WEBVTT - Jennifer Grancio Talks ETF Business

0:00:02.440 --> 0:00:07.760
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, podcasts, radio News. You know, Molly, one

0:00:07.760 --> 0:00:10.200
<v Speaker 1>of the most amazing stories to me in financial services

0:00:10.200 --> 0:00:12.120
<v Speaker 1>over the last decade or so has been the growth

0:00:12.160 --> 0:00:16.520
<v Speaker 1>of ETFs. Huge Just how amazed at the fun flows

0:00:16.560 --> 0:00:19.320
<v Speaker 1>to ETFs and it makes a lot of sense. Unfortunately,

0:00:19.320 --> 0:00:21.800
<v Speaker 1>we have people like Eric Paul Junis at Bloomberg Intelligence

0:00:21.840 --> 0:00:23.759
<v Speaker 1>who keeps us update on what's going on there. But

0:00:24.239 --> 0:00:26.279
<v Speaker 1>we wanted to talk to one of the practitioners in

0:00:26.320 --> 0:00:28.960
<v Speaker 1>the business. Jennifer Grancio joins us. She's global head of

0:00:29.000 --> 0:00:33.720
<v Speaker 1>distribution at TCW. Little firm on the West Coast, huge

0:00:33.760 --> 0:00:37.920
<v Speaker 1>firm on the West Country, and they're into the ETF business. Jennifer,

0:00:37.920 --> 0:00:41.040
<v Speaker 1>thanks for joining us here in our studio. What is

0:00:41.080 --> 0:00:44.839
<v Speaker 1>the TCW ETF business? Tell us kind of how you

0:00:44.920 --> 0:00:45.879
<v Speaker 1>guys are in that business.

0:00:46.720 --> 0:00:48.720
<v Speaker 2>Happy to you, great to be here. So from a

0:00:48.720 --> 0:00:51.400
<v Speaker 2>TCW perspective, a lot of people think of us as

0:00:51.479 --> 0:00:54.360
<v Speaker 2>you know, the core of the fixed income portfolio, which

0:00:54.400 --> 0:00:57.080
<v Speaker 2>we are for many investors with the TCW or met

0:00:57.080 --> 0:01:01.040
<v Speaker 2>West funds, and now we're growing the equity business as well,

0:01:01.160 --> 0:01:03.720
<v Speaker 2>so a lot of that will be ETFs and we

0:01:03.760 --> 0:01:06.039
<v Speaker 2>also were going to do ETFs in the fixed income space.

0:01:06.480 --> 0:01:08.920
<v Speaker 3>When you say you do ETFs, are you the one

0:01:09.160 --> 0:01:11.680
<v Speaker 3>so that you're like deciding what goes into each one

0:01:11.760 --> 0:01:14.080
<v Speaker 3>or like tell us what your role is in this marketplace?

0:01:14.200 --> 0:01:17.640
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, for sure. So from an equity perspective at TCW,

0:01:18.160 --> 0:01:20.959
<v Speaker 2>we have some great core strategies we run in mutual

0:01:20.959 --> 0:01:24.000
<v Speaker 2>funds and SMAs through the end to number one acquisition,

0:01:24.240 --> 0:01:27.920
<v Speaker 2>and then also we're converting a couple of legacy TCW

0:01:28.080 --> 0:01:30.840
<v Speaker 2>active mutual funds. We're going to have a very impressive

0:01:30.959 --> 0:01:34.280
<v Speaker 2>range of megatrend thematic products for clients. And if you

0:01:34.280 --> 0:01:36.960
<v Speaker 2>think about why and what's the role and why does

0:01:37.000 --> 0:01:39.959
<v Speaker 2>the world need that. There's a lot of index ETF

0:01:40.120 --> 0:01:42.840
<v Speaker 2>option out there. A lot of people are very indexed

0:01:42.840 --> 0:01:45.759
<v Speaker 2>in their portfolios, which has this real concentration bias now

0:01:45.800 --> 0:01:48.400
<v Speaker 2>in large tech, and so we're offering the market a

0:01:48.480 --> 0:01:52.920
<v Speaker 2>range of ETFs on energy and power transformation, reshoring of

0:01:52.960 --> 0:01:56.720
<v Speaker 2>supply chains, artificial intelligence that let you take some money

0:01:56.720 --> 0:02:00.240
<v Speaker 2>out of the core and really go after outperformance in

0:02:00.280 --> 0:02:02.080
<v Speaker 2>alpha in portfolio.

0:02:02.120 --> 0:02:04.560
<v Speaker 1>So by definition are those active ETFs.

0:02:04.600 --> 0:02:08.560
<v Speaker 2>They are very concentrated portfolios and active and if you

0:02:08.600 --> 0:02:11.760
<v Speaker 2>think about the markets, money's not free anymore rates are

0:02:11.840 --> 0:02:14.040
<v Speaker 2>much higher. So we think the next ten to twenty

0:02:14.080 --> 0:02:17.880
<v Speaker 2>years are our great market for active managers that can outperform.

0:02:18.120 --> 0:02:20.880
<v Speaker 2>So all of these ETFs on the thematic side will

0:02:20.919 --> 0:02:23.400
<v Speaker 2>be active. Yeah, So let's talk about some of those themes.

0:02:23.400 --> 0:02:25.519
<v Speaker 2>I mean you had mentioned, you know, related to energy

0:02:25.560 --> 0:02:28.320
<v Speaker 2>transition supply chains. What are some of the ones that

0:02:28.360 --> 0:02:30.280
<v Speaker 2>you guys are really paying a lot of attention to

0:02:30.440 --> 0:02:33.320
<v Speaker 2>right now. Yeah, I mean, those are two big ones,

0:02:33.360 --> 0:02:36.839
<v Speaker 2>and they're not small, tactical, narrow trends. They're huge. They're

0:02:36.840 --> 0:02:39.399
<v Speaker 2>going to be here for many decades. And so one

0:02:39.440 --> 0:02:42.320
<v Speaker 2>of the ETFs is net Z and ETZ and that's

0:02:42.320 --> 0:02:45.519
<v Speaker 2>about energy and power transformation. And so if you think

0:02:45.560 --> 0:02:48.560
<v Speaker 2>about that, we are going to need to more than

0:02:48.680 --> 0:02:51.960
<v Speaker 2>double our power and energy in the next twenty years.

0:02:51.960 --> 0:02:55.600
<v Speaker 2>So think about that, more than double. And so companies

0:02:55.600 --> 0:02:58.160
<v Speaker 2>that are at the forefront of how we service the

0:02:58.240 --> 0:03:00.720
<v Speaker 2>need and demand and kind of months or demand we

0:03:00.800 --> 0:03:03.680
<v Speaker 2>have for power, as well as companies that are more

0:03:03.720 --> 0:03:07.480
<v Speaker 2>efficient have a huge opportunity to outperform. And so that's

0:03:07.480 --> 0:03:10.079
<v Speaker 2>a big theme. And now in that theme, we own

0:03:10.160 --> 0:03:14.200
<v Speaker 2>companies that are energy better energy producers. We own Vertive,

0:03:14.520 --> 0:03:18.639
<v Speaker 2>which cools, data centers. We own waste and garbage companies

0:03:18.680 --> 0:03:21.040
<v Speaker 2>that are finding ways to create natural gas and energy

0:03:21.040 --> 0:03:24.040
<v Speaker 2>out of landfill. So it's a very diverse portfolio and

0:03:24.200 --> 0:03:26.840
<v Speaker 2>very complementary and different than what you might hold in

0:03:26.840 --> 0:03:27.640
<v Speaker 2>an index fund.

0:03:28.080 --> 0:03:31.040
<v Speaker 1>When I started my equity research business way way back

0:03:31.080 --> 0:03:33.600
<v Speaker 1>in a day, it starts within eight back in the eighties,

0:03:33.680 --> 0:03:34.720
<v Speaker 1>it covered railroads.

0:03:36.040 --> 0:03:36.360
<v Speaker 3>Really.

0:03:36.680 --> 0:03:40.240
<v Speaker 1>We wrote the first research report on Consolidata Railroad, which

0:03:40.320 --> 0:03:43.360
<v Speaker 1>the company which the government US government was privatizing via

0:03:43.360 --> 0:03:45.600
<v Speaker 1>an IPO. We wrote about a two hundre page report

0:03:45.600 --> 0:03:46.560
<v Speaker 1>on that owned that stock.

0:03:46.600 --> 0:03:48.080
<v Speaker 3>For you, you want to give us a nice summary of

0:03:48.080 --> 0:03:48.640
<v Speaker 3>that right now?

0:03:48.960 --> 0:03:52.600
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, it was a great cost cutting thing. Taking railroad

0:03:52.640 --> 0:03:55.400
<v Speaker 1>crews from five to two, tripled your margins.

0:03:55.920 --> 0:03:59.160
<v Speaker 2>And that's and the other big trend is supply supply chain.

0:03:59.200 --> 0:03:59.480
<v Speaker 2>That's it.

0:03:59.560 --> 0:04:01.480
<v Speaker 1>So I know you've got an ETF on railroads. That's

0:04:01.520 --> 0:04:04.240
<v Speaker 1>why I bring it up. Is that again, I think

0:04:04.240 --> 0:04:06.200
<v Speaker 1>about the roads and supply chain. I guess we all

0:04:06.200 --> 0:04:09.360
<v Speaker 1>got really smart about supply change and the delicate nature

0:04:09.360 --> 0:04:11.680
<v Speaker 1>of supply change during the pandemic. How do you guys

0:04:11.720 --> 0:04:12.200
<v Speaker 1>think about that?

0:04:12.560 --> 0:04:15.520
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, so the sort of restoring of supply chains and

0:04:15.560 --> 0:04:18.720
<v Speaker 2>manufacturing to America and North America is again it's a

0:04:18.800 --> 0:04:22.160
<v Speaker 2>monster trend. It started during COVID. So if I'm deer

0:04:22.200 --> 0:04:24.159
<v Speaker 2>and I'm trying to make it tractor and my bolt

0:04:24.240 --> 0:04:26.120
<v Speaker 2>is made in Asia, I couldn't get my bolt. It

0:04:26.200 --> 0:04:29.200
<v Speaker 2>was really bad for business. So we're seeing that trend

0:04:29.279 --> 0:04:31.839
<v Speaker 2>already having started. And then on top of that, we've

0:04:31.839 --> 0:04:35.159
<v Speaker 2>now got geopolitical issues that make us more nervous about

0:04:35.200 --> 0:04:39.120
<v Speaker 2>doing things like semiconductors outside of the US. So again huge,

0:04:39.320 --> 0:04:42.520
<v Speaker 2>very broad, multi sector trend. And what we own in

0:04:42.760 --> 0:04:46.280
<v Speaker 2>sup or the reshoring of supply chain ETF is all

0:04:46.320 --> 0:04:49.120
<v Speaker 2>the way from railroads, So how are we going to

0:04:49.200 --> 0:04:52.440
<v Speaker 2>transport things if we're manufacturing all over North America. It's

0:04:52.720 --> 0:04:56.120
<v Speaker 2>fantastic for railroads and they've been undervalued. So that's a

0:04:56.120 --> 0:04:59.720
<v Speaker 2>big performance opportunity. And early in the cycle where I

0:04:59.720 --> 0:05:03.000
<v Speaker 2>think we have three trillion of committed projects of new manufacturing,

0:05:03.040 --> 0:05:05.719
<v Speaker 2>more than we've ever had in the US. Early in

0:05:05.720 --> 0:05:07.680
<v Speaker 2>the cycle, we invest a lot in what we call

0:05:07.720 --> 0:05:12.360
<v Speaker 2>picks and shovels, so Martin Marrietta Vulcan companies that make materials.

0:05:12.360 --> 0:05:15.480
<v Speaker 2>So as we build all of these factors, factories, pardon me.

0:05:15.839 --> 0:05:18.719
<v Speaker 2>And then we own a lot of semiconductor names as well,

0:05:18.800 --> 0:05:20.919
<v Speaker 2>because all of these factors are going to have AI

0:05:21.279 --> 0:05:24.360
<v Speaker 2>and robots and they have much higher demand for content

0:05:24.680 --> 0:05:26.240
<v Speaker 2>from a semiconductor perspective.

0:05:26.400 --> 0:05:28.440
<v Speaker 3>I wanted to ask you about the AI theme next.

0:05:28.480 --> 0:05:30.120
<v Speaker 3>That's certainly got to be a big one of these

0:05:30.160 --> 0:05:32.919
<v Speaker 3>thematic trends that you're focusing on. So how are you

0:05:32.960 --> 0:05:34.960
<v Speaker 3>positioning around AI right now?

0:05:35.080 --> 0:05:37.000
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, So in the case of AI, it's in those

0:05:37.040 --> 0:05:39.760
<v Speaker 2>two portfolios to some extent. And then we have a

0:05:39.839 --> 0:05:42.760
<v Speaker 2>mutual fund at TCW which we're converting to an ETF,

0:05:42.839 --> 0:05:44.120
<v Speaker 2>so watch the space for that.

0:05:44.920 --> 0:05:46.960
<v Speaker 3>And the advantage of that is it just like you know,

0:05:47.880 --> 0:05:49.920
<v Speaker 3>I guess, because ETFs tend to be a bit cheaper

0:05:49.960 --> 0:05:52.240
<v Speaker 3>for like a more consumer friendly product. Is that the idea?

0:05:52.320 --> 0:05:54.640
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, in this case, it's an active fund, so it's

0:05:55.200 --> 0:05:58.120
<v Speaker 2>not a sort of a cheap index fund. But the argument,

0:05:58.120 --> 0:05:59.560
<v Speaker 2>and what I think you see a lot of active

0:05:59.560 --> 0:06:02.839
<v Speaker 2>manager converting where it makes sense, is that the market

0:06:02.920 --> 0:06:06.479
<v Speaker 2>likes ETFs. It likes the ability to click through and

0:06:06.480 --> 0:06:09.680
<v Speaker 2>see the underlying holdings on the website, it likes the

0:06:09.720 --> 0:06:12.280
<v Speaker 2>tax advantages of an ETF, and so in the case

0:06:12.279 --> 0:06:14.919
<v Speaker 2>of these mega trends, we see the market in general

0:06:15.080 --> 0:06:18.000
<v Speaker 2>buying ETFs, not funds. So we have a very long

0:06:18.120 --> 0:06:22.159
<v Speaker 2>track record on the TCW Artificial Intelligence Fund, and we're

0:06:22.160 --> 0:06:24.440
<v Speaker 2>converting it to an ETF and a little bit like

0:06:24.480 --> 0:06:26.480
<v Speaker 2>what we talked about in the case of net Z

0:06:26.760 --> 0:06:29.760
<v Speaker 2>and sub, the AI fund has an ability to invest

0:06:29.839 --> 0:06:31.720
<v Speaker 2>in different things as we move through time. So it's

0:06:31.760 --> 0:06:34.640
<v Speaker 2>not all big tech. It's also systems and enablers and

0:06:34.720 --> 0:06:38.360
<v Speaker 2>hardware that is going to grow aggressively as all these

0:06:38.360 --> 0:06:39.640
<v Speaker 2>companies are doing more in AI.

0:06:39.760 --> 0:06:41.280
<v Speaker 1>So it's safe to say, you, guys at tc there'll

0:06:41.279 --> 0:06:44.320
<v Speaker 1>be a big believers in AI. We are okay, because

0:06:44.320 --> 0:06:48.480
<v Speaker 1>I guess my skeptical self sient analysts nature is like,

0:06:49.320 --> 0:06:51.640
<v Speaker 1>where did this come from? Is this just big data

0:06:51.720 --> 0:06:54.039
<v Speaker 1>from three or four years ago? Is this just big

0:06:54.120 --> 0:06:57.760
<v Speaker 1>tech growing as a percentage a GDP of twenty years ago?

0:06:58.080 --> 0:06:59.200
<v Speaker 1>What's new about AI?

0:07:00.040 --> 0:07:03.240
<v Speaker 2>We're in the We're in the next evolution of training

0:07:03.320 --> 0:07:06.880
<v Speaker 2>systems asking systems questions with all these models and natural

0:07:06.920 --> 0:07:09.840
<v Speaker 2>language models asking questions in a way that we just

0:07:09.880 --> 0:07:12.400
<v Speaker 2>get faster and faster and better output. And so that's

0:07:12.560 --> 0:07:15.120
<v Speaker 2>really that's good for everyone and so it'll start slowly,

0:07:15.400 --> 0:07:18.080
<v Speaker 2>but as more people learn to get that leverage, I

0:07:18.080 --> 0:07:20.280
<v Speaker 2>think we're going to see is you're going to see

0:07:20.280 --> 0:07:21.000
<v Speaker 2>it boom.

0:07:20.760 --> 0:07:23.840
<v Speaker 1>Yep, and it's you know. We hear every company in

0:07:23.880 --> 0:07:26.800
<v Speaker 1>the S and pat on with it on their conference

0:07:26.840 --> 0:07:29.240
<v Speaker 1>call talking about you know uh ai and how it's

0:07:29.240 --> 0:07:31.480
<v Speaker 1>getting to be critical to their business. Jennifer Grantcio, thanks

0:07:31.480 --> 0:07:33.520
<v Speaker 1>so much for joining us. Jennifer is a global head

0:07:33.560 --> 0:07:36.520
<v Speaker 1>of Distribution for TCW. We appreciate our coming into our

0:07:36.520 --> 0:07:38.880
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Interactor Broker studio in New York City.