WEBVTT - January Q&A

0:00:02.040 --> 0:00:06.880
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the solid verbal. Come that for me. I'm

0:00:06.920 --> 0:00:09.719
<v Speaker 1>a man, I'm for I've heard so many players say, well,

0:00:09.720 --> 0:00:11.640
<v Speaker 1>I want to be happy. You want to be happy

0:00:11.680 --> 0:00:13.000
<v Speaker 1>for day? Edith State?

0:00:13.360 --> 0:00:19.640
<v Speaker 2>Is that? Woo woom? And Dan and Tye, welcome back

0:00:19.680 --> 0:00:22.639
<v Speaker 2>to the solid verbal boys and girls. My name is

0:00:22.680 --> 0:00:26.800
<v Speaker 2>ty Hildebrand, joining me as always my good friend Dan

0:00:26.880 --> 0:00:29.840
<v Speaker 2>Rubinstein in New York City. Sir, how are you just

0:00:29.920 --> 0:00:34.560
<v Speaker 2>clocking in? Clocking out? Ty Yeah, Bud Foster lunch, paiale

0:00:34.680 --> 0:00:37.800
<v Speaker 2>my hard hat. I'm ready to go, just living the

0:00:37.880 --> 0:00:39.320
<v Speaker 2>dream on super Bowl Week?

0:00:39.400 --> 0:00:42.120
<v Speaker 1>No less, it is super Bowl week? Do we have

0:00:42.200 --> 0:00:45.440
<v Speaker 1>super Bowl content planned? I don't think we do. Ah,

0:00:45.800 --> 0:00:46.320
<v Speaker 1>we sort of do.

0:00:46.400 --> 0:00:48.839
<v Speaker 2>We asked for food questions about super bowl S to

0:00:48.880 --> 0:00:50.440
<v Speaker 2>find super Bowl content.

0:00:52.200 --> 0:00:55.640
<v Speaker 1>Who is your here? You ready? Yeahy? This is this

0:00:55.720 --> 0:01:00.320
<v Speaker 1>is blue chip, top level, solid verbal super Bowl content. Yeah.

0:01:00.360 --> 0:01:03.880
<v Speaker 1>Who is your favorite college football player playing in the

0:01:03.920 --> 0:01:07.000
<v Speaker 1>Super Bowl? So? Who on the Patriots or Eagles did

0:01:07.040 --> 0:01:11.440
<v Speaker 1>you most enjoy playing college football? Oh? Man, my answer

0:01:11.480 --> 0:01:15.560
<v Speaker 1>is Lagarrett Blunt. Lagarrett Blunt. My answer is one thousand.

0:01:15.800 --> 0:01:17.839
<v Speaker 1>I liked all the organ ducs. I think Kenyon Barner

0:01:17.880 --> 0:01:21.880
<v Speaker 1>and Patrick Chung. I may be missing somebody. But my

0:01:22.280 --> 0:01:24.560
<v Speaker 1>definitive answer is Lagarrett Blunt. I can think of some

0:01:24.680 --> 0:01:26.880
<v Speaker 1>a non organ person if you can think of something.

0:01:26.920 --> 0:01:28.800
<v Speaker 2>Al Sean Jeffrey was pretty damn cool.

0:01:28.800 --> 0:01:31.360
<v Speaker 1>It's Carol. That's a good answer. I like that answer.

0:01:31.800 --> 0:01:33.520
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, al Sean's probably my answer.

0:01:33.840 --> 0:01:35.680
<v Speaker 1>You know who I liked watching play a lot in

0:01:35.720 --> 0:01:38.160
<v Speaker 1>college who had sort of a bum rap I think

0:01:38.200 --> 0:01:41.400
<v Speaker 1>injury wise, Dean Lewis. Yeah, okay, it was real fun

0:01:41.480 --> 0:01:43.720
<v Speaker 1>for pay Yeah, it's decent.

0:01:44.000 --> 0:01:47.080
<v Speaker 2>Well, we hope everyone out there enjoys watching the Super Bowl.

0:01:47.160 --> 0:01:50.040
<v Speaker 2>It's obviously a big deal here in eastern Pennsylvania given

0:01:50.080 --> 0:01:53.800
<v Speaker 2>the matchup and the Eagles being there. Oh Foles, I

0:01:53.960 --> 0:01:59.280
<v Speaker 2>was going to go there with Nick falls hopefully not

0:01:59.400 --> 0:02:03.480
<v Speaker 2>in a loose effort. Dan, Yeah, if you're an Eagles fan.

0:02:03.560 --> 0:02:05.240
<v Speaker 2>But do you have a final score prediction?

0:02:06.200 --> 0:02:10.840
<v Speaker 1>Yeah? Sure, I don't know. Twenty four fourteen Patriots. I'm

0:02:10.840 --> 0:02:15.240
<v Speaker 1>gonna pick the Eagles. Yeah, Nick Foles, Nick for Bill Belichick?

0:02:15.600 --> 0:02:16.040
<v Speaker 1>What the hell?

0:02:16.080 --> 0:02:21.880
<v Speaker 2>Why not? Thirty one to twenty six. I'm predicting a

0:02:22.360 --> 0:02:25.040
<v Speaker 2>missed two point conversion at the end for the Patriots.

0:02:25.120 --> 0:02:26.760
<v Speaker 2>Thirty one twenty six is my prediction.

0:02:27.280 --> 0:02:30.280
<v Speaker 1>I could not know any less about the NFL in

0:02:30.320 --> 0:02:34.000
<v Speaker 1>twenty seventeen twenty eighteen, in terms of making a prediction

0:02:34.560 --> 0:02:37.519
<v Speaker 1>that's rooted in any sort of knowledge, I started watching

0:02:37.520 --> 0:02:39.440
<v Speaker 1>the season basically during the playoffs, so.

0:02:39.600 --> 0:02:43.040
<v Speaker 2>I just hope for fun football I watched during the

0:02:43.120 --> 0:02:48.280
<v Speaker 2>regular season. And this is due in large part to

0:02:48.320 --> 0:02:52.080
<v Speaker 2>the fact that you and I overdose on college football. Yeah,

0:02:52.120 --> 0:02:56.280
<v Speaker 2>on Saturdays, then we record on Sundays. I'm editing most

0:02:56.280 --> 0:02:59.280
<v Speaker 2>of the day on an NFL Sunday, and so by

0:02:59.320 --> 0:03:01.720
<v Speaker 2>the time i'm with that around three o'clock, I don't

0:03:01.720 --> 0:03:04.160
<v Speaker 2>feel like watching any more football. I probably watched a

0:03:04.240 --> 0:03:08.400
<v Speaker 2>combined forty five minutes of the NFL regular season this year.

0:03:08.440 --> 0:03:11.160
<v Speaker 2>I'm with you, I was very uninformed come playoff time.

0:03:11.600 --> 0:03:14.720
<v Speaker 1>I will also add in terms of players that I

0:03:14.880 --> 0:03:18.200
<v Speaker 1>enjoyed or have a strong reaction to what they did

0:03:18.200 --> 0:03:22.000
<v Speaker 1>in college. I remember, I want to say, two thousand

0:03:22.040 --> 0:03:28.240
<v Speaker 1>and eight, maybe when Arizona played Oregon and Gronk was

0:03:28.360 --> 0:03:32.680
<v Speaker 1>completely unstoppable and like they you could see Oregon going

0:03:32.720 --> 0:03:35.640
<v Speaker 1>through like what about an outside linebacker on Gronk? What

0:03:35.840 --> 0:03:38.920
<v Speaker 1>about Patrick Chung a safety on Gonk? What about a corner?

0:03:39.040 --> 0:03:41.480
<v Speaker 1>And he just started dragging three people at a time.

0:03:41.520 --> 0:03:43.200
<v Speaker 1>I was like, all right, this guy's gonna be pretty good.

0:03:43.360 --> 0:03:45.440
<v Speaker 1>This guy's pretty good. He's very good.

0:03:45.480 --> 0:03:47.960
<v Speaker 2>We hope everyone out there, if you're going to a

0:03:48.040 --> 0:03:51.560
<v Speaker 2>Super Bowl party, if you're I don't know, watching the game,

0:03:51.640 --> 0:03:55.440
<v Speaker 2>if you're being festive on Super Bowl Sunday, enjoy the game,

0:03:55.920 --> 0:03:58.160
<v Speaker 2>be safe. Let us know if anything fun happens at

0:03:58.160 --> 0:03:58.600
<v Speaker 2>your party.

0:03:59.360 --> 0:04:02.840
<v Speaker 1>Sure, yeah, yeah, we're interested. So what do we have today?

0:04:03.080 --> 0:04:06.480
<v Speaker 1>What are we doing on it is? We're recording this Tuesday,

0:04:06.720 --> 0:04:12.280
<v Speaker 1>January thirtieth, That is corrow. If Nick Saban retires Wednesday, whoops.

0:04:12.440 --> 0:04:16.160
<v Speaker 2>This show will go live on the last day of

0:04:16.279 --> 0:04:19.520
<v Speaker 2>January the thirty first. And so we thought, just as

0:04:19.560 --> 0:04:24.120
<v Speaker 2>like a monthly close out, right, h congratulations, Skippy, you've

0:04:24.120 --> 0:04:25.599
<v Speaker 2>got mail, You've got mail.

0:04:25.839 --> 0:04:27.240
<v Speaker 1>On the solid verbal.

0:04:27.040 --> 0:04:30.080
<v Speaker 2>We're going to play our old sound to pay homage

0:04:31.960 --> 0:04:35.920
<v Speaker 2>to those people who right into the show and ask

0:04:36.120 --> 0:04:39.479
<v Speaker 2>us football and non football and food and whatever else

0:04:39.560 --> 0:04:44.120
<v Speaker 2>related questions. That sound that I just played, along with

0:04:44.160 --> 0:04:47.599
<v Speaker 2>our intro and a handful of other audio drops that

0:04:47.640 --> 0:04:50.200
<v Speaker 2>we play from time to time here on the show

0:04:50.720 --> 0:04:53.279
<v Speaker 2>is an original that was one of the very first

0:04:53.640 --> 0:04:57.120
<v Speaker 2>that we developed on our old version of garage band

0:04:57.520 --> 0:05:00.960
<v Speaker 2>back in two thousand and eight when we were first

0:05:00.960 --> 0:05:04.279
<v Speaker 2>starting out. So that's been with us the entire journey

0:05:04.320 --> 0:05:08.880
<v Speaker 2>here on the Solid Verbal and look, there are numerous

0:05:08.880 --> 0:05:11.880
<v Speaker 2>different ways that people can write in now, either at

0:05:11.880 --> 0:05:16.000
<v Speaker 2>solid Verbal at gmail dot com, or through Facebook or

0:05:16.040 --> 0:05:19.240
<v Speaker 2>Twitter or Instagram. You even asked for some questions out

0:05:19.279 --> 0:05:19.760
<v Speaker 2>on Reddit.

0:05:20.200 --> 0:05:20.440
<v Speaker 1>Yep.

0:05:21.120 --> 0:05:25.080
<v Speaker 2>So we're really pulling in the full audio, full podcasting,

0:05:25.160 --> 0:05:29.200
<v Speaker 2>full social media universe here and trying to get questions

0:05:29.240 --> 0:05:30.320
<v Speaker 2>from the verballerhood.

0:05:30.800 --> 0:05:33.160
<v Speaker 1>Do we have a po box? We actually do have

0:05:33.200 --> 0:05:37.720
<v Speaker 1>a po box. I do want to try doing an

0:05:37.800 --> 0:05:40.560
<v Speaker 1>actual mailbag episode. We don't do that.

0:05:40.800 --> 0:05:42.840
<v Speaker 2>Don't do that to me. I'm the one that's got

0:05:42.880 --> 0:05:46.560
<v Speaker 2>to collect all those Well, listen, well ask for letters.

0:05:46.839 --> 0:05:48.840
<v Speaker 1>You can give out the address whenever tie. It doesn't

0:05:48.880 --> 0:05:51.440
<v Speaker 1>have to be tonight, doesn't have to be. Don't do that.

0:05:51.480 --> 0:05:53.680
<v Speaker 1>But I want to do a show tye where we

0:05:53.720 --> 0:05:57.440
<v Speaker 1>can like flap the physical letter that we get. How

0:05:57.440 --> 0:05:58.720
<v Speaker 1>many could we possibly get.

0:05:58.760 --> 0:06:01.320
<v Speaker 2>It's gonna be like Merrik on thirty four Street with

0:06:01.400 --> 0:06:03.479
<v Speaker 2>the postal workers bringing in the sack.

0:06:04.760 --> 0:06:07.520
<v Speaker 1>I want to do an actual mailbag episode. Let's call

0:06:07.560 --> 0:06:11.280
<v Speaker 1>it maybe July. So at least you're not going out

0:06:11.320 --> 0:06:14.360
<v Speaker 1>in the cold. You'll be wearing shorts and flip flops.

0:06:15.240 --> 0:06:16.800
<v Speaker 1>If I give if I give you.

0:06:16.800 --> 0:06:18.920
<v Speaker 2>This, you have to give me an all Notre Dame show.

0:06:20.600 --> 0:06:28.240
<v Speaker 1>All right, I withdraw my request, I officially, I withdraw

0:06:28.560 --> 0:06:33.840
<v Speaker 1>my I apologize that was uncalled for, it was short sighted,

0:06:33.960 --> 0:06:35.119
<v Speaker 1>and it'll never happen again.

0:06:35.240 --> 0:06:36.560
<v Speaker 2>See I know how to play it.

0:06:37.080 --> 0:06:39.200
<v Speaker 1>No, you will get it. You will get a all

0:06:39.240 --> 0:06:41.880
<v Speaker 1>Notre Dame show. Well, you've done all Notre Dame shows before.

0:06:41.920 --> 0:06:44.240
<v Speaker 1>But if you're in crisis mode like I was with

0:06:44.279 --> 0:06:45.960
<v Speaker 1>Willy Taggert leaving Oregon.

0:06:46.720 --> 0:06:49.200
<v Speaker 2>Okay, well then I don't agree to your terms.

0:06:49.600 --> 0:06:52.520
<v Speaker 1>Okay, we can do something centered around Notre Dame. Kind

0:06:52.560 --> 0:06:52.880
<v Speaker 1>we can.

0:06:53.080 --> 0:06:56.039
<v Speaker 2>We can continue this negotiation. We've got time.

0:06:56.520 --> 0:07:00.360
<v Speaker 1>How about May twenty third at three am and it's lively.

0:07:02.240 --> 0:07:04.560
<v Speaker 1>Do you want to get to some questions. Let's get

0:07:04.600 --> 0:07:06.560
<v Speaker 1>to some questions here. We had a bunch come in.

0:07:06.680 --> 0:07:09.479
<v Speaker 2>Thank you, Daniel, you collected them while I was at

0:07:09.520 --> 0:07:12.840
<v Speaker 2>the Mysterious day job, and a bunch of good ones here.

0:07:12.840 --> 0:07:14.760
<v Speaker 2>I'm excited. Let's record, let's talk.

0:07:14.640 --> 0:07:18.720
<v Speaker 1>Let's go to CJ. Somebody just walked by the voiceover

0:07:19.040 --> 0:07:22.200
<v Speaker 1>both Our pal Liz walked by. CJ wants to know

0:07:22.400 --> 0:07:24.320
<v Speaker 1>thoughts on Jimbo and how he will do at A

0:07:24.400 --> 0:07:27.720
<v Speaker 1>and M. Who also this is a two parter. I'm

0:07:27.760 --> 0:07:29.480
<v Speaker 1>willing to bet you won't be able to list a

0:07:29.520 --> 0:07:33.400
<v Speaker 1>better side to chili than cornbread. Best of luck. Okay,

0:07:33.400 --> 0:07:35.280
<v Speaker 1>I have an answer for that is too. Let's start.

0:07:35.320 --> 0:07:38.280
<v Speaker 1>We actually haven't talked about Jimbo Fisher type beyond like

0:07:38.320 --> 0:07:41.240
<v Speaker 1>the salary thing and the Mike Elco thing. We really

0:07:41.280 --> 0:07:44.880
<v Speaker 1>haven't looked at big picture our thoughts on Jimbo in

0:07:44.920 --> 0:07:46.560
<v Speaker 1>college station, and I think.

0:07:46.400 --> 0:07:50.320
<v Speaker 2>It's mostly due to when he accepted the position at

0:07:50.360 --> 0:07:53.080
<v Speaker 2>A and M. Relative to other stuff that you and

0:07:53.120 --> 0:07:55.120
<v Speaker 2>I had to talk about. We just haven't really had

0:07:55.120 --> 0:07:58.520
<v Speaker 2>an opportunity to delve in. Have you had a chance

0:07:58.560 --> 0:08:02.280
<v Speaker 2>to look at A and m's road schedule in twenty eighteen.

0:08:03.360 --> 0:08:05.720
<v Speaker 1>It's weird. I think they have three straight road games

0:08:05.720 --> 0:08:08.120
<v Speaker 1>with a bye week sort of lumped in the middle somewhere.

0:08:08.480 --> 0:08:12.240
<v Speaker 1>It is not a great road schedule for Texas, A

0:08:12.280 --> 0:08:16.400
<v Speaker 1>and M, Mississippi State, Auburn, and South Carolina. I want

0:08:16.400 --> 0:08:20.360
<v Speaker 1>to say, just schedule wise, in consecutive weeks, not calendar wise, right.

0:08:20.320 --> 0:08:24.960
<v Speaker 2>That's right, October thirteenth at South Carolina, October twenty seventh,

0:08:25.160 --> 0:08:29.200
<v Speaker 2>after an open date at Mississippi State, and then November

0:08:29.240 --> 0:08:31.840
<v Speaker 2>three on the road at Auburn. Now, I don't think

0:08:31.880 --> 0:08:34.480
<v Speaker 2>any of those games are going to be particularly easy,

0:08:34.559 --> 0:08:38.200
<v Speaker 2>especially not for what I would say is a younger

0:08:38.280 --> 0:08:45.120
<v Speaker 2>team now starting over with a new system under Jimbo Fisher. Yeah,

0:08:45.120 --> 0:08:48.280
<v Speaker 2>that's not even the worst part of the schedule. Yeah,

0:08:48.320 --> 0:08:52.720
<v Speaker 2>in two out of three weeks they have who exactly September.

0:08:52.880 --> 0:08:55.960
<v Speaker 2>The eighth week two, they're home against Clemson. I don't

0:08:55.960 --> 0:08:57.360
<v Speaker 2>know if that's a neutral psych game. That might be

0:08:57.400 --> 0:08:58.199
<v Speaker 2>a neutral psych game.

0:08:58.280 --> 0:08:59.520
<v Speaker 1>No, it's home, it's Kyle Field.

0:08:59.720 --> 0:09:02.120
<v Speaker 2>Then two weeks later on the road at Bama.

0:09:02.760 --> 0:09:06.320
<v Speaker 1>Yes, the last two the previous two national champions in

0:09:06.400 --> 0:09:07.439
<v Speaker 1>three weeks.

0:09:07.360 --> 0:09:09.920
<v Speaker 2>And both will be loaded for Bear as they always are.

0:09:11.200 --> 0:09:14.439
<v Speaker 2>I don't think there's any chance in the world that

0:09:14.559 --> 0:09:17.920
<v Speaker 2>A and M escapes the month of September without a

0:09:18.000 --> 0:09:19.199
<v Speaker 2>minimum of two losses.

0:09:19.760 --> 0:09:22.559
<v Speaker 1>Wow, Okay, I mean Jimbo is a very good coach,

0:09:22.840 --> 0:09:25.760
<v Speaker 1>and he has some experience on both sides of the ball.

0:09:25.840 --> 0:09:29.240
<v Speaker 1>Some promising young talent loses his what his biggest playmaker,

0:09:29.240 --> 0:09:31.720
<v Speaker 1>perhaps on both sides of the ball are Monti Watts

0:09:31.760 --> 0:09:36.120
<v Speaker 1>on defense, Christian Kirk and all Timer on offense. Certainly,

0:09:36.120 --> 0:09:38.880
<v Speaker 1>it's a new staff for him, a lot of pieces,

0:09:38.960 --> 0:09:41.800
<v Speaker 1>you know. Damian Craig comes over from lsu Ace recruiter,

0:09:41.840 --> 0:09:43.680
<v Speaker 1>Tim Brewster who's been with him for a while. Darryl

0:09:43.760 --> 0:09:46.120
<v Speaker 1>Dickey the offensive coordinator though I don't believe he called

0:09:46.160 --> 0:09:48.800
<v Speaker 1>plays at Memphis, but has a lot of experience in

0:09:48.840 --> 0:09:53.320
<v Speaker 1>the state of Texas. And Mike Elco, who has we're.

0:09:53.200 --> 0:09:55.520
<v Speaker 2>Not talking about Mike Elcho. Lala la la la la

0:09:55.559 --> 0:09:57.000
<v Speaker 2>la la la la la la la la la la

0:09:57.080 --> 0:09:57.400
<v Speaker 2>la la.

0:09:57.400 --> 0:10:01.040
<v Speaker 1>La, and I will only keep it text saying his

0:10:01.080 --> 0:10:04.520
<v Speaker 1>reputation is such that he runs organized defenses and he

0:10:04.600 --> 0:10:08.480
<v Speaker 1>fixes problems, and that has been an issue the past

0:10:08.520 --> 0:10:11.480
<v Speaker 1>couple of years with John Chavis inconsistency. And they do

0:10:11.520 --> 0:10:13.800
<v Speaker 1>see John Chavis, I think early on, right after the

0:10:13.840 --> 0:10:14.679
<v Speaker 1>Alabama game with.

0:10:14.640 --> 0:10:15.880
<v Speaker 2>That against Arkansas.

0:10:15.960 --> 0:10:18.440
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, that's right, so he'll at least be familiar with

0:10:18.520 --> 0:10:21.360
<v Speaker 1>the offensive personnel. But yeah, it's a quarterback battle and

0:10:21.400 --> 0:10:24.240
<v Speaker 1>the big thing is and we didn't see this early

0:10:24.240 --> 0:10:26.880
<v Speaker 1>on in Kevin Someone's tenure because Mike Sherman recruited so

0:10:26.920 --> 0:10:31.200
<v Speaker 1>many ridiculous offensive linemen, that line has been leaky and

0:10:31.520 --> 0:10:35.000
<v Speaker 1>a problem. So what can Jimbo Fisher and his staff

0:10:35.000 --> 0:10:37.760
<v Speaker 1>do with the offensive line? How does that wed to

0:10:38.400 --> 0:10:41.600
<v Speaker 1>an offensive system that looked pretty stale last year given

0:10:41.600 --> 0:10:44.800
<v Speaker 1>a backup quarterback at Florida State, And how does the

0:10:44.800 --> 0:10:48.680
<v Speaker 1>staff all come together with a, to say the very least,

0:10:49.200 --> 0:10:50.760
<v Speaker 1>pretty trying schedule, right.

0:10:50.760 --> 0:10:54.760
<v Speaker 2>Really trying schedule. I'm right now looking at this, looking

0:10:54.840 --> 0:10:57.599
<v Speaker 2>at what they have coming back. I think eight and

0:10:57.800 --> 0:11:01.840
<v Speaker 2>four would be miraculous. I think seven and five is

0:11:01.920 --> 0:11:04.920
<v Speaker 2>more likely. I think six and six could be a possibility.

0:11:05.120 --> 0:11:07.720
<v Speaker 2>Jimbo's a really good coach. He's an excellent coach.

0:11:07.760 --> 0:11:11.080
<v Speaker 1>He's one of what five coaches who's won a national championship, three,

0:11:11.200 --> 0:11:13.480
<v Speaker 1>four or five somewhere in that that are still active

0:11:13.760 --> 0:11:18.680
<v Speaker 1>in college football Power five level whatever. So I think

0:11:18.760 --> 0:11:21.680
<v Speaker 1>certainly Jimbo gives them an edge right now that Kevin

0:11:21.679 --> 0:11:25.520
<v Speaker 1>someone certainly didn't where perhaps they will win a game

0:11:25.600 --> 0:11:28.200
<v Speaker 1>they should lose, and I don't think they will lose

0:11:28.640 --> 0:11:31.240
<v Speaker 1>games they should win as often with Jimbo, but in

0:11:31.320 --> 0:11:35.920
<v Speaker 1>year one, with quarterback questions, offensive line questions. They've recruited

0:11:35.920 --> 0:11:38.600
<v Speaker 1>well obviously, and so I think there's a good amount

0:11:38.640 --> 0:11:42.480
<v Speaker 1>of talent in college station. But long term, I feel

0:11:42.600 --> 0:11:45.040
<v Speaker 1>very good. I think they're going to have consistent top

0:11:45.640 --> 0:11:49.360
<v Speaker 1>eight to twelve recruiting classes. Yeah. Just being in Texas,

0:11:49.400 --> 0:11:51.120
<v Speaker 1>you know, being able to recruit to the SEC, I

0:11:51.120 --> 0:11:53.920
<v Speaker 1>think is still a thing. As certainly as long as

0:11:53.960 --> 0:11:57.440
<v Speaker 1>Texas is not a thing winning double digit games.

0:11:57.320 --> 0:12:00.400
<v Speaker 2>I feel fine about them long term. That's that's not

0:12:00.520 --> 0:12:04.600
<v Speaker 2>my problem. My problem. My question, I guess is twenty eighteen.

0:12:04.679 --> 0:12:10.000
<v Speaker 2>And in twenty eighteen, I'm telling you eight and four miraculous,

0:12:10.200 --> 0:12:12.960
<v Speaker 2>seven and five more likely, six and six of possibility.

0:12:13.000 --> 0:12:13.760
<v Speaker 2>It's on the table.

0:12:14.400 --> 0:12:17.679
<v Speaker 1>Okay, Yeah, I mean they we have what an ole

0:12:17.760 --> 0:12:20.400
<v Speaker 1>miss team going through lots of changes. We may have

0:12:20.400 --> 0:12:24.400
<v Speaker 1>a good quarterback in Jordan Tamu Tamu whatever. They have

0:12:24.480 --> 0:12:27.800
<v Speaker 1>an LSU team offensively, a lot of question marks at

0:12:27.800 --> 0:12:32.280
<v Speaker 1>the onset of what February. But yeah, there's you know,

0:12:32.320 --> 0:12:34.720
<v Speaker 1>we have a Mississippi State team that might have a

0:12:34.760 --> 0:12:37.679
<v Speaker 1>Heisman type caliber quarterback and Nick Fitzgerald, if you.

0:12:37.720 --> 0:12:39.640
<v Speaker 2>I mean, it's just too many landlines. We got to

0:12:39.640 --> 0:12:40.640
<v Speaker 2>go through the full schedule here.

0:12:40.760 --> 0:12:44.800
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, but listen, we're both high, just not necessarily. On

0:12:44.880 --> 0:12:48.800
<v Speaker 1>twenty eighteen, and on his second point, arguably more important point,

0:12:49.679 --> 0:12:52.600
<v Speaker 1>is there something better to serve with chili than cornbread?

0:12:52.760 --> 0:12:57.520
<v Speaker 1>Because I tie controversy. Okay, corn bread's fine. I don't

0:12:57.520 --> 0:13:00.480
<v Speaker 1>go out of my way for cornbread. Do you like

0:13:00.520 --> 0:13:03.439
<v Speaker 1>something like that, like a sweeter type side to not

0:13:03.640 --> 0:13:07.160
<v Speaker 1>necessarily would what would you if you were making a

0:13:07.160 --> 0:13:10.120
<v Speaker 1>big cauldron of chili for the Super Bowl or for whatever?

0:13:10.880 --> 0:13:13.560
<v Speaker 2>What's your side I might get? I don't know if

0:13:13.559 --> 0:13:15.800
<v Speaker 2>it's so much a side, Dan, I'm sure you'll make

0:13:15.840 --> 0:13:18.720
<v Speaker 2>fun of me for this or on a tramole whatever

0:13:18.760 --> 0:13:22.880
<v Speaker 2>that was? What was that word? Okay, something to serve

0:13:22.960 --> 0:13:23.480
<v Speaker 2>with it?

0:13:23.600 --> 0:13:23.880
<v Speaker 1>Great?

0:13:24.120 --> 0:13:28.560
<v Speaker 2>I would say, if you can find some of those

0:13:28.559 --> 0:13:31.800
<v Speaker 2>homemade tortilla chips, sure, just as maybe something that you

0:13:31.840 --> 0:13:34.080
<v Speaker 2>can dip in. Even if you got to go like

0:13:34.600 --> 0:13:37.679
<v Speaker 2>old school toastedos scoops, that's fine. But if you can

0:13:37.720 --> 0:13:41.240
<v Speaker 2>get more of the homemade variety, I know my beloved

0:13:41.280 --> 0:13:43.560
<v Speaker 2>Wegmans has now started making them. If you could find

0:13:43.559 --> 0:13:47.720
<v Speaker 2>a good Mexican restaurant. All of the Mexican restaurants generally

0:13:47.760 --> 0:13:51.160
<v Speaker 2>make their own tortilla chips. See, I ride with Freedo's tie. Okay,

0:13:51.160 --> 0:13:54.520
<v Speaker 2>I'm gonna make some Freedo pie. So on the same lines, Yes,

0:13:54.640 --> 0:13:55.160
<v Speaker 2>I want.

0:13:55.000 --> 0:13:58.240
<v Speaker 1>That salty crunch with not chili and melt some cheese

0:13:58.320 --> 0:14:01.720
<v Speaker 1>or something like that. Love a Freedo pie? Okay. Next question, abbot,

0:14:01.760 --> 0:14:04.800
<v Speaker 1>longtime reball or big time Michigan fan. Yeah, and we

0:14:04.840 --> 0:14:07.439
<v Speaker 1>compare this with somebody also asked, is this a make

0:14:07.520 --> 0:14:09.960
<v Speaker 1>or break here for Jim Harvey. I don't believe so,

0:14:10.040 --> 0:14:13.000
<v Speaker 1>but you know what, there is some subtlety of that question.

0:14:13.040 --> 0:14:15.559
<v Speaker 1>I think we can get into Michigan goes to Notre Dame,

0:14:15.600 --> 0:14:18.480
<v Speaker 1>two East Lansing to Columbus and home against Wisconsin and

0:14:18.520 --> 0:14:21.120
<v Speaker 1>Penn State. Any possible way they can improve on an

0:14:21.160 --> 0:14:24.920
<v Speaker 1>eight and fourth season on a crucial year for Jim Harbaugh.

0:14:25.520 --> 0:14:29.040
<v Speaker 1>I think so. I absolutely think so. I think so.

0:14:29.120 --> 0:14:33.240
<v Speaker 2>If you look at Michigan, they bring back a lot

0:14:33.880 --> 0:14:37.640
<v Speaker 2>the shape Patterson thing I think has the potential to

0:14:37.760 --> 0:14:41.600
<v Speaker 2>make Michigan a lot better in a hurry. If eligible, Yeah,

0:14:41.680 --> 0:14:44.880
<v Speaker 2>If eligible, sure, I'm not sure which way Notre Dame

0:14:44.960 --> 0:14:49.280
<v Speaker 2>is headed. To be perfectly honest, Okay, you could make

0:14:49.320 --> 0:14:51.160
<v Speaker 2>a case that you're not sure which way things are

0:14:51.160 --> 0:14:54.560
<v Speaker 2>headed for Michigan State. Two Columbus is always a struggle

0:14:55.240 --> 0:15:01.040
<v Speaker 2>home against Wisconsin. I think has better prosper this year

0:15:01.920 --> 0:15:04.240
<v Speaker 2>then it did last season when they had to go

0:15:04.280 --> 0:15:07.520
<v Speaker 2>on the road to Wisconsin, just because the Shape Patterson

0:15:07.560 --> 0:15:10.200
<v Speaker 2>thing could bring with I think a little bit more

0:15:10.240 --> 0:15:15.080
<v Speaker 2>offense and uh Penn State. Penn State lost a lot

0:15:15.120 --> 0:15:18.520
<v Speaker 2>as well. So yeah, my short answer, if there is

0:15:18.560 --> 0:15:21.560
<v Speaker 2>such a thing is that they can absolutely improve on

0:15:21.640 --> 0:15:22.000
<v Speaker 2>eight and.

0:15:21.920 --> 0:15:25.440
<v Speaker 1>Four Michigan if everything's clicking correctly. And I don't know

0:15:25.440 --> 0:15:27.520
<v Speaker 1>if you saw there's like a Wilton Spate thing with

0:15:27.720 --> 0:15:31.160
<v Speaker 1>If Shape Patterson is ineligible, maybe he'll come back now

0:15:31.200 --> 0:15:35.240
<v Speaker 1>to ann Arbor. He's open to it. So and you know,

0:15:35.360 --> 0:15:39.040
<v Speaker 1>at his best, Wilton Spate is pretty good. And if

0:15:39.040 --> 0:15:41.360
<v Speaker 1>Michigan's defense is what it has been the last couple

0:15:41.400 --> 0:15:44.680
<v Speaker 1>of years, that's fine. Pretty good at quarterback is fine

0:15:44.720 --> 0:15:47.280
<v Speaker 1>with a defense that has a capability to play on

0:15:47.280 --> 0:15:50.480
<v Speaker 1>that high level. They have perhaps one of the best

0:15:50.640 --> 0:15:55.040
<v Speaker 1>three inside defensive line duos, and Aubrey Solomon and Rashaun Gary.

0:15:55.080 --> 0:15:57.440
<v Speaker 1>Devin Bush had a nice freshman year. They relied on

0:15:57.520 --> 0:15:59.960
<v Speaker 1>youth in the secondary and for the most part held

0:16:00.160 --> 0:16:04.200
<v Speaker 1>up really well. They're recruiting well again, They'll get healthier

0:16:04.200 --> 0:16:07.000
<v Speaker 1>at offensive skill positions, and there's no way the offensive

0:16:07.040 --> 0:16:10.240
<v Speaker 1>line can be as woeful as it was against the

0:16:10.240 --> 0:16:12.800
<v Speaker 1>better teams on their schedule last year. So I think

0:16:12.840 --> 0:16:16.000
<v Speaker 1>Michigan will be improved. I mean, there's now the sort

0:16:16.000 --> 0:16:20.640
<v Speaker 1>of NCAA rule discussion about, Okay, maybe we only let

0:16:20.680 --> 0:16:23.880
<v Speaker 1>players transfer without sitting out if their coach leaves or

0:16:23.960 --> 0:16:27.080
<v Speaker 1>is fired, which would that would be a Shape Patterson thing, right,

0:16:27.200 --> 0:16:31.640
<v Speaker 1>you freeze being let go. Whatever. So I think Michigan's

0:16:31.640 --> 0:16:34.440
<v Speaker 1>in pretty good shape, especially the teams he mentioned. You

0:16:34.520 --> 0:16:37.800
<v Speaker 1>mentioned uncertainty about Notre Dame, especially since that's Week one,

0:16:38.320 --> 0:16:41.480
<v Speaker 1>so Notre Dame and or Michigan could transform into something

0:16:41.520 --> 0:16:44.600
<v Speaker 1>in the middle of the year. But they go to

0:16:44.760 --> 0:16:48.400
<v Speaker 1>East Lancing, which was a winnable game, and it has

0:16:48.440 --> 0:16:50.600
<v Speaker 1>been a winnable game for them. They just haven't gotten

0:16:50.640 --> 0:16:53.720
<v Speaker 1>over that hump recently. They go to Columbus, which will

0:16:53.720 --> 0:16:56.280
<v Speaker 1>be pretty much impossible. I have a lot of high

0:16:56.320 --> 0:16:59.680
<v Speaker 1>expectations for Dwayne Haskins probably who is going to be

0:16:59.720 --> 0:17:04.080
<v Speaker 1>starting quarterback, maybe Tamar tell whatever home against Wisconsin. Could

0:17:04.080 --> 0:17:07.600
<v Speaker 1>they win that game thirteen ten. Sure, of course they could.

0:17:07.800 --> 0:17:10.840
<v Speaker 1>Penn State loses what three of their top four pass catchers,

0:17:10.880 --> 0:17:14.840
<v Speaker 1>their offensive coordinator, a good chunk of that excellent defense,

0:17:15.720 --> 0:17:20.080
<v Speaker 1>and perhaps the best all around all purposed offensive skill

0:17:20.119 --> 0:17:24.280
<v Speaker 1>player they've ever had. Yep. So it's not a bad

0:17:24.400 --> 0:17:27.919
<v Speaker 1>year to be improving and returning a ton of talent

0:17:28.040 --> 0:17:31.120
<v Speaker 1>for Michigan. But in terms of make or break tie,

0:17:31.160 --> 0:17:33.640
<v Speaker 1>because we have the end of that question with crucial

0:17:33.720 --> 0:17:36.359
<v Speaker 1>year and then I think it's Jason who said make

0:17:36.440 --> 0:17:39.880
<v Speaker 1>or break here, Jason Horvath, longtime for baller, what does

0:17:39.920 --> 0:17:41.120
<v Speaker 1>that question mean to you?

0:17:41.280 --> 0:17:44.280
<v Speaker 2>To me, it means something different than I think was

0:17:44.320 --> 0:17:46.440
<v Speaker 2>intended by the question asker.

0:17:46.680 --> 0:17:47.560
<v Speaker 1>Okay, what does it mean?

0:17:48.080 --> 0:17:50.200
<v Speaker 2>I think you need to look at Jim harbausch track

0:17:50.280 --> 0:17:55.760
<v Speaker 2>record of burning himself out at places, and I wonder if,

0:17:56.920 --> 0:18:00.199
<v Speaker 2>even if he does improve on eight and four, say

0:18:00.200 --> 0:18:03.119
<v Speaker 2>he gets to nine and three, if there are people

0:18:03.119 --> 0:18:06.320
<v Speaker 2>within the Michigan community who don't view that as good

0:18:06.400 --> 0:18:11.679
<v Speaker 2>enough and taken in concert with Jim Harbaugh's normal m O,

0:18:11.760 --> 0:18:14.040
<v Speaker 2>which is burning himself out after a couple of years,

0:18:14.680 --> 0:18:19.240
<v Speaker 2>if that weird cocktail isn't enough to see him off

0:18:19.280 --> 0:18:20.680
<v Speaker 2>to another coaching locale.

0:18:21.320 --> 0:18:24.159
<v Speaker 1>Is it burning himself out or burning others out on

0:18:24.200 --> 0:18:28.119
<v Speaker 1>the Jim Harbaugh experience allegedly probably a little of both.

0:18:28.480 --> 0:18:31.640
<v Speaker 1>And I think player wise, I think people like him.

0:18:31.680 --> 0:18:35.200
<v Speaker 1>I think the players, you know, obviously he's recruiting. This

0:18:35.280 --> 0:18:37.320
<v Speaker 1>is not a matter of players not having a choice

0:18:37.320 --> 0:18:39.240
<v Speaker 1>and being drafted by the forty nine ers or whoever

0:18:39.640 --> 0:18:42.399
<v Speaker 1>they're coming to Michigan. They like what they're being sold

0:18:43.200 --> 0:18:47.159
<v Speaker 1>to me. The question is when Jason asked make or

0:18:47.200 --> 0:18:49.520
<v Speaker 1>break here, is it a make or break here for

0:18:49.600 --> 0:18:53.960
<v Speaker 1>phase one of the Michigan and Jim Harbaugh era, Like

0:18:54.080 --> 0:18:57.120
<v Speaker 1>is there going to be a retool of like, all right,

0:18:57.160 --> 0:18:58.760
<v Speaker 1>this is what we are now going to focus on

0:18:58.800 --> 0:19:02.119
<v Speaker 1>an offense because I've lost a couple of assistants, or

0:19:02.160 --> 0:19:04.800
<v Speaker 1>we just stop seeing eye to eye, or this is

0:19:04.840 --> 0:19:07.760
<v Speaker 1>how we're going to work defense because you know what,

0:19:07.960 --> 0:19:10.879
<v Speaker 1>maybe you know I'm just making this up. You know,

0:19:10.920 --> 0:19:14.240
<v Speaker 1>a linebackers coach or Don Brown or whoever says, yeah,

0:19:14.280 --> 0:19:16.639
<v Speaker 1>I think I just need to change of scenery. So

0:19:16.720 --> 0:19:19.080
<v Speaker 1>that I think is the make or break of phase one.

0:19:19.840 --> 0:19:21.880
<v Speaker 1>I think Michigan is going to be very good this year.

0:19:22.320 --> 0:19:23.879
<v Speaker 1>I have a lot of faith in them. I'm just

0:19:23.920 --> 0:19:26.919
<v Speaker 1>worried about those sort of close games that require you

0:19:26.960 --> 0:19:31.080
<v Speaker 1>to have a quarterback that's you know, you're two forty

0:19:31.119 --> 0:19:33.920
<v Speaker 1>one left and you're down five. What does that offense

0:19:33.960 --> 0:19:36.080
<v Speaker 1>look like, you know, when they really have to move

0:19:36.119 --> 0:19:38.680
<v Speaker 1>the ball through the air. Whatever, I'm with you. And yeah,

0:19:38.720 --> 0:19:41.560
<v Speaker 1>if it's Shaye Patterson, I have more confidence than if

0:19:41.600 --> 0:19:45.920
<v Speaker 1>it were Brandon Peters or Dyl McCaffrey or John o'corn,

0:19:46.000 --> 0:19:48.479
<v Speaker 1>who I assure you will not be playing this year now.

0:19:48.640 --> 0:19:51.400
<v Speaker 1>But those are my thoughts. And yeah, the schedule's tough,

0:19:51.440 --> 0:19:53.080
<v Speaker 1>but not impossible to me.

0:19:53.359 --> 0:19:55.800
<v Speaker 2>Right, Let's go one more question here before we got

0:19:55.800 --> 0:19:58.280
<v Speaker 2>to pay some bills and we got to move quicker,

0:19:58.320 --> 0:20:00.480
<v Speaker 2>because God, we got so many questions here, Dan.

0:20:00.680 --> 0:20:02.200
<v Speaker 1>That's true, Let's go to Luke.

0:20:02.960 --> 0:20:05.720
<v Speaker 2>I love this question, by the way, this is a

0:20:05.760 --> 0:20:10.439
<v Speaker 2>great question. What coaches in the SEC are likely to

0:20:10.560 --> 0:20:14.200
<v Speaker 2>still be around when Nick Saban retires. I like this

0:20:14.320 --> 0:20:20.800
<v Speaker 2>question because it requires an extra level of comprehension to

0:20:20.880 --> 0:20:24.320
<v Speaker 2>try and figure out to forecast when we think Nick

0:20:24.359 --> 0:20:27.199
<v Speaker 2>Saban's going to retire. Nick Saban, take a guess how

0:20:27.240 --> 0:20:28.920
<v Speaker 2>old Nick Saban is. If you haven't looked this.

0:20:28.960 --> 0:20:32.359
<v Speaker 1>Up nineteen years old? Hy, I have no idea. Is

0:20:32.680 --> 0:20:34.520
<v Speaker 1>he what's sixty six years old?

0:20:34.680 --> 0:20:36.640
<v Speaker 2>He is exactly sixty six years old?

0:20:36.640 --> 0:20:37.200
<v Speaker 1>Is that's true?

0:20:37.280 --> 0:20:41.719
<v Speaker 2>He will turn sixty seven on Halloween Robins Dan this

0:20:41.800 --> 0:20:47.000
<v Speaker 2>coming year. So not a spring chicken in the coaching world,

0:20:47.480 --> 0:20:53.440
<v Speaker 2>in the greater employment world. How many years do you think,

0:20:53.480 --> 0:20:55.200
<v Speaker 2>realistically we get out of Nick Saban?

0:20:56.359 --> 0:21:00.359
<v Speaker 1>Oh man, what a great generic. And I don't you

0:21:00.440 --> 0:21:02.640
<v Speaker 1>for this, it's just the off season question. Every year.

0:21:04.680 --> 0:21:07.240
<v Speaker 1>Let's put a date. Let's put a date on it

0:21:07.359 --> 0:21:12.919
<v Speaker 1>of he retires or for whatever reason, leaves after the

0:21:13.000 --> 0:21:17.479
<v Speaker 1>twenty twenty twenty season, twenty ten around when he's like

0:21:17.520 --> 0:21:19.840
<v Speaker 1>seventy years old. Seventy years old?

0:21:19.880 --> 0:21:24.000
<v Speaker 2>Okay, so let's just say three full season for the

0:21:24.040 --> 0:21:27.480
<v Speaker 2>purposes of argument, three full seasons.

0:21:27.680 --> 0:21:28.080
<v Speaker 1>Mm hmm.

0:21:28.840 --> 0:21:32.480
<v Speaker 2>I'm going to pull up the SEC coaching list here

0:21:33.160 --> 0:21:34.639
<v Speaker 2>and we're going to figure this out. We're going to

0:21:34.720 --> 0:21:37.359
<v Speaker 2>set an over under in the same manner that we

0:21:37.440 --> 0:21:40.760
<v Speaker 2>set an over under by the way, for Link Kiffin

0:21:40.880 --> 0:21:43.560
<v Speaker 2>and how many coaching jobs, how many head coaching jobs

0:21:43.560 --> 0:21:46.360
<v Speaker 2>he would have? Yeah, in his full career, it's still

0:21:46.400 --> 0:21:47.800
<v Speaker 2>an ongoing little over under.

0:21:48.400 --> 0:21:49.439
<v Speaker 1>But okay, here we go.

0:21:49.800 --> 0:21:53.440
<v Speaker 2>Let's start in the SEC East. I think it's likely

0:21:53.480 --> 0:21:55.680
<v Speaker 2>that Kirby Smart's still going to be there, So that's one.

0:21:56.359 --> 0:21:56.600
<v Speaker 1>Dang.

0:21:57.680 --> 0:22:01.960
<v Speaker 2>Will mush Champ at South Carolina I will put decidedly

0:22:02.080 --> 0:22:03.280
<v Speaker 2>in the maybe category.

0:22:04.200 --> 0:22:06.840
<v Speaker 1>No, you got no no fence sitting here, Ty, I'll

0:22:06.840 --> 0:22:10.000
<v Speaker 1>say no. We're counting digits, integers.

0:22:10.080 --> 0:22:14.000
<v Speaker 2>I'm gonna say no. Okay, so we have one Kentucky.

0:22:14.040 --> 0:22:20.000
<v Speaker 2>I'm also inclined to say no. Missouri and Barry Odom.

0:22:20.000 --> 0:22:23.000
<v Speaker 1>I have no idea. No fence sitting.

0:22:24.400 --> 0:22:27.199
<v Speaker 2>Why this is a two person operation. You can answer too.

0:22:27.320 --> 0:22:29.760
<v Speaker 2>I know I'm saying no. All right, let's say no.

0:22:30.600 --> 0:22:33.640
<v Speaker 2>So so far we have Kirby Smart, Uh, Florida, I'm

0:22:33.640 --> 0:22:40.240
<v Speaker 2>gonna say yes, it'll be there too. Vanderbilt I say no, Nope.

0:22:41.320 --> 0:22:45.679
<v Speaker 2>And Tennessee I say yes with Jeremy Pruett. Sure he

0:22:45.840 --> 0:22:47.920
<v Speaker 2>just got there. He better be there in three years.

0:22:47.920 --> 0:22:50.600
<v Speaker 1>Three three to three.

0:22:51.000 --> 0:22:53.480
<v Speaker 2>Auburn and Gus Malsan, I'm gonna say no. I think

0:22:53.480 --> 0:22:54.680
<v Speaker 2>he goes else at some point.

0:22:55.320 --> 0:22:55.560
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

0:22:55.760 --> 0:23:01.320
<v Speaker 2>No, Alabama, Nick Saban, I guess they're out. Given this question.

0:23:03.280 --> 0:23:06.119
<v Speaker 2>Coach or Geron at LSU, I say no, I say no,

0:23:07.920 --> 0:23:10.760
<v Speaker 2>Joe moorehead at Mississippi State is very interesting.

0:23:10.800 --> 0:23:15.919
<v Speaker 1>But I say yes, that said, could Joe moorehead be

0:23:17.119 --> 0:23:22.360
<v Speaker 1>a Willie Taggart type situation potentially where he finally has

0:23:22.400 --> 0:23:25.840
<v Speaker 1>this opportunity to coach at a major place Power five

0:23:25.920 --> 0:23:31.000
<v Speaker 1>conference and then something unexpected and huge opens up that

0:23:31.440 --> 0:23:36.040
<v Speaker 1>perhaps given where he's from and what he grew I

0:23:36.040 --> 0:23:37.720
<v Speaker 1>don't know who he grew up rooting for, but like

0:23:38.320 --> 0:23:40.560
<v Speaker 1>it would not be completely unheard of that Notre Dame

0:23:40.600 --> 0:23:43.120
<v Speaker 1>opened up now right, No, no, and if he had,

0:23:43.160 --> 0:23:45.000
<v Speaker 1>if he had a really good eight and four year

0:23:45.000 --> 0:23:45.960
<v Speaker 1>from Mississippi State.

0:23:46.200 --> 0:23:49.680
<v Speaker 2>Sure, So we're up to four mm HM, Texas A

0:23:49.760 --> 0:23:51.680
<v Speaker 2>and M I think is a given because they signed

0:23:51.720 --> 0:23:56.080
<v Speaker 2>Jimbo through the year three thousand. Yep, all miss I say.

0:23:55.880 --> 0:23:57.000
<v Speaker 1>No, nope.

0:23:57.920 --> 0:24:03.840
<v Speaker 2>And Arkansas I Chad Morris.

0:24:04.520 --> 0:24:06.720
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna say no, not because I don't have faith

0:24:06.720 --> 0:24:09.760
<v Speaker 1>in Chad Moore. But he gets poached. Yeah, I could

0:24:09.760 --> 0:24:11.680
<v Speaker 1>see that happening, all right.

0:24:11.760 --> 0:24:15.159
<v Speaker 2>So if we set that over under at five and

0:24:15.160 --> 0:24:18.160
<v Speaker 2>a half, I think that's a good line, the same

0:24:18.200 --> 0:24:20.119
<v Speaker 2>as our Lane Kiffen career head coaching.

0:24:20.320 --> 0:24:23.080
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. I take the under stints line, not because I

0:24:23.080 --> 0:24:25.440
<v Speaker 1>don't want any of these coaches to succeed and improve

0:24:25.480 --> 0:24:27.920
<v Speaker 1>and be fun and great TV for years to come.

0:24:28.359 --> 0:24:31.600
<v Speaker 1>But we're talking about the SEC. That's a great question,

0:24:31.680 --> 0:24:32.200
<v Speaker 1>thank you, Luis.

0:24:32.359 --> 0:24:35.439
<v Speaker 2>Five and a half is the over under coaches that

0:24:35.480 --> 0:24:39.840
<v Speaker 2>will still be around when Nick Saban retires by our

0:24:39.880 --> 0:24:42.840
<v Speaker 2>forecast in the year twenty twenty or after three full seasons?

0:24:43.840 --> 0:24:44.320
<v Speaker 1>Good one.

0:24:44.400 --> 0:24:49.520
<v Speaker 2>All right, Daniel. We've talked about these guys before, but

0:24:49.600 --> 0:24:54.239
<v Speaker 2>not for a while. MVMT. Oh yeah, all right. Now,

0:24:54.280 --> 0:24:57.360
<v Speaker 2>I know you where your movement watch on as we

0:24:57.400 --> 0:25:01.000
<v Speaker 2>speak on your wrist frequently. I know you get compliments

0:25:01.000 --> 0:25:05.480
<v Speaker 2>about your watch. But a lot's happened since we last

0:25:05.640 --> 0:25:09.240
<v Speaker 2>heard from our friends over at MVMT. The company's grown.

0:25:10.000 --> 0:25:13.680
<v Speaker 2>Over two million watches have now been sold in one

0:25:13.800 --> 0:25:18.520
<v Speaker 2>hundred and sixty plus countries. They continue to revolutionize fashion

0:25:19.160 --> 0:25:23.120
<v Speaker 2>in the belief that style shouldn't break the bank. They've

0:25:23.200 --> 0:25:27.600
<v Speaker 2>doubled their number of watches. They're now selling high quality sunglasses,

0:25:27.720 --> 0:25:28.840
<v Speaker 2>women's bracelets.

0:25:29.480 --> 0:25:32.239
<v Speaker 1>Really, yeah, it's a way of life.

0:25:32.320 --> 0:25:35.680
<v Speaker 2>Our friends over at MVMT they've put together the perfect

0:25:35.760 --> 0:25:40.000
<v Speaker 2>interactive guide to make Valentine's Day shopping as painless as possible.

0:25:40.320 --> 0:25:42.320
<v Speaker 2>So whether you're going to shop for him or for her,

0:25:42.760 --> 0:25:46.879
<v Speaker 2>find everything from watches to fashion forward bracelets and sunglasses

0:25:47.320 --> 0:25:54.280
<v Speaker 2>in mvmt's limited edition gift box. It's all curated by

0:25:54.280 --> 0:25:59.200
<v Speaker 2>their in house stylist, their trendious pieces. Give it all

0:25:59.240 --> 0:26:02.840
<v Speaker 2>to that someone special because they'll love it. Right now,

0:26:02.840 --> 0:26:07.520
<v Speaker 2>you can get fifteen percent off with free shipping and

0:26:07.560 --> 0:26:12.200
<v Speaker 2>free returns if you go to mvmt dot com slash solid.

0:26:12.600 --> 0:26:17.600
<v Speaker 2>Go to mvmt dot com slash solid Dan, join the movement,

0:26:18.600 --> 0:26:20.879
<v Speaker 2>join the movie. You know what, ty there is nothing

0:26:21.320 --> 0:26:25.840
<v Speaker 2>on my person shoes, pants, shirts, glasses, whatever that I

0:26:25.920 --> 0:26:30.080
<v Speaker 2>receive more comments and compliments, and yeah, I need one

0:26:30.119 --> 0:26:34.200
<v Speaker 2>of those. Do you like yours about my MVMT watch.

0:26:34.240 --> 0:26:35.200
<v Speaker 2>That's one hundred percent truth.

0:26:35.280 --> 0:26:37.560
<v Speaker 1>Since we did our first campaign, they were kind enough

0:26:37.600 --> 0:26:41.360
<v Speaker 1>to send us watches. You know, I'm into analog wearables, Tye.

0:26:41.960 --> 0:26:44.159
<v Speaker 1>I am one hundred percent into analog wearables. I know

0:26:44.200 --> 0:26:46.399
<v Speaker 1>you like the government tracking you on your wrist, but

0:26:47.080 --> 0:26:50.400
<v Speaker 1>not I And this thing, this watch, it's a brown

0:26:50.480 --> 0:26:52.040
<v Speaker 1>leather watch. And what I like about it too is

0:26:52.040 --> 0:26:55.280
<v Speaker 1>on the website it tells you how big the face is. Yeah,

0:26:55.760 --> 0:26:58.399
<v Speaker 1>you know, I like that circumference talk, sure, sure, sure,

0:26:58.600 --> 0:27:01.919
<v Speaker 1>and you get it. You get it in bunches on

0:27:01.960 --> 0:27:04.720
<v Speaker 1>the MVMT. Is it circumference, is it diameter? What am

0:27:04.720 --> 0:27:07.840
<v Speaker 1>I looking for here? But whatever it is, the geometry

0:27:07.920 --> 0:27:10.480
<v Speaker 1>is right. Because some people don't like that oversized watch.

0:27:10.520 --> 0:27:12.879
<v Speaker 1>Some people have dainty risks. Some people have big, thick risks,

0:27:13.080 --> 0:27:14.560
<v Speaker 1>and they want to know how big they're watches if

0:27:14.560 --> 0:27:16.719
<v Speaker 1>they're ordering it online. Now that I see, if they

0:27:16.720 --> 0:27:19.159
<v Speaker 1>have sunglasses, and I'm going to say it, Tie is

0:27:19.200 --> 0:27:21.840
<v Speaker 1>a pretty good price point for quality looking sunglasses. It's

0:27:21.840 --> 0:27:24.280
<v Speaker 1>not bad. I'm looking at it too. I'm I'm a

0:27:24.400 --> 0:27:27.480
<v Speaker 1>huge fan, all right. Well this is also also true,

0:27:27.760 --> 0:27:29.720
<v Speaker 1>and this is just it speaks to the quality of

0:27:29.840 --> 0:27:34.320
<v Speaker 1>MVMT tie. This is one from the heart. At my

0:27:34.400 --> 0:27:37.960
<v Speaker 1>bachelor party in New Orleans, Louisiana, I was taken to

0:27:39.080 --> 0:27:43.960
<v Speaker 1>an adult establishment. Huh and these are not light Tie,

0:27:44.040 --> 0:27:46.120
<v Speaker 1>These are not you know, the light the house lights

0:27:46.160 --> 0:27:50.880
<v Speaker 1>are not on in these places. Sure, two different employees

0:27:51.800 --> 0:27:55.760
<v Speaker 1>commented on my watch in the dark. It just stood out.

0:27:55.880 --> 0:28:00.639
<v Speaker 1>And these employees are of the highest taste. So it

0:28:00.720 --> 0:28:03.679
<v Speaker 1>was a great experience. And shout out to MVMT for

0:28:03.760 --> 0:28:04.720
<v Speaker 1>making dreams come true.

0:28:04.760 --> 0:28:07.159
<v Speaker 2>Are we certain it was because they liked the watch

0:28:08.240 --> 0:28:11.680
<v Speaker 2>and they weren't just trying to maybe get US American currency.

0:28:11.880 --> 0:28:15.359
<v Speaker 1>You know, Ty, when I'm thinking about MVMT, my heart's

0:28:15.359 --> 0:28:18.479
<v Speaker 1>always in the right place, So I couldn't speak to that.

0:28:18.920 --> 0:28:23.200
<v Speaker 2>Fair enough, fair enough, Let's go to Irwin. Yeah, which

0:28:23.280 --> 0:28:26.280
<v Speaker 2>quarterbacks will be the early front runners for the Heisman?

0:28:26.320 --> 0:28:28.320
<v Speaker 2>And he throws out a few names here, Khalil tate

0:28:29.240 --> 0:28:34.280
<v Speaker 2>to a TAGAVLOA good Ty, you are nailing it, Jake

0:28:34.400 --> 0:28:41.560
<v Speaker 2>from Jared Stidham. Trace McSorley will grear. I will say this,

0:28:41.680 --> 0:28:43.280
<v Speaker 2>and I don't have it in front of me, so

0:28:43.880 --> 0:28:47.040
<v Speaker 2>forgive me for not putting in the requisite amount of

0:28:47.040 --> 0:28:51.040
<v Speaker 2>research here. I did look at some early heisman lines,

0:28:51.600 --> 0:28:54.680
<v Speaker 2>and I remember looking at it and thinking that the

0:28:54.840 --> 0:29:00.560
<v Speaker 2>line for Trace mcsoorly looked astonishingly low. Now, Hi's bets

0:29:00.640 --> 0:29:05.320
<v Speaker 2>are preposterous, especially at this early stage in the game,

0:29:05.960 --> 0:29:11.000
<v Speaker 2>but Trace mcsorly will clearly be the centerpiece of that

0:29:11.480 --> 0:29:14.320
<v Speaker 2>Penn State offense. You could make a case that even

0:29:14.360 --> 0:29:18.200
<v Speaker 2>though Saquon Barkley got most of the love this year,

0:29:18.640 --> 0:29:22.160
<v Speaker 2>Trace mcsorly was still the engine that made that offense

0:29:22.200 --> 0:29:23.240
<v Speaker 2>go and it was pretty.

0:29:22.920 --> 0:29:25.640
<v Speaker 1>Good, perhaps more consistent. Yeah, absolutely so.

0:29:25.760 --> 0:29:30.000
<v Speaker 2>I think Trace mcsrely if I were a betting man,

0:29:30.040 --> 0:29:34.000
<v Speaker 2>and I am, if he were out there at that

0:29:34.160 --> 0:29:36.760
<v Speaker 2>price point whatever it was, maybe like twenty or twenty

0:29:36.760 --> 0:29:41.360
<v Speaker 2>five to one, something ridiculous. Trace mcsorely, of all those names,

0:29:41.880 --> 0:29:44.880
<v Speaker 2>I think would be the best bet, just because I

0:29:44.920 --> 0:29:48.640
<v Speaker 2>know everything runs through him. I don't have a ton

0:29:48.680 --> 0:29:51.480
<v Speaker 2>of faith in Khalil Tate, even though I'm all about

0:29:51.520 --> 0:29:55.760
<v Speaker 2>Khalil Tate, but new system and maybe not consistent enough

0:29:55.800 --> 0:29:58.960
<v Speaker 2>at this point. Tua's got so many other players on

0:29:59.000 --> 0:30:01.720
<v Speaker 2>his team. I think it's tough. Jake FROMM I don't

0:30:01.760 --> 0:30:04.160
<v Speaker 2>know if the stats will be there for him to

0:30:04.160 --> 0:30:06.920
<v Speaker 2>be a Heisman caliber quarterback. You can make a case

0:30:06.920 --> 0:30:09.760
<v Speaker 2>for Stidham, You can make a case for Greer, although

0:30:09.800 --> 0:30:11.680
<v Speaker 2>I don't know if the wins will be there in

0:30:11.720 --> 0:30:13.880
<v Speaker 2>the manner that they need to be to be a

0:30:13.920 --> 0:30:16.600
<v Speaker 2>true Heisman contender. So, of all those names, McSorley is

0:30:16.600 --> 0:30:17.120
<v Speaker 2>my guy.

0:30:17.120 --> 0:30:19.480
<v Speaker 1>When I try and this is nobody knows what they're

0:30:19.480 --> 0:30:21.680
<v Speaker 1>talking about, but this is my particular brand of not

0:30:21.720 --> 0:30:24.000
<v Speaker 1>knowing what I'm talking about. When I look at these names,

0:30:24.080 --> 0:30:26.600
<v Speaker 1>as well as any other big returning quarterback names, of

0:30:26.640 --> 0:30:28.840
<v Speaker 1>which there are not many. There really aren't. I mean,

0:30:28.960 --> 0:30:30.840
<v Speaker 1>Justin Herbert would be a name I would add to this.

0:30:30.960 --> 0:30:34.440
<v Speaker 1>Just yeah, yeah, he did went healthy. Whatever I want

0:30:34.440 --> 0:30:37.000
<v Speaker 1>to see, you know, perhaps an offensive line that returns

0:30:37.000 --> 0:30:39.120
<v Speaker 1>a good amount, not every doesn't have to be everything.

0:30:39.160 --> 0:30:43.400
<v Speaker 1>Good amount consistency and lack of attrition among offensive coaches.

0:30:43.880 --> 0:30:45.960
<v Speaker 1>I think it's fair just the comfort level, you know,

0:30:46.520 --> 0:30:49.560
<v Speaker 1>just like Baker Mayfield. Having Lincoln Riley around another year,

0:30:49.760 --> 0:30:52.480
<v Speaker 1>even with Bob Stoop stepping down, I thought was enormous,

0:30:52.840 --> 0:30:55.160
<v Speaker 1>you know, because Oklahoma lost so much in the way

0:30:55.200 --> 0:30:57.400
<v Speaker 1>of skill talent, But the Lincoln Riley consistency I thought

0:30:57.480 --> 0:31:02.400
<v Speaker 1>was a big deal. Schedule certainly can improve things, which

0:31:02.440 --> 0:31:06.560
<v Speaker 1>is I think why Khalil Tate to me coaching gone.

0:31:06.600 --> 0:31:10.160
<v Speaker 1>But probably now that we're hearing different things, perhaps for

0:31:10.200 --> 0:31:13.880
<v Speaker 1>the best Kevin someone inheriting a talented quarterback and experience,

0:31:14.600 --> 0:31:15.560
<v Speaker 1>we've seen it happen.

0:31:15.720 --> 0:31:15.920
<v Speaker 2>You know.

0:31:16.080 --> 0:31:18.280
<v Speaker 1>It's not a one to one comparison of Khalil Tate

0:31:18.280 --> 0:31:22.520
<v Speaker 1>to Johnny Manziel, but returns what Chun Brown, Tony Allison.

0:31:22.960 --> 0:31:27.040
<v Speaker 1>The schedule Arizona misses I believe both Washington and Stanford

0:31:27.240 --> 0:31:31.200
<v Speaker 1>cross division conference, which is pretty ideal. I don't think

0:31:31.240 --> 0:31:34.080
<v Speaker 1>they have any real tough road games. So Khalil Tate

0:31:34.120 --> 0:31:36.680
<v Speaker 1>is in good shape, has good running backs. Tua is

0:31:36.720 --> 0:31:39.920
<v Speaker 1>sort of an unknown because we've seen him play a

0:31:40.160 --> 0:31:41.840
<v Speaker 1>half of important football.

0:31:41.800 --> 0:31:45.760
<v Speaker 2>He was seven to one if I remember correctly, right

0:31:46.000 --> 0:31:47.800
<v Speaker 2>on the odds that I saw.

0:31:48.000 --> 0:31:52.240
<v Speaker 1>He'll have the stage. Yeah, Calvin Ridley gone, Brian Dable

0:31:52.320 --> 0:31:54.960
<v Speaker 1>mentioned gone, but he'll have, you know, all the weapons

0:31:55.000 --> 0:31:57.320
<v Speaker 1>in the world. His line should be good from will

0:31:57.360 --> 0:32:00.720
<v Speaker 1>be very interesting to me. I think that is more interesting.

0:32:00.800 --> 0:32:03.080
<v Speaker 2>Perhaps I don't think you'll have the stats he wanted

0:32:03.080 --> 0:32:04.200
<v Speaker 2>the stats.

0:32:04.560 --> 0:32:06.920
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, he won't, but he'll be counted on more. Without

0:32:07.040 --> 0:32:09.600
<v Speaker 1>Sony Michelle and Nick Chubb. He will have to do

0:32:09.760 --> 0:32:14.120
<v Speaker 1>with DeAndre Swift. Yeah. No, I think they will be fine.

0:32:14.240 --> 0:32:16.560
<v Speaker 1>But the fact that and part of the line is

0:32:16.640 --> 0:32:19.720
<v Speaker 1>pretty young and succeeded last year. The concern for me

0:32:19.800 --> 0:32:25.840
<v Speaker 1>is Trace McSorley, the Joe moorehead factor, losing what Dayshawn Hamilton,

0:32:26.040 --> 0:32:29.800
<v Speaker 1>Mike Kasicki, Sakwon Barkley, Jawan Johnson's back and is a

0:32:29.880 --> 0:32:32.120
<v Speaker 1>huge weapon. They have a I think a red shirt

0:32:32.120 --> 0:32:35.520
<v Speaker 1>freshman who should be was kJ Hamlery you want to

0:32:35.520 --> 0:32:40.400
<v Speaker 1>talk about kJ Hamler I think Will Greer is actually

0:32:41.000 --> 0:32:44.680
<v Speaker 1>just in terms of what we've seen from Dana Holgerson

0:32:44.760 --> 0:32:47.520
<v Speaker 1>quarterback with experience in the system and the ability to

0:32:47.920 --> 0:32:51.160
<v Speaker 1>identify really good receivers year over year. David Sill's coming

0:32:51.200 --> 0:32:53.719
<v Speaker 1>back as a huge red zone target, I think that

0:32:53.880 --> 0:32:57.920
<v Speaker 1>is probably of that list my my pick.

0:32:58.520 --> 0:33:03.440
<v Speaker 2>All Rightoh okay, next, a real quick one here from Adrian,

0:33:03.640 --> 0:33:07.720
<v Speaker 2>who says where will Alex Hornybrook rank among Big ten

0:33:07.800 --> 0:33:13.320
<v Speaker 2>quarterbacks in twenty eighteen? How horny are you for Alex Hornybrook? Dan?

0:33:15.120 --> 0:33:17.760
<v Speaker 1>In which half? In the second half? I am hot

0:33:17.760 --> 0:33:21.800
<v Speaker 1>and bothered? Tye, Yeah, I am sweating pants a gett

0:33:21.800 --> 0:33:24.960
<v Speaker 1>a little tight. I'm ready to be energized for Alex

0:33:25.000 --> 0:33:26.040
<v Speaker 1>Hornybrook in the second half.

0:33:26.040 --> 0:33:28.720
<v Speaker 2>Well, number one is obviously Elijah Sindelar.

0:33:29.240 --> 0:33:31.280
<v Speaker 1>I mean, second year in a Jeff bram offense tie

0:33:31.280 --> 0:33:34.600
<v Speaker 1>that could prove to me pretty good. I'm just tye.

0:33:35.680 --> 0:33:38.400
<v Speaker 2>I'm not putting him over Hornybrook. Come on, okay, but

0:33:38.640 --> 0:33:43.720
<v Speaker 2>I think I put Trace McSorley over Hornybrook. Do you

0:33:43.720 --> 0:33:47.840
<v Speaker 2>put a little workie over Alex Hornybrook. I probably don't.

0:33:48.360 --> 0:33:50.360
<v Speaker 1>I don't think I do yet, but I think they

0:33:50.360 --> 0:33:53.400
<v Speaker 1>are both. They both should be very good this fall.

0:33:53.800 --> 0:33:56.680
<v Speaker 2>I'm not putting Clayton Thorson, who is coming back for

0:33:56.720 --> 0:34:00.200
<v Speaker 2>his eighteenth year, over Alex Hornybrook.

0:34:00.480 --> 0:34:03.400
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, he's just turning in his dissertation. He'll get his

0:34:03.440 --> 0:34:06.480
<v Speaker 1>pH d. And he's ready to go Ohio State. We

0:34:06.520 --> 0:34:11.040
<v Speaker 1>put Haskins above him, So Haskins is interesting. Haskins has

0:34:11.360 --> 0:34:14.960
<v Speaker 1>we haven't seen him well, we saw him a little bit,

0:34:15.040 --> 0:34:18.320
<v Speaker 1>a little bit in yeah, in relief in the Michigan

0:34:18.400 --> 0:34:21.160
<v Speaker 1>game where he was If he looks like what he

0:34:21.239 --> 0:34:24.239
<v Speaker 1>looked like in that very small sample, he will be

0:34:24.400 --> 0:34:26.120
<v Speaker 1>one of the best three quarterbacks in the country.

0:34:26.440 --> 0:34:27.880
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. Uh.

0:34:27.960 --> 0:34:30.120
<v Speaker 1>He is the highest ceiling of anybody, I would say

0:34:30.160 --> 0:34:33.920
<v Speaker 1>because of the offensive skill, talent, the offensive line, and

0:34:34.960 --> 0:34:37.440
<v Speaker 1>you know, reshuffling of offense. Now I think Ryan Day

0:34:37.520 --> 0:34:39.360
<v Speaker 1>is going to be calling plays. Maybe we'll see some

0:34:39.400 --> 0:34:42.759
<v Speaker 1>more creativity with a pure passer like Dwayne Haskins. He

0:34:42.880 --> 0:34:46.239
<v Speaker 1>is the highest ceiling I would go right now in

0:34:46.320 --> 0:34:49.640
<v Speaker 1>terms of ceiling and what we've seen of these players.

0:34:49.640 --> 0:34:53.880
<v Speaker 1>Trace McSorley is the best returning, the best option to me,

0:34:54.040 --> 0:34:55.160
<v Speaker 1>best quarterback.

0:34:54.880 --> 0:34:58.960
<v Speaker 2>Shaye Patterson probably is a higher ceiling in terms of

0:34:59.160 --> 0:35:03.719
<v Speaker 2>shape pass sir, But uh yeah, I like what Penn

0:35:03.760 --> 0:35:06.840
<v Speaker 2>State has more than what Michigan has right now. Now

0:35:06.880 --> 0:35:08.879
<v Speaker 2>I'm not saying over Trace, I'm saying over Horny Pops.

0:35:08.920 --> 0:35:16.360
<v Speaker 1>Okay, all right, Yeah, I would say Trace Haskins, Shay Horny,

0:35:17.239 --> 0:35:23.400
<v Speaker 1>the worky. I might put Nate Stanley right there. I

0:35:23.440 --> 0:35:25.960
<v Speaker 1>forgot it, and he's super he would I think it was.

0:35:26.480 --> 0:35:28.160
<v Speaker 1>I don't know if he like threw down field a

0:35:28.200 --> 0:35:29.600
<v Speaker 1>ton and he needs to be more accurate.

0:35:29.600 --> 0:35:33.919
<v Speaker 2>I don't think he had an incredible interception ratio. He was, Yeah,

0:35:34.000 --> 0:35:34.319
<v Speaker 2>he was.

0:35:34.680 --> 0:35:37.799
<v Speaker 1>He was accurate, he protected the ball. Wow, I'd put

0:35:37.880 --> 0:35:39.800
<v Speaker 1>him there. And this is all to say. By putting

0:35:39.840 --> 0:35:45.040
<v Speaker 1>THEAWORKI fourth or fifth or whatever. Brian Lawurki's really good. Yeah, yeah, yeah.

0:35:45.120 --> 0:35:47.960
<v Speaker 1>It's just a particularly good upper half I think right

0:35:47.960 --> 0:35:51.120
<v Speaker 1>now of the Big ten in terms of quarterback and

0:35:51.160 --> 0:35:52.080
<v Speaker 1>returning experience.

0:35:52.320 --> 0:35:56.759
<v Speaker 2>Finally, here in our pure football section of the question worksheet,

0:35:57.200 --> 0:36:01.000
<v Speaker 2>Andy wants to know what non conference matchup, aside from

0:36:01.120 --> 0:36:05.800
<v Speaker 2>annual rivalry games, are you most excited for in twenty eighteen,

0:36:06.239 --> 0:36:10.080
<v Speaker 2>So thankfully about a week ago, our friend Richard Johnson,

0:36:10.120 --> 0:36:13.440
<v Speaker 2>over an espianation put together a list of not only

0:36:14.400 --> 0:36:17.719
<v Speaker 2>non conference games in twenty eighteen, but pretty much through

0:36:17.800 --> 0:36:19.200
<v Speaker 2>like the year twenty thirty.

0:36:18.880 --> 0:36:20.279
<v Speaker 1>One best of the best.

0:36:20.400 --> 0:36:22.920
<v Speaker 2>Richard Johnson went, he went all the way out there

0:36:23.600 --> 0:36:25.920
<v Speaker 2>to try and give us a feel for what we

0:36:25.960 --> 0:36:29.439
<v Speaker 2>should be looking forward to for many years to come.

0:36:29.719 --> 0:36:33.760
<v Speaker 2>The one that jumps out to me other than Michigan

0:36:33.760 --> 0:36:36.759
<v Speaker 2>at Notre Dame, which for obvious reasons I think is

0:36:37.160 --> 0:36:40.759
<v Speaker 2>you know, one of my answers here, UCLA at Oklahoma

0:36:40.800 --> 0:36:43.759
<v Speaker 2>to me is interesting, Yeah, because we've got a new

0:36:43.880 --> 0:36:48.440
<v Speaker 2>system at UCLA with Chip or Chip Kelly. We've got

0:36:48.760 --> 0:36:54.160
<v Speaker 2>Oklahoma without Baker Mayfield, still very well positioned for the

0:36:54.200 --> 0:36:56.960
<v Speaker 2>future given all the talent that they've got there on

0:36:57.000 --> 0:37:00.280
<v Speaker 2>their depth chart. But feels to me like a game

0:37:01.160 --> 0:37:03.960
<v Speaker 2>where a lot of points.

0:37:04.840 --> 0:37:06.719
<v Speaker 1>I think that's a really good pick to see what

0:37:06.960 --> 0:37:09.600
<v Speaker 1>Oklahoma is going to look like early on, Kyler Murray,

0:37:10.560 --> 0:37:13.759
<v Speaker 1>a lot of returning Rodnie Anderson's back, right, I believe, Yeah, Yeah,

0:37:13.760 --> 0:37:18.040
<v Speaker 1>he's in the Heisman odds consideration, the top twenty thirty. Whatever.

0:37:18.080 --> 0:37:20.279
<v Speaker 2>It is like even if u c LA doesn't win,

0:37:20.360 --> 0:37:23.120
<v Speaker 2>that game. I think there will be enough of a

0:37:23.320 --> 0:37:26.839
<v Speaker 2>pyrotechnic display on offense really on both sides, to make

0:37:26.880 --> 0:37:28.720
<v Speaker 2>it a fun game to watch.

0:37:29.000 --> 0:37:33.160
<v Speaker 1>Sure, I would add I think Auburn Washington, I believe

0:37:33.239 --> 0:37:34.280
<v Speaker 1>in in Atlanta.

0:37:34.320 --> 0:37:37.160
<v Speaker 2>It's in Atlanta, It's in Atlanta. Excuse me, Yeah, good game.

0:37:38.120 --> 0:37:41.160
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. I think Ole Miss, Texas Tech is in Houston.

0:37:42.440 --> 0:37:46.960
<v Speaker 1>Auburn Washington me with Washington being the clear right now,

0:37:47.040 --> 0:37:50.120
<v Speaker 1>I think alone class of the Pac twelve, with what

0:37:50.160 --> 0:37:52.319
<v Speaker 1>they return on offense, they still need to find a

0:37:52.360 --> 0:37:54.799
<v Speaker 1>big play receiver. They still are missing that. But Jake

0:37:54.800 --> 0:37:58.880
<v Speaker 1>Browning as a senior Miles Gaskin back against what should

0:37:58.880 --> 0:38:01.279
<v Speaker 1>once again be a pretty light out Auburn defense. With

0:38:01.280 --> 0:38:05.279
<v Speaker 1>but they return, I think that's going to be pretty fun.

0:38:05.320 --> 0:38:08.880
<v Speaker 1>It'll be a pretty partisan crowd being in Atlanta, like

0:38:09.040 --> 0:38:12.040
<v Speaker 1>Chris Peterson, with you know, an entire offseason prepare and

0:38:12.080 --> 0:38:16.160
<v Speaker 1>to figure things out Auburn against a creative offensive mind.

0:38:16.200 --> 0:38:19.319
<v Speaker 1>Gotten A struggled in the bowl game. So I think

0:38:19.320 --> 0:38:22.360
<v Speaker 1>that's I think we might be sleeping on FAU.

0:38:22.040 --> 0:38:24.880
<v Speaker 2>Oklahoma early in the year. Week one, week one.

0:38:24.760 --> 0:38:30.560
<v Speaker 1>Come on, I know. And also honestly, like I'm excited

0:38:30.600 --> 0:38:34.080
<v Speaker 1>about Michigan, Notre Dame, Arizona, Houston. I think that game

0:38:34.160 --> 0:38:37.880
<v Speaker 1>is at Houston. We have Big at Oliver, Big Khalil Tates.

0:38:38.719 --> 0:38:41.279
<v Speaker 1>I think that could be fun. I just that's my

0:38:41.360 --> 0:38:44.120
<v Speaker 1>low key answer. My high key answer is Auburn Washington.

0:38:44.760 --> 0:38:47.600
<v Speaker 2>All right, let's go to another question here, Dan, you

0:38:47.640 --> 0:38:49.799
<v Speaker 2>get to pick before we pay another bill.

0:38:50.000 --> 0:38:53.640
<v Speaker 1>Okay, so we asked for what Super Bowl food questions? Yeah,

0:38:53.800 --> 0:38:57.080
<v Speaker 1>that was part of it. Ratings. Andy Neuberg wants to

0:38:57.080 --> 0:39:00.640
<v Speaker 1>know longtime reballer ratings on any Buffalo foods. So that

0:39:00.800 --> 0:39:04.080
<v Speaker 1>is to say, buffalo sauce, some kind of mixture of

0:39:04.160 --> 0:39:07.439
<v Speaker 1>hot sauce and butter and incorporating them into Super Bowl

0:39:07.440 --> 0:39:10.600
<v Speaker 1>snacks as examples. It gives buffalo chicken dip, wings, pasta.

0:39:10.640 --> 0:39:14.200
<v Speaker 1>Can you make buffalo pasta? I don't see why not

0:39:14.680 --> 0:39:17.759
<v Speaker 1>you toss a pasta in some sauce. It sounds dreadful.

0:39:17.920 --> 0:39:20.280
<v Speaker 1>I think if you had maybe a buffalo chicken pasta,

0:39:20.320 --> 0:39:23.080
<v Speaker 1>so it's sort of like a buffalo chicken pasta salad. Maybe,

0:39:23.120 --> 0:39:26.960
<v Speaker 1>oh god, maybe it's chilled. I don't know. It sounds

0:39:27.000 --> 0:39:27.480
<v Speaker 1>fine to me.

0:39:27.640 --> 0:39:29.680
<v Speaker 2>Buffalo chicken dip, I think is number one.

0:39:30.560 --> 0:39:33.120
<v Speaker 1>I've had that, and I didn't have it growing up.

0:39:33.160 --> 0:39:34.839
<v Speaker 1>I didn't know it existed, and I have in New

0:39:34.920 --> 0:39:35.759
<v Speaker 1>York and it was very good.

0:39:36.760 --> 0:39:41.359
<v Speaker 2>I think that's number one, followed followed very closely by

0:39:42.160 --> 0:39:45.560
<v Speaker 2>buffalo chicken wings. And the reason I put the dip

0:39:45.600 --> 0:39:48.200
<v Speaker 2>above the wings is because the wings tend to be messy,

0:39:49.000 --> 0:39:49.759
<v Speaker 2>and that you.

0:39:49.800 --> 0:39:50.600
<v Speaker 1>Gotta have a dip.

0:39:51.040 --> 0:39:53.600
<v Speaker 2>You gotta have a dip at a Super Bowl party,

0:39:54.719 --> 0:39:57.359
<v Speaker 2>and I think a really good buffalo chicken dip can

0:39:57.400 --> 0:39:58.280
<v Speaker 2>be the talk of the party.

0:39:59.360 --> 0:40:03.320
<v Speaker 1>I think that's right. I've only had maybe once or twice,

0:40:03.360 --> 0:40:06.640
<v Speaker 1>and it was very good both times. There By the way,

0:40:07.360 --> 0:40:09.719
<v Speaker 1>if you want to feel fake healthy and eat vegetables,

0:40:10.800 --> 0:40:14.200
<v Speaker 1>buffalo cucumbers with a little bit if you there's like

0:40:14.239 --> 0:40:16.719
<v Speaker 1>a crumbly cheese that you like, take healthy. I like

0:40:17.000 --> 0:40:21.080
<v Speaker 1>blue tie. Toss some cukes in buffalo sauce with like

0:40:21.200 --> 0:40:27.280
<v Speaker 1>a crumbly cheese, Hukes cues baby geez. Yeah. Buffalo collie

0:40:27.280 --> 0:40:30.239
<v Speaker 1>also really good. But yeah, I would say the dip

0:40:30.320 --> 0:40:32.440
<v Speaker 1>is probably the move. Any sort of buffalo dip for

0:40:32.480 --> 0:40:35.160
<v Speaker 1>the Super Bowl is the move. And we have a

0:40:35.239 --> 0:40:38.600
<v Speaker 1>follow up not from Andy, which is a good questions

0:40:38.560 --> 0:40:41.239
<v Speaker 1>from Gary. He said, if you had a friend from

0:40:41.280 --> 0:40:45.440
<v Speaker 1>a foreign country get in this headspace tie okay, and

0:40:45.520 --> 0:40:48.239
<v Speaker 1>wanted to give them their first authentic American Super Bowl

0:40:48.239 --> 0:40:52.200
<v Speaker 1>party experience where you're quintessential staple foods that have to

0:40:52.239 --> 0:40:57.359
<v Speaker 1>be there. So I would argue, and I'm about to Yeah,

0:40:57.680 --> 0:41:00.120
<v Speaker 1>I don't think there's quinn essential and whatever you do well,

0:41:00.520 --> 0:41:04.680
<v Speaker 1>whatever is important to you, and yours are quintessential. But

0:41:04.800 --> 0:41:10.000
<v Speaker 1>if you had this foreign friend, a Latvia and chum,

0:41:10.160 --> 0:41:13.840
<v Speaker 1>coming to Allentown, PA, and he just happened to be

0:41:13.880 --> 0:41:18.000
<v Speaker 1>there Sunday, what are you serving for Christaps.

0:41:19.000 --> 0:41:22.279
<v Speaker 2>Kristavs you need I'm going to go back to the

0:41:22.280 --> 0:41:24.680
<v Speaker 2>well here, but I think you need a really good dip.

0:41:25.080 --> 0:41:25.840
<v Speaker 1>You need a dip.

0:41:26.080 --> 0:41:27.600
<v Speaker 2>You need a really good dip in whether it's a

0:41:27.600 --> 0:41:32.640
<v Speaker 2>buffalo what dip are you doing well? Non buffalo chicken addition? Yeah, see,

0:41:32.640 --> 0:41:35.480
<v Speaker 2>I'm kind of boring. I tend to go in the

0:41:35.480 --> 0:41:37.960
<v Speaker 2>direction of a really good taco dip. We've talked with

0:41:39.040 --> 0:41:42.200
<v Speaker 2>on previous shows. But a really good taco dip not

0:41:42.239 --> 0:41:46.240
<v Speaker 2>necessarily difficult to make. But is that like a multi

0:41:46.320 --> 0:41:48.279
<v Speaker 2>layer dip? Is that what you're a multi layered dip?

0:41:48.320 --> 0:41:50.120
<v Speaker 2>You got some sour cream on there. You got some

0:41:50.200 --> 0:41:53.040
<v Speaker 2>cheese in there mixed with the sour cream. You got

0:41:53.040 --> 0:41:56.640
<v Speaker 2>a good salsa that you layer down first, sprinkle some

0:41:56.719 --> 0:41:59.919
<v Speaker 2>cheese on the top of it. A really good taco dip,

0:42:00.000 --> 0:42:00.960
<v Speaker 2>I think is essential.

0:42:02.080 --> 0:42:04.920
<v Speaker 1>Okay, Yeah, five layer, seven layer dip. I think that's

0:42:04.920 --> 0:42:06.879
<v Speaker 1>a good answer. I would I would throw guak into

0:42:06.920 --> 0:42:10.440
<v Speaker 1>the equation. Yeah, yeah, sure, quawk nice and straightforward, although

0:42:10.960 --> 0:42:14.000
<v Speaker 1>I'd give yourself the option if you're willing not to

0:42:14.040 --> 0:42:16.919
<v Speaker 1>do chips with the guak, but to crisp up quesadillas

0:42:17.440 --> 0:42:21.040
<v Speaker 1>and cut them into triangles, because pretty good vehicles for

0:42:21.080 --> 0:42:24.440
<v Speaker 1>both quak and salsa at the same time, stands up

0:42:24.440 --> 0:42:26.120
<v Speaker 1>to it a little bit better than a thinner chip.

0:42:28.120 --> 0:42:30.840
<v Speaker 1>I'm trying to think what other you know. I would

0:42:30.840 --> 0:42:33.560
<v Speaker 1>go with something like, what is more American than like

0:42:33.560 --> 0:42:34.680
<v Speaker 1>a French onion dip type?

0:42:34.680 --> 0:42:36.200
<v Speaker 2>Either that or I was going to say like some

0:42:36.239 --> 0:42:37.680
<v Speaker 2>sort of pizza, and I.

0:42:37.680 --> 0:42:39.920
<v Speaker 1>Realize how ridiculous that sounds for me to say, what's

0:42:39.960 --> 0:42:41.520
<v Speaker 1>more American than a French onion? Yeah?

0:42:41.560 --> 0:42:43.640
<v Speaker 2>But yeah, I have a hard time with this question

0:42:43.680 --> 0:42:46.440
<v Speaker 2>because I feel like if you don't have an annual

0:42:46.560 --> 0:42:50.000
<v Speaker 2>Super Bowl party, it might be difficult to answer. What

0:42:50.080 --> 0:42:52.719
<v Speaker 2>the quintessential Super Bowl food is Just a lot of

0:42:52.719 --> 0:42:55.040
<v Speaker 2>bar food, a lot of football game day food.

0:42:55.600 --> 0:42:57.360
<v Speaker 1>Have a big old bowl of M and M's or

0:42:57.400 --> 0:43:05.600
<v Speaker 1>Reese's pieces and gallons of Eminem's tie All right, real quick, Dan? Next,

0:43:06.360 --> 0:43:11.520
<v Speaker 1>Indo Chino is the largest custom apparel company. Yeah, Indo

0:43:11.600 --> 0:43:14.120
<v Speaker 1>Chino has been a friend of the verbal for a

0:43:14.120 --> 0:43:18.920
<v Speaker 1>long time now. They make made to measure suits that

0:43:19.000 --> 0:43:20.720
<v Speaker 1>are way better. They fit your frame.

0:43:21.560 --> 0:43:26.640
<v Speaker 2>They cultivate your natural geometry in a way that a

0:43:26.760 --> 0:43:30.400
<v Speaker 2>generic off the rack suit never could. They make suits

0:43:31.280 --> 0:43:35.480
<v Speaker 2>and shirts to your exact measurements to give you the

0:43:35.480 --> 0:43:39.600
<v Speaker 2>best possible fit. Guys out there have commented about the

0:43:39.640 --> 0:43:43.799
<v Speaker 2>wide selection of high quality fabrics, the option to personalize

0:43:43.840 --> 0:43:47.680
<v Speaker 2>all the details of your suit, the lapel, the jacket lining,

0:43:47.760 --> 0:43:50.759
<v Speaker 2>the monogram you got, You got anything monogram?

0:43:50.840 --> 0:43:54.680
<v Speaker 1>Dan, I don't have? I have? Uh, what's the I

0:43:54.719 --> 0:43:57.319
<v Speaker 1>have cuff links that are monogramed, but not no piece

0:43:57.360 --> 0:43:58.360
<v Speaker 1>of clothing or cloth.

0:43:58.440 --> 0:44:03.080
<v Speaker 2>Yet. Here's the way it works, Dan, Pick your fabric,

0:44:03.520 --> 0:44:07.799
<v Speaker 2>choose your customizations, submit your measurements, and place your order,

0:44:08.560 --> 0:44:11.000
<v Speaker 2>and then you just wait for it to arrive in

0:44:11.080 --> 0:44:15.239
<v Speaker 2>three weeks or less. You can shop online at Indochino

0:44:15.280 --> 0:44:19.839
<v Speaker 2>dot com. That's idocchi n o dot com, or like

0:44:19.840 --> 0:44:23.480
<v Speaker 2>our friend Peter who runs the subreddit and lives down

0:44:23.520 --> 0:44:25.520
<v Speaker 2>in DC, I hope I'm not giving too much away.

0:44:26.200 --> 0:44:31.080
<v Speaker 2>He sent us a picture personally visiting one of the showrooms,

0:44:31.640 --> 0:44:35.799
<v Speaker 2>the Indo Chino showrooms. He's gonna look very dapper tie

0:44:36.480 --> 0:44:39.719
<v Speaker 2>absolutely so again, go online or visit any of their

0:44:39.880 --> 0:44:43.759
<v Speaker 2>showrooms across North America. This week, our listeners can get

0:44:43.800 --> 0:44:47.160
<v Speaker 2>any premium Indo chinosuit for just three hundred and fifty

0:44:47.239 --> 0:44:51.239
<v Speaker 2>nine bones three hundred and fifty nine domes at indochino

0:44:51.280 --> 0:44:55.520
<v Speaker 2>dot com when you enter the code SOLID at checkout.

0:44:55.520 --> 0:44:58.960
<v Speaker 2>That's over fifty percent off their regular price for a

0:44:59.000 --> 0:45:03.839
<v Speaker 2>premium made to measure suit. Shipping is free again Indo

0:45:03.920 --> 0:45:07.240
<v Speaker 2>Chino dot com, I ndochi no dot com. Your promo

0:45:07.280 --> 0:45:10.440
<v Speaker 2>code is solid any premium suit for just three point

0:45:10.440 --> 0:45:14.640
<v Speaker 2>fifty nine plus free shipping. An incredible deal for a

0:45:14.760 --> 0:45:18.160
<v Speaker 2>perfectly tailored suit. Dan check him out.

0:45:18.440 --> 0:45:20.360
<v Speaker 1>Come on. If you're gonna listen to the best college

0:45:20.360 --> 0:45:23.840
<v Speaker 1>football podcast there is, and you're also gonna listen to

0:45:23.920 --> 0:45:26.680
<v Speaker 1>us in addition to podcasts, Ain't played Nobody that's right.

0:45:27.080 --> 0:45:29.800
<v Speaker 1>You should take some pride in your appearance, hold yourself

0:45:29.800 --> 0:45:32.560
<v Speaker 1>to a high level. And you go to a wedding tie,

0:45:32.600 --> 0:45:34.680
<v Speaker 1>you can immediately spot the people who are like, yeah,

0:45:34.760 --> 0:45:37.760
<v Speaker 1>my wife, drag me to the department store. Oh it fits.

0:45:38.360 --> 0:45:40.400
<v Speaker 1>Come on, hold yourself to a high standard.

0:45:40.960 --> 0:45:43.520
<v Speaker 2>Indo Chino dot com, your promo code is solid. All right,

0:45:43.600 --> 0:45:48.920
<v Speaker 2>let's go to Josh. He tailored this question specifically to me.

0:45:49.040 --> 0:45:51.480
<v Speaker 2>It's like an Indo Chino suit. But it's a question.

0:45:51.920 --> 0:45:54.520
<v Speaker 1>This is this is a utility question, Tye. I like

0:45:54.600 --> 0:45:55.200
<v Speaker 1>this one a lot.

0:45:55.360 --> 0:45:58.200
<v Speaker 2>This is right up my alley, like a ninety two

0:45:58.280 --> 0:46:02.440
<v Speaker 2>mile an hour fastball, right down the pike. A nice

0:46:02.520 --> 0:46:06.839
<v Speaker 2>meaty question, he says. How was your experience tie as

0:46:06.880 --> 0:46:10.920
<v Speaker 2>a cord cutter during college football season? You had mentioned

0:46:10.960 --> 0:46:13.760
<v Speaker 2>sometime in the summer that you ditched your traditional cable

0:46:13.800 --> 0:46:16.760
<v Speaker 2>TV subscription in favor of YouTube TV.

0:46:17.400 --> 0:46:18.040
<v Speaker 1>How did it go?

0:46:18.440 --> 0:46:20.840
<v Speaker 2>Did you have any issues with buffering or games not

0:46:20.880 --> 0:46:24.920
<v Speaker 2>playing smoothly? What about watching games that were thirty to

0:46:25.000 --> 0:46:29.359
<v Speaker 2>ninety seconds behind quote unquote live TV? How did that work?

0:46:29.400 --> 0:46:32.480
<v Speaker 2>With social media? So on and so forth? Now listen,

0:46:33.440 --> 0:46:36.839
<v Speaker 2>both you and I are I guess now what would

0:46:36.880 --> 0:46:40.120
<v Speaker 2>be considered cord cutters, right right, neither one of us

0:46:40.120 --> 0:46:45.200
<v Speaker 2>have a traditional cable TV subscription. You've gone completely cold turkey.

0:46:45.280 --> 0:46:49.480
<v Speaker 2>You're just living off of passwords and other streaming services, right.

0:46:49.400 --> 0:46:52.080
<v Speaker 1>Son, I'm gonna be honest here, Ty, This is a

0:46:52.520 --> 0:46:55.200
<v Speaker 1>if we're here in the snow globe of honesty. Yeah,

0:46:56.280 --> 0:46:59.560
<v Speaker 1>my wife likes cable television a whole bunch WHOA and

0:46:59.600 --> 0:47:01.360
<v Speaker 1>I have not been able so I had cut the

0:47:01.360 --> 0:47:03.680
<v Speaker 1>cord when I was living alone, but when we moved

0:47:03.719 --> 0:47:08.320
<v Speaker 1>in together, our options were such that I don't remember,

0:47:08.520 --> 0:47:10.919
<v Speaker 1>like we didn't have Bravo with Sling at the time,

0:47:11.000 --> 0:47:13.160
<v Speaker 1>or we didn't have HGTV with another one. I don't know.

0:47:13.320 --> 0:47:15.439
<v Speaker 1>There was something that where she just like didn't want

0:47:15.480 --> 0:47:19.360
<v Speaker 1>to navigate with a Roku. And that is not a

0:47:19.360 --> 0:47:21.879
<v Speaker 1>battle I was willing to fight, Like, no, I want

0:47:22.080 --> 0:47:25.359
<v Speaker 1>there's some hills when you're married that aren't worth dying on. Now,

0:47:25.400 --> 0:47:27.799
<v Speaker 1>that's not well for you. I have a lot of

0:47:27.840 --> 0:47:30.920
<v Speaker 1>thoughts about this having done it, and I am pushing

0:47:30.920 --> 0:47:33.759
<v Speaker 1>to do it once again. But you are the one

0:47:33.800 --> 0:47:36.400
<v Speaker 1>that can stand alone with YouTube TV specifically, I can

0:47:36.440 --> 0:47:37.800
<v Speaker 1>talk about Sling continue.

0:47:38.400 --> 0:47:40.040
<v Speaker 2>YouTube TV has been a revelation.

0:47:41.000 --> 0:47:41.920
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I won't.

0:47:42.000 --> 0:47:45.799
<v Speaker 2>I won't go into the full economics because that's not

0:47:45.920 --> 0:47:48.920
<v Speaker 2>exactly made for a entertaining podcast.

0:47:49.000 --> 0:47:50.440
<v Speaker 1>But how much is not not let's talk. I mean

0:47:50.480 --> 0:47:51.000
<v Speaker 1>that's an element.

0:47:51.080 --> 0:47:53.000
<v Speaker 2>YouTube TV is thirty five bucks a month. They're not

0:47:53.160 --> 0:47:55.799
<v Speaker 2>paying They're not paying us, by the way, for the sponsorship.

0:47:55.880 --> 0:47:57.600
<v Speaker 2>This is a totally organic question.

0:47:57.960 --> 0:47:59.680
<v Speaker 1>This is college football. This is a thing.

0:48:00.280 --> 0:48:04.799
<v Speaker 2>But this was actually the solid wife's idea. She was

0:48:04.840 --> 0:48:06.480
<v Speaker 2>the one pushing it. I was the one who was

0:48:06.520 --> 0:48:10.640
<v Speaker 2>a bit resistant to the idea. But YouTube TV came

0:48:10.680 --> 0:48:12.800
<v Speaker 2>into our area, the Philadelphia area. We were one of

0:48:12.840 --> 0:48:15.680
<v Speaker 2>the first five cities to become eligible for YouTube TV.

0:48:16.880 --> 0:48:20.960
<v Speaker 2>In combination with changing our cable plan, cutting traditional cable,

0:48:21.560 --> 0:48:25.200
<v Speaker 2>and also switching up our internet provider, we're saving somewhere

0:48:25.200 --> 0:48:28.680
<v Speaker 2>in the neighborhood of about one hundred dollars a month, damn,

0:48:29.280 --> 0:48:30.600
<v Speaker 2>which is not a small number.

0:48:31.120 --> 0:48:34.080
<v Speaker 1>No, that is significant, twelve hundred dollars a year to

0:48:34.120 --> 0:48:35.840
<v Speaker 1>support your multi layer dip habit.

0:48:37.120 --> 0:48:42.440
<v Speaker 2>I have not had any issues with watching the games

0:48:42.480 --> 0:48:45.719
<v Speaker 2>that are most relevant to me. There have been a

0:48:45.719 --> 0:48:51.000
<v Speaker 2>few rare occasions where I've needed to piggyback off someone

0:48:51.040 --> 0:48:55.200
<v Speaker 2>else's Pack twelve network subscription. But for the most part, Dan,

0:48:55.760 --> 0:48:58.759
<v Speaker 2>I think if you're not a college football mutant like

0:48:58.800 --> 0:49:02.520
<v Speaker 2>you and I are, a service like YouTube TV, which

0:49:02.520 --> 0:49:06.719
<v Speaker 2>gives you a lot of really strong sports options, is

0:49:06.760 --> 0:49:09.440
<v Speaker 2>a good option, a really good option. I did not

0:49:09.520 --> 0:49:13.040
<v Speaker 2>have any issues watching the games that were most relevant.

0:49:13.280 --> 0:49:15.440
<v Speaker 2>I'd say to about ninety percent of the people who

0:49:15.480 --> 0:49:17.480
<v Speaker 2>listen to this show, so it worked really well during

0:49:17.520 --> 0:49:20.279
<v Speaker 2>the season. They are in the process of creating a

0:49:20.360 --> 0:49:23.400
<v Speaker 2>Roku TV app, which will be perfect. Then you'll be

0:49:23.440 --> 0:49:25.560
<v Speaker 2>able to navigate YouTube TV. So what do you use

0:49:25.600 --> 0:49:29.600
<v Speaker 2>it on right now? We just chrome cast it. Yeah,

0:49:29.640 --> 0:49:31.760
<v Speaker 2>we chrome cast from the app directly to our TV.

0:49:33.040 --> 0:49:35.440
<v Speaker 2>They gave me a free chrome cast with my first

0:49:35.719 --> 0:49:36.920
<v Speaker 2>month's subscription.

0:49:37.440 --> 0:49:37.919
<v Speaker 1>Makes sense.

0:49:38.000 --> 0:49:40.080
<v Speaker 2>But before long they're going to have a Roku app,

0:49:40.080 --> 0:49:42.600
<v Speaker 2>so you'll be able to navigate your television just like

0:49:42.640 --> 0:49:46.279
<v Speaker 2>you would normally. You get unlimited DVR, you get a

0:49:46.280 --> 0:49:48.880
<v Speaker 2>bunch of really good options. It's not perfect, it doesn't

0:49:48.920 --> 0:49:53.000
<v Speaker 2>offer everything, and I'm sure people out there will find

0:49:53.040 --> 0:49:56.600
<v Speaker 2>something wrong with the chrome casting option, or there's something

0:49:56.600 --> 0:49:58.800
<v Speaker 2>that I've forgotten to mention. I'm sure, but I have

0:49:58.920 --> 0:50:03.600
<v Speaker 2>had no issues with it. The social media thing has

0:50:03.680 --> 0:50:06.880
<v Speaker 2>been probably the only downside to it.

0:50:06.880 --> 0:50:08.680
<v Speaker 1>Would you go as far as saying it's a bugaboo,

0:50:09.040 --> 0:50:09.359
<v Speaker 1>It's a.

0:50:09.280 --> 0:50:12.000
<v Speaker 2>Bugaboo, A little bit of a bugaboo, okay, in that

0:50:12.120 --> 0:50:17.279
<v Speaker 2>it's about thirty to maybe forty seconds behind. Yeah, but

0:50:17.440 --> 0:50:19.319
<v Speaker 2>I'm willing to live with it because I'm saving one

0:50:19.360 --> 0:50:20.160
<v Speaker 2>hundred dollars a month.

0:50:20.760 --> 0:50:23.160
<v Speaker 1>Do you have a do need with YouTube? Because you

0:50:23.200 --> 0:50:25.319
<v Speaker 1>get you get CBS.

0:50:25.040 --> 0:50:27.120
<v Speaker 2>I get CBS, you get all the local channels, all

0:50:27.120 --> 0:50:28.160
<v Speaker 2>my wall, the local chanels.

0:50:28.239 --> 0:50:31.320
<v Speaker 1>So yeah, depending on because I don't think Sling has CBS.

0:50:31.320 --> 0:50:33.279
<v Speaker 1>And you can look at the various lineups, you know

0:50:33.400 --> 0:50:36.279
<v Speaker 1>something doesn't. I don't know if you know PlayStation View

0:50:36.400 --> 0:50:38.520
<v Speaker 1>has all of the college networks. You know, one will

0:50:38.560 --> 0:50:40.920
<v Speaker 1>have no Big ten and one will have no Pac

0:50:41.000 --> 0:50:42.960
<v Speaker 1>twelve and whatever. Most of them have the ESPN and

0:50:43.000 --> 0:50:46.239
<v Speaker 1>Fox family of networks. What I would definitely recommend, as

0:50:46.239 --> 0:50:49.040
<v Speaker 1>somebody who's done this before, the over the air antennas

0:50:49.200 --> 0:50:52.759
<v Speaker 1>in most places really well, you can buy them to

0:50:52.840 --> 0:50:55.799
<v Speaker 1>like varying strengths like whatever, like Killer Hurtz. I don't

0:50:55.800 --> 0:50:58.440
<v Speaker 1>know what I'm talking about, but they're very small now.

0:50:58.440 --> 0:50:59.800
<v Speaker 1>They look like mouse paths. You can get them on

0:50:59.840 --> 0:51:03.480
<v Speaker 1>an Amazon so you live within dozens of miles fifty

0:51:03.520 --> 0:51:08.000
<v Speaker 1>miles yeah, yeah, so those work really nicely. For network channels.

0:51:08.040 --> 0:51:09.799
<v Speaker 1>I don't know if you know, there used to be

0:51:09.800 --> 0:51:12.279
<v Speaker 1>a thing that what was the arrow that you can

0:51:12.360 --> 0:51:14.800
<v Speaker 1>record stuff with. I don't think that exists anymore. But

0:51:14.960 --> 0:51:17.839
<v Speaker 1>like YouTube, TV has a DVR built in I believe, yep,

0:51:18.360 --> 0:51:22.200
<v Speaker 1>unlimited DVR. So I would just whatever the college network

0:51:22.280 --> 0:51:24.080
<v Speaker 1>is for you. Don't worry about Twitter. Twitter is the

0:51:24.080 --> 0:51:27.080
<v Speaker 1>worst thing that exists. Don't worry about the social mediaing

0:51:27.160 --> 0:51:29.799
<v Speaker 1>behind social media. Just do it for convenience, do it

0:51:29.840 --> 0:51:32.520
<v Speaker 1>for quality, and you can get the over the air

0:51:32.600 --> 0:51:34.520
<v Speaker 1>for you're missing CBS and you want to see SEC

0:51:34.680 --> 0:51:38.439
<v Speaker 1>games whatever, But go with the lineup that works best

0:51:38.480 --> 0:51:41.239
<v Speaker 1>for you. Price it all out. It's it's pretty good.

0:51:41.280 --> 0:51:43.360
<v Speaker 1>I was very happy with Sling TV when I had it,

0:51:43.440 --> 0:51:44.759
<v Speaker 1>and I would do it again. I would do that

0:51:44.880 --> 0:51:48.280
<v Speaker 1>or YouTube again. I'm not a big cable TV watcher.

0:51:48.680 --> 0:51:51.840
<v Speaker 2>I'm not either. I'm not either football yeah so either.

0:51:52.520 --> 0:51:55.239
<v Speaker 1>I of course like watching Adam Amine in all of

0:51:55.239 --> 0:51:57.040
<v Speaker 1>his forms on ESPN and all of our friends that

0:51:57.120 --> 0:51:59.759
<v Speaker 1>do college football content. But like I don't really watch

0:51:59.760 --> 0:52:03.520
<v Speaker 1>the network anymore. I think it's largely garbage. HGTV not

0:52:03.719 --> 0:52:06.239
<v Speaker 1>for me. I like Top Chef on Bravo, but like

0:52:06.280 --> 0:52:07.680
<v Speaker 1>I can get a Bravo app and pas.

0:52:07.640 --> 0:52:10.160
<v Speaker 2>See there there are shows that the solid wife likes

0:52:10.160 --> 0:52:14.040
<v Speaker 2>on HGTV and shows that shows that I'll watch with her.

0:52:14.040 --> 0:52:16.160
<v Speaker 2>But you can buy those. You can buy them on

0:52:16.200 --> 0:52:19.560
<v Speaker 2>a on a Google Play or Apple TV, whatever you have.

0:52:20.360 --> 0:52:23.239
<v Speaker 2>And still you're coming out in front.

0:52:23.360 --> 0:52:25.520
<v Speaker 1>And maybe HGTV has an app I don't know, and

0:52:25.560 --> 0:52:27.279
<v Speaker 1>you can get a password for set app. Yeah, I

0:52:27.320 --> 0:52:27.600
<v Speaker 1>don't know.

0:52:27.680 --> 0:52:29.080
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, don't know anything about that.

0:52:29.200 --> 0:52:34.640
<v Speaker 1>Dan. Perhaps I don't know this. I'm just giving you options. Yeah.

0:52:34.680 --> 0:52:37.280
<v Speaker 1>I think we're gonna push to do it again because Okay,

0:52:37.560 --> 0:52:40.320
<v Speaker 1>I don't know. Listen, I'm who's the cable provider in

0:52:40.360 --> 0:52:42.279
<v Speaker 1>your area because ours is Like, No, I don't want

0:52:42.280 --> 0:52:43.520
<v Speaker 1>to I don't want to talk about that.

0:52:43.560 --> 0:52:45.200
<v Speaker 2>I'm not even going to talk about them. I don't

0:52:45.200 --> 0:52:46.560
<v Speaker 2>even want to say their name. A lot wars I

0:52:46.600 --> 0:52:49.040
<v Speaker 2>have issues. But yeah, here is my point for anyone

0:52:49.040 --> 0:52:53.080
<v Speaker 2>out there who's listening from YouTube TV. I have quietly,

0:52:53.120 --> 0:52:55.839
<v Speaker 2>behind the scenes, been your best salesman and if you'd

0:52:55.840 --> 0:52:57.879
<v Speaker 2>like to pay us for more ad space. Solid verbol

0:52:57.880 --> 0:52:59.040
<v Speaker 2>at gmail dot com.

0:52:58.880 --> 0:53:01.759
<v Speaker 1>Hit me up. What uh what cities are they in now?

0:53:02.239 --> 0:53:03.440
<v Speaker 2>Like eighty cities or something?

0:53:03.440 --> 0:53:03.760
<v Speaker 1>Crazy?

0:53:03.800 --> 0:53:06.160
<v Speaker 2>Are they really? They're all over in New York. They're

0:53:06.200 --> 0:53:07.960
<v Speaker 2>all over. Maybe it's not eighty, but it's a lot

0:53:08.239 --> 0:53:09.160
<v Speaker 2>dozens available.

0:53:09.280 --> 0:53:11.920
<v Speaker 1>Oh, they're in a bunch. Yeah. Ty Just before we

0:53:11.960 --> 0:53:14.560
<v Speaker 1>started recording, you're like, there's no way they're in Harrisburg, Tye.

0:53:14.760 --> 0:53:19.400
<v Speaker 1>Wrong again, they are in Harrisburg, Hartill, Decatur, you bet you.

0:53:19.480 --> 0:53:20.479
<v Speaker 1>I don't want to drone on.

0:53:20.400 --> 0:53:22.640
<v Speaker 2>Too long about cord cutting, but okay, if you got

0:53:22.640 --> 0:53:25.839
<v Speaker 2>more questions, email me Josh, wait, where are we going

0:53:25.840 --> 0:53:26.200
<v Speaker 2>next day?

0:53:26.200 --> 0:53:29.719
<v Speaker 1>And you get to pick? All right, Um, we do

0:53:29.800 --> 0:53:32.319
<v Speaker 1>have a couple other ones, but let's go. Let's stay

0:53:32.360 --> 0:53:36.040
<v Speaker 1>with I like this question from Kevin, Tie because it's

0:53:36.080 --> 0:53:39.000
<v Speaker 1>going to make you uncomfortable, and I have some thoughts. Okay,

0:53:39.360 --> 0:53:41.799
<v Speaker 1>Kevin wants to know what can we do to make

0:53:41.840 --> 0:53:44.799
<v Speaker 1>bid days more popular? Oh? God, let me repeat that.

0:53:45.120 --> 0:53:48.360
<v Speaker 1>What can we do to make bid days? That's B

0:53:48.480 --> 0:53:52.600
<v Speaker 1>I D E T. Yeah, more popular. It's a much

0:53:52.600 --> 0:53:56.719
<v Speaker 1>better alternative to wiping dry. Okay, Okay, Tie, let's start

0:53:56.719 --> 0:53:59.960
<v Speaker 1>at the beginning. Yeah, what to you? Is it a beday?

0:54:00.760 --> 0:54:03.799
<v Speaker 2>That's a great question. So here is my follow up

0:54:03.880 --> 0:54:07.000
<v Speaker 2>to that question. Yeah, I don't even know what a

0:54:07.040 --> 0:54:12.560
<v Speaker 2>bidet is. Okay, would you like to google bidet? Please

0:54:12.640 --> 0:54:15.280
<v Speaker 2>google b id e t. Let's all learn together.

0:54:15.760 --> 0:54:18.440
<v Speaker 1>Okay, I'm looking at it now. So a bidet is

0:54:18.480 --> 0:54:22.279
<v Speaker 1>a separate seated apparatus in a bathroom.

0:54:22.880 --> 0:54:24.120
<v Speaker 2>I'm not sure I knew this.

0:54:24.960 --> 0:54:31.280
<v Speaker 1>After you move your bowels, you transfer to the second apparatus,

0:54:31.960 --> 0:54:37.880
<v Speaker 1>which shoots a generally warm stream to clean you up. So,

0:54:38.080 --> 0:54:43.240
<v Speaker 1>in fact, it's a more aggressive cleansing than your standard

0:54:43.239 --> 0:54:46.919
<v Speaker 1>toilet paper, which, especially hotels whatever, could be a little

0:54:46.920 --> 0:54:49.680
<v Speaker 1>thinner and not as good an experience.

0:54:50.000 --> 0:54:53.399
<v Speaker 2>I'm seeing here from Walmart. It's French, a twenty three

0:54:53.440 --> 0:54:57.120
<v Speaker 2>dollars portable bidet sure, which looks like the nozzle for

0:54:57.200 --> 0:54:57.760
<v Speaker 2>a host.

0:54:58.800 --> 0:55:01.200
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. I mean I it's something I would skimp on.

0:55:01.480 --> 0:55:06.440
<v Speaker 2>Though technically portable, maybe not logistically possible, depending on how

0:55:06.480 --> 0:55:07.480
<v Speaker 2>portable you're trying to.

0:55:07.400 --> 0:55:09.319
<v Speaker 1>Make it right, And it looks like there are like

0:55:10.080 --> 0:55:12.279
<v Speaker 1>there's a groupon for a biday that you attached to

0:55:12.320 --> 0:55:14.319
<v Speaker 1>the toilet. I I don't know.

0:55:14.560 --> 0:55:18.839
<v Speaker 2>Does a biday that you get via a groupon. Yeah,

0:55:19.320 --> 0:55:21.800
<v Speaker 2>really give you the benefits you're looking for. I'm not sure.

0:55:22.160 --> 0:55:23.839
<v Speaker 1>No, I don't think you want to cheap out when

0:55:23.880 --> 0:55:27.440
<v Speaker 1>it comes to that area. Yeah. I just the transfer

0:55:27.520 --> 0:55:30.759
<v Speaker 1>to me is the tricky part because you're sort of scooting. Yeah,

0:55:30.760 --> 0:55:35.080
<v Speaker 1>you're scooting over. And when I was in Paris with

0:55:35.160 --> 0:55:38.879
<v Speaker 1>my wife a couple of years ago, now almost it

0:55:38.920 --> 0:55:42.680
<v Speaker 1>was digital tie digital. Well, so there's a thing on

0:55:42.719 --> 0:55:45.920
<v Speaker 1>the wall, there's a digital readout and you can choose

0:55:46.120 --> 0:55:49.440
<v Speaker 1>like the motion and the temperature and the angle and

0:55:49.480 --> 0:55:54.440
<v Speaker 1>the speed. So it's we've the bidet industry has its

0:55:54.520 --> 0:55:57.279
<v Speaker 1>leaps and bounds tie from where it was.

0:55:58.000 --> 0:56:00.680
<v Speaker 2>I can't offer I can't offer any first and experience

0:56:00.719 --> 0:56:00.960
<v Speaker 2>on this.

0:56:01.360 --> 0:56:04.600
<v Speaker 1>Sure it's it's thorough, ty, I'll give you that it is.

0:56:04.719 --> 0:56:08.399
<v Speaker 1>It is thorough. Here's my sub question, because I don't

0:56:08.400 --> 0:56:10.920
<v Speaker 1>know marketing wise what you and I can do besides

0:56:11.080 --> 0:56:14.000
<v Speaker 1>look up the actual definition on our show to increase

0:56:14.000 --> 0:56:21.800
<v Speaker 1>bidet awareness. But have you experimented with the non dry cleaning?

0:56:22.480 --> 0:56:23.839
<v Speaker 1>I have it, if you know what I mean? You

0:56:23.880 --> 0:56:27.680
<v Speaker 1>have not? No, So, camera guy Dave, who is who

0:56:27.719 --> 0:56:30.560
<v Speaker 1>takes this more seriously than I have ever seen anybody

0:56:30.640 --> 0:56:33.319
<v Speaker 1>take it. He is like, you know what a wet

0:56:33.400 --> 0:56:36.560
<v Speaker 1>nap is. Yeah. Sure, he travels for work and he

0:56:36.600 --> 0:56:40.000
<v Speaker 1>brings bags of that with him. Okay, so some people

0:56:40.040 --> 0:56:42.720
<v Speaker 1>subscribe to the wet only like a wet wipe only.

0:56:43.080 --> 0:56:47.799
<v Speaker 1>Some people go wet dry. Okay, to really attack the

0:56:47.840 --> 0:56:50.760
<v Speaker 1>issue because you don't want to have an issue. Okay,

0:56:51.600 --> 0:56:54.239
<v Speaker 1>But the next time, ty if you find yourself at

0:56:54.280 --> 0:56:58.000
<v Speaker 1>a very nice hotel or a very nice home and

0:56:58.080 --> 0:57:01.359
<v Speaker 1>you see a second apparatus in the bathroom, I need

0:57:01.400 --> 0:57:08.440
<v Speaker 1>you to make me a promise right now. Clean that region. Tie, okay,

0:57:09.000 --> 0:57:11.440
<v Speaker 1>clean that region. That's a very report back. That is

0:57:11.920 --> 0:57:14.640
<v Speaker 1>what was his name, Kevin? Yeah, long time for baller,

0:57:14.719 --> 0:57:16.120
<v Speaker 1>Kevin Hanson. Kevin.

0:57:16.160 --> 0:57:18.080
<v Speaker 2>That is a weird question to send into people.

0:57:18.120 --> 0:57:21.240
<v Speaker 1>You know, it's I think it's a worthy question. I

0:57:21.320 --> 0:57:23.360
<v Speaker 1>just I would be worried with the wet wipes that

0:57:23.400 --> 0:57:25.800
<v Speaker 1>there's residue or something like that. I feel like the

0:57:25.800 --> 0:57:29.400
<v Speaker 1>wet dry is the move to go on the road.

0:57:29.760 --> 0:57:32.040
<v Speaker 2>Okay, Yeah, where do you want to go next?

0:57:32.080 --> 0:57:35.040
<v Speaker 1>In you get the next question, Let's go to Sean

0:57:35.120 --> 0:57:37.200
<v Speaker 1>Dan and Tye. Please tell us about the most awkward

0:57:37.280 --> 0:57:38.240
<v Speaker 1>date you've ever been.

0:57:38.240 --> 0:57:39.760
<v Speaker 2>Knew you know what. I knew you were going to

0:57:39.760 --> 0:57:45.160
<v Speaker 2>ask this damn question. Okay, Tye, No you start not okay,

0:57:45.200 --> 0:57:47.400
<v Speaker 2>ty you start with this. Okay, you think about this

0:57:47.440 --> 0:57:47.920
<v Speaker 2>a little bit.

0:57:48.440 --> 0:57:51.320
<v Speaker 1>I have two, and they were only the only dates

0:57:51.360 --> 0:57:53.520
<v Speaker 1>I went on with either of these people were first

0:57:53.560 --> 0:57:56.560
<v Speaker 1>and final date with these people. One date I went

0:57:56.600 --> 0:58:01.480
<v Speaker 1>on with somebody and she said, we could sort of

0:58:01.560 --> 0:58:05.240
<v Speaker 1>like be obvious about this or like pretend like we're

0:58:05.280 --> 0:58:07.800
<v Speaker 1>not being obvious about this, but like, can I scroll

0:58:07.840 --> 0:58:10.080
<v Speaker 1>through your Instagram to like stalk you so if I

0:58:10.080 --> 0:58:10.960
<v Speaker 1>have any questions?

0:58:12.280 --> 0:58:14.000
<v Speaker 2>Okay, Yeah, that's awkward.

0:58:14.520 --> 0:58:17.880
<v Speaker 1>Awkward, I guess, And so like I handed her my

0:58:18.040 --> 0:58:20.640
<v Speaker 1>phone because I you know, maybe it was going to

0:58:20.680 --> 0:58:22.760
<v Speaker 1>be playful. Maybe it was going to be like, ah,

0:58:22.840 --> 0:58:25.280
<v Speaker 1>let's make crack some jokes. They'll be chemistry. She's just

0:58:25.320 --> 0:58:27.600
<v Speaker 1>scrolling through and like, you really do like Mexican food,

0:58:27.640 --> 0:58:30.760
<v Speaker 1>don't you like? Yeah? I guess. Oh, Like who's this?

0:58:31.080 --> 0:58:34.680
<v Speaker 1>Like it's my brother? Yeah? That it was weird. It

0:58:34.680 --> 0:58:36.800
<v Speaker 1>brought the date to a screeching halt. The other time,

0:58:37.800 --> 0:58:39.440
<v Speaker 1>I went on a date with somebody who lived in

0:58:39.520 --> 0:58:42.760
<v Speaker 1>Chinatown and she did not like Chinese people o, which

0:58:42.840 --> 0:58:45.600
<v Speaker 1>I thought was a weird topic to bring up and

0:58:46.120 --> 0:58:49.720
<v Speaker 1>a bad place to live. How does that come up?

0:58:49.800 --> 0:58:49.960
<v Speaker 2>Dan?

0:58:52.560 --> 0:58:54.560
<v Speaker 1>I asked what neighborhood she lived in, and she said

0:58:54.640 --> 0:58:58.120
<v Speaker 1>Chinatown And she said and oh, I said something like,

0:58:58.880 --> 0:59:01.640
<v Speaker 1>you don't hear about a lot of people living in Chinatown.

0:59:01.640 --> 0:59:03.760
<v Speaker 1>It's just a lot of grocery stores and things like that.

0:59:03.800 --> 0:59:05.680
<v Speaker 1>There's not like a part a lot of apartment buildings.

0:59:06.160 --> 0:59:08.480
<v Speaker 1>And she was like, yeah, it was sort of convenient

0:59:08.560 --> 0:59:10.400
<v Speaker 1>for work or something like that. She worked on a

0:59:10.440 --> 0:59:13.760
<v Speaker 1>TV show And I'm like, all right. She was like, yeah,

0:59:14.120 --> 0:59:16.480
<v Speaker 1>the weird part of it is I don't like Chinese people.

0:59:17.000 --> 0:59:20.800
<v Speaker 1>Oh okay, just divulge it like that, sure, just on

0:59:20.840 --> 0:59:24.320
<v Speaker 1>a first date. Hide the racist stuff. Yeah, no, leave

0:59:24.360 --> 0:59:29.000
<v Speaker 1>that out for you. So that that was awkward, and

0:59:29.200 --> 0:59:31.680
<v Speaker 1>she kept half apologizing. She's like, oh, you think I'm

0:59:31.760 --> 0:59:34.520
<v Speaker 1>like a bad person now, don't you? Like No, it's

0:59:34.600 --> 0:59:37.320
<v Speaker 1>just you know, just behind your passion, but not to

0:59:37.360 --> 0:59:41.000
<v Speaker 1>your face. Yeah. So that those were the one and

0:59:41.040 --> 0:59:41.960
<v Speaker 1>only dates with those two.

0:59:42.960 --> 0:59:44.400
<v Speaker 2>I think your stories beat mine.

0:59:44.480 --> 0:59:45.960
<v Speaker 1>You're bashful with the spotlight.

0:59:46.320 --> 0:59:50.240
<v Speaker 2>My my awkward story was that I went on a

0:59:50.320 --> 0:59:52.280
<v Speaker 2>second date on Valentine's Day.

0:59:52.800 --> 0:59:54.560
<v Speaker 1>Oh, I think you've told this before.

0:59:55.440 --> 0:59:58.600
<v Speaker 2>It was a second date on Valentine's Day, and it

0:59:58.640 --> 1:00:01.840
<v Speaker 2>was shortly after I hurt my shoulder for the first time.

1:00:01.920 --> 1:00:04.320
<v Speaker 2>So I was in a sling and the person that

1:00:04.400 --> 1:00:07.480
<v Speaker 2>I was on a date with had broken her right arm,

1:00:08.120 --> 1:00:11.400
<v Speaker 2>and so she was in a cast, which made it

1:00:12.560 --> 1:00:16.320
<v Speaker 2>which made it very naturally awkward to begin with. Yeah,

1:00:16.360 --> 1:00:18.320
<v Speaker 2>and then on top of it, given the fact that

1:00:18.360 --> 1:00:20.720
<v Speaker 2>it was a second date, but there was pressure from

1:00:20.800 --> 1:00:24.080
<v Speaker 2>Valentine's Day, no one was really sure how to carry on.

1:00:25.080 --> 1:00:26.280
<v Speaker 1>No one really knew what to do.

1:00:27.280 --> 1:00:30.440
<v Speaker 2>And we're gonna go see a movie, but then we

1:00:30.520 --> 1:00:33.280
<v Speaker 2>got to the movie place and it turns out that

1:00:33.360 --> 1:00:36.760
<v Speaker 2>the theater was closed. I didn't know what to do,

1:00:37.320 --> 1:00:40.560
<v Speaker 2>so I got like one of those non red roses,

1:00:40.680 --> 1:00:42.800
<v Speaker 2>just like kind of as but no, kind of as

1:00:42.840 --> 1:00:47.360
<v Speaker 2>a gesture for Valentine's Day, Right, what do I know?

1:00:47.480 --> 1:00:49.480
<v Speaker 2>The whole thing sort of went south from there.

1:00:49.520 --> 1:00:52.480
<v Speaker 1>This is many moons ago. We're two weeks out from

1:00:52.560 --> 1:00:55.440
<v Speaker 1>Valentine's Day ish, Yeah, so a lot of people listening

1:00:55.440 --> 1:00:58.200
<v Speaker 1>could find themselves on a first date next week and

1:00:58.200 --> 1:00:59.400
<v Speaker 1>then perhaps a second date.

1:00:59.480 --> 1:01:01.840
<v Speaker 2>Don't make don't make too much of the fact that

1:01:01.880 --> 1:01:05.640
<v Speaker 2>it's Valentine's Day, act as if it's like not even happening.

1:01:05.640 --> 1:01:08.320
<v Speaker 1>If you're in my situation, here's what I would do.

1:01:09.000 --> 1:01:11.200
<v Speaker 1>If it's a second or third or fourth date whatever,

1:01:11.320 --> 1:01:13.000
<v Speaker 1>and you know, perhaps you've hung out at one of

1:01:13.040 --> 1:01:16.640
<v Speaker 1>your places. Yeah, don't don't get flowers for a second

1:01:16.720 --> 1:01:18.920
<v Speaker 1>date or third That's but it was.

1:01:19.120 --> 1:01:21.400
<v Speaker 2>It wasn't like a full bouquet. It was more of

1:01:21.520 --> 1:01:22.760
<v Speaker 2>just like a gag thing.

1:01:22.880 --> 1:01:24.720
<v Speaker 1>You know. No, I understand, but I didn't know what

1:01:24.720 --> 1:01:28.680
<v Speaker 1>to do. Yeah, I would go out to dinner. And

1:01:28.720 --> 1:01:30.680
<v Speaker 1>this is easier when I guess if you're in New

1:01:30.760 --> 1:01:32.560
<v Speaker 1>York and you're just walking around and it can sort

1:01:32.560 --> 1:01:35.560
<v Speaker 1>of seem spontaneous, but go to dinner, maybe someplace that's

1:01:35.600 --> 1:01:39.720
<v Speaker 1>near a drug store, and like, just go get candy together. Okay,

1:01:39.760 --> 1:01:42.520
<v Speaker 1>so it's Valentine's Day, it's candy and it's not you know,

1:01:42.560 --> 1:01:45.440
<v Speaker 1>it's a dollar, like what can't like? And then you're like, oh, here,

1:01:45.560 --> 1:01:47.560
<v Speaker 1>here are you mic and Ikes? Because you're a Valentine,

1:01:48.040 --> 1:01:50.360
<v Speaker 1>you're locked in Mike and Ikes, tell the story and

1:01:50.400 --> 1:01:51.600
<v Speaker 1>then just move on with your life.

1:01:51.640 --> 1:01:53.520
<v Speaker 2>I thought you were gonna say, go pick out some

1:01:54.160 --> 1:01:57.040
<v Speaker 2>fresh flowers from somewhere on v now bustlers in New

1:01:57.120 --> 1:01:57.880
<v Speaker 2>York City Street.

1:01:58.240 --> 1:02:00.640
<v Speaker 1>No, no, there's a five dollars limit on the camp.

1:02:00.800 --> 1:02:03.320
<v Speaker 1>You can buy it write eight or Dwayne Reid or whatever.

1:02:03.720 --> 1:02:07.360
<v Speaker 2>All right, question, next question here?

1:02:07.440 --> 1:02:09.240
<v Speaker 1>Do you want to go to Jordan Knight of the

1:02:09.240 --> 1:02:12.720
<v Speaker 1>New Kids on the Block? Yes? Please? Okay, he probably

1:02:12.720 --> 1:02:15.560
<v Speaker 1>gets it all the time. I apologize. If you were

1:02:15.600 --> 1:02:19.720
<v Speaker 1>in control of the XFL, what changes would you make

1:02:19.760 --> 1:02:22.439
<v Speaker 1>to make it more enjoyable to watch? We had somebody

1:02:22.480 --> 1:02:24.600
<v Speaker 1>else said they wanted XFL thoughts because I guess it's

1:02:24.640 --> 1:02:26.040
<v Speaker 1>coming back in a couple of years.

1:02:25.840 --> 1:02:29.160
<v Speaker 2>Twenty twenty, I think is the initial plan. First off,

1:02:29.200 --> 1:02:34.160
<v Speaker 2>I would not broadcast it exclusively from that spider cam. Okay,

1:02:34.320 --> 1:02:36.160
<v Speaker 2>and I know that's all the rage these days and

1:02:36.160 --> 1:02:37.360
<v Speaker 2>people are really into it.

1:02:37.960 --> 1:02:38.480
<v Speaker 1>I love it.

1:02:38.520 --> 1:02:42.320
<v Speaker 2>But as a compliment, what I would love to see

1:02:42.880 --> 1:02:46.640
<v Speaker 2>are more creative camera angles, things that the XFL can

1:02:46.680 --> 1:02:48.960
<v Speaker 2>pull off that the NFL might be too scared to do.

1:02:49.160 --> 1:02:53.040
<v Speaker 2>So you think spider cam, I think drone cams all

1:02:53.040 --> 1:02:55.919
<v Speaker 2>twenty two on third down, like the high coaches cam

1:02:56.000 --> 1:02:58.480
<v Speaker 2>kind of thing. Let's get some drones hovering above the

1:02:58.520 --> 1:03:02.840
<v Speaker 2>field and giving us angles that we've never seen before.

1:03:02.920 --> 1:03:05.720
<v Speaker 1>God what a disaster that would be potentially, But it's

1:03:05.720 --> 1:03:08.440
<v Speaker 1>the end. No, I agree, I want disasters.

1:03:09.880 --> 1:03:13.160
<v Speaker 2>Let's get creative with our technology. Let's put a chip

1:03:13.200 --> 1:03:16.320
<v Speaker 2>in the ball so that we know when we get

1:03:16.360 --> 1:03:18.840
<v Speaker 2>over the goal line. Let's put a chip in the

1:03:18.840 --> 1:03:20.760
<v Speaker 2>ball so we know when we get a first down.

1:03:22.720 --> 1:03:25.040
<v Speaker 2>Putting some sort of receiver in the ball gives you

1:03:25.080 --> 1:03:29.040
<v Speaker 2>all sorts of capabilities technically speaking, that the NFL has

1:03:29.120 --> 1:03:33.480
<v Speaker 2>yet to embark upon that would give it a competitive advantage.

1:03:33.640 --> 1:03:36.280
<v Speaker 1>Oh, I would just not broadcast it and give people

1:03:36.360 --> 1:03:41.800
<v Speaker 1>DVDs of real football. I could not be less interested

1:03:41.840 --> 1:03:45.360
<v Speaker 1>in the XFL. Oh, not interested at all. I So

1:03:45.440 --> 1:03:48.240
<v Speaker 1>here's the thing for me. It's not because it's like

1:03:48.320 --> 1:03:52.120
<v Speaker 1>a wrestling Vince McMahon thing whatever. It's not because I

1:03:52.120 --> 1:03:54.520
<v Speaker 1>think it's going to be a gimmick. It's because I'm

1:03:54.560 --> 1:03:57.720
<v Speaker 1>a snob and I don't want to watch super duper

1:03:57.840 --> 1:04:01.760
<v Speaker 1>minor league football with super duper minor league players, super

1:04:01.800 --> 1:04:07.120
<v Speaker 1>duper minor league coaches, broadcasters, whatever. I'm not interested in that.

1:04:07.160 --> 1:04:11.240
<v Speaker 1>There's a reason we don't eat Thanksgiving food every Friday night.

1:04:11.760 --> 1:04:14.720
<v Speaker 1>It's good to take some time off from football. I know,

1:04:14.760 --> 1:04:16.960
<v Speaker 1>we do a year round podcast, and that's very strange

1:04:16.960 --> 1:04:20.080
<v Speaker 1>for us to say, but we wouldn't like football as

1:04:20.200 --> 1:04:25.000
<v Speaker 1>much if it went to may Right, you don't know

1:04:25.040 --> 1:04:26.120
<v Speaker 1>what you got till it's gone.

1:04:26.240 --> 1:04:28.600
<v Speaker 2>Ty, I don't know. If they made it cool, I'd

1:04:28.640 --> 1:04:31.560
<v Speaker 2>give it. I'd give it a go. I I am

1:04:31.600 --> 1:04:34.920
<v Speaker 2>not spending time with the NBA. I'm not sure this

1:04:35.040 --> 1:04:38.760
<v Speaker 2>actually happens, by the way, really, I'm not sure that

1:04:38.800 --> 1:04:40.360
<v Speaker 2>they're going to get this thing off the ground.

1:04:41.560 --> 1:04:42.680
<v Speaker 1>I'll believe it when I see it.

1:04:42.720 --> 1:04:47.760
<v Speaker 2>But my answer here, Jordan, very broadly speaking, is do

1:04:47.960 --> 1:04:50.760
<v Speaker 2>cool things with technology that the NFL is too afraid

1:04:50.760 --> 1:04:50.960
<v Speaker 2>to do.

1:04:51.400 --> 1:04:53.760
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, if they had the ball chip, if they had

1:04:53.840 --> 1:04:56.800
<v Speaker 1>interesting angles and drones, if they had some of that stuff,

1:04:57.160 --> 1:05:00.280
<v Speaker 1>and if there were you know, I don't if it

1:05:00.320 --> 1:05:02.160
<v Speaker 1>was the NFL or College this year. I know College

1:05:02.200 --> 1:05:04.840
<v Speaker 1>did a little bit having like a camera on like

1:05:04.920 --> 1:05:07.919
<v Speaker 1>a go pro style camera on the referees hat. Yeah,

1:05:08.640 --> 1:05:11.720
<v Speaker 1>it wasn't great this year. It didn't do much, but

1:05:11.840 --> 1:05:13.920
<v Speaker 1>it was a good alpha. It was a good sort

1:05:13.960 --> 1:05:16.520
<v Speaker 1>of initial test that maybe we can figure some stuff

1:05:16.560 --> 1:05:18.640
<v Speaker 1>out down the road that gives us some stuff like

1:05:18.720 --> 1:05:22.520
<v Speaker 1>the pylon cam I thought was pretty successful. Right, they'll

1:05:22.600 --> 1:05:24.040
<v Speaker 1>try and do They'll try.

1:05:23.920 --> 1:05:26.720
<v Speaker 2>And do some cool stuff with augmented reality for people

1:05:26.760 --> 1:05:29.320
<v Speaker 2>who go to games or sure people who are watching

1:05:29.400 --> 1:05:32.160
<v Speaker 2>at home. I think they've got some cool options on

1:05:32.240 --> 1:05:34.040
<v Speaker 2>the technology side that they could pursue.

1:05:34.720 --> 1:05:36.920
<v Speaker 1>I just, yeah, I don't want to watch C minus football,

1:05:37.040 --> 1:05:38.640
<v Speaker 1>And I say that as somebody who had to watch

1:05:38.720 --> 1:05:41.760
<v Speaker 1>a lot of bad Oregon Defense recently. All right, Dan,

1:05:42.240 --> 1:05:47.480
<v Speaker 1>do you ever grow your hair out? Sophomore year of college?

1:05:47.600 --> 1:05:50.920
<v Speaker 2>Yes, define what growing your hair out means to you.

1:05:51.480 --> 1:05:54.360
<v Speaker 1>So it froze, it has like the jewfro thing, and

1:05:54.360 --> 1:05:56.800
<v Speaker 1>then it just sort of flops, like gravity kind of

1:05:56.880 --> 1:05:59.920
<v Speaker 1>takes over and it sort of looks gross and mushrooming

1:06:00.640 --> 1:06:04.400
<v Speaker 1>like the guitar player from Incubus. Okay, right, Like it's

1:06:04.480 --> 1:06:07.560
<v Speaker 1>not great, it's not you know all you know, all

1:06:07.560 --> 1:06:09.240
<v Speaker 1>of a sudden, it just it stops poofing and it

1:06:09.360 --> 1:06:12.760
<v Speaker 1>just flops. Which are not good verbs? Have you?

1:06:13.080 --> 1:06:13.120
<v Speaker 2>Not?

1:06:13.440 --> 1:06:14.280
<v Speaker 1>No? Not really?

1:06:15.440 --> 1:06:18.280
<v Speaker 2>Okay, My hair does have a tendency to get a

1:06:18.320 --> 1:06:20.800
<v Speaker 2>little about too, a little bit wacky.

1:06:21.360 --> 1:06:21.560
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

1:06:21.680 --> 1:06:25.560
<v Speaker 2>When I was down in Jamaica for my honeymoon, I

1:06:25.680 --> 1:06:27.840
<v Speaker 2>had the Phil Simms thing going on where I don't

1:06:27.840 --> 1:06:29.640
<v Speaker 2>know if it was the humidity or what, but it

1:06:29.720 --> 1:06:31.720
<v Speaker 2>puffed out like I just hatched out of an egg.

1:06:33.240 --> 1:06:36.560
<v Speaker 2>And that to me, sometimes that happens. Actually, that kind

1:06:36.640 --> 1:06:38.919
<v Speaker 2>of happened when we were down in Atlanta. I thought

1:06:38.920 --> 1:06:41.280
<v Speaker 2>you looked great, Tie before the live show. I had

1:06:41.320 --> 1:06:43.480
<v Speaker 2>a moment. You were commenting on the hair moment that

1:06:43.560 --> 1:06:45.840
<v Speaker 2>I was having beforehand. You want to say something, Ti,

1:06:45.920 --> 1:06:48.959
<v Speaker 2>I'm going to connect with you on video right now. Okay, Okay, yep,

1:06:49.640 --> 1:06:52.280
<v Speaker 2>I think we're connecting. Okay, I can see you. You

1:06:52.400 --> 1:06:53.400
<v Speaker 2>probably can't see me.

1:06:53.760 --> 1:06:57.439
<v Speaker 1>You see what's going on here? Oh wow, okay, winter

1:06:57.560 --> 1:07:01.560
<v Speaker 1>Beard tie playoff. I can't super Bowl, super Bowl Beard,

1:07:01.600 --> 1:07:04.400
<v Speaker 1>winter Beard. It's it's happening right here. Wow.

1:07:04.440 --> 1:07:04.720
<v Speaker 2>I don't know.

1:07:04.960 --> 1:07:06.400
<v Speaker 1>It's not going to fill in on the cheeks.

1:07:06.480 --> 1:07:07.680
<v Speaker 2>How many days growth is that?

1:07:08.840 --> 1:07:13.360
<v Speaker 1>I think it's about a week. Okay, Yeah, you look good.

1:07:13.760 --> 1:07:16.000
<v Speaker 1>That's all I got. Great.

1:07:16.120 --> 1:07:17.280
<v Speaker 2>Thank you Gary for that question.

1:07:17.440 --> 1:07:18.600
<v Speaker 1>Let's go one more questions.

1:07:18.720 --> 1:07:21.280
<v Speaker 2>One final question, Dan, one final question here you get.

1:07:21.200 --> 1:07:23.400
<v Speaker 1>Is this about the unc Charlotte forty nine ers? No?

1:07:23.520 --> 1:07:25.520
<v Speaker 1>I don't want that one. Ah. No, we did get

1:07:25.560 --> 1:07:27.440
<v Speaker 1>a question about Charlotte. It's gonna be tough for them

1:07:27.480 --> 1:07:30.320
<v Speaker 1>to ever become a consistently solid program unless they're in

1:07:30.360 --> 1:07:33.800
<v Speaker 1>Conference USA, they're gonna need a weird wash out shamed

1:07:33.840 --> 1:07:36.960
<v Speaker 1>coach like Lane Kiffin or Butch Davis. So that's it.

1:07:37.440 --> 1:07:41.240
<v Speaker 2>Next, let's go to Chris Let's This is a good

1:07:41.280 --> 1:07:43.800
<v Speaker 2>way to close it out. Chris wants to know what

1:07:44.040 --> 1:07:47.480
<v Speaker 2>is the solid verbals planned for twenty eighteen. M what

1:07:47.720 --> 1:07:51.680
<v Speaker 2>do y'all got planned? I think I said job right? Yeah,

1:07:51.760 --> 1:07:52.480
<v Speaker 2>y'all you nailed it.

1:07:53.680 --> 1:07:56.360
<v Speaker 1>Do y'all plan on more live video to pair with

1:07:56.440 --> 1:07:56.960
<v Speaker 1>the podcast?

1:07:57.040 --> 1:08:01.600
<v Speaker 2>Dan? What is our official for twenty eighteen? Have we

1:08:01.720 --> 1:08:02.320
<v Speaker 2>talked about this?

1:08:02.440 --> 1:08:03.640
<v Speaker 1>Do we plan?

1:08:03.880 --> 1:08:07.400
<v Speaker 2>Yeah? Have we ever had a plan for any singular

1:08:07.520 --> 1:08:09.160
<v Speaker 2>season in which we've done a podcast?

1:08:09.880 --> 1:08:11.960
<v Speaker 1>Yeah? We we're doing better and better with that. We

1:08:12.040 --> 1:08:15.040
<v Speaker 1>don't have a strict plan, but yes, there is a

1:08:15.120 --> 1:08:17.559
<v Speaker 1>plan to do more live video. I don't know if

1:08:17.560 --> 1:08:19.240
<v Speaker 1>it'll be a Q and a thing because during the

1:08:19.320 --> 1:08:22.120
<v Speaker 1>season it's very boring to look at us looking at

1:08:22.120 --> 1:08:22.439
<v Speaker 1>our lab.

1:08:22.840 --> 1:08:27.480
<v Speaker 2>Let me let me rephrase Chris's question. Okay, Dan Rubinstein,

1:08:27.960 --> 1:08:30.000
<v Speaker 2>mm hmm, And I want you to give me a

1:08:30.600 --> 1:08:31.800
<v Speaker 2>semi serious answer here.

1:08:32.040 --> 1:08:32.519
<v Speaker 1>I'm ready.

1:08:32.800 --> 1:08:35.320
<v Speaker 2>My guess is when I ask this, you will take

1:08:35.360 --> 1:08:38.320
<v Speaker 2>it in a non serious direction. Okay, I will as

1:08:38.479 --> 1:08:42.320
<v Speaker 2>is your normal empulsis. I will ignore the impulses. Let's

1:08:42.320 --> 1:08:47.120
<v Speaker 2>say we've got every person of power eating out of

1:08:47.160 --> 1:08:51.320
<v Speaker 2>our hands, hm, every decision maker, every influencer out there

1:08:51.360 --> 1:08:54.280
<v Speaker 2>eating out of our hands. What would we want to do.

1:08:55.000 --> 1:08:58.080
<v Speaker 2>We've got a blank slate. What would you want to

1:08:58.200 --> 1:09:00.920
<v Speaker 2>do with the soliverbal And twenty eighteen to make it

1:09:00.960 --> 1:09:01.839
<v Speaker 2>as big as possible?

1:09:03.120 --> 1:09:07.080
<v Speaker 1>I would want to We're a podcast, so everybody that

1:09:07.320 --> 1:09:12.080
<v Speaker 1>listens to us, everybody that found us, did so digitally, right, correct,

1:09:12.800 --> 1:09:15.800
<v Speaker 1>It'd be sort of dumb to not try and grow

1:09:15.960 --> 1:09:19.080
<v Speaker 1>that way, right, I agree, And I understand, Like, you know,

1:09:19.160 --> 1:09:22.800
<v Speaker 1>there's TV, and it would be very cool to do

1:09:23.000 --> 1:09:26.720
<v Speaker 1>something with TV, and that's always a goal. But our

1:09:27.120 --> 1:09:31.280
<v Speaker 1>DNA is pretty digital. So to me, it's figuring out

1:09:31.400 --> 1:09:35.640
<v Speaker 1>the right place for us, the right platform or platforms,

1:09:36.040 --> 1:09:41.440
<v Speaker 1>the right concept to pair with those platforms. If it's Instagram, YouTube, Facebook.

1:09:41.560 --> 1:09:43.320
<v Speaker 1>You know, we just did really cool things with Facebook

1:09:43.320 --> 1:09:45.120
<v Speaker 1>and that really only made sense to do with Facebook

1:09:45.160 --> 1:09:48.240
<v Speaker 1>at Media Day in Atlanta ahead of the National Championship game.

1:09:48.680 --> 1:09:52.160
<v Speaker 1>But it's sort of marrying what the best idea would

1:09:52.200 --> 1:09:55.320
<v Speaker 1>be living in two different places. We can be in

1:09:55.360 --> 1:09:58.680
<v Speaker 1>the same place very easily. Yeah, yeah we can. We're

1:09:58.720 --> 1:10:01.160
<v Speaker 1>about an hour and a half apart. But the fact

1:10:01.200 --> 1:10:05.560
<v Speaker 1>that usually we're in different places. And I mean this

1:10:05.720 --> 1:10:08.519
<v Speaker 1>is I'm being very serious. Give us feedback about where

1:10:08.560 --> 1:10:12.639
<v Speaker 1>you like watching sports content, because that's my day job

1:10:13.360 --> 1:10:16.960
<v Speaker 1>for USB Nation, and that's like our eternal challenge is

1:10:17.200 --> 1:10:20.640
<v Speaker 1>what content goes where? So, if Ty and I were

1:10:20.680 --> 1:10:24.560
<v Speaker 1>to do something, and these are ongoing discussions that we

1:10:24.720 --> 1:10:26.880
<v Speaker 1>have with each other and we are fortunate to have

1:10:26.960 --> 1:10:32.640
<v Speaker 1>with other people as well, where makes the most sense? YouTube? Facebook, Instagram,

1:10:32.920 --> 1:10:36.320
<v Speaker 1>Instagram's big kids love Instagram. I don't have Snapchat on

1:10:36.400 --> 1:10:39.120
<v Speaker 1>my phone anymore because it's just it got to be

1:10:39.200 --> 1:10:43.519
<v Speaker 1>too many social media apps. But where makes the most sense?

1:10:43.680 --> 1:10:46.400
<v Speaker 1>Beyond and the podcast will never go away, we promise.

1:10:46.760 --> 1:10:49.960
<v Speaker 1>And furthermore, stupid show is staying yes continue.

1:10:49.880 --> 1:10:53.320
<v Speaker 2>And furthermore, if you are one of those hypothetical influencers

1:10:53.439 --> 1:10:57.400
<v Speaker 2>or people in power, what have you solverble at gmail

1:10:57.439 --> 1:10:57.880
<v Speaker 2>dot com.

1:10:57.840 --> 1:11:00.680
<v Speaker 1>What's solverble at gmail dot com? Look us up, let

1:11:00.760 --> 1:11:04.160
<v Speaker 1>us know, let us know where you watch and would

1:11:04.240 --> 1:11:07.040
<v Speaker 1>like to watch, Just not us but sports things in general,

1:11:07.320 --> 1:11:12.720
<v Speaker 1>weirdos talking and making stuff. And while we're on the subject, Hi,

1:11:13.439 --> 1:11:16.439
<v Speaker 1>i'd like to get to two thousand iTunes reviews. How

1:11:16.479 --> 1:11:19.519
<v Speaker 1>many we got, like, I don't know, thirteen hundred. I

1:11:19.640 --> 1:11:21.800
<v Speaker 1>really we've asked, you know, here and there at the

1:11:21.880 --> 1:11:23.600
<v Speaker 1>end of shows and stuff like that. Let's get to

1:11:23.640 --> 1:11:25.599
<v Speaker 1>two k. Well, let's get to three k and beyond

1:11:26.040 --> 1:11:29.920
<v Speaker 1>SV two K SV two K like five star reviews iTunes.

1:11:30.120 --> 1:11:30.559
<v Speaker 1>It helps.

1:11:31.520 --> 1:11:35.160
<v Speaker 2>It seems like these shows just fly by dan mm hmm.

1:11:36.479 --> 1:11:38.360
<v Speaker 2>So forgive us if it's a little bit longer than

1:11:38.360 --> 1:11:41.120
<v Speaker 2>you bargained for, but it's a free download. We appreciate

1:11:41.240 --> 1:11:46.240
<v Speaker 2>you sending in your questions via email, via Facebook, Twitter.

1:11:47.160 --> 1:11:49.880
<v Speaker 2>I don't know if we got any on LinkedIn. I

1:11:49.920 --> 1:11:52.120
<v Speaker 2>think I created a LinkedIn years we have a LinkedIn.

1:11:52.280 --> 1:11:55.639
<v Speaker 2>We do officially have a LinkedIn, Okay, I haven't updated

1:11:55.640 --> 1:11:57.400
<v Speaker 2>it in about two years, but we do have one

1:11:57.479 --> 1:12:02.439
<v Speaker 2>of those two read Thank you for sending in your

1:12:02.479 --> 1:12:05.479
<v Speaker 2>questions as well. We appreciate everyone's interest here in the

1:12:05.560 --> 1:12:09.559
<v Speaker 2>off season. Do enjoy the Super Bowl again. Dance prediction

1:12:09.880 --> 1:12:13.439
<v Speaker 2>is twenty four to fourteen Patriots. Mine is thirty one

1:12:13.479 --> 1:12:16.479
<v Speaker 2>to twenty six. Eagles with a missed two point conversion

1:12:16.520 --> 1:12:18.360
<v Speaker 2>late for the pets. That's my big one, the miss

1:12:18.439 --> 1:12:21.519
<v Speaker 2>two point conversion. And if you are one of the

1:12:21.600 --> 1:12:25.240
<v Speaker 2>betting types my Super Bowl prop every year that I

1:12:25.320 --> 1:12:27.280
<v Speaker 2>tell people to bet on and people don't listen to me.

1:12:27.800 --> 1:12:30.120
<v Speaker 2>But if it's there on your pool, if it's there

1:12:30.160 --> 1:12:34.479
<v Speaker 2>on your betting service, three consecutive scorers by one team

1:12:34.520 --> 1:12:38.719
<v Speaker 2>in the Super Bowl hits nearly every year, bet on that. Okay,

1:12:39.560 --> 1:12:41.760
<v Speaker 2>for that guy over there, my good friend Dan Rubinstein,

1:12:42.160 --> 1:12:45.160
<v Speaker 2>for myself, Tie Hildebrand, thanks again for tuning in. We'll

1:12:45.200 --> 1:12:48.160
<v Speaker 2>catch you all in a week. In the meantime, stay solid, peace,