WEBVTT - Your Money or Your Data: A Ransomware Story

0:00:04.400 --> 0:00:07.800
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to tech Stuff, a production from I Heart Radio.

0:00:12.320 --> 0:00:14.880
<v Speaker 1>Hey there, and welcome to tech Stuff. I'm your host,

0:00:15.000 --> 0:00:18.320
<v Speaker 1>Jonathan Strickland. I'm an executive producer with I Heart Radio

0:00:18.480 --> 0:00:23.360
<v Speaker 1>and I love all things tech. Now, let me paint

0:00:23.440 --> 0:00:28.080
<v Speaker 1>you a scenario, or, as my quiz to alter Ego

0:00:28.120 --> 0:00:33.520
<v Speaker 1>would say, over on Ridiculous History, a sonario. You sit

0:00:33.560 --> 0:00:37.280
<v Speaker 1>down to your computer. Maybe you're about to do some work,

0:00:37.440 --> 0:00:40.360
<v Speaker 1>or maybe you're planning on, you know, being totally sussed

0:00:40.360 --> 0:00:43.360
<v Speaker 1>while claiming to work on wires and among us. Maybe

0:00:43.360 --> 0:00:45.080
<v Speaker 1>you just want to watch an episode of The Haunting

0:00:45.120 --> 0:00:48.920
<v Speaker 1>a blind manner. But whatever the reason, you encounter an

0:00:49.000 --> 0:00:54.040
<v Speaker 1>unexpected problem. Your computer won't come out of unlock mode. Instead,

0:00:54.080 --> 0:00:58.680
<v Speaker 1>you get an ominous message. Someone has locked down your computer,

0:00:59.080 --> 0:01:01.360
<v Speaker 1>creating a new path us were to keep you out.

0:01:01.680 --> 0:01:03.800
<v Speaker 1>If you don't cough up a certain amount of money

0:01:03.920 --> 0:01:06.920
<v Speaker 1>by a certain amount of time, something bad will happen.

0:01:07.319 --> 0:01:10.039
<v Speaker 1>Maybe that's something bad is that the intruder will lock

0:01:10.080 --> 0:01:13.000
<v Speaker 1>down your computer forever. Maybe they will convert all the

0:01:13.080 --> 0:01:16.800
<v Speaker 1>data on your computer to gibberish. Maybe they'll fill up

0:01:16.840 --> 0:01:19.600
<v Speaker 1>your computer with garbage data to turn it into a

0:01:19.680 --> 0:01:24.000
<v Speaker 1>useless device. Or maybe they'll use the information stored on

0:01:24.040 --> 0:01:29.120
<v Speaker 1>your computer against you in some way allah blackmail. You

0:01:29.520 --> 0:01:35.640
<v Speaker 1>have been hit by ransomware. Ransomware is a subset of malware,

0:01:36.080 --> 0:01:38.559
<v Speaker 1>or what we goofs is in the old days, lumped

0:01:38.640 --> 0:01:42.679
<v Speaker 1>under the general term computer virus, though as it turns out,

0:01:43.000 --> 0:01:48.200
<v Speaker 1>that's not accurate. Really, ransomware is ugly stuff, and it

0:01:48.240 --> 0:01:52.400
<v Speaker 1>can cause enormous problems for people and organizations. There are

0:01:52.480 --> 0:01:56.480
<v Speaker 1>dozens of stories of computer systems and critical infrastructure being

0:01:56.560 --> 0:01:59.920
<v Speaker 1>hit by ransomware. One target that seems to get hit

0:02:00.040 --> 0:02:04.840
<v Speaker 1>fairly frequently would be hospitals. That is particularly ugly, and

0:02:04.920 --> 0:02:09.080
<v Speaker 1>even more so during a pandemic. So in this episode,

0:02:09.240 --> 0:02:12.560
<v Speaker 1>we're going to explore the history of ransomware, how it

0:02:12.600 --> 0:02:15.760
<v Speaker 1>works in general, and some stories on how it's been

0:02:15.880 --> 0:02:19.600
<v Speaker 1>used and what people did in response. Now, often with

0:02:19.680 --> 0:02:23.600
<v Speaker 1>these topics, I have to give pretty vague estimations of

0:02:23.840 --> 0:02:27.920
<v Speaker 1>when something got started, sometimes even having to resort to

0:02:28.040 --> 0:02:32.280
<v Speaker 1>using a decade rather than a specific year. Thankfully, I

0:02:32.320 --> 0:02:36.359
<v Speaker 1>guess for ransomware, the origin story is fairly well established.

0:02:36.639 --> 0:02:40.640
<v Speaker 1>Now I cannot for certain state that this is categorically

0:02:40.800 --> 0:02:44.880
<v Speaker 1>the very first case of ransomware, but generally speaking people

0:02:44.960 --> 0:02:49.440
<v Speaker 1>accept it as such, and so we come to the odd,

0:02:49.760 --> 0:02:55.480
<v Speaker 1>sinister and absurd story of the Aid's Trojan. Now, in

0:02:55.520 --> 0:02:59.440
<v Speaker 1>this case, a trojan is also a subset of malware.

0:02:59.760 --> 0:03:03.760
<v Speaker 1>It's really more of a delivery system for malware, and

0:03:03.880 --> 0:03:06.200
<v Speaker 1>one that a lot of folks are probably familiar with

0:03:06.600 --> 0:03:11.040
<v Speaker 1>by concept, if not by name. The name Trojan references

0:03:11.120 --> 0:03:14.320
<v Speaker 1>the story of the Trojan Horse, in which the Greek

0:03:14.440 --> 0:03:17.560
<v Speaker 1>forces that have been laying siege to the Free city

0:03:17.639 --> 0:03:22.639
<v Speaker 1>of Troy got a great idea. Hey, said the Greek forces,

0:03:22.639 --> 0:03:26.400
<v Speaker 1>what if we pretend to give them a really big present,

0:03:26.800 --> 0:03:29.960
<v Speaker 1>only instead of you know, I don't know, chocolate or whatever,

0:03:30.360 --> 0:03:34.840
<v Speaker 1>they find out that it's actually some secret Greek task force.

0:03:35.520 --> 0:03:39.000
<v Speaker 1>That task force will be inside Troy without having to

0:03:39.040 --> 0:03:42.360
<v Speaker 1>break through the walls, and then they could actually open

0:03:42.480 --> 0:03:44.120
<v Speaker 1>up the gates and let the rest of us in.

0:03:44.280 --> 0:03:48.520
<v Speaker 1>And so the story goes, the Greeks constructed a massive

0:03:48.720 --> 0:03:53.480
<v Speaker 1>wooden horse, hiding the warriors inside of the horse and

0:03:53.480 --> 0:03:56.280
<v Speaker 1>then leaving it out for the Trojan forces to bring

0:03:56.320 --> 0:03:58.760
<v Speaker 1>into the city while the rest of the Greek forces

0:03:59.160 --> 0:04:04.920
<v Speaker 1>pretended to sail away. Well, according to the story, the

0:04:04.960 --> 0:04:09.480
<v Speaker 1>Trojans celebrated and they pulled the massive wooden horse into

0:04:09.480 --> 0:04:12.480
<v Speaker 1>the city as a kind of war trophy, and the

0:04:12.560 --> 0:04:16.960
<v Speaker 1>Greek warriors inside the horse snuck out at night, opened

0:04:17.040 --> 0:04:20.440
<v Speaker 1>up the city gates, and then the returning Greek forces

0:04:20.560 --> 0:04:24.279
<v Speaker 1>just sauntered their way in conquering the city. In the

0:04:24.320 --> 0:04:28.920
<v Speaker 1>world of malware, a trojan is some sort of program

0:04:29.080 --> 0:04:33.120
<v Speaker 1>or application that appears to be legitimate but is secretly

0:04:33.279 --> 0:04:37.839
<v Speaker 1>carrying along some malware. A lot of malware falls into

0:04:37.880 --> 0:04:41.080
<v Speaker 1>this category or uses similar tactics to get people to,

0:04:41.520 --> 0:04:45.400
<v Speaker 1>you know, actually install the malware on their computers. When

0:04:45.520 --> 0:04:48.599
<v Speaker 1>file sharing became a huge trend as peer to peer

0:04:48.640 --> 0:04:52.440
<v Speaker 1>networks took off, one of the biggest dangers wasn't that

0:04:52.640 --> 0:04:55.720
<v Speaker 1>a movie studio or a record studio is going to

0:04:55.839 --> 0:05:00.800
<v Speaker 1>come after you with some absurdly overblown lawsuit. Although those

0:05:00.920 --> 0:05:04.520
<v Speaker 1>did happen. The bigger threat is that one of those

0:05:04.560 --> 0:05:08.359
<v Speaker 1>files you downloaded was actually malware in disguise, or it

0:05:08.480 --> 0:05:12.600
<v Speaker 1>had malware embedded within the program just waiting to be unleashed.

0:05:13.120 --> 0:05:17.240
<v Speaker 1>The AIDS Trojan was called that because it had to

0:05:17.360 --> 0:05:22.200
<v Speaker 1>do with events surrounding the AIDS crisis, and it was

0:05:22.240 --> 0:05:27.560
<v Speaker 1>actually distributed on diskette. This was pre Internet days. Well,

0:05:27.640 --> 0:05:30.240
<v Speaker 1>the Internet was around, but not many people were using it.

0:05:30.279 --> 0:05:33.760
<v Speaker 1>This was nineteen eighty nine. So the person who made

0:05:33.800 --> 0:05:38.680
<v Speaker 1>this malware saved the malware on two disks disguised as

0:05:38.720 --> 0:05:42.720
<v Speaker 1>a legitimate program. Only that he did it to twenty

0:05:43.000 --> 0:05:45.920
<v Speaker 1>thousand discs, and I imagine that must have taken a

0:05:46.120 --> 0:05:50.760
<v Speaker 1>very long time. So who received those discs? Who was

0:05:50.800 --> 0:05:53.880
<v Speaker 1>on the target side? Well, the discs went to people

0:05:54.200 --> 0:05:57.359
<v Speaker 1>who were part of a nineteen eighty nine World Health

0:05:57.440 --> 0:06:02.000
<v Speaker 1>Organization conference on the AIDS crisis. And who was the

0:06:02.000 --> 0:06:07.359
<v Speaker 1>mastermind behind this plot? Well, that would be Dr Joseph L. Pop,

0:06:07.760 --> 0:06:13.600
<v Speaker 1>an evolutionary biologist and AIDS researcher. Okay, so let's get

0:06:13.760 --> 0:06:19.120
<v Speaker 1>some more context. The medical community first began identifying medical

0:06:19.160 --> 0:06:22.640
<v Speaker 1>cases that in retrospect we would understand to be related

0:06:22.680 --> 0:06:27.799
<v Speaker 1>to acquired immuno deficiency syndrome or AIDS, back in nineteen

0:06:27.920 --> 0:06:31.200
<v Speaker 1>eight one. The c d C would first use the

0:06:31.360 --> 0:06:37.800
<v Speaker 1>term AIDS on September. The World Health Organization would hold

0:06:37.800 --> 0:06:43.599
<v Speaker 1>its first meeting to discuss the global situation in nine three. Now,

0:06:43.600 --> 0:06:48.039
<v Speaker 1>despite the clear danger, many countries, including the United States,

0:06:48.440 --> 0:06:52.560
<v Speaker 1>failed to take this crisis very seriously at first, in

0:06:52.680 --> 0:06:56.480
<v Speaker 1>large part because it was seemingly affecting only gay men,

0:06:56.920 --> 0:07:01.000
<v Speaker 1>and the general social attitude toward homosexual in these countries,

0:07:01.040 --> 0:07:04.640
<v Speaker 1>including the United States, was at the very least uninviting,

0:07:04.839 --> 0:07:08.240
<v Speaker 1>which is putting it lightly. By nine nine, the US

0:07:08.320 --> 0:07:12.400
<v Speaker 1>government couldn't sit by idly, and Congress created the National

0:07:12.440 --> 0:07:17.960
<v Speaker 1>Commission on AIDS. Dr Anthony Fauci, And yes, I'm talking

0:07:18.000 --> 0:07:22.920
<v Speaker 1>about that Dr Fauci, the same one today who's advocating

0:07:23.040 --> 0:07:27.360
<v Speaker 1>social distancing and using masks during our COVID pandemic. Well

0:07:27.400 --> 0:07:31.840
<v Speaker 1>back then he was endorsing giving HIV positive people access

0:07:31.880 --> 0:07:36.000
<v Speaker 1>to experimental treatments, even if those people did not technically

0:07:36.120 --> 0:07:41.080
<v Speaker 1>qualify for clinical trials, because that man is a freaking legend.

0:07:41.600 --> 0:07:46.080
<v Speaker 1>And just to be clear, HIV is human immuno deficiency virus.

0:07:46.200 --> 0:07:49.640
<v Speaker 1>That's the virus that can lead to AIDS. The number

0:07:49.760 --> 0:07:52.400
<v Speaker 1>of AIDS cases in the United States at that point

0:07:52.480 --> 0:07:55.480
<v Speaker 1>reached one hundred thousand, and the w h O, the

0:07:55.520 --> 0:07:59.240
<v Speaker 1>World Health Organization, estimated that there were up to four

0:07:59.320 --> 0:08:02.240
<v Speaker 1>hundred doll and cases around the world, and in some

0:08:02.280 --> 0:08:06.720
<v Speaker 1>parts of the world, like Africa, the medical establishment was

0:08:06.960 --> 0:08:12.280
<v Speaker 1>woefully underprepared to treat infected people and outbreaks were rampant,

0:08:12.760 --> 0:08:15.040
<v Speaker 1>and all of this is important when we get to

0:08:15.520 --> 0:08:19.360
<v Speaker 1>motives behind this trojan malware a little bit later on.

0:08:19.640 --> 0:08:23.160
<v Speaker 1>That's why I needed to set the stage. So Dr

0:08:23.240 --> 0:08:26.559
<v Speaker 1>Pop had been a collaborating member of a group called

0:08:26.640 --> 0:08:30.160
<v Speaker 1>the Flying Doctors, and that itself was a branch of

0:08:30.200 --> 0:08:34.400
<v Speaker 1>the African Medical Research Foundation. Pop had served as a

0:08:34.440 --> 0:08:38.680
<v Speaker 1>consultant for the World Health Organization in Kenya and had

0:08:38.760 --> 0:08:44.640
<v Speaker 1>even organized AIDS related conferences himself. So Dr Pop takes

0:08:44.640 --> 0:08:47.079
<v Speaker 1>a look at the list of attendees to this w

0:08:47.400 --> 0:08:51.840
<v Speaker 1>h O conference in males twenty thousand people and various organizations.

0:08:52.120 --> 0:08:55.360
<v Speaker 1>A diskette and the discs label stated that it was

0:08:55.520 --> 0:09:00.320
<v Speaker 1>an quote AIDS Information Introductory Diskette end quote from a

0:09:00.320 --> 0:09:05.720
<v Speaker 1>company called PC Cyborg Corporation, a fictional company of Dr

0:09:05.800 --> 0:09:09.240
<v Speaker 1>Pop's invention. Now, if you were to insert the diskette

0:09:09.280 --> 0:09:12.400
<v Speaker 1>into a PC and then run the program, you would

0:09:12.440 --> 0:09:16.880
<v Speaker 1>encounter a seemingly straightforward survey, you know, a questionnaire about AIDS.

0:09:17.480 --> 0:09:22.040
<v Speaker 1>But in the background, the malware was infecting the auto

0:09:22.160 --> 0:09:27.240
<v Speaker 1>exec dot bat file in the root directory for the PC. Now,

0:09:27.280 --> 0:09:30.840
<v Speaker 1>this file is the startup file for a computer of

0:09:30.880 --> 0:09:34.040
<v Speaker 1>that era. It's in charge of booting up a computer

0:09:34.120 --> 0:09:37.880
<v Speaker 1>and activating all the components to work with the operating system.

0:09:37.880 --> 0:09:41.200
<v Speaker 1>It sets up everything to move forward when you are

0:09:41.240 --> 0:09:43.880
<v Speaker 1>actually using your computer, so when you power it on,

0:09:44.120 --> 0:09:47.040
<v Speaker 1>this is the program that sets everything up. And then,

0:09:47.480 --> 0:09:50.520
<v Speaker 1>like the Greek soldiers in our legend about the City

0:09:50.559 --> 0:09:53.520
<v Speaker 1>of Troy, the malware would lie and wait for the

0:09:53.640 --> 0:09:56.600
<v Speaker 1>right moment to strike. But instead of waiting for night

0:09:56.640 --> 0:09:59.400
<v Speaker 1>to fall, the malware would keep count of how many

0:09:59.440 --> 0:10:03.520
<v Speaker 1>times the program had been activated, although actually some sources

0:10:03.559 --> 0:10:07.680
<v Speaker 1>say it tracked how frequently the computer system was rebooted

0:10:07.760 --> 0:10:11.840
<v Speaker 1>or turned on, so different reports have conflicting information about this,

0:10:11.920 --> 0:10:15.479
<v Speaker 1>but generally speaking, it was keeping track of how frequently

0:10:15.640 --> 0:10:19.480
<v Speaker 1>the system was being used, and eventually, typically around either

0:10:19.760 --> 0:10:24.800
<v Speaker 1>the program activation or reboot number ninety, the malware would

0:10:24.800 --> 0:10:27.439
<v Speaker 1>then initiate the actual attacks. So it would wait until

0:10:27.960 --> 0:10:31.800
<v Speaker 1>this counter I'd hit nine of ninety instances of this

0:10:31.840 --> 0:10:35.280
<v Speaker 1>thing happening. The program would then encrypt all the files

0:10:35.320 --> 0:10:38.559
<v Speaker 1>on the sea drive of the host machine, which is

0:10:38.600 --> 0:10:41.160
<v Speaker 1>where most files lived. The sea drive is kind of

0:10:41.160 --> 0:10:45.760
<v Speaker 1>the default drive on PC machines, and it rendered those

0:10:45.760 --> 0:10:49.400
<v Speaker 1>files inaccessible to the user, and it would also launch

0:10:49.520 --> 0:10:53.320
<v Speaker 1>a ransom message. Now, if you search for the stuff online,

0:10:53.520 --> 0:10:56.360
<v Speaker 1>you're likely to come across a picture of a screen

0:10:56.440 --> 0:10:59.720
<v Speaker 1>that has a message that starts with quote, attention, I

0:10:59.760 --> 0:11:02.760
<v Speaker 1>have and elected to inform you that throughout your process

0:11:02.800 --> 0:11:05.520
<v Speaker 1>of collecting and executing files and so on and so on.

0:11:06.200 --> 0:11:08.760
<v Speaker 1>It then goes on to drop some expletives. So I'm

0:11:08.760 --> 0:11:10.480
<v Speaker 1>not going to quote the whole thing on here. This

0:11:10.760 --> 0:11:13.560
<v Speaker 1>show is family friendly for the most part. And the

0:11:13.679 --> 0:11:16.800
<v Speaker 1>message also gloats over the fact that the computer has

0:11:16.800 --> 0:11:19.880
<v Speaker 1>been infected by a virus. But that is not the

0:11:19.920 --> 0:11:23.720
<v Speaker 1>actual message that popped up with the AIDS trojan. It's

0:11:23.760 --> 0:11:27.360
<v Speaker 1>frequently used in articles that are about the AIDS trojan,

0:11:27.559 --> 0:11:31.000
<v Speaker 1>but that's not what users saw. For one thing, that

0:11:31.040 --> 0:11:35.440
<v Speaker 1>message has no information regarding the actual ransom, which for

0:11:35.600 --> 0:11:40.480
<v Speaker 1>ransomware is kind of an important step. The message that

0:11:40.679 --> 0:11:44.360
<v Speaker 1>gets shown all over the place concludes by saying, rememb

0:11:44.360 --> 0:11:49.079
<v Speaker 1>member that that's actually the way it's written. Now that's misspelled.

0:11:49.400 --> 0:11:52.720
<v Speaker 1>There is no cure for AIDS end quote, So I

0:11:52.760 --> 0:11:55.040
<v Speaker 1>just want to clear out the confusion. That was not

0:11:55.160 --> 0:12:00.640
<v Speaker 1>the message that dr pops ransomware used. Instead, the actual

0:12:00.760 --> 0:12:04.080
<v Speaker 1>message came across as more official and less of a

0:12:04.400 --> 0:12:08.080
<v Speaker 1>Nelson from the Simpsons, pointing and saying ha ha. The

0:12:08.160 --> 0:12:12.640
<v Speaker 1>real message starts off as quote, Dear customer, it is

0:12:12.720 --> 0:12:17.439
<v Speaker 1>time to pay for your software lease from PC Cyborg Corporation.

0:12:17.920 --> 0:12:21.560
<v Speaker 1>Complete the invoice and attached payment for the lease option

0:12:21.720 --> 0:12:25.400
<v Speaker 1>of your choice. End quote, and the two choices offered

0:12:25.679 --> 0:12:30.240
<v Speaker 1>included a yearly lease for one eighty nine dollars or

0:12:30.320 --> 0:12:34.360
<v Speaker 1>a lifetime lease for three d seventy eight dollars. In

0:12:34.400 --> 0:12:36.920
<v Speaker 1>either case, the user was instructed to pay in the

0:12:36.960 --> 0:12:41.120
<v Speaker 1>form of a banker's draft, a cashier's check, or international

0:12:41.320 --> 0:12:45.720
<v Speaker 1>money order payable to PC Cyborg Corporation to a post

0:12:45.760 --> 0:12:51.040
<v Speaker 1>office box located in Panama. Now, presumably, after paying this

0:12:51.160 --> 0:12:54.839
<v Speaker 1>so called lease, you would receive a way to decrypt

0:12:55.040 --> 0:12:59.240
<v Speaker 1>the files on your computer from the PC Cyborg Corporation.

0:12:59.600 --> 0:13:02.640
<v Speaker 1>But the timeline for how this all shook out was

0:13:02.679 --> 0:13:04.800
<v Speaker 1>a bit too short to know for sure whether or

0:13:04.800 --> 0:13:07.720
<v Speaker 1>not Dr Pop would have sent anything out, because I'm

0:13:07.720 --> 0:13:09.880
<v Speaker 1>not even sure that Dr Pop had a chance to

0:13:09.920 --> 0:13:12.520
<v Speaker 1>retrieve anything from that post office box before it all

0:13:12.559 --> 0:13:15.800
<v Speaker 1>went down. Now, the fact that the malware didn't go

0:13:16.040 --> 0:13:19.400
<v Speaker 1>into action immediately, it would wait a bit before striking

0:13:19.600 --> 0:13:23.120
<v Speaker 1>meant that the outbreak of infected computers was a little staggered.

0:13:23.480 --> 0:13:26.760
<v Speaker 1>The first reports of the computer virus came out of England,

0:13:27.240 --> 0:13:30.079
<v Speaker 1>and that's also when it first became clear that this

0:13:30.200 --> 0:13:33.560
<v Speaker 1>was a new type of crime, one that wasn't covered

0:13:33.640 --> 0:13:38.400
<v Speaker 1>on the lawbooks explicitly, which would force prosecutors to rely

0:13:38.520 --> 0:13:42.120
<v Speaker 1>on older laws and hope that those laws could maybe

0:13:42.400 --> 0:13:46.760
<v Speaker 1>bend enough to apply to this brand new crime. As

0:13:46.840 --> 0:13:50.240
<v Speaker 1>news spread through the medical research community of the virus,

0:13:50.280 --> 0:13:55.760
<v Speaker 1>some organizations took extreme steps. The newspaper The Independent reported

0:13:55.800 --> 0:13:59.720
<v Speaker 1>that and AIDS organization in Italy chose to delete data

0:14:00.120 --> 0:14:03.400
<v Speaker 1>off of infected machines and they lost ten years of

0:14:03.440 --> 0:14:06.600
<v Speaker 1>work in the process. Now, as it turned out, that

0:14:06.760 --> 0:14:10.600
<v Speaker 1>was an extreme overreaction, but this was a new type

0:14:10.600 --> 0:14:13.720
<v Speaker 1>of crisis, so I can't really put too much blame here.

0:14:14.400 --> 0:14:18.360
<v Speaker 1>While computer scientists started to tackle the technological problem of

0:14:18.360 --> 0:14:23.440
<v Speaker 1>how to decrypt infected computers, Scotland Yards Computer Unit launched

0:14:23.480 --> 0:14:26.800
<v Speaker 1>its largest investigation at that point to try and track

0:14:26.840 --> 0:14:30.200
<v Speaker 1>down the perpetrator, and Dr Pop might have even slipped

0:14:30.200 --> 0:14:34.480
<v Speaker 1>away without anyone ever knowing about his involvement except for

0:14:34.600 --> 0:14:39.000
<v Speaker 1>his odd behaviors which gave him away. Researchers figured out

0:14:39.120 --> 0:14:42.640
<v Speaker 1>how to decrypt the machines. They created a decryption tool

0:14:42.920 --> 0:14:46.760
<v Speaker 1>called AIDS out, for example, that would reverse the process

0:14:46.840 --> 0:14:50.360
<v Speaker 1>on an infected computer, so you could decrypt your own files.

0:14:50.800 --> 0:14:53.920
<v Speaker 1>If Dr Pop had just kept a low profile, the

0:14:54.000 --> 0:14:57.440
<v Speaker 1>AIDS trojan might have entered computer lore as a great

0:14:57.600 --> 0:15:03.160
<v Speaker 1>unsolved mystery. But Dr Pop was behaving in odd ways.

0:15:03.520 --> 0:15:06.320
<v Speaker 1>Shortly after mailing out the discs, he attended an AIDS

0:15:06.400 --> 0:15:10.000
<v Speaker 1>seminar in Nairobi, and while this was a short time

0:15:10.080 --> 0:15:13.040
<v Speaker 1>after the infected discs had hit the targets, it was

0:15:13.080 --> 0:15:15.600
<v Speaker 1>already becoming a big point of conversation. It was like

0:15:15.960 --> 0:15:18.560
<v Speaker 1>less than two weeks after he had mailed out the discs,

0:15:19.120 --> 0:15:22.880
<v Speaker 1>and maybe that unnerved Dr Pop. As he was traveling

0:15:22.920 --> 0:15:25.600
<v Speaker 1>back to the United States, he had a layover at

0:15:25.600 --> 0:15:29.400
<v Speaker 1>an airport in Amsterdam, and he wrote the phrase Dr

0:15:29.480 --> 0:15:34.600
<v Speaker 1>Pop has been poisoned on a fellow traveler's suitcase. That

0:15:34.680 --> 0:15:37.840
<v Speaker 1>did not go unnoticed, and authorities decided they wanted to

0:15:37.880 --> 0:15:42.000
<v Speaker 1>have a little word with Dr Pop. Upon searching his luggage,

0:15:42.040 --> 0:15:46.280
<v Speaker 1>the authorities found material with the label PC Cyborg Corporation,

0:15:46.680 --> 0:15:50.440
<v Speaker 1>the fictional company at the heart of the ransomware. Pop

0:15:50.600 --> 0:15:53.480
<v Speaker 1>was allowed to return to the United States, but not

0:15:53.600 --> 0:15:57.320
<v Speaker 1>long afterward received a visit from the FBI, who arrested him,

0:15:57.680 --> 0:16:01.600
<v Speaker 1>and then the US extradited Dr Pop to Britain on

0:16:01.760 --> 0:16:06.800
<v Speaker 1>charges of blackmail and criminal damage. Pop's lawyers would claim

0:16:06.880 --> 0:16:09.800
<v Speaker 1>that Pop was planning on using that money from his

0:16:09.880 --> 0:16:14.080
<v Speaker 1>scheme to fund alternative AIDS research, kind of framing his

0:16:14.120 --> 0:16:15.800
<v Speaker 1>defense in such a way as to make it seem

0:16:15.840 --> 0:16:18.400
<v Speaker 1>as though Pop was responding to what he saw as

0:16:18.440 --> 0:16:22.800
<v Speaker 1>a flawed approach to tackling this global crisis. Now, as

0:16:22.840 --> 0:16:26.240
<v Speaker 1>I mentioned earlier, it took far too long for most

0:16:26.280 --> 0:16:29.840
<v Speaker 1>of the world to take the AIDS crisis seriously, so

0:16:30.000 --> 0:16:32.360
<v Speaker 1>this narrative had a bit of an appeal to it.

0:16:32.400 --> 0:16:36.400
<v Speaker 1>There was evidence that the world was not responding quickly

0:16:36.720 --> 0:16:41.520
<v Speaker 1>or appropriately to this problem, so he was kind of

0:16:41.600 --> 0:16:44.800
<v Speaker 1>like a Robin Hood figure at least by this story,

0:16:44.880 --> 0:16:48.640
<v Speaker 1>you know, stealing from bloated bureaucracies that were spending more

0:16:48.680 --> 0:16:52.560
<v Speaker 1>money on infrastructure than on actual research. Or at least

0:16:52.920 --> 0:16:56.160
<v Speaker 1>that was the narrative that his lawyers wanted people to accept,

0:16:56.440 --> 0:17:00.240
<v Speaker 1>but there were some potential alternative motivations. The guard In

0:17:00.280 --> 0:17:03.480
<v Speaker 1>newspaper published an article that revealed that Dr Pop had

0:17:03.520 --> 0:17:05.960
<v Speaker 1>recently applied for a job with the w h O

0:17:06.480 --> 0:17:10.439
<v Speaker 1>but had been rejected, so it's possible that the malware

0:17:10.560 --> 0:17:14.600
<v Speaker 1>was an act of vindictive revenge for being snubbed. The

0:17:14.640 --> 0:17:18.720
<v Speaker 1>actual trial was a huge mess for many reasons. One

0:17:18.760 --> 0:17:20.959
<v Speaker 1>big one, as I mentioned, is that the legal system

0:17:21.000 --> 0:17:24.160
<v Speaker 1>didn't yet have a framework for cyber crimes like this,

0:17:24.600 --> 0:17:27.879
<v Speaker 1>so they had to apply older crimes in the charge.

0:17:28.160 --> 0:17:32.240
<v Speaker 1>But another was Pop's own behavior. Reportedly, he would show

0:17:32.320 --> 0:17:35.119
<v Speaker 1>up to court while wearing a cardboard box on his head,

0:17:35.320 --> 0:17:38.400
<v Speaker 1>or he would put curlers in his beard or a

0:17:38.440 --> 0:17:41.399
<v Speaker 1>condom on his nose, and he claimed that it was

0:17:41.440 --> 0:17:45.080
<v Speaker 1>to ward off radiation. The judge in the case ultimately

0:17:45.160 --> 0:17:49.280
<v Speaker 1>ruled that Dr Pop was unfit to stand trial. Prosecutors

0:17:49.280 --> 0:17:53.400
<v Speaker 1>were frustrated, pointing out that a digital diary in Pop's

0:17:53.440 --> 0:17:57.399
<v Speaker 1>possession revealed that this aid's trojan plan had been in

0:17:57.440 --> 0:18:01.879
<v Speaker 1>development for well over a year, indicating that this was

0:18:01.920 --> 0:18:07.240
<v Speaker 1>not some sort of spontaneous manic manifestation. And nevertheless, Pop

0:18:07.359 --> 0:18:10.320
<v Speaker 1>was off the hook and he returned back home to

0:18:10.359 --> 0:18:15.480
<v Speaker 1>the United States. He continued his work researching evolutionary biology.

0:18:15.520 --> 0:18:18.240
<v Speaker 1>According to some sources that came across. He also spent

0:18:18.280 --> 0:18:21.560
<v Speaker 1>a lot of time pushing some rather unorthodox ideas about

0:18:21.680 --> 0:18:27.800
<v Speaker 1>human reproduction that I find at best misogynistic. Anyway, he

0:18:27.920 --> 0:18:31.520
<v Speaker 1>passed away in two thousand seven. His legacy includes not

0:18:31.640 --> 0:18:35.959
<v Speaker 1>just the first case of ransomware, but also a lovely

0:18:36.080 --> 0:18:39.879
<v Speaker 1>butterfly conservatory in Cooperstown, New York. For real, So I

0:18:39.880 --> 0:18:43.399
<v Speaker 1>mean that Joseph L. Pop Junior Butterfly Conservatory is a

0:18:43.440 --> 0:18:47.280
<v Speaker 1>place you can visit, you know, when things are more safe.

0:18:48.000 --> 0:18:50.280
<v Speaker 1>When we come back, I'll talk a bit more about

0:18:50.280 --> 0:18:53.760
<v Speaker 1>the encryption method Pop used and why the ransomware of

0:18:53.800 --> 0:18:57.359
<v Speaker 1>today is far more dangerous. But first let's take a

0:18:57.480 --> 0:19:08.800
<v Speaker 1>quick break. When Pop designed his malware, he had a

0:19:08.840 --> 0:19:11.840
<v Speaker 1>limited tool set. When it came to encrypting the files

0:19:11.840 --> 0:19:17.520
<v Speaker 1>on target computers, he used a process called symmetric key encryption. Now,

0:19:17.560 --> 0:19:20.639
<v Speaker 1>the name gives us a hint about how this works.

0:19:21.160 --> 0:19:25.399
<v Speaker 1>You've got a key to encode and decode text, and

0:19:25.480 --> 0:19:29.040
<v Speaker 1>that key is the same for both parties that are

0:19:29.080 --> 0:19:32.800
<v Speaker 1>trying to communicate secretly. You each have an exact copy

0:19:33.000 --> 0:19:36.840
<v Speaker 1>of this key. This is easier to understand with an analogy.

0:19:37.080 --> 0:19:39.399
<v Speaker 1>So let's say that you and I both have a

0:19:39.520 --> 0:19:43.760
<v Speaker 1>Captain Crusader decoder ring, and I can write a message

0:19:43.960 --> 0:19:47.000
<v Speaker 1>in plain old English, and then I use this decoder

0:19:47.119 --> 0:19:50.800
<v Speaker 1>ring to encode that message so that it looks like

0:19:50.840 --> 0:19:55.119
<v Speaker 1>a meaningless jumble of letters, numbers, and symbols. I send

0:19:55.160 --> 0:19:58.879
<v Speaker 1>you the encoded message. You have your own ring, which

0:19:59.040 --> 0:20:01.760
<v Speaker 1>in every way is a duplicate of the one I have,

0:20:02.280 --> 0:20:05.480
<v Speaker 1>and using your ring, you reverse the process. You turn

0:20:05.520 --> 0:20:09.600
<v Speaker 1>each coded letter back into the original uncoded text, and

0:20:09.640 --> 0:20:13.800
<v Speaker 1>after some work, voila, you have the original message. You

0:20:13.920 --> 0:20:17.399
<v Speaker 1>probably see the limitations of this approach right away. It

0:20:17.440 --> 0:20:20.960
<v Speaker 1>depends upon the various parties having access to a private

0:20:21.080 --> 0:20:26.040
<v Speaker 1>encryption key. If anyone else should get hold of that key,

0:20:26.080 --> 0:20:31.000
<v Speaker 1>they could conceivably reverse the encryption process on any intercepted message.

0:20:31.359 --> 0:20:35.080
<v Speaker 1>So the encryption method only works if the keys remain secret,

0:20:35.600 --> 0:20:38.800
<v Speaker 1>and that's tricky because you first have to make sure

0:20:38.840 --> 0:20:43.280
<v Speaker 1>that both parties have the secret key, and getting a

0:20:43.359 --> 0:20:48.520
<v Speaker 1>secret key to somebody securely is its own problem. Moreover,

0:20:48.960 --> 0:20:53.000
<v Speaker 1>this type of encryption can be vulnerable to cryptanalysis, that is,

0:20:53.320 --> 0:20:57.359
<v Speaker 1>efforts of others to reverse the process without a key

0:20:57.400 --> 0:21:00.680
<v Speaker 1>in an effort to determine what the key is. This

0:21:00.760 --> 0:21:03.280
<v Speaker 1>is something that happened a lot during World War Two,

0:21:03.359 --> 0:21:06.960
<v Speaker 1>where both the Axis and the Allied powers worked hard

0:21:07.000 --> 0:21:10.200
<v Speaker 1>to crack the codes of the opposition and then try

0:21:10.240 --> 0:21:12.399
<v Speaker 1>to keep the fact that they had cracked the codes

0:21:12.600 --> 0:21:16.439
<v Speaker 1>secret long enough to capitalize on the discovered information. The

0:21:16.520 --> 0:21:22.440
<v Speaker 1>limitations of symmetric key cryptography made ransomware largely an impractical

0:21:22.600 --> 0:21:26.240
<v Speaker 1>method to make some cash. With a wide enough spread,

0:21:26.440 --> 0:21:28.840
<v Speaker 1>you might get some hits from people who lack the

0:21:28.920 --> 0:21:33.720
<v Speaker 1>information or access to information to make an informed decision,

0:21:34.040 --> 0:21:37.760
<v Speaker 1>So a few targets might panic and capitulate, but it's

0:21:37.760 --> 0:21:40.919
<v Speaker 1>not the most reliable means of pulling off a big heist.

0:21:41.440 --> 0:21:45.880
<v Speaker 1>A few years after Dr Pop's attempt, a pair of researchers,

0:21:46.359 --> 0:21:50.000
<v Speaker 1>or as some have written, a cryptographer and a hacker,

0:21:50.520 --> 0:21:53.920
<v Speaker 1>laid out the strategies that they expected to see used

0:21:54.000 --> 0:21:58.800
<v Speaker 1>in future ransomware attacks, and they were right. The two

0:21:58.840 --> 0:22:03.600
<v Speaker 1>were multi Yng and Adam L Young, Young and Young.

0:22:04.160 --> 0:22:07.679
<v Speaker 1>They were working together to anticipate future problems, and just

0:22:07.760 --> 0:22:10.200
<v Speaker 1>to be clear here, they were looking at the challenges

0:22:10.400 --> 0:22:14.480
<v Speaker 1>from the perspective of a potential attacker, which is important

0:22:14.520 --> 0:22:18.520
<v Speaker 1>because that's what the attackers are doing all the time right.

0:22:18.840 --> 0:22:21.640
<v Speaker 1>I mean this is similar to white hat hackers, who

0:22:21.680 --> 0:22:25.520
<v Speaker 1>operate the same way as a malicious attacker, but for

0:22:25.560 --> 0:22:28.879
<v Speaker 1>the purposes of figuring out where vulnerabilities are within a

0:22:29.000 --> 0:22:32.359
<v Speaker 1>system and in an effort to design a more effective

0:22:32.400 --> 0:22:37.040
<v Speaker 1>digital security measure. Young and Young started to ask some

0:22:37.280 --> 0:22:41.280
<v Speaker 1>pretty simple questions and come up with answers. So let's

0:22:41.280 --> 0:22:44.879
<v Speaker 1>say you want to design some malware. You know for

0:22:44.960 --> 0:22:48.240
<v Speaker 1>some reason, you'd probably have a checklist of things you

0:22:48.280 --> 0:22:52.880
<v Speaker 1>would want for that malware. Now, depending upon your motivations,

0:22:53.240 --> 0:22:56.240
<v Speaker 1>you might want the malware to remain hidden from view

0:22:56.359 --> 0:23:00.240
<v Speaker 1>as well. If you're making a statement with malware, that's

0:23:00.280 --> 0:23:03.199
<v Speaker 1>probably not the case. Maybe you want to hijack computer

0:23:03.280 --> 0:23:07.280
<v Speaker 1>systems and display some sort of anarchistic message on monitors.

0:23:07.600 --> 0:23:09.800
<v Speaker 1>But if your goal is to do something else like

0:23:10.160 --> 0:23:14.920
<v Speaker 1>secretly monitor communications or steal information, or spread an infection

0:23:14.960 --> 0:23:18.600
<v Speaker 1>to other computers on a connected system, chances are you

0:23:18.680 --> 0:23:21.760
<v Speaker 1>don't want people detecting the malware right away. But let's

0:23:21.800 --> 0:23:24.080
<v Speaker 1>say you actually want people to know that their machines

0:23:24.119 --> 0:23:27.399
<v Speaker 1>are infected, because the whole point of your malware is

0:23:27.440 --> 0:23:30.440
<v Speaker 1>to extort money from the owners of the target systems,

0:23:30.760 --> 0:23:32.639
<v Speaker 1>and you can only do that if they realize that

0:23:32.680 --> 0:23:36.480
<v Speaker 1>they've been targeted. You'll have a few other considerations at play.

0:23:36.520 --> 0:23:39.400
<v Speaker 1>For example, you probably don't want people to be able

0:23:39.440 --> 0:23:43.119
<v Speaker 1>to remove the malware easily before it can actually do

0:23:43.240 --> 0:23:46.720
<v Speaker 1>its work. Young and Young compared this to the face

0:23:46.800 --> 0:23:50.560
<v Speaker 1>hugger in the Alien franchise of films. Once the face

0:23:50.640 --> 0:23:54.479
<v Speaker 1>hugger latches onto a person, any attempts to remove it

0:23:54.600 --> 0:23:58.600
<v Speaker 1>from the victim cause injury to the victim. So a

0:23:58.640 --> 0:24:01.879
<v Speaker 1>malware designer will likely want to make it difficult or

0:24:01.920 --> 0:24:05.679
<v Speaker 1>impossible to remove the malware without causing harm to the

0:24:05.720 --> 0:24:10.360
<v Speaker 1>target machine. It reduces the incentive to just rip out

0:24:10.400 --> 0:24:13.720
<v Speaker 1>the malware, So you want your malware to be like

0:24:13.960 --> 0:24:17.399
<v Speaker 1>a barbed arrow. Removing the arrow has the potential to

0:24:17.480 --> 0:24:20.560
<v Speaker 1>cause even more damage than it creates, an opportunity to

0:24:20.560 --> 0:24:24.080
<v Speaker 1>convince people to pay up rather than risk their data

0:24:24.160 --> 0:24:27.320
<v Speaker 1>being out of reach forever. The question then arises, how

0:24:27.359 --> 0:24:29.840
<v Speaker 1>do you make sure the attack is one that isn't

0:24:29.920 --> 0:24:35.120
<v Speaker 1>easily reversible? How do you avoid the weakness of pops approach?

0:24:35.880 --> 0:24:39.879
<v Speaker 1>And their answer wasn't Another approach to cryptography, one that

0:24:40.080 --> 0:24:43.520
<v Speaker 1>had its history dating back several decades. This approach called

0:24:43.640 --> 0:24:48.840
<v Speaker 1>asymmetric key or public private key cryptography sidestep the major

0:24:48.920 --> 0:24:53.640
<v Speaker 1>vulnerabilities of the symmetric key approach. Now I'll describe what's

0:24:53.640 --> 0:24:57.080
<v Speaker 1>going on from a very high level, and just to

0:24:57.160 --> 0:24:59.760
<v Speaker 1>let you guys know, I'm not going to go into

0:24:59.800 --> 0:25:03.360
<v Speaker 1>a deep dive into detail because it's a very complicated

0:25:03.400 --> 0:25:07.000
<v Speaker 1>concept to unwrap and it merits its own episode. In fact,

0:25:07.119 --> 0:25:11.880
<v Speaker 1>I've actually done episodes about this. But with a symmetric key,

0:25:12.040 --> 0:25:15.480
<v Speaker 1>the two parties in communication are using exact copies of

0:25:15.520 --> 0:25:21.119
<v Speaker 1>the same encoding and decoding component. But with an asymmetric key,

0:25:21.200 --> 0:25:25.520
<v Speaker 1>you've got one key that encodes and a different key

0:25:25.560 --> 0:25:30.639
<v Speaker 1>that decodes, and that's it. Communication goes one way for

0:25:30.720 --> 0:25:34.159
<v Speaker 1>each set of keys. This allows for a public key

0:25:34.200 --> 0:25:38.240
<v Speaker 1>for encoding and a private key for decoding. So again

0:25:38.320 --> 0:25:41.600
<v Speaker 1>let's talk about examples. Let's say I want to send

0:25:41.760 --> 0:25:45.760
<v Speaker 1>you an encrypted message, and that way, anyone who intercepts

0:25:45.840 --> 0:25:48.359
<v Speaker 1>my communication to you would just see a garbled mess

0:25:48.359 --> 0:25:52.200
<v Speaker 1>of nonsense. Now you have your own private key and

0:25:52.280 --> 0:25:55.680
<v Speaker 1>there is a corresponding public key, and you have made

0:25:55.960 --> 0:25:59.640
<v Speaker 1>the public key truly public. Anyone in the world can

0:25:59.760 --> 0:26:03.960
<v Speaker 1>use it to send you encrypted messages. So I use

0:26:04.119 --> 0:26:07.520
<v Speaker 1>your public key to encode my message to you. Now

0:26:07.560 --> 0:26:10.520
<v Speaker 1>we've got an encrypted message, one that could only be

0:26:10.680 --> 0:26:13.879
<v Speaker 1>decoded by the private key. There's only one of those,

0:26:14.080 --> 0:26:17.040
<v Speaker 1>and it's in your possession, and that one you are

0:26:17.080 --> 0:26:20.479
<v Speaker 1>not sharing with nobody. Gosh darn it. So with a

0:26:20.520 --> 0:26:24.399
<v Speaker 1>public private key, everyone can send you encrypted messages. Only

0:26:24.520 --> 0:26:27.439
<v Speaker 1>you can decrypt them to see the original text. The

0:26:27.480 --> 0:26:30.640
<v Speaker 1>public key cannot be used for decoding. It can only

0:26:30.640 --> 0:26:34.080
<v Speaker 1>be used for encoding. But then, what if you wanted

0:26:34.160 --> 0:26:37.240
<v Speaker 1>to send a reply message to me, then you wanted

0:26:37.240 --> 0:26:39.880
<v Speaker 1>to encrypt it. Well, in that case, you would use

0:26:40.320 --> 0:26:43.840
<v Speaker 1>my public key, the one I have for anyone to

0:26:43.920 --> 0:26:47.960
<v Speaker 1>send me an encrypted message. You send your encoded message

0:26:48.000 --> 0:26:51.080
<v Speaker 1>to me, and then I use my private key to

0:26:51.200 --> 0:26:54.520
<v Speaker 1>decipher that message and read the contents. So we're using

0:26:54.560 --> 0:26:57.359
<v Speaker 1>two different sets of keys here, to public and to

0:26:57.560 --> 0:27:01.440
<v Speaker 1>private keys. Now why is this important for ransomware? Well,

0:27:01.600 --> 0:27:05.800
<v Speaker 1>asymmetric keys are harder to crack through cryptanalysis. You cannot

0:27:05.920 --> 0:27:10.040
<v Speaker 1>reverse engineer them nearly as effectively. They typically rely on

0:27:10.160 --> 0:27:17.080
<v Speaker 1>factoring really big numbers. So, for example, take two enormous

0:27:17.200 --> 0:27:19.600
<v Speaker 1>prime numbers, and a prime number is a number that

0:27:19.640 --> 0:27:23.640
<v Speaker 1>can only be divided by itself. So you multiply these

0:27:23.640 --> 0:27:27.160
<v Speaker 1>two huge prime numbers together, and thus you get an

0:27:27.240 --> 0:27:31.840
<v Speaker 1>even bigger number that is the the product of these

0:27:31.880 --> 0:27:35.280
<v Speaker 1>two being multiplied. This bigger number, you can think of

0:27:35.320 --> 0:27:38.160
<v Speaker 1>that as the public key. If you happen to know

0:27:38.480 --> 0:27:42.320
<v Speaker 1>the two factors that were used to create that bigger number,

0:27:42.680 --> 0:27:46.280
<v Speaker 1>then you can decode messages that use that public key.

0:27:46.320 --> 0:27:49.880
<v Speaker 1>That would technically be the private key. But by choosing

0:27:50.000 --> 0:27:55.880
<v Speaker 1>really really big prime numbers, you've created a difficult computational challenge.

0:27:56.480 --> 0:27:59.040
<v Speaker 1>A computer system would have to go through all the

0:27:59.240 --> 0:28:03.480
<v Speaker 1>factors of that big number and then dismiss any of

0:28:03.520 --> 0:28:06.960
<v Speaker 1>the factors that are not themselves prime numbers. So if

0:28:07.000 --> 0:28:09.480
<v Speaker 1>one of the factors where something like a four, you

0:28:09.480 --> 0:28:12.760
<v Speaker 1>would toss that one. That could not possibly be one

0:28:12.840 --> 0:28:15.000
<v Speaker 1>of the components you need because four it can be

0:28:15.040 --> 0:28:17.480
<v Speaker 1>divided by two, So four is not a prime number.

0:28:17.560 --> 0:28:19.360
<v Speaker 1>You get rid of it, You get rid of all

0:28:19.400 --> 0:28:22.400
<v Speaker 1>the non prime factors. Then you would have to find

0:28:22.440 --> 0:28:25.320
<v Speaker 1>the specific pair of really big prime numbers that were

0:28:25.359 --> 0:28:29.280
<v Speaker 1>used to create this private key. Now this isn't impossible,

0:28:29.720 --> 0:28:32.840
<v Speaker 1>but as you use larger prime numbers, it gets more

0:28:32.960 --> 0:28:37.800
<v Speaker 1>computationally complex and it requires more processing power and thus

0:28:37.840 --> 0:28:42.120
<v Speaker 1>more time to crack it. Time is a precious resource,

0:28:42.480 --> 0:28:45.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, you can think of time as money, so

0:28:45.480 --> 0:28:49.000
<v Speaker 1>you don't even need to make the encryption full proof.

0:28:49.360 --> 0:28:51.600
<v Speaker 1>You just need to make it good enough so that

0:28:51.880 --> 0:28:56.280
<v Speaker 1>is too expensive for anyone to bother trying to crack it. Anyway,

0:28:56.360 --> 0:29:00.080
<v Speaker 1>this type of cryptography is fascinating, and like all cryptog or,

0:29:00.200 --> 0:29:03.160
<v Speaker 1>he becomes a sort of seesaw approach as people find

0:29:03.200 --> 0:29:07.280
<v Speaker 1>new ways to decrypt things more effectively and efficiently. Young

0:29:07.400 --> 0:29:11.320
<v Speaker 1>and Young projected that future ransomware designers would make use

0:29:11.360 --> 0:29:14.760
<v Speaker 1>of asymmetric cryptography approaches to make it more difficult to

0:29:14.840 --> 0:29:18.400
<v Speaker 1>reverse the attack, and it would just be easier for

0:29:18.440 --> 0:29:21.520
<v Speaker 1>people to pay the hackers the ransoms. So in other words,

0:29:21.800 --> 0:29:25.560
<v Speaker 1>you might say, well, they're asking for ten thousand dollars,

0:29:25.600 --> 0:29:29.080
<v Speaker 1>but the value of my data is incredibly high, and

0:29:29.120 --> 0:29:32.320
<v Speaker 1>the price of reversing this attack could end up being

0:29:32.480 --> 0:29:35.720
<v Speaker 1>much more expensive than ten grand, so we'll just cough

0:29:35.800 --> 0:29:40.680
<v Speaker 1>up the money. Young and Young called this crypto viral extortion,

0:29:41.160 --> 0:29:44.600
<v Speaker 1>defining it as quote an active attack in which the

0:29:44.680 --> 0:29:48.920
<v Speaker 1>hybrid encrypts the victims files works if there are no backups.

0:29:49.200 --> 0:29:54.240
<v Speaker 1>Attacker demands ransom in return for the randomly generated symmetric key.

0:29:54.400 --> 0:29:59.400
<v Speaker 1>Cannot determine decryption key even when code is scrutinized end quote.

0:30:00.040 --> 0:30:04.320
<v Speaker 1>Young also describes some related scenarios that are equally troubling,

0:30:04.600 --> 0:30:08.440
<v Speaker 1>such as one in which malware infects a computer and

0:30:08.480 --> 0:30:12.720
<v Speaker 1>then uses cryptography to encode specific information on that computer

0:30:13.040 --> 0:30:17.400
<v Speaker 1>before broadcasting the information to the attacker, essentially sending secret

0:30:17.440 --> 0:30:21.240
<v Speaker 1>messages from the target machine. The attacker has created the

0:30:21.320 --> 0:30:25.040
<v Speaker 1>keys for encoding and decoding, and thus only the attacker

0:30:25.120 --> 0:30:28.880
<v Speaker 1>knows what information was even stolen. So even if someone

0:30:28.960 --> 0:30:31.960
<v Speaker 1>detects that a security breach has happened, they couldn't be

0:30:32.040 --> 0:30:35.959
<v Speaker 1>certain what information had been accessed. That's not great if

0:30:36.000 --> 0:30:40.760
<v Speaker 1>you're handling supersensitive information like financial information or medical records

0:30:40.840 --> 0:30:45.600
<v Speaker 1>or military communications, etcetera. But I digress. When we come back,

0:30:45.640 --> 0:30:48.960
<v Speaker 1>i'll dive into a little more detail in cryptoviral extortion

0:30:49.040 --> 0:30:51.560
<v Speaker 1>methods and we'll talk about a few cases where we've

0:30:51.600 --> 0:30:54.720
<v Speaker 1>seen it play out. But first let's take another quick break.

0:31:02.040 --> 0:31:06.160
<v Speaker 1>You'll pointed out that a crypto viral extortion methodology really

0:31:06.160 --> 0:31:10.040
<v Speaker 1>only works if a computer system lacks backups, and that's

0:31:10.040 --> 0:31:14.000
<v Speaker 1>because you could potentially wipe an effect infected machine clean.

0:31:14.240 --> 0:31:19.040
<v Speaker 1>Right you've got hit by ransomware, you could just completely

0:31:19.120 --> 0:31:22.520
<v Speaker 1>reformat that machine. You can even uninstall and reinstall the

0:31:22.600 --> 0:31:26.640
<v Speaker 1>operating system and all the necessary applications, and then restore

0:31:26.680 --> 0:31:29.760
<v Speaker 1>the data from your backup. It doesn't matter if the

0:31:29.800 --> 0:31:32.880
<v Speaker 1>attacker encrypted all the content on the computer, because you've

0:31:32.920 --> 0:31:36.160
<v Speaker 1>got an unaffected copy of that material. I think what

0:31:36.200 --> 0:31:38.560
<v Speaker 1>I'm trying to say here is that it's a good

0:31:38.560 --> 0:31:42.400
<v Speaker 1>idea to make regular backups of your data, preferably onto

0:31:42.440 --> 0:31:44.960
<v Speaker 1>a secondary storage device that you can keep in a

0:31:45.000 --> 0:31:48.600
<v Speaker 1>safe location. There are a lot of external hard drive

0:31:48.680 --> 0:31:52.080
<v Speaker 1>solutions out there, and many of them are not very expensive.

0:31:52.360 --> 0:31:55.000
<v Speaker 1>So if you work on sensitive stuff, or let's say

0:31:55.000 --> 0:31:56.959
<v Speaker 1>you've just got a lot of data that you're attached to,

0:31:57.120 --> 0:32:00.479
<v Speaker 1>like maybe a lot of sentimental photos and videos and stuff,

0:32:00.680 --> 0:32:04.440
<v Speaker 1>I recommend investing in a backup. It's an extra step,

0:32:04.520 --> 0:32:06.600
<v Speaker 1>and I get it that can be a hassle, but

0:32:06.680 --> 0:32:09.240
<v Speaker 1>it's better to have it and not need it than

0:32:09.440 --> 0:32:12.560
<v Speaker 1>need it and not have it. Uh. Cloud storage can

0:32:12.600 --> 0:32:15.719
<v Speaker 1>also be a solution, so that's also a potential, but

0:32:15.840 --> 0:32:19.240
<v Speaker 1>you should definitely have a backup now. Young also said

0:32:19.680 --> 0:32:23.560
<v Speaker 1>that an attacker could take a couple of different tactics

0:32:23.600 --> 0:32:27.000
<v Speaker 1>to make their approach more robust. And this gets pretty

0:32:27.000 --> 0:32:29.480
<v Speaker 1>technical too, so I'm not going to go into any

0:32:29.520 --> 0:32:32.800
<v Speaker 1>detail because to explain all of it would require another episode.

0:32:33.080 --> 0:32:36.480
<v Speaker 1>But the point is that Young and Young were anticipating

0:32:36.640 --> 0:32:39.400
<v Speaker 1>the attacks that would happen in the future, and they

0:32:39.440 --> 0:32:44.320
<v Speaker 1>published this paper that they wrote in It would take

0:32:44.360 --> 0:32:47.560
<v Speaker 1>about a decade before we started seeing ransomware attacks that

0:32:47.640 --> 0:32:50.800
<v Speaker 1>kind of aligned with the predictions, but they were on

0:32:50.840 --> 0:32:53.040
<v Speaker 1>the way. And by the way, I think this is

0:32:53.080 --> 0:32:56.320
<v Speaker 1>a good point for me to reaffirm my stance on

0:32:56.360 --> 0:32:59.480
<v Speaker 1>this kind of work. So from one perspective, you could

0:32:59.600 --> 0:33:04.280
<v Speaker 1>argue that this research accelerated the development of new approaches

0:33:04.320 --> 0:33:08.560
<v Speaker 1>to ransomware. In other words, that by publishing these findings,

0:33:08.720 --> 0:33:13.160
<v Speaker 1>Young and Young were enabling the next wave of attackers.

0:33:13.200 --> 0:33:16.920
<v Speaker 1>But on the other hand, figuring out potential vulnerabilities is

0:33:17.000 --> 0:33:21.640
<v Speaker 1>important if you want to prevent people from exploiting those vulnerabilities.

0:33:21.840 --> 0:33:24.320
<v Speaker 1>So the good guys have to look at how to

0:33:24.440 --> 0:33:29.040
<v Speaker 1>crack systems because that's what the bad guys are always doing.

0:33:29.160 --> 0:33:32.560
<v Speaker 1>If good guys were not doing it too, then only

0:33:32.600 --> 0:33:35.720
<v Speaker 1>the bad guys would be figuring out how to exploit systems,

0:33:35.760 --> 0:33:39.120
<v Speaker 1>and we would be caught unawares far more often, with

0:33:39.440 --> 0:33:43.040
<v Speaker 1>much more dire consequences as a result. Now, all that

0:33:43.080 --> 0:33:47.640
<v Speaker 1>being said, there is a tendency even within the white

0:33:47.640 --> 0:33:51.719
<v Speaker 1>hat community to communicate these discoveries in a way that

0:33:51.800 --> 0:33:55.280
<v Speaker 1>comes across as you know, smug or snarky, or sometimes

0:33:55.360 --> 0:33:59.840
<v Speaker 1>even cruel. That's more of a commentary about communication style

0:34:00.440 --> 0:34:05.000
<v Speaker 1>and the tendency to detach the significance of the consequences

0:34:05.000 --> 0:34:08.960
<v Speaker 1>of an action from the problems of just solving tough

0:34:09.040 --> 0:34:13.839
<v Speaker 1>computational challenges. But that's a soapbox for another episode. In

0:34:13.920 --> 0:34:16.919
<v Speaker 1>the mid two thousand's we started to see slightly more

0:34:17.000 --> 0:34:23.360
<v Speaker 1>sophisticated attempts at ransomware emerge. One ransomware was cry zip,

0:34:23.719 --> 0:34:27.640
<v Speaker 1>and the name suggests that it used ZIP file compression

0:34:27.640 --> 0:34:30.160
<v Speaker 1>technology as part of the attack. In fact, that's exactly

0:34:30.160 --> 0:34:33.880
<v Speaker 1>what it did. Essentially, if you were unlucky enough to

0:34:34.000 --> 0:34:37.840
<v Speaker 1>have fallen for the tactic and installed the program, cry

0:34:37.920 --> 0:34:41.160
<v Speaker 1>zip would crawl through your sea drive and select files

0:34:41.200 --> 0:34:45.000
<v Speaker 1>to put into a password protected ZIP folder, and then

0:34:45.040 --> 0:34:48.359
<v Speaker 1>it would delete all the original files. So rather than

0:34:48.440 --> 0:34:51.040
<v Speaker 1>a hard drive full of files, you would see a

0:34:51.080 --> 0:34:54.479
<v Speaker 1>folder with password protection on it, and the ransomware would

0:34:54.480 --> 0:34:57.640
<v Speaker 1>place a t x T or text file on the

0:34:57.760 --> 0:35:01.040
<v Speaker 1>drive that, if you opened, would of you instructions on

0:35:01.120 --> 0:35:04.600
<v Speaker 1>where you were to deposit money. In return, you would

0:35:04.640 --> 0:35:08.120
<v Speaker 1>get the password to access your files. The hacker who

0:35:08.160 --> 0:35:11.680
<v Speaker 1>designed this actually put the password within the d l

0:35:11.920 --> 0:35:17.040
<v Speaker 1>L file for the ransomware itself, unencrypted too. I guess

0:35:17.120 --> 0:35:19.240
<v Speaker 1>they just figured no one was going to go looking

0:35:19.280 --> 0:35:22.400
<v Speaker 1>for it. But it turns out if you include your

0:35:22.440 --> 0:35:27.440
<v Speaker 1>password with the protected stuff, it's not that protected. It's

0:35:27.520 --> 0:35:30.520
<v Speaker 1>kind of like writing the password for your computer on

0:35:30.600 --> 0:35:32.719
<v Speaker 1>a post it note and then putting the post it

0:35:32.760 --> 0:35:37.400
<v Speaker 1>note next to your computer. What's even the point. The

0:35:37.600 --> 0:35:41.920
<v Speaker 1>Archivaus ransomware, which was based off of Chrysip, was another

0:35:41.960 --> 0:35:45.319
<v Speaker 1>one that caused some mischief. In two thousand six, Mike

0:35:45.400 --> 0:35:50.160
<v Speaker 1>Chrysip analysts found the password for the ransomware embedded within

0:35:50.200 --> 0:35:53.680
<v Speaker 1>the code of the malware itself, and it was a

0:35:53.760 --> 0:35:57.680
<v Speaker 1>thirty digit pass code. I'm not gonna read it, because

0:35:57.719 --> 0:36:00.040
<v Speaker 1>who wants to hear a string of seemingly ran of

0:36:00.360 --> 0:36:03.640
<v Speaker 1>letters and numbers. The point is that if the code

0:36:03.680 --> 0:36:07.120
<v Speaker 1>had not contained the passwords, it would have been a

0:36:07.160 --> 0:36:10.040
<v Speaker 1>lot trickier to get around, But while some folks were

0:36:10.040 --> 0:36:12.799
<v Speaker 1>tricked into installing the malware, the solution ended up being

0:36:13.000 --> 0:36:15.719
<v Speaker 1>fairly straightforward in the end, so it didn't have as

0:36:15.880 --> 0:36:20.279
<v Speaker 1>massive an impact as it could have. By ransomware was

0:36:20.320 --> 0:36:23.360
<v Speaker 1>on the rise, in September of that year, hackers released

0:36:23.360 --> 0:36:27.719
<v Speaker 1>a particularly effective weapon called crypto Locker. Like the other

0:36:27.800 --> 0:36:31.400
<v Speaker 1>examples that I've mentioned, this malware, once it was installed,

0:36:31.560 --> 0:36:34.759
<v Speaker 1>would encrypted files on Windows machines and then show a

0:36:34.800 --> 0:36:38.799
<v Speaker 1>message demanding payment in exchange for the decryption key. One

0:36:38.840 --> 0:36:41.920
<v Speaker 1>new twist is that the hackers were demanding the ransom

0:36:41.960 --> 0:36:46.560
<v Speaker 1>be paid in bitcoins, the cryptocurrency that makes transactions difficult

0:36:46.600 --> 0:36:50.040
<v Speaker 1>to trace. If the hackers remained careful about how they

0:36:50.120 --> 0:36:53.600
<v Speaker 1>accessed their ill gotten gains, they could profit off their

0:36:53.640 --> 0:36:56.680
<v Speaker 1>crime without much fear of being tracked by the authorities.

0:36:57.080 --> 0:37:01.239
<v Speaker 1>The trojan horse attacks carrying crypto Lockers spread primarily through

0:37:01.400 --> 0:37:05.600
<v Speaker 1>email attachments. The code could not replicate itself. It couldn't

0:37:05.640 --> 0:37:08.680
<v Speaker 1>spread to other machines all on its own, so it

0:37:08.800 --> 0:37:12.280
<v Speaker 1>wasn't a virus or a worm like other malware. Instead,

0:37:12.400 --> 0:37:16.120
<v Speaker 1>the hackers created a boton net to spam out millions

0:37:16.120 --> 0:37:20.000
<v Speaker 1>of computers with emails carrying infected files. A boton net,

0:37:20.040 --> 0:37:23.160
<v Speaker 1>by the way, is a network of computers a k a.

0:37:23.320 --> 0:37:27.120
<v Speaker 1>Bots that ultimately are under the control of a hacker

0:37:27.320 --> 0:37:30.680
<v Speaker 1>or a group of hackers. There are other types of

0:37:30.719 --> 0:37:34.200
<v Speaker 1>malware that can give a hacker remote access to your computer.

0:37:34.800 --> 0:37:37.919
<v Speaker 1>Sometimes this is done just to snoop on communications, other

0:37:38.000 --> 0:37:41.520
<v Speaker 1>times to turn your computer into a resource for the hackers.

0:37:41.560 --> 0:37:43.920
<v Speaker 1>So in this case it was a resource. It was

0:37:43.960 --> 0:37:48.239
<v Speaker 1>meant to help distribute emails, and these emails had the

0:37:48.320 --> 0:37:52.000
<v Speaker 1>infected attachments. Uh. This also comes with the bonus of

0:37:52.080 --> 0:37:56.359
<v Speaker 1>creating some separation between the hacker and the emails. So,

0:37:56.640 --> 0:37:59.200
<v Speaker 1>in other words, if authorities were to trace back where

0:37:59.200 --> 0:38:01.640
<v Speaker 1>the email came from and they found out it came

0:38:01.680 --> 0:38:04.880
<v Speaker 1>from your computer, and your computer had been compromised by

0:38:04.880 --> 0:38:07.719
<v Speaker 1>this botan net, you could be on the hook at

0:38:07.760 --> 0:38:13.840
<v Speaker 1>least temporarily, while the hacker remains undetected. The cryptographic method

0:38:14.040 --> 0:38:17.799
<v Speaker 1>used by crypto locker was pretty sophisticated, and unlike the

0:38:17.840 --> 0:38:21.480
<v Speaker 1>earlier examples, the decryption key was not evident within the

0:38:21.520 --> 0:38:25.880
<v Speaker 1>code of the malware itself. Crypto Locker used asymmetric keys,

0:38:26.120 --> 0:38:29.080
<v Speaker 1>a public and a private one, and the hackers held

0:38:29.120 --> 0:38:32.400
<v Speaker 1>on to both of them. A task force called Operation

0:38:32.520 --> 0:38:36.440
<v Speaker 1>Tovar was able to discover the decryption keys another way,

0:38:36.600 --> 0:38:40.600
<v Speaker 1>because the task force targeted the bot net, not the

0:38:40.640 --> 0:38:44.799
<v Speaker 1>actual ransomware directly. Doing this gave the team access to

0:38:44.920 --> 0:38:47.719
<v Speaker 1>the decryption keys, but it took time, and in the

0:38:47.760 --> 0:38:50.520
<v Speaker 1>gap between when the malware first hit the Internet and

0:38:50.560 --> 0:38:53.759
<v Speaker 1>started to infect machines and when the task force had

0:38:53.760 --> 0:38:56.400
<v Speaker 1>found the decryption keys, a lot of people and companies

0:38:56.440 --> 0:38:58.920
<v Speaker 1>had given up and they had ponied up the cash

0:38:58.960 --> 0:39:03.480
<v Speaker 1>to get their data back. Since crypto Locker, numerous ransomware variants,

0:39:03.520 --> 0:39:07.680
<v Speaker 1>many of them descended from crypto Locker itself, have appeared

0:39:07.719 --> 0:39:10.600
<v Speaker 1>on the scene. The medical sector continues to be one

0:39:10.640 --> 0:39:13.520
<v Speaker 1>that gets hit hard by this type of malware, and

0:39:13.600 --> 0:39:17.520
<v Speaker 1>from a criminals perspective, you can understand why the information

0:39:17.560 --> 0:39:20.400
<v Speaker 1>on computers that are tied to the medical industry contain

0:39:20.560 --> 0:39:24.440
<v Speaker 1>critical information. A lot of that information is private. It

0:39:24.600 --> 0:39:28.280
<v Speaker 1>is protected by law, so for it to get revealed

0:39:28.280 --> 0:39:32.080
<v Speaker 1>would be a big legal problem as well. It's tied

0:39:32.080 --> 0:39:35.239
<v Speaker 1>to patients frequently, and there is an enormous sense of

0:39:35.400 --> 0:39:39.160
<v Speaker 1>urgency to regain access to that kind of information, and

0:39:39.239 --> 0:39:44.760
<v Speaker 1>many medical establishments, including hospitals, lacked the robust backup infrastructure

0:39:44.800 --> 0:39:47.960
<v Speaker 1>to recover in the event of a ransomware attack. And

0:39:48.000 --> 0:39:50.839
<v Speaker 1>that's not just me throwing shade at hospitals for not

0:39:51.000 --> 0:39:54.840
<v Speaker 1>having appropriate backups. This is actually a really tricky area

0:39:54.920 --> 0:39:58.520
<v Speaker 1>because you want that data to remain secure and private,

0:39:58.880 --> 0:40:03.240
<v Speaker 1>and making copies of data creates an opportunity for data breaches.

0:40:03.560 --> 0:40:08.439
<v Speaker 1>So it's a pretty delicate balance. Since crypto Locker, we've

0:40:08.480 --> 0:40:11.960
<v Speaker 1>seen a lot of other ransomware variants out in the wild. Locky,

0:40:12.200 --> 0:40:16.160
<v Speaker 1>similar to crypto Locker, targeted more than one sixty different

0:40:16.200 --> 0:40:20.000
<v Speaker 1>file types when infecting machines, particularly those file types that

0:40:20.040 --> 0:40:24.719
<v Speaker 1>are prevalent in areas like design and engineering. Wanna cry,

0:40:24.800 --> 0:40:28.640
<v Speaker 1>which made headlines in teen, took advantage of an exploit

0:40:28.719 --> 0:40:32.240
<v Speaker 1>in older Windows systems. Now, one juicy bit of information

0:40:32.239 --> 0:40:36.279
<v Speaker 1>about that mess was that the United States National Security

0:40:36.320 --> 0:40:41.000
<v Speaker 1>Agency a A the n s A had discovered this exploit,

0:40:41.480 --> 0:40:44.719
<v Speaker 1>but then they sat on it. They were quiet about it,

0:40:44.800 --> 0:40:48.319
<v Speaker 1>presumably so that the agency itself would be able to

0:40:48.360 --> 0:40:52.040
<v Speaker 1>take advantage of that exploit. Now, reporting the exploit would

0:40:52.040 --> 0:40:55.759
<v Speaker 1>have given Microsoft the chance to patch the problem, So

0:40:56.040 --> 0:40:58.040
<v Speaker 1>the NSA said nothing at all so that they could

0:40:58.040 --> 0:41:01.920
<v Speaker 1>take advantage of it. And then addictively, hackers got hold

0:41:01.960 --> 0:41:05.279
<v Speaker 1>of that information, and so they used the exploit themselves

0:41:05.480 --> 0:41:09.480
<v Speaker 1>to craft the Wanna cry ransomware, which, like crypto locker,

0:41:09.760 --> 0:41:13.760
<v Speaker 1>demanded payment in the form of bitcoin to return data.

0:41:13.840 --> 0:41:16.800
<v Speaker 1>And that gives me a chance not just to wag

0:41:16.920 --> 0:41:19.400
<v Speaker 1>my finger at the n S, a an organization that

0:41:19.480 --> 0:41:24.400
<v Speaker 1>has had an incredibly shady reputation, but also to explain

0:41:24.440 --> 0:41:28.080
<v Speaker 1>how this points out that a government mandated back door

0:41:28.280 --> 0:41:33.319
<v Speaker 1>into any system is always a bad idea. Governments love

0:41:33.360 --> 0:41:37.920
<v Speaker 1>the idea because monitoring digital communication is really hard, and

0:41:37.960 --> 0:41:41.640
<v Speaker 1>sometimes parties that are in opposition to that government, whether

0:41:41.960 --> 0:41:46.760
<v Speaker 1>foreign or domestic, will use digital communications, you know, plan stuff,

0:41:47.080 --> 0:41:49.480
<v Speaker 1>and so it would be useful to have a window

0:41:49.600 --> 0:41:52.120
<v Speaker 1>to peek through and see what's going on and prepare.

0:41:52.719 --> 0:41:56.640
<v Speaker 1>But even if you trust your government, a backdoor is

0:41:56.719 --> 0:42:00.680
<v Speaker 1>something that can potentially be exploited by any one if

0:42:00.680 --> 0:42:03.000
<v Speaker 1>they find out about it, which was kind of the

0:42:03.040 --> 0:42:06.759
<v Speaker 1>case with Wanna cry, although that was an exploit, not

0:42:06.960 --> 0:42:12.240
<v Speaker 1>an intentional back door. You do not improve national security

0:42:12.280 --> 0:42:17.680
<v Speaker 1>by making systems less secure anyway. Want to Cry could

0:42:17.719 --> 0:42:22.000
<v Speaker 1>have been an enormous problem. But fortunately Microsoft was able

0:42:22.040 --> 0:42:26.239
<v Speaker 1>to patch the exploit quickly and data security specialists discovered

0:42:26.280 --> 0:42:28.880
<v Speaker 1>a kill switch for the ransomware and we're able to

0:42:28.920 --> 0:42:31.520
<v Speaker 1>shut it down before I could really go into overdrive.

0:42:31.920 --> 0:42:35.040
<v Speaker 1>So we were lucky on that one. Other examples of

0:42:35.120 --> 0:42:41.400
<v Speaker 1>ransomware include malware names like bad Rabbit, Yoke, troll Dish,

0:42:41.560 --> 0:42:46.120
<v Speaker 1>Golden Eye, and ganned Crab. The details vary from case

0:42:46.160 --> 0:42:49.960
<v Speaker 1>to case, but the general approach is very similar. To

0:42:50.040 --> 0:42:52.919
<v Speaker 1>close this out, I want to stress a few good

0:42:52.920 --> 0:42:57.480
<v Speaker 1>ways to prevent yourself from becoming a victim of ransomware. First,

0:42:57.680 --> 0:43:01.520
<v Speaker 1>of course, is to be on alert for suspicious messages

0:43:01.600 --> 0:43:05.600
<v Speaker 1>and files and attachments. Don't open emails from sources you

0:43:05.680 --> 0:43:11.080
<v Speaker 1>don't know. Definitely don't open unfamiliar email attachments, and back

0:43:11.160 --> 0:43:14.480
<v Speaker 1>up your data. The best defense against ransomware is just

0:43:14.640 --> 0:43:17.200
<v Speaker 1>not to install the dang stuff in the first place.

0:43:17.400 --> 0:43:20.000
<v Speaker 1>But if you do get tricked, and we all get

0:43:20.040 --> 0:43:24.480
<v Speaker 1>tricked on occasion, having that backup is key. What you

0:43:24.840 --> 0:43:29.319
<v Speaker 1>absolutely do not want to do is pay the ransom.

0:43:29.360 --> 0:43:32.600
<v Speaker 1>Every time a ransom is paid, the message is sent

0:43:32.640 --> 0:43:36.960
<v Speaker 1>out that this tactic works. This is a way to

0:43:37.040 --> 0:43:40.440
<v Speaker 1>make money. So if we send that message, we shouldn't

0:43:40.480 --> 0:43:44.480
<v Speaker 1>be surprised when we see it happen again and again,

0:43:44.680 --> 0:43:47.520
<v Speaker 1>because other people will follow suit in an effort to

0:43:47.520 --> 0:43:51.840
<v Speaker 1>make some cash. And also keep in mind, there's no

0:43:51.960 --> 0:43:55.160
<v Speaker 1>guarantee that paying the ransom will actually get you the

0:43:55.200 --> 0:43:58.600
<v Speaker 1>decryption key. There might be cases where there is no

0:43:58.680 --> 0:44:02.080
<v Speaker 1>way to recover the day, but you don't necessarily know that,

0:44:02.239 --> 0:44:05.040
<v Speaker 1>and then you pay the ransom and you never get

0:44:05.080 --> 0:44:10.160
<v Speaker 1>a cure for your problem. So paying is a terrible idea.

0:44:10.400 --> 0:44:13.960
<v Speaker 1>Let's all just remember the lesson we learned from that

0:44:14.080 --> 0:44:18.640
<v Speaker 1>classic film War Games. The only winning move is not

0:44:18.840 --> 0:44:22.640
<v Speaker 1>to play, and that wraps up this look at what

0:44:22.840 --> 0:44:26.840
<v Speaker 1>ransomware is and its history. It is fascinating. It is

0:44:26.880 --> 0:44:30.160
<v Speaker 1>important to be very much on alert about it, especially

0:44:30.760 --> 0:44:34.520
<v Speaker 1>right now and again in our pandemic, we've seen an

0:44:34.640 --> 0:44:39.680
<v Speaker 1>uptick in malware attacks and spamming attacks because we have

0:44:39.800 --> 0:44:44.120
<v Speaker 1>people who are not in centralized locations anymore. They're working

0:44:44.160 --> 0:44:47.480
<v Speaker 1>from home. Their security at home maybe lower than it

0:44:47.560 --> 0:44:51.319
<v Speaker 1>is in say, an office environment. So it's even more

0:44:51.360 --> 0:44:54.120
<v Speaker 1>important that we each do our part and we pay

0:44:54.239 --> 0:44:57.839
<v Speaker 1>very close attention, and if we do get attacked, we

0:44:57.880 --> 0:45:00.839
<v Speaker 1>should not panic. We should really care fully consider all

0:45:00.840 --> 0:45:04.400
<v Speaker 1>of our options. Sometimes just the option of waiting. It

0:45:04.480 --> 0:45:09.439
<v Speaker 1>works because there are people in data security constantly trying

0:45:09.440 --> 0:45:13.680
<v Speaker 1>to build decryptor tools to reverse these kind of attacks.

0:45:14.160 --> 0:45:20.719
<v Speaker 1>So hold on and just be alert, keep calm, and

0:45:20.800 --> 0:45:23.920
<v Speaker 1>don't install ransomwhere I guess is what I'm saying. If

0:45:23.960 --> 0:45:26.600
<v Speaker 1>you guys have suggestions for topics for future episodes of

0:45:26.640 --> 0:45:29.400
<v Speaker 1>tech Stuff, reach out to me on Twitter. The handle

0:45:29.560 --> 0:45:32.799
<v Speaker 1>is text stuff h s W and I'll talk to

0:45:32.800 --> 0:45:41.560
<v Speaker 1>you again really soon. Text Stuff is an I Heart

0:45:41.640 --> 0:45:45.399
<v Speaker 1>Radio production. For more podcasts from my Heart Radio, visit

0:45:45.440 --> 0:45:48.480
<v Speaker 1>the i Heart Radio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you

0:45:48.560 --> 0:45:49.920
<v Speaker 1>listen to your favorite shows.