WEBVTT - Developing Tech to Increase COVID-19 Testing

0:00:00.720 --> 0:00:03.720
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg Business Week. I'm Carol Masser and I'm

0:00:03.800 --> 0:00:06.320
<v Speaker 1>Jason Kelly. We're right here every day bringing you the

0:00:06.400 --> 0:00:11.160
<v Speaker 1>latest news from the world's of business and finance, plus technology, politics, economics,

0:00:11.240 --> 0:00:14.280
<v Speaker 1>all harnessing the power of Business Week reporters and editors.

0:00:14.440 --> 0:00:16.439
<v Speaker 1>And of course Carol that's part of a team of

0:00:16.520 --> 0:00:20.439
<v Speaker 1>twenty seven hundred journalists and analysts more than a hundred

0:00:20.480 --> 0:00:23.280
<v Speaker 1>and twenty countries and Jason. You can download Bloomberg Business

0:00:23.280 --> 0:00:26.239
<v Speaker 1>Week on iTunes, SoundCloud, bl Bloomberg dot com. You can

0:00:26.280 --> 0:00:28.600
<v Speaker 1>also listen to our radio show at two pm Eastern

0:00:28.680 --> 0:00:31.560
<v Speaker 1>on Bloomberg Radio every weekday, or watch us on YouTube

0:00:31.600 --> 0:00:36.320
<v Speaker 1>by searching Bloomberg Global News. So much to get to,

0:00:36.479 --> 0:00:39.640
<v Speaker 1>but let's understand what's going on in the trade today,

0:00:39.760 --> 0:00:42.239
<v Speaker 1>what we have to look forward to this week, Scarlett,

0:00:42.320 --> 0:00:44.440
<v Speaker 1>we are going to set the business week agenda. We've

0:00:44.479 --> 0:00:47.000
<v Speaker 1>got Gina Martin Adams with this, chief equity strategist for

0:00:47.000 --> 0:00:49.640
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Intelligence. She joins us from New Jersey. As to

0:00:49.680 --> 0:00:53.840
<v Speaker 1>Stave Wilson, stocks editor for Bloomberg. He's also in the

0:00:53.880 --> 0:00:58.240
<v Speaker 1>Garden States. So Dave quickly set the stage for us. Uh,

0:00:58.240 --> 0:01:01.840
<v Speaker 1>what's underneath this trade. Well, you look at the eleven

0:01:01.880 --> 0:01:04.559
<v Speaker 1>main industry groups in the SMP five hundred and it

0:01:04.560 --> 0:01:09.319
<v Speaker 1>it looks rather familiar technology stocks of leading the way.

0:01:09.440 --> 0:01:12.440
<v Speaker 1>Uh you know, you look at the consumer discretionary category,

0:01:12.440 --> 0:01:16.080
<v Speaker 1>which is basically Amazon dot Com and it's up. You know,

0:01:16.280 --> 0:01:20.200
<v Speaker 1>so kind of a familiar story. Communications services, which is

0:01:20.560 --> 0:01:24.360
<v Speaker 1>you know, Facebook and U Alphabet, the owner of Google

0:01:24.959 --> 0:01:29.000
<v Speaker 1>also higher and you know it's really their week, those

0:01:29.080 --> 0:01:32.360
<v Speaker 1>kinds of companies because you know, you you talk about

0:01:32.440 --> 0:01:36.360
<v Speaker 1>the four trillion dollar companies in the SMP five hundred

0:01:36.400 --> 0:01:40.280
<v Speaker 1>based on market value, you have three of them, Uh,

0:01:40.319 --> 0:01:44.200
<v Speaker 1>you know, reporting on the same day coming up on Thursday.

0:01:44.200 --> 0:01:48.640
<v Speaker 1>I'm calling it a triple a afternoon because you get Alphabet,

0:01:49.000 --> 0:01:51.800
<v Speaker 1>you know, the owner of Google, and Amazon dot Com

0:01:51.840 --> 0:01:54.040
<v Speaker 1>and Apple. It just goes to show you what kind

0:01:54.080 --> 0:01:57.160
<v Speaker 1>of week it's gonna be. Uh. You know, something like

0:01:57.200 --> 0:02:01.120
<v Speaker 1>a third of the SNP five companies were warning today,

0:02:01.160 --> 0:02:03.400
<v Speaker 1>pretty quiet on that front, but it really does pick

0:02:03.480 --> 0:02:06.640
<v Speaker 1>up tomorrow and carries through the rest of the week.

0:02:06.800 --> 0:02:09.800
<v Speaker 1>So you know, it isn't just about the Fed policymakers

0:02:09.800 --> 0:02:12.240
<v Speaker 1>getting together. It's about what companies are gonna have to

0:02:12.280 --> 0:02:15.639
<v Speaker 1>say on their results. Absolutely. Technology is going to be

0:02:15.720 --> 0:02:18.280
<v Speaker 1>front and center this week. But it's interesting because when

0:02:18.320 --> 0:02:21.000
<v Speaker 1>I look at the most actively traded stocks by value

0:02:21.000 --> 0:02:23.760
<v Speaker 1>and I look at foreign common stocks, nine out of

0:02:23.760 --> 0:02:27.000
<v Speaker 1>the ten most actively traded stocks are all gold miners

0:02:27.080 --> 0:02:30.359
<v Speaker 1>or precious metals miners, and that speaks to the rally

0:02:30.400 --> 0:02:33.800
<v Speaker 1>that we've seen in gold prices Gina. Material stocks are

0:02:33.880 --> 0:02:36.359
<v Speaker 1>certainly in favor right now as people continue to bid

0:02:36.480 --> 0:02:39.520
<v Speaker 1>gold and silver prices higher. Do we have any sense

0:02:39.560 --> 0:02:44.120
<v Speaker 1>of whether this will be reflected in their earnings? Probably not.

0:02:44.480 --> 0:02:46.520
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I think it's a bit early to expect

0:02:46.600 --> 0:02:49.440
<v Speaker 1>that the companies are actually going to produce earnings results

0:02:49.480 --> 0:02:51.600
<v Speaker 1>as a results of the price action in gold. So

0:02:51.639 --> 0:02:54.760
<v Speaker 1>I do think that the materials sector is most likely

0:02:54.800 --> 0:02:56.760
<v Speaker 1>to be one of the weaker sectors within the S

0:02:56.840 --> 0:03:00.720
<v Speaker 1>and P five in terms of actual output um from

0:03:00.760 --> 0:03:04.720
<v Speaker 1>an earnings perspective. That said, I do think that if

0:03:04.720 --> 0:03:07.920
<v Speaker 1>you start looking at value names in the SMP five hundred,

0:03:08.040 --> 0:03:10.760
<v Speaker 1>you could have an opportunity for a lot of beats

0:03:10.760 --> 0:03:13.200
<v Speaker 1>to expectations. So if you think about the sort of

0:03:13.280 --> 0:03:17.519
<v Speaker 1>value styles in a broader set, I've got fifteen stocks

0:03:17.520 --> 0:03:20.360
<v Speaker 1>on a list of stocks in our high Value Bucket

0:03:20.400 --> 0:03:22.919
<v Speaker 1>as well as the SMP five hundred peer Value Index

0:03:23.000 --> 0:03:25.920
<v Speaker 1>that report this week. All of them are expected to

0:03:25.960 --> 0:03:29.880
<v Speaker 1>have just really really weak earnings, just kind of tremendous declines,

0:03:29.960 --> 0:03:33.560
<v Speaker 1>some of them even with negative earnings, and as a group,

0:03:33.639 --> 0:03:36.880
<v Speaker 1>they're starting to experience positive estimate revision, which is very

0:03:37.000 --> 0:03:40.040
<v Speaker 1>different than what Dave was talking about. With the big

0:03:40.200 --> 0:03:46.280
<v Speaker 1>heavyweight tech companies facing a completely alternative with higher expectations

0:03:46.840 --> 0:03:49.840
<v Speaker 1>going into their earnings, it's less likely that they can

0:03:49.920 --> 0:03:53.040
<v Speaker 1>sustain those expectations, where some of the value stocks actually

0:03:53.120 --> 0:03:55.760
<v Speaker 1>might be able to beat um very very low forecasts.

0:03:56.480 --> 0:04:00.360
<v Speaker 1>And so, Gina, I believe you told us last this

0:04:00.400 --> 0:04:03.520
<v Speaker 1>is the single biggest, big, busiest, excuse me week for

0:04:03.560 --> 0:04:07.080
<v Speaker 1>earnings right this quarter, this week that we're headed into it. Yeah,

0:04:07.560 --> 0:04:09.200
<v Speaker 1>there's not going to be any rest for the weary

0:04:09.240 --> 0:04:11.920
<v Speaker 1>this week. Yeah. So, any I mean, what's the key

0:04:12.040 --> 0:04:15.320
<v Speaker 1>theme for you beyond what you were just describing and

0:04:15.880 --> 0:04:20.560
<v Speaker 1>the tech importance here? Yeah, So it's a combination of things.

0:04:20.560 --> 0:04:22.240
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I think one thing that happened last week

0:04:22.279 --> 0:04:25.160
<v Speaker 1>that really quite frankly surprised us is for the first

0:04:25.160 --> 0:04:27.040
<v Speaker 1>time in a long time, despite the fact that every

0:04:27.080 --> 0:04:30.320
<v Speaker 1>tech stock that reported earnings last week beat expectations. Price

0:04:30.360 --> 0:04:33.880
<v Speaker 1>performance was negative. So I think I want to watch

0:04:33.960 --> 0:04:37.760
<v Speaker 1>that really carefully. Can sticks tech stocks actually live up

0:04:37.760 --> 0:04:39.880
<v Speaker 1>to expectations? Are heavily gotten a little bit ahead of

0:04:39.880 --> 0:04:42.320
<v Speaker 1>our skis, and investors are going to sell the news

0:04:42.320 --> 0:04:44.359
<v Speaker 1>on both tech as well as healthcare and some of

0:04:44.400 --> 0:04:48.920
<v Speaker 1>the grossy stocks. UM, the opposite may occur with respective value.

0:04:49.040 --> 0:04:52.320
<v Speaker 1>I think beyond earning season, there's more than just earnings.

0:04:52.360 --> 0:04:54.000
<v Speaker 1>Even though this is the heaviest week of earnings and

0:04:54.040 --> 0:04:56.520
<v Speaker 1>next week is the second heaviest week, we're obviously also

0:04:56.560 --> 0:04:59.120
<v Speaker 1>contending with the FED policy meeting this week, and we're

0:04:59.120 --> 0:05:02.680
<v Speaker 1>contending with the fiscal package, which we keep bumping around

0:05:03.320 --> 0:05:06.200
<v Speaker 1>UM as a possibility or not a possibility, And you know,

0:05:06.240 --> 0:05:08.960
<v Speaker 1>I think that that has the prospect of creating a

0:05:09.000 --> 0:05:11.960
<v Speaker 1>little bit of turmoil for stocks as well. So, Dave,

0:05:12.080 --> 0:05:14.960
<v Speaker 1>when we talk about the FED meeting this week, do

0:05:15.000 --> 0:05:18.400
<v Speaker 1>you sense a change in tone or in sentiment when

0:05:18.440 --> 0:05:20.880
<v Speaker 1>it comes to what the Fed will likely say? Obviously,

0:05:21.000 --> 0:05:24.320
<v Speaker 1>the environment around US has worsened with the increase of

0:05:24.320 --> 0:05:27.640
<v Speaker 1>cases across much of the United States. UM. How much

0:05:27.720 --> 0:05:30.800
<v Speaker 1>of that is reflected in people's expectations of what they

0:05:30.800 --> 0:05:33.800
<v Speaker 1>expect to hear from J. Powell. You know, I haven't

0:05:33.880 --> 0:05:36.800
<v Speaker 1>really run across a whole lot on that score at

0:05:36.839 --> 0:05:40.000
<v Speaker 1>this point, you know, I mean, given that there's sort

0:05:40.040 --> 0:05:43.159
<v Speaker 1>of a policy direction that's been set, you know, near

0:05:43.240 --> 0:05:46.400
<v Speaker 1>zero interest rates and and and some bond bind though

0:05:46.440 --> 0:05:50.600
<v Speaker 1>they backed off lately in terms of actual purchases, you know,

0:05:50.680 --> 0:05:52.960
<v Speaker 1>trying to throw money at the economy where they can.

0:05:53.760 --> 0:05:56.400
<v Speaker 1>I And it does seem like, if anything, they'll try

0:05:56.400 --> 0:05:59.960
<v Speaker 1>and redouble those efforts. But at least the policy direction

0:06:00.040 --> 0:06:03.240
<v Speaker 1>has been set, and what we may get Wednesday just

0:06:03.360 --> 0:06:06.440
<v Speaker 1>were sort of reinforced where we are when it comes

0:06:06.480 --> 0:06:09.479
<v Speaker 1>to what the Fed's up to. Right, all right, Well,

0:06:09.480 --> 0:06:11.640
<v Speaker 1>thank you both so much. You know, Martin Adam's chief

0:06:11.640 --> 0:06:15.400
<v Speaker 1>equity strategist for Bloomberg Intelligence. She joined us from New Jersey,

0:06:15.400 --> 0:06:18.720
<v Speaker 1>as did Dave Wilson, stocks editor. This is Bloomberg Business Week.

0:06:18.920 --> 0:06:21.479
<v Speaker 1>We are keeping an eye obviously on the virus, those

0:06:21.520 --> 0:06:25.480
<v Speaker 1>cases continuing to rise across the country, and testing Scarlett

0:06:25.640 --> 0:06:30.120
<v Speaker 1>certainly front of mind, and we need to understand how

0:06:30.160 --> 0:06:33.320
<v Speaker 1>it works, where it works, when it works, and how

0:06:33.320 --> 0:06:35.400
<v Speaker 1>it's all going to be executed. We got the perfect

0:06:35.400 --> 0:06:39.320
<v Speaker 1>person to talk about that, Neil D. Crescenzo Crescenso, did

0:06:39.360 --> 0:06:43.640
<v Speaker 1>I say that right now? All right, thank you, I

0:06:43.680 --> 0:06:46.800
<v Speaker 1>appreciate it. Uh you're the CEO of Change Health here

0:06:46.839 --> 0:06:50.160
<v Speaker 1>joining us on the phone from San Francisco. Uh, so

0:06:50.240 --> 0:06:53.120
<v Speaker 1>tell us about testing here, like, where are we? How

0:06:53.160 --> 0:06:55.880
<v Speaker 1>should we be thinking about it? Especially when it comes

0:06:55.880 --> 0:07:00.599
<v Speaker 1>to a typical local community. How's it happening? Well, Jason,

0:07:00.640 --> 0:07:02.719
<v Speaker 1>I think you made a very important point is that

0:07:02.760 --> 0:07:06.240
<v Speaker 1>there really is maybe not a typical community. There's a

0:07:06.240 --> 0:07:09.480
<v Speaker 1>lot of different types of communities in this country. And

0:07:09.480 --> 0:07:12.600
<v Speaker 1>what you know, people didn't really perhaps realized prior to

0:07:12.640 --> 0:07:16.880
<v Speaker 1>the pandemic that only about of lab orders are actually

0:07:16.920 --> 0:07:21.080
<v Speaker 1>submitted electronically today, and as you can imagine, that's particularly

0:07:21.120 --> 0:07:24.920
<v Speaker 1>challenging in a rural or per community. So, um, what

0:07:25.080 --> 0:07:28.200
<v Speaker 1>we really focus on with our network, where you know,

0:07:28.280 --> 0:07:32.440
<v Speaker 1>we move around about fifteen billion healthcare transactions per year,

0:07:32.480 --> 0:07:36.160
<v Speaker 1>were the largest clinical, financial administrative networks in the country,

0:07:36.360 --> 0:07:39.040
<v Speaker 1>is really helping the doctors ordered these lab tests and

0:07:39.080 --> 0:07:41.320
<v Speaker 1>making sure that people can get them in the most

0:07:41.360 --> 0:07:46.240
<v Speaker 1>convenient and fast fast process possible. In order of course, critically,

0:07:46.240 --> 0:07:49.280
<v Speaker 1>as we've heard, particularly recently to get their results back,

0:07:49.320 --> 0:07:52.880
<v Speaker 1>and so we've made access to our nationwide lab network

0:07:52.960 --> 0:07:56.880
<v Speaker 1>free for all positions, and we have over fourteen hundred

0:07:56.960 --> 0:07:59.720
<v Speaker 1>labs and over a hundred providing COVID testing on the

0:07:59.760 --> 0:08:03.760
<v Speaker 1>net work. Neil, is there a difference between people going

0:08:03.800 --> 0:08:06.920
<v Speaker 1>to their primary doctor or to an urgent care center

0:08:07.040 --> 0:08:10.280
<v Speaker 1>or to the hospital to get COVID tests, because I

0:08:10.320 --> 0:08:12.840
<v Speaker 1>remember reading that ultimately they all get process at the

0:08:12.880 --> 0:08:16.640
<v Speaker 1>same couple of labs. Well, I think Scott don's a

0:08:16.640 --> 0:08:19.040
<v Speaker 1>great question, because whe does that really come down to.

0:08:19.120 --> 0:08:22.440
<v Speaker 1>It comes down to convenience and people's comfort level with

0:08:22.600 --> 0:08:25.320
<v Speaker 1>either maybe their primary care physician or an urgent care

0:08:25.360 --> 0:08:28.080
<v Speaker 1>center they're familiar with, where some other site, whether it's

0:08:28.080 --> 0:08:31.960
<v Speaker 1>a Walgreens of CBS, etcetera. UM, And you know, right

0:08:32.000 --> 0:08:35.160
<v Speaker 1>now we've got about thirty six states that are testing

0:08:35.280 --> 0:08:39.120
<v Speaker 1>less than the recommended level with the c d C.

0:08:39.440 --> 0:08:42.040
<v Speaker 1>So unless people go in to get tested, they're clearly

0:08:42.040 --> 0:08:44.000
<v Speaker 1>not going to get the results, and we're not gonna

0:08:44.040 --> 0:08:46.079
<v Speaker 1>be able to impact not only the testing rates, but

0:08:46.160 --> 0:08:51.160
<v Speaker 1>the positivity rates through treatment and contact tracing afterwards. That

0:08:51.280 --> 0:08:55.760
<v Speaker 1>spend such a challenge in many states, and so if

0:08:55.800 --> 0:08:58.320
<v Speaker 1>people have a choice of where to go. Where should

0:08:58.360 --> 0:09:01.880
<v Speaker 1>they go? Well, I think it really comes down to

0:09:01.960 --> 0:09:05.120
<v Speaker 1>the individual. Uh, you know, I think that the testing

0:09:05.200 --> 0:09:09.480
<v Speaker 1>is getting obviously continued to have different sites, additional types

0:09:09.520 --> 0:09:11.680
<v Speaker 1>of sites, and it's going to come down to, you know,

0:09:11.720 --> 0:09:13.839
<v Speaker 1>what people are able to do in terms of the

0:09:14.080 --> 0:09:17.800
<v Speaker 1>convenience for them what they're dealing with in their personal lives,

0:09:17.800 --> 0:09:20.760
<v Speaker 1>but making sure that it's done in a way that

0:09:20.840 --> 0:09:24.040
<v Speaker 1>the results are provided back to them as fast as possible,

0:09:24.280 --> 0:09:27.000
<v Speaker 1>and utilizing the lab network that we and others have

0:09:27.080 --> 0:09:29.640
<v Speaker 1>had in place, you know, frankly for decades, but it

0:09:29.720 --> 0:09:32.960
<v Speaker 1>just wasn't really of course, operating at this level and

0:09:32.960 --> 0:09:35.080
<v Speaker 1>with this degree of focus. You know, one of the

0:09:35.120 --> 0:09:37.960
<v Speaker 1>things that's important for people to realize is one are

0:09:37.960 --> 0:09:40.160
<v Speaker 1>the key priorities over the next few months is also

0:09:40.200 --> 0:09:41.760
<v Speaker 1>going to be trying to figure out how to get

0:09:41.800 --> 0:09:44.920
<v Speaker 1>at home testing. One of the things we focused on

0:09:45.000 --> 0:09:47.400
<v Speaker 1>is connecting our network to be sort of fast growing

0:09:47.400 --> 0:09:50.600
<v Speaker 1>companies like you do tests that provide home tests. But

0:09:50.679 --> 0:09:54.160
<v Speaker 1>we're now seeing the industry leaders like Mayo, Clinical Labs,

0:09:54.240 --> 0:09:57.360
<v Speaker 1>Lab Core Quests, the big lab companies as they're often

0:09:57.400 --> 0:10:00.280
<v Speaker 1>thought of, beginning to develop these tests. You can imagine

0:10:00.360 --> 0:10:02.720
<v Speaker 1>the paradigm shift will have if we're able to get

0:10:02.840 --> 0:10:06.559
<v Speaker 1>at home testing that's reliable, that will really facilitate people,

0:10:06.600 --> 0:10:08.880
<v Speaker 1>particularly trying to get back to work or kids going

0:10:08.880 --> 0:10:11.320
<v Speaker 1>to school. Well, speaking of kids going back to school,

0:10:11.520 --> 0:10:14.439
<v Speaker 1>um for students who are going back to university of campuses.

0:10:14.559 --> 0:10:16.800
<v Speaker 1>Jason and I were talking earlier about how some schools

0:10:16.800 --> 0:10:20.400
<v Speaker 1>will say that they will be testing students what fairly

0:10:20.440 --> 0:10:24.040
<v Speaker 1>frequently twice a week for instance, What kind of what

0:10:24.120 --> 0:10:26.880
<v Speaker 1>kind of problems or challenges do you foresee in being

0:10:26.920 --> 0:10:29.760
<v Speaker 1>able to execute that not just on one campus but

0:10:29.960 --> 0:10:33.160
<v Speaker 1>across the nation. Yeah, it's really a lot of the

0:10:33.240 --> 0:10:36.000
<v Speaker 1>challenges we've seen Scarlett throughout the pandemic, which is really

0:10:36.000 --> 0:10:39.200
<v Speaker 1>one of infrastructure. I think all of these universities will

0:10:39.320 --> 0:10:41.920
<v Speaker 1>point out that they weren't really set up or contemplating

0:10:42.000 --> 0:10:44.560
<v Speaker 1>doing this ever in the past, and so you know,

0:10:44.559 --> 0:10:46.440
<v Speaker 1>what we really look at is how can we take

0:10:46.760 --> 0:10:50.200
<v Speaker 1>infrastructure we've had in place for the traditional settings and

0:10:50.280 --> 0:10:54.120
<v Speaker 1>expand them these sorts of settings, including universities. You know,

0:10:54.360 --> 0:10:57.880
<v Speaker 1>down in Florida and the pandemic started, they have sixty

0:10:57.880 --> 0:11:01.319
<v Speaker 1>seven counties with clinics that wanted to obviously leverage is

0:11:01.400 --> 0:11:03.640
<v Speaker 1>part of the testing, and just in a few days

0:11:03.679 --> 0:11:06.199
<v Speaker 1>we connected them with the commercial labs because we had

0:11:06.200 --> 0:11:08.920
<v Speaker 1>most of the infrastructure in place to help with the

0:11:09.080 --> 0:11:12.000
<v Speaker 1>challenges that they continue to have, like many of these

0:11:12.000 --> 0:11:15.440
<v Speaker 1>hotspots states in Florida, and I think you know, universities

0:11:15.520 --> 0:11:17.640
<v Speaker 1>very unusually as you can imagine, are now having to

0:11:17.679 --> 0:11:20.760
<v Speaker 1>contemplate how they do that as well prior to school starting.

0:11:21.800 --> 0:11:25.320
<v Speaker 1>And so last question for you and Neil, what's the

0:11:25.480 --> 0:11:28.120
<v Speaker 1>sort of technology solution that sort of sticks with us

0:11:28.320 --> 0:11:30.800
<v Speaker 1>here now that all of this tech has been thrown

0:11:30.800 --> 0:11:33.640
<v Speaker 1>I mean your background was having a big job over

0:11:33.679 --> 0:11:37.720
<v Speaker 1>the health sector at Oracle. I do wonder how how

0:11:37.720 --> 0:11:40.280
<v Speaker 1>our lives going to be different even beyond COVID testing

0:11:40.320 --> 0:11:42.040
<v Speaker 1>when it comes to tech. Only got about a minute

0:11:42.080 --> 0:11:46.120
<v Speaker 1>left here. Well, there's gonna be a lot more digital data, Jason,

0:11:46.200 --> 0:11:48.720
<v Speaker 1>that's going to be used for variety of purposes. So

0:11:48.760 --> 0:11:52.720
<v Speaker 1>I'd say it's really three things. More data, more connectivity,

0:11:52.840 --> 0:11:57.280
<v Speaker 1>and the interoperability around that data and connectivity to enable

0:11:57.400 --> 0:12:00.560
<v Speaker 1>people to basically better maintain or improve health or in

0:12:00.600 --> 0:12:04.480
<v Speaker 1>this case, deal with a crisis situation like the pandemic. Right,

0:12:04.720 --> 0:12:07.360
<v Speaker 1>A lot to learn, We're going to be dealing with

0:12:07.400 --> 0:12:09.679
<v Speaker 1>this a lot. I have a feeling, especially in this

0:12:09.760 --> 0:12:11.880
<v Speaker 1>race to a vaccine, we've got to get tested to

0:12:12.040 --> 0:12:13.880
<v Speaker 1>get back to work, as you point out, and back

0:12:13.880 --> 0:12:18.200
<v Speaker 1>to school. Neil D. Crescenso is the CEO of Change Healthcare,

0:12:18.280 --> 0:12:21.520
<v Speaker 1>joiningus on the phone from San Francisco. This is Bloomberg

0:12:21.559 --> 0:12:24.680
<v Speaker 1>Business Week. But let's get into the world of sports.

0:12:24.800 --> 0:12:28.800
<v Speaker 1>John Stashower joins us Bloomberg sports reporter on the remote

0:12:28.840 --> 0:12:33.280
<v Speaker 1>line from Connecticut. Alright, so, John, we saw some baseball

0:12:33.360 --> 0:12:37.160
<v Speaker 1>over the weekend. We're gonna see less baseball tonight. How

0:12:37.200 --> 0:12:42.160
<v Speaker 1>in danger is the baseball season given these positive tests

0:12:42.160 --> 0:12:44.640
<v Speaker 1>with the Miami Marlins. Yeah, we don't never really know.

0:12:44.760 --> 0:12:47.240
<v Speaker 1>I think we have to wait for more test results.

0:12:47.240 --> 0:12:50.400
<v Speaker 1>I think we're at eleven Miami Marlins players right now.

0:12:50.400 --> 0:12:52.160
<v Speaker 1>There was I think the report of twelve. Least I

0:12:52.160 --> 0:12:54.480
<v Speaker 1>heard was eleven plus a couple of coaches. One player.

0:12:55.160 --> 0:12:57.680
<v Speaker 1>First positive tests I guess last Friday, and it's spread

0:12:57.679 --> 0:13:00.120
<v Speaker 1>through the team and they are still in Philadelphi. Few

0:13:00.120 --> 0:13:02.760
<v Speaker 1>of the Marlins were supposed to come home last night

0:13:03.280 --> 0:13:05.360
<v Speaker 1>or then this morning. They still haven't done it. They're

0:13:05.360 --> 0:13:07.560
<v Speaker 1>winning on these test results. I mean, if it stays

0:13:07.640 --> 0:13:10.680
<v Speaker 1>right there at eleven Miami Marlins. You know that these

0:13:10.840 --> 0:13:14.040
<v Speaker 1>teams have extra players at an alternate campsite, they can

0:13:14.040 --> 0:13:17.160
<v Speaker 1>bring them up. But who knows. You know, they played

0:13:17.160 --> 0:13:20.000
<v Speaker 1>the Braves last week in Atlanta, and the Braves were

0:13:20.000 --> 0:13:21.840
<v Speaker 1>in New York they played the Mets. Now the Mets

0:13:21.840 --> 0:13:24.320
<v Speaker 1>are in Boston to play the Red Socks. So who

0:13:24.360 --> 0:13:26.200
<v Speaker 1>knows how one long this how much this thing can

0:13:26.240 --> 0:13:29.160
<v Speaker 1>spread around. So John, eleven out of a squad of

0:13:29.200 --> 0:13:32.880
<v Speaker 1>how many and therefore doesn't mean that the Braves need

0:13:32.920 --> 0:13:34.480
<v Speaker 1>to get tested as well, and the Phillies need to

0:13:34.480 --> 0:13:37.520
<v Speaker 1>get tested too, Yeah, I would think absolutely. And you know,

0:13:37.559 --> 0:13:40.280
<v Speaker 1>as we just talked about, there's thirty. Normally our team

0:13:40.320 --> 0:13:42.360
<v Speaker 1>in Pastors has had twenty five. They were gonna expand

0:13:42.360 --> 0:13:46.720
<v Speaker 1>it to twenty six. Anyway, they're starting with thirty players, uh,

0:13:46.760 --> 0:13:49.320
<v Speaker 1>and then they have like another thirty, Like there's no

0:13:49.400 --> 0:13:52.000
<v Speaker 1>minor leagues this year, but they have like a reserves

0:13:52.040 --> 0:13:54.920
<v Speaker 1>of about thirty players. So yeah, they can replace these

0:13:54.960 --> 0:13:58.280
<v Speaker 1>eleven players with with other players. But yeah, we have

0:13:58.400 --> 0:14:01.040
<v Speaker 1>to wait on the test results. Are they more Marlins,

0:14:01.080 --> 0:14:04.280
<v Speaker 1>like you said, the Braves, the Phillies, the Phillies was

0:14:04.280 --> 0:14:06.880
<v Speaker 1>supposed to host the Yankees tonight. That game has been

0:14:06.920 --> 0:14:09.840
<v Speaker 1>postponed because the Yankees would have been going into the

0:14:09.880 --> 0:14:13.400
<v Speaker 1>locker room that the Marlins had just used this past weekend.

0:14:13.440 --> 0:14:15.880
<v Speaker 1>So they didn't want that to happen, obviously, and obviously

0:14:15.880 --> 0:14:17.520
<v Speaker 1>there's a ton of money on the line. I mean,

0:14:17.520 --> 0:14:19.720
<v Speaker 1>not to be too cross about it here, John, I mean,

0:14:19.800 --> 0:14:22.200
<v Speaker 1>baseball basically sort of limped over the finish line to

0:14:22.280 --> 0:14:26.760
<v Speaker 1>get these sixty games. They opted not to bubble themselves

0:14:26.880 --> 0:14:30.280
<v Speaker 1>as some of the other leagues have done, and a

0:14:30.280 --> 0:14:31.920
<v Speaker 1>lot of folks have a lot to lose players and

0:14:31.920 --> 0:14:35.600
<v Speaker 1>owners alike here if we if this season doesn't go on,

0:14:36.320 --> 0:14:38.760
<v Speaker 1>Oh there's no question about it, and a lot of surprise.

0:14:38.840 --> 0:14:41.040
<v Speaker 1>We haven't heard yet from the commissioner around Manford, but

0:14:41.080 --> 0:14:44.040
<v Speaker 1>I assume we will at some point today that you know,

0:14:44.080 --> 0:14:46.640
<v Speaker 1>maybe he's waiting on these these test results. But it's

0:14:46.640 --> 0:14:48.360
<v Speaker 1>a good point you make about the bubble because the

0:14:48.360 --> 0:14:51.400
<v Speaker 1>other sports are doing that. The hockey players have arrived

0:14:51.400 --> 0:14:55.320
<v Speaker 1>in Canada, they're getting ready to have playoff games this weekend. Um.

0:14:55.560 --> 0:14:58.000
<v Speaker 1>The NBA players are in this bubble in Orlando. The

0:14:58.080 --> 0:15:00.880
<v Speaker 1>latest test results from NBA players were no positive tests,

0:15:00.920 --> 0:15:04.640
<v Speaker 1>so Baseball talked about doing the bubble changed their mind.

0:15:05.320 --> 0:15:07.200
<v Speaker 1>Some people thought maybe they were thought they were smart

0:15:07.200 --> 0:15:09.119
<v Speaker 1>because they were going to go to Florida and Arizona,

0:15:09.320 --> 0:15:11.240
<v Speaker 1>two places you don't want to be right now. But

0:15:11.880 --> 0:15:14.480
<v Speaker 1>no bubble, a lot of travel and you know, that's

0:15:14.480 --> 0:15:16.960
<v Speaker 1>why the Toronto the Canadian government didn't let the Blue

0:15:17.000 --> 0:15:20.080
<v Speaker 1>Jays play in Toronto because they didn't want players traveling

0:15:20.360 --> 0:15:22.880
<v Speaker 1>in and out of the country. And my understanding John

0:15:22.880 --> 0:15:25.800
<v Speaker 1>as well, is that these Marlin's players got tested before

0:15:25.880 --> 0:15:28.080
<v Speaker 1>they played their game against the Phillies, right and then

0:15:28.120 --> 0:15:31.000
<v Speaker 1>they got their results after the game. So they went

0:15:31.040 --> 0:15:35.640
<v Speaker 1>into that game presumably eleven of them um testing positive.

0:15:36.080 --> 0:15:39.920
<v Speaker 1>And right now, in terms of context, the league is

0:15:39.960 --> 0:15:42.560
<v Speaker 1>trying to play when the case number in the country

0:15:42.760 --> 0:15:45.520
<v Speaker 1>is higher than when sports overall shut down in March.

0:15:45.800 --> 0:15:48.920
<v Speaker 1>It's pretty stunning when you think about the broader picture. Well,

0:15:48.960 --> 0:15:51.040
<v Speaker 1>I mean, if you think back to when this all started,

0:15:51.040 --> 0:15:54.400
<v Speaker 1>they remember those one NBA player who tested positive, and

0:15:54.400 --> 0:15:56.880
<v Speaker 1>it was all like, oh my god, you know, and

0:15:56.920 --> 0:15:59.960
<v Speaker 1>now yeah, they're they're playing with with all kinds of

0:16:00.000 --> 0:16:04.400
<v Speaker 1>players having the virus testing positive. Um, you know, they

0:16:04.400 --> 0:16:06.720
<v Speaker 1>were the report. Originally, as of this morning, there was

0:16:06.760 --> 0:16:10.240
<v Speaker 1>that four Marlins had tested positive, and you could argue

0:16:10.240 --> 0:16:12.360
<v Speaker 1>maybe they shouldn't have played a game yesterday, actually won

0:16:12.360 --> 0:16:15.040
<v Speaker 1>the game yesterday in Philadelphia, But then they got more

0:16:15.080 --> 0:16:19.280
<v Speaker 1>test results and now we're up to eleven. And I

0:16:19.360 --> 0:16:22.560
<v Speaker 1>have to think Roger Goodella and others in the National

0:16:22.600 --> 0:16:26.920
<v Speaker 1>Football League or watching this in a very very worried way, John, Oh, yeah, absolutely,

0:16:26.960 --> 0:16:30.360
<v Speaker 1>football is a big question mark. They can't have a bubble,

0:16:30.440 --> 0:16:32.360
<v Speaker 1>you know. I mean, there's just too man two large

0:16:32.360 --> 0:16:35.760
<v Speaker 1>a roster, so many coaches and all that, so you know,

0:16:35.800 --> 0:16:38.320
<v Speaker 1>it's such a contact sport and some of the college

0:16:38.360 --> 0:16:41.360
<v Speaker 1>players where we're having workouts and we were hearing about,

0:16:41.680 --> 0:16:44.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, dozens of positive tests as a result of that.

0:16:45.000 --> 0:16:47.280
<v Speaker 1>College football as a whole other story, you know, with

0:16:47.320 --> 0:16:49.080
<v Speaker 1>the kids who are not if they may not even

0:16:49.120 --> 0:16:52.360
<v Speaker 1>have classes and they really have football games. So I'm

0:16:52.360 --> 0:16:54.720
<v Speaker 1>sure the NFL is gonna try. You talked before about

0:16:54.800 --> 0:16:56.960
<v Speaker 1>the money involved, So the NFL is gonna give it

0:16:57.000 --> 0:16:58.720
<v Speaker 1>a go, but I think there's a lot of questions

0:16:58.760 --> 0:17:01.280
<v Speaker 1>about whether it'll work. All right, John stash Our, We're

0:17:01.320 --> 0:17:04.000
<v Speaker 1>gonna leave it there. Thank you so much. Great context

0:17:04.119 --> 0:17:07.200
<v Speaker 1>and keeping us up to date on a story scarlet

0:17:07.240 --> 0:17:09.440
<v Speaker 1>that obviously all of us are watching. You and I

0:17:09.480 --> 0:17:12.040
<v Speaker 1>are big sports fans, and it was great to see

0:17:12.040 --> 0:17:15.400
<v Speaker 1>baseball back. But who knows, maybe short lived, or maybe

0:17:15.480 --> 0:17:17.680
<v Speaker 1>they will find a way through this hard to say.

0:17:17.840 --> 0:17:21.240
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to Bloomberg business Week, Well, let's dive into

0:17:21.920 --> 0:17:25.800
<v Speaker 1>the magazine if we can. Bloomberg business Week, this is

0:17:25.800 --> 0:17:29.639
<v Speaker 1>a story that's on the Bloomberg and at Bloomberg dot com.

0:17:29.840 --> 0:17:32.080
<v Speaker 1>One of our phase him a parmer. She joins us

0:17:32.320 --> 0:17:34.800
<v Speaker 1>on the phone from New York City, along with Joel Weber,

0:17:34.880 --> 0:17:38.720
<v Speaker 1>the editor of Bloomberg Business Week. He joins us from Massachusetts.

0:17:39.240 --> 0:17:41.320
<v Speaker 1>You know, I love talking about hedge funds and fees

0:17:41.400 --> 0:17:43.479
<v Speaker 1>and money in Wall Street. Joel so te this up

0:17:43.480 --> 0:17:48.479
<v Speaker 1>for us. Uh So, the moment that um Nischanch, who

0:17:48.560 --> 0:17:50.880
<v Speaker 1>was one of the UH co authors on this kind

0:17:50.880 --> 0:17:52.840
<v Speaker 1>of spoke up about it, I was like, oh, please

0:17:52.880 --> 0:17:56.840
<v Speaker 1>tell me more. And obviously the two and twenty UH

0:17:56.960 --> 0:18:00.680
<v Speaker 1>business model has been a mainstay of the hedge funds

0:18:00.760 --> 0:18:04.359
<v Speaker 1>in this industry. UM, but we're we're beginning to see

0:18:04.800 --> 0:18:08.679
<v Speaker 1>UH that get trimmed and um and it's not just

0:18:08.760 --> 0:18:11.280
<v Speaker 1>a little trimming. It's a big trim him. And what

0:18:11.320 --> 0:18:15.200
<v Speaker 1>did you guys discover as you dug into the numbers

0:18:15.200 --> 0:18:19.240
<v Speaker 1>behind the story? Yeah, so UM in our story, we

0:18:19.240 --> 0:18:22.680
<v Speaker 1>we're looking at the fee changes over see hedgebund sees

0:18:22.720 --> 0:18:25.000
<v Speaker 1>them falling for a number of years. But what we're

0:18:25.000 --> 0:18:27.879
<v Speaker 1>seeing now is not only are they continuing to fall,

0:18:28.080 --> 0:18:31.040
<v Speaker 1>but you're seeing a lot of UM creative things that

0:18:31.280 --> 0:18:36.359
<v Speaker 1>hedge funds are offering more concessions UM, such things as

0:18:36.640 --> 0:18:39.760
<v Speaker 1>one funds offering to cover all investor losses that's almost

0:18:39.880 --> 0:18:42.679
<v Speaker 1>never heard of UM. One fund is doing away with

0:18:42.720 --> 0:18:45.919
<v Speaker 1>performance fees until they hit a threshold. Some firms are

0:18:46.000 --> 0:18:49.119
<v Speaker 1>lowering their fees in exchange for locking up capital for

0:18:49.160 --> 0:18:52.280
<v Speaker 1>more time. And what this is reflective of is UM

0:18:53.240 --> 0:18:55.680
<v Speaker 1>a decline and some of the assets that we're seeing

0:18:55.680 --> 0:18:57.840
<v Speaker 1>as investors have been pulling away from hedge funds a

0:18:57.880 --> 0:19:03.320
<v Speaker 1>little bit and demand doing uh lower fees as performances

0:19:03.359 --> 0:19:05.840
<v Speaker 1>away and just hasn't compared to the kind of returns

0:19:05.920 --> 0:19:08.480
<v Speaker 1>we were seeing twenty years ago. Okay, so when we

0:19:08.600 --> 0:19:11.240
<v Speaker 1>talk about two and twenty, is two percent management fees

0:19:11.240 --> 0:19:14.000
<v Speaker 1>and is the cut of profits? A lot of people

0:19:14.040 --> 0:19:16.440
<v Speaker 1>have said that two and twenty has been out of

0:19:16.720 --> 0:19:19.200
<v Speaker 1>play for a long time. There have been modifications to that.

0:19:19.600 --> 0:19:21.680
<v Speaker 1>But in your story how much you also talk about

0:19:21.720 --> 0:19:26.480
<v Speaker 1>this one or thirty fee model. What does that even mean? Yeah,

0:19:26.560 --> 0:19:30.040
<v Speaker 1>so one or thirty it's been champion by an L

0:19:30.119 --> 0:19:33.000
<v Speaker 1>Born And basically what it means is in a good year,

0:19:33.040 --> 0:19:36.800
<v Speaker 1>as a fun you could charge of the performance and

0:19:37.240 --> 0:19:39.800
<v Speaker 1>no assets, no fees on the asset side. But in

0:19:39.880 --> 0:19:42.400
<v Speaker 1>a bad year you would charge just one percent of assets.

0:19:42.720 --> 0:19:46.120
<v Speaker 1>And what that does is it equals it equals out

0:19:46.520 --> 0:19:48.399
<v Speaker 1>um the fees that you can charge and makes them

0:19:48.440 --> 0:19:51.879
<v Speaker 1>more attractive to potential investors. And this has become increasingly

0:19:52.000 --> 0:19:55.440
<v Speaker 1>popular with a number of hedge funds, and it's becoming

0:19:55.600 --> 0:19:58.600
<v Speaker 1>um something that I think allocators are asking for too.

0:20:00.480 --> 0:20:02.879
<v Speaker 1>So him UM when when you think about, you know,

0:20:03.119 --> 0:20:07.800
<v Speaker 1>how long the hedge fund industry has gotten UM gotten

0:20:08.359 --> 0:20:10.240
<v Speaker 1>you know away with this this has been really the

0:20:12.080 --> 0:20:15.960
<v Speaker 1>normal for for decades now, UM. And obviously this has

0:20:16.080 --> 0:20:21.320
<v Speaker 1>some profound impact UM, especially for investors. Uh So we're

0:20:21.560 --> 0:20:25.960
<v Speaker 1>investors actually saying about this change in tactic because I

0:20:26.000 --> 0:20:27.760
<v Speaker 1>mean it seems almost like it could have happened a

0:20:27.840 --> 0:20:31.280
<v Speaker 1>decade ago. UM at this point, UM, you know, is

0:20:31.320 --> 0:20:33.919
<v Speaker 1>it is it all happening too late? And and how

0:20:34.040 --> 0:20:37.800
<v Speaker 1>sticky is this money ultimately going to be among institutional

0:20:38.000 --> 0:20:42.000
<v Speaker 1>institutional investors. Well, investors I think are happy. UM, they

0:20:42.080 --> 0:20:45.600
<v Speaker 1>are able to negotiate and get better sees. The bigger

0:20:45.720 --> 0:20:48.560
<v Speaker 1>the allocator is, the more influence they have, the better

0:20:48.600 --> 0:20:51.640
<v Speaker 1>fees they can negotiate for themselves. UM. Even the numbers

0:20:51.680 --> 0:20:55.080
<v Speaker 1>that we've mentioned in our story, UM, an allocator could

0:20:55.560 --> 0:20:58.840
<v Speaker 1>an investor could demand an even more preferential treatment for

0:20:58.880 --> 0:21:02.000
<v Speaker 1>themselves if they have a big ticket investment investment that

0:21:02.040 --> 0:21:07.080
<v Speaker 1>they're making. UM. And etaties have been declining as hedge been.

0:21:07.119 --> 0:21:09.320
<v Speaker 1>Performance has been souring if we look at it as

0:21:09.359 --> 0:21:11.719
<v Speaker 1>a whole. But I think investors over the past few

0:21:11.800 --> 0:21:14.720
<v Speaker 1>years have been getting particularly frustrated. And as we're seeing

0:21:14.840 --> 0:21:17.680
<v Speaker 1>this year, UM, this this environment has been hard of

0:21:17.760 --> 0:21:20.280
<v Speaker 1>funds to trade in. Their performance hasn't been so great

0:21:20.359 --> 0:21:22.320
<v Speaker 1>and if you look broadly across the space, there has

0:21:22.359 --> 0:21:25.720
<v Speaker 1>been some outliers, but UM, you're seeing it's just a

0:21:26.000 --> 0:21:31.120
<v Speaker 1>much much difficult fundraising environment. Is particularly for smaller managers. UM.

0:21:32.000 --> 0:21:34.399
<v Speaker 1>Some of the money has gone towards the bigger funds.

0:21:34.880 --> 0:21:37.680
<v Speaker 1>As you know, it's once you get to being a

0:21:37.880 --> 0:21:41.000
<v Speaker 1>twenty billion dollar fund um, it's it's a lot harder

0:21:41.040 --> 0:21:45.120
<v Speaker 1>to lose that stature. But for a small expense, we're

0:21:45.440 --> 0:21:47.080
<v Speaker 1>just kind of working their way up and trying to

0:21:47.160 --> 0:21:49.879
<v Speaker 1>gain assets. It's an incredibly difficult time. Those are the

0:21:49.920 --> 0:21:53.200
<v Speaker 1>ones that especially are having to rethink about rethink their

0:21:53.240 --> 0:21:56.800
<v Speaker 1>CE model and their fee structure. So, Emma, when you

0:21:57.119 --> 0:22:00.720
<v Speaker 1>look at this story, that sort of really nice data

0:22:00.800 --> 0:22:04.760
<v Speaker 1>driven trend story against a lot of the breaking news

0:22:04.920 --> 0:22:07.080
<v Speaker 1>great scoops that you've had over the past couple of

0:22:07.200 --> 0:22:10.960
<v Speaker 1>years around big investors saying, you know what big hedge

0:22:11.040 --> 0:22:12.760
<v Speaker 1>and investors thing, I'm just going to do the family

0:22:12.840 --> 0:22:15.520
<v Speaker 1>office thing, or I'm gonna shut it down a little bit.

0:22:15.720 --> 0:22:21.280
<v Speaker 1>I mean, those have to be somehow synthesized, right, Yes,

0:22:21.560 --> 0:22:24.840
<v Speaker 1>And we've seen especially that this year and last year,

0:22:25.200 --> 0:22:28.399
<v Speaker 1>a number of firms pivots from being a big name

0:22:28.480 --> 0:22:31.399
<v Speaker 1>hedge funds into a family offers. If we look at

0:22:31.440 --> 0:22:35.520
<v Speaker 1>John Paulson just just this month, I believe um and

0:22:35.640 --> 0:22:37.720
<v Speaker 1>so that is that does speak to the broader trend

0:22:37.760 --> 0:22:40.120
<v Speaker 1>that we're seeing. Also, a lot of big names hedge

0:22:40.119 --> 0:22:42.439
<v Speaker 1>funds like called to the Jones firm and Alan Howard,

0:22:42.680 --> 0:22:45.000
<v Speaker 1>they've had to cut fees in recent years. So you

0:22:45.080 --> 0:22:50.080
<v Speaker 1>are seeing UM, the old school guard, the big titans

0:22:50.119 --> 0:22:53.240
<v Speaker 1>of the industry also facing this reckoning that we're seeing

0:22:53.280 --> 0:22:55.800
<v Speaker 1>in the space, UM having to adjust, having to be

0:22:55.920 --> 0:23:00.200
<v Speaker 1>more creative as particularly fundamental firms that haven't adapt into

0:23:00.240 --> 0:23:04.440
<v Speaker 1>becoming more quantitative or included more unique trading methods, they've

0:23:04.440 --> 0:23:06.840
<v Speaker 1>struggled if they have failed to do that, and that

0:23:06.960 --> 0:23:08.760
<v Speaker 1>has also been part of the factors if we look

0:23:08.800 --> 0:23:11.240
<v Speaker 1>at some of the firms that have closed down or

0:23:11.320 --> 0:23:13.920
<v Speaker 1>only traded their own internal lasts as well. You know,

0:23:14.040 --> 0:23:17.919
<v Speaker 1>the thing that reminds me of the bigger picture here

0:23:18.040 --> 0:23:20.000
<v Speaker 1>is that hedge funds really never got their mojo back

0:23:20.040 --> 0:23:23.800
<v Speaker 1>after the financial crisis. UM the central bank intervention increased

0:23:23.840 --> 0:23:26.760
<v Speaker 1>all the correlation between the different assets, that reduced volatility.

0:23:27.000 --> 0:23:29.639
<v Speaker 1>Yet we did have volatility in the first quarter of

0:23:29.720 --> 0:23:32.120
<v Speaker 1>this year and it was not a good first quarter

0:23:32.200 --> 0:23:34.760
<v Speaker 1>for hedge funds. Why not? Why was the volatility not

0:23:34.840 --> 0:23:38.080
<v Speaker 1>the right kind of volatility? Right? So you had been

0:23:38.119 --> 0:23:40.959
<v Speaker 1>focused on a specific kind of volatility, and sometimes if

0:23:41.000 --> 0:23:45.679
<v Speaker 1>it's too short term and to unexpected, they don't. They

0:23:45.760 --> 0:23:49.000
<v Speaker 1>find out a lot harder to trade, especially systematic funds.

0:23:49.000 --> 0:23:51.159
<v Speaker 1>At a computer driven UM, they did a little bit

0:23:51.240 --> 0:23:53.719
<v Speaker 1>more time to catch up with the spikes and volatility.

0:23:53.760 --> 0:23:56.040
<v Speaker 1>And so if it's over a short lip and then

0:23:56.119 --> 0:23:58.919
<v Speaker 1>at random spurts, that's a lot harder to trade than

0:23:59.000 --> 0:24:01.480
<v Speaker 1>a longer period of vlatility over a couple of months,

0:24:01.800 --> 0:24:07.040
<v Speaker 1>which then you can um to make more opportunistic trades. UM.

0:24:07.280 --> 0:24:09.840
<v Speaker 1>If it's a sudden shock, as we've seen, that has

0:24:09.880 --> 0:24:11.840
<v Speaker 1>been a lot harder. So that's why I think you've

0:24:11.840 --> 0:24:15.360
<v Speaker 1>seen a lot of struggles in March, which most fun

0:24:15.560 --> 0:24:18.320
<v Speaker 1>firms did did terribly that that month. And if you

0:24:18.359 --> 0:24:21.880
<v Speaker 1>look at our chart UM and our story we take,

0:24:22.000 --> 0:24:25.600
<v Speaker 1>we have a line graph that shows the SMP as

0:24:25.640 --> 0:24:29.040
<v Speaker 1>it as it compares to a hedgebunt performance, and since

0:24:29.080 --> 0:24:31.879
<v Speaker 1>two thousands and eight you'll see broadly that hedgegunt to

0:24:31.880 --> 0:24:35.439
<v Speaker 1>have trailed the SMP increasingly with a broader spread UM

0:24:35.640 --> 0:24:38.680
<v Speaker 1>compared to prior to two thousand and eight. Yeah, sort

0:24:38.720 --> 0:24:40.800
<v Speaker 1>of defeats the whole purpose of all those fees if

0:24:40.840 --> 0:24:42.920
<v Speaker 1>you ask me, all right, hemm a parmer, thank you

0:24:42.960 --> 0:24:45.000
<v Speaker 1>so much. Great piece of reporting. Check it out on

0:24:45.040 --> 0:24:48.239
<v Speaker 1>the Bloomberg and at Bloomberg dot com, not surprisingly one

0:24:48.280 --> 0:24:50.760
<v Speaker 1>of the most read. Hemma headgund reporter for Bloomberg on

0:24:50.840 --> 0:24:53.240
<v Speaker 1>the phone from New York City. Follow her at Parmar

0:24:53.520 --> 0:24:56.280
<v Speaker 1>Hemma for all of her scoops. Our thanks as well

0:24:56.359 --> 0:24:58.680
<v Speaker 1>to Joel Webber, editor of Bloomberg Business Week. He joined

0:24:58.760 --> 0:25:06.639
<v Speaker 1>us from Massachusett. It's a journal, yeah, but you let

0:25:06.680 --> 0:25:11.520
<v Speaker 1>me drive. Oh no, no, no, no, honey, please, I'll

0:25:11.560 --> 0:25:14.800
<v Speaker 1>do the right vel et me. I want to try it.

0:25:17.480 --> 0:25:30.560
<v Speaker 1>Just drive, baby, good questions trying. This is the Drive

0:25:30.680 --> 0:25:35.600
<v Speaker 1>to the Globe. Thanks. We'll try us on Bluebird Radio.

0:25:36.200 --> 0:25:38.200
<v Speaker 1>And it is time for the Drive to the Clothes

0:25:38.280 --> 0:25:41.000
<v Speaker 1>on this Monday afternoon. Jason Kelley and Scarlet Food here

0:25:41.119 --> 0:25:43.760
<v Speaker 1>with you, and we're joined by Bert White, chief investment

0:25:43.800 --> 0:25:47.400
<v Speaker 1>officer of LPL Financial, on the phone from Charlotte. Burt,

0:25:47.480 --> 0:25:49.600
<v Speaker 1>really nice to have you with us. First of all,

0:25:50.000 --> 0:25:52.639
<v Speaker 1>what's going on down in Charlotte. I'm guessing it is

0:25:52.840 --> 0:25:54.639
<v Speaker 1>probably about as hot as it is here in the

0:25:54.720 --> 0:25:58.159
<v Speaker 1>New York City area. But how's everything going with virus

0:25:58.280 --> 0:26:01.879
<v Speaker 1>cases and all that has it field there? Well, it

0:26:02.200 --> 0:26:05.480
<v Speaker 1>is hot, and the good news is that air conditioning

0:26:05.680 --> 0:26:08.640
<v Speaker 1>is helping when you're staying at home. But no doubt

0:26:08.680 --> 0:26:11.639
<v Speaker 1>about it, there is, uh, you know, an upward trend

0:26:11.800 --> 0:26:14.760
<v Speaker 1>of of nervousness around some of the cases that are

0:26:14.800 --> 0:26:17.200
<v Speaker 1>coming through in this regional area of the South in

0:26:17.440 --> 0:26:21.719
<v Speaker 1>general has been a little bit quick to to reopen. Um.

0:26:21.880 --> 0:26:24.200
<v Speaker 1>It's all that quick reopening and now we're beginning to

0:26:24.240 --> 0:26:27.520
<v Speaker 1>start to see an increase in cases, and so being careful,

0:26:27.680 --> 0:26:31.320
<v Speaker 1>is is really what's happening here? Then down here in Charlotte, Well,

0:26:31.400 --> 0:26:33.040
<v Speaker 1>it sounds like you're doing well, and I'm glad to

0:26:33.119 --> 0:26:36.080
<v Speaker 1>hear that that's the case. Um. When you look at

0:26:36.119 --> 0:26:38.280
<v Speaker 1>what's happening around you and then you look at the

0:26:38.320 --> 0:26:40.960
<v Speaker 1>stock market, is it is there disconnect or does it

0:26:41.040 --> 0:26:45.119
<v Speaker 1>make sense to you? Well, I've never seen the market,

0:26:45.520 --> 0:26:49.159
<v Speaker 1>the stock market and the economy be as disparate um

0:26:49.280 --> 0:26:52.560
<v Speaker 1>in their absolute results. Um. I do think that's the

0:26:52.600 --> 0:26:55.920
<v Speaker 1>real watch out for investors though. I think investors want

0:26:55.960 --> 0:26:58.160
<v Speaker 1>to look at things and determine whether or not it's

0:26:58.240 --> 0:27:01.320
<v Speaker 1>good or it's bad. You know, like so far earnings

0:27:01.440 --> 0:27:05.040
<v Speaker 1>is down year every year? Is that good or is

0:27:05.080 --> 0:27:07.480
<v Speaker 1>that bad? And so the reality is that's not the

0:27:07.560 --> 0:27:10.080
<v Speaker 1>metric the market nor the economy sort of looks at

0:27:10.280 --> 0:27:13.280
<v Speaker 1>it's really is it better or worse? And I think

0:27:13.400 --> 0:27:16.680
<v Speaker 1>by and large from the market, dow and the economic view,

0:27:16.840 --> 0:27:20.240
<v Speaker 1>things are getting better both and so to some degree

0:27:20.280 --> 0:27:23.920
<v Speaker 1>the metric that matters most is actually in harmony between

0:27:24.000 --> 0:27:27.240
<v Speaker 1>the market and UM and the economy. It's just the

0:27:27.320 --> 0:27:30.600
<v Speaker 1>absolute levels that are so disparate that's really got things

0:27:30.720 --> 0:27:34.119
<v Speaker 1>pretty uh pretty confusing. And so Bert, how big of

0:27:34.160 --> 0:27:37.480
<v Speaker 1>a role does the FED play here? That don't fight

0:27:37.560 --> 0:27:41.640
<v Speaker 1>the FED mantra? The market by all accounts, at least

0:27:41.680 --> 0:27:46.280
<v Speaker 1>partially was up today. Given a sentiment around what we

0:27:46.960 --> 0:27:49.800
<v Speaker 1>may hear may not hear candidly from j. Pale and

0:27:49.880 --> 0:27:53.840
<v Speaker 1>his colleagues on Wednesday, where does the FED fit into

0:27:53.920 --> 0:27:58.119
<v Speaker 1>this equation? I think the FED, frankly is the is

0:27:58.200 --> 0:28:01.439
<v Speaker 1>the most important, uh way, and the most important words

0:28:02.080 --> 0:28:04.560
<v Speaker 1>right now, that's the backstop right now. That is the

0:28:04.640 --> 0:28:08.040
<v Speaker 1>first relay runner. You know, oftentimes try to talk about

0:28:08.080 --> 0:28:11.359
<v Speaker 1>these recoveries as being relay races um and what you

0:28:11.440 --> 0:28:14.040
<v Speaker 1>need is you actually need to have a strong runner,

0:28:14.080 --> 0:28:16.120
<v Speaker 1>and then they got to pass the baton to somebody else.

0:28:16.640 --> 0:28:19.840
<v Speaker 1>And the FED is always the first runner in these recoveries,

0:28:19.920 --> 0:28:22.359
<v Speaker 1>always the first runner, and They've run hard and they've

0:28:22.440 --> 0:28:24.800
<v Speaker 1>run long. And what I think you're going to hear

0:28:24.840 --> 0:28:26.800
<v Speaker 1>the FED stay, which they have been saying the last

0:28:26.840 --> 0:28:29.440
<v Speaker 1>few meetings, is it's time for someone else to take

0:28:29.520 --> 0:28:31.920
<v Speaker 1>this baton, and they're trying. They've been trying to give

0:28:31.960 --> 0:28:35.080
<v Speaker 1>this baton really the fiscal policy, and by and large

0:28:35.240 --> 0:28:38.000
<v Speaker 1>they've run pretty well, and we'll probably see some more

0:28:38.080 --> 0:28:40.720
<v Speaker 1>running there. My guess is you will hear pal and

0:28:40.800 --> 0:28:43.480
<v Speaker 1>you will hear the FED say that they are going

0:28:43.560 --> 0:28:45.640
<v Speaker 1>to continue to be very dubbish. They're going to continue

0:28:45.680 --> 0:28:49.040
<v Speaker 1>to support this. I think they're gonna hint to low rates,

0:28:49.560 --> 0:28:52.320
<v Speaker 1>uh for longer. I don't know what you know. We've

0:28:52.360 --> 0:28:54.280
<v Speaker 1>been saying that the FED is lower for longer. I

0:28:54.280 --> 0:28:56.680
<v Speaker 1>don't know what longer than longer is whatever that is,

0:28:56.800 --> 0:28:59.240
<v Speaker 1>that is what they're lower. And so I think you're

0:28:59.240 --> 0:29:01.800
<v Speaker 1>gonna hear more of that news. Yeah, people have interpreted

0:29:01.840 --> 0:29:05.240
<v Speaker 1>that to mean lower forever or at least in our lifetime. UM.

0:29:05.600 --> 0:29:08.440
<v Speaker 1>I like the analogy of passing the baton to fiscal policy,

0:29:08.680 --> 0:29:12.080
<v Speaker 1>and we've seen how fiscal policymakers are are kind of

0:29:12.120 --> 0:29:14.239
<v Speaker 1>stumbling getting out of the gate. They can't quite get there.

0:29:14.520 --> 0:29:17.240
<v Speaker 1>We know the Republicans will be proposing something in the

0:29:17.320 --> 0:29:20.280
<v Speaker 1>next hour or two. Um, what does it mean in

0:29:20.480 --> 0:29:23.960
<v Speaker 1>terms of how much it's going to affect day to

0:29:24.040 --> 0:29:26.160
<v Speaker 1>day trading over the next couple of weeks, Because we're

0:29:26.160 --> 0:29:28.920
<v Speaker 1>probably not going to get any kind of agreement today tomorrow,

0:29:29.000 --> 0:29:31.200
<v Speaker 1>but this will be something that's negotiated on. We're gonna

0:29:31.240 --> 0:29:33.320
<v Speaker 1>get lots of headlines that will conflict with each other,

0:29:33.760 --> 0:29:35.520
<v Speaker 1>and it's you know, we're gonna go through all the

0:29:35.560 --> 0:29:38.880
<v Speaker 1>machinations before something eventually happens. Is the stock market going

0:29:38.920 --> 0:29:40.560
<v Speaker 1>to be held hostage to that or do people just

0:29:40.680 --> 0:29:42.880
<v Speaker 1>look past that and assume something's going to come out

0:29:42.920 --> 0:29:45.360
<v Speaker 1>of it. We'll just we'll just go ahead and and

0:29:45.880 --> 0:29:49.240
<v Speaker 1>and price in the fact that it will get resolved. Well,

0:29:49.400 --> 0:29:51.160
<v Speaker 1>I think the stock market is going to try to

0:29:51.400 --> 0:29:54.959
<v Speaker 1>bully a bit of a response. I wouldn't be surprised if, um,

0:29:55.200 --> 0:29:58.560
<v Speaker 1>if the market doesn't get some of the more positive, gearing,

0:29:58.760 --> 0:30:01.880
<v Speaker 1>forward looking rhetoric on this. It doesn't look good, it

0:30:02.000 --> 0:30:03.960
<v Speaker 1>doesn't look positive, it doesn't look like it's going to

0:30:04.000 --> 0:30:06.080
<v Speaker 1>happen in the next week or two. I think you'll

0:30:06.080 --> 0:30:08.840
<v Speaker 1>see the market through a slight temper tantrum wouldn't be

0:30:08.880 --> 0:30:12.280
<v Speaker 1>surprised if you see a couple of sharp down days

0:30:12.680 --> 0:30:15.240
<v Speaker 1>as the market just sort of sends its message that

0:30:15.400 --> 0:30:17.680
<v Speaker 1>this is really important. This is the next runner in

0:30:17.720 --> 0:30:19.680
<v Speaker 1>this relay race. It's got to step up and do that.

0:30:20.360 --> 0:30:22.880
<v Speaker 1>And right now I think sometimes watching them needs to

0:30:22.920 --> 0:30:25.600
<v Speaker 1>be shaken just a bit. They've got to shake that

0:30:25.680 --> 0:30:27.920
<v Speaker 1>sugar tree just a bit. And the market is not

0:30:28.000 --> 0:30:30.080
<v Speaker 1>afraid to do that. You saw it do that in March.

0:30:30.160 --> 0:30:31.960
<v Speaker 1>You saw it do it in April, you saw do

0:30:32.040 --> 0:30:34.240
<v Speaker 1>it something may it will do it if it needs to.

0:30:34.720 --> 0:30:37.160
<v Speaker 1>I think you'll probably see that happen. If um, if

0:30:37.200 --> 0:30:39.160
<v Speaker 1>the rehed rick that comes out of Washington is the

0:30:39.240 --> 0:30:42.440
<v Speaker 1>positive before looking so Bert, I think some of the

0:30:42.480 --> 0:30:44.520
<v Speaker 1>research that you and your team have done, you know,

0:30:44.640 --> 0:30:48.880
<v Speaker 1>talk about this swoosh, this Nike swoosh shape recovery. Um,

0:30:49.280 --> 0:30:51.920
<v Speaker 1>has that sort of been your consistent view or how

0:30:52.040 --> 0:30:55.000
<v Speaker 1>has that evolved over time? And what does the latest

0:30:55.080 --> 0:30:57.920
<v Speaker 1>round of earnings tell you about that in terms of

0:30:57.960 --> 0:31:02.920
<v Speaker 1>your confidence there? Yeah, that's that's been our view really

0:31:03.120 --> 0:31:05.960
<v Speaker 1>through the outfit. You know, the reality is we've felt

0:31:06.040 --> 0:31:10.320
<v Speaker 1>more confident around the direction and the slope that has

0:31:10.360 --> 0:31:13.040
<v Speaker 1>been where we've been largely most confident. I think trying

0:31:13.080 --> 0:31:15.640
<v Speaker 1>to trying to get levels in timing is harder, UM.

0:31:15.800 --> 0:31:18.760
<v Speaker 1>But I think direction and slope has been really where

0:31:18.760 --> 0:31:21.680
<v Speaker 1>we've been most confident. And we're still seeing this, uh,

0:31:21.800 --> 0:31:25.880
<v Speaker 1>this Nike swoop type of move. The reality is coming

0:31:25.920 --> 0:31:29.960
<v Speaker 1>off bottoms and extremes. It is relatively common to get

0:31:30.040 --> 0:31:33.080
<v Speaker 1>a very fast, sharp move UM, but I think here

0:31:33.120 --> 0:31:35.000
<v Speaker 1>going forward, it's going to be a lot harder for

0:31:35.080 --> 0:31:38.480
<v Speaker 1>those next games, UM, both in economic games and others.

0:31:38.760 --> 0:31:41.400
<v Speaker 1>And on top of that, UM, you've got a fair

0:31:41.440 --> 0:31:44.400
<v Speaker 1>amount of concern around the election, and then also the

0:31:44.560 --> 0:31:46.840
<v Speaker 1>increase in some of the cases we've seen here um

0:31:47.160 --> 0:31:49.800
<v Speaker 1>after some of these early reopenings, and so all that

0:31:49.960 --> 0:31:52.360
<v Speaker 1>mixed together, I think the next part of this recovery

0:31:52.440 --> 0:31:54.880
<v Speaker 1>is going to be the harder part of this recovery UM,

0:31:55.040 --> 0:31:58.520
<v Speaker 1>and therefore sort of lends itself to slower growth but

0:31:58.640 --> 0:32:01.480
<v Speaker 1>still an upward trajectory. Okay, slower growth but still an

0:32:01.560 --> 0:32:04.120
<v Speaker 1>upper trajectory. Is that better or worse than what we

0:32:04.160 --> 0:32:06.800
<v Speaker 1>can expect from Europe? Because there's been a lot more

0:32:06.880 --> 0:32:10.000
<v Speaker 1>talk about how Europe might provide better opportunities right now,

0:32:10.120 --> 0:32:12.920
<v Speaker 1>especially after all those countries managed to come together and

0:32:13.080 --> 0:32:16.959
<v Speaker 1>unanimously agree on the seven hundred fifty billion euro rescue package.

0:32:17.160 --> 0:32:19.000
<v Speaker 1>The Republicans can't figure out what they want to do,

0:32:19.120 --> 0:32:22.000
<v Speaker 1>but you have twenty countries in Europe coming up with

0:32:22.040 --> 0:32:26.440
<v Speaker 1>a solution in thirty seconds or less. Fert Well, I

0:32:26.520 --> 0:32:29.080
<v Speaker 1>think in thirty seconds or less. The reality is that

0:32:29.240 --> 0:32:32.400
<v Speaker 1>that Europe's got some other issues. They've got deficit, They've

0:32:32.440 --> 0:32:34.640
<v Speaker 1>got a ton of populism that's going to continue to

0:32:34.720 --> 0:32:36.920
<v Speaker 1>drive that, and so we think that's going to continue

0:32:36.960 --> 0:32:39.680
<v Speaker 1>to weigh on growth there. Um, we think the United

0:32:39.760 --> 0:32:42.080
<v Speaker 1>States and to some degree China are really the two

0:32:42.120 --> 0:32:44.640
<v Speaker 1>places that you're going to see the quickest bounce back

0:32:44.680 --> 0:32:47.680
<v Speaker 1>here economically. All Right, you nailed it. Great job. Thank

0:32:47.720 --> 0:32:50.800
<v Speaker 1>you so much for White, chief investment officer for LPL Financial.

0:32:50.880 --> 0:32:54.320
<v Speaker 1>Joinus on the phone from Charlotte. Stay safe down there,

0:32:54.440 --> 0:32:57.240
<v Speaker 1>Stay safe and cool. Uh. The same can be said

0:32:57.560 --> 0:32:59.640
<v Speaker 1>for those of us here in the Northeast right now.

0:32:59.680 --> 0:33:03.480
<v Speaker 1>Record temperatures sweeping through New York and Boston as we

0:33:03.600 --> 0:33:06.160
<v Speaker 1>heard for days to come to Jason, I know, no,

0:33:06.880 --> 0:33:10.520
<v Speaker 1>it's it's unrelenting. It's unrelenting. Thanks so much for listening

0:33:10.560 --> 0:33:13.520
<v Speaker 1>to Bloomberg. Business Week, Download the podcast on iTunes, SoundCloud,

0:33:13.560 --> 0:33:16.280
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg dot com, or wherever you get your podcasts. And

0:33:16.360 --> 0:33:18.280
<v Speaker 1>of course you can always listen to our radio show

0:33:18.320 --> 0:33:21.040
<v Speaker 1>at two pm Eastern on Bloomberg Radio, or watch us

0:33:21.040 --> 0:33:23.320
<v Speaker 1>on YouTube by searching Bloomberg Global News