WEBVTT - Ed Oliver Moving Up the Draft Board & Schedule Release Speculation  | Bucs Insider Live

0:00:12.680 --> 0:00:14.960
<v Speaker 1>Welcome in to Buccaneers Inside a live presented by Miller

0:00:15.000 --> 0:00:17.040
<v Speaker 1>like Casey Phillips and Scott Smith here, and this is

0:00:17.079 --> 0:00:19.840
<v Speaker 1>always where we take your questions. And we know draft

0:00:20.000 --> 0:00:22.200
<v Speaker 1>one week out. I bet they don't have any questions.

0:00:22.280 --> 0:00:24.120
<v Speaker 1>I bet they have nothing to ask us. Yeah, I know, right.

0:00:24.440 --> 0:00:25.960
<v Speaker 1>And it's been great because we now have guys out

0:00:26.000 --> 0:00:28.400
<v Speaker 1>on the field actually getting to do Phase two. Just

0:00:28.480 --> 0:00:30.520
<v Speaker 1>hurt an airhorn right now. They're literally out on the

0:00:30.520 --> 0:00:32.839
<v Speaker 1>field right now. Um, so we've got a little bit

0:00:32.880 --> 0:00:34.960
<v Speaker 1>of clarity on some stuff. And also, I mean it's

0:00:34.960 --> 0:00:37.600
<v Speaker 1>still not really football. They're they're doing sort of the

0:00:37.600 --> 0:00:40.000
<v Speaker 1>individual drills. There's no contact, but at least the coaches

0:00:40.040 --> 0:00:42.160
<v Speaker 1>are getting to be out there with them, which is cool.

0:00:42.200 --> 0:00:44.520
<v Speaker 1>And we also have a little bit of breaking probably

0:00:44.520 --> 0:00:46.680
<v Speaker 1>saw me sneaking and peeked down on my phone. We

0:00:46.760 --> 0:00:50.080
<v Speaker 1>actually have right now breaking news. Um. We don't know

0:00:50.120 --> 0:00:52.840
<v Speaker 1>the full schedule until later tonight, but we've been informed

0:00:53.159 --> 0:00:55.200
<v Speaker 1>that the game we're gonna play against the Carolina Panthers

0:00:55.200 --> 0:00:57.880
<v Speaker 1>in London is going to be at the Tottenham Hotspur

0:00:58.240 --> 0:01:02.400
<v Speaker 1>Stadium on October thirteenth. That's week six, and it's the

0:01:02.480 --> 0:01:06.920
<v Speaker 1>kickoff our local time. Will that's so awesome. That's got

0:01:06.920 --> 0:01:08.600
<v Speaker 1>to be the earliest game the Buccaneers have ever played,

0:01:08.600 --> 0:01:12.080
<v Speaker 1>and I'm sure, So what does that kind of say

0:01:12.120 --> 0:01:13.280
<v Speaker 1>to you? What do you learn from that about the

0:01:13.280 --> 0:01:15.120
<v Speaker 1>schedule and what what could that mean for the team overall?

0:01:15.160 --> 0:01:16.840
<v Speaker 1>Of whin that is in the London game, Well, we

0:01:17.080 --> 0:01:18.040
<v Speaker 1>kind of knew it was going to be and it's

0:01:18.080 --> 0:01:19.720
<v Speaker 1>usually in the week like six to eight range, so

0:01:19.760 --> 0:01:24.120
<v Speaker 1>that's not surprising, um it. It probably also means that

0:01:24.160 --> 0:01:26.080
<v Speaker 1>our bye week will be week seven, because you usually

0:01:26.080 --> 0:01:28.400
<v Speaker 1>get your bye week the week after you play in London.

0:01:28.840 --> 0:01:31.320
<v Speaker 1>It's just a cool experience. We've been to London twice

0:01:31.400 --> 0:01:33.400
<v Speaker 1>and it's been fun both times. But this is there's

0:01:33.400 --> 0:01:34.920
<v Speaker 1>a new wrinkle here and that this is a brand

0:01:34.959 --> 0:01:37.840
<v Speaker 1>new stadium. There is gonna be one more game on

0:01:37.880 --> 0:01:40.200
<v Speaker 1>the whole International series before ours, so we'll be the

0:01:40.240 --> 0:01:43.319
<v Speaker 1>second game ever in that stadium. It's brand new. It

0:01:43.400 --> 0:01:46.720
<v Speaker 1>was built with the NFL in mind. Actually, it's obviously

0:01:46.760 --> 0:01:48.720
<v Speaker 1>it's main purposes to be the home team of the

0:01:48.720 --> 0:01:51.120
<v Speaker 1>soccer club of the same name, but they it's a

0:01:51.200 --> 0:01:55.480
<v Speaker 1>it's a multi purpose stadium built one of the purposes. Specifically,

0:01:55.480 --> 0:01:58.360
<v Speaker 1>it was that was I said specifically while there, I

0:01:58.400 --> 0:02:02.080
<v Speaker 1>specifically said that word well as um it was the

0:02:02.160 --> 0:02:04.880
<v Speaker 1>NFL because they want to keep attracting more and more

0:02:05.000 --> 0:02:07.480
<v Speaker 1>NFL games over there. So, for instance, they have their

0:02:07.560 --> 0:02:11.680
<v Speaker 1>usual soccer pitch, but it splits and retracts, and underneath

0:02:11.720 --> 0:02:13.840
<v Speaker 1>it there's a synthetic turf for NFL teams to play on.

0:02:14.000 --> 0:02:16.239
<v Speaker 1>That's really I'm sure there's some other features as well

0:02:16.320 --> 0:02:18.960
<v Speaker 1>that are specific to the NFL, but it's just a

0:02:19.000 --> 0:02:21.880
<v Speaker 1>sign of how much that international series is progressing. I mean,

0:02:21.880 --> 0:02:23.799
<v Speaker 1>there's five games in it this year. Every year it

0:02:23.840 --> 0:02:25.640
<v Speaker 1>seems like there's more. I think there were five scheduled

0:02:25.680 --> 0:02:27.760
<v Speaker 1>last year as well, But when this whole thing started

0:02:27.760 --> 0:02:30.200
<v Speaker 1>it was one one game year. Right, it's five, four

0:02:30.200 --> 0:02:32.720
<v Speaker 1>in London and one in Mexico City, so it's it's

0:02:32.720 --> 0:02:34.919
<v Speaker 1>becoming a bigger and bigger deal. But um, it should

0:02:34.919 --> 0:02:36.640
<v Speaker 1>be fun to play at that new stadium. That's gonna

0:02:36.639 --> 0:02:38.880
<v Speaker 1>be awesome. I can't wait. Um So yeah, stay tuned

0:02:38.919 --> 0:02:42.480
<v Speaker 1>for the full schedule at least later tonight at eight o'clock. Um, alry,

0:02:42.480 --> 0:02:44.480
<v Speaker 1>we've got question starting rolling. We've got people from watching

0:02:44.520 --> 0:02:46.560
<v Speaker 1>all over the place. I saw a Czech Republic and

0:02:46.880 --> 0:02:49.040
<v Speaker 1>a bunch of really unique places that we Uh. It

0:02:49.080 --> 0:02:51.200
<v Speaker 1>seems like new new people chiming in here. Um and

0:02:51.480 --> 0:02:53.680
<v Speaker 1>I think his name is raw. I hope I got

0:02:53.720 --> 0:02:57.000
<v Speaker 1>that right from the Bahamas. Um says, is it true

0:02:57.040 --> 0:02:59.519
<v Speaker 1>that we don't have much money left on the cap

0:02:59.600 --> 0:03:04.360
<v Speaker 1>to sign our draft picks? Uh? Just as we said

0:03:04.360 --> 0:03:06.320
<v Speaker 1>heading into free agency when it looked like it wasn't

0:03:06.360 --> 0:03:08.760
<v Speaker 1>it wouldn't even be possible for the Buccaneers to sign anybody.

0:03:09.440 --> 0:03:11.600
<v Speaker 1>It's not that hard to create the cap space that

0:03:11.639 --> 0:03:14.120
<v Speaker 1>you need. That no team has ever like passed on

0:03:14.200 --> 0:03:16.200
<v Speaker 1>draft picks because they didn't have the cap space for it.

0:03:16.560 --> 0:03:19.200
<v Speaker 1>Don't worry about that. We will have the cap space

0:03:19.440 --> 0:03:22.000
<v Speaker 1>to sign all our draft picks. Whatever the number you're

0:03:22.000 --> 0:03:24.480
<v Speaker 1>seeing on spot track or whatever website you go to

0:03:24.600 --> 0:03:26.680
<v Speaker 1>right now that's making concerned, don't worry about it. It'll

0:03:26.720 --> 0:03:29.120
<v Speaker 1>be fine. Yes, Um okay. And another question, we've been

0:03:29.120 --> 0:03:30.919
<v Speaker 1>getting a lot and now we at least have heard

0:03:31.000 --> 0:03:34.040
<v Speaker 1>a little bit from Jason light On. Tito said, what's

0:03:34.040 --> 0:03:37.240
<v Speaker 1>going on with Kendall beck with uh, and I we've

0:03:37.280 --> 0:03:38.680
<v Speaker 1>heard from Jason. I don't know that we have a

0:03:38.680 --> 0:03:42.520
<v Speaker 1>lot more than we've had before, yeah, three times now.

0:03:42.560 --> 0:03:45.160
<v Speaker 1>And Jason actually addressed this fact. He said, I know

0:03:45.240 --> 0:03:47.320
<v Speaker 1>I spoke to you at the Combine about this, and

0:03:47.400 --> 0:03:49.800
<v Speaker 1>I spoke to you at the NFL Owners meetings about

0:03:49.800 --> 0:03:52.560
<v Speaker 1>this that at both times I said we'd have more

0:03:52.560 --> 0:03:56.080
<v Speaker 1>information in a specific amount of time, and in this

0:03:56.120 --> 0:03:58.960
<v Speaker 1>case it was mid April, and he said, we were

0:03:59.040 --> 0:04:01.400
<v Speaker 1>not there yet. What we do know is that Kindle

0:04:01.400 --> 0:04:03.080
<v Speaker 1>has not been clear to practice. The team has moved

0:04:03.080 --> 0:04:05.280
<v Speaker 1>into phase two of the off season, where you can

0:04:05.400 --> 0:04:08.160
<v Speaker 1>have assistant coaches on the field, you can do position drills,

0:04:08.400 --> 0:04:10.600
<v Speaker 1>you can't do offense versus defense, but you can do more.

0:04:10.840 --> 0:04:13.120
<v Speaker 1>And Kindle's not out there. He hasn't been cleared, so

0:04:13.160 --> 0:04:16.200
<v Speaker 1>that's obviously not a positive step forward or a positive

0:04:16.200 --> 0:04:19.080
<v Speaker 1>step forward that hasn't been taken yet. But he also said,

0:04:19.080 --> 0:04:21.159
<v Speaker 1>we still are a little bit away from having our

0:04:21.480 --> 0:04:25.159
<v Speaker 1>you know, our true knowledge of what's going to happen.

0:04:25.680 --> 0:04:28.000
<v Speaker 1>So we still don't have an exact answer for you yet.

0:04:28.000 --> 0:04:30.200
<v Speaker 1>We The only part of that that's new is that

0:04:30.360 --> 0:04:32.120
<v Speaker 1>we know he's not been clear to practice, and he

0:04:32.200 --> 0:04:34.040
<v Speaker 1>was practicing in the middle of the last season, so

0:04:34.480 --> 0:04:37.479
<v Speaker 1>that's a little confusing. Yeah, that's true. Uh. Something else

0:04:37.480 --> 0:04:39.240
<v Speaker 1>that Jason was asked about him that we are also

0:04:39.279 --> 0:04:42.280
<v Speaker 1>being asked about is Gerald McCoy and the fact that

0:04:42.320 --> 0:04:43.720
<v Speaker 1>he's not at the workouts, And it's always a good

0:04:43.720 --> 0:04:47.239
<v Speaker 1>time to remind everybody that these are voluntary workouts, and um,

0:04:47.320 --> 0:04:49.960
<v Speaker 1>you know there's I think on every team, I would

0:04:49.960 --> 0:04:52.159
<v Speaker 1>be safe to say that there's usually players that choose

0:04:52.160 --> 0:04:54.000
<v Speaker 1>to work out other places and aren't here. But what

0:04:54.040 --> 0:04:56.280
<v Speaker 1>did Jason say when asked about Gerald McCoy. Well, I mean,

0:04:56.839 --> 0:05:00.800
<v Speaker 1>you know, it's kind of all the same thing. Uh,

0:05:01.120 --> 0:05:04.000
<v Speaker 1>Like you said, it's voluntary, and Jerald McCoy is on

0:05:04.000 --> 0:05:06.800
<v Speaker 1>the team right now. Um, you know, he gets asked

0:05:06.839 --> 0:05:09.280
<v Speaker 1>constantly are you trying to trade him? Or is he

0:05:09.800 --> 0:05:12.320
<v Speaker 1>staying away? And basically there's not a lot more to

0:05:12.320 --> 0:05:15.560
<v Speaker 1>say about it than Jerom mcois on the roster and

0:05:15.640 --> 0:05:17.960
<v Speaker 1>he's not practicing here, but he doesn't have to be right. Yeah,

0:05:18.080 --> 0:05:21.320
<v Speaker 1>that's very true. Uh TC said, I've seen a lot

0:05:21.360 --> 0:05:23.600
<v Speaker 1>of mock draft showing that we might trade our fifth

0:05:23.640 --> 0:05:27.120
<v Speaker 1>overall pick back for another second round pick. Do you

0:05:27.120 --> 0:05:29.719
<v Speaker 1>see that as being a well, last year we traded

0:05:29.720 --> 0:05:32.080
<v Speaker 1>from seven to twelve and got two second rounders. Um,

0:05:32.160 --> 0:05:34.200
<v Speaker 1>you have to look at that draft value chart to

0:05:34.240 --> 0:05:36.520
<v Speaker 1>get a good idea of and I don't have an

0:05:36.560 --> 0:05:38.720
<v Speaker 1>in front of me of what exactly you would pay

0:05:38.960 --> 0:05:42.040
<v Speaker 1>or get for different moves. One thing that I found

0:05:42.120 --> 0:05:45.520
<v Speaker 1>interesting in what Jason Light said yesterday, and it matches

0:05:45.600 --> 0:05:48.080
<v Speaker 1>up with what I was believing. Anyways, there is only

0:05:48.080 --> 0:05:50.840
<v Speaker 1>a certain point to which we would trade down. We're

0:05:50.880 --> 0:05:54.320
<v Speaker 1>at five. Jason said, there's five guys he would absolutely

0:05:54.320 --> 0:05:58.720
<v Speaker 1>love to take there, so there's no urgency necessary if

0:05:58.760 --> 0:06:00.360
<v Speaker 1>you could sit there and you're gonna get a guy

0:06:00.360 --> 0:06:03.000
<v Speaker 1>you love. And that's true whether or not Kyler Murray

0:06:03.000 --> 0:06:06.040
<v Speaker 1>goes first. It's probably easier if Kyler Murray goes first,

0:06:06.400 --> 0:06:09.160
<v Speaker 1>because then you're reducing the four guys because he's surely

0:06:09.200 --> 0:06:10.839
<v Speaker 1>not on our list because we're not taking a quarterback

0:06:10.880 --> 0:06:13.640
<v Speaker 1>and five. I think that's pretty obvious. So, um, you know,

0:06:13.680 --> 0:06:16.719
<v Speaker 1>it becomes five guys, four guys instead of five, or

0:06:16.800 --> 0:06:18.440
<v Speaker 1>three guys instead of four that can be taken in

0:06:18.480 --> 0:06:21.080
<v Speaker 1>front of you. Um, I don't know what it is,

0:06:22.920 --> 0:06:25.479
<v Speaker 1>but there's some line where they won't trade back, and

0:06:25.480 --> 0:06:28.039
<v Speaker 1>and that could that that decision will be made when

0:06:28.080 --> 0:06:30.000
<v Speaker 1>we're on the clock at five, because you don't know

0:06:30.120 --> 0:06:32.160
<v Speaker 1>right now which four guys are going. So let's say

0:06:32.800 --> 0:06:35.560
<v Speaker 1>you have Jason said, there's they've drawn a line between

0:06:35.600 --> 0:06:39.600
<v Speaker 1>they're absolutely top tier, great prospects and just the very

0:06:39.680 --> 0:06:42.200
<v Speaker 1>very good ones. There's a there's a specific line there.

0:06:42.440 --> 0:06:44.920
<v Speaker 1>And so if you get to let's pick a number

0:06:44.960 --> 0:06:46.640
<v Speaker 1>and see there's ten of them, a nice round number.

0:06:46.839 --> 0:06:50.240
<v Speaker 1>If you get to pick five and there are five

0:06:50.279 --> 0:06:52.679
<v Speaker 1>of those, let's say that's there's seven of those guys

0:06:52.760 --> 0:06:56.039
<v Speaker 1>left on your list, then you can move back seven spots,

0:06:56.080 --> 0:06:59.400
<v Speaker 1>but no more and be guaranteed you can gamble that much.

0:06:59.720 --> 0:07:02.279
<v Speaker 1>On the wise you're you're not guaranteed of getting that guy.

0:07:02.520 --> 0:07:05.200
<v Speaker 1>You could probably move one more depending upon who you're

0:07:05.200 --> 0:07:07.440
<v Speaker 1>trading with, if you know they're trading up to get

0:07:07.480 --> 0:07:09.039
<v Speaker 1>a quarterbacks and you don't have to worry about that

0:07:09.120 --> 0:07:12.000
<v Speaker 1>pick being rid of your guys. So there is a spot.

0:07:12.240 --> 0:07:15.360
<v Speaker 1>I do believe that we're willing to trade, and absolutely

0:07:15.960 --> 0:07:17.280
<v Speaker 1>you can get a second round pick out of that

0:07:17.320 --> 0:07:21.000
<v Speaker 1>if you're trading two spots down like we did in

0:07:21.240 --> 0:07:26.400
<v Speaker 1>um in two thousand and twelve. We traded down with

0:07:26.480 --> 0:07:29.000
<v Speaker 1>the Jaguars I think in two thousand twelve from five

0:07:29.040 --> 0:07:32.480
<v Speaker 1>to seven, and they took the wide receiver who who

0:07:32.560 --> 0:07:34.960
<v Speaker 1>didn't last, and we took Mark Barron and we only

0:07:35.000 --> 0:07:37.680
<v Speaker 1>got like a high fourth. I found another five to

0:07:37.720 --> 0:07:40.040
<v Speaker 1>seven trade from another pair of teams that they got

0:07:40.040 --> 0:07:41.720
<v Speaker 1>a third round pick for it. So if you're talking

0:07:41.920 --> 0:07:44.400
<v Speaker 1>one or two spots, you're probably only getting like a

0:07:44.440 --> 0:07:46.600
<v Speaker 1>third or fourth round pick. But anything more than that,

0:07:46.600 --> 0:07:48.320
<v Speaker 1>you're almost certainly going to get a second round pick

0:07:48.320 --> 0:07:50.240
<v Speaker 1>out of it. And you saw from seven to twelve

0:07:50.320 --> 0:07:54.320
<v Speaker 1>was worth two second round picks, right, Yeah, that's very true. Um,

0:07:54.320 --> 0:07:57.280
<v Speaker 1>Travis wanted to know do you think Josh Allen or

0:07:57.360 --> 0:07:59.640
<v Speaker 1>Devon White at five? So I don't know if he's

0:07:59.640 --> 0:08:01.760
<v Speaker 1>asking which you'd prefer or what you think is more likely.

0:08:01.920 --> 0:08:03.640
<v Speaker 1>You can answer either way or but I think Devin

0:08:03.680 --> 0:08:06.960
<v Speaker 1>wants more likely because I think Josh Allen will probably

0:08:07.000 --> 0:08:10.040
<v Speaker 1>be gone. But UM, I think I would pick Josh

0:08:10.040 --> 0:08:12.760
<v Speaker 1>Allen out of those two. We've been saying this all along.

0:08:13.520 --> 0:08:15.960
<v Speaker 1>Whatever I answer that question doesn't mean that I wouldn't

0:08:16.000 --> 0:08:19.400
<v Speaker 1>like to have the other one. Unfortunately, can only have one. So, UM,

0:08:19.440 --> 0:08:21.480
<v Speaker 1>I think Josh Allen would be a perfect fit for

0:08:21.600 --> 0:08:24.000
<v Speaker 1>Todd Bowl's three four defense. I know as Jason was

0:08:24.000 --> 0:08:25.880
<v Speaker 1>saying yesterday, you're gonna see four three, you're gonna see

0:08:25.880 --> 0:08:27.720
<v Speaker 1>three four, you're gonna see Nicole. You're gonna see a

0:08:27.720 --> 0:08:29.720
<v Speaker 1>lot of different looks. But let's just call to three

0:08:29.760 --> 0:08:35.280
<v Speaker 1>four and there are as Jason was saying yesterday, running

0:08:35.320 --> 0:08:39.240
<v Speaker 1>that defense and the multiple schemes really opens up the

0:08:39.280 --> 0:08:43.320
<v Speaker 1>amount of prospects. It makes more prospects viable for you

0:08:43.360 --> 0:08:45.120
<v Speaker 1>to draft, which is nice. It also helps some of

0:08:45.120 --> 0:08:46.840
<v Speaker 1>the players that are already on the roster. As Carmen

0:08:46.840 --> 0:08:48.880
<v Speaker 1>wrote about yesterday, Um, you can read that here on

0:08:48.920 --> 0:08:52.320
<v Speaker 1>buccaneers dot com um or we're on Facebook now right, yes,

0:08:52.440 --> 0:08:57.360
<v Speaker 1>well whatever on Buccaneers dot com um. That was going

0:08:57.400 --> 0:09:00.240
<v Speaker 1>a little bit off tangent there. But the point is

0:09:00.320 --> 0:09:02.960
<v Speaker 1>Josh Allen would be a really good fit. Now, another

0:09:03.000 --> 0:09:06.200
<v Speaker 1>guy that maybe you're seeing rise up a lot of

0:09:06.240 --> 0:09:09.320
<v Speaker 1>mock drafts lately is at Oliver. That's funny. That actually

0:09:09.880 --> 0:09:11.760
<v Speaker 1>is the next question. A lot of people were asking

0:09:11.800 --> 0:09:13.160
<v Speaker 1>if you feel like he would be a good fit.

0:09:13.200 --> 0:09:16.920
<v Speaker 1>Here do and I think at Oliver would would be

0:09:16.960 --> 0:09:21.200
<v Speaker 1>a viable pick for the Buccaneers if Josh Allen, Nick Bolsa,

0:09:21.280 --> 0:09:22.960
<v Speaker 1>Quentin Williams is a lot of mock draft show are

0:09:22.960 --> 0:09:25.120
<v Speaker 1>all going right before them, then I think he's a

0:09:25.120 --> 0:09:28.080
<v Speaker 1>good choice there. I think if not, if Ed Oliver

0:09:28.160 --> 0:09:30.640
<v Speaker 1>even goes before us, then that knocks another guy down.

0:09:30.679 --> 0:09:32.640
<v Speaker 1>So either way, him rising up the board can have

0:09:32.679 --> 0:09:35.280
<v Speaker 1>an impact on the Buccaneers. Okay, uh TC wants to

0:09:35.320 --> 0:09:37.360
<v Speaker 1>know who you know. It's important to note that when

0:09:37.400 --> 0:09:39.319
<v Speaker 1>I say rising up the board, I'm talking about the

0:09:39.360 --> 0:09:41.760
<v Speaker 1>consensus the mock draft Roar, it's not I don't think.

0:09:42.120 --> 0:09:43.520
<v Speaker 1>I don't think over the last couple of weeks we're

0:09:43.520 --> 0:09:47.280
<v Speaker 1>gonna like it a bit. Yeah, that's that's a very

0:09:47.280 --> 0:09:50.200
<v Speaker 1>good clarification that we are not up there sneaking draft board.

0:09:50.600 --> 0:09:52.200
<v Speaker 1>Uh TC said, who do you think will win the

0:09:52.200 --> 0:09:57.360
<v Speaker 1>backup QB job? Gabbert or Griffin? I think probably Gabbert. Um,

0:09:57.400 --> 0:09:59.599
<v Speaker 1>I think we'll keep all three of them, though U

0:10:00.000 --> 0:10:04.480
<v Speaker 1>Albert has obviously more game experience because as we always

0:10:04.520 --> 0:10:06.520
<v Speaker 1>say about Ryan, he hasn't had the chance yet to

0:10:06.520 --> 0:10:08.959
<v Speaker 1>throw the ball in a regular season game. Uh but

0:10:09.240 --> 0:10:11.760
<v Speaker 1>he's he has said he likes Ryan Griffin, that he

0:10:11.880 --> 0:10:14.480
<v Speaker 1>being Bruce Arians. So, UM, I don't think it's a gimme,

0:10:14.640 --> 0:10:16.280
<v Speaker 1>But if you're asking me which one I think probably

0:10:16.280 --> 0:10:19.720
<v Speaker 1>Gabbert Justin said, should we consider trading up for the

0:10:19.720 --> 0:10:24.920
<v Speaker 1>guy we really want? Consider? Of course, but um two

0:10:24.960 --> 0:10:27.120
<v Speaker 1>things they're the guy we really want could be several

0:10:27.160 --> 0:10:28.880
<v Speaker 1>of different guys. I mean, we we could have a

0:10:28.960 --> 0:10:31.760
<v Speaker 1>very similar grade on three guys. And if that's the case,

0:10:31.800 --> 0:10:33.040
<v Speaker 1>then I don't think you want to trade up and

0:10:33.040 --> 0:10:36.720
<v Speaker 1>give away valuable draft assets to get one of those

0:10:36.760 --> 0:10:38.360
<v Speaker 1>three when you can get one of them by sitting still.

0:10:38.720 --> 0:10:42.480
<v Speaker 1>Um two, I just don't think with seven a total

0:10:42.480 --> 0:10:45.000
<v Speaker 1>of seven picks and a lot of needs, it makes

0:10:45.000 --> 0:10:46.640
<v Speaker 1>a ton of sense to trade any of that a way.

0:10:46.760 --> 0:10:49.839
<v Speaker 1>I don't. I don't see trade up happening right. Um

0:10:49.880 --> 0:10:51.719
<v Speaker 1>A J is already putting you on the spot. Here,

0:10:51.760 --> 0:10:54.079
<v Speaker 1>what is your prediction on what our regular season record

0:10:54.120 --> 0:10:58.880
<v Speaker 1>will be? Man, I know you always hate this questions. Well, right,

0:10:58.880 --> 0:11:02.960
<v Speaker 1>because you can't. I'm gonna look bad whatever I do here,

0:11:03.000 --> 0:11:05.880
<v Speaker 1>Because you can say like eleven and five, like come on,

0:11:05.960 --> 0:11:08.080
<v Speaker 1>you're being a home er, say nine and seven and

0:11:08.160 --> 0:11:11.120
<v Speaker 1>what you don't believe in this thing, I'll just go

0:11:11.160 --> 0:11:13.160
<v Speaker 1>in nine and seven, I mean, because that's what you

0:11:13.160 --> 0:11:18.160
<v Speaker 1>don't believe in, the exactly appreciate that, Thank you. M

0:11:18.840 --> 0:11:21.480
<v Speaker 1>Richard asked, when is the next Salty Dogs podcast. We've

0:11:21.480 --> 0:11:24.439
<v Speaker 1>been talking about doing one soon, um, because we've got

0:11:24.440 --> 0:11:26.120
<v Speaker 1>some players in the building now, so be cool to

0:11:26.160 --> 0:11:29.880
<v Speaker 1>have one of those guests on. That's a good question,

0:11:30.040 --> 0:11:32.840
<v Speaker 1>and if that person is interested in Salty Dogs, know

0:11:32.960 --> 0:11:35.560
<v Speaker 1>that you can email us questions at Salty Dogs at

0:11:35.559 --> 0:11:38.000
<v Speaker 1>Buccaneers dot NFL dot com. I'm gonna email and ask

0:11:38.040 --> 0:11:41.160
<v Speaker 1>you what do you think of records? Thank you and um.

0:11:41.960 --> 0:11:43.959
<v Speaker 1>In addition, you could suggest so I guess you might

0:11:44.000 --> 0:11:45.959
<v Speaker 1>like us to have on, like of all the new players,

0:11:46.040 --> 0:11:47.560
<v Speaker 1>do you want us to talk to day On? We can?

0:11:47.559 --> 0:11:50.920
<v Speaker 1>And do you talk to Jack Barrett? And I could

0:11:51.000 --> 0:11:52.480
<v Speaker 1>lead us in the direction. We've been talking about doing

0:11:52.520 --> 0:11:54.360
<v Speaker 1>another one soon, so I think it'll be quite soon.

0:11:54.720 --> 0:11:57.440
<v Speaker 1>Chris said, if we trade back, let's say into the teens,

0:11:57.600 --> 0:12:01.320
<v Speaker 1>is there a chance we go cornerback at that position? Absolutely,

0:12:01.440 --> 0:12:04.920
<v Speaker 1>and and that'll but again that's if one of those

0:12:04.960 --> 0:12:07.320
<v Speaker 1>players on their list that I was talking about their

0:12:07.360 --> 0:12:10.280
<v Speaker 1>top tier is a quarterback. If if if there's a

0:12:10.360 --> 0:12:12.880
<v Speaker 1>quarnerback on that list, then yes, But I don't think

0:12:13.440 --> 0:12:17.080
<v Speaker 1>they trade back past the point of where that list ends.

0:12:17.160 --> 0:12:19.240
<v Speaker 1>And then they go all the ends of linebackers going

0:12:19.280 --> 0:12:20.800
<v Speaker 1>that are gone. We took the corner. I don't think

0:12:20.840 --> 0:12:24.000
<v Speaker 1>that's the scenario that's gonna unfold. If a cornerback is

0:12:24.000 --> 0:12:25.560
<v Speaker 1>good enough to be on that list of what they

0:12:25.559 --> 0:12:28.679
<v Speaker 1>think are the top great player tiers, then then yes.

0:12:28.720 --> 0:12:31.839
<v Speaker 1>Second okay, Gerald said, is Ed Oliver too small to

0:12:31.880 --> 0:12:35.000
<v Speaker 1>play three for defensive end? Light said, Bowls likes his

0:12:35.080 --> 0:12:39.600
<v Speaker 1>d NS a certain size well, and the size is

0:12:39.679 --> 0:12:44.480
<v Speaker 1>definitely the question mark about Oliver um. But I don't

0:12:45.400 --> 0:12:48.000
<v Speaker 1>there's been some players around that size that have that

0:12:48.120 --> 0:12:50.240
<v Speaker 1>have been able to play at that size. I don't

0:12:50.240 --> 0:12:51.800
<v Speaker 1>think Aaron donald is the biggest guy in the world,

0:12:52.000 --> 0:12:55.280
<v Speaker 1>you know, and he's obviously the most dominant. He's definitely shorter.

0:12:55.360 --> 0:12:58.920
<v Speaker 1>He's I think he's six to I think he's yeah,

0:12:58.920 --> 0:13:01.600
<v Speaker 1>I mean I was better and Donaldson there wait a yeah,

0:13:01.600 --> 0:13:03.400
<v Speaker 1>he's short of I think he's also bulked up a

0:13:03.440 --> 0:13:06.040
<v Speaker 1>lot since he came in to the league. You know.

0:13:06.760 --> 0:13:08.400
<v Speaker 1>Here's what I'd say about that, and it was I

0:13:08.440 --> 0:13:10.720
<v Speaker 1>don't think it was a question about Oliver Our specifically.

0:13:10.760 --> 0:13:14.040
<v Speaker 1>But um Jason was asked yesterday about a player and

0:13:14.679 --> 0:13:17.520
<v Speaker 1>would he fit in this and was the size right,

0:13:17.600 --> 0:13:19.960
<v Speaker 1>And he said, Todd Bowles knows how to take a

0:13:20.000 --> 0:13:22.920
<v Speaker 1>guy and not use him in a way that if

0:13:23.000 --> 0:13:25.760
<v Speaker 1>his size makes him not perfect for a certain role,

0:13:25.880 --> 0:13:28.520
<v Speaker 1>then he'll devise a role for him that will work.

0:13:28.800 --> 0:13:32.240
<v Speaker 1>So I think if he's talented enough, um, his his

0:13:32.280 --> 0:13:35.640
<v Speaker 1>size won't be an issue. Okay, Morton said, um, I've

0:13:35.679 --> 0:13:38.320
<v Speaker 1>seen some people predicting that we might trade with the

0:13:38.360 --> 0:13:40.839
<v Speaker 1>Packers to go back in the first round. Do you

0:13:40.880 --> 0:13:42.800
<v Speaker 1>see that as a possibility? Who are the Packers training

0:13:42.840 --> 0:13:45.200
<v Speaker 1>up four? Right? That's the thing is like, it's I

0:13:45.200 --> 0:13:47.160
<v Speaker 1>think the questions are always funny of the idea of

0:13:47.160 --> 0:13:48.880
<v Speaker 1>just oh yeah, we'll trade back with them, but they

0:13:48.880 --> 0:13:51.000
<v Speaker 1>have to want to trade up. And I mean, I

0:13:51.000 --> 0:13:53.400
<v Speaker 1>guess some people were saying, I've seen predictions that they

0:13:53.480 --> 0:13:57.800
<v Speaker 1>might take a QB to replace Rogers eventually. Eventually he

0:13:57.880 --> 0:14:01.440
<v Speaker 1>just signed like a year worked really well when he

0:14:01.480 --> 0:14:03.480
<v Speaker 1>sat behind far for a while, so maybe they're like,

0:14:03.600 --> 0:14:05.520
<v Speaker 1>let's do that again. Yeah, but they took her and

0:14:05.600 --> 0:14:08.400
<v Speaker 1>Rodgers at around the little different trade up to take

0:14:08.480 --> 0:14:12.559
<v Speaker 1>him a little In fact, that was historically, um an

0:14:12.559 --> 0:14:15.199
<v Speaker 1>amazing draft in that everybody passed on him all that, right,

0:14:15.280 --> 0:14:18.080
<v Speaker 1>and Alex Smith I think went first in that draft.

0:14:18.559 --> 0:14:22.480
<v Speaker 1>Um no, I mean yeah, you tell me who it

0:14:22.480 --> 0:14:24.240
<v Speaker 1>is the Packers are trading up for, because twelve is

0:14:24.280 --> 0:14:26.120
<v Speaker 1>a spot that I could see happening five to twelve

0:14:26.120 --> 0:14:28.480
<v Speaker 1>and you probably still learned that range of players on

0:14:28.520 --> 0:14:31.240
<v Speaker 1>that top tier list. And if you trade from five

0:14:31.280 --> 0:14:34.160
<v Speaker 1>to twelve, like I did a mock draft this for

0:14:34.320 --> 0:14:36.680
<v Speaker 1>this past at the on Monday casing, Carmen and I

0:14:36.680 --> 0:14:39.200
<v Speaker 1>did our last mock draft and I had the Bucks

0:14:39.200 --> 0:14:41.880
<v Speaker 1>pick because we alternate picks, and I had us trade

0:14:41.920 --> 0:14:44.640
<v Speaker 1>back with Miami at thirteen because Miami was trading up

0:14:44.640 --> 0:14:47.600
<v Speaker 1>to get a quarterback. Um. And then as it turned out,

0:14:47.600 --> 0:14:49.560
<v Speaker 1>I eventually traded back up to nine. But in any case,

0:14:49.800 --> 0:14:52.040
<v Speaker 1>the traft chart worked out. I got a second and

0:14:52.080 --> 0:14:54.280
<v Speaker 1>a third, had to had to give back a fifth.

0:14:54.960 --> 0:14:57.040
<v Speaker 1>If you move from from five to twelve, you're probably

0:14:57.040 --> 0:14:59.080
<v Speaker 1>getting something like a second and a third or two seconds.

0:14:59.080 --> 0:15:03.320
<v Speaker 1>I don't know what the Packers have up so um yeah,

0:15:03.400 --> 0:15:05.000
<v Speaker 1>I mean that could work. I just don't see the

0:15:05.040 --> 0:15:07.080
<v Speaker 1>motivation on the other end. Okay, And we'll close with

0:15:07.120 --> 0:15:09.520
<v Speaker 1>this one uh TC. As we know, JPP will start

0:15:09.560 --> 0:15:11.680
<v Speaker 1>his defensive end either left or right, who do you

0:15:11.720 --> 0:15:14.280
<v Speaker 1>think will start opposite of him? Probably right now, you'd

0:15:14.280 --> 0:15:16.400
<v Speaker 1>say Carl Nassa. And I think there's a belief that

0:15:16.680 --> 0:15:18.680
<v Speaker 1>Karl Nassi is one of those guys that could drop

0:15:18.680 --> 0:15:21.280
<v Speaker 1>back and coverage a little bit. Now. Shack Barrett when

0:15:21.280 --> 0:15:23.000
<v Speaker 1>he when he came here said one of the reasons

0:15:23.000 --> 0:15:25.760
<v Speaker 1>he came here was he was told up front, He's like,

0:15:25.840 --> 0:15:27.560
<v Speaker 1>this is who we got, and we're not guaranteeing you

0:15:27.600 --> 0:15:29.240
<v Speaker 1>a start, but you're gonna get an You're getting an

0:15:29.240 --> 0:15:31.320
<v Speaker 1>opportunity to compete, to be a starter. He wants to start,

0:15:31.560 --> 0:15:33.440
<v Speaker 1>or at least play a lot more. And as we've

0:15:33.440 --> 0:15:35.720
<v Speaker 1>said on some of these questions, sometimes it's not all

0:15:35.800 --> 0:15:38.160
<v Speaker 1>important who's listed as a starter, right, if you're getting

0:15:38.800 --> 0:15:40.520
<v Speaker 1>the snaps, doesn't really matter that you're not listed as

0:15:40.560 --> 0:15:44.680
<v Speaker 1>a starter. So, but that aside um, i'd say Carl now,

0:15:44.720 --> 0:15:46.360
<v Speaker 1>but check there is certainly gonna get a chance to

0:15:46.400 --> 0:15:48.280
<v Speaker 1>compete for it. Okay, well, it's gonna do it for us.

0:15:48.280 --> 0:15:50.520
<v Speaker 1>In this edition of Buccaneers Inside of Live, presented by

0:15:50.520 --> 0:15:52.640
<v Speaker 1>Miller Lte And we have one more before the draft.

0:15:52.720 --> 0:15:54.680
<v Speaker 1>To make sure you're back here next week with all

0:15:54.720 --> 0:15:56.960
<v Speaker 1>those final draft questions and hopefully we'll also see you

0:15:57.200 --> 0:15:59.400
<v Speaker 1>at the Draft party at the Stadium next week as well.

0:15:59.400 --> 0:16:00.280
<v Speaker 1>We'll see you then. Two