WEBVTT - Interview Only w/ Bradley Tusk - Voting On Your Phone Could Be The Future Of Democracy

0:00:00.040 --> 0:00:02.840
<v Speaker 1>It's sponsorship time. But you know what, it's really great

0:00:02.880 --> 0:00:06.040
<v Speaker 1>when you get a sponsor that you already use. And

0:00:06.120 --> 0:00:09.119
<v Speaker 1>guess what. Quint's is something that in the Todd household

0:00:09.200 --> 0:00:10.920
<v Speaker 1>we already go to. Why do we go to Quint's

0:00:10.920 --> 0:00:13.160
<v Speaker 1>Because it's a place you go where you can get

0:00:13.200 --> 0:00:16.680
<v Speaker 1>some really nice clothes without the really expensive prices. And

0:00:17.040 --> 0:00:18.840
<v Speaker 1>one of the things I've been going through is I've

0:00:18.880 --> 0:00:22.120
<v Speaker 1>transitioned from being mister cot and tie guy to wanting

0:00:22.400 --> 0:00:25.360
<v Speaker 1>a little more casual but to look nice doing it.

0:00:25.400 --> 0:00:27.880
<v Speaker 1>Is I've become mister quarter zip guy. Well guess what.

0:00:28.040 --> 0:00:31.920
<v Speaker 1>Guess who's got amazing amounts of quarter zips? It is Quints.

0:00:32.479 --> 0:00:36.000
<v Speaker 1>I have gotten quite a few already from there. The

0:00:36.040 --> 0:00:40.720
<v Speaker 1>stuff's really nice. They have Mongolian cashmere sweaters for fifty dollars.

0:00:40.840 --> 0:00:43.320
<v Speaker 1>I just know, hey, cashmere, that's pretty good. You don't

0:00:43.320 --> 0:00:46.400
<v Speaker 1>normally get that for fifty bucks or less. Italian wool

0:00:46.440 --> 0:00:49.279
<v Speaker 1>coats that look and feel like designer the stuff. I'll

0:00:49.280 --> 0:00:51.160
<v Speaker 1>be honest, right, you look at it online, you think, okay,

0:00:51.200 --> 0:00:52.680
<v Speaker 1>is this really as nice as it looks? Well, when

0:00:52.680 --> 0:00:54.600
<v Speaker 1>I got it, I was like, oh, this is real quality.

0:00:54.680 --> 0:00:57.080
<v Speaker 1>So yeah, I'm going to end up making sure I

0:00:57.120 --> 0:00:59.080
<v Speaker 1>take it to my dry cleaner so I don't screw

0:00:59.080 --> 0:01:01.680
<v Speaker 1>it up when I clean it. But I've been quite

0:01:01.720 --> 0:01:04.840
<v Speaker 1>impressed in Hey, it's holiday season. It is impossible to

0:01:05.080 --> 0:01:08.440
<v Speaker 1>shop for us middle aged men. I know this well.

0:01:08.480 --> 0:01:12.480
<v Speaker 1>Tell your kids, tell your spouses, tell your partners. Try Quints.

0:01:12.720 --> 0:01:14.760
<v Speaker 1>Or if you're trying to figure out what to get

0:01:14.800 --> 0:01:17.839
<v Speaker 1>your adult child, what to get your mom or dad,

0:01:18.000 --> 0:01:20.080
<v Speaker 1>I'm telling you you're going to find something that is

0:01:20.120 --> 0:01:22.840
<v Speaker 1>going to be comfortable for them on Quints. So get

0:01:22.880 --> 0:01:26.600
<v Speaker 1>your wardrobe sorted and your gift list handled with Quints.

0:01:26.720 --> 0:01:29.760
<v Speaker 1>Don't wait. Go to quints dot com slash chuck for

0:01:29.840 --> 0:01:32.360
<v Speaker 1>free shipping on your order and three hundred and sixty

0:01:32.360 --> 0:01:35.000
<v Speaker 1>five day returns now available in Canada as well. That's

0:01:35.120 --> 0:01:40.840
<v Speaker 1>qui nce dot com, slash chuck, free shipping and three

0:01:40.959 --> 0:01:45.360
<v Speaker 1>hundred and sixty five day returns quints dot com slash chuck.

0:01:46.200 --> 0:01:52.680
<v Speaker 1>Use that code. My guest today as someone who's been

0:01:52.680 --> 0:01:56.200
<v Speaker 1>at the center of American politics, business tech uh for

0:01:56.240 --> 0:01:58.720
<v Speaker 1>the better part of a couple of decades, and because

0:01:58.840 --> 0:02:01.880
<v Speaker 1>there's so much happening in the world of business that

0:02:02.000 --> 0:02:06.160
<v Speaker 1>is intersecting with the world of politics, and Washington in

0:02:06.160 --> 0:02:11.360
<v Speaker 1>some ways is becoming an epicenter of business in a

0:02:11.400 --> 0:02:15.040
<v Speaker 1>derivative way, because it's frankly about a whole bunch of

0:02:15.040 --> 0:02:17.520
<v Speaker 1>companies trying to figure out what it takes to keep

0:02:17.600 --> 0:02:21.239
<v Speaker 1>Washington out of their business. But that in itself is

0:02:21.280 --> 0:02:24.679
<v Speaker 1>a big business. So my guest is Bradley Tusk. He's

0:02:24.680 --> 0:02:28.400
<v Speaker 1>a political strategist turned investor. He lives in this world

0:02:28.919 --> 0:02:31.520
<v Speaker 1>in between in a political side. He was the campaign

0:02:31.520 --> 0:02:36.359
<v Speaker 1>manager for Michael Bloomberg. And when Michael Bloomberg decided he

0:02:36.400 --> 0:02:39.079
<v Speaker 1>wanted a third term, which I wonder if in hindsight

0:02:39.160 --> 0:02:41.760
<v Speaker 1>he ever. I want to tell anybody who wants a

0:02:41.800 --> 0:02:45.200
<v Speaker 1>third term, don't do it. Yeah, third terms never go.

0:02:45.960 --> 0:02:47.560
<v Speaker 2>I'm trying. I was trying to sit here and think

0:02:47.600 --> 0:02:48.799
<v Speaker 2>of a good third term.

0:02:48.880 --> 0:02:53.040
<v Speaker 1>There's none, Bradley, there's none. Ask Mario Cuomo whether he

0:02:53.040 --> 0:02:55.720
<v Speaker 1>should have run for a third term. Ask Andrew Cuomo

0:02:55.760 --> 0:02:57.560
<v Speaker 1>whether he should have been thinking about a third term.

0:02:58.200 --> 0:03:01.840
<v Speaker 1>Third term. I Tim Walls is running for a third term.

0:03:01.880 --> 0:03:05.880
<v Speaker 1>I want to say, don't do it. There's no good

0:03:05.960 --> 0:03:09.040
<v Speaker 1>that comes from it. If you've if you've succeeded enough

0:03:09.080 --> 0:03:11.880
<v Speaker 1>that a third term is viable. There's nowhere to go

0:03:11.919 --> 0:03:12.320
<v Speaker 1>but down.

0:03:12.680 --> 0:03:14.959
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. I saw a study once it said that after

0:03:15.080 --> 0:03:18.320
<v Speaker 2>seven years, no matter who the chief executive is, people

0:03:18.320 --> 0:03:21.240
<v Speaker 2>are ready to move on. And that's like every Taco system,

0:03:21.360 --> 0:03:25.440
<v Speaker 2>whether it's a dictator or a mayor or a governor

0:03:25.520 --> 0:03:26.200
<v Speaker 2>or anything else.

0:03:26.480 --> 0:03:28.920
<v Speaker 1>Right, look at our own history. I mean, I'm a believer.

0:03:29.560 --> 0:03:30.960
<v Speaker 1>And this will get to a little bit of our

0:03:30.960 --> 0:03:33.960
<v Speaker 1>conversation here a little bit. But you know, I think

0:03:34.000 --> 0:03:36.800
<v Speaker 1>any Democrat that is still consumed with Trump is sort

0:03:36.800 --> 0:03:40.000
<v Speaker 1>of wasting their time. And I don't mean this. Look Trump,

0:03:40.240 --> 0:03:42.880
<v Speaker 1>there's a lot of things he's doing that you that

0:03:42.960 --> 0:03:45.480
<v Speaker 1>you may that may impact your life, and you've got

0:03:45.480 --> 0:03:47.800
<v Speaker 1>to care about it. I get it, But I don't

0:03:47.800 --> 0:03:50.640
<v Speaker 1>think he's you know, we're about to have a debate

0:03:50.680 --> 0:03:52.600
<v Speaker 1>about what the post Trump world's going to look like.

0:03:52.680 --> 0:03:54.880
<v Speaker 1>And I got to think people need to be focused

0:03:54.880 --> 0:03:57.800
<v Speaker 1>on that because he's been in our lives for a decade.

0:03:58.320 --> 0:04:01.040
<v Speaker 1>And guess what, nobody ever lasts that long. We're at

0:04:01.040 --> 0:04:04.280
<v Speaker 1>the tail end, right, the Reagan Bush eraw basically ended

0:04:04.280 --> 0:04:05.840
<v Speaker 1>with the nineteen ninety tax deal.

0:04:06.240 --> 0:04:06.480
<v Speaker 2>Right.

0:04:06.560 --> 0:04:09.680
<v Speaker 1>You know, Eisenhower lasted, you know, you know, his era

0:04:09.880 --> 0:04:13.040
<v Speaker 1>was about a decade, Kennedy, Johnson a decade, Nixon even

0:04:13.080 --> 0:04:15.440
<v Speaker 1>less than that. I mean, you know, Obama sort of,

0:04:15.640 --> 0:04:18.520
<v Speaker 1>you know, but it just we don't we sort of

0:04:18.560 --> 0:04:20.640
<v Speaker 1>wear out. And if you look at the modern era

0:04:20.720 --> 0:04:23.920
<v Speaker 1>of our presidents going back since World War Two, there's

0:04:23.960 --> 0:04:28.240
<v Speaker 1>a reason that sort of a movement sort of petered

0:04:28.279 --> 0:04:31.120
<v Speaker 1>out right in that eight to ten year mark in

0:04:31.200 --> 0:04:33.960
<v Speaker 1>some form or another, and we're ten years with Trumpere.

0:04:34.720 --> 0:04:39.560
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. Man, I think the question is to me, the

0:04:39.600 --> 0:04:42.880
<v Speaker 2>things that he's doing that will go away when he

0:04:42.960 --> 0:04:46.799
<v Speaker 2>goes away, and the things that he's done that will last,

0:04:47.040 --> 0:04:50.080
<v Speaker 2>of which some might prove to be good, but a

0:04:50.080 --> 0:04:52.320
<v Speaker 2>lot of it might prove to be pretty harmful long

0:04:52.400 --> 0:04:56.080
<v Speaker 2>term the area. And maybe this is where kind of

0:04:56.080 --> 0:04:58.279
<v Speaker 2>my perspective from the business side is a little different

0:04:58.320 --> 0:05:02.919
<v Speaker 2>than the typical person in the political world is I

0:05:02.960 --> 0:05:05.560
<v Speaker 2>don't like all the rule of law stuff, but I

0:05:05.600 --> 0:05:08.480
<v Speaker 2>think that that ends when he ends right. That is

0:05:08.600 --> 0:05:13.240
<v Speaker 2>very much a product of him specifically, Whereas some of

0:05:13.279 --> 0:05:16.920
<v Speaker 2>the steps he's taking around the economy really do worry

0:05:17.000 --> 0:05:20.400
<v Speaker 2>me from a much longer perspective as an investor, because

0:05:20.480 --> 0:05:23.800
<v Speaker 2>if I were China and I said I want to

0:05:23.839 --> 0:05:27.520
<v Speaker 2>put in the Manchurian candidate, and I want to undermine

0:05:27.600 --> 0:05:31.279
<v Speaker 2>the long term strength of the US, our economy, one

0:05:31.320 --> 0:05:33.520
<v Speaker 2>of the things you would really go after. So what

0:05:33.560 --> 0:05:37.120
<v Speaker 2>are the things to me that make our economy unique.

0:05:37.839 --> 0:05:41.480
<v Speaker 2>It's free trade, its intellectual property, it's rule of law,

0:05:41.680 --> 0:05:45.880
<v Speaker 2>it's independent markets, independent data. It is getting the very

0:05:45.920 --> 0:05:52.040
<v Speaker 2>best people through immigration. So a lot of the fundamental

0:05:52.279 --> 0:05:55.719
<v Speaker 2>things that make our economy truly unique, Investing in R

0:05:55.760 --> 0:05:59.240
<v Speaker 2>and D, investing in higher ed, all of that are

0:05:59.279 --> 0:06:02.800
<v Speaker 2>all things that Trump, for whatever reason, has really tried

0:06:02.839 --> 0:06:07.719
<v Speaker 2>to undermine. So I worry more about the impact of

0:06:07.839 --> 0:06:11.320
<v Speaker 2>just taking our strengths and undermining all of them than

0:06:11.480 --> 0:06:14.840
<v Speaker 2>whateverything he has said today that on truth social that

0:06:14.920 --> 0:06:17.120
<v Speaker 2>makes everyone upset. I don't care about that stuff.

0:06:17.560 --> 0:06:19.280
<v Speaker 1>No, I mean, to me, the biggest I've always said

0:06:19.279 --> 0:06:22.119
<v Speaker 1>that there's the presidency. Actually there's three different jobs wrapped

0:06:22.200 --> 0:06:26.920
<v Speaker 1>up in one. You're being elected to lead your party,

0:06:27.279 --> 0:06:30.239
<v Speaker 1>you're being elected to command our armed forces as commander

0:06:30.240 --> 0:06:32.200
<v Speaker 1>in chief, and you're being elected to be leader of

0:06:32.200 --> 0:06:35.480
<v Speaker 1>the free world. And he has chosen not to be

0:06:35.560 --> 0:06:40.240
<v Speaker 1>leader of the free world. And that is something that

0:06:40.680 --> 0:06:43.720
<v Speaker 1>the public doesn't realize is a problem until it's gone.

0:06:44.360 --> 0:06:46.799
<v Speaker 1>It's a very hard in fact, when you tell people

0:06:46.839 --> 0:06:48.360
<v Speaker 1>you want to be leader of the free world, No,

0:06:48.760 --> 0:06:50.440
<v Speaker 1>we don't want that. We don't want to be the

0:06:50.480 --> 0:06:52.280
<v Speaker 1>beat cop. But as I always say, you know, I

0:06:52.320 --> 0:06:54.320
<v Speaker 1>always say when people say I don't want to be

0:06:54.360 --> 0:06:56.919
<v Speaker 1>the world's policeman, I'm like, yeah, but somebody's going to be.

0:06:57.320 --> 0:07:00.560
<v Speaker 1>Would you rather be us or another country? You may

0:07:00.560 --> 0:07:03.040
<v Speaker 1>not want us to be the world's cop, but you're

0:07:03.080 --> 0:07:05.360
<v Speaker 1>not gonna like it if China is right.

0:07:05.440 --> 0:07:08.760
<v Speaker 2>Which then how do you explain the other day him

0:07:09.640 --> 0:07:13.240
<v Speaker 2>sending allowing the Vida to sell you know, the h

0:07:13.320 --> 0:07:17.720
<v Speaker 2>two hundred GPUs to China, right like it? There are

0:07:17.800 --> 0:07:21.120
<v Speaker 2>things that I don't get. So for example, he says that,

0:07:21.240 --> 0:07:28.120
<v Speaker 2>and look if you were a full free trade you know, absolutist, right.

0:07:28.520 --> 0:07:31.520
<v Speaker 2>But then the next day they issue an executive order saying, oh,

0:07:31.560 --> 0:07:34.680
<v Speaker 2>States can't regulate AI because it's a national security issue.

0:07:35.120 --> 0:07:37.280
<v Speaker 2>It can't be an ob security issue. If you just

0:07:37.360 --> 0:07:40.840
<v Speaker 2>took the most valuable thing that your biggest rival would

0:07:40.840 --> 0:07:42.280
<v Speaker 2>want and allow the to go to the.

0:07:43.800 --> 0:07:45.600
<v Speaker 1>Well, let's talk about this is actually the heart of

0:07:45.640 --> 0:07:48.440
<v Speaker 1>the conversation. I want to have which is, you know,

0:07:49.960 --> 0:07:53.920
<v Speaker 1>the business community in general has been frustrated with the

0:07:55.000 --> 0:08:00.160
<v Speaker 1>last two Democratic administrations, sure for too much regular, too

0:08:00.200 --> 0:08:06.400
<v Speaker 1>much regulation, too much red tape, things like this. And

0:08:06.480 --> 0:08:10.840
<v Speaker 1>I get the appeal of, Hey, isn't it great that

0:08:10.920 --> 0:08:13.160
<v Speaker 1>you don't have to have an army of lobbyists on

0:08:13.200 --> 0:08:15.080
<v Speaker 1>Capitol Hill? You just have to go into the Oval

0:08:15.120 --> 0:08:18.640
<v Speaker 1>office write one check or rite you know, or make

0:08:18.720 --> 0:08:22.200
<v Speaker 1>one board seat change whatever. You only have to placate

0:08:22.280 --> 0:08:24.400
<v Speaker 1>one individual as a hell of a lot easier than

0:08:24.440 --> 0:08:28.440
<v Speaker 1>placating you know, thirty members of Congress or ten senators

0:08:28.480 --> 0:08:30.840
<v Speaker 1>and all of that stuff. So I understand the efficiency

0:08:30.880 --> 0:08:37.480
<v Speaker 1>aspect of this, But are we doomed here because business

0:08:37.480 --> 0:08:40.560
<v Speaker 1>such as an easy relationship right now with Trump's version

0:08:40.600 --> 0:08:44.960
<v Speaker 1>of the Republican Party, that they're now going to expect

0:08:45.040 --> 0:08:48.360
<v Speaker 1>this kind of treatment from all politicians going forward. That

0:08:48.480 --> 0:08:51.000
<v Speaker 1>this is something that we can't put back in the bottle.

0:08:51.600 --> 0:08:55.200
<v Speaker 1>And I, you know, I'm sorry, I don't trust the

0:08:55.240 --> 0:08:58.960
<v Speaker 1>tech industry with AI without guardrails, because I saw what

0:08:59.000 --> 0:09:02.720
<v Speaker 1>the tech industry did was social media, which totally destroyed

0:09:02.920 --> 0:09:06.679
<v Speaker 1>our information ecosystem. So yeah, but this is the world

0:09:06.800 --> 0:09:10.400
<v Speaker 1>you live in, and you're navigating, so you tell me, so, I.

0:09:10.360 --> 0:09:15.120
<v Speaker 2>Would say, for me, the efficiency argument probably doesn't work

0:09:16.800 --> 0:09:20.000
<v Speaker 2>because it's it's too risky and too variable. Right, you

0:09:20.040 --> 0:09:24.240
<v Speaker 2>were dealing just with winning the favor of one very

0:09:24.320 --> 0:09:28.200
<v Speaker 2>mercurial person and who seems to a lot of the

0:09:28.280 --> 0:09:31.200
<v Speaker 2>time agree with the last person he spoke to about something,

0:09:31.720 --> 0:09:35.400
<v Speaker 2>and so I don't like the notion of basing an

0:09:35.440 --> 0:09:40.600
<v Speaker 2>investment strategy or regulatory strategy around that. And to me,

0:09:40.679 --> 0:09:44.959
<v Speaker 2>the right analogy is when I have a company that

0:09:45.000 --> 0:09:47.480
<v Speaker 2>I'm investing in that has some sort of new disruptive

0:09:47.600 --> 0:09:51.800
<v Speaker 2>technology that either we're taking on an entrenched interest and

0:09:51.800 --> 0:09:54.960
<v Speaker 2>there's a regulatory fight, or we're cruitting an entirely new

0:09:55.400 --> 0:09:59.840
<v Speaker 2>type of industry AI, crypto, flying cars, whatever, and you

0:09:59.840 --> 0:10:02.960
<v Speaker 2>need to build a regulatory framework. There's often the question

0:10:03.080 --> 0:10:06.080
<v Speaker 2>of do you go federal or do goo state? We

0:10:06.320 --> 0:10:09.800
<v Speaker 2>usually choose to go state by state, which is wildly inefficient. Right,

0:10:09.880 --> 0:10:12.440
<v Speaker 2>we're talking about fifty different bills or whatever it is

0:10:12.480 --> 0:10:14.160
<v Speaker 2>that we rules, whatever it might be that we have

0:10:14.240 --> 0:10:18.559
<v Speaker 2>to create or pass. However I can get outcomes. So

0:10:18.640 --> 0:10:23.600
<v Speaker 2>in twenty fifteen, the House Energy Subcommittee, on a bipartisan

0:10:23.679 --> 0:10:29.920
<v Speaker 2>basis passed unanimously legislation to begin the regulation of autonomous vehicles.

0:10:30.160 --> 0:10:33.560
<v Speaker 2>So right now, the US federal government has done nothing

0:10:34.160 --> 0:10:36.880
<v Speaker 2>to figure out how to regulator deal with self driving

0:10:36.920 --> 0:10:40.800
<v Speaker 2>cars or trucks or anything else. The bill passed the

0:10:40.920 --> 0:10:45.960
<v Speaker 2>subcommittee honesty and has never moved since, nor has federal

0:10:46.040 --> 0:10:50.319
<v Speaker 2>dot issued any sort of rules whatsoever as to how

0:10:50.679 --> 0:10:51.640
<v Speaker 2>this should work.

0:10:52.720 --> 0:10:55.640
<v Speaker 1>This is for presidential administrations.

0:10:54.960 --> 0:10:58.800
<v Speaker 2>Correct, right and at the same time in states that

0:10:58.920 --> 0:11:02.000
<v Speaker 2>you can like or not like any individual states rules

0:11:02.040 --> 0:11:05.920
<v Speaker 2>around autonomous vehicles, but they have them right, and you

0:11:05.960 --> 0:11:09.640
<v Speaker 2>can get to an outcome and even if you don't

0:11:09.640 --> 0:11:12.000
<v Speaker 2>get the president you want in one state, you have

0:11:12.040 --> 0:11:15.199
<v Speaker 2>fifty bytes at the apple. So oftentimes we're looking at

0:11:15.200 --> 0:11:18.680
<v Speaker 2>something and saying, Okay, where do we think is the

0:11:18.760 --> 0:11:22.000
<v Speaker 2>right starting point to launch this thing? Based on partly

0:11:22.040 --> 0:11:25.200
<v Speaker 2>the economics, so the market you know, and evermarally starts

0:11:25.200 --> 0:11:29.000
<v Speaker 2>in California, in New York and Texas, but also from

0:11:29.000 --> 0:11:32.200
<v Speaker 2>a political standpoint, where can we win? Because you know,

0:11:32.360 --> 0:11:34.559
<v Speaker 2>one of the things that when when I invest in

0:11:34.600 --> 0:11:38.200
<v Speaker 2>an early stage tech startup, I genuinely believe that people

0:11:38.240 --> 0:11:40.800
<v Speaker 2>are going to really like the product or the service

0:11:40.920 --> 0:11:44.040
<v Speaker 2>or otherwise I'm not deploying the capital or making the

0:11:44.080 --> 0:11:46.600
<v Speaker 2>investment in the first place, and so like. For example,

0:11:46.640 --> 0:11:48.880
<v Speaker 2>the very first tech company I ever did was Uber,

0:11:49.240 --> 0:11:53.679
<v Speaker 2>starting in twenty eleven. And my view, which was the

0:11:53.720 --> 0:11:57.600
<v Speaker 2>same as Travis's view, was people are really gonna like this,

0:11:58.200 --> 0:12:00.679
<v Speaker 2>So we just need to get this thing up and

0:12:00.760 --> 0:12:04.520
<v Speaker 2>running wherever we can show people how much better it

0:12:04.600 --> 0:12:07.600
<v Speaker 2>is in the taxi system, and then they will fight

0:12:07.679 --> 0:12:10.360
<v Speaker 2>for it. And in every market where we prove it,

0:12:10.360 --> 0:12:13.000
<v Speaker 2>it gets that much easier in the next market. And

0:12:13.000 --> 0:12:14.959
<v Speaker 2>that basically it was a big fight, and it was

0:12:15.000 --> 0:12:17.120
<v Speaker 2>city by city in that case, but it turned out

0:12:17.200 --> 0:12:21.160
<v Speaker 2>to be right. So I generally think the right strategy

0:12:21.160 --> 0:12:24.920
<v Speaker 2>to legalize most technology actually occurs at the unicipal or

0:12:24.960 --> 0:12:26.600
<v Speaker 2>state level, and not in Washington.

0:12:26.880 --> 0:12:29.599
<v Speaker 1>It's always been the I mean, look at the recreational

0:12:29.600 --> 0:12:33.719
<v Speaker 1>marijuana movement, the medical marijuana movement, same sex marriage. Right,

0:12:33.760 --> 0:12:38.720
<v Speaker 1>we've in some ways to create critical mass to convince

0:12:38.800 --> 0:12:41.720
<v Speaker 1>Congress that hey, you should get involved in this, you know,

0:12:42.040 --> 0:12:44.560
<v Speaker 1>having it emanate. I mean, that's the beauty of federalism, right,

0:12:44.600 --> 0:12:46.600
<v Speaker 1>Like that is that is supposed to be the beauty

0:12:46.600 --> 0:12:50.760
<v Speaker 1>of the system, which is why I'm glad to see

0:12:50.760 --> 0:12:55.520
<v Speaker 1>there's bipartisan concern about a moratorium on state regulations with AI,

0:12:56.320 --> 0:13:01.400
<v Speaker 1>and it it is you know that this is I

0:13:01.440 --> 0:13:04.680
<v Speaker 1>think this is where if I were, if I were

0:13:04.760 --> 0:13:09.600
<v Speaker 1>in this industry, I wouldn't want this. I mean, look

0:13:09.600 --> 0:13:12.160
<v Speaker 1>at the public right now. The public approval ratings of

0:13:12.200 --> 0:13:15.960
<v Speaker 1>AI are plummeting. Right we are, compared to the rest

0:13:16.000 --> 0:13:19.080
<v Speaker 1>of the world, more dystopian about AI than most other

0:13:19.360 --> 0:13:23.080
<v Speaker 1>civil societies. I would argue that has a lot to

0:13:23.120 --> 0:13:26.640
<v Speaker 1>do with how involved our polarizing president is with the industry.

0:13:26.920 --> 0:13:29.480
<v Speaker 1>I actually think if he were less involved, there'd be

0:13:29.559 --> 0:13:31.640
<v Speaker 1>fewer doom and gloomers about AI.

0:13:32.120 --> 0:13:35.640
<v Speaker 2>With two caddiats, one is I actually think the political

0:13:35.679 --> 0:13:38.080
<v Speaker 2>tsunami and AI hasn't even hate.

0:13:38.880 --> 0:13:40.720
<v Speaker 1>I agree twenty eight is going to be that. I

0:13:40.760 --> 0:13:44.440
<v Speaker 1>think it's I think the fear I believe the single

0:13:44.480 --> 0:13:46.439
<v Speaker 1>biggest issue in twenty eight, and we'll see it a

0:13:46.480 --> 0:13:48.680
<v Speaker 1>little bit in twenty six. He is going to be

0:13:48.720 --> 0:13:50.520
<v Speaker 1>fear of AI displacement.

0:13:50.080 --> 0:13:54.280
<v Speaker 2>Well displaced on our jobs, combined with so every data

0:13:54.320 --> 0:13:58.920
<v Speaker 2>center requires so much compute and so much energy that

0:13:58.960 --> 0:14:01.800
<v Speaker 2>they're expecting it to consumption to double. We're certainly that

0:14:01.920 --> 0:14:06.599
<v Speaker 2>doubling supply, which means consumers electric builds are going to skyrocket.

0:14:06.720 --> 0:14:08.920
<v Speaker 2>We already saw a little bit of this in Georgia.

0:14:09.880 --> 0:14:13.600
<v Speaker 1>Virginia, I mean Louden County. Man. You know, they were

0:14:13.600 --> 0:14:16.000
<v Speaker 1>making all this money lead some land on data centers.

0:14:16.240 --> 0:14:19.960
<v Speaker 1>It is now like you know, it's a they've declared

0:14:19.960 --> 0:14:20.920
<v Speaker 1>war on data centers.

0:14:21.080 --> 0:14:23.640
<v Speaker 2>I think we're going to see laws passing states this

0:14:23.760 --> 0:14:27.880
<v Speaker 2>year that say that localities cannot issue permits and zoning

0:14:28.080 --> 0:14:31.720
<v Speaker 2>for data centers without proof that there will not be

0:14:31.760 --> 0:14:35.720
<v Speaker 2>a corresponding price increase for consumers and electric bills. And

0:14:35.800 --> 0:14:38.520
<v Speaker 2>so you're right, But we had a world where let's

0:14:38.560 --> 0:14:42.160
<v Speaker 2>say that unemployment and the job numbers today, I think

0:14:42.240 --> 0:14:44.840
<v Speaker 2>further to except that they were valid. Further you know,

0:14:44.920 --> 0:14:49.240
<v Speaker 2>support of this thesis that if job displacement keeps going up,

0:14:49.280 --> 0:14:52.960
<v Speaker 2>and unemployment keeps rising and rising gets even potentially double digits,

0:14:53.600 --> 0:14:57.120
<v Speaker 2>and electric prices keep going up, and because of Tariff's

0:14:57.160 --> 0:15:00.160
<v Speaker 2>other consumer prices keep going up, and you know, only

0:15:00.240 --> 0:15:03.640
<v Speaker 2>five thirty guys like Sam Altman become trillionaires, but the

0:15:03.680 --> 0:15:05.080
<v Speaker 2>rest of the world's you know, that's of the country

0:15:05.080 --> 0:15:08.680
<v Speaker 2>city of eighteen percent unemployment. That's the French revolution man,

0:15:08.800 --> 0:15:13.520
<v Speaker 2>and I don't think either party necessarily understands that or

0:15:13.560 --> 0:15:16.480
<v Speaker 2>sees it coming. I think one, you know, Trump in

0:15:16.520 --> 0:15:19.000
<v Speaker 2>his view is like, doesn't matter. The only goal is

0:15:19.040 --> 0:15:20.680
<v Speaker 2>to get your hands on as much as you can

0:15:20.800 --> 0:15:23.720
<v Speaker 2>before you die. So therefore this at least fits with

0:15:23.800 --> 0:15:28.160
<v Speaker 2>his worldview. Democrats, I don't think have any plan at

0:15:28.160 --> 0:15:29.440
<v Speaker 2>all from one I can tell.

0:15:30.720 --> 0:15:33.560
<v Speaker 1>No, I don't think they do either, and it strikes

0:15:33.600 --> 0:15:38.440
<v Speaker 1>me and I'm curious. Look, I take it you're trying

0:15:38.440 --> 0:15:40.640
<v Speaker 1>to help Democrats be more pro business.

0:15:41.160 --> 0:15:43.720
<v Speaker 2>Yes, I mean, in part because that's how.

0:15:43.640 --> 0:15:45.800
<v Speaker 1>You would describe your you know, your sort of your

0:15:45.800 --> 0:15:47.280
<v Speaker 1>altruistic goals here.

0:15:47.680 --> 0:15:50.160
<v Speaker 2>Often times, and I think, you know, not counting what

0:15:50.200 --> 0:15:52.120
<v Speaker 2>I do out of my foundation, which is totally separate.

0:15:52.120 --> 0:15:55.880
<v Speaker 2>But yeah, and I think oftentimes I feel like, and

0:15:56.560 --> 0:16:01.200
<v Speaker 2>you might appreciate this more than most people. Both sides

0:16:01.440 --> 0:16:04.720
<v Speaker 2>are so dug in that they miss the underlying point. Right.

0:16:04.760 --> 0:16:08.160
<v Speaker 2>So you have these Silicon Valley types who are now

0:16:08.280 --> 0:16:11.720
<v Speaker 2>very powerful Washington a Mark Injuries or someone like that, right,

0:16:11.960 --> 0:16:15.920
<v Speaker 2>and they hate regulation and their Libertarians and that sort

0:16:15.920 --> 0:16:19.960
<v Speaker 2>of sounds great in theory, no rules, but in reality

0:16:20.320 --> 0:16:23.960
<v Speaker 2>you can't build multi multi billion dollar industries. In the

0:16:24.000 --> 0:16:26.600
<v Speaker 2>absence of all structure, you need a certain amount of

0:16:26.960 --> 0:16:30.520
<v Speaker 2>rules and regulation. Crypto, right needs a certain amount of

0:16:30.560 --> 0:16:34.000
<v Speaker 2>regulation to separate the coin basis of the world the

0:16:34.040 --> 0:16:36.920
<v Speaker 2>circles of the world. Companies that I've invested in with

0:16:37.360 --> 0:16:40.120
<v Speaker 2>total scams, right, And because there's a lot of fraud

0:16:40.160 --> 0:16:42.000
<v Speaker 2>in the crypto world, and there's also a lot of

0:16:42.480 --> 0:16:44.880
<v Speaker 2>genuine companies that you can decide whether or not buying

0:16:44.880 --> 0:16:47.400
<v Speaker 2>crypto is a good idea. That's up to the individual.

0:16:48.040 --> 0:16:51.360
<v Speaker 2>But crypto itself only works because there is some level

0:16:51.360 --> 0:16:55.960
<v Speaker 2>of regulation that says this exchange is permissible, this exchange

0:16:56.200 --> 0:16:59.400
<v Speaker 2>is not right, so you need that. But then, on

0:16:59.440 --> 0:17:02.440
<v Speaker 2>the other hand, democrats, by sort of playing to their

0:17:02.520 --> 0:17:06.600
<v Speaker 2>extremes that all capitalism and all wealth is inherently corrupt

0:17:06.640 --> 0:17:10.720
<v Speaker 2>and evil in some way totally missed the point because

0:17:10.800 --> 0:17:14.040
<v Speaker 2>people need to make a living, and people are aspirational

0:17:14.119 --> 0:17:17.200
<v Speaker 2>and want to do well, and so just vilifying everyone

0:17:17.440 --> 0:17:21.480
<v Speaker 2>doesn't work either. And the reality is regulation is neither

0:17:21.520 --> 0:17:25.239
<v Speaker 2>inherently good nor bad. It's how it's applied. Like, let

0:17:25.280 --> 0:17:28.679
<v Speaker 2>me give an example. I was driving once from Santa

0:17:28.720 --> 0:17:31.760
<v Speaker 2>Barbara to Alla, and I'm going down the Pacific Coast Highway,

0:17:32.280 --> 0:17:34.879
<v Speaker 2>and I'm appreciating how beautiful it is, because you'd have

0:17:34.920 --> 0:17:36.639
<v Speaker 2>to be something really wrong with you not to do

0:17:36.720 --> 0:17:39.359
<v Speaker 2>that right. And the thing that hit me was, Okay,

0:17:39.480 --> 0:17:43.000
<v Speaker 2>what I'm seeing is from my car window the ocean.

0:17:43.080 --> 0:17:46.920
<v Speaker 2>The reason why is that they are not gas stations

0:17:47.160 --> 0:17:50.720
<v Speaker 2>and you know, Chipolis and whatever else blocking the view

0:17:51.000 --> 0:17:53.840
<v Speaker 2>because of regulation. So in that case, I would say,

0:17:53.920 --> 0:17:56.760
<v Speaker 2>a good regulation, I didn't get to LA and I

0:17:56.920 --> 0:18:00.760
<v Speaker 2>run into all these homeless encampments. Now again, again that's

0:18:00.800 --> 0:18:04.200
<v Speaker 2>the product of regulation. Bad regulation in that case, those

0:18:04.200 --> 0:18:08.040
<v Speaker 2>are regulations that make constructing affordable housing way too expensive

0:18:08.040 --> 0:18:10.399
<v Speaker 2>and difficult, and people don't have anywhere to live as

0:18:10.440 --> 0:18:14.600
<v Speaker 2>a result. So basically, zoning regulation on the same street

0:18:15.080 --> 0:18:18.119
<v Speaker 2>right resulted in a net positive at one part of

0:18:18.160 --> 0:18:21.760
<v Speaker 2>it and negative in the other. And anyone on either

0:18:21.880 --> 0:18:25.480
<v Speaker 2>side who just declares unilaterally that something is inherently good

0:18:25.560 --> 0:18:27.400
<v Speaker 2>or bad just doesn't understand what they're talking.

0:18:29.119 --> 0:18:32.760
<v Speaker 1>Having good life insurance is incredibly important. I know from

0:18:32.800 --> 0:18:35.880
<v Speaker 1>personal experience. I was sixteen when my father passed away.

0:18:35.920 --> 0:18:38.320
<v Speaker 1>We didn't have any money. He didn't leave us in

0:18:38.359 --> 0:18:43.320
<v Speaker 1>the best shape. My mother, single mother now widow, myself sixteen,

0:18:43.400 --> 0:18:44.800
<v Speaker 1>trying to figure out how am I going to pay

0:18:44.800 --> 0:18:48.080
<v Speaker 1>for college? And lo and behold, my dad had one

0:18:48.160 --> 0:18:51.439
<v Speaker 1>life insurance policy that we found wasn't a lot, but

0:18:51.560 --> 0:18:54.320
<v Speaker 1>it was important at the time, and it's why I

0:18:54.440 --> 0:18:57.600
<v Speaker 1>was able to go to college. Little did he know

0:18:57.760 --> 0:19:01.760
<v Speaker 1>how important that would be in that well, guess what.

0:19:02.080 --> 0:19:04.640
<v Speaker 1>That's why I am here to tell you about Ethos Life.

0:19:05.000 --> 0:19:07.360
<v Speaker 1>They can provide you with peace of mind knowing your

0:19:07.400 --> 0:19:11.040
<v Speaker 1>family is protected even if the worst comes to pass.

0:19:11.040 --> 0:19:14.320
<v Speaker 1>Ethos is an online platform that makes getting life insurance

0:19:14.320 --> 0:19:17.439
<v Speaker 1>fast and easy, all designed to protect your family's future

0:19:17.480 --> 0:19:21.000
<v Speaker 1>in minutes, not months. There's no complicated process, and it's

0:19:21.119 --> 0:19:25.320
<v Speaker 1>one hundred percent online. There's no medical exam require you

0:19:25.400 --> 0:19:27.880
<v Speaker 1>just answer a few health questions online. You can get

0:19:27.880 --> 0:19:29.639
<v Speaker 1>a quote in as little as ten minutes, and you

0:19:29.680 --> 0:19:33.359
<v Speaker 1>can get same day coverage without ever leaving your home.

0:19:34.080 --> 0:19:35.959
<v Speaker 1>You can get up to three million dollars in coverage,

0:19:36.000 --> 0:19:38.000
<v Speaker 1>and some policies start as low as two dollars a

0:19:38.119 --> 0:19:41.399
<v Speaker 1>day that would be billed monthly. As of March twenty

0:19:41.400 --> 0:19:44.399
<v Speaker 1>twenty five, Business Insider named Ethos the number one no

0:19:44.520 --> 0:19:48.919
<v Speaker 1>medical exam instant life insurance provider. So protect your family

0:19:49.440 --> 0:19:52.239
<v Speaker 1>with life insurance from Ethos. Get your free quote at

0:19:52.240 --> 0:19:56.520
<v Speaker 1>ethos dot com slash chuck. So again that's Ethos dot

0:19:56.520 --> 0:20:01.720
<v Speaker 1>com slash chuck. Application times vary and the rates themselves

0:20:01.720 --> 0:20:04.639
<v Speaker 1>may vary as well, but trust me, life insurance is

0:20:04.680 --> 0:20:07.640
<v Speaker 1>something you should really think about, especially if you've got

0:20:07.640 --> 0:20:14.000
<v Speaker 1>a growing family. You know, it's funny, I keep it

0:20:14.240 --> 0:20:18.000
<v Speaker 1>feels as if the Democrats are looking for the twenty

0:20:18.040 --> 0:20:21.600
<v Speaker 1>first century version of Bill Clinton, who who struck this

0:20:21.760 --> 0:20:25.240
<v Speaker 1>balance right now. He did it out of necessity. Democrats

0:20:25.280 --> 0:20:29.359
<v Speaker 1>had lost three straight presidential elections, all of them were blowouts.

0:20:30.080 --> 0:20:32.600
<v Speaker 1>It was sort of you kind of had to have

0:20:32.680 --> 0:20:36.959
<v Speaker 1>a Democrat who acknowledged at that point in time. And

0:20:37.000 --> 0:20:38.600
<v Speaker 1>I have a friend of mine who we argue, is

0:20:38.600 --> 0:20:41.800
<v Speaker 1>the country center right or are the institutions center right right?

0:20:41.880 --> 0:20:45.640
<v Speaker 1>The constitution sort of arguably gives the minority a bit.

0:20:45.760 --> 0:20:49.960
<v Speaker 1>You know, you could our rules give the current structure

0:20:50.359 --> 0:20:52.760
<v Speaker 1>the right side of the spectrum has more advantages. I

0:20:52.760 --> 0:20:55.760
<v Speaker 1>could argue fifty years ago that same structure gave sort

0:20:55.800 --> 0:21:00.720
<v Speaker 1>of the Democrats a little bit more. But at some

0:21:00.800 --> 0:21:04.000
<v Speaker 1>point that is the structure that we live under. But

0:21:04.040 --> 0:21:07.280
<v Speaker 1>Bill Clinton sort of you know want, Hey, we should

0:21:07.320 --> 0:21:13.199
<v Speaker 1>have a rules based, opportunity focused society, right like you know,

0:21:13.359 --> 0:21:18.040
<v Speaker 1>should be fair, equal access and opportunity, and I remember

0:21:18.359 --> 0:21:23.600
<v Speaker 1>responsibility and opportunity, right, that balance between the two. I

0:21:23.880 --> 0:21:26.400
<v Speaker 1>guess you know. I could say Obama tried to get

0:21:26.400 --> 0:21:28.720
<v Speaker 1>that messaging, and he was better about it by twenty eleven,

0:21:28.800 --> 0:21:32.119
<v Speaker 1>twenty twelve. Frankly out of necessity, right he was. He

0:21:32.160 --> 0:21:35.080
<v Speaker 1>had a tough reelection, and he borrowed more of the

0:21:35.080 --> 0:21:38.080
<v Speaker 1>Bill Clinton language or the Teddy Roosevelt language of the

0:21:38.080 --> 0:21:41.720
<v Speaker 1>Square Deal things like that. It seems as if we

0:21:41.880 --> 0:21:45.760
<v Speaker 1>just haven't found the politician to meet the moment that

0:21:45.760 --> 0:21:47.920
<v Speaker 1>we're in. I think we all know them. We want

0:21:47.920 --> 0:21:51.840
<v Speaker 1>to be both aspirational but with a I think we

0:21:51.880 --> 0:21:54.719
<v Speaker 1>want a stronger safety net, and we haven't figured out

0:21:54.760 --> 0:21:57.800
<v Speaker 1>how to. Donald Trump said, hey, I can do both,

0:21:58.359 --> 0:22:00.800
<v Speaker 1>but he couldn't. Right, he doesn't really have the He

0:22:00.840 --> 0:22:04.320
<v Speaker 1>doesn't really have a political party behind him that actually

0:22:04.359 --> 0:22:08.560
<v Speaker 1>wants to do both. And I think there are those

0:22:08.600 --> 0:22:11.159
<v Speaker 1>in the Business Committee that don't believe the left wants

0:22:11.160 --> 0:22:15.440
<v Speaker 1>to create what you said, a society that allows for wealth,

0:22:15.760 --> 0:22:18.400
<v Speaker 1>right right, Yes, they want the strong social safety net.

0:22:18.720 --> 0:22:21.960
<v Speaker 1>So with Ultimately, what we really want is strong safety

0:22:22.040 --> 0:22:24.560
<v Speaker 1>net and a realistic path.

0:22:25.119 --> 0:22:27.159
<v Speaker 2>And look, it's harder stand the other day, right, So,

0:22:27.320 --> 0:22:31.520
<v Speaker 2>capitalism as a system, to me, I think almost just

0:22:31.560 --> 0:22:35.080
<v Speaker 2>incontrovertibly is the greatest system ever created because if you

0:22:35.119 --> 0:22:37.280
<v Speaker 2>look at the last eighty years since World War Two,

0:22:37.960 --> 0:22:41.520
<v Speaker 2>three billion people who were living in extreme poverty now

0:22:41.600 --> 0:22:45.840
<v Speaker 2>have clean drinking water and electricity and less infant mortality

0:22:45.840 --> 0:22:48.520
<v Speaker 2>and longer life expectancy in higher literacy. You know all

0:22:48.560 --> 0:22:51.480
<v Speaker 2>those stats, right, So unquestioningly none of that happens without

0:22:51.480 --> 0:22:57.840
<v Speaker 2>globalization and capitalism. Capitalism, when taken into its full logical extreme,

0:22:57.880 --> 0:22:59.600
<v Speaker 2>which is kind of what we tend to have here,

0:23:01.280 --> 0:23:04.240
<v Speaker 2>often results in a lot of unhappiness and a lot

0:23:04.280 --> 0:23:07.680
<v Speaker 2>of people who are frustrated with the system. Because if

0:23:07.680 --> 0:23:12.760
<v Speaker 2>the only ultimate goal to be successful and happy is

0:23:12.800 --> 0:23:16.960
<v Speaker 2>to accumulate as much status and wealth as possible by definition,

0:23:17.080 --> 0:23:19.320
<v Speaker 2>ninety nine percent of people can't be in the one percent,

0:23:19.400 --> 0:23:22.760
<v Speaker 2>and those ninety nine percent are upset. So then you

0:23:22.760 --> 0:23:24.760
<v Speaker 2>look at it say, okay, well does Finland or someone

0:23:24.840 --> 0:23:27.199
<v Speaker 2>have it right, because it's capitalism, but with a much

0:23:27.200 --> 0:23:30.960
<v Speaker 2>stronger social safety net, like you said, so, yes, people

0:23:31.000 --> 0:23:33.119
<v Speaker 2>there if you look at say the World Happiness Report,

0:23:33.240 --> 0:23:37.480
<v Speaker 2>are exponentially happier because both they feel compelled to need

0:23:37.680 --> 0:23:40.920
<v Speaker 2>less and they have more on the on the floor.

0:23:41.560 --> 0:23:44.439
<v Speaker 2>But when you look at the last thirty years or

0:23:44.440 --> 0:23:46.800
<v Speaker 2>so and look at all of the innovation in the

0:23:46.840 --> 0:23:49.960
<v Speaker 2>world that has emerged, basically none of it has come

0:23:49.960 --> 0:23:52.679
<v Speaker 2>from Europe right other than Spotify, and there's not a

0:23:52.840 --> 0:23:56.440
<v Speaker 2>giant tech company that's been invented. So if you were

0:23:56.480 --> 0:23:59.399
<v Speaker 2>to say, Okay, the US will be Scandinavia, as the

0:23:59.480 --> 0:24:02.879
<v Speaker 2>Left I think would like to see the case, yes,

0:24:03.240 --> 0:24:06.000
<v Speaker 2>you will have a higher floor for people, and I

0:24:06.119 --> 0:24:08.679
<v Speaker 2>believe in that. But at the same time, there is

0:24:08.800 --> 0:24:12.600
<v Speaker 2>something about our system that is incredibly unique and that

0:24:12.800 --> 0:24:16.880
<v Speaker 2>encourages the kind of innovation that has lifted the billions

0:24:16.920 --> 0:24:20.119
<v Speaker 2>of extremely poor people that in theory the lefts you

0:24:20.240 --> 0:24:22.720
<v Speaker 2>care about the most out of poverty.

0:24:22.840 --> 0:24:25.040
<v Speaker 1>Well, I do think I'm one of those who believes

0:24:25.080 --> 0:24:28.760
<v Speaker 1>it's because we're a nation and immigrants that we that

0:24:28.880 --> 0:24:32.040
<v Speaker 1>if we if we have I think what you're I

0:24:32.080 --> 0:24:34.439
<v Speaker 1>think we could we would already be Scandinavia if we

0:24:34.440 --> 0:24:39.000
<v Speaker 1>weren't continuing to have fairly open doors, meaning if we

0:24:39.000 --> 0:24:42.639
<v Speaker 1>weren't importing more people who want it, who are looking

0:24:42.680 --> 0:24:45.679
<v Speaker 1>for the American dream. Like in some ways third and

0:24:45.720 --> 0:24:49.480
<v Speaker 1>fourth generation Americans are more satisfied than first and second

0:24:49.520 --> 0:24:50.360
<v Speaker 1>generation of Americas.

0:24:50.400 --> 0:24:53.399
<v Speaker 2>So would you say then that, let's say we have

0:24:53.560 --> 0:24:58.840
<v Speaker 2>so I would argue, which have exponentially higher legal immigration? Right,

0:25:00.119 --> 0:25:02.480
<v Speaker 2>perfect world. You know who was at the quotas the

0:25:02.520 --> 0:25:05.159
<v Speaker 2>Bureau of Labor Stistics, because they would say, okay, the

0:25:05.200 --> 0:25:07.240
<v Speaker 2>construction industry has this whole.

0:25:07.200 --> 0:25:10.040
<v Speaker 1>Hospitality this by the way, along with the Social Security

0:25:10.200 --> 0:25:16.399
<v Speaker 1>Administration where because we need new workers to fund Social Security, correct, right.

0:25:16.320 --> 0:25:18.960
<v Speaker 2>You need tens of millions potentially of people. And that's

0:25:18.960 --> 0:25:22.040
<v Speaker 2>not at all exclusive with having strong borders. But the

0:25:22.119 --> 0:25:25.280
<v Speaker 2>question is if we said we're going to keep bringing

0:25:25.280 --> 0:25:27.560
<v Speaker 2>in the greatest talent from all over the world, and

0:25:27.640 --> 0:25:29.720
<v Speaker 2>if we do that, we're always going to have the

0:25:29.800 --> 0:25:31.840
<v Speaker 2>kind of innovation we need because those are I'm a

0:25:31.880 --> 0:25:34.080
<v Speaker 2>first generation America and I know I was raised in

0:25:34.080 --> 0:25:35.840
<v Speaker 2>an immigrant house, so I know exactly what this is.

0:25:35.840 --> 0:25:38.080
<v Speaker 1>You like, right, right, It's always like you were I

0:25:38.119 --> 0:25:40.359
<v Speaker 1>mean education. First look, I grew up in Miami, an

0:25:40.359 --> 0:25:45.000
<v Speaker 1>immigrant community where it was just you felt it all around.

0:25:45.040 --> 0:25:49.159
<v Speaker 1>Everybody in that community even frankly, even the domestic you know,

0:25:49.240 --> 0:25:53.160
<v Speaker 1>even those second third generation Americans like myself. You moved

0:25:53.160 --> 0:25:56.040
<v Speaker 1>to Miami for opportunity. Nobody was a native of there.

0:25:56.080 --> 0:25:58.240
<v Speaker 1>You were there for opportunities. So it had it had

0:25:58.240 --> 0:26:01.160
<v Speaker 1>an immigrants mentality, which means it hustlers. Everybody hustle.

0:26:01.200 --> 0:26:04.480
<v Speaker 2>So let's say that we really increase that, which again

0:26:04.520 --> 0:26:06.359
<v Speaker 2>does not in any way have to me not having

0:26:06.359 --> 0:26:08.560
<v Speaker 2>strong border security. They're not mutual exclusive at all. But

0:26:08.640 --> 0:26:10.520
<v Speaker 2>let's say that we said we are going to radically

0:26:10.520 --> 0:26:13.600
<v Speaker 2>increase legal immigration so that the people who are the

0:26:13.640 --> 0:26:17.200
<v Speaker 2>hustlers are constantly coming in. Right, if you did that,

0:26:17.600 --> 0:26:20.119
<v Speaker 2>could you have the kind of social safety net that

0:26:20.119 --> 0:26:26.240
<v Speaker 2>Scandinavia has without deterring the innovation that America has because

0:26:26.280 --> 0:26:29.960
<v Speaker 2>that combination of the new people constantly coming in takes

0:26:29.960 --> 0:26:30.920
<v Speaker 2>care of that problem.

0:26:32.480 --> 0:26:34.359
<v Speaker 1>Well, it depends on when you make them eligible for

0:26:34.400 --> 0:26:35.000
<v Speaker 1>the safety net.

0:26:35.040 --> 0:26:37.080
<v Speaker 2>Now, right, Oh, fair point.

0:26:37.800 --> 0:26:41.280
<v Speaker 1>And I think you and I think this is what

0:26:41.680 --> 0:26:44.119
<v Speaker 1>I'm what we're talking about here. Some people would say,

0:26:44.119 --> 0:26:45.760
<v Speaker 1>as heartless, what do you mean you wouldn't make the

0:26:45.800 --> 0:26:50.440
<v Speaker 1>safety net available for the immediate first gen family at

0:26:50.440 --> 0:26:52.480
<v Speaker 1>the same You know, I but I think that would

0:26:52.520 --> 0:26:55.000
<v Speaker 1>be a debate, and I think that's a fair political

0:26:55.000 --> 0:26:58.040
<v Speaker 1>debate to have. Is I don't think when should somebody

0:26:58.080 --> 0:27:01.480
<v Speaker 1>be eligible for the social safety net in the United States?

0:27:01.520 --> 0:27:03.760
<v Speaker 1>You know, you certainly need to become the citizen, right,

0:27:03.840 --> 0:27:06.200
<v Speaker 1>I think that that's a fair that's a fair bar.

0:27:06.320 --> 0:27:08.160
<v Speaker 1>You have to do the work to be a citizen.

0:27:08.320 --> 0:27:10.240
<v Speaker 1>You have to proact. Now, I'll tell you this. I

0:27:10.240 --> 0:27:12.640
<v Speaker 1>remember this great George W. Bush quote when he used

0:27:12.680 --> 0:27:14.800
<v Speaker 1>to talk about people coming over there. He goes, anybody

0:27:14.880 --> 0:27:18.359
<v Speaker 1>that's going to go over is going to fight the

0:27:18.520 --> 0:27:23.439
<v Speaker 1>environmental elements to get across the Rio Grande River. I

0:27:23.440 --> 0:27:25.440
<v Speaker 1>want them in America. Yeah, because they're going to be

0:27:25.440 --> 0:27:26.040
<v Speaker 1>great workers.

0:27:26.200 --> 0:27:28.520
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, that's totally hart. Well, look, do you remember when

0:27:30.560 --> 0:27:33.920
<v Speaker 2>Eric Adams all these migrants showed up in New York

0:27:33.960 --> 0:27:37.760
<v Speaker 2>City and Eric Adams made the decision that New York

0:27:37.760 --> 0:27:41.040
<v Speaker 2>City would house and feed everyone. Even though I am

0:27:41.200 --> 0:27:44.480
<v Speaker 2>wildly promegration and our first generation American, I thought that

0:27:44.640 --> 0:27:47.480
<v Speaker 2>was crazy for two reasons. One, so they didn't have

0:27:47.480 --> 0:27:49.520
<v Speaker 2>the money to do that. It came to the expense

0:27:49.600 --> 0:27:53.200
<v Speaker 2>of sanitation and police and schools and everything else. But two,

0:27:54.920 --> 0:27:58.760
<v Speaker 2>my family, your family, you know, millions of families have

0:27:58.920 --> 0:28:00.960
<v Speaker 2>come here, and what there are asking for is not

0:28:01.320 --> 0:28:04.040
<v Speaker 2>free housing or free food. What they're asking for is

0:28:04.160 --> 0:28:07.719
<v Speaker 2>the opportunity to work and to make a living. And

0:28:07.760 --> 0:28:09.840
<v Speaker 2>I don't think you needed to provide that because I

0:28:09.840 --> 0:28:12.200
<v Speaker 2>think people would have gone to where the jobs were.

0:28:12.520 --> 0:28:14.160
<v Speaker 2>Some might be in New York City, a lot might

0:28:14.160 --> 0:28:16.880
<v Speaker 2>be at meat packing plants in Iowa or something like that.

0:28:16.880 --> 0:28:20.720
<v Speaker 2>That's fine, right, But I don't think you even necessarily

0:28:20.840 --> 0:28:23.359
<v Speaker 2>need to at the beginning, because the truth is, most

0:28:23.359 --> 0:28:26.760
<v Speaker 2>immigrants just want to work, and the economy has a

0:28:26.800 --> 0:28:29.199
<v Speaker 2>lot of holes of jobs that are needed to be

0:28:29.200 --> 0:28:31.679
<v Speaker 2>filled that most Americans don't want to do. And so

0:28:31.800 --> 0:28:34.280
<v Speaker 2>I think the problem kind of solves itself if you

0:28:34.440 --> 0:28:35.439
<v Speaker 2>just let it happen.

0:28:36.480 --> 0:28:38.480
<v Speaker 1>No, I mean, it's by the way, it's been true

0:28:38.480 --> 0:28:43.280
<v Speaker 1>if you fought, you know before, if you look at

0:28:43.320 --> 0:28:47.520
<v Speaker 1>the immigration patterns at the border pre say twenty fifteen, okay,

0:28:47.560 --> 0:28:51.200
<v Speaker 1>and we've had some different surges for different reasons, I

0:28:51.200 --> 0:28:54.240
<v Speaker 1>would argue since then, but it usually went if we

0:28:54.360 --> 0:28:57.320
<v Speaker 1>had a lot of ope, but if our economy was humming,

0:28:57.600 --> 0:28:59.880
<v Speaker 1>there were more people at the border. If our economy

0:29:00.080 --> 0:29:02.880
<v Speaker 1>and humming, there were fewer people at the border. I mean,

0:29:03.160 --> 0:29:05.360
<v Speaker 1>you know, if you thought you could find work in

0:29:05.400 --> 0:29:07.560
<v Speaker 1>the United States, you came. If you didn't think you

0:29:07.600 --> 0:29:09.960
<v Speaker 1>could find work, you weren't going to risk your life to.

0:29:09.920 --> 0:29:13.240
<v Speaker 2>Come, right, right, Yeah, I think that that's I think

0:29:13.240 --> 0:29:16.160
<v Speaker 2>that that's right, and I think I mean, it seems

0:29:16.320 --> 0:29:20.360
<v Speaker 2>like it's a puzzle, right, which is, if you accept

0:29:20.720 --> 0:29:25.080
<v Speaker 2>that most people want others to do well right now,

0:29:25.240 --> 0:29:27.720
<v Speaker 2>some of us have easier some mentality where literally we

0:29:27.840 --> 0:29:30.280
<v Speaker 2>believe that if you win, that means that I lose,

0:29:30.320 --> 0:29:33.160
<v Speaker 2>and I think the president has that mentality quite frankly.

0:29:33.520 --> 0:29:38.640
<v Speaker 2>But overall, what we're really talking about is enough resources,

0:29:38.920 --> 0:29:42.640
<v Speaker 2>enough of a social statety, and enough opportunity and balancing

0:29:42.680 --> 0:29:45.400
<v Speaker 2>it so that it's fair so that people aren't starving.

0:29:45.520 --> 0:29:47.400
<v Speaker 2>And yet we are still innovating and creating.

0:29:48.040 --> 0:29:50.760
<v Speaker 1>So let me go back to sort of the premise

0:29:50.840 --> 0:29:53.440
<v Speaker 1>that I that I really want you to deal with,

0:29:53.480 --> 0:29:58.240
<v Speaker 1>which is, is the business community going to see the

0:29:58.480 --> 0:30:01.600
<v Speaker 1>Trump way of doing things and not want to risk

0:30:01.680 --> 0:30:05.000
<v Speaker 1>of going back And basically, look, you brought up crypto.

0:30:06.440 --> 0:30:09.880
<v Speaker 1>Whatever you think of crypto, the industry decided, hey man,

0:30:09.920 --> 0:30:12.600
<v Speaker 1>we're tired of waiting to convince the left on this.

0:30:13.040 --> 0:30:19.240
<v Speaker 1>We're just going to buy supporters, right. You know, Look,

0:30:19.240 --> 0:30:21.280
<v Speaker 1>they're not the first industry to decide to do that,

0:30:21.920 --> 0:30:24.560
<v Speaker 1>but it was kind of it's kind of gross just

0:30:24.640 --> 0:30:27.600
<v Speaker 1>looking at it from my perspective, You're like, I don't

0:30:27.800 --> 0:30:31.160
<v Speaker 1>we're not making We didn't create that. That Genius Act

0:30:31.240 --> 0:30:33.400
<v Speaker 1>didn't pass because we thought it was a good idea.

0:30:33.440 --> 0:30:39.160
<v Speaker 1>It passed because they bought enough politicians. I could argue, okay,

0:30:39.240 --> 0:30:41.440
<v Speaker 1>and we can we can have a we can we can.

0:30:42.280 --> 0:30:48.520
<v Speaker 1>You know, I am pro blockchain, less convinced on the

0:30:48.640 --> 0:30:53.240
<v Speaker 1>value of of of of the of the coins themselves,

0:30:53.240 --> 0:30:56.880
<v Speaker 1>but I accept the pre tokenization I get right like,

0:30:56.960 --> 0:30:59.640
<v Speaker 1>I'm I find myself. I'm in I'm in the middle

0:30:59.640 --> 0:31:04.240
<v Speaker 1>on this. I worry that the value scam on one hand,

0:31:04.400 --> 0:31:07.320
<v Speaker 1>to get rich quick scheme part of it, versus the

0:31:07.400 --> 0:31:10.360
<v Speaker 1>blockchain and all of that, which is a different type

0:31:10.360 --> 0:31:14.880
<v Speaker 1>of technology. But if I look at if I'm an

0:31:15.160 --> 0:31:17.400
<v Speaker 1>upstart industry in any sort, and I look at what

0:31:17.520 --> 0:31:22.040
<v Speaker 1>crypto pulled off, why do I want to risk the

0:31:22.080 --> 0:31:24.200
<v Speaker 1>other party coming in, who is just at the end

0:31:24.200 --> 0:31:25.920
<v Speaker 1>of the day going to be more bureaucratic.

0:31:26.480 --> 0:31:29.800
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, well, but flipping around depends on the industry right.

0:31:29.840 --> 0:31:33.680
<v Speaker 2>So if you are the solar and wind energy industry,

0:31:33.880 --> 0:31:36.560
<v Speaker 2>you feel exactly the opposite. Right. You felt like under

0:31:36.640 --> 0:31:40.280
<v Speaker 2>the Democrats you had the kind of regulatory structure, the

0:31:40.320 --> 0:31:42.760
<v Speaker 2>kind of tax credits, the grants, everything else that you

0:31:43.080 --> 0:31:46.200
<v Speaker 2>wanted and needed, and Trump came away and came in

0:31:46.240 --> 0:31:46.960
<v Speaker 2>and threw the big viewery.

0:31:47.080 --> 0:31:49.719
<v Speaker 1>I hear you. But should any industry be basically at

0:31:49.760 --> 0:31:51.560
<v Speaker 1>the whims of which party wins?

0:31:52.240 --> 0:31:55.440
<v Speaker 2>I mean, to a certain extent, that is the point

0:31:55.440 --> 0:31:59.560
<v Speaker 2>of democracy, right. I think the bigger question really becomes

0:32:00.120 --> 0:32:03.959
<v Speaker 2>who's making the decisions? And to me, the real problem

0:32:04.000 --> 0:32:07.320
<v Speaker 2>is a structure one in that if you accept that

0:32:07.520 --> 0:32:11.280
<v Speaker 2>in a world of gerrymandering, only the primary matters ninety

0:32:11.280 --> 0:32:13.600
<v Speaker 2>plus percent of the time, and Stat's proved that out.

0:32:13.920 --> 0:32:16.120
<v Speaker 2>And if you look at primary turnout, which is typically

0:32:16.160 --> 0:32:19.880
<v Speaker 2>about ten to fifteen percent, and those voters are typically

0:32:19.880 --> 0:32:22.440
<v Speaker 2>the extremes, either the far right or the far left,

0:32:22.760 --> 0:32:24.880
<v Speaker 2>or different special interests that can move money and votes,

0:32:24.920 --> 0:32:27.800
<v Speaker 2>whether it's fair Shake doing Crypto or the teachers unions

0:32:27.880 --> 0:32:30.640
<v Speaker 2>or whoever it might be. And if you accept that

0:32:30.680 --> 0:32:33.920
<v Speaker 2>politicians will always do whatever it takes to get re elected,

0:32:34.400 --> 0:32:37.240
<v Speaker 2>then by definition they're governing for that ten percent on

0:32:37.360 --> 0:32:40.400
<v Speaker 2>each side to the exclusion of everyone else. And I

0:32:40.440 --> 0:32:43.680
<v Speaker 2>actually think, you know, if you sat most people down,

0:32:44.080 --> 0:32:46.240
<v Speaker 2>you could get eighty percent of people to agree on

0:32:46.280 --> 0:32:49.320
<v Speaker 2>a framework to solve almost every single problem we have.

0:32:49.960 --> 0:32:53.320
<v Speaker 2>But those people don't vote in primary, so they're disenfranchised.

0:32:53.320 --> 0:32:56.360
<v Speaker 2>So one thing that I've been trying to do with

0:32:56.680 --> 0:32:59.320
<v Speaker 2>you know, I didn't I can to grow up a

0:32:59.320 --> 0:33:01.760
<v Speaker 2>lot of money. We're in government. I didn't make much money.

0:33:02.160 --> 0:33:04.160
<v Speaker 2>Then I went into tack and I did pretty well,

0:33:04.240 --> 0:33:06.840
<v Speaker 2>and so I've been given it away is to try

0:33:06.840 --> 0:33:10.000
<v Speaker 2>to make mobile voting happen, because to me, you're only

0:33:10.040 --> 0:33:12.760
<v Speaker 2>going to get primary turnout from ten to say thirty

0:33:12.840 --> 0:33:15.760
<v Speaker 2>or forty by meeting the people where they are. Will

0:33:15.800 --> 0:33:18.000
<v Speaker 2>people take off from work and line up to vote

0:33:18.040 --> 0:33:20.920
<v Speaker 2>for president, yes, But will they do that for city council,

0:33:20.960 --> 0:33:24.560
<v Speaker 2>state rep, state Senate. No, they don't. And as a result,

0:33:24.560 --> 0:33:26.720
<v Speaker 2>and that, by the way, even congressional primaries have a

0:33:26.760 --> 0:33:28.920
<v Speaker 2>ten percent primary, you know, have ten percent turnout rate.

0:33:29.160 --> 0:33:32.640
<v Speaker 2>So and yet close to one hundred percent of us

0:33:32.640 --> 0:33:35.480
<v Speaker 2>have phones. We live our lives on our phones, our banking,

0:33:35.520 --> 0:33:38.200
<v Speaker 2>our healthcare, our love, lives, all this other stuff, and

0:33:38.280 --> 0:33:40.800
<v Speaker 2>if we were able to allow people to vote securely

0:33:40.840 --> 0:33:43.720
<v Speaker 2>on their phones, we could get turnout from ten to

0:33:43.760 --> 0:33:46.360
<v Speaker 2>say thirty, and then all of a sudden, I'm not

0:33:46.400 --> 0:33:49.200
<v Speaker 2>sure that any one industry is at much risk of

0:33:49.240 --> 0:33:52.880
<v Speaker 2>the whims of a party because it's not being decided

0:33:53.280 --> 0:33:55.680
<v Speaker 2>just by the extremes that either hate Crypto or hate

0:33:55.760 --> 0:33:57.160
<v Speaker 2>gran energy or whatever it is.

0:33:57.600 --> 0:34:00.480
<v Speaker 1>Well, I just had somebody on as a guest who's

0:34:00.520 --> 0:34:03.239
<v Speaker 1>been advocating getting rid of partisan primaries, and I kind

0:34:03.280 --> 0:34:07.560
<v Speaker 1>of think that it's pretty clear it is. I put

0:34:07.600 --> 0:34:10.720
<v Speaker 1>it this way, I don't see how a taxpayer funded

0:34:10.760 --> 0:34:15.760
<v Speaker 1>primary is constitutional. The idea that I think it's actually

0:34:15.800 --> 0:34:16.600
<v Speaker 1>a poll tax.

0:34:16.920 --> 0:34:17.080
<v Speaker 2>Right.

0:34:17.360 --> 0:34:19.280
<v Speaker 1>If I tell you the only way you could participate

0:34:19.320 --> 0:34:22.520
<v Speaker 1>in this primary is you join a private club and

0:34:22.640 --> 0:34:26.120
<v Speaker 1>you could participate in this taxpayer funded election. That's that

0:34:26.239 --> 0:34:29.680
<v Speaker 1>seems you know, give where the where are my goddamn

0:34:29.719 --> 0:34:30.279
<v Speaker 1>lawyers here?

0:34:30.320 --> 0:34:32.640
<v Speaker 2>Come on, I'm an independent living in New York City

0:34:32.640 --> 0:34:33.960
<v Speaker 2>and my vote does not count.

0:34:34.200 --> 0:34:37.040
<v Speaker 1>Well, and that's just that doesn't make It's like, what

0:34:37.080 --> 0:34:40.000
<v Speaker 1>are we doing, especially when you look at this youngest

0:34:40.040 --> 0:34:44.040
<v Speaker 1>generation and they're registering as independent or no party at

0:34:44.080 --> 0:34:46.080
<v Speaker 1>a greater rate than either of the two major parties.

0:34:46.080 --> 0:34:51.040
<v Speaker 1>So I do think this might actually fix itself, meaning

0:34:51.600 --> 0:34:56.160
<v Speaker 1>a majority of people plurality would prefer a non party

0:34:56.239 --> 0:34:58.399
<v Speaker 1>you know, sort of, Hey, I want to I want

0:34:58.400 --> 0:35:02.320
<v Speaker 1>to decide, right, we're we're actually all libertarian, you know,

0:35:02.400 --> 0:35:06.080
<v Speaker 1>the whole idea of America's libertarian. You know, I would,

0:35:06.120 --> 0:35:09.080
<v Speaker 1>I would, I would argue. So I think we're getting there.

0:35:09.880 --> 0:35:15.600
<v Speaker 1>But on mobile voting, you know, when you look at

0:35:15.760 --> 0:35:19.399
<v Speaker 1>mobile technology through the prism of our banking system, yep,

0:35:20.400 --> 0:35:25.200
<v Speaker 1>it's really secure right now. The times that it's not, Like,

0:35:25.239 --> 0:35:27.200
<v Speaker 1>there's nothing I hate more than when a credit card

0:35:27.200 --> 0:35:29.920
<v Speaker 1>company tells me, hey, you've got to change your number.

0:35:30.200 --> 0:35:32.600
<v Speaker 1>We're doing this for your purposes. No, you're not. You're

0:35:32.600 --> 0:35:34.879
<v Speaker 1>doing it for your purpose. Like I just hate being

0:35:35.000 --> 0:35:38.239
<v Speaker 1>lied to about that. Like it's like no, no, no, no, And

0:35:38.280 --> 0:35:41.000
<v Speaker 1>I even tell them, stop reading your script. You're not

0:35:41.080 --> 0:35:43.080
<v Speaker 1>doing it for my benefit. You're doing it for your benefit.

0:35:43.840 --> 0:35:48.920
<v Speaker 1>But let's you know, let's figure this out. You have

0:35:49.000 --> 0:35:51.480
<v Speaker 1>a You're going to have a hard time convincing the

0:35:51.520 --> 0:35:57.480
<v Speaker 1>public that because cyber criminal activity exists when it comes

0:35:57.480 --> 0:36:01.800
<v Speaker 1>to scamming people out of crypto or scamming people based

0:36:01.840 --> 0:36:05.520
<v Speaker 1>on you know, a text message they get and they

0:36:05.520 --> 0:36:08.520
<v Speaker 1>click the wrong link, that they're going to have a

0:36:08.520 --> 0:36:13.760
<v Speaker 1>hard time believing that the voting is going to be secure.

0:36:13.880 --> 0:36:14.759
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I mean, I.

0:36:14.760 --> 0:36:16.640
<v Speaker 1>Just think psyched the psyche.

0:36:17.320 --> 0:36:20.359
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I think that's right. The polling doesn't quite show that.

0:36:20.400 --> 0:36:25.200
<v Speaker 2>What's interesting is so before twenty twenty, we polled nationally

0:36:25.560 --> 0:36:29.279
<v Speaker 2>and about seventy five percent of Republicans, Democrats, Independence all

0:36:29.320 --> 0:36:32.240
<v Speaker 2>said if mobile voting is secure, of course we should

0:36:32.280 --> 0:36:36.120
<v Speaker 2>have it. Right after twenty twenty, we pulled again, stayed

0:36:36.160 --> 0:36:39.120
<v Speaker 2>in the mid seventies with Independence, and Democrats fell to

0:36:39.160 --> 0:36:42.040
<v Speaker 2>the forties with Republicans because of all the doubt cast

0:36:42.120 --> 0:36:45.760
<v Speaker 2>on the twenty twenty election. So, to me, the solution

0:36:45.920 --> 0:36:47.600
<v Speaker 2>to that, and this is what we're working on right

0:36:47.640 --> 0:36:49.960
<v Speaker 2>now by to start running legislation in seven states to

0:36:50.040 --> 0:36:54.640
<v Speaker 2>do this is to allow start with local elections and

0:36:54.760 --> 0:36:58.240
<v Speaker 2>let cities choose to opt in to offer mobile voting

0:36:58.320 --> 0:37:02.799
<v Speaker 2>as one form of voting for council, school board, may

0:37:02.880 --> 0:37:05.800
<v Speaker 2>or things like that. So Anchorage is the first city

0:37:05.840 --> 0:37:07.360
<v Speaker 2>that's going to do this. They're going to do it

0:37:07.360 --> 0:37:11.160
<v Speaker 2>in their April municipal elections and then if we pass

0:37:11.239 --> 0:37:14.280
<v Speaker 2>our bills in these different states that would allow cities

0:37:14.320 --> 0:37:16.680
<v Speaker 2>to choose to opt in if they want to, to

0:37:16.840 --> 0:37:19.640
<v Speaker 2>offer it for local elections only, and then let's see

0:37:19.640 --> 0:37:22.160
<v Speaker 2>how it goes. If people use it and it works

0:37:22.200 --> 0:37:24.840
<v Speaker 2>and they develop trust, we can move up the ladder

0:37:24.840 --> 0:37:27.759
<v Speaker 2>to state and then maybe one day federal. If not,

0:37:27.880 --> 0:37:30.439
<v Speaker 2>then then we don't. But I think we have enough.

0:37:30.880 --> 0:37:33.400
<v Speaker 2>You can start locally enough to sort of experiment a

0:37:33.440 --> 0:37:33.839
<v Speaker 2>little bit.

0:37:34.440 --> 0:37:36.920
<v Speaker 1>What's your So give me some of the tech, the

0:37:36.920 --> 0:37:38.719
<v Speaker 1>security things is it?

0:37:38.760 --> 0:37:40.520
<v Speaker 2>Here's how it would work. Location?

0:37:40.840 --> 0:37:41.360
<v Speaker 1>What would it be?

0:37:41.880 --> 0:37:44.480
<v Speaker 2>So you would go on the app store. You live

0:37:44.480 --> 0:37:46.640
<v Speaker 2>in Arlington. So let's just say for purposes, you would

0:37:46.640 --> 0:37:49.600
<v Speaker 2>download the Arlington Board of Elections app and the first

0:37:49.600 --> 0:37:51.759
<v Speaker 2>thing would say, okay to someone named Chuck Todd, really

0:37:51.800 --> 0:37:54.680
<v Speaker 2>live in Arlington? Who's registered voter? Last four digits of

0:37:54.680 --> 0:37:57.319
<v Speaker 2>your social your address? Okay, now we know that there's

0:37:57.360 --> 0:38:00.200
<v Speaker 2>a voter named Chuck Todd in Arlington, but are you

0:38:00.239 --> 0:38:03.880
<v Speaker 2>really that person? So first thing is multi factor authentications.

0:38:03.920 --> 0:38:06.080
<v Speaker 2>That's like when you figet your password, they send your code,

0:38:06.080 --> 0:38:09.200
<v Speaker 2>you put it in the app. Then biometric screening so

0:38:09.239 --> 0:38:11.520
<v Speaker 2>they matt scan your face, match it up against your

0:38:11.560 --> 0:38:14.480
<v Speaker 2>driver's license or whatever idea you have. Now we know

0:38:14.560 --> 0:38:17.760
<v Speaker 2>this is really Chuck Todd. Ballot comes up on your screen.

0:38:18.320 --> 0:38:21.360
<v Speaker 2>Ballot is as simple and straightforward as can be. Whenever

0:38:21.480 --> 0:38:24.400
<v Speaker 2>you're done and you're ready to submit, three things happen.

0:38:24.640 --> 0:38:27.880
<v Speaker 2>Your ballots encrypted, your ballots anonymized, and you get a

0:38:27.920 --> 0:38:30.879
<v Speaker 2>tracking code, goes back to the Board of Elections. They

0:38:30.920 --> 0:38:33.959
<v Speaker 2>air gap it, which just mean they take it offline

0:38:34.160 --> 0:38:36.400
<v Speaker 2>once your ballot is on a flash drive and not

0:38:36.440 --> 0:38:39.960
<v Speaker 2>connected to the Internet. Then they decrypt it. A paper

0:38:40.000 --> 0:38:42.439
<v Speaker 2>copy of your ballot gets printed out. That gets mixed

0:38:42.440 --> 0:38:44.960
<v Speaker 2>in with all the other ballots. You can see where

0:38:44.960 --> 0:38:47.319
<v Speaker 2>your ballot stands because the tracking code will show you

0:38:47.360 --> 0:38:51.000
<v Speaker 2>it was received, tabulated, printed, and so on. And then

0:38:51.040 --> 0:38:54.200
<v Speaker 2>the underlying code itself is open source. So we've spent

0:38:54.280 --> 0:38:57.320
<v Speaker 2>the last five years building this thing out of my foundation.

0:38:58.080 --> 0:39:00.600
<v Speaker 2>We posted it to GitHub a couple of weeks ago,

0:39:00.719 --> 0:39:04.200
<v Speaker 2>so it is now public code. Anybody can use it,

0:39:04.239 --> 0:39:06.840
<v Speaker 2>anybody can download it. I don't even known it anymore.

0:39:06.880 --> 0:39:10.680
<v Speaker 2>It's just purely in the public domain, and any government

0:39:10.719 --> 0:39:12.239
<v Speaker 2>that wants to try to do it now has the

0:39:12.280 --> 0:39:14.879
<v Speaker 2>ability to do so. And I've already and I've spent

0:39:15.040 --> 0:39:17.319
<v Speaker 2>twenty million dollars my own money so far, you know,

0:39:17.360 --> 0:39:20.120
<v Speaker 2>working on all of this, I've already paid for it.

0:39:20.200 --> 0:39:23.040
<v Speaker 2>So I feel like, given that we live in a

0:39:23.080 --> 0:39:28.120
<v Speaker 2>world where polarization seems to be the contributing factor to

0:39:28.320 --> 0:39:32.440
<v Speaker 2>so many of our problems, and polarization is because not

0:39:32.800 --> 0:39:36.040
<v Speaker 2>that people are polarized, but because the only the extremes

0:39:36.120 --> 0:39:39.719
<v Speaker 2>vote in primaries, and that's where everything is decided. If

0:39:39.760 --> 0:39:42.120
<v Speaker 2>you could do something that could make it so much

0:39:42.160 --> 0:39:45.239
<v Speaker 2>easier to vote, especially in primaries, and you get do

0:39:45.239 --> 0:39:47.800
<v Speaker 2>you remember when Amazon wanted to put their second headquarters

0:39:47.800 --> 0:39:49.719
<v Speaker 2>in Queen So part of it went to where you are,

0:39:49.760 --> 0:39:52.000
<v Speaker 2>to Arlington, right, and then the other half was supposed

0:39:52.000 --> 0:39:54.720
<v Speaker 2>to go to Long Island City, So hundreds of cities

0:39:54.719 --> 0:39:58.160
<v Speaker 2>competed for this. New York want a little unexpectedly, everyone's

0:39:58.239 --> 0:40:00.640
<v Speaker 2>very excited. The poland shows people are really into it.

0:40:01.120 --> 0:40:04.760
<v Speaker 2>Then AOC comes out against it and look for her politics. Fine,

0:40:04.840 --> 0:40:08.840
<v Speaker 2>she's anti jobs, business, capitalism, whatever. Fine. So there's a

0:40:08.840 --> 0:40:11.680
<v Speaker 2>guy named Mike Gennaris who is a state senator in

0:40:11.760 --> 0:40:14.560
<v Speaker 2>Long Island City, Queens. And Mike is just a guy.

0:40:14.880 --> 0:40:17.960
<v Speaker 2>He's not good, He's not bad. He's not conservatives at liberal.

0:40:18.120 --> 0:40:20.680
<v Speaker 2>He is just a political hack that wants to stay

0:40:20.719 --> 0:40:24.879
<v Speaker 2>in office, nothing else, and all things being equal, of course,

0:40:24.920 --> 0:40:27.520
<v Speaker 2>it's exciting when your district is picked by Amazon to

0:40:27.560 --> 0:40:30.479
<v Speaker 2>be this thing. But now he says to himself, oh shit,

0:40:31.360 --> 0:40:33.560
<v Speaker 2>if I support this, I could get a primary from

0:40:33.560 --> 0:40:36.400
<v Speaker 2>the left. Turn out I'll be around eight nine percent

0:40:36.480 --> 0:40:40.480
<v Speaker 2>based on the data, and the voters in that primary

0:40:40.480 --> 0:40:42.600
<v Speaker 2>will be the most left wing voters of my district.

0:40:42.680 --> 0:40:46.080
<v Speaker 2>And if AOC supports the opponent, I could lose. And

0:40:46.120 --> 0:40:50.400
<v Speaker 2>he had a choice forty thousand, forty thousand new jobs

0:40:50.400 --> 0:40:53.279
<v Speaker 2>for New Yorkers that are good jobs with benefits, or

0:40:53.400 --> 0:40:56.879
<v Speaker 2>one job his own, and he picked himself, and by

0:40:56.880 --> 0:40:59.920
<v Speaker 2>the way, that's what politicians do. But if he did

0:41:00.000 --> 0:41:02.719
<v Speaker 2>the same analysis and turn out as primary was gonna

0:41:02.719 --> 0:41:06.040
<v Speaker 2>be thirty seven instead of nine, not because he cared

0:41:06.040 --> 0:41:09.520
<v Speaker 2>anymore about the voters, the district, the job, whatever, Nothing

0:41:10.000 --> 0:41:12.799
<v Speaker 2>only changed, just the math. He would have done the

0:41:12.800 --> 0:41:16.160
<v Speaker 2>deal simply because he would have needed to get re elected.

0:41:16.480 --> 0:41:20.280
<v Speaker 2>So what if they were not partisan primaries or open primaries,

0:41:20.320 --> 0:41:22.719
<v Speaker 2>that would definitely help. But you know, I still think

0:41:22.760 --> 0:41:24.520
<v Speaker 2>if you look at places with the open primaries, and

0:41:24.560 --> 0:41:29.439
<v Speaker 2>I'm a big supporter of open primaries for local elections.

0:41:29.600 --> 0:41:33.240
<v Speaker 2>You still just don't get people going to submit plays.

0:41:33.239 --> 0:41:35.040
<v Speaker 2>With mail in voting, it's a little easier, but in

0:41:35.080 --> 0:41:38.080
<v Speaker 2>New York where you have to go, people just don't

0:41:38.120 --> 0:41:40.719
<v Speaker 2>show up. But you know what, those same people all

0:41:40.760 --> 0:41:43.560
<v Speaker 2>have phones, So when they're sitting on the subway or

0:41:43.560 --> 0:41:45.960
<v Speaker 2>they're waiting for their coffee or wherever else, if all

0:41:46.000 --> 0:41:48.120
<v Speaker 2>they have to do is press a few buttons, then

0:41:48.160 --> 0:41:50.680
<v Speaker 2>you can go from nine to thirty seven. I don't

0:41:50.680 --> 0:41:52.520
<v Speaker 2>think you can do that when people have to go

0:41:52.560 --> 0:41:53.279
<v Speaker 2>show up some money.

0:41:56.200 --> 0:41:58.839
<v Speaker 1>Do you hate hangovers, well, say goodbye to hangovers. Out

0:41:58.840 --> 0:42:01.399
<v Speaker 1>of Office gives you the social buzz without the next

0:42:01.440 --> 0:42:04.040
<v Speaker 1>day regret. Their best selling out of Office gummies were designed

0:42:04.080 --> 0:42:06.840
<v Speaker 1>to provide a mild, relaxing buzz, boost your mood and

0:42:06.960 --> 0:42:10.520
<v Speaker 1>enhance creativity and relaxation. With five different strengths, you can

0:42:10.560 --> 0:42:13.040
<v Speaker 1>tailor the dose to fit your vibe, from a gentle

0:42:13.160 --> 0:42:17.360
<v Speaker 1>one point five milligram micro doose to their newest fifteen

0:42:17.400 --> 0:42:21.480
<v Speaker 1>milligram gummy for a more elevated experience. Their THHC beverages

0:42:21.480 --> 0:42:24.680
<v Speaker 1>and gummies are a modern mindful alternative to a glass

0:42:24.680 --> 0:42:26.920
<v Speaker 1>of wine or a cocktail. And I'll tell you this,

0:42:27.120 --> 0:42:30.080
<v Speaker 1>I've given up booze. I don't like the hangovers. I

0:42:30.360 --> 0:42:33.719
<v Speaker 1>prefer the gummy experience. Soul is a wellness brand that

0:42:33.760 --> 0:42:37.279
<v Speaker 1>believes feeling good should be fun and easy. Soul specializes

0:42:37.320 --> 0:42:41.000
<v Speaker 1>in delicious HEMP derived THHC and CBD products, all designed

0:42:41.000 --> 0:42:44.040
<v Speaker 1>to boost your mood and simply help you unwine. So

0:42:44.080 --> 0:42:46.360
<v Speaker 1>if you struggle to switch off at night, Soul also

0:42:46.400 --> 0:42:49.400
<v Speaker 1>has a variety of products specifically designed to just simply

0:42:49.440 --> 0:42:51.879
<v Speaker 1>help you get a better night's sleep, including their top

0:42:51.960 --> 0:42:56.080
<v Speaker 1>selling Sleepy gummies. It's a fan favorite for deep restorative sleep.

0:42:56.320 --> 0:42:58.520
<v Speaker 1>So bring on the good vibes and treat yourself to

0:42:58.560 --> 0:43:02.320
<v Speaker 1>Soul today. Right now, Soul is offering my audience thirty

0:43:02.360 --> 0:43:05.200
<v Speaker 1>percent off your entire order, So go to get sold

0:43:05.280 --> 0:43:09.520
<v Speaker 1>dot Com use the promo code toodcast. Don't forget that code.

0:43:09.640 --> 0:43:13.400
<v Speaker 1>That's get sold dot Com promo code toodcast for thirty

0:43:13.520 --> 0:43:23.320
<v Speaker 1>percent off. Let me introduce a counterintuitive point about voting. Yeah,

0:43:23.840 --> 0:43:25.880
<v Speaker 1>and I'm not I'm saying this. I'm not saying I

0:43:25.880 --> 0:43:28.439
<v Speaker 1>agree with it. So anybody listening that wants to try

0:43:28.440 --> 0:43:31.359
<v Speaker 1>to like, you know, aggregate me and sort of say, oh,

0:43:31.400 --> 0:43:35.880
<v Speaker 1>there he goes he doesn't want to if you choose not.

0:43:36.040 --> 0:43:40.080
<v Speaker 1>You know, it's sort of like I'm not for compulsory

0:43:40.120 --> 0:43:43.040
<v Speaker 1>voting like I think you should. I think you should

0:43:43.440 --> 0:43:47.200
<v Speaker 1>feel comfortable made. You know. In fact, I think it's

0:43:47.239 --> 0:43:52.439
<v Speaker 1>been fascinating that that voter turnout goes down. The more

0:43:53.160 --> 0:43:57.799
<v Speaker 1>apathy goes up, the more content and stable our governments are. Right,

0:43:57.880 --> 0:44:00.920
<v Speaker 1>apathy goes down a bit more unstable when our leadership

0:44:00.960 --> 0:44:03.920
<v Speaker 1>is a little bit more unstable. Maybe that's a good

0:44:03.920 --> 0:44:09.120
<v Speaker 1>thing that that people pay more attention, but it is

0:44:09.800 --> 0:44:12.239
<v Speaker 1>is more uninformed people voting a good thing.

0:44:14.120 --> 0:44:18.200
<v Speaker 2>You know what, if more uninformed people is more, it's

0:44:18.200 --> 0:44:22.600
<v Speaker 2>still a better reflection of the mainstream and therefore democracy

0:44:22.640 --> 0:44:25.600
<v Speaker 2>than fewer. And you know, I just when I was

0:44:25.600 --> 0:44:28.640
<v Speaker 2>giving a talk on mobilevoting somewhere someone said raise their hands, said, well,

0:44:29.040 --> 0:44:31.320
<v Speaker 2>under your as system, we're going to have a TikTok president.

0:44:31.760 --> 0:44:34.320
<v Speaker 2>We have a TikTok president, and a New York have

0:44:34.360 --> 0:44:35.520
<v Speaker 2>a TikTok mayor mayor.

0:44:35.600 --> 0:44:38.800
<v Speaker 1>Right now, we're already living in the biggest in the

0:44:38.800 --> 0:44:40.879
<v Speaker 1>biggest markets. We're already living in that world so we're

0:44:40.920 --> 0:44:41.960
<v Speaker 1>we're already there.

0:44:42.000 --> 0:44:46.120
<v Speaker 2>So to me, the thing that I learned I worked

0:44:46.120 --> 0:44:48.560
<v Speaker 2>in city government. I worked in you know, I was

0:44:48.600 --> 0:44:51.680
<v Speaker 2>in DC, I was sumer's communications director, I was deputy

0:44:51.719 --> 0:44:54.320
<v Speaker 2>governor of Illinois. I saw it from really every angle,

0:44:54.920 --> 0:44:56.760
<v Speaker 2>And to me, the only thing that you can count

0:44:56.800 --> 0:44:59.279
<v Speaker 2>on is that politicians will do whatever it takes to

0:44:59.320 --> 0:45:02.279
<v Speaker 2>get re elected. And so even if it's an uninformed

0:45:02.320 --> 0:45:05.560
<v Speaker 2>thirty seven percent, a politician trying to sell for an

0:45:05.640 --> 0:45:08.919
<v Speaker 2>uninformed thirty seven percent is still going to land much

0:45:08.960 --> 0:45:11.759
<v Speaker 2>more in the mainstream than a politician trying to solve

0:45:11.840 --> 0:45:12.640
<v Speaker 2>for nine percent.

0:45:13.120 --> 0:45:16.399
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, do you think you're gonna have an easier time

0:45:16.440 --> 0:45:20.800
<v Speaker 1>selling more rural states on mobile voting than urban.

0:45:20.600 --> 0:45:23.520
<v Speaker 2>St It's one of the reasons why Alaska's are Alaska

0:45:23.600 --> 0:45:27.719
<v Speaker 2>is a perfect Yeah, a perfect example, if not for

0:45:27.840 --> 0:45:32.120
<v Speaker 2>twenty twenty. Yes, the challenge I have right now is

0:45:32.160 --> 0:45:35.600
<v Speaker 2>that red states don't want to do anything Trump doesn't like,

0:45:35.680 --> 0:45:37.719
<v Speaker 2>and he hasn't said anything about mobile voting. But if

0:45:37.800 --> 0:45:41.080
<v Speaker 2>you are a paper only in person thing, then clearly

0:45:41.120 --> 0:45:44.239
<v Speaker 2>you're not gonna like mobile voting. And so therefore in

0:45:44.320 --> 0:45:47.719
<v Speaker 2>blue states, you not only don't have the concern about Trump,

0:45:47.800 --> 0:45:51.000
<v Speaker 2>but you actually have the incentive of sticking it to Trump. Right,

0:45:51.320 --> 0:45:54.920
<v Speaker 2>So in theory, what you said should have been the

0:45:55.000 --> 0:45:59.480
<v Speaker 2>rollout plan, Trump scrambled that. So now the rollout plan

0:46:00.280 --> 0:46:02.440
<v Speaker 2>is much more partisan, which I'd say again, I'm not

0:46:02.480 --> 0:46:04.920
<v Speaker 2>even an Emerald party anymore, right, So it's not like

0:46:05.600 --> 0:46:07.759
<v Speaker 2>I want one party as opposed to another or one

0:46:07.760 --> 0:46:09.439
<v Speaker 2>type of state. But I'm going to have mobile voting.

0:46:09.480 --> 0:46:12.480
<v Speaker 2>I want ever want to have it. I think realistically,

0:46:13.160 --> 0:46:14.960
<v Speaker 2>there's a world that I live in for what I'm

0:46:14.960 --> 0:46:17.160
<v Speaker 2>doing through twenty eight, and then there's a new world

0:46:17.160 --> 0:46:18.280
<v Speaker 2>that starts in twenty nine.

0:46:19.800 --> 0:46:21.880
<v Speaker 1>That's interesting that you say it that way when you

0:46:21.920 --> 0:46:25.160
<v Speaker 1>say there's just a new world, that's you're just are

0:46:25.200 --> 0:46:28.439
<v Speaker 1>you sort of plotting and living? I mean I want

0:46:28.480 --> 0:46:30.439
<v Speaker 1>more people to be thinking this way, which is, Look,

0:46:30.480 --> 0:46:33.160
<v Speaker 1>the Trump era is over. It just hasn't ended yet.

0:46:33.840 --> 0:46:37.719
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I mean He's gonna go away and norms will

0:46:37.760 --> 0:46:39.319
<v Speaker 2>be restored.

0:46:39.440 --> 0:46:41.719
<v Speaker 1>So well, see that's the question. That's what I'm not

0:46:42.000 --> 0:46:44.600
<v Speaker 1>I'm now starting to become a skeptical so we never

0:46:44.680 --> 0:46:45.960
<v Speaker 1>go backwards, Bradley.

0:46:46.280 --> 0:46:49.960
<v Speaker 2>So I've been asking people who know Dvance specifically this question, right,

0:46:50.000 --> 0:46:53.399
<v Speaker 2>because let's say it's any Democrat, we're probably going back

0:46:53.440 --> 0:46:56.360
<v Speaker 2>to a more normalized rule of laws system, right. So

0:46:56.480 --> 0:47:01.000
<v Speaker 2>now on the Republican side, even someone like Rubio probably

0:47:01.040 --> 0:47:03.560
<v Speaker 2>goes back to that. So to me, Vance is the

0:47:03.600 --> 0:47:08.160
<v Speaker 2>biggest of the major contenders, the biggest variable. He might

0:47:08.200 --> 0:47:12.000
<v Speaker 2>not want to, but remember when Jordan retired and the

0:47:12.080 --> 0:47:15.319
<v Speaker 2>NBA kept turning to manufacture these errors to Jordan and

0:47:15.360 --> 0:47:18.239
<v Speaker 2>it never worked. Right, you had great basketball players, but

0:47:18.320 --> 0:47:22.399
<v Speaker 2>until Lebron naturally came along, you just didn't have it. Right,

0:47:23.719 --> 0:47:27.240
<v Speaker 2>Vance and others will try to imitate Trump at every turn,

0:47:27.400 --> 0:47:30.360
<v Speaker 2>and it's not gonna work because Trump is an end

0:47:30.400 --> 0:47:34.040
<v Speaker 2>of one and for better or worse, he's just unique, right,

0:47:34.280 --> 0:47:37.520
<v Speaker 2>and if you try to imitate him, that will probably

0:47:37.600 --> 0:47:43.439
<v Speaker 2>look really inauthentic and actually fail. And so Vance would

0:47:43.440 --> 0:47:47.000
<v Speaker 2>be my biggest concern about continuation of the current approach

0:47:47.040 --> 0:47:50.439
<v Speaker 2>to rule of law. But I kind of think that

0:47:51.400 --> 0:47:54.000
<v Speaker 2>people are gonna want change, and I think that he

0:47:54.120 --> 0:47:57.080
<v Speaker 2>is gonna refer he has to run on continuity to Trump.

0:47:57.600 --> 0:48:03.560
<v Speaker 1>And look, Vance is discovering this same trap that being

0:48:03.640 --> 0:48:06.680
<v Speaker 1>vice president for an unpopular president is like that Kamala

0:48:06.719 --> 0:48:09.600
<v Speaker 1>Harris discovered you're never going to be judged on your

0:48:09.600 --> 0:48:10.760
<v Speaker 1>own merits, right.

0:48:10.840 --> 0:48:12.400
<v Speaker 2>Right, Well, do you think he learned?

0:48:12.400 --> 0:48:12.440
<v Speaker 1>So?

0:48:12.600 --> 0:48:17.960
<v Speaker 2>Harris clearly regrets not distancing herself from Biden in any way.

0:48:18.400 --> 0:48:21.520
<v Speaker 2>Do you think Vance has learned from that? And if so,

0:48:22.040 --> 0:48:25.560
<v Speaker 2>when you're the city vice president and a candidate, how

0:48:25.600 --> 0:48:26.600
<v Speaker 2>do you distance yourself?

0:48:26.719 --> 0:48:29.080
<v Speaker 1>You can't. I mean the point is just because you

0:48:29.160 --> 0:48:33.440
<v Speaker 1>should doesn't mean you can, right, yeah, right, you know, look,

0:48:35.840 --> 0:48:38.959
<v Speaker 1>Hubert Humphrey couldn't do it, and he waited too long.

0:48:43.360 --> 0:48:46.680
<v Speaker 1>Al Gore to this day did the best version of

0:48:46.719 --> 0:48:47.640
<v Speaker 1>it that was possible.

0:48:48.160 --> 0:48:48.359
<v Speaker 2>Right.

0:48:48.719 --> 0:48:50.560
<v Speaker 1>He found he was trying to figure out a way

0:48:50.600 --> 0:48:54.560
<v Speaker 1>to show distance on the things that mattered the most,

0:48:55.280 --> 0:48:58.840
<v Speaker 1>the concerns that people had, which was the kind of

0:48:58.600 --> 0:49:03.120
<v Speaker 1>the personal ickiness of Clinton, right, and Joe Lieberman was

0:49:03.200 --> 0:49:03.680
<v Speaker 1>the tonic.

0:49:04.600 --> 0:49:05.600
<v Speaker 2>And so.

0:49:08.840 --> 0:49:15.400
<v Speaker 1>You know what, you know, had Kamala Harris picked Elon

0:49:15.520 --> 0:49:17.439
<v Speaker 1>Musks are running made, I don't know. I'm like trying

0:49:17.480 --> 0:49:19.160
<v Speaker 1>to think, like who could have been the.

0:49:20.320 --> 0:49:22.719
<v Speaker 2>I'm not sure anything. I don't know if anything.

0:49:22.440 --> 0:49:26.640
<v Speaker 1>Could even al Gore couldn't outrun it. Right, he got closer.

0:49:26.800 --> 0:49:29.520
<v Speaker 1>I will always go to my grave believing that race

0:49:29.560 --> 0:49:33.560
<v Speaker 1>got competitive because he figured out a way to walk

0:49:33.600 --> 0:49:35.600
<v Speaker 1>the line of being, Hey, I'm going to be the

0:49:35.640 --> 0:49:39.799
<v Speaker 1>stuff you liked about Clinton, and I'm not going to

0:49:39.840 --> 0:49:42.879
<v Speaker 1>allow the stuff you didn't like to happen either, right,

0:49:43.080 --> 0:49:44.720
<v Speaker 1>which was but it was hard.

0:49:45.040 --> 0:49:48.080
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and bother one of the biggest what asks because

0:49:48.080 --> 0:49:50.880
<v Speaker 2>if you think about it, let's say Florida. You know,

0:49:51.040 --> 0:49:54.040
<v Speaker 2>a few ballots got fully punched through instead of hanging

0:49:54.080 --> 0:49:56.440
<v Speaker 2>had tats or whatever. Right, and the outcome is different.

0:49:57.200 --> 0:50:00.600
<v Speaker 2>It seems to be there's two very radically differ friend

0:50:00.800 --> 0:50:02.840
<v Speaker 2>outcomes that we said of what we had. One is,

0:50:03.040 --> 0:50:05.080
<v Speaker 2>let's just see nine to eleven still happens, because it

0:50:05.200 --> 0:50:05.960
<v Speaker 2>probably would have.

0:50:06.080 --> 0:50:08.319
<v Speaker 1>Right, I've gone through this. What if I'm curious where

0:50:08.320 --> 0:50:10.239
<v Speaker 1>you're going to go. I have an idea where this goes.

0:50:10.400 --> 0:50:13.320
<v Speaker 2>See, you still get Afghanistan. That doesn't change, No.

0:50:13.440 --> 0:50:17.960
<v Speaker 1>But I don't think you realize Rack, it's not just that, Bradley.

0:50:18.239 --> 0:50:19.200
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:50:19.239 --> 0:50:22.799
<v Speaker 1>If at nine to eleven happens under Al Gore, that's

0:50:22.840 --> 0:50:28.040
<v Speaker 1>the ninth year of a democratic presidency. So while George W.

0:50:28.160 --> 0:50:32.319
<v Speaker 1>Bush was new and could claim the intelligence was new,

0:50:33.360 --> 0:50:36.600
<v Speaker 1>then all of a sudden, if Gore's president, then the

0:50:36.719 --> 0:50:39.440
<v Speaker 1>whole well, you knew this guy was a problem because

0:50:39.480 --> 0:50:42.680
<v Speaker 1>your administration tried to kill him once and missed. You

0:50:42.719 --> 0:50:45.480
<v Speaker 1>were on top of bin Ladden, and you still missed this.

0:50:45.960 --> 0:50:50.759
<v Speaker 1>I think the politicizing of the intelligence failure under a

0:50:50.800 --> 0:50:55.040
<v Speaker 1>democratic administration, which is a continuation of eight years of

0:50:55.040 --> 0:51:00.319
<v Speaker 1>a democratic administration, becomes we are far more polarized. The

0:51:00.360 --> 0:51:03.359
<v Speaker 1>world we live in today is the world that would

0:51:03.400 --> 0:51:07.040
<v Speaker 1>have happened to us September twelfth, ninth, two thousand and one.

0:51:07.040 --> 0:51:11.400
<v Speaker 1>Meaning I think we would have gone immediately because it

0:51:11.400 --> 0:51:14.759
<v Speaker 1>would have been this was the because he would have

0:51:14.760 --> 0:51:17.440
<v Speaker 1>had the same CIA chief probably maybe he had the

0:51:17.440 --> 0:51:19.120
<v Speaker 1>same Secretary of State maybe, but you know what I mean.

0:51:19.160 --> 0:51:23.600
<v Speaker 1>There would have been more continuation than difference, and it

0:51:23.640 --> 0:51:26.120
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't have been a new president. It would have been

0:51:26.200 --> 0:51:29.880
<v Speaker 1>right like. So that to me is the is the

0:51:29.920 --> 0:51:32.319
<v Speaker 1>dog that didn't mark right, which is well, we were

0:51:32.360 --> 0:51:34.400
<v Speaker 1>we could have nine to eleven, could have gotten politicized.

0:51:34.400 --> 0:51:36.759
<v Speaker 1>It didn't, right, and it was a unique set of

0:51:36.760 --> 0:51:38.200
<v Speaker 1>circumstances for why it didn't.

0:51:38.360 --> 0:51:41.120
<v Speaker 2>But could you have gotten away with the WMD stuff?

0:51:42.360 --> 0:51:45.120
<v Speaker 1>Well, I don't think Iraq ever happens right, right right?

0:51:45.120 --> 0:51:48.000
<v Speaker 1>I mean, in that sense it doesn't happen, and we

0:51:48.080 --> 0:51:51.799
<v Speaker 1>probably still do Afghanistan. But what I'm saying is I

0:51:51.840 --> 0:51:56.759
<v Speaker 1>think we have a far more politicized world because this

0:51:56.800 --> 0:51:59.160
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't have been the failure of a new administration. It

0:51:59.160 --> 0:52:02.120
<v Speaker 1>would have been the failure of an administration that, in theory,

0:52:02.160 --> 0:52:04.120
<v Speaker 1>had been in power for nine years.

0:52:03.920 --> 0:52:06.319
<v Speaker 2>Right, right? I think that's probably right. Can I throw

0:52:06.400 --> 0:52:08.080
<v Speaker 2>one crazy idea at you, because.

0:52:08.200 --> 0:52:10.520
<v Speaker 1>Lad, that's what we do here at the Chuck Podcast.

0:52:10.719 --> 0:52:13.280
<v Speaker 2>So, okay, So if you look at sort of modern

0:52:13.560 --> 0:52:17.360
<v Speaker 2>political history for the president, let's just say since Reagan,

0:52:17.480 --> 0:52:21.440
<v Speaker 2>So there's been seven presidents, including Reagan's nineteen eighty five

0:52:21.520 --> 0:52:24.319
<v Speaker 2>of them, I would argue, were rock stars who were

0:52:24.360 --> 0:52:28.840
<v Speaker 2>definitely not the most qualified person to win. So Reagan, Clinton,

0:52:29.600 --> 0:52:33.120
<v Speaker 2>w to some extent, Obama Trump. The two that were

0:52:33.280 --> 0:52:38.479
<v Speaker 2>ultra qualified, Biden and HW both only lasted one term.

0:52:38.640 --> 0:52:41.279
<v Speaker 1>Right, so I call them nineteenth century presidents. They'd have

0:52:41.320 --> 0:52:45.000
<v Speaker 1>been better in the non media era, right the at

0:52:45.080 --> 0:52:46.040
<v Speaker 1>least for president.

0:52:46.640 --> 0:52:51.000
<v Speaker 2>Americans want rock stars, and my argument is the DNC

0:52:51.239 --> 0:52:55.080
<v Speaker 2>or the RNC are the least qualified entities to pick

0:52:55.640 --> 0:52:59.000
<v Speaker 2>rock stars. Do you remember that show? I think you

0:52:59.239 --> 0:53:02.360
<v Speaker 2>were probably around this age Battle of the network stars.

0:53:02.640 --> 0:53:05.040
<v Speaker 2>It's like when I was a kid, right, So, yeah,

0:53:05.120 --> 0:53:08.480
<v Speaker 2>what if you did that in say in twenty twenty seven,

0:53:08.560 --> 0:53:10.799
<v Speaker 2>where you said, okay, instead of a tug of war

0:53:10.880 --> 0:53:14.480
<v Speaker 2>in the mud, go to the waffle house of midnight,

0:53:14.640 --> 0:53:16.799
<v Speaker 2>talk to the truckers, talk to the cops, talk to

0:53:16.800 --> 0:53:19.399
<v Speaker 2>the college kids, show them all of America and see

0:53:19.440 --> 0:53:21.359
<v Speaker 2>who comes and what they talk to you about. Call

0:53:21.440 --> 0:53:24.000
<v Speaker 2>inning of a Cardinals game on the radio, whatever it is.

0:53:24.520 --> 0:53:27.560
<v Speaker 2>And put candidates in real world situations that are not

0:53:27.719 --> 0:53:32.239
<v Speaker 2>totally scripted and not totally packed with party faithful and

0:53:32.360 --> 0:53:35.440
<v Speaker 2>just see how they do. Because some will resonate, some

0:53:35.520 --> 0:53:39.000
<v Speaker 2>will not. And ultimately you got to pick the candidate

0:53:39.120 --> 0:53:43.960
<v Speaker 2>that has that intangible quality. And you're never going to

0:53:44.040 --> 0:53:47.920
<v Speaker 2>get that through the debates and the normal primary systems.

0:53:47.960 --> 0:53:49.600
<v Speaker 2>You almost need an alternate method.

0:53:50.040 --> 0:53:52.200
<v Speaker 1>Well, you know we have. You know, it's funny, what

0:53:52.239 --> 0:53:54.680
<v Speaker 1>if I told you that we had already had that system,

0:53:55.320 --> 0:53:58.719
<v Speaker 1>but we didn't like it, and it's called the Iowa CAUCUSUS.

0:53:59.120 --> 0:54:02.120
<v Speaker 1>This single grind greatest aspect of the Iowa caucuses is

0:54:02.160 --> 0:54:06.080
<v Speaker 1>what you just described, the fact that candidates have to

0:54:06.120 --> 0:54:11.160
<v Speaker 1>go into small venues, They have to it's the only

0:54:11.280 --> 0:54:16.719
<v Speaker 1>time in the presidential process where you see more personal interactions, right.

0:54:16.960 --> 0:54:19.680
<v Speaker 1>And you know, I've always thought that what people don't

0:54:19.760 --> 0:54:22.759
<v Speaker 1>understand that actually the two parties that stumbled on a

0:54:22.800 --> 0:54:25.920
<v Speaker 1>really smart way to do the presidential primary system. We

0:54:26.040 --> 0:54:29.360
<v Speaker 1>start in a super rural state that's very friendly, in

0:54:29.440 --> 0:54:32.160
<v Speaker 1>the state of Iowa, and you're being tested, can you

0:54:32.360 --> 0:54:36.319
<v Speaker 1>organize ninety nine counties? Like that's essentially what you're being

0:54:36.320 --> 0:54:38.960
<v Speaker 1>told to do. You've got to figure out how to organize.

0:54:39.120 --> 0:54:42.360
<v Speaker 1>You can't just win DesMoines. You've actually got to show

0:54:42.480 --> 0:54:45.760
<v Speaker 1>strength in ninety nine counties. Then with the second test,

0:54:46.440 --> 0:54:48.440
<v Speaker 1>we're going to send you to a state that is

0:54:48.840 --> 0:54:53.040
<v Speaker 1>cranky independence and in fact they get to decide which

0:54:53.160 --> 0:54:56.560
<v Speaker 1>party to vote in and they vacillate Like two thousand

0:54:56.719 --> 0:54:59.680
<v Speaker 1>was fantastic. It was really a fight between McCain and

0:54:59.760 --> 0:55:02.799
<v Speaker 1>braw to see who could convince more independence to pick

0:55:03.080 --> 0:55:05.759
<v Speaker 1>the D ballot or the R ballot. Well, McCain won that,

0:55:06.040 --> 0:55:09.640
<v Speaker 1>and therefore Gore won. Had Bradley won the debate with McCain,

0:55:10.040 --> 0:55:14.000
<v Speaker 1>Bradley wins the New Hampshire primary, and then the messages said, hey,

0:55:14.320 --> 0:55:18.799
<v Speaker 1>this guy is better at winning independence and it's a

0:55:18.880 --> 0:55:22.400
<v Speaker 1>test of that. Like I think the parties and we

0:55:22.480 --> 0:55:25.360
<v Speaker 1>didn't fully appreciate that the system that we had stumbled

0:55:25.400 --> 0:55:29.719
<v Speaker 1>into place you test or actually existed. And what you

0:55:29.880 --> 0:55:32.560
<v Speaker 1>have is you had a whole bunch of idiots at

0:55:32.560 --> 0:55:36.560
<v Speaker 1>the DNC who said, well, Iowa was too white, and

0:55:36.920 --> 0:55:38.759
<v Speaker 1>it is, and they had it, and they applied a

0:55:38.840 --> 0:55:43.000
<v Speaker 1>DEI test to the state of Iowa mistakenly realized, not

0:55:43.160 --> 0:55:46.759
<v Speaker 1>realizing that by preventing their candidates from learning how to

0:55:46.800 --> 0:55:49.840
<v Speaker 1>speak to rural America in a friendly state like Iowa,

0:55:50.160 --> 0:55:52.359
<v Speaker 1>that they were going to fail in appealing to rural

0:55:52.360 --> 0:55:57.400
<v Speaker 1>America all over the country. So I absolutely agree with

0:55:57.440 --> 0:55:59.319
<v Speaker 1>what you're saying. And I'm like, we already had this

0:55:59.480 --> 0:56:04.280
<v Speaker 1>system because it tested Barack Obama, it tested Bill Clinton,

0:56:04.920 --> 0:56:07.560
<v Speaker 1>and in fact, it was in the small states and

0:56:07.640 --> 0:56:11.240
<v Speaker 1>their interactions in the small states that made the country

0:56:11.360 --> 0:56:15.040
<v Speaker 1>comfortable with what they what. We weren't sure whether these

0:56:15.040 --> 0:56:17.640
<v Speaker 1>were attributes that were going to work or not. So

0:56:18.360 --> 0:56:20.719
<v Speaker 1>we had the system, and we're now actually trying to

0:56:20.760 --> 0:56:23.880
<v Speaker 1>throw that system away, which I sort of am frustrated them.

0:56:23.800 --> 0:56:27.640
<v Speaker 2>Well because by throwing it, throwing it away and sort

0:56:27.640 --> 0:56:32.120
<v Speaker 2>of nationalizing it empowers the people inside the Beltway at

0:56:32.239 --> 0:56:35.080
<v Speaker 2>the expense of everyone else. But the problem is those

0:56:35.120 --> 0:56:37.839
<v Speaker 2>people like other people who went to Yale and write

0:56:37.840 --> 0:56:41.279
<v Speaker 2>in bullet points, and that is not a rock star, right, right,

0:56:43.800 --> 0:56:44.960
<v Speaker 2>But let me go back, let me.

0:56:44.880 --> 0:56:48.279
<v Speaker 1>Throw some up at echew, which is which is? And

0:56:48.360 --> 0:56:53.480
<v Speaker 1>I've i've I've been working with a company that's basically

0:56:53.560 --> 0:56:56.200
<v Speaker 1>popped up, that didn't exist for a while, but now

0:56:56.239 --> 0:57:02.080
<v Speaker 1>exists as an entity to help corporations communicate how to

0:57:02.160 --> 0:57:06.600
<v Speaker 1>deal with tricky political situations, either with their own employees

0:57:06.800 --> 0:57:09.920
<v Speaker 1>or with the outside world. And it's sort of it's

0:57:09.960 --> 0:57:12.120
<v Speaker 1>a company now that it's thriving, and there's a lot

0:57:12.120 --> 0:57:15.960
<v Speaker 1>of Fortune five hundred companies that want this research, this information, etc.

0:57:17.040 --> 0:57:21.360
<v Speaker 1>And what I've come to discover is that basically we're

0:57:21.400 --> 0:57:25.680
<v Speaker 1>now looking for the same attributes in our CEOs as

0:57:25.720 --> 0:57:28.120
<v Speaker 1>we expect in our presidents as you just defined, right,

0:57:28.160 --> 0:57:32.960
<v Speaker 1>which is ultimately we're looking for the best communicator. Right,

0:57:33.040 --> 0:57:36.480
<v Speaker 1>we elect the best communicator. We don't elect the best person.

0:57:36.520 --> 0:57:41.040
<v Speaker 1>We're electing the best communicator. The companies with good communicators

0:57:42.680 --> 0:57:44.920
<v Speaker 1>probably are doing better on Wall Street than the companies

0:57:44.920 --> 0:57:51.880
<v Speaker 1>with bad communicators. And I actually think now we're communicating

0:57:51.960 --> 0:57:55.680
<v Speaker 1>is so much more important now to success in both

0:57:55.720 --> 0:58:00.520
<v Speaker 1>the business world, the political world, the entertainment world, frankly

0:58:00.560 --> 0:58:04.280
<v Speaker 1>even the sports world. That it is now a skill

0:58:04.320 --> 0:58:06.640
<v Speaker 1>set that is as important as learning how to type.

0:58:07.400 --> 0:58:09.960
<v Speaker 1>It is a skill set that it's important as understanding

0:58:10.040 --> 0:58:12.160
<v Speaker 1>how to write. In fact, you need to know how

0:58:12.160 --> 0:58:15.520
<v Speaker 1>to do that then you do right cursive. Right. I

0:58:15.600 --> 0:58:17.640
<v Speaker 1>just think it's a skill set that it's necessary now

0:58:17.640 --> 0:58:18.400
<v Speaker 1>and all walks away.

0:58:18.920 --> 0:58:23.000
<v Speaker 2>In my world investing in tech startups, narrative is frequently

0:58:23.080 --> 0:58:28.720
<v Speaker 2>more important than economic fundamentals, right, you know, even and

0:58:29.080 --> 0:58:32.600
<v Speaker 2>P and L and everything else oftentimes takes a backseat

0:58:32.720 --> 0:58:37.600
<v Speaker 2>to who has the narrative, the rhetoric, the sort of

0:58:37.800 --> 0:58:42.760
<v Speaker 2>you know, flash that really gets investors excited, and that's

0:58:42.760 --> 0:58:46.640
<v Speaker 2>what drives evaluation. Look, think about AI right now. You

0:58:46.720 --> 0:58:48.959
<v Speaker 2>take two companies and you call one of them AI

0:58:49.120 --> 0:58:51.000
<v Speaker 2>and one of them not you think to be the

0:58:51.040 --> 0:58:55.080
<v Speaker 2>same company. The AI one has doubled evaluation immediately, right.

0:58:55.680 --> 0:58:58.360
<v Speaker 2>I mean, I would even argue that a lot of

0:58:58.400 --> 0:59:03.440
<v Speaker 2>the spending the open aiyes and the Navidias are doing

0:59:03.440 --> 0:59:08.000
<v Speaker 2>on data centers and everything else is really short term

0:59:08.120 --> 0:59:12.360
<v Speaker 2>narrative and profit seeking disguise as long term plan. So

0:59:12.880 --> 0:59:15.760
<v Speaker 2>it looks like you're saying, oh, I'm thinking twenty thirty

0:59:15.840 --> 0:59:18.800
<v Speaker 2>years out, and the market loves that and they reward

0:59:18.840 --> 0:59:21.480
<v Speaker 2>it with higher share prices or higher valuations if you're

0:59:21.480 --> 0:59:26.040
<v Speaker 2>still a private company, and in reality, we have no

0:59:26.200 --> 0:59:29.560
<v Speaker 2>idea what we're actually going to need to power AI

0:59:29.680 --> 0:59:32.080
<v Speaker 2>in twenty or thirty years, because the answer might be

0:59:32.120 --> 0:59:34.800
<v Speaker 2>that we don't need nearly this much compute, right, maybe

0:59:34.800 --> 0:59:37.760
<v Speaker 2>the influence model works. I'm at a company that is

0:59:38.000 --> 0:59:42.360
<v Speaker 2>literally using rat brain stem cells to try to power compute.

0:59:42.600 --> 0:59:45.720
<v Speaker 2>Whether it works, who knows, right, But like, there's lots

0:59:45.760 --> 0:59:48.479
<v Speaker 2>of different ways to go about it. And I think

0:59:48.520 --> 0:59:53.080
<v Speaker 2>that if your Jensen want you know, you say, if

0:59:53.120 --> 0:59:55.120
<v Speaker 2>I announced I'm going to spend a trillion dollars on

0:59:55.200 --> 1:00:00.000
<v Speaker 2>data centers, my valuation goes way up immediately, and the truth,

1:00:00.280 --> 1:00:02.880
<v Speaker 2>by the time that the bill comes due, I'm probably

1:00:02.960 --> 1:00:06.280
<v Speaker 2>long gone. My shares became worth more and more money

1:00:06.320 --> 1:00:09.000
<v Speaker 2>in the short term, and even if all that debt

1:00:09.080 --> 1:00:11.640
<v Speaker 2>goes bad and people's four oh one k's get wiped

1:00:11.680 --> 1:00:16.000
<v Speaker 2>out as a result, not really your problem. So yeah, narrative,

1:00:16.200 --> 1:00:18.840
<v Speaker 2>you know, for better and for worse, you know, it

1:00:18.840 --> 1:00:21.160
<v Speaker 2>has overwhelming influence over everything else.

1:00:21.600 --> 1:00:23.800
<v Speaker 1>No, and it's like, it's not just politics, it's it's

1:00:23.840 --> 1:00:25.920
<v Speaker 1>it's business. Let me get you out of here on

1:00:25.960 --> 1:00:31.240
<v Speaker 1>this is is it better to be a public company

1:00:31.320 --> 1:00:33.400
<v Speaker 1>or a private company in twenty twenty five and in

1:00:33.400 --> 1:00:34.200
<v Speaker 1>twenty twenty.

1:00:34.000 --> 1:00:40.080
<v Speaker 2>Six, that's a great, great question. I believe that tech

1:00:40.120 --> 1:00:44.000
<v Speaker 2>startups stay private for too long. And the reason they

1:00:44.080 --> 1:00:47.520
<v Speaker 2>stay private oftentimes is it's easier you don't have all

1:00:47.640 --> 1:00:50.280
<v Speaker 2>the scrutiny of the market and analysts and investors and

1:00:50.320 --> 1:00:56.560
<v Speaker 2>all of that. And b oftentimes they're really overvalued and

1:00:56.600 --> 1:00:59.200
<v Speaker 2>they're afraid to go to the public markets because they're

1:00:59.200 --> 1:01:02.280
<v Speaker 2>going to face a deep cut in the share price.

1:01:02.680 --> 1:01:04.440
<v Speaker 2>They might have a good IPO day, but then you

1:01:04.520 --> 1:01:07.240
<v Speaker 2>look six months later and it's down seventy percent, and

1:01:07.280 --> 1:01:10.440
<v Speaker 2>that's because fundamentally the company was never worth what people

1:01:10.520 --> 1:01:12.640
<v Speaker 2>like me said it was in the first place. And

1:01:12.720 --> 1:01:14.480
<v Speaker 2>we tell me if this is a little too technical,

1:01:14.520 --> 1:01:17.960
<v Speaker 2>but in the venture world, we have gotten into a

1:01:18.000 --> 1:01:21.680
<v Speaker 2>game where the real way for people to make money

1:01:21.800 --> 1:01:24.480
<v Speaker 2>is have more AUM assets under management, because you get

1:01:24.480 --> 1:01:27.880
<v Speaker 2>a two percent fee. So if you can have billions

1:01:27.920 --> 1:01:30.640
<v Speaker 2>of dollars of AUM it doesn't really matter what your

1:01:30.640 --> 1:01:33.560
<v Speaker 2>investment performance is because the management fee is worth tens

1:01:33.560 --> 1:01:36.280
<v Speaker 2>of millions of dollars and if you're the you know,

1:01:36.360 --> 1:01:39.560
<v Speaker 2>the main GP, you can pocket that. And so as

1:01:39.600 --> 1:01:42.120
<v Speaker 2>a result, if you are raising much more money than

1:01:42.120 --> 1:01:44.440
<v Speaker 2>you need to get that two percent, you have to

1:01:44.480 --> 1:01:48.040
<v Speaker 2>deploy it at much higher evaluations to make the math work.

1:01:48.400 --> 1:01:50.480
<v Speaker 2>And everyone's in on the joke from sort of the

1:01:50.560 --> 1:01:54.240
<v Speaker 2>earliest stage, you know, investor to Fidelity, whoever at the

1:01:54.280 --> 1:01:58.600
<v Speaker 2>Series F for g. And then they know that it

1:01:58.680 --> 1:02:01.120
<v Speaker 2>all works for as long as are not exposed. And

1:02:01.200 --> 1:02:04.720
<v Speaker 2>what exposes it is often the public markets. As I

1:02:04.800 --> 1:02:08.040
<v Speaker 2>think tech companies stay private for way too long as

1:02:08.040 --> 1:02:12.400
<v Speaker 2>a result, and that is really harmful to the employees,

1:02:12.760 --> 1:02:15.560
<v Speaker 2>to consumers, to a lot of other people. So I

1:02:16.040 --> 1:02:18.760
<v Speaker 2>think that ultimately I would really like to see the

1:02:18.840 --> 1:02:21.360
<v Speaker 2>speed to market increase.

1:02:21.880 --> 1:02:25.280
<v Speaker 1>How would you incentivize that because right now, I mean,

1:02:25.320 --> 1:02:28.280
<v Speaker 1>I'll be honest, is as much as look, I'm an

1:02:28.320 --> 1:02:31.160
<v Speaker 1>advocate of the public markets. I think the public markets

1:02:31.160 --> 1:02:33.680
<v Speaker 1>are for all the reasons you just said, right, It's

1:02:33.720 --> 1:02:37.560
<v Speaker 1>a way to protect employee rights and all those things

1:02:37.800 --> 1:02:39.720
<v Speaker 1>you have. You know, it's having another set of eyes

1:02:40.160 --> 1:02:45.360
<v Speaker 1>on everything. But I think the incentive is to stay private,

1:02:45.600 --> 1:02:47.840
<v Speaker 1>and atentive is But if you so, how do you

1:02:47.840 --> 1:02:50.520
<v Speaker 1>incentivize the public. How do you incentivize.

1:02:49.960 --> 1:02:55.120
<v Speaker 2>Driven by the institutional capital allocators, meaning the giant pension funds,

1:02:55.120 --> 1:03:00.440
<v Speaker 2>the sovereign wealth funds, the endowments that give hundreds of

1:03:00.440 --> 1:03:02.960
<v Speaker 2>millions of dollars or billions of dollars to a private

1:03:02.960 --> 1:03:07.120
<v Speaker 2>equity fund of entra capital fund, whatever it is. Because ultimately,

1:03:07.600 --> 1:03:11.040
<v Speaker 2>every year that the company stays private, the RR of

1:03:11.360 --> 1:03:14.880
<v Speaker 2>the pension fund goes down. Right, So the people who

1:03:15.000 --> 1:03:18.960
<v Speaker 2>ultimately control the money are way too lax in the

1:03:19.000 --> 1:03:22.040
<v Speaker 2>requirements and pression that they put on the funds that

1:03:22.080 --> 1:03:22.840
<v Speaker 2>they invest in.

1:03:22.920 --> 1:03:25.920
<v Speaker 1>And so you think that people running the pension funds

1:03:25.960 --> 1:03:28.400
<v Speaker 1>could put more pressure in these private companies. And you

1:03:28.440 --> 1:03:30.800
<v Speaker 1>want our if they want our crash, you need to

1:03:30.800 --> 1:03:31.320
<v Speaker 1>go public.

1:03:31.480 --> 1:03:34.120
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, they said to Sequoia, if you don't get your

1:03:34.160 --> 1:03:38.200
<v Speaker 2>average company from your investment to an IPO down by

1:03:38.240 --> 1:03:41.360
<v Speaker 2>twenty five percent, we're not doing your next fund. At

1:03:41.360 --> 1:03:43.720
<v Speaker 2>the next board meeting, the person with Zaquoia on the

1:03:43.760 --> 1:03:46.160
<v Speaker 2>board is betting in the table, saying we got to

1:03:46.200 --> 1:03:49.400
<v Speaker 2>get to the market faster. So that's where the power

1:03:49.440 --> 1:03:52.440
<v Speaker 2>lies in this situation. And I really think that in

1:03:52.440 --> 1:03:55.920
<v Speaker 2>some ways because the public pension funds especially or look

1:03:55.960 --> 1:03:58.200
<v Speaker 2>when I was deputy governor of Illinois, like I saw this.

1:03:58.280 --> 1:04:01.240
<v Speaker 2>We would appoint people, but there are pointees right to

1:04:01.320 --> 1:04:04.400
<v Speaker 2>the pension funds. They weren't business people and as a result,

1:04:04.720 --> 1:04:09.959
<v Speaker 2>they're often poorly run. And you know, they are more

1:04:10.040 --> 1:04:12.240
<v Speaker 2>eager to be able to say I'm in sequoia, I'm

1:04:12.240 --> 1:04:15.120
<v Speaker 2>in in grease and whatever it is KKR. Then it

1:04:15.200 --> 1:04:19.280
<v Speaker 2>is demaining that the leaders of those funds be accountable

1:04:19.440 --> 1:04:23.600
<v Speaker 2>and provide really good returns. And so you know, that's

1:04:23.640 --> 1:04:29.240
<v Speaker 2>where it has to come from.

1:04:29.320 --> 1:04:33.360
<v Speaker 1>Anybody, uh, anybody getting grabbing your attention for twenty twenty

1:04:33.360 --> 1:04:34.960
<v Speaker 1>eight that you're excited about yet.

1:04:34.920 --> 1:04:37.920
<v Speaker 2>Or no, because in part, if you go back to

1:04:37.920 --> 1:04:40.680
<v Speaker 2>the conversation we had about twelve minutes ago, I would

1:04:40.720 --> 1:04:43.439
<v Speaker 2>say that I don't know who the rock star is yet,

1:04:44.000 --> 1:04:47.360
<v Speaker 2>and I know that if I just find the look

1:04:47.760 --> 1:04:50.120
<v Speaker 2>you know, like you people come through New York and

1:04:50.160 --> 1:04:51.840
<v Speaker 2>they're rising money or whatever in the car.

1:04:52.000 --> 1:04:55.200
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, you meet these people, right you kick, they're smart,

1:04:55.200 --> 1:04:59.360
<v Speaker 1>anyone's for president smart, they're impressive. Well, they're they're also

1:04:59.400 --> 1:05:02.920
<v Speaker 1>super narsiss. I always say this, like you run for president,

1:05:03.440 --> 1:05:05.960
<v Speaker 1>You're like, boy, you know you're You're a bit different

1:05:05.960 --> 1:05:08.240
<v Speaker 1>than most of us who don't think we should be right,

1:05:08.480 --> 1:05:08.960
<v Speaker 1>but you're.

1:05:08.840 --> 1:05:13.360
<v Speaker 2>Good at this. And so I don't trust my own

1:05:13.400 --> 1:05:16.120
<v Speaker 2>reaction in those meetings. And I've spent a lifetime around

1:05:16.120 --> 1:05:18.960
<v Speaker 2>politicians because I understand what they're really good at, and

1:05:18.960 --> 1:05:22.680
<v Speaker 2>that's what they're really good at, and so I don't

1:05:22.800 --> 1:05:24.960
<v Speaker 2>maybe it's you know, returned to the version of Iowa,

1:05:25.160 --> 1:05:27.480
<v Speaker 2>but I would like to see something that shows me

1:05:27.680 --> 1:05:30.960
<v Speaker 2>because look, I'm a rich guy in Manhattan, right. I

1:05:31.000 --> 1:05:35.280
<v Speaker 2>am not an any way indicative of America, right you.

1:05:36.320 --> 1:05:39.520
<v Speaker 2>I live in downtown, I went to Ivy League schools.

1:05:39.520 --> 1:05:42.360
<v Speaker 2>I'm everything that the that the right hates right many ways,

1:05:42.800 --> 1:05:46.440
<v Speaker 2>and I'm not a good barometer for who's gonna win

1:05:46.520 --> 1:05:51.280
<v Speaker 2>Iowa or New Hampshire. And so for me, what I'm

1:05:51.280 --> 1:05:53.160
<v Speaker 2>trying to do is know what I don't know. And

1:05:53.240 --> 1:05:56.400
<v Speaker 2>rather than saying, oh, Josh Shapiro is the guy, Yeah

1:05:56.760 --> 1:05:58.720
<v Speaker 2>he might. I don't even know Josh Piera, but he

1:05:58.840 --> 1:06:00.800
<v Speaker 2>might resonate really well with in a one on one

1:06:01.000 --> 1:06:03.800
<v Speaker 2>launch or whatever it is. But so what right, So

1:06:05.520 --> 1:06:08.480
<v Speaker 2>I would like to try to figure out a way

1:06:09.280 --> 1:06:12.280
<v Speaker 2>that who is the candidate that can do what you

1:06:12.400 --> 1:06:15.200
<v Speaker 2>talked about, which is they figured out how to navigate

1:06:15.200 --> 1:06:17.720
<v Speaker 2>the independence in New Hampshire, they figured out how to

1:06:17.800 --> 1:06:21.840
<v Speaker 2>organize ninety nine counties in Iowa, and then through that

1:06:22.200 --> 1:06:24.880
<v Speaker 2>you knew this person has the intangible skill.

1:06:25.640 --> 1:06:27.520
<v Speaker 1>Well it goes back. You know, it's funny you brought

1:06:27.560 --> 1:06:29.480
<v Speaker 1>up the Battle of the Network Stars. By the way,

1:06:29.480 --> 1:06:32.000
<v Speaker 1>if you if you ever want to entertain yourself, go

1:06:32.040 --> 1:06:34.440
<v Speaker 1>look at go go watch highlight reels of that on YouTube,

1:06:34.480 --> 1:06:37.000
<v Speaker 1>because they haven't. Okay, oh my god, it's it's fantastic.

1:06:37.320 --> 1:06:41.080
<v Speaker 1>It's unbelievable, right you just see the You're like, how

1:06:41.160 --> 1:06:44.400
<v Speaker 1>much cocaine was being done behind the scenes, right, there

1:06:44.480 --> 1:06:48.080
<v Speaker 1>is no doubt, Like you wouldn't have it if there

1:06:48.160 --> 1:06:50.400
<v Speaker 1>was it, like you know, the amount of like crazy

1:06:50.520 --> 1:06:53.880
<v Speaker 1>s seventies coke that was taking place. But anyway, that

1:06:53.920 --> 1:06:57.880
<v Speaker 1>ought to be actually a pretty good Netflix limited series

1:06:57.960 --> 1:07:00.720
<v Speaker 1>like behind the scenes and the battles and would starts.

1:07:00.880 --> 1:07:02.240
<v Speaker 1>I'm sure it'd be you know.

1:07:03.000 --> 1:07:06.040
<v Speaker 2>Just hilarious investing and we're going to make the show.

1:07:06.240 --> 1:07:08.560
<v Speaker 1>Let's make that show. It would be you know, tell

1:07:08.640 --> 1:07:11.200
<v Speaker 1>us the real story of Farah Faucet and Lee Majors,

1:07:11.280 --> 1:07:16.760
<v Speaker 1>you know, like those those sorts of things. But there

1:07:16.800 --> 1:07:20.240
<v Speaker 1>is a series of tests that we want these candidates

1:07:20.280 --> 1:07:22.840
<v Speaker 1>to go through. And while I don't think we want

1:07:22.880 --> 1:07:26.200
<v Speaker 1>it to look like Survivor or a game show, in

1:07:26.280 --> 1:07:31.080
<v Speaker 1>some ways I do. I do like that there are

1:07:31.160 --> 1:07:34.760
<v Speaker 1>all these weird obstacles in the primary calendar, or that

1:07:34.800 --> 1:07:39.360
<v Speaker 1>there used to be, because while it doesn't test you

1:07:39.400 --> 1:07:42.200
<v Speaker 1>on whether how you're going to handle Putin, if you

1:07:42.360 --> 1:07:47.240
<v Speaker 1>can't handle you know, the person that you got to

1:07:47.280 --> 1:07:50.560
<v Speaker 1>deal with in Columbia, South Carolina, that that in order

1:07:50.600 --> 1:07:53.960
<v Speaker 1>to navigate you know, precinct, why well, then how the

1:07:54.000 --> 1:07:56.520
<v Speaker 1>hell do we expect you to be able to handle

1:07:56.640 --> 1:07:58.200
<v Speaker 1>a tough moment with Putin? Right?

1:07:58.280 --> 1:08:02.600
<v Speaker 2>So, the modern version that actually is the candidates who

1:08:02.600 --> 1:08:05.720
<v Speaker 2>are truly adapt to new forms of technology, whether it

1:08:05.840 --> 1:08:10.680
<v Speaker 2>was Kennedy and television or Obama and text, or Trump

1:08:10.680 --> 1:08:14.520
<v Speaker 2>and Twitter or Mandani in short form video, they do

1:08:14.720 --> 1:08:17.559
<v Speaker 2>really well because that becomes the way to do it.

1:08:18.840 --> 1:08:21.880
<v Speaker 1>No, it's a you're not wrong, it's like how do

1:08:21.920 --> 1:08:25.360
<v Speaker 1>we how do we how do we sort of celebrate

1:08:25.439 --> 1:08:27.800
<v Speaker 1>that part of the prime because you know, there's plenty

1:08:27.800 --> 1:08:31.000
<v Speaker 1>of people who will criticize our conversation. You're trying to gamify.

1:08:31.479 --> 1:08:33.880
<v Speaker 1>It is sort of, it's not gamify. It's simply finding

1:08:33.920 --> 1:08:39.080
<v Speaker 1>the person who's got the best attributes to handle how

1:08:39.120 --> 1:08:40.599
<v Speaker 1>the job is done today.

1:08:40.880 --> 1:08:46.360
<v Speaker 2>Plus a binary contest is a game by definition, right,

1:08:46.560 --> 1:08:48.880
<v Speaker 2>So like we're already in that construct.

1:08:49.600 --> 1:08:54.080
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, well, mobile voting, when will we see the first votes.

1:08:54.400 --> 1:08:59.320
<v Speaker 2>April in Anchorage? And then my hope would be a

1:08:59.360 --> 1:09:01.120
<v Speaker 2>whole bunch of these in different states.

1:09:01.360 --> 1:09:04.640
<v Speaker 1>What does success look like to you? Fifty turnout? Like

1:09:04.720 --> 1:09:05.960
<v Speaker 1>huge increases, You're not.

1:09:05.960 --> 1:09:08.880
<v Speaker 2>Going to get that in year one. So Estonia is

1:09:08.880 --> 1:09:10.840
<v Speaker 2>the one country in the world that has had internet

1:09:10.920 --> 1:09:13.040
<v Speaker 2>voting for twenty years. I went over there this summer

1:09:13.080 --> 1:09:14.280
<v Speaker 2>to kind of meet with a lot of people and

1:09:14.360 --> 1:09:17.040
<v Speaker 2>learn more about it. So in year one it was

1:09:17.120 --> 1:09:21.760
<v Speaker 2>one point three percent of voters voted online. Today it's well,

1:09:22.120 --> 1:09:26.960
<v Speaker 2>it's a significant majority, right, And they went from having

1:09:27.760 --> 1:09:31.000
<v Speaker 2>higher national turnout and low local turnout to sort of

1:09:31.080 --> 1:09:34.639
<v Speaker 2>normalize get across the board, whereas now even Musp elections

1:09:34.640 --> 1:09:37.960
<v Speaker 2>are getting fifty instead of five because people just got

1:09:38.040 --> 1:09:40.320
<v Speaker 2>used to it and it just became so easy that

1:09:40.360 --> 1:09:42.200
<v Speaker 2>there's no reason not to do it. So that's what

1:09:42.240 --> 1:09:42.840
<v Speaker 2>I'm going for.

1:09:43.320 --> 1:09:45.920
<v Speaker 1>Hey, in nineteen ninety five, the state of Oregon ran

1:09:45.920 --> 1:09:50.320
<v Speaker 1>this interesting experiment for mail in voting. It was the

1:09:50.360 --> 1:09:55.639
<v Speaker 1>special election to replace Bob Packway the entire West coast.

1:09:55.720 --> 1:09:59.040
<v Speaker 1>Now it majority votes by mail. Yeah right, you know,

1:09:59.120 --> 1:10:00.439
<v Speaker 1>and that was just thirty years ago.

1:10:00.920 --> 1:10:02.639
<v Speaker 2>So that's that's what I'm hoping to do here.

1:10:02.960 --> 1:10:05.599
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, well, I'll be watching rather than this great conversation

1:10:05.600 --> 1:10:06.200
<v Speaker 1>and this was.

1:10:06.160 --> 1:10:08.519
<v Speaker 2>Super fun and yeah, absolutely loved it to meet and

1:10:08.520 --> 1:10:10.840
<v Speaker 2>sort we'll do it again, all right, See, thank you.

1:10:14.600 --> 1:10:17.680
<v Speaker 1>There's a reason results matter more than promises, just like

1:10:17.720 --> 1:10:20.839
<v Speaker 1>there's a reason Morgan and Morgan is America's largest injury

1:10:20.920 --> 1:10:23.639
<v Speaker 1>law firm. For the last thirty five years, they've recovered

1:10:23.760 --> 1:10:26.919
<v Speaker 1>twenty five billion dollars for more than half a million clients.

1:10:27.479 --> 1:10:31.080
<v Speaker 1>It includes cases where insurance companies offered next to nothing,

1:10:31.360 --> 1:10:34.120
<v Speaker 1>just hoping to get away with paying as little as possible.

1:10:34.200 --> 1:10:37.240
<v Speaker 1>Morgan and Morgan fought back ended up winning millions. In fact,

1:10:37.360 --> 1:10:40.479
<v Speaker 1>in Pennsylvania, one client was awarded twenty six million dollars,

1:10:40.960 --> 1:10:44.000
<v Speaker 1>which was a staggering forty times the amount that the

1:10:44.040 --> 1:10:47.280
<v Speaker 1>insurance company originally offered that original offer six hundred and

1:10:47.360 --> 1:10:50.880
<v Speaker 1>fifty thousand dollars twenty six million, six hundred fifty thousand dollars.

1:10:50.960 --> 1:10:53.120
<v Speaker 1>So with more than one thousand lawyers across the country,

1:10:53.240 --> 1:10:55.879
<v Speaker 1>they know how to deliver for everyday people. If you're injured,

1:10:56.000 --> 1:10:58.559
<v Speaker 1>you need a lawyer, You need somebody to get your back.

1:10:58.960 --> 1:11:01.720
<v Speaker 1>Check out for the People dot com, Slash podcast or

1:11:02.160 --> 1:11:07.320
<v Speaker 1>Dow Pound Law Pound five two nine law on your

1:11:07.360 --> 1:11:09.960
<v Speaker 1>cell phone. And remember all law firms are not the same,

1:11:10.000 --> 1:11:12.160
<v Speaker 1>so check out Morgan and Morgan. Their fee is free

1:11:12.439 --> 1:11:13.080
<v Speaker 1>unless they win