WEBVTT - Clay talks with legendary broadcaster Bob Costas

0:00:02.080 --> 0:00:05.760
<v Speaker 1>This is Wins and Losses with Clay Trevis. Clay talks

0:00:05.800 --> 0:00:09.879
<v Speaker 1>with the most entertaining people in sports, entertainment and business.

0:00:10.160 --> 0:00:21.760
<v Speaker 1>Now here's Clay Travis. Welcome and Wins and Losses podcast.

0:00:21.840 --> 0:00:24.000
<v Speaker 1>I am Clay Travis. We have got I don't know

0:00:24.040 --> 0:00:26.400
<v Speaker 1>what the number is now, thirty five of these long

0:00:26.520 --> 0:00:29.280
<v Speaker 1>form conversations. If you're new to us, i'd encourage you

0:00:29.320 --> 0:00:32.479
<v Speaker 1>to go check out the entire library. The idea is

0:00:32.640 --> 0:00:35.760
<v Speaker 1>these conversations are just as good in two years or

0:00:35.800 --> 0:00:38.599
<v Speaker 1>three years, or hopefully ten years as they are when

0:00:38.640 --> 0:00:40.519
<v Speaker 1>you are listening to them and the week that they

0:00:40.520 --> 0:00:44.520
<v Speaker 1>are released. The guest this week and or this month

0:00:44.560 --> 0:00:51.320
<v Speaker 1>in October of twenty twenty is legendary sports broadcaster Bob Costas.

0:00:51.360 --> 0:00:54.600
<v Speaker 1>And Bob, I've been watching you literally my entire life,

0:00:54.640 --> 0:00:56.760
<v Speaker 1>and I feel like there are a billion things we

0:00:56.800 --> 0:00:59.760
<v Speaker 1>can get into, but you reached out to me most recently.

0:00:59.760 --> 0:01:02.120
<v Speaker 1>First of all, you participated and I thought a really

0:01:02.120 --> 0:01:05.080
<v Speaker 1>well done piece by Greg Couch about the struggles of

0:01:05.120 --> 0:01:07.720
<v Speaker 1>the n b A when it came to the ratings

0:01:07.800 --> 0:01:10.440
<v Speaker 1>this year, UH and trying to analyze where the league

0:01:10.440 --> 0:01:13.560
<v Speaker 1>goes going forward. And I appreciate you being involved in

0:01:13.560 --> 0:01:16.559
<v Speaker 1>that OutKick article because certainly I watched you for years

0:01:16.600 --> 0:01:19.160
<v Speaker 1>and years be associated with the NBA, and we'll get

0:01:19.200 --> 0:01:22.840
<v Speaker 1>into that in a little bit as well. But in particular,

0:01:23.160 --> 0:01:25.440
<v Speaker 1>I sent out a tweet one of my listener, one

0:01:25.480 --> 0:01:28.160
<v Speaker 1>of my listeners, one of my readers out there, grabbed

0:01:28.240 --> 0:01:31.520
<v Speaker 1>in uh, probably thirty second segment that you had done

0:01:31.600 --> 0:01:36.080
<v Speaker 1>on Don Lemon CNN show dealing with the return of

0:01:36.120 --> 0:01:38.880
<v Speaker 1>college football, and I saw it and what immediately jumped

0:01:38.920 --> 0:01:43.760
<v Speaker 1>out to me was that CNN had mischaracterized the return date.

0:01:43.840 --> 0:01:47.520
<v Speaker 1>They had gotten it wrong. We are actually talking today

0:01:47.600 --> 0:01:50.040
<v Speaker 1>on the day that the Big Ten will return. There's

0:01:50.040 --> 0:01:54.400
<v Speaker 1>a Friday night football game between Illinois and Wisconsin later tonight,

0:01:54.840 --> 0:01:58.760
<v Speaker 1>and uh, but last week's CNN said that the that

0:01:58.840 --> 0:02:00.960
<v Speaker 1>the Big Ten was returning that weekend, and it was

0:02:01.000 --> 0:02:03.520
<v Speaker 1>an interesting conversation, and so I popped it out there,

0:02:03.960 --> 0:02:06.240
<v Speaker 1>and then you reached out to me. We've never talked before.

0:02:06.240 --> 0:02:08.840
<v Speaker 1>We had a good private conversation. You said you'd like

0:02:08.880 --> 0:02:10.480
<v Speaker 1>to come on and do the show. So we've got

0:02:10.480 --> 0:02:14.119
<v Speaker 1>a lot to get into, but we'll start there with

0:02:14.320 --> 0:02:16.400
<v Speaker 1>what you felt. And I think this is a fair

0:02:16.840 --> 0:02:20.760
<v Speaker 1>fair position is at times we live in a social

0:02:20.760 --> 0:02:24.200
<v Speaker 1>media era maybe all the time, where small clips can

0:02:24.240 --> 0:02:29.000
<v Speaker 1>be characterized that are not necessarily representative of the entirety

0:02:29.000 --> 0:02:30.600
<v Speaker 1>of a statement that was made. And that's why I

0:02:30.639 --> 0:02:33.480
<v Speaker 1>like having long form conversations with people here. So welcome

0:02:33.520 --> 0:02:35.960
<v Speaker 1>to the show, and we'll start right there with the

0:02:36.000 --> 0:02:37.760
<v Speaker 1>tweet that I sent and the hit that you did

0:02:37.800 --> 0:02:41.920
<v Speaker 1>on CNN with Don Lemon. Thanks Clay, and I appreciate

0:02:41.919 --> 0:02:46.200
<v Speaker 1>the opportunity to speak here at some lane. First of all, um,

0:02:46.240 --> 0:02:51.160
<v Speaker 1>as you know, I couldn't see the graphic that was incorrect.

0:02:51.240 --> 0:02:53.920
<v Speaker 1>Somebody at the production level at CNN, and it's not

0:02:54.000 --> 0:02:57.600
<v Speaker 1>a sports operation, got that wrong. If I had seen it,

0:02:57.960 --> 0:03:01.639
<v Speaker 1>I would have subtly corrected it. But what I said,

0:03:03.240 --> 0:03:07.560
<v Speaker 1>Don asked me about the return of college football, and

0:03:07.639 --> 0:03:10.919
<v Speaker 1>I made all I think the necessary stipulations. I'm sure

0:03:11.000 --> 0:03:14.080
<v Speaker 1>that they've got all the protocols in place, etcetera, etcetera.

0:03:14.440 --> 0:03:17.280
<v Speaker 1>But to me, there's something, if you take a step back,

0:03:17.520 --> 0:03:22.760
<v Speaker 1>something about this that exemplifies how big time college sports

0:03:22.919 --> 0:03:26.680
<v Speaker 1>football the most, but college basketball also big time college

0:03:26.680 --> 0:03:30.200
<v Speaker 1>sports has for so long been so out of perspective

0:03:30.560 --> 0:03:34.000
<v Speaker 1>and so out of proportion that the whole thing is

0:03:34.040 --> 0:03:36.480
<v Speaker 1>a sham, And well, I shouldn't say it that way,

0:03:36.480 --> 0:03:38.000
<v Speaker 1>and I didn't say it that way, that it is

0:03:38.080 --> 0:03:42.080
<v Speaker 1>too often a sham. And what I said was in

0:03:42.240 --> 0:03:46.280
<v Speaker 1>light of for example, Dan Mullen, the Florida football coach, saying,

0:03:46.440 --> 0:03:50.200
<v Speaker 1>we need ninety thousand people for our game against l

0:03:50.360 --> 0:03:54.080
<v Speaker 1>s U. We need to have the swamp full. Ironically,

0:03:54.200 --> 0:03:56.840
<v Speaker 1>he's the one who drained the swamp. He tests positive,

0:03:57.120 --> 0:04:00.320
<v Speaker 1>a good portion of his team test positive. And what

0:04:00.360 --> 0:04:03.880
<v Speaker 1>I'm saying is a lot of people are so obsessed

0:04:04.200 --> 0:04:08.160
<v Speaker 1>with football, be at the NFL or college football, they

0:04:08.280 --> 0:04:11.480
<v Speaker 1>just have to have it no matter what. And you

0:04:11.520 --> 0:04:14.000
<v Speaker 1>know as well as I if you could give truth

0:04:14.040 --> 0:04:18.479
<v Speaker 1>serum to many college football fans, especially in certain parts

0:04:18.480 --> 0:04:21.719
<v Speaker 1>of the country, and you gave them the following proposition,

0:04:22.360 --> 0:04:25.880
<v Speaker 1>over the next ten years, your university will more or

0:04:25.920 --> 0:04:30.720
<v Speaker 1>less mirror Stanford. You'll always be competitive, maybe once or

0:04:30.760 --> 0:04:33.880
<v Speaker 1>twice you'll win the national championship or be in contention

0:04:34.320 --> 0:04:38.280
<v Speaker 1>for it. You'll be good across a wide swath of sports,

0:04:38.640 --> 0:04:43.000
<v Speaker 1>and the the compact that should exist between academics and

0:04:43.040 --> 0:04:47.880
<v Speaker 1>athletics will be there. Or you can be in contention

0:04:47.920 --> 0:04:52.919
<v Speaker 1>for the national championship almost every year, And if a

0:04:53.120 --> 0:04:57.599
<v Speaker 1>very large number of your quote student athletes aren't really

0:04:57.640 --> 0:05:01.160
<v Speaker 1>students at all, and if many of them recruited despite

0:05:01.279 --> 0:05:04.880
<v Speaker 1>dubious and sometimes criminal backgrounds, and if many of them

0:05:04.920 --> 0:05:09.760
<v Speaker 1>will in fact misbehave and and bring some rather dubious

0:05:10.560 --> 0:05:14.120
<v Speaker 1>attention to the program, but you'll be in contention for

0:05:14.160 --> 0:05:18.599
<v Speaker 1>the national championship every year. We know damn well which

0:05:18.600 --> 0:05:21.360
<v Speaker 1>of those two choices would be most appealing to a

0:05:21.440 --> 0:05:25.320
<v Speaker 1>huge percentage of college sports fans. And in that sense,

0:05:25.360 --> 0:05:28.840
<v Speaker 1>to me, it's out of whack. And this notion that

0:05:28.920 --> 0:05:32.400
<v Speaker 1>we have to have college football no matter what. We

0:05:32.520 --> 0:05:36.080
<v Speaker 1>gotta travel, we gotta intermingle. We know how large the

0:05:36.120 --> 0:05:39.200
<v Speaker 1>size of the rosters are and all the auxiliary personnel,

0:05:39.320 --> 0:05:42.720
<v Speaker 1>even if life on campus is nothing like normal. The

0:05:42.839 --> 0:05:44.760
<v Speaker 1>one thing that's going to be as close to almost

0:05:44.839 --> 0:05:48.919
<v Speaker 1>we can possibly make its football. So that's what I said.

0:05:48.960 --> 0:05:52.680
<v Speaker 1>I said, I think the exact words were too often,

0:05:53.080 --> 0:05:56.800
<v Speaker 1>not always, too often, football, or in this case, college

0:05:56.800 --> 0:06:01.680
<v Speaker 1>football isn't just pleasing pastime or an interest of some kind.

0:06:02.240 --> 0:06:05.279
<v Speaker 1>It is too often a mindless of obsession. Now people

0:06:05.279 --> 0:06:08.400
<v Speaker 1>object to that, fine, but that's what I said, all right,

0:06:08.920 --> 0:06:11.600
<v Speaker 1>I think so much of what you said is obviously fascinating.

0:06:11.720 --> 0:06:14.599
<v Speaker 1>I have spent a ton of time arguing for the

0:06:14.680 --> 0:06:18.200
<v Speaker 1>return of college football. Uh and everybody out there who

0:06:18.360 --> 0:06:20.560
<v Speaker 1>is listening right now to this program knows that I've

0:06:20.600 --> 0:06:23.680
<v Speaker 1>advocated as aggressively as I can possibly for it. So

0:06:23.680 --> 0:06:25.520
<v Speaker 1>I'm not going to make that argument right here, because

0:06:25.520 --> 0:06:28.000
<v Speaker 1>we've done it a ton about the importance of it.

0:06:28.040 --> 0:06:30.840
<v Speaker 1>What I will say is I agree with your larger

0:06:30.960 --> 0:06:35.040
<v Speaker 1>context that college football fans uniquely and I think it's

0:06:35.080 --> 0:06:37.280
<v Speaker 1>actually the most American of all sports. By the way,

0:06:37.320 --> 0:06:39.760
<v Speaker 1>if you actually strip it back and consider all of

0:06:39.800 --> 0:06:44.320
<v Speaker 1>the different conflicting loyalties and hypocrisies and challenges, and both

0:06:44.720 --> 0:06:48.039
<v Speaker 1>incredible highs and incredible lows, it is in many ways,

0:06:48.120 --> 0:06:52.160
<v Speaker 1>I believe, a metaphor for the larger American experience rich poor,

0:06:52.640 --> 0:06:55.760
<v Speaker 1>the difference between the big schools and the small schools,

0:06:55.960 --> 0:06:57.920
<v Speaker 1>the difference and resources. I mean, there are just so

0:06:57.960 --> 0:07:01.520
<v Speaker 1>many fascinating to me representation of college football that reflects

0:07:01.520 --> 0:07:04.159
<v Speaker 1>both the good and bad of American life in general.

0:07:04.480 --> 0:07:06.680
<v Speaker 1>I do agree with you on the big precept there

0:07:06.720 --> 0:07:09.080
<v Speaker 1>that that basically you dove into, and I've said this

0:07:09.120 --> 0:07:12.440
<v Speaker 1>for a long time college football fans are selective moralist,

0:07:12.800 --> 0:07:15.280
<v Speaker 1>and what I mean by that is they want other

0:07:15.400 --> 0:07:20.480
<v Speaker 1>programs to behave morally, but they will forgive anything that

0:07:20.600 --> 0:07:23.440
<v Speaker 1>their school does if it makes them more likely to

0:07:23.440 --> 0:07:25.880
<v Speaker 1>win a football game. And I didn't really think about this,

0:07:26.040 --> 0:07:28.000
<v Speaker 1>uh Bob a lot, and thanks for being on with

0:07:28.040 --> 0:07:30.760
<v Speaker 1>us here until I started doing local radio. And that's

0:07:30.840 --> 0:07:34.200
<v Speaker 1>kind of the warrior background in me. Is if somebody

0:07:34.320 --> 0:07:36.360
<v Speaker 1>when when you looked at an n C double A violation,

0:07:36.400 --> 0:07:39.600
<v Speaker 1>for example, the first way I would think about it

0:07:39.680 --> 0:07:42.040
<v Speaker 1>is as I analyzed the case, and I make no book,

0:07:42.360 --> 0:07:44.920
<v Speaker 1>bring no bones about it. Right. I I am a

0:07:45.000 --> 0:07:48.160
<v Speaker 1>University of Tennessee fan. My grandfather played for General Neiland.

0:07:48.200 --> 0:07:50.160
<v Speaker 1>I started going to games when I was five years old.

0:07:50.800 --> 0:07:55.520
<v Speaker 1>I'm actually going up to watch Alabama probably absolutely obliterate

0:07:55.560 --> 0:08:00.480
<v Speaker 1>Tennessee this weekend and Kneeland. But what was thinking about

0:08:00.480 --> 0:08:03.720
<v Speaker 1>it was I always say, okay, if my school is

0:08:03.720 --> 0:08:07.880
<v Speaker 1>accused of wrongdoing before I figure out what my opinion is.

0:08:08.480 --> 0:08:12.040
<v Speaker 1>What would my opinion be if it were Alabama or

0:08:12.160 --> 0:08:16.320
<v Speaker 1>Florida or Georgia one of the rival programs that was

0:08:16.360 --> 0:08:19.560
<v Speaker 1>accused of doing the same thing. If my response is

0:08:19.560 --> 0:08:23.640
<v Speaker 1>not the exact same to those accusations. That is a

0:08:23.680 --> 0:08:27.440
<v Speaker 1>way to test my own fan bias. And so what

0:08:27.520 --> 0:08:29.360
<v Speaker 1>I would always say on the radio anytime we had

0:08:29.360 --> 0:08:31.520
<v Speaker 1>a story was I would say, Okay, what would your

0:08:31.600 --> 0:08:34.719
<v Speaker 1>response be if Alabama was accused of this and you're

0:08:34.720 --> 0:08:37.199
<v Speaker 1>a Tennessee fan, Well, Alabama they cheat, you know how

0:08:37.200 --> 0:08:39.920
<v Speaker 1>they are. And I said, okay, but if you're defending

0:08:39.960 --> 0:08:42.920
<v Speaker 1>Tennessee and you believe it immediately if you were Alabama,

0:08:43.240 --> 0:08:46.080
<v Speaker 1>then that's an example of bias. And to me, what

0:08:46.240 --> 0:08:48.600
<v Speaker 1>has happened in a large sense, I'm not surprised about

0:08:48.600 --> 0:08:51.000
<v Speaker 1>any of the arguments I see on social media in

0:08:51.000 --> 0:08:54.000
<v Speaker 1>the country now, because basically the country has become a

0:08:54.000 --> 0:08:57.840
<v Speaker 1>college football fan, right. You will you will defend to

0:08:57.880 --> 0:09:00.400
<v Speaker 1>the end of the earth anything that your school does,

0:09:00.920 --> 0:09:03.720
<v Speaker 1>or your party does, or your guy or girl does.

0:09:04.280 --> 0:09:07.439
<v Speaker 1>But if the other side does it, it's an outrage.

0:09:07.600 --> 0:09:11.240
<v Speaker 1>And so what bothers me in general is not the

0:09:11.320 --> 0:09:13.720
<v Speaker 1>decisions that are made. It's the hypocrisy because, as I

0:09:13.760 --> 0:09:15.920
<v Speaker 1>told you one of our conversation, as my listeners know,

0:09:16.440 --> 0:09:19.160
<v Speaker 1>I kind of consider every opinion that I have to

0:09:19.200 --> 0:09:21.760
<v Speaker 1>be almost the equivalent of a judicial opinion. This is

0:09:21.800 --> 0:09:24.040
<v Speaker 1>the lawyer in me speaking, there has to be a

0:09:24.080 --> 0:09:28.160
<v Speaker 1>precedent that connects my opinions across the board or else.

0:09:28.200 --> 0:09:31.239
<v Speaker 1>I'm guilty of what I accuse others of, which is hypocrisy.

0:09:31.240 --> 0:09:33.320
<v Speaker 1>And I'm not saying I'm perfect. Certainly I make mistakes

0:09:33.360 --> 0:09:35.760
<v Speaker 1>in the way that I analyze cases and facts and

0:09:35.800 --> 0:09:38.720
<v Speaker 1>everything else, like any other human out there. But I

0:09:38.760 --> 0:09:42.200
<v Speaker 1>do believe that there is a logical basis behind most

0:09:42.280 --> 0:09:44.520
<v Speaker 1>of my opinions. And if you went back and looked

0:09:44.520 --> 0:09:47.200
<v Speaker 1>at what I wrote in two thousand twelve, it would

0:09:47.200 --> 0:09:50.080
<v Speaker 1>make sense in two thousand twenty. And if you, for instance,

0:09:50.160 --> 0:09:53.800
<v Speaker 1>you know to to bring in multiple conflicting areas, If

0:09:53.840 --> 0:09:56.400
<v Speaker 1>you looked at what I said about Duke Lacrosse and

0:09:56.440 --> 0:10:00.320
<v Speaker 1>you compared it with Brett Kavanaugh, it would cross O right.

0:10:00.440 --> 0:10:04.000
<v Speaker 1>It would make sense logically in the Kavanaugh case the

0:10:04.080 --> 0:10:06.120
<v Speaker 1>same way that it did in the Duke Lacrosse case,

0:10:06.240 --> 0:10:08.240
<v Speaker 1>or in the Ezekiel Elliott case, or the O. J.

0:10:08.320 --> 0:10:10.320
<v Speaker 1>Simpson case, which I know you were involved in a

0:10:10.360 --> 0:10:13.680
<v Speaker 1>big way. There are so many different interesting threads there.

0:10:13.840 --> 0:10:15.720
<v Speaker 1>But that's what jumped out at me about the first

0:10:15.760 --> 0:10:19.199
<v Speaker 1>thing that you said there well as you were presenting

0:10:19.400 --> 0:10:22.480
<v Speaker 1>your argument. In the last couple of minutes, I was

0:10:22.520 --> 0:10:26.640
<v Speaker 1>thinking about something you got to, which is that that

0:10:26.960 --> 0:10:31.800
<v Speaker 1>sort of tunnel vision about college football. Uh, mirrors what

0:10:31.840 --> 0:10:35.679
<v Speaker 1>we see in our politics, where a relative misdemeanor by

0:10:35.720 --> 0:10:38.040
<v Speaker 1>the other side is in fact an outrage but a

0:10:38.160 --> 0:10:42.280
<v Speaker 1>certifiable felony, not a matter of opinion, but it's objectively

0:10:42.360 --> 0:10:45.120
<v Speaker 1>true if our guy or our side did it, either

0:10:45.240 --> 0:10:47.720
<v Speaker 1>it can't be true, or will ignore it, will soft

0:10:47.720 --> 0:10:50.480
<v Speaker 1>pedal it. And this is just one example. I don't

0:10:50.520 --> 0:10:53.760
<v Speaker 1>want to get overly partisan politically here, because I'm much

0:10:53.840 --> 0:10:57.200
<v Speaker 1>less partisan than a portion of your audience likely thinks.

0:10:57.280 --> 0:10:59.480
<v Speaker 1>And we'll get to that later. And I'm sure you

0:10:59.520 --> 0:11:02.359
<v Speaker 1>could find an example of this that is the equivalent

0:11:02.720 --> 0:11:05.640
<v Speaker 1>from the other side. But when Janine Pierro, with a

0:11:05.679 --> 0:11:09.800
<v Speaker 1>straight face, says, by my new book, don't lie to me,

0:11:10.400 --> 0:11:12.800
<v Speaker 1>and all the lives that outrage her, of course come

0:11:13.200 --> 0:11:16.440
<v Speaker 1>from the left or from Democrats, well, if she doesn't

0:11:16.440 --> 0:11:20.080
<v Speaker 1>just defend she venerates Donald Trump, who, regardless of your

0:11:20.120 --> 0:11:24.320
<v Speaker 1>political affiliations, as objectively one of the most dishonest people

0:11:24.440 --> 0:11:27.800
<v Speaker 1>in modern American political history. You can you can barely

0:11:27.840 --> 0:11:30.480
<v Speaker 1>fact check him in real time. He lies so frequently,

0:11:30.840 --> 0:11:34.520
<v Speaker 1>and the irony of that is lost on Sean Hannity,

0:11:34.559 --> 0:11:37.560
<v Speaker 1>are on Janine Pierrou. That's just the world we live in,

0:11:38.160 --> 0:11:41.920
<v Speaker 1>all right. So this is this is fascinating in general. Um,

0:11:42.000 --> 0:11:44.960
<v Speaker 1>and I do think this this goes into my analogy

0:11:45.000 --> 0:11:47.480
<v Speaker 1>that I've been making for a long time. What matters

0:11:47.520 --> 0:11:52.040
<v Speaker 1>to me is whether or not there is a logical

0:11:52.080 --> 0:11:54.679
<v Speaker 1>basis to reach a conclusion. And let me explain what

0:11:54.720 --> 0:11:56.480
<v Speaker 1>I mean for everybody out there who's listening, and I

0:11:56.520 --> 0:11:59.480
<v Speaker 1>think you'll follow along too. And I like to use

0:11:59.520 --> 0:12:01.600
<v Speaker 1>this in all g in sports. Uh. And we're talking

0:12:01.600 --> 0:12:04.760
<v Speaker 1>to Bob Costas. Appreciate him joining us. If I tell you, hey,

0:12:04.800 --> 0:12:06.880
<v Speaker 1>I don't think that Tom Brady is going to win

0:12:06.920 --> 0:12:08.520
<v Speaker 1>the Super Bowl this year. And I said this to

0:12:08.520 --> 0:12:11.319
<v Speaker 1>you in my conversation recently, and I said, you know

0:12:11.480 --> 0:12:13.800
<v Speaker 1>you might listening right now, say, Okay, I agree with you.

0:12:13.800 --> 0:12:17.080
<v Speaker 1>Tampa Bay Buccaneers, Bruce Arians never done it before. NFC

0:12:17.160 --> 0:12:20.080
<v Speaker 1>is gonna be tough, NFC South, you got Drew Brees. Uh,

0:12:20.160 --> 0:12:22.720
<v Speaker 1>You've got a lot of challenges there. But if I've

0:12:22.800 --> 0:12:25.400
<v Speaker 1>said I don't believe Tom Brady is going to win

0:12:25.400 --> 0:12:27.400
<v Speaker 1>the Super Bowl because he's never been there and won

0:12:27.480 --> 0:12:30.640
<v Speaker 1>it before. You might agree with my conclusion, but the

0:12:30.640 --> 0:12:34.400
<v Speaker 1>facts upon which I based that conclusion are completely wrong.

0:12:34.480 --> 0:12:36.720
<v Speaker 1>And one of the things that troubles me most about

0:12:36.800 --> 0:12:40.720
<v Speaker 1>society today is the basis of facts. And I think

0:12:40.760 --> 0:12:43.120
<v Speaker 1>there are lots of politicians of both parties that agree

0:12:43.520 --> 0:12:45.960
<v Speaker 1>with me here, and unfortunately they don't have a prominent

0:12:46.080 --> 0:12:48.839
<v Speaker 1>of a platform in their parties. In general, we can

0:12:48.880 --> 0:12:52.680
<v Speaker 1>disagree about conclusions, which are basically opinions about ways to

0:12:52.760 --> 0:12:56.400
<v Speaker 1>address problems, but when we don't agree on the most

0:12:56.440 --> 0:13:00.320
<v Speaker 1>basic factual level, then we can't in any way have

0:13:00.440 --> 0:13:03.560
<v Speaker 1>a legitimate marketplace of ideas. And worse than that, we

0:13:03.679 --> 0:13:06.720
<v Speaker 1>have people who look at the conclusion and say, oh,

0:13:06.800 --> 0:13:09.720
<v Speaker 1>I agree with where that person he or she got

0:13:09.880 --> 0:13:13.040
<v Speaker 1>from a political purpose, but they don't understand that the

0:13:13.120 --> 0:13:16.080
<v Speaker 1>facts upon which that was based are quicksand and there's

0:13:16.120 --> 0:13:19.240
<v Speaker 1>nothing there and therefore the essence of the argument is

0:13:19.280 --> 0:13:22.120
<v Speaker 1>not legitimate, and that bothers me in a big way

0:13:22.160 --> 0:13:25.920
<v Speaker 1>by by and large, And this is a generalization, and

0:13:26.000 --> 0:13:29.240
<v Speaker 1>it's more true in the social media world than it

0:13:29.400 --> 0:13:33.840
<v Speaker 1>is and what still passes from more traditional forms of media,

0:13:34.360 --> 0:13:40.840
<v Speaker 1>which is anything that aligns with my predispositions and or resentments.

0:13:40.920 --> 0:13:46.080
<v Speaker 1>I'm inclined to believe without skepticism. Anything that challenges that,

0:13:46.440 --> 0:13:52.800
<v Speaker 1>I'm inclined to dismiss. The mainstream media has many flaws

0:13:52.840 --> 0:13:55.319
<v Speaker 1>that should be held to account. But when you've got

0:13:55.320 --> 0:13:57.880
<v Speaker 1>an all purpose intellectual will get out of jail free

0:13:57.880 --> 0:14:01.839
<v Speaker 1>card that says it's all news, which really has come

0:14:01.880 --> 0:14:04.040
<v Speaker 1>to mean anything I don't want to hear, and anything

0:14:04.040 --> 0:14:06.760
<v Speaker 1>that doesn't align with my prejudices, or anything that is

0:14:06.840 --> 0:14:10.720
<v Speaker 1>critical in a responsibly journalistic way of someone I don't

0:14:10.760 --> 0:14:13.920
<v Speaker 1>want to see criticized, I can just immediately dismiss it.

0:14:14.000 --> 0:14:18.880
<v Speaker 1>Never consider it as fake news. Okay, what happens in

0:14:19.160 --> 0:14:21.880
<v Speaker 1>the Twitter world, And that's what started this conversation, and

0:14:21.920 --> 0:14:26.640
<v Speaker 1>I'm glad we're acquainted through it is a fragment that

0:14:26.760 --> 0:14:31.360
<v Speaker 1>misrepresents not only is out there, but you think people,

0:14:31.440 --> 0:14:34.720
<v Speaker 1>no matter what their political affiliation is, no matter what

0:14:34.760 --> 0:14:37.760
<v Speaker 1>the rooting interest is in sports, you would think that

0:14:37.840 --> 0:14:40.320
<v Speaker 1>they had learned, They would have learned by now that

0:14:40.440 --> 0:14:44.520
<v Speaker 1>a lot of what is out there is either untrue, misleading,

0:14:45.000 --> 0:14:50.160
<v Speaker 1>or incomplete. And so you had people responding to what

0:14:50.240 --> 0:14:53.360
<v Speaker 1>you tweeted, Well, what about all the people who rely

0:14:53.480 --> 0:14:57.240
<v Speaker 1>on Saturday college football for the hotels and the restaurants.

0:14:57.240 --> 0:15:00.480
<v Speaker 1>Of course, I'm aware of that of co words, and

0:15:00.520 --> 0:15:08.160
<v Speaker 1>I've stipulated that many times, um this this may seem trivial,

0:15:08.240 --> 0:15:12.000
<v Speaker 1>and it is, except sometimes something that isn't all that important.

0:15:12.320 --> 0:15:15.960
<v Speaker 1>It's like a grain of sand on the beach. A

0:15:16.080 --> 0:15:18.520
<v Speaker 1>geologist can tell you what the beach is like by

0:15:18.560 --> 0:15:24.160
<v Speaker 1>examining that grain of sand. Jason Starr, the acclaimed baseball writer,

0:15:25.160 --> 0:15:27.320
<v Speaker 1>Hall of Fame Baseball writer. As a matter of fact,

0:15:27.720 --> 0:15:30.560
<v Speaker 1>I went to college with him at Syracuse, and he

0:15:30.600 --> 0:15:35.560
<v Speaker 1>wrote something very nice about my induction into the broadcasters

0:15:35.560 --> 0:15:37.320
<v Speaker 1>going in the Hall of Fame a couple of years ago,

0:15:37.920 --> 0:15:39.840
<v Speaker 1>and he tweeted out, and I'm not much of a

0:15:39.880 --> 0:15:42.160
<v Speaker 1>twitter guy, but some people called it to my attention,

0:15:42.960 --> 0:15:47.480
<v Speaker 1>he tweeted out one line from what he called my

0:15:47.600 --> 0:15:50.880
<v Speaker 1>wonderful speech or something to that effect, and that line

0:15:51.440 --> 0:15:56.880
<v Speaker 1>was that very often the way we recall the most

0:15:56.960 --> 0:16:01.720
<v Speaker 1>memorable moments in sports is dependent upon how they were

0:16:01.800 --> 0:16:07.160
<v Speaker 1>framed by a great writer or by a broadcaster, producer, director.

0:16:07.680 --> 0:16:11.240
<v Speaker 1>And in my Hall of Fame speech, which was about

0:16:11.280 --> 0:16:15.960
<v Speaker 1>people other than myself, I mentioned the Vince Scullies, the

0:16:16.080 --> 0:16:19.280
<v Speaker 1>Jack Box, the Ernie Harwell's and also the producers like

0:16:19.760 --> 0:16:23.000
<v Speaker 1>Um David Neil and Mike Weissman, and a great director

0:16:23.080 --> 0:16:27.160
<v Speaker 1>like Harry Coyle, and how they shaped people's recollections. I

0:16:27.240 --> 0:16:31.760
<v Speaker 1>used Kirk Gibson's Home Run as an example, and Gibson

0:16:31.840 --> 0:16:34.160
<v Speaker 1>himself says he was at the center of it, but

0:16:34.400 --> 0:16:37.640
<v Speaker 1>partly how he remembers it is how you now here

0:16:37.720 --> 0:16:40.840
<v Speaker 1>Vince Scullies call, and the way Harry Coyle directed it.

0:16:40.840 --> 0:16:44.560
<v Speaker 1>It was like a movie, right, So this one line

0:16:44.640 --> 0:16:47.200
<v Speaker 1>is there, and then I shouldn't have done it. You

0:16:47.240 --> 0:16:49.920
<v Speaker 1>should shouldn't waste your time going down these rabbit holes.

0:16:49.960 --> 0:16:53.880
<v Speaker 1>But since someone had called my attention to Jason's article

0:16:53.960 --> 0:16:56.720
<v Speaker 1>and then the tweet that accompanied it, there were a

0:16:56.720 --> 0:16:59.880
<v Speaker 1>bunch of responses. Maney of them are very kind regarding me.

0:17:00.240 --> 0:17:04.719
<v Speaker 1>But somewhere, oh right, Hostess says that the broadcasters are

0:17:04.760 --> 0:17:07.880
<v Speaker 1>more important than the players. Thought about the players, it's

0:17:07.920 --> 0:17:12.600
<v Speaker 1>about him. If you had seen the speech in context,

0:17:13.000 --> 0:17:15.880
<v Speaker 1>it was the exact opposite of that. It was less

0:17:15.920 --> 0:17:18.320
<v Speaker 1>about me than almost anybody I think who has ever

0:17:18.359 --> 0:17:22.240
<v Speaker 1>stood there behind that podium. It was about my love

0:17:22.240 --> 0:17:24.920
<v Speaker 1>of the craft and my love of baseball. But wouldn't

0:17:24.920 --> 0:17:28.520
<v Speaker 1>you think that by now somebody wouldn't think that they

0:17:28.520 --> 0:17:32.040
<v Speaker 1>could go off and voice an opinion based on a

0:17:32.080 --> 0:17:36.000
<v Speaker 1>fragment of something. And yet that is rampant in our

0:17:36.040 --> 0:17:40.560
<v Speaker 1>media culture. So people, including some people of goodwill, believe

0:17:40.640 --> 0:17:43.720
<v Speaker 1>a lot of things that just are not so, are

0:17:43.760 --> 0:17:47.160
<v Speaker 1>not so factually, or are not so about the beliefs

0:17:47.160 --> 0:17:51.640
<v Speaker 1>and motivations of people they either support or opposed. All Right,

0:17:51.680 --> 0:17:55.320
<v Speaker 1>this is fascinating to me what that whole story in general.

0:17:56.359 --> 0:17:58.440
<v Speaker 1>I I have said for a long time that my

0:17:58.600 --> 0:18:01.639
<v Speaker 1>biggest talent to the in that I have one is

0:18:01.720 --> 0:18:04.359
<v Speaker 1>and my wife says this, drives are crazy about me

0:18:04.400 --> 0:18:06.000
<v Speaker 1>one of many things. By the way, we've been married

0:18:06.040 --> 0:18:09.359
<v Speaker 1>sixteen years, so they're basically everything I do. Drives are

0:18:09.359 --> 0:18:13.400
<v Speaker 1>crazy at this point. But yeah, welcome to the club. Indeed,

0:18:13.560 --> 0:18:16.160
<v Speaker 1>be sure to catch live editions about Kicked the coverage

0:18:16.160 --> 0:18:19.040
<v Speaker 1>with Clay Travis week days at six am Eastern, three

0:18:19.119 --> 0:18:22.560
<v Speaker 1>am Pacific. We're talking with Bob Costas. This is the

0:18:22.600 --> 0:18:27.240
<v Speaker 1>Wins and Losses Podcast. I genuinely am not impacted by

0:18:27.400 --> 0:18:31.520
<v Speaker 1>what someone says about me online, positive or negative. I

0:18:31.520 --> 0:18:34.440
<v Speaker 1>don't know why that is. I but I think it's

0:18:34.720 --> 0:18:39.000
<v Speaker 1>been important in allowing me to basically continue to plow

0:18:39.160 --> 0:18:43.119
<v Speaker 1>forward in my career even as social media has become

0:18:43.160 --> 0:18:46.120
<v Speaker 1>more all encompassing. I'm sure I've got my phone sitting

0:18:46.160 --> 0:18:48.359
<v Speaker 1>in front of me right now. If I typed in

0:18:48.440 --> 0:18:50.320
<v Speaker 1>my name, I could go through and there would be

0:18:50.359 --> 0:18:52.840
<v Speaker 1>ten awful things that have been said about me today

0:18:52.880 --> 0:18:56.320
<v Speaker 1>already that I just haven't seen. And so you are

0:18:56.480 --> 0:19:00.080
<v Speaker 1>one of the most accomplished broadcasters in the history of

0:19:00.119 --> 0:19:04.679
<v Speaker 1>sports on television. Kevin Durant, for example, is whatever you

0:19:04.720 --> 0:19:06.960
<v Speaker 1>want to say about him, one of the four or

0:19:07.080 --> 0:19:10.760
<v Speaker 1>five best at his craft of basketball that has played

0:19:10.760 --> 0:19:13.240
<v Speaker 1>in his generation, right, I think that's probably fair to say.

0:19:13.960 --> 0:19:16.880
<v Speaker 1>Yet I do believe that there are many people out

0:19:16.880 --> 0:19:20.760
<v Speaker 1>there who are wildly accomplished like yourself, like Kevin Durant,

0:19:20.800 --> 0:19:23.119
<v Speaker 1>and I'm we're using athletics in particular, but I think

0:19:23.160 --> 0:19:25.040
<v Speaker 1>it could be the president. I think it could be

0:19:25.280 --> 0:19:27.840
<v Speaker 1>other people who are, you know, reading the mentions and

0:19:27.880 --> 0:19:33.400
<v Speaker 1>reading the tweets that are really taking into account what

0:19:33.480 --> 0:19:36.600
<v Speaker 1>other people say. And and my perspective on that is,

0:19:37.000 --> 0:19:39.240
<v Speaker 1>if I'm one of the best in the world at anything,

0:19:39.840 --> 0:19:42.560
<v Speaker 1>I don't care what someone who is not in my

0:19:42.680 --> 0:19:46.399
<v Speaker 1>field thinks about me at all, And I don't know

0:19:46.440 --> 0:19:49.199
<v Speaker 1>why that is. I care about people who know me right,

0:19:49.280 --> 0:19:52.840
<v Speaker 1>people who have interactions. But for you, I don't know.

0:19:52.920 --> 0:19:55.080
<v Speaker 1>Like I told my mom, never read the comments to

0:19:55.119 --> 0:19:57.560
<v Speaker 1>anything that I say. Read it, have your own opinions.

0:19:57.600 --> 0:19:59.760
<v Speaker 1>I almost have never read any comment that people have

0:19:59.840 --> 0:20:02.640
<v Speaker 1>put after my articles in my entire life. Same thing

0:20:02.760 --> 0:20:05.240
<v Speaker 1>is true for Twitter. At this point, I barely read

0:20:05.280 --> 0:20:08.280
<v Speaker 1>the mentions. I share my opinion. What do you think

0:20:08.320 --> 0:20:11.800
<v Speaker 1>it was about that that made you click down below?

0:20:11.920 --> 0:20:14.040
<v Speaker 1>What you said was a nice thing. Jason Stark, who

0:20:14.080 --> 0:20:16.840
<v Speaker 1>is an incredibly accomplished writer, was saying, to see what

0:20:16.880 --> 0:20:19.399
<v Speaker 1>people you didn't know we're saying about what he had

0:20:19.440 --> 0:20:22.199
<v Speaker 1>said about you. You mentioned rabbit holes. To me, that's like,

0:20:22.320 --> 0:20:23.800
<v Speaker 1>that's like going all the way in the rabbit hole

0:20:23.800 --> 0:20:26.600
<v Speaker 1>to China. Like you, you've gone really far at that point.

0:20:27.400 --> 0:20:30.879
<v Speaker 1>And truth, that took about five minutes, and but it

0:20:30.960 --> 0:20:33.240
<v Speaker 1>is fascinating and it's seductive, and I think it speaks

0:20:33.280 --> 0:20:36.600
<v Speaker 1>to social media in general, which is designed to make

0:20:36.720 --> 0:20:40.000
<v Speaker 1>us care what people we don't know think about us

0:20:40.040 --> 0:20:42.680
<v Speaker 1>all day long, whether you're a celebrity like Bob Costas,

0:20:42.680 --> 0:20:44.720
<v Speaker 1>who's one of the best sports journalists of all time,

0:20:45.359 --> 0:20:48.720
<v Speaker 1>or whether you're somebody's grandma who's going on Facebook and

0:20:48.760 --> 0:20:50.679
<v Speaker 1>making a comment and then it goes viral and a

0:20:50.680 --> 0:20:53.280
<v Speaker 1>lot of people she doesn't know suddenly respond to it

0:20:53.320 --> 0:20:56.520
<v Speaker 1>and she feels compelled to read what they say to Yeah,

0:20:56.600 --> 0:20:59.000
<v Speaker 1>I think the key here, Clay is I'm trying to

0:20:59.040 --> 0:21:00.800
<v Speaker 1>make a larger point, and you'll have to take me

0:21:00.840 --> 0:21:03.800
<v Speaker 1>at my word here. I am well aware. I hope

0:21:03.840 --> 0:21:07.040
<v Speaker 1>I have enough perspective to be well aware that on

0:21:07.119 --> 0:21:10.080
<v Speaker 1>the worst day of my life, I am more fortunate

0:21:10.200 --> 0:21:13.480
<v Speaker 1>than most people will ever be. And I'm very, very

0:21:13.520 --> 0:21:15.880
<v Speaker 1>appreciative of all the nice things that have been said

0:21:15.920 --> 0:21:18.439
<v Speaker 1>and written about me, and about all the breaks and

0:21:18.480 --> 0:21:22.840
<v Speaker 1>great experiences I've had in my career. I truly feel blessed.

0:21:23.080 --> 0:21:25.240
<v Speaker 1>And so I'm not losing any sleep over this, and

0:21:25.240 --> 0:21:28.440
<v Speaker 1>I'm not spending undo time on it. But where it

0:21:28.520 --> 0:21:32.240
<v Speaker 1>interests me is in the larger point. And sometimes you

0:21:32.320 --> 0:21:34.600
<v Speaker 1>have to use your own experience, because if you're an

0:21:34.640 --> 0:21:38.840
<v Speaker 1>honest person, you're going to be credible about your own experience.

0:21:38.880 --> 0:21:41.760
<v Speaker 1>You're going to know the wise and wherefores of your

0:21:41.800 --> 0:21:46.080
<v Speaker 1>own experience. And if it illustrates something larger, that is

0:21:46.119 --> 0:21:50.560
<v Speaker 1>of some importance beyond yourself, then I think it's legitimate.

0:21:50.800 --> 0:21:53.119
<v Speaker 1>And so we may talk, for example, about the gun

0:21:53.160 --> 0:21:57.879
<v Speaker 1>thing from eight years ago on NBC and how you know.

0:21:58.119 --> 0:22:00.359
<v Speaker 1>I wish it hadn't happened. I wish people didn't have

0:22:00.359 --> 0:22:02.560
<v Speaker 1>a misimpression. I wish I had done a better job

0:22:02.760 --> 0:22:06.040
<v Speaker 1>in that moment. But I also think it illustrates a

0:22:06.160 --> 0:22:09.159
<v Speaker 1>larger point. And that's why we're talking about beyond me

0:22:09.280 --> 0:22:12.720
<v Speaker 1>just muttering to myself. We're talking to Bob Costas. This

0:22:12.760 --> 0:22:16.120
<v Speaker 1>is the Wins and Losses Podcast. I'm Clay Travis. Okay,

0:22:16.280 --> 0:22:18.920
<v Speaker 1>I want to get to the essays and everything else,

0:22:18.960 --> 0:22:22.119
<v Speaker 1>but I want to start here. You have won a

0:22:22.320 --> 0:22:25.919
<v Speaker 1>legendary career as a sports sports broadcaster. There are a

0:22:25.960 --> 0:22:28.400
<v Speaker 1>lot of people out there right now who have experienced

0:22:28.440 --> 0:22:31.639
<v Speaker 1>many of your broadcasts over the years. There are also

0:22:31.720 --> 0:22:34.000
<v Speaker 1>a lot of young people who listen to this podcast

0:22:34.040 --> 0:22:36.840
<v Speaker 1>because one of the goals with the Wins and Losses

0:22:36.960 --> 0:22:40.440
<v Speaker 1>theme is to discuss the best and worst parts potentially

0:22:40.520 --> 0:22:44.000
<v Speaker 1>of one's career and the wins and losses along the way.

0:22:44.320 --> 0:22:46.800
<v Speaker 1>So I want to start here. Take you back to

0:22:46.880 --> 0:22:50.199
<v Speaker 1>when you are in college, if you are able to

0:22:50.280 --> 0:22:54.240
<v Speaker 1>go back and tell twenty year old Bob Costas things

0:22:54.280 --> 0:22:57.160
<v Speaker 1>that you have learned along the way in your career

0:22:57.240 --> 0:22:59.719
<v Speaker 1>that you think would have been very important. There are

0:23:00.000 --> 0:23:01.600
<v Speaker 1>a year olds who would like to be the next

0:23:01.600 --> 0:23:04.920
<v Speaker 1>Bob cost Us listening to this podcast right now. What

0:23:05.000 --> 0:23:07.760
<v Speaker 1>do you think you have learned that you didn't know

0:23:07.880 --> 0:23:09.800
<v Speaker 1>when you were a college kid or maybe a high

0:23:09.800 --> 0:23:14.200
<v Speaker 1>school kid trying to become what you became. I think

0:23:14.240 --> 0:23:16.640
<v Speaker 1>I learned this along the way, and it didn't take

0:23:16.760 --> 0:23:20.280
<v Speaker 1>all that long. No matter how much you would meire someone,

0:23:20.480 --> 0:23:23.320
<v Speaker 1>you can be influenced by them. I was influenced by

0:23:23.359 --> 0:23:26.439
<v Speaker 1>Jim McKay. I was influenced directly by Marty Glickman and

0:23:26.440 --> 0:23:28.920
<v Speaker 1>Marv Albert. I went to Syracuse because they had gone

0:23:29.240 --> 0:23:33.120
<v Speaker 1>to Syracuse, and because Syracuse had early on fifty years ago,

0:23:33.480 --> 0:23:36.640
<v Speaker 1>they had a genuine communications department, not just a print

0:23:36.680 --> 0:23:41.440
<v Speaker 1>journalism department, but a true state of the art communications department.

0:23:41.520 --> 0:23:44.679
<v Speaker 1>Now almost every university does, but Syracuse was ahead of

0:23:44.680 --> 0:23:48.719
<v Speaker 1>the curve, and since I got there, a legion of

0:23:48.920 --> 0:23:53.000
<v Speaker 1>notable sports broadcasters have followed, and some had preceded me.

0:23:53.160 --> 0:23:57.439
<v Speaker 1>Marvin Marty and Dick stocked In and Len Berman and

0:23:57.480 --> 0:24:00.000
<v Speaker 1>a few others, But now it's into dozens and does.

0:24:00.560 --> 0:24:04.200
<v Speaker 1>But no matter who, you were influenced by Jim McKay,

0:24:04.440 --> 0:24:07.480
<v Speaker 1>Vince Scully, Jack Buck. Early in my career I was

0:24:07.520 --> 0:24:10.280
<v Speaker 1>in St. Louis at km O X. One of the

0:24:10.280 --> 0:24:14.240
<v Speaker 1>things I learned was, do not copy them. They're great

0:24:14.359 --> 0:24:19.359
<v Speaker 1>because they are distinctive, because they are not generic, and

0:24:19.400 --> 0:24:21.919
<v Speaker 1>if you try to copy them, you'll only be a

0:24:21.960 --> 0:24:27.000
<v Speaker 1>pale imitation of the master. Early on, it's inevitable you'll

0:24:27.080 --> 0:24:29.760
<v Speaker 1>copy somebody. You've got to have a starting point, but

0:24:29.920 --> 0:24:33.560
<v Speaker 1>eventually you've got to be able to develop your own style,

0:24:34.040 --> 0:24:36.960
<v Speaker 1>otherwise you won't get very far. And the other thing

0:24:37.000 --> 0:24:40.679
<v Speaker 1>I learned early on was that there's no such thing

0:24:40.680 --> 0:24:44.120
<v Speaker 1>as a perfect broadcast, and not even I think Vince

0:24:44.119 --> 0:24:46.000
<v Speaker 1>Scully would tell you the same thing. As close to

0:24:46.000 --> 0:24:49.440
<v Speaker 1>perfection as you could get, maybe have perfect moments. Jim

0:24:49.560 --> 0:24:54.800
<v Speaker 1>McKay was perfect in that moment in munich Ino, Al

0:24:54.880 --> 0:24:59.000
<v Speaker 1>Michaels was perfect with do you believe in miracles? But

0:24:59.119 --> 0:25:01.720
<v Speaker 1>if you are a perfect actionist, that can be a

0:25:01.800 --> 0:25:05.760
<v Speaker 1>good thing because it keeps you working hard and it

0:25:05.840 --> 0:25:09.800
<v Speaker 1>makes you concentrate on the fine points and never be satisfied.

0:25:10.359 --> 0:25:12.560
<v Speaker 1>But it can also cost you sleep unless you get

0:25:12.560 --> 0:25:16.960
<v Speaker 1>a handle on it. Because I used to threat over

0:25:17.080 --> 0:25:20.119
<v Speaker 1>things that other people thought were terrific. Some of the

0:25:20.119 --> 0:25:23.080
<v Speaker 1>things that people mentioned to me as among their favorite

0:25:23.080 --> 0:25:25.280
<v Speaker 1>things I've ever done, somewhere in the back of my

0:25:25.320 --> 0:25:29.520
<v Speaker 1>head is yeah, but if only I'd said that, or

0:25:29.520 --> 0:25:32.240
<v Speaker 1>if only I changed one word, or if only I'd

0:25:32.240 --> 0:25:37.000
<v Speaker 1>remember to include that. And eventually I came to understand,

0:25:37.600 --> 0:25:40.520
<v Speaker 1>on my own peace of mind that sometimes perfect is

0:25:40.560 --> 0:25:43.360
<v Speaker 1>the enemy of the good. A lot of what I've

0:25:43.400 --> 0:25:47.040
<v Speaker 1>done has been pretty damn good, only occasionally if you

0:25:47.080 --> 0:25:50.879
<v Speaker 1>reach perfection. Did you go back early in your career

0:25:51.280 --> 0:25:55.320
<v Speaker 1>and study your broadcast, listen to yourself to pick out

0:25:55.400 --> 0:25:58.959
<v Speaker 1>flaws or so, And how would you do that and

0:25:59.040 --> 0:26:03.160
<v Speaker 1>be effective in being able to analyze yourself? Well? Then

0:26:03.359 --> 0:26:05.800
<v Speaker 1>you know, in the seventies, if you're listening to radio

0:26:05.880 --> 0:26:09.880
<v Speaker 1>broadcast on a cassette recorder, uh, you couldn't get your

0:26:09.920 --> 0:26:14.280
<v Speaker 1>television broadcasts unless you went down to thirty Rock at

0:26:14.359 --> 0:26:18.400
<v Speaker 1>NBC and somebody there, you know, quote it up for you.

0:26:19.080 --> 0:26:22.560
<v Speaker 1>I bought one of the very early VHS machines. Uh,

0:26:22.720 --> 0:26:25.639
<v Speaker 1>three quarter inch tapes an hour at a time, so

0:26:25.720 --> 0:26:28.359
<v Speaker 1>a whole ball of ball game was three tapes. I

0:26:28.359 --> 0:26:33.440
<v Speaker 1>remember the Sandberg game in the legendary Cardinal Cub game,

0:26:33.480 --> 0:26:36.280
<v Speaker 1>where Sandberg get the two home runs of Bruce Suitor

0:26:36.359 --> 0:26:38.080
<v Speaker 1>late in the game, and it was the NBC game

0:26:38.119 --> 0:26:40.399
<v Speaker 1>of the week on a Saturday afternoon, when that meant something.

0:26:40.440 --> 0:26:43.400
<v Speaker 1>It was a really big deal. Sometimes the Saturday afternoon

0:26:43.400 --> 0:26:46.440
<v Speaker 1>game of the week got higher ratings regular season game

0:26:46.480 --> 0:26:49.840
<v Speaker 1>than some World Series games get now. Um, And it's

0:26:49.840 --> 0:26:53.760
<v Speaker 1>probably the signature game of Sandberg's career. It took five tapes,

0:26:54.440 --> 0:27:00.000
<v Speaker 1>um to have that, and I've got those VHS tapes somewhere, um.

0:27:00.080 --> 0:27:02.640
<v Speaker 1>But it was much harder then than it is now.

0:27:02.760 --> 0:27:05.440
<v Speaker 1>Now you can everything at your fingertips and you can

0:27:05.480 --> 0:27:08.399
<v Speaker 1>review it. Uh. Yeah. I used to go back, and

0:27:08.440 --> 0:27:12.720
<v Speaker 1>I remember being discouraged early on the first time I

0:27:12.760 --> 0:27:16.359
<v Speaker 1>heard myself on the air at w A E Er,

0:27:16.680 --> 0:27:19.480
<v Speaker 1>the campus station at Syracuse, and I heard it back

0:27:19.920 --> 0:27:22.320
<v Speaker 1>and there were still vestiges of a New York accent,

0:27:22.680 --> 0:27:26.400
<v Speaker 1>and it was a thin, reedy kind of penny voice.

0:27:26.960 --> 0:27:29.600
<v Speaker 1>And then shortly after that I heard the twenty six

0:27:29.680 --> 0:27:32.160
<v Speaker 1>year old Al Michaels just a year or two after

0:27:32.200 --> 0:27:37.000
<v Speaker 1>that on the radio on the two World Series between

0:27:37.000 --> 0:27:39.840
<v Speaker 1>the Reds and the Age, and I said to myself, damn,

0:27:39.880 --> 0:27:43.479
<v Speaker 1>he's only twenty six. I'll never be that good, at

0:27:43.520 --> 0:27:45.320
<v Speaker 1>least not in the next few years. I'll never be

0:27:45.400 --> 0:27:48.920
<v Speaker 1>that good. Um. And I was discouraged, actually, but things

0:27:48.960 --> 0:27:51.200
<v Speaker 1>turned out all right. I guess I'm along run. So

0:27:51.960 --> 0:27:55.119
<v Speaker 1>that's amazing. Take me through your career path as a

0:27:55.160 --> 0:27:58.639
<v Speaker 1>young guy. You're at Syracuse. How do you get in

0:27:58.920 --> 0:28:02.040
<v Speaker 1>because you've got to the top at NBC at a

0:28:02.119 --> 0:28:06.600
<v Speaker 1>relatively young age. How did you get along that path?

0:28:06.920 --> 0:28:09.720
<v Speaker 1>What happened to allow you to advance the way that

0:28:09.800 --> 0:28:14.080
<v Speaker 1>you did, and where did you start? Very importantly, I

0:28:14.119 --> 0:28:18.360
<v Speaker 1>had a professor at Syracuse who took an active interest

0:28:18.520 --> 0:28:22.680
<v Speaker 1>in me. He would identify a handful of kids each

0:28:22.760 --> 0:28:26.080
<v Speaker 1>year who he thought had the potential to be good

0:28:26.480 --> 0:28:29.359
<v Speaker 1>if they worked at it. And he was a caring

0:28:29.520 --> 0:28:33.880
<v Speaker 1>but merciless critic to the point where and no joke here,

0:28:33.920 --> 0:28:37.600
<v Speaker 1>Clay in the until the mid eighties when I was

0:28:37.640 --> 0:28:40.560
<v Speaker 1>on NBC and pretty successful, I would still hear from

0:28:40.640 --> 0:28:44.440
<v Speaker 1>him after the baseball and football broadcast. That was good,

0:28:44.520 --> 0:28:48.040
<v Speaker 1>but you know, he was still critiquing me, and and

0:28:48.120 --> 0:28:51.880
<v Speaker 1>he helped me with projecting, with with getting my voice

0:28:51.920 --> 0:28:54.560
<v Speaker 1>into better shape. I never took speech classes, but he

0:28:54.680 --> 0:28:57.800
<v Speaker 1>kind of gave me some tips. Um, and he told me,

0:28:57.960 --> 0:29:01.560
<v Speaker 1>you're you're rushing too much here. Ace is important. Try

0:29:01.640 --> 0:29:04.800
<v Speaker 1>to pace yourself. Uh, don't feel like you have to

0:29:04.880 --> 0:29:07.800
<v Speaker 1>use all your preparation early on. It's normal to be

0:29:07.880 --> 0:29:11.160
<v Speaker 1>anxious when you're young, so you come in really well prepared.

0:29:11.440 --> 0:29:13.360
<v Speaker 1>But if you empty the whole bucket in the first

0:29:13.400 --> 0:29:15.480
<v Speaker 1>few innings are in the first period of a hockey

0:29:15.480 --> 0:29:17.800
<v Speaker 1>game or whatever it is, wait till the time where

0:29:17.800 --> 0:29:21.040
<v Speaker 1>it really fits and the audience doesn't know whether you've

0:29:21.160 --> 0:29:24.400
<v Speaker 1>used or a hundred percent of what you came into

0:29:24.400 --> 0:29:26.760
<v Speaker 1>the boothworth as long as what you use was appropriate

0:29:27.040 --> 0:29:29.600
<v Speaker 1>and it was good. So I think that with his

0:29:29.720 --> 0:29:32.360
<v Speaker 1>help and being at w A e R, which is

0:29:32.400 --> 0:29:37.040
<v Speaker 1>a legendary campus radio station, and you're surrounded by like

0:29:37.280 --> 0:29:40.239
<v Speaker 1>minded people, some of whom are really quite talented, and

0:29:40.280 --> 0:29:43.480
<v Speaker 1>we fed off each other's energy, I think I became

0:29:44.160 --> 0:29:47.600
<v Speaker 1>pretty good early. I must have had some precocious level

0:29:47.920 --> 0:29:51.360
<v Speaker 1>of talent, and I worked to refine it. And then

0:29:51.400 --> 0:29:53.600
<v Speaker 1>when I was a senior at Syracuse, I got a

0:29:53.720 --> 0:29:57.440
<v Speaker 1>job broadcasting minor league hockey in the Old Eastern Hockey League,

0:29:57.480 --> 0:29:59.880
<v Speaker 1>the league that the Paul Newman movie Slap Shot is

0:30:00.000 --> 0:30:02.320
<v Speaker 1>based on thirty bucks a game, five dollars a day

0:30:02.520 --> 0:30:05.760
<v Speaker 1>meal money on the road. But that was sort of

0:30:05.800 --> 0:30:09.520
<v Speaker 1>a baptismal um. I wasn't that good at it right away,

0:30:09.560 --> 0:30:12.880
<v Speaker 1>but I came became pretty good at it by by

0:30:12.960 --> 0:30:15.320
<v Speaker 1>mid season, and I thought that I'd come back for

0:30:15.360 --> 0:30:19.160
<v Speaker 1>a second season of that, uh and finish up the

0:30:19.200 --> 0:30:22.880
<v Speaker 1>remaining credits at Syracuse. When I sent a tape to

0:30:23.120 --> 0:30:25.520
<v Speaker 1>k m X and St. Louis on a lark, the

0:30:25.600 --> 0:30:28.680
<v Speaker 1>Carolina Cougars of the Old A B A had become

0:30:28.720 --> 0:30:31.080
<v Speaker 1>the Spirits of St. Louis. They would last only two

0:30:31.160 --> 0:30:34.719
<v Speaker 1>years until the ABA folded and only four of the teams.

0:30:34.800 --> 0:30:37.560
<v Speaker 1>The nets dispersed, the Nuggets and the Pacers got absorbed

0:30:37.880 --> 0:30:41.000
<v Speaker 1>and the Spirits went away. But those two years were

0:30:41.080 --> 0:30:44.880
<v Speaker 1>big for me. Uh. Somehow, some way, Jack Buck, who

0:30:44.920 --> 0:30:47.440
<v Speaker 1>was the sports director of the station, they had some

0:30:47.560 --> 0:30:51.720
<v Speaker 1>two applicants on real to real tapes, and Jack Buck

0:30:51.800 --> 0:30:54.960
<v Speaker 1>liked my tape and I got brought into St. Louis

0:30:55.000 --> 0:30:58.120
<v Speaker 1>for an interview, and perhaps my willingness to work cheap.

0:30:58.840 --> 0:31:02.239
<v Speaker 1>Eleven dollars was my salary for that first year at

0:31:02.280 --> 0:31:05.160
<v Speaker 1>km X, and I would have paid them eleven thousand

0:31:06.680 --> 0:31:09.480
<v Speaker 1>and So I'm at k X, I'm twenty two years old,

0:31:10.160 --> 0:31:13.200
<v Speaker 1>and I'm not a colleague of I wouldn't be so presumptuous.

0:31:13.240 --> 0:31:16.479
<v Speaker 1>But I'm in the same place as Jack Buck and

0:31:16.680 --> 0:31:19.640
<v Speaker 1>Dan Kelly, who until Doc Emer came along, was the

0:31:19.760 --> 0:31:23.800
<v Speaker 1>gold standard of hockey announcers, and everyone was terrific. They're

0:31:24.080 --> 0:31:26.680
<v Speaker 1>both in news and in sports. They were all. They

0:31:26.680 --> 0:31:29.280
<v Speaker 1>could have stopped the network with the quality of the

0:31:29.360 --> 0:31:32.840
<v Speaker 1>talent that was there. And you got to kind of

0:31:32.840 --> 0:31:35.000
<v Speaker 1>pick up your game if you're going to keep pace.

0:31:35.120 --> 0:31:38.800
<v Speaker 1>And I think that accelerated my development as well. And

0:31:38.840 --> 0:31:40.920
<v Speaker 1>I'll try to make this as concise as possible, but

0:31:40.920 --> 0:31:44.320
<v Speaker 1>I've already failed in that regard. People love these stories,

0:31:44.320 --> 0:31:47.560
<v Speaker 1>don't don't worry about that. Km o X was not

0:31:47.680 --> 0:31:50.400
<v Speaker 1>just an affiliate. It was a CBS owned and operated

0:31:50.440 --> 0:31:56.680
<v Speaker 1>station when that really made a difference, powerhouse station and

0:31:56.960 --> 0:32:01.560
<v Speaker 1>many of their announcers Joe Garagiola, Harry Jack Buck, later

0:32:01.840 --> 0:32:05.520
<v Speaker 1>Gary Bender, and Dan deardorfan of course later Joe Buck

0:32:05.560 --> 0:32:09.280
<v Speaker 1>and Dan Kelly on hockey. These guys had gone to

0:32:09.360 --> 0:32:12.160
<v Speaker 1>the network while remaining at km o X, so it

0:32:12.200 --> 0:32:16.200
<v Speaker 1>was kind of a feeder system. So al Michaels is

0:32:16.240 --> 0:32:21.240
<v Speaker 1>at CBS. It's September and he signs with ABC in

0:32:21.320 --> 0:32:23.760
<v Speaker 1>less than a week before the first game of the season,

0:32:24.000 --> 0:32:26.680
<v Speaker 1>and he was supposed to do San Francisco at Green Bay.

0:32:26.840 --> 0:32:30.640
<v Speaker 1>And so the president of CBS Sports calls Bob Highland,

0:32:30.640 --> 0:32:34.000
<v Speaker 1>who ran km OX, and says, we need somebody. Well,

0:32:34.000 --> 0:32:36.840
<v Speaker 1>Buck already had an assignment. Kelly had an assignment. He said,

0:32:36.840 --> 0:32:38.920
<v Speaker 1>we got a kid here. He's twenty four years old.

0:32:38.960 --> 0:32:42.600
<v Speaker 1>He looks like he's four team, but he's pretty good off.

0:32:42.600 --> 0:32:44.880
<v Speaker 1>I go to Green Bay. I had never done, except

0:32:44.960 --> 0:32:47.680
<v Speaker 1>for a half of two football games on the radio.

0:32:47.800 --> 0:32:50.800
<v Speaker 1>I've never done a football game. I go to Green Bay.

0:32:51.000 --> 0:32:53.760
<v Speaker 1>Jay Randall showed me how to make a spotting board.

0:32:53.840 --> 0:32:56.360
<v Speaker 1>I go to Green Bay. I do this game. I'm

0:32:56.360 --> 0:32:58.600
<v Speaker 1>sure it wasn't a game worthy of the time capsule,

0:32:58.640 --> 0:33:00.920
<v Speaker 1>but it was good enough. The They brought me back

0:33:01.520 --> 0:33:04.640
<v Speaker 1>for occasional games, maybe three or four small regional games

0:33:04.640 --> 0:33:08.040
<v Speaker 1>a year in football or backed up basketball games on

0:33:08.120 --> 0:33:11.480
<v Speaker 1>the NBA and Don Olmire at NBC, even though none

0:33:11.480 --> 0:33:13.240
<v Speaker 1>of those games ever went into the big market of

0:33:13.280 --> 0:33:16.960
<v Speaker 1>New York. He became aware of me and he hired

0:33:17.000 --> 0:33:20.480
<v Speaker 1>me when I was twenty seven full time at NBC.

0:33:20.880 --> 0:33:22.960
<v Speaker 1>And after I was there for only a month or so,

0:33:23.080 --> 0:33:25.040
<v Speaker 1>he calls me into his office and he says, you know,

0:33:25.520 --> 0:33:27.240
<v Speaker 1>we really liked to work. We think you have a

0:33:27.280 --> 0:33:29.560
<v Speaker 1>future here. Let me ask me something. How old are you?

0:33:29.880 --> 0:33:33.080
<v Speaker 1>He said? He said, God, damn it, you look like

0:33:33.160 --> 0:33:36.440
<v Speaker 1>your fourth seen that words. He goes, how much older

0:33:36.680 --> 0:33:38.560
<v Speaker 1>do you think you would look if you grew a beard?

0:33:38.960 --> 0:33:40.960
<v Speaker 1>And I set out five years at least, and he

0:33:41.000 --> 0:33:43.400
<v Speaker 1>perks up. He goes, really, I said yeah, because that's

0:33:43.400 --> 0:33:47.760
<v Speaker 1>how long it would take to grow it. So you know, somehow,

0:33:48.000 --> 0:33:51.480
<v Speaker 1>somehow it worked out. Um, even when I was hosting

0:33:51.520 --> 0:33:53.520
<v Speaker 1>the Olympics when I was forty, I'm sure I didn't

0:33:53.520 --> 0:33:57.400
<v Speaker 1>look the part exactly, but people accepted it and and

0:33:57.480 --> 0:34:00.280
<v Speaker 1>it worked out. And I think I think the outom

0:34:00.280 --> 0:34:02.440
<v Speaker 1>line of it is if you have any talent at

0:34:02.480 --> 0:34:06.720
<v Speaker 1>all and you get thrust into situations. Brian Gumbel left

0:34:06.720 --> 0:34:09.520
<v Speaker 1>Sports to go to the Today Show. They didn't have

0:34:09.560 --> 0:34:12.360
<v Speaker 1>anybody in mind to host the football show, and that

0:34:12.440 --> 0:34:17.080
<v Speaker 1>eventually became hosting the NBA on NBC and hosting the Olympics.

0:34:17.520 --> 0:34:20.480
<v Speaker 1>I got thrust into it. I had almost no studio

0:34:20.560 --> 0:34:23.440
<v Speaker 1>hosting the experience at all. The first five years. I've

0:34:23.480 --> 0:34:26.640
<v Speaker 1>never used a telepopter at all. I just ad lived everything.

0:34:27.080 --> 0:34:30.080
<v Speaker 1>But I just found my way, and you become more

0:34:30.120 --> 0:34:33.920
<v Speaker 1>and more comfortable with it. I think of the luck involved.

0:34:34.280 --> 0:34:38.640
<v Speaker 1>NBC hires Ben Scully, Joe garg Joel and Tony Kubec

0:34:38.680 --> 0:34:42.719
<v Speaker 1>had been a legendary pair. They put Joe with them.

0:34:43.120 --> 0:34:44.680
<v Speaker 1>Then has to be on the a game. He is

0:34:44.719 --> 0:34:49.200
<v Speaker 1>the greatest I inherit. Tony Kubeck the backup game becomes

0:34:49.200 --> 0:34:52.320
<v Speaker 1>a much more important thing. And then I started hosting

0:34:52.320 --> 0:34:54.480
<v Speaker 1>the World Series, and in the years where we had

0:34:54.520 --> 0:34:57.400
<v Speaker 1>both lcs is, Tony and I would do the American League.

0:34:57.760 --> 0:34:59.920
<v Speaker 1>That put me on a much bigger stage than I

0:35:00.000 --> 0:35:02.600
<v Speaker 1>would have expected at that point in my career. Now,

0:35:02.760 --> 0:35:05.359
<v Speaker 1>if an opportunity comes along, you have to be able

0:35:05.360 --> 0:35:09.720
<v Speaker 1>to take advantage of that opportunity. Uh. David Letterman starts

0:35:09.719 --> 0:35:15.120
<v Speaker 1>his show at NBC one night. He wants a sportscaster

0:35:15.160 --> 0:35:19.880
<v Speaker 1>and to do mock commentary on elevator racist Mark Albert

0:35:19.920 --> 0:35:22.520
<v Speaker 1>is the guy. He wants Marvis out of town doing

0:35:22.520 --> 0:35:25.880
<v Speaker 1>a nick game. I'm sitting in the office. They go,

0:35:26.000 --> 0:35:28.920
<v Speaker 1>we got this kid here, Bob Costas send them up

0:35:29.239 --> 0:35:31.799
<v Speaker 1>again on the elevator on on the sixth floor. I

0:35:31.880 --> 0:35:34.160
<v Speaker 1>do this thing for David Letterman. He likes it because

0:35:34.200 --> 0:35:35.839
<v Speaker 1>I kind of get where he's coming from and what

0:35:35.880 --> 0:35:39.399
<v Speaker 1>he wants. This mock serious thing. He brings me back

0:35:39.440 --> 0:35:41.040
<v Speaker 1>to sit down next to him. At the end of

0:35:41.040 --> 0:35:44.560
<v Speaker 1>the show, I'd say something that makes him laugh. He says,

0:35:44.600 --> 0:35:46.560
<v Speaker 1>you're really funny. Would you like to do this again?

0:35:47.120 --> 0:35:49.759
<v Speaker 1>Of course I would. You're David Letterman. Even then, he's

0:35:49.840 --> 0:35:53.359
<v Speaker 1>David Letterman. I was probably on two dozen times, and

0:35:53.440 --> 0:35:56.920
<v Speaker 1>those things not only introduced me to a different audience

0:35:56.920 --> 0:35:59.680
<v Speaker 1>in a different way, but early on, when you're trying

0:35:59.719 --> 0:36:02.480
<v Speaker 1>to find your way, you get some laughs there, or

0:36:02.520 --> 0:36:05.239
<v Speaker 1>you get some good notices for what you're doing. In

0:36:05.280 --> 0:36:09.160
<v Speaker 1>the sportscasting world. It increases your confidence and it makes

0:36:09.160 --> 0:36:12.200
<v Speaker 1>you feel like you can be more spontaneous and show

0:36:12.239 --> 0:36:14.680
<v Speaker 1>more of yourself, not just color between the lines, for

0:36:14.800 --> 0:36:17.760
<v Speaker 1>maybe color outside the lines a little bit. Fox Sports

0:36:17.880 --> 0:36:20.520
<v Speaker 1>Radio has the best sports talk lineup in the nation.

0:36:20.840 --> 0:36:23.759
<v Speaker 1>Catch all of our shows at Fox Sports Radio dot

0:36:23.800 --> 0:36:26.799
<v Speaker 1>com and within the I Heart Radio app. Search f

0:36:27.120 --> 0:36:30.560
<v Speaker 1>s R to listen live. We're talking to Bob Costas.

0:36:30.600 --> 0:36:33.400
<v Speaker 1>I'm Clay Travis. We're here with the Wins and Losses Podcast.

0:36:33.920 --> 0:36:36.640
<v Speaker 1>How nervous were you going to Green Bay to call

0:36:36.680 --> 0:36:40.200
<v Speaker 1>that game? At twenty four years old? Shaking like a

0:36:40.320 --> 0:36:45.320
<v Speaker 1>freaking leaf. And the analyst on the game with someone

0:36:45.400 --> 0:36:49.000
<v Speaker 1>that only older listeners would remember firsthand, Hall of Fame

0:36:49.080 --> 0:36:52.279
<v Speaker 1>receiver Tommy McDonald, who had been a big deal at

0:36:52.280 --> 0:36:56.680
<v Speaker 1>Oklahoma and then primarily with the Philadelphia Eagles, one of

0:36:56.680 --> 0:37:01.200
<v Speaker 1>the last to play without forget about a mask, no

0:37:01.320 --> 0:37:04.600
<v Speaker 1>no bar, no bar on, Yeah, that's amazing. And then

0:37:04.640 --> 0:37:07.319
<v Speaker 1>went and then went to the single helmet thing, and

0:37:07.360 --> 0:37:10.120
<v Speaker 1>he was quite a single bar and he was quite

0:37:10.160 --> 0:37:13.759
<v Speaker 1>a character. But however nervous I was, he was a

0:37:13.880 --> 0:37:16.920
<v Speaker 1>hundred times more nervous. He has since passed away. And

0:37:16.960 --> 0:37:21.400
<v Speaker 1>I say this with affection play. He literally froze on

0:37:21.520 --> 0:37:25.360
<v Speaker 1>the on camera open. He couldn't remember what he wanted

0:37:25.400 --> 0:37:29.520
<v Speaker 1>to say. And I'm twenty four years old. Nobody outside St.

0:37:29.560 --> 0:37:32.960
<v Speaker 1>Louis has any damn idea who I am, and so

0:37:33.000 --> 0:37:36.799
<v Speaker 1>I basically I'm doing the whole broadcast by myself. There

0:37:36.800 --> 0:37:40.279
<v Speaker 1>were times when he couldn't complete sentences, and that was

0:37:40.360 --> 0:37:44.160
<v Speaker 1>the last game be he ever did. So I was

0:37:44.160 --> 0:37:46.560
<v Speaker 1>nervous to begin with, and I was damn near panic

0:37:46.640 --> 0:37:49.919
<v Speaker 1>stricken by the second quarter. But but I muddled through.

0:37:51.120 --> 0:37:53.760
<v Speaker 1>They brought me back. So either I was very lucky

0:37:53.840 --> 0:37:57.040
<v Speaker 1>or I was a little bit better than I feared. Okay,

0:37:57.080 --> 0:38:02.160
<v Speaker 1>other question, Don Olmeyer, I know that he was incredibly

0:38:02.239 --> 0:38:04.920
<v Speaker 1>important for a lot of different people in the world

0:38:04.920 --> 0:38:07.920
<v Speaker 1>of sports. What did he mean for you and for

0:38:07.960 --> 0:38:10.680
<v Speaker 1>people who do not know him? Who was he and

0:38:10.719 --> 0:38:14.680
<v Speaker 1>why was he important? Don Oldmeyer was bigger than life.

0:38:15.360 --> 0:38:18.520
<v Speaker 1>He and Dick Ebersol, who was even more important in

0:38:18.560 --> 0:38:22.640
<v Speaker 1>my career, were proteges of run Ledge. Run Ledge is

0:38:22.719 --> 0:38:26.000
<v Speaker 1>of course, still viewed as the single most important person

0:38:26.320 --> 0:38:28.759
<v Speaker 1>in the history of sports television who wasn't on the air,

0:38:29.440 --> 0:38:32.560
<v Speaker 1>although I think Dick Eversol could rival him for that.

0:38:33.239 --> 0:38:38.280
<v Speaker 1>Uh So, first Don and then Dick headed up NBC Sports,

0:38:38.320 --> 0:38:41.400
<v Speaker 1>and they each had a tremendous influence on me. And

0:38:41.480 --> 0:38:44.920
<v Speaker 1>the very fact that they liked me and saw something

0:38:45.120 --> 0:38:47.719
<v Speaker 1>in me that maybe others would not have seen at

0:38:47.760 --> 0:38:51.880
<v Speaker 1>least that quickly that elevated my career. They put me

0:38:51.920 --> 0:38:56.400
<v Speaker 1>in positions to succeed or I guess fail, and luckily

0:38:57.160 --> 0:38:59.880
<v Speaker 1>each of those worked out. In the case of Dick Eversol,

0:39:00.400 --> 0:39:03.400
<v Speaker 1>not only did he elevate me from late night host

0:39:03.520 --> 0:39:05.920
<v Speaker 1>of the Olympics to primetime host. I've been the late

0:39:06.000 --> 0:39:10.799
<v Speaker 1>night host, he made me the primetime host in in Barcelona,

0:39:11.280 --> 0:39:15.239
<v Speaker 1>but he also created a late night talk show for

0:39:15.400 --> 0:39:20.400
<v Speaker 1>me in conjunction with Brandon Tartakoff uh later with Bob Costas,

0:39:20.440 --> 0:39:24.960
<v Speaker 1>followed Johnny Carson and David Letterman in NBC's late night lineup,

0:39:25.400 --> 0:39:29.120
<v Speaker 1>and showed a different side of me because only maybe

0:39:29.200 --> 0:39:31.160
<v Speaker 1>five of it had to do with sports. Most of

0:39:31.200 --> 0:39:34.799
<v Speaker 1>it was other walks of life. So ohmy are at

0:39:34.800 --> 0:39:39.360
<v Speaker 1>the beginning hiring me, having some confidence in me, giving

0:39:39.360 --> 0:39:41.920
<v Speaker 1>me big assiglence. I mean, in the first year I

0:39:42.000 --> 0:39:44.920
<v Speaker 1>was there, when Dick Enberg had an overlap and there

0:39:44.960 --> 0:39:47.560
<v Speaker 1>was a college basketball game and a football game, he'd

0:39:47.560 --> 0:39:50.279
<v Speaker 1>go to the football game and Ollmyer threw me right

0:39:50.320 --> 0:39:53.799
<v Speaker 1>in there with Al McGuire and Billy Packer, a legendary

0:39:53.840 --> 0:39:57.920
<v Speaker 1>combination in college basketball back when a college basketball game

0:39:57.960 --> 0:40:00.279
<v Speaker 1>on a Saturday or Sunday afternoon was a different thing

0:40:00.719 --> 0:40:03.520
<v Speaker 1>than it is now. The media landscape was so different.

0:40:03.640 --> 0:40:06.360
<v Speaker 1>So Don threw me into those things, and basically it

0:40:06.360 --> 0:40:08.160
<v Speaker 1>was sink or swim, and I might have sunk a

0:40:08.160 --> 0:40:10.279
<v Speaker 1>few times, but I made it to the other side

0:40:10.280 --> 0:40:13.279
<v Speaker 1>of the waterway, I guess to strain that metaphor. And

0:40:13.320 --> 0:40:17.600
<v Speaker 1>then when Don went off and eventually became the head

0:40:17.600 --> 0:40:21.560
<v Speaker 1>of entertainment at NBC in the nineties, in the heyday

0:40:21.560 --> 0:40:26.840
<v Speaker 1>of NBC e Er Seinfeld, Uh, Cosby, Show, Um whatever, Friends,

0:40:26.880 --> 0:40:29.480
<v Speaker 1>whatever it might have been, when NBC was the unquestioned

0:40:29.560 --> 0:40:34.200
<v Speaker 1>number one eversol Is running NBC Sports and NBC Sports

0:40:34.239 --> 0:40:36.840
<v Speaker 1>is clearly number one in that area, and all Myer's

0:40:36.920 --> 0:40:41.000
<v Speaker 1>running NBC Entertainment, and luckily I'm their boy. I mean,

0:40:41.320 --> 0:40:43.880
<v Speaker 1>I'm sure that I aggravated them. I know I aggravated

0:40:43.920 --> 0:40:46.879
<v Speaker 1>them sometimes because sometimes I have a mind of my own,

0:40:46.920 --> 0:40:48.520
<v Speaker 1>So I may have pissed them off now and then.

0:40:48.920 --> 0:40:51.839
<v Speaker 1>But what they did for me, uh is something I

0:40:51.840 --> 0:40:55.120
<v Speaker 1>can never fully repay. And they were both so charismatic

0:40:55.160 --> 0:40:57.960
<v Speaker 1>and dynamic. They themselves were as big a star, at

0:40:58.040 --> 0:41:00.600
<v Speaker 1>least among those who knew them as any of the

0:41:00.600 --> 0:41:04.120
<v Speaker 1>broadcasters were. They had tremendous presence. When they walked into

0:41:04.200 --> 0:41:07.560
<v Speaker 1>a room, you knew that you better snap to it

0:41:07.640 --> 0:41:10.759
<v Speaker 1>and pay attention because there was just something about them

0:41:11.000 --> 0:41:13.880
<v Speaker 1>something you know, intelligence is one thing, inside is another,

0:41:14.120 --> 0:41:17.080
<v Speaker 1>but presence in charisma, and they had it in space.

0:41:17.800 --> 0:41:20.520
<v Speaker 1>You mentioned going on David Letterman. So as a kid

0:41:20.600 --> 0:41:24.880
<v Speaker 1>growing up in Nashville, I would watch baseball all day long,

0:41:25.000 --> 0:41:27.320
<v Speaker 1>right when I was home in the summers, in particular,

0:41:27.360 --> 0:41:30.320
<v Speaker 1>I'd watch w g N with Harry Carey and Steve Stone.

0:41:30.360 --> 0:41:33.680
<v Speaker 1>In the afternoons, I would watch the late night at

0:41:33.680 --> 0:41:36.719
<v Speaker 1>the time ESPN games. And one of the great things

0:41:36.760 --> 0:41:38.640
<v Speaker 1>about being a kid and being able to stay up late,

0:41:38.640 --> 0:41:40.400
<v Speaker 1>and I've always kind of been a night owl despite

0:41:40.400 --> 0:41:42.600
<v Speaker 1>the fact that I have an early morning show, is

0:41:42.640 --> 0:41:45.359
<v Speaker 1>I would watch David Letterman, and I just found him

0:41:45.400 --> 0:41:49.440
<v Speaker 1>to be an unbelievably compelling television present who, as you

0:41:49.480 --> 0:41:53.120
<v Speaker 1>mentioned earlier, broke pretty much every rule that would have

0:41:53.160 --> 0:41:55.959
<v Speaker 1>existed in television. Right if you had gone through and said,

0:41:55.960 --> 0:41:58.920
<v Speaker 1>how would you design a late night show? Uh that

0:41:59.040 --> 0:42:01.839
<v Speaker 1>they came up with basically the everything that they would

0:42:01.840 --> 0:42:05.440
<v Speaker 1>tell you not to do. And it worked flawlessly for Letterman.

0:42:05.840 --> 0:42:08.399
<v Speaker 1>What was working with him? Like you said, you went

0:42:08.440 --> 0:42:10.720
<v Speaker 1>on a show a bunch as well, and you've later

0:42:10.760 --> 0:42:13.520
<v Speaker 1>followed his show. What did you find him to be

0:42:13.640 --> 0:42:16.080
<v Speaker 1>like off the air as opposed to on the air,

0:42:16.480 --> 0:42:19.439
<v Speaker 1>And how would the show be constructed, and what if

0:42:19.480 --> 0:42:24.400
<v Speaker 1>anything could you take from that? Well, David, I didn't

0:42:24.520 --> 0:42:29.360
<v Speaker 1>want anything to be cookie cutter. You go on other shows,

0:42:29.719 --> 0:42:32.640
<v Speaker 1>they do a pre interview and you talk about a

0:42:32.680 --> 0:42:35.000
<v Speaker 1>few areas that you might discuss, and you give them

0:42:35.000 --> 0:42:37.160
<v Speaker 1>a few anecdotes that you have that are sure to

0:42:37.160 --> 0:42:40.359
<v Speaker 1>get laughs and be interesting. And David would have that,

0:42:40.719 --> 0:42:43.680
<v Speaker 1>but he'd depart from it. Jay Leno would pretty much

0:42:43.840 --> 0:42:46.800
<v Speaker 1>stay with it, and Jay was successful for his own reasons.

0:42:47.200 --> 0:42:50.680
<v Speaker 1>But Letterman thought there was an integrity in that. At

0:42:50.719 --> 0:42:53.360
<v Speaker 1>least that was my assumption that if he just painted

0:42:53.400 --> 0:42:56.200
<v Speaker 1>by the numbers, that he couldn't be David Letterman. So

0:42:56.360 --> 0:42:58.640
<v Speaker 1>you never knew. He could get bored with what you

0:42:58.680 --> 0:43:00.400
<v Speaker 1>were saying, or you could want to alan j you

0:43:00.520 --> 0:43:03.520
<v Speaker 1>it could throw something out. So you really had to

0:43:03.560 --> 0:43:06.560
<v Speaker 1>be on your toes when you were on with David Letterman.

0:43:06.760 --> 0:43:10.240
<v Speaker 1>But David was great to me. Um, he was always

0:43:10.840 --> 0:43:15.000
<v Speaker 1>very kind to me, said nice things about me, and

0:43:15.080 --> 0:43:18.520
<v Speaker 1>when he went to CBS UM after he didn't get

0:43:18.560 --> 0:43:21.160
<v Speaker 1>the Tonight show and Jay Leno did. Part of his

0:43:21.239 --> 0:43:24.840
<v Speaker 1>deal was that he controlled the hour after his show,

0:43:25.160 --> 0:43:28.320
<v Speaker 1>and eventually Tom Snyder got that hour and later Craig

0:43:28.400 --> 0:43:30.959
<v Speaker 1>Kilborn and Craig Ferguson. M Snyder was the first month,

0:43:31.200 --> 0:43:35.160
<v Speaker 1>but only after David offered it to me. I was

0:43:35.320 --> 0:43:38.000
<v Speaker 1>very tempted because it was David Letterman, and because it

0:43:38.040 --> 0:43:40.480
<v Speaker 1>was a full hour and it was an hour earlier,

0:43:40.560 --> 0:43:45.359
<v Speaker 1>twelve thirty instead of one thirty. But NBC had the NBA. Uh,

0:43:45.400 --> 0:43:48.400
<v Speaker 1>they still had the NFL, although I was I was

0:43:48.719 --> 0:43:51.440
<v Speaker 1>transitioning out of the NFL, but still that they had it.

0:43:51.960 --> 0:43:56.000
<v Speaker 1>They were reacquiring baseball. I was the host of the Olympics,

0:43:56.120 --> 0:43:59.680
<v Speaker 1>and so if the offer had come at a different time,

0:43:59.680 --> 0:44:01.560
<v Speaker 1>I said, who would have taken it? And I certainly

0:44:01.560 --> 0:44:04.360
<v Speaker 1>appreciated that David thought enough of me to offer it

0:44:04.400 --> 0:44:08.279
<v Speaker 1>to me. Um he remade late night television. You know,

0:44:08.400 --> 0:44:12.040
<v Speaker 1>his his idol was always Johnny Carson, and Johnny was

0:44:12.200 --> 0:44:16.600
<v Speaker 1>magnificent and he had a certain saboaf there that almost

0:44:16.680 --> 0:44:20.839
<v Speaker 1>no one else could match. For his time period. I don't.

0:44:20.840 --> 0:44:22.480
<v Speaker 1>I don't mean time period at night, I mean that

0:44:22.640 --> 0:44:28.600
<v Speaker 1>era of television. He was beyond cool. But David actually

0:44:29.000 --> 0:44:33.640
<v Speaker 1>going forward was more influential. Because everybody as wonderful as

0:44:33.719 --> 0:44:36.880
<v Speaker 1>Conan is or or Kimmel or Fallon or Colbert or

0:44:36.880 --> 0:44:40.759
<v Speaker 1>whoever you want to name, they all are influenced by

0:44:40.840 --> 0:44:44.520
<v Speaker 1>David Letterman. Follow them. There's no doubt at all. And

0:44:45.160 --> 0:44:47.200
<v Speaker 1>all of this kind of leads into this question, which

0:44:47.239 --> 0:44:49.960
<v Speaker 1>I think is is important also for people out there listening,

0:44:49.960 --> 0:44:52.080
<v Speaker 1>and I'm Clay Travis. We're talking with Bob Costas on

0:44:52.120 --> 0:44:55.680
<v Speaker 1>The Winds and Lost his podcast. Being able to do

0:44:55.840 --> 0:45:00.359
<v Speaker 1>sports well requires an ability to see sports as part

0:45:00.440 --> 0:45:04.600
<v Speaker 1>of a larger landscape of American and world life, and

0:45:04.640 --> 0:45:07.560
<v Speaker 1>certainly you had to do that at the Olympics. Do

0:45:07.680 --> 0:45:11.359
<v Speaker 1>you believe sometimes that people who do sports get so

0:45:11.440 --> 0:45:14.920
<v Speaker 1>wrapped up into the essence of the sport itself that

0:45:15.000 --> 0:45:19.279
<v Speaker 1>they lack the ability to understand the larger context. And

0:45:19.320 --> 0:45:22.239
<v Speaker 1>how has that mattered and been an asset to you

0:45:22.480 --> 0:45:24.640
<v Speaker 1>in terms of the growth of your career and what

0:45:24.719 --> 0:45:28.000
<v Speaker 1>you were able to do understanding sports. But also just

0:45:28.000 --> 0:45:30.560
<v Speaker 1>based on our conversations, I know that you have a

0:45:30.560 --> 0:45:34.320
<v Speaker 1>lot of interest outside of sports. Sometimes there are guys

0:45:34.320 --> 0:45:36.520
<v Speaker 1>and girls in our field where it's like all they

0:45:36.560 --> 0:45:39.880
<v Speaker 1>know is sports, and I think that can sometimes constrain

0:45:39.960 --> 0:45:44.200
<v Speaker 1>them to a large extent. It's a perceptive question, you know.

0:45:44.280 --> 0:45:47.759
<v Speaker 1>You listen to Vince Scully through all those years and

0:45:47.840 --> 0:45:53.240
<v Speaker 1>then obviously was steeped in baseball history, but he knew

0:45:53.520 --> 0:45:57.279
<v Speaker 1>something about the world beyond that you could gracefully bring

0:45:57.360 --> 0:46:01.640
<v Speaker 1>it in. I knew Jack Buck very well. Jack Buck

0:46:02.000 --> 0:46:06.400
<v Speaker 1>was wounded at the bridge at Remagen during World War Two.

0:46:07.000 --> 0:46:09.080
<v Speaker 1>He got either the Bronze Star or Purple Heart, I

0:46:09.160 --> 0:46:13.560
<v Speaker 1>don't remember which. He had worked on the docks. He

0:46:13.600 --> 0:46:17.799
<v Speaker 1>had grown up relatively poor in Massachusetts, one of six

0:46:17.880 --> 0:46:22.160
<v Speaker 1>or seven kids. He was a Depression era kid um.

0:46:22.200 --> 0:46:26.200
<v Speaker 1>He'd scuffled a little bit. He'd lived the light. He

0:46:26.360 --> 0:46:30.680
<v Speaker 1>was a reader. He was someone that that got out there,

0:46:30.719 --> 0:46:34.200
<v Speaker 1>you know, he was. He lived a textured light, and

0:46:34.239 --> 0:46:37.320
<v Speaker 1>that came across in his broadcast. As great as people

0:46:37.400 --> 0:46:41.920
<v Speaker 1>perceived Jack being from his network broadcast, it was really

0:46:41.960 --> 0:46:44.919
<v Speaker 1>on the Cardinals day in, day out, night and night out,

0:46:45.200 --> 0:46:48.040
<v Speaker 1>where his sly wit and his frame of reference and

0:46:48.120 --> 0:46:53.000
<v Speaker 1>his texture as a person came across, and that's that's

0:46:53.040 --> 0:46:54.520
<v Speaker 1>what you want to emulate. I don't know if you

0:46:54.560 --> 0:46:57.280
<v Speaker 1>ever fully get there, but it's that in your own

0:46:57.320 --> 0:47:01.839
<v Speaker 1>way that you want to do if the circumstances allow it.

0:47:02.200 --> 0:47:06.160
<v Speaker 1>You want the broadcast to be textured. I've always used

0:47:06.200 --> 0:47:09.520
<v Speaker 1>this example. Over time, maybe you can't get it into

0:47:09.560 --> 0:47:14.640
<v Speaker 1>every broadcast, but over time you hope to do what

0:47:14.760 --> 0:47:19.600
<v Speaker 1>a really good um issue of Sports Illustrated does. Some

0:47:19.719 --> 0:47:23.600
<v Speaker 1>of it is a celebration of sports. It's excitement, it's beauty,

0:47:23.760 --> 0:47:27.840
<v Speaker 1>even the poetry of it, great photography, great writing about

0:47:27.880 --> 0:47:31.360
<v Speaker 1>a big event. Some of it's quirky and humorous. Some

0:47:31.480 --> 0:47:35.520
<v Speaker 1>of it's historical and when called for and in proportion,

0:47:36.000 --> 0:47:40.600
<v Speaker 1>there's journalism and there's commentary, and taken all together, it's

0:47:40.600 --> 0:47:43.520
<v Speaker 1>a mosaic. It isn't just one thing, or isn't just

0:47:43.640 --> 0:47:47.600
<v Speaker 1>primary colors. There's different shadings. And I hope that over

0:47:47.719 --> 0:47:51.520
<v Speaker 1>time That's what my career has been and where I

0:47:51.560 --> 0:47:55.520
<v Speaker 1>got frustrated, and it's nobody's fault. NBC does not run

0:47:55.560 --> 0:47:58.160
<v Speaker 1>for my benefit, did not run for my benefit. But

0:47:58.239 --> 0:48:00.680
<v Speaker 1>in the last ten years or so of my career

0:48:00.680 --> 0:48:04.360
<v Speaker 1>there they had lost baseball. They had lost the NBA,

0:48:04.480 --> 0:48:07.880
<v Speaker 1>my two favorite things. I've done a dozen Olympics, and

0:48:07.920 --> 0:48:11.960
<v Speaker 1>the formats became more and more constricting, and so there

0:48:12.000 --> 0:48:13.919
<v Speaker 1>was less of a chance to do the very thing

0:48:14.320 --> 0:48:18.120
<v Speaker 1>that your question implies. And so if you think about

0:48:18.200 --> 0:48:23.880
<v Speaker 1>younger viewers, they may not have the full sense of

0:48:23.880 --> 0:48:25.600
<v Speaker 1>what I might have been about. And I don't think

0:48:25.680 --> 0:48:27.759
<v Speaker 1>it matters all that much. I mean it matters to me.

0:48:28.160 --> 0:48:30.360
<v Speaker 1>No one's going to put it in a time capsule

0:48:30.360 --> 0:48:34.080
<v Speaker 1>of the twentieth century, but from the mid eighties too,

0:48:34.280 --> 0:48:38.279
<v Speaker 1>I don't know, early two thousand's the combination of the

0:48:38.360 --> 0:48:41.000
<v Speaker 1>late night show of the n b A, of the

0:48:41.040 --> 0:48:45.680
<v Speaker 1>baseball coverage, of the early hosting of football, of showing

0:48:45.760 --> 0:48:50.560
<v Speaker 1>up on Letterman and Atlano and even Carson on one occasion,

0:48:50.920 --> 0:48:54.680
<v Speaker 1>or Nightline or Meet the Press or Charlie Rose, or

0:48:54.760 --> 0:48:59.400
<v Speaker 1>doing pieces for the NBC news magazines, and then the Olympics,

0:48:59.440 --> 0:49:03.200
<v Speaker 1>of course, and then my spint at HBO. I think

0:49:03.239 --> 0:49:06.480
<v Speaker 1>that almost everything I did that was true to me

0:49:06.520 --> 0:49:09.840
<v Speaker 1>as a broadcaster and as a person. And you know,

0:49:09.920 --> 0:49:12.680
<v Speaker 1>no one's going to be universally popular, but I'll stand

0:49:12.760 --> 0:49:14.759
<v Speaker 1>by that and be comfortable with it because it was

0:49:14.800 --> 0:49:18.200
<v Speaker 1>true to me. I think some of what happened over

0:49:18.239 --> 0:49:23.239
<v Speaker 1>the last decade at NBC didn't perfectly exemplify who I was,

0:49:23.440 --> 0:49:26.400
<v Speaker 1>either personally or professionally. But that's nobody's fault. Just the

0:49:26.400 --> 0:49:29.480
<v Speaker 1>way it goes talking to Bob Costas and I'm fascinated

0:49:29.480 --> 0:49:31.440
<v Speaker 1>by so much of what you just said, and I

0:49:31.480 --> 0:49:34.359
<v Speaker 1>told you this off the air. One reason I think

0:49:34.400 --> 0:49:37.719
<v Speaker 1>I don't care very much what people say about me,

0:49:37.840 --> 0:49:41.040
<v Speaker 1>and this also goes to a larger conversation, is when

0:49:41.040 --> 0:49:44.080
<v Speaker 1>you do daily radio for three hours a day, fifteen

0:49:44.120 --> 0:49:47.200
<v Speaker 1>hours a week, I basically get to have therapy in

0:49:47.320 --> 0:49:50.279
<v Speaker 1>public for anything that bothers me. Right, I get to

0:49:50.320 --> 0:49:53.400
<v Speaker 1>tell you exactly what I think. And it can be

0:49:53.440 --> 0:49:56.080
<v Speaker 1>about being a father of three young boys. It can

0:49:56.120 --> 0:49:58.799
<v Speaker 1>be about being married. It can be about a game

0:49:58.840 --> 0:50:01.319
<v Speaker 1>that didn't go away the way I anticipated, or a

0:50:01.400 --> 0:50:04.160
<v Speaker 1>bet that I lost, or whatever else. I think people

0:50:04.160 --> 0:50:07.759
<v Speaker 1>who listen to my radio show, and it's obviously you

0:50:07.800 --> 0:50:10.560
<v Speaker 1>know this, it's never as many as you want them

0:50:10.600 --> 0:50:12.719
<v Speaker 1>to write. I wish that more people listen to the

0:50:12.760 --> 0:50:15.719
<v Speaker 1>show continues to grow and everything else, But when you're

0:50:15.760 --> 0:50:18.919
<v Speaker 1>in this space, you always want to have more, right,

0:50:19.000 --> 0:50:21.480
<v Speaker 1>Like that's kind of in the universe in which we live.

0:50:21.520 --> 0:50:24.000
<v Speaker 1>If you're ambitious and you want to continue to grow,

0:50:24.440 --> 0:50:26.160
<v Speaker 1>you think you're pretty good and you'd like to have

0:50:26.200 --> 0:50:28.839
<v Speaker 1>as many people paying attention as possible. And we're one

0:50:28.840 --> 0:50:31.120
<v Speaker 1>of the four or five biggest radio shows now, but

0:50:31.200 --> 0:50:32.920
<v Speaker 1>I think, you know, we should be the biggest. And

0:50:33.360 --> 0:50:36.319
<v Speaker 1>the point on a larger scale is though we have

0:50:36.360 --> 0:50:38.920
<v Speaker 1>a big enough audience now where I feel like people

0:50:38.960 --> 0:50:40.640
<v Speaker 1>may not love me all the time, but they know

0:50:40.760 --> 0:50:43.440
<v Speaker 1>me right. I am an authentic person to them on

0:50:43.560 --> 0:50:45.840
<v Speaker 1>many different ways, both good and bad, as the people

0:50:45.880 --> 0:50:48.080
<v Speaker 1>that we all know in our day to day lives are.

0:50:48.719 --> 0:50:51.160
<v Speaker 1>And we have found that I bet you have found too.

0:50:51.360 --> 0:50:55.120
<v Speaker 1>Oftentimes it's not the talents that make people like you,

0:50:55.480 --> 0:50:59.640
<v Speaker 1>it's your flaws, because they humanize you, whether dad, mom, grandma,

0:50:59.719 --> 0:51:02.600
<v Speaker 1>grand paw, aunt, uncle, whatever it might be, you in

0:51:02.640 --> 0:51:05.480
<v Speaker 1>an interesting way. At least in the last you know,

0:51:05.560 --> 0:51:08.400
<v Speaker 1>fifteen twenty years, for many people who are listening to us,

0:51:08.760 --> 0:51:13.680
<v Speaker 1>had a massive audience, the Olympics, big sports, all of those.

0:51:14.000 --> 0:51:19.719
<v Speaker 1>But you're within that television window where the larger context

0:51:19.840 --> 0:51:22.799
<v Speaker 1>is not necessarily known. You don't have you've got the

0:51:22.800 --> 0:51:25.360
<v Speaker 1>massive audience everybody may know you when you walk through

0:51:25.440 --> 0:51:29.040
<v Speaker 1>the airport, but at times you're almost an enigma that

0:51:29.160 --> 0:51:32.399
<v Speaker 1>people can project up on to choose to believe what

0:51:32.440 --> 0:51:35.480
<v Speaker 1>they would like to believe about you. Is that a

0:51:35.560 --> 0:51:37.719
<v Speaker 1>challenge in many ways? I would think it's it's such

0:51:37.719 --> 0:51:39.480
<v Speaker 1>an interest, it's it's it's kind of the opposite of

0:51:39.520 --> 0:51:41.640
<v Speaker 1>what I've got now, where the people who listen, we've

0:51:41.680 --> 0:51:43.719
<v Speaker 1>got a good size audience, but they really feel like

0:51:43.760 --> 0:51:47.840
<v Speaker 1>they know me. Whereas when you're talking to million people

0:51:47.840 --> 0:51:50.840
<v Speaker 1>on television or seventy five million or whatever the biggest

0:51:50.920 --> 0:51:53.799
<v Speaker 1>number was that you ever spoke to, they kind of

0:51:53.840 --> 0:51:56.640
<v Speaker 1>see you and and and and you're a sphinx of sorts.

0:51:56.760 --> 0:52:00.600
<v Speaker 1>They project up on you what they think of you.

0:52:00.600 --> 0:52:02.840
<v Speaker 1>You know, that's so insightful, And it's one of the

0:52:02.880 --> 0:52:07.840
<v Speaker 1>subtexts of this conversation. And as an aside, one of

0:52:07.840 --> 0:52:12.080
<v Speaker 1>the obvious reasons why I've taken advantage of this format

0:52:12.600 --> 0:52:14.880
<v Speaker 1>uh and gone on at greater length that I almost

0:52:14.920 --> 0:52:17.839
<v Speaker 1>ever have a chance to go on on television. And

0:52:17.880 --> 0:52:21.600
<v Speaker 1>going back to the last comment I made, I was

0:52:21.719 --> 0:52:26.080
<v Speaker 1>very comfortable with what I put out there in the eighties,

0:52:26.200 --> 0:52:30.080
<v Speaker 1>nineties and early part of the two thousands, I think

0:52:30.080 --> 0:52:33.040
<v Speaker 1>that those who paid even casual attention had a pretty

0:52:33.080 --> 0:52:37.960
<v Speaker 1>accurate idea of where I was coming from professionally and personally.

0:52:38.480 --> 0:52:42.040
<v Speaker 1>And if in more recent years they had followed me

0:52:42.080 --> 0:52:45.040
<v Speaker 1>on HBO or on the Baseball Network, then that would

0:52:45.040 --> 0:52:49.480
<v Speaker 1>also be true. But on NBC, my role on Sunday

0:52:49.560 --> 0:52:53.919
<v Speaker 1>Night Football, working alongside Al Michaels and Chris Collinsworth, they're

0:52:53.960 --> 0:52:56.040
<v Speaker 1>doing what they were put on Planet Earth to do,

0:52:56.600 --> 0:52:59.920
<v Speaker 1>and Fred Goodelly the producer, and Drew Sakoff the director,

0:53:00.000 --> 0:53:03.120
<v Speaker 1>everybody else what they were put there to do. And

0:53:03.160 --> 0:53:06.319
<v Speaker 1>I was there because I had equity and NBC and

0:53:06.360 --> 0:53:09.759
<v Speaker 1>people associated me with big events on NBC, and I

0:53:09.800 --> 0:53:14.400
<v Speaker 1>don't know that that really uh personified anything that I

0:53:14.480 --> 0:53:17.759
<v Speaker 1>truly cared about. There were moments perhaps that I was

0:53:17.800 --> 0:53:21.360
<v Speaker 1>able to contribute something worthwhile that was um if not

0:53:21.560 --> 0:53:25.640
<v Speaker 1>unique to me, than at least distinctive about me, but

0:53:25.719 --> 0:53:28.200
<v Speaker 1>for the most part it didn't serve that purpose. And

0:53:28.320 --> 0:53:32.640
<v Speaker 1>on the Olympics, the same thing. I think the first

0:53:32.840 --> 0:53:36.640
<v Speaker 1>seven or eight that I did pretty much we're close

0:53:36.680 --> 0:53:39.319
<v Speaker 1>to the bullseye nothing, as we started out this conversation saying,

0:53:39.400 --> 0:53:42.520
<v Speaker 1>is ever truly perfect, but pretty close, And then After that,

0:53:43.440 --> 0:53:48.600
<v Speaker 1>the formats and viewer expectation and everything else um changed

0:53:48.640 --> 0:53:51.600
<v Speaker 1>the role. And I think I still handled it professionally

0:53:51.680 --> 0:53:55.239
<v Speaker 1>and competently, and there were times little windows where maybe

0:53:55.280 --> 0:53:57.760
<v Speaker 1>you could hit a great note, but those windows seemed

0:53:57.760 --> 0:54:01.560
<v Speaker 1>to me to be fewer. And and now you coupled

0:54:01.680 --> 0:54:06.719
<v Speaker 1>that with social media, and that's what brought us together

0:54:06.800 --> 0:54:10.680
<v Speaker 1>here and this point. And again I'm not saying it's

0:54:10.680 --> 0:54:12.400
<v Speaker 1>the end of the world. And I'm one of the

0:54:12.480 --> 0:54:16.480
<v Speaker 1>luckiest guys on the planet, so I'm not complaining. But

0:54:17.120 --> 0:54:24.200
<v Speaker 1>there is a widespread misimpression, perhaps especially among your audience

0:54:24.920 --> 0:54:31.239
<v Speaker 1>or audiences that have a certain predisposition. There is a

0:54:31.320 --> 0:54:35.560
<v Speaker 1>misimpression that I'm somewhere to the left of Bernie Sanders

0:54:35.680 --> 0:54:38.839
<v Speaker 1>or Noam Chomsky. And the truth of the matter is

0:54:38.880 --> 0:54:42.240
<v Speaker 1>that anybody who knows me knows that that isn't even

0:54:42.280 --> 0:54:45.960
<v Speaker 1>close to true. That I'm an ala carte guy, that

0:54:46.080 --> 0:54:52.160
<v Speaker 1>I have many views that could be called old school liberal,

0:54:52.560 --> 0:54:57.160
<v Speaker 1>not progressive or leftist. I have a problem with that.

0:54:57.200 --> 0:54:58.840
<v Speaker 1>I have a problem with cancel culture. I have a

0:54:58.880 --> 0:55:02.880
<v Speaker 1>problem with political wreckness. I have a problem with identity politics.

0:55:02.880 --> 0:55:05.520
<v Speaker 1>If it's blind identity politics. I have a problem with

0:55:05.600 --> 0:55:08.440
<v Speaker 1>what I understand is going on in academia to a

0:55:08.520 --> 0:55:13.560
<v Speaker 1>large extent um. But I have classic liberal views, but

0:55:13.680 --> 0:55:17.680
<v Speaker 1>I also have many views that could be characterized as conservative.

0:55:18.280 --> 0:55:23.520
<v Speaker 1>But a few things kind of hope a bear uh

0:55:23.560 --> 0:55:27.000
<v Speaker 1>in the right wing blog of sphere and Fox News

0:55:27.080 --> 0:55:30.000
<v Speaker 1>or whatever. And it's part of the business model there

0:55:30.520 --> 0:55:33.840
<v Speaker 1>to say to the resentments of the audience, not so

0:55:33.920 --> 0:55:36.880
<v Speaker 1>much the enlightenment of the audience. And so someone like me,

0:55:37.080 --> 0:55:40.759
<v Speaker 1>relatively visible and well known, is useful if you can

0:55:40.800 --> 0:55:42.919
<v Speaker 1>make a straw man out of me. Now I'm not

0:55:43.040 --> 0:55:45.919
<v Speaker 1>I'm not as useful as Nancy Pelosi or somebody like that.

0:55:46.160 --> 0:55:49.319
<v Speaker 1>And neither am I aligned necessarily with Nancy Pelosi. But

0:55:49.320 --> 0:55:52.520
<v Speaker 1>but in passing there were times when I served the purpose.

0:55:52.960 --> 0:55:55.760
<v Speaker 1>And the purpose was not let's see what he really

0:55:55.800 --> 0:55:58.880
<v Speaker 1>thinks and let's get into shades of gray and nuanced. No,

0:55:59.440 --> 0:56:03.000
<v Speaker 1>the purpose was he is part of the left wing

0:56:03.120 --> 0:56:06.040
<v Speaker 1>media machine. And it's very hard, as you said, I

0:56:06.040 --> 0:56:09.120
<v Speaker 1>don't have a show like yours. It's very hard to

0:56:09.880 --> 0:56:12.879
<v Speaker 1>answer that you can defend a position you actually hold,

0:56:12.920 --> 0:56:15.040
<v Speaker 1>and you should if you actually hold it, But how

0:56:15.040 --> 0:56:17.560
<v Speaker 1>do you defend or explain a position that's been assigned

0:56:17.560 --> 0:56:21.319
<v Speaker 1>to you, and motivations and a constellation of beliefs that

0:56:21.360 --> 0:56:24.600
<v Speaker 1>people have extrapolated from one thing that they misunderstood to

0:56:24.600 --> 0:56:27.480
<v Speaker 1>begin with. How are you supposed to defend or unravel

0:56:27.560 --> 0:56:29.360
<v Speaker 1>all of that when none of it is true to

0:56:29.400 --> 0:56:33.000
<v Speaker 1>who you are? What I always say on my shows

0:56:33.360 --> 0:56:38.319
<v Speaker 1>is social media creates fifty foot tall caricatures that are

0:56:38.360 --> 0:56:41.400
<v Speaker 1>often one inch one inch deep. Right, you can punch

0:56:41.520 --> 0:56:45.120
<v Speaker 1>right through it, but the caricature itself is so large

0:56:45.560 --> 0:56:48.440
<v Speaker 1>that it isn't in any way representative. And all of

0:56:48.520 --> 0:56:51.880
<v Speaker 1>us out there, regardless of whether you're a Democrat, Republican, independent,

0:56:51.960 --> 0:56:55.600
<v Speaker 1>everybody listening to this right now has beliefs that conflict

0:56:55.719 --> 0:56:58.920
<v Speaker 1>with their party if they are intellectually honest. And I

0:56:58.920 --> 0:57:02.640
<v Speaker 1>always say, if you agree with everything that a political

0:57:02.719 --> 0:57:06.480
<v Speaker 1>candidate is saying, then you aren't listening very hard. And

0:57:06.560 --> 0:57:09.160
<v Speaker 1>I'm not even sure if I were running for president

0:57:09.239 --> 0:57:12.239
<v Speaker 1>or political office that I would agree with everything I say,

0:57:12.280 --> 0:57:16.520
<v Speaker 1>because I'm constantly evolving and recalibrating what I believe on

0:57:16.560 --> 0:57:19.240
<v Speaker 1>a day to day basis. That's what I think intelligent

0:57:19.320 --> 0:57:23.160
<v Speaker 1>people have to do now. A big part of your

0:57:23.280 --> 0:57:25.800
<v Speaker 1>becoming what I think it would be fair to say,

0:57:26.200 --> 0:57:31.120
<v Speaker 1>is a is a figure of of of an easy target. Right,

0:57:31.200 --> 0:57:34.720
<v Speaker 1>Because you work at NBC, you seem like, you know,

0:57:34.720 --> 0:57:37.960
<v Speaker 1>you've got the glasses on, you seem professorial at times.

0:57:38.280 --> 0:57:41.320
<v Speaker 1>You can imagine how you could play the role of

0:57:41.560 --> 0:57:45.280
<v Speaker 1>a feat liberal. Uh, Mom costas right like you. You

0:57:45.360 --> 0:57:46.760
<v Speaker 1>kind of they put up the picture and they can

0:57:46.840 --> 0:57:49.320
<v Speaker 1>kind of take advantage of you. Your global You've been

0:57:49.320 --> 0:57:52.280
<v Speaker 1>doing the Olympics, all these things. A lot of that

0:57:52.400 --> 0:57:55.040
<v Speaker 1>came out of and you can correct me if I'm

0:57:55.080 --> 0:57:58.680
<v Speaker 1>wrong here, But in essay you did about guns on

0:57:59.080 --> 0:58:03.840
<v Speaker 1>NBC J Ring Sunday Night Football, What exactly happened there?

0:58:03.880 --> 0:58:07.680
<v Speaker 1>What was the experience? What would you change if anything,

0:58:07.920 --> 0:58:12.680
<v Speaker 1>about the way that that was presented. First of all, I,

0:58:13.000 --> 0:58:17.160
<v Speaker 1>to some extent fumbled it, and I've always owned up

0:58:17.200 --> 0:58:22.640
<v Speaker 1>to it. Jovan Belcher, linebacker for the Chiefs, murders his

0:58:22.760 --> 0:58:26.160
<v Speaker 1>fiance in front of their two year old child, uh

0:58:26.200 --> 0:58:28.400
<v Speaker 1>and his mother in law, and then goes to the

0:58:28.480 --> 0:58:31.760
<v Speaker 1>Chiefs training center and in front of his coach and

0:58:31.880 --> 0:58:37.000
<v Speaker 1>general manager, commits suicide. All right, I do not think

0:58:37.200 --> 0:58:39.320
<v Speaker 1>that I'm going to be called upon to do anything

0:58:39.880 --> 0:58:44.600
<v Speaker 1>in essay form that Sunday Night. Uh. They had devoted

0:58:45.160 --> 0:58:48.800
<v Speaker 1>almost the entire pregame and halftime to looking at this

0:58:48.840 --> 0:58:51.560
<v Speaker 1>issue still evolving. They had a lot of people from

0:58:51.600 --> 0:58:55.840
<v Speaker 1>the chiefs with poignant commentary. Dan Patrick and Rodney Harrison

0:58:55.840 --> 0:58:58.160
<v Speaker 1>and Tony Dunge were handling it back in the studio.

0:58:58.760 --> 0:59:04.200
<v Speaker 1>UM usually I would my essays sometime after the opening kickoff,

0:59:04.640 --> 0:59:06.800
<v Speaker 1>and I presented to them so that they could put

0:59:06.840 --> 0:59:09.200
<v Speaker 1>some b roll on it with about I don't know,

0:59:09.280 --> 0:59:12.360
<v Speaker 1>seven eight minutes to go in the second quarter. In

0:59:12.400 --> 0:59:14.600
<v Speaker 1>this case, with about three or four minutes to go

0:59:15.080 --> 0:59:18.440
<v Speaker 1>in the second quarter, it's we're gonna need a minute

0:59:18.480 --> 0:59:22.240
<v Speaker 1>to ninety seconds from you and a producer. I take

0:59:22.280 --> 0:59:24.960
<v Speaker 1>responsibility not blaming it on him, because I'm the last

0:59:25.000 --> 0:59:27.640
<v Speaker 1>line of defense. I gotta sign off on it. A

0:59:27.760 --> 0:59:31.120
<v Speaker 1>producer hands me a column written and here's the irony

0:59:31.240 --> 0:59:36.680
<v Speaker 1>written by your colleague and partner, Jason Whitlock, who now

0:59:36.840 --> 0:59:39.760
<v Speaker 1>is seen as although it's a caricature, and I have

0:59:39.840 --> 0:59:42.320
<v Speaker 1>more regard for Jason than to caricature him, but for

0:59:42.920 --> 0:59:46.680
<v Speaker 1>our purposes here is seen as a conservative voice. He's

0:59:46.720 --> 0:59:50.640
<v Speaker 1>on Fox, he's on OutKick. But Malason had written a

0:59:50.760 --> 0:59:55.480
<v Speaker 1>large article about this part of which decried what he

0:59:55.640 --> 1:00:01.400
<v Speaker 1>called the gun culture in sports. And the gun culture

1:00:01.440 --> 1:00:04.400
<v Speaker 1>in sports had been something which had been written about

1:00:04.400 --> 1:00:09.360
<v Speaker 1>and talked about well before the Belcher incident. ESPN had

1:00:09.400 --> 1:00:12.840
<v Speaker 1>done a big thing about it. There has been takeout

1:00:12.880 --> 1:00:16.520
<v Speaker 1>stories in the New York Times, Sports Illustrated, and the

1:00:16.640 --> 1:00:20.720
<v Speaker 1>USA Today about a gun culture in sports. And all

1:00:20.760 --> 1:00:23.920
<v Speaker 1>you have to do is google athletes and guns, and

1:00:23.960 --> 1:00:29.440
<v Speaker 1>there's a litany of criminality, tragedy, folly associated with athletes

1:00:29.440 --> 1:00:33.440
<v Speaker 1>and guns. And while certainly it has happened in society,

1:00:33.960 --> 1:00:37.560
<v Speaker 1>it has happened infrequently, if at all, that a prominent athlete,

1:00:37.560 --> 1:00:40.560
<v Speaker 1>by virtue of having a gun, has turned the situation

1:00:40.600 --> 1:00:43.760
<v Speaker 1>around for the better, where any sensible person would say,

1:00:43.920 --> 1:00:47.560
<v Speaker 1>thank goodness, he did that. So there was a gun culture.

1:00:47.920 --> 1:00:51.640
<v Speaker 1>Think Gilbert Arenas pulling a gun on a teammate in

1:00:51.680 --> 1:00:56.640
<v Speaker 1>the Washington Wizard's locker room. Think Ray Caruth, Think Tank Johnson,

1:00:56.920 --> 1:01:01.800
<v Speaker 1>think a long, long list. And that's what That's what

1:01:02.040 --> 1:01:08.400
<v Speaker 1>Jason was concerned about, an attitude towards guns, a misplaced

1:01:08.400 --> 1:01:13.480
<v Speaker 1>notion of street cred or manhood, and the easy accessibility

1:01:13.640 --> 1:01:17.960
<v Speaker 1>to guns which leads very often to tragedy, no one

1:01:18.000 --> 1:01:20.920
<v Speaker 1>in the right mind thinks that that Javon Belchi couldn't

1:01:20.920 --> 1:01:24.400
<v Speaker 1>have strangled his fiancee or beaten her to death or

1:01:24.600 --> 1:01:28.200
<v Speaker 1>stabbed there. But we know that a gun not only

1:01:28.240 --> 1:01:32.280
<v Speaker 1>makes it easier, but that the survival rate with a gun,

1:01:32.560 --> 1:01:36.720
<v Speaker 1>whether it's attempted suicide or attempted murder, is the survival

1:01:37.040 --> 1:01:40.400
<v Speaker 1>rate is less than by other means. And if we're

1:01:40.400 --> 1:01:43.160
<v Speaker 1>also just talking about guns in general, you don't have

1:01:43.680 --> 1:01:46.920
<v Speaker 1>maths instances of people throwing people off the roof or

1:01:47.000 --> 1:01:51.000
<v Speaker 1>up the building, but you do have mass shootings that

1:01:51.040 --> 1:01:56.680
<v Speaker 1>involve guns. So now this producer hands me this article.

1:01:57.080 --> 1:02:00.480
<v Speaker 1>I look at it, and what Jason was saying was

1:02:00.840 --> 1:02:04.040
<v Speaker 1>obvious to me. He was talking about a gun culture,

1:02:04.240 --> 1:02:07.000
<v Speaker 1>out about gun control, out about the Second Amendment. It

1:02:07.160 --> 1:02:10.280
<v Speaker 1>rang true to me, and I thought wrongly that the

1:02:10.400 --> 1:02:15.320
<v Speaker 1>audience would understand the point, so I quoted a portion

1:02:15.360 --> 1:02:17.040
<v Speaker 1>of it because they didn't have time to write my

1:02:17.120 --> 1:02:20.800
<v Speaker 1>own thing. I quoted a portion of it. It was

1:02:21.440 --> 1:02:26.760
<v Speaker 1>misunderstood as a plea for gun control or an anti

1:02:26.800 --> 1:02:33.120
<v Speaker 1>Second Amendment position. That's my fault, And in retrospect, Clay,

1:02:33.280 --> 1:02:36.720
<v Speaker 1>I'm a good enough broadcaster. I knew this an hour

1:02:36.840 --> 1:02:39.560
<v Speaker 1>later when the response started to come in and people

1:02:39.600 --> 1:02:42.360
<v Speaker 1>were outraged that they wanted me fired, and the n

1:02:42.480 --> 1:02:46.120
<v Speaker 1>r A goes nuts and he's anti American, he's anti

1:02:46.200 --> 1:02:50.520
<v Speaker 1>Second Amendment, etcetera, etcetera. I should have off the top

1:02:50.560 --> 1:02:53.640
<v Speaker 1>of my head, I should have said, because this is

1:02:53.680 --> 1:02:59.040
<v Speaker 1>really what I was thinking. Every time a tragedy intersects

1:02:59.120 --> 1:03:03.520
<v Speaker 1>with sports, we hear one of the dumbest cliches in sports. Well,

1:03:03.920 --> 1:03:06.800
<v Speaker 1>that really puts it all in perspective, But in fact,

1:03:06.840 --> 1:03:09.680
<v Speaker 1>that perspective has a very short shelf life because we're

1:03:09.760 --> 1:03:12.240
<v Speaker 1>right back to obsessing about the same sports issues we

1:03:12.240 --> 1:03:16.120
<v Speaker 1>were concerned with fifteen minutes ago. If we're really looking

1:03:16.160 --> 1:03:19.280
<v Speaker 1>for some perspective in the aftermath of this tragedy, then

1:03:19.320 --> 1:03:23.760
<v Speaker 1>a serious conversation should ensued, including but not limited to

1:03:24.240 --> 1:03:27.720
<v Speaker 1>domestic violence and are those who play a violent sport

1:03:28.120 --> 1:03:32.040
<v Speaker 1>more inclined to it than they're athletic peers and contemporaries

1:03:32.560 --> 1:03:35.960
<v Speaker 1>the effects of football itself. We're learning about the long

1:03:36.080 --> 1:03:39.760
<v Speaker 1>range effects of CTE, but we're also beginning to learn

1:03:39.800 --> 1:03:44.400
<v Speaker 1>then in the short term, emotions and impulse control can

1:03:44.440 --> 1:03:48.840
<v Speaker 1>be affected by head trauma, especially when mixed with alcohol.

1:03:49.240 --> 1:03:53.959
<v Speaker 1>Performance enhancing drugs or pain killers, whatever it might be,

1:03:54.280 --> 1:03:57.480
<v Speaker 1>and the whole idea of athletes and guns. And I

1:03:57.520 --> 1:04:00.160
<v Speaker 1>should have said, and would have said, not talking here

1:04:00.200 --> 1:04:05.600
<v Speaker 1>about anyone's responsible, lawful exercise of their legitimate Second Amendment rights,

1:04:06.040 --> 1:04:10.400
<v Speaker 1>but there is an irresponsible attitude toward guns that is

1:04:10.520 --> 1:04:12.960
<v Speaker 1>part of the sports world, and we'd be better off

1:04:13.000 --> 1:04:15.840
<v Speaker 1>taking a serious look at that. If I had said that,

1:04:15.960 --> 1:04:18.240
<v Speaker 1>the n r A types, the absolutists still would have

1:04:18.320 --> 1:04:20.960
<v Speaker 1>come after me, but a larger portion of the audience

1:04:20.960 --> 1:04:24.640
<v Speaker 1>would have understood what I was saying. I clarified it

1:04:25.160 --> 1:04:29.480
<v Speaker 1>after that, almost immediately after that, I went into the Lions.

1:04:29.520 --> 1:04:31.800
<v Speaker 1>Then I went on with Bill O'Reilly. I went on

1:04:31.880 --> 1:04:34.800
<v Speaker 1>with Howard Kurtz. But again, if it's part of the

1:04:34.880 --> 1:04:40.120
<v Speaker 1>business model, no one comes on and says, oh, okay,

1:04:40.240 --> 1:04:43.040
<v Speaker 1>he clarified it, we get it now. No, that wouldn't

1:04:43.080 --> 1:04:48.680
<v Speaker 1>serve their purpose. So somebody on box says, Bob Costas

1:04:48.800 --> 1:04:53.160
<v Speaker 1>is a hypocritical buffoon. He has armed security, but he

1:04:53.240 --> 1:04:56.160
<v Speaker 1>doesn't want you to have it. So I said to

1:04:56.760 --> 1:05:01.840
<v Speaker 1>Howard Kurtz, who's their media reporter, I've never had armed security.

1:05:02.000 --> 1:05:05.760
<v Speaker 1>I've never had personal security in my entire life. Maybe

1:05:05.840 --> 1:05:10.280
<v Speaker 1>I should, especially now, but I never have. I said,

1:05:10.320 --> 1:05:13.520
<v Speaker 1>there's massive security. Of course, at an Olympics, where the

1:05:13.560 --> 1:05:15.440
<v Speaker 1>President of the United States has to go through the

1:05:15.480 --> 1:05:18.800
<v Speaker 1>same security that someone holding a ticket has to go through,

1:05:19.120 --> 1:05:22.880
<v Speaker 1>and there is one security person assigned to NBC something

1:05:22.880 --> 1:05:26.120
<v Speaker 1>I football. Apart from that, I have never had personal

1:05:26.160 --> 1:05:29.520
<v Speaker 1>security a day in my life, on the job or

1:05:29.560 --> 1:05:32.520
<v Speaker 1>going to the restaurant or walking down the street. What

1:05:32.680 --> 1:05:35.560
<v Speaker 1>was the way that was fun? Bob Costa says, because

1:05:35.600 --> 1:05:38.840
<v Speaker 1>I don't personally pay for it, an NBC does. I'm

1:05:38.880 --> 1:05:41.040
<v Speaker 1>not a hypocrite, even though I've got all of this

1:05:41.520 --> 1:05:46.160
<v Speaker 1>personal security. If I could make this any clearer than this,

1:05:47.000 --> 1:05:49.680
<v Speaker 1>I don't know how I could look. When I hear

1:05:49.720 --> 1:05:54.200
<v Speaker 1>about somebody whose home is broken into, they're in some

1:05:54.320 --> 1:05:57.320
<v Speaker 1>kind of danger, and he or she uses a gun

1:05:57.400 --> 1:06:01.920
<v Speaker 1>to defend themselves and their family, I applaud it. I

1:06:02.040 --> 1:06:07.400
<v Speaker 1>applaud it. If someone breaks into your home, you don't

1:06:07.400 --> 1:06:12.200
<v Speaker 1>have time to evaluate what is it here at sixty

1:06:13.320 --> 1:06:17.680
<v Speaker 1>if you're if you're a woman who could be overpowered,

1:06:18.400 --> 1:06:21.280
<v Speaker 1>or you're a guy who calculates the odds, and I

1:06:21.280 --> 1:06:24.120
<v Speaker 1>don't like my chances here in hand to hand combat

1:06:24.600 --> 1:06:27.920
<v Speaker 1>and my kids are asleep upstairs. If there's even a

1:06:27.960 --> 1:06:31.600
<v Speaker 1>five percent chance of one percent chance that you, your wife,

1:06:31.680 --> 1:06:35.600
<v Speaker 1>your kids are in danger, that person who broke into

1:06:35.680 --> 1:06:39.840
<v Speaker 1>your house put him or herself in jeopardy, and whatever happens,

1:06:40.320 --> 1:06:44.520
<v Speaker 1>I'm okay with it. I do not want to see

1:06:44.520 --> 1:06:48.400
<v Speaker 1>the Second Amendment revoked. I think there should be reasonable

1:06:48.520 --> 1:06:54.920
<v Speaker 1>guns safety laws. UM. Looking at rules about cars um

1:06:55.280 --> 1:06:59.880
<v Speaker 1>would be a good template. Uh. Nobody says that because

1:07:00.080 --> 1:07:02.800
<v Speaker 1>or speed limits, and because you have to register your

1:07:02.840 --> 1:07:06.600
<v Speaker 1>car or have a license. Nobody says that means that

1:07:06.680 --> 1:07:08.280
<v Speaker 1>we're going to have to go to Grandma's house and

1:07:08.320 --> 1:07:10.520
<v Speaker 1>a horse and buggy on Thanksgiving because they're going to

1:07:10.560 --> 1:07:14.880
<v Speaker 1>take our cars away. And nobody says also that you,

1:07:15.520 --> 1:07:18.960
<v Speaker 1>um that you should be allowed to drive the same

1:07:19.080 --> 1:07:22.800
<v Speaker 1>car that they use them that they Tonify hundred or

1:07:22.840 --> 1:07:27.640
<v Speaker 1>at Indie on a city street. These are reasonable restrictions

1:07:27.680 --> 1:07:32.040
<v Speaker 1>which don't get in the way of people's basic rights. Um.

1:07:32.080 --> 1:07:35.280
<v Speaker 1>And when someone says they look to take the Second

1:07:35.280 --> 1:07:37.800
<v Speaker 1>Amendment way, they're going to take the Second Amendment away.

1:07:37.880 --> 1:07:40.760
<v Speaker 1>Anyone who could pass a Civics test knows just how

1:07:40.800 --> 1:07:46.120
<v Speaker 1>difficult it is to revoke a constitutional amendment. Exactly one

1:07:46.200 --> 1:07:48.440
<v Speaker 1>has been revoked in the entire history of the country,

1:07:48.720 --> 1:07:52.800
<v Speaker 1>and that was the short lived prohibition against alcohol. The

1:07:52.880 --> 1:07:57.240
<v Speaker 1>steps you'd have to go through to revoke a constitutional

1:07:57.280 --> 1:08:00.640
<v Speaker 1>amendment are so extensive that hill is so high to climb.

1:08:00.920 --> 1:08:04.400
<v Speaker 1>And nobody I know that has any credibility has suggested it.

1:08:04.520 --> 1:08:10.840
<v Speaker 1>Certainly not me, but that kind of paranoia that that

1:08:10.840 --> 1:08:14.320
<v Speaker 1>that's it worked there this, this person who is prominent,

1:08:14.520 --> 1:08:18.360
<v Speaker 1>has said something that perchs your resentment, and it's not

1:08:18.479 --> 1:08:21.680
<v Speaker 1>in our best interests really to clarify it or to

1:08:22.320 --> 1:08:25.840
<v Speaker 1>acknowledge the shades of gray, because this works for us,

1:08:26.320 --> 1:08:30.439
<v Speaker 1>this works in our business model. So once once that

1:08:30.520 --> 1:08:32.320
<v Speaker 1>was in place, and I thank you for giving me

1:08:32.360 --> 1:08:35.280
<v Speaker 1>this much time, Clay, And I also know that no

1:08:35.280 --> 1:08:39.320
<v Speaker 1>matter how carefully I've expressed myself, how truthfully and how

1:08:39.400 --> 1:08:42.400
<v Speaker 1>much nuance, there are some people who just don't want

1:08:42.439 --> 1:08:45.360
<v Speaker 1>to hear it because it doesn't align with what they

1:08:45.400 --> 1:08:48.880
<v Speaker 1>want to believe. Bob Costas here Clay Travis Wins and Losses.

1:08:48.960 --> 1:08:51.800
<v Speaker 1>How much of the reaction do you think had to

1:08:51.840 --> 1:08:54.960
<v Speaker 1>do with your opinion came out during a football game?

1:08:55.760 --> 1:09:01.320
<v Speaker 1>Oh a lot, a lot of it did and in

1:09:01.320 --> 1:09:03.599
<v Speaker 1>other words, if you had gone on meet the press,

1:09:04.000 --> 1:09:06.719
<v Speaker 1>you know, let's say that weekend, because they had wanted

1:09:06.760 --> 1:09:09.840
<v Speaker 1>to talk about violence in football and you had expressed

1:09:09.880 --> 1:09:13.719
<v Speaker 1>the exact same opinions, I don't know that it would

1:09:13.760 --> 1:09:17.439
<v Speaker 1>have been characterized in the same way as it was

1:09:17.600 --> 1:09:20.120
<v Speaker 1>because it occurred at halftime of a football game, and

1:09:20.120 --> 1:09:22.800
<v Speaker 1>whether or not people wanted to see a serious analysis

1:09:22.800 --> 1:09:25.439
<v Speaker 1>of Jovan Belcher in that situation a lot of people,

1:09:25.439 --> 1:09:27.240
<v Speaker 1>and this has been, you know, kind of what I've

1:09:27.240 --> 1:09:28.960
<v Speaker 1>focused on for a long time. I try to think

1:09:28.960 --> 1:09:31.519
<v Speaker 1>about the average guy or girl out there watching a game.

1:09:31.880 --> 1:09:33.760
<v Speaker 1>They just want to have a beer, and they want

1:09:33.760 --> 1:09:36.320
<v Speaker 1>to watch a football game, and they don't really want

1:09:36.320 --> 1:09:40.000
<v Speaker 1>to see or have to confront larger societal issues for

1:09:40.040 --> 1:09:46.480
<v Speaker 1>any reason. And so I think sometimes the juxtaposition of frivolity,

1:09:46.520 --> 1:09:51.639
<v Speaker 1>which is in general football and gun control or racial

1:09:52.000 --> 1:09:55.599
<v Speaker 1>oppression or whatever it is, that is grating too many

1:09:55.640 --> 1:09:58.280
<v Speaker 1>people because this is their escape from the real world.

1:09:58.360 --> 1:10:00.720
<v Speaker 1>So I think that also actored in in a big

1:10:00.760 --> 1:10:03.559
<v Speaker 1>way here, which goes to you having a relatively short

1:10:03.600 --> 1:10:06.200
<v Speaker 1>amount of time to suddenly get thrown into the deep

1:10:06.280 --> 1:10:08.519
<v Speaker 1>end to the pool where you have to address something

1:10:08.560 --> 1:10:11.720
<v Speaker 1>that is freighted with incredible difficulty and complexity in the

1:10:11.720 --> 1:10:15.120
<v Speaker 1>middle of something that's otherwise privilege. They asked me to

1:10:15.200 --> 1:10:16.880
<v Speaker 1>do it, and I should have said I had enough

1:10:16.920 --> 1:10:20.599
<v Speaker 1>standing to say, look, there isn't enough time. It's better

1:10:20.680 --> 1:10:24.439
<v Speaker 1>off being addressed in a larger and different forum. I

1:10:24.520 --> 1:10:27.920
<v Speaker 1>didn't do that. That was my mistake. Look, a guy

1:10:27.960 --> 1:10:31.240
<v Speaker 1>who wins a gold glove can food a routine groundball.

1:10:31.680 --> 1:10:34.680
<v Speaker 1>It happens. This is live television in the heat of

1:10:34.720 --> 1:10:37.960
<v Speaker 1>the moment, and I made a mistake in judgment. But

1:10:38.080 --> 1:10:42.480
<v Speaker 1>that does not mean that my views should be perpetually

1:10:42.600 --> 1:10:48.080
<v Speaker 1>mischaracterized and grotesquely caricatured. But I think if I had

1:10:48.160 --> 1:10:51.360
<v Speaker 1>done what I mentioned a few minutes ago, starting with

1:10:51.439 --> 1:10:55.400
<v Speaker 1>domestic violence and the effects of football, and then framed

1:10:55.600 --> 1:10:58.040
<v Speaker 1>the gun part of it as I just suggest that

1:10:58.120 --> 1:11:00.559
<v Speaker 1>I should have, then it would have been less jarring,

1:11:00.880 --> 1:11:03.160
<v Speaker 1>and it would have been understood that I wasn't doing

1:11:03.200 --> 1:11:09.640
<v Speaker 1>it gratuitously because these issues had intersected with with football

1:11:09.800 --> 1:11:12.439
<v Speaker 1>that weekend, just as when NBC asked me to do

1:11:12.439 --> 1:11:15.559
<v Speaker 1>a commentary on the red Skins team name that had

1:11:15.600 --> 1:11:17.960
<v Speaker 1>become a big issue that week. The President had been

1:11:17.960 --> 1:11:20.320
<v Speaker 1>asked about it. Goodell had been asked about it, Dan

1:11:20.360 --> 1:11:22.719
<v Speaker 1>Snyder had been asked about it, and Washington was playing

1:11:22.760 --> 1:11:26.960
<v Speaker 1>Dallas on our air, and I delivered a very measured

1:11:27.400 --> 1:11:32.080
<v Speaker 1>commentary about it, trying to lay out the distinctions in

1:11:32.160 --> 1:11:37.440
<v Speaker 1>my mind between redskins and names associated with Native Americans

1:11:37.520 --> 1:11:42.880
<v Speaker 1>like chiefs, braves or warriors. By definition every dictionary, by definition,

1:11:43.160 --> 1:11:49.519
<v Speaker 1>redskins is derogatory, pejorative, a slur, an insult. No such

1:11:49.560 --> 1:11:52.920
<v Speaker 1>definition applies to chiefs, braves, warriors. So I'm not a

1:11:52.960 --> 1:11:55.840
<v Speaker 1>political correctness guy, even though it was handy for people

1:11:55.880 --> 1:11:58.160
<v Speaker 1>to luck me in there, because after the gun thing

1:11:58.439 --> 1:12:01.040
<v Speaker 1>then there were poised to believe um that I was

1:12:01.080 --> 1:12:05.160
<v Speaker 1>some sort of crazy leftist. Um. Now, I think some

1:12:05.240 --> 1:12:09.840
<v Speaker 1>people view the Redskins thing differently. Even then, a lot

1:12:09.840 --> 1:12:15.400
<v Speaker 1>of conservatives, including the late Charles Krafhammer, Kathleen Parker, Phil Mushnik,

1:12:15.439 --> 1:12:18.280
<v Speaker 1>who is viewed as being writer center media columnists in

1:12:18.320 --> 1:12:21.680
<v Speaker 1>the New York Post, Tom Cole, a Native American but

1:12:21.800 --> 1:12:25.439
<v Speaker 1>Republican congressman from Oklahoma, a lot of them agreed with

1:12:25.439 --> 1:12:28.280
<v Speaker 1>me at that at that time. But what also came

1:12:28.280 --> 1:12:33.080
<v Speaker 1>out of that play was this this notion, including among

1:12:33.160 --> 1:12:35.800
<v Speaker 1>people who are fans of mine and who might have

1:12:35.840 --> 1:12:38.920
<v Speaker 1>agreed with what I've said, But the notion, well, he

1:12:39.000 --> 1:12:43.840
<v Speaker 1>really leaned into politics. He politicized everything. They were well

1:12:43.880 --> 1:12:47.400
<v Speaker 1>over a hundred of those halftime essays. Two the two

1:12:47.439 --> 1:12:51.160
<v Speaker 1>we've just discussed guns and redskins could even be construed

1:12:51.479 --> 1:12:55.280
<v Speaker 1>as political. Everything else was Tom Brady and Peyton Manning

1:12:55.360 --> 1:12:57.640
<v Speaker 1>or art Model or al Davis dies and you do

1:12:57.760 --> 1:13:01.000
<v Speaker 1>some sort of assessment and a pre creation or what's

1:13:01.479 --> 1:13:05.280
<v Speaker 1>right or wrong about the overtime rules? That's what it was. Herry.

1:13:06.080 --> 1:13:08.679
<v Speaker 1>And if I'm such a left wing guy as opposed

1:13:08.720 --> 1:13:11.679
<v Speaker 1>to the ala carte guy I really am, What would

1:13:11.680 --> 1:13:16.719
<v Speaker 1>it count for? The essay I did about Vladimir Putin

1:13:17.240 --> 1:13:20.439
<v Speaker 1>in Sochi, which was widely viewed as one of the

1:13:20.520 --> 1:13:24.160
<v Speaker 1>toughest ever directed towards the head of state and toward

1:13:24.200 --> 1:13:28.040
<v Speaker 1>a host nation. What would account for me? Asking the

1:13:28.080 --> 1:13:31.120
<v Speaker 1>heads of the IOC repeatedly, what is it with the

1:13:31.200 --> 1:13:36.639
<v Speaker 1>IOC and authoritarian nations like China and Russia? What would

1:13:36.640 --> 1:13:40.519
<v Speaker 1>account for me? Twice in the opening ceremonies and again

1:13:40.520 --> 1:13:44.840
<v Speaker 1>in two thousand and eight, pointing out that China was positioned,

1:13:44.840 --> 1:13:48.160
<v Speaker 1>had the motivation and the means to replicate the old

1:13:48.280 --> 1:13:53.040
<v Speaker 1>Eastern Bloc sports machine, complete with all the cheating that

1:13:53.040 --> 1:13:56.160
<v Speaker 1>that implies, and pointing out both in an interview with

1:13:56.479 --> 1:14:00.320
<v Speaker 1>President Bush in two thousand eight and another common areas

1:14:00.640 --> 1:14:05.320
<v Speaker 1>small little snippets, judicious small percentage of the overall coverage.

1:14:05.320 --> 1:14:08.000
<v Speaker 1>But look, there's no freedom of speech here. There's a

1:14:08.000 --> 1:14:11.720
<v Speaker 1>firewall on the internet. Yes, China has opened up to

1:14:11.760 --> 1:14:14.760
<v Speaker 1>the world. Yes, the Beijing that I'm visiting in two

1:14:14.800 --> 1:14:18.360
<v Speaker 1>thousand eight is much different than the p King is.

1:14:18.439 --> 1:14:21.479
<v Speaker 1>Most Americans knew it that I first saw in nineteen.

1:14:22.600 --> 1:14:26.960
<v Speaker 1>It's been transformed. It's a modern city, it's there's lots

1:14:26.960 --> 1:14:31.479
<v Speaker 1>of commerce. They're not a communist country by economics anymore,

1:14:31.800 --> 1:14:36.000
<v Speaker 1>but they are still an authoritarian country, often often a

1:14:36.200 --> 1:14:41.639
<v Speaker 1>terribly tunitive totalitarian country. Is that a left wing thing

1:14:41.720 --> 1:14:44.360
<v Speaker 1>to say? Is it a left wing thing to say that?

1:14:44.479 --> 1:14:48.880
<v Speaker 1>The two thousand twelve Olympics in London for anniversary of

1:14:48.920 --> 1:14:52.200
<v Speaker 1>the Munich massacre, when the Israeli delegation came in to

1:14:52.280 --> 1:14:54.960
<v Speaker 1>point out that the IOC, for reasons of its own,

1:14:55.280 --> 1:15:00.840
<v Speaker 1>would not acknowledge this, not commemorate the dark this day

1:15:00.880 --> 1:15:04.320
<v Speaker 1>in Olympic history and here's the key. I wasn't talking

1:15:04.320 --> 1:15:09.519
<v Speaker 1>about Newtown. I wasn't talking about um Sandy Hook. I

1:15:09.600 --> 1:15:13.840
<v Speaker 1>wasn't talking about something that happened outside the context of sports,

1:15:13.880 --> 1:15:17.040
<v Speaker 1>that was relevant in the context of the Olympics and

1:15:17.120 --> 1:15:19.880
<v Speaker 1>on that occasion. And it took about thirty seconds. But

1:15:19.920 --> 1:15:22.800
<v Speaker 1>I don't think many other broadcasters in my position would

1:15:22.840 --> 1:15:26.200
<v Speaker 1>have done it. But it certainly wasn't a left wing position.

1:15:26.560 --> 1:15:29.920
<v Speaker 1>I think I'm a common sense guy who has, as

1:15:29.960 --> 1:15:32.760
<v Speaker 1>I said, all the cart positions, some that could be

1:15:32.880 --> 1:15:36.640
<v Speaker 1>characterized on either side of the central dividing line. Have

1:15:36.720 --> 1:15:39.680
<v Speaker 1>you voted for Republicans for president as well as Democrats

1:15:39.680 --> 1:15:41.960
<v Speaker 1>in your life? Yeah, and you're and you're open to

1:15:42.040 --> 1:15:44.320
<v Speaker 1>doing that in the years ahead. You know, who knows

1:15:44.360 --> 1:15:48.920
<v Speaker 1>who's gonna be running in That might surprise people who

1:15:48.960 --> 1:15:51.800
<v Speaker 1>are convinced that you're a left winger. Right, you're open

1:15:51.880 --> 1:15:57.200
<v Speaker 1>to voting for either side of the political equation. Sure, sure,

1:15:58.160 --> 1:15:59.880
<v Speaker 1>Now I want to make it too political, but I'll

1:16:00.160 --> 1:16:06.040
<v Speaker 1>just say this this year, if if a Republican like

1:16:06.240 --> 1:16:12.400
<v Speaker 1>John McCain or John Kasik, or Mitt Romney or or others,

1:16:12.960 --> 1:16:17.320
<v Speaker 1>if Republicans of those of that stripe, we're running this

1:16:17.400 --> 1:16:21.599
<v Speaker 1>year against Joe Biden, who is a decent man, clearly

1:16:21.600 --> 1:16:25.080
<v Speaker 1>a decent man, but has certain deficits. I would seriously

1:16:25.080 --> 1:16:28.439
<v Speaker 1>consider voting Republican. Be sure to catch live editions about

1:16:28.520 --> 1:16:31.920
<v Speaker 1>Kicked the coverage with Clay Travis weekdays at six am Eastern,

1:16:32.000 --> 1:16:35.479
<v Speaker 1>three am Pacific. We're talking to Bob Costas. I'm Clay

1:16:35.479 --> 1:16:38.479
<v Speaker 1>Traviss is the Wins and Losses podcast. This ties in

1:16:38.520 --> 1:16:41.000
<v Speaker 1>a bit with cancel culture, which you said you are

1:16:41.080 --> 1:16:44.720
<v Speaker 1>not a fan of live television or live radio or

1:16:44.800 --> 1:16:47.960
<v Speaker 1>any form of live broadcast. You have done it as

1:16:48.040 --> 1:16:51.080
<v Speaker 1>well or better than almost anyone when you consider the

1:16:51.160 --> 1:16:54.280
<v Speaker 1>number of hours that you're going to do it. Everybody

1:16:54.280 --> 1:16:56.679
<v Speaker 1>out there who listens to the radio show knows it's difficult.

1:16:56.720 --> 1:16:59.799
<v Speaker 1>It's like tap dancing at times above a razor, particularly

1:16:59.840 --> 1:17:03.160
<v Speaker 1>in social media era, what I would say often happens.

1:17:03.160 --> 1:17:05.000
<v Speaker 1>And this is what my position on the n r A.

1:17:05.640 --> 1:17:07.880
<v Speaker 1>I think many people in the n r A are

1:17:08.080 --> 1:17:10.519
<v Speaker 1>terrified that if they've given inch, somebody's gonna take a

1:17:10.560 --> 1:17:14.120
<v Speaker 1>mile right and that uh, and that the perspective on

1:17:14.600 --> 1:17:16.799
<v Speaker 1>you may you may you and I may have different agreements,

1:17:16.880 --> 1:17:19.000
<v Speaker 1>or many people out there may have different agreements on

1:17:19.360 --> 1:17:22.080
<v Speaker 1>what should happen with the statue of Robert E. Lee Right,

1:17:22.560 --> 1:17:25.080
<v Speaker 1>um and uh, And certainly many people could have a

1:17:25.120 --> 1:17:27.559
<v Speaker 1>variety of opinions. I'm a big history buff grew up

1:17:27.600 --> 1:17:31.240
<v Speaker 1>in the South. I abhor the idea of taking down statues.

1:17:31.280 --> 1:17:33.840
<v Speaker 1>I think it's a bad precedent to set. I think

1:17:33.920 --> 1:17:36.640
<v Speaker 1>oftentimes the statues the museums don't want them, which is

1:17:36.640 --> 1:17:39.559
<v Speaker 1>a usual thing to say. But I think most people,

1:17:39.840 --> 1:17:42.840
<v Speaker 1>regardless of where they come down on that issue, would

1:17:42.880 --> 1:17:46.439
<v Speaker 1>say it's crazy to tear down the Washington Monument, or

1:17:46.560 --> 1:17:49.160
<v Speaker 1>to blow up the Lincoln Memorial or the Jefferson Memorial

1:17:49.200 --> 1:17:52.200
<v Speaker 1>or things like that. But to me, the problem with

1:17:52.280 --> 1:17:55.840
<v Speaker 1>cancel culture is it's the progressive tip of the spear.

1:17:56.000 --> 1:17:58.519
<v Speaker 1>They never stop right there. There's never like your point

1:17:58.560 --> 1:18:00.720
<v Speaker 1>on the Redskins name is I think a one. If

1:18:00.760 --> 1:18:03.960
<v Speaker 1>you told me, hey, you can give away the Redskins

1:18:04.040 --> 1:18:06.920
<v Speaker 1>name and we'll never have an argument about the Chiefs

1:18:07.120 --> 1:18:09.920
<v Speaker 1>or the Braves, or the Florida State Seminoles or any

1:18:09.960 --> 1:18:12.800
<v Speaker 1>of those tribes, that's the end of the discussion. Right.

1:18:13.080 --> 1:18:15.880
<v Speaker 1>As a reasonable person, I would say, Okay, I'll give

1:18:15.920 --> 1:18:19.600
<v Speaker 1>you the Redskins. Let's just table all other mascots and

1:18:19.640 --> 1:18:23.960
<v Speaker 1>whether or not they're offensive. I don't want to be Yeah,

1:18:24.000 --> 1:18:26.840
<v Speaker 1>I don't want to go uh full board to try

1:18:26.840 --> 1:18:29.759
<v Speaker 1>to defend the fighting Irish nickname because somebody is upset

1:18:29.800 --> 1:18:32.559
<v Speaker 1>that it's a caricature of an Irish person who has,

1:18:32.720 --> 1:18:34.479
<v Speaker 1>you know, so much too much to drink and wants

1:18:34.479 --> 1:18:36.479
<v Speaker 1>to get into a fight. I'm okay with it, right,

1:18:36.960 --> 1:18:42.120
<v Speaker 1>let's just yes, right. At some point you have to

1:18:42.240 --> 1:18:45.040
<v Speaker 1>just say, in my opinion, okay, we kind of reached

1:18:45.040 --> 1:18:48.599
<v Speaker 1>the logical extension of offense. And the problem with political

1:18:48.640 --> 1:18:51.439
<v Speaker 1>correctness and progressive culture to me in many ways is

1:18:51.920 --> 1:18:55.040
<v Speaker 1>then it can't happen because they wouldn't have a reason

1:18:55.080 --> 1:18:57.960
<v Speaker 1>to exist, right, And so I understand some of the

1:18:58.000 --> 1:19:01.880
<v Speaker 1>pushback on those issues. But as someone who does live

1:19:02.000 --> 1:19:04.400
<v Speaker 1>television as much as you have, and and has done

1:19:04.400 --> 1:19:08.000
<v Speaker 1>as many different live radio events, are you as troubled

1:19:08.040 --> 1:19:11.639
<v Speaker 1>by the obsession with finding the two minutes that somebody

1:19:11.680 --> 1:19:14.080
<v Speaker 1>has that may be the least accurate reflection of their

1:19:14.160 --> 1:19:17.320
<v Speaker 1>career and insisting that we cashier them for it and

1:19:17.320 --> 1:19:19.439
<v Speaker 1>that they can no longer do what they've done for

1:19:19.479 --> 1:19:26.800
<v Speaker 1>so long. Absolutely, um, people who demand respect and compassion

1:19:27.240 --> 1:19:32.759
<v Speaker 1>and rightly so for marginalized groups or historically discriminated against groups.

1:19:33.520 --> 1:19:36.960
<v Speaker 1>Often are not very respectful of the totality of a

1:19:36.960 --> 1:19:41.799
<v Speaker 1>person's life, are very compassionate about a mistake that doesn't

1:19:41.800 --> 1:19:48.559
<v Speaker 1>necessarily reflect the depth of someone's feelings. Um, you know,

1:19:48.600 --> 1:19:51.280
<v Speaker 1>I think that we can we can work towards being

1:19:51.280 --> 1:19:57.360
<v Speaker 1>a more tolerant and sensitive society without without needing notches

1:19:57.439 --> 1:19:59.800
<v Speaker 1>on our belt. We canceled this guy, We canceled that

1:19:59.840 --> 1:20:02.040
<v Speaker 1>in stitutional we canceled this, that and the other thing.

1:20:02.600 --> 1:20:07.400
<v Speaker 1>Um with without with failing to recognize that the things

1:20:07.560 --> 1:20:11.000
<v Speaker 1>took place in a different context. The idea that some

1:20:11.080 --> 1:20:13.880
<v Speaker 1>twenty five year old kid is going to stand here

1:20:13.880 --> 1:20:19.120
<v Speaker 1>in and judge something that happened decades and centuries ago.

1:20:19.720 --> 1:20:23.720
<v Speaker 1>Judge the people. Judge the people, not necessarily the attitudes,

1:20:23.760 --> 1:20:26.920
<v Speaker 1>because attitudes evolved, and rightly so, but judge the people

1:20:27.040 --> 1:20:29.800
<v Speaker 1>and what they did and said in the context of

1:20:29.880 --> 1:20:33.760
<v Speaker 1>their time, and and be so unself aware as not

1:20:33.840 --> 1:20:37.960
<v Speaker 1>to realize the generations from now. If this continues, you

1:20:38.000 --> 1:20:41.120
<v Speaker 1>will will be viewed just as harshly and perhaps just

1:20:41.240 --> 1:20:45.120
<v Speaker 1>as unfairly. You think you've reached the endpoint of evolution

1:20:45.479 --> 1:20:50.080
<v Speaker 1>in sensitivity and awareness. But you haven't, Jack, you haven't.

1:20:50.160 --> 1:20:53.720
<v Speaker 1>And if you played this game eternally, eventually it's going

1:20:53.760 --> 1:20:58.000
<v Speaker 1>to come back and and like Frankenstein's Monster, it's gonna,

1:20:58.200 --> 1:21:01.840
<v Speaker 1>it's gonna it's going to kill its career gator. That's

1:21:01.880 --> 1:21:05.560
<v Speaker 1>what history teaches us, and that's why having an understanding

1:21:05.680 --> 1:21:07.920
<v Speaker 1>of the scope of history is so important. I've just

1:21:07.960 --> 1:21:11.400
<v Speaker 1>got a few more questions for you. Uh, the Olympics.

1:21:11.400 --> 1:21:14.639
<v Speaker 1>You've hit on several different times. What is it like

1:21:14.960 --> 1:21:17.960
<v Speaker 1>for people out there who don't know the procedures and

1:21:17.960 --> 1:21:21.480
<v Speaker 1>the processes and what is involved to do in Olympics?

1:21:21.680 --> 1:21:24.439
<v Speaker 1>Is it the hardest thing that you do in live

1:21:24.520 --> 1:21:29.520
<v Speaker 1>sports business? How would you contextualize that? It's it's very difficult.

1:21:29.560 --> 1:21:32.839
<v Speaker 1>But what helped me was the advice that Jim McKay

1:21:32.880 --> 1:21:35.559
<v Speaker 1>gave me and then my own experience, which was that

1:21:35.680 --> 1:21:39.080
<v Speaker 1>the host of the Olympics must be a very good generalist.

1:21:39.439 --> 1:21:41.600
<v Speaker 1>You have to have a very good grasp of the

1:21:41.800 --> 1:21:45.519
<v Speaker 1>history of the Olympics, history and current circumstances of the

1:21:45.520 --> 1:21:48.920
<v Speaker 1>host city and the host nation, and you have to

1:21:48.960 --> 1:21:53.920
<v Speaker 1>know about the handful of events and sports and competitors

1:21:53.920 --> 1:21:56.800
<v Speaker 1>that are likely to be part of the focus of

1:21:57.120 --> 1:22:00.920
<v Speaker 1>prime time coverage. You know that the researchers are so

1:22:00.960 --> 1:22:04.959
<v Speaker 1>good that if somebody or something pops out out of nowhere,

1:22:05.160 --> 1:22:09.560
<v Speaker 1>like I think of Rulan Gardner feeding the seemingly invincible

1:22:09.760 --> 1:22:13.280
<v Speaker 1>correll In, who was so good that that competitors feared

1:22:13.280 --> 1:22:16.519
<v Speaker 1>going in against him. Um he was a mythic figure,

1:22:16.760 --> 1:22:19.400
<v Speaker 1>and Rulan Gardner beat him for the gold medal in

1:22:19.520 --> 1:22:22.600
<v Speaker 1>Sydney in two thousand, even though he was an American competitor.

1:22:22.680 --> 1:22:25.439
<v Speaker 1>I didn't know who the hell Rulan Gardner was until

1:22:25.479 --> 1:22:27.680
<v Speaker 1>this happened, And if it hadn't happened, it wouldn't have

1:22:27.680 --> 1:22:29.120
<v Speaker 1>been on in prime time. But it was such a

1:22:29.120 --> 1:22:31.200
<v Speaker 1>big upset that eventually we throw it on the air

1:22:31.240 --> 1:22:33.400
<v Speaker 1>as quickly as possible, and in the space of about

1:22:33.439 --> 1:22:37.000
<v Speaker 1>five minutes, the researchers give me his bio. And something

1:22:37.040 --> 1:22:38.640
<v Speaker 1>you have to be good at is that you have

1:22:38.680 --> 1:22:41.720
<v Speaker 1>to be able to take a briefing briefly, quickly and

1:22:41.840 --> 1:22:45.920
<v Speaker 1>assimilate the information, understand what's worth emphasizing, see if there's

1:22:45.960 --> 1:22:49.000
<v Speaker 1>a narrative here that makes some sense. But if you

1:22:49.120 --> 1:22:51.479
<v Speaker 1>go into an Olympics thinking you have to know every

1:22:51.560 --> 1:22:54.479
<v Speaker 1>Rulan gardener, and you have to know every platform diver

1:22:54.680 --> 1:22:58.880
<v Speaker 1>from Peru or every crush country skier from Norway. Your

1:22:58.960 --> 1:23:03.639
<v Speaker 1>head will explode. Ken Jennings of Jeopardy fans, the front

1:23:03.640 --> 1:23:07.120
<v Speaker 1>Fame couldn't possibly, you know, hold all of that information.

1:23:07.479 --> 1:23:10.360
<v Speaker 1>At a summer Olympics, you've got two hundred countries and

1:23:10.400 --> 1:23:14.040
<v Speaker 1>over ten thousand athletes. So be a good generalist, be

1:23:14.160 --> 1:23:16.800
<v Speaker 1>able to see the big picture and then be able

1:23:16.840 --> 1:23:20.960
<v Speaker 1>to say, hone in on the particulars, if and when

1:23:21.000 --> 1:23:25.479
<v Speaker 1>they rise to the top. Here's another example, Clay of

1:23:26.160 --> 1:23:30.040
<v Speaker 1>the business model that applies too often, and it applies

1:23:30.720 --> 1:23:33.840
<v Speaker 1>across the political spectrum. But in this case it was

1:23:33.880 --> 1:23:40.800
<v Speaker 1>the right wing that got me in Sochi. NBC put

1:23:40.840 --> 1:23:46.000
<v Speaker 1>together a piece that explained Vladimir Putin's influence in Russia,

1:23:46.640 --> 1:23:50.639
<v Speaker 1>and part of that said that Forbes, not Mother Jones

1:23:50.640 --> 1:23:54.559
<v Speaker 1>of the Nation. Forbes had named Vladimir Putin the year

1:23:54.560 --> 1:23:59.080
<v Speaker 1>before as the world's most influential leader, bumping Barack Obama

1:23:59.120 --> 1:24:00.880
<v Speaker 1>to two. They didn't say was the best. They didn't

1:24:00.880 --> 1:24:04.280
<v Speaker 1>say he was a good guy, most influential. So I

1:24:04.320 --> 1:24:09.160
<v Speaker 1>had said that. Immediately after narrating that piece, there was

1:24:09.200 --> 1:24:11.280
<v Speaker 1>a panel discussion which made it clear that he was

1:24:11.320 --> 1:24:14.160
<v Speaker 1>a former KGB agent, that he was no friend of

1:24:14.240 --> 1:24:18.559
<v Speaker 1>the West, that he was aligned with UH with very

1:24:18.640 --> 1:24:22.800
<v Speaker 1>questionable and that's to be kind policies, that it was

1:24:22.800 --> 1:24:27.920
<v Speaker 1>a repressive regime, etcetera, etcetera. And subsequently I did a

1:24:27.960 --> 1:24:32.600
<v Speaker 1>commentary which talked about all those things and talked about

1:24:32.720 --> 1:24:36.120
<v Speaker 1>how the success of the SoC games on the surface

1:24:36.800 --> 1:24:41.679
<v Speaker 1>might obscure just how problematic and often vicious and criminal

1:24:42.560 --> 1:24:49.400
<v Speaker 1>Blutin's Russia was. Okay, Fox News decides that I have

1:24:49.560 --> 1:24:53.000
<v Speaker 1>praised Vladimir Putin, and they make an issue out of

1:24:53.040 --> 1:24:57.040
<v Speaker 1>it because that moves the needle for their audience. John

1:24:57.120 --> 1:25:00.439
<v Speaker 1>McCain comes on the next day with Neil of Vudo.

1:25:01.000 --> 1:25:03.280
<v Speaker 1>I had known McCain who was a sports fan. I'd

1:25:03.280 --> 1:25:05.840
<v Speaker 1>have friendly relationship with him. I'd interviewed him on a

1:25:05.880 --> 1:25:09.400
<v Speaker 1>couple of occasions. You know more than your audience does, Clay,

1:25:09.680 --> 1:25:12.719
<v Speaker 1>how these things work. They kind of briefed the guests,

1:25:12.760 --> 1:25:15.080
<v Speaker 1>these are the topics, and this is what so and

1:25:15.120 --> 1:25:18.559
<v Speaker 1>so said, and McCain was sometimes shot from the hip, said,

1:25:18.640 --> 1:25:21.120
<v Speaker 1>you know, I really like Bob Costas. I enjoy his

1:25:21.160 --> 1:25:24.000
<v Speaker 1>sports broadcast, but he doesn't know what he's talking about.

1:25:24.280 --> 1:25:29.479
<v Speaker 1>He should stick to sports, okay. Subsequently, the Olympics are

1:25:29.520 --> 1:25:34.320
<v Speaker 1>over with, McCain calls me out of the blue, calls me,

1:25:34.880 --> 1:25:37.400
<v Speaker 1>and before I could even say hello, he says, my friend,

1:25:37.680 --> 1:25:40.920
<v Speaker 1>I'm sorry. I saw what you said in full context.

1:25:41.360 --> 1:25:45.840
<v Speaker 1>I tweeted out an apology. What you said was contextualized.

1:25:46.120 --> 1:25:50.280
<v Speaker 1>It was all good. Okay. Now I go on Bill O'Reilly,

1:25:50.560 --> 1:25:53.759
<v Speaker 1>and I mentioned this to O'Reilly. Now you would think

1:25:54.360 --> 1:25:56.760
<v Speaker 1>it was important enough for two or three days to

1:25:56.840 --> 1:26:00.240
<v Speaker 1>make an issue out of Bob costas sympathy, as is

1:26:00.280 --> 1:26:03.080
<v Speaker 1>with Vladimir Putin. If it was important enough to make

1:26:03.120 --> 1:26:05.639
<v Speaker 1>an issue out of it, wouldn't it be important enough

1:26:05.680 --> 1:26:09.439
<v Speaker 1>to cite that McCain reversed field. Wouldn't it be important

1:26:09.560 --> 1:26:13.679
<v Speaker 1>enough to note that. Wouldn't it be important enough to say, look,

1:26:14.600 --> 1:26:20.400
<v Speaker 1>if an American broadcaster really praised a foreign adversary, wouldn't

1:26:20.439 --> 1:26:23.320
<v Speaker 1>everybody from the New York Times to the National Review

1:26:23.800 --> 1:26:26.960
<v Speaker 1>take exception to that. Why is it only in these

1:26:27.000 --> 1:26:31.160
<v Speaker 1>little echo chambers that this was mentioned? Maybe because we

1:26:31.280 --> 1:26:35.479
<v Speaker 1>mischaracterized it and made something out of nothing, and now

1:26:35.560 --> 1:26:39.320
<v Speaker 1>we don't feel compelled to correct it. Because that wouldn't

1:26:39.320 --> 1:26:44.360
<v Speaker 1>fit our business model. Um and that that, along with

1:26:44.439 --> 1:26:48.120
<v Speaker 1>other things and coupled with social media, is why some people,

1:26:48.280 --> 1:26:50.960
<v Speaker 1>including some people of goodwill who just don't have the

1:26:51.120 --> 1:26:55.320
<v Speaker 1>media literacy to navigate this think, Yeah, you know Bob

1:26:55.360 --> 1:26:57.760
<v Speaker 1>cost this, I've always liked this sports broadcasting, but he's

1:26:57.840 --> 1:27:00.000
<v Speaker 1>really kind of a political guy and he's really out there.

1:27:00.000 --> 1:27:04.920
<v Speaker 1>Are on the left, not sho. That's fantastic what you

1:27:05.000 --> 1:27:08.800
<v Speaker 1>mentioned starting to cover the Olympics in many of the

1:27:08.800 --> 1:27:11.920
<v Speaker 1>people listening to us crazily are so young they don't

1:27:11.960 --> 1:27:15.479
<v Speaker 1>remember the dream Team. That was for me one of

1:27:15.520 --> 1:27:18.760
<v Speaker 1>the best moments as being an American sports fan was

1:27:18.840 --> 1:27:21.920
<v Speaker 1>the Dream Team. You also covered the m b A

1:27:21.920 --> 1:27:25.720
<v Speaker 1>at a time that the NBA was just stratospheric with

1:27:25.800 --> 1:27:28.760
<v Speaker 1>the Jordan's era, and I think you were featured in

1:27:28.840 --> 1:27:32.160
<v Speaker 1>some of the documentary surrounding the Jordan era and if

1:27:32.160 --> 1:27:35.200
<v Speaker 1>you weren't just watching yeah yeah, the Last Dance. Just

1:27:35.320 --> 1:27:38.080
<v Speaker 1>watching that made me think back to all of the

1:27:38.120 --> 1:27:41.120
<v Speaker 1>games that you had been involved in. What was it

1:27:41.240 --> 1:27:44.760
<v Speaker 1>like to cover Jordan's I don't know what kind of relationship,

1:27:44.800 --> 1:27:47.439
<v Speaker 1>if any, that you had with him, but for people

1:27:47.479 --> 1:27:50.839
<v Speaker 1>out there who now think about the Lebron versus Jordan's debate.

1:27:51.560 --> 1:27:55.120
<v Speaker 1>Jordan was and unbelo He was like the sun in

1:27:55.479 --> 1:27:58.280
<v Speaker 1>my life growing up. You know, it was an inescapable

1:27:58.280 --> 1:28:02.240
<v Speaker 1>object that was almost always present every day. What was

1:28:02.280 --> 1:28:05.040
<v Speaker 1>it like to cover him? I had a good relationship

1:28:05.120 --> 1:28:08.599
<v Speaker 1>with him. He was a magnificent player, but he also

1:28:08.680 --> 1:28:13.599
<v Speaker 1>had all those intangible things. His presence was the presence

1:28:13.600 --> 1:28:17.519
<v Speaker 1>of a star. He was handsome, He carried himself with

1:28:17.840 --> 1:28:21.880
<v Speaker 1>incredible grace. Although he's not a small man, he's six

1:28:21.880 --> 1:28:26.120
<v Speaker 1>ft six, but in the context of basketball, he wasn't

1:28:26.200 --> 1:28:30.720
<v Speaker 1>so big, so overwhelmingly strong as to be unrelatable to

1:28:30.840 --> 1:28:34.360
<v Speaker 1>some portion of the audience. Everything about him was like

1:28:34.400 --> 1:28:37.120
<v Speaker 1>a ten on a ten scale. Plus the era, the

1:28:37.240 --> 1:28:40.639
<v Speaker 1>Dream Team, the NBA factor in my bias. The NBA

1:28:40.800 --> 1:28:42.759
<v Speaker 1>was on NBC, and prior to that in the eighties

1:28:42.760 --> 1:28:46.759
<v Speaker 1>that have been on CBS. Now primarily it's a cable product.

1:28:47.000 --> 1:28:49.200
<v Speaker 1>This is no knock on the quality of the coverage.

1:28:49.240 --> 1:28:52.519
<v Speaker 1>The coverage is great. You know, Ernie and Charles and Shack,

1:28:53.040 --> 1:28:55.360
<v Speaker 1>those guys are great. That's probably the best studio show

1:28:55.640 --> 1:28:58.880
<v Speaker 1>in the history of television sports. And my Breen is

1:28:59.040 --> 1:29:02.200
<v Speaker 1>breaming terrific, and Kevin Harland is exciting to listen to,

1:29:02.320 --> 1:29:04.960
<v Speaker 1>and Marv still does the games, but it isn't as

1:29:05.040 --> 1:29:08.400
<v Speaker 1>much a part of the cultural conversation as it once was.

1:29:08.720 --> 1:29:11.800
<v Speaker 1>The promos for the NBA on NBC, We're on during

1:29:11.920 --> 1:29:15.120
<v Speaker 1>Seinfeld and Carson and Letterman and e r And and

1:29:15.160 --> 1:29:18.400
<v Speaker 1>all the rest um and the games were all the

1:29:18.400 --> 1:29:22.480
<v Speaker 1>playoff games, all the weekend playoff games were on NBC doubleheaders,

1:29:22.560 --> 1:29:26.880
<v Speaker 1>triple headers, primetime games. It was just a whole different thing.

1:29:27.200 --> 1:29:29.640
<v Speaker 1>And even though the Bulls won all those titles, there

1:29:29.680 --> 1:29:32.360
<v Speaker 1>was a constellation of stars. Just think of the roster

1:29:32.800 --> 1:29:35.120
<v Speaker 1>of the Dream Team. It's only Jordan and Pippen from

1:29:35.120 --> 1:29:38.160
<v Speaker 1>the Bulls. Think of the others. Think think of the

1:29:38.360 --> 1:29:43.280
<v Speaker 1>texture and how visible Um Stockton and Malone were, and

1:29:43.400 --> 1:29:46.879
<v Speaker 1>Barkley and Isaiah at the tail end of the Pistons

1:29:46.960 --> 1:29:50.200
<v Speaker 1>run and Clyde Drexler and Patrick Ewing and pat Riley,

1:29:50.200 --> 1:29:52.960
<v Speaker 1>even the coaches. It was a whole group of stars.

1:29:53.280 --> 1:29:55.479
<v Speaker 1>Now Jordan was at the center of it. Here's the

1:29:55.520 --> 1:30:00.519
<v Speaker 1>way I feel about the Lebron Jordan comparison on is

1:30:00.560 --> 1:30:03.639
<v Speaker 1>an all time great And if you want to call

1:30:03.680 --> 1:30:06.719
<v Speaker 1>it a toss up. I put it this way. Let's

1:30:06.720 --> 1:30:12.400
<v Speaker 1>say Lebron is equally excellent, and his prowess is equal

1:30:12.400 --> 1:30:16.160
<v Speaker 1>in its own way to Jordan's basketball prowess. He is

1:30:16.200 --> 1:30:21.639
<v Speaker 1>equally excellent, but not equally great, because Jordan's greatness went

1:30:21.720 --> 1:30:26.480
<v Speaker 1>beyond numbers or even the specific outcomes of games or championships.

1:30:27.040 --> 1:30:32.160
<v Speaker 1>His impact on the league, his global impact. Just what

1:30:32.640 --> 1:30:36.960
<v Speaker 1>mentioning his name conjures up. It's intangible, but you know

1:30:37.040 --> 1:30:39.080
<v Speaker 1>it when you see it and you feel it. So

1:30:39.240 --> 1:30:43.760
<v Speaker 1>Jordan's was greater than Lebron, not necessarily better, although I

1:30:43.840 --> 1:30:45.240
<v Speaker 1>think I still would give him an edge of the

1:30:45.280 --> 1:30:49.960
<v Speaker 1>basketball player. But he was greater than Lebron. It's so

1:30:50.000 --> 1:30:52.160
<v Speaker 1>well said. We're talking to Bob Costas, this is the

1:30:52.160 --> 1:30:55.519
<v Speaker 1>Wins and Lost his podcast. I'm Clay Travis. Charles Barkley.

1:30:55.560 --> 1:30:58.839
<v Speaker 1>You mentioned there, and you mentioned that that NBA Inside

1:30:58.920 --> 1:31:02.320
<v Speaker 1>the NBA Studio show maybe the best that's out there

1:31:02.439 --> 1:31:06.040
<v Speaker 1>right now. Did you foresee Barkley becoming as good of

1:31:06.040 --> 1:31:08.880
<v Speaker 1>a media personality as he has become when he was

1:31:08.920 --> 1:31:12.560
<v Speaker 1>a player. I don't think he could perceive ahead of

1:31:12.600 --> 1:31:15.280
<v Speaker 1>time that it would be this big, but you knew

1:31:15.320 --> 1:31:17.160
<v Speaker 1>that he would be a star on television. Money was

1:31:17.200 --> 1:31:19.439
<v Speaker 1>an active player. We were talking about how we could

1:31:19.520 --> 1:31:21.479
<v Speaker 1>use and Dick Eversoul was talking about it. I mean,

1:31:21.560 --> 1:31:26.240
<v Speaker 1>he's such an incandescent personality that that part didn't surprise me.

1:31:26.560 --> 1:31:29.200
<v Speaker 1>Because we're running short of time here, and I thank

1:31:29.240 --> 1:31:31.120
<v Speaker 1>you for giving me the platform and for being so

1:31:31.200 --> 1:31:33.640
<v Speaker 1>patient with me while I took advantage of it in

1:31:33.680 --> 1:31:36.000
<v Speaker 1>the way that I did. Um, I actually have to

1:31:36.040 --> 1:31:38.080
<v Speaker 1>run off and do something for the Baseball Network about

1:31:38.080 --> 1:31:40.080
<v Speaker 1>a half hour from now, which means I have to

1:31:40.160 --> 1:31:43.160
<v Speaker 1>change clothes as opposed to what you can do for

1:31:43.200 --> 1:31:45.920
<v Speaker 1>a podcast or or radio. A couple of points that

1:31:45.960 --> 1:31:48.800
<v Speaker 1>I wanted to make. One that relates to one of

1:31:48.800 --> 1:31:51.880
<v Speaker 1>your earlier questions when you're talking about having a sense

1:31:51.920 --> 1:31:57.040
<v Speaker 1>of things beyond stats and numbers. Somebody mentioned to me

1:31:57.800 --> 1:32:02.120
<v Speaker 1>the Mets and would the raise be like the sixty

1:32:02.200 --> 1:32:06.320
<v Speaker 1>nine Mets raise against the Dodgers, Mets against the Mighty

1:32:06.560 --> 1:32:09.759
<v Speaker 1>Baltimore Orioles. And one of the things that came to mind,

1:32:10.280 --> 1:32:15.160
<v Speaker 1>besides the obvious statistical comparisons, um Tyler Glass now and

1:32:15.200 --> 1:32:18.120
<v Speaker 1>Blake Snell have never thrown a complete game. Tom seb

1:32:18.200 --> 1:32:22.879
<v Speaker 1>and Jerry Kuzman through eighteen and sixteen respectively in that season,

1:32:23.160 --> 1:32:25.719
<v Speaker 1>and sever through a tenant in complete game in Game four,

1:32:25.960 --> 1:32:28.640
<v Speaker 1>and Kuzman went all the way in the clincher in

1:32:28.720 --> 1:32:31.640
<v Speaker 1>Game five. But those are just differences in strategy as

1:32:31.680 --> 1:32:34.759
<v Speaker 1>the game evolved. But if I were to answer that question,

1:32:35.439 --> 1:32:37.320
<v Speaker 1>and I think that this is part of what makes

1:32:37.360 --> 1:32:39.519
<v Speaker 1>a good broadcaster, I'd like to think this is what

1:32:39.760 --> 1:32:43.720
<v Speaker 1>Red Barber would say, or whatever it might have been

1:32:43.800 --> 1:32:47.360
<v Speaker 1>that you brought to Jim McKay's attention or Vince Gully,

1:32:47.400 --> 1:32:50.280
<v Speaker 1>it's this. You would have had to have been there.

1:32:50.640 --> 1:32:53.439
<v Speaker 1>The sixty nine Mets came out of nowhere. Not only

1:32:53.479 --> 1:32:56.280
<v Speaker 1>were they never good, they were comically bad. They were

1:32:56.320 --> 1:33:00.479
<v Speaker 1>synonymous with lovable ineptitude, and they've never had a win season.

1:33:00.520 --> 1:33:02.320
<v Speaker 1>Then they go all the way and they win the

1:33:02.360 --> 1:33:06.280
<v Speaker 1>World Series. But it's more than that. The Dodgers and

1:33:06.360 --> 1:33:10.479
<v Speaker 1>Giants were only half a generation removed from being in

1:33:10.880 --> 1:33:13.719
<v Speaker 1>New York, and many of those Dodger and Giant fans

1:33:13.760 --> 1:33:17.920
<v Speaker 1>attached themselves to a National League team because Willie Mays

1:33:17.920 --> 1:33:20.320
<v Speaker 1>and those guys were still coming through New York to

1:33:20.439 --> 1:33:22.920
<v Speaker 1>play the Mets, and so there was a National League

1:33:22.960 --> 1:33:26.400
<v Speaker 1>feel that predated the Mets. People who had rooted for

1:33:26.479 --> 1:33:31.200
<v Speaker 1>Snyder and Newcombe and Campanella and Robinson and Willie Mays,

1:33:31.439 --> 1:33:36.120
<v Speaker 1>they became Met fans. The Yankee dynasty had just ended.

1:33:36.160 --> 1:33:39.880
<v Speaker 1>Mantel retired after the preceding season. Now the town belonged

1:33:39.920 --> 1:33:43.840
<v Speaker 1>not to the Yankees. It belonged to the Mets. And

1:33:43.920 --> 1:33:46.720
<v Speaker 1>not incidentally, I'd make this point. It's not really a

1:33:46.720 --> 1:33:50.720
<v Speaker 1>political point. It's just a fact that factors into the

1:33:50.760 --> 1:33:53.479
<v Speaker 1>texture of it. Mookie Betts happens to be the only

1:33:53.520 --> 1:33:57.720
<v Speaker 1>African American in this year's World Series either team. The

1:33:57.840 --> 1:34:00.599
<v Speaker 1>Arios had Frank Robinson and Don view Heard and Paul

1:34:00.640 --> 1:34:04.040
<v Speaker 1>Blair and el Rod Hendricks. The Mets had ed Charles

1:34:04.040 --> 1:34:07.360
<v Speaker 1>and Cleon Jones and Tommy A. G and Don Clendennon,

1:34:07.880 --> 1:34:10.680
<v Speaker 1>and their manager was Gil Hodges, who was attached to

1:34:10.760 --> 1:34:15.479
<v Speaker 1>Jackie Robinson's Brooklyn Dodgers. There was a texture to it

1:34:15.840 --> 1:34:17.720
<v Speaker 1>and the World Series, even though every game was on

1:34:17.760 --> 1:34:20.800
<v Speaker 1>in the afternoon, every one of those games got a

1:34:20.880 --> 1:34:24.479
<v Speaker 1>higher rating than even a Game seven would get today.

1:34:24.720 --> 1:34:27.120
<v Speaker 1>Leave aside that this is a weird season, sixty games,

1:34:27.160 --> 1:34:30.200
<v Speaker 1>neutral field, almost no fans in the stands. Even if

1:34:30.200 --> 1:34:32.679
<v Speaker 1>this were a normal season, every one of those games

1:34:32.880 --> 1:34:35.360
<v Speaker 1>got a higher rating than a game seven would likely

1:34:35.400 --> 1:34:38.200
<v Speaker 1>get today. I think part of your job as a

1:34:38.240 --> 1:34:41.760
<v Speaker 1>broadcaster isn't just to know what stat cast tells you

1:34:41.840 --> 1:34:45.840
<v Speaker 1>the exit velocity is or what someone's ops is. That's important,

1:34:46.280 --> 1:34:50.120
<v Speaker 1>but if you can't, if you can't capture what the

1:34:50.200 --> 1:34:52.680
<v Speaker 1>weather was, you know, that's kind of a catch all.

1:34:52.920 --> 1:34:55.800
<v Speaker 1>Tell them how the weather was, meaning in the biggest sense,

1:34:56.240 --> 1:34:59.160
<v Speaker 1>what were all the dynamics that were at play here,

1:34:59.680 --> 1:35:04.800
<v Speaker 1>not what it was in raw statistical or objective terms.

1:35:05.000 --> 1:35:07.280
<v Speaker 1>How did it steal? What did it look like, what

1:35:07.360 --> 1:35:10.400
<v Speaker 1>did it steel like? What was the humanity of it

1:35:11.360 --> 1:35:13.200
<v Speaker 1>that was That's a point that I would make if

1:35:13.240 --> 1:35:16.679
<v Speaker 1>someone asked me about the sixty nine Mets. It's different

1:35:16.680 --> 1:35:19.800
<v Speaker 1>than just comparing Tom Sieber's e r A to Charlie

1:35:19.840 --> 1:35:24.559
<v Speaker 1>Morton z r R. That's incredibly well said, and I

1:35:24.600 --> 1:35:26.920
<v Speaker 1>think it is a fantastic way to end. I know

1:35:27.000 --> 1:35:29.120
<v Speaker 1>you have to go get changed for your job on

1:35:29.200 --> 1:35:32.240
<v Speaker 1>the Major League Baseball Network, Bob Costa, this has been

1:35:32.280 --> 1:35:33.960
<v Speaker 1>a lot of fun. Are you on Twitter? How can

1:35:34.040 --> 1:35:37.240
<v Speaker 1>people reach out and give you feedback from this podcast

1:35:37.280 --> 1:35:40.840
<v Speaker 1>if they wanted to do so? No, no social media whatsoever.

1:35:40.920 --> 1:35:43.280
<v Speaker 1>I just don't see that much of an upside. Yeah

1:35:43.280 --> 1:35:45.600
<v Speaker 1>for me, I I've had my platforms, and so I

1:35:45.880 --> 1:35:48.520
<v Speaker 1>do what I do as a as a sports broadcaster.

1:35:49.160 --> 1:35:52.320
<v Speaker 1>UM So, so there you have it. That's Bob Costas.

1:35:52.320 --> 1:35:55.000
<v Speaker 1>He just told you. He's not on social media, so

1:35:55.080 --> 1:35:57.320
<v Speaker 1>you can't reach out and let him know what you thought.

1:35:57.400 --> 1:36:00.000
<v Speaker 1>But I think you guys are going to have completely

1:36:00.040 --> 1:36:03.679
<v Speaker 1>you love to this huge roster of great episodes. They

1:36:03.760 --> 1:36:07.360
<v Speaker 1>are timeless. That's the goal of the Wins and Losses Podcast.

1:36:07.439 --> 1:36:09.880
<v Speaker 1>If you enjoyed this one, it's a really good chance

1:36:09.920 --> 1:36:12.400
<v Speaker 1>you're gonna like a lot more of them. Thirty four,

1:36:12.560 --> 1:36:14.720
<v Speaker 1>thirty five dubb Do you know how many we've totally done.

1:36:14.800 --> 1:36:17.160
<v Speaker 1>I think it's thirty five of these at least an

1:36:17.160 --> 1:36:20.640
<v Speaker 1>hour in length, uh, from a variety of different perspectives.

1:36:20.680 --> 1:36:22.840
<v Speaker 1>I hope you can enjoy and learn from them as

1:36:22.920 --> 1:36:24.880
<v Speaker 1>much as I have. This has been the Wins and

1:36:24.920 --> 1:36:28.040
<v Speaker 1>Losses Podcast. I'm Clay Travis. Check back frequently and in

1:36:28.080 --> 1:36:30.400
<v Speaker 1>the meantime, go check out the archives of our long

1:36:30.439 --> 1:36:34.280
<v Speaker 1>form discussions here. Fox Sports Radio has the best sports

1:36:34.280 --> 1:36:37.120
<v Speaker 1>talk lineup in the nation. Catch all of our shows

1:36:37.120 --> 1:36:40.360
<v Speaker 1>at Fox Sports radio dot com and within the i

1:36:40.439 --> 1:36:43.439
<v Speaker 1>Heart Radio app search f s R to listen live.