.720
<v Speaker 1>you about another story, and that is an Nvidia agreeing

0:28:21.760 --> 0:28:24.160
<v Speaker 1>to pay a five and a half million dollar fine

0:28:24.280 --> 0:28:27.919
<v Speaker 1>is part of a settlement with the SEC over crypto mining.

0:28:27.960 --> 0:28:30.560
<v Speaker 1>What do we know about this? This is fascinating. So

0:28:30.640 --> 0:28:33.480
<v Speaker 1>it basically boils down to the video allegations that in

0:28:33.480 --> 0:28:36.600
<v Speaker 1>the video failed to adequately disclose just how much of

0:28:36.640 --> 0:28:39.760
<v Speaker 1>its revenue comes from demand from crypto minders. So the

0:28:39.840 --> 0:28:44.120
<v Speaker 1>SEC said that for two consecutive quarters in the video

0:28:44.280 --> 0:28:47.280
<v Speaker 1>didn't make clear that demand from crypto minors in particular

0:28:47.480 --> 0:28:50.239
<v Speaker 1>made up a significant part of its sales increase for

0:28:50.320 --> 0:28:54.080
<v Speaker 1>graphics processing units. In the video of course settled that case.

0:28:54.120 --> 0:28:56.920
<v Speaker 1>They didn't admit wrongdoing, but they did pay that five

0:28:56.960 --> 0:28:59.880
<v Speaker 1>point five million dollar fine. And this is fascinating, and

0:29:00.200 --> 0:29:02.800
<v Speaker 1>because if you think about Ethereum, it's moving away from

0:29:02.840 --> 0:29:05.480
<v Speaker 1>proof of work mining to proof of steak and what

0:29:05.640 --> 0:29:08.239
<v Speaker 1>that really means is that it's no longer going to

0:29:08.280 --> 0:29:12.920
<v Speaker 1>require those graphics cards. It's much less intensive. And already

0:29:12.960 --> 0:29:16.480
<v Speaker 1>in December, the video had warned that it's seen revenue

0:29:16.520 --> 0:29:20.720
<v Speaker 1>from crypto mining dropped by over compared to the previous

0:29:20.760 --> 0:29:24.320
<v Speaker 1>few quarters. And Ethereum hasn't even moved to this proof

0:29:24.440 --> 0:29:28.480
<v Speaker 1>of state mining process yet that's still yet to come

0:29:28.560 --> 0:29:31.640
<v Speaker 1>further this year but already the video under pressure really

0:29:31.640 --> 0:29:34.320
<v Speaker 1>reminded me of the conversation we had yesterday about how

0:29:34.400 --> 0:29:37.800
<v Speaker 1>these movements in the crypto market they affect the equities

0:29:38.040 --> 0:29:40.840
<v Speaker 1>of stocks and the companies that are involved just broadly

0:29:40.880 --> 0:29:43.400
<v Speaker 1>in the crypto sphere. So, Katie, what aren't going to

0:29:43.440 --> 0:29:45.680
<v Speaker 1>be watching when the markets open next week and of

0:29:45.720 --> 0:29:49.200
<v Speaker 1>course crypto trades through the weekend. It's a great question. Honestly,

0:29:49.240 --> 0:29:53.960
<v Speaker 1>I'm most interesting interested in this dynamic between Ethereum and Bitcoin. Again, Bitcoin,

0:29:54.040 --> 0:29:56.920
<v Speaker 1>it's the largest cryptocurrency out there, it's supposed to be

0:29:56.960 --> 0:30:00.200
<v Speaker 1>the most liquid, the most stable. This haven the area

0:30:00.360 --> 0:30:02.360
<v Speaker 1>clearly giving it a run for its money. We'll see

0:30:02.360 --> 0:30:04.880
<v Speaker 1>if this out performance can continue, both on the upside

0:30:04.920 --> 0:30:09.440
<v Speaker 1>and the downside. All right, Bloomberg's Katie Greifeld, thank you

0:30:09.600 --> 0:30:20.040
<v Speaker 1>for wrapping all that up for us. We saw tech

0:30:20.040 --> 0:30:23.440
<v Speaker 1>stocks fall for the fifth straight week, marking the sector's

0:30:23.560 --> 0:30:26.600
<v Speaker 1>worst weekly streak since two thousand and twelve. I'm joined

0:30:26.600 --> 0:30:29.960
<v Speaker 1>out by Tuilio CEO Jeff Lawson. The company just reported

0:30:30.120 --> 0:30:33.959
<v Speaker 1>it's earnings results and better than expected, but still they

0:30:33.960 --> 0:30:36.440
<v Speaker 1>couldn't escape the sell off either. Jeff, thank you so

0:30:36.480 --> 0:30:38.360
<v Speaker 1>much for joining us. So let's put Tuilio aside for

0:30:38.360 --> 0:30:40.000
<v Speaker 1>the moment. I really want to get your view on

0:30:40.040 --> 0:30:45.120
<v Speaker 1>the broader picture of what's happening in the markets here. Inflation, macroeconomics,

0:30:45.120 --> 0:30:50.800
<v Speaker 1>certain uncertainty, rising rates. How are you reading all of this? Well,

0:30:50.840 --> 0:30:52.360
<v Speaker 1>you know, the way I look at it is, you know,

0:30:52.360 --> 0:30:54.760
<v Speaker 1>we're seeing the end of a long era of free

0:30:54.840 --> 0:30:57.400
<v Speaker 1>money that our economy and the global economy has been in,

0:30:57.880 --> 0:30:59.760
<v Speaker 1>you know, going back all the way to September eleven

0:30:59.880 --> 0:31:02.640
<v Speaker 1>and then refreshed again during the Financial crisis and then

0:31:02.640 --> 0:31:06.120
<v Speaker 1>with COVID, and so you know, investorors are obviously reacting

0:31:06.120 --> 0:31:08.720
<v Speaker 1>to and the whole world reacting to the government's reacting to.

0:31:08.960 --> 0:31:11.360
<v Speaker 1>You know what the implications of that are to now

0:31:11.480 --> 0:31:13.560
<v Speaker 1>for the really almost the first time in twenty years,

0:31:13.600 --> 0:31:16.840
<v Speaker 1>like managing inflation versus interest rates, and so, yeah, a

0:31:16.920 --> 0:31:19.080
<v Speaker 1>lot of rescent going on. You know, we're not happy

0:31:19.080 --> 0:31:21.479
<v Speaker 1>about obviously what's been happening with tech stocks or our

0:31:21.520 --> 0:31:24.200
<v Speaker 1>stock but at the same time, you know, new world

0:31:24.200 --> 0:31:26.200
<v Speaker 1>that that we're entering. And I just think about the

0:31:26.200 --> 0:31:29.640
<v Speaker 1>fundamental value proposition that Toyo provides, you know, to our customers.

0:31:30.240 --> 0:31:32.280
<v Speaker 1>And we're now in three and a half billion dollar

0:31:32.320 --> 0:31:35.680
<v Speaker 1>revenue run rate. Business growing incredibly fast, and so yeah,

0:31:35.720 --> 0:31:36.920
<v Speaker 1>we just keep our eye on the ball, which is

0:31:36.920 --> 0:31:38.640
<v Speaker 1>serving our customers. And I think that's what a lot

0:31:38.640 --> 0:31:40.800
<v Speaker 1>of companies are probably just doing there in this time.

0:31:41.680 --> 0:31:44.160
<v Speaker 1>You say you're planning to deliver thirty percent more than

0:31:45.080 --> 0:31:48.080
<v Speaker 1>organic growth over the next couple of years, does not

0:31:48.240 --> 0:31:52.600
<v Speaker 1>still happen if we go into a recession. Well, we

0:31:52.680 --> 0:31:56.719
<v Speaker 1>just reconfirmed our guidance that we are going to deliver

0:31:56.960 --> 0:32:01.600
<v Speaker 1>thirty percent annual organic growth through two and we started

0:32:01.640 --> 0:32:05.880
<v Speaker 1>that guidance um UH in twenty uh and so we

0:32:05.920 --> 0:32:08.920
<v Speaker 1>have yet again reconfirmed it as well as last quarter

0:32:08.960 --> 0:32:11.680
<v Speaker 1>we added that we intend to be profitable for the

0:32:11.760 --> 0:32:15.520
<v Speaker 1>fiscal year for twenty three and uh and so we

0:32:15.600 --> 0:32:17.720
<v Speaker 1>just reconfirmed both of those Now. Now, luck if the

0:32:18.040 --> 0:32:21.200
<v Speaker 1>whole world hits some you know, the worst case scenario

0:32:21.280 --> 0:32:25.040
<v Speaker 1>of a macro environment, you know, who knows what could

0:32:25.040 --> 0:32:27.160
<v Speaker 1>happen in that world. But from every indicator that we

0:32:27.200 --> 0:32:29.400
<v Speaker 1>see today, that that gave us a reason to reconfirm

0:32:29.440 --> 0:32:31.640
<v Speaker 1>both of those points of titants on our call this week.

0:32:32.240 --> 0:32:34.760
<v Speaker 1>So talk to us more about how things like messaging

0:32:34.840 --> 0:32:38.360
<v Speaker 1>and other new features are evolving. So you keep those customers,

0:32:38.560 --> 0:32:42.720
<v Speaker 1>new customers signing up, and sales coming in. Yeah, we

0:32:42.760 --> 0:32:46.320
<v Speaker 1>have almost two hundred and seventy thousand companies that use

0:32:46.360 --> 0:32:49.120
<v Speaker 1>Tilio to engage with their customers. And when you think

0:32:49.160 --> 0:32:52.840
<v Speaker 1>about what's been happening in the long trend of last

0:32:52.840 --> 0:32:56.440
<v Speaker 1>twenty years of digital transformation, more and more companies, businesses

0:32:56.440 --> 0:33:00.000
<v Speaker 1>are moving online and they're seeing more more digital transactions.

0:33:00.040 --> 0:33:02.600
<v Speaker 1>That means they meet their customers in this digital world.

0:33:03.000 --> 0:33:06.680
<v Speaker 1>And we provide the tools and the communications channels and

0:33:06.720 --> 0:33:10.600
<v Speaker 1>now the data infrastructure to allow companies to know their

0:33:10.600 --> 0:33:13.080
<v Speaker 1>customers based on all the data that they see about

0:33:13.080 --> 0:33:16.600
<v Speaker 1>their customers first party data, and then take that understanding

0:33:16.600 --> 0:33:20.040
<v Speaker 1>of their customer and use it to engage with those customers.

0:33:20.240 --> 0:33:24.000
<v Speaker 1>And engagement is essentially the act of personalizing all of

0:33:24.040 --> 0:33:27.360
<v Speaker 1>your interactions, making every interaction relevant. It's the act of

0:33:27.400 --> 0:33:30.600
<v Speaker 1>actually buying relevant ads to target your customers. It's the

0:33:30.640 --> 0:33:34.120
<v Speaker 1>act of tiving a direct channel of conversation with your customer.

0:33:34.440 --> 0:33:38.280
<v Speaker 1>And companies who do this well see outsized performance in

0:33:38.280 --> 0:33:40.760
<v Speaker 1>their revenue. In fact, we recently did a survey of

0:33:41.120 --> 0:33:44.680
<v Speaker 1>three thousand different executives and a wide variety of companies

0:33:44.720 --> 0:33:47.560
<v Speaker 1>all around the Globe, and we found that those companies

0:33:47.560 --> 0:33:50.320
<v Speaker 1>that invested in customer engagement, which is building that digital

0:33:50.360 --> 0:33:54.680
<v Speaker 1>relationship with their customers, on average, saw seventy revenue growth

0:33:54.720 --> 0:33:56.720
<v Speaker 1>last year. And so that just goes to show you

0:33:56.760 --> 0:33:59.080
<v Speaker 1>that when you build a strong relationship with your customer

0:33:59.160 --> 0:34:01.520
<v Speaker 1>using all this amazing technology that is out there that

0:34:01.600 --> 0:34:06.520
<v Speaker 1>Tilio powers, well, it has outside returns in terms of revenue. Now,

0:34:06.640 --> 0:34:08.840
<v Speaker 1>I want to ask you about a slightly different topic

0:34:09.000 --> 0:34:11.680
<v Speaker 1>and the leak of the draft opinion from the Supreme

0:34:11.680 --> 0:34:15.120
<v Speaker 1>Court on Where versus Wade. Tuilio came out last year

0:34:15.160 --> 0:34:18.680
<v Speaker 1>opposing the Texas anti abortion law, and I'm I'm just

0:34:18.800 --> 0:34:23.840
<v Speaker 1>curious for your reaction to this league what you're telling employees. Well,

0:34:24.200 --> 0:34:26.120
<v Speaker 1>you know, I think it is it is a dark

0:34:26.200 --> 0:34:29.440
<v Speaker 1>day to be removing fundamental rights from basically half of

0:34:29.440 --> 0:34:33.200
<v Speaker 1>our population. And we think it is a woman's right

0:34:33.520 --> 0:34:36.080
<v Speaker 1>to choose her health care decisions for her body. We're

0:34:36.120 --> 0:34:38.759
<v Speaker 1>going to support our employees in their need to to

0:34:38.840 --> 0:34:42.080
<v Speaker 1>get the health care options that they need. And ultimately,

0:34:42.200 --> 0:34:44.680
<v Speaker 1>we think that healthcare is a personal choice and that

0:34:44.680 --> 0:34:46.560
<v Speaker 1>should be a choice that's left up to the individual.

0:34:47.040 --> 0:34:49.040
<v Speaker 1>And how do you think about this as a business leader,

0:34:49.040 --> 0:34:54.239
<v Speaker 1>because there certainly are customers who don't necessarily agree with you. Absolutely,

0:34:54.560 --> 0:34:56.880
<v Speaker 1>it's a very tough issue and it is it is

0:34:56.880 --> 0:35:00.640
<v Speaker 1>an issue that science has not answered the question of,

0:35:00.680 --> 0:35:03.640
<v Speaker 1>like when does life begin? And so therefore it becomes

0:35:03.680 --> 0:35:06.880
<v Speaker 1>a matter of beliefs, and there are religious beliefs, personal beliefs,

0:35:06.880 --> 0:35:09.239
<v Speaker 1>etcetera involved in this decision, which makes it a very

0:35:09.280 --> 0:35:13.120
<v Speaker 1>hard issue for leaders, um like myself or I need

0:35:13.200 --> 0:35:16.000
<v Speaker 1>to to actually kind of you know, a pine on

0:35:16.120 --> 0:35:19.680
<v Speaker 1>and so in some ways it's like stop asking me

0:35:19.760 --> 0:35:22.239
<v Speaker 1>a man just because I'm a CEO what I think

0:35:22.280 --> 0:35:25.000
<v Speaker 1>about it? Like what I what I ultimately can say

0:35:25.080 --> 0:35:27.600
<v Speaker 1>is I believe that women should have the choice to

0:35:27.600 --> 0:35:30.520
<v Speaker 1>to to make decisions health care decisions about their own bodies.

0:35:30.560 --> 0:35:33.479
<v Speaker 1>And you know, and that's not an opinion of when

0:35:33.520 --> 0:35:35.880
<v Speaker 1>life begins and all that. Science doesn't know the answer.

0:35:35.960 --> 0:35:37.600
<v Speaker 1>Nobody knows the answer to that. But what I do

0:35:37.680 --> 0:35:39.359
<v Speaker 1>believe is that women should have the ability to make

0:35:39.400 --> 0:35:42.200
<v Speaker 1>those decisions for themselves. Fair Enough, I want to ask

0:35:42.239 --> 0:35:45.360
<v Speaker 1>you about another hard issue, and that is of free speech.

0:35:45.560 --> 0:35:48.960
<v Speaker 1>You in the past, for example, the Pittsburgh synagogue shooting,

0:35:48.960 --> 0:35:51.200
<v Speaker 1>you called on social media to do a better job

0:35:51.280 --> 0:35:54.600
<v Speaker 1>cracking down on hate and misinformation. What do you think

0:35:54.600 --> 0:35:59.080
<v Speaker 1>about Twitter being owned by Elon Musk given that his

0:35:59.160 --> 0:36:03.359
<v Speaker 1>big thing quote unquote free speech. Well, I do think

0:36:03.400 --> 0:36:07.120
<v Speaker 1>that reality like free speech in a broad sense is

0:36:07.160 --> 0:36:09.719
<v Speaker 1>a nice thing to rally around, but then you do

0:36:09.840 --> 0:36:13.240
<v Speaker 1>right into reality, which is that when people say things

0:36:13.320 --> 0:36:15.799
<v Speaker 1>or do things that violate the community standards, and every

0:36:15.800 --> 0:36:19.400
<v Speaker 1>community has standards online, offline, you name it, um, what

0:36:19.440 --> 0:36:22.160
<v Speaker 1>are you gonna do? And that there's business consequences, like

0:36:22.200 --> 0:36:26.000
<v Speaker 1>if users stop liking the community of of of social

0:36:26.000 --> 0:36:28.680
<v Speaker 1>media network, they'll stop using it. That is very real

0:36:28.760 --> 0:36:31.719
<v Speaker 1>business impacts. And so the way I thought about, you know,

0:36:31.840 --> 0:36:34.640
<v Speaker 1>free speech, whether free speech is a legal doctrine that

0:36:34.680 --> 0:36:38.560
<v Speaker 1>governs the government's um uh imposition of things you can

0:36:38.560 --> 0:36:40.680
<v Speaker 1>say or can't say, It has nothing to do with

0:36:40.680 --> 0:36:43.879
<v Speaker 1>what private companies um actually how they drive their terms

0:36:43.880 --> 0:36:46.600
<v Speaker 1>of service and how a company builds its community. And

0:36:46.640 --> 0:36:49.000
<v Speaker 1>so the very real business question will be is if

0:36:49.080 --> 0:36:53.080
<v Speaker 1>some of those engagement, if some of those rules get loosened,

0:36:53.320 --> 0:36:58.200
<v Speaker 1>or you know, there is more community breaking type behavior

0:36:58.400 --> 0:37:01.439
<v Speaker 1>on Twitter, people should vote with their feet. And look,

0:37:01.480 --> 0:37:03.239
<v Speaker 1>you can go to the metaverse, you can go to

0:37:03.280 --> 0:37:05.439
<v Speaker 1>the muskie verse, you can go to the snappy verse,

0:37:05.520 --> 0:37:07.680
<v Speaker 1>you can go to the insta verse, whatever. Like, There's

0:37:07.680 --> 0:37:10.520
<v Speaker 1>a lot of options out there, um and so, and

0:37:10.680 --> 0:37:13.080
<v Speaker 1>people can and will vote with how they use the service.

0:37:13.120 --> 0:37:16.960
<v Speaker 1>And ultimately it's a business and uh that is probably

0:37:17.000 --> 0:37:20.280
<v Speaker 1>going to drive a lot of the decisions that that

0:37:20.280 --> 0:37:24.200
<v Speaker 1>that owners will make. That was quite an epic way

0:37:24.239 --> 0:37:27.520
<v Speaker 1>to end this show on a Friday afternoon. Jeff Lawson,

0:37:27.680 --> 0:37:31.200
<v Speaker 1>thank you for waiting through some very thorny issues with

0:37:31.239 --> 0:37:33.640
<v Speaker 1>the CEO of Toilio. I was good to have you

0:37:33.760 --> 0:37:34.320
<v Speaker 1>on the show.