WEBVTT - Deep Bread Basket Blues

0:00:03.800 --> 0:00:07.280
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to Bloomberg Opinion. I'm Bonnie Quinn. This week they've

0:00:07.320 --> 0:00:11.320
<v Speaker 1>been very, very slow to move towards this. Jonathan Bernstein

0:00:11.400 --> 0:00:14.080
<v Speaker 1>on the public hearings from the House January sixth Committee,

0:00:14.120 --> 0:00:18.400
<v Speaker 1>which start Thursday, and the impression the six Countom six

0:00:18.560 --> 0:00:22.279
<v Speaker 1>sessions will make. Later, we'll speak with Ruth Pollard in Colombo,

0:00:22.360 --> 0:00:25.160
<v Speaker 1>Sri Lanka which defaulted for the first time since it

0:00:25.239 --> 0:00:28.640
<v Speaker 1>won independence from Great Britain, and the country is a

0:00:28.680 --> 0:00:34.160
<v Speaker 1>potential bellweather for investors on developing economies post pandemic. First though,

0:00:34.240 --> 0:00:37.360
<v Speaker 1>to the intensifying and global food crisis. Here's the U. S.

0:00:37.400 --> 0:00:41.520
<v Speaker 1>Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen last week. Russia's war against Ukraine

0:00:41.760 --> 0:00:46.440
<v Speaker 1>has exacerbated the issue of food security for people around

0:00:46.440 --> 0:00:51.200
<v Speaker 1>the world, particularly in emerging and developing countries. I spoke

0:00:51.200 --> 0:00:54.120
<v Speaker 1>with David Fickling for an overview of just how bad

0:00:54.200 --> 0:00:58.240
<v Speaker 1>the situation is for global economies, particularly those dependent on

0:00:58.320 --> 0:01:03.080
<v Speaker 1>food imports. I think we're approaching a quite unusual turn

0:01:03.160 --> 0:01:05.480
<v Speaker 1>in the sort of history of global food security. To

0:01:05.480 --> 0:01:07.880
<v Speaker 1>be honest, if you look back at the long history

0:01:07.880 --> 0:01:09.840
<v Speaker 1>of this, you know, one of the crucial things that

0:01:09.959 --> 0:01:12.600
<v Speaker 1>helps keep the world fed over the past fifty years,

0:01:12.680 --> 0:01:16.039
<v Speaker 1>while the world population has doubled, is actually trade. People

0:01:16.080 --> 0:01:18.000
<v Speaker 1>talk a lot about the growth of sort of chemical

0:01:18.040 --> 0:01:21.399
<v Speaker 1>fertilizers and farm machinery, which have both been very important

0:01:21.440 --> 0:01:24.080
<v Speaker 1>in the twentieth century in keeping the world fed, but

0:01:24.160 --> 0:01:26.280
<v Speaker 1>trade is a really important part of that because, of course,

0:01:26.280 --> 0:01:29.120
<v Speaker 1>if you have drought and crop failures in your region,

0:01:29.440 --> 0:01:32.160
<v Speaker 1>then there's no amount of fertilizer or farm machinery that

0:01:32.200 --> 0:01:34.240
<v Speaker 1>will solve the fact that your crop just won't grow.

0:01:34.680 --> 0:01:37.240
<v Speaker 1>So a really important thing that I think is underappreciated

0:01:37.640 --> 0:01:39.679
<v Speaker 1>is that the cost of ocean trade in the nineteenth

0:01:39.720 --> 0:01:42.840
<v Speaker 1>century dropped by about and so you suddenly have this

0:01:42.920 --> 0:01:45.399
<v Speaker 1>global trade in grains and about a quarter of all

0:01:45.440 --> 0:01:48.280
<v Speaker 1>the calories we consume it and now traded across borders.

0:01:48.320 --> 0:01:50.880
<v Speaker 1>So it's very important that this is a global trade.

0:01:50.920 --> 0:01:53.480
<v Speaker 1>But I think something's undappreciated is that it's quite a

0:01:53.560 --> 0:01:57.640
<v Speaker 1>concentrated trade. The world's bread baskets are rather few. There's

0:01:57.640 --> 0:02:01.080
<v Speaker 1>probably about six of them the US Midwest, the South America,

0:02:01.120 --> 0:02:04.440
<v Speaker 1>sort of Argentina, Brazil, that area, areas of western Europe

0:02:04.440 --> 0:02:07.040
<v Speaker 1>and the Ukraine and the former Soviet Union and Russia.

0:02:07.360 --> 0:02:10.080
<v Speaker 1>And I think most importantly the plain between the Indus

0:02:10.120 --> 0:02:13.160
<v Speaker 1>and the Ganges in northern India and Pakistan and eastern China,

0:02:13.200 --> 0:02:16.480
<v Speaker 1>between the Yank Sea and the Yellow Rivers. Those six

0:02:16.680 --> 0:02:20.000
<v Speaker 1>red baskets are absolutely crucial to the world's growth. Of

0:02:20.000 --> 0:02:24.200
<v Speaker 1>these relatively few number of crops that we depend on, wheat, rice, corn, soybeans.

0:02:24.240 --> 0:02:27.160
<v Speaker 1>More than half of wheat and rice and corn are

0:02:27.200 --> 0:02:33.440
<v Speaker 1>grown if you put those those areas together soybeans described Now,

0:02:33.480 --> 0:02:35.560
<v Speaker 1>for most of the time, that's not too much of

0:02:35.560 --> 0:02:37.920
<v Speaker 1>a problem because although there's just half a dozen of

0:02:37.919 --> 0:02:40.520
<v Speaker 1>these bread baskets, if you get a drought in one region,

0:02:40.919 --> 0:02:43.919
<v Speaker 1>it tends to pair with good rainfall and another region

0:02:43.960 --> 0:02:46.639
<v Speaker 1>that leads to higher crop yields, because essentially the rainfall

0:02:46.680 --> 0:02:48.880
<v Speaker 1>has to go somewhere. It evaporates on one side of

0:02:48.919 --> 0:02:50.519
<v Speaker 1>the ocean, it tends to drop on the other side

0:02:50.520 --> 0:02:52.240
<v Speaker 1>of the ocean, and when we talk about things like

0:02:52.280 --> 0:02:55.600
<v Speaker 1>El Nino and Landinia, that's essentially about rainfall ending up

0:02:55.639 --> 0:02:59.280
<v Speaker 1>in different places. However, as the climate is changing, a

0:02:59.360 --> 0:03:01.440
<v Speaker 1>lot of va is getting a lot less secure than

0:03:01.480 --> 0:03:03.120
<v Speaker 1>it has been in the past, and I think that's

0:03:03.120 --> 0:03:05.360
<v Speaker 1>really putting pressure on some of the fairly sort of

0:03:05.360 --> 0:03:07.200
<v Speaker 1>shaky system that we have there in place over the

0:03:07.200 --> 0:03:09.640
<v Speaker 1>stage of half a dozen bread baskets to keep the

0:03:09.639 --> 0:03:12.040
<v Speaker 1>world said, were seeing several weather events right now, even

0:03:12.120 --> 0:03:15.360
<v Speaker 1>just in the United States alone, where Montana is suffering drought,

0:03:15.440 --> 0:03:18.320
<v Speaker 1>North Dakota can't get anything seated because of rain. So

0:03:18.440 --> 0:03:20.560
<v Speaker 1>weather has a lot to do with the fact that

0:03:20.760 --> 0:03:22.560
<v Speaker 1>there's going to be a shortage. It is not just

0:03:22.680 --> 0:03:25.680
<v Speaker 1>Russias war in Ukraine. Absolutely, And of course you know

0:03:25.760 --> 0:03:28.040
<v Speaker 1>you see that weather event in the US. Prices for

0:03:28.160 --> 0:03:31.480
<v Speaker 1>spring red wheat in Chicago here fourteen year high in March,

0:03:31.600 --> 0:03:34.040
<v Speaker 1>So there is a wheat problem in North America. Now,

0:03:34.480 --> 0:03:36.720
<v Speaker 1>in normal times you would look to the world's other

0:03:36.800 --> 0:03:39.400
<v Speaker 1>big wheat producers. Now one of the world's top three

0:03:39.440 --> 0:03:42.960
<v Speaker 1>wheat producers may be slightly surprising in fact, is India.

0:03:43.240 --> 0:03:45.000
<v Speaker 1>You don't think of India as a big wheat producer.

0:03:45.160 --> 0:03:47.880
<v Speaker 1>It's not a big wheat exporter normally because it's almost

0:03:47.920 --> 0:03:53.080
<v Speaker 1>all consumed at home for chapaties. And now, well, exactly

0:03:53.360 --> 0:03:55.720
<v Speaker 1>what we've seen in India over the past couple of months.

0:03:55.760 --> 0:03:58.440
<v Speaker 1>We've seen this very extreme heat wave and that has

0:03:58.480 --> 0:04:02.160
<v Speaker 1>caused India to embargo exports of wheat places like the

0:04:02.160 --> 0:04:05.680
<v Speaker 1>Middle East, they were very dependent on wheat from Ukraine.

0:04:05.840 --> 0:04:08.600
<v Speaker 1>That's obviously been damaged by the war in Ukraine. The

0:04:08.640 --> 0:04:11.200
<v Speaker 1>places they were hoping to get their wheat supplies from

0:04:11.240 --> 0:04:14.040
<v Speaker 1>with India, but now injuries not supply that either. Obviously

0:04:14.080 --> 0:04:16.159
<v Speaker 1>you see these high prices in the US as well,

0:04:16.480 --> 0:04:19.520
<v Speaker 1>So you really see how some relatively small changes, and

0:04:19.640 --> 0:04:21.800
<v Speaker 1>especially if you throw geer politics in the mix, as

0:04:21.839 --> 0:04:24.760
<v Speaker 1>with the war in Ukraine, suddenly what looked like a

0:04:24.760 --> 0:04:27.680
<v Speaker 1>decent spread of food baskets can very quickly that are

0:04:27.760 --> 0:04:30.679
<v Speaker 1>rather short. You also point out on a recent piece

0:04:30.839 --> 0:04:34.240
<v Speaker 1>food dependent nations can import nutrition, but they must have

0:04:34.279 --> 0:04:36.520
<v Speaker 1>the foreign exchange to pay for it, and we know

0:04:36.680 --> 0:04:39.240
<v Speaker 1>that because of the dollar strength, that's in short supply

0:04:39.320 --> 0:04:42.000
<v Speaker 1>in many of these countries. Yeah. Absolutely, and of course

0:04:42.000 --> 0:04:45.160
<v Speaker 1>a wheat currency becomes a problem for especially the poorest

0:04:45.200 --> 0:04:48.280
<v Speaker 1>in the country, even if there is the availability of

0:04:48.520 --> 0:04:52.800
<v Speaker 1>imported nutrition. I mean, another interesting example you look at Brazil.

0:04:52.880 --> 0:04:55.680
<v Speaker 1>Brazil recently not a country that you really associate with

0:04:55.720 --> 0:04:58.719
<v Speaker 1>a sort of open trade policy, but they've been drastically

0:04:58.760 --> 0:05:02.640
<v Speaker 1>cutting the tara frights essentially to zero for all food imports.

0:05:02.680 --> 0:05:04.599
<v Speaker 1>The idea of values. Of course, that inflation is very

0:05:04.680 --> 0:05:06.760
<v Speaker 1>high in Brazil, and it is a problem for people

0:05:06.760 --> 0:05:09.200
<v Speaker 1>in Brazil that they can't afford to eat. Well. That

0:05:09.560 --> 0:05:12.240
<v Speaker 1>is a decent policy approach, but the problem is it's

0:05:12.240 --> 0:05:14.120
<v Speaker 1>not nearly sufficient, because if you look at the way

0:05:14.160 --> 0:05:17.000
<v Speaker 1>that the real the currency has fallen in recent years,

0:05:17.360 --> 0:05:20.000
<v Speaker 1>Brazili the big food producer anyway, and it's probably not

0:05:20.040 --> 0:05:22.320
<v Speaker 1>going to lead to any increase in food imports because

0:05:22.480 --> 0:05:26.920
<v Speaker 1>Brazilians simply can't afford the market global price of food. Now, David,

0:05:27.000 --> 0:05:30.240
<v Speaker 1>how bad does this get in terms of people actually

0:05:30.320 --> 0:05:33.760
<v Speaker 1>starving people in places you might even associate balmon and

0:05:33.800 --> 0:05:37.440
<v Speaker 1>food and security with I mean, the past few decades

0:05:37.680 --> 0:05:41.920
<v Speaker 1>mostly have been an extremely successful period of bringing down

0:05:42.200 --> 0:05:46.240
<v Speaker 1>rates of under nutrition under nourishment. That progress continued to

0:05:46.320 --> 0:05:51.200
<v Speaker 1>slow down through but then just in and then particularly

0:05:52.120 --> 0:05:55.479
<v Speaker 1>since of course the code pandemic, we've really started to

0:05:55.480 --> 0:05:57.800
<v Speaker 1>lose ground on that. Now, part of that is essentially

0:05:57.880 --> 0:06:00.360
<v Speaker 1>driven by the pandemic and driven by incomes. People don't

0:06:00.360 --> 0:06:02.240
<v Speaker 1>have the money to spend on food that they used

0:06:02.240 --> 0:06:04.680
<v Speaker 1>to have, but it's not just because of that, and

0:06:04.720 --> 0:06:07.679
<v Speaker 1>I think particularly at the moment, we see all sorts

0:06:07.680 --> 0:06:10.719
<v Speaker 1>of factors are leading to a much more insecure environment

0:06:10.760 --> 0:06:13.520
<v Speaker 1>for food. Clearly, you have the crop failers that we're seeing.

0:06:13.520 --> 0:06:15.760
<v Speaker 1>We're in the third year of a Landinia event, which

0:06:15.800 --> 0:06:17.960
<v Speaker 1>causes all sorts of disruption to the food system in

0:06:18.000 --> 0:06:19.400
<v Speaker 1>that way, that's why you see a lot of these

0:06:19.520 --> 0:06:22.320
<v Speaker 1>low yields on crops from Latin America. That tends to

0:06:22.320 --> 0:06:24.159
<v Speaker 1>be the case with that with a landing near event.

0:06:24.560 --> 0:06:26.560
<v Speaker 1>On top of that, of course, energy prices are very

0:06:26.640 --> 0:06:29.080
<v Speaker 1>high and that pushes up the cost of fertilizer, so

0:06:29.240 --> 0:06:32.000
<v Speaker 1>that's another thing that decreases yield. And then you throw

0:06:32.040 --> 0:06:34.640
<v Speaker 1>into the mix the war in Ukraine is a factor.

0:06:34.760 --> 0:06:38.000
<v Speaker 1>Ukraine and Russia are both big food exporters for that matter,

0:06:38.040 --> 0:06:41.400
<v Speaker 1>and then led up at ports in Ukraine and Russia

0:06:41.440 --> 0:06:44.440
<v Speaker 1>that just won't get out now absolutely absolutely. Then you

0:06:44.480 --> 0:06:47.440
<v Speaker 1>can add some of these export embargoes obviously, you know,

0:06:47.480 --> 0:06:52.560
<v Speaker 1>an interesting one was India's wheat embargo follows very rapidly

0:06:52.560 --> 0:06:56.000
<v Speaker 1>on the heels of an export embargo in Indonesia for

0:06:56.080 --> 0:06:58.599
<v Speaker 1>palmer which has actually now been revoked, but went on

0:06:58.680 --> 0:07:01.080
<v Speaker 1>for a while injuries. One of the biggest importers of

0:07:01.080 --> 0:07:04.520
<v Speaker 1>palm oil. India needs palm oil for basic nutrition for Indians,

0:07:04.800 --> 0:07:08.600
<v Speaker 1>they lose that nutrition from Indonesia, they embargo their wet

0:07:08.600 --> 0:07:11.840
<v Speaker 1>exports elsewhere, and you see these knock on effects everywhere.

0:07:12.040 --> 0:07:14.800
<v Speaker 1>Malaysia embargoing exports of chicken. But of course you've got

0:07:14.800 --> 0:07:17.640
<v Speaker 1>an avian influenza atbreak around the world at the moment,

0:07:17.920 --> 0:07:20.160
<v Speaker 1>and the price of corn, which is essentially the price

0:07:20.160 --> 0:07:22.760
<v Speaker 1>of raising chickens, is also very high. So there are

0:07:22.800 --> 0:07:25.680
<v Speaker 1>all sorts of impacts like this, and the World Food Program,

0:07:25.720 --> 0:07:29.360
<v Speaker 1>for example, do much about this. Well. Traditionally, that's exactly

0:07:29.400 --> 0:07:31.680
<v Speaker 1>what the World Food Program is for, and in fact,

0:07:31.720 --> 0:07:34.880
<v Speaker 1>it's its origins essentially are as a US export program.

0:07:34.920 --> 0:07:37.320
<v Speaker 1>It's deep origins are in World War One when Herbert

0:07:37.320 --> 0:07:40.080
<v Speaker 1>Hoover was seeing sort of famine in Belgium and decided

0:07:40.120 --> 0:07:43.160
<v Speaker 1>to use some of the US's significant agricultural surpluses to

0:07:43.400 --> 0:07:46.000
<v Speaker 1>solve that problem. So that is what the World Food

0:07:46.000 --> 0:07:49.880
<v Speaker 1>Program does. It uses the agricultural surpluses from from the

0:07:50.000 --> 0:07:52.360
<v Speaker 1>US and to a lesser extent, Europe as a way

0:07:52.400 --> 0:07:56.040
<v Speaker 1>of applying supplementary nutrition around the world. That works as

0:07:56.080 --> 0:07:59.840
<v Speaker 1>long as you don't have these simultaneous bread basket failures

0:08:00.200 --> 0:08:02.640
<v Speaker 1>and as long as they don't come repeatedly. But that's

0:08:02.640 --> 0:08:05.600
<v Speaker 1>the risk with climate change. And you know, I think

0:08:05.640 --> 0:08:09.760
<v Speaker 1>a key instance here in ten you had very dramatic

0:08:09.800 --> 0:08:12.360
<v Speaker 1>heat waves and drought in Russia that caused a real

0:08:12.360 --> 0:08:15.600
<v Speaker 1>collapse in the agricultural production there, and they were paired

0:08:15.640 --> 0:08:19.160
<v Speaker 1>with flooding in Pakistan. Normally, of course, the rainfall it

0:08:19.240 --> 0:08:21.840
<v Speaker 1>was the same climate system. Normally, you would say, you know,

0:08:21.880 --> 0:08:24.400
<v Speaker 1>there's a drought one place, there's rainfall elsewhere. But the

0:08:24.400 --> 0:08:28.000
<v Speaker 1>flood in Pakistan was so severe that Pakistan also suffered

0:08:28.160 --> 0:08:30.160
<v Speaker 1>a collapse in production. So two of the world's big

0:08:30.200 --> 0:08:33.120
<v Speaker 1>wheat belts collapsed at the same time, which is not

0:08:33.240 --> 0:08:35.080
<v Speaker 1>something that we've seen before, but it is something that

0:08:35.679 --> 0:08:38.680
<v Speaker 1>as global warming increases the risk of that. And remember

0:08:38.679 --> 0:08:40.840
<v Speaker 1>that only you know six or some of these red

0:08:40.920 --> 0:08:43.440
<v Speaker 1>baskets around the world, the risk of that goes up

0:08:43.520 --> 0:08:46.880
<v Speaker 1>quite substantially. Is easter in China at least a functioning

0:08:46.880 --> 0:08:49.720
<v Speaker 1>bread basket for the world at moment. China is an

0:08:49.720 --> 0:08:52.840
<v Speaker 1>interesting case, but it also an interesting case around geo politics.

0:08:53.200 --> 0:08:55.600
<v Speaker 1>You see occasional reports out of China saying that you know,

0:08:55.640 --> 0:08:59.040
<v Speaker 1>they're the agricultural yields are not as good as expected,

0:08:59.080 --> 0:09:00.720
<v Speaker 1>and there are you know, there as of food problems,

0:09:00.720 --> 0:09:02.840
<v Speaker 1>but I would say China is pretty well supplied with

0:09:02.840 --> 0:09:05.600
<v Speaker 1>food at the moment, and actually over amplic supplied. If

0:09:05.600 --> 0:09:08.920
<v Speaker 1>you look at the stockpiles that they have of key grains,

0:09:09.360 --> 0:09:12.880
<v Speaker 1>they are extremely high. They've got enough stockpiles to last,

0:09:13.280 --> 0:09:15.400
<v Speaker 1>you know, in most cases well beyond a year, when

0:09:15.440 --> 0:09:18.360
<v Speaker 1>a lot of other parts of the world are very short. Now.

0:09:18.400 --> 0:09:20.959
<v Speaker 1>I think in part that is actually a product of geopolitics.

0:09:21.280 --> 0:09:23.920
<v Speaker 1>You know, China is less sure of its trading relationships

0:09:23.960 --> 0:09:25.880
<v Speaker 1>than it was a few years ago, and there's a

0:09:25.880 --> 0:09:27.800
<v Speaker 1>bit of a sort of fortress China approach to that.

0:09:27.880 --> 0:09:30.440
<v Speaker 1>So it is stockpiling this stuff at home and it

0:09:30.559 --> 0:09:33.719
<v Speaker 1>is not available for its its trading partners and other

0:09:33.840 --> 0:09:39.400
<v Speaker 1>nations to feed their own shortages. Yeah, it's terribly how

0:09:39.400 --> 0:09:42.120
<v Speaker 1>many billions are at least hundreds of millions of people

0:09:42.200 --> 0:09:44.480
<v Speaker 1>are looking at a spectrum all the way from just

0:09:44.559 --> 0:09:46.920
<v Speaker 1>food and security, which is bad enough on its own,

0:09:47.120 --> 0:09:50.880
<v Speaker 1>all the way through to famine. Yeah, well, it's very concerning.

0:09:51.280 --> 0:09:52.800
<v Speaker 1>You know, if you look at some of the numbers

0:09:52.800 --> 0:09:55.040
<v Speaker 1>that have been coming out of the world's food program

0:09:55.080 --> 0:09:58.200
<v Speaker 1>in a typical year, they feed I think, around about

0:09:58.320 --> 0:10:00.559
<v Speaker 1>a hundred and fifty million people, or they they ensure

0:10:00.600 --> 0:10:02.520
<v Speaker 1>that there's food supply to about a hundred and fifty

0:10:02.520 --> 0:10:05.600
<v Speaker 1>million people. And I think I think there was a

0:10:05.640 --> 0:10:08.040
<v Speaker 1>report they did a couple of months ago. They're saying,

0:10:08.160 --> 0:10:10.920
<v Speaker 1>you know, there's a there's about fifty million people around

0:10:10.960 --> 0:10:14.600
<v Speaker 1>the world who are in an emergency situation in terms

0:10:14.600 --> 0:10:17.640
<v Speaker 1>of food food security. So um, so that is a

0:10:17.679 --> 0:10:20.560
<v Speaker 1>sort of ongoing problem. It's something the World Who program

0:10:20.640 --> 0:10:23.760
<v Speaker 1>deals with all the time. And in terms of a

0:10:23.800 --> 0:10:26.520
<v Speaker 1>sort of lower level of food insecurity, the sort of

0:10:26.520 --> 0:10:29.520
<v Speaker 1>thing that leads just to um, you know, growth stunting

0:10:29.559 --> 0:10:33.800
<v Speaker 1>among children. Um, we're talking about significantly more, you know,

0:10:33.840 --> 0:10:37.480
<v Speaker 1>you're talking sort of hundreds of millions. UM. The world,

0:10:37.559 --> 0:10:39.880
<v Speaker 1>I should say, has been very good at dealing with

0:10:39.920 --> 0:10:42.760
<v Speaker 1>this over the twentieth century. It's it's nothing short of

0:10:42.760 --> 0:10:46.080
<v Speaker 1>a modern miracle that we have managed to feed so

0:10:46.160 --> 0:10:50.360
<v Speaker 1>many people, and we've seen hunger decline so dramatically, But

0:10:50.600 --> 0:10:54.480
<v Speaker 1>it is a year after year struggle. If there was

0:10:54.480 --> 0:10:57.880
<v Speaker 1>a famous economist, Thomas Malthus sort of two years ago

0:10:58.080 --> 0:11:01.440
<v Speaker 1>who predicted that there would be massed starve because population

0:11:01.520 --> 0:11:05.640
<v Speaker 1>growth was faster than than agricultural output growth. And it's

0:11:05.679 --> 0:11:08.400
<v Speaker 1>it's a it's a miracle for the past few centuries

0:11:08.440 --> 0:11:11.640
<v Speaker 1>that not only has population growth not been as fast

0:11:11.679 --> 0:11:14.920
<v Speaker 1>as as he predicted, but also agricultural yields have just

0:11:15.400 --> 0:11:20.239
<v Speaker 1>risen and ritten and continue to rise at an astonishing pace. Um.

0:11:20.640 --> 0:11:22.840
<v Speaker 1>That gives me a lot of confidence that actually we

0:11:22.880 --> 0:11:26.680
<v Speaker 1>are seeing temporary problems here, but human ingenuity will be

0:11:26.760 --> 0:11:29.599
<v Speaker 1>able to solve it. Um. But I don't think we

0:11:29.600 --> 0:11:32.240
<v Speaker 1>should underestimate the how much we're sort of dancing on

0:11:32.280 --> 0:11:35.040
<v Speaker 1>the edge of the precipice here. Every every year that

0:11:35.800 --> 0:11:38.880
<v Speaker 1>you know, the growth of agricultural yields doesn't match the

0:11:38.920 --> 0:11:42.320
<v Speaker 1>growth of population is a year year that brings the

0:11:42.320 --> 0:11:45.640
<v Speaker 1>world population closer to starvation. And we need to keep

0:11:45.640 --> 0:11:48.719
<v Speaker 1>increasing that. Finally, David, if there was to be a

0:11:48.800 --> 0:11:50.880
<v Speaker 1>letter up on Russia's war in Ukraine, if there was

0:11:50.920 --> 0:11:53.320
<v Speaker 1>to be an opening of some of the boards that

0:11:53.360 --> 0:11:55.760
<v Speaker 1>have been blockaded, for example, how much would that alleviate

0:11:55.800 --> 0:11:59.920
<v Speaker 1>the situation. It wouldn't happen immediately because actually, to some extent,

0:12:00.000 --> 0:12:02.320
<v Speaker 1>a larger problem with Ukraine at the moment is of

0:12:02.360 --> 0:12:06.240
<v Speaker 1>course that we've we've missed the planting season largely for

0:12:06.240 --> 0:12:09.040
<v Speaker 1>for a lot of the crops for this year, and

0:12:09.080 --> 0:12:11.480
<v Speaker 1>that's that's pretty significant. And if you look at some

0:12:11.600 --> 0:12:15.560
<v Speaker 1>of the US Power of Agricultures projections, the bigger supply

0:12:15.640 --> 0:12:18.360
<v Speaker 1>crunch for wheat, if I remember rightly, is actually for

0:12:18.400 --> 0:12:21.600
<v Speaker 1>the for thecoming marketing year, not the one that's you know,

0:12:21.720 --> 0:12:23.480
<v Speaker 1>not the wheat that's just done its way to port

0:12:24.280 --> 0:12:26.200
<v Speaker 1>for the coming marketing year. They lose about a third

0:12:26.200 --> 0:12:29.559
<v Speaker 1>of their fair output. So that's that's going to be

0:12:29.600 --> 0:12:33.200
<v Speaker 1>the more significant one. Um. Of course, you know, a

0:12:33.280 --> 0:12:35.760
<v Speaker 1>big factor on behind this is what happens with the

0:12:35.800 --> 0:12:39.559
<v Speaker 1>global climate. We are three years into a landinio event

0:12:39.720 --> 0:12:42.800
<v Speaker 1>and the sort of climate shifts that that causes. It's

0:12:42.920 --> 0:12:44.679
<v Speaker 1>likely that we're going to see a shift into an

0:12:44.840 --> 0:12:49.319
<v Speaker 1>alnnio event, which favors different bread baskets um. But when

0:12:49.360 --> 0:12:52.440
<v Speaker 1>we move into that, we have the the you know,

0:12:52.480 --> 0:12:54.840
<v Speaker 1>the real core of the high prices that we're seeing

0:12:54.840 --> 0:12:57.960
<v Speaker 1>for agricultural produced is that stocks are low um, and

0:12:58.040 --> 0:13:00.439
<v Speaker 1>stocks have been running down essentially over this three year

0:13:00.520 --> 0:13:03.720
<v Speaker 1>learning neer event UM. So we need to rebuild those docks.

0:13:03.720 --> 0:13:05.400
<v Speaker 1>And that's not going to come overnight. That will that

0:13:05.400 --> 0:13:07.600
<v Speaker 1>will be the product of a number of years um

0:13:07.640 --> 0:13:12.040
<v Speaker 1>I suspect um climate change. Notwithstanding um that we will

0:13:12.080 --> 0:13:15.880
<v Speaker 1>again see very cheap prices for food over the next decade,

0:13:15.920 --> 0:13:17.360
<v Speaker 1>but it will it will be a number of years

0:13:17.400 --> 0:13:22.160
<v Speaker 1>before things really get back on track. David Fickling there,

0:13:22.400 --> 0:13:24.480
<v Speaker 1>and don't forget to get in touch. All thoughts and

0:13:24.520 --> 0:13:27.360
<v Speaker 1>opinions very welcome. I'm at Vanney Quinn on Twitter or

0:13:27.400 --> 0:13:30.400
<v Speaker 1>email v Quinn at Bloomberg dot net. And by the way,

0:13:30.440 --> 0:13:33.440
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Opinion is also available as a podcast on Apple,

0:13:33.559 --> 0:13:36.720
<v Speaker 1>Spotify and wherever you get your podcasts. I feel for

0:13:36.800 --> 0:13:39.439
<v Speaker 1>the people of Sri Lanka. This is a tremendous shock

0:13:39.520 --> 0:13:43.800
<v Speaker 1>for them. We would like to see progress made and

0:13:43.840 --> 0:13:48.320
<v Speaker 1>we are already engaging with Sri Lanka's creditors to appeal

0:13:48.840 --> 0:13:54.640
<v Speaker 1>for fast action on that restructuring. Of course, to help

0:13:54.640 --> 0:13:58.200
<v Speaker 1>a country, the country needs to help itself first. Christian

0:13:58.440 --> 0:14:00.600
<v Speaker 1>your Gafa. They're managing director of the i m F

0:14:00.640 --> 0:14:04.320
<v Speaker 1>on efforts to restructure of Sri Lanka's sovereign debt. The country,

0:14:04.480 --> 0:14:07.160
<v Speaker 1>which is needed sixteen i m F agreements since ninet,

0:14:08.240 --> 0:14:11.080
<v Speaker 1>is officially in default for the first time since independence.

0:14:11.080 --> 0:14:16.000
<v Speaker 1>In let's get to Ruth Pollard in Colombo. Ruth details

0:14:16.000 --> 0:14:18.760
<v Speaker 1>some of the chaos and trilina for us, what does

0:14:18.760 --> 0:14:22.880
<v Speaker 1>a country in default look like? Well, one thing that

0:14:23.040 --> 0:14:26.200
<v Speaker 1>is really obvious is very very long queues for fuel,

0:14:26.440 --> 0:14:31.000
<v Speaker 1>and that's petrol, diesel and also LPG cooking gas. People

0:14:31.200 --> 0:14:33.760
<v Speaker 1>are standing in line or sitting in line in their

0:14:33.760 --> 0:14:36.320
<v Speaker 1>cars or their bikes for days at a time trying

0:14:36.360 --> 0:14:39.680
<v Speaker 1>to get this most basic commodity, and that of course

0:14:39.720 --> 0:14:42.600
<v Speaker 1>has flow on effects because people can't get to work,

0:14:42.760 --> 0:14:46.040
<v Speaker 1>children can't get to school, people can't get to medical

0:14:46.080 --> 0:14:49.280
<v Speaker 1>appointments or get to hospitals. Patients are telling their doctors

0:14:49.320 --> 0:14:53.640
<v Speaker 1>that they've started rationing really important medications like heart medication

0:14:53.760 --> 0:14:57.240
<v Speaker 1>and diabetes drugs because they're running out and they don't

0:14:57.240 --> 0:14:59.960
<v Speaker 1>know when the next ship shipment of medication will arise.

0:15:00.240 --> 0:15:02.880
<v Speaker 1>And of course there's armed soldiers on the streets. Some

0:15:02.960 --> 0:15:05.560
<v Speaker 1>of them are controlling accused at petrol stations, but others

0:15:05.560 --> 0:15:08.640
<v Speaker 1>are just making their presence felt to try and implement

0:15:08.760 --> 0:15:11.680
<v Speaker 1>some kind of order into Sri Lanka. It's deeply disturbing

0:15:11.680 --> 0:15:13.880
<v Speaker 1>to watch. We of course saw all of the protests

0:15:13.920 --> 0:15:17.360
<v Speaker 1>in the streets and now we're seeing that there's government

0:15:17.520 --> 0:15:20.120
<v Speaker 1>being formed and trying to put some order on all

0:15:20.120 --> 0:15:23.840
<v Speaker 1>of this, but it seems to have happened extraordinarily quickly.

0:15:24.320 --> 0:15:27.440
<v Speaker 1>Is that the case was it post pandemic, it just disintegrated.

0:15:28.120 --> 0:15:32.080
<v Speaker 1>It's been disintegrating for some time. This all started way

0:15:32.120 --> 0:15:35.920
<v Speaker 1>back when the Rudger puckss were in power from two

0:15:35.920 --> 0:15:39.360
<v Speaker 1>thousand and five onwards, when they started doing a lot

0:15:39.360 --> 0:15:45.800
<v Speaker 1>of borrowing and establishing credit lines that have subsequently become unsustainable.

0:15:45.920 --> 0:15:49.880
<v Speaker 1>And now Sri Lanka is facing the prospect of its

0:15:49.920 --> 0:15:53.720
<v Speaker 1>principle being the same amount as the interest rate payments.

0:15:53.760 --> 0:15:57.120
<v Speaker 1>So obviously this is an unsustainable situation for the country

0:15:57.120 --> 0:16:00.640
<v Speaker 1>to find itself in. Now. It has had extein I

0:16:00.800 --> 0:16:04.560
<v Speaker 1>MF bailout packages since x five, so now it's going

0:16:04.560 --> 0:16:08.080
<v Speaker 1>for one. But the I m F and the World

0:16:08.160 --> 0:16:11.440
<v Speaker 1>Bank are going to want to see some significant progress

0:16:11.480 --> 0:16:15.920
<v Speaker 1>in macroeconomic policies in Sri Lanka before another package will

0:16:15.960 --> 0:16:18.560
<v Speaker 1>be entered into and it's difficult to see how that

0:16:18.600 --> 0:16:22.160
<v Speaker 1>happens without tourism resuming, which of course has really fallen

0:16:22.160 --> 0:16:24.440
<v Speaker 1>away because of the pandemic and other reasons as well.

0:16:24.840 --> 0:16:27.160
<v Speaker 1>Now investors are looking at Shri Lanka and saying this

0:16:27.200 --> 0:16:30.280
<v Speaker 1>could be a bell whether for other economies in Southeast

0:16:30.280 --> 0:16:33.840
<v Speaker 1>Asia and other developing economies. More broadly, give us a

0:16:33.920 --> 0:16:37.880
<v Speaker 1>few economies that investors are comparing Sri Lanka too well.

0:16:37.920 --> 0:16:41.160
<v Speaker 1>The most obvious one is Pakistan. It too is going

0:16:41.240 --> 0:16:44.840
<v Speaker 1>through a political crisis. Now we have a new prime minister,

0:16:45.000 --> 0:16:48.600
<v Speaker 1>Shebaz Sharif. But the question for him is can his

0:16:48.680 --> 0:16:51.720
<v Speaker 1>government be brave enough I guess to implement the austerity

0:16:51.720 --> 0:16:55.640
<v Speaker 1>measures that the IMF requires of it to access I

0:16:55.840 --> 0:16:58.560
<v Speaker 1>m F funding. And now those austerity measures are very

0:16:58.640 --> 0:17:00.960
<v Speaker 1>similar to those in Sri Lanka. Her the I m

0:17:01.080 --> 0:17:04.919
<v Speaker 1>F wants the governments in both those countries to stop

0:17:05.160 --> 0:17:08.560
<v Speaker 1>very high fuel subsidies and remove other subsidies that are

0:17:08.680 --> 0:17:11.560
<v Speaker 1>sucking up a lot of the public money and adding

0:17:11.640 --> 0:17:15.359
<v Speaker 1>to the economic crisis. Now, once you remove fuel subsidies,

0:17:15.440 --> 0:17:18.680
<v Speaker 1>that in turn makes feel unaffordable for the population, which

0:17:18.680 --> 0:17:22.520
<v Speaker 1>in turn runs the risk of creating civil unrest, and

0:17:22.600 --> 0:17:24.640
<v Speaker 1>that brings with it a whole host of other problems.

0:17:24.640 --> 0:17:28.720
<v Speaker 1>So these countries are facing very very complex situations to

0:17:28.760 --> 0:17:31.119
<v Speaker 1>sort of try and dig themselves out of these crises.

0:17:32.080 --> 0:17:34.919
<v Speaker 1>The latest inflation reading was closed to thirty percent and

0:17:34.920 --> 0:17:37.800
<v Speaker 1>there are forecasts that the next one might be forty percent.

0:17:37.960 --> 0:17:42.879
<v Speaker 1>How does somebody live with an inflation read at forty present, Well,

0:17:43.200 --> 0:17:46.200
<v Speaker 1>they live by cutting back on absolutely everything, and that

0:17:46.359 --> 0:17:50.560
<v Speaker 1>includes food. So daily wage journalists, who make up a

0:17:50.800 --> 0:17:54.400
<v Speaker 1>very large part of Sri Lanka's workforce, are seeing what

0:17:54.440 --> 0:17:57.560
<v Speaker 1>little they're managing to earn just get completely eroded by

0:17:57.880 --> 0:18:01.359
<v Speaker 1>very high food cost very high fuel costs, and also

0:18:01.560 --> 0:18:06.160
<v Speaker 1>very high medication costs. As the generic version of medications

0:18:06.240 --> 0:18:10.040
<v Speaker 1>run out, doctors are having to prescribe to patients much

0:18:10.080 --> 0:18:13.480
<v Speaker 1>more expensive versions of drugs, and so they can't afford them.

0:18:13.560 --> 0:18:15.800
<v Speaker 1>What happens is parents are now saying that they're going

0:18:15.840 --> 0:18:18.120
<v Speaker 1>to only take one meal a day so their kids

0:18:18.160 --> 0:18:20.480
<v Speaker 1>can have three meals a day. Now, that's going to

0:18:20.520 --> 0:18:23.960
<v Speaker 1>have long term consequences on a population if this continues

0:18:24.080 --> 0:18:27.400
<v Speaker 1>much longer. Is the current Prime Minister, who by the way,

0:18:27.440 --> 0:18:30.080
<v Speaker 1>has been the Prime minister at least half a dozen

0:18:30.119 --> 0:18:33.080
<v Speaker 1>times in the past, running with we're messing a is

0:18:33.119 --> 0:18:36.440
<v Speaker 1>he qualified to let Sri Lanka out of this mess?

0:18:37.320 --> 0:18:40.240
<v Speaker 1>You know, Sri Lanka only has one day of fuel

0:18:40.359 --> 0:18:44.000
<v Speaker 1>left each day, and so you know, trying to manage

0:18:44.040 --> 0:18:47.280
<v Speaker 1>that as a government is incredibly difficult now. While he

0:18:47.320 --> 0:18:49.760
<v Speaker 1>has the respect of the international community and the i

0:18:49.880 --> 0:18:53.560
<v Speaker 1>m F and the other international agencies, his appointment hasn't

0:18:53.680 --> 0:18:56.479
<v Speaker 1>calmed the mood of the protesters who are down on

0:18:56.800 --> 0:19:01.119
<v Speaker 1>Goldfaced Green in the capital Colombo. They're satisfied with renewal

0:19:01.160 --> 0:19:04.040
<v Speaker 1>Riquam Singer as Prime Minister. They see him as part

0:19:04.040 --> 0:19:07.320
<v Speaker 1>of the political old guard. They want a slate claimed

0:19:07.760 --> 0:19:09.840
<v Speaker 1>whole new government in place that's going to do or

0:19:09.920 --> 0:19:12.800
<v Speaker 1>not just with the economic crisis, but also look at

0:19:12.840 --> 0:19:14.679
<v Speaker 1>the future and make sure that Sri Lanka isn't going

0:19:14.720 --> 0:19:16.159
<v Speaker 1>to be back at the I m F looking for

0:19:16.160 --> 0:19:20.440
<v Speaker 1>an eighteen bailout package. Ruth Pollard in Colombo. The January

0:19:20.480 --> 0:19:24.200
<v Speaker 1>sixth Committee is due to finally start public hearings this Thursday.

0:19:24.560 --> 0:19:27.880
<v Speaker 1>Six of them to prime time hearings, four morning hearings.

0:19:28.240 --> 0:19:30.800
<v Speaker 1>It took eighteen months to put these hearings together, and

0:19:31.119 --> 0:19:34.320
<v Speaker 1>in comparison with hearings passed, the effort seems well a

0:19:34.320 --> 0:19:37.320
<v Speaker 1>little slim. I spoke with Jonathan Bernstein on how these

0:19:37.359 --> 0:19:40.960
<v Speaker 1>hearings compare with successful hearings of eras passed, such as

0:19:41.040 --> 0:19:43.960
<v Speaker 1>the Watergate hearings. So Jonathan next week, we see the

0:19:44.000 --> 0:19:46.880
<v Speaker 1>start of the public hearings on the January sixth events.

0:19:47.320 --> 0:19:49.440
<v Speaker 1>It seems insane that it's taken this long for public

0:19:49.440 --> 0:19:51.360
<v Speaker 1>hearings to happen. But give us a little bit of context.

0:19:51.440 --> 0:19:54.480
<v Speaker 1>How do public hearings end up coming to the table. Well,

0:19:54.520 --> 0:19:57.280
<v Speaker 1>you know, it depends on the event. They're all different.

0:19:57.440 --> 0:19:59.280
<v Speaker 1>One of the things about Congress is that they can

0:19:59.280 --> 0:20:02.280
<v Speaker 1>do whatever they want hunt in terms of format, and so,

0:20:02.640 --> 0:20:05.360
<v Speaker 1>you know, it's been different over the years. Generally, Congress

0:20:05.359 --> 0:20:08.879
<v Speaker 1>has moved away from public hearings. Overall, there's way fewer

0:20:08.920 --> 0:20:11.359
<v Speaker 1>public hearings of every type of committee than there was

0:20:11.640 --> 0:20:15.440
<v Speaker 1>twenty thirty years ago. But in particular on the January

0:20:15.440 --> 0:20:20.040
<v Speaker 1>six committee, they've been very, very slow to move towards this.

0:20:20.160 --> 0:20:23.040
<v Speaker 1>And you can compare it to Watergate and the Senate

0:20:23.080 --> 0:20:25.800
<v Speaker 1>Watergate Committee hearings went on. There were fifty one hearings

0:20:26.240 --> 0:20:28.800
<v Speaker 1>that went on for six months, and they really did

0:20:28.920 --> 0:20:32.680
<v Speaker 1>capture the imagination of the nation. It's questionable how much

0:20:32.760 --> 0:20:36.240
<v Speaker 1>effect they had in terms of President Nixon's approval ratings,

0:20:36.280 --> 0:20:38.600
<v Speaker 1>but it was an important thing in people's lives. We're

0:20:38.640 --> 0:20:42.440
<v Speaker 1>going to get here. Six hearings over two weeks, and

0:20:42.760 --> 0:20:45.959
<v Speaker 1>it's just not sufficiently after whatever it is eighteen months

0:20:46.160 --> 0:20:48.560
<v Speaker 1>after the event, and in a very different media environment

0:20:48.640 --> 0:20:50.879
<v Speaker 1>in which these are also competing against things like the

0:20:50.920 --> 0:20:54.320
<v Speaker 1>Johnny Depp amber Heard trial. You know, the thing about

0:20:54.320 --> 0:20:57.320
<v Speaker 1>Watergate and the Watergate hearings is that occurred at the

0:20:57.400 --> 0:21:02.119
<v Speaker 1>peak really of central eised television. Most people in the

0:21:02.160 --> 0:21:05.920
<v Speaker 1>country had at most five TV channels. They had three

0:21:06.000 --> 0:21:10.320
<v Speaker 1>networks ABC, NBC, and and CBS. They had a PBS channel,

0:21:10.640 --> 0:21:13.800
<v Speaker 1>and they had one independentization, and and medium size and

0:21:13.840 --> 0:21:17.400
<v Speaker 1>small towns didn't necessarily have even an independent stations. Some

0:21:17.560 --> 0:21:21.239
<v Speaker 1>sounds only had two of the three networks, so an

0:21:21.400 --> 0:21:24.399
<v Speaker 1>enormous number of people watched them. Now, at this point,

0:21:24.440 --> 0:21:26.200
<v Speaker 1>we've already had a lot of digestion of what the

0:21:26.280 --> 0:21:28.239
<v Speaker 1>January six Committee has been doing. We've had a lot

0:21:28.280 --> 0:21:30.119
<v Speaker 1>of the members of the January six Committee come on

0:21:30.160 --> 0:21:32.960
<v Speaker 1>and do interviews, I mean constantly. In fact, what's different

0:21:32.960 --> 0:21:35.440
<v Speaker 1>about a public hearing than private hearings. Well, one of

0:21:35.520 --> 0:21:38.560
<v Speaker 1>the things that's happened, unfortunately, because of the way that

0:21:38.560 --> 0:21:41.800
<v Speaker 1>this has developed, is that most of the publicity has

0:21:41.840 --> 0:21:45.399
<v Speaker 1>been on the fights between the committee and the witnesses,

0:21:45.800 --> 0:21:48.720
<v Speaker 1>and so we've had a series of subpoenas and then

0:21:48.920 --> 0:21:52.160
<v Speaker 1>people fighting subpoenas and the Committee deciding whether the issue

0:21:52.200 --> 0:21:55.359
<v Speaker 1>subpoenas and court cases about it, and sentary stuff almost

0:21:55.400 --> 0:21:57.639
<v Speaker 1>although extremely important, of course, yeah, and and and the

0:21:57.680 --> 0:22:00.640
<v Speaker 1>thing is that people don't care about the fight over evidence.

0:22:00.680 --> 0:22:04.680
<v Speaker 1>People care about they might care about an attempt to

0:22:04.720 --> 0:22:08.600
<v Speaker 1>overthrow the government of the United States. And so yes,

0:22:09.240 --> 0:22:13.240
<v Speaker 1>a lot of the details are out, but proper hearings

0:22:13.240 --> 0:22:15.480
<v Speaker 1>would lay them out in a way that was compelling,

0:22:15.520 --> 0:22:18.720
<v Speaker 1>that would be interesting. You would see the people involved,

0:22:18.840 --> 0:22:20.560
<v Speaker 1>and we're getting at some of that. We just don't

0:22:20.560 --> 0:22:22.960
<v Speaker 1>know how much we can get in only six hearings.

0:22:23.240 --> 0:22:25.080
<v Speaker 1>You know, see some of these people who have pled

0:22:25.080 --> 0:22:29.600
<v Speaker 1>guilty to criminal acts, who were involved in leadership roles

0:22:29.600 --> 0:22:32.040
<v Speaker 1>in organizing this event of people from some of these

0:22:32.119 --> 0:22:36.240
<v Speaker 1>fringe groups that Trump was encouraging to come to the capital.

0:22:36.600 --> 0:22:38.800
<v Speaker 1>The Committee wants to spend a lot of time, and

0:22:38.920 --> 0:22:42.440
<v Speaker 1>rightly so, connecting the dots of these groups Proud Boys

0:22:42.520 --> 0:22:45.680
<v Speaker 1>or whoever it is, with signals sent by the Trump administration.

0:22:45.680 --> 0:22:47.679
<v Speaker 1>And we don't know to some extent whether we're going

0:22:47.720 --> 0:22:50.400
<v Speaker 1>to get not just connecting dots, but some very serious

0:22:50.440 --> 0:22:52.719
<v Speaker 1>lines between them, and some of that has been reported.

0:22:52.840 --> 0:22:54.320
<v Speaker 1>Some of it we just don't know yet, and we

0:22:54.359 --> 0:22:56.720
<v Speaker 1>don't know what's going to be coming out in the hearings.

0:22:56.760 --> 0:22:58.639
<v Speaker 1>But I think that, you know, one of the things

0:22:58.680 --> 0:23:01.480
<v Speaker 1>that it's hard to do were only six hearings, is

0:23:01.520 --> 0:23:04.520
<v Speaker 1>to sort of develop the storylines and get people to

0:23:04.560 --> 0:23:08.640
<v Speaker 1>sort of get involved in the unfolding story of it

0:23:08.880 --> 0:23:10.480
<v Speaker 1>and the characters. And you know, one of the things

0:23:10.520 --> 0:23:13.320
<v Speaker 1>that happened with Watergate is you had some just wacky

0:23:13.400 --> 0:23:16.320
<v Speaker 1>characters who would come and and get give testimony for

0:23:16.320 --> 0:23:18.600
<v Speaker 1>a day, and people pay attention. People knew who these

0:23:18.640 --> 0:23:20.560
<v Speaker 1>characters were, and they were talked about on the Johnny

0:23:20.600 --> 0:23:22.560
<v Speaker 1>Carson Show back then, and they would be quoted on

0:23:22.600 --> 0:23:24.280
<v Speaker 1>the evening news and all that kind of stuff. I

0:23:24.280 --> 0:23:27.160
<v Speaker 1>hesitate to compare this to a trial, because we obviously

0:23:27.200 --> 0:23:29.560
<v Speaker 1>don't want to be judge an executioner before any of

0:23:29.640 --> 0:23:31.800
<v Speaker 1>this happens. That's not really the point of this anyway.

0:23:31.840 --> 0:23:33.159
<v Speaker 1>But at the same time, it does feel like the

0:23:33.160 --> 0:23:36.600
<v Speaker 1>private hearings were to prepare the public six days. Is

0:23:36.640 --> 0:23:39.320
<v Speaker 1>that what happens? Yeah, And some of that back in Watergate,

0:23:39.440 --> 0:23:41.800
<v Speaker 1>And I keep going back to that because those were

0:23:41.840 --> 0:23:44.800
<v Speaker 1>generally recognized as an extremely successful set of hearings that

0:23:44.880 --> 0:23:48.119
<v Speaker 1>the Senate Watergate Committee that was set up basically a

0:23:48.160 --> 0:23:51.720
<v Speaker 1>couple of weeks after the original cover up collapse. The

0:23:51.880 --> 0:23:55.359
<v Speaker 1>cover up held back in seventy three for about six months,

0:23:55.560 --> 0:23:58.439
<v Speaker 1>then it collapsed. Then the Senate authorized this committee two

0:23:58.520 --> 0:24:01.760
<v Speaker 1>months later. They started holding heres not eighteen months later.

0:24:02.160 --> 0:24:05.080
<v Speaker 1>But what the Senate Watergate Committee group did is they

0:24:05.080 --> 0:24:08.159
<v Speaker 1>would pre interview everybody, they would take the positions, and

0:24:08.160 --> 0:24:10.480
<v Speaker 1>then the witnesses that they thought would be compelling they

0:24:10.520 --> 0:24:12.800
<v Speaker 1>would put on not on the as you say, it's

0:24:12.840 --> 0:24:15.040
<v Speaker 1>not a trial, but but it has you know. It

0:24:15.119 --> 0:24:17.320
<v Speaker 1>was the kind of compelling thing. And one of the

0:24:17.359 --> 0:24:19.879
<v Speaker 1>things that I wonder about. You know, people say, well,

0:24:19.920 --> 0:24:22.359
<v Speaker 1>these days we don't have an attention span, and but

0:24:22.480 --> 0:24:27.240
<v Speaker 1>the truth is people love trials absolutely, and there's something

0:24:27.320 --> 0:24:30.479
<v Speaker 1>about the sense that you don't know what people are

0:24:30.520 --> 0:24:32.679
<v Speaker 1>and it's live and it's it's real, you know, in

0:24:32.720 --> 0:24:35.280
<v Speaker 1>the same way the reality television is real. So even

0:24:35.320 --> 0:24:37.760
<v Speaker 1>if the Watergate Committee had a pretty good idea of

0:24:37.800 --> 0:24:39.879
<v Speaker 1>what where the testament was going, or in some cases

0:24:39.880 --> 0:24:42.360
<v Speaker 1>where it wasn't because some of the witnesses were hostile

0:24:42.640 --> 0:24:46.200
<v Speaker 1>from the administration. Um Famously, the former Attorney General John

0:24:46.240 --> 0:24:48.840
<v Speaker 1>mitchell I didn't remember anything that happened in the year

0:24:48.880 --> 0:24:53.960
<v Speaker 1>of nine and that was good TV too, and that

0:24:54.040 --> 0:24:56.520
<v Speaker 1>was good for the committee because it showed the depths

0:24:56.560 --> 0:25:00.679
<v Speaker 1>that people were going to not cooperate. And so it

0:25:00.760 --> 0:25:04.320
<v Speaker 1>seems to me that this particular committee, rather than thinking

0:25:04.400 --> 0:25:06.680
<v Speaker 1>of the public side of things as one of their

0:25:06.760 --> 0:25:10.080
<v Speaker 1>major things to do, they seem very focused on the

0:25:10.119 --> 0:25:13.639
<v Speaker 1>report they're writing, and I don't quite understand why, because

0:25:14.520 --> 0:25:16.760
<v Speaker 1>it could be important to turn over evidence to the

0:25:16.800 --> 0:25:19.320
<v Speaker 1>Justice Department. It does seem that there are crimes that

0:25:19.359 --> 0:25:21.520
<v Speaker 1>were committed by people who have not yet been indicted,

0:25:22.000 --> 0:25:24.920
<v Speaker 1>and they've collected information that will be relevant to that.

0:25:25.520 --> 0:25:28.280
<v Speaker 1>But people don't read government reports for the most part,

0:25:29.119 --> 0:25:31.040
<v Speaker 1>So who will we here from most It's gonna be

0:25:31.119 --> 0:25:33.719
<v Speaker 1>up to the committee. They've talked a lot about having

0:25:34.400 --> 0:25:38.960
<v Speaker 1>multimedia presentations, about having a lot of videotape, and they

0:25:39.000 --> 0:25:43.800
<v Speaker 1>seem to be afraid of dry question and answer hearings.

0:25:44.119 --> 0:25:47.080
<v Speaker 1>One of the huge advantages that this committee has is

0:25:47.160 --> 0:25:50.360
<v Speaker 1>that because of the way it was put together, because

0:25:50.440 --> 0:25:55.199
<v Speaker 1>Republicans boycotted it after Speaker Nancy Pelosi vetoed two of

0:25:55.520 --> 0:25:58.560
<v Speaker 1>the Republican suggestions to be on the committee. It's a

0:25:58.600 --> 0:26:01.240
<v Speaker 1>small committee with two or publicans who are dedicated to

0:26:01.280 --> 0:26:03.680
<v Speaker 1>take their job seriously. So there are no people here

0:26:04.000 --> 0:26:06.639
<v Speaker 1>whose job is going to be to disrupt things. So

0:26:06.720 --> 0:26:09.639
<v Speaker 1>the committee is pretty united in taking seriously what happened

0:26:09.640 --> 0:26:12.680
<v Speaker 1>on January six. And what I wonder though, is whether

0:26:12.760 --> 0:26:17.800
<v Speaker 1>they're going to present something that's too polished and too basic,

0:26:18.280 --> 0:26:20.919
<v Speaker 1>as the kids say, to really have the kind of

0:26:20.960 --> 0:26:24.080
<v Speaker 1>effect that it should have, especially with it only being

0:26:24.119 --> 0:26:26.200
<v Speaker 1>over a short period of time. I mean, there's also

0:26:26.240 --> 0:26:28.439
<v Speaker 1>the question of timing. So it seemed like there was

0:26:28.560 --> 0:26:30.320
<v Speaker 1>a lot of delays. I mean, as you said, eighteen months,

0:26:30.359 --> 0:26:32.920
<v Speaker 1>it seems a little crazy, and at the same time,

0:26:33.040 --> 0:26:35.000
<v Speaker 1>sort of we're in the middle of primary season now,

0:26:35.119 --> 0:26:37.359
<v Speaker 1>we're also going into summer, and it's sort of a

0:26:37.359 --> 0:26:40.199
<v Speaker 1>pandemic summer. You have to wonder is there anything that

0:26:40.240 --> 0:26:42.119
<v Speaker 1>we should read into the timing of this. You know,

0:26:42.280 --> 0:26:44.399
<v Speaker 1>I'm not worried as much about that a lot of

0:26:44.480 --> 0:26:47.880
<v Speaker 1>big hearings have happened during summer, is possibly because there's

0:26:47.920 --> 0:26:50.280
<v Speaker 1>not a whole lot of other news to compete with them.

0:26:50.359 --> 0:26:53.040
<v Speaker 1>But Senate Watergate Committee hearings were in the summer. The

0:26:53.119 --> 0:26:56.359
<v Speaker 1>Judiciary Committee impeachment hearings in nineteen seventy four during the summer,

0:26:56.440 --> 0:26:58.560
<v Speaker 1>and people paid attention to. Of course, that's impeached of

0:26:58.600 --> 0:27:01.280
<v Speaker 1>a sitting presidents, a little bit different. But the Iran

0:27:01.400 --> 0:27:04.640
<v Speaker 1>Contra hearings were a summer story also and did well.

0:27:04.680 --> 0:27:07.240
<v Speaker 1>And we've had some Supreme Court justices, quite a few

0:27:07.280 --> 0:27:09.639
<v Speaker 1>of them actually, because they tend to announce their resignations

0:27:09.720 --> 0:27:11.679
<v Speaker 1>at the end of the term in June, and so

0:27:11.680 --> 0:27:14.680
<v Speaker 1>we've had a bunch of those happened from Bork up

0:27:14.760 --> 0:27:17.360
<v Speaker 1>through some of the recent ones. So some of those

0:27:17.359 --> 0:27:19.240
<v Speaker 1>hearings have been the summer, and they don't capture the

0:27:19.240 --> 0:27:21.760
<v Speaker 1>imagination of everybody, but they've gotten pretty good play in

0:27:21.800 --> 0:27:24.440
<v Speaker 1>the media. So watch people be watching out for I mean,

0:27:24.440 --> 0:27:26.480
<v Speaker 1>if they are interested in watching. It does feel like

0:27:26.520 --> 0:27:29.120
<v Speaker 1>we've heard everything that there couldn't possibly be anything new,

0:27:29.640 --> 0:27:31.720
<v Speaker 1>could there. I think we're gonna get a lot of

0:27:31.800 --> 0:27:34.719
<v Speaker 1>new details, But I think what matters is the big picture.

0:27:35.320 --> 0:27:38.320
<v Speaker 1>There's a question of how much of a story do

0:27:38.400 --> 0:27:43.359
<v Speaker 1>we have in terms of a deliberate plot involving the

0:27:43.359 --> 0:27:46.639
<v Speaker 1>White House, possibly members Congress and other people working with

0:27:46.880 --> 0:27:50.080
<v Speaker 1>some of these fringe groups. But I think even backing

0:27:50.160 --> 0:27:52.240
<v Speaker 1>up from that, some of it is just getting a

0:27:52.240 --> 0:27:55.600
<v Speaker 1>perspective on Hey, this thing really happened. The President United

0:27:55.640 --> 0:27:59.639
<v Speaker 1>States attempted to overturn an election. He called state legislators

0:27:59.640 --> 0:28:02.760
<v Speaker 1>and said, throw out the vote from your state and

0:28:02.840 --> 0:28:06.080
<v Speaker 1>pick collectors loyal to me. As you say, even with

0:28:06.119 --> 0:28:08.359
<v Speaker 1>all that, it may not change anything this time around,

0:28:08.960 --> 0:28:12.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, I think we have to see what Attorney

0:28:12.119 --> 0:28:13.960
<v Speaker 1>General says in terms of nitaments all that. I don't

0:28:13.960 --> 0:28:17.320
<v Speaker 1>think any of this has much to do with midterm elections,

0:28:17.359 --> 0:28:20.360
<v Speaker 1>but I think that it's at least possible that it

0:28:20.400 --> 0:28:23.080
<v Speaker 1>could bring the Republican Party as a whole back from

0:28:23.080 --> 0:28:26.159
<v Speaker 1>the brink. Does the Republican Party really want to oppose

0:28:26.200 --> 0:28:30.119
<v Speaker 1>democracy is really one of the big questions here. Donald

0:28:30.160 --> 0:28:33.240
<v Speaker 1>Trump is not in favor of democracy. Some of the

0:28:33.280 --> 0:28:37.440
<v Speaker 1>Republicans seem to think democracy less important than US ruling

0:28:37.560 --> 0:28:40.480
<v Speaker 1>or than some policy. Well, it seems to be popular,

0:28:40.600 --> 0:28:43.040
<v Speaker 1>so they're going with it. Right. Well, it's not clear

0:28:43.080 --> 0:28:46.000
<v Speaker 1>how popular, you know, but but most people in their

0:28:46.040 --> 0:28:48.680
<v Speaker 1>everyday lives, they're not thinking, should we be a democracy?

0:28:48.720 --> 0:28:52.040
<v Speaker 1>Should be an authoritarian state. They're thinking, you know, what's

0:28:52.080 --> 0:28:54.600
<v Speaker 1>the price of gas? They're thinking, oh, you know, I

0:28:54.640 --> 0:28:56.440
<v Speaker 1>have a job, that kind of stuff. But I think

0:28:56.520 --> 0:28:59.959
<v Speaker 1>if you think about it, yes, most Americans actually support

0:29:00.040 --> 0:29:02.280
<v Speaker 1>democracy and are very happy that the United States is

0:29:02.320 --> 0:29:07.320
<v Speaker 1>a republic and not a dictatorship. And actually hear you

0:29:07.360 --> 0:29:11.160
<v Speaker 1>say that sentence, and I think that it's possible that

0:29:11.720 --> 0:29:14.120
<v Speaker 1>as a result of sort of just facing this, that

0:29:14.240 --> 0:29:16.400
<v Speaker 1>some Republicans could take a step back and realize, you

0:29:16.640 --> 0:29:19.440
<v Speaker 1>know what, this isn't the path that we want to

0:29:19.480 --> 0:29:21.800
<v Speaker 1>go down. I hope that happens. I don't know if

0:29:21.800 --> 0:29:24.400
<v Speaker 1>it will, but I think that's what you would hope for.

0:29:24.560 --> 0:29:27.640
<v Speaker 1>And I think that people are very quick to move

0:29:27.680 --> 0:29:30.080
<v Speaker 1>on from things and to say, oh, well, the parties

0:29:30.120 --> 0:29:32.720
<v Speaker 1>are sort of pretty much alike, and we really don't

0:29:32.720 --> 0:29:35.680
<v Speaker 1>have that. We have a Republican party that has as

0:29:35.720 --> 0:29:40.640
<v Speaker 1>apparently their dominant faction that is perfectly happy to leave

0:29:40.720 --> 0:29:46.280
<v Speaker 1>democracy behind. And that's a scary thing. But it doesn't

0:29:46.280 --> 0:29:49.360
<v Speaker 1>necessarily have to stay that way. But it's best to

0:29:49.360 --> 0:29:52.800
<v Speaker 1>call it what it is. Jonathan Bernstein, There, and don't forget.

0:29:52.800 --> 0:29:55.640
<v Speaker 1>Public hearings start this Thursday at eight p m. Eastern

0:29:56.080 --> 0:29:59.160
<v Speaker 1>We're now choosing to end all conversations. Not with you, though,

0:29:59.200 --> 0:30:02.600
<v Speaker 1>do get in touch. All thoughts, opinions and comments very welcome.

0:30:02.640 --> 0:30:05.360
<v Speaker 1>I'm at vanniy Quinn on Twitter or email v Quinn

0:30:05.400 --> 0:30:08.720
<v Speaker 1>at bloomberg dot net and don't forget. Bloomberg Opinion is

0:30:08.760 --> 0:30:12.160
<v Speaker 1>also available as a podcast on Apple, Spotify and wherever

0:30:12.240 --> 0:30:15.280
<v Speaker 1>you get your Podcasts were produced by Eric mollow Until

0:30:15.320 --> 0:30:16.719
<v Speaker 1>Next Time on Bloomberg Opinion