1 00:00:01,520 --> 00:00:04,720 Speaker 1: This is Bloomberg Wall Street Week. We turn our attention 2 00:00:04,880 --> 00:00:08,600 Speaker 1: to the markets this week us CPI members reinforcing concerns 3 00:00:08,600 --> 00:00:11,800 Speaker 1: about inflation. The financial stories that sheep are worth a 4 00:00:11,840 --> 00:00:14,760 Speaker 1: really different reaction to mark. Its more indications of just 5 00:00:14,960 --> 00:00:17,360 Speaker 1: how hot the U. S economy really is. Through the 6 00:00:17,400 --> 00:00:20,759 Speaker 1: eyes of the most influential voices. Larry Summers, the former 7 00:00:20,800 --> 00:00:23,840 Speaker 1: Treachery Secretary, Katherine Keating, CEO of d n Y mom 8 00:00:23,960 --> 00:00:27,240 Speaker 1: Sam's l Sharmon and founder of Equatic Group Investment in 9 00:00:27,320 --> 00:00:34,880 Speaker 1: Bloomberg Wall Street Week with David Weston from Bloomberg Radio. Inflation, Ukraine, Climate, China, 10 00:00:35,360 --> 00:00:38,480 Speaker 1: you name it and investors have faced it. In two. 11 00:00:38,760 --> 00:00:41,440 Speaker 1: This is a special year end version of Bloomberg Wall 12 00:00:41,440 --> 00:00:57,600 Speaker 1: Street Week. I'm David Weston. Whatever else you might say 13 00:00:57,600 --> 00:01:01,640 Speaker 1: about two, you cannot in that call it boring. We 14 00:01:01,760 --> 00:01:04,280 Speaker 1: began the year with the first major ground war in 15 00:01:04,319 --> 00:01:08,080 Speaker 1: Europe since World War Two. I would like to remind 16 00:01:08,120 --> 00:01:11,440 Speaker 1: you of the words that United Kingdom already heard. We 17 00:01:11,480 --> 00:01:14,240 Speaker 1: will not give up, We will not lose. We will 18 00:01:14,240 --> 00:01:17,520 Speaker 1: fight till the end at sea, in the air, we 19 00:01:17,560 --> 00:01:21,200 Speaker 1: will continue fighting for our land, whatever the cost. We 20 00:01:21,240 --> 00:01:24,360 Speaker 1: will fight in the forests, in the fields on the shores, 21 00:01:24,920 --> 00:01:28,679 Speaker 1: in the streets, and inflation rising rapidly to test the 22 00:01:28,720 --> 00:01:32,560 Speaker 1: resolve of central bankers all around the world. It's unconditional. 23 00:01:32,600 --> 00:01:35,440 Speaker 1: Our commitment is we really need to restore price stability, 24 00:01:35,480 --> 00:01:38,600 Speaker 1: get inflation back down to two because without that, we're 25 00:01:38,600 --> 00:01:41,240 Speaker 1: not going to be able to have a sustained period 26 00:01:41,440 --> 00:01:44,520 Speaker 1: of maximum employment. With even the Bank of Japan making 27 00:01:44,560 --> 00:01:47,840 Speaker 1: moves that some took as tightening hints, though Governor Coroda 28 00:01:48,000 --> 00:01:51,240 Speaker 1: denied it, the b o J intends to aim for 29 00:01:51,360 --> 00:01:55,760 Speaker 1: price stability by increasing the sustainability of this monetary easing. 30 00:01:56,200 --> 00:01:59,360 Speaker 1: It's not the beginning of an exit strategy. And we 31 00:01:59,400 --> 00:02:01,960 Speaker 1: are in the year dealing with the aftermath of a 32 00:02:02,000 --> 00:02:05,520 Speaker 1: crypto collapse triggered by one of the biggest financial scandals 33 00:02:05,520 --> 00:02:09,079 Speaker 1: of all time, as ft X is in bankruptcy, billions 34 00:02:09,080 --> 00:02:12,480 Speaker 1: of dollars have gone missing, and founder Samuel Bankman Freed 35 00:02:12,639 --> 00:02:17,600 Speaker 1: faces multiple fraud and conspiracy charges. Not sophisticated at all, 36 00:02:18,480 --> 00:02:21,639 Speaker 1: sophisticated perhaps in the way they were able to sort 37 00:02:21,639 --> 00:02:24,160 Speaker 1: of hide it from people, frankly right in front of 38 00:02:24,200 --> 00:02:27,280 Speaker 1: their eyes. Then there were the risks left over from 39 00:02:27,320 --> 00:02:31,040 Speaker 1: the year before, like climate change. We're not in a 40 00:02:31,040 --> 00:02:35,120 Speaker 1: good track right now. The world. It's not serious enough 41 00:02:35,160 --> 00:02:38,520 Speaker 1: about reducing our missions fast enough, and we've had to 42 00:02:38,560 --> 00:02:41,480 Speaker 1: deal with continuing effects of COVID as China pursued a 43 00:02:41,600 --> 00:02:46,040 Speaker 1: zero COVID policy that hurt its economy. What does euro 44 00:02:46,160 --> 00:02:51,160 Speaker 1: COVID policy mean for recession and inflation? And unfortunately it 45 00:02:51,200 --> 00:02:58,120 Speaker 1: means stagflation. Not surprisingly, the markets reacted to all this 46 00:02:58,320 --> 00:03:01,519 Speaker 1: risk with some trepidation, with the stock market moving into 47 00:03:01,600 --> 00:03:04,440 Speaker 1: bear territory. The SMP five at one point was off 48 00:03:04,480 --> 00:03:07,400 Speaker 1: some twenty percent for the year, The NAZAC down over, 49 00:03:08,680 --> 00:03:11,480 Speaker 1: while the yield on the tenure climbed from under two 50 00:03:11,480 --> 00:03:14,079 Speaker 1: percent at the start of the year to hover around 51 00:03:14,080 --> 00:03:17,280 Speaker 1: three point five percent by year's end. Through the ups 52 00:03:17,320 --> 00:03:19,640 Speaker 1: and downs of the year, Wall Street Week invited the 53 00:03:19,680 --> 00:03:22,880 Speaker 1: most experienced experts and investors to rise above the day 54 00:03:22,880 --> 00:03:25,080 Speaker 1: to day and week to week and give us a 55 00:03:25,120 --> 00:03:28,200 Speaker 1: broader perspective on where we are and where we're likely going. 56 00:03:29,280 --> 00:03:31,920 Speaker 1: We begin this year interview with the smart investor, and 57 00:03:31,919 --> 00:03:34,239 Speaker 1: that's the person we're trying to speak to and speak 58 00:03:34,320 --> 00:03:37,480 Speaker 1: with every week, starting with one of the most distinctive 59 00:03:37,480 --> 00:03:40,119 Speaker 1: and successful that there is, Sam's ll of Equity Group 60 00:03:40,240 --> 00:03:43,560 Speaker 1: Investments who told us what tighter money meant for deal flow, 61 00:03:43,760 --> 00:03:48,360 Speaker 1: at least for those with the cash. We're seeing more 62 00:03:48,440 --> 00:03:55,240 Speaker 1: deal flow. We're seeing more situations where companies are having 63 00:03:55,480 --> 00:04:01,320 Speaker 1: difficulty figuring out what to do. Uh. We're seeing situations 64 00:04:01,320 --> 00:04:07,440 Speaker 1: where nine months ago, financing a transaction of X y 65 00:04:07,560 --> 00:04:11,280 Speaker 1: Z size was nothing. You know, it was you know, 66 00:04:11,880 --> 00:04:17,200 Speaker 1: as you said, money was free. Uh, what's changed dramatically? 67 00:04:17,240 --> 00:04:21,039 Speaker 1: I mean, think about the impact of the doubling of 68 00:04:21,080 --> 00:04:24,840 Speaker 1: interest rates in eight weeks double you know, it's just 69 00:04:25,080 --> 00:04:29,200 Speaker 1: eight weeks earlier. Uh, interest rates were you know, two 70 00:04:29,240 --> 00:04:31,120 Speaker 1: and a half to three, and now they're five and 71 00:04:31,160 --> 00:04:35,840 Speaker 1: a half to six. That's an enormous uh change. And 72 00:04:36,040 --> 00:04:40,279 Speaker 1: and and it's gonna slow down everybody's activity. It's gonna 73 00:04:40,440 --> 00:04:45,720 Speaker 1: for sure, uh impact getting deals done. But in our 74 00:04:45,800 --> 00:04:51,400 Speaker 1: particular case, because frankly, I've I've oftentime told the world 75 00:04:51,440 --> 00:04:55,440 Speaker 1: that you know, when I'm liquid, the stock market can't 76 00:04:55,440 --> 00:04:58,320 Speaker 1: go down. It only goes down when I'm ire liquid. 77 00:04:59,160 --> 00:05:01,480 Speaker 1: And here I am sitting there with a level of 78 00:05:01,520 --> 00:05:06,400 Speaker 1: liquidity I've never experienced in my life. Because my focus 79 00:05:06,800 --> 00:05:09,000 Speaker 1: for the last three and a half years has been 80 00:05:09,600 --> 00:05:14,200 Speaker 1: nothing more important than liquidity. So you've got a significant 81 00:05:14,240 --> 00:05:16,239 Speaker 1: deal flow. If anything, it's bigger than it was before. 82 00:05:16,400 --> 00:05:18,680 Speaker 1: What about the quality of deals? Are they different from 83 00:05:18,680 --> 00:05:21,560 Speaker 1: what they were, for example, preach pandemic. I think they 84 00:05:21,600 --> 00:05:26,440 Speaker 1: are because I think they're a little more realistic. I 85 00:05:26,480 --> 00:05:33,000 Speaker 1: think in pre pandemic when money was free, Uh, they 86 00:05:33,040 --> 00:05:36,760 Speaker 1: were transaction. I mean, the whole spack market was. You know, 87 00:05:37,200 --> 00:05:41,320 Speaker 1: we did its back and chose not to take it 88 00:05:41,400 --> 00:05:44,400 Speaker 1: to the next level because when we did this back, 89 00:05:45,200 --> 00:05:49,120 Speaker 1: spac seemed like a very interesting way to in effect 90 00:05:49,240 --> 00:05:55,480 Speaker 1: monetize opportunity. Uh, it very quickly became a highly speculative 91 00:05:56,120 --> 00:06:02,120 Speaker 1: scenario dependent on preposterous valuation shans that ultimately led to 92 00:06:02,160 --> 00:06:05,800 Speaker 1: the crash of the whole spack market. Uh. You know, 93 00:06:06,680 --> 00:06:10,320 Speaker 1: the world has changed a lot since then, and and 94 00:06:10,400 --> 00:06:15,160 Speaker 1: the change is basically modifying what you can do. On 95 00:06:15,200 --> 00:06:20,280 Speaker 1: the other hand, is always demand for capital. Sam's el 96 00:06:20,360 --> 00:06:23,120 Speaker 1: sees an advantage to his liquidity as rates go up. 97 00:06:23,440 --> 00:06:26,680 Speaker 1: Steve Rattner's will It Advisors manages the personal and philanthropic 98 00:06:26,680 --> 00:06:29,320 Speaker 1: funds from Michael Bloomberg. He's the man who founded and 99 00:06:29,400 --> 00:06:32,400 Speaker 1: owns most of the shares in our parent company Steve 100 00:06:32,520 --> 00:06:35,080 Speaker 1: sees some of the same challenges and rising rates, but 101 00:06:35,200 --> 00:06:38,200 Speaker 1: also keeps an eye on the regulatory environment. With a 102 00:06:38,240 --> 00:06:41,800 Speaker 1: Biden administration committed to more regulation, even if it hasn't 103 00:06:41,839 --> 00:06:46,479 Speaker 1: quite gotten there yet, you may see more activity by 104 00:06:46,520 --> 00:06:49,400 Speaker 1: the regulators because they might feel like the clock is 105 00:06:49,440 --> 00:06:51,560 Speaker 1: running out on their tournament office or whatever, and they 106 00:06:51,600 --> 00:06:53,880 Speaker 1: might want to get stuff done. I've been a little 107 00:06:53,960 --> 00:06:57,479 Speaker 1: surprised in that I would expect a very robust regulatory 108 00:06:57,520 --> 00:07:00,200 Speaker 1: environment out of this administration. They have appointed people too, 109 00:07:00,240 --> 00:07:03,360 Speaker 1: many of the top regulatory positions who are very much 110 00:07:03,400 --> 00:07:05,840 Speaker 1: pro regulation, and you can see it's starting to happen 111 00:07:05,880 --> 00:07:08,360 Speaker 1: at the SEC in places like that. So I do 112 00:07:08,400 --> 00:07:10,320 Speaker 1: think you're going to see a lot of regulatory activity 113 00:07:10,320 --> 00:07:12,320 Speaker 1: over the next two years, regardless of what happens in 114 00:07:12,360 --> 00:07:14,720 Speaker 1: the election. One of the things that this administration said 115 00:07:14,720 --> 00:07:16,400 Speaker 1: they really want to go after, if I can put 116 00:07:16,440 --> 00:07:19,240 Speaker 1: it that way, private equity, using things like Clayton next 117 00:07:19,280 --> 00:07:21,840 Speaker 1: Section eight and intellecting directors, things like that. They think 118 00:07:21,840 --> 00:07:24,440 Speaker 1: that there's some and a trust things going on. There 119 00:07:24,760 --> 00:07:26,720 Speaker 1: is there a chilling effect on private equity right now 120 00:07:26,720 --> 00:07:29,640 Speaker 1: because they also have other things. There are headwinds for 121 00:07:29,720 --> 00:07:32,120 Speaker 1: them well The biggest headwind for private equity at the 122 00:07:32,160 --> 00:07:34,320 Speaker 1: moment is the fact that in an environment like this, 123 00:07:34,880 --> 00:07:37,160 Speaker 1: deals tend to slow down or even stop. And you 124 00:07:37,160 --> 00:07:38,680 Speaker 1: can see if you look at the overall M and 125 00:07:38,720 --> 00:07:41,000 Speaker 1: A volumes, how how much slower it is now than 126 00:07:41,040 --> 00:07:43,800 Speaker 1: it was because the sellers all want yesterday's prices, the 127 00:07:43,800 --> 00:07:46,480 Speaker 1: buyers want to pay today or tomorrow's prices. So you 128 00:07:46,560 --> 00:07:50,320 Speaker 1: have a disconnect there. Um. I think I think the 129 00:07:50,360 --> 00:07:53,119 Speaker 1: problem in in general with mergers over the last really 130 00:07:53,120 --> 00:07:55,800 Speaker 1: twenty years or more has been a pretty benign anti 131 00:07:55,840 --> 00:07:58,160 Speaker 1: trust environment. And when I was in when I was 132 00:07:58,200 --> 00:07:59,920 Speaker 1: in the M and A business, clients would come in 133 00:08:00,000 --> 00:08:01,680 Speaker 1: and immediately they want to talk about which of their 134 00:08:01,720 --> 00:08:05,040 Speaker 1: competitors they could buy, and that game I think in 135 00:08:05,120 --> 00:08:08,040 Speaker 1: this environment is starting to wear out, and that and 136 00:08:08,040 --> 00:08:10,040 Speaker 1: and so that relates a bit to private equity in 137 00:08:10,120 --> 00:08:12,760 Speaker 1: terms of their portfolio companies. But I don't think private 138 00:08:12,800 --> 00:08:17,040 Speaker 1: equity in and of itself is an anitrust problem. Steve 139 00:08:17,120 --> 00:08:21,320 Speaker 1: Rattner manages a very large and very diversified portfolio of investments, 140 00:08:21,400 --> 00:08:25,040 Speaker 1: but Jeff Blause, CEO of Related Companies, focuses specifically on 141 00:08:25,200 --> 00:08:27,840 Speaker 1: real estate, running one of the largest firms in the 142 00:08:27,920 --> 00:08:30,720 Speaker 1: United States. He came on Wall Street Week to explain 143 00:08:30,760 --> 00:08:33,920 Speaker 1: what is happening in commercial real estate in the aftermath 144 00:08:34,040 --> 00:08:38,120 Speaker 1: of the pandemic. What we have seen is a real 145 00:08:38,320 --> 00:08:44,760 Speaker 1: dispersion in values between older buildings and brand new buildings. UM. 146 00:08:44,800 --> 00:08:47,319 Speaker 1: And it's not just new, it's new with the right features, 147 00:08:47,360 --> 00:08:50,640 Speaker 1: the right amenities that tenants are looking for today. UM. 148 00:08:50,679 --> 00:08:54,880 Speaker 1: So we're seeing more and more corporations thinking about how 149 00:08:54,880 --> 00:08:57,360 Speaker 1: do they get people back to their office and thinking 150 00:08:57,360 --> 00:09:02,120 Speaker 1: about using the physical space as attraction to bring people back. 151 00:09:02,480 --> 00:09:04,960 Speaker 1: But truthfully, people don't want to go back to old 152 00:09:05,120 --> 00:09:08,200 Speaker 1: kind of quiet offices that are dark and have bad 153 00:09:08,200 --> 00:09:11,320 Speaker 1: air circulation and long weights and the elevators and no amenities. 154 00:09:11,880 --> 00:09:15,439 Speaker 1: So what corporations are doing is investing in their office 155 00:09:15,440 --> 00:09:19,240 Speaker 1: space not for occupancy, but for talent attraction and retention. 156 00:09:19,760 --> 00:09:22,840 Speaker 1: And I think that's where you're really seeing, uh, the 157 00:09:22,960 --> 00:09:25,720 Speaker 1: A buildings and the new buildings that are focused on this, 158 00:09:25,800 --> 00:09:27,640 Speaker 1: that have the right amenities, that have the right H, 159 00:09:27,760 --> 00:09:31,439 Speaker 1: B A C circulation, that have hospitality type services, that 160 00:09:31,520 --> 00:09:34,360 Speaker 1: have great air and light um and the right type 161 00:09:34,360 --> 00:09:37,400 Speaker 1: of build out. The build out in office space is 162 00:09:37,480 --> 00:09:40,520 Speaker 1: changing tremendously where we used to see kind of the 163 00:09:40,559 --> 00:09:43,440 Speaker 1: old mad Max version of a build out with you know, 164 00:09:43,600 --> 00:09:48,400 Speaker 1: private offices on the exterior wall and assistance offices or 165 00:09:48,520 --> 00:09:52,840 Speaker 1: cubes inside. That's really not the way office is built today. 166 00:09:53,160 --> 00:09:58,200 Speaker 1: We're seeing much more collaboration space, teeming space, meeting space, 167 00:09:58,640 --> 00:10:01,680 Speaker 1: food service tables around food where people are using for 168 00:10:01,760 --> 00:10:05,520 Speaker 1: gathering and working as opposed to private offices. So this 169 00:10:05,559 --> 00:10:09,160 Speaker 1: type of office of the future, UM, we think can 170 00:10:09,200 --> 00:10:12,160 Speaker 1: be successful and is successful. The data is there today, 171 00:10:12,720 --> 00:10:16,640 Speaker 1: UM for these new buildings. So we compared brand new 172 00:10:16,640 --> 00:10:20,640 Speaker 1: buildings across markets in the United States, UM, not just 173 00:10:20,760 --> 00:10:23,760 Speaker 1: here in New York, and you look at new modern 174 00:10:23,800 --> 00:10:26,600 Speaker 1: buildings with the right features, the right amenities, and the 175 00:10:26,679 --> 00:10:31,400 Speaker 1: demand for those buildings is tremendous. That was Jeff blau 176 00:10:31,520 --> 00:10:36,200 Speaker 1: CEO of Related Companies. Coming up, we'll take a look 177 00:10:36,240 --> 00:10:39,920 Speaker 1: at what three may have in store for Global Wall Street. 178 00:10:42,040 --> 00:10:44,760 Speaker 1: This is a special year end version of Wall Street 179 00:10:44,800 --> 00:10:49,560 Speaker 1: Week on Bloomberg from New York. Another up day on 180 00:10:49,600 --> 00:10:53,079 Speaker 1: Wall Street. In fact, records to London, UK businesses are 181 00:10:53,160 --> 00:10:56,199 Speaker 1: feeding the effects of part prices to home. The Hanks 182 00:10:56,240 --> 00:10:59,480 Speaker 1: sang down about one point three right now twenty four 183 00:10:59,600 --> 00:11:03,800 Speaker 1: seven Business and market news that expands your worldviewmail always 184 00:11:03,840 --> 00:11:06,079 Speaker 1: nice to see you, French Finance Minister. I'm much more 185 00:11:06,080 --> 00:11:09,280 Speaker 1: concerned about how things slow out of China. Bloomberg Radio, 186 00:11:09,480 --> 00:11:13,360 Speaker 1: the Bloomberg Business App, and Bloomberg Radio dot Com. Bloomberg 187 00:11:13,640 --> 00:11:20,880 Speaker 1: The world is listening. This is Bloomberg Wall Street Week 188 00:11:21,120 --> 00:11:25,079 Speaker 1: with David Weston from Bloomberg Radio. This is a special 189 00:11:25,200 --> 00:11:27,520 Speaker 1: year in the edition of Wall Street Week. I'm David Weston. 190 00:11:27,840 --> 00:11:30,440 Speaker 1: China has loomed large once again this year in the 191 00:11:30,480 --> 00:11:33,920 Speaker 1: thinking of investors as it is pursued a zero COVID policy, 192 00:11:34,000 --> 00:11:37,120 Speaker 1: triggering public resistance to the shutdowns that followed. It is 193 00:11:37,160 --> 00:11:40,680 Speaker 1: seen its growth slow, raising questions for the global economy, 194 00:11:41,000 --> 00:11:43,040 Speaker 1: and in the middle of it all, Presidents she sought 195 00:11:43,040 --> 00:11:46,680 Speaker 1: and god an historic third term at the twentieth Party Congress. 196 00:11:46,920 --> 00:11:49,520 Speaker 1: Debra Layer, vice chair of the Pulse and Institute and 197 00:11:49,559 --> 00:11:52,840 Speaker 1: CEO of Edelman Advisory, has been a pioneer in understanding 198 00:11:52,920 --> 00:11:56,319 Speaker 1: Chinese economic policy since her days in the Trade Representatives 199 00:11:56,360 --> 00:11:59,800 Speaker 1: Office negotiating China's accession to the w t O, and 200 00:12:00,040 --> 00:12:02,160 Speaker 1: she talked to Wall Street Week at the time of 201 00:12:02,200 --> 00:12:04,920 Speaker 1: the Party Congress about the significance of it for us all. 202 00:12:06,280 --> 00:12:08,880 Speaker 1: We are all focused on President g and what's going 203 00:12:08,960 --> 00:12:11,719 Speaker 1: on over in Beijing this week. Give us your sense 204 00:12:11,760 --> 00:12:13,319 Speaker 1: about what we're learning. It strikes me that one of 205 00:12:13,360 --> 00:12:16,800 Speaker 1: the biggest challenges he has is the economy and growing 206 00:12:16,800 --> 00:12:19,080 Speaker 1: the economy. And yet I'm not sure we're hearing much 207 00:12:19,120 --> 00:12:21,360 Speaker 1: about his economic policy. I hear a lot about politics, 208 00:12:21,440 --> 00:12:25,240 Speaker 1: a lot about security, that's right. I mean she Didn'ping 209 00:12:25,360 --> 00:12:28,120 Speaker 1: gave his all important work report at the beginning of 210 00:12:28,160 --> 00:12:31,640 Speaker 1: the planeum, and it gave up a few previews of 211 00:12:31,720 --> 00:12:33,719 Speaker 1: how he's going to start to look at the economy. 212 00:12:33,920 --> 00:12:37,839 Speaker 1: One of the things that he's emphasizing is common prosperity. 213 00:12:37,920 --> 00:12:42,040 Speaker 1: His slogan about how he brings greater equality. Uh. One 214 00:12:42,080 --> 00:12:45,880 Speaker 1: of the things that he's looking at is also how 215 00:12:45,920 --> 00:12:48,240 Speaker 1: the party can continue to play an important role in 216 00:12:48,240 --> 00:12:51,400 Speaker 1: the economy. And also he did give reassurance to foreign 217 00:12:51,840 --> 00:12:54,680 Speaker 1: companies that they will continue to push for market opening 218 00:12:54,679 --> 00:12:58,559 Speaker 1: in key areas. So will we get a sense from 219 00:12:58,600 --> 00:13:01,040 Speaker 1: the personnel that sur ound him of where it might 220 00:13:01,040 --> 00:13:03,880 Speaker 1: be headed, Because as I understand it, eventually we will 221 00:13:03,880 --> 00:13:06,640 Speaker 1: see him come out from behind the curtain. And we 222 00:13:06,720 --> 00:13:09,560 Speaker 1: assume everybody assumes that he will get his third term, 223 00:13:09,600 --> 00:13:11,880 Speaker 1: but there's gonna be a critical question of who's with 224 00:13:11,960 --> 00:13:15,520 Speaker 1: him and he comes out absolutely the important thing. And 225 00:13:15,559 --> 00:13:18,200 Speaker 1: we're all watching for this weekend when the new party 226 00:13:18,280 --> 00:13:20,679 Speaker 1: lineup is going to be announced. There's a lot of 227 00:13:20,840 --> 00:13:24,040 Speaker 1: rumors starting to fly around, although not as many as 228 00:13:24,040 --> 00:13:27,800 Speaker 1: there usually are, But it's a big guessing game because 229 00:13:27,840 --> 00:13:30,560 Speaker 1: that will give us really our first clue into what 230 00:13:30,880 --> 00:13:32,920 Speaker 1: the third term is going to look like. And I 231 00:13:32,960 --> 00:13:35,920 Speaker 1: think there are three important things to watch. One is 232 00:13:36,000 --> 00:13:38,960 Speaker 1: going to be what happens to Lee Ka Chung, the 233 00:13:39,040 --> 00:13:43,239 Speaker 1: current premiere. Does he continue to stay on the Standing Committee. 234 00:13:43,640 --> 00:13:46,000 Speaker 1: He's termed out of staying on as the premiere, but 235 00:13:46,040 --> 00:13:48,200 Speaker 1: could they make him the number two and head of 236 00:13:48,200 --> 00:13:52,000 Speaker 1: the National People's Congress to who will be in the 237 00:13:52,040 --> 00:13:56,880 Speaker 1: lineup to then take the premiere position, And the two 238 00:13:57,040 --> 00:14:00,440 Speaker 1: leading candidates appear to be Wang Yang, who's viewed as 239 00:14:00,480 --> 00:14:04,920 Speaker 1: being more open on the economic issues, and Wang Hunning, 240 00:14:05,040 --> 00:14:08,360 Speaker 1: who really isn't ideologue. And the third to watch is 241 00:14:08,400 --> 00:14:11,520 Speaker 1: what happens to Leoja, who is currently the Vice Premier, 242 00:14:11,800 --> 00:14:15,040 Speaker 1: who's in charge of the economy and finance. Does he 243 00:14:15,160 --> 00:14:20,200 Speaker 1: stay He has good relations with many foreign firms or 244 00:14:20,640 --> 00:14:24,120 Speaker 1: who really comes in to take his portfolio. They were 245 00:14:24,160 --> 00:14:25,840 Speaker 1: one of the things that we watch in the West, 246 00:14:25,880 --> 00:14:27,600 Speaker 1: and we may be right or wrong, and watching it 247 00:14:27,680 --> 00:14:29,760 Speaker 1: is the extent to which the markets in some way 248 00:14:29,840 --> 00:14:33,200 Speaker 1: play a substantial role in economic policy over there. It 249 00:14:33,240 --> 00:14:36,720 Speaker 1: strikes me that it's possible to interpret presidency thus far 250 00:14:36,880 --> 00:14:38,800 Speaker 1: is moving somewhat away from the markets. A lot of 251 00:14:38,840 --> 00:14:41,960 Speaker 1: what do you emphasis right now is ideology, and I 252 00:14:42,000 --> 00:14:44,480 Speaker 1: think it's what he came out of more than perhaps 253 00:14:44,520 --> 00:14:47,720 Speaker 1: we've seen in the past. Absolutely, we're seeing much more 254 00:14:47,800 --> 00:14:52,240 Speaker 1: emphasis on ideology um under Shi Jimping, and if we 255 00:14:52,360 --> 00:14:55,560 Speaker 1: look back under John Zamin, Jack Zaman was saying the 256 00:14:55,680 --> 00:15:00,080 Speaker 1: party is big enough to include business. She takes it 257 00:15:00,160 --> 00:15:03,360 Speaker 1: in a different way. He says the party is all 258 00:15:03,480 --> 00:15:07,800 Speaker 1: encompassing and it should be forced into business, and so 259 00:15:08,120 --> 00:15:11,320 Speaker 1: ideology is playing a much bigger role. Also, we need 260 00:15:11,400 --> 00:15:14,800 Speaker 1: to keep an eye on how she's favorite slogan, common 261 00:15:14,880 --> 00:15:19,440 Speaker 1: prosperity is going to be implemented. China surprisingly is actually 262 00:15:19,680 --> 00:15:23,760 Speaker 1: much more unequal than the United States, and one of 263 00:15:23,840 --> 00:15:25,800 Speaker 1: the things that he's trying to do through this common 264 00:15:25,880 --> 00:15:29,720 Speaker 1: prosperity UH slogan is saying there should be a cap 265 00:15:29,800 --> 00:15:33,840 Speaker 1: on executive salaries. We should be looking at big companies, 266 00:15:33,920 --> 00:15:37,560 Speaker 1: particularly the private sector, giving back to the community, and 267 00:15:38,640 --> 00:15:41,000 Speaker 1: how that's going to be implemented at the same time 268 00:15:41,080 --> 00:15:43,240 Speaker 1: when he's trying to grow the economy, when he's trying 269 00:15:43,240 --> 00:15:46,520 Speaker 1: to encourage entrepreneurship and create jobs. Is going to be 270 00:15:46,600 --> 00:15:49,240 Speaker 1: a very tough thing for him to balance. Well, I 271 00:15:49,320 --> 00:15:51,880 Speaker 1: was going to ask exactly about that debora, because through history, 272 00:15:52,000 --> 00:15:53,800 Speaker 1: a lot of people have said we should have a 273 00:15:53,960 --> 00:15:57,520 Speaker 1: more equality, less inequality, whether it's income or wealth, but 274 00:15:57,680 --> 00:16:00,080 Speaker 1: a lot of attempts to get that done. Actually you 275 00:16:00,200 --> 00:16:03,200 Speaker 1: get in the way of growth overall. Absolutely. I mean 276 00:16:03,280 --> 00:16:07,040 Speaker 1: in China, and we've talked about this before, the overwhelming 277 00:16:07,200 --> 00:16:10,680 Speaker 1: majority of Chinese companies or small and medium sized enterprises, 278 00:16:10,760 --> 00:16:14,320 Speaker 1: it's up into the nineties, they are responsible for about 279 00:16:14,360 --> 00:16:18,840 Speaker 1: six of China's growth and about six of john creation. 280 00:16:19,280 --> 00:16:21,560 Speaker 1: And so if you can't create the right atmosphere for 281 00:16:21,680 --> 00:16:24,760 Speaker 1: them to grow, you're going to have a significant impact 282 00:16:24,840 --> 00:16:27,800 Speaker 1: on China's ability. And right now she's facing a lot 283 00:16:27,920 --> 00:16:30,560 Speaker 1: of headwinds when it comes to the economy. He's got 284 00:16:30,680 --> 00:16:33,040 Speaker 1: issues still to deal with with the real estate market. 285 00:16:33,080 --> 00:16:35,840 Speaker 1: It's one of the only places that Chinese people can invest, 286 00:16:36,400 --> 00:16:39,120 Speaker 1: and obviously housing prices are going down at the moment, 287 00:16:39,800 --> 00:16:42,760 Speaker 1: the world is facing a global recession, and she is 288 00:16:42,800 --> 00:16:47,560 Speaker 1: still very dependent on exports to grow the economy. He 289 00:16:47,720 --> 00:16:52,240 Speaker 1: needs to find a way to unlock consumer spending, and 290 00:16:52,360 --> 00:16:55,120 Speaker 1: that's very hard to do when you don't have confidence 291 00:16:55,240 --> 00:16:57,880 Speaker 1: in the path of the economy, and particularly when you 292 00:16:57,920 --> 00:17:00,680 Speaker 1: don't have the kind of social safety nets in place, 293 00:17:00,800 --> 00:17:04,480 Speaker 1: particularly around health, that make people feel comfortable enough and 294 00:17:04,560 --> 00:17:07,080 Speaker 1: have confidence to spend their money. If you put in 295 00:17:07,160 --> 00:17:10,560 Speaker 1: a longer course of Chinese history, because you've been really 296 00:17:10,880 --> 00:17:12,719 Speaker 1: very active in China for a good long time. Now, 297 00:17:13,200 --> 00:17:15,280 Speaker 1: are we seeing something of a turn back toward male 298 00:17:15,359 --> 00:17:19,840 Speaker 1: and away from Duncho Ping. Well, certainly we're seeing a 299 00:17:19,960 --> 00:17:23,320 Speaker 1: difference in the way that she is governing the economy. 300 00:17:23,440 --> 00:17:26,600 Speaker 1: You know, the Chinese Communist Party has about ninety three 301 00:17:26,680 --> 00:17:30,240 Speaker 1: million members, and to put that in context, that's ten 302 00:17:30,359 --> 00:17:34,320 Speaker 1: million more people than the whole population of Germany. And 303 00:17:34,440 --> 00:17:36,800 Speaker 1: he'd used this as the way to govern the economy, 304 00:17:37,200 --> 00:17:41,320 Speaker 1: and so therefore the party is involved in every aspect. 305 00:17:42,320 --> 00:17:45,520 Speaker 1: As we look at this new leadership coming in, watching 306 00:17:45,720 --> 00:17:48,720 Speaker 1: the ideology versus the technocrats is going to be really 307 00:17:48,760 --> 00:17:51,880 Speaker 1: important and give us a sense of what the government 308 00:17:52,119 --> 00:17:55,560 Speaker 1: appointees which will take place next March, will look like 309 00:17:56,040 --> 00:17:59,160 Speaker 1: and how they're going to approach the economy. Is there 310 00:17:59,200 --> 00:18:01,800 Speaker 1: going to be this this on a more socialist economy 311 00:18:02,320 --> 00:18:04,240 Speaker 1: or are they going to be more emphasis in what 312 00:18:04,359 --> 00:18:08,040 Speaker 1: they call the socialist market economy. The fact that they 313 00:18:08,080 --> 00:18:11,600 Speaker 1: didn't put out the GDP numbers on time, I think 314 00:18:11,720 --> 00:18:16,480 Speaker 1: is very disconcerting. For the world's second largest economy to 315 00:18:16,640 --> 00:18:22,560 Speaker 1: place politics over just the standard transparency and publication of 316 00:18:22,720 --> 00:18:28,240 Speaker 1: data is not an encouraging sign. Debra, looking into your 317 00:18:28,280 --> 00:18:30,119 Speaker 1: crystal ball there, what do you think this might mean 318 00:18:30,200 --> 00:18:32,399 Speaker 1: for US China relations? I mean, it strikes me at 319 00:18:32,480 --> 00:18:34,719 Speaker 1: least that going back five or ten years, a lot 320 00:18:34,800 --> 00:18:37,680 Speaker 1: of it was about economics, it was about trade, things 321 00:18:37,720 --> 00:18:41,200 Speaker 1: like that, increasingly from Beijing but also from Washington. When 322 00:18:41,240 --> 00:18:44,080 Speaker 1: they talk about one another, it's about geopolitics, it's about Taiwan, 323 00:18:44,160 --> 00:18:47,399 Speaker 1: it's about Russia, it's about security in the Asia area. 324 00:18:48,640 --> 00:18:52,639 Speaker 1: We national security definitely dominates the headlines, and there are 325 00:18:52,760 --> 00:18:55,639 Speaker 1: some very serious issues that we're dealing with. I was 326 00:18:55,760 --> 00:18:57,840 Speaker 1: just in the UK and they were telling me Taiwan 327 00:18:57,920 --> 00:19:00,080 Speaker 1: didn't even used to really be on their agen to 328 00:19:00,240 --> 00:19:03,919 Speaker 1: and now they're spending about se at their time. These 329 00:19:03,960 --> 00:19:07,000 Speaker 1: are the China experts focused on this, So those are 330 00:19:07,080 --> 00:19:10,920 Speaker 1: absolutely definite important issues to watch. But I think the 331 00:19:11,040 --> 00:19:13,159 Speaker 1: real story here is going to be what happens with 332 00:19:13,240 --> 00:19:17,800 Speaker 1: the economic and trade relationship. Traditionally it's been the foundation 333 00:19:17,920 --> 00:19:21,240 Speaker 1: of the relationship and it's created the people, the people 334 00:19:21,359 --> 00:19:25,880 Speaker 1: ties and built some levels of trust. Without these exchanges, 335 00:19:26,520 --> 00:19:30,200 Speaker 1: with the Western companies reconsidering both because of the politics, 336 00:19:30,320 --> 00:19:32,760 Speaker 1: but also because of the state of the Chinese economy 337 00:19:32,800 --> 00:19:36,160 Speaker 1: and the complications that have come with dealing with COVID zero, 338 00:19:36,600 --> 00:19:40,720 Speaker 1: they're reconsidering their strategies and not having that level of 339 00:19:40,800 --> 00:19:43,280 Speaker 1: trust I think really is going to have an impact 340 00:19:43,600 --> 00:19:45,639 Speaker 1: and ensure that they're going to continue to be fraught 341 00:19:45,640 --> 00:19:49,800 Speaker 1: relations between the United States and China. That was Debora 342 00:19:49,840 --> 00:19:53,080 Speaker 1: Lair of the Pulse and Institute and Edelman Global Advisory. 343 00:19:55,000 --> 00:19:57,359 Speaker 1: Coming up, we turned to the subject of inflation and 344 00:19:57,440 --> 00:19:59,960 Speaker 1: our special contribute to Law Street Week Larry Summers of 345 00:20:00,040 --> 00:20:03,280 Speaker 1: Harvard who got it early and got it right. That's 346 00:20:03,359 --> 00:20:08,480 Speaker 1: next on Wall Street Week on Bloomberg. This is Bloomberg 347 00:20:08,520 --> 00:20:12,879 Speaker 1: Wall Street Week with David Weston from Bloomberg Radio. This 348 00:20:13,040 --> 00:20:15,640 Speaker 1: is our year end edition of Wall Street Week. I'm 349 00:20:15,720 --> 00:20:18,960 Speaker 1: David Weston, special contributor to Larry Summers of Harvard. Has 350 00:20:19,000 --> 00:20:21,800 Speaker 1: been our Wall Street Week mused throughout the year on 351 00:20:21,920 --> 00:20:24,920 Speaker 1: a range of subjects, but just as two will go 352 00:20:25,000 --> 00:20:28,200 Speaker 1: down as the year inflation came to stay, Larry will 353 00:20:28,200 --> 00:20:30,680 Speaker 1: be remembered as one of the leading economists who saw 354 00:20:30,760 --> 00:20:33,560 Speaker 1: it early and kept insisting something needed to be done. 355 00:20:33,960 --> 00:20:36,160 Speaker 1: Here's Larry in Wall Street Week way back in February. 356 00:20:38,119 --> 00:20:42,360 Speaker 1: I don't understand why people keep being so surprised when 357 00:20:42,440 --> 00:20:49,040 Speaker 1: there's evidence that inflation is entrenched. This confirms, Uh, just 358 00:20:49,280 --> 00:20:53,200 Speaker 1: how far behind the curve the FED has gotten. And 359 00:20:53,440 --> 00:20:56,680 Speaker 1: this along with the fact that it now looks like 360 00:20:56,840 --> 00:21:01,040 Speaker 1: build back batter is in trouble. UH couldn't firms what 361 00:21:01,240 --> 00:21:05,399 Speaker 1: a serious error the excessive stimulus of last March was. 362 00:21:05,960 --> 00:21:08,600 Speaker 1: Here's what I think the FED should do. I think 363 00:21:08,640 --> 00:21:14,280 Speaker 1: the FED should have a special meeting right now to 364 00:21:14,680 --> 00:21:21,720 Speaker 1: end quee. It is nothing short of preposterous that in 365 00:21:21,760 --> 00:21:26,560 Speaker 1: an economy was seven and a half percent inflation in 366 00:21:26,640 --> 00:21:30,800 Speaker 1: an economy with the tightest labor markets we've seen in 367 00:21:31,320 --> 00:21:36,520 Speaker 1: more than two generations that the Central Bank is still 368 00:21:36,840 --> 00:21:41,360 Speaker 1: as we speak, growing its bound sheet, and I think 369 00:21:41,440 --> 00:21:47,000 Speaker 1: the FED could show that at last it really gets 370 00:21:47,080 --> 00:21:52,720 Speaker 1: it by having a special meeting for the purpose of 371 00:21:53,440 --> 00:21:59,120 Speaker 1: simply ending quee. And by May we started to see 372 00:21:59,160 --> 00:22:02,000 Speaker 1: the results. The FED moved towards a series of seventy 373 00:22:02,240 --> 00:22:05,080 Speaker 1: basis point rate hikes, and we asked Laurie whether that 374 00:22:05,280 --> 00:22:09,280 Speaker 1: was enough. Do you think that they really have made 375 00:22:09,359 --> 00:22:13,120 Speaker 1: a turn towards really regaining their credibility when it comes 376 00:22:13,160 --> 00:22:17,080 Speaker 1: to inflation. This is certainly the most dramatic action UH 377 00:22:17,640 --> 00:22:22,080 Speaker 1: they've taken, UH, both the fact of a basis point 378 00:22:22,240 --> 00:22:25,800 Speaker 1: move and what was clearly a calling of an audible 379 00:22:26,640 --> 00:22:31,520 Speaker 1: just before the play at at the meeting, and I 380 00:22:31,640 --> 00:22:37,040 Speaker 1: think that was welcome and appropriate. I still think that 381 00:22:37,320 --> 00:22:43,960 Speaker 1: the Fed and most market participants are underestimating the gravity 382 00:22:44,359 --> 00:22:49,600 Speaker 1: of our situation. UH. The FED moved its forecast by 383 00:22:49,720 --> 00:22:55,320 Speaker 1: an epic amount, both up on inflation and down on 384 00:22:56,320 --> 00:23:00,399 Speaker 1: the economy. But their current view that they're going to 385 00:23:00,480 --> 00:23:04,520 Speaker 1: get to two and a half percent UH inflation or 386 00:23:04,720 --> 00:23:11,719 Speaker 1: below with unemployment just above four strikes me as an 387 00:23:12,200 --> 00:23:19,480 Speaker 1: optimistic tail outcome, not a central tendency in a forecast. 388 00:23:20,200 --> 00:23:25,400 Speaker 1: I think a better judgment is that there's no reduction 389 00:23:25,680 --> 00:23:33,879 Speaker 1: to UH normality without a significant increase in unemployment of 390 00:23:34,160 --> 00:23:39,800 Speaker 1: perhaps two percentage points or more at some point UH 391 00:23:40,320 --> 00:23:44,640 Speaker 1: down the road. And when Chair Pale suggested in July 392 00:23:45,000 --> 00:23:47,720 Speaker 1: that maybe the Fed was already at the neutral rate, 393 00:23:48,200 --> 00:23:53,080 Speaker 1: Larry did not mince words. I think J. Powell said 394 00:23:53,119 --> 00:23:59,240 Speaker 1: things that, to be blunts, were analytically indefensible. He claimed 395 00:23:59,320 --> 00:24:03,280 Speaker 1: twice in his press conference that the Fed was now 396 00:24:03,520 --> 00:24:08,280 Speaker 1: at the neutral UH interest rate, calling it two and 397 00:24:08,359 --> 00:24:12,600 Speaker 1: a half. It's elementary that the level of the neutral 398 00:24:12,680 --> 00:24:17,000 Speaker 1: interest rate depends upon the inflation rate. We've got on 399 00:24:17,560 --> 00:24:21,119 Speaker 1: the most quoted measure, a nine point one percent inflation 400 00:24:21,280 --> 00:24:25,760 Speaker 1: measure he extrapolated off core or something it's four or 401 00:24:25,840 --> 00:24:33,040 Speaker 1: five percent inflation. There is no conceivable way that a 402 00:24:33,160 --> 00:24:36,840 Speaker 1: two and a half percent interest rate in an economy 403 00:24:36,960 --> 00:24:42,359 Speaker 1: inflating like this is anywhere near neutral. And if you 404 00:24:42,480 --> 00:24:47,119 Speaker 1: think it is neutral, you are misjudging the posture of 405 00:24:47,280 --> 00:24:52,000 Speaker 1: policy in a fundamental way. So I was very sorry, 406 00:24:52,760 --> 00:24:57,760 Speaker 1: UH to hear him UH say that, and frankly surprised. 407 00:24:58,160 --> 00:25:02,320 Speaker 1: He said back in that the neutral interest rate that 408 00:25:02,760 --> 00:25:05,680 Speaker 1: the Fed was approaching the neutral interest rate at a 409 00:25:05,840 --> 00:25:09,639 Speaker 1: time when the inflation rate was one point nine percent. 410 00:25:10,200 --> 00:25:14,560 Speaker 1: How he could be saying the same thing today when 411 00:25:15,080 --> 00:25:22,879 Speaker 1: the inflation rate is where it is is inexplicable. But 412 00:25:23,040 --> 00:25:25,639 Speaker 1: by year's end, with a series of rate hikes behind 413 00:25:25,720 --> 00:25:27,840 Speaker 1: the Fed and the promise of more yet to come, 414 00:25:28,359 --> 00:25:31,240 Speaker 1: Larry said that they were moving in the right direction. 415 00:25:32,920 --> 00:25:37,080 Speaker 1: The Chairman is in about the right place. He's recognizing 416 00:25:37,200 --> 00:25:43,000 Speaker 1: that we can't forecast the economy with precision. He's recognizing 417 00:25:43,200 --> 00:25:47,120 Speaker 1: that it would be a terrible error if we were 418 00:25:47,280 --> 00:25:53,760 Speaker 1: to fail to stop inflation. In this episode, he's rejecting 419 00:25:54,280 --> 00:25:58,800 Speaker 1: the talk about this being a moment to change the 420 00:26:00,000 --> 00:26:08,440 Speaker 1: placition target, and he's maintaining substantial flexibility with respect to 421 00:26:08,520 --> 00:26:12,880 Speaker 1: the future. I think that is broadly, UH, the right 422 00:26:13,000 --> 00:26:16,520 Speaker 1: place for him to be. UH. But I think we've 423 00:26:16,560 --> 00:26:22,000 Speaker 1: got a very difficult challenge ahead of us, because I 424 00:26:22,080 --> 00:26:26,000 Speaker 1: think the old adage about things taking longer to happen 425 00:26:26,040 --> 00:26:29,080 Speaker 1: than you think they will, and then they happen faster 426 00:26:29,240 --> 00:26:34,000 Speaker 1: than you thought they could is really operating. With respect 427 00:26:34,160 --> 00:26:39,400 Speaker 1: to the forecasted UH recession. It does look like it's 428 00:26:39,600 --> 00:26:43,640 Speaker 1: pushed back a bit in time, but there are reasons 429 00:26:43,760 --> 00:26:46,520 Speaker 1: to think and this is what makes the chairman's job 430 00:26:46,680 --> 00:26:49,560 Speaker 1: so hard. That the economy could have a kind of 431 00:26:49,680 --> 00:26:55,880 Speaker 1: widely coyote UH moment, that recession induced slow earnings could 432 00:26:55,920 --> 00:27:01,119 Speaker 1: pop into focus for stock market investors, with verse consequences 433 00:27:01,200 --> 00:27:05,560 Speaker 1: for the market, that consumers could deplete their hoard of 434 00:27:05,720 --> 00:27:11,520 Speaker 1: post COVID savings. As outspoken as Larry Summers was on 435 00:27:11,600 --> 00:27:14,000 Speaker 1: Wall Street weeks throughout the year, he didn't hesitate to 436 00:27:14,000 --> 00:27:16,600 Speaker 1: say what he thought about other subjects as well as inflation, 437 00:27:16,960 --> 00:27:20,120 Speaker 1: such as the disastrous Many budget that the short lived 438 00:27:20,200 --> 00:27:23,440 Speaker 1: Prime Minister Liz Trust put forward and that nearly broke 439 00:27:23,680 --> 00:27:27,400 Speaker 1: the market in guilt. When do you make of what's 440 00:27:27,400 --> 00:27:30,919 Speaker 1: going on in the UK. It makes me very sorry 441 00:27:31,080 --> 00:27:37,480 Speaker 1: to say, but I think the UK is behaving a 442 00:27:37,600 --> 00:27:43,880 Speaker 1: bit like an emerging market turning itself into a submerging 443 00:27:44,280 --> 00:27:49,000 Speaker 1: UH market. There's nothing in the pattern of market response 444 00:27:49,640 --> 00:27:54,640 Speaker 1: in the UK that suggests anything but fear rather than 445 00:27:54,960 --> 00:28:00,600 Speaker 1: confidence in the policy approaches UH being taken. It would 446 00:28:00,680 --> 00:28:04,600 Speaker 1: not surprise me if the pound eventually gets below a 447 00:28:04,720 --> 00:28:11,760 Speaker 1: dollar if the current policy path is maintained. This is 448 00:28:11,840 --> 00:28:17,960 Speaker 1: simply not a moment for the kind of naive uh, 449 00:28:18,640 --> 00:28:24,000 Speaker 1: wishful thinking supply side economics uh. That is being pursued 450 00:28:25,359 --> 00:28:30,800 Speaker 1: in Britain. And even the subject of artificial intelligence caught 451 00:28:30,840 --> 00:28:33,879 Speaker 1: the eye of our special contributor, who thinks something truly 452 00:28:33,960 --> 00:28:40,720 Speaker 1: profound maybe afoot with chat GPT. The great computer scientist 453 00:28:40,920 --> 00:28:45,560 Speaker 1: Alan Turing seven years ago said that it was going 454 00:28:45,680 --> 00:28:51,640 Speaker 1: to be a threshold for humanity when a machine could SEPT, 455 00:28:51,760 --> 00:28:56,440 Speaker 1: could it could imitate human beings answers to questions in 456 00:28:56,560 --> 00:29:00,440 Speaker 1: a way where another human being wouldn't be to tell 457 00:29:00,520 --> 00:29:05,600 Speaker 1: the difference. We're somewhere in the territory of that right now, 458 00:29:06,280 --> 00:29:10,400 Speaker 1: and that is a profound thing for humanity. It points 459 00:29:10,520 --> 00:29:15,520 Speaker 1: to a profound change in the way we're all going 460 00:29:15,760 --> 00:29:19,040 Speaker 1: to be working. We're all gonna have a kind of 461 00:29:19,240 --> 00:29:21,960 Speaker 1: caddy that or many of us are going to have 462 00:29:22,120 --> 00:29:28,080 Speaker 1: a kind of caddy that is going to augment our creativity, 463 00:29:28,360 --> 00:29:33,640 Speaker 1: augment our capacities, to bring knowledge to bear on what 464 00:29:33,880 --> 00:29:39,240 Speaker 1: we do, augment our accuracy. That was special contributor to 465 00:29:39,320 --> 00:29:42,960 Speaker 1: Wall Street Week Larry Summer's commenting throughout an eventful year 466 00:29:43,200 --> 00:29:47,640 Speaker 1: for global Wall Street coming up, we looked back to 467 00:29:47,720 --> 00:29:50,880 Speaker 1: how Lewis ruckheiserre wrapped up the year two thousand on 468 00:29:51,200 --> 00:29:55,240 Speaker 1: his version of Wall Street Week. This is Wall Street 469 00:29:55,280 --> 00:30:00,680 Speaker 1: Week on Bloomberg. This is Bloomberg Wall Street Week with 470 00:30:00,880 --> 00:30:05,600 Speaker 1: David Weston from Bloomberg Radio. Finally, one more thought, Well, 471 00:30:05,720 --> 00:30:08,400 Speaker 1: it's actually the one more thought of Lewis Ruckheiser from 472 00:30:08,440 --> 00:30:11,080 Speaker 1: two decades ago, when, at the end of a difficult 473 00:30:11,200 --> 00:30:14,120 Speaker 1: year of two thousand, he reflected back over the aftermath 474 00:30:14,200 --> 00:30:16,680 Speaker 1: of a market downturn led by a collapse of tech, 475 00:30:16,960 --> 00:30:20,160 Speaker 1: showing once again the wisdom of Mark Twain that history 476 00:30:20,280 --> 00:30:25,520 Speaker 1: doesn't repeat itself, but it often rhymes. Much of the 477 00:30:25,560 --> 00:30:29,280 Speaker 1: world of investors regards two thousand as a year of mourning. 478 00:30:30,240 --> 00:30:34,640 Speaker 1: For profits past, the bubbles burst, for bulls de horned, 479 00:30:35,360 --> 00:30:39,520 Speaker 1: and for certainties crumbled. And let's face it, it wasn't 480 00:30:39,560 --> 00:30:44,000 Speaker 1: always fun. As Winston Churchill put it, I'm always ready 481 00:30:44,040 --> 00:30:47,240 Speaker 1: to learn, although I do not always like to be taught. 482 00:30:48,920 --> 00:30:53,080 Speaker 1: Virtually nobody except the NonStop pessimists who are still stone 483 00:30:53,160 --> 00:30:57,000 Speaker 1: losers over the past decade foresaw the viciousness of this 484 00:30:57,120 --> 00:31:01,200 Speaker 1: year's declines, although the year was country victory even there. 485 00:31:01,960 --> 00:31:06,880 Speaker 1: For example, is this a bear market? Well, yes and no, 486 00:31:07,920 --> 00:31:11,000 Speaker 1: even from their highest heights in early two thousand, the 487 00:31:11,120 --> 00:31:14,280 Speaker 1: Dow Jones Industrial Average and the SMP five hundred have 488 00:31:14,480 --> 00:31:18,520 Speaker 1: declined far less than the twenty percent that traditionally has 489 00:31:18,560 --> 00:31:22,200 Speaker 1: defined a bear market. But for the formerly high flying 490 00:31:22,360 --> 00:31:26,760 Speaker 1: technology stocks personified by the NASDAC, this has not only 491 00:31:26,880 --> 00:31:31,560 Speaker 1: been a bear but the growley of all time. NAZDAK, 492 00:31:31,680 --> 00:31:36,080 Speaker 1: which never does things moderately, fell nearly forty percent this 493 00:31:36,240 --> 00:31:39,640 Speaker 1: year and is off more than fifty one from its 494 00:31:39,720 --> 00:31:43,360 Speaker 1: March tenth high. That makes this not only the worst 495 00:31:43,480 --> 00:31:46,880 Speaker 1: year ever for the twenty nine year old NASDAK, but 496 00:31:47,080 --> 00:31:50,400 Speaker 1: the biggest decline for any of the three major indexes 497 00:31:50,920 --> 00:31:54,320 Speaker 1: since the SMP five hundred lost forty seven percent in 498 00:31:54,440 --> 00:31:59,880 Speaker 1: nineteen thirty one during the Great Depression. So devastating was 499 00:32:00,080 --> 00:32:04,200 Speaker 1: this latest and most severe tech wreck that any attempt 500 00:32:04,240 --> 00:32:07,320 Speaker 1: to put it in perspective by pointing out say that 501 00:32:07,800 --> 00:32:11,160 Speaker 1: NASDAC has been the bullish phenomenon in the past decade 502 00:32:11,720 --> 00:32:15,959 Speaker 1: and that it gained more than eighty five in nine alone, 503 00:32:16,960 --> 00:32:21,560 Speaker 1: is likely to seem like irrelevant ancient history to today's 504 00:32:21,640 --> 00:32:25,760 Speaker 1: bleeding tech investors. Are they right? Is this just a 505 00:32:25,840 --> 00:32:30,200 Speaker 1: temporary reversal of a fantastically promising uptrend or Is it 506 00:32:30,320 --> 00:32:34,160 Speaker 1: truly the end of a booming era? Were the downward 507 00:32:34,280 --> 00:32:38,720 Speaker 1: catalysts of two thousand a fierce federal reserve, a steeply 508 00:32:38,840 --> 00:32:43,240 Speaker 1: weakening economy, and a nation driven to embarrassing self doubt 509 00:32:43,440 --> 00:32:48,240 Speaker 1: by the election that would not die passing phenomena or 510 00:32:48,360 --> 00:32:52,120 Speaker 1: orderies of enduring change. We'll try to get you some 511 00:32:52,240 --> 00:32:57,160 Speaker 1: meaningful answers tonight, and we will try and get you 512 00:32:57,320 --> 00:32:59,720 Speaker 1: answers in the new year. That does it for Wall 513 00:32:59,720 --> 00:33:03,080 Speaker 1: Street Week for this year. I'm David Weston. This is Bloomberg. 514 00:33:03,320 --> 00:33:08,440 Speaker 1: See you next year. M