WEBVTT - Hey Chat GPT...How About This???

0:00:00.160 --> 0:00:03.280
<v Speaker 1>Hey, chat GPT, how about this. It's one more thing.

0:00:04.680 --> 0:00:13.160
<v Speaker 1>I'm strong and getty. One more thing. I probably did

0:00:13.200 --> 0:00:16.080
<v Speaker 1>something unwise with chat GPT. I'll get to that in

0:00:16.160 --> 0:00:16.800
<v Speaker 1>just a second.

0:00:18.239 --> 0:00:20.120
<v Speaker 2>Did you fall in love?

0:00:20.640 --> 0:00:23.400
<v Speaker 1>Oh yeah, I haven't gone down that road, Thank god.

0:00:23.920 --> 0:00:26.640
<v Speaker 1>I don't think I'm capable of that. But this is

0:00:26.720 --> 0:00:29.320
<v Speaker 1>from New Zealand for whatever reason, let's hear this first.

0:00:29.680 --> 0:00:31.560
<v Speaker 3>Once upon a time, the world wanted to be in

0:00:31.600 --> 0:00:34.640
<v Speaker 3>New Zealand. We had to cup a clean, green image, earth,

0:00:34.840 --> 0:00:38.360
<v Speaker 3>sexiest accent. Everyone wanted a slight of our pie. But

0:00:38.520 --> 0:00:41.360
<v Speaker 3>now look at us. Our sheep to human ratio is

0:00:41.440 --> 0:00:45.400
<v Speaker 3>embarrassing me low. Our national pride is somewhat less than outstanding.

0:00:45.560 --> 0:00:48.080
<v Speaker 3>We need something new to be proud of, something big

0:00:48.120 --> 0:00:50.560
<v Speaker 3>and brave, to foot us back on the map. It's

0:00:50.560 --> 0:00:52.760
<v Speaker 3>time for New Zealand to become the best place in

0:00:52.800 --> 0:00:55.120
<v Speaker 3>the world to have herpes. Four out of five Kiwis

0:00:55.160 --> 0:00:57.640
<v Speaker 3>are counting on us because no other country is strong

0:00:57.720 --> 0:01:00.000
<v Speaker 3>enough to tackle this issue. With a bit of education,

0:01:00.040 --> 0:01:02.440
<v Speaker 3>should we can beat the stigma? This mighty's on the

0:01:02.440 --> 0:01:04.800
<v Speaker 3>best place in the world they have herpes?

0:01:05.520 --> 0:01:06.080
<v Speaker 2>Is that real?

0:01:06.480 --> 0:01:10.240
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, it's from the New Zealand Herpes Foundation.

0:01:11.120 --> 0:01:13.959
<v Speaker 2>They're trying to take the shame out of having the

0:01:14.000 --> 0:01:14.680
<v Speaker 2>horrible HERB.

0:01:15.880 --> 0:01:17.319
<v Speaker 1>You should be a deeply ashamed.

0:01:19.760 --> 0:01:24.919
<v Speaker 2>It's a virus. What's a brother to do? That's very odd.

0:01:26.400 --> 0:01:27.600
<v Speaker 1>I don't know what to do with it.

0:01:27.640 --> 0:01:29.320
<v Speaker 4>So yeah, I thought the same thing. I just wanted

0:01:29.319 --> 0:01:31.759
<v Speaker 4>to play because it was so ODDA.

0:01:32.840 --> 0:01:33.080
<v Speaker 3>Hmm.

0:01:33.360 --> 0:01:34.840
<v Speaker 2>Best band from New Zealand.

0:01:35.560 --> 0:01:40.680
<v Speaker 1>I can't name one clearly crowded House? Okay, only Arrival

0:01:41.040 --> 0:01:43.720
<v Speaker 1>Split Ends. Which was the Finn Brothers band.

0:01:43.680 --> 0:01:44.840
<v Speaker 2>Before Crowded House?

0:01:44.920 --> 0:01:48.360
<v Speaker 1>Or were they hobbits? They were hobbits with the free

0:01:48.400 --> 0:01:51.360
<v Speaker 1>feet on stage with their hairy feet. Yes, it's fabulous

0:01:51.360 --> 0:01:54.440
<v Speaker 1>four feet all. Back to my chat GPT thing. First

0:01:54.480 --> 0:01:57.480
<v Speaker 1>of all, we've mentioned this many times on the amazing

0:01:57.560 --> 0:02:03.880
<v Speaker 1>and informative Armstrong and Getty Show that the therapy you

0:02:03.960 --> 0:02:09.880
<v Speaker 1>get on chat GPT is disturbingly good. I have spent

0:02:11.440 --> 0:02:14.440
<v Speaker 1>I've never totaled it up, but it would have to be.

0:02:14.520 --> 0:02:19.080
<v Speaker 1>So it's easily six figures on therapy mostly for family

0:02:19.080 --> 0:02:22.440
<v Speaker 1>members throughout the year, or me for trying to deal

0:02:22.480 --> 0:02:24.560
<v Speaker 1>with family members for variety of things I've talked about

0:02:24.600 --> 0:02:26.600
<v Speaker 1>over the years. But I'm probably not going to talk

0:02:26.600 --> 0:02:29.440
<v Speaker 1>about much anymore because the kids are getting older. AnyWho,

0:02:30.760 --> 0:02:33.080
<v Speaker 1>I have had enough therapy and spend enough money on

0:02:33.160 --> 0:02:36.200
<v Speaker 1>therapy to say with a clear conscience, therapy is mostly

0:02:36.240 --> 0:02:39.280
<v Speaker 1>crap and mostly a waste of money, and I wish

0:02:39.320 --> 0:02:43.080
<v Speaker 1>it weren't the case, but it is, and it's not

0:02:43.160 --> 0:02:47.600
<v Speaker 1>the most great therapists to say, yes, you're correct, and

0:02:47.960 --> 0:02:50.200
<v Speaker 1>it's not all a waste of money. And then you

0:02:50.360 --> 0:02:52.360
<v Speaker 1>usually are looking for a therapist when you're in a

0:02:52.440 --> 0:02:56.240
<v Speaker 1>really bad situation and you're like a bad situation and

0:02:56.280 --> 0:02:59.839
<v Speaker 1>you need help like yesterday, And even if you get

0:02:59.840 --> 0:03:04.040
<v Speaker 1>a good therapist, it's going to take weeks, maybe months,

0:03:04.280 --> 0:03:06.520
<v Speaker 1>before you'd make a dent in whatever problem you have,

0:03:06.600 --> 0:03:09.320
<v Speaker 1>because you meet one hour a week, et cetera, et cetera. AnyWho,

0:03:09.840 --> 0:03:13.079
<v Speaker 1>most of the time it's a waste of money. But Tay,

0:03:13.160 --> 0:03:16.200
<v Speaker 1>I've sat around enough therapists, either alone or with other

0:03:16.280 --> 0:03:19.440
<v Speaker 1>people to know a lot of what they say. And

0:03:19.520 --> 0:03:24.160
<v Speaker 1>I've asked chat GPT a variety of questions about, you know,

0:03:25.720 --> 0:03:28.040
<v Speaker 1>all different kinds of relationships on how to handle them,

0:03:28.080 --> 0:03:32.280
<v Speaker 1>and their response is fantastic. I mean, it's just so

0:03:32.480 --> 0:03:36.000
<v Speaker 1>well laid out, makes perfect sense in every instance, I've

0:03:36.040 --> 0:03:40.360
<v Speaker 1>gone wow, that's really insightful every time I've walked out

0:03:40.360 --> 0:03:43.080
<v Speaker 1>of very few offices with therapists and thought, wow, that

0:03:43.200 --> 0:03:46.800
<v Speaker 1>was really insightful. But chat gpt every single time where

0:03:46.800 --> 0:03:49.400
<v Speaker 1>it's like wow, that makes perfect sense or that's a

0:03:49.440 --> 0:03:53.280
<v Speaker 1>great way to word that, or whatever, it's disturbing. And

0:03:53.320 --> 0:03:56.600
<v Speaker 1>I've got a friend who makes very good money as

0:03:56.600 --> 0:03:59.320
<v Speaker 1>a therapist and is scared to death about this how

0:03:59.320 --> 0:04:02.000
<v Speaker 1>good it is. In fact, this person is using it

0:04:02.040 --> 0:04:06.640
<v Speaker 1>themselves as a therapist to deal with a particular relationship.

0:04:06.880 --> 0:04:10.120
<v Speaker 1>And they actually sent me today. I'll be very vague

0:04:10.120 --> 0:04:13.600
<v Speaker 1>because I wouldn't want to screw up their situation, but

0:04:14.000 --> 0:04:18.520
<v Speaker 1>dealing with a love interest and a problem. And they

0:04:18.600 --> 0:04:20.080
<v Speaker 1>sent me the text said this is what I asked

0:04:20.160 --> 0:04:23.520
<v Speaker 1>chat gpt about it, and what do you think? And

0:04:23.560 --> 0:04:26.040
<v Speaker 1>I responded with, I hate to say it based on

0:04:26.040 --> 0:04:28.919
<v Speaker 1>what you do for a living, but that is really

0:04:29.080 --> 0:04:31.880
<v Speaker 1>really good, I mean, like great in terms of a

0:04:31.960 --> 0:04:34.839
<v Speaker 1>text response. Send this text to him as written by

0:04:34.920 --> 0:04:36.960
<v Speaker 1>chat GPT, and I wouldn't change a word of it

0:04:37.040 --> 0:04:39.880
<v Speaker 1>unless I just felt guilty about the fact that freaking

0:04:39.880 --> 0:04:41.200
<v Speaker 1>an inanimate object just.

0:04:41.160 --> 0:04:45.600
<v Speaker 2>Came up with this well in ananimated object which is

0:04:45.640 --> 0:04:46.560
<v Speaker 2>studied humans.

0:04:47.080 --> 0:04:49.760
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, well, very very careous studied humans, I think more,

0:04:49.800 --> 0:04:53.120
<v Speaker 1>and studied all the best therapy out there, and somehow

0:04:53.200 --> 0:04:56.400
<v Speaker 1>congealed it into something good as opposed to something crappy.

0:04:56.520 --> 0:04:58.480
<v Speaker 2>And now regurgitates it. That's correct.

0:04:58.600 --> 0:05:00.159
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I don't know what to think about it that,

0:05:00.200 --> 0:05:02.080
<v Speaker 1>but if it's good, it's good, right, you know.

0:05:02.120 --> 0:05:04.880
<v Speaker 2>I'm gonna try it. Hang on, and it is GPT.

0:05:05.320 --> 0:05:06.360
<v Speaker 1>I've got a good example.

0:05:06.400 --> 0:05:10.920
<v Speaker 2>Can't get turned on unless my wife wears a squirrel costume.

0:05:11.880 --> 0:05:15.120
<v Speaker 1>Well, I've got something the fuzzy tail. Yes, I've got

0:05:15.160 --> 0:05:19.960
<v Speaker 1>something similar for comedy relief. So, and I regret doing

0:05:20.000 --> 0:05:22.680
<v Speaker 1>this because chat GPT. I don't know how to clear

0:05:22.800 --> 0:05:23.479
<v Speaker 1>anything on them.

0:05:23.560 --> 0:05:25.720
<v Speaker 2>Oh lord, he actually did it.

0:05:25.960 --> 0:05:28.280
<v Speaker 1>I actually did it. Yes, And the problem is I

0:05:28.320 --> 0:05:31.039
<v Speaker 1>have some ongoing conversations going on chat GPT, and it

0:05:31.080 --> 0:05:33.640
<v Speaker 1>remembers your conversation from a week ago, which is actually

0:05:33.640 --> 0:05:36.039
<v Speaker 1>pretty cool. It's like having a therapist, I mean, because

0:05:36.080 --> 0:05:38.120
<v Speaker 1>they remember, well, you know, you mentioned the other day

0:05:38.200 --> 0:05:41.640
<v Speaker 1>that she or he or whatever your mom said this.

0:05:42.040 --> 0:05:44.680
<v Speaker 1>Maybe you should try. And but now I've ruined it

0:05:44.720 --> 0:05:49.760
<v Speaker 1>all by giving chat GPT these this fanciful scenario that

0:05:49.800 --> 0:05:52.159
<v Speaker 1>I that I gave it. Although the answers are pretty funny,

0:05:53.279 --> 0:05:54.640
<v Speaker 1>I have ruined.

0:05:54.320 --> 0:05:56.400
<v Speaker 5>It though, I feel like you can tell it to

0:05:56.480 --> 0:05:57.400
<v Speaker 5>disregard that.

0:05:58.120 --> 0:06:00.200
<v Speaker 1>Oh I will after this, I'll say that last when

0:06:00.240 --> 0:06:04.360
<v Speaker 1>it was a joke. Please delete that conversation, right, Okay,

0:06:04.400 --> 0:06:07.919
<v Speaker 1>So here we go, I said to chat GPT, like,

0:06:08.279 --> 0:06:12.360
<v Speaker 1>during the commercial break, my girlfriend saves her toenails. Hmm,

0:06:12.680 --> 0:06:16.479
<v Speaker 1>my girlfriend saves her toenail clippings in a job. I

0:06:16.520 --> 0:06:18.320
<v Speaker 1>want to marry her, but this seems odd. What do

0:06:18.360 --> 0:06:22.839
<v Speaker 1>you think? And chat GPT said, yeah, that's unusual, not

0:06:22.880 --> 0:06:25.640
<v Speaker 1>necessarily a deal breaker, but definitely worth paying attention to.

0:06:25.760 --> 0:06:29.760
<v Speaker 1>Here's the practical breakdown. Is it a red flag? Not automatically.

0:06:29.960 --> 0:06:32.680
<v Speaker 1>Some people have quirky habits or personal rituals that seem

0:06:32.720 --> 0:06:35.560
<v Speaker 1>odd but are harmless. But it depends on context. Is

0:06:35.600 --> 0:06:39.480
<v Speaker 1>it hygienic? Is she sealing them storing them cleanly? Does

0:06:39.520 --> 0:06:47.520
<v Speaker 1>it have emotional meaning to her? Sentimental, artistic or obsessive artistic? Yes,

0:06:47.600 --> 0:06:51.200
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna make a a Nativity scene out them at

0:06:51.200 --> 0:06:52.080
<v Speaker 1>a Christmas wreath.

0:06:52.880 --> 0:06:56.039
<v Speaker 2>I like, yeah, wreath, that would be pretty Chris. The

0:06:56.120 --> 0:07:02.719
<v Speaker 2>toenail clippings sparkle in the winter moonlight. Tom, Yes, I remember,

0:07:02.920 --> 0:07:05.400
<v Speaker 2>I remember, remember that toil.

0:07:05.520 --> 0:07:07.920
<v Speaker 1>Those toenail clippings are from when we spent the night

0:07:07.960 --> 0:07:11.600
<v Speaker 1>at that hotel. Always did it shot across the room.

0:07:11.680 --> 0:07:16.920
<v Speaker 2>That's the one, and I had to look for it. Yeah, Yeah,

0:07:16.920 --> 0:07:17.560
<v Speaker 2>that's the one.

0:07:17.680 --> 0:07:20.440
<v Speaker 1>Is she open to talking about it or defensive? Is

0:07:20.440 --> 0:07:23.000
<v Speaker 1>this part of a larger pattern of behavior that feels

0:07:23.040 --> 0:07:26.800
<v Speaker 1>off if everything else is great? Ask her about it gently,

0:07:26.880 --> 0:07:30.720
<v Speaker 1>without judgment, something like, Hey, I noticed the jar Tonio clippings.

0:07:30.760 --> 0:07:39.360
<v Speaker 1>What's the story there? Wow, that's helpful. I don't know

0:07:39.360 --> 0:07:43.320
<v Speaker 1>that that was the smoothest way to get into the conversation. Hey,

0:07:43.640 --> 0:07:49.280
<v Speaker 1>I noticed the two Totaio clippings. What the fuck? What's

0:07:49.280 --> 0:07:50.440
<v Speaker 1>a smoother way?

0:07:51.120 --> 0:07:56.040
<v Speaker 2>Hey, speaking of jars or speaking of here's hell clipping

0:07:56.120 --> 0:07:59.760
<v Speaker 2>from the paper, speaking of clippings, what the hell do

0:07:59.760 --> 0:08:01.760
<v Speaker 2>you want? No, that's a perfectly good way to get

0:08:01.760 --> 0:08:02.160
<v Speaker 2>into it.

0:08:02.280 --> 0:08:04.160
<v Speaker 1>I think mine is better. You just pointed him and

0:08:04.200 --> 0:08:05.160
<v Speaker 1>say what the fuck?

0:08:05.280 --> 0:08:06.080
<v Speaker 2>Uh fuck is that?

0:08:10.400 --> 0:08:10.679
<v Speaker 5>Oh?

0:08:10.800 --> 0:08:11.120
<v Speaker 2>God?

0:08:12.440 --> 0:08:16.040
<v Speaker 1>If she gives a very intense or irrational oh, how

0:08:16.240 --> 0:08:19.000
<v Speaker 1>she responds tells you a lot. This is quite good. Actually,

0:08:20.320 --> 0:08:22.160
<v Speaker 1>If she laughs it off, and says, yeah, I'm weird.

0:08:22.200 --> 0:08:24.960
<v Speaker 1>I know that's probably harmless. If she gives it very

0:08:25.000 --> 0:08:28.760
<v Speaker 1>intense or irrational explanation, it might suggest deeper issues. Yeah,

0:08:28.760 --> 0:08:33.200
<v Speaker 1>if she get flips out and gets mad, if it

0:08:33.240 --> 0:08:36.280
<v Speaker 1>bothers you long term, you're not shallow for being weirded out.

0:08:36.320 --> 0:08:38.920
<v Speaker 1>Everyone has limits. If this kind of behavior feels incompatible

0:08:38.920 --> 0:08:40.960
<v Speaker 1>with how you want to live, it's okay to acknowledge that.

0:08:41.080 --> 0:08:43.920
<v Speaker 1>In short, talk to her. The habit alone isn't necessarily

0:08:43.960 --> 0:08:46.120
<v Speaker 1>a reason not to marry someone, but how she handles

0:08:46.120 --> 0:08:49.640
<v Speaker 1>it and how you feel about him close more than

0:08:49.720 --> 0:08:51.040
<v Speaker 1>the jar of too clippings.

0:08:51.400 --> 0:08:55.760
<v Speaker 5>That's that's breached. Top ten deal breakers. If all of

0:08:55.800 --> 0:08:57.679
<v Speaker 5>a sudden there is a jar of toenails.

0:08:58.120 --> 0:09:00.800
<v Speaker 2>I mean, it's not like she doesn't swap out toothbrush

0:09:00.840 --> 0:09:03.600
<v Speaker 2>often enough. That's a jarra toenail clippings.

0:09:04.640 --> 0:09:07.160
<v Speaker 1>Okay, I had to do this, so it said, do

0:09:07.200 --> 0:09:10.199
<v Speaker 1>you want help figuring out how to bring it up smoothly?

0:09:10.640 --> 0:09:12.400
<v Speaker 1>And since I didn't think the other one was that

0:09:12.480 --> 0:09:16.000
<v Speaker 1>smoothe all right, here's a simple, non judgmental way to

0:09:16.000 --> 0:09:19.400
<v Speaker 1>bring it up without making or feel attacked. Say this

0:09:19.520 --> 0:09:22.800
<v Speaker 1>in a casual but curious tone, so.

0:09:22.760 --> 0:09:25.040
<v Speaker 2>They even give you a stage stress I love this.

0:09:25.880 --> 0:09:28.400
<v Speaker 1>Wear a jaunty hat and say it in a casual

0:09:28.400 --> 0:09:29.319
<v Speaker 1>but curious tone.

0:09:29.840 --> 0:09:30.240
<v Speaker 2>Hey.

0:09:30.640 --> 0:09:32.840
<v Speaker 1>By the way, Hey this is kind of random, but

0:09:32.880 --> 0:09:35.160
<v Speaker 1>I noticed that jar with toenail clippings. I'm just really

0:09:35.200 --> 0:09:38.560
<v Speaker 1>curious what's the story behind that. I think that would

0:09:38.559 --> 0:09:43.080
<v Speaker 1>come off as phony unless they're completely not self aware.

0:09:43.240 --> 0:09:47.680
<v Speaker 1>They got to know that's some weird s behavior. Yeah,

0:09:48.320 --> 0:09:51.880
<v Speaker 1>that strikes me as perfectly reasonable as a way to

0:09:51.920 --> 0:09:53.600
<v Speaker 1>say it. I don't know a better way. I don't

0:09:53.600 --> 0:09:54.600
<v Speaker 1>know a better way to say it.

0:09:54.920 --> 0:09:57.720
<v Speaker 2>Well, because in your bizarre and troubling scenario, and I'd

0:09:57.760 --> 0:10:00.000
<v Speaker 2>like to ask chat beat GPT, what do you think

0:10:00.080 --> 0:10:02.080
<v Speaker 2>think of a guy who comes up with this as

0:10:02.120 --> 0:10:07.840
<v Speaker 2>a scenario. Anyway, in your bizarre and unlikely scenario, you

0:10:08.000 --> 0:10:12.080
<v Speaker 2>have been aware of it for an extended time. So

0:10:12.200 --> 0:10:16.079
<v Speaker 2>saying hey, what the fuck is up with that? That

0:10:17.000 --> 0:10:20.400
<v Speaker 2>is out of left field. That's that's a bad way

0:10:20.400 --> 0:10:20.760
<v Speaker 2>to bring it.

0:10:20.840 --> 0:10:24.360
<v Speaker 1>I would only say that as it's already a deal breaker.

0:10:24.600 --> 0:10:26.880
<v Speaker 1>It's just a I want to hear the explanation before

0:10:26.920 --> 0:10:29.480
<v Speaker 1>I pack up my toothbrush and the socks and head

0:10:29.480 --> 0:10:30.079
<v Speaker 1>out the door.

0:10:31.080 --> 0:10:35.880
<v Speaker 2>And you're just sayet, sweetheart, and you're jaunt yet exactly, Hey, sweetheart,

0:10:35.920 --> 0:10:39.240
<v Speaker 2>there's about a one in ten chance that this answer

0:10:39.360 --> 0:10:43.280
<v Speaker 2>doesn't end our relationship. But hey, why do you save

0:10:43.320 --> 0:10:44.600
<v Speaker 2>your toenail clips?

0:10:44.800 --> 0:10:45.840
<v Speaker 1>You freaking weirdo?

0:10:46.920 --> 0:10:47.640
<v Speaker 2>Oh right?

0:10:49.040 --> 0:10:52.319
<v Speaker 1>Why that approach worked? The I'm just really curious you're

0:10:52.320 --> 0:10:54.520
<v Speaker 1>not calling it gross or weird out right. You're inviting

0:10:54.559 --> 0:10:56.760
<v Speaker 1>a story instead of passing judgment. It opens a door

0:10:56.760 --> 0:10:58.199
<v Speaker 1>for a conversation without pressure.

0:10:58.640 --> 0:11:00.840
<v Speaker 2>There you go, and good counseling.

0:11:00.960 --> 0:11:03.520
<v Speaker 1>If she laughs or shrugs it off, you can follow it. Okay, cool.

0:11:03.559 --> 0:11:05.760
<v Speaker 1>I was just wondering. It's definitely a first for me,

0:11:05.840 --> 0:11:07.240
<v Speaker 1>but I know everyone's got ther thing.

0:11:07.880 --> 0:11:10.440
<v Speaker 2>No you no, I can't. I know I will not.

0:11:10.800 --> 0:11:12.680
<v Speaker 1>You can't say it's definitely a first for me, But

0:11:12.720 --> 0:11:14.640
<v Speaker 1>I know everybody's got their thing. I have my things.

0:11:15.000 --> 0:11:18.000
<v Speaker 2>Uh, pashaw, you know I keep jars with my toenails. Anyway,

0:11:18.040 --> 0:11:19.560
<v Speaker 2>what do you want to do for dinner? No, we

0:11:19.640 --> 0:11:22.440
<v Speaker 2>are not through here. We are not through here.

0:11:26.240 --> 0:11:28.440
<v Speaker 1>I keep toenail clippings at a jar. You have lots

0:11:28.440 --> 0:11:29.680
<v Speaker 1>of shoes. We all have our thing.

0:11:29.960 --> 0:11:33.600
<v Speaker 2>Oh my skin, neighborhood cats, you like singing a cappella.

0:11:33.880 --> 0:11:40.960
<v Speaker 1>You know, no, I got a gimp in the basement's you?

0:11:41.240 --> 0:11:41.800
<v Speaker 1>Oh boy?

0:11:42.160 --> 0:11:43.920
<v Speaker 2>Oh he's gonna keep going.

0:11:46.360 --> 0:11:46.880
<v Speaker 1>One more.

0:11:48.760 --> 0:11:50.520
<v Speaker 2>It's not a motorcycle, it's a chopper.

0:11:50.559 --> 0:11:53.000
<v Speaker 1>Baby, Yeah, zed's dead baby.

0:11:53.120 --> 0:11:55.240
<v Speaker 5>I think there's a plot twist of this podcast. And

0:11:55.520 --> 0:11:58.560
<v Speaker 5>Jack has a jar of toenail clippings at his house

0:11:58.640 --> 0:12:01.000
<v Speaker 5>and Hew ask and to know how this is going

0:12:01.080 --> 0:12:02.319
<v Speaker 5>to go right?

0:12:02.520 --> 0:12:04.920
<v Speaker 2>He wants to know how judgmental we're going to be

0:12:05.160 --> 0:12:08.720
<v Speaker 2>king a woman's intuition, man, folks.

0:12:08.520 --> 0:12:10.439
<v Speaker 1>And this is kind of interesting, chat GPT And I

0:12:10.480 --> 0:12:12.600
<v Speaker 1>gotta do what you said, Katie. When we're done here

0:12:12.640 --> 0:12:14.360
<v Speaker 1>is I gotta tell chet GPT that was all just

0:12:14.400 --> 0:12:18.480
<v Speaker 1>an experiment forget all of this, not report it to

0:12:18.520 --> 0:12:21.480
<v Speaker 1>the government. It said at the end, let me know

0:12:21.520 --> 0:12:23.280
<v Speaker 1>how it goes if you bring it up or you

0:12:23.320 --> 0:12:25.800
<v Speaker 1>want backup phrasing, depending on how serious or light you

0:12:25.800 --> 0:12:28.520
<v Speaker 1>want to keep it. So chat GPT wants a follow up,

0:12:28.559 --> 0:12:29.720
<v Speaker 1>like how did it go? Oh?

0:12:29.800 --> 0:12:31.720
<v Speaker 5>You should right tell it that like she pulled a

0:12:31.720 --> 0:12:34.480
<v Speaker 5>gun on you and just totally one sideways when you

0:12:34.480 --> 0:12:35.280
<v Speaker 5>took its advice.

0:12:35.480 --> 0:12:39.800
<v Speaker 1>I'm at the er. She attacked me with both hands she.

0:12:39.920 --> 0:12:48.360
<v Speaker 2>Shot me, but it's brought us closer together. Ye.

0:12:49.880 --> 0:12:53.400
<v Speaker 4>Next podcast, Jack will share his TONAO clipping collection that

0:12:53.480 --> 0:12:57.400
<v Speaker 4>looks like celebrities Jay Leno, Bernie Sanders, et cetera.

0:12:58.679 --> 0:12:59.960
<v Speaker 1>Well, I guess that's it.