WEBVTT - US AI Action Plan Targets Rapid Data Center Growth

0:00:04.120 --> 0:00:08.520
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Tech is alive from coast to coast, with Caroline

0:00:08.560 --> 0:00:12.120
<v Speaker 1>Hide in New York and Ed Lavelow into then Rince's goal.

0:00:15.120 --> 0:00:18.360
<v Speaker 2>This is Bloomberg Tech coming up. Tech earnings are in focus,

0:00:18.440 --> 0:00:21.360
<v Speaker 2>with Texas Instruments and AT and T already out and

0:00:21.400 --> 0:00:24.560
<v Speaker 2>looking to Alphabet and Tesla after the bell today, Plus

0:00:24.560 --> 0:00:25.720
<v Speaker 2>the Microsoft.

0:00:25.239 --> 0:00:28.920
<v Speaker 1>SharePoint hack hits the US Nuclear Weapons Agency as the

0:00:29.000 --> 0:00:32.519
<v Speaker 1>tally grows of organizations breached, and the.

0:00:32.479 --> 0:00:36.159
<v Speaker 2>White House unveils its AI action plan, including the promotion

0:00:36.360 --> 0:00:39.360
<v Speaker 2>of a rapid buildout of data centers for AI.

0:00:39.800 --> 0:00:42.559
<v Speaker 1>Meanwhile, let's check in on these markets because maybe then,

0:00:42.600 --> 0:00:44.559
<v Speaker 1>as that one hundred is lagging some of the other

0:00:44.640 --> 0:00:47.839
<v Speaker 1>key benchmarks today, the enthusiasm for the SMP, for the

0:00:47.920 --> 0:00:51.840
<v Speaker 1>Dow post, that Japan trade deal not quite filtering through,

0:00:51.880 --> 0:00:55.000
<v Speaker 1>We've got more anxiety around individual earnings that you're digging into.

0:00:55.160 --> 0:00:57.720
<v Speaker 1>Currently flat on the Naskak one hundred key tech benchmark.

0:00:57.760 --> 0:00:58.440
<v Speaker 3>What are you looking at?

0:00:59.200 --> 0:01:01.200
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, we're kind of trying water to tonight, right, But

0:01:01.280 --> 0:01:03.320
<v Speaker 2>the two earnings that are our AT and T, which

0:01:03.320 --> 0:01:06.959
<v Speaker 2>is also completely flat the story. They just didn't hype

0:01:06.959 --> 0:01:09.040
<v Speaker 2>themselves up as much as some of their peers had

0:01:09.040 --> 0:01:11.600
<v Speaker 2>taken advantage of policy. We'll get into that in just

0:01:11.600 --> 0:01:14.720
<v Speaker 2>a minute, but look at Texas Instruments down twelve point

0:01:14.760 --> 0:01:15.400
<v Speaker 2>three percent.

0:01:15.800 --> 0:01:17.200
<v Speaker 4>Do the math on tariffs.

0:01:17.240 --> 0:01:20.319
<v Speaker 2>Maybe part of this, Carrow is that for a company

0:01:20.319 --> 0:01:23.360
<v Speaker 2>that makes chips that go into basically everything, they can't

0:01:23.360 --> 0:01:24.400
<v Speaker 2>do the math on tariffs.

0:01:24.440 --> 0:01:25.319
<v Speaker 4>And I think that's where we go.

0:01:25.880 --> 0:01:28.720
<v Speaker 1>We do because one hundred thousand customers, they couldn't tell

0:01:28.760 --> 0:01:30.800
<v Speaker 1>us who is dragging inventory forward or not.

0:01:30.959 --> 0:01:32.360
<v Speaker 3>In King joins us for more.

0:01:32.400 --> 0:01:34.800
<v Speaker 1>And look, this is the worst fall in the stock

0:01:34.920 --> 0:01:36.360
<v Speaker 1>since two thousand and eighty in.

0:01:37.800 --> 0:01:40.880
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, they're having a very bad day. And it's not

0:01:41.040 --> 0:01:44.119
<v Speaker 5>because the numbers are terrible, they're absolutely not. It's more

0:01:44.160 --> 0:01:46.440
<v Speaker 5>of a directional thing. And it's more because, as you

0:01:46.480 --> 0:01:50.320
<v Speaker 5>guys just alluded to, they're kind of pressing the wrong buttons,

0:01:50.320 --> 0:01:52.800
<v Speaker 5>the fear buttons for the market right now, which is

0:01:53.360 --> 0:01:55.760
<v Speaker 5>tariffs are going to have an impact. Maybe they're having

0:01:55.800 --> 0:01:59.200
<v Speaker 5>an impact already. Frankly, we don't know. And that was

0:01:59.240 --> 0:02:02.840
<v Speaker 5>really then of the call yesterday, and obviously analysts and

0:02:02.880 --> 0:02:05.040
<v Speaker 5>investors this morning did not like that.

0:02:06.800 --> 0:02:07.000
<v Speaker 4>Ian.

0:02:07.040 --> 0:02:10.440
<v Speaker 2>In your interview with CFO Raphael Lazardi, he basically said

0:02:10.440 --> 0:02:12.320
<v Speaker 2>this idea, right, we have all these customers in all

0:02:12.320 --> 0:02:14.440
<v Speaker 2>these different domains. It's hard of us for us to

0:02:14.520 --> 0:02:17.520
<v Speaker 2>keep track. But executives on the call also talked about

0:02:17.560 --> 0:02:20.520
<v Speaker 2>the idea that in the current period, the order data

0:02:20.560 --> 0:02:21.400
<v Speaker 2>is quite strong.

0:02:23.200 --> 0:02:25.480
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, I mean the way that they described it was

0:02:25.480 --> 0:02:28.119
<v Speaker 5>that it was kind of long, nonlinear, that when there

0:02:28.200 --> 0:02:30.400
<v Speaker 5>was a lot of uncertainty about what was going to

0:02:30.440 --> 0:02:33.080
<v Speaker 5>happen with tariffs, at the beginning of the quarter, we

0:02:33.120 --> 0:02:36.200
<v Speaker 5>had a kind of a spike very strong orders, and

0:02:36.240 --> 0:02:38.880
<v Speaker 5>then after that things kind of evened out a little

0:02:38.880 --> 0:02:41.720
<v Speaker 5>bit more and followed normal patterns. But that is the

0:02:41.840 --> 0:02:44.400
<v Speaker 5>kind of thing that analysts and investors have kind of

0:02:44.400 --> 0:02:47.600
<v Speaker 5>been looking for as like a sign that this demand

0:02:47.680 --> 0:02:50.520
<v Speaker 5>that we're seeing isn't real demand, that it's this inventory

0:02:50.560 --> 0:02:53.040
<v Speaker 5>build up that Caroline just sort of alluded to that

0:02:53.120 --> 0:02:54.400
<v Speaker 5>this kind of pulled forward.

0:02:54.840 --> 0:02:57.799
<v Speaker 6>So again, the numbers were good, right.

0:02:58.080 --> 0:03:00.960
<v Speaker 5>Sixteen percent then forecasting eleven percent growth.

0:03:01.200 --> 0:03:02.240
<v Speaker 4>There's nothing wrong with that.

0:03:02.680 --> 0:03:05.639
<v Speaker 5>The problem is that people are concerned about how much

0:03:05.639 --> 0:03:08.440
<v Speaker 5>of that is real and how much of that can continue.

0:03:08.680 --> 0:03:11.600
<v Speaker 1>What's the reader cross Because NXP sort of signaled this,

0:03:12.080 --> 0:03:14.240
<v Speaker 1>but Texas Instruments is the Bellweather.

0:03:15.400 --> 0:03:19.720
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, Texas Instruments is a more diverse company than an XP.

0:03:20.080 --> 0:03:22.800
<v Speaker 5>What they have in common was auto and what Texas

0:03:22.840 --> 0:03:25.640
<v Speaker 5>Instruments said about automotive, which is, as you know, one

0:03:25.639 --> 0:03:29.079
<v Speaker 5>of the great hopes for the chip industry. Things haven't

0:03:29.160 --> 0:03:31.760
<v Speaker 5>got better yet. We perhaps or a bit of pull

0:03:31.880 --> 0:03:34.960
<v Speaker 5>forward in China. And again this is a you know,

0:03:35.000 --> 0:03:37.960
<v Speaker 5>this should be turning into a positive story. This should

0:03:37.960 --> 0:03:40.880
<v Speaker 5>be sort of heading upwards and making everybody smile again.

0:03:41.200 --> 0:03:43.960
<v Speaker 5>And it's not right. So that as we look at

0:03:44.000 --> 0:03:47.240
<v Speaker 5>other companies throughout this earnings period, companies that are trying

0:03:47.240 --> 0:03:50.600
<v Speaker 5>to do well in auto, perhaps the company is like Qualcomm,

0:03:50.720 --> 0:03:54.000
<v Speaker 5>which is part of the IDA versification story. People are

0:03:54.000 --> 0:03:56.760
<v Speaker 5>now concerned about this area. People are now concerned more

0:03:56.800 --> 0:03:57.280
<v Speaker 5>in general.

0:03:58.640 --> 0:04:00.840
<v Speaker 4>Blue Magsie King, thank you very much.

0:04:01.000 --> 0:04:03.400
<v Speaker 2>Another company that's out of earnings is AT and T

0:04:03.600 --> 0:04:06.360
<v Speaker 2>shares have been slipping. They're now flat after the company

0:04:06.400 --> 0:04:10.680
<v Speaker 2>reiterated a profit forecast that fell short of analyst estimate. Still,

0:04:10.760 --> 0:04:14.400
<v Speaker 2>the company saw rapid wireless phone subscriber growth, adding four

0:04:14.480 --> 0:04:17.480
<v Speaker 2>hundred and one thousand customers with the help of increased

0:04:17.520 --> 0:04:21.039
<v Speaker 2>perks and incentives in the second quarter. For more Bloombers.

0:04:21.120 --> 0:04:25.080
<v Speaker 2>Kelsey Griffiths is here in Washington, DC. So basically investors

0:04:25.120 --> 0:04:26.680
<v Speaker 2>are saying, well, hold on a minute. One of your

0:04:26.680 --> 0:04:30.520
<v Speaker 2>big rivals, Verizon big themselves up what they've been able

0:04:30.560 --> 0:04:34.320
<v Speaker 2>to do because of President Trump's policies, particularly around tax i.

0:04:34.360 --> 0:04:36.760
<v Speaker 2>Guess the reader cross is that they're disappointed AT and

0:04:36.800 --> 0:04:39.479
<v Speaker 2>T's not doing the same thing exactly.

0:04:39.640 --> 0:04:41.760
<v Speaker 7>So what we saw this Maureene is that AT and

0:04:41.800 --> 0:04:44.800
<v Speaker 7>T became a bit of a victim of inflated Wall

0:04:44.800 --> 0:04:49.039
<v Speaker 7>Street expectations. After a Verizon ended up posting these really

0:04:49.080 --> 0:04:54.960
<v Speaker 7>good numbers, they ended up updating their full year forecast,

0:04:55.200 --> 0:04:57.240
<v Speaker 7>and I think the market was kind of hoping that

0:04:57.279 --> 0:04:59.480
<v Speaker 7>AT and T would do the same. Now, AT and

0:04:59.520 --> 0:05:03.719
<v Speaker 7>T did adjust their numbers a bit, but it wasn't

0:05:03.760 --> 0:05:05.560
<v Speaker 7>anything as dramatic as we saw a Verizon.

0:05:05.839 --> 0:05:08.599
<v Speaker 1>Meanwhile, what was dramatically better than Verizon was the amount

0:05:08.640 --> 0:05:11.360
<v Speaker 1>of net ads they're making in terms of phone use.

0:05:11.520 --> 0:05:13.479
<v Speaker 3>Kelsey just push us forward.

0:05:13.560 --> 0:05:15.640
<v Speaker 1>Therefore, on AT and T, perhaps what was baked in

0:05:15.680 --> 0:05:17.279
<v Speaker 1>because these stocks have run up this year.

0:05:18.880 --> 0:05:19.360
<v Speaker 3>That's right.

0:05:19.440 --> 0:05:22.280
<v Speaker 7>AT and T is on a really good growth trajectory

0:05:22.480 --> 0:05:25.440
<v Speaker 7>and they're seen as this pretty steady you.

0:05:25.320 --> 0:05:28.000
<v Speaker 6>Know growing business.

0:05:28.040 --> 0:05:30.240
<v Speaker 7>They've been investing a lot of cash into their Fiver

0:05:30.880 --> 0:05:33.919
<v Speaker 7>subscriber ads, and although they were a little short of

0:05:33.960 --> 0:05:37.599
<v Speaker 7>expectations this quarter, that is still an area where they're

0:05:37.640 --> 0:05:38.920
<v Speaker 7>predicting massive growth.

0:05:39.640 --> 0:05:42.960
<v Speaker 2>They were bullish about their commitment to investing in this country.

0:05:42.960 --> 0:05:45.039
<v Speaker 2>This is a theme Caroline and I've discussed with AT

0:05:45.160 --> 0:05:47.200
<v Speaker 2>and T in the past. What did the CFO say

0:05:47.240 --> 0:05:50.080
<v Speaker 2>they're going to prioritize and what's the kind of level

0:05:50.120 --> 0:05:52.240
<v Speaker 2>of investment that they're talking about here.

0:05:52.720 --> 0:05:55.640
<v Speaker 7>That's right, So in the wake of the big beautiful bill,

0:05:56.400 --> 0:06:00.240
<v Speaker 7>all companies, including Verizon and AT and T are looking

0:06:00.279 --> 0:06:03.400
<v Speaker 7>to really invest in their networks. They're looking at these

0:06:03.440 --> 0:06:06.240
<v Speaker 7>tax savings and kind of thinking about how they're going

0:06:06.279 --> 0:06:08.320
<v Speaker 7>to spend that. For AT and T, we've heard that

0:06:08.360 --> 0:06:13.080
<v Speaker 7>they're going to invest an extra billion or so in

0:06:13.920 --> 0:06:17.320
<v Speaker 7>the fiber network, I believe per year. And then we're

0:06:17.320 --> 0:06:19.520
<v Speaker 7>also going to see some pretty big contributions to the

0:06:19.560 --> 0:06:20.640
<v Speaker 7>employee pension plan.

0:06:21.400 --> 0:06:22.040
<v Speaker 3>We'll keep an eye on it.

0:06:22.160 --> 0:06:24.159
<v Speaker 1>Kelsey Griffiths, we thanks so much on the wrap up

0:06:24.200 --> 0:06:25.920
<v Speaker 1>on AT and T, But now let's get some other

0:06:25.960 --> 0:06:28.440
<v Speaker 1>earnings context and what we expect to come after.

0:06:28.360 --> 0:06:30.120
<v Speaker 3>The closing bell today. Of course it's Alphabet.

0:06:30.320 --> 0:06:33.440
<v Speaker 1>Brad Ericsson, internet analyst that obviously Capital Markets joins us

0:06:33.480 --> 0:06:35.680
<v Speaker 1>now and you've got I think it's about a two

0:06:35.760 --> 0:06:36.760
<v Speaker 1>hundred dollars price.

0:06:36.560 --> 0:06:38.560
<v Speaker 3>Tag outperform on Alphabet.

0:06:38.920 --> 0:06:41.040
<v Speaker 1>How can they live up to the prior to this

0:06:41.120 --> 0:06:44.240
<v Speaker 1>day ten day run up, a longest winning streak for

0:06:44.240 --> 0:06:46.360
<v Speaker 1>Alphabet that we've seen since twenty ten.

0:06:46.520 --> 0:06:46.839
<v Speaker 4>Rat.

0:06:48.200 --> 0:06:51.680
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, there's a couple of kind of cross current things

0:06:51.720 --> 0:06:54.720
<v Speaker 8>going on. I think first on the fundamental side, we're

0:06:54.760 --> 0:06:56.920
<v Speaker 8>going to see really good numbers our checks through the quarter.

0:06:56.960 --> 0:07:00.320
<v Speaker 8>We're fairly strong, and I do expect them to print

0:07:00.360 --> 0:07:03.520
<v Speaker 8>upside tonight. So I think that's kind of why you've

0:07:03.520 --> 0:07:06.120
<v Speaker 8>seen the market price that in a little bit and

0:07:06.440 --> 0:07:08.119
<v Speaker 8>run the stock up here in front of the print

0:07:08.800 --> 0:07:12.320
<v Speaker 8>off setting that maybe not quite as good from a

0:07:12.400 --> 0:07:15.560
<v Speaker 8>from a forward set of perspective, is that once they

0:07:15.600 --> 0:07:18.800
<v Speaker 8>print numbers tonight, say what they say, then we've got

0:07:18.840 --> 0:07:21.520
<v Speaker 8>to sit around and wait two three four weeks for

0:07:21.600 --> 0:07:24.520
<v Speaker 8>this regulatory decision out of the judge that the obviously

0:07:24.720 --> 0:07:27.760
<v Speaker 8>will we'll scare some people, so and let's.

0:07:27.640 --> 0:07:30.040
<v Speaker 1>Just think about that regulatory overhang. And we love reading

0:07:30.080 --> 0:07:32.880
<v Speaker 1>your notes and really we're talking about how this is

0:07:32.920 --> 0:07:36.480
<v Speaker 1>a strong fundamentally company but challenged thematically in a waiting

0:07:36.520 --> 0:07:40.280
<v Speaker 1>regulatory wild card. We await what Judge Meta says in August.

0:07:40.520 --> 0:07:44.680
<v Speaker 1>But when you think about the challenge thematically, any numbers

0:07:44.720 --> 0:07:46.120
<v Speaker 1>that you're going to be looking at that would tell

0:07:46.160 --> 0:07:48.840
<v Speaker 1>you that there is competition in terms of search that

0:07:49.000 --> 0:07:51.720
<v Speaker 1>CHATCHBT is eating in to their breadwinner.

0:07:53.920 --> 0:07:56.440
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, I mean they'll they'll obviously again, they'll print the

0:07:56.480 --> 0:07:58.760
<v Speaker 8>numbers tonight. I do expect them to be good and

0:07:58.840 --> 0:08:01.960
<v Speaker 8>so just objectively on that piece of it, I think

0:08:01.960 --> 0:08:04.600
<v Speaker 8>they'll have a really strong case and story to tell

0:08:04.600 --> 0:08:05.720
<v Speaker 8>on the conference.

0:08:05.320 --> 0:08:08.320
<v Speaker 6>Call around why AI is good for their business.

0:08:08.560 --> 0:08:11.480
<v Speaker 8>They're not going to directly address sort of the competitive threats,

0:08:11.720 --> 0:08:13.640
<v Speaker 8>but they will definitely be I think in a good

0:08:13.680 --> 0:08:17.200
<v Speaker 8>position tonight to position AIS as sort of nothing but

0:08:17.280 --> 0:08:19.680
<v Speaker 8>a good thing for the business.

0:08:20.120 --> 0:08:22.760
<v Speaker 6>But yeah, I think the point of our note was

0:08:23.600 --> 0:08:24.520
<v Speaker 6>the numbers will be good.

0:08:24.600 --> 0:08:26.560
<v Speaker 8>They can say what they want, but the reality is,

0:08:26.600 --> 0:08:29.680
<v Speaker 8>so long as you know chat GPT, Perplexity, anthropic, there's

0:08:29.680 --> 0:08:32.719
<v Speaker 8>a number of companies that are really making a lot

0:08:32.720 --> 0:08:35.440
<v Speaker 8>of headway on the AI front. Everyone's well aware of

0:08:36.240 --> 0:08:40.480
<v Speaker 8>that bare case that AI narrative against Google's core business

0:08:40.880 --> 0:08:43.360
<v Speaker 8>is not going anywhere for the foreseeable future.

0:08:44.440 --> 0:08:44.600
<v Speaker 9>Right.

0:08:44.640 --> 0:08:47.640
<v Speaker 2>The technology story I see is quite simple. How does

0:08:47.840 --> 0:08:51.439
<v Speaker 2>the Gemini model become more embedded across all of Google's business?

0:08:52.040 --> 0:08:54.160
<v Speaker 2>But I guess i'd love to know where you want

0:08:54.200 --> 0:08:57.040
<v Speaker 2>to see it show up in the financial results to

0:08:57.080 --> 0:08:58.880
<v Speaker 2>give you faith that the payoff is there.

0:09:00.480 --> 0:09:03.160
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, you know, I think the most important piece and

0:09:03.240 --> 0:09:03.600
<v Speaker 8>it's not.

0:09:04.040 --> 0:09:07.800
<v Speaker 6>I don't think it gets enough focus. Is Gemini the model?

0:09:07.960 --> 0:09:08.240
<v Speaker 9>Right?

0:09:08.480 --> 0:09:10.920
<v Speaker 8>Partially, it's just because of the brand. People have learned

0:09:10.920 --> 0:09:14.520
<v Speaker 8>the name. It's obviously driving the Gemini app, and that

0:09:14.640 --> 0:09:18.880
<v Speaker 8>is important. Where we're actually really focused is certainly on

0:09:18.960 --> 0:09:19.800
<v Speaker 8>AI overviews.

0:09:19.880 --> 0:09:22.640
<v Speaker 6>But bringing Gemini to AI mode, I call it the

0:09:22.960 --> 0:09:25.239
<v Speaker 6>my mom test. Right when my mom.

0:09:25.040 --> 0:09:27.560
<v Speaker 8>Is suddenly using some of these tools, we know they're

0:09:27.600 --> 0:09:30.760
<v Speaker 8>really hitting sort of broad based. In fairness, my mom

0:09:30.800 --> 0:09:32.800
<v Speaker 8>doesn't do a lot with technology, So there it is.

0:09:32.840 --> 0:09:36.000
<v Speaker 8>But the point is that if you're spoon feeding AI

0:09:36.160 --> 0:09:39.320
<v Speaker 8>mode to people that would ultimately just be coming to

0:09:39.360 --> 0:09:42.480
<v Speaker 8>Google for normal purposes, and you've got the power of

0:09:42.520 --> 0:09:45.760
<v Speaker 8>a really solid set of Gemini models, that's where I

0:09:45.800 --> 0:09:49.040
<v Speaker 8>think it becomes to a bigger and bigger tailwind.

0:09:48.679 --> 0:09:49.680
<v Speaker 6>For these guys.

0:09:50.520 --> 0:09:50.840
<v Speaker 4>Brad.

0:09:50.840 --> 0:09:53.680
<v Speaker 2>We got the White House's AI action plan this morning,

0:09:53.679 --> 0:09:56.680
<v Speaker 2>twenty three pages. I printed it out for you, so

0:09:56.840 --> 0:09:59.439
<v Speaker 2>for some light reading. Later in the program, we'll get

0:09:59.440 --> 0:10:01.640
<v Speaker 2>into the detail and the politics of it. But the

0:10:01.640 --> 0:10:04.599
<v Speaker 2>simple question is whether or not Alphabet is going to

0:10:04.640 --> 0:10:08.640
<v Speaker 2>be a beneficiary of what this administration wants America to

0:10:08.679 --> 0:10:09.280
<v Speaker 2>do in AI.

0:10:09.400 --> 0:10:10.319
<v Speaker 4>Do you think it will be.

0:10:13.120 --> 0:10:15.720
<v Speaker 8>Generally yes, But I do think there's going to be

0:10:16.480 --> 0:10:21.040
<v Speaker 8>more and more attention paid to how sort of equitable

0:10:21.280 --> 0:10:24.920
<v Speaker 8>the value distribution is of AI. I think that's something

0:10:24.960 --> 0:10:26.920
<v Speaker 8>we spend a lot of time thinking about these days,

0:10:26.920 --> 0:10:29.760
<v Speaker 8>which is, I think if you look at the parts

0:10:29.800 --> 0:10:32.360
<v Speaker 8>and pieces of what we know of AI today, it

0:10:32.360 --> 0:10:34.960
<v Speaker 8>would suggest that a lot of the value could accrue

0:10:35.040 --> 0:10:38.080
<v Speaker 8>to only a very few number of companies. And I

0:10:38.080 --> 0:10:40.360
<v Speaker 8>don't think that's going to work bigger picture from a

0:10:40.400 --> 0:10:42.079
<v Speaker 8>regulatory perspective.

0:10:41.760 --> 0:10:44.600
<v Speaker 6>And the reason we like Google in that perspective is.

0:10:44.840 --> 0:10:48.840
<v Speaker 8>Google is the distributor of traffic right the biggest one

0:10:48.880 --> 0:10:51.080
<v Speaker 8>on the Internet, and I don't see that changing, and

0:10:51.120 --> 0:10:53.599
<v Speaker 8>so I actually think that plays quite well into the

0:10:53.640 --> 0:10:55.800
<v Speaker 8>regulatory framework going forward.

0:10:56.320 --> 0:10:59.600
<v Speaker 1>Let's go to regulatory overhang just the last case though, Brad,

0:10:59.640 --> 0:11:02.360
<v Speaker 1>because that is the cloud you signal coming in August.

0:11:02.800 --> 0:11:03.520
<v Speaker 3>What do you brace for.

0:11:03.880 --> 0:11:06.840
<v Speaker 1>Do you think Judge Meta would break up the company?

0:11:08.640 --> 0:11:10.400
<v Speaker 6>Shorty answer is we don't. We don't think so.

0:11:10.840 --> 0:11:12.480
<v Speaker 8>I think that we have we ascribe kind of a

0:11:12.520 --> 0:11:15.000
<v Speaker 8>lower probability to that. But there's sort of two or

0:11:15.040 --> 0:11:17.400
<v Speaker 8>three things we think about. Number one is you're not

0:11:17.440 --> 0:11:19.760
<v Speaker 8>going to be able to pay for placement nd fall search.

0:11:19.800 --> 0:11:22.199
<v Speaker 6>We're pretty certain that's that's that is going away.

0:11:22.880 --> 0:11:26.080
<v Speaker 8>Two, there could be some some sort of opening up

0:11:26.120 --> 0:11:29.880
<v Speaker 8>the kimono on data that Google has to competitors. We

0:11:29.920 --> 0:11:32.480
<v Speaker 8>actually don't think that matters that much, but that could

0:11:32.520 --> 0:11:34.680
<v Speaker 8>certainly play out. And then the third one is the

0:11:34.720 --> 0:11:38.679
<v Speaker 8>divest at your potential of Chrome, and there are stances.

0:11:39.160 --> 0:11:42.520
<v Speaker 8>You know, Chrome's not a business, it's a product. I

0:11:42.559 --> 0:11:45.600
<v Speaker 8>think the maybe the dj comments sort of ignored that

0:11:45.679 --> 0:11:50.120
<v Speaker 8>piece in their aspirations to have that piece of it removed,

0:11:50.400 --> 0:11:53.840
<v Speaker 8>and so ultimately you can they could force them to

0:11:53.840 --> 0:11:57.560
<v Speaker 8>do that. It's certainly possible, but then you're introducing a

0:11:57.720 --> 0:12:02.439
<v Speaker 8>whole other set of issues, as we've seen Perplexity, open AI,

0:12:02.559 --> 0:12:05.600
<v Speaker 8>all these companies talking about opening browsers right, it's clearly

0:12:05.600 --> 0:12:07.240
<v Speaker 8>going to be very important for distribution.

0:12:07.960 --> 0:12:11.280
<v Speaker 6>Seems incredibly arbitrary to sort of.

0:12:11.200 --> 0:12:14.320
<v Speaker 8>Hand away Google's browser in the hands of another when

0:12:14.320 --> 0:12:16.320
<v Speaker 8>they're saying that is going to be critical to the

0:12:16.320 --> 0:12:18.160
<v Speaker 8>technology innovation here for the future.

0:12:18.200 --> 0:12:20.720
<v Speaker 6>It would just be handing value away. So we see

0:12:20.760 --> 0:12:22.280
<v Speaker 6>low likelihood of that happening.

0:12:23.880 --> 0:12:27.040
<v Speaker 2>Brad ericson RBC Capital Markets into the analysts, pushing ahead

0:12:27.040 --> 0:12:28.680
<v Speaker 2>to alphabet after the bell, thank you.

0:12:28.720 --> 0:12:30.320
<v Speaker 4>The other name after the bell is Tesla.

0:12:30.600 --> 0:12:33.199
<v Speaker 2>This is a stock that's down seventeen percent year to date,

0:12:33.280 --> 0:12:35.400
<v Speaker 2>it's up half a percent in the moment, and the

0:12:35.480 --> 0:12:39.080
<v Speaker 2>data carro is like probably biggest dropping revenue for a

0:12:39.120 --> 0:12:42.000
<v Speaker 2>decade year on year, but the street probably looking past

0:12:42.040 --> 0:12:43.959
<v Speaker 2>that because it's not about selling cars anymore.

0:12:44.280 --> 0:12:46.920
<v Speaker 1>It's not it's about one man really and his vision.

0:12:47.000 --> 0:12:50.120
<v Speaker 1>And let's just stick with Elon and Elon's enpart because actually, look,

0:12:50.240 --> 0:12:53.000
<v Speaker 1>you took a look at the language the fine print

0:12:53.040 --> 0:12:55.400
<v Speaker 1>included in the tender off of this going on for SpaceX, right,

0:12:55.440 --> 0:12:57.920
<v Speaker 1>and you notice that there's a new little warning just

0:12:57.960 --> 0:13:01.080
<v Speaker 1>tucked in there about his potential to get more involved

0:13:01.120 --> 0:13:01.680
<v Speaker 1>in politics.

0:13:02.800 --> 0:13:05.280
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, so what we saw was the risk factors section

0:13:05.520 --> 0:13:08.480
<v Speaker 2>in the tender documents that valued SpaceX at four hundred

0:13:08.480 --> 0:13:11.160
<v Speaker 2>billion dollars. Right, and this is what it literally says.

0:13:11.200 --> 0:13:13.960
<v Speaker 2>It acknowledges that Musk was previously a senior advisor to

0:13:13.960 --> 0:13:14.760
<v Speaker 2>President Trump.

0:13:14.559 --> 0:13:15.559
<v Speaker 4>As part of DOGE.

0:13:15.720 --> 0:13:18.200
<v Speaker 2>But also this is the key bit, may in the

0:13:18.240 --> 0:13:21.520
<v Speaker 2>future serve in similar roles in devote significant time and

0:13:21.679 --> 0:13:24.840
<v Speaker 2>energy to such roles. The reason that's important right now

0:13:24.840 --> 0:13:28.080
<v Speaker 2>and analogous to Tesla, is that Tesla investors are also

0:13:28.160 --> 0:13:30.520
<v Speaker 2>saying all we need to hear is that Musk is

0:13:30.559 --> 0:13:33.680
<v Speaker 2>committed to the company and other companies, not necessarily what

0:13:33.720 --> 0:13:35.720
<v Speaker 2>his political beliefs. So I think that's kind of what

0:13:35.760 --> 0:13:36.439
<v Speaker 2>we're watching for.

0:13:36.559 --> 0:13:38.199
<v Speaker 1>And look, he's been trying to signal that on X

0:13:38.320 --> 0:13:41.280
<v Speaker 1>right he's sleeping, eating, repeating work.

0:13:41.240 --> 0:13:43.559
<v Speaker 3>Amid a little bit of like childcare.

0:13:44.840 --> 0:13:47.680
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, seven days a week back at the company. But

0:13:47.679 --> 0:13:50.400
<v Speaker 2>there's this big overhang about the America Party, and people

0:13:50.440 --> 0:13:53.040
<v Speaker 2>on X are saying, will he even address the America

0:13:53.080 --> 0:13:55.280
<v Speaker 2>Party thing during Tesla's earnings calls.

0:13:55.360 --> 0:13:56.679
<v Speaker 4>That's the state of play right now.

0:13:56.760 --> 0:13:59.840
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, Well, we keep our eyes on it. More coming

0:13:59.920 --> 0:14:05.800
<v Speaker 1>up up right now on the Microsoft SharePoint TCAD. It's widening.

0:14:09.320 --> 0:14:09.440
<v Speaker 9>Now.

0:14:09.480 --> 0:14:12.360
<v Speaker 1>The number of companies and organizations that have been breached

0:14:12.400 --> 0:14:15.120
<v Speaker 1>by the hack on Microsoft's SharePoint has going to about

0:14:15.160 --> 0:14:18.360
<v Speaker 1>four hundred entities now, but it's according to Bloomberg reporting

0:14:18.400 --> 0:14:21.040
<v Speaker 1>that this includes the US National Nuclear.

0:14:20.680 --> 0:14:24.120
<v Speaker 3>Security Administration, which of course oversees the design of nuclear weapons.

0:14:24.360 --> 0:14:27.600
<v Speaker 3>For more, Bloomberg's Jake Bleiberg joins us and just how

0:14:27.960 --> 0:14:29.240
<v Speaker 3>extreme are these hacks?

0:14:29.280 --> 0:14:31.440
<v Speaker 1>What sort of information do we understand that they've managed

0:14:31.440 --> 0:14:31.800
<v Speaker 1>to gather?

0:14:32.320 --> 0:14:35.680
<v Speaker 10>So we're still learning about what they're gathering, and it's

0:14:35.720 --> 0:14:36.800
<v Speaker 10>a hard question to answer.

0:14:36.840 --> 0:14:37.720
<v Speaker 4>In a lot of cases.

0:14:38.000 --> 0:14:40.720
<v Speaker 10>The thing we know they've taken in at least some

0:14:40.760 --> 0:14:47.160
<v Speaker 10>instances are signing credentials, user names, passwords, other information that's

0:14:47.280 --> 0:14:51.200
<v Speaker 10>used to secure systems. And that's particularly concerning because it

0:14:51.240 --> 0:14:54.400
<v Speaker 10>means the hackers can potentially branch out from what the

0:14:54.920 --> 0:14:58.360
<v Speaker 10>one system they got into here, Jake.

0:14:58.440 --> 0:15:01.640
<v Speaker 2>When Bloomberg break the storyline last night about this particular

0:15:01.720 --> 0:15:05.320
<v Speaker 2>agency being hacked that is responsible for the development and

0:15:05.400 --> 0:15:10.440
<v Speaker 2>disposal of nuclear weapons, understandably, loads of Americans on social

0:15:10.520 --> 0:15:11.120
<v Speaker 2>media were like.

0:15:11.160 --> 0:15:13.240
<v Speaker 4>What on earth are we in trouble?

0:15:13.960 --> 0:15:15.920
<v Speaker 2>Do we know the limits of what the hackers were

0:15:15.920 --> 0:15:18.640
<v Speaker 2>able to gather what is the agency's response. I think

0:15:18.640 --> 0:15:20.480
<v Speaker 2>it's a time where we just like, here's the reality

0:15:20.480 --> 0:15:21.120
<v Speaker 2>of the situation.

0:15:21.480 --> 0:15:27.280
<v Speaker 10>So what are reporting shows so far is that there

0:15:27.400 --> 0:15:32.480
<v Speaker 10>wasn't sensitive or classified information taken from this nuclear agency,

0:15:33.040 --> 0:15:37.160
<v Speaker 10>and that the classified information within it and most other

0:15:37.200 --> 0:15:41.400
<v Speaker 10>government agencies is sort of sectioned off from the type

0:15:41.400 --> 0:15:46.040
<v Speaker 10>of system that was easily breached in this attack. However,

0:15:46.240 --> 0:15:49.360
<v Speaker 10>as I just mentioned, one of the concerns here is

0:15:49.400 --> 0:15:52.000
<v Speaker 10>that once the hackers get in, they may be able

0:15:52.040 --> 0:15:54.080
<v Speaker 10>to branch out and burrow in elsewhere.

0:15:54.480 --> 0:15:57.480
<v Speaker 1>Now, what's interesting is the number of agencies in companies

0:15:57.520 --> 0:16:00.960
<v Speaker 1>and entities has been identified by Dutch cyber company at

0:16:00.960 --> 0:16:04.200
<v Speaker 1>the moment, this one being I Security. They're saying it's

0:16:04.240 --> 0:16:08.320
<v Speaker 1>largely US based, but actually very international. What has Microsoft

0:16:08.320 --> 0:16:10.680
<v Speaker 1>been identifying? They've of course told us who pers actually

0:16:10.720 --> 0:16:12.800
<v Speaker 1>the hackers are, but how are they keeping us abreast

0:16:12.800 --> 0:16:13.000
<v Speaker 1>of this?

0:16:13.320 --> 0:16:17.720
<v Speaker 10>So Microsoft has told us that at least two Chinese

0:16:18.000 --> 0:16:21.960
<v Speaker 10>state backed hacking groups are behind some of these attacks,

0:16:22.000 --> 0:16:25.320
<v Speaker 10>and that there's another group based in China that is

0:16:25.360 --> 0:16:29.880
<v Speaker 10>carrying out attacks to what we know is that the

0:16:29.920 --> 0:16:32.800
<v Speaker 10>servers that were made vulnerable by this attack, for the

0:16:33.040 --> 0:16:37.160
<v Speaker 10>common micro or soft software SharePoint are spread out all

0:16:37.200 --> 0:16:40.800
<v Speaker 10>over the globe, and that the number that we're potentially

0:16:40.920 --> 0:16:43.680
<v Speaker 10>vulnerable is in the thousand, it's not the hundreds.

0:16:43.960 --> 0:16:45.400
<v Speaker 4>So the scope of this is.

0:16:45.360 --> 0:16:48.800
<v Speaker 10>Really something that's still coming into view. And you know,

0:16:48.920 --> 0:16:52.240
<v Speaker 10>Microsoft up to now has not told us how many

0:16:52.280 --> 0:16:55.800
<v Speaker 10>of their customers have experienced breaches, Jake.

0:16:55.920 --> 0:16:59.360
<v Speaker 2>Many Microsoft customers watch this program, many Microsoft employees watch

0:16:59.400 --> 0:17:02.640
<v Speaker 2>this program. What has Microsoft told us in terms of

0:17:02.680 --> 0:17:04.280
<v Speaker 2>their response and how they're handling it.

0:17:04.600 --> 0:17:09.280
<v Speaker 10>So Microsoft moved quite quickly to roll out patches to

0:17:09.560 --> 0:17:11.960
<v Speaker 10>this vulnerability once they became.

0:17:11.760 --> 0:17:12.360
<v Speaker 6>Aware of it.

0:17:12.440 --> 0:17:16.040
<v Speaker 10>They rolled out a patch over the weekend and more

0:17:16.520 --> 0:17:19.520
<v Speaker 10>during the week to sort of try to close this

0:17:19.640 --> 0:17:20.920
<v Speaker 10>door and keep it shut.

0:17:21.320 --> 0:17:23.200
<v Speaker 6>But what we've heard from other.

0:17:23.080 --> 0:17:27.000
<v Speaker 10>Security researchers is that once the hackers are in, you're

0:17:27.040 --> 0:17:30.119
<v Speaker 10>still potentially vulnerable. Closing the door once they're in the

0:17:30.119 --> 0:17:33.960
<v Speaker 10>house doesn't solve your problems, and that really requires sort

0:17:33.960 --> 0:17:36.640
<v Speaker 10>of continuing to search and understand did we.

0:17:36.600 --> 0:17:37.240
<v Speaker 4>Get hit.

0:17:38.680 --> 0:17:41.080
<v Speaker 2>Bloombergs Jake Bleiberg with ongoing reporting.

0:17:41.119 --> 0:17:42.000
<v Speaker 4>Thank you very much.

0:17:47.600 --> 0:17:50.359
<v Speaker 1>It's time now for talking tech and first up, Uber

0:17:50.600 --> 0:17:52.880
<v Speaker 1>is testing a ride option in the un The match

0:17:52.920 --> 0:17:55.440
<v Speaker 1>is female riders and drivers now. The safety feature is

0:17:55.480 --> 0:17:58.800
<v Speaker 1>already available in some international markets. The pilot will launch

0:17:58.840 --> 0:18:00.840
<v Speaker 1>in Los Angeles, San Fransle, us Go, and Detroit in

0:18:00.880 --> 0:18:01.639
<v Speaker 1>the next few weeks.

0:18:01.840 --> 0:18:04.040
<v Speaker 3>Has long been offered by Lyft Plus.

0:18:04.119 --> 0:18:07.760
<v Speaker 1>Sonos has named interim leader Tom Conrad as chief executive officer.

0:18:07.960 --> 0:18:10.280
<v Speaker 1>The appointment is a vote of confidence in his effort

0:18:10.320 --> 0:18:13.360
<v Speaker 1>to get the struggling audio company back on track after

0:18:13.400 --> 0:18:16.399
<v Speaker 1>a disastrous software launch that hurts sales and force the

0:18:16.400 --> 0:18:17.760
<v Speaker 1>company to layoff workers.

0:18:18.480 --> 0:18:20.800
<v Speaker 3>And the UK's antitrust watchdog.

0:18:20.520 --> 0:18:24.320
<v Speaker 1>Is proposing giving Apple and Google's Android so called strategic

0:18:24.440 --> 0:18:27.159
<v Speaker 1>market status now. The move would pave the way for

0:18:27.200 --> 0:18:30.280
<v Speaker 1>regulation of their mobile operating systems, app stores and mobile

0:18:30.359 --> 0:18:31.359
<v Speaker 1>web browsers.

0:18:31.720 --> 0:18:35.399
<v Speaker 2>Ed a stick with Apple, it's launching a new version

0:18:35.440 --> 0:18:38.920
<v Speaker 2>of its device insurance plan Apple Care. The new twenty

0:18:38.920 --> 0:18:41.920
<v Speaker 2>dollars a month plan can cover up to three devices.

0:18:41.960 --> 0:18:45.760
<v Speaker 2>Bloomberg Sam Kelly has the details. So often have I

0:18:45.800 --> 0:18:48.640
<v Speaker 2>tapped into Apple Care having dropped this thing on the floor?

0:18:49.000 --> 0:18:51.280
<v Speaker 2>What's new about it? Why are they updating it?

0:18:51.960 --> 0:18:52.160
<v Speaker 10>HI?

0:18:52.240 --> 0:18:52.720
<v Speaker 3>Good morning?

0:18:52.800 --> 0:18:53.040
<v Speaker 4>Yeah.

0:18:53.080 --> 0:18:56.760
<v Speaker 11>So, basically, this new twenty dollars a month subscription allows

0:18:56.760 --> 0:18:59.800
<v Speaker 11>you to have three different devices of any different base.

0:19:00.000 --> 0:19:00.679
<v Speaker 3>And also you could have.

0:19:00.680 --> 0:19:03.399
<v Speaker 11>A newer iPhone or a Vision Pro or an Apple

0:19:03.440 --> 0:19:09.040
<v Speaker 11>Watch and for twenty dollars, it will protect against spills, accidents,

0:19:09.480 --> 0:19:13.119
<v Speaker 11>crack screens, you can talk to somebody twenty four seven

0:19:13.200 --> 0:19:17.960
<v Speaker 11>if you have it, help battery replacements before Previously, the

0:19:18.000 --> 0:19:21.520
<v Speaker 11>company has long offered a subscription plan where you can

0:19:21.560 --> 0:19:24.720
<v Speaker 11>opt into the same type of thing for the iPhone,

0:19:24.720 --> 0:19:26.240
<v Speaker 11>but you would have to pay for it almost a

0:19:26.320 --> 0:19:28.080
<v Speaker 11>la carte. So if you had an Apple Watch, you'd

0:19:28.080 --> 0:19:30.200
<v Speaker 11>have to do just that, you'd have to do the iPhone.

0:19:30.320 --> 0:19:34.040
<v Speaker 11>This bundles packages everything very nicely together for twenty dollars

0:19:34.119 --> 0:19:36.440
<v Speaker 11>a month, and in theory there could be some savings

0:19:36.440 --> 0:19:39.840
<v Speaker 11>here for some consumers as well, and obviously a subscription

0:19:39.960 --> 0:19:41.280
<v Speaker 11>play for Apple as well.

0:19:41.560 --> 0:19:44.320
<v Speaker 1>Let's go there because I can see what the appetizing

0:19:44.320 --> 0:19:47.160
<v Speaker 1>for consumer, particularly if there's loss and theft coverage.

0:19:47.680 --> 0:19:48.840
<v Speaker 3>What is in this for Apple?

0:19:48.920 --> 0:19:51.560
<v Speaker 11>Yeah, so this is a major play for Apple. Again,

0:19:51.840 --> 0:19:54.640
<v Speaker 11>you know, devices and insurance isn't exactly it doesn't sound

0:19:54.640 --> 0:19:57.040
<v Speaker 11>sexy on the service, but there is a major play here.

0:19:57.200 --> 0:19:59.960
<v Speaker 3>So basically the services to.

0:20:00.240 --> 0:20:04.120
<v Speaker 11>In general is Apple's second biggest money maker behind the iPhone.

0:20:04.119 --> 0:20:05.240
<v Speaker 3>Not only is it the.

0:20:05.200 --> 0:20:08.879
<v Speaker 11>App Store, there's Apple TV Plus, there's Apple Fitness, there's iCloud.

0:20:09.240 --> 0:20:14.679
<v Speaker 11>So here with Apple Care you're able to keep you

0:20:14.760 --> 0:20:18.000
<v Speaker 11>have two billion devices out there. This is people who

0:20:18.080 --> 0:20:19.720
<v Speaker 11>maybe have one device ensured.

0:20:19.880 --> 0:20:21.160
<v Speaker 3>If that this is.

0:20:21.240 --> 0:20:23.399
<v Speaker 11>Money that they would be able to make, and it

0:20:23.440 --> 0:20:26.160
<v Speaker 11>would in theory, help upset some of the different challenges

0:20:26.160 --> 0:20:28.679
<v Speaker 11>that they're seeing right now around the Apple Store or

0:20:28.800 --> 0:20:33.600
<v Speaker 11>lagging behind AI in certain areas, against competitors trying to

0:20:33.840 --> 0:20:37.040
<v Speaker 11>drum up subscription sales in general. And this is money

0:20:37.040 --> 0:20:40.360
<v Speaker 11>that potentially people might not be paying, but they might say,

0:20:40.359 --> 0:20:42.040
<v Speaker 11>you know what, for twenty dollars a month, if my

0:20:42.080 --> 0:20:44.720
<v Speaker 11>phone breaks, if I lose it, maybe this is enticing

0:20:44.840 --> 0:20:45.520
<v Speaker 11>enough for me to do it.

0:20:45.600 --> 0:20:47.359
<v Speaker 1>Where all the limitations though, for me, I think the

0:20:47.400 --> 0:20:49.960
<v Speaker 1>off putting thing is, Yes, I can see you want.

0:20:49.880 --> 0:20:51.520
<v Speaker 3>Into opt in if you're buying a new device, but

0:20:51.560 --> 0:20:52.159
<v Speaker 3>then to get.

0:20:52.040 --> 0:20:54.119
<v Speaker 1>The oldest stuff that you already have, and should you

0:20:54.280 --> 0:20:57.160
<v Speaker 1>kind of go to get it diagnostically tested, Yes.

0:20:57.040 --> 0:20:57.320
<v Speaker 5>You do.

0:20:57.440 --> 0:21:00.320
<v Speaker 11>So you have to go through a short sort of

0:21:00.440 --> 0:21:03.280
<v Speaker 11>a several minutes testing to make sure that the screen

0:21:03.400 --> 0:21:06.760
<v Speaker 11>is okay, you know, the battery they want to make

0:21:06.800 --> 0:21:09.639
<v Speaker 11>sure everything is okay before your insurance, almost like health insurance,

0:21:09.680 --> 0:21:11.280
<v Speaker 11>they want to make sure things are okay.

0:21:12.119 --> 0:21:14.320
<v Speaker 3>But it does go back four years.

0:21:14.320 --> 0:21:16.240
<v Speaker 11>So you might say, you know, I have a brand

0:21:16.280 --> 0:21:18.080
<v Speaker 11>new iPhone, but I haven't bought an Apple Watch in

0:21:18.119 --> 0:21:20.600
<v Speaker 11>quite a while, and so this might be a way

0:21:20.640 --> 0:21:22.520
<v Speaker 11>for you to say, oh, you know, maybe I can

0:21:22.640 --> 0:21:24.040
<v Speaker 11>opt into something a little bit more.

0:21:24.520 --> 0:21:27.000
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg'smartha Kelly, great analysis.

0:21:27.040 --> 0:21:35.520
<v Speaker 3>We appreciate it. Welcome back to Bluemberg Tech. Let's check

0:21:35.520 --> 0:21:36.399
<v Speaker 3>in on these markets.

0:21:36.119 --> 0:21:38.359
<v Speaker 1>Because actually tech it's kind of under performing some of

0:21:38.359 --> 0:21:41.600
<v Speaker 1>the other major benchmarks today. There is uplifted euphoria around

0:21:41.680 --> 0:21:42.880
<v Speaker 1>Japan US trade deal.

0:21:42.960 --> 0:21:43.680
<v Speaker 3>Is there more to come?

0:21:43.720 --> 0:21:45.879
<v Speaker 1>But on the big tech benchmark were flat on the

0:21:45.960 --> 0:21:48.880
<v Speaker 1>NASA one hundred, we had some key earnings that drag us.

0:21:48.800 --> 0:21:50.760
<v Speaker 3>Lower from a point's perspective. Let's dig into them.

0:21:50.800 --> 0:21:53.200
<v Speaker 1>Texas Instruments and we talked about it at the top

0:21:53.200 --> 0:21:53.680
<v Speaker 1>of the show.

0:21:53.960 --> 0:21:56.800
<v Speaker 3>It is having its worst day since two thousand and eight.

0:21:57.040 --> 0:21:59.639
<v Speaker 1>Clear global tariffs impact to the business, but the executives

0:21:59.680 --> 0:22:00.840
<v Speaker 1>can't all articulate.

0:22:00.520 --> 0:22:02.760
<v Speaker 3>How much is there is a pull forward.

0:22:02.440 --> 0:22:04.800
<v Speaker 1>On the previous quarter and it just didn't live up

0:22:04.920 --> 0:22:07.639
<v Speaker 1>to the expectations of investors. Meanwhile, we're also down on

0:22:07.760 --> 0:22:10.480
<v Speaker 1>SAP and trading in Europe. We've just closed the market,

0:22:10.520 --> 0:22:11.400
<v Speaker 1>were off by five.

0:22:11.240 --> 0:22:14.120
<v Speaker 3>Percent again, Tariff headwinds, the dollar.

0:22:13.800 --> 0:22:16.760
<v Speaker 1>Weakness impacting this particular software business.

0:22:16.520 --> 0:22:18.960
<v Speaker 4>At okay AI.

0:22:19.080 --> 0:22:22.320
<v Speaker 2>Leaders are gathering here in Washington as President Trump is

0:22:22.320 --> 0:22:25.240
<v Speaker 2>set to give an address on his AI roadmap for

0:22:25.359 --> 0:22:29.240
<v Speaker 2>the United States. Details that it includes the rapid buildout

0:22:29.280 --> 0:22:33.639
<v Speaker 2>of data centers and the removal of quote onerous AI regulations.

0:22:33.680 --> 0:22:37.080
<v Speaker 2>Bloomberg's Michael Sheppard joins us with more. We've both printed

0:22:37.080 --> 0:22:39.960
<v Speaker 2>it out, all twenty three pages. We haven't read the

0:22:40.119 --> 0:22:43.520
<v Speaker 2>entirety of it, skimmed it, but we've been talking for

0:22:43.560 --> 0:22:47.000
<v Speaker 2>a while about how the focus of the document, it's

0:22:47.000 --> 0:22:50.959
<v Speaker 2>infrastructure related, the American technology stack and the energy to

0:22:50.960 --> 0:22:53.960
<v Speaker 2>support it is their substance to it, and.

0:22:54.040 --> 0:22:56.840
<v Speaker 12>Well, the substance will really bear out over time mat

0:22:56.880 --> 0:22:59.840
<v Speaker 12>as we see a lot of administrations and all those

0:23:00.080 --> 0:23:04.080
<v Speaker 12>up administration, but all of its predecessors have flooded Washington

0:23:04.119 --> 0:23:07.560
<v Speaker 12>with these sorts of policy directives in the past, and

0:23:07.600 --> 0:23:09.680
<v Speaker 12>the catch here will be to see whether they can

0:23:09.760 --> 0:23:13.840
<v Speaker 12>actually gain some traction with this document, not only with industry,

0:23:13.920 --> 0:23:17.240
<v Speaker 12>but also with Congress, with the federal bureaucracy, with the

0:23:17.240 --> 0:23:19.960
<v Speaker 12>agencies that they currently oversee, and then at the state

0:23:20.040 --> 0:23:22.399
<v Speaker 12>and local level too. They have to make sure that

0:23:22.840 --> 0:23:25.480
<v Speaker 12>a lot of this can be done. And it's an

0:23:25.520 --> 0:23:29.560
<v Speaker 12>onerous process. They talk about removing onerous regulations, but they

0:23:29.600 --> 0:23:31.600
<v Speaker 12>will have a lot of digging to do on it.

0:23:31.800 --> 0:23:34.080
<v Speaker 12>That is, to cut some of the red tape that

0:23:34.119 --> 0:23:36.600
<v Speaker 12>they talk about right in the beginning of the report.

0:23:36.880 --> 0:23:39.000
<v Speaker 12>To also try to pave the way not only for

0:23:39.040 --> 0:23:41.800
<v Speaker 12>the data centers, but for the energy needed to power them.

0:23:41.840 --> 0:23:42.640
<v Speaker 4>That's a big deal.

0:23:42.840 --> 0:23:44.679
<v Speaker 6>It's a big pillar of this.

0:23:44.920 --> 0:23:46.880
<v Speaker 12>And then also you talked about this, and we've talked

0:23:46.880 --> 0:23:49.040
<v Speaker 12>about this on the program before too, and it was

0:23:49.080 --> 0:23:53.280
<v Speaker 12>in your conversation with David Sachs just last week. Building

0:23:53.600 --> 0:23:57.040
<v Speaker 12>AI globally on the American tech stack. That's another pillar

0:23:57.160 --> 0:23:59.560
<v Speaker 12>of this document and it's something we'll have to watch

0:23:59.800 --> 0:24:01.800
<v Speaker 12>to see how they implement, yeah.

0:24:01.680 --> 0:24:05.080
<v Speaker 1>Sort of helping promote exports to an extent. Mike dig

0:24:05.119 --> 0:24:07.560
<v Speaker 1>into what they're looking at abroad right now, because yes,

0:24:07.640 --> 0:24:10.919
<v Speaker 1>there's been anxiety about states going it alone, but meanwhile

0:24:10.960 --> 0:24:12.560
<v Speaker 1>Europe's on top of AI regulation.

0:24:12.720 --> 0:24:13.720
<v Speaker 3>How do they counteract that.

0:24:15.240 --> 0:24:17.040
<v Speaker 12>Well, what they're trying to do first is set the

0:24:17.080 --> 0:24:19.520
<v Speaker 12>tone here in use when it comes to regulation of

0:24:19.640 --> 0:24:23.359
<v Speaker 12>AI by pursuing what they consider to be a lighter

0:24:23.640 --> 0:24:27.480
<v Speaker 12>touch CARO. More importantly, though, they are focusing on deployment

0:24:27.600 --> 0:24:31.439
<v Speaker 12>of technology and the infrastructure that is needed to power

0:24:31.480 --> 0:24:33.840
<v Speaker 12>it abroad, and that is why in part you saw

0:24:33.880 --> 0:24:36.959
<v Speaker 12>the relaxation of the export curbs on Age twenty eight

0:24:37.080 --> 0:24:40.200
<v Speaker 12>chips from Nvidia to China. And this is a step

0:24:40.200 --> 0:24:44.000
<v Speaker 12>that the administration sees and certainly one that Jensen Wang endorses.

0:24:44.600 --> 0:24:47.440
<v Speaker 12>That's needed to be able to have American companies, especially

0:24:47.440 --> 0:24:51.160
<v Speaker 12>in Vidia, competing in China so that it doesn't make

0:24:51.200 --> 0:24:53.840
<v Speaker 12>it so easy for China to be able to export

0:24:53.880 --> 0:24:58.240
<v Speaker 12>its own technology, perfected at home, to other markets as well.

0:24:58.280 --> 0:25:00.400
<v Speaker 4>And that's a really critical step for them.

0:25:00.600 --> 0:25:03.639
<v Speaker 12>They've articulated here, and President Donald Trump will be signing

0:25:03.760 --> 0:25:07.240
<v Speaker 12>orders later today to implement parts of this plan. Among them,

0:25:07.280 --> 0:25:13.399
<v Speaker 12>we expect to see orders instructing US export agencies to

0:25:13.520 --> 0:25:17.359
<v Speaker 12>take steps that would enhance deployment of American technology and

0:25:17.520 --> 0:25:21.920
<v Speaker 12>export of not only just the chips themselves, but everything

0:25:21.920 --> 0:25:26.520
<v Speaker 12>that goes with it, for the software and everything else too, Caro,

0:25:27.040 --> 0:25:27.600
<v Speaker 12>Max Mike.

0:25:27.480 --> 0:25:29.000
<v Speaker 3>Shephard with the latest on the report.

0:25:29.040 --> 0:25:31.200
<v Speaker 1>We appreciate it that for more in the future of

0:25:31.240 --> 0:25:34.520
<v Speaker 1>AI and President Trump's Action Plan, Naarena singers with us

0:25:34.600 --> 0:25:37.280
<v Speaker 1>Cudo AI CEO. You really look at the way in

0:25:37.280 --> 0:25:39.720
<v Speaker 1>which we can implement AI from a governance perspective, from

0:25:39.720 --> 0:25:43.840
<v Speaker 1>a rose tolerance perspective, from a cultural perspective within businesses Navarna,

0:25:43.880 --> 0:25:46.240
<v Speaker 1>when you're looking at this report, when you're thinking about

0:25:46.320 --> 0:25:49.119
<v Speaker 1>AI being more hands off, more pro growth, is that

0:25:49.160 --> 0:25:49.600
<v Speaker 1>the right way?

0:25:51.960 --> 0:25:54.240
<v Speaker 9>Well, good to see you, Caroline, and today we really

0:25:54.240 --> 0:25:57.320
<v Speaker 9>commend the White House on launching the AI Action Plan.

0:25:57.640 --> 0:25:59.320
<v Speaker 3>I think if you dive a little bit deeper into

0:25:59.359 --> 0:26:01.760
<v Speaker 3>the AI Action Plan, there's a key, key.

0:26:01.600 --> 0:26:06.040
<v Speaker 9>Statement and sentiment which is the bottleneck to harnessing AI's

0:26:06.040 --> 0:26:10.399
<v Speaker 9>full potential is not necessarily the availability of models or

0:26:10.400 --> 0:26:14.119
<v Speaker 9>tooled an application. It is slow adoption and central to

0:26:14.200 --> 0:26:16.560
<v Speaker 9>that is lack of trust. And I think, as you

0:26:16.640 --> 0:26:18.760
<v Speaker 9>know that Tredo AI has been on this journey to

0:26:18.880 --> 0:26:22.959
<v Speaker 9>embed that trust in the full AI life cycle, and

0:26:23.040 --> 0:26:26.280
<v Speaker 9>I think the AI Action Plan is really diving deep

0:26:26.320 --> 0:26:29.600
<v Speaker 9>into it with how do you standardize evaluations, how do

0:26:29.680 --> 0:26:33.000
<v Speaker 9>you actually bring more transparency to AI so that you

0:26:33.040 --> 0:26:33.920
<v Speaker 9>can fuel.

0:26:33.680 --> 0:26:36.040
<v Speaker 3>Growth, but all that growth has.

0:26:35.920 --> 0:26:38.920
<v Speaker 9>To be grounded in trust, and that's what the Action

0:26:39.000 --> 0:26:39.920
<v Speaker 9>Plan is focused on.

0:26:41.359 --> 0:26:42.600
<v Speaker 4>Navarena Impillar.

0:26:42.720 --> 0:26:46.080
<v Speaker 2>One of the document, which is titled Accelerate AI Innovation.

0:26:46.280 --> 0:26:50.080
<v Speaker 2>Something very high up is the commitment to encourage open

0:26:50.280 --> 0:26:53.280
<v Speaker 2>source and open weight AI, and I thought that was

0:26:53.320 --> 0:26:56.520
<v Speaker 2>really interesting the prominence of it within the document. Why

0:26:56.600 --> 0:27:00.480
<v Speaker 2>is it important that this administration focuses on open source

0:27:00.480 --> 0:27:01.399
<v Speaker 2>and open way AI.

0:27:03.160 --> 0:27:04.399
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, ed, great question.

0:27:04.640 --> 0:27:08.199
<v Speaker 9>I think we've seen historically that open source really contributes

0:27:08.280 --> 0:27:12.240
<v Speaker 9>to more innovation and in artificial intelligence, especially with the

0:27:12.320 --> 0:27:15.520
<v Speaker 9>United States leading, we are finding a lot of great

0:27:15.520 --> 0:27:18.679
<v Speaker 9>innovation is coming from our open source ecosystem. So the

0:27:18.800 --> 0:27:23.000
<v Speaker 9>focus in the AI Action Plan on open source further

0:27:23.119 --> 0:27:27.359
<v Speaker 9>strengthens the capability for everyone else to build on top

0:27:27.480 --> 0:27:29.879
<v Speaker 9>of AI innovation at large scale.

0:27:31.720 --> 0:27:36.760
<v Speaker 2>There is a really heavy emphasis on deregulation, cutting red

0:27:36.800 --> 0:27:41.359
<v Speaker 2>tape to facilitate the infrastructure side of this. Does that

0:27:41.440 --> 0:27:44.919
<v Speaker 2>concern you that that's the plan as opposed to I

0:27:44.960 --> 0:27:49.440
<v Speaker 2>guess a codified or framework piece of rulemaking around AI.

0:27:52.240 --> 0:27:54.560
<v Speaker 9>So, as you know, creed OI serves some of the

0:27:54.640 --> 0:27:58.280
<v Speaker 9>largest global two thousand companies in the world, and what

0:27:58.320 --> 0:28:01.679
<v Speaker 9>we are finding is governance and oversight and control of

0:28:01.720 --> 0:28:04.359
<v Speaker 9>AI systems is not just tied to regulation.

0:28:05.000 --> 0:28:06.280
<v Speaker 4>It is really about.

0:28:06.080 --> 0:28:08.959
<v Speaker 9>Understanding these AI systems and making sure that you have

0:28:09.080 --> 0:28:12.480
<v Speaker 9>the right you know, not only standards, but also some

0:28:12.600 --> 0:28:15.560
<v Speaker 9>guardrails which are in place. So what we are going

0:28:15.600 --> 0:28:17.920
<v Speaker 9>to see I think coming out of this AI Action

0:28:18.080 --> 0:28:22.440
<v Speaker 9>Plan as stated, is a focus on more contextual evaluations,

0:28:22.560 --> 0:28:26.200
<v Speaker 9>which are paramount for making these systems happen. I would

0:28:26.280 --> 0:28:28.840
<v Speaker 9>like to see Obviously the CI action plans stretch a

0:28:28.880 --> 0:28:32.040
<v Speaker 9>little bit further into standardizing what does good look like

0:28:32.119 --> 0:28:33.760
<v Speaker 9>for AI and more to come on that soon.

0:28:34.359 --> 0:28:37.480
<v Speaker 1>Navarna, let's just tick into the global perspective you have

0:28:38.000 --> 0:28:40.880
<v Speaker 1>and the fact that the context is this is a

0:28:41.000 --> 0:28:43.440
<v Speaker 1>race and this is a win. It takes sol us

0:28:43.520 --> 0:28:46.240
<v Speaker 1>versus China. Is that what you're saying.

0:28:48.280 --> 0:28:49.000
<v Speaker 3>Absolutely?

0:28:49.080 --> 0:28:53.160
<v Speaker 9>You know what has been really important is this isn't

0:28:53.280 --> 0:28:56.560
<v Speaker 9>just a policy moment. I really believe this is a

0:28:56.560 --> 0:29:00.320
<v Speaker 9>moonshot moment for US and to continue lead leading and

0:29:00.440 --> 0:29:04.560
<v Speaker 9>artificial intelligence, US will need to lead with trust and

0:29:04.600 --> 0:29:06.320
<v Speaker 9>that's how we are going to unlock the power of

0:29:06.320 --> 0:29:07.200
<v Speaker 9>this technology.

0:29:07.520 --> 0:29:09.000
<v Speaker 3>So this is our arms race.

0:29:09.320 --> 0:29:12.120
<v Speaker 9>United States is leading, and it's going to be critical.

0:29:12.200 --> 0:29:13.120
<v Speaker 6>How we bring.

0:29:13.040 --> 0:29:16.840
<v Speaker 9>Our allies and partners together on this journey by grounding

0:29:16.880 --> 0:29:21.200
<v Speaker 9>them in trust, oversight, and right responsibility is going to

0:29:21.240 --> 0:29:21.600
<v Speaker 9>be key.

0:29:22.000 --> 0:29:24.240
<v Speaker 1>So when we go back to the open source question,

0:29:24.760 --> 0:29:28.040
<v Speaker 1>that feels in reaction to what happened with deep Seek

0:29:28.280 --> 0:29:31.520
<v Speaker 1>and China, and ultimately is that do you think where

0:29:31.560 --> 0:29:34.120
<v Speaker 1>this sentiment is coming from and what does that mean

0:29:34.160 --> 0:29:36.040
<v Speaker 1>for the players here in the United States is all

0:29:36.040 --> 0:29:37.800
<v Speaker 1>in our meta's viewpoint.

0:29:39.600 --> 0:29:42.600
<v Speaker 9>You know, Caroline, that's a great question. You know, United

0:29:42.640 --> 0:29:45.160
<v Speaker 9>States has been leading in artificial intelligence and we will

0:29:45.160 --> 0:29:48.680
<v Speaker 9>continue to maintain that leadership. The open source focus is

0:29:48.680 --> 0:29:51.240
<v Speaker 9>a really pivotal one because if we want to lead,

0:29:51.920 --> 0:29:57.400
<v Speaker 9>especially with heart sciences, in using artificial intelligence, building on

0:29:57.440 --> 0:30:00.480
<v Speaker 9>each other's work has always been foundational to how open

0:30:00.520 --> 0:30:03.240
<v Speaker 9>source works. So I don't think this is in reaction,

0:30:03.720 --> 0:30:06.520
<v Speaker 9>but this is a continued leadership from the United States

0:30:06.520 --> 0:30:08.719
<v Speaker 9>perspective in terms of how we are going to lead

0:30:08.760 --> 0:30:10.560
<v Speaker 9>an artificial intelligence.

0:30:12.120 --> 0:30:14.480
<v Speaker 2>Verna saying of credo AI, great to have you back

0:30:14.480 --> 0:30:14.920
<v Speaker 2>on the show.

0:30:14.960 --> 0:30:15.800
<v Speaker 4>Thank you very much.

0:30:16.440 --> 0:30:18.160
<v Speaker 1>This is bloombg Tech and you are looking in a

0:30:18.160 --> 0:30:19.360
<v Speaker 1>live shot at the principal room.

0:30:19.520 --> 0:30:21.000
<v Speaker 3>Check out the bloombg Tech podcast.

0:30:21.200 --> 0:30:24.360
<v Speaker 1>Find it on the terminal as well as online on Apple, Spotify,

0:30:24.520 --> 0:30:37.720
<v Speaker 1>and iHeart. This is Bloomberg compliance startup vanter Well. It's

0:30:37.760 --> 0:30:39.600
<v Speaker 1>raised one hundred and fifty million dollars in its Series

0:30:39.680 --> 0:30:42.959
<v Speaker 1>D round, bringing its valuation to over four billion dollars now.

0:30:43.000 --> 0:30:45.120
<v Speaker 1>The eight year old company helps businesses stay in line

0:30:45.160 --> 0:30:48.000
<v Speaker 1>with rules and regulations around managing and storing customer data.

0:30:48.320 --> 0:30:51.920
<v Speaker 1>Banta's CEO and co founder, Christina Kacciopo joins us. Now,

0:30:51.960 --> 0:30:53.480
<v Speaker 1>So the one hundred and fifty million what does that

0:30:53.520 --> 0:30:53.960
<v Speaker 1>help you do?

0:30:55.320 --> 0:30:59.160
<v Speaker 13>It helps us continue to help our customers build and

0:30:59.520 --> 0:31:01.360
<v Speaker 13>demonstrate trust across the internet.

0:31:01.880 --> 0:31:04.720
<v Speaker 1>Okay, demonstrates trust across the internet. I mean it immediately

0:31:04.800 --> 0:31:07.000
<v Speaker 1>makes me think of today's news flow. We're worrying about

0:31:07.040 --> 0:31:09.560
<v Speaker 1>Microsoft and the hack there. I mean, is this something

0:31:09.640 --> 0:31:13.200
<v Speaker 1>that you're worrying about more broadly, that security isn't strong enough,

0:31:13.200 --> 0:31:15.240
<v Speaker 1>particularly when it comes to access to third parties.

0:31:16.120 --> 0:31:18.760
<v Speaker 13>Yeah, I think what we've seen is security online. It's

0:31:18.880 --> 0:31:21.120
<v Speaker 13>an increasing concern. This has been true for years, It

0:31:21.200 --> 0:31:23.360
<v Speaker 13>been true for decades, it will continue to be true.

0:31:23.720 --> 0:31:25.760
<v Speaker 13>And it's not because smart people aren't working on it.

0:31:25.880 --> 0:31:28.760
<v Speaker 13>Lots of smart people are. It is just an increasingly

0:31:28.800 --> 0:31:32.080
<v Speaker 13>hard cat and mouse game as adversaries get stronger and

0:31:32.120 --> 0:31:35.440
<v Speaker 13>stronger now with AI as well, and so it is

0:31:35.520 --> 0:31:40.200
<v Speaker 13>increasingly hard for businesses to build out trustworthy platforms, secure

0:31:40.240 --> 0:31:43.120
<v Speaker 13>customer data, and we hope vantas a part in helping

0:31:43.160 --> 0:31:43.520
<v Speaker 13>them do that.

0:31:43.800 --> 0:31:46.040
<v Speaker 3>Twelve thousand of them already customers that you're helping.

0:31:46.240 --> 0:31:48.440
<v Speaker 1>What has been the demand like for your own AI

0:31:48.480 --> 0:31:50.560
<v Speaker 1>applications AI agents in particular.

0:31:51.400 --> 0:31:54.320
<v Speaker 13>Yeah, we launched our AI agents earlier this year. We've

0:31:54.360 --> 0:31:57.840
<v Speaker 13>seen great reception from customers. I think we've had the

0:31:57.920 --> 0:32:01.400
<v Speaker 13>agent's kind of automated a lot of manual worker customers.

0:32:01.440 --> 0:32:05.440
<v Speaker 13>We're doing customer It's like Duo Lingo and Ramp and

0:32:05.760 --> 0:32:08.880
<v Speaker 13>Snowflake are all using the AI agents to automate kind

0:32:08.880 --> 0:32:11.600
<v Speaker 13>of what we're manual security and compliance workflows.

0:32:11.960 --> 0:32:13.640
<v Speaker 1>What's interesting is the way in which you want to

0:32:13.680 --> 0:32:16.800
<v Speaker 1>expand now is by looking not just at companies, but

0:32:16.920 --> 0:32:19.480
<v Speaker 1>at governments and government agencies.

0:32:19.640 --> 0:32:20.680
<v Speaker 3>We can show your customers.

0:32:20.680 --> 0:32:23.560
<v Speaker 1>We can also show the vcs that are continuing to

0:32:23.640 --> 0:32:27.840
<v Speaker 1>back you, one of whom, of course is well the

0:32:27.880 --> 0:32:31.480
<v Speaker 1>business of Craft Ventures and that we associate with David Sachs.

0:32:31.920 --> 0:32:35.280
<v Speaker 1>Is he going to be able to open doors for you?

0:32:35.280 --> 0:32:38.000
<v Speaker 13>You know, what we've heard from David and Craft is

0:32:38.080 --> 0:32:40.959
<v Speaker 13>David is very focused on Washington, DC. He left an

0:32:40.960 --> 0:32:44.040
<v Speaker 13>incredibly strong team at Craft, but there's kind of strong

0:32:44.040 --> 0:32:46.480
<v Speaker 13>guardrails and in place between those two teams. So we

0:32:46.560 --> 0:32:49.160
<v Speaker 13>really enjoy working on you know, with the folks at Craft,

0:32:49.560 --> 0:32:52.760
<v Speaker 13>and you know, separately we're pursuing engagements in DC. But

0:32:53.320 --> 0:32:55.560
<v Speaker 13>from what I hear, David's really engaged with us work

0:32:55.600 --> 0:32:56.160
<v Speaker 13>with the government.

0:32:56.360 --> 0:32:59.080
<v Speaker 1>And do you think just in the current administration and

0:32:59.240 --> 0:33:01.960
<v Speaker 1>environment that they are more willing to work up with

0:33:02.080 --> 0:33:05.040
<v Speaker 1>startups such as yourself that government now is a more

0:33:05.120 --> 0:33:06.960
<v Speaker 1>accessible area for your company.

0:33:07.920 --> 0:33:11.640
<v Speaker 13>I think so we've seen this government be very receptive

0:33:11.720 --> 0:33:14.080
<v Speaker 13>to software providers. They want to get more software into

0:33:14.120 --> 0:33:19.320
<v Speaker 13>the government, save time, save money for taxpayers. And there's

0:33:19.320 --> 0:33:22.280
<v Speaker 13>programs like fed Ramp twenty x, this pilot that is

0:33:22.280 --> 0:33:26.160
<v Speaker 13>going through to help software providers prepare better and faster

0:33:26.280 --> 0:33:28.600
<v Speaker 13>to serve the government. Because US government is just a

0:33:28.640 --> 0:33:31.800
<v Speaker 13>different sort of customer than almost any other in the world.

0:33:31.920 --> 0:33:34.400
<v Speaker 1>It is, and what I'm interested there for is how

0:33:34.440 --> 0:33:37.360
<v Speaker 1>you beef yourself up to meet that demand. You said

0:33:37.360 --> 0:33:39.720
<v Speaker 1>that you want to continue to expanding, continuing to help

0:33:40.000 --> 0:33:42.560
<v Speaker 1>your own clients that you already have. Where are the

0:33:42.600 --> 0:33:45.560
<v Speaker 1>bottlenecks for you? Is it about hiring more talent? Is

0:33:45.600 --> 0:33:48.200
<v Speaker 1>it more about a marketing play just getting into.

0:33:48.120 --> 0:33:50.200
<v Speaker 3>The orbit of other businesses.

0:33:51.360 --> 0:33:53.600
<v Speaker 13>Talent is a huge part of it, and we are

0:33:53.640 --> 0:33:55.400
<v Speaker 13>only as good as the people who.

0:33:55.360 --> 0:33:56.000
<v Speaker 6>Work at Vanta.

0:33:56.120 --> 0:33:59.600
<v Speaker 13>At Vanta and there are all sorts of different pieces

0:33:59.640 --> 0:34:01.960
<v Speaker 13>of that. So AI talent is definitely a part of

0:34:02.000 --> 0:34:03.920
<v Speaker 13>it for a very hot area of the market. I'm

0:34:03.920 --> 0:34:07.400
<v Speaker 13>sure you're covering the government pieces another one again that

0:34:07.520 --> 0:34:10.880
<v Speaker 13>is just a specialized skill set. And so we are

0:34:10.960 --> 0:34:13.560
<v Speaker 13>hiring across the board, lots of roles, lots of opportunity.

0:34:13.680 --> 0:34:14.479
<v Speaker 3>And where are you hiring.

0:34:14.520 --> 0:34:16.920
<v Speaker 1>I know you've been beefing up offices in London, You've

0:34:16.920 --> 0:34:18.600
<v Speaker 1>been put data centers in Australia.

0:34:18.680 --> 0:34:21.440
<v Speaker 3>How global does this get? Quite global?

0:34:21.440 --> 0:34:23.840
<v Speaker 13>So we've got five global officers around the world follow

0:34:23.880 --> 0:34:27.480
<v Speaker 13>the Sun coverage for our customers. We also in the

0:34:27.560 --> 0:34:30.520
<v Speaker 13>US have folks spread out across the country, which we've

0:34:30.520 --> 0:34:33.160
<v Speaker 13>found to be a very successful hiring strategy over the

0:34:33.200 --> 0:34:34.040
<v Speaker 13>last five years.

0:34:34.400 --> 0:34:35.320
<v Speaker 3>Christina and Kechiopo.

0:34:35.440 --> 0:34:37.040
<v Speaker 1>We will let you get back to that hiring strategy

0:34:37.080 --> 0:34:38.920
<v Speaker 1>and running the business. The CEO and co founder of

0:34:39.000 --> 0:34:45.520
<v Speaker 1>Vanter congratulations on the rays.

0:34:46.800 --> 0:34:47.200
<v Speaker 3>Tesla.

0:34:47.400 --> 0:34:49.480
<v Speaker 1>It is set to report earnings after the bell. The

0:34:49.560 --> 0:34:52.120
<v Speaker 1>quarter was a busy one, but the re engagement of

0:34:52.200 --> 0:34:54.520
<v Speaker 1>CEO Elon Musk the launch of the company's robot taxi

0:34:54.600 --> 0:34:57.640
<v Speaker 1>service in Austin the most Creatrudell is here to tell.

0:34:57.560 --> 0:34:59.840
<v Speaker 3>Us well, whether investors are going to care about the.

0:34:59.800 --> 0:35:02.480
<v Speaker 1>F fundamental business picture, which is an ugly one. We're

0:35:02.520 --> 0:35:05.359
<v Speaker 1>expecting revenues to fool the most severely in more than

0:35:05.400 --> 0:35:05.920
<v Speaker 1>a decade.

0:35:07.360 --> 0:35:09.560
<v Speaker 14>Yeah, and I think, you know, we only have to

0:35:09.560 --> 0:35:12.600
<v Speaker 14>go back a quarter for you know how Musk is

0:35:13.040 --> 0:35:16.840
<v Speaker 14>likely to approach you know tonight's call where you know,

0:35:16.880 --> 0:35:20.040
<v Speaker 14>he said something to the effect of kind of look,

0:35:20.239 --> 0:35:23.080
<v Speaker 14>don't don't look at what's going on now, cast your

0:35:23.120 --> 0:35:25.680
<v Speaker 14>gaze on you know, this bright shiny object on a hill.

0:35:26.160 --> 0:35:26.319
<v Speaker 13>Uh.

0:35:26.480 --> 0:35:28.399
<v Speaker 14>You know that that is likely what we're going to

0:35:28.560 --> 0:35:31.080
<v Speaker 14>have a sort of repeat of here, because this is

0:35:31.080 --> 0:35:34.560
<v Speaker 14>a company that it's it's fundamentals are in really rough shape.

0:35:34.960 --> 0:35:35.160
<v Speaker 9>Uh.

0:35:35.400 --> 0:35:37.920
<v Speaker 14>You know the car business. Uh, not only is it

0:35:38.040 --> 0:35:42.080
<v Speaker 14>is it not growing anymore, but it's actually shrinking pretty substantially.

0:35:42.600 --> 0:35:45.239
<v Speaker 14>And you know, they did indicate earlier this year that

0:35:45.600 --> 0:35:48.520
<v Speaker 14>the energy business, which has been a source of growth,

0:35:48.719 --> 0:35:50.880
<v Speaker 14>is going to get hit hardest by by tariff. So

0:35:51.360 --> 0:35:54.680
<v Speaker 14>you know, the the leaning into the robotaxi messaging, the

0:35:55.040 --> 0:35:58.160
<v Speaker 14>AI story is absolutely what we can expect to hear

0:35:58.160 --> 0:35:58.920
<v Speaker 14>from Musk tonight.

0:35:59.320 --> 0:36:01.880
<v Speaker 1>It's also not just tarifs that they're exposed to, but

0:36:01.960 --> 0:36:05.160
<v Speaker 1>are pulling away of support for ev measures. Does that

0:36:05.239 --> 0:36:07.480
<v Speaker 1>ultimately matter when you're thinking of a company that is

0:36:07.560 --> 0:36:10.440
<v Speaker 1>valued at one hundred and forty two times projective profit?

0:36:10.640 --> 0:36:14.520
<v Speaker 1>Do they care about what happens from a support perspective

0:36:14.560 --> 0:36:15.319
<v Speaker 1>for buying.

0:36:16.360 --> 0:36:18.120
<v Speaker 14>I think that's that's got to come up at some

0:36:18.239 --> 0:36:21.920
<v Speaker 14>point on tonight's call, right, is where are regulatory credit

0:36:21.960 --> 0:36:26.480
<v Speaker 14>revenues headed? Because there's a lot of concern particularly about

0:36:27.239 --> 0:36:29.919
<v Speaker 14>you know, the state of affairs in the US where

0:36:29.920 --> 0:36:32.359
<v Speaker 14>you have you know, as part of the Big Beautiful Bill,

0:36:32.440 --> 0:36:35.280
<v Speaker 14>you had the zeroing out of penalties for not meeting

0:36:36.080 --> 0:36:40.800
<v Speaker 14>fuel economy standards. So that sort of source of revenue

0:36:40.840 --> 0:36:44.760
<v Speaker 14>where other manufacturers who are having trouble meeting those numbers

0:36:45.320 --> 0:36:47.759
<v Speaker 14>they no longer need to go to Tesla for help.

0:36:48.560 --> 0:36:51.120
<v Speaker 14>You know, there's also the Trump administration going after the

0:36:51.239 --> 0:36:55.720
<v Speaker 14>California ZEV mandate, and you know also on the EPA

0:36:55.840 --> 0:36:59.760
<v Speaker 14>front tailpipe emission standards. So really sort of across the board,

0:37:00.080 --> 0:37:03.759
<v Speaker 14>there's less and less reason for Tesla's rivals to have

0:37:03.840 --> 0:37:06.279
<v Speaker 14>to turn to Musk and say, hey, we need some

0:37:06.320 --> 0:37:08.000
<v Speaker 14>help from a regulatory perspective.

0:37:08.280 --> 0:37:10.080
<v Speaker 4>And that's been a huge source.

0:37:09.800 --> 0:37:11.560
<v Speaker 14>Of revenue for this company over the years.

0:37:11.680 --> 0:37:15.080
<v Speaker 1>And how much does that matter for plowing money into

0:37:15.120 --> 0:37:17.920
<v Speaker 1>the future bets As Nick Kolos over at Data Trecks

0:37:17.920 --> 0:37:21.080
<v Speaker 1>puts it in our story, I think ninety five percent

0:37:21.120 --> 0:37:24.360
<v Speaker 1>of the valuation of Tesla is basically based on its futures,

0:37:24.560 --> 0:37:27.600
<v Speaker 1>which are optimists, which are ROBOTAXI. But is that at

0:37:27.680 --> 0:37:29.239
<v Speaker 1>risk if we don't have the cash cap.

0:37:30.640 --> 0:37:33.200
<v Speaker 14>Yeah, I mean we're talking when we talk about just

0:37:33.200 --> 0:37:35.719
<v Speaker 14>how much revenue you know, over the years, going back

0:37:35.760 --> 0:37:38.640
<v Speaker 14>to you know, since this has been a public company,

0:37:38.800 --> 0:37:42.160
<v Speaker 14>we're talking about over twelve billion dollars. That's a substantial

0:37:42.200 --> 0:37:44.680
<v Speaker 14>amount of money, and a lot of that has is

0:37:44.760 --> 0:37:47.319
<v Speaker 14>weighted towards just the last few years, where we've seen

0:37:47.719 --> 0:37:50.840
<v Speaker 14>you know, steadily Tesla report more and more of this revenue.

0:37:51.120 --> 0:37:53.200
<v Speaker 4>And so when you if then when you.

0:37:53.120 --> 0:37:57.080
<v Speaker 14>See that reverse and also this company is no longer

0:37:57.160 --> 0:38:01.839
<v Speaker 14>to generate cash from its its car business because that

0:38:01.960 --> 0:38:04.880
<v Speaker 14>is no longer growing, and yet it has all of

0:38:04.920 --> 0:38:08.520
<v Speaker 14>these you know, operations to tend to, you know, with

0:38:08.520 --> 0:38:12.400
<v Speaker 14>with plans that are underutilize. This starts to become a

0:38:12.440 --> 0:38:15.280
<v Speaker 14>real issue. And you do have to sort of question

0:38:15.840 --> 0:38:21.000
<v Speaker 14>if these robotaxi statements sort of don't pan out, what

0:38:21.000 --> 0:38:23.200
<v Speaker 14>what next? You know, what what can investors sort of

0:38:23.239 --> 0:38:26.160
<v Speaker 14>count on, you know, from from Tesla to sort of

0:38:26.760 --> 0:38:30.200
<v Speaker 14>steady things and get back to a state where you

0:38:30.239 --> 0:38:33.040
<v Speaker 14>can feel comfortable putting that sort of multiple on the stock.

0:38:33.239 --> 0:38:36.239
<v Speaker 1>Can they count on elon being focused on the business? Crowtidel,

0:38:36.560 --> 0:38:38.920
<v Speaker 1>We thank you so much for looking ahead to after

0:38:38.960 --> 0:38:42.040
<v Speaker 1>the bell, and look let's continue looking at because we've

0:38:42.040 --> 0:38:43.960
<v Speaker 1>got IBM coming up as well.

0:38:43.880 --> 0:38:45.960
<v Speaker 3>And it's flipping the script at the moment.

0:38:46.360 --> 0:38:49.520
<v Speaker 1>This is once some relic of another era and big

0:38:49.520 --> 0:38:50.840
<v Speaker 1>Blue is back.

0:38:51.000 --> 0:38:53.640
<v Speaker 3>As our Brodie Ford says, let's just.

0:38:53.600 --> 0:38:57.360
<v Speaker 1>Talk about how this company has steadily convinced investors that

0:38:57.480 --> 0:38:58.040
<v Speaker 1>it can grow.

0:38:59.480 --> 0:39:00.839
<v Speaker 6>You put it perfectly right.

0:39:00.920 --> 0:39:04.400
<v Speaker 15>I mean, IBM has been talking about re orienting around

0:39:04.440 --> 0:39:09.120
<v Speaker 15>software and services since the nineties. People didn't really believe

0:39:09.160 --> 0:39:11.239
<v Speaker 15>them until a year or two ago, and you can

0:39:11.239 --> 0:39:14.239
<v Speaker 15>see it in the stock price right that investors are

0:39:14.280 --> 0:39:16.880
<v Speaker 15>really trying to starting to buy into this idea of

0:39:16.920 --> 0:39:22.319
<v Speaker 15>an IBM based around largely infrastructure, software and consulting. The

0:39:22.360 --> 0:39:26.920
<v Speaker 15>real star right now is that software picture, led by

0:39:26.960 --> 0:39:30.120
<v Speaker 15>the acquisitions of red Hat and Hashi Corp. This year,

0:39:30.160 --> 0:39:33.239
<v Speaker 15>And if you look at large scale software companies, most

0:39:33.280 --> 0:39:36.480
<v Speaker 15>of them are struggling to really keep growing revenue steadily.

0:39:36.880 --> 0:39:40.280
<v Speaker 15>IBM is doing it, making a better profit picture stick

0:39:40.360 --> 0:39:43.759
<v Speaker 15>your business. Clearly Wall Street is happy about it.

0:39:44.040 --> 0:39:46.680
<v Speaker 1>They are sending the shares up thirty percent so far

0:39:46.760 --> 0:39:49.719
<v Speaker 1>this year, Brody. But the flying the ointment has been,

0:39:49.760 --> 0:39:54.480
<v Speaker 1>of course global narrative of trade issues and worry about

0:39:54.520 --> 0:39:57.560
<v Speaker 1>people really playing money into consultancy. How much do you

0:39:57.600 --> 0:40:00.160
<v Speaker 1>think the Genai piece of that is going to be

0:40:00.200 --> 0:40:02.840
<v Speaker 1>eroded because they've already done what six billion dollars in business,

0:40:02.840 --> 0:40:03.960
<v Speaker 1>but largely through consulting.

0:40:05.120 --> 0:40:06.200
<v Speaker 6>It's a really good point.

0:40:06.280 --> 0:40:09.520
<v Speaker 15>Yeah, Consulting is the other half of the IBM empire,

0:40:09.600 --> 0:40:13.200
<v Speaker 15>and that really has struggled because when the economy looks funky,

0:40:13.239 --> 0:40:15.800
<v Speaker 15>what do you do, you can see your consulting projects,

0:40:16.040 --> 0:40:18.319
<v Speaker 15>and so IBM has booked a lot of business and

0:40:18.360 --> 0:40:22.319
<v Speaker 15>consulting for Jenai products. You know, these big companies saying, hey,

0:40:22.400 --> 0:40:23.560
<v Speaker 15>which tools do we use?

0:40:23.600 --> 0:40:24.360
<v Speaker 6>We're confused.

0:40:25.040 --> 0:40:27.040
<v Speaker 15>What is kind of an issue is that this is

0:40:27.040 --> 0:40:30.480
<v Speaker 15>coming at the expense of traditional consulting, and so it

0:40:30.520 --> 0:40:33.560
<v Speaker 15>may not be a net increase. But what we've seen

0:40:33.600 --> 0:40:36.560
<v Speaker 15>so far is that as long as software keeps getting purchased,

0:40:36.640 --> 0:40:39.320
<v Speaker 15>investors are willing to overlook the choppy consulting.

0:40:39.960 --> 0:40:42.160
<v Speaker 1>Well for now, analysts none of them say buy nine

0:40:42.160 --> 0:40:45.320
<v Speaker 1>to hold, just for say, sell Bloomberg's Brodie Ford across

0:40:45.360 --> 0:40:48.560
<v Speaker 1>IBM or waiting for your reporting after the bill when

0:40:48.600 --> 0:40:50.960
<v Speaker 1>it breaks. But meanwhile, that does it for this edition

0:40:51.000 --> 0:40:53.600
<v Speaker 1>of Bloomberg Tech. Don't forget to check out our podcast.

0:40:53.640 --> 0:40:55.120
<v Speaker 1>You can find it on the terminal as well as

0:40:55.160 --> 0:40:56.200
<v Speaker 1>online on Apple.

0:40:55.960 --> 0:40:57.080
<v Speaker 3>Spotify, and iHeart.

0:40:57.239 --> 0:41:00.480
<v Speaker 1>And don't forget to tune into Ed Ludlow as he's

0:41:00.520 --> 0:41:02.600
<v Speaker 1>over in the White House, of course, listening in on

0:41:02.680 --> 0:41:05.919
<v Speaker 1>the AI summit and what that will bring in terms

0:41:06.080 --> 0:41:08.759
<v Speaker 1>of the look ahead from President Trump. We've also got

0:41:08.880 --> 0:41:11.120
<v Speaker 1>S and P five hundred and at session highs records

0:41:11.120 --> 0:41:13.440
<v Speaker 1>across the board that sack just lags a little bit,

0:41:13.440 --> 0:41:15.200
<v Speaker 1>though today it is Blue Bag Tech