WEBVTT - Spicy Margs To Go: WP Next to SXSW

0:00:00.640 --> 0:00:04.360
<v Speaker 1>I'm off my game today. No, you're not. People are

0:00:04.360 --> 0:00:06.200
<v Speaker 1>going to have to start making better content. I think

0:00:06.200 --> 0:00:07.720
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna be talking about this for a long time.

0:00:07.800 --> 0:00:10.800
<v Speaker 1>When you program for everyone, you program for no one.

0:00:10.800 --> 0:00:12.879
<v Speaker 1>I think it's a were purpose driven platform. Like we're

0:00:12.880 --> 0:00:16.200
<v Speaker 1>trying to get to substance? How was that? Are you

0:00:16.239 --> 0:00:19.840
<v Speaker 1>happy with that? This is marketing therapy right now? And

0:00:19.880 --> 0:00:24.400
<v Speaker 1>it really is? What's up? I'm Laura Currency and I'm

0:00:24.400 --> 0:00:28.000
<v Speaker 1>Alexa Kristen. Welcome back to at Landia. Hey everybody. So

0:00:28.120 --> 0:00:33.360
<v Speaker 1>recently Laura, myself and Cam our producer and producer, we're

0:00:33.400 --> 0:00:37.880
<v Speaker 1>down in Keepiskene, Florida for the Washington Post Next conference.

0:00:38.040 --> 0:00:42.120
<v Speaker 1>We did a live recording and UM we had a

0:00:42.120 --> 0:00:44.320
<v Speaker 1>great conversation with some folks there. Yeah, I mean it

0:00:44.400 --> 0:00:47.120
<v Speaker 1>was really interesting to be front and center with Amelia

0:00:47.200 --> 0:00:50.080
<v Speaker 1>Garcia Ruez who is there managing editor, and Jed Hartman,

0:00:50.120 --> 0:00:52.800
<v Speaker 1>who is their chief revenue officer, and get the difference

0:00:52.800 --> 0:00:55.920
<v Speaker 1>in opinion on things like KPIs and the tension that

0:00:55.960 --> 0:01:00.120
<v Speaker 1>exists between brand experience UM for readers and technology. You

0:01:00.160 --> 0:01:02.400
<v Speaker 1>what they're doing to really kind of push the industry

0:01:02.440 --> 0:01:06.240
<v Speaker 1>forward and think differently about uh, new products. So Yeah,

0:01:06.240 --> 0:01:08.600
<v Speaker 1>we had a great time, So thank you Washington Post

0:01:08.680 --> 0:01:11.400
<v Speaker 1>for hosting us and furnishing probably one of the best

0:01:11.400 --> 0:01:14.000
<v Speaker 1>spicy margarita is I think we've had on the show. Yeah,

0:01:14.040 --> 0:01:16.000
<v Speaker 1>we definitely got through the second round the crowd and

0:01:16.000 --> 0:01:17.720
<v Speaker 1>I think they were very excited. I have to say

0:01:18.440 --> 0:01:23.160
<v Speaker 1>Amelio definitely hit the second one quickly. So this weekend

0:01:23.160 --> 0:01:27.120
<v Speaker 1>Atlandia UM coming back off my visit down to one of,

0:01:27.400 --> 0:01:32.240
<v Speaker 1>if not my favorite town outside of the Tri state, Austin, Texas.

0:01:32.360 --> 0:01:34.280
<v Speaker 1>I have to say something about Austin. I was like

0:01:34.360 --> 0:01:37.119
<v Speaker 1>totally skeptical of Austin, and then I went down like

0:01:37.440 --> 0:01:39.960
<v Speaker 1>a couple of years ago to visit friends and I

0:01:40.000 --> 0:01:45.080
<v Speaker 1>went to the Alamo Alamo Drafthouse, Fried Pickles, get them

0:01:45.360 --> 0:01:50.080
<v Speaker 1>watch a movie Crunch. Crunch It's the best thing in Texas. Underrated.

0:01:50.280 --> 0:01:52.480
<v Speaker 1>So I didn't have time to get to the Alamo Drafthouse,

0:01:52.520 --> 0:01:54.800
<v Speaker 1>but I did spend quite a bit of time downtown

0:01:54.840 --> 0:01:59.680
<v Speaker 1>south by Southwest and one of the big winners I saw.

0:01:59.680 --> 0:02:02.720
<v Speaker 1>And another reason why I think brands continue or need

0:02:02.760 --> 0:02:07.480
<v Speaker 1>to continue to show up at these sort of conferences

0:02:09.280 --> 0:02:12.440
<v Speaker 1>right is because it gives people both in the industry

0:02:12.440 --> 0:02:15.480
<v Speaker 1>and from a consumer standpoint, a chance to touch the

0:02:15.520 --> 0:02:20.520
<v Speaker 1>brand in a way that isn't always accessible through day

0:02:20.560 --> 0:02:23.280
<v Speaker 1>to day interaction. I also think to that point, and

0:02:23.320 --> 0:02:25.480
<v Speaker 1>when we were talking about this, when you were down there,

0:02:25.720 --> 0:02:27.960
<v Speaker 1>I had this moment where it was like, so many

0:02:28.040 --> 0:02:30.960
<v Speaker 1>brands actually, if they go down or if they're at

0:02:30.960 --> 0:02:33.639
<v Speaker 1>an event like south By, they actually have the opportunity

0:02:33.760 --> 0:02:36.040
<v Speaker 1>strike out and do something different than they would in

0:02:36.080 --> 0:02:39.320
<v Speaker 1>their full like marketing media mix. Right, it's a chance

0:02:39.320 --> 0:02:42.480
<v Speaker 1>to experiment for sure, and and and truly innovate. I

0:02:42.520 --> 0:02:44.800
<v Speaker 1>remember because we were That's why you said, because I

0:02:44.840 --> 0:02:46.600
<v Speaker 1>was talking to a couple of clients down there. And

0:02:46.639 --> 0:02:48.560
<v Speaker 1>it's funny. It's like, if there's ever a place to

0:02:48.720 --> 0:02:54.760
<v Speaker 1>test whether it's tech, art, science, data like Austin, is

0:02:54.760 --> 0:02:57.400
<v Speaker 1>the place in south By in particular where all of

0:02:57.440 --> 0:02:59.520
<v Speaker 1>those things intersect. So it's like, what do you have

0:02:59.600 --> 0:03:00.960
<v Speaker 1>to lose? You, what do you have to lose? I

0:03:01.000 --> 0:03:03.400
<v Speaker 1>agree with that, and and I love the idea that

0:03:03.400 --> 0:03:06.040
<v Speaker 1>you were talking about. Was like it's tangible, yeah, and

0:03:06.080 --> 0:03:08.000
<v Speaker 1>you can touch it. And so I'll give you a

0:03:08.080 --> 0:03:10.240
<v Speaker 1>list of some of the things that caught my eye

0:03:10.280 --> 0:03:12.519
<v Speaker 1>and and some of the things that I heard um

0:03:12.560 --> 0:03:15.359
<v Speaker 1>at the JW. Marriott that were some fan favorites. So

0:03:15.680 --> 0:03:19.480
<v Speaker 1>American Gods is a show on stars to this enormous bowl,

0:03:19.560 --> 0:03:21.519
<v Speaker 1>like you could not miss this ship. It was a

0:03:21.600 --> 0:03:26.960
<v Speaker 1>huge bull be all. It was a bowl and it

0:03:27.040 --> 0:03:31.440
<v Speaker 1>was a show stopping and arresting UM experience, whereas Prison,

0:03:32.000 --> 0:03:35.640
<v Speaker 1>Prison Break, UM did this escape room that I actually

0:03:35.680 --> 0:03:37.280
<v Speaker 1>didn't have a chance to go through, but a lot

0:03:37.320 --> 0:03:39.960
<v Speaker 1>of my colleagues did and said it was such unique experience.

0:03:40.000 --> 0:03:41.440
<v Speaker 1>You felt like you actually got in and around the

0:03:41.480 --> 0:03:43.440
<v Speaker 1>brand and felt like you were actually on the set,

0:03:43.480 --> 0:03:46.080
<v Speaker 1>which I think is another way to give people a

0:03:46.120 --> 0:03:49.000
<v Speaker 1>different perspective. One that I did get a chance to

0:03:49.040 --> 0:03:51.440
<v Speaker 1>see UM, which is right around the corner from a

0:03:51.440 --> 0:03:53.200
<v Speaker 1>place I actually used to bartend, so I know the

0:03:53.200 --> 0:03:57.400
<v Speaker 1>street very well, they know me well. Was breaking Bads,

0:03:57.480 --> 0:04:02.160
<v Speaker 1>Los Poilos Armanos set and actually two of the actors

0:04:02.200 --> 0:04:06.280
<v Speaker 1>gian Carlos Posito and Bob Auden Kirker Kirk, I'm going

0:04:06.320 --> 0:04:08.720
<v Speaker 1>to mess that up. Thank you actually came by and

0:04:08.760 --> 0:04:11.040
<v Speaker 1>again it's it's this really cool way to and and

0:04:11.120 --> 0:04:14.920
<v Speaker 1>also it's such a low key kick back vibe and

0:04:14.960 --> 0:04:17.120
<v Speaker 1>I think it gives you a chance to see, you know,

0:04:17.160 --> 0:04:20.200
<v Speaker 1>the celebrities getting into it, but again a very non

0:04:20.240 --> 0:04:25.120
<v Speaker 1>Hollywood glamorous because like three years ago, right, it was

0:04:25.200 --> 0:04:30.719
<v Speaker 1>like lines around the corner, celebrities everywhere, but it felt

0:04:30.760 --> 0:04:33.560
<v Speaker 1>like it was more plugged in, like more amped, and

0:04:33.680 --> 0:04:36.880
<v Speaker 1>almost like to a point where it got overamped, you know,

0:04:37.080 --> 0:04:39.080
<v Speaker 1>I feel like we're over the cliff, right, like some

0:04:39.200 --> 0:04:41.520
<v Speaker 1>of the foam has come down on the beer and

0:04:41.560 --> 0:04:44.600
<v Speaker 1>like it's a good drink. Well. I think that the

0:04:44.640 --> 0:04:46.840
<v Speaker 1>stars of south By were actually different this year. It

0:04:46.880 --> 0:04:50.400
<v Speaker 1>was a very politically charged south By UM so Cecil Richards,

0:04:50.400 --> 0:04:53.320
<v Speaker 1>the president Plan Parenthood, was down there talking a lot

0:04:53.400 --> 0:04:55.960
<v Speaker 1>about how tech stands with Planned Parenthood, which I thought

0:04:56.000 --> 0:04:58.560
<v Speaker 1>was really interesting. I did take a picture with her,

0:04:58.680 --> 0:05:02.000
<v Speaker 1>you can see it on her Instagram. A podcast Joe

0:05:02.000 --> 0:05:04.920
<v Speaker 1>Biden gave a huge talk down there relative to healthcare

0:05:05.320 --> 0:05:07.400
<v Speaker 1>camp cancer UM, and I would say the star of

0:05:07.400 --> 0:05:09.800
<v Speaker 1>the show, and I'm not biased because I am a

0:05:09.839 --> 0:05:12.800
<v Speaker 1>resident from New Jersey UM was Corey Booker, who had

0:05:12.800 --> 0:05:15.640
<v Speaker 1>a key note. From what I understand, there was overspill

0:05:16.080 --> 0:05:18.640
<v Speaker 1>that standing room only didn't even have an overspill room

0:05:18.760 --> 0:05:20.360
<v Speaker 1>or overflow. I should say, I'm not talking about me

0:05:20.360 --> 0:05:23.680
<v Speaker 1>and my gene so I think it was interesting to

0:05:23.720 --> 0:05:27.200
<v Speaker 1>see um a political leader come and obviously we've talked

0:05:27.240 --> 0:05:29.680
<v Speaker 1>about politics quite a bit on our show, but all

0:05:29.760 --> 0:05:31.800
<v Speaker 1>these worlds are really starting to blur. I was just

0:05:31.839 --> 0:05:35.880
<v Speaker 1>gonna say, issues causes blending now with tech, and I

0:05:35.880 --> 0:05:39.200
<v Speaker 1>wonder my question to you, was tech as responsive like

0:05:39.240 --> 0:05:43.799
<v Speaker 1>the tech crowd, as responsive to the politicians, the people

0:05:43.920 --> 0:05:45.840
<v Speaker 1>like the n g O s, those types of people

0:05:45.880 --> 0:05:49.120
<v Speaker 1>who showed up. Well, these organizations know that they need them, right,

0:05:49.160 --> 0:05:52.520
<v Speaker 1>They need advancements in tech to help scale their causes.

0:05:52.560 --> 0:05:55.479
<v Speaker 1>But it's always been that way. I also also conversations

0:05:55.520 --> 0:05:57.600
<v Speaker 1>that now tech has to get closer to d C,

0:05:58.040 --> 0:06:00.479
<v Speaker 1>the belt Way, right and I in a way that

0:06:00.520 --> 0:06:03.040
<v Speaker 1>they never have. This is a great kind of place

0:06:03.080 --> 0:06:05.800
<v Speaker 1>for them to me UM. One of the other things

0:06:05.839 --> 0:06:09.200
<v Speaker 1>that was really cool, UH was podcasting, how a presence,

0:06:09.240 --> 0:06:11.960
<v Speaker 1>I think for the first time UM and I think

0:06:12.000 --> 0:06:14.479
<v Speaker 1>they're still talking though about advertising. I mean, their general

0:06:14.520 --> 0:06:17.720
<v Speaker 1>which isn't a bad thing, right and it's early. It's

0:06:17.760 --> 0:06:20.960
<v Speaker 1>early days, is to say listen, brands need to start

0:06:21.200 --> 0:06:25.240
<v Speaker 1>experimenting with podcasting now because it's an easy way in right,

0:06:25.760 --> 0:06:29.240
<v Speaker 1>in branded content, in sure, in advertising, just straight up

0:06:29.279 --> 0:06:31.880
<v Speaker 1>advertising that's not a bad thing, it's a good thing.

0:06:32.520 --> 0:06:35.479
<v Speaker 1>But to get to a really comfortable place where you say,

0:06:35.520 --> 0:06:39.080
<v Speaker 1>wait a second, what's my brand's value in audio in

0:06:39.120 --> 0:06:44.159
<v Speaker 1>these conversational interfaces, when our lives become so programmed, right,

0:06:44.279 --> 0:06:50.400
<v Speaker 1>we tell our Alexa to only order tied. Right, I'm

0:06:50.400 --> 0:06:53.040
<v Speaker 1>not even kidding. So if it is getting there, you say,

0:06:53.200 --> 0:06:55.000
<v Speaker 1>I mean this is a simple example, right, you say,

0:06:55.120 --> 0:06:56.880
<v Speaker 1>only order tied. I don't want to hear about any

0:06:56.880 --> 0:07:00.960
<v Speaker 1>other laundry detergent definitely, And I think again it's it's

0:07:01.000 --> 0:07:04.159
<v Speaker 1>early days. Um. But it was just really exciting to

0:07:04.240 --> 0:07:07.719
<v Speaker 1>see so many great podcasters um, and people in the

0:07:07.760 --> 0:07:11.440
<v Speaker 1>podcast industry down at south By. That was a new one. Um.

0:07:11.480 --> 0:07:13.760
<v Speaker 1>I'll tell you what my favorite. One of my favorite

0:07:13.760 --> 0:07:19.080
<v Speaker 1>consumer things of south By was accessories. Um, everything old

0:07:19.160 --> 0:07:20.760
<v Speaker 1>is new again is something that I feel, like I've

0:07:20.760 --> 0:07:23.720
<v Speaker 1>said on the last two shows, but pins, like straight

0:07:23.800 --> 0:07:26.960
<v Speaker 1>up old school buttons and pins. They've been like they've

0:07:26.960 --> 0:07:30.600
<v Speaker 1>been getting really total nineties nostalgia. But my favorite thing

0:07:30.600 --> 0:07:33.680
<v Speaker 1>I came on with was a customed Jane jacket that

0:07:33.800 --> 0:07:37.080
<v Speaker 1>I designed with the Ladies of Soul Cycle. Um. So

0:07:37.120 --> 0:07:40.600
<v Speaker 1>it was total badass, like skull and crossbones Jeane Jacket

0:07:40.720 --> 0:07:43.240
<v Speaker 1>Levi's hello. I mean I thought it was like it

0:07:43.280 --> 0:07:44.680
<v Speaker 1>was No, it was so. It was not that kind

0:07:44.680 --> 0:07:48.400
<v Speaker 1>of skull cross it was. It was the sole cycle version. Um.

0:07:48.480 --> 0:07:51.920
<v Speaker 1>And they had these three young women who were um

0:07:52.400 --> 0:07:57.280
<v Speaker 1>seams artists and they were hand sewing and stitching these jackets. UM.

0:07:57.320 --> 0:07:59.040
<v Speaker 1>So the back of my jacket if you see a

0:07:59.080 --> 0:08:03.920
<v Speaker 1>girl walking around, you know, I thought about it. Maybe

0:08:03.920 --> 0:08:06.520
<v Speaker 1>that would be the next one. It says savage and

0:08:08.440 --> 0:08:12.560
<v Speaker 1>with some cactus patches. Anyhow, it was a lot of fun.

0:08:12.600 --> 0:08:14.760
<v Speaker 1>I'll tell you who the losers were really quickly. The weather.

0:08:14.880 --> 0:08:17.240
<v Speaker 1>The weather sucked and the weather totally brings down the

0:08:17.320 --> 0:08:18.880
<v Speaker 1>vibe and awesome because you just want to be outside

0:08:18.880 --> 0:08:22.280
<v Speaker 1>and walking around. And rain, which leads to my next

0:08:22.360 --> 0:08:25.320
<v Speaker 1>big loser. Car service apps, so Uber and Lyft for

0:08:25.320 --> 0:08:28.360
<v Speaker 1>those who don't know, is not often UM. So they

0:08:28.400 --> 0:08:30.680
<v Speaker 1>had these two that were I feel like jockeying for

0:08:30.760 --> 0:08:33.319
<v Speaker 1>like the Star of south By from a car service standpoint,

0:08:33.640 --> 0:08:36.800
<v Speaker 1>Fasten and Fair and both of them were failing miserably

0:08:36.800 --> 0:08:39.679
<v Speaker 1>in the rain. UM. And then the last big loser

0:08:40.760 --> 0:08:46.040
<v Speaker 1>were these panels that feel like a redundancy see of

0:08:46.160 --> 0:08:49.520
<v Speaker 1>same The panel, no speaking panels speaking, which is something

0:08:49.559 --> 0:08:51.800
<v Speaker 1>that you and I have talked about. I would definitely

0:08:51.960 --> 0:08:55.480
<v Speaker 1>challenge the industry a bit too, to reimagine putting four

0:08:55.520 --> 0:08:58.640
<v Speaker 1>people up on stools that are definitely look so uncomfortable.

0:08:59.200 --> 0:09:01.040
<v Speaker 1>Like I mean, at the end of the day, you

0:09:01.080 --> 0:09:04.600
<v Speaker 1>need someone to have some point of view on something

0:09:04.640 --> 0:09:07.520
<v Speaker 1>that they've done, and you need some experience, right and

0:09:07.520 --> 0:09:09.679
<v Speaker 1>everyone think it's like how this applies to me in

0:09:09.720 --> 0:09:12.280
<v Speaker 1>the audience? Well, reason for being there. I mean for me,

0:09:12.440 --> 0:09:14.560
<v Speaker 1>what I would love to see is like a redo,

0:09:15.080 --> 0:09:18.480
<v Speaker 1>a different take on the format. Let's just three do

0:09:18.640 --> 0:09:21.080
<v Speaker 1>a different take on the format. I don't have an answer.

0:09:21.240 --> 0:09:22.640
<v Speaker 1>I don't know. We can think about this, I can

0:09:22.720 --> 0:09:26.280
<v Speaker 1>think about it. So I think that all in all,

0:09:26.440 --> 0:09:28.400
<v Speaker 1>you had a good time in south By. You didn't

0:09:28.400 --> 0:09:30.800
<v Speaker 1>have my fried pickles at the Aluma, but that's okay.

0:09:30.840 --> 0:09:32.760
<v Speaker 1>You go down there again. Because you're a hook them girl.

0:09:33.000 --> 0:09:37.280
<v Speaker 1>I am. I am a longhorn hook them Anyway, We're

0:09:37.280 --> 0:09:41.120
<v Speaker 1>going to roll into our live record that we did

0:09:41.240 --> 0:09:44.000
<v Speaker 1>with the Washington Post at the Washington Post next conference

0:09:44.040 --> 0:09:59.840
<v Speaker 1>and key a Biscayne, we'll be right back. Should as

0:09:59.880 --> 0:10:06.520
<v Speaker 1>a about to get so real, so I'm Laura Carenti,

0:10:06.640 --> 0:10:09.800
<v Speaker 1>I'm Alexa Christian and this is Atlandia. So we're super

0:10:09.840 --> 0:10:14.439
<v Speaker 1>excited to have two industry veterans join us today, Amilio

0:10:14.720 --> 0:10:18.360
<v Speaker 1>Garcia Ruez, who is the managing editor of The Washington Post,

0:10:18.840 --> 0:10:21.680
<v Speaker 1>and Jed Hartman, the c r O of the Washington Post.

0:10:22.120 --> 0:10:25.680
<v Speaker 1>So obviously the industry, um guys has been talking a

0:10:25.720 --> 0:10:30.640
<v Speaker 1>lot about your breaking tagline, democracy dies in the darkness.

0:10:30.679 --> 0:10:34.080
<v Speaker 1>Although Amelia, after last night, we're convinced that the darkness

0:10:34.080 --> 0:10:36.360
<v Speaker 1>also brings out the best of democracy after we saw

0:10:36.360 --> 0:10:43.000
<v Speaker 1>you on the dance floor, So yeah, are you going

0:10:43.040 --> 0:10:49.280
<v Speaker 1>to shake it? But we're we're, obviously like everybody here

0:10:49.320 --> 0:10:52.880
<v Speaker 1>with us today at the Washington Post Next Conference, enamored

0:10:52.960 --> 0:10:55.520
<v Speaker 1>with the courage and the bravery it took for a

0:10:55.559 --> 0:10:58.280
<v Speaker 1>hundred and thirty year brand to come out with a tagline.

0:10:58.520 --> 0:11:00.840
<v Speaker 1>And Alexa and I really just want to know why now?

0:11:01.679 --> 0:11:04.880
<v Speaker 1>So why now is has nothing to do with Donald Trump,

0:11:04.920 --> 0:11:08.520
<v Speaker 1>although the timing seems to be that way. We began

0:11:08.640 --> 0:11:12.240
<v Speaker 1>working on tagline branding thing a couple of years ago,

0:11:12.840 --> 0:11:16.920
<v Speaker 1>and newspapers or publishers, i should say, are terrible at

0:11:16.960 --> 0:11:18.600
<v Speaker 1>that sort of thing. We're just not very good at marketing.

0:11:18.640 --> 0:11:20.960
<v Speaker 1>We don't like doing it, and uh, it took us

0:11:21.000 --> 0:11:23.360
<v Speaker 1>a very long time. We had consultants come in, we

0:11:23.400 --> 0:11:25.800
<v Speaker 1>had meeting after meeting after meeting. Jed was a part

0:11:25.800 --> 0:11:28.640
<v Speaker 1>of the process, and we were sort of kind of stuck.

0:11:28.880 --> 0:11:32.280
<v Speaker 1>And eventually we got to this point where Jeff uh

0:11:32.280 --> 0:11:36.160
<v Speaker 1>in conversations with Bob Woodward, the fame journalist, came back

0:11:36.200 --> 0:11:39.000
<v Speaker 1>with this democracy dies in darkness thing. And you know,

0:11:39.280 --> 0:11:42.199
<v Speaker 1>newsrooms in general are very cynical places, so that is

0:11:42.240 --> 0:11:45.440
<v Speaker 1>you can imagine. The first reaction was, oh my god, really,

0:11:45.480 --> 0:11:47.760
<v Speaker 1>what else are you gonna come up with? But as

0:11:47.760 --> 0:11:49.920
<v Speaker 1>it time went on, we all sort of grew closer

0:11:49.920 --> 0:11:52.360
<v Speaker 1>to it. We look at a lot of alternatives, uh,

0:11:52.400 --> 0:11:55.719
<v Speaker 1>and nothing quite fit, and finally we settled on what

0:11:55.760 --> 0:11:57.800
<v Speaker 1>we settled on that came out a couple weeks ago. Yeah,

0:11:57.800 --> 0:11:59.720
<v Speaker 1>I mean, you know, Alexa and I have been talking

0:11:59.760 --> 0:12:01.400
<v Speaker 1>a lot over the last few days since we've been

0:12:01.559 --> 0:12:05.000
<v Speaker 1>down here in Miami, just about obviously the new cycle

0:12:05.040 --> 0:12:07.920
<v Speaker 1>and what um it's brought to the surface, which is

0:12:07.960 --> 0:12:11.960
<v Speaker 1>the credibility of journalism. UM. What we find interesting is

0:12:12.080 --> 0:12:16.960
<v Speaker 1>this kind of tension between scale um versus quality is

0:12:16.960 --> 0:12:19.760
<v Speaker 1>a truly a race to the bottom or is there

0:12:19.840 --> 0:12:22.480
<v Speaker 1>this more important time now than ever to kind of

0:12:22.480 --> 0:12:24.880
<v Speaker 1>separate yourselves from the pack and start thinking about how

0:12:24.880 --> 0:12:27.760
<v Speaker 1>you come to the market from a quality standpoint. Are

0:12:27.840 --> 0:12:30.600
<v Speaker 1>you speaking about a marketer coming from a quality standpoint

0:12:30.720 --> 0:12:34.480
<v Speaker 1>or a publisher? But then how do marketers how do

0:12:34.600 --> 0:12:37.959
<v Speaker 1>marketers spot you right quickly doing that, and how do

0:12:38.080 --> 0:12:43.480
<v Speaker 1>they engage with you doing that? Sure? So I think

0:12:43.559 --> 0:12:46.800
<v Speaker 1>it depends on what a marketer's true goals are with

0:12:46.880 --> 0:12:50.640
<v Speaker 1>the real kpi and not superficial kpi click through those

0:12:50.679 --> 0:12:53.839
<v Speaker 1>are all superficial kpi. No marketers, unless you're an add

0:12:53.840 --> 0:12:56.240
<v Speaker 1>tech company, make money on clickthrough, You make money on

0:12:56.280 --> 0:12:59.760
<v Speaker 1>something else, right, So it depends on your real KPI

0:13:00.760 --> 0:13:04.679
<v Speaker 1>to really leverage Washington Post or other publishers. It's to

0:13:04.760 --> 0:13:08.520
<v Speaker 1>understand what is the audience engaging with, what do they

0:13:08.720 --> 0:13:12.520
<v Speaker 1>on their own organically, and how does that intersect with

0:13:13.000 --> 0:13:16.760
<v Speaker 1>a marketer's objectives and do you look for a sweet

0:13:16.760 --> 0:13:19.560
<v Speaker 1>spot in there and then you capitalize it and it

0:13:19.559 --> 0:13:23.520
<v Speaker 1>which seems so easy, However, it can be very difficult

0:13:24.120 --> 0:13:27.400
<v Speaker 1>for a marketer sometimes to leave a core message to

0:13:27.480 --> 0:13:31.320
<v Speaker 1>get closer to what the publisher is organically engaging their

0:13:31.360 --> 0:13:33.720
<v Speaker 1>audience with So it's looking for that, and it's the

0:13:33.760 --> 0:13:36.840
<v Speaker 1>onus is on us to find that, and the onus

0:13:36.960 --> 0:13:40.680
<v Speaker 1>is on the marketer to look for that. I want

0:13:41.120 --> 0:13:44.440
<v Speaker 1>to want to want that and it Both of those

0:13:44.480 --> 0:13:46.600
<v Speaker 1>things are challenges. We have to find the right intersection

0:13:46.640 --> 0:13:48.559
<v Speaker 1>that, but but the marketers to say I want that intersection.

0:13:48.679 --> 0:13:52.199
<v Speaker 1>I don't want this just us talking about ourselves to

0:13:52.400 --> 0:13:54.280
<v Speaker 1>people who may or may not want to hear that.

0:13:54.320 --> 0:13:56.560
<v Speaker 1>I want to find where it intersects. So the focus

0:13:56.559 --> 0:13:59.480
<v Speaker 1>on technology with Washington Post, to focus on new products

0:13:59.480 --> 0:14:01.840
<v Speaker 1>with Washington tim Post. Has that made it easier to

0:14:02.000 --> 0:14:07.240
<v Speaker 1>get to that engagement metric? Absolutely? How so? I mean

0:14:07.840 --> 0:14:12.160
<v Speaker 1>for many years advertising has been about the marriage of

0:14:12.240 --> 0:14:15.280
<v Speaker 1>art and science. You could look at holding companies, websites.

0:14:16.080 --> 0:14:18.000
<v Speaker 1>It has. I would argue though, that there are many

0:14:18.200 --> 0:14:22.800
<v Speaker 1>new news uh publishers that would say they're leading for

0:14:22.840 --> 0:14:24.880
<v Speaker 1>scale because they're relying on tech. We were having this

0:14:24.920 --> 0:14:27.680
<v Speaker 1>really interesting conversation about the fact that you're tied to

0:14:28.200 --> 0:14:31.120
<v Speaker 1>this rich legacy of investigative journalism that was born out

0:14:31.120 --> 0:14:33.920
<v Speaker 1>of the Beltway. Um, now you've been able to use

0:14:33.960 --> 0:14:36.640
<v Speaker 1>technology to help scale. I actually think that's not even

0:14:36.640 --> 0:14:39.080
<v Speaker 1>giving you enough credit. So this is where I think

0:14:39.120 --> 0:14:42.160
<v Speaker 1>you're not even giving us endit. No, no, like this

0:14:42.160 --> 0:14:43.760
<v Speaker 1>this is the show, right, this is what we do.

0:14:43.840 --> 0:14:46.000
<v Speaker 1>But like, I actually think that you've thought about journalism

0:14:46.000 --> 0:14:50.840
<v Speaker 1>and technology together first. It's what's the experience? Right, I

0:14:50.840 --> 0:14:52.320
<v Speaker 1>think I think you got to go to the evolution

0:14:52.320 --> 0:14:54.360
<v Speaker 1>of this, right, And my team is tired of me

0:14:54.800 --> 0:14:57.200
<v Speaker 1>hearing me say this. But for years, on one side

0:14:57.200 --> 0:15:00.640
<v Speaker 1>of the spectrum, you had the traditional public. Here's the Post,

0:15:00.680 --> 0:15:03.120
<v Speaker 1>the Times, the Wall Street Journal, l A Times are

0:15:03.120 --> 0:15:05.400
<v Speaker 1>over here. And then you had the disruptors come in, right,

0:15:05.440 --> 0:15:09.360
<v Speaker 1>the Huffington Post, buzz Feeds, people like that. And so

0:15:09.480 --> 0:15:11.960
<v Speaker 1>we existed in these sort of parallel universes for a

0:15:11.960 --> 0:15:15.160
<v Speaker 1>while until we began to learn from them the audience

0:15:15.160 --> 0:15:17.880
<v Speaker 1>acquisition techniques that work. So how do you make sure

0:15:17.880 --> 0:15:20.640
<v Speaker 1>your headlines work on Facebook? Your Google search terms are right?

0:15:20.880 --> 0:15:23.440
<v Speaker 1>And all of a sudden, we saw our audiences grow. They,

0:15:23.480 --> 0:15:25.240
<v Speaker 1>on the other hand, decided, we'll wait a minute, we

0:15:25.280 --> 0:15:27.880
<v Speaker 1>need to do more quality. We can't just be only

0:15:27.920 --> 0:15:31.600
<v Speaker 1>about scale, So they began hiring newsrooms. BuzzFeed has a

0:15:31.640 --> 0:15:34.160
<v Speaker 1>pretty large newsroom now, and there is this meeting in

0:15:34.200 --> 0:15:36.840
<v Speaker 1>the middle that is going to happen uh, and that

0:15:37.000 --> 0:15:39.080
<v Speaker 1>is happening now, and I think that's what you're seeing.

0:15:39.400 --> 0:15:42.360
<v Speaker 1>So the reason, the reason we're coming at it from

0:15:42.400 --> 0:15:44.960
<v Speaker 1>a content point is that that's where we started on

0:15:45.000 --> 0:15:47.520
<v Speaker 1>the road. Then we learned the techniques, we added the

0:15:47.520 --> 0:15:50.880
<v Speaker 1>great technology, and we are now sort of ready to rumble.

0:15:51.160 --> 0:15:52.920
<v Speaker 1>On the other side, which you have is people who

0:15:52.920 --> 0:15:55.320
<v Speaker 1>are just now learning the journalism. And you've seen with

0:15:55.480 --> 0:15:58.360
<v Speaker 1>like the problem BuzzFeed had with the UH, with the

0:15:58.440 --> 0:16:02.000
<v Speaker 1>document they chose to make public. Journalism is hard. It's

0:16:02.080 --> 0:16:04.760
<v Speaker 1>just as hard as the technology and the audience audience

0:16:04.760 --> 0:16:10.400
<v Speaker 1>acquisition parts were. But they are and they are the Trump,

0:16:10.520 --> 0:16:13.120
<v Speaker 1>the Trump Dosier, the Yah. Yeah. When they did the

0:16:13.160 --> 0:16:15.720
<v Speaker 1>Trump dossier, they made it public and that was the

0:16:15.760 --> 0:16:18.560
<v Speaker 1>first time you really saw BuzzFeed take big time heat

0:16:18.600 --> 0:16:21.600
<v Speaker 1>for a journalistic decision. Right. So there's a meeting in

0:16:21.640 --> 0:16:24.480
<v Speaker 1>the middle. We're getting closer and closer, and here comes

0:16:24.520 --> 0:16:27.080
<v Speaker 1>the mother of all battles to see who survives. And

0:16:27.240 --> 0:16:29.520
<v Speaker 1>I don't think everybody's gonna be able to survive. I

0:16:29.560 --> 0:16:32.120
<v Speaker 1>think it's the people that have the best technique, audience

0:16:32.160 --> 0:16:36.320
<v Speaker 1>acquisition techniques, the best content and the best technology who

0:16:36.320 --> 0:16:38.640
<v Speaker 1>were going to succeed. And I think that's why Jeff

0:16:38.680 --> 0:16:40.960
<v Speaker 1>believes were so well positioned right now because of the

0:16:41.000 --> 0:16:44.520
<v Speaker 1>three Uh, we think we're the best. Final point is

0:16:44.520 --> 0:16:48.640
<v Speaker 1>if you go back to October, dropped back to October

0:16:48.720 --> 0:16:50.720
<v Speaker 1>and you look at what happened right, this huge story

0:16:50.800 --> 0:16:53.920
<v Speaker 1>was going on in the country, the election was going nuts. Uh,

0:16:53.960 --> 0:16:56.720
<v Speaker 1>and here we are the traditional publishers. And if you

0:16:56.720 --> 0:16:59.600
<v Speaker 1>look at com Score for October, what happened right the

0:16:59.680 --> 0:17:03.560
<v Speaker 1>trade sational publishers, the disrupted actually kick the ass of

0:17:03.640 --> 0:17:08.119
<v Speaker 1>the disruptors. You had US, CNN and The Times leading

0:17:08.240 --> 0:17:12.000
<v Speaker 1>com Score, BuzzFeed and Huffball below. What happened. What happened

0:17:12.080 --> 0:17:15.160
<v Speaker 1>was the story became so important and so big that

0:17:15.160 --> 0:17:16.880
<v Speaker 1>that's what you had to have and we just had

0:17:16.880 --> 0:17:19.760
<v Speaker 1>it better. Alex and I did some homework, um between

0:17:19.960 --> 0:17:22.520
<v Speaker 1>last night and this morning, just about going bring this

0:17:22.640 --> 0:17:25.480
<v Speaker 1>back to the I P. So your partnership with Storied

0:17:25.480 --> 0:17:28.360
<v Speaker 1>Media Group, can you talk about like I P and

0:17:28.440 --> 0:17:32.959
<v Speaker 1>now how it's more important because of technology. So for years,

0:17:33.600 --> 0:17:36.560
<v Speaker 1>if you worked in the newsroom, you had this experience.

0:17:36.720 --> 0:17:40.119
<v Speaker 1>We would write a story and then a the phone

0:17:40.119 --> 0:17:42.200
<v Speaker 1>would ring and it would be somebody claiming to be

0:17:42.240 --> 0:17:46.000
<v Speaker 1>a pulp a producer in Hollywood, and they would say,

0:17:46.000 --> 0:17:48.879
<v Speaker 1>I saw your story on X I would like to

0:17:48.920 --> 0:17:53.640
<v Speaker 1>buy that story. And we all would go, okay, you're

0:17:53.640 --> 0:17:55.480
<v Speaker 1>gonna buy the story. We already wrote the story. What

0:17:55.560 --> 0:17:57.119
<v Speaker 1>do you want to buy the story? And then they

0:17:57.119 --> 0:17:58.600
<v Speaker 1>would say no, no no, we want to do the rights

0:17:58.640 --> 0:18:00.480
<v Speaker 1>to this story. We want to we to make a

0:18:00.560 --> 0:18:02.639
<v Speaker 1>movie or make a TV show out of that. And

0:18:02.640 --> 0:18:06.879
<v Speaker 1>we're like, okay, what are you gonna give us? You know,

0:18:06.920 --> 0:18:09.440
<v Speaker 1>they'd say four dollars and we'd said okay, we'll take

0:18:09.440 --> 0:18:12.120
<v Speaker 1>four dollars. Uh, and that was it and off they went.

0:18:13.080 --> 0:18:15.800
<v Speaker 1>And maybe it got made, maybe it didn't. Maybe they

0:18:15.840 --> 0:18:17.600
<v Speaker 1>reached out to the reporter, or maybe they didn't. It

0:18:17.680 --> 0:18:21.040
<v Speaker 1>just sort of happens. Uh. There was a guy smarter

0:18:21.160 --> 0:18:24.800
<v Speaker 1>than me, unfortunately in Hollywood, had been an agent for

0:18:24.800 --> 0:18:26.400
<v Speaker 1>a long time. We said, wait, wait, wait, every day

0:18:26.480 --> 0:18:30.120
<v Speaker 1>publishers are creating this unbelievable amount of content. I'm gonna

0:18:30.200 --> 0:18:31.840
<v Speaker 1>hire a bunch of people who are gonna sit in

0:18:31.920 --> 0:18:33.919
<v Speaker 1>my office and they're gonna go through all of the

0:18:33.960 --> 0:18:36.639
<v Speaker 1>publisher's content. They're gonna take that content, they're gonna put

0:18:36.640 --> 0:18:40.440
<v Speaker 1>it into a giant database, and they're gonna make the database, uh,

0:18:40.880 --> 0:18:45.200
<v Speaker 1>based on different types of stories. So, uh, story about

0:18:45.320 --> 0:18:48.760
<v Speaker 1>a single woman overcoming long odds, story of trouble family,

0:18:48.880 --> 0:18:51.760
<v Speaker 1>story of refugee, story of whatever. And they're gonna create

0:18:51.800 --> 0:18:54.880
<v Speaker 1>this sort of giant matrix of all the content being

0:18:54.920 --> 0:18:57.439
<v Speaker 1>created in in the country and they're gonna flip it

0:18:57.440 --> 0:18:59.479
<v Speaker 1>and they're gonna say to Hollywood, Hey, you need an

0:18:59.480 --> 0:19:02.520
<v Speaker 1>idea for something, Come on in. Do you think the

0:19:02.600 --> 0:19:04.240
<v Speaker 1>brands have a right to play in that with you?

0:19:05.080 --> 0:19:07.600
<v Speaker 1>Do they have a right to play in it with us?

0:19:07.800 --> 0:19:10.040
<v Speaker 1>I think they do. Ever, I think I think the

0:19:10.080 --> 0:19:11.639
<v Speaker 1>reason I'm up here and the reason I come to

0:19:11.720 --> 0:19:14.199
<v Speaker 1>this event is that we need to explore this right.

0:19:14.200 --> 0:19:17.200
<v Speaker 1>We need to open this dialogue. Uh. So we now

0:19:17.240 --> 0:19:20.240
<v Speaker 1>have this company's representing us in Hollywood, uh, and they

0:19:20.240 --> 0:19:23.840
<v Speaker 1>are going to sell our our stuff. We talked earlier

0:19:23.840 --> 0:19:26.000
<v Speaker 1>about The Butler. The Butler was a story that ran

0:19:26.040 --> 0:19:28.120
<v Speaker 1>in the Washington Post that a producer read that made

0:19:28.160 --> 0:19:30.399
<v Speaker 1>that phone call, and next thing you know, it became

0:19:30.560 --> 0:19:33.720
<v Speaker 1>a movie that I think Oprah did right producing folks.

0:19:33.760 --> 0:19:35.720
<v Speaker 1>So this happens all the time. So what else can

0:19:35.800 --> 0:19:38.879
<v Speaker 1>we do with our i P so that we do

0:19:38.960 --> 0:19:41.800
<v Speaker 1>more than just the one article. Let's try to redefine

0:19:41.840 --> 0:19:44.880
<v Speaker 1>it and let's make it far more effective, sharpened, sharpen

0:19:44.960 --> 0:19:47.640
<v Speaker 1>the sword so that we can hit a specific audience.

0:19:47.760 --> 0:19:49.480
<v Speaker 1>You all can do the same thing with your with

0:19:49.560 --> 0:19:52.120
<v Speaker 1>your branded content. Right instead of trying to put out

0:19:52.119 --> 0:19:55.120
<v Speaker 1>the piece that will appeal to the most people, think

0:19:55.160 --> 0:19:57.399
<v Speaker 1>about it in terms of I'm going to create it

0:19:57.480 --> 0:19:59.480
<v Speaker 1>this way to appeal to these people, this way to

0:19:59.520 --> 0:20:01.879
<v Speaker 1>appeal to the those people, and then put it where

0:20:01.920 --> 0:20:04.160
<v Speaker 1>they are. And if you do those two things that

0:20:04.160 --> 0:20:06.120
<v Speaker 1>that's going to be our strategy going forward. I think

0:20:06.119 --> 0:20:08.360
<v Speaker 1>you'll find a big audience. But how do brands then

0:20:08.880 --> 0:20:11.199
<v Speaker 1>come to you and say, I don't want to just

0:20:11.280 --> 0:20:14.520
<v Speaker 1>do branded content. I don't just want to sponsor something.

0:20:14.720 --> 0:20:16.320
<v Speaker 1>I want to partner with you in a different one.

0:20:16.320 --> 0:20:18.679
<v Speaker 1>I don't just want to I want I want to

0:20:18.680 --> 0:20:21.000
<v Speaker 1>go co produce. What does that look like in this

0:20:21.040 --> 0:20:24.680
<v Speaker 1>new world where i P is focused. It's very difficult.

0:20:25.119 --> 0:20:27.960
<v Speaker 1>Uh And And there is a line between the newsroom

0:20:28.000 --> 0:20:30.720
<v Speaker 1>and advertising, and the line is very simple. We make

0:20:30.760 --> 0:20:34.359
<v Speaker 1>our decisions based on journalistic reasons, not financial reasons. So

0:20:34.520 --> 0:20:37.920
<v Speaker 1>once you get a marketer into that conversation, it can

0:20:37.960 --> 0:20:41.720
<v Speaker 1>become very tricky. Is it impossible. No, We've seen a

0:20:41.720 --> 0:20:43.680
<v Speaker 1>lot of things in the past few years that work fine,

0:20:44.040 --> 0:20:46.800
<v Speaker 1>satisfying both sides of the wall. But you do have

0:20:46.880 --> 0:20:49.720
<v Speaker 1>to be careful, and we need brands and marketers and

0:20:49.760 --> 0:20:52.639
<v Speaker 1>agencies to be respectful of the fact that this is

0:20:52.760 --> 0:20:55.080
<v Speaker 1>what we do, and this is the single most important

0:20:55.119 --> 0:20:58.000
<v Speaker 1>thing in our industry is the fact that we make

0:20:58.040 --> 0:21:01.960
<v Speaker 1>decisions based on journalism. If that were to falter, if

0:21:02.000 --> 0:21:05.200
<v Speaker 1>we were seen as making decisions based for financial reasons

0:21:05.359 --> 0:21:07.800
<v Speaker 1>and doing stories because a marketer wants us to do it,

0:21:07.920 --> 0:21:10.080
<v Speaker 1>our industry has gone in five minutes. What if a

0:21:10.119 --> 0:21:12.440
<v Speaker 1>brand said, listen, I feel like I have I P,

0:21:12.760 --> 0:21:15.040
<v Speaker 1>you have I P. Let's combine. Let's go create a

0:21:15.040 --> 0:21:18.040
<v Speaker 1>product together. So we've tried a couple of different things

0:21:18.680 --> 0:21:21.000
<v Speaker 1>in that space. We like. We love it in the

0:21:21.040 --> 0:21:24.800
<v Speaker 1>hardware space. So if you are a technology company that

0:21:24.800 --> 0:21:27.320
<v Speaker 1>that is building hardware, we'd love to be able to

0:21:27.400 --> 0:21:30.240
<v Speaker 1>take your hardware and then use it for journalistic purposes

0:21:30.240 --> 0:21:33.080
<v Speaker 1>and tell a really cool story. We had a very

0:21:33.119 --> 0:21:38.480
<v Speaker 1>long drawn out conversation with a major hardware producer last year,

0:21:38.520 --> 0:21:43.720
<v Speaker 1>about ten months about actually taking something that they were building,

0:21:44.280 --> 0:21:46.760
<v Speaker 1>taking it to the space station for journalistic reasons and

0:21:46.760 --> 0:21:48.800
<v Speaker 1>being able to tell a story that way that didn't happen,

0:21:49.000 --> 0:21:51.280
<v Speaker 1>didn't quite work out. But I think there are partnership

0:21:51.359 --> 0:21:54.080
<v Speaker 1>opportunities work and work, but we got to be very careful,

0:21:54.600 --> 0:22:00.359
<v Speaker 1>I mean agreement. And I've evolved a lot on this um.

0:22:00.400 --> 0:22:05.240
<v Speaker 1>I've pushed many editors hard on not to say a

0:22:05.320 --> 0:22:08.280
<v Speaker 1>nice thing about a client, but it but and this

0:22:08.359 --> 0:22:11.879
<v Speaker 1>is years ago, not certainly recently, but on topics like

0:22:11.960 --> 0:22:13.600
<v Speaker 1>doesn't it make sense to cover this topic? I have

0:22:13.600 --> 0:22:15.760
<v Speaker 1>a market that wants to sponsor it. Even that is

0:22:15.840 --> 0:22:22.119
<v Speaker 1>dangerous and uh, I would never think to try to

0:22:22.280 --> 0:22:25.920
<v Speaker 1>influence in any way anything that The Washington Post is

0:22:25.920 --> 0:22:29.640
<v Speaker 1>going to do from a journalistic perspective, they I sell

0:22:29.720 --> 0:22:32.840
<v Speaker 1>ads next to their stuff. That's why you have a

0:22:32.880 --> 0:22:35.639
<v Speaker 1>brand studio, and that's why exactly a brand studio. And

0:22:35.760 --> 0:22:38.320
<v Speaker 1>very importantly, it has to be transparent of where the

0:22:38.320 --> 0:22:41.720
<v Speaker 1>content is coming from. It needs to be labeled clearly

0:22:42.000 --> 0:22:44.200
<v Speaker 1>what it is. So this drives us. I also think

0:22:45.760 --> 0:22:48.639
<v Speaker 1>you gotta remember there's a one point of information. The

0:22:48.640 --> 0:22:52.720
<v Speaker 1>biggest complaint we get in the newsroom is when we

0:22:52.800 --> 0:22:58.240
<v Speaker 1>do not label stories correctly as opinion or analysis. This

0:22:58.359 --> 0:23:03.000
<v Speaker 1>drives readers nuts. And we might think that a label

0:23:03.119 --> 0:23:05.800
<v Speaker 1>is a u X negative. I think it actually is

0:23:05.840 --> 0:23:10.960
<v Speaker 1>a u X signal that is helpful, but there has distinction.

0:23:12.320 --> 0:23:15.640
<v Speaker 1>But I know because the focus isn't here's this thing.

0:23:15.640 --> 0:23:18.880
<v Speaker 1>It drives are crazy because that's all there is. Right.

0:23:19.000 --> 0:23:20.760
<v Speaker 1>People are coming to the table and still saying, I

0:23:20.760 --> 0:23:24.240
<v Speaker 1>want a fifty with a label, right, and I'll have

0:23:24.320 --> 0:23:26.640
<v Speaker 1>this this bag. The conversation is that you asked about

0:23:26.720 --> 0:23:28.439
<v Speaker 1>u X yesterday, which I thought was the smart and

0:23:28.440 --> 0:23:31.160
<v Speaker 1>we just talked about this, which is such a smart question,

0:23:31.400 --> 0:23:35.560
<v Speaker 1>and the answer back to you was, Washington Post, we

0:23:35.640 --> 0:23:38.760
<v Speaker 1>need you to lead the way, right, We need you

0:23:38.960 --> 0:23:41.400
<v Speaker 1>to tell us what's available. How do we do this?

0:23:41.960 --> 0:23:45.119
<v Speaker 1>So I think we need to redefine the paradigm. Right.

0:23:45.119 --> 0:23:48.080
<v Speaker 1>We haven't changed the fundamental framework of the article page

0:23:48.400 --> 0:23:54.199
<v Speaker 1>since when the web first started, so we have not

0:23:54.359 --> 0:23:57.360
<v Speaker 1>made that change. But it is a very difficult thing

0:23:57.560 --> 0:24:00.320
<v Speaker 1>for us to change in the newsroom because I can't

0:24:00.640 --> 0:24:03.879
<v Speaker 1>and we we have these conversations where somebody in our

0:24:03.920 --> 0:24:06.280
<v Speaker 1>news room will go to Jed and say, you know what, man,

0:24:06.359 --> 0:24:08.679
<v Speaker 1>this article really looks great. Without any ads on it.

0:24:08.920 --> 0:24:10.840
<v Speaker 1>Can we just take the ads off, take the take

0:24:10.840 --> 0:24:13.320
<v Speaker 1>the banner off, and it would look really cool. Jennal said, well,

0:24:13.359 --> 0:24:15.240
<v Speaker 1>you can't do that that, you know, we we need

0:24:15.280 --> 0:24:19.320
<v Speaker 1>that revenue. So my people get frustrated. He gets frustrated

0:24:19.359 --> 0:24:21.920
<v Speaker 1>about the question. You know, we we missed an amazing

0:24:21.960 --> 0:24:24.960
<v Speaker 1>opportunity with the iPad. In my opinion, that was where

0:24:25.000 --> 0:24:26.920
<v Speaker 1>we all should have said, you know what, stop the ship.

0:24:27.400 --> 0:24:29.640
<v Speaker 1>Let's come up with an entirely new way of doing this.

0:24:30.000 --> 0:24:32.520
<v Speaker 1>Let's not make it feel like an interruption. Let's create

0:24:32.520 --> 0:24:34.280
<v Speaker 1>a whole new flow. And I think we blew it.

0:24:34.520 --> 0:24:37.480
<v Speaker 1>I think there's I think there's more opportunities. There's plenty

0:24:37.520 --> 0:24:41.320
<v Speaker 1>of opportunity, and that's what Jared's team is developing with

0:24:41.440 --> 0:24:44.320
<v Speaker 1>many of the new ad units, that are options for

0:24:44.400 --> 0:24:47.919
<v Speaker 1>marketers that lend to u X, that are light fast

0:24:48.000 --> 0:24:53.440
<v Speaker 1>and and UH capture attention. However, if for some reason,

0:24:53.520 --> 0:24:55.639
<v Speaker 1>if a three two fifty, if an agency and a

0:24:55.720 --> 0:24:58.400
<v Speaker 1>marketer want to invest money in it because it works

0:24:58.400 --> 0:25:01.640
<v Speaker 1>for their business, say I'm not going to tell them

0:25:01.640 --> 0:25:03.960
<v Speaker 1>not to. Now, there is a inherent problem with the

0:25:03.960 --> 0:25:06.919
<v Speaker 1>creation of of digital advertising. It's the only medium that

0:25:07.000 --> 0:25:09.000
<v Speaker 1>was really built on the fraction lad First of all,

0:25:10.440 --> 0:25:13.240
<v Speaker 1>every other medium, a thirty second spot gets the exact

0:25:13.280 --> 0:25:16.280
<v Speaker 1>same palette that the directors of the show gets. Right.

0:25:16.359 --> 0:25:20.040
<v Speaker 1>A magazine, everyone gets the same The editor, the advertiser

0:25:20.080 --> 0:25:22.680
<v Speaker 1>get the same thing. But the advent of the Internet,

0:25:23.200 --> 0:25:25.199
<v Speaker 1>the editors take all the good stuff and what they

0:25:25.240 --> 0:25:27.280
<v Speaker 1>don't want they toss the advertiser, and that's how ads

0:25:27.320 --> 0:25:30.119
<v Speaker 1>were created. And that's a problem. What a lot of

0:25:30.160 --> 0:25:32.879
<v Speaker 1>the issue is is what sits with inside that, what

0:25:32.920 --> 0:25:34.800
<v Speaker 1>you do and what you do with it, and how

0:25:34.960 --> 0:25:40.280
<v Speaker 1>marketers can work with publishers to understand platform by platform technology,

0:25:40.320 --> 0:25:43.679
<v Speaker 1>pike by technology, how they can take the best of

0:25:43.800 --> 0:25:46.560
<v Speaker 1>what they have to bring to an audience with the

0:25:47.280 --> 0:25:49.199
<v Speaker 1>needs and the desires of the people coming to the

0:25:49.280 --> 0:25:52.520
<v Speaker 1>post and create time spent that This is such a

0:25:52.520 --> 0:25:55.680
<v Speaker 1>critical conversation to have now because of the distributed platform's

0:25:55.760 --> 0:25:59.399
<v Speaker 1>right create a great experience. We solved Let's say we

0:25:59.440 --> 0:26:02.560
<v Speaker 1>solve the problem on Washington Post dot com. That's great,

0:26:02.760 --> 0:26:05.600
<v Speaker 1>But when then I send out that article to Apple News,

0:26:05.640 --> 0:26:08.879
<v Speaker 1>to Facebook, Instant, to Google AMP, all those ads get

0:26:08.920 --> 0:26:11.119
<v Speaker 1>stripped away and we're starting the game all over again.

0:26:11.280 --> 0:26:13.440
<v Speaker 1>You know, we had a great conversation with Apple News.

0:26:13.960 --> 0:26:17.040
<v Speaker 1>We were we were creating these beautiful projects and then

0:26:17.080 --> 0:26:18.520
<v Speaker 1>we were sending them to Apple News and they just

0:26:18.560 --> 0:26:21.160
<v Speaker 1>looked like shit. So we went to them and we said,

0:26:21.400 --> 0:26:24.240
<v Speaker 1>look look at look at what you're producing, and look

0:26:24.240 --> 0:26:27.520
<v Speaker 1>at what we're producing. And we expected them to push back.

0:26:27.560 --> 0:26:29.560
<v Speaker 1>We expected them to say, you know, we don't really care.

0:26:29.840 --> 0:26:32.359
<v Speaker 1>We just want the feed of content. We know better

0:26:32.400 --> 0:26:34.959
<v Speaker 1>than you. Apple News said, you know what, come to Cupertino.

0:26:35.119 --> 0:26:37.680
<v Speaker 1>Come to Cuppertino, sit down with our designers, and let's

0:26:37.680 --> 0:26:40.719
<v Speaker 1>try to solve this problem. These are the conversations we

0:26:40.760 --> 0:26:43.760
<v Speaker 1>have to have with the Facebook. You know, Facebook instant

0:26:43.800 --> 0:26:46.280
<v Speaker 1>is great. It's fast, it's fast. It's fast. It's fast

0:26:46.440 --> 0:26:48.560
<v Speaker 1>because the only thing they're loading is the article. They're

0:26:48.560 --> 0:26:50.800
<v Speaker 1>not loading head units. They're not doing all the other

0:26:50.840 --> 0:26:54.000
<v Speaker 1>stuff that actually slows the page down. That's not solving

0:26:54.040 --> 0:26:58.840
<v Speaker 1>the problem. When when you're starting on sorry, go ahead,

0:27:00.040 --> 0:27:04.920
<v Speaker 1>are we filling up glasses here or not? Than you

0:27:05.040 --> 0:27:11.000
<v Speaker 1>look at this servant, take so damn long, Thank you

0:27:11.040 --> 0:27:13.359
<v Speaker 1>so much, thank you, plea, don't let that happen again.

0:27:14.080 --> 0:27:22.680
<v Speaker 1>Could see evaluation season that everybody's list. If you're long,

0:27:22.720 --> 0:27:26.040
<v Speaker 1>if you're starting a business from scratch, you don't have

0:27:26.119 --> 0:27:33.480
<v Speaker 1>certain legacy ties. There's a newspaper company inside legacy digital

0:27:33.520 --> 0:27:35.840
<v Speaker 1>companies and it's called the three fifty right. It's a

0:27:35.840 --> 0:27:40.000
<v Speaker 1>declining legacy medium that you can watch. You can look

0:27:40.000 --> 0:27:42.320
<v Speaker 1>at these enormous digital companies have been around for a

0:27:42.359 --> 0:27:47.040
<v Speaker 1>long time. They're doing great in native social programmatic, but

0:27:47.200 --> 0:27:50.760
<v Speaker 1>their businesses declined. Why because they have this legacy business

0:27:50.840 --> 0:27:53.640
<v Speaker 1>withinside them and it makes it doesn't make it hard.

0:27:53.760 --> 0:27:55.600
<v Speaker 1>You can't just shut it down. You don't want to.

0:27:55.640 --> 0:27:59.360
<v Speaker 1>You want the money. So again, that's what you try

0:27:59.400 --> 0:28:02.040
<v Speaker 1>to improve those units. You try to you try to

0:28:02.160 --> 0:28:07.280
<v Speaker 1>educate your marketing partners. That's a two way conversation. Alexa,

0:28:07.359 --> 0:28:10.680
<v Speaker 1>you hate programmatic, you hate you know these We don't

0:28:10.720 --> 0:28:12.639
<v Speaker 1>have an issue with efficiency. We don't have There are

0:28:12.640 --> 0:28:15.359
<v Speaker 1>certain brands who need scale. They need to get into

0:28:15.359 --> 0:28:19.520
<v Speaker 1>certain places, in certain mindsets and certain behaviors quickly. But

0:28:19.640 --> 0:28:24.320
<v Speaker 1>how we utilize that space has to change. It's also

0:28:24.440 --> 0:28:28.240
<v Speaker 1>we have to ask you for something else. It's it's

0:28:28.240 --> 0:28:31.879
<v Speaker 1>on both of them. No we did, we have to

0:28:31.920 --> 0:28:34.159
<v Speaker 1>ask for something else. And I will tell you that

0:28:34.240 --> 0:28:37.000
<v Speaker 1>some of the best ideas that we have done with

0:28:37.080 --> 0:28:40.800
<v Speaker 1>you guys. Was we came to the table. He said, no, RFP,

0:28:41.400 --> 0:28:43.440
<v Speaker 1>we know what you're good at, right, we have respect

0:28:43.480 --> 0:28:46.719
<v Speaker 1>for who you are. How can we build something together together?

0:28:46.760 --> 0:28:48.960
<v Speaker 1>That's it. It was truly that. And then we would

0:28:49.000 --> 0:28:51.200
<v Speaker 1>sit in a room for hours and just grind it up.

0:28:51.280 --> 0:28:53.160
<v Speaker 1>Grind I mean, just bang on it. I agree with

0:28:53.200 --> 0:28:56.800
<v Speaker 1>everything you guys are saying. It has to be a partnership.

0:28:57.800 --> 0:29:00.959
<v Speaker 1>The important thing is that the brand recognizes that we

0:29:01.000 --> 0:29:05.000
<v Speaker 1>know the audience well and we're gonna make recommendations so

0:29:05.120 --> 0:29:08.560
<v Speaker 1>your content performs best. And that can be very hard

0:29:09.000 --> 0:29:10.920
<v Speaker 1>when if a brand wants to stick to a certain

0:29:10.960 --> 0:29:13.960
<v Speaker 1>type of content and that's what they're they're they're very

0:29:13.960 --> 0:29:18.080
<v Speaker 1>close to that content. But we're saying that may not resonate.

0:29:18.200 --> 0:29:20.040
<v Speaker 1>And then and then there's a KPI to hit. So

0:29:20.120 --> 0:29:22.400
<v Speaker 1>I love. This is My challenge to the both of

0:29:22.440 --> 0:29:24.600
<v Speaker 1>you is to come to the next meeting we have.

0:29:25.080 --> 0:29:27.520
<v Speaker 1>Instead of it being a deck about your calm score,

0:29:27.600 --> 0:29:31.280
<v Speaker 1>reached numbers, the different verticals you have, etcetera. Tell me

0:29:31.360 --> 0:29:34.520
<v Speaker 1>what your audience needs and why I can help that conversation.

0:29:35.440 --> 0:29:37.640
<v Speaker 1>Come with that, you guys, Come with the we're getting

0:29:37.680 --> 0:29:40.160
<v Speaker 1>heads forever the sales and so we do. But you

0:29:40.200 --> 0:29:42.080
<v Speaker 1>have to say, you have to say no when they

0:29:42.320 --> 0:29:45.040
<v Speaker 1>when when people are asking for three, it doesn't say

0:29:47.400 --> 0:29:51.840
<v Speaker 1>but here's what we do. It's yes, that's true. I

0:29:52.120 --> 0:29:56.240
<v Speaker 1>want the IO and and the space is the client's space.

0:29:56.840 --> 0:29:59.760
<v Speaker 1>The space I can recommend. I could say this will

0:29:59.760 --> 0:30:02.160
<v Speaker 1>work better, but if the client wants to run something,

0:30:02.200 --> 0:30:04.160
<v Speaker 1>as long as not offense. I think all clients want

0:30:04.160 --> 0:30:07.320
<v Speaker 1>to know what problems we can solve for our audiences.

0:30:08.680 --> 0:30:10.960
<v Speaker 1>But if the more you understand the audience and what

0:30:11.000 --> 0:30:12.640
<v Speaker 1>their needs are, the better you're going to stand down.

0:30:15.600 --> 0:30:18.080
<v Speaker 1>What is most important to you, guys? Is it having

0:30:18.080 --> 0:30:21.440
<v Speaker 1>the splash and making the impact or respecting the time

0:30:21.760 --> 0:30:24.200
<v Speaker 1>and the needs of maybe the person who didn't want

0:30:24.200 --> 0:30:27.040
<v Speaker 1>to buy a car today. Yeah, I mean, I think

0:30:26.520 --> 0:30:33.320
<v Speaker 1>we can answer, but I want to anybody, anybody that

0:30:33.400 --> 0:30:35.960
<v Speaker 1>has an opinion on that, I think obviously answer. We

0:30:36.000 --> 0:30:38.240
<v Speaker 1>want to respect. We want to respect the reader. We

0:30:38.280 --> 0:30:42.160
<v Speaker 1>want to respect um your editorial relationship with those folks.

0:30:42.280 --> 0:30:45.200
<v Speaker 1>But we want to track what is eventually happening with

0:30:45.240 --> 0:30:47.640
<v Speaker 1>that person. So no, we don't want to have this

0:30:47.720 --> 0:30:51.520
<v Speaker 1>big disruptive experience. Every smart marketer in the world wants

0:30:51.560 --> 0:30:53.960
<v Speaker 1>to get away from that, right and to respect what

0:30:54.000 --> 0:30:55.800
<v Speaker 1>you guys are doing with them. But we need to

0:30:55.840 --> 0:30:58.280
<v Speaker 1>find a way to understand what really is happening. How

0:30:58.320 --> 0:31:00.440
<v Speaker 1>are we connecting with them? If you say, we're not

0:31:00.480 --> 0:31:03.280
<v Speaker 1>making an instant sales, so how are we successful there?

0:31:03.400 --> 0:31:05.280
<v Speaker 1>That's where we really could use you guys work. I

0:31:05.280 --> 0:31:08.120
<v Speaker 1>think that so I would sum that up as attribution, right,

0:31:08.480 --> 0:31:13.040
<v Speaker 1>like we can't we actually so, digital is trackable. Digital

0:31:13.120 --> 0:31:16.280
<v Speaker 1>is traceable. But you ask any brand marketer and you say,

0:31:16.360 --> 0:31:18.760
<v Speaker 1>did this really move the r O? I right, didn't

0:31:18.760 --> 0:31:21.640
<v Speaker 1>move the needle for you. They're gonna hem and haw

0:31:21.800 --> 0:31:24.280
<v Speaker 1>and say, well, we did this, we did this, and

0:31:24.320 --> 0:31:28.840
<v Speaker 1>we found this causal relationship. Am I right? Digital is trackable? Yes,

0:31:29.120 --> 0:31:30.840
<v Speaker 1>And that is a great thing about digital, and it's

0:31:30.840 --> 0:31:33.680
<v Speaker 1>a poor thing about digital. There was a you know,

0:31:33.720 --> 0:31:37.440
<v Speaker 1>I wanted a poor show when I was fifteen. It

0:31:37.560 --> 0:31:39.920
<v Speaker 1>meant something to me. I wanted. I had no money

0:31:39.920 --> 0:31:41.920
<v Speaker 1>and I had no driver's license, two things you need

0:31:42.000 --> 0:31:50.320
<v Speaker 1>the ideal customer. Right, There was no such thing as

0:31:50.360 --> 0:31:54.480
<v Speaker 1>the internet back then. Thirty years later, you got I

0:31:54.520 --> 0:31:57.600
<v Speaker 1>got one, A used one, but I got one. Go

0:31:57.760 --> 0:32:01.600
<v Speaker 1>follow my click stream. It's just not happening. There has

0:32:01.600 --> 0:32:04.240
<v Speaker 1>to be a comfort that some waste is okay to

0:32:04.360 --> 0:32:07.640
<v Speaker 1>develop brand and not everything has to be targeted work

0:32:07.680 --> 0:32:09.920
<v Speaker 1>down the funnel. There has to be some comfort the

0:32:09.920 --> 0:32:11.720
<v Speaker 1>old saying, I know half of my advertising works, I

0:32:11.840 --> 0:32:13.640
<v Speaker 1>just don't know what happened. So I actually when I

0:32:13.680 --> 0:32:17.920
<v Speaker 1>talked to partners, I don't say I have to. I

0:32:17.960 --> 0:32:20.360
<v Speaker 1>do say, Okay, how are we attributing some of this stuff?

0:32:20.360 --> 0:32:21.680
<v Speaker 1>How are we looking at it? But I put the

0:32:21.680 --> 0:32:25.000
<v Speaker 1>onus on me to think about completely different metrics to

0:32:25.080 --> 0:32:27.160
<v Speaker 1>what I'm trying to do. What I'm saying to you

0:32:27.440 --> 0:32:29.880
<v Speaker 1>I think is really interesting is a new conversation with

0:32:29.960 --> 0:32:34.280
<v Speaker 1>publisher and brand to say, think about it, maybe like

0:32:34.400 --> 0:32:38.400
<v Speaker 1>this and we'll see come with us. Right, We're open

0:32:38.440 --> 0:32:41.680
<v Speaker 1>to that conversation. Our article, next project, we will go anywhere.

0:32:41.680 --> 0:32:44.160
<v Speaker 1>We'll go on the road. You know Joey travels well

0:32:44.360 --> 0:32:48.400
<v Speaker 1>only to Miami. Right, it'll have to be a nice place.

0:32:50.320 --> 0:32:53.400
<v Speaker 1>I do think though, that the frustration too is the

0:32:53.440 --> 0:32:56.360
<v Speaker 1>one off solution. So we'll see a solution that you

0:32:56.400 --> 0:32:58.200
<v Speaker 1>guys come up with. Our people in this room are

0:32:58.200 --> 0:33:00.520
<v Speaker 1>really creative, come up with and we're like, this is

0:33:00.560 --> 0:33:02.240
<v Speaker 1>really cool and then we don't see anything like that

0:33:02.280 --> 0:33:04.560
<v Speaker 1>again for months. So maybe I put a challenge out

0:33:04.600 --> 0:33:07.400
<v Speaker 1>to the marketer side of this and the agency side

0:33:07.440 --> 0:33:12.440
<v Speaker 1>of this, because also we run generally generalizing on campaign cycles.

0:33:12.480 --> 0:33:14.880
<v Speaker 1>That's why we're fair weather. When you say I thought

0:33:14.960 --> 0:33:16.840
<v Speaker 1>it was great and then I never saw it again,

0:33:17.040 --> 0:33:19.640
<v Speaker 1>that's right we're doing. So maybe we have to change

0:33:19.640 --> 0:33:23.680
<v Speaker 1>the conversation. We it's about building audience over time and

0:33:23.760 --> 0:33:27.640
<v Speaker 1>having and having consistent relationship. So I think, I mean,

0:33:27.680 --> 0:33:30.200
<v Speaker 1>I take that on for all of us marketers. You

0:33:30.360 --> 0:33:32.480
<v Speaker 1>came up with a with a great ad unit and

0:33:32.520 --> 0:33:35.920
<v Speaker 1>a great idea that ran into campaign. Are there other

0:33:35.960 --> 0:33:37.880
<v Speaker 1>people out just to steal that idea and copy it

0:33:37.920 --> 0:33:39.640
<v Speaker 1>and do it themselves. I hope they do. If it

0:33:39.680 --> 0:33:41.480
<v Speaker 1>were Yeah, I hope they do. I agree with that.

0:33:42.000 --> 0:33:44.080
<v Speaker 1>So rarely do we let you have the last word,

0:33:44.120 --> 0:33:46.800
<v Speaker 1>but we're going to. Um, this is what we call

0:33:46.880 --> 0:33:53.120
<v Speaker 1>the last tweet. Uh, how has technology changed your career

0:33:53.160 --> 0:33:58.800
<v Speaker 1>personally for better or for worse? Okay, let me answer them. Uh,

0:33:58.920 --> 0:34:01.560
<v Speaker 1>it's without a doubt changed it for the better because

0:34:01.560 --> 0:34:06.640
<v Speaker 1>it's so exciting and so fun. Um, it's ever changing

0:34:07.600 --> 0:34:11.759
<v Speaker 1>and there's an unlimited amount of possibilities that you can

0:34:11.800 --> 0:34:15.399
<v Speaker 1>create with it, and so I think because of that,

0:34:15.480 --> 0:34:19.080
<v Speaker 1>you can only be excited about technology and as relates

0:34:19.120 --> 0:34:24.000
<v Speaker 1>to digital UM as opposed to analog UM. What I

0:34:24.000 --> 0:34:28.440
<v Speaker 1>would also say is that it's just well, you can

0:34:28.480 --> 0:34:32.839
<v Speaker 1>you can edit it down. The other thing I would

0:34:32.840 --> 0:34:38.360
<v Speaker 1>say in my next tweet would be alright, go ahead,

0:34:41.000 --> 0:34:44.560
<v Speaker 1>I and I can fix this. Uh. What what I

0:34:44.600 --> 0:34:47.640
<v Speaker 1>would say is, what I would say is that if

0:34:47.680 --> 0:34:51.480
<v Speaker 1>you feel your new school and you're thinking today it

0:34:51.480 --> 0:34:53.359
<v Speaker 1>it's sort of a blank slate Tomorrow, it doesn't mean

0:34:53.360 --> 0:34:56.920
<v Speaker 1>your new school tomorrow. Right, So every day you have

0:34:56.960 --> 0:35:01.120
<v Speaker 1>to you have to keep learning, uh, because that's just true.

0:35:01.200 --> 0:35:02.640
<v Speaker 1>So you can feel like, wow, I'm ahead of the

0:35:02.640 --> 0:35:04.920
<v Speaker 1>curve right now, you can wake up tomorrow and be

0:35:05.040 --> 0:35:07.200
<v Speaker 1>so far behind. Don't stop, get it, get it. You

0:35:07.239 --> 0:35:12.719
<v Speaker 1>could have just said that the fire sign and one

0:35:11.040 --> 0:35:18.880
<v Speaker 1>after the how about you? Uh? So what we do

0:35:18.960 --> 0:35:22.560
<v Speaker 1>is we tell stories. So I'm a storyteller. Technologies to paint. Uh,

0:35:22.719 --> 0:35:25.719
<v Speaker 1>it's the ink, it's the pencil. Uh, it's it's how

0:35:25.760 --> 0:35:29.040
<v Speaker 1>we tell the story. And because the more it devolves

0:35:29.040 --> 0:35:31.440
<v Speaker 1>and the more you embrace the evolution, the more colors

0:35:31.480 --> 0:35:34.279
<v Speaker 1>you have to paint with. It's truly that simple. Thank you.

0:35:34.560 --> 0:35:38.919
<v Speaker 1>I like your palette. Yeah, thank everybody, Thank you had fun,

0:35:40.080 --> 0:35:50.000
<v Speaker 1>Thank you, thank you care awesome. So that was spicy, spicy.

0:35:50.400 --> 0:35:54.840
<v Speaker 1>Third episode, last question, who runs the world? Girls? Girls?

0:35:55.280 --> 0:35:57.719
<v Speaker 1>So at Lanta, I have something really special that I've

0:35:57.719 --> 0:35:59.920
<v Speaker 1>been working on. We're talking about industry events. I'm act

0:36:00.000 --> 0:36:02.080
<v Speaker 1>really working on one with the ladies off she runs

0:36:02.080 --> 0:36:05.200
<v Speaker 1>It dot Org? Who runs it? She runs it to

0:36:05.400 --> 0:36:07.520
<v Speaker 1>put on one of the hottest lineups I've seen in

0:36:07.600 --> 0:36:11.400
<v Speaker 1>quite a long time, featuring women in marketing and advertising,

0:36:11.440 --> 0:36:15.520
<v Speaker 1>talk about everything from communications to experiential data and definitely

0:36:15.800 --> 0:36:18.480
<v Speaker 1>women's content. Check out the lineup on She runs It

0:36:18.560 --> 0:36:21.160
<v Speaker 1>dot Org. Tickets available now. We'll see out there in

0:36:21.200 --> 0:36:23.920
<v Speaker 1>March twenty nine. I'm excited. It's gonna be awesome, amazing.

0:36:24.280 --> 0:36:28.759
<v Speaker 1>But anyhow, here we are Episode three. Make sure you subscribe, download,

0:36:28.800 --> 0:36:31.480
<v Speaker 1>and definitely follow us on at Landia Podcast on Twitter,

0:36:31.560 --> 0:36:34.000
<v Speaker 1>Instagram and Facebook. As always, we'd like to thank our

0:36:34.040 --> 0:36:38.000
<v Speaker 1>family at Panoply, Cameron Drew's, Laura Mayor and Bowers, and

0:36:38.040 --> 0:36:41.279
<v Speaker 1>our secret EP Matt Turk, thanks for joining us this

0:36:41.320 --> 0:36:43.920
<v Speaker 1>weekend at Landia. We'll be back into Tuesdays with an

0:36:43.920 --> 0:36:58.480
<v Speaker 1>all new episode. Bye. Full Disclosure. Our opinions are our own.