Speaker 1: All right, thank you Scott Shannon, and thanks to all
Speaker 1: of you for being with us. Here is our toll
Speaker 1: free telephone number you want to be a part of
Speaker 1: this extravaganza. It is eight hundred ninety four one Sean
Speaker 1: if you want to join us. Just breaking black smoke
Speaker 1: at the sixteen Chapel. This is the first vote as
Speaker 1: the Conclave is officially underway. No pope has been elected.
Speaker 1: I wouldn't expect it on the first round of balloting anyway,
Speaker 1: and then usually there are meetings behind the scenes. Linda,
Speaker 1: you never saw the movie Conclave that came out fairly recently, right,
Speaker 1: so you know it was fairly interesting, but.
Speaker 2: It passed and burned at the end. It was a
Speaker 2: little strange, the ending.
Speaker 1: There's no doubt that the ending was weird and quite unexpected,
Speaker 1: to be honest, but it is what it is.
Speaker 2: I don't want to get too deep into this.
Speaker 1: The you have now thirty five Democrats have voted to
Speaker 1: overturn the electric vehicle mandate that the Biden administration let
Speaker 1: California impose on the rest of America. Thirty five House
Speaker 1: Democrats joining with the Republicans and the majority two forty
Speaker 1: six one sixty four landslide vote. That includes three to
Speaker 1: six Democrats from Michigan, three from three of five from Ohio.
Speaker 1: That's four of twelve from Texas, and even two from California.
Speaker 1: The mandate would have required zero missions vehicles for forty
Speaker 1: three percent of an automaker sales by twenty twenty seven.
Speaker 1: Can you imagine two years from now in California. Great job, Gavin.
Speaker 1: They don't care how much. Thirteen and a half percent
Speaker 1: state income tax, the highest gas taxes, you know, I mean,
Speaker 1: it's just is NonStop, just burdening, burdening, burdening people, you know.
Speaker 1: Sweet baby James sent this out earlier today. I don't
Speaker 1: know if you saw this, Linda. It was pretty interesting
Speaker 1: what he sent. And it was mapped, you know, the
Speaker 1: best and worst US states for saving money in twenty
Speaker 1: twenty five, and it has different colors. And interestingly, the
Speaker 1: states where you can it's easiest to save money are
Speaker 1: states that are red states, and then you go to
Speaker 1: the then you go to the deep blue states. And
Speaker 1: for example, Mike free state of Florida is the fifth
Speaker 1: easiest state to save money in Texas's number three, South
Speaker 1: Dakota's number seven. I mean, there's nothing on this list
Speaker 1: that would surprise anybody. Tennessee, interestingly, was number one, Missouri
Speaker 1: was number two. Let's see Pennsylvania, You're number eighteen. New
Speaker 1: York is forty one. Shouldn't surprise anybody. Let's see New
Speaker 1: Jersey's forty six, Connecticut's forty nine. Let's see Massachusetts four three,
Speaker 1: Vermont forty eight, Main thirty eight. I mean they make
Speaker 1: it so hard on people to save money. Oklahoma was
Speaker 1: number four. I'm still looking for the number one state.
Speaker 1: I haven't found the number number one, Oh, Tennessee. That's right,
Speaker 1: I haven't found number two.
Speaker 3: Oh.
Speaker 1: Number two is Missouri. I haven't found number three, number
Speaker 1: three Texas. All right, I got it now. So I
Speaker 1: have the top five, and it matters. California's number forty seven,
Speaker 1: Oregon forty you know, Washington state forty two. One surprise.
Speaker 1: Idaho was thirty seven. I didn't expect that to be
Speaker 1: so high. Montana thirty four. I didn't expect that to
Speaker 1: be so high. Wyomi twenty six. It shouldn't be that high. Now,
Speaker 1: Colorado doesn't surprise me at thirty one, and New Mexico
Speaker 1: doesn't surprise me at thirty Utah kind of surprises me
Speaker 1: at twenty seven and they're in the middle of the pack.
Speaker 1: Arkansas at twenty four should be a little bit better
Speaker 1: there too. South Carolina was higher than I expected at
Speaker 1: two eight. They've got to bring things down there. Pennsylvania
Speaker 1: or state is actually surprisingly doing surprisingly well, and just
Speaker 1: every red state is right up there in every blue
Speaker 1: state is where it is, and it shouldn't really, you know,
Speaker 1: Tennessee the easiest state for saving money, help by the
Speaker 1: low cost of living lack of an income tax. Hawaii
Speaker 1: ranks last due to high living costs, declining employment growth,
Speaker 1: four straight years of Biden inflation, followed by you know,
Speaker 1: worries of you know, where the economy is going, which
Speaker 1: we're going to get into a great specificity in detail here,
Speaker 1: but you know, there's a lot of rankings that the
Speaker 1: top five states all share the same characteristics low living costs,
Speaker 1: below average tax burdens. There are plenty of places in
Speaker 1: Florida that remain affordable, plenty of places. If you want
Speaker 1: to live in a more coastal area, you're probably going
Speaker 1: to pay a premium. But there are so many nice
Speaker 1: places that you can live in this country and live
Speaker 1: relatively inexpensively, you know, if you're smart with your money anyway.
Speaker 1: So it's a lot of it has to do with
Speaker 1: the government. I know there's a lot of chatter out
Speaker 1: there today about the Attorney General Pam Bondi. I know
Speaker 1: that there's a desire to get this information. I want
Speaker 1: to see it just as much as everybody else as
Speaker 1: it relates to the full JFK files, RFK files, MLK files, etc.
Speaker 1: But also the Epstein files and a lot of reports
Speaker 1: since Jeffrey Epstein died that he had surveillance cameras set
Speaker 1: up all throughout his various properties which would record any
Speaker 1: interactions that the guests would have with these underage girls
Speaker 1: and the allegations that they made. And there's absolutely zero
Speaker 1: information about what happened to the videotapes until today, and
Speaker 1: we did get at this information. The FBI apparently has
Speaker 1: tens of thousands of videos related to Epstein's sexual crimes
Speaker 1: against young girls before releasing any of the information of
Speaker 1: the public. Now, Pam Bondi originally had files, but then
Speaker 1: remember two is then she found out, for example, in
Speaker 1: the case of jfk Oh there was this whole other
Speaker 1: area of information that we didn't even know about. I've
Speaker 1: got to give kudos to our friend John Solomon for
Speaker 1: breaking this story today. We'll cover tonight in more specificity
Speaker 1: in detail. But now they have declassified a Biden memo
Speaker 1: that would allow the FBI and the FEDS to target
Speaker 1: Americans for quote, non criminal behavior. And this is before
Speaker 1: Remember we went through the issue with Catholics and pro
Speaker 1: life people and parents being probed at school board meetings.
Speaker 1: Now this this they had literally put it in writing
Speaker 1: and it's now declassified. Understanding is that Tulsi Gabbert had
Speaker 1: a big part in exposing this. It's actually in the
Speaker 1: piece that she did. The breath of the mandate disclosed
Speaker 1: when Tulsi released a fully unredacted version of the prior
Speaker 1: administration's Strategic Implementation Plan by Countering Domestic Terrorism. And this
Speaker 1: is from June of twenty twenty one and exposed for
Speaker 1: the first time the law enforcement and intelligence framework that
Speaker 1: led the FBI to monitor and probe conservative Catholics and
Speaker 1: parents who protested against some school board policies, and justified
Speaker 1: homeland security to engage in censorship or the banking of Americans.
Speaker 1: Remember we went through that as well. Considered to be
Speaker 1: quote political or potential enemies of the state. I mean,
Speaker 1: what we are learning about government corruption, abuse of power
Speaker 1: is it takes your breath away. But the Biden administration
Speaker 1: authorized federal law enforcement to target Americans engaged in quote
Speaker 1: concerning non criminal behavior.
Speaker 2: What does that mean.
Speaker 1: It's sort of like the deep state debunking the very
Speaker 1: real Hunter Biden laptop that they had confirmed as authentic
Speaker 1: in March of twenty twenty, meeting weekly in the lead
Speaker 1: up to the twenty twenty election, with big tech companies
Speaker 1: warning them that they might be victims of a misinformation
Speaker 1: campaign during the election, and it may have to do
Speaker 1: with Hunter and Joe and Barisma. I mean, they were
Speaker 1: pre bunking what they knew was ultimately going to come out,
Speaker 1: becausey knew Rudy Giuliani's attorney, Bob Costello, had a copy
Speaker 1: of it and that that was going to be released. Anyway,
Speaker 1: the directives provided to the Justice Department and the FBI
Speaker 1: by the National Security Council. They developed the memo. It's
Speaker 1: that agencies should drive executive and legislative action to ban
Speaker 1: assault weapons, high capacity magazines, reigning ghost guns, et cetera,
Speaker 1: et cetera. Anyway, the memo goes into it. You know,
Speaker 1: for decades, the FBI has been required to meet very
Speaker 1: stringent requirements. As John Solomon points out in his Peace
Speaker 1: for opening criminal and National security investigation, it's known as
Speaker 1: a predicate. The predicate for a full investigation requires an
Speaker 1: articulable factual basis. In other words, got to be real,
Speaker 1: reasonably indicating that a crime or national security threat has
Speaker 1: or is about to occur. This is according to the
Speaker 1: Attorney General Guidelines for domestic FBI operations. And you know,
Speaker 1: all every everybody with any brains understands that this is
Speaker 1: an abuse of power. And this is what we were
Speaker 1: talking about when we kept talking about weaponization of our government.
Speaker 1: And this is what this is what it happened. This
Speaker 1: is what they now came down to. This is what
Speaker 1: it came down to. You know, the the fact that
Speaker 1: my personal text messages, not that it's about me, but
Speaker 1: I thought, do I not even though I'm a talk
Speaker 1: show host with an opinion, do I not have a
Speaker 1: right to privacy? And they just you know, release thousands
Speaker 1: of text messages of mine and nobody in the media.
Speaker 1: You know, the only reason it became news is oh,
Speaker 1: Sean Hannity's text message is released. I can't believe he
Speaker 1: really believed this crap. He's saying exactly on text message
Speaker 1: everything he says on the air. Oh, I guess I
Speaker 1: was supposed to be a phony and a different person
Speaker 1: we are watching. I mean the amount of lawsuits. This
Speaker 1: is where the democratic resistance is getting worse and worse daily.
Speaker 1: He got all these activist legal groups, elected officials, local jurisdictions.
Speaker 1: Now we now have the full number was on Fox
Speaker 1: News Digital. More than one hundred and fifty lawsuits against
Speaker 1: the Trump administration since January twentieth, in response to more
Speaker 1: than ninety executive orders as well as executive proclamations and memos.
Speaker 1: And the president has long been a legal target, which
Speaker 1: hit a fever pitch during the twenty twenty four election
Speaker 1: cycle when Trump faced four criminal indictments. I mean, all
Speaker 1: of this is designed to stop and usurp the constitutional
Speaker 1: authority of a president. For example, Trump's executive order on
Speaker 1: voting now blocked by a low level federal judge amid
Speaker 1: a flurry of setbacks, and all this would would would
Speaker 1: specify is providing documentary proof of citizen citizenship before being
Speaker 1: allowed to register to vote. That should be basic and fundamental.
Speaker 1: Go try and buy an e sig without a license,
Speaker 1: you know, Go try and buy a beer without a
Speaker 1: license and proof to try and get on a plane
Speaker 1: now without one.
Speaker 2: Good luck. Now.
Speaker 1: The Supreme Court did stay a lower court ruling allowing
Speaker 1: the Trump Transgender Band to proceed, but another federal judge
Speaker 1: ordered a return of a deported illegal immigrant you know,
Speaker 1: to the US, rejecting Donald Trump's request. I mean, We're
Speaker 1: going to have to get some finality here. Judges cannot
Speaker 1: asserp the power of the president, especially on issues of immigration.
Speaker 1: I mean, yeah, I mean, you got a look at
Speaker 1: how bad things have gotten here. Yeah, Venezuelan's attacking NYP
Speaker 1: officers in Times Square, a twelve year old arrested, you know,
Speaker 1: several times, thought to be the leader of this theff ring.
Speaker 1: You know, immigrants, uh, you know, they used to come
Speaker 1: to this country for a better life. But under Biden,
Speaker 1: where there was no vetting at all whatsoever, you've got
Speaker 1: the most dangerous people. Terrorists, murderers, rapists, cartel members, gang members.
Speaker 1: Look at just this week, a man from Brazil playing
Speaker 1: a nine year prison sentence after being convicted of raping
Speaker 1: a thirteen year old after crossing a legally yeah, he
Speaker 1: settled in a house in Cape cod where the mother
Speaker 1: of his two children was running a daycare center. Now
Speaker 1: convicted Kyle rapist living at a daycare center kind of
Speaker 1: a bad idea. And it was only after Ice arrested
Speaker 1: this monster that the daycare center was finally shut down.
Speaker 1: And his example after example after example, Ice attained another
Speaker 1: illegal in another part of Massachusetts while he faces charges
Speaker 1: of repeatedly assaulting a fourteen year old. Another illegal from
Speaker 1: Brazil recently deported back to his home country, accused of
Speaker 1: planning to murder children and plant bombs at the Lady
Speaker 1: Gaga concert at Copa Cabana Beach. Another illegal committed a
Speaker 1: wide variety of crimes in Virginia, including exposing himself to children.
Speaker 1: Now finally facing Ice custody, set a deportation, and it
Speaker 1: just goes on and on and on, an I keep going.
Speaker 1: The Trump DHS plans, by the way, to start deporting
Speaker 1: Biden illegals to Libya. Top House investigator James Comer plans
Speaker 1: to grill Democratic governors over their sanctuary state policies. It's
Speaker 1: about time, because it's my understanding.
Speaker 2: Of the law.
Speaker 1: Many lawyers we've interviewed sounds like aiding in a betting
Speaker 1: to me, how how else could you otherwise interpret that?
Speaker 1: I love that The House Oversight Committee Chair James Comer
Speaker 1: is going to be grilling these Democratic governors like Kathy
Speaker 1: Hulkel and Tim Walls and JB. Pritzker. Anyway, sanctuary state
Speaker 1: leaders will have to answer questions June the twelve about
Speaker 1: how their administrations reduced or baned cooperation with federal immigration authorities.
Speaker 1: Remember the supremacy clause says that they have to do
Speaker 1: it anyway. Comer said, sanctuary policies only provide sanctuaries for
Speaker 1: criminal illegal aliens. To get very interesting because they're all
Speaker 1: going to have a political agenda. Let's see Tom Homan
Speaker 1: vows to triple ICE enforcement in New York City after
Speaker 1: the NYPD Commissioner orders cops not to cooperate with deportations.
Speaker 1: How is that not aiding and a betting in law breaking?
Speaker 1: I don't get it makes no sense Ice. By the way,
Speaker 1: if you look at them. Ice is also making news
Speaker 1: today the Rated a DC restaurant owned by former CBS
Speaker 1: anchored Nora O'Donnell's husband Whoopsee Daisy, how did that happen?
Speaker 1: I'm sure they'll be covering it on CBS News tonight.
Speaker 1: I doubt it anyway, Quick Break, welcome back, more to
Speaker 1: the news of the day, your calls eight hundred and
Speaker 1: nine point one Shaw. We have discussed in great specificity
Speaker 1: and at length, the resident and what he's doing with
Speaker 1: tariffs and the economy, and we're going to get into
Speaker 1: this latest. Steve Moore will be with us. We'll check
Speaker 1: in with O'Reilly get his take on this. But the
Speaker 1: choice we had was simple, and you may not agree
Speaker 1: with the option the President shows, and it definitely it
Speaker 1: leads to disruption anytime there is change, and anytime you
Speaker 1: think anew about something like, for example, nobody's ever thought
Speaker 1: of an iron dome for the United States. I like
Speaker 1: the idea, especially because the world has got a lot
Speaker 1: of evil in it, a lot of hate in it.
Speaker 1: People with a lot of hate lists that run countries
Speaker 1: in the world, and we've got to protect ourselves and
Speaker 1: assume that one day there could be a worst case scenario.
Speaker 1: I just have to believe that. It's a simple reality.
Speaker 1: You have to have a personal safety and security plan.
Speaker 1: There's evil, you see it, you know in the news
Speaker 1: every single day. It's unfortunate. I wish it didn't exist.
Speaker 1: I wish everybody was a good person, but it's just
Speaker 1: not the case. And so the president's choice was simple,
Speaker 1: either we go along with what has been fifty sixty
Speaker 1: years of establishment institutionalists thinking that oh, okay, these countries
Speaker 1: friend and foe will rip us off, charge us terriffs,
Speaker 1: and we're not going to do a thing about it.
Speaker 1: No reciprocal terriffs, no demands that they remove their terroriffs,
Speaker 1: never challenge the system, and just accept the status quo.
Speaker 1: And Donald Trump chose not to do that. As a result,
Speaker 1: I think an unintended consequence is we see a lot
Speaker 1: of things have changed, and we see a lot of
Speaker 1: money investment money in American manufacturing and infrastructure, including semiconductors
Speaker 1: and all important pharmaceuticals that it's very critical, which is
Speaker 1: why you need your Jase case. I'll tell you about
Speaker 1: that later. But you know, we're too reliant on other countries.
Speaker 1: And the President yesterday when he said we don't want
Speaker 1: Canadian cars, this is what he said when he was
Speaker 1: with the Prime Minister of Canada yesterday. We don't need
Speaker 1: your stuff.
Speaker 3: We don't really want cars from Canada, and we put
Speaker 3: tariffs on cars from Canada, and at a certain point
Speaker 3: it won't make economic sense for Canada to build those cars.
Speaker 3: And we don't want steel from Canada because we're making
Speaker 3: our own steel and we're having massive steel plants being
Speaker 3: built right now as we speak. We really don't want
Speaker 3: Canadian steel, and we don't want Canadian aluminum and various
Speaker 3: other things because we want to be able to do
Speaker 3: it ourselves, and there's no reason for us to be
Speaker 3: subsidized in Canada. Canada is a place that we'll have
Speaker 3: to be able to take care of itself economically. I
Speaker 3: assume they can. We protect Canada militarily, and we always will.
Speaker 3: We're going to you know, that's not a money thing,
Speaker 3: that's but we always will. But you know it's not fair.
Speaker 3: But why are we subsidizing Canada two hundred billion dollars
Speaker 3: a year or whatever the number might be. It's a
Speaker 3: very substantial number.
Speaker 1: It is very And why is Canada? You know, why
Speaker 1: do they put tariffs on any American products? Why don't
Speaker 1: they want us to be best friends with them? We
Speaker 1: they do rely on us for the national security, whether
Speaker 1: they want to admit it or not. It's just a simple, basic,
Speaker 1: undeniable truth. Now the president has the eight trillion in investment,
Speaker 1: we didn't expect that. We're now approaching two hundred billion
Speaker 1: dollars identified monies, waste, fraud, abuse, and corruption. You know,
Speaker 1: we got to think about future generations, our kids, our grandkids.
Speaker 1: You know, we're going to be approaching forty trillion dollars
Speaker 1: in debt in no time at all. The President now
Speaker 1: pushing for that one big, beautiful bill, hopefully by July fourth,
Speaker 1: that would make his tax cuts permanent. And for people
Speaker 1: that doubt that, they they don't know the history of
Speaker 1: tax cuts, Revenues increase because investment is spurred and jobs
Speaker 1: are created and you have fewer people uh dependent on government.
Speaker 1: And then factor in also the president's plan to make
Speaker 1: America the most energy dominant country on the face of
Speaker 1: the earth, because we have the resources to do it.
Speaker 1: And there's been nothing but great doubt, uncertainty, skittishness, wall Street,
Speaker 1: et cetera. I think people are now beginning to adapt
Speaker 1: and adjust to the President's policies and understanding it better
Speaker 1: and considering that the people should know better. Never thought
Speaker 1: this through or have not followed the news on the
Speaker 1: eight trillion and committed monies and manufacturing, et cetera. And
Speaker 1: the jobs that will be created and the wealth that'll
Speaker 1: be created, and the energy factor of this.
Speaker 2: Is kind of amazing to me.
Speaker 1: I was the one that was predicting, Yeah, I think
Speaker 1: China is gonna eventually have to come to the table
Speaker 1: because they need access to our markets.
Speaker 3: We do.
Speaker 1: We actually both need each other. We need certain things
Speaker 1: from them, they need. They need a lot from us,
Speaker 1: including access to their markets. And now that their economy
Speaker 1: has been in a bit of a tailstin and that
Speaker 1: there's been uprisings throughout China according to the Wall Street
Speaker 1: Journal and other places, it doesn't surprise me that this
Speaker 1: meeting has taken place on Saturday with the Treasury Secretary
Speaker 1: Scott Bessett.
Speaker 2: Now, both the Atlanta Fed and.
Speaker 1: Goldman Sacks have dramatically increased their GDP growth projections.
Speaker 2: How interesting is this?
Speaker 1: It looks like, you know, it's time to call off
Speaker 1: the recession that you know, all these companies and all
Speaker 1: these media economists have been predicting now for six weeks.
Speaker 1: For example, the widely watched Atlanta Atlantic Fed Atlanta Fed
Speaker 1: has dramatically increased GDP growth projection for the second quarter.
Speaker 1: The investment and analysts at Goldman Sacks agree and they've
Speaker 1: raised their second quarter growth projections even higher than the
Speaker 1: Atlanta Fed's number. And you know, how can the folks
Speaker 1: that were panicked into cashing out their investments by the
Speaker 1: media's politicized recession mongering. You know what do they do
Speaker 1: to get the money back because they sold out early?
Speaker 1: The GDP now Model estimate for real GDP growth from
Speaker 1: the Atlanta Fed in the second quarter of twenty twenty
Speaker 1: five is two point two percent as of May sixth,
Speaker 1: up from one point one percent on May first. That
Speaker 1: is a dramatic shift after recent releases by the US
Speaker 1: Bureau of Labor Statistics, the Census Bureau, the US Bureau
Speaker 1: of Economic Analysis. The new forecast of the second quarter
Speaker 1: real personal consumption expenditures growth released from one point nine
Speaker 1: percent to three point three percent, real private fixed investment
Speaker 1: growth increase from one point three to three point six percent.
Speaker 1: Goldman Sachs has significantly revised their forecast for the US economy,
Speaker 1: raising their expectation for set quarter GDP great growth rate
Speaker 1: from negative three tenths of one percent to positive two
Speaker 1: point four percent. That's that's drastic, and the revision effectively
Speaker 1: rules out the possibility of a near term re session,
Speaker 1: which was the word of the day every day, you know,
Speaker 1: But look at all the monies that are they not
Speaker 1: realizing what the President has foundationally set up to happen.
Speaker 2: You know.
Speaker 1: For example, Astrasenica, it's a UK based pharmaceutical giant, you know.
Speaker 1: As part of their ongoing three point five billion dollar
Speaker 1: investment in American innovation, Astrasenica has opened up at their
Speaker 1: first US operated cell therapy factory of Maryland to help
Speaker 1: treat cancer patients. And this pharmaceutical giant said the new
Speaker 1: three hundred million dollar plant in Rockville, Maryland symbolizes their
Speaker 1: confidence in America's role as a global leader in science, manufacturing,
Speaker 1: and economic growth. You know, do you think the communist Chinese,
Speaker 1: you know, wanted to keep ratcheting up tensions to the
Speaker 1: point that no products would make their way to the US. No,
Speaker 1: they need access to our markets, you know. And in
Speaker 1: the lead up to this, they've had to cut their
Speaker 1: key rates by ten points and bake bank reserve requirement
Speaker 1: by fifty points and a bit to boost the economy
Speaker 1: you know, it's all of this is predictable, and the
Speaker 1: President keeps saving money. You know, the President's Trump Energy
Speaker 1: budget is going to save all of every American in total,
Speaker 1: fifteen billion dollars on these green new scam funds that
Speaker 1: they've been they've been wasting so much money. A menu
Speaker 1: American manufacturers will report out today are seeing a massive surge.
Speaker 1: As a matter of fact. The term that I read
Speaker 1: is they're being overwhelmed and swamped with orders because people
Speaker 1: want to now buy American. And you know, tell me
Speaker 1: how that's bad for America to be to not be
Speaker 1: dependent on pharmaceuticals from China or automobile from Mexico and
Speaker 1: Canada and Germany and other European Union nations that have
Speaker 1: been tariffing us to death and then adding their national
Speaker 1: sales tax there there on top of everything else, which
Speaker 1: is what they've been doing. I mean, it's it's the
Speaker 1: fair tax, you know, is Neil Boortz called it. With
Speaker 1: the economic turmoil all over the place, you know, it's
Speaker 1: it's you get the doom and gloom from everywhere. I'm
Speaker 1: just telling you these policies, it's going to take time,
Speaker 1: and you know, then to hear you, ho, bien, it's
Speaker 1: blasting Trump is foolish. Why didn't sat back and let
Speaker 1: all of this happen and lied about it. We'll get
Speaker 1: into this with O'Reilly and he denies he left the
Speaker 1: twenty twenty four race too late to stop Trump, does it?
Speaker 1: It wouldn't have made a difference. I don't know how
Speaker 1: that would have made much difference. He said, Well, maybe
Speaker 1: they would have had a real primary. Maybe it wouldn't
Speaker 1: have been Kamala. That could have been a big difference.
Speaker 1: I don't know, possible. You know, it's interesting yesterday we
Speaker 1: had the Rasmussen Daily Tracking poll Trump of fifty one percent,
Speaker 1: when nobody in the media ever reports is the Democratic
Speaker 1: approval ratings that are just in the sewer? I mean,
Speaker 1: how many people in the mainstream media have been pointing
Speaker 1: out the Democrats, you know, sixty percent plus unfavorable ratings
Speaker 1: or and on issues. It's even worse. Republicans are taking
Speaker 1: on eighty twenty issues and it's paying off for them.
Speaker 2: Let's see. I saw this.
Speaker 1: Trump offers to help with help Obama with presidential libraries disaster. Apparently,
Speaker 1: offer to help out with the development of the Obama
Speaker 1: presidential Center, which has been plagued by huge cost overruns,
Speaker 1: delays the project's embrace of diversity, equity inclusion policies, drawing
Speaker 1: significant tension recently, Look, President Obama, if he wanted help,
Speaker 1: I'd give him help, because I'm really a good builder,
Speaker 1: and I build on time, on budget. He's building his
Speaker 1: library in Chicago. It's a disaster, he said that. I mean,
Speaker 1: I'm sure it's Brocklegon McCall and poor poor Michelle Obama
Speaker 1: is transitioning, you know, now that her kids have been raised.
Speaker 1: You know, she's now dealing with the fact she's an
Speaker 1: empty nester. She used the word transitioning. I know, it
Speaker 1: got a lot of people's attention. We talked about it yesterday.
Speaker 1: Columbia University lays off around one hundred and eighty staff
Speaker 1: after the administration revoked their grants. Oh it's interesting that
Speaker 1: they have, you know, tens of billions of dollars in
Speaker 1: all this money that they've been given, just like Harvard
Speaker 1: havevid has what how about a fifty three or four
Speaker 1: you know billion dollars available to them and their endowments. Anyway, So, anyway,
Speaker 1: after the Trump administration announced they canceling four hundred million
Speaker 1: in federal grants. Why should any taxpayer pay a penny
Speaker 1: for people to go to elite universities. You don't have
Speaker 1: a right to take from hard working Americans to go
Speaker 1: to elite universities.
Speaker 2: You just don't.
Speaker 1: There's something so fundamentally wrong about that, you know. And
Speaker 1: it just and the Liberals are the ones that want it,
Speaker 1: which I find interesting, you know, considering they claim to
Speaker 1: care about poor people. Well, poor people, the ones that
Speaker 1: pay the taxes that are paying these schools. It's ridiculous.
Speaker 1: By the way, Donald Trump did pick up on the
Speaker 1: story I told you at the beginning of the show
Speaker 1: that Biden memo let the Feds target Americans for non
Speaker 1: criminal behavior. You know, why do I believe that if
Speaker 1: we look deeper, that we're probably going to find out
Speaker 1: that that's the illegal I would bet anything, any amount
Speaker 1: that that, in fact is true. We have information and
Speaker 1: news out of the Middle East, some of it good,
Speaker 1: not good, and a message to Iran. Trump used bunker
Speaker 1: buster bombs to pound the hooties into submission. Now the
Speaker 1: hoodies are denying it. This is what I suspect the
Speaker 1: Supreme Political Council, which is the hoodie president Presidential Council
Speaker 1: stated they have indirectly informed the US that continued escalation
Speaker 1: what affect President Trump's planned visit to the region, emphasizing
Speaker 1: that this was the only message conveyed. Let me tell
Speaker 1: you how I interpret that. The Iranians got to them
Speaker 1: and said, you better listen to us. We're providing you
Speaker 1: the weaponry, or you'll have a problem with us. Because
Speaker 1: the hoodies, I'm sure did tell the Trump administration they
Speaker 1: plan to stop now if they want to keep getting
Speaker 1: pounded and they want to see their leadership taken out.
Speaker 1: I'm fine with that. I'm not that worried as many
Speaker 1: others are. I know India, Pakistan, they have had these
Speaker 1: these flare ups historically. I don't like it, but usually
Speaker 1: they tend to calm down. And I think it was
Speaker 1: Pakistan that said, maybe we want to rethink this today
Speaker 1: we hopefully that'll go away.