Speaker 1: Hello, and welcome back to another episode of The Markmas Show,
Speaker 1: where we talk about the decentralized Revolution, talking about the
Speaker 1: way the world's changing, of course through the lens of politics, finance,
Speaker 1: and technology. We're running through some of the latest breaking
Speaker 1: stories and news headlines of this week, and you know,
Speaker 1: we talk about the decentralized revolution, how we're moving from
Speaker 1: a unipolar world of peace and harmony and global trade
Speaker 1: and just in time supply chains and dollar homogene and
Speaker 1: moving to a multipolar world with multiple leaders and broken
Speaker 1: supply chains and broken alliances and things like that. And
Speaker 1: it's important to kind of document the process as we're
Speaker 1: going through this. Now. I've done extensive work talking about
Speaker 1: how this happens in periods of time on tune your
Speaker 1: time frame, and how we're there now, but we're really
Speaker 1: we're watching it happen in real time. And so when
Speaker 1: people ask when is this going to happen, I'm like,
Speaker 1: it's happening right now, and I think, you know, we
Speaker 1: can look at lots of signposts would start to say that,
Speaker 1: or I would start I would say that it really
Speaker 1: started with Brexit and Trump being elected. So really back
Speaker 1: about twenty sixteen is really when the pendulum started to
Speaker 1: swing the other way and the world started to go
Speaker 1: this direction back to a you know, leaving the globalist agenda,
Speaker 1: going back to more of like a nationalistic agenda. And
Speaker 1: so we've been on this trend for a while, and
Speaker 1: it has really been sped up, of course, with the
Speaker 1: Russia Ukraine US war that's going on, which is now
Speaker 1: potentially spilling over into China and even the Middle East
Speaker 1: into potentially some sort of like a World War three
Speaker 1: or something like that, which is it's just insane. It's
Speaker 1: just insane. I mean, this is where we're at right now.
Speaker 1: I couldn't imagine ever that we would get here, but
Speaker 1: yet here we are. And so we have this situation
Speaker 1: where it's really the NATO, the US NATO at war
Speaker 1: with Russia using Crane as a proxy. There's been numerous reports,
Speaker 1: numerous reports from very credible high ranking people who have
Speaker 1: said multiple times that peace has been brokeer like Zelenski
Speaker 1: and Putin have wanted to get peace and the US
Speaker 1: won't allow them to make peace. And so we know
Speaker 1: that to be true because if the US just stopped
Speaker 1: sending money and weapons, the war would be over. Peace
Speaker 1: would have been reached by now. Now, Unfortunately, in a war,
Speaker 1: just like an argument, there's really no winners, right, Nobody
Speaker 1: wins an argument, they say, nobody wins a fight. Nobody
Speaker 1: wins a war. And so unfortunately, in order to end this,
Speaker 1: you know, hopefully a peace treaty can be brokered. In
Speaker 1: a peace treaty, probably both sides aren't super happy. They
Speaker 1: realize that it's in the best interest to accept this
Speaker 1: peace treaty, but they're not really happy with the way
Speaker 1: it did. They probably have to make concessions that they
Speaker 1: didn't want to make. We don't know a hundred percent.
Speaker 1: We know that credited people have said this, but we
Speaker 1: also know, like I said, if the US stopped providing
Speaker 1: funding and stopped providing weapons, that this would all be over.
Speaker 1: But yet here we are and they're not. Now. I
Speaker 1: listened to this interview with Jordan Peterson and Tulsie Gabbard
Speaker 1: this week, which is very informative, highly recommended if you
Speaker 1: care about this topic and just just go go on
Speaker 1: to YouTube in search Jordan Peterson, Tulsa Gabbard. But Jordan Peterson,
Speaker 1: he's so good at unpacking things, and he was just
Speaker 1: asking the question, like, what does winning look like. What
Speaker 1: does winning look like? Is there a win? And to
Speaker 1: the point I made, there is no win, So what
Speaker 1: does it look like? And we know that now as
Speaker 1: things have been going on and on. Now apparently China
Speaker 1: now is saying they could potentially help Russia out in
Speaker 1: the side of the war. Now, of course, China has
Speaker 1: massive needs and motivations to do so will motivate it
Speaker 1: because of their needs. They need what Russia has, which
Speaker 1: is the commodities. If you could take the you know,
Speaker 1: one of the largest commodity producing nations in the world,
Speaker 1: like US, and match them up with the greatest producer
Speaker 1: of goods and goods in the world, which is China,
Speaker 1: and you put them together, that is a massive alliance
Speaker 1: and alliance that the US would not want to have.
Speaker 1: And so here we have China saying potentially the support Russia,
Speaker 1: and the US came out and condemned that. As a
Speaker 1: matter of fact, they condemned. That's the Secretary of State
Speaker 1: Anthony B. Lincoln made the accusation on Sunday where he
Speaker 1: said Chinese companies have already been supplying in Russia with
Speaker 1: non lethal aid and may soon do more. He says,
Speaker 1: quote the concern that we have now is based on
Speaker 1: information we have that they're considering providing lethal support, and
Speaker 1: we've made very clear to them that would cause a
Speaker 1: serious problem for US and in our relationship, Lincoln said.
Speaker 1: When asked what lethal aid China might deliver, Blincoln said weapons.
Speaker 1: And so he's basically saying this outright, right right right
Speaker 1: run the news, and as you might imagine, it drew
Speaker 1: furious comments from China on Monday, not in a denial,
Speaker 1: China deny it, but they got mad. They said, quote,
Speaker 1: it is the US, not China that has been pouring
Speaker 1: weapons into the battlefield. End quote. That's from the Ministry
Speaker 1: of Foreign Affairs spokesperson for China. Quote the US is
Speaker 1: in no position to tell China what to do. We
Speaker 1: would never stand for fingerpointing or even coercion and pressurizing
Speaker 1: from the US on our relations with Russia. End quote.
Speaker 1: You want to get somebody mad, accused them of something
Speaker 1: they haven't done. You want to get somebody even more mad,
Speaker 1: tell them what they can and can't do. And so
Speaker 1: here we have Secretary of State b Lincoln saying on
Speaker 1: public news that China could do this or should do this,
Speaker 1: and they better not and China's like, wait a minute,
Speaker 1: Wait a minute, wait a minute. You're the ones putting
Speaker 1: all the weapons on the battlefield. You're the ones starting
Speaker 1: this war. You're the ones perpetuate. Let's sit in, US
Speaker 1: stays starting. You're the ones perpetuating this war by pouring
Speaker 1: weapons onto the battlefield. The US is in no position
Speaker 1: to tell China what to do. Wow, strong words, but
Speaker 1: you can see how this is certainly going, which is
Speaker 1: not good. And then we saw this week Zelenski says,
Speaker 1: if China allies itself with Russia, there will be World
Speaker 1: War three. Who the heck is this guy to say,
Speaker 1: what's going to be World War three? Why does the
Speaker 1: entire world care? Who controls Crimea, that's the capital of Ukraine?
Speaker 1: Who who? Who in the world cares? Does anybody in
Speaker 1: the world want their entire life threatened because of nuclear war?
Speaker 1: Over that? Because of because Zelenski says that that now
Speaker 1: the world is going to go to war. He says,
Speaker 1: quote for US, it's important that China does not support
Speaker 1: the Russian Federation in this war, Zelenski says, and state,
Speaker 1: and like I said, Lincoln warned that there would be
Speaker 1: consequences if China would would back them. I mean, this
Speaker 1: is just insane and it's gotten to a point where
Speaker 1: we should be worried. This week, put Putin came out
Speaker 1: and gave a speech which I think is important to
Speaker 1: touch on for a couple of topics. One it sounded
Speaker 1: pretty good overall. I mean, he basically said that he
Speaker 1: blasted a degradation of humanity and the family unit. He
Speaker 1: basically dedicated a portion of his State of the Nation
Speaker 1: address to blast left wing the tax against the family unit,
Speaker 1: normalization of pedophilia, saying that pedophilia and sexualization of children
Speaker 1: have become the new normal in NATO nations. He's not wrong,
Speaker 1: he said, Well, with Russia, I went in on the
Speaker 1: battlefield in Ukraine. The globalist leaders of the West have
Speaker 1: turned to information attacks that target kids with the express
Speaker 1: intent of destroying our culture and historical truth. They cannot
Speaker 1: ignore the fact that Russia cannot be defeated on the battlefield,
Speaker 1: so they're waging increasing aggressive information attacks, first of all,
Speaker 1: targeting the young generations, lyne on every step, destroying historical truths,
Speaker 1: attacking our culture, the Russian Orthodox Church and other traditional
Speaker 1: religious institutions in our country, and what they're doing in
Speaker 1: the West to their own people is even worse. Putin
Speaker 1: went on to say, look at what they're doing to
Speaker 1: their own people. They're destroying the institution of family, their
Speaker 1: cultural historical identity, and various perversions with regards to children
Speaker 1: up to pedophilia are accepted as the new norms. So
Speaker 1: there's some stuff to unpack there. I don't know if
Speaker 1: this is exactly what you think it is. So before
Speaker 1: you go and support Putin over this, I want to
Speaker 1: break this down down. If you're just tuning in, you're
Speaker 1: listening to the Markma Show. We're going through some of
Speaker 1: the latest breaking news headlines this week, and we're talking
Speaker 1: about how the world is breaking apart as we sit
Speaker 1: here and watch it happened. So I got a whole
Speaker 1: lot more to cover and unpack. I want to first
Speaker 1: start by unpacking this, why this might be a bait
Speaker 1: and switch I want to warn you about, and some
Speaker 1: other stuff. So anyway, I'll be right back in a minute.
Speaker 1: I gotta take a quick break, but don't go away,
Speaker 1: all right, Welcome back. If you just tune in, you're
Speaker 1: listening to the Mark Ma Show. We're talking about the
Speaker 1: decentralized Revolution, how the world's breaking apart right before our
Speaker 1: very eyes, leading into a world of decentralization, which in
Speaker 1: my opinion I think could turn out to be a
Speaker 1: good thing. But it's not going to be a smooth transition.
Speaker 1: And that's exactly what we're seeing right now. I was
Speaker 1: talking about this speech that Putin just gave, where he
Speaker 1: was basically right in what he was saying, in my opinion,
Speaker 1: that NATO countries are quote destroying the institution of family,
Speaker 1: their cultural historical identity, and various perversions with regards to
Speaker 1: children up to pe Ilia as accepted as the new
Speaker 1: norm end quote. So there's truth to that. Yes, NATO
Speaker 1: countries America is trying to destroy the institution of family,
Speaker 1: that's true. Their cultural historical identity is gone. So we
Speaker 1: used to have an American identity of shared values, values
Speaker 1: of freedom and responsibility and private property and the ability
Speaker 1: that someone could come here with nothing and build their life.
Speaker 1: We used to have those values, but today all those
Speaker 1: values have been destroyed, and now supposedly we align on identities.
Speaker 1: So now supposedly whether you're man or woman or trans,
Speaker 1: or you're gay or straight, or you're black or white,
Speaker 1: or your male or female, you align on that not
Speaker 1: values anymore, which is exactly why this country is so
Speaker 1: torn today. We are more alike on our We're more
Speaker 1: alike than they want us to believe. They want us
Speaker 1: to belie that we're all different based off the color
Speaker 1: of our skin or sexual orientation. But that's not true.
Speaker 1: We were Americans was shared values. But of course, as
Speaker 1: he rightly points out, Putin rightly points out, they destroyed
Speaker 1: the cultural historical identity or historical identity that made American Greek,
Speaker 1: that brought all the immigrants here from all over the world.
Speaker 1: That shared historical identity is gone. And then, even as
Speaker 1: he said, the perversions with regards to children up to pedophilia.
Speaker 1: So now they want to normalize pedophilia. They call it
Speaker 1: a minor attracted person. Now they've tried to change the name. No, no, no,
Speaker 1: let's not call it anymore. People don't like that word.
Speaker 1: Let's call it just a minor attracted person. So you're
Speaker 1: just a person that's attracted to miners. That's the same
Speaker 1: thing they're normalizing pedophilia. What do they do unto the
Speaker 1: kids in schools here in California, in middle schools, they
Speaker 1: have tampons in the boys bathrooms. They have kiddie litter
Speaker 1: boxes in schools, and even worse, they're trying to allow
Speaker 1: transitioning where kids can change their whole life by changing
Speaker 1: their sexual identity, having surgeries, puberty blockers, all these transition surgeries,
Speaker 1: even without consent of their parents. Those are perversions with
Speaker 1: regards to children. You can't drink until you're twenty one
Speaker 1: because you might get drunk and make a bad decision.
Speaker 1: But at twelve you can change your whole life take
Speaker 1: out your reproductive organs at twelve. But no, but but
Speaker 1: but don't drink till your twenty one because you could
Speaker 1: happen to make a bad decision. You can't vote to
Speaker 1: your eighteen because you're not smart enough about about politics
Speaker 1: to know what you may or may not want to vote.
Speaker 1: But at twelve you can just take out your reproductive organs.
Speaker 1: So what he's saying is correct. The one thing that
Speaker 1: I fear, though, is that actually, before we talk about this,
Speaker 1: he goes on to talk about the priest. He says,
Speaker 1: attacking our culture and attacking the Russian Orthodox Church and
Speaker 1: other traditional religious institutions. And so you don't have to
Speaker 1: go super far to see that this is exactly what
Speaker 1: Zelenski has done. If you think that we are fighting
Speaker 1: for democracy and freedom in Ukraine, you are sadly mistaken. Now,
Speaker 1: I don't want to see anybody get invaded, and I
Speaker 1: don't want to see anybody killed, and I'd like to
Speaker 1: see everybody kind of sit to their own their own borders. However,
Speaker 1: if you think what we're doing in Ukraine is fighting
Speaker 1: for freedom, you are sadly mistaken. And there's one hundred
Speaker 1: data points I can give you, but let's just talk
Speaker 1: about one. Zelenski took a page directly from the Bolshevik playbook,
Speaker 1: So the Russian Revolution in the early nineteen hundreds, where
Speaker 1: they basically, you know, a communist marks his takeover, went
Speaker 1: and killed everybody, and he's basically doing the same thing.
Speaker 1: He announced a ban on the Ukrainian Orthodox Church, a
Speaker 1: government answered crackdown. Zelenski claims they can't be trusted because
Speaker 1: scripture isn't under the control of the Ukrainian government. That's right,
Speaker 1: God's word. The scripture lies outside of government control. It
Speaker 1: is what it is. It's a book that was written
Speaker 1: thousand year it's the oldest book. As Jordan Peterson sums up,
Speaker 1: it's not just true it's the truth itself. It's the
Speaker 1: first manuscript we have, and so yes, it's not under
Speaker 1: control of the Ukrainian government or any government for that matter.
Speaker 1: Zelensky outlawed the Ukrainian Orthodox Church, just like the Bolshevik
Speaker 1: crackdown implemented before. Now the Russian Orthodox Church is fifty
Speaker 1: two percent majority of Ukrainians. So if you think we're
Speaker 1: standing for a democracy, if you think Ukrainians democracy, the
Speaker 1: majority over fifty percent of the people are Orthodox Christians.
Speaker 1: So wouldn't democracy be what the people want? But yet
Speaker 1: not to them, they went and shut it down because
Speaker 1: to Zolensy's quote, it can't it's not under the control
Speaker 1: of the Ukrainian government. So, just like the media outlets,
Speaker 1: the churches now are only allowed to operate in Ukraine
Speaker 1: with the express consent and direct control of the Zelensky government.
Speaker 1: So if you think there's freedom or democracy and we're
Speaker 1: fighting for that, you are sadly mistaken. That is not
Speaker 1: the case at Also, if Putin was right about saying that, however,
Speaker 1: what I'm afraid that Putin might be doing is really
Speaker 1: trying to appeal to this entire segment of the world
Speaker 1: that feels that they're being shut down, where their voices
Speaker 1: and being heard because sort of like any good president
Speaker 1: would do, sort of like Trump. Trump hit a chord
Speaker 1: with people talking about you know, legal immigration, things like that,
Speaker 1: and that's sort of like what Putin's doing. However, what
Speaker 1: does what does his own history and his government say?
Speaker 1: So he certainly persecuted and killed lots of people in Russia.
Speaker 1: Russia is not the bastion of freedom in the world.
Speaker 1: And so while he is saying these things which leads
Speaker 1: people to go wow', he kind of gets it. Maybe
Speaker 1: maybe he's a good guy. I wouldn't go that far.
Speaker 1: I wouldn't say that Putin is a good guy, like
Speaker 1: I said, by historical standards, he certainly is not, so
Speaker 1: be careful with that. It's right, what he's saying is right.
Speaker 1: I'm afraid that he might have some suspect intentions, and
Speaker 1: I guess only time will tell. However, so the speech
Speaker 1: went out, he went on the offensive. Now, apparently the
Speaker 1: US is trying to pick a war with China, saying hey,
Speaker 1: you better not or else. And on top of that,
Speaker 1: Lady mcplutin now said that Russia is pulling out or
Speaker 1: suspending the nuclear arms treaty. So we've been in a
Speaker 1: nuclear arms treaty with Russia. It's called start sta RT.
Speaker 1: It started in nineteen eighty five. Back then Soviet leader
Speaker 1: Michael gorbus Chef and President Ronald Reagan made this treaty saying, quote,
Speaker 1: a nuclear war cannot be one, so must never be
Speaker 1: five is under something called the mutually assured destruction, Like, hey,
Speaker 1: if we go to war, we're both going to kill
Speaker 1: each other, so let's just not go to war. And
Speaker 1: so we've had this. It's been affirmed as recently as
Speaker 1: January twenty two by Putin and Biden, as well as
Speaker 1: leaders of China, France, in the UK who will have
Speaker 1: nuclear weapons. But now Russia says it's suspending its participation
Speaker 1: in the treaty. That's not good. It sounds like escalation.
Speaker 1: In my opinion. It sounds like we might be actually
Speaker 1: getting closer to nuclear war than we were anytime since
Speaker 1: nineteen eighty five. So I want to break that down
Speaker 1: more into detail and kind of explain exactly what's going
Speaker 1: on and how this is growing even past Russia and Ukraine.
Speaker 1: It's going to be it's a it's a big story.
Speaker 1: I got a whole lot to cover when I come back,
Speaker 1: don't go away. You listen to the Markamas Show. I'll
Speaker 1: be back after a quick break. Don't go away, all right,
Speaker 1: welcome back. If you just tune in, you are listening
Speaker 1: to the Mark Moas Show. We're talking about the Decentralized Revolution,
Speaker 1: and we're talking about how the world is actually decentralizing,
Speaker 1: like literally, like all of the peace and harmony and
Speaker 1: cooperation that we've been enjoying for the last you know,
Speaker 1: fifty sixty years is coming to an end, and it's
Speaker 1: coming to an end very very quickly, and it seems
Speaker 1: like it's all being driven by the United States. You know,
Speaker 1: one thing, when when Donald Trump was elected, all these
Speaker 1: people were saying, you know, he's a hot head, which
Speaker 1: which he is, and you know that that's probably that's
Speaker 1: one of his greatest character flaws, you know, is he
Speaker 1: kind of is his hot head and he kind of
Speaker 1: says things off the cuff. And so they said, he's
Speaker 1: his hot head, and if he's elected, he's going to
Speaker 1: lead us into nuclear war. We just know it. Well,
Speaker 1: he didn't. As a matter of fact, he was nominated
Speaker 1: for a Nobel Peace Price because for the first time
Speaker 1: in like decades. He actually brokered peace in the Middle East.
Speaker 1: He got rid of Isis that had propped up under Obama.
Speaker 1: He got rid of that, and he broker peace in
Speaker 1: the Middle East, and the world had peace. But under Biden,
Speaker 1: we're now facing nuclear war. We're facing nuclear war with Russia,
Speaker 1: We're facing war with China, and we're even now facing
Speaker 1: war in the Middle East with Israel, Israel and Iran.
Speaker 1: So it wasn't it wasn't Trump taking its to nuclear war.
Speaker 1: It's Biden that did that. Now this isn't a left
Speaker 1: or right thing. Well, it sort it is. It's sort
Speaker 1: it is. So now now Russia has pulled out of
Speaker 1: their treaty that's been brokered, and for what again? For what?
Speaker 1: A poll was just recently done and that Americans do
Speaker 1: not support shipping of weapons to Ukraine. An Associated Press
Speaker 1: Center for Public Affairs research found that Americans do not
Speaker 1: support shipping weapons and tax dollars off to Ukraine for
Speaker 1: war with no end in sight that has already cost you,
Speaker 1: as taxpayers, about one hundred and thirteen billion in less
Speaker 1: than a year. Americans are more concerned about how they'll
Speaker 1: foot their wildly inflated grocery bill or handled declining wages
Speaker 1: due in part to the influx of migrant at the
Speaker 1: US border. Meanwhile, a fent in all crisis thanks to
Speaker 1: truckloads of illegal drugs smuggling in the country via the
Speaker 1: same disastrous border policies, is wreaking havoc on poor, blue
Speaker 1: collar communities. More than one hundred and seven thousand Americans
Speaker 1: died from drug overdoses in twenty twenty one. Americans want
Speaker 1: Biden to focus on issues at home home. Let's talk
Speaker 1: about that five million illegal aliens poured through our southern borders.
Speaker 1: Five million. That's an invasion. I would say that's a
Speaker 1: failed policy. We have the number one cause of death
Speaker 1: from eighteen to I believe forty four. You can check
Speaker 1: me on that. Eighteen to forty four I believe is
Speaker 1: fennel which pours through our southern border and being shipped
Speaker 1: over here from China. So there's an attack by China
Speaker 1: coming in through our southern border. Five million people invading
Speaker 1: the country. The number one cause of death is because
Speaker 1: of that. We have grocery bills out of control that
Speaker 1: can't be handled. We have attacks all over our energy grid,
Speaker 1: from our energy grids to all of our core stuff.
Speaker 1: I talked about that in earlier segment. How the attacks
Speaker 1: on our energy grid have almost doubled last year. Could
Speaker 1: that be that of the five million people that entered
Speaker 1: the government country illegally could be potentially terrorist coming. So
Speaker 1: we have a massive crisis going on a home, students
Speaker 1: graduating from high school that can't read or write, and
Speaker 1: now we're arguing about kitty boxes, kitty litter boxes in
Speaker 1: high school, a massive problem at home. So failed policy
Speaker 1: at home and then failed policy abroad. We're literally phacing
Speaker 1: a nuclear war and it's escalating, and now we're at
Speaker 1: war with China. So yeah, I would say people are
Speaker 1: more concerned about what the heck is going on here
Speaker 1: than we are sending more weapons and more money to
Speaker 1: to Ukraine. This as the US tax payers have already
Speaker 1: spent one hundred the US has already sent one hundred
Speaker 1: and thirteen billion. I've seen reports that show up to
Speaker 1: two hundred billion has already gone going to Ukraine, two
Speaker 1: hundred billion. Two hundred billion when people can't afford groceries
Speaker 1: at home, and that and and that probably is even more.
Speaker 1: We don't even know. We know that the Pentagon now
Speaker 1: the Department of Defense couldn't find another two and a
Speaker 1: half trillion dollars, but we don't know where it went. Now,
Speaker 1: I say another because this is not the first time
Speaker 1: they've lost trillions of dollars. A matter of fact, they've
Speaker 1: never passed the au they can't pass an audit. They
Speaker 1: can't even show where the money's going. So between one
Speaker 1: hundred and two hundred billion dollars has gone there, and
Speaker 1: Americans don't support this. You would think the president or
Speaker 1: any politician for that matter, should be out there thinking
Speaker 1: about what's in the best interest for Americans, and in
Speaker 1: any president of any country should think about the best
Speaker 1: interues of their people. What is going to war over there?
Speaker 1: Supporting how is that in the best interest for people.
Speaker 1: We're not supporting freedom, we're not supporting democracy. We've already
Speaker 1: talked about that. So what are we doing? And now
Speaker 1: we're supposedly crossing another red lines? We've already crossed proverbial
Speaker 1: red lines. We've you know, we know that NATO said
Speaker 1: that we would never move East. Russia wants a buffer
Speaker 1: in between where NATO is and where they are, which
Speaker 1: makes sense, and so Ukraine was supposed to stay this
Speaker 1: neutral place. And as Ukraine was moving into NATO. Russia said, hey,
Speaker 1: don't do it. Don't do it. You've already you've already
Speaker 1: gone back on every commitment you've made. Ukraine's the last stand.
Speaker 1: Don't do it. Don't do it. That's the red line.
Speaker 1: And yet we did. And there's the red line. And
Speaker 1: now they're saying that. Blincoln Secretary of State Anthony Lincoln
Speaker 1: is now saying that if you know, they want to
Speaker 1: get Ukraine to retake Crimea, and that would be a
Speaker 1: red line for Putin that could lead to a wider
Speaker 1: Russian response. So Russia got Crimea and now they're trying
Speaker 1: to get Ukraine to take back over Crimea, and they're saying,
Speaker 1: this is a red line. Don't do it. And I'll
Speaker 1: ask you again, no matter where you are listening from
Speaker 1: in this world today, you could be at risk of
Speaker 1: a nuclear war. This is where we're going. If you're
Speaker 1: young enough, you could go to war and potentially die
Speaker 1: over this, or your kids or your grandkids could go
Speaker 1: to war over what? Over Crimea? Even point to it
Speaker 1: on a map, Why do you care who controls Crimea?
Speaker 1: But that's what Ukrainian forces want, says their crosshairs are
Speaker 1: on Crima. That's where they want to go. They want
Speaker 1: to go where the red line is. They want to
Speaker 1: continue to escalate. And I'm going to tell you again
Speaker 1: if you just tuned in, don't don't let anybody tell
Speaker 1: you this is a proxy war. This is the US
Speaker 1: is a war with Russia. And I say that because
Speaker 1: without the hundreds of billions of dollars we've given them,
Speaker 1: without the weapons that we've given, and this war would
Speaker 1: be over. We have all the American leaders that have
Speaker 1: come out and said we will win, we will stick
Speaker 1: with it until the end. So this is this is
Speaker 1: not a proxy war anymore. This is a war. Russia
Speaker 1: knows it and you better know it too. And and
Speaker 1: this is spiraling out of control. As I said, China
Speaker 1: is now potentially jumping in. They're mad because the US
Speaker 1: is trying to tell what to do. And now we
Speaker 1: have this growing shadow war between the US, Israel, and Iran.
Speaker 1: So remember Trump had brokered peace in the Middle East,
Speaker 1: and now that's all fallen apart. We can see that
Speaker 1: preparing for an armed conflict with Israel and the US.
Speaker 1: The IRGC, which is the Iranian Revolutionary Guard Corps, have
Speaker 1: evaluated their weaponry in Ukraine selling Russia the Shahid drones.
Speaker 1: In return, Moscow has pledged to help Tehran in air
Speaker 1: defense and potentially help to enrich their nuclear program, which
Speaker 1: is a major red line of Washington and Tel Aviv.
Speaker 1: Of course. So now the US has been trying to
Speaker 1: keep nuclear weapons out of Iran's hand, and here Moscow
Speaker 1: is like, hey, we'll help you out, and we'll give
Speaker 1: you air defense and you give us some drones and
Speaker 1: let's just all work together. This is another war spiler
Speaker 1: out of control in the Middle East. If Iran gets
Speaker 1: nuclear weapons, obviously that threatens Israel. Israel said that they
Speaker 1: would attack before that ever happens. And so now we
Speaker 1: have war with China and Taiwan, and in Russia and Ukraine,
Speaker 1: and now with Israel and Iran. And this is spiraling
Speaker 1: out of control. This is not getting better, This is
Speaker 1: getting worse. This is leading to the decentralized revolution. What
Speaker 1: does all this mean for us as investors, Well, it
Speaker 1: means that inflation is going through the roof. It means
Speaker 1: prices are going to get high. It means that if
Speaker 1: you think supply chains were a problem two years ago,
Speaker 1: just wait until what happens next. If you're just tune in,
Speaker 1: you're listening to the Mark Moss Show going on a
Speaker 1: rant about the decentralized Revolution, breaking through the biggest stories
Speaker 1: of this week. I got more to come. I gotta
Speaker 1: take a quick break. Don't go away, I'm gonna be
Speaker 1: right back. All right, Welcome back. If you're just tune in,
Speaker 1: you are listening to the Mark Moss Show talking about
Speaker 1: the decentralized Revolution, how the world is breaking apart. And
Speaker 1: we went through all the wars Russia, China and the
Speaker 1: Middle East, and I mean, this is getting bad. I
Speaker 1: want to shift gears a little bit, but as the
Speaker 1: pendulum swings, we're not done with globalism yet. And so
Speaker 1: at a time when globalism it's dead, I mean it's dead.
Speaker 1: Come on, look, I mean what's happening in China, Taiwan, Russia, Ukraine, Israel.
Speaker 1: I mean it's over, but doesn't stop the globalist push
Speaker 1: from trying to go forward. And one of the biggest
Speaker 1: stories I saw this week, one of the scariest stories
Speaker 1: I saw this week that you need to be aware of,
Speaker 1: is that the United States government wants to lay down
Speaker 1: its sovereignty to be underneath the globalists, underneath the globalists.
Speaker 1: So the US is no longer the captain of their
Speaker 1: own ship. Now this started with Obama. Okay. Obama went around.
Speaker 1: He was the first president going around and apologizing for
Speaker 1: the US. Obama laid us under the power of the globalists,
Speaker 1: including put us into the Paris Accord, including putting us
Speaker 1: under the UN. He brought the UN in to watch
Speaker 1: US elections. Okay, And as soon as Trump came elected,
Speaker 1: he went to Davos and he said, look, the US
Speaker 1: is a sovereign nation. The US will never lay down
Speaker 1: its sovereignty to globalists. As the president, my job is
Speaker 1: to think about America first. Now, he said, look, we'll cooperate,
Speaker 1: we'll work with everybody, but we're always going to be
Speaker 1: thinking about Americans first. So he pulled us out of
Speaker 1: the Paris Accord, and of course that's what put the
Speaker 1: target on his back, and the global said to get
Speaker 1: him out. Biden the first day back in office, put
Speaker 1: us back into the Paris Score, back under this globalist
Speaker 1: and now here we are we have Now we have
Speaker 1: the Biden administration wants to put us give all of
Speaker 1: our power of health and pandemic response to the who
Speaker 1: the who, which has been proven completely corrupt, which has
Speaker 1: been proven completely incompetent, which has been proven to be
Speaker 1: under China's control. Now they want to put us under that.
Speaker 1: As member states of the World Health Organization WHO prepared
Speaker 1: to gather in Switzerland next week and negotiate final terms
Speaker 1: of an accord that will give the WHO centralized authority
Speaker 1: over US policy in the case of a pandemic. What wait,
Speaker 1: what did you get a vote on that? Did you
Speaker 1: hear anything about that? No, you didn't. Well they want
Speaker 1: to have we want to give the WHO authority over
Speaker 1: the US in the case of a pandemic. Now, luckily
Speaker 1: we have some Republican senators pushing back on this with
Speaker 1: an effort to reinforce congressional power to authorize treaties. Now,
Speaker 1: this draft accord would be quote legally binding on all
Speaker 1: one ninety four member nations. WHO gives the WHO the
Speaker 1: authority to declare pandemics and submits member countries to the
Speaker 1: quote the central role of the WHO as the directing
Speaker 1: and coordinate authority on all international health work in areas
Speaker 1: like oh lockdowns, treatments, medical supply chains, surveillance and yes
Speaker 1: and disinformation and false news. Once a pandemic is declared,
Speaker 1: now you might know that we're still in a pandemic
Speaker 1: in the United States, and so what's even in a
Speaker 1: pandemic anyway? So the central role WHO, We're going to
Speaker 1: basically give them all power over lockdowns, treatments, medical supply chains,
Speaker 1: surveillance and disinformation. Wow. Seventeen years senators led by Ron Johnson,
Speaker 1: Republican and Wisconsin introduced the quote Know WHO Pandemic Preparedness
Speaker 1: Treaty without Senate Approval Act on February fifteenth, states the
Speaker 1: pandemic award must be deemed a treaty, thus required the
Speaker 1: consent of the supermajority of the Senate. Other sponsors of
Speaker 1: the bill all Republicans. Of course, I'm not going to
Speaker 1: read them all out here. The WHO, along with our
Speaker 1: federal health agencies, felt miserably in their response to COVID.
Speaker 1: Senator Johnson stated this failure should not be rewarded with
Speaker 1: a new international treaty that would increase the WHOSE power
Speaker 1: at the expense of American sovereignty end quote Senator Johnson.
Speaker 1: But some doubt this bill, even if approval, will stop
Speaker 1: the WHO Accord from going into effect once President Joe
Speaker 1: Biden signs it. Are you listening here. The Obama Biden
Speaker 1: administration is back doing the same thing, trying to lay
Speaker 1: down US sovereignty to globalist, non elected leaders. Currently, the
Speaker 1: United States is the largest contributor to the who's six
Speaker 1: point seven billion dollars budget. Of course, Bill and milind
Speaker 1: the Gates Foundations is the second largest donor to the WHO,
Speaker 1: contributing to the nine percent of its budget. So the
Speaker 1: US and Bill and millinivigates, they're the main funders of
Speaker 1: the WHO. And it remains unclear if the Biden administration
Speaker 1: will need senator approval from for this, which is insane.
Speaker 1: How can somebody lay down our sovereignty? I mean, this
Speaker 1: is just insane to me. Now, like I said, this
Speaker 1: is not a smooth operation. Now, they're going to have
Speaker 1: control over one hundred and ninety four nations, but these
Speaker 1: one hundred ninety four nations are breaking apart. I certainly
Speaker 1: don't think Russia or China are going to want to
Speaker 1: lay down their sovereignty to the WHO. I highly doubt
Speaker 1: that's going to be the case. So we're getting a
Speaker 1: lot of pushback on this. Now. Another piece of news
Speaker 1: this week I talked about before, Jordan Peterson is setting
Speaker 1: up a new organization to counter the World Economic Forum.
Speaker 1: So there's pushback, there's capitalism. Does another one I want
Speaker 1: to talk about this week? Who saw Vivik Ramaswamy. He
Speaker 1: announced that he is running for president now. He's the
Speaker 1: author of a couple of books called Woke Inc Inside
Speaker 1: Corporate American Social Justice Scam and also Nations of Victims,
Speaker 1: which is dealing with identity politics. He's also the co
Speaker 1: founder of Strive Asset Management, which was set up to
Speaker 1: work against Black Rock. And he says that America is
Speaker 1: in the midst of a national identity crisis. We embrace
Speaker 1: secularis religions like climatism, Covidism, and gender ideology to satisfy
Speaker 1: our need for meaning. Yeah, we can't answer what it
Speaker 1: means to be an American. He emphasized the importance of
Speaker 1: merit and decrying illegal immigration and affirmative action. So he
Speaker 1: described affirmative action as national cancer. So we're seeing the
Speaker 1: pushback to this. So on one side, we have Obama,
Speaker 1: I'm sorry Biden, Obama and Biden pushing us to lay
Speaker 1: down our sovereign tis through globalists, and yet we have
Speaker 1: other people standing up to counter this. No, we need
Speaker 1: to cancel this, We need to push this back. This
Speaker 1: is the This is the volatility at the top before
Speaker 1: the pendulum swings back. Now this is getting massive, as
Speaker 1: you might imagine, massive public support. We can see another
Speaker 1: poll this week that says Americans prefer businesses stay out
Speaker 1: of politics. The majority of general election voters say they
Speaker 1: would prefer to do business with companies that do not
Speaker 1: engage in politics and tolerate viewpoints of employees and customers
Speaker 1: across the board. Hm, who would have thought? Who would
Speaker 1: have thought? The people you and I were tired of this.
Speaker 1: We don't want businesses involved in politics. We don't want
Speaker 1: what Claus Schwab is calling the public private partnership. We
Speaker 1: want businesses like black Rock out. We don't want them
Speaker 1: pushing their agendas on them on us. And we can
Speaker 1: see this. It's happening in polls. We can see the
Speaker 1: rise up of alternative news sources. We can see Jordan's
Speaker 1: Peterson rise and push back. And even Elon Musk this
Speaker 1: week came out and blasted a one world government at
Speaker 1: the World Government Summit. He says, quote, I think we
Speaker 1: want to be a little cautious about being too much
Speaker 1: of a single civilization, because if we're too much of
Speaker 1: a single civilization, then the whole thing may collapse, he said.
Speaker 1: He praised what he called quote civilization diversity. I think
Speaker 1: we want to be a little wary of actually cooperating
Speaker 1: too much. It sounds a little odd, but we want
Speaker 1: to have some amount of civilization diversity so if something
Speaker 1: goes wrong with some sort of part of civilization, that
Speaker 1: the whole thing doesn't collapse, which is exactly what happens.
Speaker 1: You see civilizations rise and fall, and we need to
Speaker 1: have different civilizations that can compete and so we can
Speaker 1: start to see the better way. If you're just tuning in,
Speaker 1: you're listening to the Mark Moss Show, I've been talking
Speaker 1: about the of course, like I talked about it every week,
Speaker 1: the decentralized revolution. How the world is breaking apart right
Speaker 1: before our very eyes, and we're seeing it Russia, Rain,
Speaker 1: in the Middle East, Iran, Israel, we're seeing it with
Speaker 1: China and Taiwan. It's happening, and it's happening fast. That's
Speaker 1: what I got today. I appreciate you listening. Let me
Speaker 1: send me a message, let me know if you're listening,
Speaker 1: and any questions you have. Until next time