WEBVTT - What Is Super Memory (And How Do You Get It)?

0:00:00.200 --> 0:00:02.400
<v Speaker 1>Hey, please take a second and leave us a review

0:00:02.480 --> 0:00:06.279
<v Speaker 1>on Apple Podcasts, Spotify, or wherever you listen to the podcast.

0:00:06.960 --> 0:00:07.480
<v Speaker 2>Thanks a lot.

0:00:09.200 --> 0:00:12.800
<v Speaker 1>Hey, welcome to Sign Stuff, a production of iHeartRadio Hoe

0:00:13.000 --> 0:00:17.080
<v Speaker 1>Cham and today we're talking about super memory. There are

0:00:17.120 --> 0:00:20.279
<v Speaker 1>people out there that can memorize over one hundred thousand

0:00:20.400 --> 0:00:24.239
<v Speaker 1>digits of pie. Others can read a series of books

0:00:24.480 --> 0:00:28.360
<v Speaker 1>and then recite them by hears and still others can

0:00:28.440 --> 0:00:31.880
<v Speaker 1>remember what they did every single day of their lives,

0:00:32.280 --> 0:00:35.760
<v Speaker 1>some reportedly as far back to the day they were born.

0:00:36.440 --> 0:00:38.360
<v Speaker 1>How are they able to do that? Is it a

0:00:38.440 --> 0:00:42.320
<v Speaker 1>superpower or is it something that anyone can learn to do.

0:00:42.720 --> 0:00:44.960
<v Speaker 1>We're going to talk to a couple of memory scientists

0:00:45.040 --> 0:00:47.600
<v Speaker 1>who are going to break down how memory works, what

0:00:47.720 --> 0:00:51.040
<v Speaker 1>are its limits, and whether being able to remember everything

0:00:51.400 --> 0:00:55.560
<v Speaker 1>is a gift or a curse. So get ready for

0:00:55.640 --> 0:01:06.520
<v Speaker 1>a memorable episode about memory, one that you won't soon forget. Enjoy. Hey, everyone,

0:01:06.920 --> 0:01:10.000
<v Speaker 1>So there are some people out there with amazing memory.

0:01:10.480 --> 0:01:14.160
<v Speaker 1>For example, there's Akira Haragucci, who broke the world record

0:01:14.200 --> 0:01:18.399
<v Speaker 1>for memorizing and reciting the most digits of pie. You

0:01:18.440 --> 0:01:21.640
<v Speaker 1>know pie, It's that math number that goes three point

0:01:21.760 --> 0:01:25.280
<v Speaker 1>one four one, five, nine, two, six, five, three, five,

0:01:25.440 --> 0:01:29.240
<v Speaker 1>eight nine, seventy nine three two, three, eight four, and

0:01:29.400 --> 0:01:32.640
<v Speaker 1>so on and so on. That's just twenty digits of it.

0:01:33.160 --> 0:01:37.080
<v Speaker 1>But Akira Haragucci was able to memorize and recall one

0:01:37.120 --> 0:01:40.399
<v Speaker 1>hundred thousand digits of it, a record that to this

0:01:40.520 --> 0:01:45.279
<v Speaker 1>day is still unbroken. Then there's famous savant Kim Peak.

0:01:45.720 --> 0:01:48.360
<v Speaker 1>Peak was the inspiration for the character in the movie

0:01:48.440 --> 0:01:52.080
<v Speaker 1>rain Man. He could recide from memory over six thousand

0:01:52.200 --> 0:01:54.560
<v Speaker 1>books he had read, and he could tell you the

0:01:54.680 --> 0:01:57.800
<v Speaker 1>ZIP code and aera code of pretty much every city

0:01:58.040 --> 0:02:00.880
<v Speaker 1>in the United States. Now, I don't know about you,

0:02:00.920 --> 0:02:04.080
<v Speaker 1>but I'm a little forgetful sometimes. So the fact that

0:02:04.080 --> 0:02:06.960
<v Speaker 1>there are humans that can have this level of memory

0:02:07.400 --> 0:02:11.400
<v Speaker 1>is absolutely mind boggling to me. To learn more about

0:02:11.440 --> 0:02:14.640
<v Speaker 1>memory and how super memory works, I reached out to

0:02:14.639 --> 0:02:18.919
<v Speaker 1>an expert in the field, doctor Daniella Palombo. Doctor Palombo

0:02:19.000 --> 0:02:22.600
<v Speaker 1>is a professor at the University of British Columbia or UBC,

0:02:22.960 --> 0:02:27.520
<v Speaker 1>who studies people with extraordinary memory. Now, before we got

0:02:27.520 --> 0:02:31.120
<v Speaker 1>started hearing that she works at UBC, there a memory

0:02:31.240 --> 0:02:32.200
<v Speaker 1>in my head.

0:02:33.720 --> 0:02:35.799
<v Speaker 2>I've been to the UBC a couple of times.

0:02:35.880 --> 0:02:37.920
<v Speaker 3>I think, yeah, nice campus.

0:02:38.160 --> 0:02:40.720
<v Speaker 2>I rememory of being there. I've been going skiing at night.

0:02:41.200 --> 0:02:43.040
<v Speaker 3>Oh yeah, probably app in Whistler.

0:02:43.440 --> 0:02:46.600
<v Speaker 2>Uh no, just above the city there's a ski slope.

0:02:46.720 --> 0:02:50.239
<v Speaker 3>Oh yeah, Well that's a good segue into our conversation

0:02:50.320 --> 0:02:55.320
<v Speaker 3>about memory. You were you out Cyprus or maybe.

0:02:55.160 --> 0:03:00.519
<v Speaker 2>Gross gosh, it was a long time ago, and I've

0:03:00.520 --> 0:03:02.480
<v Speaker 2>been to about four hundred universities.

0:03:02.720 --> 0:03:04.640
<v Speaker 3>You didn't know I was going to grill your memory today.

0:03:05.520 --> 0:03:09.119
<v Speaker 2>That did such detail a memory of us snowboarding down

0:03:09.160 --> 0:03:10.840
<v Speaker 2>a mountain in Vancouver mid night.

0:03:11.280 --> 0:03:11.720
<v Speaker 3>Amazing?

0:03:12.720 --> 0:03:14.919
<v Speaker 1>Like I said, I would not be the poster child

0:03:14.960 --> 0:03:18.440
<v Speaker 1>for people with super memory. Okay, doctor Palumbo is going

0:03:18.520 --> 0:03:22.119
<v Speaker 1>to talk to us about super memory, memory athletes and

0:03:22.200 --> 0:03:24.920
<v Speaker 1>people who can remember every single day of their lives.

0:03:25.280 --> 0:03:28.040
<v Speaker 1>But first I wanted to ask her a basic question.

0:03:28.639 --> 0:03:31.640
<v Speaker 1>What do we know about our memory? Is it like

0:03:31.720 --> 0:03:34.200
<v Speaker 1>a computer hard drive that sits in one place in

0:03:34.200 --> 0:03:37.640
<v Speaker 1>our brain? Does it store things as files with holders

0:03:37.640 --> 0:03:40.640
<v Speaker 1>that we can just look up whenever we want. It

0:03:40.680 --> 0:03:43.640
<v Speaker 1>turns out there's a lot we don't know about how

0:03:43.680 --> 0:03:46.880
<v Speaker 1>memory works. First of all, I was curious to know

0:03:47.280 --> 0:03:48.400
<v Speaker 1>how does memory work?

0:03:48.840 --> 0:03:52.240
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, that's a very big question. So first, memory is

0:03:52.280 --> 0:03:56.000
<v Speaker 3>not just one thing. When we remember our past, we

0:03:56.040 --> 0:03:59.240
<v Speaker 3>can do so with different forms of remembering. So you

0:03:59.280 --> 0:04:01.080
<v Speaker 3>may have heard the our memory systems.

0:04:01.960 --> 0:04:03.920
<v Speaker 1>Okay, The first thing to know about memory is that

0:04:03.960 --> 0:04:07.640
<v Speaker 1>there isn't one kind of memory. There are several types

0:04:07.640 --> 0:04:10.160
<v Speaker 1>of memory. The first kind is the kind that we

0:04:10.200 --> 0:04:16.240
<v Speaker 1>are most familiar with, called episodic memory or basically flashbacks.

0:04:17.080 --> 0:04:20.920
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, so episodic memory is our memory for specific events.

0:04:21.200 --> 0:04:24.080
<v Speaker 3>So for example, if I asked you to remember your

0:04:24.120 --> 0:04:26.920
<v Speaker 3>first date, or if I asked you to remember something

0:04:27.200 --> 0:04:30.320
<v Speaker 3>unusual that happened to you, you'd be able to conjure

0:04:30.400 --> 0:04:33.520
<v Speaker 3>up details that are specific to that event, like where

0:04:33.520 --> 0:04:35.920
<v Speaker 3>you were sitting, what you were wearing, how you were

0:04:35.960 --> 0:04:39.159
<v Speaker 3>feeling at the time. So we can really sort of

0:04:39.200 --> 0:04:42.280
<v Speaker 3>it feels like we're reliving these events from our past,

0:04:42.640 --> 0:04:46.520
<v Speaker 3>like we're playing back a recording. And that's very different

0:04:46.520 --> 0:04:49.520
<v Speaker 3>from other forms of memory, like our semantic memory or

0:04:49.680 --> 0:04:53.400
<v Speaker 3>memory for facts knowing that Paris is the capital of France,

0:04:53.480 --> 0:04:56.480
<v Speaker 3>for example, or that Vancouver is in British Columbia.

0:04:56.520 --> 0:04:58.560
<v Speaker 2>I see Episodic.

0:04:58.040 --> 0:05:01.200
<v Speaker 3>Memory and semantic memory a are part of a broader

0:05:01.480 --> 0:05:05.520
<v Speaker 3>sort of umbrella within our memory systems called declarative memory.

0:05:05.680 --> 0:05:10.080
<v Speaker 3>Some people refer to it as explicit memory.

0:05:10.200 --> 0:05:12.960
<v Speaker 1>So there are two basic types of memory. The first,

0:05:13.160 --> 0:05:18.440
<v Speaker 1>declarative memory is basically what you consciously remember, facts, things

0:05:18.520 --> 0:05:20.680
<v Speaker 1>that happen. You can bring them up in your brain

0:05:20.960 --> 0:05:24.120
<v Speaker 1>and think about them. The second type of memory is

0:05:24.120 --> 0:05:28.120
<v Speaker 1>the kind you remember unconsciously. It's what gets today call

0:05:28.680 --> 0:05:30.360
<v Speaker 1>ball knowledge.

0:05:31.440 --> 0:05:35.760
<v Speaker 3>And that's another form of remembering called implicit memory. And so,

0:05:36.120 --> 0:05:38.400
<v Speaker 3>for example, do you play any instruments?

0:05:38.920 --> 0:05:43.159
<v Speaker 2>I do, Yeah, little piano, little guitar, great, there's some drums.

0:05:42.800 --> 0:05:45.159
<v Speaker 3>Okay, So when you sit down at the piano and

0:05:45.200 --> 0:05:48.960
<v Speaker 3>you start playing, that kind of just comes back to naturally,

0:05:49.040 --> 0:05:52.960
<v Speaker 3>you don't necessarily remember every piano lesson you had, but

0:05:53.040 --> 0:05:56.719
<v Speaker 3>nonetheless you're able to perform that incredible feat of playing music.

0:05:58.000 --> 0:06:01.240
<v Speaker 3>Another example is the first time you learn to ride

0:06:01.279 --> 0:06:04.000
<v Speaker 3>a bike. Many of us don't remember that event, but

0:06:04.080 --> 0:06:06.400
<v Speaker 3>we can hop on a bike kind of at any age,

0:06:06.440 --> 0:06:07.560
<v Speaker 3>and we can ride.

0:06:07.480 --> 0:06:09.640
<v Speaker 2>And you never forget, as they say, how to ride

0:06:09.680 --> 0:06:09.960
<v Speaker 2>a bike.

0:06:10.120 --> 0:06:12.800
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, that's exactly right. And so we think of that

0:06:12.920 --> 0:06:15.240
<v Speaker 3>as being a more implicit form of memory. So or

0:06:15.440 --> 0:06:17.000
<v Speaker 3>memory for how to do things.

0:06:18.080 --> 0:06:22.040
<v Speaker 1>Yes, there are different kinds of memory. Another interesting thing

0:06:22.040 --> 0:06:24.240
<v Speaker 1>we know about memory is that it doesn't just sit

0:06:24.400 --> 0:06:27.680
<v Speaker 1>in one place in our brains. It's kind of all

0:06:27.680 --> 0:06:30.800
<v Speaker 1>over the place, depending on what you use it for.

0:06:31.160 --> 0:06:33.960
<v Speaker 1>If it's your memory for how to physically do something

0:06:34.320 --> 0:06:37.919
<v Speaker 1>like ride a bike or the baseball, that memory is

0:06:37.960 --> 0:06:41.200
<v Speaker 1>in the motor areas of your brain, sort of across

0:06:41.240 --> 0:06:44.000
<v Speaker 1>the top of your brain. If it's your ability to

0:06:44.080 --> 0:06:48.359
<v Speaker 1>remember a song or remembering what something tastes or smells like,

0:06:48.880 --> 0:06:52.680
<v Speaker 1>then it's in your sensory cortex, which is closer to

0:06:52.720 --> 0:06:55.120
<v Speaker 1>the back of your head, kind of where the swirl

0:06:55.200 --> 0:06:58.760
<v Speaker 1>of your hair is. And if it's your vivid dream

0:06:58.800 --> 0:07:02.240
<v Speaker 1>type of memory or your memory of facts, scientists think

0:07:02.320 --> 0:07:05.440
<v Speaker 1>those are kind of diffused all over the brain. In

0:07:05.480 --> 0:07:08.560
<v Speaker 1>other words, there's no one central hard drive for story

0:07:08.640 --> 0:07:12.520
<v Speaker 1>memories in your brain. Okay, The last interesting thing doctor

0:07:12.560 --> 0:07:15.480
<v Speaker 1>Palombo says we know about memory came up when he

0:07:15.520 --> 0:07:18.000
<v Speaker 1>asked me if I remember the first date.

0:07:18.120 --> 0:07:18.960
<v Speaker 2>I ever went on.

0:07:20.040 --> 0:07:22.840
<v Speaker 1>I do not remember my first date, but I do

0:07:22.960 --> 0:07:25.120
<v Speaker 1>remember the first date I had with my spouse, So

0:07:25.240 --> 0:07:27.800
<v Speaker 1>I think that's yeah, that worked it right.

0:07:28.680 --> 0:07:31.440
<v Speaker 3>Yes, that is that is very good. That is very good.

0:07:31.760 --> 0:07:34.120
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. Ohether it's debated still whether it was a date

0:07:34.240 --> 0:07:34.440
<v Speaker 2>or not.

0:07:35.760 --> 0:07:37.840
<v Speaker 3>So I'm sure you have some good stories about that,

0:07:38.000 --> 0:07:41.080
<v Speaker 3>and I would imagine that if you and your partner

0:07:41.120 --> 0:07:45.120
<v Speaker 3>were to exchange details about that event, some of the

0:07:45.200 --> 0:07:47.920
<v Speaker 3>details you would be the same, and some you'd have

0:07:48.000 --> 0:07:50.640
<v Speaker 3>you have very different versions of what actually happened. And

0:07:50.680 --> 0:07:54.120
<v Speaker 3>that's fascinating. So one of the things that's kind of

0:07:54.120 --> 0:07:58.960
<v Speaker 3>interesting about memory is this idea that we playback events

0:07:59.120 --> 0:08:02.600
<v Speaker 3>like we're playing our memories back on a recorder. Memory

0:08:02.640 --> 0:08:05.920
<v Speaker 3>actually doesn't work this way at all, and in fact,

0:08:05.960 --> 0:08:08.600
<v Speaker 3>when we're remembering those events like the first time we

0:08:08.640 --> 0:08:12.800
<v Speaker 3>had a pomegranate, we're actually remembering a combination of what

0:08:12.960 --> 0:08:15.840
<v Speaker 3>actually happened and a bunch of other stuff. And that

0:08:16.080 --> 0:08:19.000
<v Speaker 3>other stuff is the general knowledge we have about the

0:08:19.040 --> 0:08:22.800
<v Speaker 3>world how events should work. We're filling in the blanks

0:08:22.800 --> 0:08:25.760
<v Speaker 3>of our memory, and what we ultimately remember is a

0:08:25.760 --> 0:08:29.080
<v Speaker 3>combination of these two things, what actually happened and the

0:08:29.120 --> 0:08:31.960
<v Speaker 3>inferences and generalizations we have about the world.

0:08:32.160 --> 0:08:35.400
<v Speaker 2>I Meanan, we remember part of what happened, and part

0:08:35.400 --> 0:08:37.199
<v Speaker 2>of what we remember is what we think.

0:08:37.000 --> 0:08:40.960
<v Speaker 3>Happened exactly exactly, and it happens very seamlessly, so we

0:08:41.000 --> 0:08:43.800
<v Speaker 3>don't really realize that we're filling in the blanks this way.

0:08:44.679 --> 0:08:48.720
<v Speaker 1>In other words, memories aren't perfect. They're kind of fuzzy,

0:08:49.360 --> 0:08:52.520
<v Speaker 1>at least for most of us. Okay, now we're going

0:08:52.559 --> 0:08:56.960
<v Speaker 1>to get to super memory, because some people they remember

0:08:57.000 --> 0:08:59.960
<v Speaker 1>a lot and sometimes quite perfectly.

0:09:00.800 --> 0:09:02.640
<v Speaker 2>Well, that brings me to the topic of people who

0:09:02.720 --> 0:09:06.800
<v Speaker 2>have super memory. Yeah, I guess I'm Christine. Some people,

0:09:06.840 --> 0:09:09.600
<v Speaker 2>for example, are able to memorize, you know, one hundred

0:09:09.679 --> 0:09:13.439
<v Speaker 2>thousand digits of pie, or you know, he can memorize

0:09:13.720 --> 0:09:14.800
<v Speaker 2>the works of Shakespeare.

0:09:15.080 --> 0:09:17.640
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, it is such an interesting topic, and I guess

0:09:17.720 --> 0:09:20.079
<v Speaker 3>I'll start a little bit broad by saying that there

0:09:20.080 --> 0:09:23.079
<v Speaker 3>are many sort of types of superior memory.

0:09:23.960 --> 0:09:27.040
<v Speaker 1>According to doctor Palombo, there are two basic types of

0:09:27.120 --> 0:09:32.160
<v Speaker 1>super or superior memorizers. The first type are called memory athletes.

0:09:32.559 --> 0:09:36.440
<v Speaker 1>In the second are people with something called highly superior

0:09:36.480 --> 0:09:41.640
<v Speaker 1>autobiographical memory, or h SAM. And in each of these

0:09:41.720 --> 0:09:44.920
<v Speaker 1>kinds of super memories there are surprising facts that tell

0:09:45.000 --> 0:09:47.920
<v Speaker 1>us a lot about how memory works in our brains

0:09:48.120 --> 0:09:51.480
<v Speaker 1>and how memory shapes who we are. So when we

0:09:51.520 --> 0:09:54.160
<v Speaker 1>come back, we'll tackle the first type of super memory,

0:09:54.520 --> 0:09:58.160
<v Speaker 1>memory athletes, and we'll talk about how maybe you can

0:09:58.240 --> 0:10:01.080
<v Speaker 1>become one. So stay with it, don't forget.

0:10:01.600 --> 0:10:02.480
<v Speaker 2>We'll be right back.

0:10:14.320 --> 0:10:16.760
<v Speaker 1>Hey, welcome back. We're not going to talk about the

0:10:16.800 --> 0:10:20.400
<v Speaker 1>first type of super or superior memory, which is a

0:10:20.480 --> 0:10:24.680
<v Speaker 1>kind found in memory athletes. As I mentioned before, one

0:10:24.679 --> 0:10:27.920
<v Speaker 1>of the most extreme examples of super memory are people

0:10:27.960 --> 0:10:32.000
<v Speaker 1>who can memorize the digits of pie. For example, there's

0:10:32.040 --> 0:10:36.079
<v Speaker 1>Akira Haraguchi, who memorized over one hundred thousand digits of it,

0:10:36.400 --> 0:10:40.000
<v Speaker 1>and he's not alone. According to the Pie World Ranking

0:10:40.080 --> 0:10:43.360
<v Speaker 1>List website, there are at least ten people who have

0:10:43.520 --> 0:10:47.720
<v Speaker 1>memorized over thirty thousand digits of it, including Paul HEARDing,

0:10:47.920 --> 0:10:50.800
<v Speaker 1>the US record holder, who is said to have memorized

0:10:50.920 --> 0:10:54.720
<v Speaker 1>thirty thousand, four hundred and forty eight digits of pie.

0:10:55.520 --> 0:10:59.640
<v Speaker 1>There's even an annual event called the World Memory Championships,

0:10:59.720 --> 0:11:03.000
<v Speaker 1>which which is like the Olympics of memory in it,

0:11:03.200 --> 0:11:07.599
<v Speaker 1>memory athletes compete in timed events like who can memorize

0:11:07.600 --> 0:11:11.360
<v Speaker 1>a random deck of cards the fastest, or who can

0:11:11.400 --> 0:11:15.600
<v Speaker 1>memorize the most random numbers in one hour. Last year,

0:11:15.679 --> 0:11:19.960
<v Speaker 1>in twenty twenty five, the overall winner was narranzul Ot

0:11:20.040 --> 0:11:23.880
<v Speaker 1>gon Uhlan, a sixteen year old girl from Mongolia, who

0:11:23.920 --> 0:11:29.120
<v Speaker 1>absolutely blew away her competition with an astonishing performance. She

0:11:29.200 --> 0:11:32.240
<v Speaker 1>was able to memorize a sequence of three thousand, six

0:11:32.320 --> 0:11:36.120
<v Speaker 1>hundred and twenty three random numbers in one hour. She

0:11:36.280 --> 0:11:39.480
<v Speaker 1>memorized a six thousand, six hundred and seventy two long

0:11:39.520 --> 0:11:43.520
<v Speaker 1>sequence of random ones and zeros in thirty minutes, and

0:11:43.640 --> 0:11:46.640
<v Speaker 1>it only took her twenty four point two seconds to

0:11:46.720 --> 0:11:50.600
<v Speaker 1>memorize the complete sequence of a shuffle deck of cards.

0:11:51.200 --> 0:11:53.200
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I have a hard time remembering those six

0:11:53.360 --> 0:11:55.720
<v Speaker 1>verification digits they give you every time you have to

0:11:55.760 --> 0:11:58.880
<v Speaker 1>log in somewhere now and memorizing a ten digit phone

0:11:58.960 --> 0:12:02.400
<v Speaker 1>number these days, or get it. But here's the amazing

0:12:02.440 --> 0:12:07.559
<v Speaker 1>fact about memory athleticism. According to doctor Daniella Palombo, anyone

0:12:07.760 --> 0:12:09.400
<v Speaker 1>and be a memory athlete.

0:12:10.160 --> 0:12:13.840
<v Speaker 3>And in fact, you can take a random selection of

0:12:13.880 --> 0:12:16.760
<v Speaker 3>people from the population and you can train them to

0:12:16.800 --> 0:12:17.760
<v Speaker 3>be memory athletes.

0:12:18.920 --> 0:12:22.160
<v Speaker 1>Yes, anyone can train to be a memory athlete and

0:12:22.400 --> 0:12:25.760
<v Speaker 1>be able to memorize really long sequences of numbers or

0:12:25.880 --> 0:12:30.600
<v Speaker 1>playing cards, or names or objects. Remember Akira Haragucci, who

0:12:30.640 --> 0:12:34.520
<v Speaker 1>memorized one hundred thousand digits of pie. According to interviews,

0:12:34.600 --> 0:12:38.200
<v Speaker 1>he was neither a prodigy growing up or even particularly

0:12:38.280 --> 0:12:41.720
<v Speaker 1>good at math. He just one day decided to start

0:12:41.760 --> 0:12:45.560
<v Speaker 1>training his memory. The same goes for Alex Mullett, the

0:12:45.600 --> 0:12:48.959
<v Speaker 1>first American to win the World Memory Championship, who went

0:12:49.000 --> 0:12:51.720
<v Speaker 1>on to win it three years in a row. He

0:12:51.800 --> 0:12:54.440
<v Speaker 1>never thought of himself as having a good memory, and

0:12:54.640 --> 0:12:57.320
<v Speaker 1>none of his friends or family growing up would say

0:12:57.360 --> 0:13:00.000
<v Speaker 1>that either. But one day he saw a ted talk

0:13:00.000 --> 0:13:03.360
<v Speaker 1>talk about memory athletes and he decided to try it.

0:13:03.960 --> 0:13:07.000
<v Speaker 1>He started to train himself, and initially, when he was

0:13:07.000 --> 0:13:10.480
<v Speaker 1>able to memorize a twenty item shopping list, he was

0:13:10.520 --> 0:13:14.360
<v Speaker 1>blowing away. Eventually he was able to do amazing things

0:13:14.840 --> 0:13:19.120
<v Speaker 1>like memorize twenty eight decks of randomly shuffled cards in

0:13:19.280 --> 0:13:23.079
<v Speaker 1>one hour. Now, I know what you're thinking. Surely these

0:13:23.120 --> 0:13:26.720
<v Speaker 1>people had a gift for memorizing things, right. I Mean,

0:13:26.760 --> 0:13:29.400
<v Speaker 1>it's true any one of us can learn to play basketball,

0:13:29.800 --> 0:13:32.280
<v Speaker 1>but we can't all play in the NBA?

0:13:32.600 --> 0:13:37.080
<v Speaker 2>Can we? Is their research saying that anybody can get

0:13:37.120 --> 0:13:39.480
<v Speaker 2>to that level? Or is it sort of like playing

0:13:39.480 --> 0:13:42.080
<v Speaker 2>at the NBA you need inherent talent to sort of

0:13:42.280 --> 0:13:43.560
<v Speaker 2>make it to the NBA.

0:13:43.640 --> 0:13:47.240
<v Speaker 3>Based on the research that's done, researchers believe that the

0:13:47.280 --> 0:13:51.160
<v Speaker 3>best explanation for this type of superior memory is practice.

0:13:52.559 --> 0:13:56.120
<v Speaker 3>That's not to say that innate abilities or curiosities are

0:13:56.120 --> 0:13:59.640
<v Speaker 3>not at play. So, for example, if there are individual

0:13:59.679 --> 0:14:05.480
<v Speaker 3>different in one's interest in organizing information, this might help

0:14:05.880 --> 0:14:10.199
<v Speaker 3>use those strategies to remember leader I see. So we're

0:14:10.240 --> 0:14:11.800
<v Speaker 3>still working out the details.

0:14:12.920 --> 0:14:15.960
<v Speaker 1>According to doctor Palumbo, there's even been studies of the

0:14:16.040 --> 0:14:19.880
<v Speaker 1>brains of memory athletes to check whether there's something special

0:14:19.880 --> 0:14:23.400
<v Speaker 1>about them, and it turns out there isn't.

0:14:24.640 --> 0:14:27.320
<v Speaker 3>There's a really interesting study that was done a few

0:14:27.400 --> 0:14:30.640
<v Speaker 3>years ago where they took a group of people who

0:14:30.920 --> 0:14:33.600
<v Speaker 3>would fall into this category or so, these memory athletes,

0:14:33.640 --> 0:14:36.280
<v Speaker 3>and they scan their brains, and then they took a

0:14:36.280 --> 0:14:40.080
<v Speaker 3>group of individuals who are not memory athletes and train

0:14:40.160 --> 0:14:43.320
<v Speaker 3>them up. So the one finding is that when you

0:14:43.360 --> 0:14:46.840
<v Speaker 3>look at the brains of people with superior memory, the

0:14:46.920 --> 0:14:50.680
<v Speaker 3>structure of their brains, they don't look different from other

0:14:50.760 --> 0:14:53.280
<v Speaker 3>individuals who are not superior.

0:14:52.760 --> 0:14:55.240
<v Speaker 2>Memorizers, really huh.

0:14:55.280 --> 0:14:57.560
<v Speaker 3>But when you look at the function of their brains,

0:14:57.840 --> 0:15:01.600
<v Speaker 3>so how their brains activate when they're doing a task

0:15:01.720 --> 0:15:05.760
<v Speaker 3>or when they're at rest, then you see differences between

0:15:05.880 --> 0:15:08.920
<v Speaker 3>individuals who have superior memory and those who do.

0:15:08.920 --> 0:15:11.480
<v Speaker 2>Not what are these differences in functionalities.

0:15:11.680 --> 0:15:14.320
<v Speaker 3>What we tend to see is that the way these

0:15:14.320 --> 0:15:17.600
<v Speaker 3>brain regions are talking to each other looks different. In

0:15:17.640 --> 0:15:21.680
<v Speaker 3>people with superior memory, the connections between brain regions are

0:15:21.720 --> 0:15:25.080
<v Speaker 3>often they're more tightly connected. They're kind of talking to

0:15:25.120 --> 0:15:30.440
<v Speaker 3>each other more. And if you train everyday people like

0:15:30.720 --> 0:15:35.200
<v Speaker 3>yourself or me to engage in these strategies for hours

0:15:35.200 --> 0:15:39.920
<v Speaker 3>and hours, then you see a similar pattern of functional

0:15:39.960 --> 0:15:45.200
<v Speaker 3>differences to those superior memory. And so that points us

0:15:45.280 --> 0:15:48.040
<v Speaker 3>to the importance of training. It's not to say that

0:15:48.080 --> 0:15:50.680
<v Speaker 3>inateabilities are not at all at play. We don't know

0:15:50.800 --> 0:15:54.520
<v Speaker 3>for sure, but it certainly points to evidence that training

0:15:54.760 --> 0:15:55.840
<v Speaker 3>is part of the story.

0:15:57.160 --> 0:16:01.120
<v Speaker 1>Yes, you could train yourself to potentially play the NBA

0:16:01.200 --> 0:16:04.920
<v Speaker 1>of memory athletics if you wanted to. The only caveat

0:16:05.080 --> 0:16:08.080
<v Speaker 1>is that memory athletes have to train a.

0:16:07.960 --> 0:16:11.360
<v Speaker 3>Lot, They have to put in a lot of effort.

0:16:11.960 --> 0:16:14.040
<v Speaker 3>But you can get them trained up, and so you

0:16:14.080 --> 0:16:16.440
<v Speaker 3>could be trained. For example, you refer to yourself as

0:16:16.480 --> 0:16:19.360
<v Speaker 3>being somewhat forgetful, but I bet if you put in

0:16:19.400 --> 0:16:22.480
<v Speaker 3>the time, you would actually impress us all.

0:16:23.840 --> 0:16:25.600
<v Speaker 2>What I would have to remember it to practice.

0:16:25.880 --> 0:16:27.720
<v Speaker 3>That's right, Yes, that's the first step.

0:16:29.520 --> 0:16:31.560
<v Speaker 1>Okay, so what is this training that you have to

0:16:31.600 --> 0:16:36.080
<v Speaker 1>do to become a super memory athlete. According to doctor Palombo,

0:16:36.400 --> 0:16:42.600
<v Speaker 1>the training involves learning and practicing mnemonic strategies or memorizing tricks.

0:16:44.000 --> 0:16:47.560
<v Speaker 3>So what we know about these types of individuals that

0:16:47.600 --> 0:16:51.440
<v Speaker 3>they are actually using strategies to remember a lot of

0:16:51.480 --> 0:16:56.000
<v Speaker 3>information very quickly. And so, for example, many use a

0:16:56.040 --> 0:16:59.320
<v Speaker 3>strategy you call the method of low SI. So imagine

0:16:59.320 --> 0:17:03.080
<v Speaker 3>a memory appet needs to memorize long string of digits,

0:17:03.320 --> 0:17:06.640
<v Speaker 3>which is quite difficult. So what they'll do is they'll

0:17:06.640 --> 0:17:10.560
<v Speaker 3>take those digits and they'll associate them with some form

0:17:10.600 --> 0:17:15.080
<v Speaker 3>of imagery. So maybe the digit io is associated with

0:17:15.160 --> 0:17:17.679
<v Speaker 3>an image of a tiger, and so they'll build this

0:17:17.880 --> 0:17:22.800
<v Speaker 3>image associations because images are easier to remember than strings

0:17:22.800 --> 0:17:26.639
<v Speaker 3>of digits. They'll take those images and they will place

0:17:26.760 --> 0:17:30.320
<v Speaker 3>them in a familiar space in their mind's eyes. So,

0:17:30.520 --> 0:17:33.040
<v Speaker 3>for example, somebody might picture their home and all the

0:17:33.160 --> 0:17:35.960
<v Speaker 3>rooms in their home, and they will place the images

0:17:36.040 --> 0:17:39.280
<v Speaker 3>in different rooms, and they'll form a pathway in their

0:17:39.320 --> 0:17:41.960
<v Speaker 3>mind's eye as they're visiting the different rooms in their house.

0:17:42.080 --> 0:17:46.240
<v Speaker 1>Let's say this is a well known method for memorizing

0:17:46.280 --> 0:17:49.680
<v Speaker 1>things Let's say you want to memorize a random sequence

0:17:49.720 --> 0:17:55.800
<v Speaker 1>of words like key, woman, kangaroo, hair dryer, dinosaur. Those

0:17:55.840 --> 0:17:58.480
<v Speaker 1>words are a little hard to memorize on their own,

0:17:59.080 --> 0:18:01.720
<v Speaker 1>so you might instead picture your house or the house

0:18:01.800 --> 0:18:05.160
<v Speaker 1>you grew up in, and then imagine yourself walking through

0:18:05.200 --> 0:18:08.639
<v Speaker 1>that familiar space and finding each of the items in

0:18:08.720 --> 0:18:12.680
<v Speaker 1>a different spot. For example, I walked in the front door,

0:18:13.000 --> 0:18:15.600
<v Speaker 1>and I saw a key right next to the entrance.

0:18:15.960 --> 0:18:17.919
<v Speaker 1>Then I went into the living room and so a

0:18:17.960 --> 0:18:21.040
<v Speaker 1>woman standing there. Then I walked to the kitchen and

0:18:21.160 --> 0:18:24.760
<v Speaker 1>saw a kangaroo, and so on and so on. And

0:18:24.800 --> 0:18:28.520
<v Speaker 1>now imagine extending that walk around your house, adding more

0:18:28.560 --> 0:18:31.919
<v Speaker 1>things to remember in every corner. You can now remember

0:18:32.080 --> 0:18:35.720
<v Speaker 1>long sequences of information, and this works because you're essentially

0:18:35.760 --> 0:18:40.000
<v Speaker 1>associating the things you want to remember do something familiar.

0:18:40.880 --> 0:18:44.199
<v Speaker 3>At The idea is that you're linking kind of arbitrary

0:18:44.280 --> 0:18:47.639
<v Speaker 3>information that doesn't mean a lot to an individual to

0:18:47.920 --> 0:18:52.560
<v Speaker 3>something that's more personally relevant. So picturing your house, for example,

0:18:52.600 --> 0:18:55.159
<v Speaker 3>is something that is personally connected to you. And we

0:18:55.200 --> 0:18:58.840
<v Speaker 3>also know that people do best somewhat better at remembering

0:18:59.040 --> 0:19:04.200
<v Speaker 3>spatial information or visual information, so rich images or rich

0:19:04.240 --> 0:19:07.679
<v Speaker 3>spatial scene is maybe somewhat easier to remember than a

0:19:07.720 --> 0:19:08.679
<v Speaker 3>string of digits.

0:19:09.000 --> 0:19:13.199
<v Speaker 2>I see. Put it in context that my brain likes yeah.

0:19:13.400 --> 0:19:13.680
<v Speaker 3>Yes.

0:19:14.520 --> 0:19:17.159
<v Speaker 1>And another way to remember things more easily is to

0:19:17.200 --> 0:19:20.240
<v Speaker 1>make the things you're trying to remember more about you.

0:19:21.560 --> 0:19:24.520
<v Speaker 3>And so there's another phenomenon called the self reference effect.

0:19:24.520 --> 0:19:27.239
<v Speaker 3>This is separate from superior memory. This pertains to all

0:19:27.280 --> 0:19:31.000
<v Speaker 3>of us. We tend to remember information better when it's

0:19:31.040 --> 0:19:34.920
<v Speaker 3>self referential. And so if we are learning, let's say

0:19:35.080 --> 0:19:37.280
<v Speaker 3>we show up at a lab and they present us

0:19:37.480 --> 0:19:41.200
<v Speaker 3>a list of words, and later we're tested. The words

0:19:41.240 --> 0:19:44.320
<v Speaker 3>that are personally meaningful to us are the words that

0:19:44.359 --> 0:19:46.720
<v Speaker 3>we're going to tend to remember better from that list

0:19:46.760 --> 0:19:48.960
<v Speaker 3>than the ones that don't have kind of a personal

0:19:49.160 --> 0:19:51.920
<v Speaker 3>attachment to them. So, if I give you a list

0:19:51.960 --> 0:19:54.600
<v Speaker 3>of traits and a memory test, and some of those

0:19:54.680 --> 0:19:59.640
<v Speaker 3>traits resonate with you, so it could be funny, or

0:20:00.320 --> 0:20:02.879
<v Speaker 3>it could be the word dad, or it could be

0:20:02.920 --> 0:20:08.040
<v Speaker 3>the word partner, et cetera, and my professor, those words

0:20:08.080 --> 0:20:11.200
<v Speaker 3>were going to remember better than words that don't have

0:20:11.320 --> 0:20:13.960
<v Speaker 3>kind of a personal connection to us. And that's called

0:20:13.960 --> 0:20:15.200
<v Speaker 3>the self reference effect.

0:20:15.600 --> 0:20:19.280
<v Speaker 2>Oh I see, Yeah, we're all a little narcissistic.

0:20:18.760 --> 0:20:19.800
<v Speaker 3>That's right, exactly.

0:20:19.840 --> 0:20:19.959
<v Speaker 2>It.

0:20:21.440 --> 0:20:26.160
<v Speaker 1>So those are memory tricks that memory athletes use. They're more,

0:20:26.200 --> 0:20:28.840
<v Speaker 1>of course, but the idea is that if you use

0:20:28.920 --> 0:20:32.560
<v Speaker 1>them enough and you practice enough, then you could also

0:20:32.720 --> 0:20:37.520
<v Speaker 1>become a memory athlete and memorize potentially thousands of digits

0:20:37.520 --> 0:20:41.600
<v Speaker 1>of pie. Now what's interesting about memory athletes is that

0:20:41.720 --> 0:20:45.200
<v Speaker 1>it really is athletic. You have to train for it,

0:20:45.320 --> 0:20:48.120
<v Speaker 1>you get better over time, and if you don't use it,

0:20:48.800 --> 0:20:49.600
<v Speaker 1>you lose it.

0:20:51.440 --> 0:20:54.199
<v Speaker 3>And so a lot of these individuals will participate in

0:20:54.240 --> 0:20:57.600
<v Speaker 3>these kind of memory championships. Yeah, and before they even

0:20:57.720 --> 0:21:01.680
<v Speaker 3>get there, they're doing a lot with the memory to prepare,

0:21:01.720 --> 0:21:04.159
<v Speaker 3>just like any type of athlete, but prepare for an

0:21:04.160 --> 0:21:07.639
<v Speaker 3>important game. And they do this over and over again.

0:21:07.720 --> 0:21:11.920
<v Speaker 3>They'll practice and it takes hours and hours of training.

0:21:12.280 --> 0:21:15.200
<v Speaker 3>So by the time they get to these memory championships,

0:21:15.240 --> 0:21:18.320
<v Speaker 3>they're very well prepared to remember a lot of information

0:21:18.440 --> 0:21:19.080
<v Speaker 3>really quickly.

0:21:19.840 --> 0:21:23.040
<v Speaker 2>It's interesting that you paid the analogy to athletes and

0:21:23.080 --> 0:21:26.560
<v Speaker 2>that they have to train and prepare for events, meaning

0:21:26.600 --> 0:21:29.439
<v Speaker 2>like if they stop or they'll train, then they won't

0:21:29.560 --> 0:21:31.000
<v Speaker 2>perform or remember as much.

0:21:31.520 --> 0:21:34.480
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, they actually have to engage in what's called maintenance,

0:21:34.520 --> 0:21:37.000
<v Speaker 3>so they have to keep at it. It's not just

0:21:37.080 --> 0:21:39.280
<v Speaker 3>sort of one and done you train for you know,

0:21:39.320 --> 0:21:42.879
<v Speaker 3>one hundred hours. They actually have to, you know, train

0:21:42.920 --> 0:21:45.840
<v Speaker 3>every day or often to keep up those skills.

0:21:46.480 --> 0:21:50.200
<v Speaker 1>Okay, so here's a quick recap so far. Memory athletes

0:21:50.280 --> 0:21:53.960
<v Speaker 1>are one type of super memory, and it's something anyone

0:21:54.200 --> 0:21:57.280
<v Speaker 1>can learn to do. It's about picking the right mnemonic

0:21:57.320 --> 0:22:00.480
<v Speaker 1>device that works for you, then scaling that up, and

0:22:00.520 --> 0:22:03.520
<v Speaker 1>then keep on training. Even you can get to the

0:22:03.560 --> 0:22:07.359
<v Speaker 1>point where you can memorize incredibly long sequences of random

0:22:07.480 --> 0:22:11.399
<v Speaker 1>numbers or words or playing cards. And a big trick

0:22:11.640 --> 0:22:13.760
<v Speaker 1>is to find ways to make what you're trying to

0:22:13.760 --> 0:22:17.560
<v Speaker 1>remember relevant to you, which brings us to the second

0:22:17.640 --> 0:22:21.160
<v Speaker 1>type of super memory. Imagine that you could remember not

0:22:21.240 --> 0:22:23.920
<v Speaker 1>just some things that are relevant to you, but you

0:22:23.960 --> 0:22:26.919
<v Speaker 1>could remember everything that happens to you. And now, I

0:22:26.920 --> 0:22:29.560
<v Speaker 1>imagine what would happen if you couldn't turn it off

0:22:29.960 --> 0:22:32.879
<v Speaker 1>with your head explode. Would it be a gift or

0:22:32.920 --> 0:22:35.920
<v Speaker 1>a curse. When we come back, we'll get to that

0:22:35.920 --> 0:22:40.680
<v Speaker 1>type of super memory, assuming we don't forget. So stay

0:22:40.680 --> 0:22:58.640
<v Speaker 1>with us. We'll be right back. Hey, you remember, Welcome back.

0:22:59.119 --> 0:23:03.080
<v Speaker 1>We're talking about memory. And so far we talked about

0:23:03.160 --> 0:23:06.359
<v Speaker 1>one kind of super memory, which is the one found

0:23:06.520 --> 0:23:10.360
<v Speaker 1>in memory athletes. As we learn from doctor DANIELA. Palumbo,

0:23:10.680 --> 0:23:14.320
<v Speaker 1>a researcher in memory, anyone can be a memory athlete.

0:23:14.520 --> 0:23:17.840
<v Speaker 1>The ability to memorize thousands of digits of pie, or

0:23:17.880 --> 0:23:20.720
<v Speaker 1>to memorize a deck of cards in twenty seconds is

0:23:20.760 --> 0:23:24.480
<v Speaker 1>something that, according to brain studies, can be mostly attributed

0:23:24.720 --> 0:23:29.119
<v Speaker 1>to practice, which means you can be a memory athlete too.

0:23:29.280 --> 0:23:31.639
<v Speaker 1>In fact, one of you could be the next World

0:23:31.840 --> 0:23:36.080
<v Speaker 1>memory champion. Now, as we learned, a trick to memorizing

0:23:36.200 --> 0:23:40.040
<v Speaker 1>long sequences of abstract numbers or words or playing cards

0:23:40.200 --> 0:23:45.080
<v Speaker 1>is to turn the information into something personally relevant or experiential.

0:23:45.640 --> 0:23:48.840
<v Speaker 1>You can imagine, for example, turning a sequence of numbers

0:23:48.920 --> 0:23:52.680
<v Speaker 1>into animals or objects you're familiar with, and then imagine

0:23:52.680 --> 0:23:56.360
<v Speaker 1>yourself walking through a house or a palace and remembering

0:23:56.480 --> 0:24:00.560
<v Speaker 1>running into those animals or objects in different rooms. It's

0:24:00.600 --> 0:24:04.439
<v Speaker 1>a way to turn semantic information into something closer to

0:24:04.640 --> 0:24:08.000
<v Speaker 1>episodic memory, which brings us to the second type of

0:24:08.040 --> 0:24:12.600
<v Speaker 1>super memory, people who remember everything that happens to them.

0:24:12.920 --> 0:24:15.159
<v Speaker 1>We all think we remember what we did in the past,

0:24:15.440 --> 0:24:17.920
<v Speaker 1>but if I asked you, for example, what you had

0:24:17.920 --> 0:24:21.919
<v Speaker 1>for lunch twelve days ago, you would probably say, I

0:24:22.000 --> 0:24:25.200
<v Speaker 1>have no idea, But there are people on this planet

0:24:25.240 --> 0:24:28.480
<v Speaker 1>that would remember that. And not only that, if you

0:24:28.480 --> 0:24:31.560
<v Speaker 1>asked them about any date in the past, say they're

0:24:31.600 --> 0:24:34.200
<v Speaker 1>ready to forty years, they could tell you what day

0:24:34.200 --> 0:24:36.919
<v Speaker 1>of the week it was, where they were, what they

0:24:37.000 --> 0:24:39.160
<v Speaker 1>read in the news or saw on TV that day,

0:24:39.600 --> 0:24:43.280
<v Speaker 1>and yes, what they had for lunch. It's a characteristic

0:24:43.359 --> 0:24:49.080
<v Speaker 1>of some people called highly superior autobiographical memory. Here's how

0:24:49.119 --> 0:24:50.800
<v Speaker 1>doctor Palumbo describes it.

0:24:51.119 --> 0:24:53.840
<v Speaker 3>So you can give them a date, virtually any date,

0:24:53.920 --> 0:24:56.119
<v Speaker 3>and they will tell you what happened to them in

0:24:56.160 --> 0:24:58.440
<v Speaker 3>their life that day. And they're also really good at

0:24:58.480 --> 0:25:02.040
<v Speaker 3>remembering what happened in public, so they can remember media

0:25:02.080 --> 0:25:05.320
<v Speaker 3>events really well. Is in addition to remembering their own

0:25:05.359 --> 0:25:06.480
<v Speaker 3>personal experiences.

0:25:06.840 --> 0:25:07.399
<v Speaker 1>Wow.

0:25:07.600 --> 0:25:10.520
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, So that's the really interesting thing about ah SAM

0:25:10.640 --> 0:25:13.359
<v Speaker 3>is that those with age SAM remember all of it.

0:25:13.840 --> 0:25:17.360
<v Speaker 3>And so they remember they're really kind of inconsequential moments

0:25:17.359 --> 0:25:20.919
<v Speaker 3>of their lives, including what they were wearing an event

0:25:20.960 --> 0:25:21.639
<v Speaker 3>that they went to.

0:25:22.280 --> 0:25:24.960
<v Speaker 2>They have a memory of what they were wearing.

0:25:24.880 --> 0:25:27.320
<v Speaker 3>Yes, exactly. They have a really strong memory of what

0:25:27.359 --> 0:25:29.760
<v Speaker 3>they were wearing and what others were wearing as well.

0:25:30.160 --> 0:25:33.280
<v Speaker 3>So here you have these individuals who remember almost everything

0:25:33.320 --> 0:25:34.200
<v Speaker 3>from their lives.

0:25:35.000 --> 0:25:38.800
<v Speaker 1>Imagine if you remembered everything that ever happened to you.

0:25:39.359 --> 0:25:41.800
<v Speaker 1>But here's the amazing thing. We don't really know how

0:25:41.840 --> 0:25:44.560
<v Speaker 1>many people out there are able to do this.

0:25:45.840 --> 0:25:48.400
<v Speaker 2>How common was this phenomenon of people with age?

0:25:48.440 --> 0:25:48.720
<v Speaker 1>Sam?

0:25:48.840 --> 0:25:51.359
<v Speaker 2>Is it the one and a million, one and a bini?

0:25:52.000 --> 0:25:54.040
<v Speaker 2>What do we know about how often it happens?

0:25:54.480 --> 0:25:57.640
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, so I hate answering with an I don't know,

0:25:57.880 --> 0:26:00.879
<v Speaker 3>But we know how many people have been identified for

0:26:00.960 --> 0:26:05.120
<v Speaker 3>research studies, which is less than one hundred. So there's

0:26:05.119 --> 0:26:08.480
<v Speaker 3>a very small group of individuals who have participated in

0:26:08.520 --> 0:26:11.120
<v Speaker 3>research studies, and some of those studies have been published

0:26:11.119 --> 0:26:14.000
<v Speaker 3>and some of them are forthcoming. But we don't know

0:26:14.080 --> 0:26:16.560
<v Speaker 3>if it's more common than that.

0:26:16.560 --> 0:26:19.800
<v Speaker 1>That's right, we don't know how often this phenomenon happens.

0:26:20.200 --> 0:26:22.600
<v Speaker 1>Now you might be thinking, can we just figure out

0:26:22.600 --> 0:26:26.680
<v Speaker 1>who has it and count them? Well, it's not that easy.

0:26:27.640 --> 0:26:31.520
<v Speaker 3>That's because, at least based on the accounts of people

0:26:31.600 --> 0:26:35.600
<v Speaker 3>who have been identified, many of them did not realize

0:26:35.640 --> 0:26:38.960
<v Speaker 3>that their memory was any different from others until they

0:26:38.960 --> 0:26:42.600
<v Speaker 3>were adults. Or in adolescents, And so it could be

0:26:42.680 --> 0:26:45.159
<v Speaker 3>that a lot of people are going around with this

0:26:45.440 --> 0:26:49.080
<v Speaker 3>really amazing memory ability, but they don't realize that other

0:26:49.119 --> 0:26:50.400
<v Speaker 3>people don't have it as well.

0:26:50.600 --> 0:26:53.960
<v Speaker 2>They didn't realize other people can't remember everything about their lives.

0:26:54.160 --> 0:26:54.720
<v Speaker 3>Wow.

0:26:55.760 --> 0:26:59.160
<v Speaker 1>Yes, if you happen to remember everything that ever happens

0:26:59.200 --> 0:27:02.439
<v Speaker 1>to you, you know that's not common. You should contact

0:27:02.440 --> 0:27:06.320
<v Speaker 1>a scientists right away so they can study this better. Okay,

0:27:06.440 --> 0:27:09.200
<v Speaker 1>I had a lot of questions about this. First of all,

0:27:09.560 --> 0:27:12.359
<v Speaker 1>how is this possible? What's going on in the brains

0:27:12.359 --> 0:27:16.000
<v Speaker 1>of people with h SAM that gives them this superpower?

0:27:16.680 --> 0:27:19.320
<v Speaker 1>Is there a limit to what they can remember? And

0:27:19.880 --> 0:27:23.200
<v Speaker 1>is this a give or a curse? Will start For

0:27:23.280 --> 0:27:24.360
<v Speaker 1>the first question.

0:27:24.440 --> 0:27:29.480
<v Speaker 2>How is this possible? Like how can an individual fit

0:27:29.600 --> 0:27:30.919
<v Speaker 2>so much in their heads?

0:27:31.600 --> 0:27:34.600
<v Speaker 3>I know, it's fascinating, right, It's a big puzzle. So

0:27:34.640 --> 0:27:38.560
<v Speaker 3>the why question is what stumps a lot of researchers.

0:27:38.320 --> 0:27:42.159
<v Speaker 3>There's some hints and so, for example, one group of

0:27:42.200 --> 0:27:46.680
<v Speaker 3>researchers looked at whether individuals with h SAM differ in

0:27:46.960 --> 0:27:49.960
<v Speaker 3>the way they remember memories that are recent, let's say

0:27:50.000 --> 0:27:53.720
<v Speaker 3>a week ago, versus events that they encoded a month ago,

0:27:54.000 --> 0:27:55.359
<v Speaker 3>six months ago, et cetera.

0:27:56.160 --> 0:27:59.960
<v Speaker 1>So this is a pretty cool experiment. Scientists ask people

0:28:00.200 --> 0:28:05.040
<v Speaker 1>with and without highly superior autobiographical memory to remember something

0:28:05.080 --> 0:28:08.000
<v Speaker 1>that's happened to them a week ago, you know what

0:28:08.080 --> 0:28:11.240
<v Speaker 1>they remember? How much detail they remember, And it turned

0:28:11.280 --> 0:28:14.080
<v Speaker 1>out that there wasn't much of a difference between the

0:28:14.160 --> 0:28:14.920
<v Speaker 1>two groups.

0:28:15.880 --> 0:28:19.399
<v Speaker 3>H SAM individuals did not differ from non h SAM

0:28:19.440 --> 0:28:23.480
<v Speaker 3>individuals in their memory for events that were really really new.

0:28:23.640 --> 0:28:25.959
<v Speaker 3>So those memories that were a week or less than

0:28:26.000 --> 0:28:27.280
<v Speaker 3>a week old, what do.

0:28:27.240 --> 0:28:29.280
<v Speaker 2>You mean, they didn't differ. What does it mean?

0:28:29.400 --> 0:28:32.520
<v Speaker 3>So they were conjure up just as many details, the

0:28:32.560 --> 0:28:34.879
<v Speaker 3>same amount of details as a person who does not

0:28:35.040 --> 0:28:36.040
<v Speaker 3>have ah SAM.

0:28:36.560 --> 0:28:40.040
<v Speaker 1>So for recent memories, things that happened just a few

0:28:40.120 --> 0:28:42.760
<v Speaker 1>days ago, you and I are just as good as

0:28:42.760 --> 0:28:46.480
<v Speaker 1>people with h SAM super memory and remembering what happened.

0:28:47.040 --> 0:28:49.920
<v Speaker 1>But then in the experiment, they also asked people to

0:28:49.960 --> 0:28:54.400
<v Speaker 1>remember things that happened further back, say a few weeks ago.

0:28:55.640 --> 0:28:59.000
<v Speaker 3>However, when they looked at those older memories, so the

0:28:59.040 --> 0:29:01.840
<v Speaker 3>memories that were more more than a week old, then

0:29:01.920 --> 0:29:05.600
<v Speaker 3>you saw very large differences between individuals with h SAM

0:29:05.640 --> 0:29:10.040
<v Speaker 3>and individuals without. And so the folks without ah SAM

0:29:10.080 --> 0:29:13.560
<v Speaker 3>were forgetting a lot of those details, whereas the individuals

0:29:13.560 --> 0:29:16.440
<v Speaker 3>with h SAM were holding on to those details for

0:29:16.480 --> 0:29:20.080
<v Speaker 3>a longer period of time. And so that's really important

0:29:20.120 --> 0:29:24.360
<v Speaker 3>finding because it hints at this idea that perhaps individuals

0:29:24.360 --> 0:29:28.360
<v Speaker 3>with h SAM don't encode memories differently from those who

0:29:28.400 --> 0:29:31.440
<v Speaker 3>do not have ah SAM, but there's something about laying

0:29:31.480 --> 0:29:34.520
<v Speaker 3>down those memory traces so that they're more permanent that

0:29:34.600 --> 0:29:37.040
<v Speaker 3>may differ in individuals with h SAM.

0:29:37.640 --> 0:29:41.240
<v Speaker 2>Wow, meaning that people with a SAM are just as

0:29:41.280 --> 0:29:44.440
<v Speaker 2>good at getting memories. They seem to be better at

0:29:44.560 --> 0:29:45.840
<v Speaker 2>keeping memories.

0:29:45.600 --> 0:29:48.200
<v Speaker 3>Exactly yes, that's a perfect way to put.

0:29:48.000 --> 0:29:51.640
<v Speaker 2>It, oh fascinating, meaning that they're just good at not

0:29:51.720 --> 0:29:53.920
<v Speaker 2>forgetting exactly yes, exactly.

0:29:54.640 --> 0:29:57.719
<v Speaker 1>So this is interesting because it tells you that people

0:29:57.840 --> 0:30:01.640
<v Speaker 1>with this kind of super memory taking the world pretty

0:30:01.680 --> 0:30:04.600
<v Speaker 1>much the same way the rest of us do. It's

0:30:04.600 --> 0:30:07.600
<v Speaker 1>not like they experience more or they pay attention to

0:30:07.680 --> 0:30:11.400
<v Speaker 1>more details or have a heightened sense of going through life.

0:30:11.600 --> 0:30:15.040
<v Speaker 1>They process the world just like we do, except whereas

0:30:15.080 --> 0:30:18.240
<v Speaker 1>for most of us, most memories just fade away, for

0:30:18.360 --> 0:30:23.640
<v Speaker 1>people with AHSAM, it all sticks. We'll talk more about

0:30:23.680 --> 0:30:27.280
<v Speaker 1>how the brain encodes memories later, but here's another fascinating

0:30:27.320 --> 0:30:30.360
<v Speaker 1>thing about people with this kind of super memory. People

0:30:30.360 --> 0:30:33.600
<v Speaker 1>with ah SAM are extremely good at remembering what happened

0:30:33.640 --> 0:30:38.280
<v Speaker 1>to them, but they're not particularly good at remembering other things.

0:30:38.640 --> 0:30:42.840
<v Speaker 3>The h SAM is quite unique in that individuals who

0:30:43.000 --> 0:30:48.040
<v Speaker 3>have it are really good at remembering autobiographical content, and

0:30:48.400 --> 0:30:51.680
<v Speaker 3>they don't necessarily excel when it comes to remembering other

0:30:51.760 --> 0:30:55.280
<v Speaker 3>kinds of information. And so, if you bring individuals with

0:30:55.520 --> 0:30:59.400
<v Speaker 3>h SAM into the laboratory and you give them memory tests,

0:31:00.120 --> 0:31:03.640
<v Speaker 3>for example, tests that involve words or images, et cetera,

0:31:04.320 --> 0:31:07.600
<v Speaker 3>then they do not perform any better than individuals who

0:31:07.600 --> 0:31:09.840
<v Speaker 3>do not have aach SAM. Wow, so it has to

0:31:09.880 --> 0:31:13.120
<v Speaker 3>be autobiographical in nature for them to remember it.

0:31:13.200 --> 0:31:13.400
<v Speaker 2>Well.

0:31:14.200 --> 0:31:16.680
<v Speaker 1>Now, I know what you're probably thinking right now, which is,

0:31:17.160 --> 0:31:20.240
<v Speaker 1>if you remembered everything that ever happened to you, why

0:31:20.280 --> 0:31:21.960
<v Speaker 1>didn't you run out of space in your head for

0:31:22.040 --> 0:31:23.000
<v Speaker 1>all those memories?

0:31:23.400 --> 0:31:23.520
<v Speaker 3>Like?

0:31:23.680 --> 0:31:27.240
<v Speaker 1>What's the limit of this super memory? I asked doctor

0:31:27.280 --> 0:31:28.520
<v Speaker 1>Palombo this question.

0:31:29.320 --> 0:31:31.680
<v Speaker 2>How can to be in your room in the brain

0:31:31.760 --> 0:31:33.720
<v Speaker 2>to remember everything you do in your life?

0:31:33.800 --> 0:31:35.800
<v Speaker 3>That is such a good question, and I think we

0:31:35.960 --> 0:31:40.640
<v Speaker 3>just don't know. And so it's surprising that individuals can

0:31:40.760 --> 0:31:42.240
<v Speaker 3>remember this much information.

0:31:42.760 --> 0:31:45.040
<v Speaker 2>Do you think there's a limit to how much we

0:31:45.080 --> 0:31:46.400
<v Speaker 2>can you remember in our brains?

0:31:46.680 --> 0:31:49.000
<v Speaker 3>We used to think so, but I think people with

0:31:49.360 --> 0:31:50.760
<v Speaker 3>h SAM make us.

0:31:50.680 --> 0:31:56.520
<v Speaker 2>Question that maybe the limit is much higher than you think. Yeah, exactly, Okay.

0:31:56.600 --> 0:31:58.800
<v Speaker 1>The last question I asked doctor Plumbo about this type

0:31:58.800 --> 0:32:02.320
<v Speaker 1>of super memory was whether being able to remember everything

0:32:02.440 --> 0:32:06.080
<v Speaker 1>that's ever happened to you is a gift or a curse.

0:32:07.400 --> 0:32:10.120
<v Speaker 3>If you talk to different individuals, what they have in

0:32:10.160 --> 0:32:13.680
<v Speaker 3>common is that they all remember events in rich and

0:32:13.800 --> 0:32:17.200
<v Speaker 3>vivid detail. But the way that they feel about having

0:32:17.520 --> 0:32:20.480
<v Speaker 3>really good memory differs from one individual to the next.

0:32:20.560 --> 0:32:24.080
<v Speaker 3>So some will refer to their age SAM as a gift,

0:32:24.680 --> 0:32:29.080
<v Speaker 3>and some feel less enthusiastic about having such a good memory.

0:32:29.320 --> 0:32:33.200
<v Speaker 3>For example, there's one individual with h SAM named Mary

0:32:33.280 --> 0:32:37.640
<v Speaker 3>Lou Henner, and she's a famous actress, and she describes

0:32:37.680 --> 0:32:40.960
<v Speaker 3>her ah SAM as a gift, and she describes that

0:32:41.080 --> 0:32:44.840
<v Speaker 3>it is something that she uses in her occupation as

0:32:44.880 --> 0:32:48.000
<v Speaker 3>an actress, that she has fun with it. She really

0:32:48.200 --> 0:32:51.320
<v Speaker 3>just enjoys having a really good memory, and so for

0:32:51.440 --> 0:32:54.360
<v Speaker 3>her it is something that she really appreciates.

0:32:54.960 --> 0:32:57.880
<v Speaker 1>So some people really like having this kind of super memory.

0:32:58.120 --> 0:33:01.280
<v Speaker 1>But others describe it is a bit of a curse.

0:33:01.720 --> 0:33:04.320
<v Speaker 1>One well known person with h SAM, a woman in

0:33:04.320 --> 0:33:07.840
<v Speaker 1>her fifties from Los Angeles called Jill Price, can remember

0:33:07.960 --> 0:33:10.800
<v Speaker 1>what she did almost every single day of her life.

0:33:11.160 --> 0:33:13.520
<v Speaker 1>She even says she has memories of being a toddler

0:33:13.560 --> 0:33:16.479
<v Speaker 1>in her crip. It's like she has the camera record

0:33:16.560 --> 0:33:20.360
<v Speaker 1>button on all the time. And she describes the experience

0:33:20.480 --> 0:33:24.640
<v Speaker 1>of having this kind of super memory as quote, NonStop,

0:33:25.080 --> 0:33:28.120
<v Speaker 1>uncontrollable and totally exhausting.

0:33:29.280 --> 0:33:31.960
<v Speaker 3>There are some individuals who do feel that way, yes,

0:33:32.080 --> 0:33:35.360
<v Speaker 3>and that sometimes their memories can be really distracting for them.

0:33:35.480 --> 0:33:39.440
<v Speaker 3>So what is common across many individuals with h SAM

0:33:39.520 --> 0:33:42.360
<v Speaker 3>is the automaticity of their memories, so they come back

0:33:42.360 --> 0:33:45.440
<v Speaker 3>to them really, really easily and very quickly. But there

0:33:45.480 --> 0:33:48.160
<v Speaker 3>are times when remembering is not the task at hand,

0:33:48.320 --> 0:33:50.640
<v Speaker 3>when we have to pay attention in the classroom, or

0:33:50.680 --> 0:33:53.400
<v Speaker 3>when we have a very demanding job, and so for

0:33:53.520 --> 0:33:57.040
<v Speaker 3>some individuals they have described it as distracting and even

0:33:57.120 --> 0:34:01.480
<v Speaker 3>difficult because all their memories are really vivid, including the

0:34:01.560 --> 0:34:02.200
<v Speaker 3>bad ones.

0:34:03.240 --> 0:34:07.400
<v Speaker 1>And that brings us to the topic of forgetting. Oh wait,

0:34:07.440 --> 0:34:09.839
<v Speaker 1>I forgot to tell you. This is actually a two

0:34:09.880 --> 0:34:13.920
<v Speaker 1>part episode about super memory. We talked about people with

0:34:14.080 --> 0:34:17.560
<v Speaker 1>amazing abilities to remember a lot of things, but what

0:34:17.680 --> 0:34:21.960
<v Speaker 1>about the opposite, What about people with amazing abilities to

0:34:22.200 --> 0:34:26.719
<v Speaker 1>forget or with the lack of ability to make new memories.

0:34:27.200 --> 0:34:30.800
<v Speaker 1>Do you remember watching the movie Memento or finding dorri

0:34:31.560 --> 0:34:35.480
<v Speaker 1>Well that happens to real people. On our next episode,

0:34:35.600 --> 0:34:39.319
<v Speaker 1>we'll talk about how the brain forgets memories, what it's

0:34:39.400 --> 0:34:43.240
<v Speaker 1>like to live completely in the moment without memory, without

0:34:43.280 --> 0:34:46.480
<v Speaker 1>the burden of the past. So don't forget to come

0:34:46.520 --> 0:34:53.240
<v Speaker 1>back see you next week. You've been listening to Science

0:34:53.239 --> 0:34:58.040
<v Speaker 1>Stuff production of iHeartRadio, written and produced by me Or Hitcham,

0:34:58.480 --> 0:35:02.520
<v Speaker 1>credited by Rose Seguda, executive producer Jerry Rowland, and audio

0:35:02.560 --> 0:35:05.680
<v Speaker 1>engineer and mixer Kasey Peckram. And you can follow me

0:35:05.719 --> 0:35:08.799
<v Speaker 1>on social media. Just search for PhD Comics and the

0:35:08.880 --> 0:35:11.480
<v Speaker 1>name of your favorite platform. Be sure to subscribe to

0:35:11.560 --> 0:35:14.920
<v Speaker 1>Sign Stuff on the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever

0:35:15.000 --> 0:35:18.120
<v Speaker 1>you get your podcasts, and please tell your friends We'll

0:35:18.160 --> 0:35:27.640
<v Speaker 1>be back next Wednesday with another episode.