WEBVTT - What the DOJ Subpoenas Mean for the Fed

0:00:02.720 --> 0:00:07.560
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg, Audio Studios, podcasts, radio News.

0:00:08.720 --> 0:00:09.280
<v Speaker 2>Good Evening.

0:00:10.119 --> 0:00:13.840
<v Speaker 3>Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell issued an extraordinary statement on

0:00:13.920 --> 0:00:16.840
<v Speaker 3>Sunday night. The FED posted a video of Powell reading

0:00:16.840 --> 0:00:17.319
<v Speaker 3>it in full.

0:00:17.920 --> 0:00:21.079
<v Speaker 2>On Friday, the Department of Justice served the Federal Reserve

0:00:21.120 --> 0:00:25.200
<v Speaker 2>with grand jury subpoenas threatening a criminal indictment related to

0:00:25.239 --> 0:00:28.920
<v Speaker 2>my testimony before the Senate Banking Committee last June. That

0:00:29.000 --> 0:00:33.159
<v Speaker 2>testimony concerned, in part, a multi year project to renovate

0:00:33.280 --> 0:00:35.199
<v Speaker 2>historic Federal Reserve office buildings.

0:00:35.960 --> 0:00:40.839
<v Speaker 4>These developments represent an extreme excavation of the pressure campaign

0:00:40.920 --> 0:00:44.000
<v Speaker 4>that the Trump administration has been putting on the FED

0:00:44.040 --> 0:00:47.240
<v Speaker 4>and chaired Jerome Powell for months now.

0:00:47.600 --> 0:00:50.240
<v Speaker 3>That's Amera amok Way. She covers the Federal Reserve for

0:00:50.280 --> 0:00:51.920
<v Speaker 3>Bloomberg along with Enda Current.

0:00:52.400 --> 0:00:55.320
<v Speaker 1>What you're talking about is effectively threatening the Federal Reserve

0:00:55.440 --> 0:01:00.000
<v Speaker 1>chair with criminal charges over the costs of a building project,

0:01:00.440 --> 0:01:03.560
<v Speaker 1>when we know the backstory is that the White House

0:01:03.640 --> 0:01:06.720
<v Speaker 1>is very unhappy with where interest rates are at and

0:01:06.800 --> 0:01:09.560
<v Speaker 1>they want to use his current opportunity to remold the

0:01:09.840 --> 0:01:10.680
<v Speaker 1>Federal Reserves.

0:01:11.200 --> 0:01:13.840
<v Speaker 3>Enda and emer have been tracking how the relationship between

0:01:13.880 --> 0:01:17.760
<v Speaker 3>Trump and Powell has evolved or devolved since Trump first

0:01:17.800 --> 0:01:19.800
<v Speaker 3>tapped Powell to be the chair of the Federal Reserve

0:01:19.959 --> 0:01:23.520
<v Speaker 3>in twenty seventeen, and they've reported on the President's efforts

0:01:23.600 --> 0:01:26.679
<v Speaker 3>to try to fire Powell and to reshape the Central Bank.

0:01:27.120 --> 0:01:30.160
<v Speaker 3>Powell's term is fed share ends in May, and Preston

0:01:30.200 --> 0:01:33.040
<v Speaker 3>Trump says he's close to naming someone to succeed him.

0:01:33.640 --> 0:01:37.360
<v Speaker 3>In the face of insults and threats, Powell has kept quiet.

0:01:37.680 --> 0:01:41.520
<v Speaker 3>He's been reluctant and often unwilling to answer reporter's questions

0:01:41.640 --> 0:01:44.520
<v Speaker 3>about what President Trump has said about him. So his

0:01:44.600 --> 0:01:47.040
<v Speaker 3>statement on Sunday is a sea change.

0:01:47.200 --> 0:01:50.560
<v Speaker 2>This unprecedented action should be seen in the broader context

0:01:50.640 --> 0:01:53.520
<v Speaker 2>of the administration's threats and ongoing.

0:01:53.120 --> 0:01:57.960
<v Speaker 3>Pressure, controversy over that renovation, and allegations he misled Congress

0:01:57.960 --> 0:02:01.720
<v Speaker 3>in testimony last summer. Those are pretacts, Powell said.

0:02:01.880 --> 0:02:04.560
<v Speaker 2>The threat of criminal charges is a consequence of the

0:02:04.600 --> 0:02:08.680
<v Speaker 2>Federal Reserve setting interest rates based on our best assessment

0:02:08.840 --> 0:02:11.640
<v Speaker 2>of what will serve the public, rather than following the

0:02:11.680 --> 0:02:13.040
<v Speaker 2>preferences of the President.

0:02:20.680 --> 0:02:22.480
<v Speaker 3>I'm David Gera, and this is the big take from

0:02:22.520 --> 0:02:26.040
<v Speaker 3>Bloomberg News today. On the show, the Department of Justice

0:02:26.080 --> 0:02:28.840
<v Speaker 3>subpoenas the Federal Reserve, what it means for one of

0:02:28.880 --> 0:02:32.160
<v Speaker 3>the most important financial institutions in the world, for its leader,

0:02:32.280 --> 0:02:35.160
<v Speaker 3>Jerome Powell, and for the White House, and where things

0:02:35.200 --> 0:02:43.080
<v Speaker 3>could go from here. In Feed Reserve Chair Jerome Powell's

0:02:43.080 --> 0:02:45.880
<v Speaker 3>statement about the subpoenas the Department of Justice served the

0:02:45.880 --> 0:02:49.360
<v Speaker 3>FED on Friday, Powell said, they're part of something bigger.

0:02:49.720 --> 0:02:52.399
<v Speaker 3>They're a threat to the Fed's long standing independence.

0:02:52.760 --> 0:02:54.560
<v Speaker 2>This is about whether the FED will be able to

0:02:54.600 --> 0:02:58.160
<v Speaker 2>continue to set interest rates based on evidence and economic conditions,

0:02:58.639 --> 0:03:02.079
<v Speaker 2>or whether instead monetary policy will be directed by political

0:03:02.120 --> 0:03:03.399
<v Speaker 2>pressure or intimidation.

0:03:03.760 --> 0:03:06.560
<v Speaker 3>Amara, let's start with this statement and what made it

0:03:07.280 --> 0:03:10.520
<v Speaker 3>unique or unprecedented. Why in terms of medium and message

0:03:10.520 --> 0:03:11.840
<v Speaker 3>was the statement so significant?

0:03:12.280 --> 0:03:15.120
<v Speaker 4>Wow, David, when I read this statement, I had to

0:03:15.160 --> 0:03:17.800
<v Speaker 4>take I mean, usually take a minute before you start writing,

0:03:17.800 --> 0:03:19.800
<v Speaker 4>but I took like an extra minute because I was like,

0:03:19.880 --> 0:03:24.720
<v Speaker 4>this is this is truly remarkable that j. Powell is

0:03:24.760 --> 0:03:28.400
<v Speaker 4>coming out with both video and text and doing a

0:03:28.560 --> 0:03:33.480
<v Speaker 4>very direct response to the administration, a very forceful response

0:03:33.520 --> 0:03:37.119
<v Speaker 4>to the administration. Usually, when Chair Pale is asked about

0:03:37.520 --> 0:03:39.600
<v Speaker 4>things that President Trump is saying or things that the

0:03:39.600 --> 0:03:42.240
<v Speaker 4>administration is doing, you can almost predict what he's going

0:03:42.320 --> 0:03:45.320
<v Speaker 4>to say. It is usually we at the FED, we

0:03:45.400 --> 0:03:46.880
<v Speaker 4>just try to stick to our knitting. We try to

0:03:46.880 --> 0:03:48.560
<v Speaker 4>stay out of politics. We just want to do a

0:03:48.560 --> 0:03:50.680
<v Speaker 4>good job for the American people, some version of that.

0:03:51.400 --> 0:03:54.440
<v Speaker 4>This was so very different than what he usually says

0:03:54.480 --> 0:03:58.800
<v Speaker 4>in response to attack and pressure from the administration. He said,

0:03:58.800 --> 0:04:02.240
<v Speaker 4>this issue of the building renovation and what he said

0:04:02.280 --> 0:04:05.680
<v Speaker 4>to Congress last year about it are essentially pretexts for

0:04:06.080 --> 0:04:08.760
<v Speaker 4>the administration to go after him and go after the

0:04:08.800 --> 0:04:11.880
<v Speaker 4>FED because the FED has not delivered their preferred policy,

0:04:12.080 --> 0:04:15.240
<v Speaker 4>and he basically just came out swinging and for the FED,

0:04:15.320 --> 0:04:18.560
<v Speaker 4>which just likes to kind of take sort of a detached,

0:04:18.720 --> 0:04:22.160
<v Speaker 4>above the freight approach, this is really a departure from

0:04:22.160 --> 0:04:25.440
<v Speaker 4>how they usually respond to these kinds of situations, and

0:04:25.480 --> 0:04:27.840
<v Speaker 4>it just shows that they, I think that they are

0:04:27.880 --> 0:04:30.840
<v Speaker 4>taking it very seriously and they do see this as

0:04:31.160 --> 0:04:33.960
<v Speaker 4>perhaps the realist and most serious threat to the Fed's

0:04:33.960 --> 0:04:37.240
<v Speaker 4>independence since President Trump returned to office.

0:04:37.720 --> 0:04:40.479
<v Speaker 3>That was your reaction? What was the reaction of markets

0:04:40.480 --> 0:04:42.480
<v Speaker 3>to this news, both of the subpoenas and the statement

0:04:42.480 --> 0:04:43.120
<v Speaker 3>from the FED chair.

0:04:43.440 --> 0:04:45.920
<v Speaker 4>So initially we saw and I think we are still

0:04:45.960 --> 0:04:48.840
<v Speaker 4>seeing sort of this selloff in sort of the America

0:04:48.880 --> 0:04:51.479
<v Speaker 4>trade right. As ND and I have written about, markets

0:04:51.560 --> 0:04:55.240
<v Speaker 4>have tended to take these threats to FED independence kind

0:04:55.240 --> 0:04:58.640
<v Speaker 4>of enstride, and it'll be interesting to see if people

0:04:58.800 --> 0:05:04.800
<v Speaker 4>see this development something that is more serious than previous developments.

0:05:04.839 --> 0:05:07.839
<v Speaker 4>You know, even when the President moved to FIREFED Governor

0:05:07.880 --> 0:05:09.880
<v Speaker 4>Lisa Cook, we didn't really see much of a reaction

0:05:10.400 --> 0:05:13.200
<v Speaker 4>in markets, and that was really surprising because people were like, WHOA,

0:05:13.400 --> 0:05:15.680
<v Speaker 4>that is unprecedented that the President is trying to remove

0:05:15.720 --> 0:05:16.440
<v Speaker 4>a FED governor.

0:05:16.800 --> 0:05:20.880
<v Speaker 1>I think in terms of attacks on an institution that

0:05:21.040 --> 0:05:23.880
<v Speaker 1>is at the center of steering the economy, at an

0:05:23.920 --> 0:05:26.760
<v Speaker 1>institution that is meant to be independent of politics and

0:05:26.760 --> 0:05:30.360
<v Speaker 1>a scene as such, it's pretty unprecedented in its nature, David,

0:05:30.520 --> 0:05:33.039
<v Speaker 1>no doubt about it. So on paper, it's an argument

0:05:33.080 --> 0:05:36.640
<v Speaker 1>about classic government cost overrun, but we know the backstory

0:05:36.720 --> 0:05:37.839
<v Speaker 1>runs much deeper than that.

0:05:39.160 --> 0:05:41.800
<v Speaker 3>And it didn't take long before we heard from members

0:05:41.839 --> 0:05:45.080
<v Speaker 3>of the Senate Banking Committee. What have lawmakers said in

0:05:45.120 --> 0:05:48.039
<v Speaker 3>response to again the news of the subpoenas and also

0:05:48.360 --> 0:05:49.760
<v Speaker 3>what Chair Powell said about them.

0:05:50.000 --> 0:05:53.599
<v Speaker 1>Well, we've had one interesting intervention in particular, David, with

0:05:53.760 --> 0:05:57.680
<v Speaker 1>a Republican Party. Senator phyllis making the point that he

0:05:58.320 --> 0:06:00.560
<v Speaker 1>first of all views this as a police little attack

0:06:00.640 --> 0:06:02.880
<v Speaker 1>on the FED, and he has made the point that

0:06:02.960 --> 0:06:05.640
<v Speaker 1>he will use his role on the relevant committee in

0:06:05.680 --> 0:06:09.120
<v Speaker 1>the Senate, the Banking Committee, to block the approval of

0:06:09.160 --> 0:06:11.000
<v Speaker 1>wherever the White House puts up to be the next

0:06:11.160 --> 0:06:14.520
<v Speaker 1>FED Chair or any other Federal Reserve appointment in the meantime. Now,

0:06:14.520 --> 0:06:17.640
<v Speaker 1>that's very important because it's the first major intervention from

0:06:17.680 --> 0:06:20.840
<v Speaker 1>the Hill and into the pressure that the White has

0:06:21.000 --> 0:06:23.400
<v Speaker 1>have been putting on the FED. Number one, it comes

0:06:23.440 --> 0:06:26.320
<v Speaker 1>from the Republican side of things as well. But number two,

0:06:26.400 --> 0:06:30.000
<v Speaker 1>it means that President Trump and the treasure Tecuy Bestin

0:06:30.080 --> 0:06:31.760
<v Speaker 1>had been floating we're going to announce a new FED

0:06:31.839 --> 0:06:34.040
<v Speaker 1>chair at some point soon overcoming weeks. Well, if they

0:06:34.040 --> 0:06:36.400
<v Speaker 1>go ahead and make that announcement, now, the entire FED

0:06:36.440 --> 0:06:38.200
<v Speaker 1>watching world in the rest of the world will say, well,

0:06:38.200 --> 0:06:40.159
<v Speaker 1>hold on, you don't have the numbers to get that

0:06:40.200 --> 0:06:41.080
<v Speaker 1>person approved.

0:06:42.640 --> 0:06:44.280
<v Speaker 3>Mara at the center of all of this is this

0:06:44.360 --> 0:06:47.960
<v Speaker 3>renovation project of these two feder Reserve buildings in Washington.

0:06:48.160 --> 0:06:50.839
<v Speaker 3>Just remind us what that issue is and sort of

0:06:50.839 --> 0:06:52.520
<v Speaker 3>why it's become so controversial.

0:06:52.960 --> 0:06:57.080
<v Speaker 4>Yes, So this issue really bubbled up over last summer

0:06:57.680 --> 0:07:00.400
<v Speaker 4>after there were media reports about this and a half

0:07:00.400 --> 0:07:03.600
<v Speaker 4>billion dollar renovation of two historic buildings that the FED

0:07:03.680 --> 0:07:07.040
<v Speaker 4>is doing at its headquarters in DC. The media reports

0:07:07.120 --> 0:07:10.720
<v Speaker 4>kind of characterized the project as very extravagant, that it

0:07:10.800 --> 0:07:14.080
<v Speaker 4>had all these fancy design features and things like that.

0:07:14.280 --> 0:07:17.560
<v Speaker 4>And so when Chirpal went to do his semi annual

0:07:17.640 --> 0:07:21.600
<v Speaker 4>testimony before Congress, he was asked about this and he

0:07:21.640 --> 0:07:23.679
<v Speaker 4>sort of pushed back against the idea that the project

0:07:23.720 --> 0:07:26.880
<v Speaker 4>is very extravagant. He did have to answer questions about

0:07:26.880 --> 0:07:29.360
<v Speaker 4>the fact that the project's costs have risen over time,

0:07:30.080 --> 0:07:33.120
<v Speaker 4>and that testimony is really at the center of the

0:07:33.240 --> 0:07:38.120
<v Speaker 4>subpoenas because you had allies of President Trump after the

0:07:38.160 --> 0:07:41.640
<v Speaker 4>testimony say that Palell was not honest during that testimony,

0:07:42.160 --> 0:07:45.640
<v Speaker 4>and they called on Congress and the DOJ to investigate

0:07:46.120 --> 0:07:49.480
<v Speaker 4>whether he had lied to Congress, And evidently we now

0:07:49.480 --> 0:07:52.920
<v Speaker 4>have that DOJ investigation now. For his part, pal has

0:07:52.920 --> 0:07:56.080
<v Speaker 4>said that he was truthful during that testimony, and he's

0:07:56.120 --> 0:07:59.120
<v Speaker 4>also said that during the entire course of the project

0:07:59.400 --> 0:08:01.880
<v Speaker 4>that the FED has aimed to be transparent about its

0:08:01.920 --> 0:08:04.920
<v Speaker 4>costs and other issues and keep Congress informed.

0:08:05.800 --> 0:08:08.760
<v Speaker 3>It was maybe like a month after that congressional testimony

0:08:08.800 --> 0:08:12.480
<v Speaker 3>that President Trump made that unprecedented trip to Federal Serve

0:08:12.520 --> 0:08:15.600
<v Speaker 3>headquarters the ERA and got a tour of the construction site.

0:08:15.880 --> 0:08:19.840
<v Speaker 3>Could you just describe that moment, both the tours of

0:08:19.840 --> 0:08:22.080
<v Speaker 3>what the President said afterward, there was this kind of

0:08:22.160 --> 0:08:25.160
<v Speaker 3>memorable exchange between the FED Chair and the President about

0:08:25.160 --> 0:08:26.360
<v Speaker 3>how big those overruns are.

0:08:26.560 --> 0:08:29.440
<v Speaker 4>President Trump went over there, walked around, and then he

0:08:29.520 --> 0:08:32.719
<v Speaker 4>threw out a number about how much the project costs.

0:08:33.000 --> 0:08:35.680
<v Speaker 4>It looks like it's about three point one billion, one up.

0:08:35.559 --> 0:08:37.040
<v Speaker 1>A little bit or a lot.

0:08:37.880 --> 0:08:40.200
<v Speaker 4>And you may have seen the memes.

0:08:41.360 --> 0:08:43.960
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it just came out.

0:08:44.480 --> 0:08:45.560
<v Speaker 1>I haven't heard that from anybody.

0:08:45.559 --> 0:08:48.920
<v Speaker 4>To FED Chairpaul was like what like looking at a

0:08:48.960 --> 0:08:51.400
<v Speaker 4>piece of paper and it went completely viral because Cherpaul

0:08:51.480 --> 0:08:53.400
<v Speaker 4>was like, no, actually, that's not how much it costs.

0:08:53.760 --> 0:08:55.760
<v Speaker 2>You just added into third buildings.

0:08:55.760 --> 0:08:56.280
<v Speaker 4>What that is.

0:08:56.320 --> 0:08:59.360
<v Speaker 2>That's a third building. It's a building that's being built

0:09:00.040 --> 0:09:01.400
<v Speaker 2>and he was built five years ago.

0:09:02.160 --> 0:09:04.480
<v Speaker 4>That visit by President Trump's of the construction site was

0:09:04.520 --> 0:09:08.520
<v Speaker 4>actually really surprising because given all the pressure and all

0:09:08.559 --> 0:09:12.160
<v Speaker 4>the criticisms that he and his administration have been lobbing

0:09:12.200 --> 0:09:14.280
<v Speaker 4>about the project. You would have expected him to go

0:09:14.320 --> 0:09:16.440
<v Speaker 4>over there and come out and really be critical, but

0:09:16.520 --> 0:09:18.880
<v Speaker 4>he was kind of nice. He was like, oh, you know,

0:09:19.840 --> 0:09:21.760
<v Speaker 4>it's okay. You know, this is not a reason to

0:09:21.800 --> 0:09:22.319
<v Speaker 4>fire him.

0:09:23.520 --> 0:09:25.920
<v Speaker 3>Are there are things the Chairman can say to you

0:09:26.000 --> 0:09:26.480
<v Speaker 3>today that.

0:09:26.440 --> 0:09:29.000
<v Speaker 1>Would make you back off some of the earlier criticisms.

0:09:29.280 --> 0:09:32.440
<v Speaker 3>Well, I'd love him to lower interest rates.

0:09:32.480 --> 0:09:33.959
<v Speaker 1>Other than that, I tell you.

0:09:34.040 --> 0:09:36.480
<v Speaker 4>So, you left with the impression that maybe the construction

0:09:36.600 --> 0:09:40.400
<v Speaker 4>project was something that the administration was kind of leaving behind,

0:09:40.679 --> 0:09:44.360
<v Speaker 4>because President Trump really was kind of tame when he

0:09:44.480 --> 0:09:46.320
<v Speaker 4>visited the site over the summer.

0:09:47.640 --> 0:09:50.160
<v Speaker 3>And the Fed chair in his statement counseled everybody to

0:09:50.240 --> 0:09:52.679
<v Speaker 3>kind of look at what's happened here over the weekend.

0:09:52.800 --> 0:09:55.320
<v Speaker 3>In this broader context, it does seem that, you know,

0:09:55.760 --> 0:09:58.760
<v Speaker 3>after that tour, things quieted down a little bit. Yes,

0:09:58.800 --> 0:10:00.959
<v Speaker 3>there's this matter involving le A Cook that's still kind

0:10:00.960 --> 0:10:04.000
<v Speaker 3>of roiling in the background. The President tried to fire her.

0:10:04.480 --> 0:10:06.080
<v Speaker 3>She's a FED governor in the Supreme Court is going

0:10:06.120 --> 0:10:08.120
<v Speaker 3>to wait the legality of that in the coming weeks.

0:10:08.800 --> 0:10:12.160
<v Speaker 3>Help us understand the broader context here of the relationship

0:10:12.160 --> 0:10:14.840
<v Speaker 3>between the Trump, White House, and the Federal Reserve. Going

0:10:14.880 --> 0:10:15.160
<v Speaker 3>into the.

0:10:15.160 --> 0:10:18.240
<v Speaker 1>Weekend, it's obviously a very tense day, but it is kind

0:10:18.240 --> 0:10:20.680
<v Speaker 1>of two front suit. On the one hand, there is

0:10:20.679 --> 0:10:23.600
<v Speaker 1>the headline that the White House wants lower boring costs,

0:10:23.880 --> 0:10:27.120
<v Speaker 1>you know, cheaper money, and the Federalerserve policymakers have been

0:10:27.400 --> 0:10:29.480
<v Speaker 1>reluctant to move as fast as the White House because

0:10:29.520 --> 0:10:31.679
<v Speaker 1>they're still worried about where inflation is at and if

0:10:31.679 --> 0:10:34.000
<v Speaker 1>you cut indust rates too low too quickly, they're worried

0:10:34.000 --> 0:10:35.960
<v Speaker 1>that inflation would take off. So that's the first point

0:10:35.960 --> 0:10:39.880
<v Speaker 1>of tension between them. But the subplot underneath this is

0:10:39.880 --> 0:10:42.520
<v Speaker 1>that President Trump is also looking for opportunities to reshape

0:10:42.520 --> 0:10:44.640
<v Speaker 1>and remold the FED in the way he wants it

0:10:44.679 --> 0:10:46.920
<v Speaker 1>to be, to share his worldview on the economy, and

0:10:46.960 --> 0:10:49.880
<v Speaker 1>in particular, he has the opportunity to of course appoint

0:10:49.920 --> 0:10:52.600
<v Speaker 1>a new FED chair at some point soon to replace

0:10:52.800 --> 0:10:55.120
<v Speaker 1>a chair Palell when he steps down his chair in May.

0:10:55.600 --> 0:10:58.800
<v Speaker 1>Chair Powell can actually remain on the FED board until

0:10:58.880 --> 0:11:02.240
<v Speaker 1>early twenty twenty eight, and the thinking speaking to FED

0:11:02.320 --> 0:11:04.800
<v Speaker 1>watchers is that the White House are very concerned that

0:11:05.160 --> 0:11:07.880
<v Speaker 1>Chapell might stay on the board for some time and

0:11:07.920 --> 0:11:11.040
<v Speaker 1>deny them the opportunity to fill that gap with somebody

0:11:11.040 --> 0:11:13.680
<v Speaker 1>who shares their view and where interest rates should be.

0:11:13.720 --> 0:11:15.800
<v Speaker 1>And that's why this is thinking that this is part

0:11:15.800 --> 0:11:19.360
<v Speaker 1>of a concerted pressure campaign to you know, pressure mister

0:11:19.400 --> 0:11:22.320
<v Speaker 1>Powell to move on off the board once his termers

0:11:22.400 --> 0:11:25.120
<v Speaker 1>chair steps up. So there's been that pressure, of course

0:11:25.120 --> 0:11:28.600
<v Speaker 1>on Governor Cook with that unprecedented attempt to fire her.

0:11:29.200 --> 0:11:32.520
<v Speaker 1>We had the insulation of Governor Myron. It adds up

0:11:32.559 --> 0:11:35.920
<v Speaker 1>to this idea that we're in a moment where, you know,

0:11:35.920 --> 0:11:37.839
<v Speaker 1>Trump really is trying to remold the FED the way

0:11:37.840 --> 0:11:38.600
<v Speaker 1>Trump wants it to be.

0:11:40.679 --> 0:11:42.920
<v Speaker 3>So what do we know about the Department of Justice's

0:11:43.000 --> 0:11:56.840
<v Speaker 3>threat of a criminal indictment? That's after the break Federal

0:11:56.800 --> 0:11:59.960
<v Speaker 3>Reserve Church. Jerome Powell acknowledged the FED was served grand

0:12:00.080 --> 0:12:04.320
<v Speaker 3>jerysapoena's late last week. The Justice Department is investigating whether

0:12:04.400 --> 0:12:07.840
<v Speaker 3>Powell lied to lawmakers in June when he testified before

0:12:07.840 --> 0:12:10.640
<v Speaker 3>the Senate Banking Committee. Bloomberg is reporting this effort was

0:12:10.720 --> 0:12:14.320
<v Speaker 3>largely driven by the director of the Federal Housing Finance Agency,

0:12:14.360 --> 0:12:17.480
<v Speaker 3>Bill Poulti. Pulty declined to comment on that during an

0:12:17.480 --> 0:12:20.920
<v Speaker 3>interview on Bloomberg television on Monday morning. The DOJ's outside

0:12:20.960 --> 0:12:21.640
<v Speaker 3>of my purview.

0:12:21.800 --> 0:12:23.559
<v Speaker 4>This is out of my purview. I don't know anything

0:12:23.600 --> 0:12:25.680
<v Speaker 4>about it, and I would defer you to the DOJ.

0:12:26.320 --> 0:12:29.360
<v Speaker 3>According to Bloomberg FED reporters Enda Curran and Amara amok Way,

0:12:29.600 --> 0:12:32.160
<v Speaker 3>President Trump has said he was not briefed on the

0:12:32.240 --> 0:12:35.960
<v Speaker 3>Justice Department's investigation and he had no prior knowledge of it.

0:12:36.280 --> 0:12:40.120
<v Speaker 4>He did an interview with NBC News on Sunday night

0:12:40.280 --> 0:12:43.400
<v Speaker 4>after news of these subpoenas came out, and he said

0:12:43.440 --> 0:12:46.040
<v Speaker 4>he didn't know anything about the subpoenas, and he said

0:12:46.120 --> 0:12:49.280
<v Speaker 4>that they didn't have anything to do with his desire

0:12:49.360 --> 0:12:53.960
<v Speaker 4>for lower interest rates. So make of that what you will.

0:12:55.920 --> 0:12:58.040
<v Speaker 3>And I posted the FED chair statement the text of

0:12:58.080 --> 0:13:00.800
<v Speaker 3>it on LinkedIn shortly after the FED public And this

0:13:00.880 --> 0:13:02.839
<v Speaker 3>is what our colleague John Author has commented. He's a

0:13:02.920 --> 0:13:05.679
<v Speaker 3>commist for Bloomberg Opinion friend of the show. He said, quote,

0:13:05.840 --> 0:13:08.920
<v Speaker 3>this is quite extraordinary. Powell steps down and Trump nominates

0:13:08.960 --> 0:13:11.439
<v Speaker 3>his success for only months from now. It's hard to

0:13:11.480 --> 0:13:13.680
<v Speaker 3>see the point of this. Even if there were a

0:13:13.760 --> 0:13:17.199
<v Speaker 3>study basis for prosecution, is it possible for you to

0:13:17.240 --> 0:13:19.439
<v Speaker 3>see what the point of this is? Given the timeline

0:13:19.440 --> 0:13:20.280
<v Speaker 3>that John laid out.

0:13:20.200 --> 0:13:23.800
<v Speaker 1>There, Well, there's no doubt it's very damaging optically for

0:13:23.840 --> 0:13:26.120
<v Speaker 1>the policy making process in the US. David, I mean,

0:13:26.160 --> 0:13:28.160
<v Speaker 1>if you're looking at this from the outside, the FED

0:13:28.280 --> 0:13:31.280
<v Speaker 1>is this pre eminent institution. It's independent, as we've been discussing,

0:13:31.280 --> 0:13:33.120
<v Speaker 1>and it's meant to set the rules of the road

0:13:33.160 --> 0:13:36.079
<v Speaker 1>based on month the economy needs, not on politics. That's

0:13:36.120 --> 0:13:37.679
<v Speaker 1>important not just for the US but the rest of

0:13:37.720 --> 0:13:39.800
<v Speaker 1>the world. But now, of course we have the situation

0:13:39.840 --> 0:13:44.199
<v Speaker 1>whereby it looks like a fairly deliberate attack on share

0:13:44.240 --> 0:13:47.400
<v Speaker 1>Powell himself through using the root of what's going on

0:13:47.480 --> 0:13:50.280
<v Speaker 1>with the building site and the costover runs there. And

0:13:50.400 --> 0:13:53.200
<v Speaker 1>of course, how will that impact the internal freed dynamic?

0:13:53.240 --> 0:13:55.520
<v Speaker 1>I mean, when the new FED chair takes over, will

0:13:55.520 --> 0:13:57.560
<v Speaker 1>the rest of the committee be willing to cooperate with

0:13:57.679 --> 0:13:59.720
<v Speaker 1>him or horror, or will they view that person as

0:13:59.800 --> 0:14:02.680
<v Speaker 1>very deliberately political? And will the new FED chair have

0:14:02.760 --> 0:14:04.800
<v Speaker 1>trouble convincing the rest of the FED team that is

0:14:04.840 --> 0:14:07.400
<v Speaker 1>on their side? For example, there's a question mark? Is

0:14:07.400 --> 0:14:09.640
<v Speaker 1>the question mark now over Chair Powell? I mean, I

0:14:09.640 --> 0:14:11.640
<v Speaker 1>think a lot of people would have thought he'd move on,

0:14:11.720 --> 0:14:13.680
<v Speaker 1>but will he now stay for a little while in

0:14:13.720 --> 0:14:16.200
<v Speaker 1>a deliberate attempt to push back against the administration. So, I

0:14:16.200 --> 0:14:20.400
<v Speaker 1>think in terms of the optics the policy making process,

0:14:21.080 --> 0:14:23.640
<v Speaker 1>this idea that this is really unprecedent and now political

0:14:23.680 --> 0:14:25.600
<v Speaker 1>assault on the FED, I think that raises a lot

0:14:25.600 --> 0:14:29.120
<v Speaker 1>of question marks over what happens next, how this process

0:14:29.120 --> 0:14:31.680
<v Speaker 1>plays out, and the reputational damage that it leaves both

0:14:31.720 --> 0:14:34.600
<v Speaker 1>on the FED and I think the US policy making process.

0:14:36.200 --> 0:14:39.600
<v Speaker 3>There is this conversation about what FED Chair Powell does

0:14:39.680 --> 0:14:42.400
<v Speaker 3>in the medium to long term. In the nearer term,

0:14:42.560 --> 0:14:45.160
<v Speaker 3>there's another FED meeting just days from now. What did

0:14:45.160 --> 0:14:46.760
<v Speaker 3>he say just about what's going to happen in the

0:14:46.920 --> 0:14:48.760
<v Speaker 3>coming days versus the coming months and years.

0:14:48.880 --> 0:14:51.560
<v Speaker 1>Well, he didn't comment on monetary policy in his statement

0:14:51.720 --> 0:14:54.160
<v Speaker 1>and video last night, David, I think most people following

0:14:54.200 --> 0:14:56.360
<v Speaker 1>this would say, this isn't really going to impact the

0:14:56.440 --> 0:14:59.640
<v Speaker 1>near term path for moneged policy in Chair Powell, whether

0:14:59.680 --> 0:15:02.800
<v Speaker 1>you or not, and the FMC committee have been setting

0:15:02.800 --> 0:15:05.560
<v Speaker 1>policy based on the other reasoning they set out for it,

0:15:05.560 --> 0:15:07.360
<v Speaker 1>which is they've been cutting rates because they're worried about

0:15:07.440 --> 0:15:10.080
<v Speaker 1>the employment market. Would have been cutting fast enough. Courting

0:15:10.120 --> 0:15:13.200
<v Speaker 1>to President Trump that story probably won't change near term,

0:15:13.440 --> 0:15:15.320
<v Speaker 1>but then you know, you go a few months out

0:15:15.360 --> 0:15:17.400
<v Speaker 1>from nine, if we have that new FED chair arriving

0:15:18.040 --> 0:15:19.800
<v Speaker 1>on the board as I mentioned, then does that FED

0:15:19.880 --> 0:15:22.240
<v Speaker 1>chair committed or saying we need lower interest rates at

0:15:22.240 --> 0:15:23.960
<v Speaker 1>a time when the rest of the FMC committee or

0:15:24.000 --> 0:15:25.960
<v Speaker 1>maybe a skeptical about the need for lower interest rates

0:15:26.160 --> 0:15:29.720
<v Speaker 1>and b they're already smarting over it's extraordinaryssault on the FED.

0:15:30.000 --> 0:15:32.360
<v Speaker 1>I mean, that's where things will get complicated pretty quickly.

0:15:32.400 --> 0:15:34.120
<v Speaker 1>So we're in for I think a very uncertain few

0:15:34.120 --> 0:15:34.640
<v Speaker 1>months ahead.

0:15:35.200 --> 0:15:38.360
<v Speaker 2>I have served at the Federal Reserve under four administrations,

0:15:38.480 --> 0:15:42.760
<v Speaker 2>Republicans and Democrats alike. In every case, I have carried

0:15:42.800 --> 0:15:47.040
<v Speaker 2>out my duties without political fear or favor, focused solely

0:15:47.120 --> 0:15:48.760
<v Speaker 2>on our mandate of price stability.

0:15:50.480 --> 0:15:53.440
<v Speaker 3>Who is the audience for that statement from FED Chair Jerome.

0:15:53.240 --> 0:15:55.400
<v Speaker 4>Pal Do you think I think he went directly to

0:15:55.520 --> 0:15:58.760
<v Speaker 4>the American people? The message is different this time, right.

0:15:58.800 --> 0:16:00.640
<v Speaker 4>It's not We're just going to do our jobs and

0:16:00.720 --> 0:16:03.040
<v Speaker 4>keep our heads down. It's Look, you all need to

0:16:03.120 --> 0:16:08.440
<v Speaker 4>understand that these subpoenas are directly related to the President

0:16:08.520 --> 0:16:11.960
<v Speaker 4>trying to bend this institution to his will and I

0:16:12.000 --> 0:16:14.560
<v Speaker 4>think he wanted the American people to know that and to.

0:16:14.480 --> 0:16:18.120
<v Speaker 2>Hear that public service sometimes requires standing firm in the

0:16:18.160 --> 0:16:21.520
<v Speaker 2>face of threats. I will continue to do the job

0:16:21.600 --> 0:16:25.280
<v Speaker 2>the said confirmed me to do with integrity and a

0:16:25.320 --> 0:16:27.440
<v Speaker 2>commitment to serving the American people.

0:16:28.160 --> 0:16:28.520
<v Speaker 1>Thank you.

0:16:34.200 --> 0:16:36.400
<v Speaker 3>This is the Big Take from Bloomberg News. I'm David

0:16:36.440 --> 0:16:38.880
<v Speaker 3>gurat To get more from The Big Take and unlimited

0:16:38.880 --> 0:16:41.720
<v Speaker 3>access to all of Bloomberg dot com, subscribe today at

0:16:41.760 --> 0:16:45.840
<v Speaker 3>Bloomberg dot com slash podcast offer. If you like this episode,

0:16:45.880 --> 0:16:47.920
<v Speaker 3>make sure to follow and review The Big Take wherever

0:16:47.960 --> 0:16:50.360
<v Speaker 3>you listen to podcasts. It helps people find the show.

0:16:50.760 --> 0:16:52.640
<v Speaker 3>Thanks for listening. We'll be back tomorrow.