WEBVTT - Lithium Rush: The Key Metal Powering the EV Revolution

0:00:00.760 --> 0:00:03.400
<v Speaker 1>This is Dana Perkins and you're listening to Switched on

0:00:03.640 --> 0:00:06.560
<v Speaker 1>the b and EF podcast. On today's show, we're taking

0:00:06.559 --> 0:00:08.799
<v Speaker 1>a look at a metal that is integral to the

0:00:08.800 --> 0:00:12.160
<v Speaker 1>majority of electric vehicle battery chemistries and it is therefore

0:00:12.240 --> 0:00:15.920
<v Speaker 1>one of the most in demand medals. That's lithium. Last

0:00:15.920 --> 0:00:19.720
<v Speaker 1>week there were a couple of new discoveries of lithium deposits,

0:00:19.960 --> 0:00:22.360
<v Speaker 1>both in the United States and in the Czech Republic.

0:00:22.760 --> 0:00:25.599
<v Speaker 1>It's clear that countries around the world are looking to

0:00:25.640 --> 0:00:29.320
<v Speaker 1>find this important metal, but what about refining well, Currently

0:00:29.360 --> 0:00:32.680
<v Speaker 1>that part of lithium's supply chain is dominated by one country.

0:00:33.000 --> 0:00:35.080
<v Speaker 1>And then what about the companies involved in this space.

0:00:35.360 --> 0:00:38.280
<v Speaker 1>While there is a small list of dedicated mining companies

0:00:38.320 --> 0:00:41.200
<v Speaker 1>that are on the case. On today's episode, I speak

0:00:41.240 --> 0:00:43.800
<v Speaker 1>with two analysts from Benof's London office who know a

0:00:43.800 --> 0:00:46.199
<v Speaker 1>thing or two about lithium. One is a metals and

0:00:46.240 --> 0:00:50.320
<v Speaker 1>mining analyst, Elie Gomaskalis and the other from our batteries team,

0:00:50.440 --> 0:00:54.040
<v Speaker 1>Andy Leach. Together we discuss where lithium is found, along

0:00:54.080 --> 0:00:56.440
<v Speaker 1>with the different forms it takes, how it's mined, and

0:00:56.480 --> 0:00:59.840
<v Speaker 1>the ecological impact of the different processes, as well as

0:01:00.120 --> 0:01:03.480
<v Speaker 1>why the majority of major diversified miners might be avoiding

0:01:03.560 --> 0:01:08.520
<v Speaker 1>this metal, and which nations are controlling the supply and refining. Lastly,

0:01:08.680 --> 0:01:11.479
<v Speaker 1>we come to the relationship between lithium and different battery

0:01:11.560 --> 0:01:14.679
<v Speaker 1>chemistries and whether or not sodium ion batteries could pose

0:01:14.680 --> 0:01:17.040
<v Speaker 1>a threat to its dominance. If you'd like to learn

0:01:17.080 --> 0:01:20.360
<v Speaker 1>more about lithium, BNIF subscribers are able to access the

0:01:20.400 --> 0:01:22.880
<v Speaker 1>links that are included in the show notes, which relate

0:01:22.959 --> 0:01:25.520
<v Speaker 1>to different b and EF research that's found on BNF

0:01:25.560 --> 0:01:28.679
<v Speaker 1>dot com. As always, if you like this podcast, make

0:01:28.720 --> 0:01:31.560
<v Speaker 1>sure to subscribe and you'll receive an update every time

0:01:31.560 --> 0:01:33.640
<v Speaker 1>we publish a show. And if you want to spread

0:01:33.640 --> 0:01:35.920
<v Speaker 1>the word to others, give us a review on Apple

0:01:35.959 --> 0:01:38.840
<v Speaker 1>Podcasts or Spotify and will make us more discoverable. But

0:01:38.959 --> 0:01:41.440
<v Speaker 1>right now, let's come to my conversation with Ellie and

0:01:41.440 --> 0:01:53.600
<v Speaker 1>Andy about lithium. Ellie, thank you for joining today.

0:01:53.840 --> 0:01:55.360
<v Speaker 2>Thank you for having me, Dana.

0:01:55.400 --> 0:01:56.920
<v Speaker 1>And nice to see you as well.

0:01:56.960 --> 0:01:58.280
<v Speaker 3>Andy, thank you for having me.

0:01:58.640 --> 0:02:00.760
<v Speaker 1>All right, let's start with the history lesson part of this.

0:02:00.920 --> 0:02:04.360
<v Speaker 1>So lithium, I want to know when did I mean?

0:02:04.360 --> 0:02:07.840
<v Speaker 1>It's definitely something that many people who are listening today

0:02:07.960 --> 0:02:10.480
<v Speaker 1>we are aware of this metal. We are aware that

0:02:10.600 --> 0:02:13.880
<v Speaker 1>is critical for batteries, but when did the use case

0:02:13.880 --> 0:02:17.800
<v Speaker 1>for lithium really take off and essentrally, are we competing

0:02:17.880 --> 0:02:21.080
<v Speaker 1>with another incumbent industry or did batteries put lithium on

0:02:21.120 --> 0:02:21.440
<v Speaker 1>the map.

0:02:21.880 --> 0:02:25.120
<v Speaker 3>So lithium has had a number of uses over the years.

0:02:25.240 --> 0:02:27.120
<v Speaker 3>It's been used in the past as a medicine for

0:02:27.480 --> 0:02:30.519
<v Speaker 3>mental health issues, It's been used in glasses and ceramics.

0:02:30.639 --> 0:02:33.080
<v Speaker 3>But since nineteen ninety one it's been used as a

0:02:33.080 --> 0:02:36.079
<v Speaker 3>battery material. And nineteen ninety one was when Sony first

0:02:36.080 --> 0:02:39.799
<v Speaker 3>commercialized lithiumine batteries, and they use lithium cobo oxide as

0:02:39.800 --> 0:02:43.079
<v Speaker 3>their cathoide material. And since then batteries have grown their

0:02:43.120 --> 0:02:45.880
<v Speaker 3>demand segment and as a consequence, they're now very much

0:02:45.960 --> 0:02:48.320
<v Speaker 3>the main demand use for lithium.

0:02:48.400 --> 0:02:52.400
<v Speaker 1>So consumer electronics really make lithium in some respects a

0:02:52.400 --> 0:02:55.720
<v Speaker 1>household name or at least a piece of many household

0:02:55.720 --> 0:02:58.800
<v Speaker 1>products that we're very aware of and interact with. But

0:02:58.880 --> 0:03:01.639
<v Speaker 1>then now with it a part of batteries and really

0:03:01.680 --> 0:03:05.680
<v Speaker 1>seeing the electric vehicle industry take off, and certainly the

0:03:05.720 --> 0:03:08.000
<v Speaker 1>forecast that we see in our electric vehicle outlook, which

0:03:08.040 --> 0:03:10.440
<v Speaker 1>we do on an annual basis shows that there will

0:03:10.520 --> 0:03:13.400
<v Speaker 1>be increased demand. What sort of demand are we really

0:03:13.560 --> 0:03:16.800
<v Speaker 1>forecasting for lithium ion batteries specifically?

0:03:17.080 --> 0:03:20.840
<v Speaker 3>So you're right, as you mentioned, lithium started in consumer electronics,

0:03:20.880 --> 0:03:23.119
<v Speaker 3>and it wasn't until the late twenty tens, at only

0:03:23.160 --> 0:03:27.119
<v Speaker 3>twenty nineteen, where batteries are being used in electric vehicles

0:03:27.160 --> 0:03:30.360
<v Speaker 3>became the main demand segment, and that's only expected to

0:03:30.400 --> 0:03:33.720
<v Speaker 3>continue to grow. So between now and twenty thirty five,

0:03:34.000 --> 0:03:36.880
<v Speaker 3>the lithium I'M battery demand in vehicles is expected to

0:03:36.960 --> 0:03:40.280
<v Speaker 3>really drive demand globally, and that will see a ninefold

0:03:40.320 --> 0:03:42.920
<v Speaker 3>increase from twenty twenty two levels to twenty thirty five.

0:03:43.200 --> 0:03:46.640
<v Speaker 1>Now, battery chemistry seemed to constantly be changing, and honestly,

0:03:46.680 --> 0:03:48.760
<v Speaker 1>I was speaking with my producer today and saying we

0:03:48.800 --> 0:03:51.880
<v Speaker 1>should be doing a show specifically on battery chemistries. But

0:03:52.120 --> 0:03:55.360
<v Speaker 1>for just the next couple of minutes, lithium ion batteries

0:03:55.560 --> 0:03:58.680
<v Speaker 1>certainly make it clear that there is lithium in these batteries.

0:03:59.000 --> 0:04:03.000
<v Speaker 1>Is lithium found in other battery chemistries just not as prevalent,

0:04:03.400 --> 0:04:06.000
<v Speaker 1>or are lithium ion batteries the only ones that have

0:04:06.080 --> 0:04:07.200
<v Speaker 1>lithium in them so.

0:04:07.240 --> 0:04:09.520
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, as you say, lithium in the name of lithium

0:04:09.560 --> 0:04:12.520
<v Speaker 3>ion batteries is the lithium is in all these batteries.

0:04:12.600 --> 0:04:15.400
<v Speaker 3>There are other battery technologies which are emerging at the moment,

0:04:15.480 --> 0:04:18.440
<v Speaker 3>but their uptake and commercial uses is very low at

0:04:18.440 --> 0:04:20.960
<v Speaker 3>the moment. So sodium ion batteries is a key sort

0:04:20.960 --> 0:04:23.440
<v Speaker 3>of disruptive technology that we expect to see come into

0:04:23.480 --> 0:04:25.680
<v Speaker 3>the market over the next couple of years. But at

0:04:25.680 --> 0:04:28.360
<v Speaker 3>the minute, there's not very many people manufacturing these batteries

0:04:28.360 --> 0:04:31.599
<v Speaker 3>at a commercial scale within different battery chemistries, within the

0:04:31.600 --> 0:04:34.760
<v Speaker 3>lithium ion battery family, as it were, Lithium use does

0:04:34.839 --> 0:04:37.960
<v Speaker 3>vary between the chemistries for the amounts of energy that

0:04:38.000 --> 0:04:40.200
<v Speaker 3>you can store, so per killer or tower of energy

0:04:40.200 --> 0:04:41.839
<v Speaker 3>that you can store in the batteries, and we have

0:04:41.880 --> 0:04:44.360
<v Speaker 3>some reports that discuss these different levels of lithium in

0:04:44.400 --> 0:04:45.120
<v Speaker 3>different batteries.

0:04:45.240 --> 0:04:47.240
<v Speaker 1>But it would be safe to say that the forward

0:04:47.279 --> 0:04:50.520
<v Speaker 1>outlook for lithium is increased demand. And then therefore we're

0:04:50.520 --> 0:04:53.760
<v Speaker 1>here to talk about really how where who do we

0:04:53.800 --> 0:04:54.839
<v Speaker 1>get the supply from?

0:04:55.240 --> 0:04:58.000
<v Speaker 3>Yeap, So, as I said, sodium ion batteries are a

0:04:58.000 --> 0:05:01.000
<v Speaker 3>disruptive technology which may come in to the market and

0:05:01.040 --> 0:05:04.560
<v Speaker 3>take some market share. However, in the electric vehicle outlook

0:05:04.560 --> 0:05:06.080
<v Speaker 3>we did earlier this year, we looked at a couple

0:05:06.080 --> 0:05:09.719
<v Speaker 3>of different scenarios of sodium ion penetration into the market.

0:05:09.440 --> 0:05:12.120
<v Speaker 3>At a scenario where there wasn't any a scenario with

0:05:12.160 --> 0:05:14.680
<v Speaker 3>a sort of expected amount of sodium iin in the

0:05:14.720 --> 0:05:18.359
<v Speaker 3>chemistry mix, and a very aggressive sodium ion uptake in

0:05:18.400 --> 0:05:22.159
<v Speaker 3>the market. And even in the most unlikely and disruptive

0:05:22.200 --> 0:05:25.400
<v Speaker 3>and aggressive sodium ion uptake, we still see a five

0:05:25.440 --> 0:05:28.120
<v Speaker 3>fold increase in lithium demand out to twenty thirty five.

0:05:28.240 --> 0:05:30.640
<v Speaker 3>And this is just a consequence of the whole lithium

0:05:30.680 --> 0:05:33.720
<v Speaker 3>ion battery industry growing so much, as I previously mentioned.

0:05:33.880 --> 0:05:36.279
<v Speaker 3>So even of the sort of market share of lithimum

0:05:36.320 --> 0:05:38.520
<v Speaker 3>batteries drops a little bit, because the whole market is

0:05:38.560 --> 0:05:41.640
<v Speaker 3>growing so much, lithium demand is expected to increase.

0:05:41.839 --> 0:05:44.840
<v Speaker 1>So let's go then to where we find this supply.

0:05:45.160 --> 0:05:47.800
<v Speaker 1>Where in the world is it located? And you know,

0:05:47.839 --> 0:05:49.960
<v Speaker 1>can we find it everywhere? Are there a few countries

0:05:50.000 --> 0:05:52.120
<v Speaker 1>that actually have the majority of the supply?

0:05:52.560 --> 0:05:56.240
<v Speaker 2>So lithium deposits are sort of split into two different sections.

0:05:56.279 --> 0:05:58.920
<v Speaker 2>The first is hard rock and predominantly the industry talks

0:05:58.920 --> 0:06:01.200
<v Speaker 2>about spody mean, this is one of the higher grades

0:06:01.360 --> 0:06:04.600
<v Speaker 2>of lithium ore and that is usually found in Australia.

0:06:04.800 --> 0:06:07.400
<v Speaker 2>And there's different areas such as Africa that also have

0:06:07.560 --> 0:06:10.160
<v Speaker 2>SPoD you mean, and hard rock mining there too. Then

0:06:10.240 --> 0:06:13.400
<v Speaker 2>in lithium, there's also another deposit, which is lithium can

0:06:13.440 --> 0:06:16.480
<v Speaker 2>be found in brine, and this is found in groundwater

0:06:16.720 --> 0:06:20.480
<v Speaker 2>all around the world, but predominantly it's found in South America.

0:06:21.200 --> 0:06:25.000
<v Speaker 1>I find it really interesting that you find lithium in brine.

0:06:25.040 --> 0:06:28.559
<v Speaker 1>I mean, you think so much about mining in terms

0:06:28.600 --> 0:06:31.880
<v Speaker 1>of it actually being extracted from somewhere deep within i

0:06:32.000 --> 0:06:35.080
<v Speaker 1>rock as opposed to in some respects kind of quite

0:06:35.080 --> 0:06:37.240
<v Speaker 1>close to the surface. Can we go into a little

0:06:37.279 --> 0:06:40.159
<v Speaker 1>more detail on mining and then following that come to

0:06:40.279 --> 0:06:44.240
<v Speaker 1>the refining process. How difficult is it for us to

0:06:44.440 --> 0:06:46.479
<v Speaker 1>get this out of the ground. For the companies that

0:06:46.520 --> 0:06:49.280
<v Speaker 1>are trying to extract it is a very costly endeavor.

0:06:49.480 --> 0:06:52.560
<v Speaker 2>So, as I mentioned before, the two different types of

0:06:52.680 --> 0:06:56.160
<v Speaker 2>posit require two different types of mining or extraction methods.

0:06:56.360 --> 0:06:59.719
<v Speaker 2>And first you have the extraction from hard rock, and

0:06:59.760 --> 0:07:02.000
<v Speaker 2>that is typical type of mining. You have the large

0:07:02.040 --> 0:07:03.320
<v Speaker 2>rocks in the back of the big lorries and you

0:07:03.400 --> 0:07:05.799
<v Speaker 2>have them running around at like twenty miles twenty miles

0:07:05.800 --> 0:07:09.039
<v Speaker 2>per hour, or it's essentially dug up, crushed, ground and

0:07:09.160 --> 0:07:13.240
<v Speaker 2>roasted at high temperatures before being filtered, purified and turned

0:07:13.240 --> 0:07:17.160
<v Speaker 2>into lithium carbonate. And lithium carbonate is a battery gade product,

0:07:17.160 --> 0:07:20.960
<v Speaker 2>so it goes directly into the manufacturing of these batteries. However,

0:07:21.280 --> 0:07:24.720
<v Speaker 2>lithium carbonate can be further refined into lithium hydroxide and

0:07:24.760 --> 0:07:27.560
<v Speaker 2>this is also another battery grade product. Brine extraction is

0:07:27.560 --> 0:07:31.160
<v Speaker 2>slightly different because here you have vast areas of saline

0:07:31.160 --> 0:07:33.640
<v Speaker 2>ground water that are pumped to the surface by project

0:07:33.720 --> 0:07:37.160
<v Speaker 2>developers and these are left to evaporate in a series

0:07:37.200 --> 0:07:40.720
<v Speaker 2>of ponds, which leaves a concentrated brian remaining, and once

0:07:40.760 --> 0:07:44.280
<v Speaker 2>this remains is then filtered purified into lithium carbonate, which

0:07:44.320 --> 0:07:47.440
<v Speaker 2>may then be turned into lithium hydroxide. In terms of cost,

0:07:47.800 --> 0:07:50.840
<v Speaker 2>our estimates show that spodamine extraction is at least double

0:07:50.880 --> 0:07:54.120
<v Speaker 2>the price of brine extraction, with prices starting at around

0:07:54.320 --> 0:07:56.200
<v Speaker 2>four thousand dollars per ton.

0:07:56.280 --> 0:07:59.840
<v Speaker 1>And spojamine extraction spodamine being the rock that the lithium

0:07:59.880 --> 0:08:01.800
<v Speaker 1>is literally found in yes.

0:08:01.800 --> 0:08:03.760
<v Speaker 2>So it's a type of lithium or and at the

0:08:03.760 --> 0:08:06.600
<v Speaker 2>moment it's the industry's preferred or type because it has

0:08:06.680 --> 0:08:08.480
<v Speaker 2>some of the higher grades of lithium in it.

0:08:08.800 --> 0:08:13.000
<v Speaker 1>In the process to make battery grade lithium, where in

0:08:13.400 --> 0:08:16.680
<v Speaker 1>refining does it actually change hands and change countries from

0:08:16.680 --> 0:08:19.560
<v Speaker 1>where it was extracted to those who are actually refining it.

0:08:19.960 --> 0:08:23.280
<v Speaker 2>So with brine, because of the process and the inherent

0:08:23.360 --> 0:08:26.440
<v Speaker 2>characteristics of the process, it means that a lot of

0:08:26.480 --> 0:08:29.160
<v Speaker 2>the refining happens at the same site at which the

0:08:29.280 --> 0:08:32.480
<v Speaker 2>brian and the evaporation pools are because it's difficult to

0:08:32.640 --> 0:08:35.800
<v Speaker 2>transport a concentrated Brian solution in liquid from one place

0:08:35.800 --> 0:08:39.040
<v Speaker 2>to another. It just doesn't really seem feasible. So a

0:08:39.080 --> 0:08:42.280
<v Speaker 2>lot of the refining happens at the same site. However,

0:08:42.559 --> 0:08:45.079
<v Speaker 2>where it changes is that a lot of a lithium

0:08:45.080 --> 0:08:47.200
<v Speaker 2>carbonate may be shipped to another country to then be

0:08:47.240 --> 0:08:50.080
<v Speaker 2>turned into hydroxide. It wouldn't necessarily happen in the same

0:08:50.120 --> 0:08:51.160
<v Speaker 2>location as.

0:08:51.080 --> 0:08:51.960
<v Speaker 3>The brine extraction.

0:08:52.320 --> 0:08:54.359
<v Speaker 2>On the hard rock, you have a bit more flexibility

0:08:54.520 --> 0:08:58.280
<v Speaker 2>because it's a lot easier to deliver rock or ground

0:08:58.360 --> 0:09:01.920
<v Speaker 2>up rock to another location rather than a concentrated Brian's

0:09:01.960 --> 0:09:05.040
<v Speaker 2>what we see is once it's got past the crushing

0:09:05.040 --> 0:09:07.920
<v Speaker 2>and the grinding and the roasting, it's sent overseas, usually

0:09:08.000 --> 0:09:09.640
<v Speaker 2>to China to do some more refining.

0:09:09.840 --> 0:09:13.000
<v Speaker 1>Now you say usually China, how much of refining actually

0:09:13.080 --> 0:09:14.240
<v Speaker 1>takes place in China?

0:09:14.320 --> 0:09:19.560
<v Speaker 2>So according to our BNFD risked Supply database, around seventy

0:09:19.600 --> 0:09:22.839
<v Speaker 2>two percent of lithium was refined in China in twenty

0:09:22.880 --> 0:09:23.400
<v Speaker 2>twenty two.

0:09:23.640 --> 0:09:26.360
<v Speaker 1>That's a huge part of the market. And in terms

0:09:26.400 --> 0:09:29.440
<v Speaker 1>of looking into the future of that, does that seem

0:09:29.480 --> 0:09:32.520
<v Speaker 1>to hold for the next five plus years.

0:09:32.720 --> 0:09:36.040
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, for sure. We see that China continues to dominate

0:09:36.360 --> 0:09:37.760
<v Speaker 2>up to at least twenty thirty.

0:09:38.160 --> 0:09:42.520
<v Speaker 1>And how much of the lithium that's actually extracted and

0:09:42.559 --> 0:09:45.280
<v Speaker 1>making its way to China is coming from external sources

0:09:45.360 --> 0:09:48.680
<v Speaker 1>versus being well, I guess domestically produced.

0:09:49.040 --> 0:09:51.600
<v Speaker 2>So if we look at the MIND supply again, looking

0:09:51.640 --> 0:09:54.800
<v Speaker 2>at figures for twenty twenty two, Australia was the world's

0:09:54.800 --> 0:09:58.079
<v Speaker 2>top producer of mind lithium with forty two percent of

0:09:58.120 --> 0:10:00.720
<v Speaker 2>the market share, followed by Chile with thirty percent of

0:10:00.760 --> 0:10:03.199
<v Speaker 2>the market share, and then China finally with twenty percent

0:10:03.200 --> 0:10:05.559
<v Speaker 2>of the market share, so it only had a fifth

0:10:05.640 --> 0:10:08.320
<v Speaker 2>of total mind supply in twenty twenty two.

0:10:08.960 --> 0:10:12.240
<v Speaker 1>So does that mean that ultimately China is buying that

0:10:12.280 --> 0:10:15.040
<v Speaker 1>lithium from elsewhere and then selling it on or are

0:10:15.040 --> 0:10:19.120
<v Speaker 1>the companies essentially that are making the batteries buying the

0:10:19.120 --> 0:10:21.959
<v Speaker 1>lithium but then sending it to China for refining who

0:10:22.000 --> 0:10:26.080
<v Speaker 1>owns the lithium? And essentially is China acquiring a large

0:10:26.080 --> 0:10:29.040
<v Speaker 1>amount of the world's existing lithium supply in order to

0:10:29.200 --> 0:10:30.840
<v Speaker 1>refine it and then sell it on.

0:10:31.320 --> 0:10:34.120
<v Speaker 2>So the answers question goes quite a long way back,

0:10:34.200 --> 0:10:37.120
<v Speaker 2>and it starts back in the late noughties where China

0:10:37.160 --> 0:10:40.880
<v Speaker 2>decided to give all these political commitments to green technologies

0:10:40.960 --> 0:10:43.440
<v Speaker 2>because they saw the energy transition as an opportunity and

0:10:43.480 --> 0:10:46.359
<v Speaker 2>the country had ambitions to become a midstream and downstream

0:10:46.520 --> 0:10:48.920
<v Speaker 2>manufacturing base, and it had what it needed to do that,

0:10:49.120 --> 0:10:52.320
<v Speaker 2>but it was missing the key ingredients, which is critical minerals.

0:10:52.400 --> 0:10:55.120
<v Speaker 2>So what it did is it started to invest early

0:10:55.400 --> 0:10:58.680
<v Speaker 2>in some of these upstream projects overseas to ensure that

0:10:58.720 --> 0:11:03.000
<v Speaker 2>they had that constant stream of material and lithium coming

0:11:03.000 --> 0:11:05.640
<v Speaker 2>in to meet their battery manufacturing capacity.

0:11:05.960 --> 0:11:09.120
<v Speaker 1>And when you say invest early, you mean early two thousands,

0:11:09.200 --> 0:11:11.679
<v Speaker 1>so literally twenty years ago or did they buy up

0:11:11.920 --> 0:11:13.840
<v Speaker 1>these assets quite a long time ago?

0:11:14.120 --> 0:11:16.200
<v Speaker 2>Is where they sort of had the vision and then

0:11:17.080 --> 0:11:20.520
<v Speaker 2>lithium only started really becoming big in terms of demand

0:11:20.600 --> 0:11:23.600
<v Speaker 2>and seeing it as an opportunity mid to late teens.

0:11:23.640 --> 0:11:27.920
<v Speaker 1>This is really useful context because I think oftentimes when

0:11:28.000 --> 0:11:31.319
<v Speaker 1>we talk about being in an industry early, we're not

0:11:31.440 --> 0:11:35.080
<v Speaker 1>talking about ten years ago. We're talking about so much

0:11:35.120 --> 0:11:37.520
<v Speaker 1>further back. But the stuff that we're looking at here,

0:11:37.600 --> 0:11:40.440
<v Speaker 1>the change is happening so fast. That's really fascinating that

0:11:40.480 --> 0:11:43.160
<v Speaker 1>we're dealing with these very short periods of time, but

0:11:43.240 --> 0:11:46.559
<v Speaker 1>really do ultimately make all the differences to whether or

0:11:46.600 --> 0:11:49.440
<v Speaker 1>not you're an incumbent player. And you certainly see that

0:11:49.559 --> 0:11:52.319
<v Speaker 1>when it comes to charging networks, which is the topic

0:11:52.360 --> 0:11:55.360
<v Speaker 1>of last week's show. So when it comes to China

0:11:55.600 --> 0:11:58.760
<v Speaker 1>and their role in this space, they saw in advance

0:11:58.880 --> 0:12:01.199
<v Speaker 1>that there was going to be the transition, and I

0:12:01.240 --> 0:12:04.160
<v Speaker 1>guess we're a bit of conjecture here as to what

0:12:04.320 --> 0:12:07.400
<v Speaker 1>was happening, but we certainly do see policies and decisions

0:12:07.440 --> 0:12:10.880
<v Speaker 1>being made in terms of being involved in the lithium

0:12:10.880 --> 0:12:15.160
<v Speaker 1>industry before it was the lithium industry that we know today.

0:12:15.360 --> 0:12:17.800
<v Speaker 1>Can you give me a couple of examples of things

0:12:17.800 --> 0:12:19.800
<v Speaker 1>that China did to make sure that they would be

0:12:19.840 --> 0:12:22.800
<v Speaker 1>one of the established players in this space that now

0:12:22.880 --> 0:12:25.079
<v Speaker 1>has over seventy percent of refining capacity.

0:12:25.400 --> 0:12:29.120
<v Speaker 2>The two big lithium players in China are Gang Feng

0:12:29.440 --> 0:12:32.680
<v Speaker 2>and Tian Schi. If you first take Gunfeng, they have

0:12:32.760 --> 0:12:35.720
<v Speaker 2>a fifty percent ownership in the Mount Marion mine in

0:12:35.800 --> 0:12:39.600
<v Speaker 2>Australia and this started production back in twenty seventeen and

0:12:39.640 --> 0:12:42.120
<v Speaker 2>it's now the second largest lithium mine in the world.

0:12:42.320 --> 0:12:44.719
<v Speaker 2>So having a fifty percent ownership in that obviously gives

0:12:44.760 --> 0:12:47.719
<v Speaker 2>some access to this really really valuable and high in

0:12:47.800 --> 0:12:50.400
<v Speaker 2>demand material. But then if we look at Tian Schi,

0:12:50.600 --> 0:12:53.800
<v Speaker 2>they took a slightly more delayed approach and they bought

0:12:53.840 --> 0:12:56.680
<v Speaker 2>twenty five percent stake in SQM, which is based in

0:12:56.760 --> 0:12:59.800
<v Speaker 2>Chile back in twenty nineteen, and SQM and now of

0:12:59.800 --> 0:13:03.760
<v Speaker 2>the world's second largest lithium producer. So these two examples

0:13:03.760 --> 0:13:07.040
<v Speaker 2>show you how China, moving before the crowd, has given

0:13:07.120 --> 0:13:10.560
<v Speaker 2>them a secure and stable supply of a metal that's

0:13:10.640 --> 0:13:12.959
<v Speaker 2>high in demand and It's important to remember that these

0:13:12.960 --> 0:13:15.400
<v Speaker 2>are only two examples. China has done this over and

0:13:15.480 --> 0:13:18.080
<v Speaker 2>over again around and around the world, and having this

0:13:18.200 --> 0:13:21.760
<v Speaker 2>upstream presence paired with their downstream presence at home means

0:13:21.760 --> 0:13:24.320
<v Speaker 2>that they have ranked number one on all three editions

0:13:24.360 --> 0:13:27.240
<v Speaker 2>of BNF Global Battery Supply Chain Ranking.

0:13:27.800 --> 0:13:30.560
<v Speaker 1>So, if I am in the finance industry, I care

0:13:30.679 --> 0:13:34.080
<v Speaker 1>a lot about environmental, social and governance. If I'm looking

0:13:34.120 --> 0:13:36.480
<v Speaker 1>at these ESG factors and I'm looking at batteries and

0:13:36.480 --> 0:13:39.240
<v Speaker 1>trying to assess my supply chain, what are some of

0:13:39.280 --> 0:13:42.560
<v Speaker 1>the things that really someone would look at in regard

0:13:42.600 --> 0:13:46.320
<v Speaker 1>to lithium and assess whether or not they are fitting

0:13:46.360 --> 0:13:50.120
<v Speaker 1>into that profile of companies that they actually can invest in.

0:13:50.440 --> 0:13:52.800
<v Speaker 2>So I'd say there's three main things to consider when

0:13:52.840 --> 0:13:57.160
<v Speaker 2>looking at lithium extraction, the first being carbon emissions. So

0:13:57.400 --> 0:13:59.920
<v Speaker 2>if you take hard rocked mining, for example, this is

0:14:00.240 --> 0:14:03.800
<v Speaker 2>very energy intensive. It uses lots of large machines, a

0:14:03.800 --> 0:14:07.080
<v Speaker 2>lot of energy to crush, to grind, and to transport

0:14:07.240 --> 0:14:10.720
<v Speaker 2>all around. If we move to brine extraction, it's a

0:14:10.720 --> 0:14:14.360
<v Speaker 2>slightly different problem. Lots of brine extraction happens in very

0:14:14.400 --> 0:14:17.720
<v Speaker 2>arid conditions and the process uses up a lot of

0:14:17.760 --> 0:14:21.120
<v Speaker 2>water and can disrupt fragile ecosystems.

0:14:20.520 --> 0:14:23.640
<v Speaker 1>So the ecosystem and then also it's competing for water

0:14:23.760 --> 0:14:28.080
<v Speaker 1>use potentially with I'm thinking agriculture and other uses for

0:14:28.320 --> 0:14:29.760
<v Speaker 1>drinking water exactly.

0:14:30.040 --> 0:14:32.920
<v Speaker 2>Research has shown that the amount of water used by

0:14:32.920 --> 0:14:38.040
<v Speaker 2>the lithium industry can actually feed and sustain small communities

0:14:38.040 --> 0:14:39.720
<v Speaker 2>of up to tens and thousands of people.

0:14:40.000 --> 0:14:42.960
<v Speaker 1>So it's competitive with other things that may be a

0:14:43.640 --> 0:14:46.520
<v Speaker 1>more important priority in that region. So then the other

0:14:46.600 --> 0:14:49.840
<v Speaker 1>question I actually have is around the hard rock and

0:14:50.000 --> 0:14:54.080
<v Speaker 1>this other form because when you mention energy intensity, immediately,

0:14:54.400 --> 0:14:57.520
<v Speaker 1>at least working here, I immediately think, oh, okay, well,

0:14:57.560 --> 0:14:59.800
<v Speaker 1>then what is there such a thing as green lithium

0:15:00.080 --> 0:15:02.120
<v Speaker 1>And has that been something that has started to come

0:15:02.160 --> 0:15:03.920
<v Speaker 1>on the map? And what I mean by green lithium

0:15:04.080 --> 0:15:07.840
<v Speaker 1>is essentially energy that has come from renewable sources in

0:15:07.960 --> 0:15:11.080
<v Speaker 1>order to facilitate this breaking of rocks.

0:15:11.600 --> 0:15:14.120
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, the short answer is yes. There have been companies

0:15:14.160 --> 0:15:16.840
<v Speaker 2>that have been aware of the scrutiny that the industry

0:15:16.840 --> 0:15:19.160
<v Speaker 2>has been under and are trying to prepare themselves for

0:15:19.200 --> 0:15:22.520
<v Speaker 2>the transition towards net zero and towards a lower carbon world,

0:15:22.680 --> 0:15:25.560
<v Speaker 2>and switching to renewables is a really easy and quick

0:15:25.600 --> 0:15:29.160
<v Speaker 2>way of doing this. However, it doesn't solve the whole problem,

0:15:29.360 --> 0:15:31.720
<v Speaker 2>and the industry can make sure that they are actually

0:15:31.880 --> 0:15:34.760
<v Speaker 2>combating and trying to prevent these problems as much as

0:15:34.800 --> 0:15:35.360
<v Speaker 2>they can.

0:15:35.840 --> 0:15:38.680
<v Speaker 1>So it isn't just investors that are looking at trying

0:15:38.720 --> 0:15:41.880
<v Speaker 1>to make sure the production of batteries and their supply

0:15:42.000 --> 0:15:44.760
<v Speaker 1>chains are the best possible that they can be from

0:15:44.880 --> 0:15:49.120
<v Speaker 1>environmental standards standpoint. There are also policy makers various parts

0:15:49.120 --> 0:15:51.040
<v Speaker 1>of the world that certainly must be looking at this.

0:15:51.560 --> 0:15:53.680
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, for sure, Dana, and at the end of twenty

0:15:53.720 --> 0:15:57.000
<v Speaker 3>twenty two, the EU agreed the battery part of the

0:15:57.000 --> 0:16:00.520
<v Speaker 3>Green New Deal, which forces in fact batteries old in

0:16:00.560 --> 0:16:03.280
<v Speaker 3>the European Union to meet certain requirements. One of the

0:16:03.320 --> 0:16:05.880
<v Speaker 3>key requirements is a carbon footprint target. Now we're still

0:16:05.880 --> 0:16:08.800
<v Speaker 3>waiting for the European Union Commission and other members of

0:16:08.840 --> 0:16:11.560
<v Speaker 3>European policymakers to give exact numbers on what these targets

0:16:11.560 --> 0:16:13.440
<v Speaker 3>will be, but we know that over the next few

0:16:13.520 --> 0:16:16.040
<v Speaker 3>years these targets will be coming in and forcing batteries

0:16:16.080 --> 0:16:18.240
<v Speaker 3>sold within the EU to meet these targets.

0:16:18.400 --> 0:16:20.800
<v Speaker 2>And it might also be worth mentioning on top of

0:16:20.840 --> 0:16:24.960
<v Speaker 2>that that the EU announced the Critical Raw Materials Act

0:16:25.120 --> 0:16:28.480
<v Speaker 2>back in March twenty twenty three, and within that these

0:16:28.640 --> 0:16:33.120
<v Speaker 2>sustainability ambitions also went upstream. So they are looking to

0:16:33.400 --> 0:16:36.800
<v Speaker 2>try and create a benchmark where industry has to meet

0:16:36.840 --> 0:16:40.200
<v Speaker 2>a certain level of sustainability of the materials they produce

0:16:40.320 --> 0:16:42.240
<v Speaker 2>and they can be ranked against each other.

0:16:42.880 --> 0:16:45.120
<v Speaker 1>Give me an idea for the types of companies that

0:16:45.160 --> 0:16:48.520
<v Speaker 1>are actually involved in this space. Is lithium just part

0:16:48.560 --> 0:16:52.640
<v Speaker 1>of a portfolio of many other medals that company might

0:16:52.680 --> 0:16:56.240
<v Speaker 1>be mining, or are these quite specific pure play miners

0:16:56.240 --> 0:16:59.880
<v Speaker 1>that are really looking at this in a more exclusive capacity.

0:17:00.200 --> 0:17:02.080
<v Speaker 2>So what we see is that the majority of the

0:17:02.160 --> 0:17:06.640
<v Speaker 2>top ten lithium producers are exclusively into lithium. So the

0:17:06.640 --> 0:17:09.359
<v Speaker 2>top two that I mentioned already, the first being album

0:17:09.400 --> 0:17:12.520
<v Speaker 2>Mar which is American based, and the second being SQM,

0:17:12.520 --> 0:17:14.440
<v Speaker 2>which is based in Chile. Then you also have the

0:17:14.520 --> 0:17:18.840
<v Speaker 2>Chinese players Gamfeng and Tianchi, as well as Pilbra in Australia.

0:17:18.920 --> 0:17:21.199
<v Speaker 2>So they're scattered all around the world. But what is

0:17:21.240 --> 0:17:23.800
<v Speaker 2>quite unique about lithium is there's lots of smaller players

0:17:23.880 --> 0:17:25.679
<v Speaker 2>that are looking to get involved, and I think this

0:17:25.720 --> 0:17:28.199
<v Speaker 2>is because the market is just finding its feet, so

0:17:28.240 --> 0:17:30.800
<v Speaker 2>it's establishing itself and with this is coming lots of

0:17:30.840 --> 0:17:34.480
<v Speaker 2>smaller players that are contributing positively to the demand and

0:17:34.560 --> 0:17:35.760
<v Speaker 2>supply of lithium.

0:17:36.080 --> 0:17:39.040
<v Speaker 1>So that would mean that these are predominantly fairly new

0:17:39.080 --> 0:17:41.600
<v Speaker 1>companies that may not have existed or at least not

0:17:41.640 --> 0:17:44.200
<v Speaker 1>existed in their current form twenty plus years ago.

0:17:44.400 --> 0:17:46.960
<v Speaker 2>In some cases yes, but in cases of the big

0:17:46.960 --> 0:17:50.280
<v Speaker 2>players such as Albama and SQM, historically there were actually

0:17:50.440 --> 0:17:53.040
<v Speaker 2>chemicals companies and what we've seen them do is we've

0:17:53.040 --> 0:17:56.600
<v Speaker 2>seen them tailor their expertise towards an emerging demand.

0:17:56.840 --> 0:17:58.879
<v Speaker 1>So this has been a pivot for these companies. And

0:17:58.880 --> 0:18:00.520
<v Speaker 1>then I guess that begs the quest and if we're

0:18:00.560 --> 0:18:04.040
<v Speaker 1>seeing increased demand going forward, are there other companies that

0:18:04.080 --> 0:18:06.160
<v Speaker 1>look to be pivoting into that space right now?

0:18:06.560 --> 0:18:06.679
<v Speaker 3>Well?

0:18:06.720 --> 0:18:09.600
<v Speaker 2>I think about that question as metals and minor analysts,

0:18:09.600 --> 0:18:13.080
<v Speaker 2>I will automatically think of the major diversified miners, so

0:18:13.160 --> 0:18:16.840
<v Speaker 2>the glen cores, the bhps, the valleys, the Anglo Americans,

0:18:17.160 --> 0:18:20.160
<v Speaker 2>and surprisingly we haven't actually seen a lot of these

0:18:20.200 --> 0:18:24.360
<v Speaker 2>companies pivot towards lithium apart from one Rio Tinto, who

0:18:24.359 --> 0:18:27.560
<v Speaker 2>back in twenty twenty one purchased the Ricon mine in

0:18:27.640 --> 0:18:31.080
<v Speaker 2>Argentina and recently reinforced their position as the only diversified

0:18:31.119 --> 0:18:34.600
<v Speaker 2>miner to be interested in lithium earlier in August by

0:18:34.760 --> 0:18:37.560
<v Speaker 2>investing into Rwanda. So I think the main reason that

0:18:37.640 --> 0:18:41.080
<v Speaker 2>these other big miners aren't that interested in lithium is

0:18:41.119 --> 0:18:44.040
<v Speaker 2>because firstly, they have other battery metals in their portfolio.

0:18:44.240 --> 0:18:49.359
<v Speaker 2>So a lot of these companies have copper, aluminium, nickel, cobalt, manganese,

0:18:49.520 --> 0:18:52.159
<v Speaker 2>which will all benefit and grow in demand thanks to

0:18:52.240 --> 0:18:55.920
<v Speaker 2>the lithium iron battery boom. I think because lithium's only

0:18:55.960 --> 0:18:58.760
<v Speaker 2>sort of gotten big over the past five six years,

0:18:59.040 --> 0:19:02.560
<v Speaker 2>it means that it's still quite a high risk area.

0:19:02.640 --> 0:19:05.399
<v Speaker 2>And though high risk can equal high reward, some of

0:19:05.440 --> 0:19:07.679
<v Speaker 2>these big miners have too much on their plate and

0:19:07.760 --> 0:19:09.879
<v Speaker 2>have too much on the line to sort of just

0:19:10.160 --> 0:19:14.080
<v Speaker 2>take these dramatic steps and venture into a space where

0:19:14.240 --> 0:19:15.840
<v Speaker 2>it is still a bit of the unknown.

0:19:16.200 --> 0:19:19.120
<v Speaker 1>And is it high risk because of pricing volatility?

0:19:19.480 --> 0:19:21.879
<v Speaker 2>Put simply, I would say yes. If we look at

0:19:21.920 --> 0:19:24.360
<v Speaker 2>the prices over the past two years, we've seen them

0:19:24.359 --> 0:19:27.920
<v Speaker 2>go from around fifteen sixteen thousand dollars per ton in

0:19:27.960 --> 0:19:31.440
<v Speaker 2>twenty twenty one, to over seventy thousand dollars per ton

0:19:31.520 --> 0:19:34.520
<v Speaker 2>in twenty twenty two, and now in twenty twenty three.

0:19:34.640 --> 0:19:36.840
<v Speaker 2>As of a few weeks ago, it was at twenty

0:19:36.880 --> 0:19:40.000
<v Speaker 2>six thousand per ton. So this constant up and down,

0:19:40.080 --> 0:19:44.320
<v Speaker 2>unpredictability and volatility does equate to high risk in the

0:19:44.359 --> 0:19:44.960
<v Speaker 2>mining world.

0:19:45.160 --> 0:19:47.000
<v Speaker 1>I could certainly see how this would be something that

0:19:47.040 --> 0:19:49.800
<v Speaker 1>traders would be watching closely, but then the volatility for

0:19:49.840 --> 0:19:54.360
<v Speaker 1>the companies is maybe less appealing. When it comes to lithium,

0:19:54.600 --> 0:19:57.280
<v Speaker 1>there does seem to be, though this four trajectory, that

0:19:57.359 --> 0:19:59.359
<v Speaker 1>demand is going to increase, and we've brought that up

0:19:59.400 --> 0:20:01.960
<v Speaker 1>a few times on this show. So it seems like, okay,

0:20:02.080 --> 0:20:05.320
<v Speaker 1>let's look at the future for lithium. It seems reasonably sunny.

0:20:05.320 --> 0:20:08.359
<v Speaker 1>But early on in the show, Andy, you reference that

0:20:08.400 --> 0:20:10.639
<v Speaker 1>there might be other technologies that could be nipping on

0:20:10.720 --> 0:20:13.840
<v Speaker 1>its heels, reducing the global demand for lithium and potentially

0:20:13.920 --> 0:20:17.720
<v Speaker 1>preserving water and carbon emissions. What are the other technologies

0:20:17.760 --> 0:20:20.399
<v Speaker 1>that you would say are on the edge from a

0:20:20.440 --> 0:20:24.200
<v Speaker 1>battery standpoint that could give lithium a run for its money.

0:20:24.480 --> 0:20:26.800
<v Speaker 3>So, as I mentioned earlier, sodium mine is one of

0:20:26.800 --> 0:20:30.480
<v Speaker 3>the key technologies which is competing for some market share

0:20:30.520 --> 0:20:33.880
<v Speaker 3>at least in the near future, versus traditional lithium ion batteries.

0:20:34.000 --> 0:20:37.680
<v Speaker 3>There are other battery technologies which may be relevant, for example,

0:20:37.840 --> 0:20:41.359
<v Speaker 3>energy storage projects like flow batteries, something that we've seen

0:20:41.560 --> 0:20:44.600
<v Speaker 3>sort of growing industry for in China. But there's also

0:20:44.680 --> 0:20:48.399
<v Speaker 3>within lithium iine batteries there are a range of different

0:20:48.440 --> 0:20:51.840
<v Speaker 3>chemistries which are constantly competing for.

0:20:51.800 --> 0:20:55.320
<v Speaker 1>Market share, all optimizing certain metals over the others. But

0:20:55.359 --> 0:20:58.040
<v Speaker 1>you brought up sodium ion in particular, So what are

0:20:58.080 --> 0:21:00.560
<v Speaker 1>some of the pros and cons. Let's start with the pros.

0:21:00.640 --> 0:21:02.719
<v Speaker 1>What are the prose of a sodium ion battery and

0:21:02.760 --> 0:21:04.399
<v Speaker 1>why might it have a rosy future?

0:21:04.720 --> 0:21:08.679
<v Speaker 3>So sodiumne batteries the main prose that they don't contain lithium.

0:21:09.800 --> 0:21:13.280
<v Speaker 3>As Elia has already mentioned, lithium has had a really

0:21:13.359 --> 0:21:15.880
<v Speaker 3>volatile time in the commodity markets over the last couple

0:21:15.920 --> 0:21:19.080
<v Speaker 3>of years, and sodium is much more abundant, it's much

0:21:19.080 --> 0:21:22.040
<v Speaker 3>more geographically diverse with respect to where you can find it,

0:21:22.119 --> 0:21:24.560
<v Speaker 3>and it's much cheaper as a consequence. So the main

0:21:24.640 --> 0:21:27.600
<v Speaker 3>benefit is a cost benefit because it doesn't contain lithium.

0:21:27.800 --> 0:21:31.760
<v Speaker 1>Wow. So it's literally the lithium ion part that makes it.

0:21:31.760 --> 0:21:35.040
<v Speaker 1>It's the lithium. So when it comes to the sodium

0:21:35.040 --> 0:21:38.560
<v Speaker 1>ion batteries, now, what are some of the drawbacks and

0:21:38.680 --> 0:21:42.159
<v Speaker 1>why are they not already everywhere that we turn, and

0:21:42.200 --> 0:21:44.719
<v Speaker 1>why are we not having the show lead with sodium

0:21:44.760 --> 0:21:45.560
<v Speaker 1>ion batteries.

0:21:45.920 --> 0:21:48.439
<v Speaker 3>Sodium mine batteries have a lower energy density, So this

0:21:48.560 --> 0:21:50.680
<v Speaker 3>means that you can store less energy in the same

0:21:50.720 --> 0:21:52.960
<v Speaker 3>amount of space or the same amount of mass, and

0:21:53.000 --> 0:21:54.920
<v Speaker 3>this means that if you're putting them in an electric car,

0:21:55.000 --> 0:21:57.320
<v Speaker 3>for example, the number of miles or kilometers that you

0:21:57.359 --> 0:21:58.520
<v Speaker 3>can travel will be fewer.

0:21:58.720 --> 0:22:00.840
<v Speaker 1>So essentially this gets at the heart of whether or

0:22:00.880 --> 0:22:03.639
<v Speaker 1>not range anxiety is or isn't the thing, And we

0:22:03.680 --> 0:22:06.040
<v Speaker 1>certainly go back and forth on this one. But sodium

0:22:06.080 --> 0:22:08.399
<v Speaker 1>ion batteries would mean vehicles that just have a very

0:22:08.440 --> 0:22:10.520
<v Speaker 1>different use case. They're certainly not going to take me

0:22:10.560 --> 0:22:11.520
<v Speaker 1>on a road trip for.

0:22:11.520 --> 0:22:13.600
<v Speaker 3>Sure, as I say, they have a lower range, and

0:22:13.680 --> 0:22:16.879
<v Speaker 3>for some applications or for some regions, this might be okay.

0:22:17.040 --> 0:22:19.880
<v Speaker 3>So for example, the best selling electric vehicle in China

0:22:19.960 --> 0:22:22.760
<v Speaker 3>last year was the Hongyang Mini, which has a price

0:22:22.800 --> 0:22:24.879
<v Speaker 3>of less than ten thousand dollars, but it has a

0:22:24.920 --> 0:22:27.240
<v Speaker 3>very small battery pack range of only one hundred and

0:22:27.280 --> 0:22:29.720
<v Speaker 3>twenty kilometers. But this was the best selling electric vehicle

0:22:29.760 --> 0:22:31.959
<v Speaker 3>in China last year, So it's possible to see that

0:22:32.040 --> 0:22:34.439
<v Speaker 3>a market like this where the best selling vehicle has

0:22:34.480 --> 0:22:36.800
<v Speaker 3>a very short range could sort of offer some market

0:22:36.880 --> 0:22:40.280
<v Speaker 3>share to a lower range but cheaper battery like sodium mine.

0:22:40.359 --> 0:22:43.600
<v Speaker 1>Now, those that are developing these new battery technologies, are

0:22:43.640 --> 0:22:47.720
<v Speaker 1>they also the same manufacturers of the lithium ion batteries,

0:22:47.800 --> 0:22:51.760
<v Speaker 1>essentially looking to diversify or as you mentioned, reduce their

0:22:51.800 --> 0:22:55.560
<v Speaker 1>reliance on this price of lithium that essentially is vollatile.

0:22:55.720 --> 0:22:57.879
<v Speaker 1>Is that something that they're looking do at these completely

0:22:57.920 --> 0:23:01.439
<v Speaker 1>different companies, and essentially we are headed towards a very

0:23:01.480 --> 0:23:04.000
<v Speaker 1>competitive future for vehicle batteries.

0:23:04.240 --> 0:23:08.359
<v Speaker 3>It's a combination of both existing manufacturers and startups. So

0:23:08.720 --> 0:23:11.399
<v Speaker 3>if you look at for example, coatl, the world's largest

0:23:11.440 --> 0:23:14.959
<v Speaker 3>battery manufacturer, they announced in twenty twenty one that they

0:23:14.960 --> 0:23:17.760
<v Speaker 3>were going to be producing a sodi mine battery in

0:23:17.800 --> 0:23:19.879
<v Speaker 3>the future, and they have made some more announcements this

0:23:19.960 --> 0:23:25.240
<v Speaker 3>year confirming these announcements. Also byd and other Chinese manufacturers

0:23:25.280 --> 0:23:27.920
<v Speaker 3>who are existing players are entering this space and making

0:23:27.960 --> 0:23:30.080
<v Speaker 3>announcements that they want to make these batteries. But there

0:23:30.119 --> 0:23:33.200
<v Speaker 3>are startups as well, like Heina, a Chinese company that's

0:23:33.200 --> 0:23:36.040
<v Speaker 3>got gigawa hour production starting at the end of last year,

0:23:36.080 --> 0:23:39.439
<v Speaker 3>and also companies like Autras Feradian in Europe and Natron

0:23:39.480 --> 0:23:40.400
<v Speaker 3>in the United States.

0:23:40.520 --> 0:23:43.120
<v Speaker 1>So let's talk about some other sources of potential disruption

0:23:43.280 --> 0:23:45.679
<v Speaker 1>for the lithium supply chain. Let's talk a little bit

0:23:45.720 --> 0:23:50.560
<v Speaker 1>about geopolitical issues now, with over seventy percent of refining

0:23:50.600 --> 0:23:53.439
<v Speaker 1>in China, that certainly is a vulnerability when you have

0:23:53.520 --> 0:23:55.600
<v Speaker 1>so much in one part of the world, same with

0:23:55.680 --> 0:23:59.359
<v Speaker 1>mining predominantly being in Australia. Are there other issues that

0:23:59.480 --> 0:24:02.320
<v Speaker 1>need to be considered regarding first of all, sources of

0:24:02.359 --> 0:24:06.080
<v Speaker 1>disruption and other producers that could come online or other

0:24:06.119 --> 0:24:08.439
<v Speaker 1>things that maybe I haven't even thought about.

0:24:08.760 --> 0:24:12.240
<v Speaker 2>So, yeah, dependence on one supplier is never a good thing,

0:24:12.320 --> 0:24:14.400
<v Speaker 2>and we've seen issues with that over the past few

0:24:14.440 --> 0:24:17.480
<v Speaker 2>years with COVID and the Russian's invasion of Ukraine where

0:24:17.480 --> 0:24:21.320
<v Speaker 2>we've seen gas or even everyday objects the supply chain

0:24:21.359 --> 0:24:24.680
<v Speaker 2>completely disrupted, and the potential is there for the same

0:24:24.720 --> 0:24:28.240
<v Speaker 2>to happen to lithium iron batteries as well. But diversification

0:24:28.359 --> 0:24:30.399
<v Speaker 2>won't solve everything. If we look at some of the

0:24:30.480 --> 0:24:33.199
<v Speaker 2>key places where we get battery mestals from, there are

0:24:33.240 --> 0:24:36.520
<v Speaker 2>some other sorts of risk there, and these normally surround

0:24:36.600 --> 0:24:40.560
<v Speaker 2>political landscapes. Last week, for example, in Gambon, there was

0:24:40.600 --> 0:24:43.840
<v Speaker 2>a military coup and this led to the temporary suspension

0:24:44.000 --> 0:24:47.000
<v Speaker 2>of a manganese mine in the country. A few months

0:24:47.040 --> 0:24:50.720
<v Speaker 2>ago prior to that, in March, the Chilean government announced

0:24:50.760 --> 0:24:53.080
<v Speaker 2>that they would like a majority stake in all the

0:24:53.119 --> 0:24:55.480
<v Speaker 2>lithium projects that are going to come online from then on.

0:24:55.760 --> 0:24:59.000
<v Speaker 2>Then even further back into twenty nineteen, we saw Indonesia

0:24:59.119 --> 0:25:03.080
<v Speaker 2>ban on pro nickel from export. So there's all these

0:25:03.160 --> 0:25:06.400
<v Speaker 2>changes that happen in the political sense that could disrupt

0:25:06.560 --> 0:25:09.359
<v Speaker 2>and have disrupted supply chains just as much as a

0:25:09.440 --> 0:25:10.879
<v Speaker 2>dependence on one supplier.

0:25:11.320 --> 0:25:13.800
<v Speaker 3>Another thing to consider, as well as the mining and

0:25:13.840 --> 0:25:18.040
<v Speaker 3>refining being dominated by Chinese companies, is moving along the

0:25:18.119 --> 0:25:22.679
<v Speaker 3>value chain to making materials for batteries, so anodes, cathodes, separators,

0:25:22.680 --> 0:25:26.760
<v Speaker 3>and electrolytes. Currently over seventy five percent of manufacturing capacity

0:25:26.760 --> 0:25:29.080
<v Speaker 3>for all of these components is based in China, as

0:25:29.119 --> 0:25:31.520
<v Speaker 3>per company announcements, and if we look at where this

0:25:31.640 --> 0:25:33.520
<v Speaker 3>is going over the next few years, this is an

0:25:33.520 --> 0:25:36.720
<v Speaker 3>industry which is getting more and more dominated by Chinese companies,

0:25:36.760 --> 0:25:40.280
<v Speaker 3>and that manufacturing capacity for battery components is becoming more

0:25:40.359 --> 0:25:41.760
<v Speaker 3>Chinese out of twenty five.

0:25:43.280 --> 0:25:46.159
<v Speaker 1>The Inflation Reduction Act in the US certainly has the

0:25:46.200 --> 0:25:49.240
<v Speaker 1>aims of bringing a lot of manufacturing of various industries

0:25:49.359 --> 0:25:53.040
<v Speaker 1>back on shore and to nearshore and onshore, different parts

0:25:53.080 --> 0:25:55.600
<v Speaker 1>of clean energy, certainly things that we've talked about in

0:25:55.640 --> 0:25:58.760
<v Speaker 1>other shows. How does this impact batteries and lithium? Has

0:25:58.800 --> 0:26:01.480
<v Speaker 1>there been a move for the US to essentially take

0:26:01.600 --> 0:26:05.240
<v Speaker 1>part of either the refining process or battery manufacturing process

0:26:05.480 --> 0:26:05.960
<v Speaker 1>on shore.

0:26:06.400 --> 0:26:09.719
<v Speaker 3>With respect to battery manufacturing, there have been billions of

0:26:09.760 --> 0:26:13.800
<v Speaker 3>dollars of announcements from automakers as well as battery manufacturing

0:26:13.800 --> 0:26:16.840
<v Speaker 3>companies making joint ventures across the United States in the

0:26:16.920 --> 0:26:19.040
<v Speaker 3>last year or so since the announcement of the Inflation

0:26:19.040 --> 0:26:23.240
<v Speaker 3>Reduction Act. However, these announcements and this investment is currently

0:26:23.240 --> 0:26:27.639
<v Speaker 3>relatively limited to sell manufacturing and with respect to manufacturing components,

0:26:27.640 --> 0:26:30.840
<v Speaker 3>as I previously said, like cathodes, anode separators and electrolyte

0:26:30.920 --> 0:26:33.879
<v Speaker 3>These announcements haven't yet been made to onshore the whole

0:26:34.000 --> 0:26:35.640
<v Speaker 3>value chain of battery manufacturing.

0:26:35.760 --> 0:26:38.280
<v Speaker 1>How about refining. Is that something that companies are looking

0:26:38.359 --> 0:26:41.359
<v Speaker 1>to put in different parts of the world or is

0:26:41.400 --> 0:26:45.040
<v Speaker 1>this established incumbent player likely to continue to hold battery

0:26:45.080 --> 0:26:47.800
<v Speaker 1>refining in their country for the foreseeable future.

0:26:48.119 --> 0:26:50.520
<v Speaker 2>So to take it back a bit, the IRA basically

0:26:50.560 --> 0:26:53.960
<v Speaker 2>introduces this EV tax credit, which is worth up to

0:26:54.240 --> 0:26:57.159
<v Speaker 2>seven five hundred dollars, and to be eligible for this

0:26:57.320 --> 0:27:00.480
<v Speaker 2>tax credit, automakers have to meet a certain level of

0:27:00.520 --> 0:27:05.120
<v Speaker 2>critical mineral requirements and battery component requirements. For the battery

0:27:05.240 --> 0:27:08.480
<v Speaker 2>component requirements, it means that a certain value of these

0:27:08.520 --> 0:27:11.880
<v Speaker 2>components have to be assembled or manufactured in North America.

0:27:12.040 --> 0:27:15.119
<v Speaker 2>And for critical minerals, it's a certain value of the

0:27:15.160 --> 0:27:18.199
<v Speaker 2>crystal minerals in the battery have to be extracted or

0:27:18.240 --> 0:27:21.160
<v Speaker 2>processed in the US or in a country that's got

0:27:21.160 --> 0:27:23.919
<v Speaker 2>a free trade agreement with the US, or in Japan.

0:27:24.280 --> 0:27:27.760
<v Speaker 1>Are these high percentages of the overall.

0:27:26.880 --> 0:27:29.200
<v Speaker 2>They came into play at the start of twenty twenty

0:27:29.240 --> 0:27:32.720
<v Speaker 2>three and up until twenty thirty two. The value is

0:27:32.760 --> 0:27:36.919
<v Speaker 2>slowly increasing so for critical minerals, the value starts at

0:27:37.000 --> 0:27:39.680
<v Speaker 2>forty percent of those in the battery have to come

0:27:39.720 --> 0:27:43.760
<v Speaker 2>from these predetermined locations. In terms of the investments that

0:27:43.760 --> 0:27:48.240
<v Speaker 2>we've seen since the IRA, unfortunately in the raw materials

0:27:48.240 --> 0:27:51.280
<v Speaker 2>and mining side of things, it hasn't met or reached

0:27:51.359 --> 0:27:54.159
<v Speaker 2>nowhere near the amounts seen in the battery manufacturing. So

0:27:54.200 --> 0:27:56.720
<v Speaker 2>to put some numbers to it, battery manufacturing has seen

0:27:56.800 --> 0:28:00.000
<v Speaker 2>forty two billion pounds of investments since the IRA was announced,

0:28:00.080 --> 0:28:03.080
<v Speaker 2>but raw materials investments in mining and refining has only

0:28:03.080 --> 0:28:05.800
<v Speaker 2>seen one point three billion, and this is a massive difference.

0:28:06.359 --> 0:28:09.240
<v Speaker 1>So actually, just to summarize, I would love for you

0:28:09.280 --> 0:28:11.760
<v Speaker 1>guys to just really kind of put it all in order.

0:28:11.800 --> 0:28:15.439
<v Speaker 1>In my mind, there's this kind of hierarchy, if you will,

0:28:15.600 --> 0:28:20.280
<v Speaker 1>of different mining sources for lithium, and then places where

0:28:20.280 --> 0:28:22.880
<v Speaker 1>well one place in particular where much of the refining

0:28:22.920 --> 0:28:26.160
<v Speaker 1>is taking place. And then invariably we're also seeing manufacturing

0:28:26.240 --> 0:28:30.240
<v Speaker 1>of batteries that being much more distributed. We mentioned the

0:28:30.240 --> 0:28:33.760
<v Speaker 1>Inflation Reduction Act and how that's actually actively changing the

0:28:33.760 --> 0:28:37.320
<v Speaker 1>way the US look is approaching battery manufacturing. This then

0:28:37.400 --> 0:28:39.600
<v Speaker 1>leads me to wanting you guys to clarify who army.

0:28:39.760 --> 0:28:44.400
<v Speaker 1>Does the future look similar to today or the research

0:28:44.440 --> 0:28:47.480
<v Speaker 1>that you're looking at, whether it comes from these sodium

0:28:47.560 --> 0:28:52.160
<v Speaker 1>ion batteries or for different countries trying to increase their

0:28:52.200 --> 0:28:55.160
<v Speaker 1>mining capacity. Does this look like a space that's going

0:28:55.200 --> 0:28:57.520
<v Speaker 1>to have a ton of disruption in the near term?

0:28:57.960 --> 0:29:01.360
<v Speaker 3>In sure, I think yes. With respect to the technologies,

0:29:01.520 --> 0:29:05.160
<v Speaker 3>there's constant innovation. Sodium ion batteries have been around for

0:29:05.200 --> 0:29:08.520
<v Speaker 3>as long as lithiumin batteries. Their original scientific discoveries were

0:29:08.520 --> 0:29:10.920
<v Speaker 3>of a similar time, but the lower energy density left

0:29:10.920 --> 0:29:12.560
<v Speaker 3>them part for a long time, and now they're making

0:29:12.560 --> 0:29:14.280
<v Speaker 3>a big comeback. And if we go back just a

0:29:14.280 --> 0:29:16.840
<v Speaker 3>couple of years, a similar thing happened with lithium ion phosphate,

0:29:16.920 --> 0:29:19.120
<v Speaker 3>so still a lithiumin battery, but it was a chemistry

0:29:19.160 --> 0:29:20.840
<v Speaker 3>that had gone out of favor for a bit because

0:29:20.880 --> 0:29:23.560
<v Speaker 3>of its lower energy density. But high lithium prices and

0:29:23.680 --> 0:29:26.520
<v Speaker 3>innovations and developments with this technology meant that it became

0:29:26.560 --> 0:29:29.000
<v Speaker 3>one of the more popular chemistries that we talk about today.

0:29:29.080 --> 0:29:30.920
<v Speaker 3>And I think that this will only continue to happen

0:29:30.920 --> 0:29:33.800
<v Speaker 3>into the future with solid state batteries and maybe even

0:29:33.880 --> 0:29:36.520
<v Speaker 3>other other technologies that are still very much on lab

0:29:36.560 --> 0:29:38.600
<v Speaker 3>benches rather than in factories today.

0:29:38.800 --> 0:29:41.240
<v Speaker 2>It's funny that Anthy said yes, because I was going

0:29:41.320 --> 0:29:46.160
<v Speaker 2>to say no. So over the past few years we've

0:29:46.160 --> 0:29:49.200
<v Speaker 2>seen a really really big effort for countries trying to

0:29:49.240 --> 0:29:54.040
<v Speaker 2>diversify supply chains, and leaders have reinstated their ambitions to

0:29:54.080 --> 0:29:58.000
<v Speaker 2>try and diversify supply chains in a sustainable and responsible way,

0:29:58.120 --> 0:30:00.320
<v Speaker 2>which is great. But if we look at them of

0:30:00.360 --> 0:30:03.840
<v Speaker 2>this in the near term, so say the next five, six, seven,

0:30:04.040 --> 0:30:08.080
<v Speaker 2>eight years, I don't envision a massive change in terms

0:30:08.120 --> 0:30:12.360
<v Speaker 2>of the lithium producers, the lithium refiners, and the processes

0:30:12.360 --> 0:30:15.320
<v Speaker 2>and supply chains for other battery metals as well. Efforts

0:30:15.320 --> 0:30:17.440
<v Speaker 2>will be going in the right direction, but I don't

0:30:17.520 --> 0:30:20.840
<v Speaker 2>think they can knock China off the top spot anytime soon.

0:30:21.080 --> 0:30:23.960
<v Speaker 3>Does that have to do with the long times it

0:30:24.000 --> 0:30:27.480
<v Speaker 3>takes to build a mine and to build refining capacity

0:30:27.520 --> 0:30:30.600
<v Speaker 3>with respect to permitting and other other sort of issues.

0:30:30.400 --> 0:30:33.520
<v Speaker 2>For sure. So if you look at average mining timelines

0:30:33.720 --> 0:30:37.760
<v Speaker 2>from expiration to production can take up to sixteen years.

0:30:38.120 --> 0:30:41.240
<v Speaker 2>So more and more we're seeing companies investing into looking

0:30:41.240 --> 0:30:44.560
<v Speaker 2>in lithium deposits and other deposits of other battery metals,

0:30:44.600 --> 0:30:46.160
<v Speaker 2>but they're not going to see the light of day

0:30:46.280 --> 0:30:49.320
<v Speaker 2>until the twenty thirties, and those have already been discovered

0:30:49.640 --> 0:30:53.360
<v Speaker 2>and they're halfway through these timelines. These processes include a

0:30:53.400 --> 0:30:55.240
<v Speaker 2>lot of red tape, and as we're seeing more of

0:30:55.280 --> 0:30:58.240
<v Speaker 2>a focus on the environment, some of the environmental processes

0:30:58.280 --> 0:31:01.760
<v Speaker 2>and permitting which is getting a stricter, which is adding

0:31:01.840 --> 0:31:02.960
<v Speaker 2>further today's.

0:31:02.840 --> 0:31:05.920
<v Speaker 1>And the rights to actually buy this lithium to actually

0:31:06.000 --> 0:31:08.960
<v Speaker 1>use it in these batteries to be produced in the future.

0:31:09.160 --> 0:31:11.760
<v Speaker 1>Have those contracts largely been secured or is that something

0:31:11.800 --> 0:31:14.240
<v Speaker 1>that the lithium industry comes to the table out each year.

0:31:14.560 --> 0:31:17.719
<v Speaker 2>So a lot of companies purchased lithium in advance, not

0:31:17.760 --> 0:31:20.920
<v Speaker 2>necessarily years and years in advance, but we see off

0:31:20.960 --> 0:31:25.719
<v Speaker 2>take agreements ranging from about three to five years in general.

0:31:26.120 --> 0:31:28.480
<v Speaker 1>Okay, we have come to the water ignore section of

0:31:28.520 --> 0:31:30.680
<v Speaker 1>the podcast, which occasionally I throw this in the end

0:31:30.720 --> 0:31:32.240
<v Speaker 1>of a show, where I want to ask whether or

0:31:32.280 --> 0:31:34.200
<v Speaker 1>not you the experts who are looking at this all

0:31:34.280 --> 0:31:37.240
<v Speaker 1>day are keeping a close eye on something or potentially

0:31:37.320 --> 0:31:40.240
<v Speaker 1>kind of tabling it to the background while you focus

0:31:40.280 --> 0:31:42.240
<v Speaker 1>on other things, because you don't think it's quite as

0:31:42.240 --> 0:31:45.080
<v Speaker 1>important now when it comes to these sodium ion batteries

0:31:45.360 --> 0:31:48.800
<v Speaker 1>and a vehicle that essentially has less range but is

0:31:48.840 --> 0:31:51.760
<v Speaker 1>also less expensive. Having just come back from the US

0:31:51.800 --> 0:31:54.520
<v Speaker 1>and driving on some of the freeways there, I saw

0:31:54.720 --> 0:31:58.280
<v Speaker 1>a lot of very large SUVs and in water ignore

0:31:58.560 --> 0:32:02.680
<v Speaker 1>sodium ion battery powered vehicles in North America.

0:32:02.800 --> 0:32:04.960
<v Speaker 3>I like to watch as many things as I can,

0:32:05.080 --> 0:32:08.840
<v Speaker 3>but I don't expect sodium ion to be in vehicles

0:32:08.840 --> 0:32:12.520
<v Speaker 3>in North America anytime soon due to, as you already mentioned,

0:32:12.520 --> 0:32:14.920
<v Speaker 3>the lower range. So this is not in the forefront

0:32:14.920 --> 0:32:16.479
<v Speaker 3>of my thoughts at the moment.

0:32:16.640 --> 0:32:19.880
<v Speaker 1>Where is the predominant use case do you think with.

0:32:19.760 --> 0:32:23.360
<v Speaker 3>Respect to vehicles? I think smaller vehicles with lower ranges,

0:32:23.560 --> 0:32:26.240
<v Speaker 3>so small cars for sure, but then also two and

0:32:26.320 --> 0:32:30.160
<v Speaker 3>three wheeled vehicles, so electric electric motorcycles or tik tooks

0:32:30.200 --> 0:32:32.360
<v Speaker 3>which you may find in Asia, for example, which have

0:32:32.480 --> 0:32:35.160
<v Speaker 3>historically used lead acid batteries. And with respect to lead

0:32:35.200 --> 0:32:38.280
<v Speaker 3>acid batteries, sodiumine is actually an energy density improvement, so

0:32:38.280 --> 0:32:41.200
<v Speaker 3>it may even offer arrange improvement for these vehicles.

0:32:41.360 --> 0:32:43.320
<v Speaker 1>Okay, so Ellie, one for you, and I think you've

0:32:43.360 --> 0:32:45.240
<v Speaker 1>already answered this question, but I'm going to make you

0:32:45.280 --> 0:32:46.840
<v Speaker 1>give me an answer that we're going to have to

0:32:46.840 --> 0:32:49.600
<v Speaker 1>stick to. Are you watching or ignoring the idea of

0:32:49.800 --> 0:32:54.760
<v Speaker 1>refining capacity coming specifically to Europe or North America for

0:32:54.840 --> 0:32:55.920
<v Speaker 1>lithium dana.

0:32:56.000 --> 0:32:58.080
<v Speaker 2>That is a really, really hard question, because it's like

0:32:58.080 --> 0:32:59.880
<v Speaker 2>you're trying to make me choose between my head and

0:33:00.120 --> 0:33:02.440
<v Speaker 2>my heart. What I would say is, although I don't

0:33:02.440 --> 0:33:06.800
<v Speaker 2>see anyone replicating exactly China's success, what we are seeing

0:33:07.000 --> 0:33:10.200
<v Speaker 2>is policies coming into place, like the IRA and the CRM,

0:33:10.520 --> 0:33:13.920
<v Speaker 2>like the Europeans Critical Raw Materials Act, that are pushing

0:33:14.120 --> 0:33:18.120
<v Speaker 2>companies in industry in the direction of these alternative locations,

0:33:18.320 --> 0:33:20.640
<v Speaker 2>and with the targets they have in place, and with

0:33:20.760 --> 0:33:23.240
<v Speaker 2>companies that are based in these locations that have a

0:33:23.280 --> 0:33:27.280
<v Speaker 2>demand for local materials, I think we will see increasingly

0:33:27.320 --> 0:33:30.880
<v Speaker 2>more and more refining happening in other parts of the world.

0:33:31.200 --> 0:33:33.760
<v Speaker 1>Okay, So last one in the watcher ignore section, the

0:33:33.800 --> 0:33:38.360
<v Speaker 1>Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism SEABAM. Are you watching or ignoring

0:33:38.440 --> 0:33:41.560
<v Speaker 1>whether or not there is potential for SEABAM to expand

0:33:41.720 --> 0:33:43.560
<v Speaker 1>to include battery metals.

0:33:44.000 --> 0:33:46.240
<v Speaker 2>So on SEABAM, I think we should shelf it for now,

0:33:46.440 --> 0:33:48.080
<v Speaker 2>but I think it's something we should definitely revisit in

0:33:48.080 --> 0:33:52.800
<v Speaker 2>the future as demand and supply of battery metals increases massively,

0:33:53.000 --> 0:33:55.560
<v Speaker 2>and also until we see the success of the currency.

0:33:55.680 --> 0:33:59.440
<v Speaker 1>Bam okay, Ellie, Andy, thank you very much for joining.

0:33:59.720 --> 0:34:09.000
<v Speaker 3>Thank thank very much, Dana, Thanks Dana.

0:34:10.560 --> 0:34:13.600
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg n EF is a service provided by Bloomberg Finance

0:34:13.719 --> 0:34:17.200
<v Speaker 1>LP and its affiliates. This recording does not constitute, nor

0:34:17.239 --> 0:34:21.440
<v Speaker 1>should it be construed, as investment advice, investment recommendations, or

0:34:21.480 --> 0:34:25.000
<v Speaker 1>a recommendation as to an investment or other strategy. Bloomberg

0:34:25.080 --> 0:34:28.399
<v Speaker 1>n EF should not be considered as information sufficient upon

0:34:28.440 --> 0:34:32.040
<v Speaker 1>which to base an investment decision. Neither Bloomberg Finance LP

0:34:32.239 --> 0:34:35.640
<v Speaker 1>nor any of its affiliates makes any representation or warranty

0:34:35.719 --> 0:34:38.680
<v Speaker 1>as to the accuracy or completeness of the information contained

0:34:38.680 --> 0:34:41.799
<v Speaker 1>in this recording, and any liability as a result of

0:34:41.840 --> 0:34:43.719
<v Speaker 1>this recording is expressly disclaimed.