WEBVTT - Shoptalk 2022 and Will Smith's Slap

0:00:03.520 --> 0:00:06.880
<v Speaker 1>From the heart of where innovation, money and power collive

0:00:07.640 --> 0:00:12.159
<v Speaker 1>in Silicon Valley and beyond. This is Bloomberg Technology with

0:00:12.240 --> 0:00:28.040
<v Speaker 1>Emily Jay. I'm Emily Changing in San Francisco, and this

0:00:28.080 --> 0:00:30.720
<v Speaker 1>is Bloomberg Technology coming up in the next hour, from

0:00:30.760 --> 0:00:34.640
<v Speaker 1>Google to Macy's, instatcart and Walmart. The power players of

0:00:34.680 --> 0:00:37.000
<v Speaker 1>retail and those trying to break in are gathered at

0:00:37.000 --> 0:00:39.760
<v Speaker 1>shop Talk in Las Vegas to talk about the future

0:00:39.760 --> 0:00:44.720
<v Speaker 1>of commerce as interest rates and inflation squeeze consumer pocketbooks.

0:00:44.720 --> 0:00:48.640
<v Speaker 1>We will take you there live plus the slap seeing

0:00:48.640 --> 0:00:52.280
<v Speaker 1>around the world. Will Smith smacking Chris Rock at the Oscars,

0:00:52.360 --> 0:00:57.000
<v Speaker 1>overshadowing his own oscar, women sparking memes for day, maybe decades.

0:00:57.320 --> 0:01:00.640
<v Speaker 1>We'll have a report from Hollywood. I the future of

0:01:00.720 --> 0:01:03.800
<v Speaker 1>gene editing and biotechnology. We will speak about the promise

0:01:03.880 --> 0:01:06.880
<v Speaker 1>of new science in a post COVID world with Nobel

0:01:06.959 --> 0:01:10.760
<v Speaker 1>Prize winner Jennifer Down. Now, all of that in a moment,

0:01:10.760 --> 0:01:12.360
<v Speaker 1>but first it's going to look at the market and

0:01:12.400 --> 0:01:14.920
<v Speaker 1>tech stuck starting the week on a high. Are at

0:01:14.959 --> 0:01:17.600
<v Speaker 1>Ludlow here with the big movers, and yeah, we've got

0:01:17.600 --> 0:01:20.480
<v Speaker 1>this continuation of the risk on sentiment we've seen particularly

0:01:20.480 --> 0:01:22.520
<v Speaker 1>in equity markets over the last two weeks. You look

0:01:22.560 --> 0:01:24.360
<v Speaker 1>at it then as that one d up one point

0:01:24.360 --> 0:01:27.760
<v Speaker 1>six percent to its highest level in more than six weeks.

0:01:27.760 --> 0:01:29.640
<v Speaker 1>And it's interesting. I put bitcoin on there as well.

0:01:29.640 --> 0:01:33.160
<v Speaker 1>It's around forty eight thousand dollars per token token. It's

0:01:33.160 --> 0:01:35.080
<v Speaker 1>been a little under the radar, but we're the highest

0:01:35.160 --> 0:01:37.839
<v Speaker 1>level of the year two on bitcoin, and it's also

0:01:38.040 --> 0:01:41.440
<v Speaker 1>raised it's year to date losses, So real momentum there.

0:01:41.440 --> 0:01:44.600
<v Speaker 1>And you've got a flag oil not necessarily directly related

0:01:44.680 --> 0:01:47.720
<v Speaker 1>to tech, but oil down sharply Monday. You see futures

0:01:47.760 --> 0:01:50.880
<v Speaker 1>for W two. I what West Texas Intermediate down seven

0:01:50.920 --> 0:01:54.160
<v Speaker 1>percent below ten dollars per barrel. But there's now a

0:01:54.240 --> 0:01:57.920
<v Speaker 1>narrative around the question on global consumption, particularly China, the

0:01:57.920 --> 0:02:01.520
<v Speaker 1>biggest consumer of energy products. Of course, m coming me,

0:02:01.800 --> 0:02:05.400
<v Speaker 1>bobow terminal. Every so often a chart comes along, and

0:02:05.440 --> 0:02:07.840
<v Speaker 1>I want to talk about Apple. Just look at this chart.

0:02:08.320 --> 0:02:11.520
<v Speaker 1>Apple up on Monday for the tenth consecutive day. It's

0:02:11.600 --> 0:02:15.640
<v Speaker 1>longest streak of gains since October two thousand and ten.

0:02:16.520 --> 0:02:18.800
<v Speaker 1>Let that thinking, I'll let you have that sink in

0:02:18.840 --> 0:02:21.320
<v Speaker 1>for a moment. And that's despite a report from Nicka

0:02:21.880 --> 0:02:25.760
<v Speaker 1>that Apple's cut production of its iPhone sc by because

0:02:25.760 --> 0:02:28.959
<v Speaker 1>of waning demand, waning demand because of inflation, the conflicts

0:02:28.960 --> 0:02:32.240
<v Speaker 1>in Ukraine, and investors they didn't seem to mind. The

0:02:32.360 --> 0:02:34.760
<v Speaker 1>rapid streak that's been going on in mega tech continues

0:02:34.800 --> 0:02:37.760
<v Speaker 1>and Apple really leading that charge. Also worth noting very quickly,

0:02:37.800 --> 0:02:40.160
<v Speaker 1>the Amazon is now positive year today as well. So

0:02:40.240 --> 0:02:43.600
<v Speaker 1>despite that narrative about higher rates, really seeing investors look

0:02:43.639 --> 0:02:47.280
<v Speaker 1>real close at megacap tech stucks are looking well quickly.

0:02:47.320 --> 0:02:49.640
<v Speaker 1>Some movers Tesla up eight percent. We're gonna talk about

0:02:49.639 --> 0:02:51.840
<v Speaker 1>this later in the show. It's gonna ask investors at

0:02:51.840 --> 0:02:54.680
<v Speaker 1>this annual meeting for another stock split, the second in

0:02:54.760 --> 0:02:57.920
<v Speaker 1>two years. Hping up three percent after a three billion

0:02:57.919 --> 0:03:00.440
<v Speaker 1>dollar all cash deal to buy Polly. This is one

0:03:00.440 --> 0:03:03.320
<v Speaker 1>of the makers of remote work tools like headsets and

0:03:03.440 --> 0:03:05.440
<v Speaker 1>video cameras. An interesting all cash deal for them. But

0:03:05.480 --> 0:03:11.160
<v Speaker 1>you see investors taking negatively and lass amc entertainment up end.

0:03:11.240 --> 0:03:15.359
<v Speaker 1>Do you know why why? No idea means talks about Alright,

0:03:15.520 --> 0:03:19.160
<v Speaker 1>thank you Ed. Always love those history lessons, appreciate it well.

0:03:19.200 --> 0:03:21.920
<v Speaker 1>This week we are in Las Vegas at Shoptop where

0:03:21.960 --> 0:03:24.520
<v Speaker 1>thousands of retail moguls are coming together to talk about

0:03:24.520 --> 0:03:28.079
<v Speaker 1>the future of retail. The agenda covering the latest tech

0:03:28.160 --> 0:03:31.560
<v Speaker 1>and trends from apparel and electronics to beauty and grocery.

0:03:31.960 --> 0:03:34.440
<v Speaker 1>Connie Chance, general partner at entries in Horowitz, is in

0:03:34.720 --> 0:03:38.240
<v Speaker 1>Vegas at the conference and joins us Now Live. Connie, you,

0:03:38.240 --> 0:03:40.360
<v Speaker 1>we're a speaker on stage today, and I'm curious, what

0:03:40.400 --> 0:03:42.640
<v Speaker 1>are some of the key themes and trends your most

0:03:42.640 --> 0:03:46.360
<v Speaker 1>bullish on From day one? I mean, the energy here

0:03:46.560 --> 0:03:49.280
<v Speaker 1>is so high. Everyone is talking about how to leverage

0:03:49.320 --> 0:03:52.120
<v Speaker 1>more technology. One of the key trends I'm hearing all

0:03:52.160 --> 0:03:55.480
<v Speaker 1>retailers talk about is how to use more video going forward.

0:03:55.920 --> 0:03:58.960
<v Speaker 1>That could be a combination of short video, long video,

0:03:59.440 --> 0:04:03.680
<v Speaker 1>live video. Lots of retailers are asking questions about these topics,

0:04:03.680 --> 0:04:06.120
<v Speaker 1>how to find the right hosts, the right seller to

0:04:06.200 --> 0:04:08.920
<v Speaker 1>host these videos. But there's a lot of talk about

0:04:08.960 --> 0:04:13.559
<v Speaker 1>just incorporating more technology and to our everyday shopping experiences.

0:04:13.960 --> 0:04:18.000
<v Speaker 1>That said, we're looking at inflation, we're looking at interest rates.

0:04:18.040 --> 0:04:21.279
<v Speaker 1>All of us is really putting pressure on consumers. How

0:04:21.320 --> 0:04:24.919
<v Speaker 1>are retail companies dealing with this and how are consumers

0:04:24.960 --> 0:04:28.919
<v Speaker 1>going to respond? I think retailers are thinking about how

0:04:28.960 --> 0:04:33.359
<v Speaker 1>to decrease the space between brand, retail and customer, to

0:04:33.440 --> 0:04:38.039
<v Speaker 1>foster more brand loyalty, to deliver better customer experiences, to

0:04:38.120 --> 0:04:40.520
<v Speaker 1>make sure customers have more confidence and the things they

0:04:40.520 --> 0:04:44.039
<v Speaker 1>buy before they purchase them, and so examples like using

0:04:44.120 --> 0:04:47.560
<v Speaker 1>video or using personalized chat or having these one on

0:04:47.560 --> 0:04:51.200
<v Speaker 1>one expert recommendations are always that brands can make sure

0:04:51.240 --> 0:04:56.200
<v Speaker 1>that consumers are more confident in their purchases. Now, your

0:04:56.240 --> 0:04:59.640
<v Speaker 1>panel today focused on China as a global e commerce player,

0:04:59.760 --> 0:05:02.680
<v Speaker 1>and we know that you know, in the Chinese economy,

0:05:02.839 --> 0:05:05.800
<v Speaker 1>Chinese shopping economy, there are so many different kinds of

0:05:05.839 --> 0:05:08.839
<v Speaker 1>experiences that have yet to sort of translate to a

0:05:08.839 --> 0:05:11.720
<v Speaker 1>global audience. Talk to us about what you see there

0:05:11.720 --> 0:05:14.000
<v Speaker 1>that has the most promise and whether or not you

0:05:14.040 --> 0:05:16.839
<v Speaker 1>see some of these trends catching on around the world.

0:05:17.720 --> 0:05:20.400
<v Speaker 1>For sure, I'd say the biggest e commerce trend in

0:05:20.480 --> 0:05:24.080
<v Speaker 1>China over the last two three years would be live shopping.

0:05:24.480 --> 0:05:27.160
<v Speaker 1>Live shopping has taken China by storm and it's really

0:05:27.240 --> 0:05:29.520
<v Speaker 1>changed the way lots of brands and retailers are even

0:05:29.560 --> 0:05:32.400
<v Speaker 1>thinking about their marketing budgets. And so you can buy

0:05:32.520 --> 0:05:36.320
<v Speaker 1>everything on live video and China. Now everything from medical

0:05:36.360 --> 0:05:41.360
<v Speaker 1>procedures to clothing to fruit farming. Anything you can think

0:05:41.400 --> 0:05:44.560
<v Speaker 1>of that can be purchased online can be purchased through

0:05:44.600 --> 0:05:47.440
<v Speaker 1>online video, and so I think that trend is now

0:05:47.520 --> 0:05:49.960
<v Speaker 1>showing that it has lots of promise. In the US,

0:05:50.040 --> 0:05:53.320
<v Speaker 1>there are plenty of companies now experimenting with live video

0:05:53.640 --> 0:05:57.000
<v Speaker 1>and they're seeing really great results. You've talked about the

0:05:57.120 --> 0:06:00.600
<v Speaker 1>rise of shop attainment in the past, and I'm curious

0:06:00.600 --> 0:06:04.359
<v Speaker 1>which companies you think are at the forefront of this.

0:06:04.480 --> 0:06:08.080
<v Speaker 1>How do you, for example, think about Instagram versus TikTok,

0:06:08.320 --> 0:06:12.960
<v Speaker 1>versus Facebook versus Snapchat when it comes to video commerce.

0:06:14.240 --> 0:06:16.839
<v Speaker 1>I think lots of companies are going to put video

0:06:16.880 --> 0:06:19.520
<v Speaker 1>commerce at the forefront, just because videos such a fantastic

0:06:19.520 --> 0:06:22.520
<v Speaker 1>way to sell things. If you grow up watching infomercials,

0:06:22.560 --> 0:06:27.120
<v Speaker 1>you know they are effective. And having customer testimonials, having

0:06:27.200 --> 0:06:30.120
<v Speaker 1>live demos on boxing, all of these things are just

0:06:30.160 --> 0:06:34.279
<v Speaker 1>fantastic ways to sell product and get customers more excited

0:06:34.320 --> 0:06:36.840
<v Speaker 1>about the things that they're buying. I think you're right,

0:06:36.880 --> 0:06:39.680
<v Speaker 1>all of these large platforms are going to be experimenting

0:06:39.720 --> 0:06:43.560
<v Speaker 1>with shop attainment and having more video enabled commerce. I

0:06:43.600 --> 0:06:45.600
<v Speaker 1>also think lots of brands are going to attempt putting

0:06:45.640 --> 0:06:47.880
<v Speaker 1>it on their own websites and on their own apps.

0:06:48.200 --> 0:06:50.200
<v Speaker 1>And I also believe there's going to be third party

0:06:50.240 --> 0:06:54.560
<v Speaker 1>apps that rise as new shop um shopping video platforms

0:06:54.600 --> 0:06:57.159
<v Speaker 1>that are going to do tremendously well. Now I have

0:06:57.240 --> 0:06:59.480
<v Speaker 1>to ask you about what's going on in the broader environment.

0:06:59.600 --> 0:07:03.279
<v Speaker 1>What's happening with funding and valuations. We just saw Insta

0:07:03.360 --> 0:07:06.680
<v Speaker 1>car markets own valuation down from thirty nine billion dollars

0:07:06.680 --> 0:07:09.080
<v Speaker 1>to twenty four billion dollars. I know this is a

0:07:09.120 --> 0:07:12.600
<v Speaker 1>company that entries in horrowits invested in at an earlier stage.

0:07:12.760 --> 0:07:15.560
<v Speaker 1>Are we going to see a slew of other markdowns?

0:07:15.600 --> 0:07:18.320
<v Speaker 1>I mean, is this happening at at a lot of companies?

0:07:19.640 --> 0:07:22.320
<v Speaker 1>Like yn't speak about that particular company, but I will

0:07:22.360 --> 0:07:25.120
<v Speaker 1>say that I tend to focus on the very early stage.

0:07:25.200 --> 0:07:29.080
<v Speaker 1>So I'm talking about Precedes, Seeds and A's and so forth,

0:07:29.240 --> 0:07:31.360
<v Speaker 1>and a lot of these companies have a really long

0:07:31.400 --> 0:07:35.120
<v Speaker 1>time horizon five, ten, fifteen years, and so we're less

0:07:35.160 --> 0:07:37.760
<v Speaker 1>concerned about near term shocks to the market, and that

0:07:37.760 --> 0:07:41.240
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't change our focus on how we invest. So are

0:07:41.280 --> 0:07:44.600
<v Speaker 1>you saying the broader economic environment the uncertainty that we're

0:07:44.600 --> 0:07:47.200
<v Speaker 1>seeing what's happening with inflation and interest rates. That's not

0:07:47.280 --> 0:07:51.160
<v Speaker 1>really factoring into your calculus at all at entries and

0:07:51.200 --> 0:07:53.880
<v Speaker 1>horrowits in terms of the early investments that you're making

0:07:55.120 --> 0:07:57.239
<v Speaker 1>at the early stage, I don't think we're that phase

0:07:57.360 --> 0:07:59.800
<v Speaker 1>by near term changes to the market, because again, we

0:07:59.880 --> 0:08:02.640
<v Speaker 1>have a very long term horizon, and so do our founders.

0:08:02.920 --> 0:08:06.000
<v Speaker 1>Many of them are building for five, ten, fifteen years outward.

0:08:07.160 --> 0:08:09.720
<v Speaker 1>So let's talk about what you are looking to invest

0:08:09.760 --> 0:08:12.760
<v Speaker 1>in in terms of companies, in terms of trend what

0:08:12.800 --> 0:08:15.080
<v Speaker 1>are you most bullish on as we come out of

0:08:15.120 --> 0:08:18.560
<v Speaker 1>the pandemic hopefully uh, fingers crossed, But we are facing

0:08:18.560 --> 0:08:21.680
<v Speaker 1>this kind of uncertainty of future of hybrid work. You know,

0:08:22.000 --> 0:08:25.120
<v Speaker 1>where are you placing your bets. I think COVID brought

0:08:25.160 --> 0:08:27.480
<v Speaker 1>a lot of behaviors forward in a really great way

0:08:27.480 --> 0:08:29.640
<v Speaker 1>in the sense that now we're much more accustomed to

0:08:29.680 --> 0:08:32.840
<v Speaker 1>doing things through video, We're more used to ordering things

0:08:32.840 --> 0:08:35.439
<v Speaker 1>on our phone, So I actually think it accelerates a

0:08:35.480 --> 0:08:38.000
<v Speaker 1>lot of the trends that we're going to happen. Anyways,

0:08:38.360 --> 0:08:41.200
<v Speaker 1>I'm looking at new forms of commerce, how people are

0:08:41.600 --> 0:08:45.120
<v Speaker 1>creating new formats, whether it's video or AI driven UM

0:08:45.160 --> 0:08:49.160
<v Speaker 1>and the particularly excited about companies that use AI at

0:08:49.200 --> 0:08:52.920
<v Speaker 1>the forefront, meaning how are they rethinking an entire experience

0:08:52.960 --> 0:08:55.320
<v Speaker 1>with AI to begin with or video to begin with.

0:08:55.800 --> 0:08:58.960
<v Speaker 1>So I'm excited about AI and video in particular. And

0:08:59.000 --> 0:09:01.320
<v Speaker 1>how do you think, like, take us five years out,

0:09:01.520 --> 0:09:04.880
<v Speaker 1>how will we be shopping differently because of AI, because

0:09:05.120 --> 0:09:08.160
<v Speaker 1>of video? Let's say five years from now. I think

0:09:08.280 --> 0:09:12.400
<v Speaker 1>video shopping is going to be very common mainstream behavior

0:09:12.400 --> 0:09:14.600
<v Speaker 1>five years out, which means that you are going to

0:09:14.679 --> 0:09:17.560
<v Speaker 1>be shopping from all kinds of platforms. Means you're not

0:09:17.600 --> 0:09:20.080
<v Speaker 1>just going to be shopping on e commerce platforms. Even

0:09:20.120 --> 0:09:22.559
<v Speaker 1>you'll be shopping from social media platforms. There are other

0:09:22.600 --> 0:09:25.120
<v Speaker 1>platforms that you spend a lot of time on. UM.

0:09:25.160 --> 0:09:26.959
<v Speaker 1>I also think with AI that means you're going to

0:09:27.040 --> 0:09:30.360
<v Speaker 1>have much better personalization and that's going to improve the

0:09:30.760 --> 0:09:33.720
<v Speaker 1>shopping experience for everyone across the board. Ideally that means

0:09:33.840 --> 0:09:37.160
<v Speaker 1>for your returns. Ideally, that means you're buying things that

0:09:37.200 --> 0:09:40.200
<v Speaker 1>fit your style, You're buying things that naturally delight you.

0:09:40.360 --> 0:09:42.600
<v Speaker 1>So AI is just a wonderful way to give a

0:09:42.640 --> 0:09:46.240
<v Speaker 1>more personalized shopping experience. So is this like a smarter

0:09:46.400 --> 0:09:51.000
<v Speaker 1>version of QVC on social media. In some ways, QVC,

0:09:51.200 --> 0:09:54.320
<v Speaker 1>of course is one of the original shopping video platforms.

0:09:54.720 --> 0:09:56.680
<v Speaker 1>Um But I think if you look at what happened

0:09:56.679 --> 0:09:58.520
<v Speaker 1>in China in the last two three years, you get

0:09:58.520 --> 0:10:01.360
<v Speaker 1>a glimpse of what's possible in the US. And in

0:10:01.400 --> 0:10:04.560
<v Speaker 1>many ways, China video shopping is now one of the

0:10:04.600 --> 0:10:08.040
<v Speaker 1>most popular waste shop and people are doing it on

0:10:08.040 --> 0:10:10.800
<v Speaker 1>their smartphones all throughout the day. And you can buy

0:10:10.920 --> 0:10:14.800
<v Speaker 1>literally anything on an online video shopping and it's great

0:10:14.840 --> 0:10:17.079
<v Speaker 1>because you can ask the host questions, you can get

0:10:17.120 --> 0:10:20.520
<v Speaker 1>real time answers. There's a lot of limited time discounts.

0:10:20.520 --> 0:10:23.240
<v Speaker 1>If you think back to your infomercial days, they would

0:10:23.240 --> 0:10:25.480
<v Speaker 1>say or now or in the next fifteen minutes and

0:10:25.520 --> 0:10:28.240
<v Speaker 1>get it a freebee or give one to you know,

0:10:28.280 --> 0:10:30.600
<v Speaker 1>get an extra one to give to a friend. All

0:10:30.600 --> 0:10:34.960
<v Speaker 1>of those limited time promotions, exclusive drops, special pricing, all

0:10:35.000 --> 0:10:38.280
<v Speaker 1>of those things are much more possible through live video.

0:10:39.280 --> 0:10:41.640
<v Speaker 1>And what is the role of the creator economy and

0:10:41.679 --> 0:10:44.439
<v Speaker 1>all of this, I mean, our influencers were placed by

0:10:44.480 --> 0:10:47.240
<v Speaker 1>AI s. I mean, are these real people still selling

0:10:47.480 --> 0:10:51.199
<v Speaker 1>us stuff or not? I think influencers are still really

0:10:51.240 --> 0:10:55.240
<v Speaker 1>important creators are important because they are curating products and

0:10:55.280 --> 0:10:58.520
<v Speaker 1>they are building trusts with their end viewers. Right, there

0:10:58.520 --> 0:11:01.240
<v Speaker 1>are particular folks that I want watch on YouTube, and

0:11:01.280 --> 0:11:04.440
<v Speaker 1>I trust the recommendations they're making based off the background,

0:11:04.440 --> 0:11:07.520
<v Speaker 1>based off the things they've recommended or didn't recommend in

0:11:07.559 --> 0:11:10.840
<v Speaker 1>the past. And so creators are still really important as

0:11:10.920 --> 0:11:14.560
<v Speaker 1>either creators of products or curators, and their curation is

0:11:14.600 --> 0:11:17.920
<v Speaker 1>really valuable because it's giving me a better glimpse more

0:11:17.960 --> 0:11:22.520
<v Speaker 1>information about what I'm purchasing. All right, Connie Chan of

0:11:22.800 --> 0:11:25.800
<v Speaker 1>Entrees and Harrow, it's great to hear your view of

0:11:25.920 --> 0:11:30.560
<v Speaker 1>the future. Thanks for stopping. By meantime, Netflix has headed

0:11:30.600 --> 0:11:33.880
<v Speaker 1>for its biggest quarterly drop in a decade, entering the

0:11:33.880 --> 0:11:35.760
<v Speaker 1>final week at the first quarter of the streaming video

0:11:35.800 --> 0:11:40.080
<v Speaker 1>giant down percent. That makes Netflix one of the biggest

0:11:40.080 --> 0:11:43.920
<v Speaker 1>losers in the NAZAC one hundred, investors largely wary about

0:11:44.000 --> 0:11:48.599
<v Speaker 1>its disappointing growth outlook. Coming up, we'll head back to

0:11:48.679 --> 0:11:51.440
<v Speaker 1>Las Vegas, where Bloomberg's Bradstone sat down with Insta cart

0:11:51.480 --> 0:11:55.040
<v Speaker 1>CEO pg SMO days after the grocery tech giant slashed

0:11:55.080 --> 0:12:22.959
<v Speaker 1>its valuation. That's next. This is Bloomberg and so as

0:12:22.960 --> 0:12:26.880
<v Speaker 1>a private company, even though our businesses, you know, incredibly strong,

0:12:26.960 --> 0:12:29.720
<v Speaker 1>we we really wanted to reflect the facts that, of

0:12:29.760 --> 0:12:33.240
<v Speaker 1>course we're not immune to the volatility of the public markets,

0:12:33.760 --> 0:12:38.000
<v Speaker 1>and so by proactively kind of taking down our valuation

0:12:38.120 --> 0:12:41.480
<v Speaker 1>to reflect what it would be like if we were

0:12:41.480 --> 0:12:45.360
<v Speaker 1>a publicly treated company. It's an employee first move so

0:12:45.400 --> 0:12:48.600
<v Speaker 1>that we can start granting stock to our employees at

0:12:48.640 --> 0:12:51.960
<v Speaker 1>this lower valuation and helps um, you know, participate in

0:12:52.040 --> 0:12:57.160
<v Speaker 1>the upside. Insta Carcimo, they're at sharp talk with our

0:12:57.200 --> 0:13:00.199
<v Speaker 1>very own grad Stone talking about the company's re sent

0:13:00.360 --> 0:13:04.240
<v Speaker 1>mark down. Last week, Instacart slashed its valuation by almost

0:13:04.679 --> 0:13:08.360
<v Speaker 1>to four billion dollars to reflect public market declines at

0:13:08.400 --> 0:13:12.720
<v Speaker 1>companies like doordesh and Shopify, also Instacart and Semo, saying

0:13:12.720 --> 0:13:16.280
<v Speaker 1>this is to give employees more upside. Our Bradstone joins

0:13:16.360 --> 0:13:18.880
<v Speaker 1>us now to discuss and Brad the big question, is

0:13:18.920 --> 0:13:21.120
<v Speaker 1>this the start of something that we're going to see

0:13:21.120 --> 0:13:24.920
<v Speaker 1>happening more broadly at other companies besides Instacart. What more

0:13:24.960 --> 0:13:30.280
<v Speaker 1>contacts context did she give you there? Well, you heard it.

0:13:30.360 --> 0:13:32.760
<v Speaker 1>She called it an employee first move. She said it

0:13:32.760 --> 0:13:36.400
<v Speaker 1>would help Instacart with retention but look, I think instacarts

0:13:36.400 --> 0:13:39.679
<v Speaker 1>in a pretty unique position and it's going to be

0:13:39.880 --> 0:13:42.760
<v Speaker 1>more difficult for other companies to follow. As you remember, Emily,

0:13:43.120 --> 0:13:45.280
<v Speaker 1>last year, a poor of a meta, the CEO and

0:13:45.320 --> 0:13:48.840
<v Speaker 1>founder of instacarts, stepped aside. They brought in Fiji. She

0:13:48.960 --> 0:13:52.160
<v Speaker 1>really signaled, you know, a full pivot for the company

0:13:52.360 --> 0:13:55.640
<v Speaker 1>from just a food delivery business into a more sort

0:13:55.679 --> 0:13:59.240
<v Speaker 1>of full featured, enterprise looking business where Instacart is providing

0:13:59.280 --> 0:14:04.000
<v Speaker 1>technology for supermarkets, building them ghost warehouses, helping with thirty

0:14:04.000 --> 0:14:06.960
<v Speaker 1>minute delivery. I think that Reset bought a Fiji a

0:14:06.960 --> 0:14:11.320
<v Speaker 1>lot more runway. It's allowed this private valuation Reset. Other

0:14:11.400 --> 0:14:14.360
<v Speaker 1>companies that are facing more of a liquidity demand, who

0:14:14.440 --> 0:14:16.720
<v Speaker 1>who might have to go public soon, who can't put

0:14:16.760 --> 0:14:18.800
<v Speaker 1>it off as Fiji did last fall, are going to

0:14:18.880 --> 0:14:23.920
<v Speaker 1>have less flexibility. She's pushing this idea of insta cart

0:14:23.960 --> 0:14:26.720
<v Speaker 1>as an antidote to Amazon, and I'm curious what you

0:14:26.760 --> 0:14:29.040
<v Speaker 1>think of that, given you know, the many many years

0:14:29.040 --> 0:14:32.840
<v Speaker 1>that you've covered Amazon, Can insta cart really take on

0:14:32.920 --> 0:14:37.520
<v Speaker 1>Amazon in the way that she is expressing. You know,

0:14:37.520 --> 0:14:39.760
<v Speaker 1>It's it's funny because that's not really the right question,

0:14:39.800 --> 0:14:43.240
<v Speaker 1>at least right now, because Amazon's a little measily two

0:14:43.280 --> 0:14:46.440
<v Speaker 1>percent a player in the grocery business, whole foods. They

0:14:46.480 --> 0:14:49.400
<v Speaker 1>really haven't invested all that much. They're doing some interesting

0:14:49.400 --> 0:14:53.080
<v Speaker 1>things with the checkout technology, but really the boogeyman, if

0:14:53.120 --> 0:14:56.000
<v Speaker 1>there is one, is an instat cart partner. It's Walmart.

0:14:56.080 --> 0:14:59.520
<v Speaker 1>I mean, with a twenty percent plus market share in

0:14:59.560 --> 0:15:02.320
<v Speaker 1>grocery is Kroger of course, another big giant. If you're

0:15:02.360 --> 0:15:05.720
<v Speaker 1>a small supermarket, you know, maybe Amazon motivates you a

0:15:05.760 --> 0:15:08.320
<v Speaker 1>little bit, but really, you know, the the the the

0:15:09.400 --> 0:15:12.840
<v Speaker 1>dragon in the room are are these big scale players

0:15:12.880 --> 0:15:15.920
<v Speaker 1>that are modernizing very fast. That's the real reason for

0:15:15.960 --> 0:15:20.440
<v Speaker 1>the digital transition that's needed at small supermarkets. Now. Since

0:15:20.480 --> 0:15:22.680
<v Speaker 1>I spoke with Fiji Cimo a couple of weeks ago

0:15:22.720 --> 0:15:24.800
<v Speaker 1>for Studio one point Oh, we had a debate in

0:15:24.840 --> 0:15:28.120
<v Speaker 1>that episode about what's a fair wage and shoppers who

0:15:28.240 --> 0:15:31.880
<v Speaker 1>had told me, you know, their typical payment for a

0:15:32.000 --> 0:15:35.680
<v Speaker 1>shop is seven dollars. She told me that that wasn't

0:15:35.720 --> 0:15:39.120
<v Speaker 1>consistent with what is normal. But it sparked this frenzy

0:15:39.200 --> 0:15:42.640
<v Speaker 1>of shoppers out there sending me screenshots of their orders,

0:15:42.680 --> 0:15:45.280
<v Speaker 1>some many of them getting paid seven dollars. So I'm

0:15:45.280 --> 0:15:47.960
<v Speaker 1>getting paid as low as five dollars. You know, what

0:15:48.040 --> 0:15:50.320
<v Speaker 1>does she have to say about this about wages, whether

0:15:50.400 --> 0:15:52.440
<v Speaker 1>or not they're fair, and whether or not this kind

0:15:52.480 --> 0:15:57.800
<v Speaker 1>of economy is really sustainable? Right? And I mentioned that explicitly.

0:15:57.880 --> 0:16:00.480
<v Speaker 1>I said, you know, if for anyone who who writes

0:16:00.600 --> 0:16:03.600
<v Speaker 1>or reports about Instacart, you tend to get these testimonials

0:16:03.640 --> 0:16:06.240
<v Speaker 1>and that their shoppers are kind of suffering. And you

0:16:06.280 --> 0:16:07.840
<v Speaker 1>know from what I recall, and I want to go

0:16:07.920 --> 0:16:10.200
<v Speaker 1>back and listen to the tape she really didn't talk

0:16:10.240 --> 0:16:12.720
<v Speaker 1>about I I asked directly, can you raise the wage?

0:16:13.000 --> 0:16:16.120
<v Speaker 1>And she talked more about the kinds of perks that

0:16:16.240 --> 0:16:19.840
<v Speaker 1>come with being a shopper for Instacart, trying to instigate

0:16:19.840 --> 0:16:23.880
<v Speaker 1>more demand because in times of peak demand you maximize savings.

0:16:24.120 --> 0:16:28.080
<v Speaker 1>She talked about lots of features, specific features for female

0:16:28.120 --> 0:16:31.760
<v Speaker 1>shoppers who are a preponderance of their of their labor ecosystem.

0:16:32.160 --> 0:16:33.960
<v Speaker 1>You know, I have a feeling that they might be

0:16:34.000 --> 0:16:36.200
<v Speaker 1>a little bit constrained at least on the economics. I mean,

0:16:36.400 --> 0:16:40.160
<v Speaker 1>she talked about running the delivery business basically at cost

0:16:40.280 --> 0:16:45.080
<v Speaker 1>and making instacarts margin on things like advertising and enterprise sales.

0:16:45.120 --> 0:16:47.880
<v Speaker 1>So it might just be that you know, the economics

0:16:47.880 --> 0:16:50.720
<v Speaker 1>of instacrt delivery aren't that great, and they find that

0:16:50.760 --> 0:16:53.160
<v Speaker 1>they're they're limited what they can do for shoppers despite

0:16:53.200 --> 0:16:56.960
<v Speaker 1>that vocal percentage of shoppers that are complaining. All right,

0:16:57.000 --> 0:17:00.000
<v Speaker 1>Brad Stone joining us live from the shop top floor.

0:17:00.240 --> 0:17:02.840
<v Speaker 1>Thanks Brad. That certainly an open question. I'll be with

0:17:02.880 --> 0:17:06.640
<v Speaker 1>you tomorrow there to interview Uber CEO Dara Kasra Shah

0:17:06.680 --> 0:17:10.160
<v Speaker 1>he and much more. Meantime, HP has agreed to buy

0:17:10.240 --> 0:17:13.120
<v Speaker 1>plant Tronics, and at three point three billion dollar deal,

0:17:13.160 --> 0:17:15.760
<v Speaker 1>the acquisition will help the laptop maker further capitalize on

0:17:15.800 --> 0:17:20.240
<v Speaker 1>the pivot to hybrid work. Plantronics sells phone, headsets, and

0:17:20.440 --> 0:17:24.600
<v Speaker 1>audio and video accessories. They all cash deal give shareholders

0:17:23.720 --> 0:17:28.960
<v Speaker 1>a premium to plant Tronics closing price Friday. Coming up,

0:17:29.080 --> 0:17:33.040
<v Speaker 1>it went viral in seconds. Will Smith slapping Chris Rock

0:17:33.119 --> 0:17:36.560
<v Speaker 1>at the Oscars. We'll have more details on why and

0:17:36.920 --> 0:18:01.680
<v Speaker 1>what's next coming up. This is Bloomberg. It is what

0:18:01.880 --> 0:18:05.440
<v Speaker 1>everyone is talking about. Dub simply on social media as

0:18:05.720 --> 0:18:09.240
<v Speaker 1>the slap. Will Smith smacking Chris Rock on stage in

0:18:09.280 --> 0:18:13.160
<v Speaker 1>the middle of the Oscar ceremony. This after Chris Rock

0:18:13.280 --> 0:18:15.800
<v Speaker 1>made a g I Joe g I Jane kind of

0:18:15.880 --> 0:18:18.800
<v Speaker 1>joke about Will Smith's wife, Jada Pinkett Smith, who also

0:18:18.880 --> 0:18:21.800
<v Speaker 1>suffers from alopecia and has been embracing it by going

0:18:21.880 --> 0:18:24.359
<v Speaker 1>bald for the last several months. Let's dig into it

0:18:24.400 --> 0:18:27.520
<v Speaker 1>all with Bloomberg's Lucas Shaw joining us straight from Hollywood

0:18:27.600 --> 0:18:30.320
<v Speaker 1>and Lucas, I gotta ask you, twenty four hours later,

0:18:30.400 --> 0:18:34.280
<v Speaker 1>are there any more details on what happened here? The backstory,

0:18:34.480 --> 0:18:40.080
<v Speaker 1>what's next? No new details on exactly what happened on stage,

0:18:40.080 --> 0:18:42.800
<v Speaker 1>and I think we we all saw. The real question

0:18:43.200 --> 0:18:46.280
<v Speaker 1>is sort of what was happening behind the scenes, What

0:18:46.320 --> 0:18:49.439
<v Speaker 1>did the Academy try to do or not try to

0:18:49.440 --> 0:18:51.480
<v Speaker 1>do in the moment, and what is it going to

0:18:51.520 --> 0:18:54.040
<v Speaker 1>do going forward? There have been some reports about how

0:18:54.080 --> 0:18:57.320
<v Speaker 1>they had considered trying to intervene and maybe stop Will

0:18:57.320 --> 0:18:59.639
<v Speaker 1>Smith's from speaking, or talk to him before he spoke.

0:19:00.000 --> 0:19:02.560
<v Speaker 1>I think the question everyone has now is will he

0:19:02.640 --> 0:19:05.840
<v Speaker 1>be punished in some way? Will they, you know, bar

0:19:06.040 --> 0:19:08.280
<v Speaker 1>him from the Academy or suspend him for a couple

0:19:08.320 --> 0:19:11.159
<v Speaker 1>of years. Normally, as the winner of the Best Actor Prize,

0:19:11.200 --> 0:19:13.920
<v Speaker 1>he'd be at the ceremony next year presenting the Best Actress.

0:19:13.920 --> 0:19:16.800
<v Speaker 1>Will they let him back for that, and we should know,

0:19:17.040 --> 0:19:19.040
<v Speaker 1>probably not in the next day or two, but maybe

0:19:19.040 --> 0:19:23.120
<v Speaker 1>in the next few weeks. The memes about this incident

0:19:23.240 --> 0:19:26.480
<v Speaker 1>are insane. I'm pretty sure these will be going on

0:19:26.640 --> 0:19:32.600
<v Speaker 1>for decades. This overshadowed Will Smith's own Oscar win. You know,

0:19:32.720 --> 0:19:36.679
<v Speaker 1>in his own speech, he's he didn't totally apologize, he

0:19:36.960 --> 0:19:41.720
<v Speaker 1>kind of apologized. Um, you know, what does this mean

0:19:41.920 --> 0:19:45.919
<v Speaker 1>mean for Will Smith's career? Yeah, it is one of

0:19:45.960 --> 0:19:49.359
<v Speaker 1>the most surreal moments in certainly in the history of

0:19:49.359 --> 0:19:54.600
<v Speaker 1>the Oscars, arguably in TV history. Um, it marred what

0:19:54.680 --> 0:19:56.800
<v Speaker 1>was supposed to be the culmination of his career. He's

0:19:56.800 --> 0:19:58.480
<v Speaker 1>been one of the biggest movie starts in the world

0:19:58.560 --> 0:20:03.440
<v Speaker 1>for years and you know, he tried to win Oscars before,

0:20:03.480 --> 0:20:05.840
<v Speaker 1>but nominated a couple of times. His career had been

0:20:05.920 --> 0:20:07.800
<v Speaker 1>on the downslope for a little bit, and he's really

0:20:07.840 --> 0:20:10.239
<v Speaker 1>revived it in the last five or six years, and

0:20:10.280 --> 0:20:12.240
<v Speaker 1>this was going to be the kind of the pinnacle

0:20:12.320 --> 0:20:14.439
<v Speaker 1>of all that, and instead, to your point, we're just

0:20:14.520 --> 0:20:18.640
<v Speaker 1>talking about this this one kind of unfortunate incident. Um.

0:20:18.720 --> 0:20:21.120
<v Speaker 1>He's someone who's lived very much in the public eye

0:20:21.119 --> 0:20:23.240
<v Speaker 1>over the last little bit, and I for one I'm

0:20:23.280 --> 0:20:25.960
<v Speaker 1>curious to see how he tries to navigate this and

0:20:26.000 --> 0:20:28.040
<v Speaker 1>what his response will be after he has some time

0:20:28.040 --> 0:20:31.560
<v Speaker 1>to digest it. Meantime, Chris Rock had sort of remarkable

0:20:31.600 --> 0:20:34.440
<v Speaker 1>composure in that moment. We still haven't heard from him yet, right,

0:20:34.520 --> 0:20:37.800
<v Speaker 1>I mean, why hasn't he made a statement? I mean,

0:20:37.840 --> 0:20:40.359
<v Speaker 1>he's probably waiting to see what will in the academy do.

0:20:40.440 --> 0:20:42.800
<v Speaker 1>You're right? I mean, it's pretty amazing that he handled

0:20:42.800 --> 0:20:44.399
<v Speaker 1>He handled it so well that there were a lot

0:20:44.480 --> 0:20:46.720
<v Speaker 1>of people who thought that that was a bit including

0:20:46.720 --> 0:20:49.399
<v Speaker 1>this morning. I got text messages at with people asking

0:20:49.440 --> 0:20:52.280
<v Speaker 1>me um, But I don't expect he'll say a whole

0:20:52.320 --> 0:20:57.000
<v Speaker 1>lot all right, Luca Shaw for us in l A. Lucas,

0:20:57.000 --> 0:21:00.679
<v Speaker 1>Thanks for that update. This incident, of course, not the

0:21:00.760 --> 0:21:03.639
<v Speaker 1>only thing of note that happened at the Asker is

0:21:03.720 --> 0:21:05.639
<v Speaker 1>just the one that everyone is talking about. But my

0:21:05.720 --> 0:21:07.920
<v Speaker 1>colleague Alex Webb points out there was a whole lot

0:21:07.960 --> 0:21:11.240
<v Speaker 1>more to the ceremony. Take a listen. Much of the

0:21:11.240 --> 0:21:14.240
<v Speaker 1>conversation around this is Oscars is focused on Will Smith

0:21:14.440 --> 0:21:17.480
<v Speaker 1>hitting Chris Rock midway through the ceremony, but there was

0:21:17.520 --> 0:21:21.400
<v Speaker 1>another really significant first from a business perspect The best

0:21:21.400 --> 0:21:25.160
<v Speaker 1>picture Oscar went to Coda, which was the first film

0:21:25.200 --> 0:21:28.080
<v Speaker 1>distributed by an online stream and it wasn't Netflix, it

0:21:28.160 --> 0:21:31.480
<v Speaker 1>wasn't Amazon Prime, it was Apple. The reason that's significant

0:21:31.560 --> 0:21:33.520
<v Speaker 1>is because it says a lot about the way the

0:21:33.560 --> 0:21:36.800
<v Speaker 1>economics of film are changing. The upside for streamers to

0:21:36.800 --> 0:21:40.080
<v Speaker 1>win awards is far greater than for the classic film studio.

0:21:40.200 --> 0:21:42.560
<v Speaker 1>In the old model, if you convince more people to

0:21:42.560 --> 0:21:44.680
<v Speaker 1>go to the cinema to see your film after having

0:21:44.760 --> 0:21:47.960
<v Speaker 1>one a few awards, you might get fift dollar spend

0:21:47.960 --> 0:21:50.840
<v Speaker 1>on the cinema ticket. The studio might take home half

0:21:50.840 --> 0:21:53.080
<v Speaker 1>of that, so maybe seven or eight dollars. In the

0:21:53.119 --> 0:21:55.840
<v Speaker 1>new model, you might be encouraging someone to sign up

0:21:55.840 --> 0:21:58.560
<v Speaker 1>for your streaming service, in this case Apple tv Plus

0:21:58.720 --> 0:22:01.280
<v Speaker 1>now Apple tv Plus it's about five dollars a month.

0:22:01.520 --> 0:22:03.119
<v Speaker 1>If you convince someone to sign up for it and

0:22:03.160 --> 0:22:05.119
<v Speaker 1>they stick around for two years, once they see all

0:22:05.119 --> 0:22:07.680
<v Speaker 1>the other content you have, that customer could be worth

0:22:07.680 --> 0:22:09.679
<v Speaker 1>a hundred and twenty dollars to you, so rather than

0:22:09.680 --> 0:22:12.280
<v Speaker 1>seven or eight dollars, you're getting a hundred and twenty

0:22:12.480 --> 0:22:14.320
<v Speaker 1>at On top of that, the cachet that comes with

0:22:14.400 --> 0:22:17.240
<v Speaker 1>being an Oscar winning studio and the ability to bring

0:22:17.280 --> 0:22:20.879
<v Speaker 1>in and encourage other filmmakers to bring their talent to

0:22:21.119 --> 0:22:25.119
<v Speaker 1>your studio. And it has a real snowball effects further

0:22:25.160 --> 0:22:28.960
<v Speaker 1>down the line and can benefit your output. Bloomberg's Alex

0:22:29.000 --> 0:22:32.239
<v Speaker 1>Web there all right, coming out. Huawei earnings out at

0:22:32.280 --> 0:22:36.680
<v Speaker 1>a seventy plus percent jump in private despite tightening US sanctions.

0:22:36.720 --> 0:22:40.960
<v Speaker 1>AIE party of Huawei joins US. Next, this is Bloomberg,

0:22:58.720 --> 0:23:00.760
<v Speaker 1>Welcome back to bloom More technolog gam emily changing San

0:23:00.800 --> 0:23:04.280
<v Speaker 1>Francisco shares a vv giant Tesla jumping eight percent after

0:23:04.320 --> 0:23:07.399
<v Speaker 1>the company said it would seek a shareholder approval for

0:23:07.440 --> 0:23:10.640
<v Speaker 1>another stocks plan, the news driving the stock higher despite

0:23:10.680 --> 0:23:15.840
<v Speaker 1>other negative headlines. Bloomberg sources say Tesla has halted production

0:23:15.880 --> 0:23:18.520
<v Speaker 1>at a Shanghai plant to comply with government lockdowns to

0:23:18.560 --> 0:23:22.199
<v Speaker 1>combat COVID. Are at ludlow here with the latest and

0:23:22.800 --> 0:23:26.040
<v Speaker 1>why another stock split? Yeah, it's interesting, you know. The

0:23:26.080 --> 0:23:28.840
<v Speaker 1>street is hypothesizing that the rationale is same as the

0:23:28.920 --> 0:23:31.960
<v Speaker 1>last stock split in August, which is to lower the

0:23:31.960 --> 0:23:36.119
<v Speaker 1>barrier for entry. Right. Elon Musk has talked regularly about

0:23:36.160 --> 0:23:40.919
<v Speaker 1>how Tessa investors on the retail side are often Tesla owners, Right,

0:23:40.920 --> 0:23:43.919
<v Speaker 1>they own the cars, they own the energy products um

0:23:44.000 --> 0:23:46.320
<v Speaker 1>and they have a better understanding of the company than

0:23:46.400 --> 0:23:48.639
<v Speaker 1>institutional investors. But with the stock at the level that

0:23:48.760 --> 0:23:51.320
<v Speaker 1>it is a thousand dollars a share, it might be

0:23:51.359 --> 0:23:53.639
<v Speaker 1>inaccessible to them. So by doing a stock split, you

0:23:53.720 --> 0:23:56.960
<v Speaker 1>lower that per unit price and it opens up the field,

0:23:57.000 --> 0:24:02.119
<v Speaker 1>democratizes access to the stock. What more details do we

0:24:02.240 --> 0:24:06.240
<v Speaker 1>have on how exactly this will work. Well, that's the

0:24:06.280 --> 0:24:09.679
<v Speaker 1>whole problem, and we don't have details. You know, Tesla

0:24:09.760 --> 0:24:12.119
<v Speaker 1>communicated this in a tweet right which we saw on

0:24:12.160 --> 0:24:14.600
<v Speaker 1>your screen a few seconds ago. Then they put out

0:24:14.600 --> 0:24:17.600
<v Speaker 1>a regulatory filing saying that they're going to ask investors

0:24:17.840 --> 0:24:20.399
<v Speaker 1>to approve the additional shares that need would need to

0:24:20.400 --> 0:24:22.840
<v Speaker 1>be offered for the stock split at their annual meeting.

0:24:23.080 --> 0:24:24.960
<v Speaker 1>But we don't know the date of the annual meeting.

0:24:25.040 --> 0:24:26.760
<v Speaker 1>Last year, it was in October. The year before, I

0:24:26.760 --> 0:24:29.200
<v Speaker 1>believe it was in June. So this is classic Tesla,

0:24:29.240 --> 0:24:31.800
<v Speaker 1>you know, they don't communicate like other public companies do.

0:24:32.080 --> 0:24:34.159
<v Speaker 1>We don't know what the ratio of stock splits will be.

0:24:34.200 --> 0:24:35.480
<v Speaker 1>We don't know if it'll be a five to one

0:24:35.560 --> 0:24:40.119
<v Speaker 1>three for one one like Alphabet Google Parent did earlier

0:24:40.160 --> 0:24:42.440
<v Speaker 1>this year. This is classic Testa and it's hard to track,

0:24:42.520 --> 0:24:45.760
<v Speaker 1>but clearly the share reaction took Testa into positive territory

0:24:45.800 --> 0:24:50.120
<v Speaker 1>for two and investors like the idea of another stock split. Now,

0:24:50.160 --> 0:24:52.800
<v Speaker 1>what do we know about what's happening in Shanghai and

0:24:52.840 --> 0:24:57.200
<v Speaker 1>how problematic is it? You know, it's problematic. Authorities in Shanghai,

0:24:57.280 --> 0:25:00.600
<v Speaker 1>basically half a city at a time are doing testing

0:25:00.640 --> 0:25:04.399
<v Speaker 1>because of a resurgence of COVID. The area east of

0:25:04.440 --> 0:25:06.879
<v Speaker 1>the Huangpo River where the Tesla plant is is the

0:25:06.920 --> 0:25:10.000
<v Speaker 1>focus of that testing. So according to sources, Teslas shut

0:25:10.000 --> 0:25:12.159
<v Speaker 1>down through April one. We don't know how long it

0:25:12.200 --> 0:25:14.560
<v Speaker 1>will go through until total. But look at your screen

0:25:14.640 --> 0:25:17.960
<v Speaker 1>right now, Shanghai accounts for almost half of production. The

0:25:18.080 --> 0:25:20.560
<v Speaker 1>difference is that the cars coming out of Shanghai and

0:25:20.600 --> 0:25:23.480
<v Speaker 1>more profitable. They have higher margins because the supply chain

0:25:23.840 --> 0:25:26.920
<v Speaker 1>is localized and it has advanced robotics compared to Fremont.

0:25:27.200 --> 0:25:31.200
<v Speaker 1>In February, Tesla delivered fifty six thousand vehicles from that plant,

0:25:31.200 --> 0:25:34.879
<v Speaker 1>which basically is indicative of them outperforming the factories in

0:25:34.920 --> 0:25:37.720
<v Speaker 1>stall capacity. So if this holt does go on, it

0:25:37.800 --> 0:25:40.720
<v Speaker 1>could really be disruptive for a company that has a

0:25:40.800 --> 0:25:43.560
<v Speaker 1>lot of momentum in terms of scaling production. As you know,

0:25:43.720 --> 0:25:45.840
<v Speaker 1>m Berlin's online and we expect the new plant in

0:25:45.840 --> 0:25:49.120
<v Speaker 1>Austin's come on online again soon. So this is when

0:25:49.119 --> 0:25:53.960
<v Speaker 1>we're watching closely. All right, Bloodlow, thanks for that update. Now,

0:25:54.119 --> 0:25:57.920
<v Speaker 1>Huawei out with the company's annual report and seeing net

0:25:57.960 --> 0:26:04.520
<v Speaker 1>profit surge see despite deep revenue declines as they navigate

0:26:04.600 --> 0:26:09.280
<v Speaker 1>geo political sanctions. Andy Petty, Quawei Technologies at USA, chief

0:26:09.280 --> 0:26:12.959
<v Speaker 1>security officer with US Now, so Andy curious how Huawei

0:26:13.080 --> 0:26:15.720
<v Speaker 1>managed to pull this off and how the company will

0:26:15.800 --> 0:26:22.439
<v Speaker 1>keep it up in such an uncertain economic and geopolitical environment. Well, actually,

0:26:22.440 --> 0:26:24.520
<v Speaker 1>you know, backing up my last trip to China, I

0:26:24.640 --> 0:26:28.560
<v Speaker 1>left January and attended meetings of four different business groups

0:26:28.600 --> 0:26:32.200
<v Speaker 1>as the company was planning their strategy to try to survive.

0:26:32.400 --> 0:26:34.720
<v Speaker 1>Frankly was what it was. So this is this is

0:26:34.880 --> 0:26:37.880
<v Speaker 1>very heartening. So part of that work, given the limitations

0:26:37.920 --> 0:26:40.919
<v Speaker 1>on our ability to buy a non sensitive technology from

0:26:40.960 --> 0:26:45.040
<v Speaker 1>American semiconductor industry, we had to realign our business portfolio.

0:26:45.840 --> 0:26:48.280
<v Speaker 1>We had to invest very heavily in R and D.

0:26:48.359 --> 0:26:52.439
<v Speaker 1>You saw we invested over our revenue this year in

0:26:52.600 --> 0:26:56.800
<v Speaker 1>R and D. We're emphasizing the importance of digitalization, the

0:26:56.800 --> 0:27:01.520
<v Speaker 1>importance of cloud, the importance of carbon uh and we

0:27:01.560 --> 0:27:04.960
<v Speaker 1>are pleased that we have over seven hundred cities and

0:27:05.000 --> 0:27:07.720
<v Speaker 1>two hundred and sixty seven of the Fortune Global five

0:27:07.760 --> 0:27:11.119
<v Speaker 1>hundred companies have chosen Huawei for their digital transformation. So

0:27:11.160 --> 0:27:13.280
<v Speaker 1>we've had to modify what we do and how we

0:27:13.359 --> 0:27:16.840
<v Speaker 1>do it. It's a long haul. We are making progress

0:27:17.119 --> 0:27:19.760
<v Speaker 1>and we are going to work our way towards a

0:27:19.880 --> 0:27:22.480
<v Speaker 1>flourishing future, and we can in the in the process,

0:27:22.720 --> 0:27:25.480
<v Speaker 1>we're providing real value to our partners and customers around

0:27:25.520 --> 0:27:29.160
<v Speaker 1>the world. Now we're facing another geopolitical crisis, and that

0:27:29.440 --> 0:27:33.640
<v Speaker 1>is Russia's war on Ukraine. How will this impact Huawei.

0:27:33.800 --> 0:27:36.920
<v Speaker 1>I know that Huawei has been known to increase its

0:27:37.119 --> 0:27:41.400
<v Speaker 1>investments in Russia given US sanctions and has become Russia's

0:27:41.480 --> 0:27:46.280
<v Speaker 1>largest equipment supplier. We are really upset about the about

0:27:46.280 --> 0:27:49.439
<v Speaker 1>the invasion of Personally, in twenty nineteen, I went to

0:27:49.520 --> 0:27:52.000
<v Speaker 1>Key of twice to visits and friends over there with

0:27:52.040 --> 0:27:54.760
<v Speaker 1>the World Bank, and learning about the history, going to

0:27:54.880 --> 0:27:56.879
<v Speaker 1>museums and seeing what they're going through now is just

0:27:56.960 --> 0:28:00.040
<v Speaker 1>absolutely shocking and horrendous, and hopefully there can be to

0:28:00.119 --> 0:28:02.560
<v Speaker 1>cease far and a withdrawal and they can return some

0:28:02.600 --> 0:28:06.760
<v Speaker 1>of the children who are apparently taken from Ukraine right now,

0:28:06.800 --> 0:28:10.320
<v Speaker 1>as you know, are rotating. Chairman earlier today said we're

0:28:10.320 --> 0:28:13.040
<v Speaker 1>studying the various approaches of companies and governments around the

0:28:13.080 --> 0:28:15.760
<v Speaker 1>world to try to come up with what our approach

0:28:15.840 --> 0:28:17.800
<v Speaker 1>is going to be on this is very troubling issue.

0:28:19.160 --> 0:28:21.760
<v Speaker 1>Does while we need to abide by sanctions imposed on

0:28:21.840 --> 0:28:25.240
<v Speaker 1>Russia by other nations, and what if China imposes sanctions

0:28:25.560 --> 0:28:28.959
<v Speaker 1>on Russia by your contingency plans. Well, that's part of

0:28:29.000 --> 0:28:31.560
<v Speaker 1>what we're studying, is what the terms are. One of

0:28:31.600 --> 0:28:34.240
<v Speaker 1>the things that we've been doing even before the pandemic

0:28:34.760 --> 0:28:37.879
<v Speaker 1>was improving the diversification of our supply chain, not just

0:28:37.960 --> 0:28:41.000
<v Speaker 1>for semiconductors, So if there's a destruction in certain areas,

0:28:41.440 --> 0:28:43.960
<v Speaker 1>we can pursue other areas with our investment in R

0:28:44.040 --> 0:28:47.320
<v Speaker 1>and D and some in pure research, having the ability

0:28:47.400 --> 0:28:51.840
<v Speaker 1>to find value, to create value, and frankly working as

0:28:51.880 --> 0:28:56.040
<v Speaker 1>part of the information and communication industry telecommunications industry to

0:28:56.240 --> 0:28:59.680
<v Speaker 1>help move towards carbon negative and our work and digital

0:28:59.720 --> 0:29:02.360
<v Speaker 1>power or uh so, we've got a lot of flexibility

0:29:02.400 --> 0:29:04.600
<v Speaker 1>and different kind of products and different kinds of components.

0:29:04.960 --> 0:29:07.520
<v Speaker 1>UH and we operate in a hundred seventy countries in

0:29:07.560 --> 0:29:09.680
<v Speaker 1>the world, so we're going to find a way although

0:29:09.720 --> 0:29:12.160
<v Speaker 1>it can be very, very difficult. The idea of dealing

0:29:12.160 --> 0:29:16.800
<v Speaker 1>with business disruptions, supply chain challenges, business continuity, they're all

0:29:16.920 --> 0:29:20.200
<v Speaker 1>part of what major companies have to do. So let's

0:29:20.240 --> 0:29:24.000
<v Speaker 1>talk about that way forward, especially with your overseas business strategy,

0:29:24.240 --> 0:29:28.160
<v Speaker 1>given that you know your telecom your smartphone businesses have

0:29:28.200 --> 0:29:31.920
<v Speaker 1>been really hard hit by US sanctions in particular, and

0:29:31.960 --> 0:29:34.640
<v Speaker 1>it doesn't seem like this geopolitical uncertainty is going to

0:29:34.880 --> 0:29:40.120
<v Speaker 1>end anytime soon. Yes, going from one kind of uncertainty

0:29:40.160 --> 0:29:44.360
<v Speaker 1>to another. We're pleased that with our work, for example,

0:29:44.400 --> 0:29:47.080
<v Speaker 1>in five G there was a recent study of the

0:29:47.160 --> 0:29:50.480
<v Speaker 1>five G networks in Switzerland, Germany, Finland, nether On, South

0:29:50.560 --> 0:29:52.680
<v Speaker 1>Korean and Saudi Arabia. They said the law it provides

0:29:53.160 --> 0:29:56.520
<v Speaker 1>the best user experience. And as you know, our consumer device,

0:29:56.560 --> 0:30:00.000
<v Speaker 1>our consumer business apart from the mobile devices, UH where

0:30:00.000 --> 0:30:05.120
<v Speaker 1>doable smart screens, entertainment sort of tremendous surge in that business.

0:30:05.360 --> 0:30:08.200
<v Speaker 1>So we're and we've got like six thousand partners in

0:30:08.240 --> 0:30:11.520
<v Speaker 1>the world coming up with these digitalization solutions, and last

0:30:11.560 --> 0:30:14.440
<v Speaker 1>year we had ten thousand, five G two b UH

0:30:14.520 --> 0:30:17.200
<v Speaker 1>deployments working with our partners. So there are a lot

0:30:17.240 --> 0:30:20.560
<v Speaker 1>of different ways that we can survive, and by heavily

0:30:20.560 --> 0:30:23.040
<v Speaker 1>investing in research and working with our partners, we're finding

0:30:23.080 --> 0:30:26.280
<v Speaker 1>ways to UH find our way what is while we're

0:30:26.320 --> 0:30:30.240
<v Speaker 1>doing to address the security concerns raised by foreign countries,

0:30:30.240 --> 0:30:32.520
<v Speaker 1>in particular the United States. I know you don't agree

0:30:32.960 --> 0:30:36.120
<v Speaker 1>necessarily with all of them, but clearly these concerns remain

0:30:36.800 --> 0:30:40.240
<v Speaker 1>well in light of the recent cyber attacks that demonstrated

0:30:40.240 --> 0:30:43.480
<v Speaker 1>that an old axiom about trusted suppliers is no longer valid.

0:30:44.080 --> 0:30:47.560
<v Speaker 1>We are working with our competitors, with the major carriers

0:30:47.560 --> 0:30:50.200
<v Speaker 1>in the world, with the major standards bodies to try

0:30:50.200 --> 0:30:53.160
<v Speaker 1>to strengthen and improve standards for five G and particularly

0:30:53.560 --> 0:30:57.640
<v Speaker 1>standards for the telecom equipment, and working to create conformance

0:30:57.680 --> 0:31:00.880
<v Speaker 1>programs and independent testing programs. We are very open to

0:31:00.960 --> 0:31:05.000
<v Speaker 1>the US government recently emphasized the importance of greater information

0:31:05.000 --> 0:31:07.120
<v Speaker 1>sharing when it comes to cyber incidents. In other words,

0:31:07.440 --> 0:31:09.720
<v Speaker 1>don't just wait to really bad things happen. Try to

0:31:09.760 --> 0:31:13.600
<v Speaker 1>share information more quickly and sooner so that dots can

0:31:13.600 --> 0:31:16.520
<v Speaker 1>be connected. We're very open to having the US government

0:31:16.520 --> 0:31:19.800
<v Speaker 1>come into our facilities and hopefully those of our competitors,

0:31:19.840 --> 0:31:22.440
<v Speaker 1>to give advice about how we and other companies can

0:31:22.440 --> 0:31:24.880
<v Speaker 1>be more transparent. How can we make sure that we

0:31:24.920 --> 0:31:28.800
<v Speaker 1>are doing what's necessary to address real risk, to promote resilience,

0:31:29.040 --> 0:31:32.640
<v Speaker 1>and helping to find ways to do that before really

0:31:32.680 --> 0:31:35.400
<v Speaker 1>bad things happen, whether it's state of breaches or cyber attacks.

0:31:35.600 --> 0:31:38.719
<v Speaker 1>We need a greater capabilities of global community to figure

0:31:38.720 --> 0:31:41.520
<v Speaker 1>out where we stand in terms out comparedness so that

0:31:41.560 --> 0:31:44.000
<v Speaker 1>we can avoid really bad things happening. And hopefully the

0:31:44.080 --> 0:31:46.360
<v Speaker 1>United States is going to get much more active internationally

0:31:46.680 --> 0:31:49.840
<v Speaker 1>in these efforts as well. Well. What about the Chinese government.

0:31:49.840 --> 0:31:54.560
<v Speaker 1>We've seen the Chinese government crackdown on Chinese tech companies.

0:31:54.720 --> 0:31:58.520
<v Speaker 1>How can you assure your your overseas partners, business partners

0:31:58.560 --> 0:32:02.320
<v Speaker 1>that you can avert this kind of infravention intervention and

0:32:02.400 --> 0:32:07.000
<v Speaker 1>that it won't negatively impact Huawei's business well, and that's

0:32:07.040 --> 0:32:09.600
<v Speaker 1>one of the reasons we're partnered with so many different companies.

0:32:09.600 --> 0:32:13.200
<v Speaker 1>We've got thirty thousand partners around the world covering every

0:32:13.440 --> 0:32:16.600
<v Speaker 1>every different line of business. UH. We are continuing to

0:32:16.640 --> 0:32:20.600
<v Speaker 1>strengthen the Global Assurance and Privacy Protection program that that

0:32:20.680 --> 0:32:23.960
<v Speaker 1>we launched shortly before I joined WAWEIH almost almost ten

0:32:24.000 --> 0:32:28.320
<v Speaker 1>years ago, and the idea of of internal testing, external

0:32:28.400 --> 0:32:32.200
<v Speaker 1>independent testing, participating in these standards bodies where you have

0:32:32.280 --> 0:32:35.240
<v Speaker 1>to have certifications of your products, of your requirements, and

0:32:35.280 --> 0:32:39.080
<v Speaker 1>trying to find ways to be increasingly transparent so our

0:32:39.120 --> 0:32:42.120
<v Speaker 1>customers and the customers of others know what we're doing.

0:32:42.160 --> 0:32:44.600
<v Speaker 1>And so we've been one of the most tested companies

0:32:44.600 --> 0:32:46.800
<v Speaker 1>in the world, and we believe that the folks that

0:32:47.000 --> 0:32:50.320
<v Speaker 1>have been our customers and stakeholdness in those countries recognize

0:32:50.360 --> 0:32:52.959
<v Speaker 1>that we are committed to following the laws in those countries,

0:32:52.960 --> 0:32:56.080
<v Speaker 1>and we are committed to the best practices and cybersecurity

0:32:56.120 --> 0:32:58.120
<v Speaker 1>and and we're open to ideas on how to improve.

0:32:59.400 --> 0:33:03.680
<v Speaker 1>Andy per Huawei Technologies USA Chief Security Officer, Good to

0:33:03.680 --> 0:33:07.400
<v Speaker 1>have you, Andy, thank you for joining us. Coming up

0:33:07.400 --> 0:33:10.200
<v Speaker 1>how crypto markets are continuing to be impacted by the

0:33:10.240 --> 0:33:13.920
<v Speaker 1>War on Ukraine and how they can recover one that

0:33:14.440 --> 0:33:42.880
<v Speaker 1>next to school work, time for our crypto report now,

0:33:42.880 --> 0:33:45.200
<v Speaker 1>and let's take a look back on the crypto market

0:33:45.280 --> 0:33:48.920
<v Speaker 1>since the start of the War on Ukraine. Bitcoins and others.

0:33:49.040 --> 0:33:51.840
<v Speaker 1>Bitcoin and others have been fluctuating ever since, caught in

0:33:51.880 --> 0:33:56.240
<v Speaker 1>the crosshairs between Russian sanctions abroad and rising interest rates

0:33:56.240 --> 0:33:58.520
<v Speaker 1>in the United States. Let's bring in our own crypto

0:33:58.560 --> 0:34:01.440
<v Speaker 1>contributors n Ali Bassik now for more on this. Quite

0:34:01.440 --> 0:34:04.120
<v Speaker 1>an interesting pattern, quite an interesting pattern. But I think

0:34:04.160 --> 0:34:07.640
<v Speaker 1>what's important to note here is that even when the volatility,

0:34:07.760 --> 0:34:11.439
<v Speaker 1>Bitcoin has erased his losses for the year and since

0:34:11.440 --> 0:34:14.400
<v Speaker 1>the war has started, you see that Bitcoin has raised

0:34:14.560 --> 0:34:17.840
<v Speaker 1>risen really significantly, more than twenty five percent over the

0:34:17.880 --> 0:34:20.120
<v Speaker 1>last couple of weeks. Of course, we know there's been

0:34:20.120 --> 0:34:23.799
<v Speaker 1>a really big buyer. The Luna Foundation has confirmed to

0:34:23.920 --> 0:34:26.960
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg that they have been buying about more more than

0:34:27.000 --> 0:34:30.760
<v Speaker 1>one billion dollars worth bitcoin since last January, including millions

0:34:30.760 --> 0:34:34.120
<v Speaker 1>worth of purchases on Monday. So that's that's a steady

0:34:34.200 --> 0:34:36.680
<v Speaker 1>rise for bitcoin. Certainly in the last couple of weeks.

0:34:36.920 --> 0:34:39.960
<v Speaker 1>It really does emily outpaced the SMP five hundred since

0:34:39.960 --> 0:34:43.080
<v Speaker 1>the war started, which only rose about six percent in

0:34:43.160 --> 0:34:45.759
<v Speaker 1>that time frame. And if you take out a theory um,

0:34:46.200 --> 0:34:48.400
<v Speaker 1>take a look at the theoryum, it's risen even further

0:34:48.520 --> 0:34:51.200
<v Speaker 1>than Bitcoin has. Of course, we know that's around the

0:34:51.239 --> 0:34:54.880
<v Speaker 1>excitement around the merge among other things. However, we're seeing

0:34:54.920 --> 0:34:56.880
<v Speaker 1>if you take a look there, about a thirty percent

0:34:57.000 --> 0:34:59.840
<v Speaker 1>rise or so in the theory um now over the

0:35:00.080 --> 0:35:02.359
<v Speaker 1>last twenty four hours. Yes, we've seen a big jump,

0:35:02.440 --> 0:35:04.960
<v Speaker 1>but that has started to level off both with theory

0:35:05.000 --> 0:35:08.239
<v Speaker 1>um and with bitcoin, so we'll see how much room

0:35:08.239 --> 0:35:10.120
<v Speaker 1>it has to run. People who are watching the space

0:35:10.200 --> 0:35:13.400
<v Speaker 1>closely are waiting for it to get to fifty for bitcointe.

0:35:14.200 --> 0:35:16.560
<v Speaker 1>One of the biggest hurdles that remain for for bitcoin,

0:35:16.680 --> 0:35:19.560
<v Speaker 1>obviously there's a major regulatory one. Yeah, that is one

0:35:19.560 --> 0:35:22.040
<v Speaker 1>of the biggest things. The SEC has not yet approved

0:35:22.040 --> 0:35:25.480
<v Speaker 1>a spot bitcoin e t F. Even with the the

0:35:25.520 --> 0:35:28.960
<v Speaker 1>futures based ETFs really taking off here that pro shares

0:35:29.000 --> 0:35:32.840
<v Speaker 1>bitcoin et F again, not a huge rise since it

0:35:33.040 --> 0:35:36.399
<v Speaker 1>first really started, but we do see it coming back

0:35:36.560 --> 0:35:38.640
<v Speaker 1>up along with the rise in bitcoin for the year.

0:35:39.080 --> 0:35:41.600
<v Speaker 1>Something interesting, Emily, you can look at it both ways.

0:35:41.960 --> 0:35:45.280
<v Speaker 1>The big banks, Goldman Sachs among other big market makers

0:35:45.320 --> 0:35:47.280
<v Speaker 1>as well, have started to make a lot of bitcoin

0:35:47.360 --> 0:35:51.120
<v Speaker 1>derivative products that help institutions get exposure to bitcoin without

0:35:51.200 --> 0:35:54.959
<v Speaker 1>holding it itself. My sources say every day that there's

0:35:55.000 --> 0:35:57.799
<v Speaker 1>not a spot e t F. More people get into

0:35:57.880 --> 0:36:02.799
<v Speaker 1>these derivative products to get exposure to bitcoin while they

0:36:02.880 --> 0:36:05.200
<v Speaker 1>can't get exposure to a more direct body t F.

0:36:05.880 --> 0:36:08.560
<v Speaker 1>And what about n f T s We saw n

0:36:08.640 --> 0:36:11.680
<v Speaker 1>f T sales sputter a bit. Are we seeing any

0:36:11.760 --> 0:36:13.440
<v Speaker 1>kind of recovery there? You see a little bit of

0:36:13.520 --> 0:36:16.000
<v Speaker 1>a recovery there. As you saw in that last chart,

0:36:16.320 --> 0:36:19.400
<v Speaker 1>it's down significantly from the highs Emily and that's according

0:36:19.440 --> 0:36:23.160
<v Speaker 1>to n f T go dot io. But you're seeing

0:36:23.400 --> 0:36:26.319
<v Speaker 1>that then this is by volume to be certain, if

0:36:26.360 --> 0:36:28.520
<v Speaker 1>you look at by market cap it's still quite high.

0:36:29.000 --> 0:36:32.920
<v Speaker 1>But this all goes to say bitcoin itself has taken

0:36:32.960 --> 0:36:35.680
<v Speaker 1>a rise. All of these other products follow on the

0:36:35.760 --> 0:36:39.200
<v Speaker 1>heels of how fast Bitcoin can rise. Let's see if

0:36:39.280 --> 0:36:40.759
<v Speaker 1>n f T sales in the next couple of we

0:36:40.960 --> 0:36:44.120
<v Speaker 1>start to catch up. Should bitcoin keep its bid? Okay,

0:36:45.239 --> 0:36:48.239
<v Speaker 1>our crypto contributor, thank you, come up. The future of

0:36:48.280 --> 0:36:51.800
<v Speaker 1>biotech investing and of the crisper gene editing technology in

0:36:51.880 --> 0:36:55.960
<v Speaker 1>a post pandemic world. Biochemist and Nobel Prize winner Jennifer

0:36:56.000 --> 0:36:59.600
<v Speaker 1>Downnutt joins us to talk about all of that and more. Next,

0:37:00.040 --> 0:37:20.520
<v Speaker 1>this is Bloomberg. As we come out of the pandemic,

0:37:20.719 --> 0:37:23.920
<v Speaker 1>what the future of the biotech industry holds well? UC

0:37:24.040 --> 0:37:27.000
<v Speaker 1>Berkeley professor and Nobel Prize winner Jennifer Down is trying

0:37:27.520 --> 0:37:30.040
<v Speaker 1>to level the playing field by launching a new program

0:37:30.160 --> 0:37:34.360
<v Speaker 1>to help women founders in biotechnology. Joining us now to

0:37:34.400 --> 0:37:37.800
<v Speaker 1>talk about all that and more, Professor Down herself and

0:37:38.040 --> 0:37:41.400
<v Speaker 1>Dr Down, I think the world most people would probably

0:37:41.400 --> 0:37:43.879
<v Speaker 1>agree we need more Jennifer down as in this world.

0:37:43.920 --> 0:37:46.520
<v Speaker 1>Talk to us about this new program and what the

0:37:46.600 --> 0:37:51.000
<v Speaker 1>impact would be. Hi, Emily, we are so excited about

0:37:51.040 --> 0:37:54.320
<v Speaker 1>this program. At the Innovative Genomics Institute, we launched a

0:37:54.400 --> 0:38:01.080
<v Speaker 1>WISE program, Women in Entrepreneurial Science, founded by anerful female

0:38:01.480 --> 0:38:06.640
<v Speaker 1>entrepreneurial philanthropist. We have a incredible opportunity to recruit the

0:38:06.760 --> 0:38:11.839
<v Speaker 1>best female entrepreneurs to the institute, give them a head

0:38:11.920 --> 0:38:15.480
<v Speaker 1>start to get their ideas launched, and then found companies

0:38:15.640 --> 0:38:18.480
<v Speaker 1>off of those ideas. It's a It's an extraordinary opportunity.

0:38:18.520 --> 0:38:20.600
<v Speaker 1>I'm delighted to be part of it. Why do we

0:38:20.680 --> 0:38:24.440
<v Speaker 1>need more women in biotechnology in particular? I'm a big

0:38:24.520 --> 0:38:27.719
<v Speaker 1>believer that the best science gets done by a diverse team.

0:38:27.800 --> 0:38:30.319
<v Speaker 1>We have to have people from all walks of life

0:38:30.400 --> 0:38:34.320
<v Speaker 1>contributing to the future of biotech in genome engineering. With

0:38:34.400 --> 0:38:38.560
<v Speaker 1>Cristper technology, we've seen over the last decade the extraordinary

0:38:38.600 --> 0:38:41.719
<v Speaker 1>advance is made both on the innovative side and also

0:38:41.800 --> 0:38:44.080
<v Speaker 1>on the applied side. And I think that, you know,

0:38:44.440 --> 0:38:48.320
<v Speaker 1>going forward, we just want to have the most opportunity,

0:38:48.320 --> 0:38:52.120
<v Speaker 1>you know, the largest opportunity to recruit people from everywhere

0:38:52.320 --> 0:38:55.880
<v Speaker 1>to come into this field and work on opportunities and

0:38:55.920 --> 0:38:59.719
<v Speaker 1>geno medity. What's your assessment of where we are at

0:38:59.800 --> 0:39:04.040
<v Speaker 1>this phase of the pandemic, moving into hopefully post pandemic

0:39:04.160 --> 0:39:07.279
<v Speaker 1>and the role that CRISPER engene editing will play in

0:39:07.440 --> 0:39:11.560
<v Speaker 1>preventing the next pandemic from happening. Crisper is such an

0:39:11.600 --> 0:39:14.600
<v Speaker 1>extraordinary technology, I think, as you know, it came out

0:39:14.640 --> 0:39:17.840
<v Speaker 1>of a study of a bacterial immune system, so it

0:39:17.960 --> 0:39:21.080
<v Speaker 1>naturally works in nature as a as a way of

0:39:21.200 --> 0:39:25.719
<v Speaker 1>protecting cells against viral infection. And going forward, we're using

0:39:25.800 --> 0:39:29.600
<v Speaker 1>it not only as a way to detect the presence

0:39:29.719 --> 0:39:33.359
<v Speaker 1>of infectious agents, but also to use it to uh,

0:39:33.640 --> 0:39:36.720
<v Speaker 1>you know, make the kinds of changes in the genome

0:39:36.840 --> 0:39:39.759
<v Speaker 1>that could be protective against future infection. I think those

0:39:39.800 --> 0:39:42.480
<v Speaker 1>are the two ways that we'll see Crisper having an

0:39:42.560 --> 0:39:45.600
<v Speaker 1>impact in the future to prevent the kind of pandemic

0:39:45.719 --> 0:39:48.719
<v Speaker 1>that we've just been through. Now, there's been some controversy

0:39:48.760 --> 0:39:52.399
<v Speaker 1>in the crisper world recently. Berkeley recently lost a long

0:39:52.480 --> 0:39:55.080
<v Speaker 1>and drawn out patent battle with M. I. T. And

0:39:55.200 --> 0:39:59.200
<v Speaker 1>Harvard's Broad Institute over the ownership of this technology. What's

0:39:59.239 --> 0:40:02.920
<v Speaker 1>been your reaction to this, Oh, Emily, you know, I

0:40:03.040 --> 0:40:07.560
<v Speaker 1>think this this is a common theme in areas of

0:40:07.640 --> 0:40:13.240
<v Speaker 1>technology where there is extraordinary opportunity, there are always disputes about,

0:40:13.520 --> 0:40:16.279
<v Speaker 1>you know, intellectual property, and Cristper is no different in

0:40:16.360 --> 0:40:18.719
<v Speaker 1>that regard. I'm proud of the fact that U. C.

0:40:18.920 --> 0:40:24.200
<v Speaker 1>Berkeley University, California retains more than forty five issued patents

0:40:24.239 --> 0:40:26.360
<v Speaker 1>that are not part of the interference. So we have

0:40:26.480 --> 0:40:30.719
<v Speaker 1>a very strong intellectual property suite around Cristopher and we

0:40:30.840 --> 0:40:33.480
<v Speaker 1>continue to do our our work at the Innovative Genomics

0:40:33.520 --> 0:40:36.200
<v Speaker 1>Institute and with our partner companies. Were not impeded in

0:40:36.280 --> 0:40:39.839
<v Speaker 1>any way by that ongoing dispute. So on that note,

0:40:39.920 --> 0:40:43.600
<v Speaker 1>how does this impact your efforts too, and your dream

0:40:43.640 --> 0:40:47.680
<v Speaker 1>really to commercialize this technology and apply it to hard

0:40:47.760 --> 0:40:52.000
<v Speaker 1>problems for generations to come, not at all, you know,

0:40:52.080 --> 0:40:55.040
<v Speaker 1>I recently I was. I had a wonderful conversation just

0:40:55.239 --> 0:40:58.280
<v Speaker 1>last week with Victoria Gray. She was the first United

0:40:58.360 --> 0:41:03.560
<v Speaker 1>States uh resident who received a Crisper therapy for her

0:41:03.600 --> 0:41:07.799
<v Speaker 1>sickle cell disease. UM just incredible to talk with her

0:41:07.960 --> 0:41:10.960
<v Speaker 1>and hear about the impact on her family, her life.

0:41:11.320 --> 0:41:14.160
<v Speaker 1>She's now enrolling in business school, something she couldn't have

0:41:14.320 --> 0:41:17.640
<v Speaker 1>imagined doing when she was dealing with the ongoing impacts

0:41:17.680 --> 0:41:20.200
<v Speaker 1>of sickle cell disease. And I think that's the future

0:41:20.280 --> 0:41:22.760
<v Speaker 1>for Cristper. We're going to see more and more opportunities

0:41:22.840 --> 0:41:25.319
<v Speaker 1>to change people's lives in better way, for for the best.

0:41:26.040 --> 0:41:28.359
<v Speaker 1>Talk to us about your near term goals and your

0:41:28.440 --> 0:41:33.239
<v Speaker 1>long term goals on the therapeutic roadmap. Well, near term,

0:41:33.360 --> 0:41:37.040
<v Speaker 1>I think we're we're on a path to continue expanding

0:41:37.080 --> 0:41:40.040
<v Speaker 1>the kinds of applications that Cristopher will be used for,

0:41:40.280 --> 0:41:43.560
<v Speaker 1>not only for very rare disease, but I think in

0:41:43.680 --> 0:41:48.320
<v Speaker 1>the future using it as a way to protect against disease.

0:41:48.400 --> 0:41:51.080
<v Speaker 1>And they're already our companies, for example, Verve comes to

0:41:51.200 --> 0:41:55.239
<v Speaker 1>mind that are on that same path. And I think, then,

0:41:55.400 --> 0:41:58.480
<v Speaker 1>you know, further down the road. I think crisper eventually

0:41:58.560 --> 0:42:01.720
<v Speaker 1>becomes a standard of or for certain types of disease.

0:42:01.800 --> 0:42:04.480
<v Speaker 1>I think that's something that you know, I I can envision.

0:42:04.840 --> 0:42:08.000
<v Speaker 1>You know, it will only happen if it's developed with

0:42:08.120 --> 0:42:11.320
<v Speaker 1>an eye towards sustainability. It has to be affordable. You know,

0:42:11.480 --> 0:42:15.400
<v Speaker 1>Victoria Gray's treatment was close to two million dollars, So

0:42:15.560 --> 0:42:17.920
<v Speaker 1>clearly we need to bring down the cost. And we

0:42:18.080 --> 0:42:20.160
<v Speaker 1>think that one way to do that is to do

0:42:20.320 --> 0:42:22.480
<v Speaker 1>the kind of research that we have ongoing at the

0:42:22.520 --> 0:42:25.520
<v Speaker 1>Innovative Genomics Institute and then partner with companies when it

0:42:25.560 --> 0:42:29.160
<v Speaker 1>makes sense. And what's your outlook on the future of

0:42:29.520 --> 0:42:32.920
<v Speaker 1>biotech returns? I mean, for so many years this was

0:42:33.360 --> 0:42:36.160
<v Speaker 1>and under invested in part of the tech landscape, certainly

0:42:36.160 --> 0:42:39.400
<v Speaker 1>when you compare it to consumer and enterprise technology. Do

0:42:39.480 --> 0:42:43.520
<v Speaker 1>you see a new era for biotech investing being ushered

0:42:43.560 --> 0:42:46.600
<v Speaker 1>in over the next decade. I do. And part of

0:42:46.640 --> 0:42:49.320
<v Speaker 1>the reason, one thing I think is driving that actually

0:42:49.520 --> 0:42:53.080
<v Speaker 1>is the intersection of biotech with other kinds of technology.

0:42:53.200 --> 0:42:56.080
<v Speaker 1>Is hard tech for example, uh, computer science. You know,

0:42:56.160 --> 0:42:58.480
<v Speaker 1>I think we many of us see that there are

0:42:58.480 --> 0:43:03.759
<v Speaker 1>amazing opportunities when these areas of technology converge and that's

0:43:03.800 --> 0:43:05.759
<v Speaker 1>what we're seeing right now. So I think the next

0:43:05.880 --> 0:43:09.560
<v Speaker 1>decade in this area will be very, very exciting for

0:43:09.840 --> 0:43:13.319
<v Speaker 1>scientists and also for investors. So where the next big

0:43:13.360 --> 0:43:16.680
<v Speaker 1>bets wish and investors be putting their money quickly, Well,

0:43:16.880 --> 0:43:19.759
<v Speaker 1>one area I would I would recommend looking into is

0:43:20.239 --> 0:43:24.080
<v Speaker 1>is agriculture and synthetic biology. These are these are areas

0:43:24.160 --> 0:43:26.400
<v Speaker 1>where you know, we need crisper and we need other

0:43:26.480 --> 0:43:29.279
<v Speaker 1>technologies to address the challenges of climate change, of a

0:43:29.360 --> 0:43:32.279
<v Speaker 1>growing population on our planet. How do we keep people

0:43:32.360 --> 0:43:36.280
<v Speaker 1>fed with the you know, high nutritional value crops. Christopher

0:43:36.360 --> 0:43:40.480
<v Speaker 1>will play a big role there, all right. Dr Jennifer

0:43:40.680 --> 0:43:44.800
<v Speaker 1>dowdnat Nobel Prize winner, UC Berkeley Professor, always get to

0:43:44.840 --> 0:43:46.839
<v Speaker 1>have you here on the show. Thank you for joining us.

0:43:48.360 --> 0:43:51.080
<v Speaker 1>And that does it for this edition of Bloomberg Technology.

0:43:51.160 --> 0:43:53.920
<v Speaker 1>Tune in tomorrow for my exclusive interview with Uber CEO

0:43:54.000 --> 0:43:56.720
<v Speaker 1>Dara Kaswa Shahy. I'll be speaking with him at Shop

0:43:56.800 --> 0:43:59.640
<v Speaker 1>Talk in Las Vegas. We will be live with the

0:43:59.719 --> 0:44:02.680
<v Speaker 1>show Bloomberg Technology on the shop Talk floor and allays

0:44:02.719 --> 0:44:05.719
<v Speaker 1>at all tomorrow. And don't forget to check out our

0:44:05.760 --> 0:44:07.799
<v Speaker 1>new podcast. You can find it on the terminal, as

0:44:07.840 --> 0:44:10.960
<v Speaker 1>well as online at Apple, Spotify, our Heart Radio and

0:44:11.000 --> 0:44:14.239
<v Speaker 1>wherever you get your podcast. I'm Emily checking in San Francisco.

0:44:14.520 --> 0:45:46.920
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg. Yeah. Yeah. Every art institution I know

0:45:47.040 --> 0:45:48.600
<v Speaker 1>I want you to serve on their board. And you're

0:45:48.719 --> 0:45:50.600
<v Speaker 1>very involved in the art world. What is it about

0:45:50.680 --> 0:45:56.240
<v Speaker 1>art that attracts you? Well? Art is essential in the democracy, David.

0:45:56.560 --> 0:46:00.880
<v Speaker 1>Art is so important. We know what our does to

0:46:01.080 --> 0:46:05.960
<v Speaker 1>young people. We know that exposure to art brings about

0:46:06.680 --> 0:46:13.120
<v Speaker 1>higher levels of empathy. Um. It helps people understand how

0:46:13.280 --> 0:46:18.880
<v Speaker 1>other cultures, other people live, um. And it just brings

0:46:19.000 --> 0:46:22.200
<v Speaker 1>out the kind of humanity and all of us. There

0:46:22.239 --> 0:46:27.759
<v Speaker 1>are times when I have observed leaders uh use um

0:46:29.160 --> 0:46:33.960
<v Speaker 1>language that is inhumane while talking about other human beings,

0:46:34.719 --> 0:46:38.279
<v Speaker 1>while while talking about the world. UM, And I think

0:46:38.360 --> 0:46:42.640
<v Speaker 1>to myself, this person has clearly never engaged in beautiful poetry.

0:46:42.800 --> 0:46:49.239
<v Speaker 1>They've never listened to the words of a great play, right,

0:46:49.360 --> 0:46:53.640
<v Speaker 1>They've never um sat and reflected on a beautiful painting

0:46:54.040 --> 0:47:00.920
<v Speaker 1>or picture. Because if they had been really educated, had

0:47:01.000 --> 0:47:05.440
<v Speaker 1>they really been exposed to the arts, UM, they wouldn't

0:47:06.000 --> 0:47:09.080
<v Speaker 1>find it possible to use this kind of language.