WEBVTT - What's Next For Netflix? Look Ahead To Earnings 

0:00:00.800 --> 0:00:04.040
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the Bloomberg Markets Podcast. I'm Paul Sweeney alongside

0:00:04.040 --> 0:00:06.920
<v Speaker 1>my co host Matt Miller. Every business day, we bring

0:00:06.960 --> 0:00:11.520
<v Speaker 1>you interviews from CEOs, market pros, and Bloomberg experts, along

0:00:11.560 --> 0:00:15.520
<v Speaker 1>with essential market moving news. Find the Bloomberg Markets Podcast

0:00:15.560 --> 0:00:18.479
<v Speaker 1>on Apple Podcasts or wherever you listen to podcasts, and

0:00:18.480 --> 0:00:22.279
<v Speaker 1>at Bloomberg dot com slash podcast. Let's keep on that

0:00:22.440 --> 0:00:25.959
<v Speaker 1>Netflix team, shall we. They report earnings next week, and

0:00:26.000 --> 0:00:28.920
<v Speaker 1>that's usually a big event for the stock. Let's welcome

0:00:29.360 --> 0:00:31.880
<v Speaker 1>uh keitha wrong Onah and she is the technology and

0:00:31.920 --> 0:00:34.960
<v Speaker 1>media annalyst at Bloomberg Intelligence. She's been covering this company

0:00:35.040 --> 0:00:38.400
<v Speaker 1>pretty much since its inception as a public company. Keithan,

0:00:38.440 --> 0:00:41.120
<v Speaker 1>thanks so much for joining us here. What can we expect?

0:00:41.159 --> 0:00:46.640
<v Speaker 1>What are investors really looking for when Netflix reports next week? Yeah,

0:00:46.640 --> 0:00:50.120
<v Speaker 1>thank you so much Paul and Taylor for inviting me

0:00:50.159 --> 0:00:53.080
<v Speaker 1>to this conversation. So, um, it's going to be a

0:00:53.200 --> 0:00:57.560
<v Speaker 1>pretty week quarter for Netflix. They have telegraphs that pretty

0:00:57.560 --> 0:01:02.360
<v Speaker 1>well to investors, so they're expecting about one million editions.

0:01:02.400 --> 0:01:05.039
<v Speaker 1>This will be the lowest ever for the company in

0:01:05.080 --> 0:01:07.959
<v Speaker 1>at least ten years, and really it's a factor of

0:01:08.120 --> 0:01:10.959
<v Speaker 1>many different things. So you had that massive pull forward

0:01:11.040 --> 0:01:14.080
<v Speaker 1>of demand from last year because of COVID when they

0:01:14.120 --> 0:01:17.600
<v Speaker 1>reported twenty six million subscribers in the first half of

0:01:18.800 --> 0:01:20.880
<v Speaker 1>that's usually the number that they report for the whole year.

0:01:21.560 --> 0:01:24.200
<v Speaker 1>And then you also have, now, you know, the the

0:01:24.400 --> 0:01:27.920
<v Speaker 1>additional factor of people going wanting to go more outdoors

0:01:27.959 --> 0:01:30.760
<v Speaker 1>and demanding more out of home entertainment. And then the

0:01:30.840 --> 0:01:33.560
<v Speaker 1>third thing that we're seeing is that there was obviously

0:01:33.600 --> 0:01:36.560
<v Speaker 1>the effect of all those production shutdowns, so they had

0:01:36.560 --> 0:01:40.200
<v Speaker 1>a pretty light content slate into Q, none of their

0:01:40.240 --> 0:01:43.000
<v Speaker 1>big titles, So it's really the impact of all those

0:01:43.000 --> 0:01:45.920
<v Speaker 1>three and so a pretty weak quarter is what we're

0:01:45.959 --> 0:01:50.360
<v Speaker 1>expecting in general. With that weak quarter that we're expecting,

0:01:50.400 --> 0:01:52.560
<v Speaker 1>it seems like Netflix is trying to get ahead of

0:01:52.560 --> 0:01:56.720
<v Speaker 1>that announcement and help engagement and help penetration by going

0:01:56.760 --> 0:01:59.920
<v Speaker 1>into video games. What can we expect from net fille

0:02:00.280 --> 0:02:04.600
<v Speaker 1>Alla video games? Yeah, I think that's you know, it's

0:02:04.760 --> 0:02:06.640
<v Speaker 1>it's kind of been in the offering, I think for

0:02:06.640 --> 0:02:09.200
<v Speaker 1>a little while now, and I think it's really a

0:02:09.320 --> 0:02:13.000
<v Speaker 1>very natural extension of their content strategy. I think what

0:02:13.000 --> 0:02:15.839
<v Speaker 1>they're trying to do is to really be a comprehensive

0:02:16.040 --> 0:02:19.839
<v Speaker 1>entertainment solution and really trying to build more and more

0:02:19.880 --> 0:02:22.840
<v Speaker 1>engagement as you pointed out, and really more time spent

0:02:22.960 --> 0:02:25.720
<v Speaker 1>with the platform. Remember a few years ago, when you know,

0:02:25.800 --> 0:02:29.520
<v Speaker 1>read Hingston's was asked about who their biggest competitor competitor is.

0:02:29.960 --> 0:02:33.400
<v Speaker 1>He didn't say an Amazon Prime or or even Hbo.

0:02:33.560 --> 0:02:36.480
<v Speaker 1>He he pointed out Fortnite as being their biggest competitor

0:02:36.520 --> 0:02:39.080
<v Speaker 1>for time and attention. Um, so that's really kind of

0:02:39.120 --> 0:02:41.720
<v Speaker 1>what they want. They want to you know, increase engagement,

0:02:41.720 --> 0:02:44.560
<v Speaker 1>they want to increase time spent. And I think it's

0:02:44.400 --> 0:02:46.359
<v Speaker 1>it really kind of makes sense that it makes it.

0:02:46.440 --> 0:02:48.359
<v Speaker 1>It's a huge oportnity for Netflix to be able to

0:02:48.400 --> 0:02:53.240
<v Speaker 1>differentiate its content offering, boost subscriber engagement, boost retention against

0:02:53.280 --> 0:02:56.440
<v Speaker 1>all the other streaming players. Keithan talked to us about

0:02:57.360 --> 0:03:00.560
<v Speaker 1>the competitive environment again. Over the last year, you know,

0:03:00.600 --> 0:03:03.320
<v Speaker 1>we saw a lot of new players on the streaming business,

0:03:03.320 --> 0:03:06.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, Disney Plus and Peacock and you know all

0:03:06.000 --> 0:03:09.200
<v Speaker 1>the others uh that are out there. Give us a

0:03:09.240 --> 0:03:14.920
<v Speaker 1>sense of how it's shaking out in these early quarters. So, Um,

0:03:14.960 --> 0:03:17.400
<v Speaker 1>as you pointed out, Paul, I mean, Disney Plus has

0:03:17.400 --> 0:03:20.400
<v Speaker 1>been a runaway hit, so they have amassed more than

0:03:20.560 --> 0:03:24.040
<v Speaker 1>hundred million subscribers in you know, just a very short

0:03:24.360 --> 0:03:27.440
<v Speaker 1>about just about thirteen to fourteen months, so they it's

0:03:27.480 --> 0:03:31.119
<v Speaker 1>been a blockbuster success for them. Um and of course,

0:03:31.120 --> 0:03:32.880
<v Speaker 1>as you pointed out, we've had a lot of new

0:03:32.919 --> 0:03:35.440
<v Speaker 1>players kind of a burst down into the screen. But

0:03:35.480 --> 0:03:38.880
<v Speaker 1>I think we're kind of seeing, uh, really this come

0:03:39.200 --> 0:03:42.240
<v Speaker 1>emerged as as as a two horse race, if you will,

0:03:42.280 --> 0:03:45.040
<v Speaker 1>between Netflix and Disney, but you're also seeing all the

0:03:45.080 --> 0:03:47.680
<v Speaker 1>other players kind of trying to jockey for scale. So

0:03:47.720 --> 0:03:51.480
<v Speaker 1>Amazon time very big deals just in the space of

0:03:51.880 --> 0:03:53.880
<v Speaker 1>you know, the past few weeks. They went out and

0:03:53.920 --> 0:03:57.720
<v Speaker 1>acquired the NFL Thursday Night games for about eleven to

0:03:57.760 --> 0:04:01.000
<v Speaker 1>twelve billion dollars and then the NBM studio for another

0:04:01.080 --> 0:04:03.800
<v Speaker 1>eight and a house dollars. So again they really want

0:04:03.800 --> 0:04:06.400
<v Speaker 1>to make Prime a talk to your service. Then you

0:04:06.720 --> 0:04:09.280
<v Speaker 1>then you have HBO Max and the Discovery deal creating

0:04:09.280 --> 0:04:11.400
<v Speaker 1>a new company, a hundred and fifty billion dollar company.

0:04:11.440 --> 0:04:15.120
<v Speaker 1>Again HBO Max wanting to kind of break into that uh,

0:04:15.320 --> 0:04:18.640
<v Speaker 1>top tier streaming offering. So we're definitely going to see

0:04:18.640 --> 0:04:20.080
<v Speaker 1>a shakeout. I think at the end of the day,

0:04:20.120 --> 0:04:23.359
<v Speaker 1>we're probably going to see about three or four or

0:04:23.480 --> 0:04:27.120
<v Speaker 1>five major services Nextlork, Mestics, and Disney and Amazon obviously

0:04:27.520 --> 0:04:30.400
<v Speaker 1>the top one to three I think among those, and

0:04:30.440 --> 0:04:32.120
<v Speaker 1>then it's going to be really interesting to see what

0:04:32.160 --> 0:04:35.720
<v Speaker 1>happens with you know, speak of what happens with viacoms,

0:04:35.880 --> 0:04:40.200
<v Speaker 1>Paramount plus. I think eventually consolidation is on the card,

0:04:41.000 --> 0:04:42.920
<v Speaker 1>but we'll have to wait and watch. There seems to

0:04:43.000 --> 0:04:45.479
<v Speaker 1>be a push pull. We feel like there has to

0:04:45.520 --> 0:04:48.960
<v Speaker 1>be consolidation because you have to be big to compete.

0:04:49.320 --> 0:04:52.200
<v Speaker 1>And yeah, we're getting a lot of big anti trust,

0:04:52.440 --> 0:04:56.280
<v Speaker 1>anti big tech rhetoric out of this administration, saying that

0:04:56.320 --> 0:04:59.800
<v Speaker 1>they don't like big companies. They want to promote competition.

0:05:00.560 --> 0:05:03.720
<v Speaker 1>Do you expect deals to get done and and do

0:05:03.839 --> 0:05:06.039
<v Speaker 1>they get done or they can be tied up in

0:05:06.080 --> 0:05:09.760
<v Speaker 1>courts for a while. Yeah, So even with the that's

0:05:09.760 --> 0:05:12.040
<v Speaker 1>a great point. I think even with the Amazon deal,

0:05:12.080 --> 0:05:14.440
<v Speaker 1>I mean we have the new you know, FTC chair

0:05:14.480 --> 0:05:16.800
<v Speaker 1>who kind of expressed some reservations about that. But I

0:05:16.800 --> 0:05:18.880
<v Speaker 1>don't think they're necessarily if you kind of just look

0:05:19.680 --> 0:05:21.719
<v Speaker 1>at the business that you know, any of these big

0:05:21.720 --> 0:05:25.320
<v Speaker 1>tech players are in, I don't think they necessarily pose

0:05:25.440 --> 0:05:30.640
<v Speaker 1>any competitive challenges right Acquiring a studio acquiring a media company. Um. Again,

0:05:30.680 --> 0:05:33.280
<v Speaker 1>I'm not really sure about how long it could be

0:05:33.320 --> 0:05:35.960
<v Speaker 1>tied up in courts, but I think ultimately, um, you know,

0:05:36.040 --> 0:05:38.279
<v Speaker 1>if tex players like an Apple or an Amazon wants

0:05:38.279 --> 0:05:40.479
<v Speaker 1>to go on studio, I think they should be able

0:05:40.520 --> 0:05:43.800
<v Speaker 1>to do so without too much hassle. Keith A real

0:05:43.839 --> 0:05:46.880
<v Speaker 1>quick thirty seconds. Is Netflix still a subscriber growth story?

0:05:46.920 --> 0:05:50.160
<v Speaker 1>I see the stocks flat year to date. Um, so

0:05:50.200 --> 0:05:52.560
<v Speaker 1>they have done a really good job, Paul, and kind

0:05:52.560 --> 0:05:55.239
<v Speaker 1>of moving away a little bit from that over focus

0:05:55.320 --> 0:05:57.880
<v Speaker 1>on subscribers. They're really now focusing more on free cash

0:05:57.920 --> 0:06:01.479
<v Speaker 1>flows on margins, and they're showing some real, really good

0:06:01.560 --> 0:06:04.480
<v Speaker 1>numbers on that front as well. All right, Keithan, thank

0:06:04.480 --> 0:06:06.600
<v Speaker 1>you so much for joining us. As always, you are

0:06:06.640 --> 0:06:09.719
<v Speaker 1>our guru for all things t MT. Keith Wrong and Nothing,

0:06:10.240 --> 0:06:13.240
<v Speaker 1>technology and media analyst for Bloomberg Intelligence joining us on

0:06:13.279 --> 0:06:17.039
<v Speaker 1>the phone from New Jersey. Uh. I hired Githa back

0:06:17.080 --> 0:06:19.760
<v Speaker 1>in the day. We worked together for ten days or

0:06:19.760 --> 0:06:21.960
<v Speaker 1>ten years, and she has just developed into one of

0:06:21.960 --> 0:06:24.760
<v Speaker 1>the top media and now technology analysts on Wall Street.

0:06:24.760 --> 0:06:26.280
<v Speaker 1>And we're fortunate to have her and all the other

0:06:26.839 --> 0:06:33.719
<v Speaker 1>good folks at a Bloomberg intelligence. Let's talk about retail sales.

0:06:34.279 --> 0:06:38.080
<v Speaker 1>Got some numbers this morning. Came in better than expected.

0:06:38.120 --> 0:06:41.080
<v Speaker 1>Retail sales came into zero point six percent gain versus

0:06:41.080 --> 0:06:43.960
<v Speaker 1>a forecast of a zero point three decline. So pretty

0:06:44.000 --> 0:06:45.920
<v Speaker 1>strong there. Let's get some details on that and some

0:06:45.960 --> 0:06:48.760
<v Speaker 1>of the other retail issues out there in the U

0:06:48.800 --> 0:06:51.800
<v Speaker 1>S consumer. We do that with A. G. Solanki, national

0:06:51.839 --> 0:06:54.840
<v Speaker 1>director for Retail in the US for Collier's International, joins

0:06:54.920 --> 0:06:57.560
<v Speaker 1>us on the zone from phone from San Francisco and Chie,

0:06:57.560 --> 0:06:59.599
<v Speaker 1>thanks so much for taking the time, love to get

0:06:59.680 --> 0:07:04.280
<v Speaker 1>your kind of foot snapshot on the US consumer right

0:07:04.320 --> 0:07:06.440
<v Speaker 1>here as we slowly come out on the other side

0:07:06.440 --> 0:07:10.040
<v Speaker 1>of this pandemic. Yeah, thanks for having me. So let's

0:07:10.080 --> 0:07:12.440
<v Speaker 1>just just dive in. So what we're seeing right now

0:07:12.680 --> 0:07:18.120
<v Speaker 1>is definitely we saw certain categories in retail I e. Clothing, uh,

0:07:18.240 --> 0:07:24.239
<v Speaker 1>certain F and B categories, department store sales drop anywhere between,

0:07:26.440 --> 0:07:29.680
<v Speaker 1>and of course conversely, we saw the e commerce jump in.

0:07:29.800 --> 0:07:32.720
<v Speaker 1>Right now, we're starting to see a shift. People are

0:07:32.760 --> 0:07:36.440
<v Speaker 1>definitely coming back strong as it relates to buying power

0:07:36.600 --> 0:07:40.080
<v Speaker 1>in store, and with that, we're starting to see in

0:07:40.160 --> 0:07:45.200
<v Speaker 1>certain sectors a rebound. For example, in apparel increase. It's

0:07:45.240 --> 0:07:49.360
<v Speaker 1>the largest increase we've seen thus far in any category.

0:07:49.840 --> 0:07:52.360
<v Speaker 1>And also in addition to that, we're starting to see

0:07:52.800 --> 0:07:56.520
<v Speaker 1>um store expansion. So this is led by the grocery,

0:07:56.640 --> 0:08:01.200
<v Speaker 1>the home, beauty, and value oriented concepts. So new store

0:08:01.320 --> 0:08:04.520
<v Speaker 1>openings right now or outpacing store closing, so we're pretty

0:08:04.560 --> 0:08:10.040
<v Speaker 1>excited about that. How are consumers feeling about paying higher prices?

0:08:10.160 --> 0:08:15.120
<v Speaker 1>On one hand, you have retail sales that looked relatively

0:08:15.360 --> 0:08:19.320
<v Speaker 1>strong today, but then you're seeing consumer sentiment fall because

0:08:19.400 --> 0:08:22.760
<v Speaker 1>inflation expectations in the next year are expected to be

0:08:22.800 --> 0:08:25.400
<v Speaker 1>the highest since two thousand and eight. Are they willing

0:08:25.440 --> 0:08:30.240
<v Speaker 1>to pay these higher prices? So there is definitely a

0:08:30.320 --> 0:08:33.080
<v Speaker 1>concern around that, I think because there's this um you know,

0:08:33.160 --> 0:08:35.880
<v Speaker 1>kind of the stimulus payment of starting to slowly fade away,

0:08:36.120 --> 0:08:38.600
<v Speaker 1>so they haven't really put a percent of their mindset

0:08:38.640 --> 0:08:43.040
<v Speaker 1>into Hey, we're looking at inflation of some sort and pricing,

0:08:43.400 --> 0:08:46.200
<v Speaker 1>so there's still a spend, a strong spend, and what

0:08:46.280 --> 0:08:49.480
<v Speaker 1>we're seeing from that strong spend occur is in what

0:08:49.559 --> 0:08:54.040
<v Speaker 1>I would say more the service oriented side. So going

0:08:54.120 --> 0:08:58.040
<v Speaker 1>to the getting a massage, going for a pedigure, mannic here,

0:08:58.080 --> 0:09:01.520
<v Speaker 1>getting your hair done, um, the hair salons, et cetera.

0:09:01.679 --> 0:09:05.120
<v Speaker 1>So we're still seeing that momentum um. When we I

0:09:05.160 --> 0:09:07.680
<v Speaker 1>think it will start to fade, maybe we'll probably see

0:09:07.720 --> 0:09:11.840
<v Speaker 1>those results closer to Q three Q four. So Andie,

0:09:11.880 --> 0:09:13.440
<v Speaker 1>one of the things we saw from this from the

0:09:13.440 --> 0:09:16.240
<v Speaker 1>retail perspective during this pandemic is what a lot of

0:09:16.240 --> 0:09:18.600
<v Speaker 1>folks are saying is just you know, this accelerating growth

0:09:18.600 --> 0:09:21.000
<v Speaker 1>of e commerce, and maybe it might have pulled maybe

0:09:21.040 --> 0:09:23.080
<v Speaker 1>two or three years worth of market share gains in

0:09:23.160 --> 0:09:25.600
<v Speaker 1>terms of e commerce in terms of relative to total

0:09:25.679 --> 0:09:28.319
<v Speaker 1>re retail sales, maybe poured it, pulled it forward maybe

0:09:28.320 --> 0:09:31.000
<v Speaker 1>by two or three years. Is that in fact the case?

0:09:31.040 --> 0:09:32.880
<v Speaker 1>And do you think some of those e commerce gains

0:09:32.920 --> 0:09:37.199
<v Speaker 1>are here to stay? Um? I don't do not believe

0:09:37.200 --> 0:09:39.280
<v Speaker 1>they are here to stay. I think they are a

0:09:39.280 --> 0:09:43.840
<v Speaker 1>part of our shopping journey for any UM consumer. However,

0:09:43.880 --> 0:09:45.319
<v Speaker 1>what we're starting to see is a bit of a

0:09:45.360 --> 0:09:48.880
<v Speaker 1>cutback as it relates to e commerce, and our Q

0:09:49.080 --> 0:09:51.960
<v Speaker 1>two numbers that we're forecasting are roughly around thirteen point

0:09:52.000 --> 0:09:56.720
<v Speaker 1>six percent compared to Q two so UM, granted, it

0:09:56.800 --> 0:09:59.439
<v Speaker 1>was kind of an off quarter, but nonetheless we're starting

0:09:59.440 --> 0:10:02.120
<v Speaker 1>to see a stay realization, and I think that people

0:10:02.120 --> 0:10:04.320
<v Speaker 1>are still there's still you know, when we look at

0:10:04.760 --> 0:10:08.520
<v Speaker 1>the square footage in terms of UM per person square

0:10:08.559 --> 0:10:11.760
<v Speaker 1>footage of retail, it's still pretty significant. People want to

0:10:11.760 --> 0:10:17.480
<v Speaker 1>be out there. Are we finding enough workers to come

0:10:17.520 --> 0:10:22.840
<v Speaker 1>back to work? Good question. Yeah, that's that's a great question. Honestly,

0:10:22.960 --> 0:10:25.880
<v Speaker 1>it's been a big struggle some quick things that we've

0:10:25.880 --> 0:10:29.720
<v Speaker 1>been hearing, especially with chain restaurants and fast casual. What

0:10:29.800 --> 0:10:32.320
<v Speaker 1>we're seeing in that, you know, in that area is

0:10:32.360 --> 0:10:34.840
<v Speaker 1>that it has been a struggle. So what are they doing? Well,

0:10:35.160 --> 0:10:38.640
<v Speaker 1>they've identified some interesting ways to get around it. First off,

0:10:38.760 --> 0:10:41.319
<v Speaker 1>we're seeing a lot of the chain restaurants being quite

0:10:41.320 --> 0:10:44.120
<v Speaker 1>creative with how they're approaching or how they're getting out

0:10:44.160 --> 0:10:47.960
<v Speaker 1>there to identifying new employees. So we're not seeing too

0:10:48.040 --> 0:10:52.280
<v Speaker 1>much of an overpaying or arise in wages, but we're

0:10:52.280 --> 0:10:54.920
<v Speaker 1>seeing some interesting things of how they're kind of connecting

0:10:54.960 --> 0:10:59.520
<v Speaker 1>with you know this you know, the employees um and

0:10:59.559 --> 0:11:02.199
<v Speaker 1>that's either through TikTok. So a lot of the brands

0:11:02.240 --> 0:11:05.360
<v Speaker 1>are starting to use TikTok to um really get the

0:11:05.360 --> 0:11:08.000
<v Speaker 1>brand awareness out there, to use that as a way

0:11:08.000 --> 0:11:10.720
<v Speaker 1>of putting out you know, getting resumes in and out

0:11:11.160 --> 0:11:13.800
<v Speaker 1>UM and trying to tap into kind of that younger set.

0:11:14.200 --> 0:11:16.600
<v Speaker 1>So that's one. The other thing that we're I found

0:11:16.720 --> 0:11:20.560
<v Speaker 1>very interesting is that they're actually offering signing bonuses. Some

0:11:20.960 --> 0:11:24.400
<v Speaker 1>brands are offering signing bonuses UM to get people in.

0:11:24.960 --> 0:11:28.320
<v Speaker 1>So it's it's we'll start to see some shifts there.

0:11:28.440 --> 0:11:31.360
<v Speaker 1>But for the most part, specifically when it comes to

0:11:31.640 --> 0:11:36.520
<v Speaker 1>labor and restaurants, UM, they are still challenged. We're seeing

0:11:36.559 --> 0:11:42.640
<v Speaker 1>that with kind of reduced menu offerings, reduced operating hours, etcetera. Uh,

0:11:42.720 --> 0:11:46.240
<v Speaker 1>and so they have to be creative today. I think

0:11:46.280 --> 0:11:48.440
<v Speaker 1>some of the retailers are pretty creative during this pandemic.

0:11:48.480 --> 0:11:50.720
<v Speaker 1>One of them was this curbside pickup. That's a pretty

0:11:50.760 --> 0:11:53.680
<v Speaker 1>cool thing. I kind of enjoy that. Is that going

0:11:53.720 --> 0:11:57.240
<v Speaker 1>to state? Do you think? Oh? Most definitely. We're actually

0:11:57.240 --> 0:12:02.240
<v Speaker 1>starting to see um, you know, letters of intent requesting

0:12:02.360 --> 0:12:06.040
<v Speaker 1>or requiring curbside pick up. So when I was speaking

0:12:06.080 --> 0:12:09.400
<v Speaker 1>with a variety of national retailers, I said, how is

0:12:09.440 --> 0:12:13.040
<v Speaker 1>that you helped or not helped having curbside? Is it

0:12:13.080 --> 0:12:16.160
<v Speaker 1>an added expense? They said, not at all. It's actually

0:12:16.160 --> 0:12:20.040
<v Speaker 1>a convenience to our customer. And it's another channel of

0:12:20.040 --> 0:12:24.439
<v Speaker 1>how we can um provide another solution for that that

0:12:24.559 --> 0:12:26.640
<v Speaker 1>customer where if they don't feel like they want to

0:12:26.640 --> 0:12:27.959
<v Speaker 1>come into the store and they just want to pick

0:12:28.000 --> 0:12:31.200
<v Speaker 1>it up curbside, they have that flexibility and so that's

0:12:31.200 --> 0:12:33.760
<v Speaker 1>really important to them. They've seen a lift in sales

0:12:34.080 --> 0:12:39.200
<v Speaker 1>anywhere between twelve and FI. Yeah, that's pretty pretty interesting

0:12:39.280 --> 0:12:42.920
<v Speaker 1>seeing retailers get pretty creative on j Slanki, national director

0:12:42.920 --> 0:12:46.440
<v Speaker 1>Retail for in the US for Collier's International, giving us

0:12:46.480 --> 0:12:50.000
<v Speaker 1>her thoughts on the retail landscape again generally pretty strong

0:12:50.040 --> 0:12:55.760
<v Speaker 1>as consumer confidence continues to rebound. All right, So we

0:12:55.840 --> 0:12:58.720
<v Speaker 1>are getting right into the meat of this earning season

0:12:58.720 --> 0:13:00.320
<v Speaker 1>and there's a lot of folks out there. It's a boy,

0:13:00.320 --> 0:13:02.920
<v Speaker 1>these earnings are really better come through because when you

0:13:02.920 --> 0:13:05.280
<v Speaker 1>look at valuations, you can make the argument that a

0:13:05.320 --> 0:13:08.760
<v Speaker 1>lot of these uh parts of the market are overextended

0:13:08.800 --> 0:13:12.760
<v Speaker 1>from evaluation perspective. Josh Wine, portfolio manager at Hennessey Funds,

0:13:12.880 --> 0:13:14.800
<v Speaker 1>joins as Josh, I love to get your thoughts on

0:13:14.920 --> 0:13:17.800
<v Speaker 1>kind of what you need to see, what you expect

0:13:17.880 --> 0:13:21.120
<v Speaker 1>to see out of this earnings season here as it

0:13:21.160 --> 0:13:24.679
<v Speaker 1>relates to you know, kind of maybe earnings and valuations

0:13:24.679 --> 0:13:27.640
<v Speaker 1>in this market. Yeah, it's good to be with you.

0:13:27.679 --> 0:13:29.800
<v Speaker 1>I have a spell in my face hearing about karaoke

0:13:29.880 --> 0:13:31.400
<v Speaker 1>and Dolly part and that's a great way to start

0:13:31.440 --> 0:13:33.480
<v Speaker 1>this out. The world is a better place for my

0:13:33.559 --> 0:13:37.040
<v Speaker 1>not doing karaoke as well. Um yeah, earning season, uh,

0:13:37.120 --> 0:13:39.480
<v Speaker 1>you know, certainly want to see the consumer so as

0:13:39.640 --> 0:13:41.920
<v Speaker 1>as companies roll out earnings. You know, it was very

0:13:41.920 --> 0:13:44.040
<v Speaker 1>interesting to see bank earnings and I think it was expected,

0:13:44.080 --> 0:13:46.480
<v Speaker 1>you know, very strong earnings there. But you know, we

0:13:46.559 --> 0:13:49.360
<v Speaker 1>have a retail sales number today that was well ahead

0:13:49.400 --> 0:13:53.320
<v Speaker 1>of expectations, and things like clothing and electronics and restaurants

0:13:53.320 --> 0:13:56.160
<v Speaker 1>were you know, above above average growth and and ahead

0:13:56.200 --> 0:13:59.360
<v Speaker 1>of expectations. So you know, it is what it is,

0:13:59.400 --> 0:14:01.280
<v Speaker 1>and it would be great to hear, you know, some guidance.

0:14:01.320 --> 0:14:04.240
<v Speaker 1>You know, what are you know, companies thinking about, you know,

0:14:04.280 --> 0:14:06.559
<v Speaker 1>the next quarter. You know, right now we have very

0:14:06.600 --> 0:14:09.600
<v Speaker 1>easy comparisons to a year ago. But you know, let's see,

0:14:09.800 --> 0:14:10.920
<v Speaker 1>you know, what it's going to look like in Q

0:14:11.080 --> 0:14:15.520
<v Speaker 1>four when the comparison is is meaningfully more difficult, and

0:14:15.559 --> 0:14:18.280
<v Speaker 1>certainly Q one of next year it will be somewhat

0:14:18.280 --> 0:14:21.960
<v Speaker 1>of a regular comparison to Q one of this year. Josh,

0:14:22.000 --> 0:14:25.360
<v Speaker 1>how are you investing in this time when you get

0:14:25.440 --> 0:14:28.760
<v Speaker 1>strong retail sales but then you see consumer sentiment coming

0:14:28.840 --> 0:14:33.600
<v Speaker 1>really soft given one year inflation expectations are going back

0:14:33.640 --> 0:14:36.200
<v Speaker 1>the highest since two thousand and eight. How do you

0:14:36.320 --> 0:14:41.720
<v Speaker 1>take to contradicting factors and invest Yeah, it's interesting because

0:14:41.720 --> 0:14:44.360
<v Speaker 1>you know, I was looking, you know, the market, you know,

0:14:44.440 --> 0:14:47.240
<v Speaker 1>twenty times forward earnings, so about a five percent earnings

0:14:47.280 --> 0:14:50.400
<v Speaker 1>yield against the backdrop of a one three on the tenure.

0:14:50.960 --> 0:14:55.960
<v Speaker 1>So you know, valuations on average are incredibly compelling. You

0:14:55.960 --> 0:14:59.320
<v Speaker 1>know that they're basically that's spread the earnings yield versus

0:14:59.320 --> 0:15:02.600
<v Speaker 1>the ten years were we were before the pandemic started. Uh.

0:15:02.800 --> 0:15:07.640
<v Speaker 1>That being said, you know, yeah, certainly size matters a

0:15:07.640 --> 0:15:10.760
<v Speaker 1>lot in this market increasingly so. So you know, a Microsoft,

0:15:11.280 --> 0:15:15.520
<v Speaker 1>great company, thirty four times forward earnings. When I see that,

0:15:15.600 --> 0:15:18.040
<v Speaker 1>and they're growing quite nicely, but I think to myself

0:15:18.080 --> 0:15:21.240
<v Speaker 1>that the market definitely places a premium on growth. I

0:15:21.240 --> 0:15:24.240
<v Speaker 1>think more so in the case of a Microsoft, it's

0:15:24.280 --> 0:15:26.520
<v Speaker 1>not only a great balance, but just the size and

0:15:26.560 --> 0:15:29.240
<v Speaker 1>the liquidity. So I think that there's definitely a size

0:15:29.240 --> 0:15:32.880
<v Speaker 1>and liquidity story, and what gets blocked out by that

0:15:33.400 --> 0:15:36.400
<v Speaker 1>by that sun is you know, kind of midcaps with

0:15:36.440 --> 0:15:41.640
<v Speaker 1>a similar valuation story and you know, compelling growth, but

0:15:41.920 --> 0:15:44.240
<v Speaker 1>certainly the multiples are not there, and I think that

0:15:44.480 --> 0:15:47.840
<v Speaker 1>you know in that lies you know a great opportunity. Josh,

0:15:47.880 --> 0:15:51.240
<v Speaker 1>where are you and your team at Hennessey Advisors in

0:15:51.360 --> 0:15:54.160
<v Speaker 1>Chapel Hill, North Carolina. I don't know why you didn't

0:15:54.160 --> 0:15:58.680
<v Speaker 1>locate in Durham Superior University down there, but anyway, what

0:15:58.720 --> 0:16:01.240
<v Speaker 1>are you and your team doing in terms of work

0:16:01.320 --> 0:16:04.480
<v Speaker 1>right now? What are the areas you're focusing on? Sure? Yeah,

0:16:04.520 --> 0:16:06.840
<v Speaker 1>so I would point you know, in our Hennessy Cornerstone

0:16:06.840 --> 0:16:09.880
<v Speaker 1>mad Cap thirty fund, where we're looking at valuation, earnings,

0:16:09.880 --> 0:16:13.160
<v Speaker 1>growth and stock price momentum. And where that leads us

0:16:13.480 --> 0:16:15.640
<v Speaker 1>is a lot of the consumer names that you know,

0:16:15.720 --> 0:16:17.760
<v Speaker 1>don't get the attention of of you know, maybe like

0:16:17.760 --> 0:16:20.320
<v Speaker 1>a Costco or a Starbucks. You know, these are MidCap names,

0:16:20.960 --> 0:16:26.280
<v Speaker 1>UH companies like Mattel, Big Lots UH and Meritage Homes,

0:16:26.320 --> 0:16:30.200
<v Speaker 1>so you know, strong free cash flow generating companies, you know,

0:16:30.240 --> 0:16:33.920
<v Speaker 1>strong balance sheets. The multiples are interesting to me because

0:16:33.920 --> 0:16:36.160
<v Speaker 1>I think these are for the most part well known names.

0:16:36.200 --> 0:16:39.000
<v Speaker 1>But you know, Big Lots trading at nine times for earnings,

0:16:39.360 --> 0:16:45.360
<v Speaker 1>Mattel at sixteen times, Meritage at about six times for earnings. So, uh,

0:16:45.440 --> 0:16:48.920
<v Speaker 1>you know, I think that that you know, value can

0:16:48.960 --> 0:16:51.040
<v Speaker 1>be its own catalyst. And and I don't think a

0:16:51.040 --> 0:16:52.720
<v Speaker 1>lot of people agree with that, but I think that

0:16:53.160 --> 0:16:56.000
<v Speaker 1>these names, they are strong names, and they will live

0:16:56.040 --> 0:16:59.320
<v Speaker 1>to see another day and and at some point investors

0:16:59.320 --> 0:17:03.400
<v Speaker 1>will inevitable a U turn their attention towards these overlooked

0:17:03.480 --> 0:17:09.359
<v Speaker 1>type names. What is the path forward for interest rates? It?

0:17:09.640 --> 0:17:11.800
<v Speaker 1>Does it have to go higher from here? How are

0:17:11.840 --> 0:17:15.120
<v Speaker 1>you thinking about that? Yeah? I think about it a lot.

0:17:15.200 --> 0:17:18.480
<v Speaker 1>So I've covered equities in in some way, shape or

0:17:18.480 --> 0:17:21.280
<v Speaker 1>form for about twenty five years, and I've never paid

0:17:21.400 --> 0:17:23.359
<v Speaker 1>that much attention to the bondo market as much as

0:17:23.359 --> 0:17:25.879
<v Speaker 1>I do now. And first of all, you know, the

0:17:25.920 --> 0:17:28.120
<v Speaker 1>bond market to me, you know, there might be some

0:17:28.680 --> 0:17:31.160
<v Speaker 1>Obviously the FED is gets in the way of maybe

0:17:31.280 --> 0:17:34.560
<v Speaker 1>true price discovery to a large degree, but the bond

0:17:34.600 --> 0:17:37.919
<v Speaker 1>market is telling me that maybe we are borrowing some

0:17:37.960 --> 0:17:40.720
<v Speaker 1>growth from future quarters now that we've reopened, and there's

0:17:40.760 --> 0:17:43.760
<v Speaker 1>this delayed wealth effects, so people are out spending money,

0:17:43.800 --> 0:17:45.960
<v Speaker 1>and uh, you know, you see that if you just

0:17:46.000 --> 0:17:48.600
<v Speaker 1>walk down any and he needs, you know, any street

0:17:48.640 --> 0:17:52.400
<v Speaker 1>in this country probably, And uh so, I think that

0:17:53.359 --> 0:17:56.920
<v Speaker 1>we've been saying for so many years now that rates

0:17:56.960 --> 0:18:00.800
<v Speaker 1>have to go higher, and every year that becomes less

0:18:00.840 --> 0:18:02.520
<v Speaker 1>and less true, and and so yeah, I don't think

0:18:02.560 --> 0:18:05.199
<v Speaker 1>they have to go higher. I think rates, you know,

0:18:05.320 --> 0:18:09.120
<v Speaker 1>versus overseas rates are are somewhat elevated in the United States.

0:18:09.440 --> 0:18:12.880
<v Speaker 1>And when I look at overseas markets and economies they

0:18:12.880 --> 0:18:15.520
<v Speaker 1>are in no, they are not nearly as good a

0:18:15.560 --> 0:18:17.800
<v Speaker 1>shape as we are here in the United States for

0:18:17.880 --> 0:18:20.320
<v Speaker 1>the most part. So I think that we have a

0:18:20.320 --> 0:18:23.160
<v Speaker 1>lot to contend with overseas and in emerging markets, and

0:18:23.800 --> 0:18:26.800
<v Speaker 1>I don't know how sustainable things could ever be if

0:18:26.920 --> 0:18:30.680
<v Speaker 1>we don't get those economies reopened and functioning properly. So

0:18:31.640 --> 0:18:33.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, I'm not going to make any prediction on

0:18:33.040 --> 0:18:36.359
<v Speaker 1>the tenure or bonds in general, but you know, I

0:18:36.359 --> 0:18:38.320
<v Speaker 1>don't think rates have to go higher at all, and

0:18:38.359 --> 0:18:40.640
<v Speaker 1>I think they could go a little bit lower. All right, Josh,

0:18:40.640 --> 0:18:43.160
<v Speaker 1>thank you so much. We appreciate that. As always Josh

0:18:43.160 --> 0:18:45.840
<v Speaker 1>Way and he's a portfolio manager at Tennessee Funds giving

0:18:45.920 --> 0:18:49.479
<v Speaker 1>us his thoughts on the market. Uh. Here it remains

0:18:49.520 --> 0:18:52.880
<v Speaker 1>bullish here, but earnings coming in fast and furious will

0:18:52.880 --> 0:18:55.240
<v Speaker 1>continue next week. We had the banks this week, as

0:18:55.320 --> 0:18:58.000
<v Speaker 1>Josh mentioned, coming in pretty starn solid. But we're gonna

0:18:58.000 --> 0:19:00.520
<v Speaker 1>have some tech. We're gonna have some consumer names next

0:19:00.520 --> 0:19:04.000
<v Speaker 1>week that will continue the narrative on earnings and this market.

0:19:04.080 --> 0:19:10.760
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg looking at Moderna here stock is up

0:19:10.840 --> 0:19:14.960
<v Speaker 1>nine point eight percent all time high four dollars. Uh

0:19:14.960 --> 0:19:17.320
<v Speaker 1>it's got sporting a market cap of a hundred and

0:19:17.359 --> 0:19:21.520
<v Speaker 1>fourteen billion dollars included today in the SMP five hundred,

0:19:21.760 --> 0:19:25.080
<v Speaker 1>of course, manufacturer of the Moderna vaccine, which has been

0:19:25.119 --> 0:19:28.800
<v Speaker 1>so successful for so many patients for this COVID. Let's

0:19:28.800 --> 0:19:30.880
<v Speaker 1>get a sense of what's going on at this company.

0:19:30.920 --> 0:19:34.320
<v Speaker 1>That's now you probably started the you know, two years ago,

0:19:34.359 --> 0:19:36.840
<v Speaker 1>nobody really knew about it. Now it's a household name.

0:19:37.160 --> 0:19:40.280
<v Speaker 1>John Murphy, he's a pharmaceutical analyst for Bloomberg Intelligence based

0:19:40.320 --> 0:19:43.840
<v Speaker 1>in London. He joins us, John, tell us about this company.

0:19:43.880 --> 0:19:46.720
<v Speaker 1>Give us a thirty thou foot overview of what this

0:19:46.760 --> 0:19:49.119
<v Speaker 1>company really is. We know it, as you know, a

0:19:49.160 --> 0:19:52.080
<v Speaker 1>manufacturer of a very effective vaccine. But give us a

0:19:52.080 --> 0:19:55.120
<v Speaker 1>sense of what this company is about. Sure, yeah, nice

0:19:55.119 --> 0:19:57.440
<v Speaker 1>to join you. Actually you summed it up very nice.

0:19:57.440 --> 0:19:59.399
<v Speaker 1>That we hadn't really heard about this company, had we

0:19:59.440 --> 0:20:02.399
<v Speaker 1>a couple of years ago. Now it has been around since,

0:20:03.480 --> 0:20:05.879
<v Speaker 1>but only came to the market in two thousand and eighteen,

0:20:05.960 --> 0:20:07.560
<v Speaker 1>and it was a I guess a bit of a

0:20:07.600 --> 0:20:09.960
<v Speaker 1>minnow then, although at the time it created a splash

0:20:10.040 --> 0:20:12.080
<v Speaker 1>because it's i p O was seven and a half billion,

0:20:12.200 --> 0:20:16.120
<v Speaker 1>so for a biotech that that was quite significant. So

0:20:16.440 --> 0:20:19.800
<v Speaker 1>M R and A based a vaccine focused looking at

0:20:19.840 --> 0:20:23.239
<v Speaker 1>a number of different infectious diseases. You could argue they

0:20:23.280 --> 0:20:25.080
<v Speaker 1>maybe got a little bit lucky or got a big

0:20:25.160 --> 0:20:27.440
<v Speaker 1>leg up when COVID came along, because clearly there was

0:20:27.480 --> 0:20:29.720
<v Speaker 1>a lot of cash that that came their way. But

0:20:29.800 --> 0:20:32.200
<v Speaker 1>they have for for a number of years been looking

0:20:32.240 --> 0:20:35.760
<v Speaker 1>at areas such as flu rs V, side of megalovirus,

0:20:36.119 --> 0:20:41.280
<v Speaker 1>so really looking to to develop a broad pipeline of

0:20:41.280 --> 0:20:44.760
<v Speaker 1>of vaccines in the anti infective space. And again, as

0:20:44.800 --> 0:20:48.120
<v Speaker 1>I said, they clearly benefited from COVID here in terms

0:20:48.200 --> 0:20:51.159
<v Speaker 1>of getting an acceleration in development. And I guess the

0:20:51.280 --> 0:20:54.119
<v Speaker 1>question now is after COVID, where do things go? That

0:20:54.320 --> 0:20:56.600
<v Speaker 1>is the question. What is the future for this company.

0:20:56.640 --> 0:20:59.320
<v Speaker 1>We had a great conversation earlier this week talking about

0:20:59.600 --> 0:21:03.000
<v Speaker 1>using at m R and a technology for cancer for HIV.

0:21:03.160 --> 0:21:06.760
<v Speaker 1>I mean, the hopes here are so high. Yeah, I

0:21:06.800 --> 0:21:09.159
<v Speaker 1>think you're exactly right now. And and you know what,

0:21:09.320 --> 0:21:12.400
<v Speaker 1>sometimes I think, um, and it's kind of natural that

0:21:12.480 --> 0:21:16.040
<v Speaker 1>when you see a new technology, expectations initially are high,

0:21:16.359 --> 0:21:19.080
<v Speaker 1>they get they then they get a little bit disappointed,

0:21:19.119 --> 0:21:21.720
<v Speaker 1>if you like, when when these high expectations aren't met.

0:21:21.760 --> 0:21:23.600
<v Speaker 1>And now we're kind of going up to that to

0:21:23.680 --> 0:21:25.959
<v Speaker 1>that peak again. So I think if you look at

0:21:25.960 --> 0:21:28.560
<v Speaker 1>the anti infective areas again, as I mentioned the lights

0:21:28.600 --> 0:21:31.920
<v Speaker 1>of flu, rs V, sites of megalovirus, these are probably

0:21:31.960 --> 0:21:34.879
<v Speaker 1>more realistic in the next three to five years to

0:21:34.960 --> 0:21:37.600
<v Speaker 1>see them come out with a product. I'm pretty long

0:21:37.600 --> 0:21:39.640
<v Speaker 1>in the tooth, and I can tell you twenty years

0:21:39.640 --> 0:21:42.680
<v Speaker 1>ago we were talking about cancer vaccines. We've not seen

0:21:42.720 --> 0:21:45.360
<v Speaker 1>them come through. I wouldn't be betting my money on

0:21:45.359 --> 0:21:49.040
<v Speaker 1>on cancer delivering something there. HIV again looks like a

0:21:49.040 --> 0:21:52.560
<v Speaker 1>pretty difficult area. But although maybe not not as not

0:21:52.640 --> 0:21:56.720
<v Speaker 1>a sexy, not as attractive rs V side of megalovirus,

0:21:56.760 --> 0:21:59.320
<v Speaker 1>these are five to ten billion dollar markets, so it's

0:21:59.320 --> 0:22:02.040
<v Speaker 1>a very very large from that perspective. All right, I'd

0:22:02.040 --> 0:22:05.040
<v Speaker 1>love to talk about the economics of the vaccine. I'm

0:22:05.040 --> 0:22:07.520
<v Speaker 1>looking at the f A function on the Bloomberg terminal,

0:22:07.520 --> 0:22:09.359
<v Speaker 1>which gives the income statement balance you all the good

0:22:09.400 --> 0:22:12.840
<v Speaker 1>stuff you would need for financial analysis on m r

0:22:13.080 --> 0:22:16.560
<v Speaker 1>n A, which is the MODERNA symbol. Eight hundred million

0:22:16.600 --> 0:22:22.680
<v Speaker 1>dollars in revenue in analysts estimate eighteen point six billion.

0:22:23.480 --> 0:22:25.840
<v Speaker 1>Is all of that the vaccine. Talked to us about

0:22:25.840 --> 0:22:28.920
<v Speaker 1>the economics for MODERNA of this vaccine. They're not given

0:22:28.920 --> 0:22:32.720
<v Speaker 1>it away, are they? It is all the vaccine. Yeah,

0:22:32.760 --> 0:22:35.960
<v Speaker 1>that that is essentially that is essentially a pent You're

0:22:35.960 --> 0:22:38.600
<v Speaker 1>absolutely that is the vaccine. And I think the big

0:22:38.680 --> 0:22:41.800
<v Speaker 1>question as well, because as you said in your introduction,

0:22:41.840 --> 0:22:43.359
<v Speaker 1>you've got you've got to stop. Here is a hundred

0:22:43.359 --> 0:22:46.480
<v Speaker 1>and fourteen hundred and fifteen billion dollar market cat what

0:22:46.640 --> 0:22:49.240
<v Speaker 1>is the sustainability of that income? So can we factor

0:22:49.280 --> 0:22:51.439
<v Speaker 1>into our numbers what it's going to do. Is it're

0:22:51.440 --> 0:22:53.960
<v Speaker 1>gonna do twenty billion again next year for example, give

0:22:54.040 --> 0:22:56.360
<v Speaker 1>or take the company says it can do, and then

0:22:56.400 --> 0:22:59.040
<v Speaker 1>what happens in a couple of years after that in

0:22:59.160 --> 0:23:02.840
<v Speaker 1>terms of in the to the actual the actual economics.

0:23:03.359 --> 0:23:05.919
<v Speaker 1>They don't release or tell you exactly what they're charging,

0:23:06.000 --> 0:23:10.080
<v Speaker 1>but you can estimate it's a shop here. Um. And

0:23:10.119 --> 0:23:13.000
<v Speaker 1>of course they're going to have some associated costs marketing costs,

0:23:13.040 --> 0:23:15.000
<v Speaker 1>they've got the R and D costs. But it's going

0:23:15.040 --> 0:23:19.080
<v Speaker 1>to be relatively profitable for them in the high income markets, certainly,

0:23:19.400 --> 0:23:21.480
<v Speaker 1>But like a lot of a lot of their competitors,

0:23:22.080 --> 0:23:24.880
<v Speaker 1>this is being provided at cost to the low income markets.

0:23:24.880 --> 0:23:28.200
<v Speaker 1>And Kovacs for example. You know, John, I'm smart enough

0:23:28.240 --> 0:23:30.280
<v Speaker 1>to know that I should not be going toe to

0:23:30.280 --> 0:23:33.640
<v Speaker 1>toe with Mr Paul Sweeney on level two income statement

0:23:33.760 --> 0:23:36.960
<v Speaker 1>analysis for the c f A. What I can ask you, though,

0:23:37.160 --> 0:23:39.959
<v Speaker 1>is take us away a little bit from fundamentals, and

0:23:40.440 --> 0:23:42.560
<v Speaker 1>you have a stock that's now included in the S

0:23:42.600 --> 0:23:46.480
<v Speaker 1>and P five hundred. What are you hearing from We

0:23:46.600 --> 0:23:49.920
<v Speaker 1>know their portfolios that track the S and P that

0:23:50.040 --> 0:23:52.399
<v Speaker 1>now have to buy the stock. How much of that

0:23:52.520 --> 0:23:55.280
<v Speaker 1>is also included in a move that's now up ten

0:23:55.840 --> 0:23:58.720
<v Speaker 1>on the day. Yeah, Now, I think I think you're

0:23:58.800 --> 0:24:01.639
<v Speaker 1>exactly right, and I think that's exactly what it should

0:24:01.680 --> 0:24:04.280
<v Speaker 1>be linked to today's move. I think we've seen it before,

0:24:04.640 --> 0:24:06.480
<v Speaker 1>because you get the fact that there's a number of

0:24:06.520 --> 0:24:10.000
<v Speaker 1>index passive funds. You've also got mutual funds, for example,

0:24:10.080 --> 0:24:13.040
<v Speaker 1>that index themselves against the SMP. And you guys have

0:24:13.160 --> 0:24:15.800
<v Speaker 1>no better than me. But I understand there's in excess

0:24:15.800 --> 0:24:19.240
<v Speaker 1>of ten trillion dollars that is index or benchmark to

0:24:19.280 --> 0:24:21.760
<v Speaker 1>the SMP. Now, not all of those have to go

0:24:21.800 --> 0:24:24.359
<v Speaker 1>out and buy the stock today. But again we've seen

0:24:24.359 --> 0:24:26.359
<v Speaker 1>it before. You get a spike for the first couple

0:24:26.400 --> 0:24:29.000
<v Speaker 1>of days, and then it normally settles down. Maybe with

0:24:29.119 --> 0:24:31.560
<v Speaker 1>Maderna because we've had this phenomenal run, maybe it doesn't

0:24:31.560 --> 0:24:34.240
<v Speaker 1>settle down as quickly, but that's what you that's certainly

0:24:34.240 --> 0:24:37.639
<v Speaker 1>what you do. Tend tend to see m r N

0:24:37.760 --> 0:24:40.720
<v Speaker 1>a technology that's now entered the lexicon for a lot

0:24:40.760 --> 0:24:43.720
<v Speaker 1>of people as we've kind of dealt through this pandemic.

0:24:44.119 --> 0:24:46.120
<v Speaker 1>Give us a sense of who the players are here

0:24:46.160 --> 0:24:49.800
<v Speaker 1>besides moderna And you know, is this is this something

0:24:49.840 --> 0:24:54.080
<v Speaker 1>that we need to pay attention to going forward, this technology? Yes,

0:24:54.240 --> 0:24:56.520
<v Speaker 1>I think that's a really important question, a great point

0:24:56.560 --> 0:24:58.639
<v Speaker 1>to bring up, and and the reason for that is

0:24:59.840 --> 0:25:01.639
<v Speaker 1>the was a lot of talk about this. There's a

0:25:01.640 --> 0:25:05.600
<v Speaker 1>lot of buzzwords go around in pharmaceuticals, in science, and

0:25:05.640 --> 0:25:08.240
<v Speaker 1>they talk about new technologies and what they're going to deliver,

0:25:08.320 --> 0:25:10.280
<v Speaker 1>and a lot of times there's a lot of a

0:25:10.320 --> 0:25:12.800
<v Speaker 1>lot of talk, but they don't tend to deliver. Now,

0:25:12.920 --> 0:25:15.240
<v Speaker 1>now this is absolutely not the case here. But we've

0:25:15.240 --> 0:25:18.800
<v Speaker 1>really got two leaders here. We've got Maderna on one side,

0:25:18.960 --> 0:25:21.760
<v Speaker 1>and we've got by on Tech, the German company with

0:25:21.800 --> 0:25:25.200
<v Speaker 1>whom Fiser is partnered. They're the two leaders. They're a

0:25:25.240 --> 0:25:27.520
<v Speaker 1>long way out, and it's interesting. There's a lot of

0:25:27.520 --> 0:25:31.240
<v Speaker 1>others and making moves or saying we want to get involved.

0:25:31.280 --> 0:25:33.560
<v Speaker 1>Fiser themselves that said they might start up their own

0:25:33.760 --> 0:25:36.360
<v Speaker 1>their own area. Glaxo had mentioned that, Santa Fe had

0:25:36.359 --> 0:25:39.359
<v Speaker 1>mentioned it, but it takes a number of years to

0:25:39.760 --> 0:25:42.760
<v Speaker 1>really get get to understand the technology and make the

0:25:42.800 --> 0:25:45.440
<v Speaker 1>appropriate investments. So at the moment these guys are out

0:25:45.480 --> 0:25:48.240
<v Speaker 1>on their own, how much of a lead, maybe four

0:25:48.280 --> 0:25:50.600
<v Speaker 1>to five years of the lead something like that. But

0:25:50.600 --> 0:25:52.919
<v Speaker 1>but clearly it's an area that is going to be

0:25:53.080 --> 0:25:58.320
<v Speaker 1>super important going forward for vaccines. Finally, just quickly here,

0:25:58.359 --> 0:26:00.919
<v Speaker 1>I'm thinking, what does this means? Are other sort of

0:26:00.920 --> 0:26:04.040
<v Speaker 1>biotech companies that are also racing along with Maderna and

0:26:04.160 --> 0:26:07.240
<v Speaker 1>and you sort of have these big pharmaceutical companies that

0:26:07.280 --> 0:26:10.280
<v Speaker 1>are making big bats on some of these unprofitable companies

0:26:10.320 --> 0:26:12.959
<v Speaker 1>at the time. But all they need is is one

0:26:13.000 --> 0:26:17.080
<v Speaker 1>big grand slam. Yeah, I'm a guess, and you know,

0:26:17.359 --> 0:26:19.760
<v Speaker 1>the drug companies, the investors, all of us, right, if

0:26:19.800 --> 0:26:21.640
<v Speaker 1>we're looking at things like that, if you can, if

0:26:21.680 --> 0:26:24.240
<v Speaker 1>you can pick out, pick out that grand slam. Absolutely,

0:26:24.280 --> 0:26:27.120
<v Speaker 1>and that's why a lot of companies are paying huge

0:26:27.119 --> 0:26:30.040
<v Speaker 1>amounts and some some cases people would say over paying

0:26:30.119 --> 0:26:34.000
<v Speaker 1>for the new technologies. It's not easy to be able

0:26:34.040 --> 0:26:36.960
<v Speaker 1>to pick out unfortunately. So I think this is great

0:26:37.000 --> 0:26:39.800
<v Speaker 1>for the sector going in today. It gets people to

0:26:39.840 --> 0:26:43.000
<v Speaker 1>focus on a sector that maybe they've not looked at before. Hey, John,

0:26:43.040 --> 0:26:45.359
<v Speaker 1>thanks so much for joining us. Really appreciate your insight

0:26:45.400 --> 0:26:49.200
<v Speaker 1>and expertise. John Murphy's a pharmaceutical analysts for Bloomberg Intelligence

0:26:49.240 --> 0:26:52.560
<v Speaker 1>based in London, giving us the latest on moderna. This

0:26:53.000 --> 0:26:56.600
<v Speaker 1>is Bloomberg. Thanks for listening to the Bloomberg Markets podcast.

0:26:57.000 --> 0:27:00.240
<v Speaker 1>You can subscribe and listen to interviews with Apple Podcasts

0:27:00.359 --> 0:27:04.240
<v Speaker 1>or whatever podcast platform you prefer. I'm Matt Miller. I'm

0:27:04.280 --> 0:27:08.280
<v Speaker 1>on Twitter at Matt Miller three and I fall Sweeney.

0:27:08.320 --> 0:27:10.960
<v Speaker 1>I'm on Twitter at pt Sweeney. Before the podcast, you

0:27:10.960 --> 0:27:13.399
<v Speaker 1>can always catch us worldwide at Bloomberg Radio